COLUMBIALAWREVIEW

uurH86 COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW~ 2014 VOLUME 114 ISSUE 2N-o SISAC -o-o

1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111

o-_0- co-~ ~=----..;0- ..,--0 -o_0 0010-1958(2014)114:2;1-6 0

OU) ..,-------:: Ol- IFBR, BIB.P.017797, RBIB, 4400090139-10---::--:-w~~..,-3:

cxn

ARTICLES

CONSTITUTIO AL NONDEFENSE IN THE STATES Katherine Shaw

ELECTIONS AND ALIGNMENT Nicholas O. Stephanopoulos

NOTES

ERlE AND THE FIRST AMENOMENT: STATEANTI·SLAPP LAWSIN FEDERAL COURTAFTER SHADY GROVE Colin Quinlan

UNKNOWN ELEMENTS: THE MENS REA QUESTIONIN 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c) (1) (B) (ii) 's MACHINEGUN PROVISION Stephanie Siyi Wu

ESSAY

CAN WE Do BETTER BY ORDINARY INVESTORS?A PRAGMATIC REACTION TO THEDUELING IDEOLOGICAL MYTHOLOGISTSOF CORPORATE UW Leo E. Strine, fr.

VOL. 114 MARCH 2014 NO. 2

COLUMBIA LAW REVIEWVOL. 114 MARCH 2014 NO. 2

CONTENTS

ARTICLES

CONSTITUTIONAL NONDEFENSE IN THE STATES Katherine Shaw 213

ELECTIO S AND ALIGNMENT Nicholas O. Stephanopoulos 283

NOTES

ERiEAND THE FIRST AMENDMENT: STATE ANTI-SLAPP LAws IN FEDERAL COURT AFrER SHADY

GROVE Colin Quinlan 367

UNKNOWN ELEME TS: THE MENS REA QUESTIONIN 18 U.S.c. § 924(c) (1) (B) (ii)'S MACHINEGUN PROVISION Stephanie Siyi Wu 407

ESSAY

CAN WE Do BEITER BY ÜRDINARY INVESTORS?A PRAGMATIC REACTION TO THEDUELING IDEOLOGICAL MYTHOLOGISTSOF CORPORATE LAw Leo E. Strine, Jr. 449