-
8/13/2019 INFOWARS the Magazine - Vol. 2 Issue 2 - October 2013
1/35
-
8/13/2019 INFOWARS the Magazine - Vol. 2 Issue 2 - October 2013
2/35
2 3
-
8/13/2019 INFOWARS the Magazine - Vol. 2 Issue 2 - October 2013
3/35
4
5
Table ofContents
Globalists Openly
Embrace al-Qaeda
ADAN SALAZAR
9
14
36 42
Halloween is quickly approaching,but fear not! This year you haveno excuse to let the Washingtonwolves be the only ones in costume.Cut out either side of this uniqueHalloween special double cover,attach string or a rubber band to thesides, and frighten the sheeple withthe masks of some of Washingtonsworst horrors: the Obamacare
Skull or Prozac the Killer Clown!Send pictures of your adventures [email protected].
Quotes of the Month
Navy Yard Shooter Wason Mass Murder SuicidePills
written by:
Paul Joseph Watson
DoD Training Manual:Extremist Founding FathersWould Not Be Welcomed inTodays Military
written by:
Adan Salazar
Media Protection,Media Control: TheDeath of the FreePress
written by:
Kit Daniels
Middle of the Roadin Healthcare Leadsto Socialism
RON PAUL 18
Wife of ManExecuted by FBIDemands Justice
KURT NIMMO 20
Mental Illness andthe Ongoing Anti-Second AmendmentAgenda
KURT NIMMO 22
Leader of SyrianRebel Group CallsFor Attacks InsideU.S.
PAUL JOSEPH WATSON 26
Former NSA
Director AdvocatesChinese-StyleInternet
PAUL JOSEPH WATSON 27
The Need for Arms
KIT DANIELS 28
Do Vaccines CauseAutism?
MIKE ADAMS 31
The SecondAmendment OnlyApplies to al-Qaeda
KIT DANIELS 38
Apple iPhone 5S:Big Brothers DreamCome True
ANTHONY GUCCIARDI 45
Matt Drudge andAlex Jones:17-Year Old Bloggers
KURT NIMMO 47
Fox NewsDemonizes SecondAmendment Activist
JULIE WILSON 49
Rothschild BallExposes ElitesFascination WithOccult
ADAN SALAZAR
51
34 Percent of
Americans Say FirstAmendment TooExtreme
KIT DANIELS 55
DomesticPropaganda Is NowNormal
ADAN SALAZAR 62
Al-Qaeda RebelsProduced Sarin Gas
KIT DANIELS 65
Mass Murder PillsStrike Again
JULIE WILSON 57
Everybody favours free speech inthe slack moments when no axes arebeing ground.
Heywood Broun
It is a paradox that every dictatorhas climbed to power on the ladder offree speech. Immediately on attainingpower each dictator has suppressed allfree speech except his own.
Herbert Hoover
Free speech means the right to yelltheatre in a crowded fire.
Abbie Hoffman
After a shooting spree, they alwayswant to take the guns away from thepeople who didnt do it. I sure as hellwouldnt want to live in a society wherethe only people allowed guns are thepolice and the military.
William S. Burroughs
ON THE COVER
-
8/13/2019 INFOWARS the Magazine - Vol. 2 Issue 2 - October 2013
4/35
6 7
Infowars Sites
www.infowars.comHome of the #1 Internet news show in the world.
www.prisonplanet.comReporters on the scene, articles, andspecial coverage.
www.prisonplanet.tvGet access to all the channels: The Alex JonesShow, Nightly News, Exclusive Video Reports, 60+Movies and Documentaries, Books, and more.
www.planetinfowars.comInstantly connect to whats most important to you.Follow your friends, experts, favorite celebrities,and breaking news.
www.infowarsshop.comCheck out Infowars gear, exclusive Alex JonesMovies, Infowars Magazine, health and well-ness, preparedness products, and more.
Social Sites:Facebook.com/AlexanderEmerickJonesTwitter: @RealAlexJonesYoutube.com/TheAlexJonesChannel
Publisher
Managing Editor
Art Director
Alex Jones
John McEntire
Molly Rogers
Graphics &
Photography
Molly Rogers
Rob Reeger
Carter Watkins
Contributing
Writers
Paul J. Watson
Julie Wilson
Kurt Nimmo
Kit Daniels
Tim Fruge
Kelen McBreen
Matt Winegardner
Sales &
Advertising
Project
Manager
Editorial Assistants
Will Jones
Henry Dillard
Ricky Sullivan
War and Peaceby Erik D.W., a 10th grader in Texas
The world is turning around me, just asI am standing still.
Twisting and turning neverending, spinning.
Just as I am mirthful, people havehappiness in their hearts.
But oh! Such misery as the blood isshed across the Earth.
People crying, screaming, miserableand all this is caused by the evil spiritthat is war.
But peace, peace is the greatestspirit of all; it can conquer any land,nation, or country.
And can cause such happiness!
But Oh! Here comes the evil spirit thatis war and destruction!
The spirit is locked into us, callingfor the destruction of all.
Here peace comes; this is thegreatest battle of all.
Peace is the only thing that cansave our planet.
[email protected] [email protected] @infowarsmag infowarsmagazine
Do you realize you are the most
entertaining man in the world? Im serious.
And you know why? Simple. You tell the
truth. You tell the truth in a world of lies.
You tell the truth to people who have heard
nothing but lies all our lives. Now, when
everybody knows the truth and tells the
truth, I guess youll be boring, like the rest
of us. Keep doing what you are doing Alex.
Maurice M.
LETTERS P.O. Box 19549 Austin, TX [email protected] Send Us YourThoughts,Comments &
Artwork
Adan Salazar
Anthony Gucciardi
Ron Paul
Mike Adams
Just sent you the pic ofthe Infowars Magazinemicrodistribution push.
Common sense poppingup everywhere!
Norman S.
Sent from my NSA two-wayrecording matrix CIA ObamaPhone!
Charles A.
Philadelphia, last night of theconcert Trent Reznor Nine Inch Nails
sent by @NostraDomo Thanks greatmag.
Genaro
SUBSCRIPTIONSand bulk orders are available online at www.infowarsstore.com or through customer service a t 1-888-253-3139 ADVERTISINGinquiriescan be directed to 512-646-4414 or [email protected] INFORMATIONrequests, whether general or editorial, can be found by contacting [email protected] Infowars Magazineis published by Free Speech Systems, LLC. 12 times a year with a circulation of 100,000 copies. All content within thismagazine is copyright of Free Speech Systems, LLC. To receive a free electronic version of the magazine, become an Infowars Insider by signing up at www.
infowars.com/newletter PERMISSIONto reprint original Infowars articles in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given. Some articlesare copyrighted by our contributing writers, so check to see if copyright-free status applies. The articles appearing within this publication reflect the opinions andattitudes of their respective authors and not necessarily those of the publisher, advertisers, or editorial team.
-
8/13/2019 INFOWARS the Magazine - Vol. 2 Issue 2 - October 2013
5/35
8 9
written by:
Paul Joseph Watson
Navy Yard Shooter Was onMass Murder Suicide PillsDrug Linked to Previous Mass Shooting Despite
Washington PostDeclaring It Safe
It has been confirmed that Navy Yard gunman Aaron
Alexis was on the anti-depressant drug Trazodone,
providing yet another example of a connection
between psychiatric drugs and mass shootings.
In verifying that Alexis was prescribed Trazodone
by the Veterans Affairs Office, The Washington Post
published a brief article downplaying the danger of the
drug, quoting Miami physician Gabriela Cora who stated
(almost too eagerly), Honestly, its a very safe drug to
use. However, the drug has been linked to a number of
murders, including one mass shooting.
Trazodone is sold under the brand names Desyrel,
Oleptro, Beneficat, Deprax, Desirel, Molipaxin, Thombran,
Trazorel, Trialodine, Trittico, and Mesyrel. Although
not strictly a member of the SSRI antidepressants, itshares many of the same properties and also serves to
increase the amount of serotonin in the brain. Despite The
Washington Posts attempts to portray the drug as being
safe, it is linked with a whole host of side-effects including
suicidal tendencies, panic attacks, depersonalization,
and anger. Symptoms of Trazodone withdrawal include
aggression and violent behavior.
The drug also carries an, FDA black box warning
for suicide, and is documented to cause mania and
violent behavior, writes Kelly Patricia OMeara. Several
murder cases over the past few years have been directly
connected to Trazodone.
1)Eight people were killed and one wounded during a
mass shooting at a beauty parlor in Seal Beach, California
in 2011. The killer, Scott Evan Dekraai, was on Desyrel, a
commercial variant of Trazodone.
2)In 2009, Perley Goodrich Jr. beat his mother andthen shot his father dead shortly after being injected
with Trazodone in a psychiatric hospital. Goodrich had
complained that he didnt want to take the medication
because it made him feel violent.
3)In 2009, Steven Foster shot a gas station attendant
in the head before shooting him a second time. Bottles
of Trazodone pills were later found in Fosters room.
4)Marine Lance Cpl. Delano Holmes fatally stabbed
an Iraqi soldier to death in 2007 after military doctors
prescribed him Trazodone.
5)Indiana soldier Pfc. David Lawrence was taking
Trazodone in combination with Zoloft when he
killed a Taliban commander in a prison cell in
2010. Lawrence was charged with premeditatedmurder. According to the FDA, taking these drugs
in combination can cause altered consciousness,
confusion, hallucinations, and coma.
This is interesting given that Aaron Alexis had also
suffered from PTSD, blackouts, and anger issues years
before he began receiving treatment from the VA.
We now know that Alexis had been treated since
August by the Veterans Administration for his mental
problems. As Mike Adams points out, This is proof
that Aaron Alexis was on psychiatric drugs, because
thats the only treatment currently being offered by the
Veterans Administration for mental problems. Alexis
family members also confirmed to the press that he
was being treated for his mental health problems.
Across the medical industry, treatment is the code
word for psychiatric drugging. Could he have been on
more than just one anti-depressant drug at the time of
the rampage? The most common form of treatment forPTSD is Paroxetine, which is listed as the number three
top violence-causing drug by the Institute for Safe
-
8/13/2019 INFOWARS the Magazine - Vol. 2 Issue 2 - October 2013
6/35
10 11
Medication Practices (ISMP).
Regardless of the fact that the Navy Yard
shooter Aaron Alexis was taking a drug from
a class of psychotropics that have been linked
to dozens of previous mass shootings, the
mainstream media has once again avoided all
discussion of the issue, preferring instead to
blame the tragedy on a non-existent AR-15
that the gunman didnt even use.
Prescription drugs were found in the
apartment of Batman shooter James Holmes
days after the Aurora massacre, but it took nine
months to find out exactly what those drugs
were. Like Columbine killer Eric Harris, Holmes
had been taking Zoloft, another SSRI drug
linked with violent outbursts. The length of time
it took to find out that Holmes was on Zoloft
was partly because the media habitually shows
zero interest in pursuing the link between anti-
depressants and violence. As the website SSRI
Stories profusely documents, there are literally
hundreds of examples of mass shootings,
murders, and other violent episodes that have
been committed by individuals on psychiatric
drugs over the past three decades. The number
of cases is staggering.
Why is the corporate media so disinterested
in pursuing this clear connection? Perhaps
it has something to do with the fact that the
pharmaceutical giants who produce drugs like
Zoloft, Prozac, and Paxil spend around $2.4
billion dollars a year on direct-to-consumer
television advertising every year. By running
negative stories about prescription drugs,
networks risk losing tens of millions of dollars
in ad revenue.
While failing to ask questions about what
SSRI drugs Aaron Alexis was taking prior to
his rampage, the media instead blamed the
shooting on assault rifles, even after it had
been confirmed that no AR-15 was used by
Alexis during the massacre. FBI assistant
director Victoria Parlave stated at a press
conference on September 17 that authorities,
do not have any information at this time that
[Alexis] had an AR-15 in his possession.
Despite there being no evidence that an AR-
15 was used, The New York Daily News ran a
front page headline the morning of September
17 claiming, Same Gun Different Slay, next
to a picture of an assault rifle. Hours after
the FBI stated that no AR-15 had been used,
MSNBCs Alex Wagner, who previously blamed
the Boston bombings on Alex Jones, continued
to use an animated graphic depicting Alexis
carrying an assault rifle during the massacre.
Anti-Second Amendment crusader Piers
Morgan also erroneously blamed the shooting
on a man with a legally purchased AR-15,
who just committed the same kind of atrocity
as we saw at Sandy Hook and Aurora,
during his CNN show on Monday. CNNs live
news coverage also reported that Alexis had
recently purchased (an) AR-15 shotgun,
when in fact that purchase had been denied.
Both The New York Timesand The Washington
Postalso falsely reported that an AR-15 had
been found on Alexis after the massacre. D.C.
gun grabbers Dianne Feinstein and Dick Durbin
also regurgitated the false claim that Alexis
used an AR-15 during the rampage.
The U.S. press has once again behaved like
state media in the aftermath of the Navy Yard
shooting by pursuing the assault rifle angle
despite the fact that it was patently false in
order to bolster the White Houses gun control
agenda. In doing so, they have concurrently
buried an integral aspect of mass shootings
that needs to be highlighted as part of a
national conversation the clear connection
between violent outbursts and SSRI drugs.
-
8/13/2019 INFOWARS the Magazine - Vol. 2 Issue 2 - October 2013
7/35
12 13
or call 1.888.253.3139
PURCHASE AT INFOWARSSTORE.COM
OR CALL 1.888. 253. 3139
-
8/13/2019 INFOWARS the Magazine - Vol. 2 Issue 2 - October 2013
8/35
14 15
written by:Adan Salazar
When Infowars made the
claim months ago that the
governments ties to al-Qaeda
effectively meant Obama had
assumed the role of global head
of al-Qaeda, we were predictably demonized for
calling our beloved leader out on his administrations
murderous relationship with what we have been led
to believe are some of the most notorious criminals
on the planet. After all, it was al-Qaeda, we were told,
who committed the heinous acts of 9/11.
Although our damning report provided profuse
documentation supporting the fact the Obama
administration has directly been funneling aid and
training, along with millions of dollars, to al-Qaeda-
dominated Syrian opposition forces, mainstream
media pundits, led by the likes of MSNBCs Rachel
Maddow, still attempted to discredit Jones using straw
man and ad hominemtactics, as well as formulating
and attributing patently unsubstantiated accusations.
Maddow lumped our heavily documented claim
that Americas dear leader was in bed with al-Qaeda
with less popular conspiracies, many of whose official
stories have also been thoroughly debunked. He
also thinks the evidence is overwhelming that the
government staged the Oklahoma City bombing
[and] that the government staged the space shuttle
disaster, Maddow said in April. He also says the
evidence is overwhelming that President Obama is
now personally the global head of al-Qaeda. See,
folks, the evidence is just overwhelming. Do I have
to spell it out for you? Are you blind? Maddow
asked, feigning incredulity and ignoring the deluge of
supporting evidence provided in our article.
Fervent Infowars readers likely need no further
evidence America has been the primary mover
behind al-Qaeda forces in Syria. For years, we
have documented how the CIA and other foreign
governments have purposely installed different
factions of the terror group (read as: mercenaries)
around the world to destabilize key regions. Here is
just a smattering of recent articles further supporting
the fact Obama is working with the very p eople we
were told to fear in the days after 9/11.
Ignoring the Headlines
In order to remain blithely oblivious to the multiple
confirmations proving our claims accurate, its necessary
to ignore contradictory headlines. Here are a few:
In a recent article by the UKs London Independent,
writer Robert Fisk asked Does Obama Know Hes
Fighting on al-Qaedas Side? Fisk writes, If Barack
Obama decides to attack the Syrian regime, he has
ensured for the very first time in history that the
United States will be on the same side as al-Qaida.
In a USA Todaystory titled, Syrian Rebels Pledge
Loyalty to al-Qaeda, writer Mona Alami also claimed,
A Syrian rebel groups April pledge of allegiance to
al-Qaedas replacement for Osama bin L aden suggests
that the terrorist groups influence is not waning and
that it may take a greater role in the Western-backed
fight to topple Syrian President Bashar Assad.
Another story out of theLondon Guardian, entitled,
Al-Qaida Turns Tide for Rebels in Battle for Eastern
Syria, fleshed out that Free Syrian Army fighters met
almost every day with al-Qaeda leadership, the same
rebel forces weve been pledging millions of dollars to.
In yet another story indicating the Free Syrian Army
was increasingly being overtaken by anti-American
al-Qaeda loyalism, the BBC interestingly published
an article titled, Syria Crisis: Al-Nusra Pledges
Allegiance to al-Qaeda, which claims. The leader of
the al-Nusra Front, a jihadist group fighting in Syria,
More than a Decade After9/11, Globalists OpenlyEmbrace al-QaedaIn Case You Didnt Get the Memo, al-Qaeda, the Group
Supposedly Responsible for 9/11, Is Now Our Ally in Syria
-
8/13/2019 INFOWARS the Magazine - Vol. 2 Issue 2 - October 2013
9/35
16 17
Its true thatsome of Assadsopponents areextremists,Obama admitted.
has pledged allegiance to the leader of al-
Qaeda, Ayman al-Zawahiri Abu Mohammed
al-Jawlani said the groups behaviour in Syria
would not change as a result.
And in a report from February by the
London Telegraph, titled, Syria: How Jihadist
Group Jabhat al-Nusra is Taking Over Syrias
Revolution, Ruth Sherlock wrote, For many
Syrians, Nusra is synonymous with al-Qaeda.
Many of their fighters are foreign jihadists;
some fought with al-Qaeda in Iraq.
Last December, the Gray Lady of
establishment propaganda, The New York
Times, was also forced to report Syrian Rebels
Tied to Al Qaeda Play Key Role in War.
Ignoring Pundits, Lawmakersand Leaders
Several prominent political pundits and
national leaders have also begun attempting
to wake the American people up to Obamas
al-Qaeda support efforts. When the Senate
Foreign Relations Committee voted early
September to authorize strikes on Syria,
Kentucky Senator Rand Paul highlighted the
absurdity of aiding known terrorists when he
stated, This is an important moment You
will be funding, today, the allies of al-Qaeda.
Its an irony you cannot overcome.
Conservative pundit Pat Buchanan was
also one of the first prominent political
commentators to reveal he believed the Syrian
gas attack may have been a staged provocation.
We have also seen Senators Ted Cruz and
Dennis Kucinich state that if Obama authorized
air strikes on Syria, then our military would in
effect become al-Qaedas air force.
Also at the end of August, former
Congressman Ron Paul claimed he believed
Syrias disputed August 21 chemical weapons
attack could have been a false flag attack,
and asked Fox News host Neil Cavuto, Why
dont we ask about the al-Qaeda? Why are we
on the side of the al-Qaeda right now? Afghan
President Hamid Karzai has also made clear that
the Obama administration is now colluding with
the Taliban while the group carries out suicide
bombings in the service of America.
Obama Admits He Wantsto Aid al-Qaeda
In Obamas September 10 speech, he
confessed to the nation that the opposition
forces he so badly wanted to support in Syria
were increasingly al-Qaeda extremists. Its
true that some of Assads opponents are
extremists, Obama admitted. But al-Qaeda
will only draw strength in a more chaotic
Syria if people there see the world doing
nothing to prevent innocent civilians from
being gassed to death.
George Orwells1984perfectly depicted
the problem of a nation surrendering control
of its media to the government. In his
startlingly accurate vision, whole nations
were convinced they had never been at war,
or they were always at war, simply through
media manipulation. Of course, Orwell
never anticipated the immense technological
advances that would one day emerge to aid
those who have realized the absurdity of
embracing the very terror groups we were
supposed to be fighting.
Even former U.S. National Security Adviser
and Trilateral Commission co-founder
Zbigniew Brzezinski has recently had to admit
that instant mass communications such
as radio, television, and the Internet was
derailing efforts to create a new world order,
and that a global political awakening was
responsible for unhinging plans for a Syrian
intervention. Its important to realize that its
the medias job to feed us war propaganda.
Through war, the globalists believe, they can
derive order from chaos.
However, with the Defense Departments
recent admissions they would have to beef
up their public affairs efforts due to the
American people no longer placing faith in
their credibility, and with Obama backing off
of a potential Syria strike (for the time being),
its evident humanity is at a turning point
where alternative and independent media is
beginning to have an impact being felt at the
highest levels of government.
-
8/13/2019 INFOWARS the Magazine - Vol. 2 Issue 2 - October 2013
10/35
18 19
written by:
Ron Paul
Contrary to theclaims of someof its opponents,Obamacare isnot socializedmedicine. It iscorporatizedmedicine.T
he ever-expanding role of government in healthcare
provides an excellent example of Ludwig Von Mises
warning that the middle of the road leads to Socialism.
Beginning in the 1940s, government policies
distorted the healthcare market, causing prices to
rise and denying many Americans access to quality care. Congress
reacted to the problems caused by their prior interventions
with new interventions, such as the HMO Act, ERISA, EMTLA,
and various federal entitlement programs. Each new federal
intervention not only failed to fix the problems it was supposedly
created to solve, it created new p roblems, leading to calls for even
more new federal interventions. This process culminated in 2010,
when Congress passed Obamacare.
Contrary to the claims of some of its opponents, Obamacare is
not socialized medicine; it is corporatized medicine. After all, the
central feature of Obamacare is the mandate that all Americans buy
health insurance from private health insurance companies. And,
as with previous government interventions in the marketplace,
Obamacare is not only failing to correct the problems caused by
prior federal laws, it is creating new problems.
Consider the almost weekly stories about how Obamacare is
causing health insurance premiums to rise, causing employees
to lay off workers or reduce their workers hours, and causing
doctors to leave the p rofession. Also, consider the problems
the administration is already having administering the federal
exchanges and other parts of the healthcare law.
I fully expect the implosion of Obamacare to continue, and the
supporters of nationalized healthcare to use Obamacares failures
to push for a Canadian-style single payer healthcare system.
Unfortunately, some Obamacare opponents fail to see that the
problem is not just Obamacare, but all government interference
with healthcare. These Obamacare opponents advocate replacing
Obamacare with Obamacare lite, but economic law teaches us
that Obamacare lite will be no more successful than Obamacare.
In order to win the battle for health freedom, those who oppose
nationalized healthcare must have the courage to advocate for
a complete free market in healthcare. Enhanced individual tax
credits and enhanced use of Health Savings Accounts (HSA) are
just two polices that could help restore a free-market in health
care by putting control over the healthcare dollar back in the
hands of the people. A good place to start would be to repeal
Obamacares restrictions on HSAs.
Long-term group insurance contracts could
ensure that those with pre-existing conditions
could obtain coverage. Under such a contract,
individuals could pool resources to purchase
a group policy that would cover any and
all problems any member might develop
over time. Businesses, churches, community
organizations, and even fraternities and
sororities could offer these types of contracts.
Negative outcomes insurance, where
patients waive the right to sue for medical
errors in exchange for guaranteed payouts
to those harmed, could reduce the burden
of malpractice litigation. Other free-market
healthcare reforms that could make the
healthcare market more competitive and
lower the cost of healthcare include allowing
individuals to purchase insurance from across
state lines, removing restrictions on physician-
owned hospitals, and reducing the regulatory
power of the Food and Drug Administration.
Some will say it is unrealistic to advocate
replacing Obamacare with a pure free-market
system, but in fact it is unrealistic to expect
anything less than a true free-market to
provide quality healthcare for Americans at
all income levels. Continuing on the middle
of the road in healthcare by mixing free-
markets with government spending and
regulations will only continue to take us on
the road to socialized health care.
Former Congressman Ron Pauls article first
appeared at the-free-foundation.org, the
temporary home for his weekly column until his
personal web page is up and running.
And, as with previousgovernment interventionsin the marketplace,Obamacare is not onlyfailing to correct theproblems caused by priorfederal laws, it is creating
new problems.
Middle of the Road in HealthcareLeads to Socialism
-
8/13/2019 INFOWARS the Magazine - Vol. 2 Issue 2 - October 2013
11/35
20 21
The widow of Ibragim Todashev, Reni Todashev, told
Alex Jones on September 12 that the FBI and the U.S.
government have stonewalled attempts to find out what
happened to her husband on May 22 of this year. We
really dont have official papers of what happened,
she told Alex Jones, so there is not much we can do before our
investigation. Ibragim, an acquaintance of deceased Boston
bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev, was killed by the FBI in
Orlando, Florida, allegedly during an interrogation session related
to the Boston bombing.
Following his death, Abdulbaki Todashev, the executed mans father,
said during a news conference in Russia that his son was killed by the
FBI to keep him from talking. I want justice. I want an investigation,
he said. They come to your house like bandits, and they shoot you.
Maybe my son knew some sort of information that the police didnt
want to get out, he added. They shut him up. Thats my opinion.
The elder Todashev arrived in the United States in August determined
to investigate his sons murder. Todashev speaks little English, cannot
afford a lawyer, and has nothing more than a tourist visa to the United
States, but the ACLU has vowed to help him, according to Russia Today.
Todashev said he plans to sue the FBI for his sons death.
Prior to Todashevs arrival in the U.S., an Islamic rights group, the
Council on American-Islamic Relations, filed a formal complaint with
the Department of Justice. The organization called for an independent,
thorough, and transparent investigation into the circumstances
surrounding Ibragims death. In July, Infowars.com reported that the FBI
had barred a Florida medical examiner from publicly releasing autopsy
information that would have shed light on the death of the 27-year-old.
Reni Todashev admitted receiving justice for her husbands murder
at the hands of the FBI will be difficult, but vowed to press the case
in the United States. She said there is a prosecutor in Florida who
wants to investigate the case. Alex said he believes Todashev was
executed.They interviewed him for eight hours in the living room of
his Orlando apartment, Jones said during the September 12 interview
with Reni Todashev. Let me tell you what this is I know the
standard procedure. You know w hat eight hours means, right? They
got the info they wanted, and they executed him.
Wife of ManExecuted by FBIDemands JusticeIbragim Todashev Executed After EightHours of FBI Interrogation FollowingBoston Bombing
written by:
Kurt Nimmo
Photo Caption: Pictured here with his wife Reni, Ibragim Todashev was killed during FBI interrogation.
Reni Todashev admitted receiving justicefor her husbands murder at the hands ofthe FBI will be difficult, but vowed to pressthe case in the United States.
Following Ibragimsdeath, AbdulbakiTodashev, theexecuted mansfather, said duringa news conferencein Russia that his
son was killed bythe FBI to keep himfrom talking. I wantjustice. I want aninvestigation, he
said. They cometo your house likebandits, and they
shoot you.
-
8/13/2019 INFOWARS the Magazine - Vol. 2 Issue 2 - October 2013
12/35
scheduled a June meeting co ered in dog to this kind of eapon a reference to the symbolic actions in August He signed an
-
8/13/2019 INFOWARS the Magazine - Vol. 2 Issue 2 - October 2013
13/35
24 25
If mass shooter incidents continueto occur and especially if theybecome more violent and claimlarger numbers of victims the willof Congress will ultimately bend,if only imperceptibly at first, in the
direction of ultimate disarmament.
scheduled a June meeting covered in dog
and pony fashion to address the issue.
Obamas Telemundo remarks were an
attempt to reinvigorate flawed legislation that
unceremoniously crashed and burned after
Newtown. In March, the Senates neocon
frontman, Lindsay Graham, tried to lead an
uphill battle to get legislation enacted that
would have imposed background checks on
folks deemed mentally ill by the state. The
NICS Reporting Improvement Act of 2013
would have also paved over claimed gaps in
a standing law applicable to those who would
lose their right to buy and carry guns based
on a diagnosis of mental illness, including
those involuntarily committed to a psychiatric
hospital. Despite support by both Democrats
and Republicans, the legislation was defeated
and the Bill of Rights spared another
humiliating mauling, at least temporarily.
Undeterred, Graham added the provisions
to a later Republican-backed gun bill that was
also defeated in the Senate. Following the
Navy Yard shooting, a Democrat from Hawaii,
Senator Brian Schatz, said now is the time
to do the right thing and revisit legislation.
While legislation cant put an end to all
violence, lawmakers must do what is right and
close the gaping holes in our system in order
to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and
the severely mentally ill, he said.
In March, Senator Feinstein opposed
language proposed during a meeting of the
Senate Judiciary that would have protected
veterans from government attempts to
render their Second Amendment right to
own firearms inoperative. Feinstein told her
colleagues she was determined to find a way
that veterans who are incapacitated for one
reason or another mentally dont have access
to this kind of weapon, a reference to the
dreaded AR-15 and related semiautomatic
weapons demonized by the government and
the establishment media. Feinsteins remarks
stoked fears earlier expressed after the
Department of Homeland Security under
both Democrat and Republican presidents
declared returning veterans to be a threat
along with patriot groups and other assorted
anti-government groups and individuals.
Mental illness is at the core of the Obama
administrations antigun agenda and its
implementation may not ultimately require
the passage of laws by Congress. Firearm
regulation is slowly and quietly being turned
over to the mental health professionals,
Clinical Psychologist Dr. Dathan Paterno told
World Net Daily in September. Congress
doesnt have to pass more laws to restrict
gun ownership. The laws are already on
the books. If more people can be classified
as mentally unstable and unable to own a
firearm, fewer people will be able to legally
own guns. This can be done without the
passage of a single law. Dont be fooled by
a lack of bills being sent through Congress,
Paterno continued. Dianne Feinstein will
be successful in restricting gun ownership
whether she passes legislation or not.
Obamas executive orders paired with the new
psychiatric guidelines are all that is needed to
take firearms from the hands of Americans.
In January, Obama released nearly two
dozen executive orders controlling firearms,
including one allowing doctors to ask
patients about guns in their homes. Order
16 specifically clarifies that no federal law
prevents health care providers from warning
law enforcement authorities about threats
of violence. Obama rolled out other largely
symbolic actions in August. He signed an
executive action a regulation that does
not require legislative action by Congress
outlawing antiquated World War II military-
grade weapons the United States sells or
donates to allies from being brought back into
the states by private entities.
The government argued that 250,000 of
these weapons have found their way back
into the United States and a number of them
have ended up on the street, although it is
unlikely we will see outmoded M1 Garand
carbines in the hands of drug gang enforcers.
Banning these rifles because of their use
in quote-unquote crimes is like banning
Model Ts because so many of them are being
used as getaway cars in bank robberies,California resident Ed Woods told the
Associated Press on August 29. Despite the
absurdity of this executive action and others,
the Obama administration is establishing
a precedent for future action, especially
with congressional elections looming on
the horizon and the prospect new anti-
Second Amendment legislation will remain
a nonstarter in the short term.
The global elite, however, deals with long
term projections. If mass shooter incidents
continue to occur and especially if they
become more violent and claim larger
numbers of victims the will of Congress
will ultimately bend, if only imperceptibly at
first, in the direction of ultimate disarmament.
Unfortunately, the National Rifle Association
has facilitated this slow drift toward ultimate
disarmament. For instance, the NRA
worke d with Congress in 1998 to imp ose
an instant computerized background
check on sales that were previously legal
under the Second Amendment.
written by:
-
8/13/2019 INFOWARS the Magazine - Vol. 2 Issue 2 - October 2013
14/35
2726
Former NSADirector AdvocatesChinese-StyleInternet
During a speech at St. Johns Episcopal Church on
September 15, former NSA and CIA director Michael
Hayden advocated a move towards a Chinese-style
world wide web where users are forced to identify
themselves before posting online content. Comparing
the Internet to the wild west and Somalia, Hayden
indicated that he would like to see the United States
adopt a system of web policing similar to that used in Communist China,
where users are mandated to submit to real name registration before they
can use services like Weibo, the Chinese version of Twitter. The problem I
have with the Internet is that its anonymous, remarked Hayden.
Although the implementation of the real name registration system in
China has been fraught with technical difficulties, its ultimate intention is
to prevent social network users f rom spreading rumors about the ruling
Communist Party, or in other words, its all about crushing dissent against
the state. Prominent micro-bloggers who attracted millions of followers as
a result of criticizing the Chinese government are now being arrested and
forced to confess their crimes as part of a return to a Mao-era style ofjustice, one that Michael Hayden apparently thinks America should adopt
by following Chinas example of banning Internet anonymity.
While defending mass NSA spying on the American public via the recently
revealed PRISM program, Hayden also claimed that Gmail was the email
service of choice for terrorists. Gmail is the preferred Internet service
provider of terrorists worldwide, he stated, presumably unaware thatGmail is merely an email service and not an ISP, adding, I dont think
youre going to see that in a Google commercial, but its free, its ubiquitous,
so of course it is.
In reality, as a Bloomberg News report highlighted, the [NSA]surveillance systems are best suited for gathering information on law-
abiding citizens, and not actual terrorists, who are extremely unlikely to
use Gmail, Skype, or iCloud. This is by no means the first time that Michael
Hayden has uttered statements about the Internet rich with controversyyet poor on facts. Last month, Hayden compared hackers, cyberactivists,
and transparency groups to al-Qaeda terrorists, labeling them, nihilists,
anarchists, activists, Lulzsec, Anonymous, twentysomethings who havent
talked to the opposite sex in five or six years.
Leader of Syrian RebelGroup Calls for AttacksInside U.S.Who Also Just Happens to Be the Headof al-Qaeda
Al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahri urged small-
scale attacks inside the United States to bleed America
economically, adding he hoped eventually to see a more
significant strike, reports Reuters. We should bleed America
economically by provoking it to continue in its massive
expenditure on its security, for the weak point of America is
its economy, which has already begun to stagger due to the
military and security expenditure, al-Zawahri said.
As the Bipartisan Policy Center highlighted in a report
released mid-September, al-Zawahri took control of Jabhat
al-Nusra when he personally intervened to settle a dispute
between Jabhat al-Nusra and al-Qaeda in Iraq and
declared the Syrian group to be under his direction. Jabhat
al-Nusra, which according to reports is essential to the
frontline operations of the rebels fighting to topple Assad
and conducts the heaviest frontline fighting in Syria,
publicly pledged allegiance to al-Qaeda earlier this year.
Since then al-Qaeda, which had previously been on life
support according to expert Peter Bergen, is now undergoing
a process of revival and resuscitation by establishing a new
foothold in Syria through Jabhat al-Nusra.
Given that al-Qaeda head al-Zawahri is now the spiritual
leader of the primary Syrian opposition group, its
unsurprising that opposition militants sing the praises of
his predecessor Osama bin Laden while glorifying the 9/11attacks. What should be shocking to Americans is the fact
that the Central Intelligence Agency is sending weapons to
rebels who have pledged allegiance to Jabhat al-Nusra and
are defecting in droves. This is a group responsible for killing
U.S. troops in Iraq.
Essentially, the CIA is arming a terrorist group which is
directed by the head of al-Qaeda, who is simultaneously
calling for terror attacks inside the United States and
its all being conducted in plain view. Americans are
seeing their tax dollars used to equip terrorists who are
an integral part of the same ideology which led to the
slaughter of 3,000 Americans in New York, Pennsylvania,
and Washington 12 years ago. Only through greater
understanding of this fact will opposition to the Obama
administrations intervention on the side of the rebels
be maintained and a deadly conflict that could lead to a
regional war be averted.
written by:
Paul Joseph Watson
written by: Paul Joseph Watson
Ayman al-Zawahri, the leader of Jabhat al-Nusra, which is the primary oppositionfighting force in Syria, has called for terrorattacks inside the United States. Al-Zawahri
just happens to be the leader of another group youmight have heard of: al-Qaeda.
written by: Kit Daniels
T th t
-
8/13/2019 INFOWARS the Magazine - Vol. 2 Issue 2 - October 2013
15/35
28 29
It is a common mistake to consider a
firearm as a symbol of aggression
a sword instead of a shield but afirearm is a shield in the hands of the
peaceful public, because it will remind
an aggressor that he will pay the ultimate
price for violence against the innocent:
forfeiture of his life. The cost to him is
too great; aggression is priced too high to
pursue. It is less expensive for potential
criminals to produce rather than to take, to
build rather than to steal. Society grows and
prospers as a result.
When the people arm themselves for
protection, violence will always be more
costly than meaningful production. But
when a government, however, removes
the right to self-defense, politicians are
granting criminals a subsidy by disarming
the victims, thereby making it less costly for
them to rob, beat, rape, and kill. No longer
at its natural equilibrium, the lower cost ofviolence encourages aggression over peaceful
productivity. This is a disarmed society, living
in decadence and fear.
With the current American population atover 310 million, the federal government
will never value the individuals life as much
as he will his own. To the government, an
individual is one of millions, an insignificant
fraction. To the individual, however, his
life his very consciousness is one of
one and it is irreplaceable. The value of
an individuals life is best determined by
himself, not by the state.
Because of this, the individual is the best
defender of his own life, never the police
who have no responsibility to protect him,
according to numerous Supreme Court cases.
When in need of police services, the public
is served by a local police department with
no other options. The police operate as a
monopoly without any sort of competition
which would put them out of business if they
serve the community poorly. This is why theindividual, not the police, must have sole
responsibility for the protection of his own life.
In better understanding of the inalienable
right that makes such defense possible, itis vital for the public to understand the
Founders intent for the Second Amendment,
which is routinely misunderstood by those
unaware of the individual right to keep
and bear arms. During the founding of our
constitutional republic, a militia that was
well-regulated meant that the citizens who
comprised it were well-trained and well-
rehearsed. The word regulated referred
to the discipline practiced by those citizens,
which had absolutely nothing to do with
government involvement at all. A well-
regulated militia was effective at defending
the community without being authorized or
controlled by the state.
The Founding Fathers viewed the local
militias, who successfully resisted the
British Empire, as armed individuals who
spontaneously organized in defense oftheir homes, their families, and their own
The Need for Arms
An armed society is a polite society. Manners are goodwhen one may have to back up his acts with his life. Robert A. Heinlein, Beyond This Horizon
lives. A well-regulated militia cannot exist
without the individuals right to arm himself,
because a group cannot exist withoutindividuals. Without the individual right to
armed defense, we the people cannot resist
suppression by the state. Tyrants who do not
fear us can destroy our liberties, including
the ability to speak freely, to assemble, and to
protest against their tyranny.
Here are some stories that illustrate the
importance of the Second Amendment, which
merely recognizes a human right that existed
prior to the founding of our republic:
March 16, 1975
Two men, Marvin Kent and James Morse,
broke into a rooming house in Washington,
D.C. and raped Miriam Douglas. The two
women who lived in the room above, Carolyn
Warren and Joan Taliaferro, called police
twice, but officers never came to their aid.The two rapists finally discovered Warren and
Taliaferro above and forced all three women
to accompany them to Kents apartment,
where the women were raped for 14 hours
straight. The women later initiated Warren
v. District of Columbia, a lawsuit against the
city which alleged negligent failure to provide
police protection. In a 43 decision, the court
of appeals ruled against the women, stating
that the police were under no specific legal
duty to protect individuals.
October 16, 1991
George Hennard drove his pick-up truck
through the front window of a Luby s
Cafeteria in Killeen, Texas, and proceeded
to open fire on 50 people, killing 23. Former
Texas house member Suzanna Hupp survivedthe attack, but her parents did not. She later
y
regretted that she left her handgun outside in
her vehicle because she did not want to run
afoul of the concealed carry laws at the time.
May 27, 2010
Abraham Dickan, 79, showed up at an
AT&T store in New York Mills, New York, with
an employee kill list in one hand and a .357
magnum in the other. When Dickan fired the
first shot, off-duty police officer Donald J.
Moore drew his concealed firearm and killed
Dickan. Only one employee was injured.
March 25, 2012
Jesse Gates showed up at the Freewill
Baptist Church in Boiling Springs, South
Carolina, and aimed a shotgun at the
pastor while he preached. Aaron Guyton,
a CHL holder in the congregation, pulled
his gun on Gates while the pastor took theshotgun away from him. No shots were
fired and no one was injured.
August 28, 2012
Robert Barron allegedly stabbed Teresa
Barron multiple times after she dropped
off her child off outside of a school in San
Antonio, Texas. A CHL holder nearby pulled
out his handgun and ordered Barron to drop
the knife, which he did.
December 11, 2012
Jacob Roberts killed two people and
seriously wounded another at a shopping mall
in Clackamas County, Oregon. A shopper at
the mall, Nick Meli, pulled out his concealed
handgun on Roberts, who then retreated. Melinever fired a shot.
To the government,an individual isone of millions,an insignificantfraction. To theindividual, however,his life his veryconsciousness isone of one and itis irreplaceable.
The value of anindividuals life isbest determined byhimself, not by the
state.
written by:
Mike Adams
-
8/13/2019 INFOWARS the Magazine - Vol. 2 Issue 2 - October 2013
16/35
30 31
There is systematic suppression
in the United States on the truth
about the links between vaccines
and autism. Drug companies and
the federal government have
conspired to deny parents of vaccine-damaged
children their day in court by creating a
kangaroo vaccine court that offers no due
process whatsoever (and therefore violates
the civil liberties of Americans). Even so, this
court has, numerous times, admitted that
vaccines have irrefutably damaged children
and caused autism. Parents of those children
are offered hush money to quietly go awayafter signing an agreement that mandates
they never talk to the press about their ordeal.
This systematic suppression of the truth
about vaccine-damaged children is revealed
in a must-see new video just released by
the Canary Party (www.CanaryParty.org)
and narrated by actor Rob Schneider, an
outspoken advocate of parental rights when
it comes to medicine. The Canary Party is a
fast-growing movement of parents, doctors,
scientists, and everyday citizens who want
to put a stop to the systematic poisoning of
the population by drug companies, vaccine
manufacturers, and other corporate pushers
of toxic substances that damage humankind
(and the planet). The Canary Party seeks to
reveal the truth about how we are all being
poisoned by unethical corporations and then
find constructive ways to stop the poisoningand end the human suffering caused by it.
Why Do Vaccines Harm Children?
1) Mercury is still used in vaccines, and the
CDC openly admits it. There is no safe level
of mercury for injecting into a human child.
Not even trace levels. There is no evidence
of safety for mercury at any dose w hatsoever.
Any doctor who says the level of mercury in
a vaccine is safe to inject into a child is only
demonstrating their outrageous ignorance
of scientific facts. Mercury is arguably the
most neurotoxic element on the entire Table
of Elements. It is used in vaccines for the
convenience of the vaccine manufacturer atthe expense of the safety of the child. Any
doctor who injects mercury into a child at
any dose should be immediately stripped of
their medical license.
See the list of studies on the neurotoxicity
of mercury at science.naturalnews.com. Those
study titles include: Lactational exposure to
inorganic mercury: evidence of Neurotoxic
effects, Neurotoxic action of inorganic
Mercury injected in the intraventricular
space of mouse cerebrum, Neurotoxic
effects in workers of the clinical thermometer
manufacture plant, and Neurotoxic risk
caused by stable and variable exposure to
methylmercury from seafood.
There is no safe form of mercury as is often
ridiculously claimed by vaccine pushers. Both
ethyl and methyl mercury are extremely toxic
to the human nervous system. Neither shouldever, under any circumstances, be deliberately
Do VaccinesCause Autism?
Mike Adams
New Video Reveals the Systematic Suppression ofEvidence of Vaccine-Damaged Children
-
8/13/2019 INFOWARS the Magazine - Vol. 2 Issue 2 - October 2013
17/35
-
8/13/2019 INFOWARS the Magazine - Vol. 2 Issue 2 - October 2013
18/35
34 35
-
8/13/2019 INFOWARS the Magazine - Vol. 2 Issue 2 - October 2013
19/35
written by:
Kit Daniels Obama will act onhi t f
-
8/13/2019 INFOWARS the Magazine - Vol. 2 Issue 2 - October 2013
20/35
38 39
Obama: The SecondAmendment OnlyApplies to al-Qaeda
President Pushed to Disarm Americans on the
Same Day He Approved Arming al-Qaeda
President Barack Obama
accelerated firearm shipments
to al-Qaeda on the very same
day he demanded more gun
control in the wake of the
D.C. Navy Yard shooting. On September
16, Obama waived a provision in federal
law specifically designed to keep the U.S.
government from supplying firearms to
terrorists such as al-Qaeda, according to The
Washington Examiner. Citing his authority
under the Arms Export Control Act, the
president declared that he would waive
the prohibitions in sections 40 and 40A of
the AECA related to such a transaction. No
longer will Obama need to rely on the CIA to
give free guns to Islamic extremists in Syria;
now he will make the transfers openly withthis transparent government initiative.
On the same day as his overt approval for
arms to al-Qaeda, Obama announced that
he is drafting executive orders for more gun
control. We have gone about implementing
the executive actions that were part of the
presidents plan to take action to reduce gun
violence, White House Press Secretary Jay
Carney said after the Navy Yard shooting.
Obviously, he continues to support measures
taken by Congress that could be taken
by Congress to reduce gun violence in
a common-sense way, like improving our
background-check system.
In essence, Obama will act on his own to
force firearm restrictions onto the American
people, and if Congress would like to join him
later, they are welcome to do so. He already
has allies in Congress drooling to disarm
law-abiding citizens. When will enough be
enough? asked Diane Feinstein, a Democratic
Senator from California. Congress must
stop shirking its responsibility and resume
a thoughtful debate on gun violence in
this country. We must do more to stop this
endless loss of life.
Yet contrary to that statement, Feinstein
approves of Obamas plan for war in Syria,
which would place the U.S. military on the
side of the al-Qaeda rebels who are beheading
Syrian Christians with cinder blocks and
machetes. Obama is not content with the rebels
only being armed with knives, however, as his
administration prepares to further arm terrorists
with automatic weapons, which he does not
believe law-abiding citizens should own.
Not even a week after the Navy Yardshooting, Obama told his supporters to go
back at it and push for unconstitutional
legislation that will disarm Americans.
Federal agencies have already begun to
dry up gun supplies in America with massive
firearm and ammunition purchases which
drive private gun owners out of the market.
This is essentially back-door gun control.
In a recent purchase, the Department of
Defense bought millions of rounds of Soviet
7.62x39mm ammo and nearly 600,000 AK-47
magazines. AK-47s, which are chambered for
the 7.62x39mm round, are commonly used by
American gun owners, but not the American
military. They are also used regularly by
al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups around
the world. In his effort to reduce violence,
Obama is arming al-Qaeda extremists while
disarming peaceful Americans.
his own to forcefirearm restrictionsonto the Americanpeople, and ifCongress wouldlike to join himlater, they arewelcome to do so.
-
8/13/2019 INFOWARS the Magazine - Vol. 2 Issue 2 - October 2013
21/35
Alternative mediajournalists and
written by:
Kit Danielssomeone who regularly gathers, prepares,
collects, photographs, records, writes, edits,
reports, or publishes on matters of local,
ti l i t ti l t th
-
8/13/2019 INFOWARS the Magazine - Vol. 2 Issue 2 - October 2013
22/35
42 43
Media Protection,Media Control:The Death of theFree Press
jbloggers whoare not easilycontrolled by thestate will be leftisolated under thethreat of forceddisclosure.
national, or international events or other
matters of public interest. These definitions
seem to describe the profession rather than
the practice of journalism.
As Kurt Nimmo pointed out in an Infowars.
com article on August 9, 2013, Senator
Charles Schumer, a New York Democrat,
doesnt want the bill, if enacted, to protect
whistleblowers and others who drive out
government corruption. The world has
changed, Schumer said. Were very careful
in this bill to distinguish journalists from
those who shouldnt be protected, WikiLeaks
and all those, and we ve ensured that. Hecontinued, But there are people who write
and do real journalism, in different ways
than were used to. They should not be
excluded from this bill.
If passed, the Free Flow of Information
Act of 2013 wou ld create an offic ial class
of journalists the only class recognized
and protected by the federal government.
Protection will only be provided to preferred
press members who follow, without
question, the official narrative which
covers up the states sinister activities. They
are free from prosecution as long as their
stories support government lies.
Alternative media j ournalists and b loggers
who are not easily controlled by the sta te
will be left is olated under the threat o f
forced disclosure. In other words, the
government will decide who is protectedunder the First Amendment and who is
not, Nimmo wrote on the subject on
Infowars.com dated September 19, 2013. It
will use violenc e to force testimony.
Media shield bills have been considered in
Congress since at least 2007. In 2009, Senator
Chuck Schumer introduced an amendment
to improve that years p roposed Free Flow
of Information Act that would have limited
reporters privilege to only salaried employees
and independent contractors of media outlets.
The bill ultimately died in committee. The
current iteration of the Free Flow of
Information Act only benefits controlled
members of the mainstream media, not
independent freelancers or non-salaried
bloggers who are the spiritual successors
of the citizen journalists that dominated
the free press when James Madison wrotethe First Amendment.
In yet another attempt to kill free speech,
the United States Congress is considering
legislation that would allow the federal
government unparalleled control over
mass media and excessive authority to
attack those critical of the state. Back in May,
Representative Ted Poe, a Texas Republican,
introduced the Free Flow of Information Act
of 2013 (H.R. 1962), a bill intended to protect
journalists f rom being forced to reveal their
confidential news sources to federal investigators
except under specific circumstances. One of these
circumstances includes harm to national security
with the objecti ve to prevent such har m.
This bill effectively means little to journalists
exposing unconstitutional abuses because federal
entities could easily declare that classified leaksfrom confidential sources harm national security.
In essence, H.R. 1962 offers a stronger foothold for
the federal government to attack whistleblowers
such as Edward Snowden or former CIA agent
Jeffrey Sterling. In a 21 ruling in July, the U.S.
Court of Appeals ordered veteranNew York Times
journalist James Risen to testify whether Sterling
leaked classified information to him regarding
Operation Merlin, a covert CIA operation which
delivered flawed nuclear blueprints to the Iranians.
Writing for the majority, Chief Judge Traxler
said that there is no First Amendment testimonial
privilege, absolute or qualified, that protects a
reporter from being compelled to testify about
criminal conduct and that the reporter must
appear and give testimony just as every other
citizen must. Back in May 2011, Attorney General
Eric Holder approved a subpoena that demanded
Risen confirm that his Operation Merlin source wasin fact Sterling. Risen responded to the subpoena
by asserting that both the First Amendment and
federal common-law reporters privilege protected
him from forced testimony.
A United States district court ruled partly in
favor for Risen, stating that he had a qualified
First Amendment reporters privilege that may be
invoked when a subpoena either seeks information
about confidential sources or is issued to harass
or intimidate the journalist. The U.S. Court of
Appeals decision, however, reversed this ruling. In
support of its decision, the appeals court referenced
the 1972 Supreme Court caseBranzburg v. Hayes
which invalidated the First Amendment as a
defense for journalists compelled to testify against
their confidential sources.
Althou ghBran zburg ruled against reporters
privilege under the Press Clause of the FirstAmendme nt, Ju stice B yron Wh ite sa id that the
federal government must convincingly show
a substantial relation between the information
sought and a subject of overriding and
compelling state interest. But if enacted into
law, H.R. 1962 could lessen the governments
burden of showing overriding and compelling
state interest by allowing the immediate claim
of harm to national security. Journalists
are being offered a watered-down federal
shield law that deceptively increases the
governments ease at which it can punish
federal whistleblowers.
Additionally, H.R. 1962 defines a journalist
protected under the bill as a person engaged in
journalism for financial gain or livelihood and
extends protection to the journalists supervisor,
employer, parent, subsidiary, or affiliate. The
Senate version of this bill (S. 987) gives an evenmore rigid definition of a protected journalist as
A l iPh 5S
written by:
Anthony Gucciardi
-
8/13/2019 INFOWARS the Magazine - Vol. 2 Issue 2 - October 2013
23/35
44 45
Apple iPhone 5S:Big Brothers DreamCome TrueThe Latest iPhone Is an Ode to Biometrics, Spying,and the Big Brother Control Grid
The latest series of Apples
iPhone will not only continue
to cultivate numerous apps that
track your location through GPS
and transmit data directly back
to corporations and government, but will also
contain a fingerprint sensor that stores your
fingerprint in order to purchase apps and
unlock the phone for use.
And thats really just the beginning. As
millions will most likely continue through the
Apple food chain and purchase this phone,
the NSA and bloated federal government at
large will be beyond ecstatic. Because after
all, its a real dream come true for the Big
Daddy government spy state. No longer will
you actually need to be arrested to gatheryour fingerprints millions nationwide will
willingly submit their biometrics to a database
that most certainly is accessible by Apple and
big government.
But dont worry, the same company that
has given away all of your chats and personal
data through the NSAs top secret PRISM
program says that youre perfectly safe.
Security experts and high level tech analysts,
however, seem to disagree. In addition to the
fact that it seems consumer trust is all but
dead in regards to Apple and its ties to the
spying grid, it seems these safety features
are actually quite vulnerable in reality, to the
point now where hackers can access a massive
database of fingerprints just waiting to be
These safetyfeatures areactually quitevulnerable inreality, to thepoint now wherehackers canaccess a massivedatabase offingerprints justwaiting to betaken and utilizedfraudulently.
taken and utilized fraudulently.
Of course, Apple claims that the fingerprint
scans will be local on your hardware,
but the NSA and FBI would not let such a
precious database go to waste. We already
know that corporations are making big bucks
spying on the data of consumers. So in the
event that Apple is holding some of these
fingerprints, despite what they say, a database
of the fingerprints could be compromised.
And I dont think encryption will stop much.
The print is also used to verify app purchases,
which leads me to believe that this at least
would be stored through a third party.
According to a security specialist on CNET:
So can biometric authentication be
hacked? Almost certainly. Im sure thatsomeone with a good enough copy of your
fingerprint and some rudimentary materials
engineering capability or maybe just a
good enough printer can authenticate his
way into your iPhone The final problem
with biometric systems is the database. If the
system is centralized, there will be a large
database of biometric information thats
vulnerable to hacking.
As we inch towards a world in which our
electronics are based around biometrics, it
becomes an eerie reality that our Big Daddy,
Big Brother system is continually holding our
hands as we walk right into the current spy
system that our overlords continue to assert
does not exist.
M D d d Al
written by:
Kurt Nimmo
-
8/13/2019 INFOWARS the Magazine - Vol. 2 Issue 2 - October 2013
24/35
46 47
Matt Drudge was spot on
this September. He called
Senator Dianne Feinstein
a fascist after she had the
gall to define who is and
who is not a journalist.
Feinstein and another Democrat, New York
Senator Chuck Schumer, are pushing a bill
that claims to shield journalists from the
government. It received a thumbs up in the
Senate Judiciary Committee on a bipartisan
vote. Feinstein and Schumer like to pretend
the proposed law offers legal protections
to journalists engaged in news-gathering
activities, protections already afforded by
the First Amendment. If the government
decides, however, it has reasonable
exceptions under national security, itwill allow federal law enf orcement to
Matt Drudge and AlexJones: 17-Year OldBloggers
compel information that would mitigate
terrorist threats.
In other words, the government will
decide who is protected under the First
Amendment and who is not. It wil l use
violence to force testimony.
This is normal behavior for government. It
compels obedience at gun-point every day
of the week. It hates the idea that you are
sovereign and have the right to not testify,
to remain silent. Conscription of witnesses
is no more justified than conscription into
the armed forces or into any other serviceor occupation. Freedom and individual
rights must extend to all institutions and all
branches of life, even into the judiciary, the
heart of state power, said M urray Rothbard.
The terrorism ruse will give the government
all the pretext it needs to force journalists to
testify, so Chuckie Schumers law is basically
meaningless. The real purpose of this law
is to allow the government to define who
is and who is not a journalist. Feinstein has
made this abundantly clear. I cant support
it if everyone who has a blog has a special
privilege or if Edward Snowden were to sit
down and write this stuff, he would have a
privilege. Im not going to go there, she said.
In order to make unbridled state power
somewhat palatable, Feinstein, Schumer
and the Senate Judiciary said it will allow
freelancers, part-timers, and studentjournalists to practice the First Amendment.
Feinstein and Schumer Are Preparing to Wage War
on the Alternative Media
A government judge, they decided, would
be permitted to extend First Amendment
protection to anybody engaged in legitimate
news-gathering activities.
K i i d th t ill d id
The governmentwill decide who
written by:
Julie Wilson
Fox News Demonizes Second
fascist, because she assumes the authority to
officially declare who is a journalist covered
by the First Amendment and who is a criminal
revealing national security secrets.
F i t i S h d th th i i
-
8/13/2019 INFOWARS the Magazine - Vol. 2 Issue 2 - October 2013
25/35
48 49
Keep in mind the government will decide
what is a legitimate news-gathering activity.
Feinstein said a 17-year old blogger is not
a journalist. Neither is Edward Snowden,
or we must assume, Glenn Greenwald,
the newspaper journalist who reported on
Snowdens NSA revelations.The Los Angeles
Timesunderscored the governments caveat:
But the bill also makes it clear that the legal
protection is not absolute. Federal officials
still may compel disclosure from a journalist
who has information that could stop or
prevent crimes such as murder, kidnapping, orchild abduction, or prevent acts of terrorism
or significant harm to national security.
Its pretty obvious whats going on here. Like
the Soviet Union and Red China, or any other
authoritarian dictatorship, the state reserves
the absolute right to determine who is a
journalist and who is a 17-year old blogger.
Thats why Matt Drudge called Feinstein a
is protectedunder the FirstAmendment andwho is not. It willuse violence toforce testimony.
P
olitical activist and second
year law student, Nicholas
Somberg, holds For Liberty
Fridays in Lake Orion,Michigan, where he and
his fellow patriots assemble in the name
of liberty. On September 18, the patriots
were gathered on Sombergs private
property promoting liberty and the Second
Amendment by waving signs that read
Dont Tread on Me, Honk 4 Liberty, and
End the Fed to passing traffic when police
arrived. Somberg, 24, who was practicing his
Second Amendment right by openly carrying
a rifle, which is legal under Michigan state
law, was ordered by police to immediately
put his weapon down.
Dont point that rifle at me. I dont
want thi s to be a bad situa tion, s aid the
officer. A video taken of the confrontation
clearly illustrates that at no point was
the activist pointing the rifle at p olice,
however, per the officers order, Sombergput the rifle down. Police then ordered
the activist to move towards them, but
Somberg, knowing his innocence, told the
police to get off his property.
As the 24-year old moves towards police,
the sergeant said I dont want to shoot
you, ok? The sergeant then asked him
to step in front of the police vehicle, but
Somberg pushed back, asking officers why
he was being detained and what crime he
had committed. Sgt. Stoner answered he was
being detained for scaring people.
According to My Fox Detroit, severalpeople (all female callers) called 911 when
they saw a man with a big gun and got
scared. My Fox Detroit opened their report
by immediately demonizing the pro-
Second Amendment activist and citing the
Department of Homeland Security campaign,
If you see something, say something. The
local news station even makes the claim that
some of Sombergs neighbors consider him
a danger to society. Although he was the
one with the rifle, he says he was the one in
the right, says the Fox news reporter. When
citizens are concerned, it is their [ polices]
duty to do something about it.
Then of course, like other liberal anti-gun
pundits have done, the Oakland County
Undersheriff Mike McCabe, capitalizes on
the recent shooting at the Naval Sea Systems
Command Headquarters when he told FoxNews that because of the mass shooting,
people need to put themselves into the
perspective of the police officer. Deputies
dont know if this guy is a Second Amendment
rights person, McCabe said. If its somebody
thats looking for confrontation. They dont
know if hes mentally deranged. They dont
know anything about him. We just had a
deputy stabbed in Williamson county. We
just had a trooper shot in the head. We just
had the incident in Washington D.C. where
a guy with a rifle attacks people. One of the
responding officers was a Washington D.C.police officer that was shot in addition to the
12 or 13 other people that were killed.
Basically what the Undersheriff said was
that because of the crime police face on a
daily basis, Second Amendment supporters
are to be treated like criminals. After
creating the typical dramatic police scene
by calling six police officers to respond and
shutting down a busy street, Sgt. Stoner,
unable to prove Somberg committed a
crime, eventually returned Sombergs gun
and vacated the premises.
Somberg told Infowars before last weeks
incident with the Oakland police that theyve
had nothing but positive feedback. Lots of
cars have been honking for liberty, and one
police officer even stopped by and made a
joke saying Youre not going to give me your
ID, are you? Unfortunately, the local newsdidnt exactly portray the protests in a positive
light. My Fox Detroit wrapped up their news
report by making sure the public knows
theres been 20 mass shootings since 1999.
Once again, this is another example of how
the establishment media fuels hoplophobia
(the fear of armed citizens), when in reality,
statistics show gun crime has decreased by 39
percent since 1993.
Fox News Demonizes SecondAmendment Activist
Drivers Call 911 on Second Amendment Activist Because They
Saw a Man With a Big Gun and Got Scared
Feinstein, Schumer, and the other minions
and grocery clerks working for the state are
determined to criminalize the alternative
media and elevate the corporate media
reading from government scripts. Its a
dangerous situation for state power when
millions of citizens no longer trust the
establishment and prefer to get their news
on the web. Its unacceptable that millions of
people read Matt Drudges website instead of
The New York Timesand The Washington Post.
Its unacceptable that Infowars.com is more
popular than MSNBC.The government has to take out Matt
Drudge and Alex Jones and anybody else
who dares deviate fro m the official sc ript.
Thats what the Media Shield Law is all
about. Its an attempt by government to
define what is journalism and what is not.
Feinstein and Schumer are preparing to
wage war on th e alternative media.
written by:Adan Salazar
Rothschild Ball
-
8/13/2019 INFOWARS the Magazine - Vol. 2 Issue 2 - October 2013
26/35
50 51
Photos gathered from a high-
society surrealist ball recall
more of the same type of
strange debauchery Alex Jones
encountered when he successfully
infiltrated the Bohemian Grove. The images
were reportedly snapped by one of the partys
attendees, Alexis von Rosenberg, also known as
the Baron de Red, a prominent French banker
who was close friends with the host of the ball,
Marie-Hlne de Rothschild, of the notorious
Rothschild banking dynasty.
Rothschilds ball was held at one of her
familys expansive estates, the Chteau de
Ferrires, located j ust east of Paris. Attendees
received invitations with text written backwards
and arrived to a mansion bathed in orangelighting meant to represent the building was
on fire. In notes published on the blog Scala
Regia, which were supposedly written by von
Rosenberg to accompany photos of the ball, he
highlights several queer aspects of the night,
concluding that he is barred from repeating
such things now for many reasons. Below are
von Rosenbergs words via Scala Regia.
On 12 December 1972, Marie-Hlne gave
her Surrealist Ball at Ferrires. This time the
guests were asked to come in black tie and long
dresses with Surrealist heads. The invitation
was printed with reversed writing on a blue and
cloudy sky, inspired by a painting by Magritte. To
decipher the card, it had to be held to a mirror
For the evening the chateau was floodlit with
moving orange lights to give the impression that
it was on fire. The staircase inside was lined by
footmen dressed as cats that appeared to havefallen asleep in a variety of staged poses
Guests had to pass through a kind of
labyrinth of Hell, made of black ribbons to look
like cobwebs. The occasional cat appeared to
rescue the guests and lead them to the tapestry
salon. Here they were greeted by Guy with
a hat to resemble a still-life on a platter, and
by Marie-Hlne wearing the head of a giant
weeping tears made of diamonds
Marie-Hlne proved that she had the flare
and imagination to create something unique
and worthwhile. None of this was created by
charm alone. It needed a degree of ruthless
determination. She attended to every minute
detail of style in her life and also in her
entertaining. She was a great hostess with all
the qualities. She loved parties and people.
She was forever in quest of new talent andnew figures to entertain from the world of the
arts, literature, dance, andhaute couture. She
mixed them with the more established set of
Paris society. Everyone was intrigued. Marie-
Hlnes parties took on such importance that
one social figure threatened to commit suicide
unless she was invited
It is not possible to repeat such things
now for many reasons. But it is fascinating to
look back and to remember these occasions,
which dominated our thoughts and plans
to such an extent for so many months. I am
happy that I took part in so many, and happy
that I gave some myself.
De Reds writings do nothing to explain the
awkward symbolism portrayed in the p hotos,
such as the photo of a table centerpiece
featuring a babys shattered head and a
dismembered infant resting his head onsome sort of black demon. This fascination
Rothschild BallExposes ElitesFascination WithOccult
with the occult is of the same persuasion Alex Jones encountered
when he snuck into the private Bohemian Grove club hidden deep
within Californias redwood forest. Each year, hundreds of the worlds
most powerful men, from politicians to journalists to entertainment
industry insiders, convene there to conduct bizarre ceremonial rites
-
8/13/2019 INFOWARS the Magazine - Vol. 2 Issue 2 - October 2013
27/35
52 53
and rituals, like the sacrificing of human effigies to mock owl gods.
The elite social gatherings eerily awkward theme, black tie, long
dresses & Surrealists heads, is also reminiscent of scenes out of
director Stanley Kubricks 1999 film Eyes Wide Shut, in which the
main character is persuaded into attending a gathering that required
a costume, mask, and secret password in which bizarre sexual orgies
and pseudo-religious rituals were taking place.
written by:
Kit Daniels
34 Percent of AmericansS
-
8/13/2019 INFOWARS the Magazine - Vol. 2 Issue 2 - October 2013
28/35
54 55
Congress shallmake no lawrespecting anestablishmentof religion, orprohibiting the free
exercise thereof;or abridging thefreedom of speech,or of the press;or the right of thepeople peaceablyto assemble,and to petitionthe Governmentfor a redress ofgrievances.
Say First AmendmentToo Extreme44 Percent Also Favor the Government ForcingJournalists to Give Up Their News Sources
Ayearly national poll by the
Newseum Institutes First
Amendment Center shows
that 34 percent of Americans
believe the First Amendment
goes too far in the rights it guarantees. That
belief is up 13 percent compared to the results
of the same survey conducted last year, the
largest single-year increase since the center
started the annual surveys in 1997. The First
Amendment Center, based at Vanderbilt
University in Nashville, Tenn., conducted the
national survey of 1,006 American adults in
May.
Its unsettling to see a third of Americans
view the First Amendment as providing too
much liberty, First Amendment Center
President Ken Paulson said. This underscores
the need for more First Amendment
education. If we truly understand the
essential role of these freedoms in a
democracy, were more likely to protect them.
For reference, the text of the First
Amendment reads:
Congress shall make no law respecting an
establishment of religion, or prohibiting the
free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom
of speech, or of the press; or the right of the
people peaceably to assemble, and to petition
the Government for a redress of grievances.
When the poll respondents were asked
to name the five specific rights guaranteed
by the First Amendment, only the freedom
of speech was named by the majority at
59 percent. Less than a quarter of the
respondents, 24 percent, named freedom
of religion; 14 percent recalled the freedom
of the press; 11 p ercent remembered the
freedom of peaceful assembly; and only 4percent knew of their guaranteed freedom
to petition the government. 36 percent of
respondents could not name any of the five
specific rights listed in the First Amendment.
The survey also asked respondents other
related questions. 31 percent agreed that
musicians should not be allowed to sing
songs with lyrics that might offend others.
44 percent favor court orders requiring
journalists to give up their news sources. 80
percent agreed that the news media act as an
independent watch dog over government on
behalf of the people.
Americans remain generally supportive
of First Amendment freedoms, Newseum
Institute CEO Gene Policinski said. But the
inability of most to even name the freedoms,
combined with the increase of those who
think the freedoms go too far, shows how
quickly that support can erode. As a nation,
we must better prepare our fellow and future
citizens for the hard decision of defending
core freedoms against those who would
damage or limit them by violence or by law.
Unfortunately our core freedoms are already
under attack. Infowars.com reported in June
that police arrested a San Diego man, Jeff
Olsen, for writing anti-bank messages in
washable chalk on a public sidewalk. Olsen
said the messages he wrote, such as Shame
on Bank of America, never used profanity.
In 2010, media analyst and political activist
Mark Dice even convinced people to sign
a petition repealing the First Amendment.
He followed up with even more satire this
summer when he asked beach goers to sign
a petition banning Christian symbols from
public view.
The First Amendment Center conducts
the yearly surveys to gauge the publics
opinions and knowledge on issues affecting
the First Amendment. The sampling error
for this years survey is +/- 3.2% at the 95%
confidence level, meaning that when sampling
another group of Americans using the same
methodology, there is only a 1 in 20 chance
the results would differ by more than 3.2%
in either direction. The Newseum Insitute
operates a 250,000 square foot museum of
news and journalism history, aptly called the
Newseum, in Washington, D.C.
Mass Murder Pills
written by:
Julie Wilson
-
8/13/2019 INFOWARS the Magazine - Vol. 2 Issue 2 - October 2013
29/35
56 57
The amount ofAmericans prescribed drugs
has surged over 400 percent in the last
10 years. Prescription drug abuse is now
the fastest-growing type of substance
abuse in the United States due to heavily
marketed prescription pills from giant pharmaceutical
companies. Recent studies show 7 in 10 Americans are
taking at least one prescription drug, while half are
prescribed to two or more prescription medications. A
research report conducted by the Mayo Clinic shows
antidepressants, antibiotics, and painkiller opiates as
the most commonly consumed prescription drug. More
than