From TIMP to TIMP KPI
December 12, 2011
Ingbjørn Refsdal
Technical Integrity Management
Programme (TIMP)
This material is not to be reproduced without the permission of Statoil ASA
• Technical Integrity Management programme
• The challenge
• Building and developing the program
• Implementing TIMP
• The TIMP model
• Key learnings
• Verifications – TTS and OTS
• Technical Integrity indicator – TIMP KPI
From TIMP to TIMP KPI
The challenge
Managing technical integrity ensures predictable and sustainable operations
• Industry challenges:
− operate in various environments with different regulatory regimes and
operating conditions
− lack of a uniform approach to asset integrity management
− sharing of information
“It is particularly crucial to distinguish between process safety
and occupational safety”.
Source: 2005 "Baker Panel report"
Building and developing the program
• Define project
− mandate
− scope
− resources
− steering committee
− project risks Anleggsansvarlig
AnleggsansvarligAnleggsansvarlig
Referansegruppe
, TNE PRT HSET
, PRT GPT TIKA
, TNE PRT RT TIKAL
, EPN ONS GRA INST
, EPN ODV TMB
, ONO ASG OPS
, EPN ODV TMST
Styringskomité
, EPN ODV
, CSO CHSE
, EPN OWE
, TNE PRT
, M&M MAN HSEQ
, NG PT
, TNE POMM
Programleder
, EPN ODV
TIMP IT Tool
TNE PRT POMM
Anleggsansvarlig
(AI leder)
AnleggsansvarligAnleggsansvarlig
Anleggsansvarlig
Anleggsansvarlig
(AI leder)
AnleggsansvarligAnleggsansvarlig
Anleggsansvarlig
Anleggsansvarlig
(AI leder)
Implementeringsteam
, Leder
, DNV
, arbeidsprosess
, kompetanse og opplæring
, risikovurdering
, TNE PRT POMM
, ONS TRO OPS
Implementerings-
ansvarlig UPN Bergen
, EPN ODV TMB
Implementerings-
ansvarlig UPN Nord
,
EPN ODV TMST
Implementerings-
ansvarlig UPN Stav.
, EPN ODV TMN
Implementerings-
ansvarlig M&M
MAN OMS PL
Implementerings-
ansvarlig NG
, NG PT OMS
AnleggsansvarligAnleggsansvarlig
Anleggsansvarlig
Leder Teknisk
Integritet
AnleggsansvarligAnleggsansvarlig
Anleggsansvarlig
Leder Teknisk
Integritet
Koordinator Koordinator Koordinator Koordinator Koordinator
AnleggsansvarligAnleggsansvarlig
Anleggsansvarlig
Referansegruppe
, TNE PRT HSET
, PRT GPT TIKA
, TNE PRT RT TIKAL
, EPN ONS GRA INST
, EPN ODV TMB
, ONO ASG OPS
, EPN ODV TMST
Styringskomité
, EPN ODV
, CSO CHSE
, EPN OWE
, TNE PRT
, M&M MAN HSEQ
, NG PT
, TNE POMM
Programleder
, EPN ODV
TIMP IT Tool
TNE PRT POMM
Anleggsansvarlig
(AI leder)
AnleggsansvarligAnleggsansvarlig
Anleggsansvarlig
Anleggsansvarlig
(AI leder)
AnleggsansvarligAnleggsansvarlig
Anleggsansvarlig
Anleggsansvarlig
(AI leder)
Implementeringsteam
, Leder
, DNV
, arbeidsprosess
, kompetanse og opplæring
, risikovurdering
, TNE PRT POMM
, ONS TRO OPS
Implementerings-
ansvarlig UPN Bergen
, EPN ODV TMB
Implementerings-
ansvarlig UPN Nord
,
EPN ODV TMST
Implementerings-
ansvarlig UPN Stav.
, EPN ODV TMN
Implementerings-
ansvarlig M&M
MAN OMS PL
Implementerings-
ansvarlig NG
, NG PT OMS
AnleggsansvarligAnleggsansvarlig
Anleggsansvarlig
Leder Teknisk
Integritet
AnleggsansvarligAnleggsansvarlig
Anleggsansvarlig
Leder Teknisk
Integritet
Koordinator Koordinator Koordinator Koordinator Koordinator
Learning from others
• Airport express train (Flytoget)
• Avinor (airport operator)
• ConocoPhillips Norway
• Det Norske Veritas
• ExxonMobil
• Incident investigation reports
• Kuwait Petroleum Corporation
• McKinsey North Sea Roundtable
• Petrobras
• Shell Exploration & Production
• TATA Steel
F
E
D
C
B
F
E
D
C
B
Work process Competence
Technical Integrity Management Portal Assessment methodology
TIMP
Implementing the program
• Comprehensive preparations
• Ambitious plan
• Correlated with operating activities
• Support
• Dedicated core team
• Local champions / owners
34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
KVG
Gullfaks
Kristin
Kårstø incl Draupner
Troll
Tjeldbergodden
Sleipner
Oseberg
Kollsnes
Heidrun
Norne
Snorre
Åsgard
Marginalfelt
Njord
Mongstad incl Sture
Hammerfest LNG
Statfjord
Kalundborg
NG rørledningsdrift
Course Kick off and evaluation Evaluation subsequent installations
Installation
August September October November December January February March
Knowledge
exchange
Discipline
competence
Operational
competence
SAMS STID
QRA
SYNERGI
DISP
SAP
Data
sources
Informations
ources
Key
SAP
Maintenance
administration
system
DISP Dispensation
system
SYNERGI HSE incident
reporting
QRA Quantitative Risk
Assessment
STID Technical
information
SAMS
Audit management
and reporting
system
A portal visualises
the status of
technical barriers
Overall technical
integrity of the
plant is assessed
and documented
Technical condition is assessed
on equipment, system and
barrier
level
Information through
indicators form the
basis for technical
assessment
Expert judgement
Availability of
safety equipment
Backlog
safety critical
maintenance
Etc. Temporary
dispensations
Backlog consequence
classification
System n Barrier 1 Barrier n System 1
TIMP model
F
E
D
C
B
F
E
D
C
B
Value creation
Work process Competence
Technical Integrity Management Portal Assessment methodology
• Standardised approach for following
up technical integrity
• Clarified roles and responsibilities
• Information through indicators form
the basis for technical assessment
• Discipline evaluations transformed to
basis for management decisions
• Improved competence on risk and
barriers
• More than 1600 key personnel trained
• Reduced workload through
simplification (automated data
collection)
• Holistic overview of technical integrity
as basis for prioritisation of risk
reducing measures
TIMP
Key learnings
Preparation
• Clear objective
• Focus on value creation
• Early senior management buy-in and ownership
• Learning from others
Development
• Dedicated core team
• Regular updating of strategy towards target
• Simultaneous development of all TIMP elements
Implementation
• Strong focus on building competence
• Designated support function during roll-out and implementation
• Ensure implementation
15 - Classification: Internal 2011-
07-20
15 -
TIMP TTS OTS
Technical Integrity
Management Program
Technical Safety
Condition
Operational Safety
Condition
• Equipment
• System
• Performance Standard
• Plant dashboard
• Functionality
• Integrity
• Survivability
• Maintenance
• Competence
• Procedures
• Roles & responsibilities
• Management, etc.
Verification and continuous monitoring
Verification Continuous monitoring
16 - Classification: Internal 2011-
07-20
16 -
Overview of the TTS/OTS structure
TTS
Each barrier is divided into Performance Requirements
Each Performance Requirement consist of checklists
TTS verify 23 defined Technical Performance Standards OTS verify 7 defined Operational Performance Standards
On the basis of the checklist each Performance Requirement is given a scoring on a scale from A - F
The checklists are evaluated through activities such as: • Document review • Analyse data • Interview / Questionnaire • Inspection / testing • Observation
Gaps marked as findings!
OTS
Finding 1 Finding 2 Finding n
Technical integrity KPI
17
Basis: Technical integrity
for safety barriers – manually
quality assured evaluations
Evaluation scores converted to
numbers
Weighting of barriers importance based on expert
judgement
Calculation of plant specific TI indicator
TI indicator
with status and
trend
Technical integrity KPI – Alt 2
18
Barrier score
• Manual evaluation
• Score converted to predefined numbers
Weighting and calculation
• Pre defined barrier weighting
• KPI calculation
TI indicator
• Plant specific
• Trend and status
Cons
• May camouflage important issues
through aggregation
• May turn focus to the indicator itself
rather than underlying issues and
improvement actions
• May give better grade than without
KPI to appear good (or worse grade
to get more resources)
TI indicator - Pros and cons
20
Pros
• Provides incentives for continuous
improvement
• Highlights the «best in class» ->
experience transfer and learning
• Provides decision support for
prioritization