Transcript
Page 1: A networked response? 2013 presentation

Kim Scriven, HIF/ALNAP

A N E T W O R K E D

R E S P O N S E ?

20 September 2013 l London

Page 2: A networked response? 2013 presentation

Agenda

Background What we

did

Forms and Functions

What we found

Page 3: A networked response? 2013 presentation

Networks are

everywhere But what’s happening at the national level?

Page 4: A networked response? 2013 presentation

Exploring role of

networks Interest in local actors

Links between

level?

Interplay with

international system

Page 5: A networked response? 2013 presentation

NATIONAL

NETWORKS

Our research looked at

The Philippines Bangladesh Afghanistan

Only humanitarian or disaster response /DRR networks

Only explicit inter- organisational networks

Page 6: A networked response? 2013 presentation

REAL

EXPERIENCES

We wanted to look at

Drawing on existing theoretical models

Page 7: A networked response? 2013 presentation

COMPARISON The focus was on

across case study contexts

Page 8: A networked response? 2013 presentation

EXISTING

WORK

We used

From research and policy networks, public and private

Page 9: A networked response? 2013 presentation

NETWORK Think ing about

FORMS

Centra l ised Decentra l ised Dist r ibuted

Page 10: A networked response? 2013 presentation

ADMINISTRATIVE

BODIES

Looking at

Their presence and influence on network functions

Page 11: A networked response? 2013 presentation

FOCUS OF

ACTION

Looking at

Support versus agency

Page 12: A networked response? 2013 presentation

Network functions Why are they useful?

Page 13: A networked response? 2013 presentation

NETWORK Working through s ix

FUNCTIONS Communi ty

bui ld ing

Convening

Resource

mobi l isa t ion

Knowledge

management

Implementation

Amplification

and advocacy

Page 14: A networked response? 2013 presentation

KEY The research points to some

FINDINGS

Enthusiasm from national and

international actors

Wide range of collaborative structures,

but many exclude national actors

Page 15: A networked response? 2013 presentation

ON Key findings

FORM

Range of structures and sizes – few

comprised solely of national actors Most have nominal equality

Often formal – but this meant different

things in different contexts

Page 16: A networked response? 2013 presentation

ON FUNCTION

Examples of different networks trying to

fulfil all six ‘functions

Separating aspiration from reality a challenge

Big successes: community, knowledge

exchange, advocacy and channelling

resources to national NGOs Key findings

Page 17: A networked response? 2013 presentation

ON Key findings

FUNCTION

Sustainability a challenge

Need for links, but these can be

undermined

Instances of moving into implementation,

but these are problematic

Page 18: A networked response? 2013 presentation

Success factors What makes networks work?

Page 19: A networked response? 2013 presentation

CLEAR AIMS & STRUCTURE

Page 20: A networked response? 2013 presentation

Transparent governance &

the right sized membership

Page 21: A networked response? 2013 presentation

SUSTAINABLE FUNDING &

EXTERNAL LINKS

Page 22: A networked response? 2013 presentation

LEADERSHIP AND PRINCIPLES

Page 23: A networked response? 2013 presentation

Kim Scriven

THANK YOU

20 September 2013 l London


Top Related