annex a - surrey 09 annex… · - 2 - drawings 27 & 29 parking along the entire length – to...

- 1 -

Annex A:

Objections following advertising

for Phase 7 Epsom and Ewell parking review

Road name /

Drawing

number

Statement of reasons: Objections: Recommendation:

Andrew’s Close

-Drawing 52

To extend the double yellow lines to increase

forward visibility for safer access and egress

from junction.

1 Resident objecting to entire

proposal

2 Residents objecting and requesting

residents permits

On line survey results:

1 objection – resident parking already

at a premium.

Proceed as advertised

Badgers Copse

– Drawing 01

Double yellow lines at access to Badgers Copse

and into Kingsley Drive - Single yellow line on

the western side to allow greater access for

refuse vehicles etc. Into Badgers Copse

No objections Proceed as advertised

Beaconsfield

Road –

Drawings 63 &

64

Extend existing double yellow lines outside

no.18 Grosvenor Road, into Beaconsfield Road

to prevent obstruction of access.

Single yellow lines opposite The Vale Primary

School to create a safer area for pupils, whilst

crossing the carriageway.

2 not to implement any proposals.

1 resident believes that parking

should be left as is and speed limit

reduced.

2 residents recommend that the

hours change from the current

proposal to either 8-9am & 3-4pm

or 8.30-9am & 2.30-3pm.

Amend the proposals to operate

between 8-9am and 3-4pm

Belfield Road – Single yellow lines to prevent obstructive 1 Resident objecting to the To be advised

ITE

M 9

9

- 2 -

Drawings 27 &

29

parking along the entire length – to be

staggered to create a natural ‘chicane’ effect.

proposals for fear of obstruction

after the restricted period ends and

that the lines do not reflect the

current parking restrictions,

potentially meaning less parking for

residents.


4 objections

2 want further restrictions

Birches Close

j/w Downs

Road –

Drawing 56

Double yellow lines to increase forward

visibility for safer access and egress from

junction.


1 objection

1 support


Bishopsmead

Close / Sefton

Road –

Drawing 36



junction and to prevent all day parking by

students.


Bradford Drive

/ Kingston

Road –

Drawing 20

To implement an additional mandatory

disabled bay within the existing parking area

close to no.191 Kingston Road.

1 comment – resident of Firswood

Avenue referring to restrictions

required on that road.


Bridle Close

j/w Huntsmoor

Road –

Drawing 17



junction.


10 objections

Do not proceed

Bucknell’s

Close –

Drawing 60

Double yellow lines along entire length on both

sides, up to turning head to allow for

emergency access at all times.

1 Comment asking for permit

parking on Ebbisham Road, but not

commenting on Bucknell’s Close


ITE

M 9

0

- 3 -

proposals. On line survey results:

1 in support

Burnet Grove –

Drawing 45

To install an additional mandatory disabled

bay.


Carnforth

Close j/w

Chessington

Road –

Drawing 23



junction.

Carnforth Close – 1 resident

requesting that the DYL on the

eastern side be reduced by two car

lengths, but in agreement with the

rest of the proposals.

1 objection from local business at

corner of Ruxley Lane /

Chessington Road saying that this

will greatly reduce customer parking

– healthcare provider.


Ewell Bypass –

Drawing 32

To make the current disabled bays mandatory

as non-disabled drivers frequently use these

bays.


Castle Road /

Ebbisham

Road –

Drawing 60



junction and along the entire length on the

common side.

Single yellow line on the eastern side to allow

greater ease of access along Castle Road.


2 objections

Proceed with double yellow line

proposals only

Chadacre Road

/ Waverley

Road / The

Glade –

Drawings 13,



junction with Sparrow Farm Road.

Single yellow lines to prevent obstruction and

narrowing of effective carriageway width along

Chadacre Road, between nos.19 to

39 – 1 resident would like

restrictions reduced to 8.30-9.30am

and 3-4pm and on both sides.

1 further resident agrees with the

See Dwg 13 – Waverley Road /

Chadacre Road

ITE

M 9

Page 21

- 4 -

21 & 68 Chadacre Road and also into the junction with

The Glade.

Double yellow lines around central islands to

prevent obstruction at these narrower points.

previous suggestion and believes

that the proposed restrictions should

be more tailored to the school drop

off and pick up times.

Waverley Road – 1 resident feels

that double yellow lines are too

restrictive around the ‘roundabout’

areas, they understand the need for

restrictions near the school.

1 in agreement with the double

yellow lines at the ‘roundabouts’ but

none of the additional proposals.

1 resident says that yellow lines

should be on both sides near The

Glade, but does not understand the

rationale for the staggered proposals

along Waverley Road.


18 objections

7 other comments

13 in support

Cheam Road –

Drawing 70

To make the current loading bay legally

enforceable


Chessington

Road /

Nightingale

Drive –

Drawings 23 &

24



junction with Nightingale Drive.

Nightingale Drive – 1

correspondence from Ivan Thomas

Coaches asking us to confirm the

restrictions, but no objections made.


11 in support


ITE

M 9

Page 22

- 5 -

3 other

1 objection

Chessington

Road j/w

Chesterfield

Road –

Drawing 26



junction.

1 resident in complete agreement

with proposals.


Chessington

Road j/w

Heatherside

Road –

Drawing 26



junction.


Chessington

Road j/w

Lansdowne

Road –

Drawing 26



junction.


Church Road –

Drawing 51

To make the current advisory disabled bay into

a mandatory one. Outside no.38 Church Road.

To create a limited parking bay outside of the

local shop to allow customers to park.

Parking for ministore – petition

presented to committee with 138

signatures in support of a limited

waiting parking bay outside of the

ministore plus four letters in

support.

2 residents who are not objecting,

but requesting residents permit

parking in the area.


Church Road

j/w Wimborne

Close –



junction and to prevent obstructive parking

Welcome the proposals, but would

like the DYLs to be extended up to

six spaces between flats 3/4 and 5/6

Proceed as advertised ITE

M 9

Page 23

- 6 -

Drawing 52 near access. On line survey results:

1 other – commenting on other

restrictions in the area make it

difficult to park

Church Street

(parking area

in front of St

Martin’s

Church) –

Drawing 52

To create a time limited parking area so that the

church and all of its facilities can be used as

intended and to prevent all day commuter

parking.

1 objection from the Deputy Church

Warden, to say that the requirement

was to operate from Monday to

Friday and not to include Saturdays.


3 objections – believe that this will

restrict residents and proposals

should be reduced.

1 in support

Proceed with minor amendment, not

to include Saturdays.

Cox Lane j/w

Rowden Road –

Drawing 08



junction, and to prevent obstruction of access to

community centre.


Dalmeny Way

– Drawing 65

Single yellow lines to prevent obstructive

parking on bends and double yellow lines

across emergency access to prevent obstructive

parking.

1 in agreement to the current

proposals, but would like DYLs in

the ‘gap’ adjacent to Carrington

House.


8 objections

3 in support

1 other

Comments include request for

resident permit zone

Proceed with double yellow line

restrictions only – investigate

extending RPZ into Dalmeny Way.

Delta Road j/w

The Avenue –



1 agrees with the proposals, but

believes they should be extended to


ITE

M 9

Page 24

- 7 -

Drawing 04 junction. prevent lorries from parking near

the junction, which force vehicles

onto the wrong side of the road.


2 objections

1 in support

1 other – wants extra restrictions

Dene Close j/w

The Avenue –

Drawing 02



junction.


Downs Hill

Road –

Drawing 55

To extend the current double yellow lines to

prevent obstruction to access for no.9 Downs

Hill Road.


2 objections

2 in support – 1 wants an extension


East Street –

Drawing 49



junctions with Chuters Grove and Windmill

Lane into East Street and to prevent obstructive

pavement parking.


1 in support – enforcement needed

1 objection – shops will lose trade

Remove a section of the proposed

double yellow lines from in front of

the shops, but retain the rest of the

proposals.

Eastway –

Drawing 42

To extend the existing double yellow line to

make negotiation of the bend easier for larger

vehicles.

Petition with 17 signatures against

extending the existing double

yellow lines.

1 Resident against the DYL

extension.

2 residents against the proposals, but

would like residents permits.

Do not proceed

Edenfield

Gardens –

Drawing 03

To amend the existing single yellow lines to

double yellow lines to prevent all day parking

on the bend and therefore increasing forward

visibility throughout the day.


ITE

M 9

Page 25

- 8 -

Elm Road –

Drawing 22

Double yellow lines to prevent the obstruction

of turning place, so that vehicles can

manoeuvre more easily.

1 request from resident to reduce the

restrictions to still allow them to

park outside their house, but to

retain the proposals at the section of

road parallel to the railway line to

prevent obstructive parking there.

Petition from 43 residents objecting

to the proposals.


10 objections

Do not proceed

Fir Tree Close

– Drawing 11


of turning place, so that refuse and delivery

vehicles etc. can manoeuvre more easily.

1 objection to the proposals,

suggesting permits or to reduce

restrictions to allow residents to park

off-peak, or privatise the road.

Proceed with reduced times.

Monday to Friday 9am-5pm

Gibraltar

Crescent –

Drawing 34

To make the current advisory disabled bay into

a mandatory one.

No objections


1 other – additional restrictions

along Longmead Road near Sefton

Road


Grafton Road

j/w Mortimer

Crescent (both

junctions) –

Drawings 05 &

06



junctions.


2 in support – 1 would like further

restrictions


Green Lanes –

Drawings 28 &

30

Even side – west side of carriageway. Double

yellow lines from Chessington Road up first

layby. Single yellow lines northwards to next

layby, and then continuing after that layby to

1 resident in support, but would like

further restrictions on other parts of

Green lanes.

1 resident, not so much objecting to

Proceed as advertised.

Look to install access protection

markings at appropriate driveways.

ITE

M 9

Page 26

- 9 -

the junction with Eastcroft Road. To prevent all

day commuter parking and allow residents to

access and egress driveways safely.

the proposals, but asking why the

odd side of Green Lanes hasn’t been

considered.

1 in agreement with the proposals.


8 objections

12 in support

4 other

Grove Road –

Drawing 52

To implement single yellow lines on the

northern side and to implement double yellow

lines on the alternate side. The current

fluctuating restrictions cause a lot of problems

for residents and confusion for those who try to

park in this location.

Petition signed by 20 residents

objecting to the proposals in their

entirety, but would like to be

considered for a resident permit

zone at a later date.

1 resident who would like further

restrictions adjacent to their garages,

following restrictions that were

previously installed, causing

obstructions. Haven’t commented

on the proposals.

2 residents against the proposals and

would like us to investigate

residents parking.

1 Resident would prefer us to allow

all day parking on one side

(preferably the north side) and to

allow parking on bank holidays –

they do not want a residents permit

scheme. Also objects to any

proposals in Church Road.


Do not proceed – to investigate the

possibility of introducing a residents

permit zone if the area meets the

criteria.

ITE

M 9

Page 27

- 10 -

1 other – would like resident scheme

15 objections – split between no

change and RPZ

Harvester

Road / Nimbus

Road –

Drawing 37



junction and into the new Parkview estate.


1 objection – would still like to park

adjacent to nos.23-30

Proceed, with minor amendment to

remove DYL from in front of 23-30,

but retaining DYL proposal at

junctions.

Heathcote

Road / The

Parade /

Laburnum

Road –

Drawing 53

To install some limited waiting bays so that

The Rising Sun public house can allow some

customers to park, especially as they feel that

the current restrictions will greatly reduce

lunchtime trade. Existing restriction is a single

yellow line and the bay would only cover the

frontage of the public house.

Include the existing double yellow lines on The

Parade in front of the nursery in the TRO

Introduce double yellow lines on the western

side of Laburnum Road to prevent obstructive

parking.


1 in support

1 objection – need to increase time

of restriction

2 other – 1 in support, but not

understanding recent comments

made in the press!! The other in

support of Laburnum Road double

yellow lines but not to allow parking

in fornt of pub.


Hollymoor

Lane j/w

Westmorland

Close and

Longmead

Road –

Drawing 35



junction.


2 objections – DYLs at entrance

only including 1 remark about

repainting the bays (we are unable

to do this as it is on private land)


Horsley Close /

Hazon way /

Maidenshaw

Extend existing double yellow lines and create

a no loading area – this will prevent pick up

and drop off to the station development and

Waterloo Road – 1 business in

agreement with the proposals.


ITE

M 9

Page 28

- 11 -

Road / Gosfield

Road /

Waterloo

Road–

Drawings 44,

45 & 46

therefore prevent obstructive parking and to

allow greater access for larger vehicles into the

area.

To amend the current Monday to Saturday

single yellow line restriction, to include

Sundays.

Waterloo Road – to amend the restrictions on

the parking bays to better represent the

shopkeepers requirements and to restrict

loading to prevent obstructive parking at peak

times.

Hazon Way – Objections to the

scheme, believe it will further

restrict visitors for residents and that

the area should be looked at as part

of a CPZ like Hookfield.


4 objections – do agree to DYLs and

loading blips but not Sunday

restrictions

1 other – would like RPZ

1 in agreement with Waterloo Road

proposals

Inveresk

Gardens /

Ardrossan

Gardens /

Alsom Avenue /

Vale Road /

Stoneleigh

Park Road /

The Byway–

Drawings 09,

10 & 12

Series of double yellow and single yellow lines

to prevent obstructive parking at junctions or

where the road is too narrow to allow parking

on both sides.

Time limited bays to serve the shops at the

Vale Road roundabout.

The Byways – 1 resident has sent in

a detailed proposal asking for

double yellow lines (junction

protection) at each end of the

Byway, with a single yellow line

operating from 6.30-9am on both

sides – we are currently unable to

put forward these proposals as they

are more restrictive than the current

proposals.

1 resident asking for double yellow

lines (junction protection) at each

end, or a ban on large vehicles.

Inveresk Gardens – to reduce the

extents of the single yellow line

proposals on the south side back to

the boundary of nos. 33 & 35 and

also remove the Saturday restriction

Proceed with DYL proposals and

limited waiting bays only.

ITE

M 9

Page 29

- 12 -

and allow parking on bank holidays.

1 Resident in agreement with all of

the proposals on Alsom Ave /

Ardrossan Gds / Stoneleigh Park

Rd.

2 Residents opposed to all

restrictions on Ardrossan Gardens.

Stoneleigh Park Road – 1 resident

objects to the proposals


49 objections

8 other

4 in support

Kendor Avenue

j/w Manor

Green Road –

Drawing 43



junction.


Kingston Road

j/w Mill View

Close and Mill

Lane –

Drawing 31



junctions. Double yellow lines through existing

bus stop. This will also serve as much needed

passing places on this very narrow bus route.

Kingston Road – 1 correpondence

from The Wheatsheaf public house,

believing that the proposals will be

detrimental to their business and

that the current residents permit

scheme should only have been a

limited time restriction between 8-

10am.


Kirby Close –

Drawing 20


of turning place, so that refuse and delivery



Lakehurst Double yellow lines to increase forward 1 Objection to the entire proposal – Proceed as advertised

ITE

M 9

Page 30

- 13 -

Road j/w

Oakland Way –

Drawing 15


junction.

believes that car park issue should

be sorted out first.

Longdown

Lane North j/w

Link’s Road –

Drawing 54



junction.


Longmead

Road j/w

Almond Road /

Felstead Road

- Drawing 39



junction. Also to extend up to Felstead Road on

both sides to allow greater forward visibility

from Appleby House and to prevent bus stops

from being obstructed.

2 objections as this will reduce

parking for residents without off-

street parking and will push parking

issues further up Tonstall Road.


Manor Green

Road j/w West

Hill Avenue –

Drawing 48



junction.

2 residents in agreement, but would

like DYLs extended on the south

side from Kingswood House School

to Manor Green Road. One of the

residents feels that a Monday to

Saturday restriction would be more

appropriate.


Mavis Close –

Drawing 14


of turning places, so that refuse and delivery



3 objections – due to lack of current

parking


Marshalls

Close –

Drawing 45

Remove existing disabled bay as no longer

required by residents.

Reduce length of yellow line across garage

frontage to allow residents to park here.

7 residents in agreement with the

removal of the disabled bay.

2 in favour of reducing yellow line.


Meadway –

Drawing 47

Extend the existing single yellow line up to and

including the gulley, so that the arch can be


ITE

M 9

Page 31

- 14 -

maintained and drainage kept clear.

Mill Road –

Drawing 50

Single yellow lines to prevent current

obstructive parking during daytime. On line survey results:

1 in support

1 other – believes that this proposal

does not address current issues.

We have also received 3 subsequent

letters in favour of the proposals

Proceed with a single yellow line

proposal – restriction to be

confirmed.

Northey

Avenue /

Nonsuch Walk

– Drawing 41



junction and accesses to church car park.


Pams Way /

Elm Way –

Drawing 16

To extend the current double yellow lines to

increase forward visibility for safer access and

egress from junction.


1 in support


Pikes Hill /

Upper High

Street –

Drawing 51

Double yellow lines to prevent obstruction to

through traffic and vehicles trying to access /

egress driveways. Also to include the junction

with Upper High Street to create greater

forward visibility when leaving Pikes Hill.

1 in complete favour of Pikes Hill

proposals


2 objections as this will not allow

parking in front of pub.

Reduce restriction outside of pub, to

allow landlord to park – access is

required to properties opposite and

building have been struck numerous

times by delivery lorries due to lack

of space to get through.

Plough Road –

Drawing 29



Southville Close junction.


Riverholme

Drive –

Drawing 29

To extend the double yellow lines to the shared

access adjacent to no.1Riverholme Drive to

allow increased forward visibility when using

the shared drive to and from the garages that

serve the properties on the western side.

1 objection asking to reduce the

restriction so that there is only 10m

of restriction when exiting the

access to garages. Also to put in

measures to remove verge parking.


Riverview To extend the current double yellow lines to On line survey results: Proceed as advertised with

ITE

M 9

Page 32

- 15 -

Road –

Drawing 17

increase forward visibility for safer access and

egress from junction.

2 support

4 objections

1 other – does agree to Ruxley Lane

proposals

Riverview Road, but not Bridle

Close proposals.

Rosedale Road

– Drawing 12

Extend existing single yellow line to the county

boundary to allow buses greater ease of access

at the junction with Richlands Avenue. To

increase the current restrictions to Saturday so

that buses can manoeuvre properly on every

day that they operate.


1 in support – believes that this is a

dangerous corner.

2 objections – apparently not a bus

route so don’t see point of proposals

– one of the objectees thinks that the

proposals include Saturdays.

Proceed.

We agree that this is not a bus route

as originally stated, however by not

implementing the continuation of

the existing restriction up to the

county boundary, verge parking

would be permissible and would

restrict emergency vehicles and

cause obstructions at the junction

which would be detrimental to

traffic flow.

Ruxley Lane /

Cox Lane /

Gatley Avenue

– Drawing 19



junctions and also along Ruxley Lane to

prevent the dangerous drop off and pick up of

students.


Salisbury Road

j/w The Avenue

– Drawing 02



junction.

1 in favour of the proposals, but

would like DYLs extended.


Spa Drive j/w

The Greenway

and Wells Road

– Drawing 61



junction.


16 objections

3 others – one side only

1 in support so long as it doesn’t

affect the corner shop.

Do not proceed

St Martin’s To make the current advisory disabled bay into No objections Proceed as advertised

ITE

M 9

Page 33

- 16 -

Avenue –

Drawing 55

a mandatory one. (3 bays in total).

Station Avenue

– Drawing 30

Double yellow lines up to no.1 and no.18

Station Avenue to prevent all day commuter

parking and allow residents to access and

egress driveways safely.

1 resident in complete agreement

with proposals.


Tealing Drive

j/w Kingston

Road (service

road) –

Drawing 07


visibility for safer travel around this bend.


Temple Road –

Drawing 44

To implement single yellow lines at the

‘chicane’ outside of the church. This is

currently being obstructed and preventing two

way traffic at this point.

No objections


1 in support but believes should be

extended to Sunday.

Proceed as advertised – although

should be extended to Sunday as

this is when the main problems

arise.

The Byway -

Drawing 11

Single yellow line to restrict parking to one

side to allow for emergency and refuse vehicle

access.

See details for Inveresk Gardens /

Ardrossan Gardens / Alsom Avenue

/ Vale Road / Stoneleigh Park Road

/ The Byway– Drawings 09, 10 &

12

See details for Inveresk Gardens /

Ardrossan Gardens / Alsom Avenue

/ Vale Road / Stoneleigh Park Road

/ The Byway– Drawings 09, 10 &

12.

Proceed with DYL proposals and

limited waiting bays.

Thorndon

Gardens –

Drawing 66

To extend the existing restriction to allow

vehicles to enter and exit driveways more

easily near junction.

1 resident not objecting to the

proposals, but believes they should

be DYLs.

1 Resident believes that yellow lines

will increase speeds and that traffic

calming measures should be put in

place instead.


ITE

M 9

Page 34

- 17 -


5 other – have further issues not

relating to proposals / RPZs / Speed

calming and allow verge parking

1 objection

Tonstall Road –

Drawing 38


visibility for safer access and egress from the

flats at no.64 Tonstall Road.


Upper Court

Road j/w

Holland Close /

Kendor Avenue

/ Manor Green

Road –

Drawing 42



junction, and also the access to the houses that

comprise no.47 Upper Court Road.


10 objections

1 in support

Generally agree with Manor Green

Road proposals but not others as

residents believe there isn’t any

problems and parking would

become a greater issue.

Proceed with Manor Green Road

proposals only.

Vale Road j/w

Westways –

Drawing 09



junction.


1 objection


Vernon Close –

Drawing 25


visibility for safer travel through blind bend.

1 objection to the entire proposal.

3 residents from same address in

support of the proposals.

1 objection suggesting that the

extents should be reduced so that

they do not run in front of nos.3 to 9

Vernon Close.


5 object

2 in support

Reduce restriction so that it does not

run in front of nos. 3 to 9 Vernon

Close, but proceed with rest of

proposals as advertised.

ITE

M 9

Page 35

- 18 -

Waverley Road

/ Chadacre

Road –

drawing 13



junctions and single yellow lines to prevent

obstructive parking and road narrowing.

2 objection to the entire proposal –

has suggested address specific

temporary parking badges for home-

owners / residents parking and free

traders permits.

1 objection to the entire proposal


6 objections

3 other

5 in support

Proceed with amendments:

Waverley and Chadacre Road:

Reduce the morning restriction so

that it operates between 8.30 & 9.30

am.

Retain the current afternoon

restriction between 2.30 & 4.30 pm.

On Chadacre Road reduce the

proposed restriction between The

Glade and no.39 Chadacre Road to

8.30-9.30am and 2.30-4.30pm. This

will still allow the majority of

people who use clubs that operate

out of the church to park nearby.

Double yellow line proposals at

junctions and roundabouts should be

implemented as parking in these

area currently obstructs larger

vehicles from progressing along the

roads – vehicles either have to drive

on the wrong side of the

carriageway or over the roundabouts

to get through.

The single yellow lines will help to

enforce the current parking trends /

patterns and will only prevent

obstructive parking during school

drop off and pick up times.

Displaced traffic would park

elsewhere along the roads to the

ITE

M 9

Page 36

- 19 -

detriment of residents if we didn’t

implement restrictions along the

entire length. The kind of

obstructive parking witnessed /

experienced at school drop off times

greatly reduces the width of the

carriageway and would prevent

emergency vehicles from getting

through.

Refuse vehicles have had to amend

collection times due to this

obstructive parking.

West Gardens /

The Kingsway

– Drawing 40

Single yellow lines to prevent obstructive

parking during the daytime in West Gardens

and The Kingsway.

Double yellow lines opposite The Rise to

prevent obstructive parking on the bend.

The Rise – 1 resident agrees with

the proposals, but would like single

yellow lines opposite their

driveway.


1 objection

3 other

1 support

Generally think restrictions should

be extended, should include Nursery

Close problem may be moved

further up road


West Street j/w

Mount Pleasant

– Drawing 33



junction.


1 objection – does not believe DYLs

need to go so far up Mount Pleasant

2 other – DYLs should go further


ITE

M 9

Page 37

- 20 -

2 in support, but needs enforcement

Whitmore’s

Close –

Drawing 59

Double yellow lines around central grass area

to prevent damage to the grass / verge area. On line survey results:

2 objections – some properties are

landlocked and one resident has had

a dropped kerb refused, so there is

little room to park

Do not proceed – see if highways

can place bollards on the edge of the

green area.

Windmill Lane

– Drawing 49

Extend the existing double yellow lines to

prevent obstruction of access to no.2 Windmill

Lane.


Woodcote Park

Road j/w

Hylands Road

and Hylands

Close –

Drawing 58

Single yellow lines to increase forward


junction and to prevent obstructive all day

parking.

2 objections to the entire proposal.

1 objection to all new restrictions in

Epsom and Ewell, but mainly these

proposals – believes it should be

rethought and SCC should increase

awareness of the Highway Code.


3 Objections

3 in support

4 other


Woodcote Side

– Drawings 59

& 62

To extend the existing single yellow line

between nos. 45 and the bus stop, to prevent

obstructive parking and allowing buses to

negotiate the corner more easily.

Revoke a section of the existing single yellow

line between Oakmead Green and Yew Tree

Close, because of the knock on effect that has

moved parking in to Yew Tree Gardens.


2 objections from hospital workers

who find it difficult to park here.

3 objections to removing the

existing single yellow line

1 in support of yellow line extension

2 in support of revocation

Proceed as advertised, but do not

remove existing yellow line.

Worple Road –

Drawing 57

Double yellow lines along entire east side of

Worple Road, adjacent to the wall, to prevent

1 resident of Squirrels Way in

complete agreement, but believes


ITE

M 9

Page 38

- 21 -

damage to the wall and obstructive parking.

Double yellow lines on the western side

between the proposed new dropped karb and

Chalk Lane to allow pedestrians to walk in the

road safely, as there is no footpath.

Single yellow line between Squirrels Way and

proposed new dropped kerb to assist parents

with pick up and drop off to the nearby school.

more enforcement is required at the

access to Squirrels Way.


11 objection

5 other

74 support

Objections are from hospital

workers and parents, although the

proposals still allow drop off on the

one side as this easement was made

as part of the last review.

Verge Parking

– Court Farm

Avenue / River

Way / Fairfield

Close /

Fairfield Way /

Lakehurst

Road /

Elmstead Close

/ Ewell Court

Avenue /

Oakland Way /

Willow Way /

Pams Way –

Drawing 69

The verge parking ban will improve the local

environment and amenity and reduce the

damage caused by cars parking on the verge

and reduce costs of repair.

Notices sent to all residents within

the affected roads.

In total we have had 24 responses,

17 of which are objections to the

proposals and 7 for the proposals.


1 objection

2 support

Based on the number of households

letter dropped and the amount of

responses, we can assume that those

who haven’t responded are happy

with the proposals.


Permit parking

, permit

allocations –

Ladbroke Road:

1 written objection which is

duplicated in the On line survey

Ladbroke Road:


We do not feel that the inclusion of

ITE

M 9

Page 39

- 22 -

Ladbroke Road

, Chalk Lane,

Town Centre

(Heathcote Rd /

Hereford Road

/ Laburnum

Close / The

Parade)


+8 objections – mainly a fear of

allowing too many vehicles to park

in the road that are not residents of

Ladbroke Road and that this may

lead to overcrowding and

obstructive parking.

Chalk Lane – no objections

Town Centre:


2 objections – 1 objection about not

being included in the scheme and

the other relating to the rules and

regulations of the type of scheme

implemented.

three more permits into a zone

which is not at full capacity will

make any significant difference to

the current parking regulations.

Chalk Lane:


Town Centre:


ITE

M 9

Page 40

annex a - surrey 09 annex… · - 2 - drawings 27 & 29 parking along the entire length – to...

Documents