donna m. sobel, ph.d. university of colorado denver · research intensive urban university graduate...

57
Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver Urban, Community Teacher Education Special Education Program [email protected] 1

Upload: others

Post on 09-Aug-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D.

University of Colorado Denver

Urban, Community Teacher EducationSpecial Education

Program

[email protected]

1

Page 2: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

Research Intensive Urban UniversityGraduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher

education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12) SPED (K-12) 350-400 teacher candidates

Integrated/Merged approach to preparing general & special educators

Professional Development School model with co-teaching as a foundational approach

2

Page 3: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

This initiative builds on successfully accomplished goals of the Achieving Special Education Equity through Diversity(ASEED) 325T project as a foundation to bring professional development efforts to scale with online resources by:

1. Supporting faculty in integrating evidence-based educational resources into core course curriculum: Data-based decision-making for learners with diverse needs.

2. Providing sustainable state-of-the-art professional development, mentoring, and coaching for university faculty and partner school personnel through the edWeb platform

3

Page 4: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

4

Page 5: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

Accommodation Frameworks:1. Presentation*2. Response3. Setting/environmental; and4. Timing/scheduling

*Culturally responsive graphic organizers (mind maps, webs, or visual organizers) should be used at the onset of a unit or lesson as a way to determine and/or activate prior knowledge; during the course of instruction to achieve both content objectives and language objectives; and/or at the conclusion of a lesson as a “check for understanding” which genuinely informs student assessment, evaluation and future planning.

5

Page 6: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

Course instructor recommendations of supplemental materials;

Fourteen supplemental DWW resources;

Complexity of online sites calls for easy access;

Highlighted description of resource; and

Code denoting 19 online resources (Doing What Works DWW = 14; IRIS = 3; Youtube = 1; Schooltube = 1)*

* Attachment: Advance organizers DWW-IRIS-Schooltube [Sobel, Nov 2011]

6

Page 7: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

“Before and after”: Dropout prevention: Multimedia overview-improving classroom behavior and social skills *GO 2a

“Focus your viewing”: Guiding questions for data-team meeting video –grade 5 math review *GO 6a

“Connect with an expert”: Guiding questions for expert interview with Monica Martinez *GO 7a

“View and reflect”: Managing progress monitoring *GO 9a

* Attachments: Representative Graphic Organizers

Format: clear, succinct directions

Design: maximize organization, color, graphics, fonts, shapes and sizes

Process: attention to multiple levels of cognitive thinking with an emphasis on application to work in the schools

Evaluation: student feedback*7

Page 8: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

Building Capacity for Facilitation

Building Capacity for Facilitation

Flexible Communities based on Participant NeedsFlexible Communities based on Participant Needs

“Gateway” Community for all UCTE Participants

(Students, Faculty, PDSs, Alums)

“Gateway” Community for all UCTE Participants

(Students, Faculty, PDSs, Alums)

UCTE EdWebCommunity

Students

PDS Cohorts

Early UG

Pipeline

Faculty & PDS Site Teams

Collaborative Council

Core Faculty

Course Renewal Teams

Affiliate Faculty

Clinical Teachers

CTs as Teacher Leaders

PL Related to Courses

DWW

Future Alumni

8

Page 9: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

9

Page 10: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

Collaborate with all teacher education faculty for enhanced course alignment.

Create, support and revise professional resources for inclusion in teacher preparation website.

Plan for the complexities of institutional leverage at multiple levels Programs, Unit/Division, School of Education, Professional Development Schools, Directors of Special Education, and Departments of Education.

10

Page 11: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

Graphic  Organizer  1a    

1    

Dropout  prevention:  Multimedia  overview    Web  Resource:  http://dww.ed.gov/Dropout-­‐Prevention/topic/?T_ID=24  

 Activity  Guidelines:    This  activity  includes  five  separate  parts  each  building  upon  each  other.  Beginning  with  part  1,  work  your  way  through  each  section.    Part  1-­‐  Overview:    Look  at  the  Multimedia  Overview  and  the  Visual  Diagram      Part  2-­‐  Data  Systems:    Go  to  the  Weblink:  [http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/practiceguides/dp_pg_090308.pdf  ]  and  read  the  suggestions  (in  green)  on  pages  13-­‐15  in  the  IES  Practice  Guide:  Dropout  Prevention  (2008)  published  by  the  What  Works  Clearinghouse.    After  reviewing  the  resource,  list  the  data  recommendations,  noting  the  most  significant  points.      

 

Data  Recommendations   Significant  Points  

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

Page 12: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

 

2    

 

Part  3  –  Adult  Advocates:  Watch  the  DWW  video  in  Learn  What  Works  and  read  “How  to  carry  out  this  recommendation  &  Potential  roadblocks  and  suggested  approaches”  in  the  IES  Practice  Guide  (pp.  18-­‐21).  Write  a  brief  summary  of  what  you  learned.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Part  4  –  Academic  Supports:    Watch    the  DWW  video  in  Learn  What  Works  and  think  about  how  Dr.  Martinez’  recommendations  and  correlate  with  what  you  are  learning  about  Differentiated  Instruction.  

Dr.  Martinez  Recommendations   Correlation  with  Differentiated  Instruction  

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

Page 13: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

 

3    

 

Part  5  –  Social/Behavioral  Programs:    Watch  the  DWW  videos  on  the  Site  Profiles  of  Sleepy  Hollow  High  School  in  NY  and  Foxfire  Center  for  Student  Success  in  OH  for  ideas.  Then,  read    the  IES  Practice  Guide,  beginning  with  “Brief  summary  of  evidence  to  support  the  recommendation  (p.  26-­‐27).  

 

Questions:    

Can  you  think  of  any  other  types  of  targeted  interventions  to  support  students’  academic  success?  

 

 

 

 

 

Can  you  think  of  any  other  ways  teachers  or  the  school  can  make  all  students  feel  important  and  cared  about?  

 

 

 

 

 

Do  you  have  any  other  ideas  for  things  teachers  and  schools  can  do  to  guide  all  students’  (especially  those  vulnerable  to  dropping  out)  focus  toward  postsecondary  possibilities  and  plans?  

       

Page 14: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

 

4    

   

 Student  Feedback    

 

1) Rate  the  level  to  which  this  organizer  supported  your  engagement  in  the  activity.  

0  =  distracted  from  or  did  not  add  anything  to  my  engagement  with  this  learning  

activity  

1  =  minimally  supported  my  engagement  in  the  activity  

2  =  deepened  my  interest  and  understanding  in  the  activity  

3  =  served  to  push  me  to  

engage  in  and  critically  analyze  

the  activity  content  

   

     

2) How  might  you  use  the  format  of  this  organizer  in  your  teaching?  

             

3) What  suggestions  do  you  have  to  enhance  this  organizer?  

             

 

Page 15: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

Graphic  Organizer  2a    

1    

Dropout  prevent:  Multimedia  overview  –  improving  classroom  behavior  and  social  skills  Web  Resource:  http://dww.ed.gov/Dropout-­‐Prevention/Social-­‐Behavior-­‐Programs/practice/?T_ID=24&P_ID=56  

 Activity  Guidelines:    

Prior  to  watching  the  “Multimedia  Overview:  Improving  Classroom  Behavior  Skills”  complete  the  left  portion  of  the  following  table.  In  the  column  on  the  left,  describe  three  events  from  the  classroom  that  challenged  your  ability  to  respond  well.  Then,  in  the  center  column,  describe  the  way  that  you  responded.  An  example  has  been  provided.      

 

Behavior   Teacher/Administrator  Response                Before  Video                    

     After  Video  

Questions  to  Ask  Before  Responding  

Alternate  Response  

Ex.  A  male  student  continues  to  talk  to  peers  during  teacher’s  presentation,  causing  distractions  to  teacher  and  peers.  This  was  unusual,  and  it  was  very  frustrating  to  me.  

Ex.  After  a  couple  of  warnings,  I  sent  the  student  to  the  principal’s  office  with  a  referral.  

Ex.  Why  might  this  student  be  creating  distractions  during  the  class?  

Ex.  Mentoring/Counseling  –  this  may  provide  useful  support  that  I  may  not  be  able  to  provide  during  class  time.  

1.          

     

2.      

     

3.      

     

Page 16: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

Graphic  Organizer  3a  

1    

Dropout  prevention:  Small  group  academic  support  through  humanities  teams:  Sleepy  Hollow  High  Web  Resource:  http://dww.ed.gov/Dropout-­‐Prevention/Rigorous-­‐Relevant-­‐

Instruction/see/index.cfm?T_ID=24&P_ID=56&c1=1028#cluster-­‐1      

Activity  Guidelines:      First,  listen  to  the  interview  “Behavior  Interventions  to  Help  Students  Establish  Attainable  Goals.”  Next,  watch  the  slideshow  entitled  “Small  Group  Academic  Support  through  Humanities  Teams.”    In  the  interview,  Principal  Conklin  describes  the  discipline  system  of  Sleepy  Hollow  as  “typical  to  what  one  might  expect  in  any  high  school  around  America.”  She  also  describes  positive  reinforcement  as  an  atypical  route  to  addressing  discipline  problems  at  the  school.  Within  this  same  school,  the  Humanities  Team  provides  small  group  instruction  and  work  with  other  members  of  the  school  to  provide  multiple  layers  of  support  for  students.        The  following  image  captures  the  converging  routes  for  support  provided  by  teachers,  counselors,  and  administrators  at  Sleepy  Hollow.        

   

   

Supported  Students  

Collabora=on  

Atypical  Discipline  System    

Instruc=on  

Rela=onship  

Page 17: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

 

2    

Think  about  your  current  school  site  and  the  complexities  associated  with  the  four  focus  areas  of  support.  Next  identify  specific  examples  that  signal  a  need  for  growth  in  each  of  the  four  focus  areas.  Finally,  be  ready  to  articulate  ways  that  an  individual  or  school  could  engage  in  professional  development  to  enhance  proficiency  in  the  area  of  focus.    

 Student  Feedback  

  Area  for  Growth?  (Explain)   Professional  Growth  Plan  Collaboration      

       

Student-­‐centered  Discipline  Practices  

           

Strong  Pedagogy              

Relationship-­‐Driven  Classroom  and  School  

           

1) Rate  the  level  to  which  this  organizer  supported  your  engagement  in  the  activity.  

0  =  distracted  from  or  did  not  add  anything  to  my  engagement  with  this  learning  

activity  

1  =  minimally  supported  my  engagement  in  the  activity  

2  =  deepened  my  interest  and  understanding  in  the  activity  

3  =  served  to  push  me  to  

engage  in  and  critically  analyze  

the  activity  content  

   

     

2) How  might  you  use  the  format  of  this  organizer  in  your  teaching?  

       

3) What  suggestions  do  you  have  to  enhance  this  

     

Page 18: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

 

3    

  organizer?  

Page 19: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

Graphic  Organizer  4a    

1    

Dropout  Prevention  Topic  Overview  Video    Web  Resource:  http://dww.ed.gov/Dropout-­‐Prevention/topic/?T_ID=24  

 Activity  Guidelines:    Prior  to  viewing  this  multimedia  presentation,  explore  the  types  of  dropout  prevention  services  in  your  district.  Next  complete  the  viewing  guide  providing  highlights  of  each  of  the  coordinated  dropout-­‐prevention  recommendations.  Begin  by  capturing  representative  exemplars  of  each  recommendation,  then  assimilate  the  information  into  a  statement  that  you  would  use  in  what  might  essentially  be  an  “elevator  speech”  (one  minute  or  less)  statement  about  why  that  recommendation  is  important.    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Utilize  data  systems  to  identify  the  scope  of  the  

problem  

Address  social  and  emotional  needs  with  programming  and  

adult  advocates  

 

Provide  academic  interventions  

Establish  an  engaging  and  personalized  environment  

 

Highlights  

       

Statement  

       

Page 20: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

Graphic  Organizer  5a    

2    

 

Student  Feedback    

 

1) Rate  the  level  to  which  this  organizer  supported  your  engagement  in  the  activity.  

0  =  distracted  from  or  did  not  add  anything  to  my  engagement  with  this  learning  

activity  

1  =  minimally  supported  my  engagement  in  the  activity  

2  =  deepened  my  interest  and  understanding  in  the  activity  

3  =  served  to  push  me  to  

engage  in  and  critically  analyze  

the  activity  content  

   

     

2) How  might  you  use  the  format  of  this  organizer  in  your  teaching?  

             

3) What  suggestions  do  you  have  to  enhance  this  organizer?  

             

 

Page 21: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

Graphic  Organizer  5a  

1    

Dropout  prevention:  Utilizing  data  systems  for  dropout  prevention  Web  Resource:  http://dww.ed.gov/Dropout-­‐Prevention/Data-­‐Systems/see/?T_ID=24&P_ID=53  

 Activity  Guidelines:      The  “Utilizing  Data  Systems  for  Dropout  Prevention”  overview  focuses  on  school-­‐level  and  district-­‐level  dropout  prevention  systems.  As  you  listen  to  the  presentation,  think  about  the  questions  in  the  table  below.  Then,  complete  the  table  by  describing  the  response  to  school  dropout  at  the  school  and  classroom  levels.        

 

   

Ques;ons  to  Consider  

School  Level  

Classroom  Level  

How  are  aVendance,  grades,  and  transfer  status  

(including  mobility)  monitored?  

What  at-­‐risk  indicators  are  used  to  help  inform  

supports  for  students  who  may  be  at  risk  for  dropping  out?  

What  dropout  informaYon  is  collected?  

What  supports  are  used/available  for  students  who  may  be  at  risk  of  dropping  

out?  

If  a  student  no  longer  aVends  school  or  class,  but  

this  student  has  not  transferred  to  another  

school  or  classroom,  what  happens  in  response  to  this?  

Page 22: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

 

2    

 Student  Feedback    

 

1) Rate  the  level  to  which  this  organizer  supported  your  engagement  in  the  activity.  

0  =  distracted  from  or  did  not  add  anything  to  my  engagement  with  this  learning  

activity  

1  =  minimally  supported  my  engagement  in  the  activity  

2  =  deepened  my  interest  and  understanding  in  the  activity  

3  =  served  to  push  me  to  

engage  in  and  critically  analyze  

the  activity  content  

   

     

2) How  might  you  use  the  format  of  this  organizer  in  your  teaching?  

             

3) What  suggestions  do  you  have  to  enhance  this  organizer?  

             

Page 23: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

Graphic  Organizer  6a  

1

Guiding  questions  for  data-­‐team  meeting  video  –  grade  5  math  review  Web  Resource:  http://dww.ed.gov/Response-­‐to-­‐Intervention-­‐Math/Intentional-­‐

Teaching/see/index.cfm?T_ID=28&P_ID=69&c1=1508#cluster-­‐1    Activity  Guidelines:    Part  1  -­‐  Watch  the  Data  Team  Meeting  video.    Use  the  following  questions  to  help  focus  your  attention.    

Who

 is  par@cipa@

ng  in  th

e  mee@n

g?  

Wha

t  types  of  d

ata  are  they  con

side

ring?  

Nam

e  some  of  th

e  recommen

da@o

ns  

they  su

ggest  for  stud

ent  g

rowth.  

Nam

e  some  of  th

e  form

a@ve  

assessmen

ts  th

ey  con

side

r  to  

mon

itor  u

nderstan

ding.  

How  are  so

me  of  th

e  specialists  in  

the  scho

ol  involved

 in  su

ppor@n

g  the  stud

ents  th

at  th

e  team

 is  

discussing?  

Page 24: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

Part  2  -­‐  Use  the  grid  below  to  make  a bulleted  list  of  conclusions  in  each  area  that  you  could  draw  about  this  school  and  these  faculty  members  related  to  the  big  areas  of  the  “Using  Student  Achievement  Data  to  Support  Instructional  Decision  Making”  chart.  Then  list  examples  that  you  have  observed  at  your  partner  school.  

 

   Supports  for  Data  Driven  Culture  

 Vision  for  Data  

Use  

 Cycle  of  

Instructional  Improvement  

 Student  Use  of  

Data  

 District-­‐wide  Data  System  

Examples  from  the  Video  

         

 

 

Examples  from  your  partner  school  

         

 

 

Page 25: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

Graphic  Organizer  7a  

1    

Guiding  questions  for  expert  interview  with  Monica  Martinez  Web  Resource:  http://dww.ed.gov/Dropout-­‐Prevention/Academic-­‐

Supports/learn/?T_ID=24&P_ID=55    

Activity  Guidelines:    Watch  the  Expert  Interview  Video  and  use  the  following  questions  to  help  focus  your  attention.    

1) Connect  her  statement  -­‐    “…everyone  in  the  school  taking  collective  responsibility  for  students”  –  to  ideas  you  learned  in  your  course  on  Co-­‐Creating  the  Classroom  Environment.  Articulate  take-­‐away  message  that  is  meaningful  to  you.  

 

 2) What  are  the  “Structural  Issues”  that  she  says  you  can  do  as  a  

teacher  to  address  student  success?  • •

 3a)    Ms.  Martinez  discusses  “Differentiated  Instruction”  and  poses      three  questions  teachers  can  ask  of  themselves.    Rephrase  those  questions.  

a. Question  1:      

b. Questions  2:      

c. Question  3:      

3b)  What  additional  questions  do  you  have  for  yourself?    

4) Name some of the school-wide supports she suggests.  

   

 5) What  are  some  of  the  school-­‐wide  supports  in  place  at  your  partner  school?  

       

Page 26: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

    Graphic  Organizer    8a    

1    

Intentional  teaching:  Pacing  instruction  tier  3  video    Web  Resource:  http://dww.ed.gov/Response-­‐to-­‐Intervention-­‐Math/RtI-­‐Implementation/see/index.cfm?T_ID=28&P_ID=71&c1=1509#cluster-­‐1  

 Activity  Guidelines:    As  you  listen  to  and  watch  Ms.  Smee,  identify  and  discuss  the  four  key  features  of  teaming  structures  essential  to  the  delivery  of  tiered  instruction  in  her  teaching  episode.  Extend  this  learning  by  identifying  an  example  of  tiered  3  interventions  at  your  site.      

 

 

 

 

 

1.  Collabora<on  between  special  educa<on  and  teaching  staff  

• Example:    

2.  Explicit  teaching  strategies  

• Example:  

3.  Con<uous  progress  monitoring  

• Example:  

4.  Focus  teaching  to  mastery  

• Example:  

Page 27: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

 

2    

Apply  this  learning  to  your  current  school  by  providing  an  example  of  tiered  3  intervention:      

•      

•      

•    

 

_____________________________________________________________________________________  

Student  Feedback    

1) Rate  the  level  to  which  this  organizer  supported  your  engagement  in  the  activity.  

0  =  distracted  from  or  did  not  add  anything  to  my  engagement  with  this  learning  

activity  

1  =  minimally  supported  my  engagement  in  the  activity  

2  =  deepened  my  interest  and  understanding  in  the  activity  

3  =  served  to  push  me  to  

engage  in  and  critically  analyze  

the  activity  content  

   

     

2) How  might  you  use  the  format  of  this  organizer  in  your  teaching?  

             

3) What  suggestions  do  you  have  to  enhance  this  organizer?  

             

 

Page 28: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

Graphic  Organizer    9a    

1    

Managing  progress  monitoring  in  the  classroom  video  presentation    Web  Resource:  http://dww.ed.gov/Response-­‐to-­‐Intervention-­‐Reading/Progress-­‐Monitoring-­‐

and-­‐Differentiation/see/?T_ID=27&P_ID=73    

 Activity  Guidelines:    While  watching  Kristy  Shoaff  work  with  students  in  her  first  grade  classroom,  analyze  key  aspects  of  her  ability  to  manage    progressing  monitoring  in  the  classroom,  then  look  for  how  your  clinical  teacher  is  applying  those  and  other  strategies  in  your  classroom.  Finally,  reflect  on  specifics  skills  needed  to  effectively  implement  varied  aspects  of  management  and  identify  a  specific  focus  for  your  enhanced  proficiency  in  that  area.  What  do  you  need  to  know?  What  aspects  of  managing  progress  monitoring  do  you  need  practice  with?  Answers  to  those  questions  will  help  guide  you  on  securing  needed  assistance  from  your  school  team.  

Management  Plans  for  Monitoring  Progress  

1st  Grade  at  Tri-­‐Community  Elementary  

School  

Current  internship  site   Personal  growth  plan  

Clearly  identify  progress  monitoring  measures  used  in  the  classroom.    Name  the  tool  and  articulate  when  it  is  administered  what  it  measures,  how  it  is  analyzed,  and  how  it  is  used  to  inform  instruction.  

Example  1:      

   

Example  2:      

   

What  are  other  members  of  the  class  doing  when  the  teacher  is  working  with  an  individual  or  a  small  group?  

Example  1:      

   

Example  2:      

   

How  are  students  held  accountable  when  not  directly  working  with  the  teacher?  

Example  1:      

   

Example  2:      

   

Page 29: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

 

2    

 

Example  3:      

   

How  are  students  involved  in  self-­‐monitoring  their  progress?  

Example  1:      

   

Example  2:      

   

Provide  an  example  of  data-­‐driven  instruction.  

Example  1:      

   

Example  2:      

   

Page 30: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

Graphic  Organizer  10a    

Meeting  the  social  and  behavioral  needs  of  students  identified  as  “at-­‐risk”:  Western  Hills  University  High  School  

Web  Resource:  http://dww.ed.gov/Dropout-­‐Prevention/Rigorous-­‐Relevant-­‐Instruction/see/index.cfm?T_ID=24&P_ID=56&c1=1062#cluster-­‐1  

Activity  Guidelines:    

The  slideshow  “Meeting  the  Social  and  Behavioral  Needs  of  At-­‐Risk  Students”  describes  programs  available  to  students  at  Western  Hills  University  High  School  who  may  be  having  social  or  emotional  difficulty  at  school.  Activities  used  at  Western  Hills  to  support  these  students  include:    Opening  lesson;  Extracurricular  programming  (Controlling  myself  yoga  relaxation  group);  and  extending  the  curriculum  (Women  writing  for  change).    Use  the  table  below  to  begin  thinking  about  ways  that  you  could  support  your  students  in  responding  to  their  social  and  emotional  needs.    Identify  explicit  examples  of  what  you  might  do  in  each  of  the  four  areas.      

 

How  WH  meets  student  needs     Ideas  to  meet  your  students  needs  

Western  Hills  Program    

Socially  Just  Pedagogy  

Controlling  Myself  Yoga  Relaxation  Group      

Classroom  Practice  

Classroom  Opening  Exercise    

Extracurricular  Programs  

Women  Writing  for  Change      

Curricular  Enhancement  

 

Page 31: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

2    

 

 

 

Student  Feedback  

1) Rate  the  level  to  which  this  organizer  supported  your  engagement  in  the  activity.  

0  =  distracted  from  or  did  not  add  anything  to  my  engagement  with  this  learning  

activity  

1  =  minimally  supported  my  engagement  in  the  activity  

2  =  deepened  my  interest  and  understanding  in  the  activity  

3  =  served  to  push  me  to  

engage  in  and  critically  analyze  

the  activity  content  

   

     

2) How  might  you  use  the  format  of  this  organizer  in  your  teaching?  

             

3) What  suggestions  do  you  have  to  enhance  this  organizer?  

             

Page 32: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

Graphic  Organizer  11a    

1    

Progress  monitoring  and  differentiation  –  helping  teachers  use  progress  monitoring  Expert  interview  with  Nadine  Hoover,  reading  coach  

Web  Resource:  http://dww.ed.gov/Response-­‐to-­‐Intervention-­‐Reading/Progress-­‐Monitoring-­‐and-­‐Differentiation/learn/?T_ID=27&P_ID=73  

 Viewing  Guide:      

Questions   My  Answer  

How  does  Tri-­‐Community  Elementary  School  define  a  “benchmark  reader,”  “a  strategic  reader,”  and  an  “intensive  reader”?    

 

How  does    she  and  the  reading  team  monitor  students’  progress?    

 

   Watch  the  video  (in  See  How  It  Works):”Managing  Progress  Monitoring  in  the  Classroom”  and  explain  how  it  demonstrates  what  Nadine  Hoover  discussed.  (Note:  the  other  demonstration  videos  are  also  excellent.)                      Nadine’s  Points                              How  it  Demonstrates                                        

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 33: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

2    

   

Student  Feedback  

1) Rate  the  level  to  which  this  organizer  supported  your  engagement  in  the  activity.  

0  =  distracted  from  or  did  not  add  anything  to  my  engagement  with  this  learning  

activity  

1  =  minimally  supported  my  engagement  in  the  activity  

2  =  deepened  my  interest  and  understanding  in  the  activity  

3  =  served  to  push  me  to  

engage  in  and  critically  analyze  

the  activity  content  

   

     

2) How  might  you  use  the  format  of  this  organizer  in  your  teaching?  

             

3) What  suggestions  do  you  have  to  enhance  this  organizer?  

             

Page 34: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

Graphic  Organizer  12a    

1    

Response  to  intervention  in  primary  grade  reading:    Expert  interview  with  Dr.  Tilly:    RtI  and  special  education  

Web  Resource:  http://dww.ed.gov/Response-­‐to-­‐Intervention-­‐Reading/RtI-­‐Implementation/learn/?T_ID=27&P_ID=90&intID=1804&t=1#learn  

   

Viewing  Guide:        

 

1.  What  does  Dr.  Tilly  mean  by  changing  from  “a  normaDve  comparison”  to  a  “benchmark  comparison”?  

2.  What  was  the  reason  for  moving  away  from  specific  disability  labels?    

3.  What  does  he  mean  by  “a  non-­‐categorical  service  delivery  model”?  

4.  What  3  things  does  Dr.  Tilly  claim  create  “schools  that  are  effecDve”?    

5.  How  does  his  statement  that  “When  we  make  adjustments  to  our  instrucDon  based  on  the  data  we  collect  on  student  performance,  student  performance  improves”  relate  to  those  3  things?  

Page 35: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

 

2    

   

Student  Feedback          

1) Rate  the  level  to  which  this  organizer  supported  your  engagement  in  the  activity.  

0  =  distracted  from  or  did  not  add  anything  to  my  engagement  with  this  learning  

activity  

1  =  minimally  supported  my  engagement  in  the  activity  

2  =  deepened  my  interest  and  understanding  in  the  activity  

3  =  served  to  push  me  to  

engage  in  and  critically  analyze  

the  activity  content  

   

     

2) How  might  you  use  the  format  of  this  organizer  in  your  teaching?  

             

3) What  suggestions  do  you  have  to  enhance  this  organizer?  

             

 

Page 36: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

Graphic  Organizer  13a    

Teaching  literacy  to  K-­‐5  English  language  learners    Web  Resource:  http://dww.ed.gov/Literacy-­‐in-­‐English-­‐K-­‐5/topic/?T_ID=13  

 Activity  Guidelines:    Complete  this  three  part  activity  to  further  your  learning  regarding  students  with  second  language  needs.        Part  1:                                          

Key  findings  from  the  research  related  to  English  Language  Learners  

 

   

   

Page 37: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

2    

Screen  and  Monitor  Progress  

Provide  Reading  

Intervention  

Teach  Vocabulary  

Develop  Academic  English  

Schedule  Peer  

Learning  

Part  2:      Analyze  key  aspects  of  the  5  recommended  practices  and  indicate  how  those  and  others  are  used  in  your  school.                        

                     

     

 

 

 

 

 

Evaluation    

Synthesis    

Analysis    

Application  &  Comprehension  

Knowledge  

Page 38: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

3    

Part  3:    Apply  this  information  to  your  setting  by  responding  to  each  of  the  5  prompts  below.        

 

How  many  students  receive  second  language  services  in  your  school  and  in  your  district?  

What  languages  are  spoken  in  your  school  and  across  your  district?  

How  are  second  language  services  delivered  in  your  school  and  across  your  school  district?  Who  provides  those  services?  

How  do  services  vary  across  elementary,  middle  and  high  school  sePngs?    

What  addiQonal  quesQons  about  service  delivery  for  second  language  learners  do  you  have?    

Page 39: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

4    

 

Student  Feedback    

1) Rate  the  level  to  which  this  organizer  supported  your  engagement  in  the  activity.  

0  =  distracted  from  or  did  not  add  anything  to  my  engagement  with  this  learning  

activity  

1  =  minimally  supported  my  engagement  in  the  activity  

2  =  deepened  my  interest  and  understanding  in  the  activity  

3  =  served  to  push  me  to  

engage  in  and  critically  analyze  

the  activity  content  

   

     

2) How  might  you  use  the  format  of  this  organizer  in  your  teaching?  

             

3) What  suggestions  do  you  have  to  enhance  this  organizer?  

             

Page 40: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

Graphic  Organizer  14a  

1

Using  student  achievement  data  to  support  instructional  decision  making    Web  Resource:  http://dww.ed.gov/Data-­‐Driven-­‐Instructional-­‐Decision-­‐Making/topic/?T_ID=30  

   

Activity  Guidelines:    Download  the  Visual  Diagram  “Using  Student  Achievement  Data  to  Support  Instructional  Decision  Making”  to  use  as  a  guide  throughout  this  section  of  the  website.    Next,  click  on  each  of  the  five  sections  outlined  in  the  chart  and  view  the  overview  for  each  section.  Next,  choose  a  minimum  of  two  additional  information  sources  within  each  section  to  read  or  view.  Use  the  chart  below  to  capture  what  you  learn  from  each  section.  Conclude  your  research  by  writing  a  two-­‐paragraph  summary  of  your  learning.        

  Link  to  two  information  sources  you  chose  

Key  Ideas  You  Learned  

Cycle  of  Improvement  

   

 

Student  Use  of  Data  

   

 

Vision  For  Data  Use  

   

 

Data-­‐Driven  Culture  

   

 

District-­‐Wide  Data  System  

   

 

  Write  two  paragraphs  synthesizing  what  you  learned  from  the  “Using  Student  Achievement  Data  to  Support  Instructional  Decision  Making”  section  of  the  Doing  What  Works  website.    

Page 41: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

2

 Student  Feedback    

 1) Rate  the  level  to  which  this  organizer  supported  your  engagement  in  the  activity.  

0  =  distracted  from  or  did  not  add  anything  to  my  engagement  with  this  learning  

activity  

1  =  minimally  supported  my  engagement  in  the  activity  

2  =  deepened  my  interest  and  understanding  in  the  activity  

3  =  served  to  push  me  to  

engage  in  and  critically  analyze  

the  activity  content  

2) How  might  you  use  the  format  of  this  organizer  in  your  teaching?  

3) What  suggestions  do  you  have  to  enhance  this  organizer?  

   

Page 42: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

Graphic  Organizer    15a    

1    

An  IEP  map:  Navigating  your  way  through  the  maze    Web  Resource:  http://www.schooltube.com/video/6d476df2ef7d4abfa02f/An-­‐IEP-­‐Map-­‐Navigating-­‐

Your-­‐Way-­‐through-­‐the-­‐Maze    

Activity  Guidelines:    If  designed  and  implemented  effectively,  the  Individualized  Education  Plan  (IEP)  meeting  is  an  invaluable  opportunity  for  collaborative  planning.  To  aid  general  and  special  education  teachers  in  maximizing  those  opportunities,  view  the  video  and  generate  a  list  of  common  issues  and  accompanying  recommendations  or  suggestions  you  have  for  proactively  planning  to  ensure  a  respectful  and  productive  meeting.  

 

 

 

• How  will  you  commit  to  managing  this  issue  ?  Issue  

Page 43: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

 

2    

 

Student  Feedback    

1) Rate  the  level  to  which  this  organizer  supported  your  engagement  in  the  activity.  

0  =  distracted  from  or  did  not  add  anything  to  my  engagement  with  this  learning  

activity  

1  =  minimally  supported  my  engagement  in  the  activity  

2  =  deepened  my  interest  and  understanding  in  the  activity  

3  =  served  to  push  me  to  

engage  in  and  critically  analyze  

the  activity  content  

   

     

2) How  might  you  use  the  format  of  this  organizer  in  your  teaching?  

             

3) What  suggestions  do  you  have  to  enhance  this  organizer?  

             

Page 44: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

Graphic  Organizer  16a  

1    

Define  the  5  Step  Process:    

 

How  the  Special  Education  Process  Works!!!  Web  Resource:  www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCdR2vA1g20  

 Activity  Guidelines:    Watch  the  “Introduction  to  Special  Education”  video  which  provides  guidance  to  parents.  Complete  the  viewing  guide  to  aid  you  in  explaining  the  special  education  process  to  a  parent  of  a  student  in  your  classroom.    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Referral  

Evaluation  

IEP  Placement  

Annual  Review  

Page 45: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

 

2    

 

Student  Feedback  

 

1) Rate  the  level  to  which  this  organizer  supported  your  engagement  in  the  activity.  

0  =  distracted  from  or  did  not  add  anything  to  my  engagement  with  this  learning  

activity  

1  =  minimally  supported  my  engagement  in  the  activity  

2  =  deepened  my  interest  and  understanding  in  the  activity  

3  =  served  to  push  me  to  

engage  in  and  critically  analyze  

the  activity  content  

   

     

2) How  might  you  use  the  format  of  this  organizer  in  your  teaching?  

             

3) What  suggestions  do  you  have  to  enhance  this  organizer?  

             

Page 46: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

    Graphic  Organizer  17a  

1    

Special  education  terminology:  Iris  online  dictionary    Web  Resource:  http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/resource_TOOL_dict/onlinedictionary.html    

 Activity  Guidelines:    Using  the  IRIS  online  dictionary,  select  six  terms  you  are  unfamiliar  with  and  describe  how  this  term  applies  and/or  will  

be  useful  to  your  professional  development.        

     

Term   Application  to  Professional  Development  

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

Page 47: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

 

2    

   

Student  Feedback    

 

1) Rate  the  level  to  which  this  organizer  supported  your  engagement  in  the  activity.  

0  =  distracted  from  or  did  not  add  anything  to  my  engagement  with  this  learning  

activity  

1  =  minimally  supported  my  engagement  in  the  activity  

2  =  deepened  my  interest  and  understanding  in  the  activity  

3  =  served  to  push  me  to  

engage  in  and  critically  analyze  

the  activity  content  

   

     

2) How  might  you  use  the  format  of  this  organizer  in  your  teaching?  

             

3) What  suggestions  do  you  have  to  enhance  this  organizer?  

             

Page 48: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

    Graphic  Organizer  18a    

1    

Understanding  the  pre-­‐referral  process  Web  Resource:  http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/preref/chalcycle.htm  

 Activity  Guidelines:    Use  the  following  four  part  activity  to  deepen  your  understanding  regarding  recommended  pre-­‐referral  processes  and  how  those  align  with  practices  at  your  school.    

Part  1  Challenge  –  Initial  Thoughts:    1a)  What  is  the  pre-­‐referral  process?      1b)  What  are  the  stages  of  the  pre-­‐referral  process  and  what  do  they  involve?      

Part  2  Perspectives  and  Resources:  2a)  Provide  the  6  stages  and  a  brief  description  of  what  happens  at  each  stage:    

Stages   Brief  Description  

   

   

   

   

   

   

 Part  3  Assessment:  

 3a)  Why  is  it  important  to  begin  the  initial  team  meeting  with  a  discussion  of  the  student's  strengths?  

Page 49: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

2    

     3b)  In  Walker's  case,  what  role  might  the  general  education  teacher  play  at  each  stage  of  the  pre-­‐referral  process?    

Stage   Role      

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   3c)  List  the  other  individuals  that  you  would  include  on  Walker's  pre-­‐referral  team  and  describe  the  roles  they  would  fill.    Individual   Role        

 

   

 

   

 

   3d)  Imagine  you  are  a  fourth-­‐grade  teacher,  and  you  have  a  student  named  Kevon  in  your  class.  Kevon  has  a  good  attitude,  is  cooperative  in  class,  and  is  helpful  to  his  classmates.  He  is  always  eager  to  start  his  assignments  and  wants  to  please.  You  note  that  he  has  strong  critical  thinking  skills  and  gets  along  well  with  others.  However,  you  are  concerned  because  he  reads  slowly,  so  slowly  in  fact  that  he  has  difficulty  comprehending  the  material  in  his  textbooks.  He  often  guesses  at  words  he  does  not  recognize,  and  he  seems  to  become  easily  frustrated  with  his  reading  assignments.  Reviewing  his  cumulative  file,  you  see  that  his  grades  have  steadily  

Page 50: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

3    

declined  since  first  grade.  Based  on  all  of  this  information,  do  you  think  Kevon  is  an  appropriate  candidate  for  the  pre-­‐referral  process?  Justify  your  answer.        

Part  4  Process  your  learning:      4a)  After  completing  this  activity,  circle  back  to  your  Initial  Thoughts  (refer  to  part  1).  What  will  you  add  to  your  definition  of  the  pre-­‐referral  process?    

     

Student  Feedback  

   

1) Rate  the  level  to  which  this  organizer  supported  your  engagement  in  the  activity.  

0  =  distracted  from  or  did  not  add  anything  to  my  engagement  with  this  learning  

activity  

1  =  minimally  supported  my  engagement  in  the  activity  

2  =  deepened  my  interest  and  understanding  in  the  activity  

3  =  served  to  push  me  to  

engage  in  and  critically  analyze  

the  activity  content  

   

     

2) How  might  you  use  the  format  of  this  organizer  in  your  teaching?  

             

3) What  suggestions  do  you  have  to  enhance  this  organizer?  

             

Page 51: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

4    

 

Page 52: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

    Graphic  Organizer  19a    

1    

What  do  you  see?  Perceptions  of  disability    Web  Resource:  http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/da/cinit.htm  

 Activity  Guidelines:    Use  these  guiding  questions  to  help  you  view  the  module.      Part  1  Challenge  and  Initial  Thoughts:    What  did  you  see?    

       What  feelings  did  you  have  about  the  photos?        

   What  thoughts  did  you  have  about  the  individuals  in  this  challenge?            Do  perceptions  matter?  Why  or  Why  not?          Part  2  Perspective  and  Resources:      How  do  societal  views  shape  beliefs  about  people  with  disabilities?  Positively  and  negatively?    

•    

•  

Page 53: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

       

2    

What  are  some  myths  and  misconceptions  about  disabilities?            Part  3  Assessment:    

Some  of  these  children  have  disabilities.  Do  you  think  people's  perceptions  of  others  play  a  role  in  the  success  of  children  with  disabilities?  Why  or  why  not?    

 

 

 

 

Based  on  your  own  perceptions,  how  would  you  feel  about  having  these  children  in  your  classroom?    

 

 

 

 

If  you  were  put  in  charge  of  a  movie  production  about  a  person  with  blindness,  what  type  of  perceptions  would  you  want  to  make  sure  are  portrayed  in  your  movie?  What  myths  could  you  debunk?  What  stereotypes  would  you  want  to  make  sure  to  avoid?    

 

 

 

 

Page 54: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

       

3    

Part  4  Wrap  Up:    

How  have  your  perceptions  changed  after  viewing  the  resources  in  this  module?    

 

 

 

 

Student  Feedback    

 

 

 

 

 

1) Rate  the  level  to  which  this  organizer  supported  your  engagement  in  the  activity.  

0  =  distracted  from  or  did  not  add  anything  to  my  engagement  with  this  learning  

activity  

1  =  minimally  supported  my  engagement  in  the  activity  

2  =  deepened  my  interest  and  understanding  in  the  activity  

3  =  served  to  push  me  to  

engage  in  and  critically  analyze  

the  activity  content  

   

     

2) How  might  you  use  the  format  of  this  organizer  in  your  teaching?  

             

3) What  suggestions  do  you  have  to  enhance  this  organizer?  

             

Page 55: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

Resource  Guide:  DWW,  IRIS,  Schooltube,  Youtube    Compiled  by  Donna  Sobel,  University  of  Colorado  Denver    

1    

Resource   Graphic  Organizer  

Website   Description   SPED  5030  

UCTE/PDS  edWeb  

1   Dropout  prevention:  Multimedia  overview  

1a   http://dww.ed.gov/Dropout-­‐Prevention/topic/?T_ID=24  

A  guide  geared  towards  supporting  students  in  ways  that  prevent  dropout.    

x    

2   Dropout  prevent:  Improving  classroom  behaviors  

2a   http://dww.ed.gov/Dropout-­‐Prevention/Social-­‐Behavior-­‐Programs/practice/?T_ID=24&P_ID=56  

A  resource  designed  to  help  the  user  develop  strategies  for  improving  students’  classroom  behavior  and  social  skills.    

x   x  

3   Dropout  prevention:  Small  group  academic  support  through  humanities  teams:  Sleepy  Hollow  High  

3a   http://dww.ed.gov/Dropout-­‐Prevention/Rigorous-­‐Relevant-­‐Instruction/see/index.cfm?T_ID=24&P_ID=56&c1=1028#cluster-­‐1  

Guide  designed  to  examine  academic  and  social  supports  in  current  school  and/or  district.    

x   x  

4   Dropout  prevention  overview  video    

4a   http://dww.ed.gov/Dropout-­‐Prevention/topic/?T_ID=24  

Guides  user  through  video  to  synthesize  recommendations  and  put  them  into  action.    

x    

5   Dropout  prevention:  Utilizing  data  systems    

5a   http://dww.ed.gov/Dropout-­‐Prevention/Data-­‐Systems/see/?T_ID=24&P_ID=53  

This  activity  guides  the  viewer  to  investigate  how  data  can  reveal  dropout  tendencies  and  supports  that  can  be  created  and  provided  

x    

6   Guiding  questions  for  data-­‐team  meeting  video  –  grade  5  math  review  

6a   http://dww.ed.gov/Response-­‐to-­‐Intervention-­‐Math/Intentional-­‐Teaching/see/index.cfm?T_ID=28&P_ID=69&c1=1508#cluster-­‐1  

This  activity  illustrates  how  resources  are  used  in  a  grade  5  math  setting  and  prompts  the  viewer  to  examine  current  district/school  data-­‐driven  instructional    methods.    

x   x  

7   Guiding   7a   http://dww.ed.gov/Dropout-­‐ Guiding  questions  used  to   x   x  

Page 56: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

Resource  Guide:  DWW,  IRIS,  Schooltube,  Youtube    Compiled  by  Donna  Sobel,  University  of  Colorado  Denver    

2    

questions  for  interview  –  Collective  responsibility  

Prevention/Academic-­‐Supports/learn/?T_ID=24&P_ID=55  

synthesize  information  provided  in  interview  with  expert  Monica  Martinez  regarding  dropout  prevention.  

8   Intentional  teaching    

8a   http://dww.ed.gov/Response-­‐to-­‐Intervention-­‐Math/RtI-­‐Implementation/see/index.cfm?T_ID=28&P_ID=71&c1=1509#cluster-­‐1  

A  guide  to  accompany  the  video  demonstration  of  paced  instruction  in  tier  3  instruction.    

x    

9   Managing  progress  monitoring  in  the  classroom  

9a   http://dww.ed.gov/Response-­‐to-­‐Intervention-­‐Reading/Progress-­‐Monitoring-­‐and-­‐Differentiation/see/?T_ID=27&P_ID=73  

This  activity  prompts  the  viewer  to  links  those  progress  monitoring  practices  illustrated  in  the  video  to  recommended  professional  development  supports.    

x    

10   Meeting  the  social  and  behavioral  needs  of  students  identified  as  “at-­‐risk”  

10a   http://dww.ed.gov/Dropout-­‐Prevention/Rigorous-­‐Relevant-­‐Instruction/see/index.cfm?T_ID=24&P_ID=56&c1=1062#cluster-­‐1  

Used  to  view  module  of  Western  Hills  High  School  and  create  ideas  for  application  in  professional  development.    

x    

11   Progress  monitoring  and  differentiation  

11a   http://dww.ed.gov/Response-­‐to-­‐Intervention-­‐Reading/Progress-­‐Monitoring-­‐and-­‐Differentiation/learn/?T_ID=27&P_ID=73  

Used  to  view  an  interview  with  expert  reading  coach,  Nadine  Hoover  in  which  she  highlights  examples  of  ways  her  discussion  points  are  implemented.    

x    

12   Response  to  intervention:    Expert  interview  with  Dr.  Tilly  

12a   http://dww.ed.gov/Response-­‐to-­‐Intervention-­‐Reading/RtI-­‐Implementation/learn/?T_ID=27&P_ID=90&intID=1804&t=1#learn  

Guiding  questions  to  reflect  on  Dr.  Tilly’s  explanation  of  the  interface  of  special  education  with  response  to  intervention.      

x    

13   Teaching  literacy  to  K-­‐5  English  language  learners    

13a   http://dww.ed.gov/Literacy-­‐in-­‐English-­‐K-­‐5/topic/?T_ID=13  

A  guide  to  review  recommended  practices  for  teaching  students  with  second  language  needs  ELL.    

x   x  

Page 57: Donna M. Sobel, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver · Research Intensive Urban University Graduate (85%) & Undergraduate (15%) teacher education Elementary (K-6) Secondary (7-12)

Resource  Guide:  DWW,  IRIS,  Schooltube,  Youtube    Compiled  by  Donna  Sobel,  University  of  Colorado  Denver    

3    

14   Using  student  achievement  data  to  support  instructional  decision  making    

14a   http://dww.ed.gov/Data-­‐Driven-­‐Instructional-­‐Decision-­‐Making/topic/?T_ID=30  

A  guide  for  understanding  how  data  is  used  to  support  instructional  decision  making.    

x    

15   An  IEP  map:  Navigating  your  way  through  the  maze  

15a   http://www.schooltube.com/video/6d476df2ef7d4abfa02f/An-­‐IEP-­‐Map-­‐Navigating-­‐Your-­‐Way-­‐through-­‐the-­‐Maze  

A  guide  for  conducting  a  productive  and  respectful  individualized  education  plan.    

x   x      

16   How  the  Special  Education  process  works!!!  

16a   www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCdR2vA1g20  

A  resource  designed  to  explain  the  referral  process  for  special  education  service  delivery.    

x   x  

17   Special  education  terminology  

17a   http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/resource_TOOL_dict/onlinedictionary.html  

A  guide  for  raising  awareness  about  special  education  related  terms  through  the  IRIS  online  dictionary.    

x   x  

18   Understanding  the  pre-­‐referral  process  

18a   http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/preref/chalcycle.htm  

A  guide  to  understanding  the  pre-­‐referral  process  for  supporting  students  with  academic  and  behavioral  challenges.  

x   x  

19   Perceptions  of  disability    

19a   http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/da/cinit.htm  

A  guide  for  supporting  the  viewer  in  deepening  their  awareness  as  to  how  they  view  individuals  with  a  disability.      

x   x