Early Learning Challenge Opportunity: Massachusetts’ Plan
Outline of Massachusetts’ Application Plan
2
Early Learning Challenge Goals
“This competition represents an unprecedented opportunity for States to focus deeply on their birth through five early learning and development (ELD) systems and build a more unified approach to supporting young children and their families — one that increases access and quality and helps ensure that children enter kindergarten with the skills, knowledge, and dispositions they need to be successful.”
3
Overview of Programs and Points Absolute Priorities
Priority 1: Promoting school readiness for children with High Needs*
Competitive Priorities Priority 2: Including all programs in tiered QRIS (10 pts) Priority 3: Understanding the status of children at kindergarten
entry (10 pts) Invitational Priorities
Priority 4: Sustaining effects in early elementary grades Priority 5: Encouraging Private-sector support
*The state has traditionally defined high-needs populations as those with sufficiently low-household incomes or in need of special education assistance and support. The state envisions a more aggressive approach, however, to identifying and supporting high-needs populations by leveraging the Early Childhood Information System (ECIS) to collect and analyze socio-economic, demographic, and educational data and through informed consent proactively engage children with multiple risk factors.
4
Overview of Programs and Points
Core AreasA. Successful State Systems
1. Past commitment to ELD2. State reform agenda and goals3. Aligning and coordinating ELD across state4. Budget to implement and sustain work
B. High-quality, accountable programs1. Establish statewide tiered QRIS2. Promote participation in QRIS3. Rate and monitor ELD programs4. Promote access to high-quality ELD programs for
children with High Needs5. Validate effectiveness of QRIS
5
Overview of Program and Points
Focused Investment Areas
C. Promoting ELD outcomes for children1. Use statewide ELD standards2. Support effective uses of assessment4. Engage and support families
D. A great early childhood workforce2. Support educators’ knowledge, skills and abilities
E. Measuring outcomes and progress1. Kindergarten entry assessment2. Early learning data systems
6
RTTT-ELC Application Process Leverage EEC Board strategic plan; use to guide decision-
making in application process Hold public forums and solicit feedback on ELD agenda Convene MA RTTT-ELC leadership team, made up of EEC
Advisory Council members to develop high-quality plans Work with national experts, provided through the Early
Learning Challenge Collaborative TA initiative, to solidify details of RTTT-ELC application
Secure MOUs from participating education and health and human services agencies for shared work
Reach out to key stakeholders for letters of support endorsing the state’s application
Secure signatures from Governor, Attorney General and participating state agency heads
Submit the ELC application on behalf of the Governor
7
Massachusetts Context Leader in education, health care and public service Strong governance structure
An Act Relative to Early Education and Care Creation of EEC
Children’s early learning and development – the unfinished business of education reform 135,000 children (B-5) with multiple risk factors
Strategic Goals Enhance children’s healthy growth and development through
quality early childhood programs, both formal and informal Strengthen community, school, state and family supports to
support parents as first teachers Identify developmental risk to support school readiness and
prevent achievement gap Invest in early educators workforce as it relates to
skills, knowledge, abilities and compensation
8
Support for High Needs* Children State: governance, resource distribution, oversight, data management Regional: infrastructure
EPS grantees including Readiness Centers, CCR&Rs, Mental Health grants Community: capacity-building, leadership, public awareness, family engagement
Public awareness campaign Evidence based literacy strategies Outreach to hard to reach families especially those not in formal programs Universal screening => ASQ/ASQ SE CFCE grantees statewide
Programs: quality enhancements, data collection, assessment Family assistance/child subsidies Licensing Reprocurement Families: engage and educate
• Strengthening families, Home visiting Interagency collaboration (Early Intervention and Special Education), MOUs*Children with High Needs means children from birth through kindergarten entry
who are from Low-Income families or otherwise in need of special assistance and support, including children who have disabilities or developmental delays; who are English learners; who reside on “Indian lands” as that term is defined by section 8013(6) of the ESEA; who are migrant, homeless, or in foster care; and other children as identified by the State.9
Participating State Agencies EEC has secured MOUs with the following state agencies:
EOE, ESE, DHE, CTF, DPH, DMH, DCF, DHCD, DTA, ORI, the State Advisory Council (SAC), and the Head Start State Collaboration Office.
The MOUs will help improve the administration and coordination of programs and services serving children from birth through school age, particularly in the following areas: Data sharing; Training and professional development; Referrals, especially through Kinderwait; Child screening; Program evaluation; and Communication and governance.
10
Participating State AgenciesAdditional proposals: Support the continued development of the state Readiness Centers In partnership with ESE, establish the Massachusetts Kindergarten Entry
Assessment system In Partnership with ESE, expand the work of wraparound zones to include
programs for children from birth through age five Support staff at DPH and DCF to embed early childhood development
knowledge within approaches to children’s mental and behavioral health Continue shared oversight and management of Maternal, Infant, Child
Home Visiting (MIECHV) program Augment DPH’s MA Children at Play program Augment DCF’s Family Resource Centers Support DHCD’s Home Base approach to homeless service provision; In partnership with CTF, continue CSEFEL and Healthy Families training
modules Provide one staff member to ORI to raise awareness of immigrant and
refugee needs within the early childhood field In partnership with DMH, support the MA Child Psychiatry Access Project
and the Children’s Behavioral Health Initiative
1111
What is Massachusetts Story?
How do we achieve our strategic goals? What outcomes do we want for children?
Standards How do we support them their achievement?
Governance and infrastructure Where should we target resources?
Program quality enhancements Teacher quality enhancements Family/community engagement
How do we track our investments and measure growth? Comprehensive assessment and Data systems
How do we know we have achieved our goals? Measured growth in children
12
Massachusetts High-Quality Plans
1. Design and implement a comprehensive assessment system.
2. Engage and strengthen communities and families by formalizing community family engagement grants.
3. Support workforce development and increased compensation.
4. Improve program quality (primarily through the QRIS as a definition of quality).
5. Link schools and communities to promote healthy child development through prek to 3rd grade alignment.
6. Build data systems to support infrastructure.
13
Design and Implement a Comprehensive Assessment System
Screening – ASQ/ASQ SE Early Warning Indicators – needs and
risk assessment Massachusetts Kindergarten Entry
Assessment (MKEA) PK-3 formative assessment system
alignment with Common core and PARCC Support and training and data anylsis
14
Highlight – Massachusetts Kindergarten Entry Assessment (MKEA)
Identify formative assessment tools Measure children’s progress through growth Individualize teaching and learning Guide classroom practice and improve Professional
Development Measure children’s school readiness via a common
metric Communicate with parents (via assessment results
and potentially with report cards) MKEA methodology
Align formative assessments with standards Norm-referenced validation of formative assessment Item analysis to produce common metric
15
MKEA: Cohort I The following districts have agreed to participate in the
initial year of the MKEA: Chelsea Holyoke Lawrence Lowell Ludlow Lynn Medford New Bedford Northampton South Hadley Taunton
EEC is continuing its outreach and anticipates 12-15 districts participating in the 1st year.
16
Engage and Strengthen Communities and Families
Coordinated Family and Community Engagement Grants (CFCE)ASQ/ASQ SE screeningEvidence-based literacy modelsStrengthening Families/Brazelton
Touchpoints Frameworks Partnerships with museums and libraries
Countdown to Kindergarten expansion Public awareness campaign – Brain Building in
Progress Financial literacy education for families
17
Support Workforce Development and Increased Compensation
Practice-based supports Educator and Provider Support grants
Provider planning Formalize Coaching and Mentoring Competency measurement for literacy,
numeracy and social emotional development EPS system acceleration strategy Evaluation: Educator training and practice to
determine efficacy Readiness Centers: ECE and K-12 alignment for
assessment and data analysis
18
Support Workforce Development and Increased Compensation
Career advancement Paraprofessional support with a focus on educators
whose home language is not English Tapping Academic Potential as a bridge for educators
whose home language is not English Wheelock College post-MA program to develop
practice based research
Compensation “Support for early educators doing more!” Stipends
Assessment training Coaching and mentoring
19
Improve Program Quality
QRIS grants Online unit-based courses Online application system QRIS validation study
20
Link Schools and Communities to Promote Healthy Child Development
MOUs with local school districts/communities Three point PK-3 alignment plan
Engage leadershipDevelop universal screening processBuild PK-3 formative assessment system
Wrap-around zones Summer learning supports
21
Build Data Systems to Support Infrastructure
Build system MOUs with participating agencies Informed consent Data entry
Dashboard/early indicator system EEC Unified Data System including Early
Childhood Information System (ECIS) Student Longitudinal Data System (SLDS)
SASIDs
22
Due Date and Grant Period
The application due date has been given for October 19th, 2011.
The grant period would run from December 2011- December 2015.
23