(WEI)
Interdependent Infrastructures
Template for a Hybrid Energy System
Geographically correct Midwest HES
Hybrid Energy Systems: An Integrated Energy System Scheme
Sustainability:
• Economic
• Environmental
• Social
Results
• Case 1: High gas prices (6.2%/yr) with an imposed carbon tax
• Case 2: Low gas prices (3%/yr) with an imposed carbon tax
• Case 3: High gas prices (6.2%/yr) without an imposed carbon tax
Rajaz Khan Amitava
NATURAL GAS NETWORKS
To CNG & LNG vehicles
AGRICULTURE
THERMAL NETWORKS
HES ELECTRIC
NETWORKS
WIND, HYDRO, SOLAR
TRANSPORT NETWORKS
Passenger transport Freight transport (coal & feedstocks)
Feed- stocks
WATER
NG
H2 Networks Bio-fuels
Biogas Heat
To H2 vehicles
To PHEVs
• Two heat sources • Two uses of low
temperature heat • Three forms of storage Effective configurations may utilize subset of these.
Features: • A better DG
• At dist sub • 10-100MW
• Modular • built quickly • region-specific
configurations • Efficient • Flexible
• fast • storage
• MIMO
Technology Energy Produced (MWh)
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3
CHP 794,375 1,645,477 1,613,157
Solar 524,857 455,703 482,766
Wind 2,664,404 2,016,707 2,470,422
LTG 133,082 117,868 123,584
CST 720,526 520,584 638,577
NGB 33,716 114,622 85,736
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
452
01
6
20
18
20
20
20
22
20
24
20
26
20
28
20
30
20
32
20
34
20
36
20
38
20
40
20
42
20
44
20
46
20
48
20
50
20
52
20
54
INST
ALL
ED C
APA
CIT
Y (
MW
)
YEARS
CHP Wind Solar HS CST NGB LTG
Case 1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
20
16
20
18
20
20
20
22
20
24
20
26
20
28
20
30
20
32
20
34
20
36
20
38
20
40
20
42
20
44
20
46
20
48
20
50
20
52
20
54
INST
ALL
ED C
APA
CIT
Y (
MW
)
YEARS
CHP Wind Solar HS CST NGB LTG
Case 2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
20
16
20
18
20
20
20
22
20
24
20
26
20
28
20
30
20
32
20
34
20
36
20
38
20
40
20
42
20
44
20
46
20
48
20
50
20
52
20
54
INST
ALL
ED C
APA
CIT
Y (
MW
)
YEARS
CHP Wind Solar HS CST NGB LTG
Case 3
Hourly Analysis (Case 1)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021222324
ENER
GY
PR
OD
UC
ED (
MW
H)
HOURS
PCHP PSOL PWIND HLTG HNGB HCST
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021222324
ENER
GY
PR
OD
UC
ED (
MW
H)
HOURS
PCHP PSOL PWIND HLTG HNGB HCST
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021222324
ENER
GY
PR
OD
UC
ED (
MW
H)
HOURS
PCHP PSOL PWIND HLTG HNGB HCST
2035 Winter Day
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021222324
ENER
GY
PR
OD
UC
ED (
MW
H)
HOURS
PCHP PSOL PWIND HLTG HNGB HCST
2055 Winter Day
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Hea
t D
isch
arge
d
(MW
h)
Hours
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Hea
t D
isch
arge
d
(MW
h)
Hours
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Hea
t D
isch
arge
d
(MW
h)
Hours
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Hea
t D
isch
arge
d
(MW
h)
Hours
2035 & 2055 Summer Day
2035 & 2055 Winter Day
Integrated modeling of power & water systems + Fixed O&M Costs
+ Var O&M Costs
+ Environmental Costs
+ Fuel Costs + Reserve Costs
MIN NET PRESENT
VALUE
G&T&W Investment Costs
SUBJECT TO:
Electric & Water Infrastructure Investment constraints
Electric & Water Operational, planning, environmental constraints WT & WWT working level limits, Stream Flow Balance, ASR Charge/Discharge, VPH storage & release constraints
Decision Variables: Investment variables for Electric & Water infrastructure
Operational levels for Electric & Water infrastructure
Physical coupling between Electric & Water Systems described by the VPH, WT & WWT, ASR and Hydro Power Facilities.
Water system modelled with each individual node representing a watershed with own water system infrastructure.
Year 20 ...… Year 1 Year 2
Infrastructure integrity
• Reliability
• Flexibility
• Resilience
• Adaptable
