Download - Lutocline formation by waves
![Page 1: Lutocline formation by waves](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813521550346895d9c843d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
tim e (h)
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
dept
h (m
)
Lutocline formation by waves
Susana B. Vinzon
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
![Page 2: Lutocline formation by waves](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813521550346895d9c843d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
tim e (h)
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
dept
h (m
)
Lutocline generation: source of sediments?-Ressuspension from the bottom by tidal currents and/or waves-Deposition from suspension
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0,01 0,10 1,00 10,00
Concentration (g/l)
De
pth
(m
)
slackflood-ebb
Lutoclines :Steps in suspended sediment
concentration
![Page 3: Lutocline formation by waves](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813521550346895d9c843d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
tim e (h)
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
dept
h (m
)
100
0
5
10
15
concentration (g/l)
dept
h (m
)
320 g/l
Secondary
Primary
Tidal currents:
Amazon Shelf data
AMASSEDS project
![Page 4: Lutocline formation by waves](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813521550346895d9c843d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
tim e (h)
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
dept
h (m
)
Salt stratification effect:
![Page 5: Lutocline formation by waves](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813521550346895d9c843d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
tim e (h)
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
dept
h (m
)
concentration (g/l)
sett
ling
velo
city
(m
m/s
)
10-1
100
101
102
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
Hindered settling effect:
Flocculation
Hindered Settling
![Page 6: Lutocline formation by waves](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813521550346895d9c843d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
tim e (h)
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
dept
h (m
)
1 0- 2
1 0- 1
1 00
1 01
1 02
1 03
0
2
4
6
8
1 0
s e d i m e n t c o n c e n t r a t i o n ( g / l )
dept
h (m
)
s e c o n d a r yl u t o c l i n e
p r i m a r yl u t o c l i n e
1 0- 2
1 0- 1
1 00
1 01
1 02
1 03
0
2
4
6
8
s e d i m e n t c o n c e n t r a t i o n ( g / l )
dept
h (m
)
1 0
Ws: uniforms: uniform
Lutocline simulations
![Page 7: Lutocline formation by waves](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813521550346895d9c843d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
tim e (h)
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
dept
h (m
)
Steady state turbulent kinetic energy balance
wg
dz
duvu
Shear production
z
u 3
2uwu
1
ew
wsvs H
zCgww
g
Buoyancy
Dissipation
Tz
kau rb
3
16.0Wave-mean turbulence intensity
(Sleath,1991)
Lutocline generation by waves
![Page 8: Lutocline formation by waves](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813521550346895d9c843d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
tim e (h)
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
dept
h (m
)
Lutocline height:
4
1
3
2
33
65.0
w
wsvs
rbe
CgwT
kaH
![Page 9: Lutocline formation by waves](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813521550346895d9c843d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
tim e (h)
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
dept
h (m
)
0
0,02
0,04
0,06
0,08
0,1
0 0,02 0,04 0,06 0,08 0,1
measured lutocline height (m)
calc
ula
ted
lu
tocl
ine
he
igh
t (m
)ws = 0.05 mm/s
kr = 2 cm
Laboratory results:
![Page 10: Lutocline formation by waves](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813521550346895d9c843d/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
tim e (h)
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
dept
h (m
)
Field data (Traykovski et al 2000):
![Page 11: Lutocline formation by waves](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813521550346895d9c843d/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
tim e (h)
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
dept
h (m
)
Discussion
• Closer look at the wave turbulence model
(for field conditions)
• Limitation of the lab experiments (Re)
• The model considers no erosion threshold
![Page 12: Lutocline formation by waves](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813521550346895d9c843d/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
tim e (h)
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
dept
h (m
)
Importance of Primary Lutocline for sediment transport:
10-4
10-2
100
102
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Concentration (g/L)
Dep
th (
m)
![Page 13: Lutocline formation by waves](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813521550346895d9c843d/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
tim e (h)
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
dept
h (m
)
Time
depth
depth
![Page 14: Lutocline formation by waves](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813521550346895d9c843d/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
tim e (h)
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
dept
h (m
)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
VelocityD
ep
th0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Velocity
De
pth
First Hypothesis
No mud layer
High measured velocities near bottom due to log profile
Mud layer
High measured velocities near bottom because the profiler don’t find the true bottom
Second Hypothesis
![Page 15: Lutocline formation by waves](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070400/56813521550346895d9c843d/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
tim e (h)
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
dept
h (m
)
How to know which one is correct?
Do we need new field techniques for measuring SSC and velocities below the primary lutoclines?