- 1 -
Annex A:
Objections following advertising
for Phase 7 Epsom and Ewell parking review
Road name /
Drawing
number
Statement of reasons: Objections: Recommendation:
Andrew’s Close
-Drawing 52
To extend the double yellow lines to increase
forward visibility for safer access and egress
from junction.
1 Resident objecting to entire
proposal
2 Residents objecting and requesting
residents permits
On line survey results:
1 objection – resident parking already
at a premium.
Proceed as advertised
Badgers Copse
– Drawing 01
Double yellow lines at access to Badgers Copse
and into Kingsley Drive - Single yellow line on
the western side to allow greater access for
refuse vehicles etc. Into Badgers Copse
No objections Proceed as advertised
Beaconsfield
Road –
Drawings 63 &
64
Extend existing double yellow lines outside
no.18 Grosvenor Road, into Beaconsfield Road
to prevent obstruction of access.
Single yellow lines opposite The Vale Primary
School to create a safer area for pupils, whilst
crossing the carriageway.
2 not to implement any proposals.
1 resident believes that parking
should be left as is and speed limit
reduced.
2 residents recommend that the
hours change from the current
proposal to either 8-9am & 3-4pm
or 8.30-9am & 2.30-3pm.
Amend the proposals to operate
between 8-9am and 3-4pm
Belfield Road – Single yellow lines to prevent obstructive 1 Resident objecting to the To be advised
ITE
M 9
Page 19
- 2 -
Drawings 27 &
29
parking along the entire length – to be
staggered to create a natural ‘chicane’ effect.
proposals for fear of obstruction
after the restricted period ends and
that the lines do not reflect the
current parking restrictions,
potentially meaning less parking for
residents.
On line survey results:
4 objections
2 want further restrictions
Birches Close
j/w Downs
Road –
Drawing 56
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
junction.
On line survey results:
1 objection
1 support
Proceed as advertised
Bishopsmead
Close / Sefton
Road –
Drawing 36
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
junction and to prevent all day parking by
students.
No objections Proceed as advertised
Bradford Drive
/ Kingston
Road –
Drawing 20
To implement an additional mandatory
disabled bay within the existing parking area
close to no.191 Kingston Road.
1 comment – resident of Firswood
Avenue referring to restrictions
required on that road.
Proceed as advertised
Bridle Close
j/w Huntsmoor
Road –
Drawing 17
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
junction.
On line survey results:
10 objections
Do not proceed
Bucknell’s
Close –
Drawing 60
Double yellow lines along entire length on both
sides, up to turning head to allow for
emergency access at all times.
1 Comment asking for permit
parking on Ebbisham Road, but not
commenting on Bucknell’s Close
Proceed as advertised
ITE
M 9
Page 20
- 3 -
proposals. On line survey results:
1 in support
Burnet Grove –
Drawing 45
To install an additional mandatory disabled
bay.
No objections Proceed as advertised
Carnforth
Close j/w
Chessington
Road –
Drawing 23
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
junction.
Carnforth Close – 1 resident
requesting that the DYL on the
eastern side be reduced by two car
lengths, but in agreement with the
rest of the proposals.
1 objection from local business at
corner of Ruxley Lane /
Chessington Road saying that this
will greatly reduce customer parking
– healthcare provider.
Proceed as advertised
Ewell Bypass –
Drawing 32
To make the current disabled bays mandatory
as non-disabled drivers frequently use these
bays.
No objections Proceed as advertised
Castle Road /
Ebbisham
Road –
Drawing 60
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
junction and along the entire length on the
common side.
Single yellow line on the eastern side to allow
greater ease of access along Castle Road.
On line survey results:
2 objections
Proceed with double yellow line
proposals only
Chadacre Road
/ Waverley
Road / The
Glade –
Drawings 13,
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
junction with Sparrow Farm Road.
Single yellow lines to prevent obstruction and
narrowing of effective carriageway width along
Chadacre Road, between nos.19 to
39 – 1 resident would like
restrictions reduced to 8.30-9.30am
and 3-4pm and on both sides.
1 further resident agrees with the
See Dwg 13 – Waverley Road /
Chadacre Road
ITE
M 9
Page 21
- 4 -
21 & 68 Chadacre Road and also into the junction with
The Glade.
Double yellow lines around central islands to
prevent obstruction at these narrower points.
previous suggestion and believes
that the proposed restrictions should
be more tailored to the school drop
off and pick up times.
Waverley Road – 1 resident feels
that double yellow lines are too
restrictive around the ‘roundabout’
areas, they understand the need for
restrictions near the school.
1 in agreement with the double
yellow lines at the ‘roundabouts’ but
none of the additional proposals.
1 resident says that yellow lines
should be on both sides near The
Glade, but does not understand the
rationale for the staggered proposals
along Waverley Road.
On line survey results:
18 objections
7 other comments
13 in support
Cheam Road –
Drawing 70
To make the current loading bay legally
enforceable
No objections Proceed as advertised
Chessington
Road /
Nightingale
Drive –
Drawings 23 &
24
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
junction with Nightingale Drive.
Nightingale Drive – 1
correspondence from Ivan Thomas
Coaches asking us to confirm the
restrictions, but no objections made.
On line survey results:
11 in support
Proceed as advertised
ITE
M 9
Page 22
- 5 -
3 other
1 objection
Chessington
Road j/w
Chesterfield
Road –
Drawing 26
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
junction.
1 resident in complete agreement
with proposals.
Proceed as advertised
Chessington
Road j/w
Heatherside
Road –
Drawing 26
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
junction.
No objections Proceed as advertised
Chessington
Road j/w
Lansdowne
Road –
Drawing 26
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
junction.
No objections Proceed as advertised
Church Road –
Drawing 51
To make the current advisory disabled bay into
a mandatory one. Outside no.38 Church Road.
To create a limited parking bay outside of the
local shop to allow customers to park.
Parking for ministore – petition
presented to committee with 138
signatures in support of a limited
waiting parking bay outside of the
ministore plus four letters in
support.
2 residents who are not objecting,
but requesting residents permit
parking in the area.
Proceed as advertised
Church Road
j/w Wimborne
Close –
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
junction and to prevent obstructive parking
Welcome the proposals, but would
like the DYLs to be extended up to
six spaces between flats 3/4 and 5/6
Proceed as advertised ITE
M 9
Page 23
- 6 -
Drawing 52 near access. On line survey results:
1 other – commenting on other
restrictions in the area make it
difficult to park
Church Street
(parking area
in front of St
Martin’s
Church) –
Drawing 52
To create a time limited parking area so that the
church and all of its facilities can be used as
intended and to prevent all day commuter
parking.
1 objection from the Deputy Church
Warden, to say that the requirement
was to operate from Monday to
Friday and not to include Saturdays.
On line survey results:
3 objections – believe that this will
restrict residents and proposals
should be reduced.
1 in support
Proceed with minor amendment, not
to include Saturdays.
Cox Lane j/w
Rowden Road –
Drawing 08
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
junction, and to prevent obstruction of access to
community centre.
No objections Proceed as advertised
Dalmeny Way
– Drawing 65
Single yellow lines to prevent obstructive
parking on bends and double yellow lines
across emergency access to prevent obstructive
parking.
1 in agreement to the current
proposals, but would like DYLs in
the ‘gap’ adjacent to Carrington
House.
On line survey results:
8 objections
3 in support
1 other
Comments include request for
resident permit zone
Proceed with double yellow line
restrictions only – investigate
extending RPZ into Dalmeny Way.
Delta Road j/w
The Avenue –
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
1 agrees with the proposals, but
believes they should be extended to
Proceed as advertised
ITE
M 9
Page 24
- 7 -
Drawing 04 junction. prevent lorries from parking near
the junction, which force vehicles
onto the wrong side of the road.
On line survey results:
2 objections
1 in support
1 other – wants extra restrictions
Dene Close j/w
The Avenue –
Drawing 02
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
junction.
No objections Proceed as advertised
Downs Hill
Road –
Drawing 55
To extend the current double yellow lines to
prevent obstruction to access for no.9 Downs
Hill Road.
On line survey results:
2 objections
2 in support – 1 wants an extension
Proceed as advertised
East Street –
Drawing 49
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
junctions with Chuters Grove and Windmill
Lane into East Street and to prevent obstructive
pavement parking.
On line survey results:
1 in support – enforcement needed
1 objection – shops will lose trade
Remove a section of the proposed
double yellow lines from in front of
the shops, but retain the rest of the
proposals.
Eastway –
Drawing 42
To extend the existing double yellow line to
make negotiation of the bend easier for larger
vehicles.
Petition with 17 signatures against
extending the existing double
yellow lines.
1 Resident against the DYL
extension.
2 residents against the proposals, but
would like residents permits.
Do not proceed
Edenfield
Gardens –
Drawing 03
To amend the existing single yellow lines to
double yellow lines to prevent all day parking
on the bend and therefore increasing forward
visibility throughout the day.
No objections Proceed as advertised
ITE
M 9
Page 25
- 8 -
Elm Road –
Drawing 22
Double yellow lines to prevent the obstruction
of turning place, so that vehicles can
manoeuvre more easily.
1 request from resident to reduce the
restrictions to still allow them to
park outside their house, but to
retain the proposals at the section of
road parallel to the railway line to
prevent obstructive parking there.
Petition from 43 residents objecting
to the proposals.
On line survey results:
10 objections
Do not proceed
Fir Tree Close
– Drawing 11
Double yellow lines to prevent the obstruction
of turning place, so that refuse and delivery
vehicles etc. can manoeuvre more easily.
1 objection to the proposals,
suggesting permits or to reduce
restrictions to allow residents to park
off-peak, or privatise the road.
Proceed with reduced times.
Monday to Friday 9am-5pm
Gibraltar
Crescent –
Drawing 34
To make the current advisory disabled bay into
a mandatory one.
No objections
On line survey results:
1 other – additional restrictions
along Longmead Road near Sefton
Road
Proceed as advertised
Grafton Road
j/w Mortimer
Crescent (both
junctions) –
Drawings 05 &
06
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
junctions.
On line survey results:
2 in support – 1 would like further
restrictions
Proceed as advertised
Green Lanes –
Drawings 28 &
30
Even side – west side of carriageway. Double
yellow lines from Chessington Road up first
layby. Single yellow lines northwards to next
layby, and then continuing after that layby to
1 resident in support, but would like
further restrictions on other parts of
Green lanes.
1 resident, not so much objecting to
Proceed as advertised.
Look to install access protection
markings at appropriate driveways.
ITE
M 9
Page 26
- 9 -
the junction with Eastcroft Road. To prevent all
day commuter parking and allow residents to
access and egress driveways safely.
the proposals, but asking why the
odd side of Green Lanes hasn’t been
considered.
1 in agreement with the proposals.
On line survey results:
8 objections
12 in support
4 other
Grove Road –
Drawing 52
To implement single yellow lines on the
northern side and to implement double yellow
lines on the alternate side. The current
fluctuating restrictions cause a lot of problems
for residents and confusion for those who try to
park in this location.
Petition signed by 20 residents
objecting to the proposals in their
entirety, but would like to be
considered for a resident permit
zone at a later date.
1 resident who would like further
restrictions adjacent to their garages,
following restrictions that were
previously installed, causing
obstructions. Haven’t commented
on the proposals.
2 residents against the proposals and
would like us to investigate
residents parking.
1 Resident would prefer us to allow
all day parking on one side
(preferably the north side) and to
allow parking on bank holidays –
they do not want a residents permit
scheme. Also objects to any
proposals in Church Road.
On line survey results:
Do not proceed – to investigate the
possibility of introducing a residents
permit zone if the area meets the
criteria.
ITE
M 9
Page 27
- 10 -
1 other – would like resident scheme
15 objections – split between no
change and RPZ
Harvester
Road / Nimbus
Road –
Drawing 37
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
junction and into the new Parkview estate.
On line survey results:
1 objection – would still like to park
adjacent to nos.23-30
Proceed, with minor amendment to
remove DYL from in front of 23-30,
but retaining DYL proposal at
junctions.
Heathcote
Road / The
Parade /
Laburnum
Road –
Drawing 53
To install some limited waiting bays so that
The Rising Sun public house can allow some
customers to park, especially as they feel that
the current restrictions will greatly reduce
lunchtime trade. Existing restriction is a single
yellow line and the bay would only cover the
frontage of the public house.
Include the existing double yellow lines on The
Parade in front of the nursery in the TRO
Introduce double yellow lines on the western
side of Laburnum Road to prevent obstructive
parking.
On line survey results:
1 in support
1 objection – need to increase time
of restriction
2 other – 1 in support, but not
understanding recent comments
made in the press!! The other in
support of Laburnum Road double
yellow lines but not to allow parking
in fornt of pub.
Proceed as advertised
Hollymoor
Lane j/w
Westmorland
Close and
Longmead
Road –
Drawing 35
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
junction.
On line survey results:
2 objections – DYLs at entrance
only including 1 remark about
repainting the bays (we are unable
to do this as it is on private land)
Proceed as advertised
Horsley Close /
Hazon way /
Maidenshaw
Extend existing double yellow lines and create
a no loading area – this will prevent pick up
and drop off to the station development and
Waterloo Road – 1 business in
agreement with the proposals.
Proceed as advertised
ITE
M 9
Page 28
- 11 -
Road / Gosfield
Road /
Waterloo
Road–
Drawings 44,
45 & 46
therefore prevent obstructive parking and to
allow greater access for larger vehicles into the
area.
To amend the current Monday to Saturday
single yellow line restriction, to include
Sundays.
Waterloo Road – to amend the restrictions on
the parking bays to better represent the
shopkeepers requirements and to restrict
loading to prevent obstructive parking at peak
times.
Hazon Way – Objections to the
scheme, believe it will further
restrict visitors for residents and that
the area should be looked at as part
of a CPZ like Hookfield.
On line survey results:
4 objections – do agree to DYLs and
loading blips but not Sunday
restrictions
1 other – would like RPZ
1 in agreement with Waterloo Road
proposals
Inveresk
Gardens /
Ardrossan
Gardens /
Alsom Avenue /
Vale Road /
Stoneleigh
Park Road /
The Byway–
Drawings 09,
10 & 12
Series of double yellow and single yellow lines
to prevent obstructive parking at junctions or
where the road is too narrow to allow parking
on both sides.
Time limited bays to serve the shops at the
Vale Road roundabout.
The Byways – 1 resident has sent in
a detailed proposal asking for
double yellow lines (junction
protection) at each end of the
Byway, with a single yellow line
operating from 6.30-9am on both
sides – we are currently unable to
put forward these proposals as they
are more restrictive than the current
proposals.
1 resident asking for double yellow
lines (junction protection) at each
end, or a ban on large vehicles.
Inveresk Gardens – to reduce the
extents of the single yellow line
proposals on the south side back to
the boundary of nos. 33 & 35 and
also remove the Saturday restriction
Proceed with DYL proposals and
limited waiting bays only.
ITE
M 9
Page 29
- 12 -
and allow parking on bank holidays.
1 Resident in agreement with all of
the proposals on Alsom Ave /
Ardrossan Gds / Stoneleigh Park
Rd.
2 Residents opposed to all
restrictions on Ardrossan Gardens.
Stoneleigh Park Road – 1 resident
objects to the proposals
On line survey results:
49 objections
8 other
4 in support
Kendor Avenue
j/w Manor
Green Road –
Drawing 43
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
junction.
No objections Proceed as advertised
Kingston Road
j/w Mill View
Close and Mill
Lane –
Drawing 31
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
junctions. Double yellow lines through existing
bus stop. This will also serve as much needed
passing places on this very narrow bus route.
Kingston Road – 1 correpondence
from The Wheatsheaf public house,
believing that the proposals will be
detrimental to their business and
that the current residents permit
scheme should only have been a
limited time restriction between 8-
10am.
Proceed as advertised
Kirby Close –
Drawing 20
Double yellow lines to prevent the obstruction
of turning place, so that refuse and delivery
vehicles etc. can manoeuvre more easily.
No objections Proceed as advertised
Lakehurst Double yellow lines to increase forward 1 Objection to the entire proposal – Proceed as advertised
ITE
M 9
Page 30
- 13 -
Road j/w
Oakland Way –
Drawing 15
visibility for safer access and egress from
junction.
believes that car park issue should
be sorted out first.
Longdown
Lane North j/w
Link’s Road –
Drawing 54
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
junction.
No objections Proceed as advertised
Longmead
Road j/w
Almond Road /
Felstead Road
- Drawing 39
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
junction. Also to extend up to Felstead Road on
both sides to allow greater forward visibility
from Appleby House and to prevent bus stops
from being obstructed.
2 objections as this will reduce
parking for residents without off-
street parking and will push parking
issues further up Tonstall Road.
Proceed as advertised
Manor Green
Road j/w West
Hill Avenue –
Drawing 48
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
junction.
2 residents in agreement, but would
like DYLs extended on the south
side from Kingswood House School
to Manor Green Road. One of the
residents feels that a Monday to
Saturday restriction would be more
appropriate.
Proceed as advertised
Mavis Close –
Drawing 14
Double yellow lines to prevent the obstruction
of turning places, so that refuse and delivery
vehicles etc. can manoeuvre more easily.
On line survey results:
3 objections – due to lack of current
parking
Proceed as advertised
Marshalls
Close –
Drawing 45
Remove existing disabled bay as no longer
required by residents.
Reduce length of yellow line across garage
frontage to allow residents to park here.
7 residents in agreement with the
removal of the disabled bay.
2 in favour of reducing yellow line.
Proceed as advertised
Meadway –
Drawing 47
Extend the existing single yellow line up to and
including the gulley, so that the arch can be
No objections Proceed as advertised
ITE
M 9
Page 31
- 14 -
maintained and drainage kept clear.
Mill Road –
Drawing 50
Single yellow lines to prevent current
obstructive parking during daytime. On line survey results:
1 in support
1 other – believes that this proposal
does not address current issues.
We have also received 3 subsequent
letters in favour of the proposals
Proceed with a single yellow line
proposal – restriction to be
confirmed.
Northey
Avenue /
Nonsuch Walk
– Drawing 41
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
junction and accesses to church car park.
No objections Proceed as advertised
Pams Way /
Elm Way –
Drawing 16
To extend the current double yellow lines to
increase forward visibility for safer access and
egress from junction.
On line survey results:
1 in support
Proceed as advertised
Pikes Hill /
Upper High
Street –
Drawing 51
Double yellow lines to prevent obstruction to
through traffic and vehicles trying to access /
egress driveways. Also to include the junction
with Upper High Street to create greater
forward visibility when leaving Pikes Hill.
1 in complete favour of Pikes Hill
proposals
On line survey results:
2 objections as this will not allow
parking in front of pub.
Reduce restriction outside of pub, to
allow landlord to park – access is
required to properties opposite and
building have been struck numerous
times by delivery lorries due to lack
of space to get through.
Plough Road –
Drawing 29
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
Southville Close junction.
No objections Proceed as advertised
Riverholme
Drive –
Drawing 29
To extend the double yellow lines to the shared
access adjacent to no.1Riverholme Drive to
allow increased forward visibility when using
the shared drive to and from the garages that
serve the properties on the western side.
1 objection asking to reduce the
restriction so that there is only 10m
of restriction when exiting the
access to garages. Also to put in
measures to remove verge parking.
Proceed as advertised
Riverview To extend the current double yellow lines to On line survey results: Proceed as advertised with
ITE
M 9
Page 32
- 15 -
Road –
Drawing 17
increase forward visibility for safer access and
egress from junction.
2 support
4 objections
1 other – does agree to Ruxley Lane
proposals
Riverview Road, but not Bridle
Close proposals.
Rosedale Road
– Drawing 12
Extend existing single yellow line to the county
boundary to allow buses greater ease of access
at the junction with Richlands Avenue. To
increase the current restrictions to Saturday so
that buses can manoeuvre properly on every
day that they operate.
On line survey results:
1 in support – believes that this is a
dangerous corner.
2 objections – apparently not a bus
route so don’t see point of proposals
– one of the objectees thinks that the
proposals include Saturdays.
Proceed.
We agree that this is not a bus route
as originally stated, however by not
implementing the continuation of
the existing restriction up to the
county boundary, verge parking
would be permissible and would
restrict emergency vehicles and
cause obstructions at the junction
which would be detrimental to
traffic flow.
Ruxley Lane /
Cox Lane /
Gatley Avenue
– Drawing 19
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
junctions and also along Ruxley Lane to
prevent the dangerous drop off and pick up of
students.
No objections Proceed as advertised
Salisbury Road
j/w The Avenue
– Drawing 02
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
junction.
1 in favour of the proposals, but
would like DYLs extended.
Proceed as advertised
Spa Drive j/w
The Greenway
and Wells Road
– Drawing 61
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
junction.
On line survey results:
16 objections
3 others – one side only
1 in support so long as it doesn’t
affect the corner shop.
Do not proceed
St Martin’s To make the current advisory disabled bay into No objections Proceed as advertised
ITE
M 9
Page 33
- 16 -
Avenue –
Drawing 55
a mandatory one. (3 bays in total).
Station Avenue
– Drawing 30
Double yellow lines up to no.1 and no.18
Station Avenue to prevent all day commuter
parking and allow residents to access and
egress driveways safely.
1 resident in complete agreement
with proposals.
Proceed as advertised
Tealing Drive
j/w Kingston
Road (service
road) –
Drawing 07
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer travel around this bend.
No objections Proceed as advertised
Temple Road –
Drawing 44
To implement single yellow lines at the
‘chicane’ outside of the church. This is
currently being obstructed and preventing two
way traffic at this point.
No objections
On line survey results:
1 in support but believes should be
extended to Sunday.
Proceed as advertised – although
should be extended to Sunday as
this is when the main problems
arise.
The Byway -
Drawing 11
Single yellow line to restrict parking to one
side to allow for emergency and refuse vehicle
access.
See details for Inveresk Gardens /
Ardrossan Gardens / Alsom Avenue
/ Vale Road / Stoneleigh Park Road
/ The Byway– Drawings 09, 10 &
12
See details for Inveresk Gardens /
Ardrossan Gardens / Alsom Avenue
/ Vale Road / Stoneleigh Park Road
/ The Byway– Drawings 09, 10 &
12.
Proceed with DYL proposals and
limited waiting bays.
Thorndon
Gardens –
Drawing 66
To extend the existing restriction to allow
vehicles to enter and exit driveways more
easily near junction.
1 resident not objecting to the
proposals, but believes they should
be DYLs.
1 Resident believes that yellow lines
will increase speeds and that traffic
calming measures should be put in
place instead.
Proceed as advertised.
ITE
M 9
Page 34
- 17 -
On line survey results:
5 other – have further issues not
relating to proposals / RPZs / Speed
calming and allow verge parking
1 objection
Tonstall Road –
Drawing 38
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from the
flats at no.64 Tonstall Road.
No objections Proceed as advertised
Upper Court
Road j/w
Holland Close /
Kendor Avenue
/ Manor Green
Road –
Drawing 42
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
junction, and also the access to the houses that
comprise no.47 Upper Court Road.
On line survey results:
10 objections
1 in support
Generally agree with Manor Green
Road proposals but not others as
residents believe there isn’t any
problems and parking would
become a greater issue.
Proceed with Manor Green Road
proposals only.
Vale Road j/w
Westways –
Drawing 09
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
junction.
On line survey results:
1 objection
Proceed as advertised
Vernon Close –
Drawing 25
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer travel through blind bend.
1 objection to the entire proposal.
3 residents from same address in
support of the proposals.
1 objection suggesting that the
extents should be reduced so that
they do not run in front of nos.3 to 9
Vernon Close.
On line survey results:
5 object
2 in support
Reduce restriction so that it does not
run in front of nos. 3 to 9 Vernon
Close, but proceed with rest of
proposals as advertised.
ITE
M 9
Page 35
- 18 -
Waverley Road
/ Chadacre
Road –
drawing 13
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
junctions and single yellow lines to prevent
obstructive parking and road narrowing.
2 objection to the entire proposal –
has suggested address specific
temporary parking badges for home-
owners / residents parking and free
traders permits.
1 objection to the entire proposal
On line survey results:
6 objections
3 other
5 in support
Proceed with amendments:
Waverley and Chadacre Road:
Reduce the morning restriction so
that it operates between 8.30 & 9.30
am.
Retain the current afternoon
restriction between 2.30 & 4.30 pm.
On Chadacre Road reduce the
proposed restriction between The
Glade and no.39 Chadacre Road to
8.30-9.30am and 2.30-4.30pm. This
will still allow the majority of
people who use clubs that operate
out of the church to park nearby.
Double yellow line proposals at
junctions and roundabouts should be
implemented as parking in these
area currently obstructs larger
vehicles from progressing along the
roads – vehicles either have to drive
on the wrong side of the
carriageway or over the roundabouts
to get through.
The single yellow lines will help to
enforce the current parking trends /
patterns and will only prevent
obstructive parking during school
drop off and pick up times.
Displaced traffic would park
elsewhere along the roads to the
ITE
M 9
Page 36
- 19 -
detriment of residents if we didn’t
implement restrictions along the
entire length. The kind of
obstructive parking witnessed /
experienced at school drop off times
greatly reduces the width of the
carriageway and would prevent
emergency vehicles from getting
through.
Refuse vehicles have had to amend
collection times due to this
obstructive parking.
West Gardens /
The Kingsway
– Drawing 40
Single yellow lines to prevent obstructive
parking during the daytime in West Gardens
and The Kingsway.
Double yellow lines opposite The Rise to
prevent obstructive parking on the bend.
The Rise – 1 resident agrees with
the proposals, but would like single
yellow lines opposite their
driveway.
On line survey results:
1 objection
3 other
1 support
Generally think restrictions should
be extended, should include Nursery
Close problem may be moved
further up road
Proceed as advertised
West Street j/w
Mount Pleasant
– Drawing 33
Double yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
junction.
On line survey results:
1 objection – does not believe DYLs
need to go so far up Mount Pleasant
2 other – DYLs should go further
Proceed as advertised
ITE
M 9
Page 37
- 20 -
2 in support, but needs enforcement
Whitmore’s
Close –
Drawing 59
Double yellow lines around central grass area
to prevent damage to the grass / verge area. On line survey results:
2 objections – some properties are
landlocked and one resident has had
a dropped kerb refused, so there is
little room to park
Do not proceed – see if highways
can place bollards on the edge of the
green area.
Windmill Lane
– Drawing 49
Extend the existing double yellow lines to
prevent obstruction of access to no.2 Windmill
Lane.
No objections Proceed as advertised
Woodcote Park
Road j/w
Hylands Road
and Hylands
Close –
Drawing 58
Single yellow lines to increase forward
visibility for safer access and egress from
junction and to prevent obstructive all day
parking.
2 objections to the entire proposal.
1 objection to all new restrictions in
Epsom and Ewell, but mainly these
proposals – believes it should be
rethought and SCC should increase
awareness of the Highway Code.
On line survey results:
3 Objections
3 in support
4 other
Proceed as advertised
Woodcote Side
– Drawings 59
& 62
To extend the existing single yellow line
between nos. 45 and the bus stop, to prevent
obstructive parking and allowing buses to
negotiate the corner more easily.
Revoke a section of the existing single yellow
line between Oakmead Green and Yew Tree
Close, because of the knock on effect that has
moved parking in to Yew Tree Gardens.
On line survey results:
2 objections from hospital workers
who find it difficult to park here.
3 objections to removing the
existing single yellow line
1 in support of yellow line extension
2 in support of revocation
Proceed as advertised, but do not
remove existing yellow line.
Worple Road –
Drawing 57
Double yellow lines along entire east side of
Worple Road, adjacent to the wall, to prevent
1 resident of Squirrels Way in
complete agreement, but believes
Proceed as advertised
ITE
M 9
Page 38
- 21 -
damage to the wall and obstructive parking.
Double yellow lines on the western side
between the proposed new dropped karb and
Chalk Lane to allow pedestrians to walk in the
road safely, as there is no footpath.
Single yellow line between Squirrels Way and
proposed new dropped kerb to assist parents
with pick up and drop off to the nearby school.
more enforcement is required at the
access to Squirrels Way.
On line survey results:
11 objection
5 other
74 support
Objections are from hospital
workers and parents, although the
proposals still allow drop off on the
one side as this easement was made
as part of the last review.
Verge Parking
– Court Farm
Avenue / River
Way / Fairfield
Close /
Fairfield Way /
Lakehurst
Road /
Elmstead Close
/ Ewell Court
Avenue /
Oakland Way /
Willow Way /
Pams Way –
Drawing 69
The verge parking ban will improve the local
environment and amenity and reduce the
damage caused by cars parking on the verge
and reduce costs of repair.
Notices sent to all residents within
the affected roads.
In total we have had 24 responses,
17 of which are objections to the
proposals and 7 for the proposals.
On line survey results:
1 objection
2 support
Based on the number of households
letter dropped and the amount of
responses, we can assume that those
who haven’t responded are happy
with the proposals.
Proceed as advertised.
Permit parking
, permit
allocations –
Ladbroke Road:
1 written objection which is
duplicated in the On line survey
Ladbroke Road:
Proceed as advertised.
We do not feel that the inclusion of
ITE
M 9
Page 39
- 22 -
Ladbroke Road
, Chalk Lane,
Town Centre
(Heathcote Rd /
Hereford Road
/ Laburnum
Close / The
Parade)
On line survey results:
+8 objections – mainly a fear of
allowing too many vehicles to park
in the road that are not residents of
Ladbroke Road and that this may
lead to overcrowding and
obstructive parking.
Chalk Lane – no objections
Town Centre:
On line survey results:
2 objections – 1 objection about not
being included in the scheme and
the other relating to the rules and
regulations of the type of scheme
implemented.
three more permits into a zone
which is not at full capacity will
make any significant difference to
the current parking regulations.
Chalk Lane:
Proceed as advertised
Town Centre:
Proceed as advertised
ITE
M 9
Page 40