1
GOES-R AWG Aviation Team: Tropopause Folding Turbulence
Product (TFTP)June 14, 2011
Presented By: Anthony Wimmers
SSEC/CIMSSUniversity of Wisconsin - Madison
2
Outline
Executive Summary (1 slide) Algorithm Description (9 slides) ADEB and IPR Response Summary (1 slide) Requirements Specification Evolution (2 slides) Validation Strategy (5 slides) Validation Results (4 slides) Summary (1 slide)
3
Executive Summary This ABI Tropopause Fold Turbulence Product (TFTP) generates the
Option 2 products of tropopause fold-generated turbulence in terms of the upper/lower bounds and the two most hazardous crossing directions
Version 5 was delivered in June. The ATBD (100%) is on track for a June 30 delivery
The product requirements are met. For the accuracy requirement, this means 50% accuracy of predicting turbulence within the volume of a turbulent tropopause fold object
The validation strategy employs a 16-month dataset of automated aircraft Eddy Dissipation Rate (EDR) observations, a commonly accepted proxy for quantifying turbulence intensity.
4
Algorithm Description
What Is a Tropopause Fold?
5
14
12
10
8
6
4
150
200
300
400
500
600700
(~100 km)
subtropicalair mass
polar air mass
stratosphere
Pre
ssur
e (h
Pa)
Hei
ght (
km)
tropopause
front
Upper-air front
J
Tropopause folding describes an event at the tropopause break in which the tropopause folds into the troposphere due to ageostrophic flow around the jet stream.
This frequently leads to dynamical instability (enhanced turbulence) because of high levels of vertical shear across the boundary of the tropopause fold, which contains elevated potential vorticity.
Enhanced turbulence
What Is a Tropopause Fold?
6
14
12
10
8
6
4
150
200
300
400
500
600700
(~100 km)
subtropicalair mass
polar air mass
stratosphere
Pre
ssur
e (h
Pa)
Hei
ght (
km)
tropopause
front
Upper-air front
J
Tropopause folding describes an event at the tropopause break in which the tropopause folds into the troposphere due to ageostrophic flow around the jet stream.
This frequently leads to dynamical instability (enhanced turbulence) because of high levels of vertical shear across the boundary of the tropopause fold, which contains elevated potential vorticity.
Enhanced turbulence
7
Algorithm Summary
• The Tropopause Folding Turbulence Product (TFTP) generates Option 2 products of regions in which aircraft are prone to Moderate Or Greater turbulence due to passage through tropopause folding events
• The algorithm uses image processing techniques that produce synoptic-scale tropopause fold objects from major water vapor gradients in the hemispheric imagery (rather than a pixel-wise computation).
• Ancillary model fields help to assign height ranges to the tropopause fold objects
• The chosen channel set includes the 6.2 µm channel (ABI ch. 8), and the 7.0 µm channel (ABI ch. 9) as a backup (next slide)
8
Motivation for Algorithm Channel
Selection• The TFTP relies on the geostationary retrieval of upper-tropospheric (UT) water vapor
• Major gradients in UT water vapor correspond to air mass boundaries that give rise to tropopause folding and turbulent flow where those boundaries are dynamically unstable
• Any geostationary UT water vapor channel can resolve this feature (GOES-IM, GOES-NOP, Meteosat, MTSAT, etc.)
• GOES-ABI ch. 8 (~6.2µm) is best suited for retrieval in the upper troposphere, and ch. 9 (~7.0µm, midtroposphere) would have only a minor horizontal displacement and image gradient bias as a backup data source
Expected ABI Performance Relative
to Other Sensors• At 2km horizontal resolution, GOES-ABI would present a clear advancement in the product’s horizontal precision.
10
TFTP Processing Schematic
Produce tropopause fold objects from image gradients
INPUT: BT8 or BT9, model temperature, pressure
Assign object height relative to model tropopause height
Filter objects for most turbulent sections
OUTPUT: Upper/lower bounds, Directions of most likely turbulence, binary mask
• Used for tropopause height assignment, humidity gradient calculation
• Locates the turbulent areas in 3 dimensions• All directions experience turbulence, but
turbulent eddies are anisotropic, so some directions are more vulnerable
Example TFTP Output
GOES WV channel input
Turbulence lower bounds (kft)
Turbulence upper bounds (kft)
Example TFTP Output
GOES WV channel input
Direction #1 most favorable to turbulence (deg)
Direction #2 most favorable to turbulence (deg)
13
Algorithm Changes from 80% to 100%
Product output was filtered more restrictively to meet/exceed the 50% detection requirement
Navigation methodology revised to match latest Geocat updates (to streamline calculations at prime meridian and antimeridian)
Added a binary mask to output
Quality Flags, Product Quality Identifiers completed
14
ADEB and IPR Response Summary
All updates w.r.t. coding standards have been addressed
All ATBD errors and clarification requests have been addressed
No feedback required substantive modifications to the approach
Requirements Specification Evolution
15
Nam
e
User &
Priority
Geographic
Coverage
(G, H
, C, M
)
Vertical
Resolution
Horizontal
Resolution
Mapping
Accuracy
Measurem
entR
ange
Measurem
entA
ccuracy
Product Refresh
Rate/C
overage Tim
e (Mode 3)
Product Refresh
Rate/C
overage Tim
e (Mode 4)
Vendor A
llocated Ground
Latency
Product Measurem
ent Precision
Tropopause Folding Turbulence Prediction
Tropopause Folding Turbulence Prediction
GOES-R
GOES-R
FD
M
SFC – 100 mb
SFC – 100 mb
2 km
2 km
1 km
1 km
Binary yes/no detection above boundary layer for moderate or greater condition
Binary yes/no detection above boundary layer for moderate or greater condition
50% correct detection of Moderate or Greater turbulence
50% correct detection of Moderate or Greater turbulence
15 min
5 min
5 min 159 sec
159 sec
N/A
N/A
M – Mesoscale FD – Full Disk
Requirements Specification Evolution
16
Nam
e
User &
Priority
Geographic
Coverage
(G, H
, C, M
)
Tem
poral Coverage Q
ualifiers
Product Extent Q
ualifier
Cloud C
over Conditions
Qualifier
Product Statistics Qualifier
Tropopause Folding Turbulence Prediction
GOES-R FD, M Day and night Quantitative out to at least 70 degrees LZA and qualitative at larger LZA
Clear conditions down to feature of interest associated with threshold accuracy
Over the lengths of separate flight transects through the region of positive prediction
FD – CONUS M - Mesoscale
17
Qualifiers
The following qualifiers apply:
Ancillary model fields are available Sensor zenith angle < 70 degrees Objects must be 300 km away from bad pixels
18
Validation Strategy
19
Trop Folding Turbulence Approach –
Offline Validation: Data, Methods
Test data» GOES-12 Northern Hemisphere (domain of validation
data)» Corresponding ancillary NWP files: GFS 12 hour
forecasts covering observation times» 1132 images from November 2005 to February 2007
20
Trop Folding Turbulence Approach –
Offline Validation: Data, Methods
Truth data» Automated in-situ observations of eddy disturbance from
commercial aircraft (737s and 757s) » Generally limited to the airspace of the continental U.S.» Turbulence metric is “EDR” (Eddy Dissipation Rate)
21
Trop Folding Turbulence Approach –
Offline Validation: Data, Methods
Method: Compare Tropopause Fold product with collocated EDR observations
All EDR observations +/- 30 minutes from the image time
Moderate turbulence is yellow/orange.(Light is green)
22
Trop Folding Turbulence Approach –
Offline Validation: Data, Methods
Method: Compare Tropopause Fold product with collocated EDR observations
All EDR observations +/- 30 minutes from the image time
EDR observations collocated with Tropopause Fold product (with vertical and directional constraints).
23
Trop Folding Turbulence Approach –
Offline Validation: Data, Methods
Method: Compare Tropopause Fold product with collocated EDR observations
EDR observations collocated with Tropopause Fold product (with vertical and directional constraints).
(Sub-sampled to the volume of the tropopause fold)
24
Validation Results
25
TFTP Validation: Time of year
• Upper air mass boundaries are weak in the summer months and generate very few cases to sample
• Average accuracy: 54% (requirement: 50%)
26
TFTP Validation: Image gradient magnitude
• The algorithm uses tropopause fold objects at image gradients above a threshold magnitude value (highlighted). Turbulence generally increases with gradient magnitude.
27
TFTP Validation: Direction
• “0” means a direct path of an aircraft across the orientation of the tropopause fold object. “90” means a path along the object orientation
• The higher frequency of turbulence at the “0” bin shows the value of presenting “caution direction” product output
28
Validation Results Summary
Parameter Value (spec)
Data set 1132 images
Time period 16 months
Accuracy 53% (50%)
29
Summary The Tropopause Folding Turbulence Product is a
unique retrieval of turbulent regions in the atmosphere which will be made more spatially precise with the ABI.
Version 5 is delivered and the 100% ATBD is coming at the end of June.
These products meet the specifications and are ready for operational application.