document resume - eric · document resume ed 129 565 se 019 499 title physics in perspective volume...
TRANSCRIPT
DOCUMENT RESUME
ED 129 565 SE 019 499
TITLE Physics in Perspective Volume II, Part C, StatisticalData.
INSTITUTION National Academy of Sciences - National ResearchCouncil, Washington, D.C. Physics Survey Committee.d
PUB DATE 73NOTE 326p.; For Volume I of this series, see ED082942; Not
available in hard copy due te,numerous small printand marginal legibility of original document
EDRS PRICE MF-$0.83 Plus Postage. HC Not Available from EDRS.DESCRIPTORS Econonic Factors; *Financial Support; Graduate Study;
*Higher Education; *Manpower Needs; ManpowerUtilization; *Physics; *Research; Science Education;*Statistical Data
ABSTRACTStatistical data relating to the sociology and
economics of the physics enterprise are presented and explained. Thedata are divided into three sections: manpower data,.data on fundingand costs, and data on the literature of physics. Each sectionincludes numerous studies, with notes on the sources and types ofdata, gathering procedures, and interpretations. Additionalexplanatory notes are found in the appendices, such as questionnairesamples, term definitions, and a list of physics subfields. (MH)
***********************************************************************Documents acquired by ERIC include many informal unpublished
* materials not available from other sources. ERIC makes every effort ** to obtain the best copy available. Nevertheless, items of marginal *
* reproducibility are often encountered and this affects the quality *
* of the microfiche and hardcopy reproductions ERIC makes available *
* via the ERIC Document Reproduction Service (EDRS). EDRS is not* responsible for the quality of the original document. Reproductions *
* supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original.***********************************************************************
PHYSICSINPERSPECTIVE
VOLUME IIPART C
StatisticalDataAuxiliary MaterialCollected by the Staffand Some Members ofthe Data Panel
Physics Survey Committee National Research Council
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES Washington, D.C. 1973
3
NO'FICE: The study repor led herem was undertaken slider the aegis id. Ole Colnlmtlee on Scienceand Public Policy (LOSPITI of the National Acaderm, of Sciences National Research Counvil,with the epress approval of the rioverning Board of the National Rey-lieh Council,
Responsibility for all aspects of tills report rests with the Physics tiorsey Committee, to whomsim'ere app teem t Ion is here e pressed .
rho report has not been submitted for appn,val io the AcadernY tneinhership or to the Councilbut, in accordanee with Academy procedures, has been res leWed and .ipPr0ed t'N' the Comnutteeon Science and Public Policy. I, is being distributed. followmg tins re vie%%. with Bic approval of thePresident or the Academy.
LIBRARY 01' coNGRESS CATALOGING IN PUBLICATION DATA
National Research Council. Physics Survey Committee.Physics in perspective.
"Undertaken under the aegis of the Committee on Science and 1,oblie policy of the NationalAcademy of SciencesNational Research Cduneil."
Includes bibliographical references.PARTIAL CONTENTS: v. 2. pt. A. The core subfields of physics,---v. 2. Pt ki. The interfaces.I. PhysiesResedrchUnited States. 2. ScienceUnited States.v- 2, pl C. Statistical Data.
I. National Research Council. Committee on Science and Public Poliol.QC9.U5N28 530%0973 72-84752
ISBN 0-309-02101-4
Committee on Science and Public Policy
MELVIN CA LVIN. University of California, Berkeley, ChairmanHA R VEY BROOKS. Harvard University, Past ChairmanGEORGE BACKUS., University of California, San DiegoGERALD CLEM ENCL, Yale UniversityPAUL DOTY, Harvard UniversityROBERT CARRELS, University of HawaiiARTHUR IIAS LER, University of WisconsinLEL AND J. HAWORTH, Associated Universities, Inc.RUDOLF KOM PFN ER, Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc.JAY LUS II. towa State UniversityROBERT K. MERTON, Columbia UniversityHER SCHE L 1. ROMAN, University of WashingtonHARRISON SHUL.l, Indiana UniversityI. M. SINGER, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
ROBERT E. GREEN. National Academy of SciencesExecutive Secretary
.5
Physics Survey Committee
D. A L AN BRONI I. h V , Yale University, Chairman*DAN IE L ALPERT, University of IllinoisRAYMOND BOW FR S, Cornell UniversityJOSEPH W. CIIAMBER LAIN, The Lunar Science InstituteHERMAN FESHBACH, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGEORGE B. FIELD, University of California. BerkeleyRONALD GEBALLE, University of WashingtonCONYERS HERR !NG, Bell Telephone Laboratories. Inc.ARTHUR R. KA NTROWITZ, AVCO-Everett Research LaboratoryTHOMAS LAURITSEN, California Institute of TechnologyFRANKLIN A. LONG, Cornell UniversityE. R. PIO R E , International Business Machines CorporationE. NI. PURCELL, Harvard UniversityROBERT G. SACHS, University or Chicago
*CII A R LES H. TOWNES, University of California, BerkeleyA LV1N NI. W EINBERG. Oak Ridge National LaboratoryVICTOR F. WEISSKOPF, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
*Members of original Survey Committee. Other responsibilities precluded these physi-cists from participating in other than the early deliberations.
vi
6
PhyAic S'nrrel.
Ex (J.1P(1,,
II ARVEY BR Oo K S, liarard UniversityI.. I (;()I.l)w ASSI. , National Accelerator LaboratoryH. \V 11.1.IA K o II, ,American Institute or PItysiesRoN1 N SMOLUcHOWSK I, Princeton University
NSIILTA NTS
MARVIN Got BE I(;I R , Princeton UniversityHO BF R I W, KEYES, Internatitmal litisiness Nlachines Corporation
LIAISON REPRESENTATIVES*
C. N I. I I. A M NI F R NIA N, Department or Defense\V, U. ARMSTRONG, National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNI A R CF L BA R DON , National Science Fou11d:11kmDONALD F. CUNNINGHAM , National Science FoundationPAUL F. DONOVAN, National Science FoundationWAYNE R. t;tt LINER , National Science FoundationGEORGE A. K 0 LSTAD , Atomic Energy Commission.101IN J. M cC A NI RH (DUE. Department of DefenseWILLIAM METSCHER, Department of DefenseSIDNEY PA SS M A N. National Science FoundationJACK T. SANDERSON, National Science FoundationA. W. SC II A R DT, National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationMILTON NI. SLAWSK V. Department of DefenseHENRY SMITH, National Aeronautics and Space 'ministration
GE01;E W. WOOD, National Academy of Sciences, Executive Secretury
Stuff Olj icers
BERT IT A I, . COM PIONBRUCE N. GREGORYCHARLES K. REED
*In general, no agency was represented on the Committee or any of its Panels by morethan one person at a time.
7
Statistical Data Panel
PANEL MEMBERS
CONYERS HERRING, Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc., ChairmanTIIOM AS LAIIR ITS N, California Institute of Technology, Vice Chairman(until
May 1970)IAY AJZENBERG-SETWIE, University of PennsylvaniatEl GRoDZ.INS. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (from January 1971)ROBEIt F itERMAN, General Motors Corpora tiont; I.: u FREY KELL ER. The Ohio State UniversityRO BE K r W. KEY Es, International Business Machines t orporationBit mit' M . o RS , Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyARTHUR t I ROSENFELD. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratoryto u is B. SLICIITER, University of California, Los Angeles
Esv is st..AIK. American Institute of Physics
STAFF SCIENTIST
DALE T. TEANEY. International Business Machines Corporation
LIAISON REPRESENTATIVES
WALTIAt C. CHRISTENSEN, Department of DefenseWAYNE It, GRUNER, National Science Foundationw A LTErt E. HUGHES, Atomic Energy CommissionA. W. SCIIARDT, National Aeronautics and Space Administration
CONSULTANT
BEVERLY PORI ER, American Institute of Physics
* Contributors to this report.
8
PREFACE
The Physics Survey Committee was appointed by the President of theNational Academy of Sciences in mid-1969 to survey the status, op-portunities, and problems of physics in the United States. VolumeI of Phyvic;; Pc:ropact7:ve constitutes the full report of theCommittee. This and the companion parts of Volume II, complete thereport of the survey.
The Survey Committee early concluded that it was essential thatit obtain detailed information from experts in each of a number ofphysics subfields and interface areas. For each of these subfieldsand interface areas a chairman was appointed by the Chairman of theSurvey Committee, and groups of recognized experts were broughttogether to survey and report on their respective subject areas.
Several of the subfields have relatively well-defined andtraditional boundaries in physics. Included are the core subfieldsof acoustics, optics, condensed matter, plasmas and fluids, atomic,molecular, and electron physics, nuclear physics and elementary-particle physics. The reports of these panels constitute Part A ofVolume II. In addition, there are several important interfaceareas between physics and other sciences. These are examined inPart B of Volume II. In the case of astronomy, where activity isparticularly vigorous at the interface and is overlapping, thePhysics and Astronomy Survey Committees agreed to form a jointpanel that would report on astrophysics and relativity, an area ofspecial interest to both. The bioad area in which physics overlapsgeology, oceanography, terrestrial and planetary atmospheric studies,and other environmental sciences was defined as earth and planetaryphysics, and a panel was established to survey it. In coveringthe physics-chemistry and physics-biology interfaces, the broaderdesignations "physics in chemistry" and "physics in biology" were
9
chwion [0 dy,11 ii i ito th0 tei i 11,1111Thi to the alteadvttaditional boundaries s. iltordk, iplinarv tieldh.
Although oath particularly thwic re,ipoulithlo for thocore hublields. .was asd to tqeilder the interaction of its sub-
tiefd with technology, the Cemmittee anticipated !hat the emplhilhwould he on recent developm entn that advanced the state of the artand on what in generally dencribed an Therefore,to include more npe.Afically the active inntrumentation interfacebetween physics .nnt the more traditional manufacturing sectors ofthe economysteel, drugs, chemicaln and consumer goods, to nameonly a few, in which many old parametern are being measured andcontrolled in new and ingenious ways--a separate panel wasentahlished.
Panels were also appointed to centralize the statistical data-collection activities of the survey and Co address the questions ofphysics in education and education in physics. In addition, anextended report on the dishomination and use of the hiformation ofphysics was prepared by a member of the Committee. With the excep-tion of the one on statistical data, all these reports are includedin Part lb of Volume [if the Statistical Data report constitutesPart C of Volume II. The Survey Committee is deeply grateful toConyers Herring, Chairman of the Statistical Data Panel, who sawthis (Cfort through to completion and to others who assisted inthe gathering and analysis of thl2 statistical material that formsthe basis for this report.
Support for the survey activity has been provided equally by theAtomic Energy Commission, the Department of Defense, the NationalAeronautics and Space Administration, and the National ScienceFoundation. Additional assistance has been provided through grantsfrom the American Physical Society and from the American Instituteof Physics.
To these agencies and to other organizations and individuals whohelped to make this survey possible through their contributions, Iexpress both my personal thanks and that of the Committee and itspanels.
D. ALLAN BROMLEY, ChairmanPhysics Survey Committee
1 0
CON I 1
1 INTRODUCTION 1467
Nature of this Report, 1467Sources of Data, 1468
2 MANPOWER DATA 1478
Studies Based on the National Register and otherNationwide Sources, 1478
Samples of Special Populations, 1567
3 DATA ON FUNDING AND COSTS 1576
General Survey of the Various Sources of Supportfor Physics Research, 1576
Support of Physics Research by Major GovernmentAgencies, 1584
Industrial Support of Physics Research, 1596Physics Research Support from University Funds, 1607Growth in Costs of Research in Physics, 1622
4 DATA ON THE LITERATURE OF PHYSICS 1625
Production and Distribution, 1625Use and Usefulness, 1647
5 INDEX OF DATA
1 1
APPENDIX A: SELECTED TAHLES ERIN THE PI11S1 I ON
oF THE NATIoNAL REGISTER OE SCIENTIFIC ANn TECHNICAI,PERSONM
mpEND ALLocAT 0;4 op NAT I oNAL itp(; !.; rER .;1,1
TIES TO PHYSICS SUPFIELW;
1 2
!AL-
17/1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Nature of This Report
When the Physics Survey Committee was established by the NationalAcademy of Sciences in 1969, it was decided that among its numer-ous panels there should be one charged with coordinating the col-
lection and analysis of statistical data relating to the sociologyand economics of the physics enterprise. The reasons for setting
up such a panel were of two sorts, which may be categorized as
"internal" and "external." To make the work of the Survey Com-mittee internally consistent, the various subfield panels obviously
needed to adopt uniform definitions and, whenever possIble, to ob-
tain data from comparable sources. Moreover, the gathering of datafrom external organizations, such as government agencies, indus-
tries, and universities, obviously could be carried out more ef-
ficir_ntly and with less inconvenience to these organizations by a
single Data Panel than by many independent subfield panels. There-
fore, as much of the gathering of socioeconomic data as possible
was to be channeled through the Data Panel.In addition to its primary function of serving the Survey Com-
mittee and the subfield panels in the manner just described, itwas also thought that, after the data needed by these groups hadbeen collected and turned over to them, the Data Panel might pre-
pare an exhaustive and systematic compendium of data relevant to
the functioning of the physics community. If such a compendium
could be prepared, and periodically updated, it would be tremen-
dously useful to physicists, research and educational organiza-
tions, government agencies, and the like. Unfortunately, this
report is not the compendium that was envisaged. The demands on
the time of the Data Panel and its staff proved of longer duration
than had been anticipated, and almost no time was left for a
1467
1 3
1468 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
leisurely assembling of data on a large scale. Moreover, fundsavailable to the Survey were limited, and it seemed wasteful to re-publish data already presentee elsewhere, especially in the earliervolumes of Physics in Perspective, merely to have all the data pre-sented together.
The philosophy adopted for this report is, therefore, not en-cyclopedic but rather a philosophy of making publicly available,in as orderly a manner as possible, those 'rems of data in our pos-session thaemay be of interest to the phy.,-s community and othersand that have not been presented elsewhere. Because of the lattercondition, the resulting collection is something of a hodgepodge.We have tried to ameliorate this situation to some extent, however,by occasional cross-references to data presented in other volumesof Physics in Perspective, and by including, in Chapter V, a con-densed but we hope usable index to data presented in the figuresand tables of this and the other volumes.
1.2 Sources of Data
1.2.1 TYPES OF DATA AND SOURCES
Most, though not quite all, of the data of interest to us arerepresented by numerical values of some dependent variable y,shown in their dependence on one or several independent variablesx, which may or may not be identified by numbers. One encountersthe following types of dependent variables y:
1. People: i.e., numbers of persons or fractions of some popu-lation. Thus, the entry in a table or the ordinate of a figuremay be "number of physicists," "number of students," "fraction ofrespondents," etc.
2. Money: Typical quantities tabulated or graphed are dollaramounts of support, salaries, costs, etc.
3. Publications: i.e., such things as number of papers, frac-tion of papers, number of books or reports, etc.
4. Miscellaneous: The number of quantities other than thethree types mentioned above, for which numerical data can be given,is of course large. They can be as diverse as "average age,""maximum voltage of accelerators," "time lag between submissionand publication," etc. However, it is not unreasonable to groupall these together in a miscellaneous category, as all such itemstogether seem to constitute a rather less bulky fraction of thematerial of interest to a study such as ours than do the threepreceding categories.
We shall use these four categories as the basis for the organi-zation of our index in Chapter V. Table 1.1 gives some crude in-dicators of the relative bulk of material one is likely to en-counter in each of these categories. The top row of figures re-fers to an extensive bibliography of sources of data about physicsand physicists compiled a few years ago for.the American Institute
1 4
Introduction 1469
of Physics (AIP) by Professor A. L. Harvey.* Here, the numbers
represent the number of documents the principal emphasis of which
is on data of each of the four types. In the other rows of
Table 1.1 the entries represent numbers of figures and tables, the
ordinates or entries of which represent data of each of these types.In sheer bulk, it appears that in all cases data on people are the
most voluminous.
TABLE 1.1 Distribution ofMajor Categories
Data in Various Collections over Four
Number of ItemsPresenting (orEmphasizing) Dataof Each Category
CategoryPeople Money Publications Misc.
Mcuments referred toin the Harvey Reporta
334 73 :15 174
Figures and tabdes in 184 184 40 122
Physics in PerspectiveVols. I, IIA, 11B
This volume, excluding 168 21 29 18
Appendix
aFrom its "Index by Data Category." The numbers add to consider-
ably mure than the 220 documents indexed, because many documents
contain important data of more than one type. The entry L, in the
publications column is a guess based on scanning titles of docu-
ments.
Usually the interest of data of any of these types lies in its
dependence on various auxiliary variables. The important cate-
gories of such variables are the following:
1. Time. It is nearly always of interest to know how any given
quantity has been changing over the years.2. Discipline or type of activity. One may compare physics
with other sciences and subdisciplines of physics with one another
-.or contrast basic research with applied research, with teaching,
etc.
*Harvey, A. L. Statistical Data Resources of Physics and Physi-
cists: An Index. New York, N. Y. :Education and Manpower Divi-sion, American Institute of Physics (Pub. R-228), 1970.
15
1470 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
3. Geographical or institutional entities. For example, one
may compare different countries with each other, universities withindustrial or government laboratories, research funded by differ-ent agencies, etc.
4. Characteristics of persons. When the dependent variable yis a number of people or a fraction of a population, it can be'presented as a function of various other characteristics or quanti-ties besides the ones just named. Examples are age, sex, posses-
sion of certain degrees, academic rank, etc. Table 1.2 shows the
extent to which each of these various types of independent variablehas been used in the figures and tables of this report and in thoseof the earlier parts of Physics in Perspective.
TABLE 1.2 Frequency of the most Important Types of IndependentVariables in the Figures and Tables of this Report and of theEarlier Volumes of Physics in Perspectivea
Type of IndependentVariable
Physics inPerspectiveVols. I, HA,
This Volume (Exclud-ing Appendix)
IIB
Time 515 235
Discipline or activity:Field of science 449 232
Type of activity 24 23
Geographic or organi-zational:
Geographic region 462 228
Working institution 107 111
Source of support. 64 50
Personal characteris'frs:Age 1'; 23
Degree or rank 112 148
aNumber of figures or tables in which entries for two or more val-
ues of the independent variable are compared.
Data of any of these types can be obtained from a variety ofsources. Many of the data of interest for a study such as ourscan be acquired by consulting tabulations rhat have been preparedby various other organizations, especially those of governmentagencies. We shall discuss some of these sources briefly in Sec-tion 1.2.2. Here, we wish only to classify the means by which theoriginal gathering of a mass of data can be performed. Among themany possible sources of data, three are of particular importancefor the type of material of interest to us:
16
Iftroduction 1471
1. Individuals. Questionnaires filled out by individuals con-stitute an epecially important source; we shall discuss theirutility and limitations presently. Alternatively, one can gatherinformation from individuals by interviewing them in person or byimpersonal observation.
2. Organizations. Organizations, private or governmental,have statistics and records that can be used as data sources eitherby examining them directly or by asking officials of the organiza-tions to fill out questionnaires.
3. The scientific literature. Unlike many other objects ofsocioeconomic_study, a scientific discipline like physics leavesa record of much of its most important activity in the form ofjournal articles and other publications. These are, in turn, col-lected and indexed in the secondary literature. Thus researchjournals, abstract journals, and the like provide an extraordin-arily rich mine from which to extract information on many subjects:for example, who is doing physics where; how different subfieldsand disciplines interrelate; or how much impact certain types ofphysics work have and where it is felt.
Questionnaires deserve a special comment. Those mailed to
random fluctuations are minimized. But., unless they are intelli-gently managed and carry high prestige, the percentage of nonre-spondents is apt to be high, and one must then worry about whetherthe nonresponding population has the same statistical character-istics as the responding population. One should also think of thecost to the nation represented by the expenditure of time requiredfrom those who fill out the questionnaires. For example, it hasbeen estimated that the time invested by respondents in fillingout the forms for the 1970 National Register of Scientific andTechnical Personnel could well have been of the order of $2 mil-lion.* Thus a sensible policy is to use large-scale question-naires sparingly, restricting them to cases like the NationalRegister (unfortunately now discontinued) in which comprehensivedata are of vital importance and in which the prestige, regularity,and good management of the enterprise combine to ensure a highlevel of response. Similar considerations apply, though slightlyless strongly, to comprehensive questionnaires circulated to allorganizations of a given type, for example, to all universityphysics departments. Such questionnaires tend to be more compli-cated than those circulated to individuals, and although the num-ber of recipients is smaller, they are apt to be very busy people.
*Testimony of C. Herring before the Subcommittee on Science, Re-search, and Development, Committee on Science and Astronautics,U.S. House of Representatives, February 29, 1972.
1 7
1472 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
The loss if they fill out the questionnaire sloppily can be great.
Many types of data can be collected more quickly and efficiently
by sampling techniques. The success of public opioion polls in
this country attests to the effectiveness of such methods for even
quite large-scale surveys.In our work we have made use of existing data sources whenever
possible. The following section is devoted to a be ief discussion
of some of the more important of these. However, we found it neces-
sary to collect a considerable amount of new data. Our philosophy
in doing this, and a list of the major data-gatheriVg projects we
undertook, will be given in Section 1.2.3.
1,2.2 PRINCIPAL OLDER SOURCES
We have mentioned briefly the Harvey Report,* a rather cornprehen-
sive and quite useful bibliography of sources of Osca about physics.
This report, prepared at the AIP during 1969, with Che supp ort of
the National Science Foundation (NSF), describes soMe 220 documents,
issued by government agencies, learned societies, slid other groups
in the United States since 1960, plus a few foreigo items or items
of earlier date that are of particular value. The coverage is in-
tended to be fairly exhaustive for manpower, educational, and fund-
ing data assembled in this country in the 1960s. As we have seen
in Table 1.1, however, coverage of data on publications was appar-
ently not attempted. Practically all the documents referenced are
available in the files of the AIP. The report also lists a number
of earlier indexes and bibliographies.Having directed the reader to a fairly complete source of infor-
mation about earlier collections of data, we may oow limit our men-
tion of particular collections of data to a few tb0- proven
especially useful for the work of the Physics SurveY Committee.
We shall group these according to type of source ga::::tion.
Government Documents. Since the early 1950(s, che NSF has is-
sued annually FederaZ Funds for Research, Develop-7160, and Other
Scientific Activities. Obligations incurred by the various federal
agencies for the support of basic research, applied research, and
development in the various fields of science and eote7tralm are
listed for each of three consecutive fiscal years,these being.represented by the budget submitted to Congress but not
yet passed. The degree of detail provided can be PidicaCed by the
following remarks: Some data are given only for 'physical scienc:..s,"
others for a finer subdivision, in which physics is broken down into
four subfields; performers of the work are separated into intramural
government organizations, industrial organizations, federally funded
research and development centers, colleges and universities, non-
profit organizations, and foreign organizations; 4y for the funding
entities, several subagencies are listed for the DePertments of
Defense and Health, Education, and Welfare and other large depart-
ments, although the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), the NSF, and
others are not subdivided. Although valuable as a general guide
Harvey, A. L., op. cit.
1 8
Introduction 1473
to the pattern of government support, this publication has a numberof limitations that should be borne in mind. The separation intobasic research, applied research, and development is based on themotivation for Ihe work being pursued; the distinctions are neces-sarily somewhat ambiguous and may be interpreted differently bydifferent agencies when they report their figures to the NSF. (In
Section 111.1.1 we shall present our philosophy on the separationof "research" from "nonresearch.") The subdivision of physics isnot as detailed as was needed for the work of the Physics SurveyCommittee. Most serious of all is that there is no effective super-vision of the judgments made by the different agencies in reportingtheir figures. We shall see in Section 111.2.2 that a quite unrea-sonable picture can sometimes result from taking the figures attheir face value.
Another important publication of the NSF, biennial until 1971,has been American Science Manpower. This was a tabulation of datacollected by the National Register of Scientific and Technical Per-sonnel. In its detailed tables, scientists are divided by disci-pline (physics, chemistry, etc.), and occasionally by subdiscipline(acoustics, nuclear physics, etc.). For each discipline, scien-tists are further subdivided according to the most important pairsof the variables age, highest degree, employment status, type ofemployer, primary work activity, years of professional experience,major subject of highest degree. Extensive data are also given onmedian salaries, Peographical distribution, number receiving feder-al support, and ew other characteristics. The only shortcomingsof this compilation for our purposes are that since it covers somany disciplines it cannot give as much information about physicsas was needed for the work of the Physics Survey Committee. More-over, the subfields used although comparable in size with those ofthe Physics Survey Panels are not identical with them.
A third publication of the NSF is the annual National ScienceFoundation Grants and Awards, which lists, by field of science,state, institution, and principal investigator, the titles, dura-tions, and dollar amounts of all grants and awards for researchand other science-related activities. Some totals appear in the
NSF's internal Databook.Similar to this publication is the quarterly one, NASA's Univer-
sity Program, issued by the Office of University Affairs of theNational Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Here again,
titles, institutions, principal investigators, durations, and a-mounts are given for all grants or contracts supported by NASA in
universities. The different disciplines are separated, as are thedifferent NASA subagencies responsible for funding.
The AEC issues annually A Statistical Summary of the AysicalResearch Program, which gives data on manpower, publications, andfunding for work in federally funded research and development cen-ters, educational institutions, research institutes, and industrial
laboratories. The data are subdivided according to eight AEC dis-cipline categories, and various other statistics are given.
Although their data are rarely broken down to as fine a special-ty as physics, the compilations of the Bureau of Labor Statistics
are of especial interest in that they are obtained by intensive
1 9
1474 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTTVE
surveys of the civilian economy and are independent of such common-ly used other sources as the National Register. Of particular in-
terest in connection with demand extrapolations is their bulletin1648, PhD Scientists and Engineers in Private Industry 1968-8(y.
Publications of the American Institute of Physics. The PhysicsManpower series, published every few years by the AIP, provides aconvenient assemblage of statistics from the National Register,U.S. Office of Education, National Education Association, and othersources, most notably the data collected by AIP from physics depart-ments throughout the country. Over half is devoted to physics edu-
cation. Data on employment of physicists are broken down by salary,work activity, type of employer, highest degree, age, and subfields,
much as in American Science Manpower. However, the data on physics
are much more accessible and are often presented in graphical form.
The annual Directory of Physics and Astronomy Faculties listsall North American colleges and universities, with the names andranks of all faculty members in physics, applied physics, and astron-
omy departments. This infc=mation is obtained by direct contact
with the departments involved.The AIP has also issued some useful studies of the literature of
physics, most of which are not indexed in the Harvey Report. Two
studies of particular value are Journal Literature Covered by
Physics Abstracts in 1965, by S. Keenan and F. G. Brickwedde (Re-port ID 68-1, 1968) and Institutional Producers of Physics Research,
by M. Cooper and H. M. Watterson (Report ID 69-3, 1969).Publications of the NationaZ Academy of Sciences-National Re-
search Council. The Office of Scientific Personnel 9f the NationalResearch Council maintains a Doctorate Records File containing de-
tailed information gathered, with the cooperation of graduateschools throughout the country, from essentially all recipients ofdoctorates in the United States. Extensive data from this file
have been presented in Doctorate Recipients from United States Uni-
versities 1958-1966 (NAS publication 1489, 1967) and in supple-mental yearly summaries issued since. Geographic and institutional
distributions are given in considerable detail. Although most oY
the data are broken down only into major disciplines (i.e., physics,
chemistry, earth sciences), some 14 subfields of physics, unfortu-nately not identical with those of the panels of the Physics Sur-
vey Committee, are separated in the totals. Of particular interest
is the inclusion of information on initial postdoctoral employment.
A study directed especially to this subject is EMployment of New
PhD's and Post-Doctorcas in 1971 (Report OSP-MS-5, 1971). This
study was based on rather detailed special questionnaires sent to
academic departments.A number of extensive studies have been made by the Office of
Scientific Personnel based on questionnaires to samples drawn from
known doctorate recipients of past years and designed to explore
the subsequent development of their careers. These studies report
extensive data on geographical migration, salaries, types of em-
ployment, and the like. However, discipline specialization of the
data is usually not on a fine scale, and many figures are reported
only for "physical sciences."
2 0
Introduction 1475
Two studies, similar in nature to that of the Physics SurveyCommittee and in closely related fields, have been in progress al-most simultaneously with ours, and each has also made use of a datapanel. One is that of the Astronomy Survey Committee, whose datagathering is described in Astronomy and Astrophysics for the 1970's:Volume 2, Reports of the Panels, Chapter 9 (NAS, 1973). The other
is that of the Committee on the Survey of Materials Science and En-gineering, whose Summary Report is to be published shortly by NAS,and whose subsequent detailed report is expected to contain an ex-tensive section on manpower, funding, and literature data for thematerials field.
Miscellaneous Sources. The Organization for Economic Coopera-tion and Development (OECD), whose membership consists of most ofthe nations of Western Europe plus Japan, Canada, and the UnitedStates, has prepared a series of Reviews of National Science Policy,which surveys science and technology in various leading member andnonmember countries. Although the data are nearly all from offi-cial or other public sources, and are xarely specialized to as finea scale as phYsics, they are sometimes discussed with useful criti-
cal insight. The studies are also of value simply because they tryto discuss many countries from a unified point of view. The OECD
has also issued a series of Statistical Tables and Notes on re-search and development in meffiber countries that contains much in-formation on manpower, funding, and organizations in the govern-mental, industrial, educational, and nonprofit sector of the var-
ious countries. Further valuable studies on international migra-tion of scientists and engineers have been conducted.
In the discussion of material from the AIP we mentioned thatstatistics on publications in physics provide valuable indicatorsof the scale and distribution of research and the interrelationshipof different geographic and intellectual areas. Without namingfurther data sources specifically, we would like to stress herethe utility of many data that can be found in the documentation
literature. Among the organizations that have sponsored usefulcollections of such data special mention should be made of the Ab-stracting Board orthe International Council of Scientific Unions.
1.2.3 NEW DATA GATHERING PROJECTS
The sources of data discussed in the preceding section, thoughextensive and useful, failed to answer many questions that were ofinterest to the Physics Survey Committee. Manpower and fundingdata, even when broken down according to subfields of physics, havenot been available for subfields as finely subdivided and as clear-
ly defined as was needed. As we noted in Section 1.2.2, fundingdata from government agencies have been particularly ambiguous;this ambiguity is clearly apparent, for example, in the Pake Re-
port.* There have been almost no quantitative data on the support
rtPhueics: Survey and Outlook (NAS-NRC, 1966).
2 1
1476 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
of physics research in industrial laboratories or on the output ofthese laboratories to the physics literature. The resources in-vested by universities from their own funds in the physics researchenterprise have also been inadequately investigated. And one canthink of a host of small but intriguing questions on the sociologyof physics to which none of the previously available sources sup-plies answers. Although the resources and abilities of the DataPanel were far too limited for it to attempt to fill all these gaps,there obviously were many useful things that it could do.
In Section 1.2.1 we mentioned some of the disadvantages of large-scale questionnaires. We decided not to attempt to gather informa-tion from the physics community in this way. It was clear, however,that a rich mine of potential data existed in the tapes on whichthe complete store of replies to the National Register question-naires were recorded. In addition to the obvious possibility ofobtaining more detailed tabulations and cross-correlations of datapertaining to physicists than had previously been published, thetapes offered possibilities for obtaining entirely new types ofinformation. As described in more detail in Section 11.1.1, thereplies on specialty of present employment and on additional spe-cialties of competence afford a wealth of information on the close-ness of different specialties to one another, or their remoteness,and provide a tool for fairly objective separation of physicistsand their specialties into groupings corresponding to major sub-fields of physics, for example, the subfields to which the variouspanels of the Physics Survey Committee were assigned. In addition,the tapes for different years have been used to generate longitu-dinal files in which data from the same respondent, if he has an-swered questionnaires in a succession of years, are collected,and changes in employment, specialty, salary, and the like can bestudied statistically. (Respondents, of course, remain individual-ly anonymous.) It was decided, therefore, to examine the Registertapes in considerable detail and to make a small-scale study ofthe available longitudinal files.
Only one other data-gathering project of a comprehensive naturewas undertaken. This was a survey of the records of the principalagencies of the federal government responsible for the support ofphysics research, to isolate the amounts of such support and allo-cate it to the various subfields of physics, as defined by the do-mains of the various panels of the Physics Survey. This study wasdone through the courtesy of officials in the agencies involved,who worked in close collaboration with the Staff Scientist of theData Panel, to ensure uniformity of definitions from one agency toanother. However, not all agencies could be studied adequately,and, as we shall see in Section 111.2, a great deal of intelligentguesswork fortified by a variety of auxiliary studies was requiredto round out the funding picture.
The most important of the remaining projects undertaken by theData Panel were sampling studies of one kind or another. Most ofthe questions encountered were of such nature that an approximateanswer would be enormously better than no answer at all anclthat ahighly exact answer was almost impossible to define. The speed and
2 2
Introduction 1477
convenience of sampling studies therefore make them especially at-tractive, the more so since with this approach it is often possibleto reformulate a question after the study has begun.
The most extensive sampling study undertaken was an article-by-article survey of about 4500 articles randomly selected fromentries in Physics Abstracts. This survey was designed to revealthe distribution of physics research activity, as it is manifestedin publication, among different countries, different types of in-stitutions, and the different subfields of physics. As the Surveyprogressed, we became increasingly convinced that the literatureof a science like physics is the best possible indicator of whatcan be called research activity. The British physicst, J. M.Ziman, has pointed out in a perspicacious little book* that whatgives science its power and distinguishes it from many other worth-while human activities is the wide dissemination of new resultsthroughout the scientific community, followed by extensive criti-cism, leading to ultimate consensus. Thus, as we describe atgreater length in Section 111.1.1, we believe that it is possibleto make a fairly clear distinction between "research" and "non-research" but that the distinction between basic and applied re-search is necessarily exceedingly fuzzy. In the studies of feder-al funding mentioned previously, and the studies of other types offunding to be discussed in subsequent sections, we therefore en-deavored to isolate the funding of activities leading to publish-able results. As we shall see in Chapter III it is useful to havethe opportunity to check the general consistency of the findingsof investigations of funding with those of studies of the literature.
Studies of industrial and university funding of research andother characteristics of physics research in these two environ-ments necessitated obtaining data from some of the organizationsinvolved. The data needed were not always easy for these organi-zations to supply, and we were conscious of how painful would bethe demands on the time of anyone to whom we addressed inquiries.Fortunately; we were able to select small samples of institutionsof both types, which at the same time were adequately representa-tive of the diversity of the national populations, yet were repre-sented by persons to whom we could appeal for help by use of closepersonal contacts. This procedure ensured a high percentage ofconscientious responses. We wish to express our profound grati-tude to the representatives of these organizations who were willingto devote so much time to make our projects successful.
A number of smaller studies of samples of people, documents,or merely data from government publications were made. These,some of which will be discussed at appropriate places throughoutthe report, often proved helpful in filling in our picture of thefunctioning of some part of the physics community.
Ziman, J. M. PUblic Knowledge: The Social Dimension of Science.Cambridge University Press, 1968.
2, ,r3
II
MANPOWERDATA
11.1 Studies Based on the National Register and Other NationwideSources
11.1.1 INTRODUCTION TO THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF SCIENTIFIC ANDTECHNICAL PERSONNEL
Much of the information on manpower in Physics in Perspective, andparticularly in Parts 11.1.2 and 11.1.3 below, was based on datafrom the NSF National Register of Scientific and Technical Person-
nel. Therefore, a detailed discussion and evaluation of this ma-jor data source seems in order.
From the mid-1950's until 1970, the NSF conducted a series ofbionnial questionnaire surveys called the National Register ofScientific and Technical Personnel. The various scientific soci-eties-in physics, the AIP-were responsible for identifying the spe-cialties that comprised their fields, setting criteria for inclu-=sion, and collecting the data. Statistical tables of data from
these surveys; for a wide variety of sciences, were then regularlypublished in the NSF's American Science Manpower series.
The Register was in two respects unique. First, it was designedto be a complete survey of manpower in various sciences rather than
a sampling operation. Second, unlike the surveys of the Bureau ofLabor Statistics and other NSF surveys, it was directed to the in-dividual scientist rather than to his employing institution. The
uniqueness of this data source increases the difficulty of measur-ing its reliability.
The Physics Survey depended heavily on National Register data
for several reasons. Most sources presented data on physical sci-ences, sometimes with a further breakdown for physics as a whole;
the National Register was one of the few sources in which physics
1478
2 4
Manpower Data 1479
was subdivided into specialties. Since the Physics Survey was asconcerned with the subfields of physics as with the overall field,this feature was most useful. Second, because the Register hadbeen a continuous operation throughout the 1960's, comparative da-ta over time could be derived. Finally, both current (1970) andpast comparative data from the Register were available on computertape. This availability on tape was particularly valuable, because,as a result, data analysis was not limited to published definitions,categories, and table layouts. Register subfields could be rede-fined to fit more closely the scope of the subfield panels of thePhysics Survey.- Categories such as employer type could be revisedto show separately the federally funded research and developmentcenters,major employers of physicists. Work activity groupingscould be redefined so that categories of no relevance to physicswere eliminated. Data could also be made more nearly comparableover time. Working directly with the Register computer tapes per-mitted a flexibility seldom possible with other data sources.
Although Register data have many advantages, problems occur intheir interpretation. To deal with the numbers presented, the userneeds to know how representative they are and the nature of anybiases. In the following subsections we shall consider severalpoints relating to the opportunities and limitations presented bythe Register and our use of it.
11.1.1.1 Adequacy of Coverage
A basic question one should ask about the Register data is: Howcompletely do they cover, physicists? Professional societies iden-tify the groups of scientists who are to receive their question-naires. Thus scientists who are not known to a society are not in-
cluded. In the case of physics, this source of error is probablyrelatively small, for the AIP attempts to identify and include inthe survey physicists who are known from a variety of sourceseven though they are not members of one of the AIP societies. Cov-erage also is incomplete to the extent that persons receiving thequestionnaire fail to fill it out and return it.
Completeness of coverage is probably most useful in the case ofdoctoral scientists. They are almost automatically included in any
count of scientific personnel. At lower educational levels thedefinition of a scientist is less clearcut and varies widely amongsocieties and sources. The AIP's criterion for inclusion as aphysicist was anyone with an advanced degree in physics or a bac-calaureate in physics plus two years of professional experience inphysics or an equivalent background. It is difficult to estimatethe size of such a population.
Perhaps the most exhaustive attempt to assess Register coverageof doctorates was that of the Commission on Human Resources andHigher Education.* The Commission based its study on a comparisonof the Doctorate Records File (maintained by the National Academy
*Folger, J.K., H.S. Astin, and A.E. Bayer. Human Resources and
Higher Education. New York, N.Y.: Russell Sage Foundation, 1970.
2 5
1480 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
of Sciences Office of Scientific Personnel) and the National Reg-ister. Information for the Doctorate Records File is obtained di-rectly from universities and supplemented by a questionnaire to befilled out by the graduate. The File is believed to include 99percent of all the doctorates awarded in the United States. TheCommission attempted to identify by name in the 1964 National Reg-ister all persons who received a science doctorate in the UnitedStates between 1957 and 1962. A number of auxiliary studies wereconducted to correct for deaths and immigration and emigration.The basic datum sought was the number recorded in the DoctorateRecord File as having a U.S. baccalaureate and doctoral degree whoappeared also in the National Rer;ister. Possession of a U.S. bacca-laureate degree was interpreted de-evidence that the individualwas a permanent resident of the United States and would seek em-ployment in this country. The Commission found that 78 percent ofthe physics doctorate recipients appeared in the 1964 NationalRegister; therefore, this number could be used as an estimate ofcoverage of the Register in physics. A lower coverage was estimatedfor most other scientific disciplines.
How important is completeness of coverage? If no bias in cover-age exists, that is to say, if nonrespondents are similar to re-spondents, figures can be inflated to the proper expected total byusing the inverse of the rate of no response. In the mid-1960'sthe NSF conducted a special survey of nonrespondents and found fewdifferences from respondents on major variables such as level ofdegree and type of employer.
The National Register, therefore, appears to have been, forphysics, a relatively complete and unbiased source of informationon manpower. However, in attempting to compare data in a particu-lar Register with another source or with Registers of earlieryears, problems still exist. Such problems result principallyfrom variation in basic definitions. One cannot use Register orother data without clearly understanding what they relate to. Afew examples illuscrate problems related to coverage and defini-tions and show the need for caution in the interpretation of data.
As a first example, we compare physics and astronomy facultymembers included in the National Register and in the AIP's annualDirectory of Physics and Astronomy FacuZties. The Register reportsnumbers of faculty members by self-reported faculty rank. The AIPindependently obtains actual name listings from the heads of col-lege and university physics departments for inclusion in the Direc-tory of Physics and Astronomy FacuZties, which is probably a morenearly complete and valid source, at least for regular faculty.Table 11.1 presents the results of this comparison.
The second row in Table 11.1 shows the number of faculty ineach academic rank reported by the AIP for the 1966-1967 academicyear. The first row shows the numbers reported in American ScienceManpower 1966. Since most physics departments were growing at thistime and AIP figures for 1966-1967 represent data for a later datethan those of American Science Manpower, data for 1968 from thissource are shown in the third row. In the three professorial ranksthe mean of the numbers reported in American Science Manpower forthe two years is between 78 percent and 83 percent of the number
26
Manpower Data 1481
TABLE 11.1 Number of Faculty Members by Rank
Source Prof. Assoc. Prof. Asst. Prof. Instructor Other
ASMa
1966A1P
b1966-1967
ASMa
1968
169124492128
132218301713
183226862345
7931389757
1056641
1057
aAmerican Science Manpower.bPhysics Manpower 1969 (American Institute of Physics, New York,1969).
reported by A1P, or slightly higher than the 78 percent Registercoverage reported for physics PhD's by the Commission on HumanResources and Higher Education.
In the two lower ranks, however, discrepancies appear. If theInstructor and Other categories are added, the National Registercoverage for them appears to be 90 percent of that of A1P. If
the figures are inflated by the factor used previously, the re-sult suggests that the Register is including approximately 260more faculty members in the lower ranks than the AIP, a 13 percentoverinclusion. The difference results primarily from a differencein definition between the individual and department head. Appar-ently some individuals in lower ranks considered themselves (orwere considered by the Register) faculty members, although depart-ment heads did not define them as such. The breakdown at lowerfaculty ranks varies even more. Individuals are more restrictivein defining themselves as instructors than are department heads.For the user of Register data,.these findings suggest that lowerfaculty ranks are probably overrepresented and that any break-down of lower faculty ranks should be treated with extreme cautionas academic rank at these levels has not been standardized.
The attempt to examine the growth of a borderline subfield ofphysics that includes many nonphysicists, such as acoustics, pro-vides another example of the effect of varying definitions, asTable 11.2 shows.
According to the Register data, the population of acoustics,with some peculiar fluctuations, has been virtually stable. How-ever, membership directories of the Acoustical Society of Americaand publications in its journal show growth. Membership increasedby more than 50 percent in the nine-year period, and publicationsby almost 90 percent.
Has the Register missed physicists in acoustics? To answer thisquestion is difficult, because the Acoustical Society has notcollected data on the educational and employment background oftheir members. A general feeling, substantiated by a more recentsurvey, is that the Society's membership is exceedingly diverse,consisting of physicists, engineers, psychologists, and a varietyof other scientists. Although complete figures on these groups arenot known for the years indicated in Table 11.2, probably morethan half of those who are identified with acoustics are fromdisciplines other than physics.
2 7
1482 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
TABLE 11.2 Growth of Acoustics
Year ASMa
ASAb
Membership Pages Published in JASAC
1960 1260 2782 17811962 1454 3301 20791964 1381 3735 25251966 1261 4007 29791968 1296 4403 3369
aIn American Science Manpower series, scientists indicating first
Fompetence (1960-1966) or present work experience (1968) in acoustics.Acoustical Society of America.
cJournal of the Acoustical Society of America.
ClearLy, as Table 11.2 shows, acoustics has been growing; how-ever, growth rates by discipline may differ. The physics componentof acoustics has apparently remained approximately stable, whereasthe other components-engineering, psychology, and the like-haveincreased.
As a third example, physicists employed in industry are shownin Table 11.3, which is based in part on figures collected by theNSF and the Bureau of Labor Statistics.*
TABLE 11.3 Numbers of Physicists (Thousands) Employed in U.S.Industrial Organizations
Year American Science Manpower NSF-BLS Survey
1960 8.6 12.51962 9.8 14.01964 9.0 15.61966 8.3 16.2
According to the National Register, the number of physicistsin industry remained stable during the years indicated. However,the figures in the third column of the table show fairly substan-tial growth. The problem again stems from definitions. The Regis-ter obtains information from individuals and sets clear criteriafor who is and is not a physicist; the NSF-BLS survey obtains in-formation from employers and leaves the categorization of individu-als to them. Anyone to whom an employer gives the title of physi-cist is recorded as such, regardless of his background education
*Employment of Scientists and Engineers in the United States.Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation and Bureau ofLabor Statistics, 1968.
2 8
Manpower Data 1483
and training. With so loose a definition, inflated figures mightbe expected; but the problem is even greater, for there is no wayof knowing how such loose definitions change with time. During aperiod of increasing demand, such as the early 1960's, there couldwell be an increasing number of employer-defined physicist posi-tions but little change in the number of AIP-defined physicists soemployed. The additional positions could have been filled by engi-neers and technicians. It must be remembered that while industrialdemand was growing in the early 1960's so, too, was academic de-mand, and academia usually has been the preferred home of physi-cists.
These examples and comparisons indicate not that one source isgood, another bad, but rather that each is measuring somewhat dif-ferent phenomena. If, for example, one wanted to examine the num-ber of physics faculty members by the strict standard of the de-partment chairman, one would use the faculty directory; if onewas studying the number of physicists employed by universities,the National Register could be used, with the necessary inflationfactor. If one was interested in the growth of acoustics, broadlydefined, one would use the Acoustical Society membership or publi-cation figures. If one needed information on the change in thephysics component of acoustics, the National Register would be theappropriate source. And if one was concerned with the change inphysics positions in industry, as defined by employers, the NSF-BLS statistics would suffice. Changing participation of physicistsin industry would be shown by Register data. Comparisons of datasources can lead to useful hypotheses, for example, about the com-ponents of growth in acoustics, but cannot be taken at face valueas indications of data source deficienc.ies, for the sources oftencannot be equated.
With this background on advantages and problems in the use ofRegister data, we will look next at the way in which the Data Panelused these data and at some additional problems related to theirinterpretation.
11.1.1.2 Cross-Sectional Studies
Most of the manpower data used in the Physics Survey came from the1964, 1968, and 1970 Register computer tapes. The American ScienceManpower series provided data for other years, and AIP student.surveys were useful for obtaining data on physics baccalaureates,graduate students, and new PhD's. The 1970 Register data were themost current available at the time of the Physics Survey. Datafrom 1964 and 1968 were used for comparative purposes to examinechanges during the late 1960s.
A layout of the major analyses needed for these years was de-veloped. The tabulations decided on will be described in Section11.1.2; they are summarized there in Table 11.4. The totality oftabulations for the three years runs into the thousands. Many ofthese tabulations were used by the Data Panel in developing specif-ic analyses. A selection oE tables considered of greatest interestwere reproduced from computer printouts and appear in Appendix A.
2 9
1484 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
Additional tables are available at the NAS or the AIP to qualified
persons for research purposes.
11.1.1.3 Mapping the Subfields of Physics
The collection of data on the physics population was the centraltask of the Data Panel; however, the Panel recognized that dataon the various subfields would also be most useful. Such data
could provide information not previously available on the unityand diversity of physics.
A major problem of the Data Panel was the allocation of themany categories and specialties of the National Register amongthe 11 subfields established for the Physics Survey. The Registerdata contained 19 major physics categories and 236 detailed physicsspecialties in addition to several specialties in other sciencesthat could be defined as interdisciplinary areas or interfaces withphysics.
Using the 1968 Register data (available at the start of the Sur-vey), two panelists assigned Register categories and specialtiesto the various subfield panels. Many of the specialties were clear-
ly appropriate to particular panels. Others were less easily as-signed. For example, where did electronics or health physics be-long? A number of Register specialty groups appeared to be direct-ly related to several subfields. How to allocate these in the mostmeaningful way was a major question.
The initial step in the procedure finally adopted was to iden-tify the_specialties that were clearly related to each of thePhysics Survey panels. These groups were later termed Panels Prop-er. The next step was to identify single or groups of specialties
that could be considered borderline cases. These specialties mightbe related to several panels. Thirty-six of these borderline groupswere developed. Initially Herring and Keyes examined each of these
and made an educated guess as to what their allocation should be-what proportion of the practitioners of a particular borderlinegroup, for example, should be assigned to condensed matter, optics,
and so on. However, when this task was completed there was a cer-tain degree of dissatisfaction with this subjective allocation of
relatively unknown groups. At this point it was decided that ele-ments in the Register questionnaire might be used to develop amore objective and consistent method of allocation for these 36
borderline cases.The Register questionnaire included both a question on special-
ty of present work activity and one on specialties of additionalcompetence. It was thought that individuals whose *specialties ofpresent work activity were among the borderline groups would havea majority of their specialties of competence either in the border-
line group or in the appropriate Panels Proper.On the basis of this assumption all borderline groups (that is,
individuals indicating one of the borderline groups as specialtyof present work activity) were sorted in terms of specialties ofadditional competence, including both Panels Proper and borderlinegroups. For example, individuals currently working in electronics
were examined to determine the specialties of additional compe-
3 0
Manpower Data 1485
tence; some indicated other electronics specialties, and othersone of the Panels Proper, such as condensed matter. (Initially dis-tributions on first and additional specialties of competence wereexamined separately; however, comparisons showed that second, third,and fourth competences were merely reflections of the first. De-terminations were then made on the basis of specialties of firstcompetence.)
Allocations were based on the percentage distributions of com-petence responses. If examination showed that an overwhelming pro-portion of competence responses were to a single Panel Proper,then this specialty or group of specialties was assigned to thatPanel Proper. In most instances, a split allocation was indicated-50 percent condensed matter, 50 percent nuclear physics, or 25percent optics and 75 percent atomic, molecular, and electronphysics.
Whether this was the best way to deal with borderline cases isopen to question. Many of the borderline groups were eventuallyassigned to the same panels as they had been with the earlier sub-jective judgment procedure. Subjective re-examination showed dif-ferences when they occurred to be consistent, if not expected.
Appendix .8 shows the allocation of 1968 Register specialtiesamong subfield panels. Those that were allocated by means of theanalysis of borderline groups are listed at the end of each sub-field section. The remaining specialties that did not clearly fitinto Survey Panels were combined into a miscellaneous category.This category included a large number of people whose specialtywas physics teaching, others with specialties outside physics inchemistry, engineering, or computer science, and a few that couldnot be classified. The fractions following each overlap group in-dicate the proportion allocated to a particular subfield.
The Data Panel believed that this method of specialty alloca-tion, although not perfect, was the most objective and consistentresponse then available to the problem of defining physicists andtheir subfields, which has always presented difficulties. We shalldiscuss the analogous problem of classifying the literature ofphysics in Section IV.1.1.
11.1.1.4 Other Problems of Definition
A few additional problems among the data for the 1964, 1968, and1970 Registers can be briefly summarized.
1. Increased coverage between 1964 and 1970 could be expected,although for physics this factor should have little effect as pro-cedures did not undergo major change. In making comparisons, theincreased coverage would imply a slight exaggeration in figures ongrowth.
2. Questions dealing with competence varied slightly between1964 and 1970; further, in data collected from the Register tapesthe Data Panel used specialty of present work activity, whereastables from American Science Mcznpower used data on specialty offirst competence.
3 1
1486 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
3. In the three years examined, the Data Panel treated .cderal-
ly funded research anddevelopment centers as a special category;
published material from American Science Manpower distributed these
institutions according to administrative groups, such as university
or industry, rather than presenting a separate tabulation.
In comparing Register data with other sources it is often
necessary to examine the exact phrasing of the questions; therefore,
to aLd in such comparisons Appendix A includes copies of the 1964,
1968, and 1970 Register questionnaires.
11.1.1.5 Longitudinca Studics
In addition to cross-sectional studies, several longitudinal
studies based on two longitudinal files were conducted. The first
of these fides, referred to as the 1960-1966 Longitudinal File,
was developed from Register tapes by Robert McGinnis of the De-
partment of Sociology, Cornell University, with the cooperation of
the NAS. The Data Panel used information from this file on all
PhD's who responded to all three Register surveys in this interval
and who were defined by ALP as physicists in 1964. The data ob-
tained showed mobility among subfields of physics, between physics
and other sciences, among types of employers, among work activities,
and among regions of the United States and other countries. (These
relatively complex tables are available at the AIP to qualified
researchers.)In addition,the Data Panel worked with data on AIP-defined
physicists, both PhD and non-PhD, from a 1968-1970 longitudinal
file developed from Register surveys for these two years. The
groups considered were
1. Physicists responding to both surveys who were PhD's (or
non-PhD's) in both years2. Physicists responding to both surveys who were non-PhD's
in 1968 but PhD's in 19703. Physicists responding only to the 1968 survey
4. Physicists responding only to the 1970 survey
Analyses of data on the first two groups showed patterns of
mobility among subfields, types of employers, work activities,
and geographic areas. Further analyses of the second group also
showed how new PhD's differed from other PhD respondents. The
third group was studied to determine the characteristics of indi-
viduals who responded in 1968 but not in 1970. This type of analy-
sis gives insight into the nature of the nonrespondent group.
Analyses of the fourth group yielded information on characteristics
of new respondents-whether they were older physicists who had
failed to respond in 1968 or new entrants to the field.
A few definitional problems occur when comparing longitudinal
with cross-sectional data. First, correlating 1964 specialties with
3 0
Manpower Data 1487
those of 1968 and 1970 had presented some difficulties, which weregreatly increased by additionally correlating those of 1960, 1962,and 1966. Neither specialty categories nor physics remained thesame during this interval. Further, between 1960 and 1970 the point
of reference of specialties changed. From 1964 on, specialties ofpresent work experience were included on the questionnaire in addi-tion to specialties of competence. As a result of these variations,subfield mobility based on current work specialization can be dis-cussed only for the 1964-1966 and 1968-1970 intervals. Care mustbe exercised in the interpretation of data on mobility for theother years, for change in specialty of competence is differentfrom change in specialty of employment. Changes in definitions oftypes of employers also occurred over the years, especially in re-gard to federally funded research and development centers. Thedata for 1964-1966 and 1968-1970 again appear to be the most con-sistent. Finally, none of the Register surveys made provision forthe heavily university-based postdoctoral group. Consequently,when examining mobility from the university to other work environ-ments, it is difficult to determine the number who are departingpostdoctorates and those who are leaving regular positions. Thepostdoctoral group greatly proliferated in the late 1960's, whichincreases the difficulty of interpreting and fully evaluating themovement from the universities in the two time intervals.
Some of these problems were handled through age subclassifica-tion. This technique does not completely solve the problem of dis-crepancies but does throw light on major patterns.
As this and other portions of Physics In Perspective show, care-ful understanding and manipulation of a data source can produceuseful analyses many steps beyond a simple tabular layout of rawfigures. It is hoped that this effort will stimulate and guidefurther analyses of Register and other data.
11.1.2 TABULATIONS FROM THE PHYSICS PORTION OF THE NATIONAL
REGISTER
Through the courtesy of the NSF, extensive analyses were made,first, of the 1968 National Register computer tapes, then extendedto 1964, and, when the returns from the 1970 questionnaires be-came available, to that year also. Studying but one field--physics--we were able to make much more detailed tabulations and cross-correlations than those published biennially for the totality ofscience in American Science Manpower. Moreover, having grouped thespecialties into the various subfields corresponding to panels ofthe Physics Survey Committee and the Astronomy Survey Committee,we were able to break the tabulations down by subfield wheneverthis seemed desirable. Such a breakdown is, of course, not avail-able in American Science Manpower.
The wealth of possible subdivisions and correlations in thedata can be appreciated from an examination of the National Regis-ter questionnaire, which is reproduced, in its 1964, 1968, and
1970 versions, in Appendix A. The 1964 and 1968 questionnaires
3 3
1488 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
were almost identical in regard to all the entries used for ourtabulations, but there were some minor differences:
1. The wording of the question on professional identification(8 on the 1970 form) has varied slightly.
2. The questions on student and employment status (7 and 9 onthe 1970 form) were a single question on the 1964 form.
3. Although all three questionnaires had a question on thespecialty closest to present employment (13 on the 1970 form), thewording of the question on additional competence (18 on the 1970form) has varied. In 1964 and 1970, the four specialties ofgreatest competence were requested; in 1968, four specialtiesother than the one closest to present employment were requested.
4. The alternatives offered for present principal employer (11on the 1970 form) have varied slightly, as have the alternativesfor first and second most important activity (12 on the 1970 form).
5. Academic rank (10 on the 1970 form) was not included on the
1964 form.6. The 1970 questionnaire allowed responding physicists to iden-
tify themselves as theorists, experimentalists, or both.
With the possible exception of the slight difference in theidentification of areas of additional competence on the 1968 form,these variations in the questionnaire were all sufficiently minorthat it was possible to prepare tabulations that would be compar-able for different years. These were obtained in the form of ta-bles, with rows corresponding to possible alternative answers tosome one question, columns to alternative answers to some otherquestion; a selection according to answers to a third question, afourth, and so on could be made simply by preparing many tables,one for each combination of the latter answers. Except for sometables that were prepared only from the 1970 tapes, the totalityof tables developed for the three years is described, in a con-densed notatation, in Table 11.4. Here the rows correspond to dif-ferent categories of tables, in the order in which they appear inAppendix A. Each such type of table has its rows and columns cor-responding to the items in the black-bordered boxes. The number ofrows of columns is the number indicated in the black-bordered box,augmented where so indicated by a total (t) or a grouping intoquartiles (Q's). There is one such table for every combination ofthe variables indicated without a black-bordered box. Thus, forexample, there are 3 X 19 X 7 = 399 tables of type 1 for any givenRegister year, one for each combination of a degree status (PhD ornon-PhD Or total), an employment specialty (one of 18 physics andastronomy subfields or total) , and an employer type (one of fivecategories, "no response," or total). Each such table has rowscorresponding to the seven possible types of primary work activity,and "no response" and total, and columns corresponding to the samealternatives for secondary work activity. Where 12 subfields arelisted instead of 18, all subfields of astrOnomy except the border-line field, astrophysics and relativity, have been grouped into one.
A few additional tabulations were made from the 1970 tape.These were (a) subfield of employment by subfield of first compe-
3 4
Manpower Data 1489
tence for theorists, experimentalists, those identifying them-selves as both, and nonrespondents to this question (type 16); (b)employment specialty by age and degree status for these fourgroups (type 17); and (c) employment specialty by professionalidentification and degree status for the same groups (type 18).
Printouts of all these tables are available for study at theNAS. We have made a selection of some of the most interesting ones,which are reproduced in Appendix A. This selection consists of thefollowing:
1. Fourteen tables of type 2 (PhD or non-PhD; only t for sub-field specialty; and 6+t possible answers to the employer typequestions)
2. Twenty-six tables of type 3 (PhD or non-PhD; five employertypes with t for work activity; seven types of work activity witht for employer type; t for all types of work activity and employer)
3. Twelve tables of type 8 (PhD or non-PhD; 5+t employer types;only 5 for subfield of employment)
4. Fourteen tables of type 8 (PhD only; 14 subfields of employ-ment; only t for employer type)
5. Ten tables of type 9 (PhD or non-PhD; four combinations ofsex and student status plus t)
6. Fourteen tables of type 10(14+t subfields of employment;only t for employer type)
7. Two tables of type 11 (PhD or non-PhD; only t for subfieldof employment)
8. Eighteen tables of type 12 (PhD or non-PhD; 81-t answers toquestion on employer type; only t for subfield of employment)
9. One table of type 13 (non-PhD only; only t for subfield ofemployment)
10. Fifteen tables of type 13 (PhD only; 144t subfields ofemployment)
11. Two tables of type 15 (PhD or non-PhD; only t for subfieldof employment)
12. Six tables of type 16 (PhD only; 54t employer types)
TABLE 11.4
Tabulations Available from the 1
Question or Dimension
Table Number and Name
o f. I C 0 z ..... q
-- ..o
a.
Subfield
Specialty
Group
.elru m :,..
E, W W T o .-I 0. E r.4
Work
.by
.9Activity
Maturation
Year
Groups
u u C . ...., 0 Q.
0x
oo
U.3
<4.
1U
..0
0
....1 -,-. m 0 .ii CJ ..0 ,-
M 0
0 ,-
1<
.....
,
...4
m.o
."-'w
ao
-1-1 ..0
"..
u: gle,
eso
Ln-r
iI
+-I
C.
...loc.,
c.yz
-
= a. ,4-1 ° -0 .-1 C
J .-
-.-,
-.4
.0:..
--'
o z c 0 'V 7r4
;b: 4
-b CJI
--.
-c)
g 0
:U :J
.7cs
) :r
s,-
,, co al G 7 5, 0 ,-1 m E :0
, 14 RI
,2 0 31 m Pt1
s 0 0 M 54 L :,-
4.,
,-,
cm
0C . .
5,...
... .
0L
C-1
-.-I
CU
a.-0
4-b
E-0
CJ
ty ..
-. <
CI.
-v.
)0
co44
.-1
4-: 0
.-1
0 - 0 c...) '-,
,>
,M
W'0
mc
E0
-,I
UW
C.1
P...
cs)
1. Work activity
2. Work activity
Employment specialty vs
3. 1st additional competence
4. 2nd additional competence
5. 3rd additional competence
6. 4th additional competence
Work activity
7. By years experience
8. By age
9. Employment status
10. PhD field by activity
11. Academic rank by age
12. Salary vs totil income
13. Citizenship and birth by ag
14. Additional employment
417ny tho 10711
r.1.
...1.
"-4-
-- ..
1-__
-
2+t
18+t
6+t
18+t IMEI
2+t
18+t
6+f
rgrlIBTE-c
7 -t
2+f
12+5
12+t
5 -t
2+t
12+t
1
12+t
2+t
12+t
12+t
2+t
12+t
12+t
2+t
12+t
5+t
I 8+f I
19+r1
2+t
12+t
5+t
184-E-1
Mil
2+t
PhD-112+tf
4+t
p+ti
18+t
5+t
+2+t
id+t
+Q's
2+t
e2+t
12+t
7+t
p+ZI)3+tf
12+t
112+tI
4+t I
2+t _,._
,__
18+t
__, _
6+t
[6+ti
.-
- .
..
so
usaresown separately as well as combined,
Bo the numbers 12-t and 18-t in this column become 14-t and 20-t, respectively.
cNumber of possibilities in these columns varies according to whether the "no
response" category is in-
Not available 1964
cluded.
1491 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
11.1.3 DATA ON CHARACTERISTICS AND MOBILITY OF PHYSICISTS
Chapters 9 and 12 of Volume 1 of Physics in Perspective describethe flow of physics manpower from initial training to employmentand present data on the employing institutions and work activitiesof physicists in various subfields. The sections that follow sup-plement these data with material on such characteristics as sex,citizenship, employment status, income, and the like and examinein greater depth the way in which physics as a discipline and phys-icists as a community changed during the late 1960's.
11.1.3.1 Demographic Characteristics
11.1.3.1.1 Sex The population of physics is principally male.Females represented approximately 2 percent of the PhD's andslightly more than 5 percent of the non-PhD's in both 1968 and 1970.Table 11.5 shows differences in employment status of male and fe-male physicists in 1968. The main difference relates to part-timeemployment; 1 percent of the males and 12 percent of the femalesare employed part time.
TABLE 11.5 Employment Status by Sex, 1968a'b
Employ-mentStatus
PhD Non-PhDMale Female Male Female
Number % Number % Number % Number %
Fulltime
13,389 97 219 78 10,713 97 428 68
Parttime
129 1 34 12 136 1 67 11
Unem-ployed,seeking
42 6 2 75 1 22 3
Unem-ployed,notseeking
13 11 4 25 104 17
Otherc 230 2 10 4 151 1 7 1
Total 13,803 100 280 100 11,100 100 628 100
cData on nonstudents only.b 1968 data presented because of minor problems in the interpre-
tation of the 1970 data on non-PhD's.
cTncludeR retired and no response to question on employMent status.
A second difference pertains only to non-PhD's. Those who are
not employed and not seeking employment are regarded as outside
3 7
1492 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
the labor force, at least temporarily. As Table 11.5 shows, 17
percent of the female, non-PhD physicists have dropped out of the
labor force, compared with less than 1 percent of the males. This
finding could result from a lower degree of commitment among non-PhD women physicists, temporary family responsibilities, or lesser
job opportunities.Register data on women physicists also show the following.
1. Women PhD's are more likely to be employed in universities
and colleges and less likely to be employed in industry than are
men.2. Women non-PhD's are more likely than male PhD's to be em-
ployed in secondary schools and junior colleges.3. Women physicists' salaries are lower than those of male
physicists, regardless of type of employer.4. Women physicists less frequently receive government support
than do male physicists.
11.1.3.1.2 Age The median age of PhD physicists in 1970 was 37.4
and that of non-PhD's, 32.9. Table 11.6 shows the age distribution
of physicists. Approximately 50 percent of the PhD's are in the30-39 age group, and about 50 percent of the non-PhD's are in the
25-34 age group.
TABLE 11.6 Age Distribution of PhD's and Non-PhD's, 1970
AgePhD's Non-PhD's
Number Percent Number Percent
24 and under 5 -- 815 4.6
25-29 1808 11.1 5411 30.7
30-34 4467 27.5 3844 21.8
35-39 3188 19.6 2409 13.7
40-44 2494 15.4 1732 9.8
45-49 1953 12.0 1537 8.7
50-54 966 6.0 874 5.0
55-59 631 3.9 548 3.1
60-64 408 2.5 331 1.9
65-69 231 1.4 121 0.7
70 and over 78 0.5 21 0.1
TOTALa 16,229 17,643
aTotal refers to those whose employment was known. There were 19
PhD's and 36 non-PhD's who did not provide data on age.
Because of the heavy influx of new PhD's during the 1960's, the
median age of the PhD group dropped from 38.2 in 1964 to 37.4 in
1970. Table 11.7 shows the change in median age by subfield and
convergence toward the overall median age in 1970. Such cluster-
3 8
Manpowor Data 1493
ing about the median suggests heightened competition within agegroups.
TABLE 11.7 Median Ages of PhD's by Subfield in 1964 and 1970
Subfield 1964 1970 Change
Astrophysics and relativity 34.7 34.7 --
Atomic, molecular,and electron 36.5 35.3 -1.2
Elementary particle 34.1 34.2 +0.1
Nuclear 37.3 37.8 +0.5
Plasma physics and physicsof fluids
36.7 37.0 +0.3
Condensed matter 36.7 36.4 -0.3
Earth and planetary 38.1 37.4 -0.7
Physics in biology 40.6 37.2 -3.4
Optics 40.3 38.7 -1.6
Acoustics 42.2 40.1 -2.1
Astronomy 37.4 35.0 -2.4
Miscellaneous 42.8 41.4 -1.4
All subfields 38.2 37.4 -0.8
in the 1970's the expected decline in new PhD's should resultin a slowly aging community. The now young, heavily academicallybased populations in some subfields will show an increase in aver-age age as academic positions decrease; the currently somewhat old-er, nonacademically based populations might increase slightly innumber and decrease in average age.
11.1.3.1.3 Place of Birth and Citizenship In 1970, 75 percent of
the PhD physicists in the United States were U.S.-born citizens.Approximately half (1700) of those who were foreign born becameU.S. citizens; 1900 retained their foreign citizenship. The number
of PhD physicists who were U.S.-born citizens increased by 50 per-cent between 1964 and 1970; however, the foreign-born PhD physicistpopulation in the United States nearly doubled. The noncitizengroup could be somewhat larger than the figures reported in theNational Register survey, for many who do not become citizens area transient group, often returning to the country of origin, and
such groups are unusually undercounted in surveys.Characteristics of the U.S.-born citizen, foreign-born U.S. citi-
zen, and noncitizen groups vary. Table 11.8 shows the distribution
of these groups by age in 1970. The foreign-born U.S. citizenshave a median age of 43.7 and constitute a relatively high propor-tion of the older 060) age cohorts. In sharp contrast, the non-U.S. citizen group has a median age of 35, with four fifths of themin the 25-39 age range. The decrease in the number of noncitizensin the older age cohorts could result from return migration or nat-uralization.
3 9
TABLE 11.8
Birth and Citizenship Status of PhD's by Age in 1970
Age
Total
Number
Percent
U.S. Born
Citizen
Foreign Born
-
U.S. Citizen
Noncitizen
Number
Percent
Number
Percent
Number
Percent
20
00
00
ga.
20-24
5100
120.0
04
80.0
CD
25-29
1,896
100
1,536
81.0
64
3.4
218
11.5
1-.
.e.
%o
.e.
30-34
35-39
40-44
4,537
3,220
2,521
100
100
100
3,498
2,290
1,789
77.1
71.1
71.0
201k
275
367
4.5
8.5
14.6
687
530
286
15.1
16.5
11.3
45-49
1,975
100
1,486
75.2
313
15.8
107
5.4
50-54
982
100
730
74.3
159
16.2
41
4.2
55-59
647
100
483
74.7
126
19.5
15
2.3
60-64
434
100
305
70.3
103
23.7
10
2.3
65-69
296
100
202
68.2
71
24.0
2.7
70-
99
100
69
69.7
22
22.2
33.0
All ages
16,612
100
12,389
74.6
1,704
10.3
1,903
11.5
No response
19
12
31
Median age
37.4
37.0
43.7
34.9
TABLE 11.9
Distribution by Subfield of Citizen and Noncitizen PhD'sa
Foreign-Born
U.S.-Born Citizens
Citizens
Noncitizens
Tota1c
Subfieldb
1964
1968
1970
1964
1968
1970
1964
1968
1970
1964
1968
1970
A&R
78.5%
68.8%
69:8%
10.8%
11.2%
8.6%
10.8%
15.2%
17.6%
65
125
255
AME
75.3
74.7
73.0
13.2
10.3
10.1
11.5
11.8
13.3
660
1004
1102
EP
71.9
67.9
68.3
11.5
9.9
9.9
16.4
18.5
18.4
898
1294
1440
NP
80.9
76.7
74.6
9.6
9.4
9.4
9.4
10.7
12.3
1287
1802
1824
P&Fd
72.8
67.5
68.5
16.0
15.5
15.0
10.7
11.2
13.1
707
931
1118
CM
75.8
72.3
72.6
12.5
11.0
10.3
11.5
12.4
13.3
2748
4107
4235
g.,.
1-
.4,
E&P
PB
74.0
72.9
79.8
76.2
76.1
76.9
11.3
11.5
16.7
11.2
9.4
11.2
14.5
11.5
3.5
7.3
10.1
9.7
311
114
572
206
724
277
Immt
w LaOp
77.0
72.7
74.1
13.0
14.1
11.1
9.7
8.5
10.0
483
752
1110
Ac
80.1
76.5
78.6
14.6
12.8
9.6
5.3
6.7
7.2
226
298
332
Astron
78.0
73.9
75.7
12.1
9.9
10.3
9.8
12.8
10.9
396
710
643
Misc.
84.9
81.1
81.3
10.6
9.7
9.3
4.5
4.9
5.8
2556
2485
3552
Totale
78.3
74.2
74.6
11.9
10.9
10.3
9.6
10.9
11.5
10451
14286
16612
Med. age
38.3
37.5
37.0
41.9
42.9
43.7
34.2
34.2
34.9
aTable presents data for all
ages; data are available by five-year age cohorts.
bSubfield abbreviations used:
A&R, astrophysics and relativity; AME, Atomic, molecular and electron;
EP, elementary particle; NP, nuclear; P&F, plasmas and fluids; CM, condensed matter; E&P, earth and
planetary; PB, physics in biology; Op, optics; Ac, acoustics; Astron, astronomy; Misc, miscellaneous.
Some percentages do not add up to 100 because of 3.7 percent in 1970 whowere in an "Other" category
composed of incomplete responses and U.S.-born noncitizens.
d1970 figures for plasmas are 69.0, 13.3, and 14.2 (N=542); 1970 figures for fluids
are 68.1, 15.0,
and 12.2 (N=576).
eBased on total known; five did not respond on age in 1964, 25 in 1968, and 19 in 1970.
1496 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
Table 11.9 shows the distribution of citizen and noncitizengroups by subfield of employment. The noncitizen group is somewhat
more heavily concentrated in the so-called intrinsic subfields than
in the extrinsic ones such as optics, acoustics, physics in biology,
and earth and planetary physics. Some of this difference may re-
sult from age, for certain subfields tend to attract young people,
and the noncitizens are a comparatively young group. The variation
by subfield still occurs, however, if one controls for age by con-
sidering a single age group, for example, the 35-39 year old groupin which the highest proportion of noncitizens (16.5 percent) is
found. Table 11.10 shows the proportion of noncitizen PhD's in
this age group in each subfield. More than one fifth of the 35-39-year-old population in such major subfields as astrophysics andrelativity, elementary-particle physics, and plasma physics and
physics of fluids is noncitizen.
TABLE 11.10 Proportion of Noncitizen PhD's, 35-39 Years of Age,
in Each Subfield
PhysicsSubfield Percent Foreign-Born Noncitizens
Astrophysics And 25.0
relativityElementary Particle 22.5
Plasmas 21.9
Physics of Fluids 20.2
Nuclear 18.7
.Atomic, molecular, and 18.6
electronCondensed-matter 17.2
Earth and planetary 14.9
Optics 14.5
Astronomy 14.0
Miscellaneous 10.8
Acoustics 8.5
Physics in biology 7.1
All subfields 16.5
Only about 10 percent of the non-PhD physics population in 1970
was foreign born. The small number could result from the entry offewer non-PhD foreign physicists to the United States or to less
adequate figures on foreign pre-PhD students than on foreign PhD's.
The data on foreign-born physicists do not show how many came
to the United States for education or specific work experience and
returned to the country of origin or the number who remained. The
U.S. Department of Labor estimates indicate that some 4000 physi-
cists have immigrated to the United States since 1949. How many
had training at the time of immigration sufficient for them to be
4 2
Manpower Data 1497
regarded as physicists, their age distribution, and the rate ofreturn migration are not known. According to the 1970 NationalRegister the number of foreign-born physicists is higher than theDepartment of Labor's estimate--about 6000. However, there are nodata on when these physicists immigrated--before or after 1949, be-fore or after becoming a physicist.
The Doctorate Record File affords data on the postdoctoral des-tination and activity of new PhD's in physics and astronomy from1958 through 1970 (see Table 11.11). Of the 1918 noncitizen PhDrecipients, 53 percent remained in the United States and 40 per-cent of these went into postdoctoral study. Twenty-three percentof the noncitizen group left the United States, and these wentmore often into employment than postdoctoral study. The destina-tions of 24 percent were unknown.
TABLE 11.11 Location and Activity of New PhD Physicistsa
Postdoctoral Study EmploymentCitizenship U.S. Foreign U.S. Foreign Unknown Total
United 1695 420 6024 152 1979 10,270
StatesForeign 392 139 626 301 460 1 918
12,188b
aData from the Doctorate Record File; U.S. Doctorates, Physics andAstronomy FY 58-70.
bThere were 303 PhD's on whom data were incomplete, bringing thetotal to 12,491.
11.1.3.1.4 Driployment Before discussing the changing employmentand mobility patterns of physicists, some background informationon their employment is needed to place the analyses in context.Table 11.12, showing employment patterns of PhD physicists from1964 through 1970, is repeated from Physics in Perspective, Vol-
'time I, page 832, for it presents data on several topics that wewill discuss further--type of employer, subfield of employment,and changes in these with time.
Much of the discussion that follows deals with comparisons ofthose in academic and nonacademic employment. When relevant, thenonacademic group is subdivided, as in Table 11.13.
The distribution of academic and nonacademic physicists amongsubfields shows many similarities (see Table 11.14). Exceptionsare optics and condensed matter, which have somewhat higher per-centages of nonacademic than academic physicists, and elementary-particle physics, which is principally university-based. A sub-stantial number (23 percent) of the nonacademically employed PhD'swork in general physics or other sciences.
4 3
TABLE 11.12
Changes in Employment Patterns of PhD Physicists, 1964--1970
Phy
sics
Sub
field
Tot
al P
opul
atio
n(e
xclu
ding
nonr
espo
nden
ts)
Col
lege
or
Uni
vers
ityIn
dust
ryG
over
nmen
tR
esea
rch
Cen
ter
Oth
er In
stitu
tions
1964
1968
1970
1964
1968
1970
1964
1968
1970
1964
1968
.197
019
6419
6819
7019
6419
6819
70
Ast
roph
ysic
s an
d0.
030.
020.
070.
020.
060.
090.
050.
070.
090.
080.
040.
02
rela
tivity
6312
325
20.
830.
810.
73
op.
Ato
mic
, mol
ecul
ar,
and
elec
tron
649
998
1,06
50.
460.
510.
540.
220.
210.
230.
110.
120.
090.
170.
110.
100.
030.
040.
04
Ele
men
tary
-par
ticle
889
1,28
91.
409
0.54
0.75
0.76
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.05
0.03
0.03
0 24
0.19
0.17
0.05
0.02
0.02
W.1
4.N
ucle
ar1,
277
1,79
41,
782
0.41
0.50
0.52
0.08
0.10
0.10
0.07
0.08
0.06
0.39
0.27
0.25
0.05
0.05
0.07
Pla
smas
and
flui
ds70
793
01,
104
0.31
0.44
0.48
0.22
0.23
0.20
0.08
0.08
0.09
0.35
0.21
0.19
0.04
0.03
0.03
Con
dens
ed-m
atte
r2,
707
4,06
44,
157
0.36
0.43
0.43
0.38
0.33
0.35
0.08
0.09
0.09
0.14
0.11
0.09
0.04
0.03
0.03
i-, .0.
Spa
ce a
nd p
lane
tary
309
567
712
0.31
0.38
0.38
0.22
0.20
0.23
0.22
0.23
0,22
0.15
0.13
0.13
0.10
0.06
0.04
%C
rP
hysi
cs in
bio
logy
111
203
274
0.41
0.47
0.46
0.13
0.11
0.11
0.17
0.10
0.09
0.04
0.07
0.09
0.25
025
0.24
Co
Opt
ics
477
743
1,07
80.
200.
250.
270.
510.
520.
500.
090.
090.
100.
150.
060.
080.
050.
060.
05
Aco
ustic
s22
329
532
40.
300.
370.
310.
370.
370.
410.
130.
150.
190.
110.
050.
050.
C9
0.05
0.05
Oth
er2.
528
2.38
33,
457
0.51
0.56
,..0,
580.
230.
220.
210.
080.
080.
070.
120.
070.
070.
060.
070.
08
TO
TA
L P
HY
SIC
S9,
940
13,3
89 '
15.6
14 '
0.43
0.49
0.50
0.24
0.23
0.24
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.19
0.14
0.12
0.05
0.05
0.05
Mtr
onom
y39
3'68
9 '
634
'0.
580.
630.
590.
050.
070.
070,
170.
160.
180.
120.
090.
110.
080.
050.
05
TO
TA
L10
,333
14,0
8716
,248
0.43
0.50
0.51
0.24
0.23
0.23
0.09
0.09
0.09
0.19
0.13
0.12
0.05
0.05
0.05
Noo
resp
onde
nts=
119
.N
onre
spoo
denl
s= 2
11.
,Non
resp
onrk
nrs
= 3
73.
Non
resp
onde
nts=
123
.N
onre
spon
dent
s= 2
24.
Non
resp
onde
ms=
383
.
Manpower Data 1499
TABLE 11.13 Percentage Change in PhD Employment, 1964-1970
Employer 1964 1970
Percentage ofYearly Change('
College and university 4,478 8,223 0.139
Industry 2,450 3,805 0.092
Government 917 1,468 0.100
ReseaEch center 1,930 1,912 -0.001
Other 558 840 0.084
TOTAL 10,333 16,248 0.095
a 1970-19641196416.
bIncludes high school, junior college, hospital, and other non-profit organizations.
TABLE 11.14 Distribution among Subfields of Academically andNonacademically Employed PhD's in 1970
PhysicsSubfield
Employment (%)
Academic Nonacademic
Condensed-matter 22 29
Optics 4 10
Atomic, molecular, and electron 7 6
Plasmas and fluids 6 7
Nuclear 11 11
Elementary-particle 13 4
Other 8 23
Earth, planetary, astrophysicsand relativity, and astronomy
9 10
Teaching of physics 20 0
Figure 11.1 depicts the distribution among subfields of PhDphysicists employed in industry, government, and research centers
in 1970. Major emphasis in industry is on optics and condensedmatter, and in research centers, on nuclear physics, elementary-
particle physics, and plasmas and fluids. Most nonacademicallyemployed physicists in earth and planetary physics, astronomy,and astrophysics and relativity work for the government.
Regardless of where a physicist is employed, at least part ofhis work generally is supported by the federal goverpment. In
1970, 9491 PhD physicists who responded to the National Register
4 5
1500 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
(59.4 percent of the total respondents in physics) acknowledgedgovernment support.* Twenty-one percent of these physicists wereemployed by the government or by federally funded research anddevelopment centers; however, 52 percent of those in nonfederalemployment received some government support, as Table 11.15 indi-cates.
40%
NDUSTRY
GOVERNMENT
F1RESEARCH CENTER
CON- OPTICDENSEDMATTER
nATOM C, ASTRO- PLASMAS NUCLEAR ELEM. OTHERMOLEC,, PHYS,, AND PARTICLEELEC EARTH MA3 FLUIDS
PLAN.,ASTRON.
FIGURE 11.1 The distribution of nonacademic PhD employment bysubfield.
The fraction of the physics population receiving federal supportdecreased by 11.5 percent between 1968 and 1970, although the ab-solute number receiving such support increased by 4 percent. Thefederal programs in which physicists work appear in Table 11.16.Defense, atomic energy, and space programs account for three fourthsof the funds acknowledged by Register respondents. The DOD, AEC,and NASA account for 91 percent of the federal expenditures inbasic and applied research in physics. The distribution of feder-al obligations for basic and applied research in physics is shownin Table 11.17 for comparison with the distribution among federalprograms of support acknowledged by Register respondents shown inTable 11.16. The acknowledgments of support suggest that physi-
The 634 astronomers shown in Table 11.12 are not included in theanalyses and comparisons of funding. Although some physicistsworking in astrophysics and relativity and earth and planetaryphysics may receive funds under federal astronomy programs, thedistortion in manpower figures is likely to be small in compari-son with the distortion in support figures that would be introduced
by inclusion of federal obligations in astronomy.
4
Manpower Data 1501
TABLE 11.15 Fraction of PhD Physicists Not Employed by the Federal
Government Who Acknowledged Some Federal Support
Employer Percent Indicating Federal Support
University 56
Industry 42
Other nongovernment 61
Total nongovernment 52
TABLE 11.16 Sources of Federal Support Acknowledged by PhDPhysicists in 1970a
Program
Percentage ofFunds SupportingWork in Physics (%) No. of PhD'sb
DefenseAtomic energySpaceSubtotal, defense/space
32
27
15
74
3,8613,2281,854
8,943
Education 8 1,011
Health 4.5 541
Housing, public works,transportation, andurban development
2.5 307
Agriculture, natural re-sources, and ruraldevelopment
2 260
Other 8 946
Subtotal, nondefense/space
25 3,065
TOTAL 12,008 12,008
aExcludes astronomy.
bIncludes multiple responses. Of 15,987 PhD's, 9491 reported at
least one source of government support.
,47
1502 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
TABLE II.1Z Federal Obligations for Basic and Applied Researchin Physics
Percentage Distribution of $613 Mil-Agency lion Obligated, FY 1970 (%)
DOD 30
AEC 38
NASA 23
Subtotal, defense/space
NSFOther
5.5
3.5
91
Subtotal, nondefense/space 9
aSource of data: FederaZ Funds for Research, DeveZopment, and
Other Scientific Activities. National Science Foundation(NSF-70-38) (Volume 19).
TABLE 11.18 Acknowledgments of Federal Support by Subfield
PhysicsSubfield
Percentage of PhD's AcknowledgingSupport from the Government (%)
Plasmas 86
Acoustics 78
Nuclear 74
Elementary-particle 69
Earth and planetary 81
Astrophysics and relativity 57
Physics of fluids 73
Optics 61
Atomic, molecular, andelectron physics
61
Condensed matter 55
Miscellaneous (includingteaching)
46
All subfields 61
4 8
Manpower Data 1503
cists are finding work in fields other than the traditional onesof defense and space. It is not clear in the Register data whichprogram, education or other, a respondent supported by the NSFwould indicate. The major finding from this comparison is thatsupport from agencies other than those concerned with defense andspace, although amounting to only 9 percent of the federal obli-gations for physics research, affects one fourth of the physicistssupported, at least in part, by government programs.
Physicists in some subfields receive more federal support thanthose in others, as Table 11.18 indicates.
Another source of information on the support of physics researchis acknowledgments of support in published journal articles. Thesedata are presented and discussed in Chapter III, especially inTables III.2--III.6 and Figure 111.1. This Chapter explores indetail the support of physics in research by government, industry,and universities.
Multiple employment is a characteristic of professional life.For the academically employed physicist its economic benefits can-not be overlooked, and it generally offers a point of contact be-tween academic and nonacademic institutions that is valuable.Register data suggest that such interaction has been sharply re-duced between 1968 and 1970, presumably as a consequence of in-creasingly stringent economic conditions. In 1968, some 400 uni- -
versity-based PhD's reported additional employment outside the uni-versity and 400 nonacademically employed PhD's reported a secondaryjob, usually in a university. By 1970, these numbers had decreasedby about a factor of 2. Since the questionnaire does not detine ad-ditional employment, the data are likely to represent a lower bound
on personnel interchanges--those individuals for whom a second jobrepresents a substantial commitment of their total professionalobligations.
Funds generally regarded as discretionary have been severelyaffected by the economic situation; consequently, there has been amarked decrease in summer employment of faculty and exchanges ofpersonnel among academic and nonacademic institutions. Such ex-changes, which are highly cost effective in terms of productivity,are highly vulnerable to budget expediency.
Professional employment includes a number of specific work ac-tivities--for the physicists, principally research, teaching, andthe management of research and development. Rarely does a singleactivity adequately describe the work of a particular physicist.The individual ordering of such activities varies with institution-al setting and over time with the development of a professionalcareer. The following statistical analysis provides a descriptionof the major work activities of physicists in th% socioeconomiccircumstances that prevailed in the late 1960's. Taken togetherwith the preceding data on employment, this analysis provides aquantified picture of the traditional employment of a physicist.In interpreting this picture and assessing its relevance.to futureprojections, one must take into consideration that what a physicist
We are indebted to Hugh Odishaw for a critical discussion ofthis point.
4 9
TABLE 11.19
Distribution of Work Activities of Academically Employed PhD's
Primary
Secondary Work Activity (%)
Distribution
Work
Basic
Applied
Develop-
Mgmt.
Mgmt.
of Primary
Activity
Research
Research
ment
R&D
Other
Teaching
Other
Work Activitya (%)
crt
tr,4,
F..
Basic
research
4.85
2.44
0.60
1.11
0.20
26.5
2.36
38.4
CJ
Applied
research
0.48
0.22
0.25
0.25
01.9
0.14
3.25
Development
0.06
0.03
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.02
00.16
Management,
R&D
0.73
0.39
0.01
0.11
0.25
1.17
0.11
2.75
Management,
other
0.61
0.10
0.01
0.49
0.42
2.71
0.10
4.43
Teaching
35.4
4.74
0.15
0.82
4.68
3.26
1.83
50.9
Other
0.11
0.02
00.01
0.03
0.10
0.15
0.43
aN = 8032.
TABLE 11.20
Distribution of Work Activities of Nonacademically Employed PhD's
Primary
Secondary Work Activity (%)
Distribution
Work
Basic
Applied
Develop-
Mgmt.
Mgmt.
of Primary
Activity
Research
Research
ment
R&D
Other
Teaching
Other
Work Activity
Basic
research
6.05
13.0
1.16
4.86
0.17
2.3
4.77
32.3
Cel
1-u, o u,
Applied
research
8.35
4.88
7.9
5.1
0.13
1.0
3.92
31.2
).....i
Development
0.15
2.28
0.88
0.52
0.06
0.05
0.46
4.54
Management
3.48
9.23
2.14
2.18
2.4
0.39
2.27
21.81
R&D
Management,
Other
0.10
0.2
0.2
1.45
0.59
0.3
1.16
4.04
Teaching
0.29
0.18
00.06
0.18
0.37
0.22
1.29
Other
0.51
1.09
0.39
0.4
0.33
0.15
1.73
4.61
aN = 7864.
1506 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
can do may be qualitatively different from a statistical picture ofwhat he currently does. Such differences could become significant
in the 1970's. Future changes, of course, cannot be quantified,but one can get some insight into the modes of change by examiningpatterns of mobility of physicists, discussed in detail in 11.1.3.2.
Respondents to the National Register specify their primary andsecondary work activities, and the aggregation of these responsesprovides a more detailed picture of the distribution of activitycharacterizing the employment of a physicist. The pattern of ac-tivity for all age groups taken together appears in TalAes 11.19and 11.20. A single work activity adequately describes the pro-fessional employment of but 13 percent of the physicists. In aca-
demia research generally is combined with teaching; in nonacademicsettings basic research typically is combined with applied researchor development, and both types of research are often combined withthe management of research and development.
A major difference between PhD's working in academic institutionsand those in other types of employing institutions is, of course,involvement in teaching. More than four fifths (84 percent) ofthe academically employed PhD's had teaching responsibilities, and69 percent combined teaching and research. Research was a major
work activity in all employment settings. As adding the first two
columns in Table 11.21 will show, approximately 85 percent of thePhD's in industry, government, and universities reported some in-
volvement in research. An even higher percentage, 94 percent, ofthose working in federally funded research and development centerswas engaged in research. Among the PhD's working in other typesof institutions (5 percent of all PhD's), 70 percent had research
responsibilities.Figure 11.2 presents a comparison of the research involvement
of physicists in various types of nonacademic employment.Emphasis on basic research in the universities and research
centers has remained essentially constant since 1964; however,
basic research in industry and government, always a relatively smallfraction of the total activity of such institutions, has declinedfurther, as shown in Chapter 12 of Physics in Perspective, Vol-ume 1, Figures 12.24 and 12.25. Thus basic research is becoming
increasingly isolated in the universities and research centers.If the university population is subdivided into those who are
primarily research oriented and those who are primarily orientedtoward teaching, the pattern indicated in Table 11.22 and Fig-ure 11.3 results. Although minor fluctuations in percentage mustbe interpreted with care, the data suggest a shift toward moreresearch-oriented activities between 1964 and 1968 and'a reverseshift back to teaching between 1968 and 1970. The university ad-
justed to the changing research climate by slightly altering its
work activities. It is doubtful that such flexibility will be pos-sible in the future, with projected decreases in both universityteaching and research functions.
The priorities assigned to the various activities that comprisea physicist's professional life change over time. The emphasis onbasic research that characterizes the early years gives way to
5 2
Mdnpower Data 1507
TABLE 11.21 Researcha
and Otherb Activities of PhD Physicists in
1970 by Employer
EmployerResearch andDevelopment
Research andDevelopmentand Other Other Only Total
University 720 (0.09) 6008 (0.74) 1304 (0.13) 8,032
Industry 1789 (0.48) 1411 (0.37) 533 (0.15) 3,733
Government 573 (0.40) 658 (0.44) 201 (0.16) 1,432
Research 932 (0.50) 828 (0.45) 116 (0.05) 1,876
,tenter
Other 231 (0.28) 345 (0.44) 247 (0.28) 823
Total 4245 (0.26) 9250 (0.58) 2401 (0.15) 15,896
a Research includes basic research, applied research, and develop-
mentb In the university, other refers predominantly to teaching; in non-
academic employment, other refers predominantly to management.
cTotals may vary somewhat from earlier employer totals because a
small number of people did not respond to the work activity
question.
TABLE 11.22 Research and Teaching Orientations in Universities,
1964-1970 (%)
Orientation 1964 1968 1970
Research oriented 40 47 44Research and other 14 16 15
Research and teaching(research primary)
26 31 28
Teaching oriented 59 51 55Teaching and research(teaching primary)
38 37 40
Teaching and other 21 14 15
5 3
1508 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0
BASIC RESEARCH
BASIC and APPLIED
APPLIED RESEARCHand DEVELOPMENT
_
Or//,',
/ A\\,
,--
;0411r
'27%
,
r
\
\
\
:5?'APPUED RESEARCH,
__DEVELOPMENT andOTHER
'...
'...
\'0 *:
OTHER(NON RESEARCH)
,I.
- '
X4
INDUSTRY GOVERNMENT RESEARCHCENTERS
FIGURE 11.2 The work activities of nonacademically employed PhDphysicists in 1970.
increasing management responsibilities. In universities the com-bination of research and teaching shifts toward teaching and man-agement, and in nonacademic institutions a career is likely tomove from basic research into applied research and development,then into the management of research and development, as illus-trated in Tlble 11.23. The data in the Table are based on respon-dents to both the 1968 and 1970 Registers who remained in the sametype of employing institution, a sample of approximately 70 per-cent of the total 1970 Register population. Comparison of the
1968 and 1970 combined work activity for this relatively stablegroup shows that the changes in such activity follow the age gra-dients implied by the data of Table 11.23.
TABLE 11.23
Median Age in 1970 and Distribution of Combined WorkActivities of PhD Physicistsa
Combined Primary and
Secondary Work Activities
University
Industry
Government
Research Center
Percent
(N = 5742)
Med.
Age
Percent
(N= 2365)
Med.
Age
Percent
(N = 952)
Med.
Age
Percent
Med.
(N = 1268) Age
Basic research
2.9
30.5
2.3
35.9
6.9
38.8
5.6
38.5
Basic and applied research
2.5
32.0
19.3
36.5
23.4
37.0
15.3
37.8
1-,
vi o
Applied research and devel-
opment
0.4
31.3
20.0
37.5
4.6
42.5
8.5
38.6
,0
Research and teaching
71.0
36.8
1.3
38.2
3.9
37.7
2.7
37.7
Research and management
3.5
43.5
33.5
41.8
33.2
42.6
20.9
43.1
Management of research
and development
0.1
44.5
2.4
46.2
3.2
46.5
1.4
46.9
Teaching only
3.1
44.2
00
0Management and teaching
10.9
45.9
0.4
46.5
0.5
49.5
0.4
51.5
Other management (than R&D)
0.6
51.2
0.8
47.5
0.4
49.5
0.1
34.5
Other combinations
5.0
42.5
19.9
43.2
22.8
44.9
11.3
38.4
All work activities
37.9
40.0
41.4
40.0
aThe samples includes only respondents to both the 1968 and 1970
National Register surveys who remained
in the same type of employing institution.
1510 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
6 0
5 6
5 2
4 0
3 6
1964 1968 1970
FIGURE 11.3 Variations in teaching and research orientation inuniversities, 1964.1970.
11.1.3.2 Subfield Mobility
The distribution of young PhD's among subfields closely resemblesthat of graduate students and university-based physicists in gen-eral, as Table 11.24 shows. This comparison reflects a patternof early choice that persists despite the change of status fromgraduate student to PhD. By age 30, 44 percent of the physicsPhD's have left university study or employment and have adaptedtheir interests to new environments. Within this pattern of per-sistent interests, however, substantial mobility among subfields
occurs. The subfield transition matrix in Table 11.25 depicts
this mobility. The striking feature is that 25 percent of the 971who remained in the eight major subfields changed from one of these
subfields to another.In addition to mobility among subfields, there also is a sub-
stantial flow into other areas, for example, teaching, computerscience, and other fields. Seventy percent of the 178 PhD's mov-ing into other areas went into general physics and teaching; theother 30 percent (4.3 percent of the degree mobile cohort) went
into other sciences. The imbalance between outward and internal
5 6
Aunpower Data 1511
TABLE 11.24 Subfield Distribution of Graduate Students, YoungPhD's and University-Based PhD's
PhysicsSubfield
GraduateStudents
a
W = 9000
PhD's<30N = 1813
University-Based PhD'sN = 8208
Condensed-matter 27.3% 27.0% 21.8%Elementary-particle 15.7 13.8 13.0Nuclear 14.8 11.4 11.3Atomic, molecular,and electron
7.4 8.0 7.0
Plasmas and fluids 3.4 6.4 6.4Optics 2.6 4.8 3.4Physics in biology 1.3 2.1 1.6Acoustics . 1.1 1.4 1.2Astronomy.andastrophysics
4.9 7.9 6.7
Other 21.5 17.0 26.4
a Source of these data is American Institute of Physics publicationNo. R-207.2.
mobility could have been biased by the selection of a sample popu-lation consisting only of physicists; however, a longitudinal anal-ysis of the entire PhD population between 1960 and 1966 indicatesthat this trend is not artificial.
New PhD's who leave the university are more likely to changesubfields than those who remain. In our sample which includes 44percent of all physics and astronomy PhD's granted in 1968 and1969, the 466 young people who left the university were 36 percentmore likely to change subfield than the 614 who remained. Of thosewho remained, about 250 were probably postdoctorals, a status oftenused for advanced specialization rather than diversification.
The pattern of youthful interest in physics subfields differssignificantly from that of the physics population as a whole.These differences are reflected in a comparison of the age distri-butions of the various subfields, a comparison that is facilitatedby constructing a set of appropriate cohort ratios. Table 11.26presents a comparison of the ratio of the under 30 cohort with the40-45 cohort.* The variations from average among the subfieldsillustrates a distinct pattern of youthful interests compared withmature interests, which is depicted in Figure 11.4. The generalpersistence of this pattern since 1964 also is indicated in Fig-ure 11.4, although some changes are evident. Interest in physicsin biology has increased, and that in elementary-particle physics,which still attracts the young, clearly is decreasing. Interest
The analysis is not sensitive to the particular choice of a maturecohort. A rank ordering of the subfields by median age illustratesthe trend.
5 7
1512 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
TABLE 11.25 .Subfield Transition Matrix for Physicists Receiving
the PhD between 1968 and 1970a'
Subfieldin 1968
Subfield in 1970 Op& A&R, Total1968AME EP NP P&F CM PB Ac E&P Other
AME 44 1 3 5 15 4 14 4 23 113
EP 0 109 10 2 7 0 3 10 26 167
NP 5 5 107 4 11 2 2 6 23 165
P&F 2 1 0 52 6 0 5 3 10 79
CM 11 2 6 10 272 6 34 4 65 410
PB 1 0 3 0 1 12. 2 0 3 22
Op&Ac 6 0 0 0 7 0 29 1 9 52
A&R,E&P 2 1 2 2 4 0 8 108 19 143
Other 1 4 2 1 10 2 8 4 70 102
Total 72 123 133 76 333 26 102 140 248 1251°
1970
aSubfield abbreviations used are the same as those identified in
Table 11.9, footnote b.bAge characteristics of the sample: lower quartile 28.6; median
30.2; upper quartile 32.9. Mobility with regard to type of employ-ing institution: mobile 37 percent; static, academic 49 percent;static, nonacademic 14 percent.cThere were 604 additional respondents whose responses on subfields
were incomplete.
in astronomy and earth and planetary physics has increased consid-erably, and that in plasmas and fluids has diminished. The over-
all regularity and persistence of the interest profile suggeststhat the emphases of the previous decade do not persist in the sub-
field age distribution; subfield mobility effectively dissipates
fluctuations in fashion.The profile of youthful interest depicted in Figure 11.4 is
similar to the profile of foreign involvement in U.S. physics dis-
cussed in Chapter 8 of Physics in Perspective, Volume 1 and shown
there in Figures 8.9 and 8.10. The concentration of foreign-bornphysicists varies with subfield in the same way as the concentra-tion of young physicists and the median age of the foreign groupis inversely correlated with concentration; that is to say, sub-
fields that attract many foreign physicists also attract principal-
ly young foreign physicists.A significant feature of the data of Table 11.26 is that the
relative concentration of young PhD's is not correlated with dif-
ferential subfield growth. Although this finding may reflect to
some extent limitations on the available options in graduate edu-
cation, it is clear that the rapid growth of astrophysics and rela-
tivity, earth and planetary physics, and optics results from in-
tellectual mobility at all ages. Optics provides a representative
example.
5 8
TABLE 11.26
Age Characteristics of PhD Physicists by Subfield,
1964 and 1970a
1970 y2pulation
1964 Population
Median
Subfield
Age
Total
<29
40-44
Ratio
<29/40-44
Median
Age
Total
,Ratio
30/41-45
Growth
Total 70/Total 64
PB
37.2
274
39
73
1.39
40.6
111
0.40
2.46
EP
34.2
1,407
250
.37
1.33
34.1
889
2.70
1.59
Astron
35.0
633
106
BO
1.32
37.4
392
1.45
1.61
&SR
34.7
250
40
1L
'."1:.
34.7
63
1.72
3.97
AME
35.3
1,065
145
14b
1....1
36.5
649
1.20
1.65
C.7t
1-,
Ln 1-,
CM
36.4
BO
37.4
4,152
712
489 85
664
119
0.74
0.73
36.7
38.1
2707
309
1.07
0.78
1.54
2.30
CZ
wNP
37.8
1,782
206
315
0.65
37.3
1277
0.90
1.40
P36.0
F38.1
567
534
63
51
96
92
0.661
0.56 I
36.7
706
1.26
1.56
Op
38.7
1,077
86
159
0.54
40.3
477
0.625
2.26
Ac
40.1
324
26
49
0.53
42.2
223
0.460
1.45
All
37.4
12,877
1589
1971
0.806
38.2
7803
1.15
1.65
.subfields
aSubfield abbreviations are those indicated in Table
11.9, footnote b.
RE
LAT
IVE
SIZ
E O
F T
HE
YO
UT
HF
UL
CO
HO
RT
(per
cent
var
iatio
n fr
om a
vera
ge)
- f-
-I-
rV-1
=.
00
01 ca 0
I a) 0I 4> 0
I iv 0C
oo
01
PH
YS
ICS
IN B
IOLO
GY
03 c) m E
LEM
EN
TA
RY
PA
RT
ICLE
S
AS
TR
ON
OM
Y 0
s-
I1
1
AS
TR
OP
HY
SIC
S a
nd R
ELA
TIV
ITY
CO
ND
EN
SE
D M
AT
TE
R 0
--
0--
6-
0
EA
RT
H a
nd P
LAN
ET
AR
Y
NU
CLE
AR
PH
YS
ICS
/P
LAS
MA
S
FLU
IDS
/0-
--.-
OP
TIC
S
/0o
-A
CO
US
TIC
S
LL_
0
0 CA o
Lr.
AUnpower Data 1515
Between 1964 and 1970 approximately 700 PhD's went into optics.(The increase of 600 shown by Register data is about 85 percent ofthe total.) In this same interval the Doctorate Records File shows80 new PhD's in optics. To have met the actual growth rate withphysics graduate students (assuming 100 percent retention of newdoctorates in the subfield) would have required an 875 percent ex-pansion of university facilities as well as a promotional campaignto reverse what is apparently a rather well-established motivationalpattern. There is no evidence to suggest that optics received anyspecial external stimulation, such as increased federal supportduring this period of growth.
Table 11.27 shows changes in optics manpower between 1968 and1970. The major interchanges with optics were with atomic, molec-ular, and electron physics and condensed matter, subfields withwhich considerable overlap might be expected. However, a nontriv-ial interchange with all subfields is evident. Among establishedPhD's only about 300 remained identified with optics in both years;471 entered from other subfields and another 303 left. The staticcomponent in the subfield is relatively small compared with themobile population and the net change in optics is the differencebetween two large numbers. All ages participated; the median ageof inward mobile components correlates roughly with the median ageof the subfield of origin. An examination of simultaneous changesin type of employing institution among optics PhD's between 1968and 1970 provides no evidence that external circumstances had anyparticular effect on manpower interchanges in tht subfield. Ofthe 289 established PhD's who worked continuously in optics, 10percent changed type of employing institution; of the 471 PhD's whoentered the subfield, 13 percent changed type of employing insti-tution. Taken together, 11.6 percent of the 1970 optics manpowerhad made a change in type of employing institution since 1968, thesame percentage as for the overall physics population. The move-ment into optics, then, is largely an in situ process.
The pattern of subfield interchanges for all PhD's in the 1970Register for whom adequate responses were also available in 1968appears in Table 11.28. The sample amounts to 80 percent of thePhD's in the 1970 Register, an estimated 65 percent of the totalU.S. physics PhD population. On the basis of this classificationscheme (an 11 by 11 matrix), some 34 percent of the physics PhD'schanged the subfield in which they were working between 1968 and1970. Some subfields had a higher proportion of mobile PhD's thanothers, as Table 11.29 shows. This Table ranks the subfields ac-cording to the inward mobile fraction of the 1970 totals. In someinstances, the apparent variation results from the diversity ofspecialties that comprise a given subfield. In condensed matter,for example, a major change in scientific interest from supercon-ductivity to high-pressure physics would not show in the matrix ofTable 11.28. In contrast, elementary-particle physics, anothersubfield of low mobility, is defined by only six specialtieshadrons, leptons, photons, high-energy cosmic rays, quantum fieldtheory, and other. This brief list adequately describes the in-
terests of 84 percent of the 1970 elementary-particle Physics pop-
ulation. The actual magnitude of the mobility inferred from such
6 1
1516 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
TABLE 11.27 Changes in Optics Manpowera between 1968 and 1970
Subfieldin 1968 New PhD's Doctorates before 1968
or 1970b Entrants Leavers Entrants Med. Age Leavers Med. Age
Op 19 298 41.6
AME 14 6 92 38.7 60 43.0
EP 2 0 10 34.0 4 35.5
NP 2 0 26 45.2 5 51.5
P&F 4 0 27 37.5 5 36.2
CM 25 5 211 41.3 95 39.2
E&P 4 0 11 41.5 19 39.9
PB 1 0 8 47.5 6 48.5
Ac 0 0 7 41.5 2 36.5
Astron 0 1 11 33.5 4 41.5
Gen. phys. 7 4 47 41.0 65 47.5
& teach.Othersciences
1 1 21 44.0 38 47.3
1970total
79 769 40.9
Othersubfields:Entrants 60 471
Leavers 17 303
1968total
36 601 42.4
aBased on respondents to both the 1968 and 1970 National Register
surveys. Such respondents amount to 64 percent of new PhD's and
about 65 percent of all established PhD's.
bSubfield abbreviations used are those indicated in Table 11.9,
footnote b.
a transition matrix depends, of course, on the dimensionality of
the matrix; the finer the distinctions, the greater the numerical
magnitude of the mobility.Table 11.30 presents a comparison of established PhD's with the
degree mobile cohort and shows that established PhD's are about as
likely to change subfields as are new PhD's. More scientists move
away from the discipline-intensive physics subfields than enter;
the flow to other sciences amounts to 3 percent for established
PhD's compared with 4 percent in the young cohort.* The higher
*A 10 percent flow of new physics and astronomy PhD's to other fields
is reported by the Office of Scientific Personnel in 1969 (OSP-MS-3,
April 1970). The difference results from different definitions.
We have included some chemistry, earth sciences, and biosciences
in physics subfields.
6 2
Manpower Data 1517
TABLE 11.28 Transition Matrix between 1968 and 1970 by Subfieldof Employment for all 1970 PhD's"
. 1 _ + - . - _ , - . - _ - -4 ^ +
,011 Am- 19681964 6M4 Er NP Phf CM FAP PH op Ac trun Mime Total
_. ......
42 1q
1 2 4 -----7 ----1-1----01646 36.9 41.5 15.5 19.5 17.5 12,', 100) 12.0 36.2
2 440 9 16 17 10 4/ 10/ lq 9 106 I 14 155 925Allf 15.5 16.9 19.0 11.2 14.4 14.5 17.6 15.5 39.2 0.5 32.4 11.5 35.2 39.3 17.0
11 15 895 hi 7 1 10 25 28 2 12 4 140 121061, 15.0 15.5 14.4 15.9 14.0 31.5 0.8 31.0 31.0 36,5 33.5 32.5 219.5 14.0 34.3
6 18 54 115h 12 14 20 89 21 16 28 4 235 1674NP 35.5 11.8 41.8 18.7 17.5 11.1 14,5 19.5 15.5 36.1 43.5 14.0 41.5 39.3 38.7
1 17
6
202 11 215 45 12 2 10 4 1 52 367F 55.5 41.0 11.1 17.5 40.9 11.1 40.5 18.7 14.5 37.5 16.5 14.5 29.5 41.2 39.3
1 12 6 26 110 156 14 11 1 21 1 I 29 450P 35.5 37.8 41,0 41.5 13.9 37.2 36.8 36.5 41.5 31.5 35.5 27.5 11.5 39,9 37.2
2 29 12 228 343 571 59 21 3 31 5 2 81 825IMF 4',.'., N.5 1/.5 40.5 19.9 16,9 37,9 17.9 36.2 33.5 35.5 33.5 30.5 40.4 38.1
2 115 11 48 88 13 101 2634 26 25 236 38 3 478 3759CM 51.5 17.0 16.7 42.5 16.3 35.5 36.2 37.1 18.5 16.2 39.8 35.4 47.5 39.9 37.5
h 9 15 2 4 1 7 17 323 1 15 2 37 52 486FAP 42.5 0.5 17.7 32.5 41.5 13.5 35.5 40.0 38.5 35.5 39.0 55.5 37.7 40.0 38.6
1 22 4 4 6 112 9 6 1 17 19UPH 51.5 18.5 15.5 15.5 45.5 19.0 47.0 37.5 41.5 37.5 39.1
66 4 5 2 3 5 100 19 6 117 2 5 108 637op 40,0 15.5 51.5 36.5 36.0 36.2 18.7 19.9 48.5 41.1 36.5 36.0 46.7 41.6'
I 2 6 1 7 24 2 9 7 171 26 249Ac 43.5 51.5 37.5 35.5 35.5 40.5 45.5 38.0 41.5 43.6 46,5 43.0
75 12 7 2 2 2 4 6 55 3 11 1 391 91 658Astron 0,7 40.5 37.5 43.5 38.5 33.5 34.5 32.5 35.4 47.5 33.5 31.5 36.6 42.1 36.19 34 31 59 51 10 61 179 55 15 76 22 17 1327 1885Hine 39.0 42.5 34.8 40.0 42.0 46.5 42.7 39.4 44.7 47.5 41.5 43.8 43.5 44.2 43.5
Tots) 195 781 1064 1190 441 146 817 1748 581 701 948 ?57 604 2721 124091970
31.2 32.1 31.3 33.0 13.9 32.5 33.2 32.3 32.7 33.0 33.7 34.5 31.3 34.6 32.835.4 37.4 34.9 38.7 39.1 36.6 37.8 37.2 38.3 38.6 39.7 40.8 36.6 42.3 38.340.7 44.7 40.8 45.3 45.9 42.6 44.3 43.4 45.1 47.7 47.3 50.4 44.2 49.8 45.6
''Subfield abbreviations used are those identified in Table 11.9, footnote b.
"lover quartile, median, and upper quarttle.
subfield mobility of new PhD's is associated with the major upheav-al that takes place between graduate school and postdoctoral em-ployment.
Established PhD's change jobs from time to time, and such changesafford opportunities to undertake new scientific interests. Be-tween 1968 and 1970, 11.9 percent of the established PhD's changedtype of employing institution; Table 11.31 compares the concurrentchanging of subfields of the mobile physicists with interchangesof those who remained in the same type of employment. Clearly,those who change jobs are 20 percent more likely to change sub-fields than are those who do not. However, a substantial amountof subfield changes occur within one type of employment. Thosewho move into and leave universities--the major component of em-ployment-change group-- may_jo,so. a5 a result of the pursuit ofa certain type of research, or they may redirect their intereststo be compatible with a more satisfactory employment circumstance.Employment mobility produces, on the whole, no more than a 20 per-
63
1518 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
TABLE 11.29 Subfield Mobility between 1968 and 1970, Ranked
According to the inward Mobile Fraction of the 1970 Total
PhysicsSubfield
Inward Mobile an a Fraction of1970 Total (Z)
Elementary-particle 15.9
Nuclear 17.8
Condensed-matter 18.9
Astronomy 19.8
Plasmas and fluids 31.8
Acoustics 33.5
Atomic, molecular, and electron 43.8
Physics in biology 44.3
Earth and planetary 44.4
Astrophysic9 and rolativity 57.9
Optics 62.6
Miscellaneous 51.2
TABLE 11.30 Subfield Mobility, 1968 to 1970
PhD's
Internal Mobilityamong Eight MajorSubfield Groupingsa Outgoing
b Incomingb
NewEstablished
257. 14.2% 2.5%
21% 10.7% 4.6%
a Percentage of the 8 X 8 group.
bPercentage of the total population.
TABLE 11.31 Subfield Mobility of Established PhD's, 1968 to 1970
Type of Internal Mobility
Employing among Eight Sub- Out- In- Med.
Institution Percent field Groupings going coming Age
Mobile 11.8% 25.8% 12.2% 5.0% 35.9
Static 88.2°. 20.1% 10.8% 4.8% 39.8
cent enhancement of subfield mobility. The employer-mobile popula-
tion is distinctly younger than the employer-static part of the
established PhD population, but, as age characteristics of mobility
6 4
gmp000p Oata 15L9
wilt show, this finding suggests, tt anything, an even greater en-hancement of subfield mobility due to simultaneous employmentmobility.
To examtne the age dependence of subfield mobility, we examineddata on the employer-static, established PhD's. The results appearIn Table 11.32. The myth of youthful Intellectual. mobility wasunsubstanttated. If anything, it appears that the Likelihood ofdiversification of scientific interest is correlated with profes-sional maturation. This result was checked against Register dataon an earlier interval, 1960-66. The results are shown in Table11.33, The upward trend displayed by the youngest cohort probablyis a consequence of degree mobility; about 25 percent of that co-hort received the PhD shortly after the survey in 1960. The pat-tern of subfield interchanges between 1960 and 1962 is generallycomparable with that between 1968 and 1970. Although variation ofmobility patterns with age is almost nonexistent in both sets ofdata, there were some differences in overall mobility. At thebeginning of the decade there were fewer interchanges among majorsubfields than at the end of the decade. A balanced interchangebetween the major subfields and general physics and other sciences,which prevailed in the earlier period, became a discernible out-flow by 1970. The actual magnitude of these changes is not large,but the trends are clear.
In regard to mobility by subfield, the data were generally simi-lar for the two intervals. Those subfields broadly related toothers are characterized by high mobility at both times; the moststriking changes occurred in optics and physics in biology, twosubfields of intense current interest.
An examination of the dependence of subfield mobility on type ofemploying institution suggests that changes with time are relatedto stresses on the physics community. These data appear in Table11.34. Clearly, the circumstances at the end of the 1960's haveincreased the subfield mobility of industrial physicists and de-creased that of university physicists. The differences are notan artifact of a restricted definition of subfields, as the secondcolumn of Table 11.34 shows. There mobility is estimated on thebasis of an expanded matrix that takes into account teaching, gen-eral physics, and other sciences. Again data on an earlier periodshould be examined. In 1960-62 and 1964-1966 subfield mobility wasessentially the same in all types of employing institutions; withinthe eight major subfields, 15 percent from 1960 to 1962, and forthis same population of 4415 PhD's, 13 percent, from 1964 to 1966.The recent increase in subfield mobility among nonacademic physi-cists is asociated with the reordering of research priorities. In-deed, the high mobility within the industrial group suggests averitable scrambling about for new directions together with theshift in emphasis away from basic research. In the universities,on the other hand, the erosion of research budgets has reduced thenumber of new projects that can be undertaken.
At any point in his career a physicist carries with him varyingdegrees of competence in a variety of subfields. This catalogueof subfield competence represents the accumulated experience of
6 5
1520 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
TABLE 11.32 Subfield Mobility of Employer Static Established
PhD's by Age, 1968 to 1970
Cohort Agein 1970
Internal Mobilityamong Eight Subfields (%) Outgoing (%) Incoming (%)
27 31 19.2 9.9 3.0
32 36 19.2 8.8 3.9
37 41 20.8 9.5 4.3
42 46 21.8 10.4 4.6
47 51 25.3 14.5 5.7
52 bl 25.2 13.6 5.3
Total 20.7 10.7 4.6
(N = 10,013)
TABLE 11.33 Subfield Mobility of Established P.tD's, 1960---1962,
1964-1966
Cohort Based on 1960-1962 1964---1966
Year of PhD (10 x 10) Mobilea (10 x 10) Mobilea
1956--1960 1366 27.1% 40.5%
1950--1955 1596 25.5% 36.7%
1949 1453 27.2% 39.4%
TOTAL 4415
aBased on a 10 x 10 matrix that includes eight major subfieldgroupings plus teaching and other sciences.
previous mobility as well as a developing sr-r of knowledge that
can nurture new directions of scientific ento.tly. An analysis of
research emphasis and scientific competence of a population pro-
vides a measure of the shared interests of that population at a
particular time. The distribution of subfield competence thatresulted from our analysis had essentially the same features as
that of subfield mobility.The distribution of first competence for PhD's working in var-
ious subfields in 1970 is shown in Table 11.35. Again the general
dispersion of subfield proficiency is evident. The breadth of an
individual's competence can be further explored by looking at data
on second, third, and fourth competences. A typical pattern of
external compared to internal competences emerges, as Figure 11.5
shows. For about one fifth of the PhD's first competence was out-
side the subfield of employment. For lower levels of competence
66
Nimpowop Vata 1521
TABLE II.34 Subfield Mobility of Established PhD's by Type ofEmploying Institution, 1968 to 1970
institutionInternal Mobility
x 8)2(%)Total Mobblity(16 x 16) (7.)
University 15 31Industry 29 42Government 22 35
Research centers 22 32
TOTAL 20 35
aBased on eight major subfield groupings; see Table 11.29.
bIn the 16 x 16 matrix, optics, acoustics, astrophysics and rela-
tivity, earth and planetary physics, and astronomy are separatedand the other category is subdivided into general physics, teach-ing, computer science, other science, and other.
the percentage was, of course, higher. The fraction of competenceoutside subfield of employment provides a measure of the related-ness of subfields comparable with that used in the analysis ofmobility, in which internally mobile group was compared with thetotal in the subfield. The average external competence for thephysics population was 47 percent. Some subfields were character-ized by a higher percentage of external competence than others.Based on Table 11.35 and like tables for successive levels of com-petence, a rank ordering of subfields was developed (see Table 11.36).The sequence is much like that obtained for inward mobility (Table11.29). Changes in first competence form a pattern like that ofsubfield mobility, but the magnitude of intellectual diffusion atthe level of first competence is considerably greater than it isat the level of actual scientific employment.
Thus, we can look at three demographic measures of the diffusionof knowledge in physics: subfield mobility, external competence,and first competence mobility. Taken together these measures forma consistent pattern, as shown in Figure 11.6. The data in thefigure can be read from left to right as follows: In, for example,plasma physics and physics of fluids, we see that inward subfieldmobility accounts for 32 percent of the 1970 population (see Table11.29); concurrently, the first subfield of competence has changedfor about 45 percent of the subfield; finally, individuals workingin this subfield typically report about 56 percent of their com-petence in other subfields (see Table 11.36). Although the numer-ical scale of these measures depends on the way in which we definea subfield, comparisons are possible within this set. Generally,the greatest inertia, or the most stable intellectual relationship,is associated with a physicist's particular subfield of researchemphasis. Surrounding this subfield of research interest is a
6 7
TABLE 11.35
Subfield of First Competence Compared with Subfield of Employment for All
1970 PhD'sc
Subfield
of First
Competence
A&R
AME
EP
NP
FP
P&F
CM
E&P
PB
Op
Ac
Astron
Misc
MR
200
12
11
12
44
10
015
29
AME
1711
23
21
11
718
102
22
13
117
316
182
EP
218
1187
80
23
531
15
716
54
153
al
NP
537
63
1467
14
620
61
34
15
32
43
263 62
CO
'1.-
t.n NI
NI
F P P&F
1 0 1
9 6
15
0 4 4
2 5 7
391
11
402
17
435
452
408
446
854
66 11
77
11
11
22
3 1 4
18 8
26
6 2 8
2 6 8
31
93
CM
791
13
44
72
880
3344
26
43
200
42
11
492
ESP
41
41
41
55
446
412
151
52
PB
01
09
00
05
0147
56
016
Op
2106
512
76
13
181
20
10
541
519
146
Ac
14
02
50
529
24
8213
030
Astron
14
10
20
25
45
16
0458
63
Misc
6.2
35
45
72
25
26
51
159
51
18
72
21
35
1729
Total 1970
243
1016
1334
1692
543
502
1045
3964
676
263
1022
306
614
3158
aSubfield abbreviations used are those identified in Table 11.9, footnote
b.
Manpower Data 1523
u_ w0 2tf)
o
cc
iTERNAL COMPETENC
EMPLOYMENT I 2 3 4LEVEL OF COMPETENCE
FIGUEE 11.5 Competence in physics su!,Cields. For those employeti
in a given subfield, additional competence in that subfield isproportional to A2, and competence in other subfields is propor-tional to A
1 .The example above is the average for PhD physicists.
6 9
1524 PHYSICS TN PERSPECTIVE
TABLE 11.36 External Competence of PhD's by Subfield, 1970
PhysicsSubfield External Competence (%)
Condensed-matter 27
Elementary-particle 40
Nuclear 43
Earth and planetary 51
Plasmas and fluids 56 -
Atomic, molecular, and 57
electronAstrophysics and relativity 60
Acoustics 62
Optics 65
Physics in biology 70
Average 47
OPTICS
ASTROPHYSICSRELATIVITY
PHYSICS inBIOLOGY
and ELECTRON
ACOUSTICS U.:',1::::::;.;:::.!:.;,..r.:,;*'.f.'.:::.::i'..;,!:!':-;,::-.......i!.;;A:Vit'jir,:::"/01;.j"?.1 ... t.)ku
N..... 14,
>. .., 1...
PLASMAS and [77.7.773,77.57.74....jpi,:,..);,..1 gqz. Lu
41t:.
FLUIDS . 4 caVCI IQ at
tselI.IQ4.
(kla,
ol cl 1/4,
EARTH and LLAPLANETARY '--
1.,!;:..?:.;;;;;;-;7;;;;7's* .t.:-.:;,no.i7,3tp.A NUCLEAR
KINISEN
Ecti ,LARPIrIRYLT:
CONDENSEDMATTER
I I I I I I
10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%INWARD MOBILITY AND EXTERNAL COMPETENCE
70%
FIGURE 11.6 The comparison of inward mobility of employment sub-
field, subfield of first competence, and the degree of external
competence for physics. The scale is linear in the ratio of ex-
ternal to internal relatedness.
7 0
Manpower Data 1525
radius of competence in other subfields. Changes in the catalogueof competence are both extensive and frequent compared with changesin research activity. If the pattern of demographic diffusion(Figure 11.6) is compared with the pattern of extrinsic versus in-trinsic relationships among subfields developed on the basis ofscientific criteria (see Physics in Perspective, Volume 1, Chapter5), a remarkable unity of scientific judgment and scientific be-havior is evident.
11.1.3.3 Non-PhD Physicists
More than half (55'percent) the non-PhD physicists work in indus-try and government in jobs related to applied research and develop-ment. Thirty percent are engaged in teaching, with the majorityof these teachers employed by high schools and two-year colleges.Non-PhD physicists are qualified for inclusion in the NationalRegister by a bachelor's degree or its equivalent and a minimum oftwo years' professional experience in physics. Sixty percent ofthe non-PhD group, has a master's degree, and 74 percent belong toprofessional societies, usually one of those represented by theAIP. Thus, the non-PhD's in the National Register population areclosely identified with physics through education, experience, andmembership in professional associations, and this identificationis made by the AIP on an individual basis. We :Than examine therelationship of this population to physics-reial.ed employment andconsider its principal demographic characteristics.
11.1.3.3.1 The Physics Labor Force and the Non-PhD PhysicistOf a total of about 1.7 million scientists and engineers in theUnited States, approximately one third is scientists and two thirdsare engineers. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) conducts anongoing series of employer surveys of this population. A strati-fied sample of employers is drawn from a universe of 500,000establishments employing 33 million workers. What a physicist is,as distinct from a chemist, metallurgist, geoscientist, or otherphysical scientist, is the decision of the responding employer,who is instructed to count only those "who are actually engaged inscientific work at a level which requires a knowledge of the phys-ical sciences equivalent to that acquired through completion of afour-year college course with a major in one of the physical sci-ence fields, regardless of whether they hold a college degree."
The employment distribution by BLS occupational sector of thephysicists in the BLS survey appears in Table 11.37. Based on theassumption that the PhD's in the Register physics population arelikely to be among those employed in physics, the second columnof Table 11.37 distributes the estimated total PhD physicistsaccording to BLS categories. The estimated employment of non-PhDphysicists, the third column in this table, results from the dif-ference between BLS population and Register PhD physics population.*
*Since estimates of the PhD population are based on individual re-sponses from 83 percent of the estimated physics PhD universe, theuncertainties in this part of the calculation are regardeei asnegligible.
71
1526 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
TABLE 11.37 Estimated Total Physics Labor Force, 1970
BLSOccupationalSector
BLS Physicistsa PhD'sb
Estimated BA (orequivalent)Non-PhD sc
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent
UniversityIndustryGovernment
TOTAL
21,20020,0006,800
48,000
44
4214
11,8006,4001,800
20,000
5932
9
9,400 34
13,600 48
5,000 18
28,000
aThe 1970 total of 48,000 is apportioned by occupational sectoraccording to the distribution of the 1968 total of 46,000 (BLS data).
&rile distribution of the 20,000 estimated PhD's is based on the16,600 PhD respondents to the 1970 National Register.
c Difference between BLS numbers and numbers of Register PhD's.
The distribution of non-PhD professional physicists in the 1970
National Register by BLS occupational sectors is shown in greater
detail in Table 11.38. Clearly, the Register population in a given
year represents about half of the universe of non-PhD physics em-
ployment, and the representation by sector is entirely consistent
with that universe. The professional non-PhD population represented
by the 19,700 Register respondents in 1970 is difficult to estimate
because of migration to and from this group. Some indication of its
size can be made by means of a calculation that yields a correct
answer when applied to PhD Register respondents. There were 3677
qualified respondents in 1968, having a median age of 34.5 years,
who did not respond again in 1970. If we assume an equal number
were not heard from in either 1968 or 1970, the nonrespondent com-
ponent of the Register-qualified population is about 7400, of whom
a few would be students, about 600 would be high school teachers,
and the remaining 6800 would be in the work force. The total num-
ber of Register qualified non-PhD's in the work force is, thus,
about 20,200, or 72.5 percent of the BLS total. We estimate, then,
that professionally qualified---on the basis of education, exper-
ience, and professional self-identification---non-PhD physicists
amount to about 72 percent of the BLS-employer estimated non-PhD
physics work foLce. Responses to the combined 1968 and 1970 Reg-
ister surveys amount to 83 percent of the qualified work force;
1970 respondents alone amount to 67 percent of those who are quali-
fied. In addition, the respondents include representative popula-
tions of high school teachers as well as advanced graduate students
and others who will be entering the work force.
The distribution of non-PhD physicists according to the type of
employing institution used in previous tables based on Register data
is shown in Table 11.39, with PhD's included for comparison. Not
surprisingly, non-PhD's are much less likely to hold faculty posi-
tions in universities than are PhD's; however, junior college
7 2
Manpower Data 1527
TABLE 11.38 Labor Force Distribution of Non-PhD Respondents
to the 1970 National Register by BLS Occupational Categories
BLS Occupational SectorNon-PhD'sNumber Percent
University and Coilege 4,600 34
University:Faculty 2,000FTE student employeesa 1,300
Junior college 800University operated federalresearch centers
500
Industry 6,300 47
Industry 5,350Industrially operated federalresearch centers
400
Other 550
Government 2,500
Subtotal (BLS occupations) 13,400
Other Occupations 6,300
Students (not included above) 2,100High school teachers 1,600Military 600Unknown employer 2 000
Total, 1970 National Register 19,700
gThe full-time equivalence (FTE) of 2600 university teaching andresearCh assistants on the 1970 Register is estimated at 50 per-cent on the basis of NSF data. The NSF (Report NSF 70-16) givesthe FTE of 84,391 graduate students in part-time employment as40,443.
teaching is done largely by non-PhD's. An extensive study of jun-ior college teachers in 1967 (NSF 69-3) shows that about half ofthose teaching physics did so full time. There were 496 full-time physics junior college teachers then, and 5 percent of thephysics courses were.taught by PhD's. In the 1970 Register sample,there were 845 physicists in junior colleges, 7 percent of whomwere PhD's. The growth implied is consistent with overall physicalscience faculty growth in these institutions, but the NSF and Reg-ister populations are not strictly comparable. It is evident,however, that the rapid growth of two-year colleges has not entailed
7 3
1528 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
an accelerated recrvirment of PhD's dutiag the 1.367-1970 interval.To an.even greater e::ceat, the teaching cf physics in high schoolsis done by non-PhD's.
Ind6stry and th2 iederal.goverpment provide employment !:or 55percent of the non-PhD's compared with 38.5 percent for PhD's.Research centers employ only 6 percent of the non-PhD's comparedwith 14 percent of nhe PhD's. These diffarences are consistentqith the relatively greater emphasis on applied research and de-velopment in the employment of non-FaD's.
TABLE TI.39 Employing Institutions of Non-PhD's and PhD's, 1970
EmployerNon-PhD's PhD's
Number Percent Number Percent
University (faculty)IndustryGovernmentResearch centerOther
Secondary schoolJunior collegeKilitaryOther
SUBTOTALa
University (non-faculty)
Unknown
TOTAL
1,9905,3462,545
8773,588
14,346
3,319
2,026
19,705
1,628791
650533
13.937.217.86,124.3
16.1
8.2
5,7233,8051,4681,912
840
31
54
113
642
13,748
2,500
383
16,631
41.627.710.813.96.1
0.6
5.5
Median age 32.9 37.4
aThe non-PhD sample represents an estimated 67 percent of the uni-verse of Register qualified full-time professionals; the PhD sampleis approximately 85 percent of the PhD universe.
11.1.3.3.2 Educational Mobility of Non-PhD PhysLcists Some 60percent of the non-PhD physicists hold a master's degree. Between1968 and 1970, departmental surveys indicated that there were about8000 graduate students in the third year of training or beyond.This pool of qualified non-PhD physicists is one fifth the size ofthe nonstudent professional work force, estimated at 20,000 non-PhD's and 20,000 PhD's. Most of these students are employed, 60percent of them part time and 19 percent full time, usually tnuniversities. Graduate students thus represent the supply of po-tential professional physicists aad their employment demonstratv9a demand for non-PhD 'physicists, especially in universities.
The mobility of physicists in regard to student status between
1968 and 1970 is shown in Table 11.40. By 1970, 77 percent of the
7 4
Manpower Data 1529
TABLE 11.40 Educational Mobility of Qualified Non-PhD Physicistsbetween 1968 and 1970
Status in 1970Status Student Nonstudentin 1968 Full Time ParL Time Non-PhD New PhD 1968 Total
Stud,2nt
Full time 899 73 1,055 1,624 3,651Part time 81 226 1,277 226 1,807
Subtotal 1,279 2,332 1,847(23%) (43%) (34%) 5,485a
Nonstud
Non-PhD 149 169 8,738 - 9,056
Subtotal 318 8,738 9,056(4%) (96%)
1970 total 1,129 486 11,070 1,847 14,514
Median age 28.3 31.6 36.8 29.9
aln 1968 there were 7800 graduate students beyond the second year oftraining.
'The Doctorate Records File counts 2874 new PhD's in academic years1967-1968 and 1968-1969.
1968 advanced graduate students had entered the nonstudent workforce, 34 percent as new PhD's and 43 percent generally as terminalnon-PhD professionals; 23 percent continued their training. Re-turn to graduate study was reported by 4 percent of the regularlyemployed non-PhD population.
11.1.3.3.3 Subfield Distribution of Non-PhD's The subfield ofemployment of nonstudent non-PhD's and advanced graduate studentsappears in Table 11.41. To a large extent the subfield distribu-tion of non-PhD employment is negatively correlated with the employ-ment of young PhD's shown in Table 11.26 and Figure 11.4. However,
a positive correlation exists between the subfield employment ofnon-PhD's and mature PhD's. The subfield interest profile of grad-uate students corresponds to that of PhD university faculty, shownin Table 11.24, and is negatively correlated with non-PhD employ-ment. The most striking mismatches between graduate training andnon-PhD employment occur in optics, acoustics, and earth and plan-etary physics. These three subfields, which employ a greater thanoverage number of non-PhD's, are those least represented in thezntio of student emphasis to non-PhD employment. Whether graduateeducation is an adequate source of non-PhD physicists, the profileof specialized training in graduate schools does not correspond tothe profile of specialties characteristic of the employment ofnon-PhD's.
1530 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
TABLE 11.41 Subfield Distribution of Non-PhD Physicists---Studentsand Nonstudents--1970
PhysicsSubfield Students Nonstudents
Astrophysics and relativity 80 79
Elementary-particle 437 413
Nuclear 443 1,168
Atomic, molecular, and electron 286 576
Plasmas and fluids 195 503
Condensed-matter 1,005 2,573
Earth and planetary 157 567
Physics in biology 53 135
Optics 233 1,936
Acoustics 67 704
Astronomy 145 344
Miscellaneousa
857 6,749
TOTAL 3,958 15,747
aOther physics, 27 percent;,teaching, 46 percent; other sciences,
27 percent.
As is true of PhD's, subfield mobility among non-PhD's providesthe means of adjusting manpower supply to the prevailing patternsof use. Of 5759 non-PhD's in eight major subfields in 1968 and1970, 73 percent remained in the same :;ubfield throughout the two-year interval, a percentage equivalent to that for PhD's.
A measure of subfield mobility among relative/y established non-PhD's can be derived by using the population who did not changetypes of employing institution between 1968 and 1970; For thisgroup the mobility among major subfields was 23 percent, comparedwith 20 percent for established PhD's. One difference between non-PhD's and PhD's is that the simultaneous subfield mobility of em-ployer mobile individuals is considerable enhanced--38 percent ofnon-PhD's compared with 23 percent of PhD's changed type of employ-ment, and 26 percent of non-PhD's compared with 20 percent of PhD'schanged subfield also. Non-PhD's apparently are somewhat more like-ly to adjust subfield emphasis to suit new employment than are PhD's.An important similarity between non-PhD's and PhD's is that sub-field mobility shows a negligible dependence on age. In a two-yearperiod, changes in subfield among the eight m'ajor ones comprisingphysics by approximately one fourth of the physics population seemsto be characteristic of professional physicists, regardless of ageor degree status.
Since industry and government are the major employers of non-PhD's, we examined the subfield distribution of non-PhD's thus em-
pliayed. As shown in Figure 11.7, employment outside the discipline-specific subfields amounts to approximately 30 percent for those in
both types of employing institutions. This miscellaneous category,
7 6
Manpower Data 1531
ACOUSTICS
CONDENSEDMATTER
OPTICS
ATOMIC, MOLECULAR, and ELECTRONand PLASMAS and FLUIDS
GOVERNMENT
INDUSTRYNUCLEAR
MTEMMO1 EARTH and PLANETAR Y,and ASTRONOMY
MISC.
1 I i 1 I 4
10% 20% 30%DISTRIBUTION OF SUBFIELD EMPHASIS
FIGURE 11.7 Subfields of non-PhD physicists in industrial andgovernment employment.
for both industry and government, can be subdivided into generalphysics (48 percent), computer science and mathematics (30 percent),and other sciences (22 percent). Optics and condensed matter to-gether provide about 50 percent and 30 percent of the non-PhD em-ployment in industry and government, respectively. The percentagesFor PhD's thus employed were 60 percent and 30 percent. Other than:1,1sed matter and optics, industrial and government employment
uraiig about the same mix of acoustics; atomic, molecular, and
7 7
1532 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
electron physics; plasma physics and physics of fluids; and nuclearphysics, although the proportion engaged in these subfields isslightly greater among government-employed non-PhD's. Earth andplanetary physics, particularly atmospheric physics, and astronomyare the subfields of a greater number of non-PhD's in government
than in industry.
11.1.3.3.4 Work Activities of Non-PhD Physicists Like their PhDcounterparts, the major work activities of non-PhD professionalphysicists are research and development. The difference is thatfor PhD's research is the primary activity; for non-PhD's develop-ment is primary. Figure 11.8 compares work activities of PhD'sand non-PhD's in industry. The same differences prevail in alltypes of employing institutions, as Table 11.42 shows. Clearly,
the development work done by professional physicists is performedlargely by non-PhD's. In regard to primary work activity alone,about 7 percent of the total professional work force is engaged indevelopment and 85 percent of these are non-PhD's. Because devel-
opment is a major activity of private industry, which is the prin-cipal employer of non-PhD physicists, we examined the developmentactivities of physicists in industry in greater detail in Table
11.43. Development-related work activity constitutes 37 percent
of industrial employment. For about half of those involved indevelopment, it is a secondary activity, particularly for PhD's,and it is more likely to be secondary to basic and applied researchfor PhD's than for non-PhD's. If full-time involvement in primaryand secondary development activity is assumed to be equal, 78 per-cent of the industrially employed physicists in development arenon-PhD's.
Consistent with their major role in development, non-PhD's repre-sent a correspondingly large fraction of the physics population inindustry that is engaged in activities other than research and de-velopment. About 9 percent of the physicists in industry are em-
_ployed in activities other than research and development; of these84 percent are non-PhD's (see Table 11.44). Just as devel,r-was frequently combined with research, other activities are com-bined with research and development by another 24 percent of thephysicists in industry, 72 percent of whom are non-PhD's. It isclear from Table 11.44 that management responsibilities are highlycorrelated with non-research-and-development employment of physicists.
The use of qualified non-PhD physicists by industry has a certainrelevance to projected industrial PhD use. To the extent that re-search and development level or decline is a fraction of the grossnational product, increased employment of PhD physicists in otheractivities than these by industry is inevitable. The aggregateexperience of professionaly qualified non-PhD physicists providesa model for the kinds of changes that are likely to take place inPhD use patterns. The adjustments appear to be essentially con-tinuous, starting with increased involvement in non-research-and-development activities in conjunction with research and develop-ment, and, if the changes follow pre-existent motivational patterns,one can expect an increased emphasis on the management role of phy-icists, already a substantialfeature of professional employment.
7 8
80%
60%
40%
20%
0
Mdnpower Data 1533
BASIC RESEARCH
..-
BASIC and APPUED
_
APPUED RESEARCHand DEVELOPMENT
_
I..- -...-
//
. w
//
. .
,.
-7
%
2 %--/
-
..-
....-
.
...'" e0.: .E(I.4. .
%AC 4:::'
Aft .1..<
kp0
e .*.iMIX,70.
4IWRNS 4
e
APPUED RESEARCH,_ DEVELOPMENT and
OTHER
OTHER(NON RESEARCH)
0"):.ki.E*4 .1a6
0049 --
.XVPX$YA
i
0.A
-:f.1
PhDsINDUSTRY
Non-PhDs
FIGURE 11.8 The comparison of work activity priorities of non-PhD and PhD physicists in industry. (See caption to Figure 11.1for exact definitions of groupings.)
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0
The NSF predicts a substantial demand in the next decade for non-academic, non-research-and-development PhD physicists, a demandthat is not reflected in current functional distributions or in thetrends in these distributions. The NSF estimates that 42 percentof the nonacademic employment of new PhD's will be in activitiesother than research and development. If this projection is basedon a demand rather than an absorption process, increasing numbersof 2hD's could be expected to assume a status-consistent modifica-tion of the traditional roles of non-PhD physicists. Thus non-PhDprofessionals could be providing a certain de facto leadership forthe physics community and, possibly, leadership away from tradi-tional physics.
7 9
TABLE 11.42
Comparison of Primary Work Activities on Non-PhD and PhD Physicists by Type of
Employing Inatitution
Primary Work
Activity
00
University (Age 40-60)
Industry
Government
Research Center
Non-PhD
PhD
Non-PhD
PhD
Non-PhD
PhD
Non-PhD
PhD
Basic research
Applied research
Development
Management of
research and
development
Other
8.2%
7.5
1.2
4.7
78.4
24.2%
3.47
0.1
5.4
66.9
3.6%
33.4
22.4
16.4
23.0
19.3%
39.0
6.7
24.0
8.9
16.4%
37.9
8.4
19.2
18.1
48.4%
18.9
0.9
23.4
8c .
26.9%
30.7
12.6
13.0
15 2
.
44.3%
28.2
3.5
18.4
4.7
Manpower Data 1535
TABLE 11.43 Performance of Development In U.S. Industry byProfessional Physicists, Universe Total,a 1970
Priority ofDevelopment Non-PhD PhD Total
Primary activity 1780 310 2,090Secondary activity 1800 740 2,540Basic and appliedresearch primary
47% 72%
Other activityprimary
53 28
Total in development 3580 78 1050 22 4,630 (37%)Industry total 7980 63 4620 37 12,600
auniverse totals are estimated from Register respondents, assumingan 83 percent response from PhD's and a 67 percent response fromnon-PhD professionals.
TABLE II.44 Comparison of Research and Development, Non-Researchand Development, and Management Responsibilities of Non-PhD's andPhD's in Industry, 1970
Responsibilities
Research and developmentResearch and developmentResearch and developmentplus management
Research and developmentcombined with non-reseatchand developmentCombinedCombined plus managementNon-research and developmentNon-research and develop-ment
Non-research and develop-ment plus management
Non-PhD (N = 5273)a PhD (JV = 3733)b
61% 77%
71% 62%29 38
27 19
57 54
43 46
12 4
51 45
49 55
aEstimated universe = 7980.
hEstimdted universe = 4620.
8 1
1536 PHYSfCS IN PERSPECTIVE
11.1.4 SPECIAL IN-DEPTH STUDIES
in the foregoing discussion of physics manpower employment, andmobility, attention has been directed primarily to physics as awhole, although with some indication of variation by subfield. Itis also possible to use the Register data to provide in-depthstudies of different subfields. Two interdisciplinary subfieldshave been selected as examplesastrophysics and relativity andearth and planetary physics.
11.1.4.1 Manpower in Astrophysics and Relativity
The distinction between astronomer and physicist is especiallydifficult to draw in astrophysics and relativity. However, we canidentify these scientists by the detailed specialties in whichthey are engaged. The specialties that comprise astrophysics andrelativity appeared in Table VIII.1 of Volume II, Part B, ofPhysica in Peirapective, reproduced here as Table 11.45.
TABLE 11.45 Core Manpower in Astrophysics and Relativity, 1970a
Specialty PhD's Non-PhD's
Gravitational fields, gravitons 26 8
Cosmology 16 8
Galaxies 45 17
Quasars, pulsars, and x-ray sources 84 40
Relativity, gravitation 77 35
248 108
Otherb
9 51
Total respondents 257(627) 159(38%)
Student respondents 80
aData in the table are based on the National Register of Scientific
Bnd Technical Personnel.Respondents definitely in astrophysics and relativity, but for
whom some items of Register data are missing.
Some 250 PhD's indicated that their major scientific work was in
one of these specialties. For comparison, the specialties thatcomprise our Register definition of astronomy appear in AppendixB; 635 PhD's were identified with these specialties.
Characteristics of scientists in astrophysics and relativitysuggest multiple subfield relationships. Important in identifying
manpower at the interface of physics and astronomy is earth and
planetary physics, with 725 PhD's, the specialties of whom alsoappear in Appendix B.
To count astronomers and physicists in this interrelated com-
8 2
MaNpower Data 1537
munity is an oversimplification; however, to compare these datawith those resulting from the questionnaire circulated to institu-tions by the Astronomy Survey Committee, we shall undertake sucha count. Many PhD's working at this interface would, of course, becounted by astronomers as astronomers and by physicists as physi-cists. The use of Register specialties to define the populationobviates such double counting.
The Register also obtains the self-idel.tification of respon-dents. The results of this self-identification appear in Table11.46. The astronomers identified by institutions should includeboth self-identified astronomers and astrophysicists, a total of867 respondents, whom we estimate to be 85 percent of a total.population of some 1030 self-identified PhP astronomers.
TABLE 11.46 PhD Self-Identification
PhD Self-IdentificationRegister Space Other SubfieldSubfield Astronomy Astrophysics Physics Physics Total
Astrophysics 55 72 9 121 257
and relativityEarth and 15 61 :9': 458 724
planetaryAstronomy 286 209 50 99 644
Other physics 92 86 119 14,709 15,0'66
TOTAL 448 428 367 15,387 16,631
An institutional definition of an astronomer, however, is onnwho is working on what, in the management's view, is astronomy.All thNose working in the Register specialties classified as astro-physics and relativity and astronomy would surely be included insuch an enumeration, and some fraction of the earth and planetaryphysicists would be counted as well. The latter fraction could beestimated by establishing the way in which management would clas-sify each of the relevant specialties in Appendix B. As Table11.46 shows, about 20 percent of the earth and planetary physicistsidentify themselves as astronomers or astrophysicists; that is tosay, about 150 of the 725 PhD's in earth and planetary physicscould be identified with the institutions of astronomy.
Table 11.47 summarizes the results and shows 1050 PhD respon-dents whom we believe could be readily identified as astronomersfrom the viewpoint of managers of institutions working in physicsand astronomy. If we assume an 85 percent rate of response, thenthe population of permanent U.S. resident PhD 'astronomers insuch institutions would amount to 1240 as of January 1970. Thisfigure can be compared with the 1257 full-time, PhD-equivalentastronomy personnel, including teachers, postdoctorzl fellows,
8 3
1538 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
locally paid staff v130_ing elsewhete, and visitors paid locally,
who were reported by managers to be employed in 171 astronomyinstitutions in the 1.1:Uted States and'Galapagos Islands, whichwere surveyed by the 4stronomy Survey Committee.
TABLE I1.47 Identification of PhD Physicists and Astronomerswith the Institutions of Physics and Astronomy
PhD's in Register Subfields Institu-
Earth S Astrophys. tional
Institution Phv "lanetary & Relativ. Astron. Totals
Physics related 11. '5
Both physics 50
and astronomyrelated
Astronomyrelated
250
650
15,975
1,050
FIGURE 11.9 depicts the interrelationship of physics and astron-omy in these two subfields--astrophysics and relativity and earth
and planetary physics.
FIGURE 11.9 The interpenetration of physics and astronomy.
8 41
Manpower Data 1539
The curacteristics of manpower in astrophysics and relativity
are depicted in Tables Employment is concentrated in
universities and the university-based PhD's are principally engaged
in research. The distribution by academic rank is characteristic
of a research-oriente .! group with a large number of young univer-
sity-based researchers. Emphasis on theory is greater than in
either physics or astronomy. Consfstent with this emphasis, the
production of jourrl articles is high; in 1968 the subfield ac-
counted for 0.9 percent of the physics community but produced 1.6
percent of the articles in a sample from Physics Abstracts (see
Chapter IV).
TABLE 11.48 Distribution by Employing Institution of Physicists,Astronomers, and Those in Astrophysics and Relativity
Subfield ofDiscipline University
Research
Industry Government Center Other
Astrophysicsand relativ-
. ityAstronomyPhysics
73%
63%50%
7% 9%
7% 18%
24% 9%
9%
11%12%
4%
5%
5%
TABLE 11.49Group
Distribution u Work Activities of University-Based
Primary WorkActivity
AstrophysicsRelativity
&
Astronomy Physics
Basic research 66.3% 60.4%
Teaching 29.37 28.8%
Other 4.4% 10.8%
37.2%49.7%13.1%
TABLE 11.50 Distribution by Academic Rank
Astrophys. &Relativ. Astronomy Physics
Rank Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent
Full profes- 24 102 28 2421 29
SOTAssociate 31 17 49 13 1697 21
Assistant 46 25 104 28 2101 26
Faculty total 120 66 255 69 6219 76
Other univ. 61 34 116 31
employment
1989 24
Total PhD's 181 371 8208
8 5
1540 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
TABLE 11.51 Distribution of Theoreticians and Experimentalists
Nature ofWork
Astrophysics andRelativity(%) Astronomy(%) Physics(%)
Theoretical 51 28 25
Experimental 30 40 50
Both 19 32 25
TABLE 11.52 Distribution by Degree Level
r-ubfield or Nonstudent Non-PhD's
Discipline PhD's Non-PhD's per PhD
Astrophysics 5 reia- 250 79 0.3
tivity
Astronomy 650 344 0.5
Physics 15,600 15,700 1.0
TABLE II. Median Age of PhD's in 1970
Sample Astrophys. & Relativ. Astronomy Physics
Theoreticians 33.9 33.8 35.0
Total 34.6 35.0 37.4
TABLE 11.54 Median Age of PhD's in 1970 by Academic Rank
Rank Astrophysics & Relativity P:Isica/Astronomy
Full professor 46.0 46.8
Associate 36.7 37.4
Assistant 31.9 32.4
The subfield is cmnposed of a comparatively young group, with amedian age of 34.6. It affords relatively little opportunity forqualified non-PhD's.
The data show that scientists in astrophysics and relativityare somewhat more like asEronomers than physicists i resul.t that
could largely be expected from the institutional c.:aracteristiczof a nonapplied discipline. To describe the interl lationshir ,fphysics, astrophysics and relativity, and astronomy, apart fromthe overriding institutional correlates, we can Look at 6.-a onfield of PhD, subfields of additional scientific competenr andsubfield migration, Tables 11.55--II.58. Astro-..nyol,l; ald relativ-
8 6
Manpower Data 1541
ity is populated largely by physics PhD's. The data on specialtiesof first and second competence other than specialty of employmentshow that for those in astrophysics and relativity specialties offirst competence usually fall also within this subfield (82 per-cent so indicating). Astrophysics and relativity clearly is not asecondary pursuit; the secondary competences, physics and astron-omy, are the intellectual and practical foundation for the cre-ative thrust of this subfield.
TABU, 11.55 Field in Which PhD Was Obtained
Field of PhD
Field of Current ResearchAstronomy Physics asas a Whole(%) a Whole(%)
Astrophysicsand Relativity(%)
PhysicsAstronomyOther
36 80
57 5
7 15
70
25
5
TABLE 11.56 Additional Subfield Competence of PhD's in Astro-physics and Relativity, Astronomy, and Physics
Subfield of Subfield of EmploymentAdditional Astrophys. & Relativity Astronomy PhysicsCompetence Number Percent Number Percent Number
First levelAstrophys. &relativity
200 82 15 2 44
Astronomy 15 6 458 75 124
Physics 28 12 141 23
Total first 243 614 15,000Second level
Astrophys. &relativity
85 35 57 10 82
Astronomy 42 17 279 46 158
Physics 117 48 261 44
Total second 244 597 15,000
TABLE 11.57 Numbers of PhD's in Ast,':,-`,7s1cs and Relativity,Astronomy, and Earth and Planetary P. ,s, 196-1970
Astrophys. and Earth TotalYear Relativity Astronomy Planetary Physics/Astronomy
1964 65 397 311 10,4001966 - - - 11,8001968 125 711 572 14,300970 250 644 724 16,600
8 7
1542 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
TABLE 11.58 Mobility into Astrophysics and Relativity and Earthand Planetary Physics
1968 Sources1970 PhD'sAstrophys. and Relativity Earth and Planetary
Same subfield 82 323
Physics 37 203
Astronomy 75 55
Longitudinal sample 195 581
1970 Register total 250 725
Growth in this subfield displays the explosive charactertypical of rn exciting new research area of physics. Growth inboth astrophysics and relativity and earth and planetary physicsshows that substantial manpower is shifting into these subfieldsfrom traditional astronomy subfields. The patterns of growth alsoillustrate the close interrelationship of these subfields tophysics and astronomy.
Figure 11.10 depicts the components of growth in astrophysicsand relativity. The largest input, 75 PhD's with a median age of33.7 years in 1970, came from astronomy; only seven PhD's wentfrom astrophysics and relativity to astronomy. Of tho-e who enteredfrom astronomy, 25 percent were under 31 years of age, and 25 per-
,-o 20E' z
; F= - <
r;u. u.
=
. 0 .
A and R ( x10 in wen )250 Ph CYs
FIGUKEII.10 Growth and interchange, 1968--1970. Numbers are
1910 Register populations.
8 8
MityowaP Data 1543
cent, over 38 ycars of age; therefore, this subfield can hardly besaid to attract only young astronomers. The interchange withphysics was more nearly reciprocal. Thirty-seven came into thesubfield from physics in 1970, and 21 left it to move into physics.Six came from nuclear physics, 11 from elementary-particle physics,6 from earth and planetary physics, and 14 from other subfields.Of those who Left, one went into nuclear physics, 9 into elemen-tary-particle physics, 8 itP., earth and planetary physics, and3 to other subflelds.
11.1.4.2 Manpower in Earth and PZanetary Physics
The study of the physical environment, the earth and its surround-ings, clearly is a multidisciplinary activity that includes notjust physicists but atmospheric, geological, and oceanographicscientists. About as many scieatists are identified with earthand space science fields as with physics, perhaps 40,000 in each.An identifiable group of about 2000 physicists, those in earthand planetary physics, are working in earth and space sciences.If we look only at research effort, it appears that the earthand planetary physicists account for as much as 20 percent of theeffort in earth and space studies.
The characteristics of.earth and space scientists are drawnlargely from National Register data; however, other data areavailable from BLS, NASA, and the Civil Service. We have used theRegister data in our analyses, first, to depict the overall dimen-sions and characteristics of atmospheric, geological, trid oceano-
graphic populations and research effort and, second, to describein detail the special characteristics of the earth and planetaryphysics population. Supplementary data, based largely on employersurveys, lack definitional consistency and are piecemeal, but theyaugment the manpower from the Register, giving in some casesquite different totals.
There are some 33,000 earth and space scientists and some40,000 physicists. More than 1600 physicists work in earth andspace sciences, but only a few earth and space scientists workin physics.*
Table 11.59 shows the number' of scientists working in earthand space sciences and physics. A scientist is classified as work-ing in a field on the basis of his statement of a detailed special-ty that most nearly corresponds to his principal work activity.The assignment of specialties provides a working definition ofdiscipline and subfield.
Deciding what kind of scientist a respondent is is by nomeans as simple as deciding what science one is working in. Ifa Register form is returned to the AIP but the respondent seemsmore like a geo,:ientist than a physicist, his form is sent tothe American Geological Institute (AGI) for review and inclusion
These figures are based on an estimated 85 percent response to theRegister, which is conservative for PhD's and somewhat arbitraryfor non-PhD's. For non-PhD's, definitions of professional standards,job classifications, and fields become rather fuzzy.
8 9
CO
TABLE 11.59
Manpower in Earth and Space Sciences-
Field of Employment
No. of
Scientists
Principal
Processkng
Society
No. lden-
tified
with AIP
No.
Holding
PhD
Percentage of to-
tal Represented by
AIP Scientists(%)
Percentage
of Total
with PhD(%)
Atmospheric sciences
5,232
AMS
453
639
8.7
12.2
Structure and dynamics
1,127
378
435
33.6
38.6
Other
4,105
75
204
1.8
5.0
Geological sciences
17,198
AGI
197
3,040
1.1
17.7
Geophysics
2,873
171
431
6.0
15.0
Other
14,325
26
2,609
18.2
r cli
Oceanography
,
Total atmospheric, geological,
end oceanographic sciences
730
23,160
AGI
53
703
203
3,882
7.3
2.7
27.8
15.7
.A
Space science
816
AIP
626
399
76.7
49.0
Physics specialties
25,801
AIP
11,405
100
44.2
Astronomy
1,325
AIP
733
100
55.3
Electronics
1,504
AIP
485
100
32.2
Identification
Physics
32,491
AIP
14,311
44.0
Earth and marine sciences
23,746
AGI
4,957
21.0
Atmospheric and space
sciences
5,745
AMS
514
9.0
aData are based on
Am
eric
anScience Manpower 1968 (NSF 69-38) (Table A-48) and on the 1968 National
Register of Scientific and Technical Personnel.
bSociety responsible for the collection and processing of data in a particular discipline. These
societies
are the American Institute of Physics, American Geological Institute,
and American Meteorological Society.
Manpower Data 1545
with their respondents if qualified. In Table 11.59, the secondcolumn gives the processing society of most respondents in eachcategory, thus the major professional identification of peopleworking in earth and space sciences.
The data in Table 11.59 are also depicted in Figure 11.11, ina so-called "Fuji" representation.
In our earlier discussions of other populations, the overallsize has been estimated on the basis of all scientists regardlessof their specific work activity. However, in this section weshall look principally at the research function to get a clearerindication of the relative role of the physicist compared Ilthearth and space scientists in the performance of research.
Before we examine the Register population in detail, we willlook briefly at a special group. Scientists working in "physicsof the earth in space" were convened by the National Academy ofSciences for study programs in the summers of 1968 and 1969. Fifty-WO scientists participated, with continuity provided by 12 whoparticipated in both summer sessions. We assumed that this groupconstituted an elite -epresentation of scientific personnel inearth and space sciences. Table 11.60 presents a tabulation oftheir scientific backgrounds and professional identifications.
TABLE 11.60 Field and Degree Background of a Select Group ofEarth and Space Scientists
Fields
Field of Sciencewith which Identified Field of DegreeNumber Percent Number Percent
Physics 17 38 21 58Space physics 5 11 -
Astrophysics/astronomy
8 18 4 11
Geophysics 7 16 4 11Radio physics 4 . 2
Electrical en-gineering
3 4 11
Aeronomy 1 -
Physical chemistry 1 1
TOTAL 46 36
Data on 41 of the 52 were found in American Men of Science(11th edition). We looked particularly at major fields of profes-sional identification (such as physicist or geophysicist), fieldof PhD, and society membership. The results suggest predominanceof physics, with expertise in astronomy also a major constituent.
Society membership sometimes is regarded as a useful indica-tion of subject emphasis; for this group it should be reasonablyindicative because these are mature scientists whose economicstatus probably would override financial barriers to multiple
9 1
1546 PHYSICS TN PERSPECTIVE
FIGURE 11.11 Scientific manpower in earth and space sciences,physics, and earth and planetary physics.
memberships. Further, being acknowledged as successful in re-
search, they would nut be expected to join a society for reasons
of status. Table 11.61 presents data on souiety membership of this
group. The distribution implies asustained involvement with the
physi, :=munity. Because of the small percentage reporting de-
gree hac,round in geosciences, membership in the American Geo-
physic..11 Union, indicated by 56 percent, apparently reflects ac-
quired identification with this community. A clear v:end toward
a connection with astronomy also is indicated, alti ugh it is
difficult to say whether this association is traditional or ac-
quired, for astronomy typically has relied on a substantial in-
flux of PhD's from physics.These simple data on th- elite group suggest that-research
at the so-called frontiers uf the earth and space sciences is
done by people with a strong background in physics, who generally
maintain connections with the physics and astronomy communities
and have acquired a relationship to the geophysics community.
Indeed, professional mobility is a prominent characteristic of
the group.We must examine properties other than size of various popula-
tions to get a quantitative idea of the relative role of physi-
cists in earth and space sciences. The PhD concentration of a sub-
field or discipline is significant, because we find that publica-
tion patterns are strongly correlated with PhD distributions. The
degree concentration, distributed according to professional identi-
fication appears in Table 11.59, as well as concentration among
work arv.As. Physicists clearly are concentrated in areas charac-
terized by a high concentration of PhD's. Apparently physicists
tend to be more strongly involved in advance& subject areas in
which PhD training is important rather than in operations in
which the generalist training of a physicist is usually considered
a special cachet.
9 '1,
Manpower Data 1 47
TABLE 11.61 Society Membership of a Select Group of Earth and
Space Scientists
Society
Membership Indicated MembershipDistribution(%)Number Percent
American Physical Society 1.5 37 21.
American Geophysical Union 23 56 32
American Astronomical 15 37 21
SocietyInstitute of Electrical and 12 29 17
Electronics EngineersAmerican Meteorological 5
SocietyAmerican Chemical Society 1
Total memberships 71
Total on which this infor-mation was obtained
41
Other comparisons to show the place of physicists in this
interdisciplinary iceberg require the comparison of earth and
planetary physicists and earth and space scientists. Nonoverlap-
ping groups can be defined with reference to Table 11.59. Earth
and planetary physicists represent the physics (A1P) population.
Earth and space scientists represent the earth and marine sciences
(AGI) and atmospheric and space (American Meteorological Society)
populations. We shall compare 26,000 earth and space scientists
in 1968 (most recent American Science Manpower data) with 700
earth and planetary physicists in 1970, for we want to present the
most recent picture of physicists against the more slowly chang-
ing background of earth and space sciences. When Possible, PhD's
and non-PhD's will be compared separately. Special characteris-
tics of earth and planetary physicists will be discussed in de-
tail in a later part of this section..The distribution of earth and planetary physicists, compared
with all physicists, among employing institutions appears in
Table II.62. Clearly, research centers employ many 9f these
earth and planetary physicists. Although American Science Man-
power does not show research center as a separate category, com-
parison without data can be achieved by allocating research centtxPhD employees to universities (69 percent), industry (22 percent),and other employing institutions (9 percent). Table 11.63 presentsthis comparison and shows that the nonuniversity employment pat-tern of earth and planetary physicists is more like that of earth
and space scientists than of physicists. Nearly as many earth andplanetary PhD's work for government as for industry, which resem-bles the employment pattern of earth and space scientists anddiffers from that of physicists among whom there is a three-to-oneindustry/government ratio of use.
1548 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
TABLE 11.62 Employment Patterns of Earth and Planetary Physics
PhD's and Non-PhD's Compared with Those for the Total Physics
Populationa
Employing Earth and Plan- All Physics Earth and Plane- All Physics
Institu- tary PhD's PhD's tary Non-PhD's Non-PhD's
Lions N=,712(%) N=16,631(%) N=673(%) N=19,705(%)
College anduniversity
38 51 33 28
Industry 23 23 20 33
Covernment 22 9 31 15
Research 13 12 4 6
Othercenter
4 5 12 18
,zData are from the 1970 NSF National Register of Scientific and
Technical Personnel
TABLE II.63 Employment of PhD's in Earth and Space Sciences
Field
EmployerAcademic Industry Government Other
No. % No. % No. % No. %
Earth and plane-tary physics
338a 475a 184a 26.0a 154a 21.6a 362 50a
Earth and spacesciences
3198 55.9 919 17.0 922 16.6 234 4.5
Earth andmarine
2906 61.0'865 18.1 796 16.7. 197 4.1
Atmosphericand space
292 57.5 44 8.7 126 24.8 47 9.3
Physics - 59.0 - 26.0 - 9.0 - 5.0
Geology 1229 46.4 572 18.4 448 21.7 148 7.6
Geophysics 187 43.7 161 37.1 51 11.9 29 6.8
Oceanography 123 62.5 16 8.1 45 23.0 13 6.6
aEstimated
bThese groups are derived from numbers working in these fields
(see Table 11.59) and are commensurate with the other groups in
this Table (11.63). The numbers are listed only for comparison of
distributions.
Earth and planetary physicists are less often employed in uni-
versities than are physicists in general. In Table 11.64, earth
and planetary physics faculty is tabulated separately from uni-
versity employees; comparisons are presented for physicists in
general, nuclear physicists, astronomers, and AGI and American
Meteorological Society populations. Faculty is defined as academic
employees who specify academic rank of lecturer or above. Of 272
earth and planetary physicists in universities, 173 acknowledged
9 4
',fanpowop Mta 1549
TABLE 1I.64 Faculty Members in Earth and Planetary Physics,sics, and Earth and Space Sciencesa
Field of TotalDegree Fnculty
Professoror Dean
AssociateProfessor
AssistantProfessor
Instructoror Lecturer
Physics 7427 2625 2047 2753 702
Earth andplanetaryphysicsPhD l73 66 46 55 6
Total 206 69 51 68 18
Nuclear phys-ics
798 264 229 246 59
Astronomy 289
Earth and spacesciences
3868 1141 939 1213 575
Earth andmarLne
3580 1042 865 1135 538
Atmosphericand space
288 99 74 78 37
PhD 2632 1048 768 774 42
aGrouped according to research specialty rather than academic de-partment. Data on physicists are based on the physics section ofthe 1970 National Register; those on earth and space sciences onAmerican Science Manpower 19s.
faculty appointments; an additional 36 of 221 non-PhD's alsoclaim such appointments. Table 11.65 summarizes data on facultyroles of PhD's employed in uriversities presented in Tables 11.63and 11.64. Clearly, earth and planetary physicists are not heavilyengaged in teaching; they are not only less likely than eitherphysicists or earth and space scientists to be employed in univer-sities, but those who are thus employed are less likely to fillfaculty positions. If earth and planetary physics is to assume amore prominent place in the physics curriculum, substantialmobility will be required. There are about 175 self-acknowledgedearth and planetary physics PhD faculty members, not all of whomare in the 2000 U.S. physics departments. Increased emplisis onfaculty responsibilities could lead to an influx of earth andplanetary physicists from the immediate academic surroundings. npool that amounts to some 150 additional PhD's. A second source
is academic physicists who are competent in earth and plane-ary
9 5
1550 PRYS1CS IN PERSPECTIVE
TABLE 11.65 Comparison of Rotes in Academic InstItutionsa of
PhD's in Earth and Planetary Physics, Physics, and Earth and Space
Sciences
Field
Faculty Other
Number Percent Number Percent
Earth and planetaryphysics (1970)N 338
Physics (1970)N . 9700
Earth and space sciences
113 51
6430 62
2632 82
165
3270
566
49
38
18
(1968) N = 3198
a Includes research centers operated by universities.
ohics but who are not currently working in this subfield. Their
vumber amounts to another 50 to 60 PhD's currently in college or
.sliversity employment. Taken together these two sources do not
nresent a large pooL, ccnpared with, for example, nuclear physics.
, Lear that expansion of earth and planetary physics in thecurriculal would be manpower limited. A third kind of
fity, intellectual mobility of subfield switching, would be
ded. A favorable outcome is possible from this third source,intellectual mobility is a major characteristic'of the physics
pwlslation.T-hle 11.66 shows the production of students in 1968 in the
fields with %thich we are concerned. Although the total production
is about the same for physicists and earth and space scientists,
,he concentration of PhD's is twice as high in physics. As Table
11.67 shows, patterns of degree production differ from those of
use. Only a fraction of nonPhD's enter scientijic work in any
case, but the pattern is quite different for physicists and earth
and space scientists.Table 11.68 summarizes the primary work activities of earth
and space scientists and earth and planetary physicists. The differences in work patterns are striking. A high proportion of PhD'sand nonPhD's in earth and planetary physics are engaged in re .
search (67 percent and 64 percent, respectively). The comparablefigures for research for all physics are 55 percent for PhD's and47 percent for nonPhDls. In the earth and space sciences, the
9 6
1771.
TABLE 11.66 Degree Production, 1968':
PhD as Percent-Field BS MS PhD Degrees/Faculty
age of Total(Z)
16 1.3
8 1.2Physics 5500 2000 1400
Earth and space 2900 1100 438
sciences
Earth sciences 341
Oceanography 49
Meteorology 48
a ources of data presented in this table are the American Insti-
tute of Physics, American Geological Institute, and NRC Doctorate
Records File.
TABLE 11..67 Production and Use of Physics PhD's in Physics and
Earth and 5pac.e Sciences
Field PhD Production(%) PhD Use in Field(%)
Ph;sics 16
Earth and space sciences 8
44
18.5
figures are 32 percent (PhD) and 18 percent (non-PhD). This find-
ing reinforces the conclusion, derived from almost all types of
data on these fields, that patterns of activity and employment in
earth and planetary physics differ from those for both the earth
and space sciences as a whole and physics. The especially high
research commitment among non-PhD earth and planetary physicists
suggest that they function much more in the way that PhD's do than
is the case in other fields.Table 1.1.69 shows numbers and percentages of PhD's and non-PhD's
engaged in research in various employment settings. The emphasis
on research that characterizes the earth and planetary physicist
clearly is not a function of type of employing institution, and
the estimated allocation of 20 percent of the total research ef-
fort in earth and space cciences to ea:th and planetary physicists
probably is conservative. Even non-PhD.s in earth and planetary
physics amount to 12 percent of the research-oriented non-PhD
total.
9 7
1552 PNYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
TABLE 11.68 Primary Work Activities of Earth and Space Scientistsa
'york Actfv1tles(7)
Degree and Field Research' Teaching,R & DManagement
15
Other
5PhD's
Earth and planetaryI = 707)
67 13
Anr crientists 3(3 42 9 19
C.' = 4689)
AmS scientists 50 23 16 10
(..I = 493)
Non-7hD'sEarth and planetary 64 7 11 18
(N 657)
AGI scientists 17 18 6 59
(V = 21,146)
AMS scientists 20 5 7 67
(II .-- 5413)
aData for the American Geological Institute and the AmericanMeteorological Society respondents are based on American ScienceManpower 1P68; those on earth and planetary physics are based onthe 1970 National Register survey.bResearch includes basic and applied as well as the design anddevelopment category, which has a negligible effect in thesegroups.cThe other" category includes exploration and forecasting, which
are major activities of many scientists in the geological and
meteorological groups.
In the academic community in which the teaching-research func-tion is especially important, the commitment of earth and plane-tary physicists to research again is striking. Tables II.7CaII.70d compare primary and secondary work activity of university-based scientists. One fourth of tne earth and planetary physicists
indicated research as both first and second major activity. Another
one fourth reported research as primary and teaching secondary,
and 14.6 percent combined research with some other secondary
activity, the other category including such activities as adminis-
tration and management. In all, 64.6 percent indicated research
as the primary work activity. Although 14.4 percent of the earth
and planetary physicists are primariiy engaged in work that is
neither research nor teaching, approximately five in seven of them
report a secondary commitment to research.
9 8
anpower Data 1553
TABLE 11.69 Distribution by Employer of Those Engaged in Research
Degree and Field TotalAcademic Industry Government OtherNo. % No. No. % No. %
PhD's 2135 859 4n 441) 2n A99 11 117 A
Earth and plane- 474 206 23 129 29 116 18 23 17tary physics (22%)
Earth and space 1661 653 76 311 71 533 82 114 83sciences (78%)AGI scientists 1415 513 292 517 93AMS scientists 246 140 19 66 21
Non-PhD's 3550 1123 728 1422 284Earth and plane- 420 173 15 82 11 138 10 27 10tary physics (12%)
Earth and space 3137 950 85 646 89 1284 90 257 90sciences (88%)
AGI scientists 2310 683 541 970 116AMS scientists 827 267 105 315 141
TABLE II.70a Primary and Secondary Work Activity of University-Employed Earth and Planetary Physicistsa
Primary Work Secondary Work Activity(%)Activity Research Teaching Other Primary Totals(%)
Research and 26.4development.
Teaching 16.6Other 5.7
23.6 14.6 64.4
3.3 1.1 21.08.7 14.4
ALL degrees included, N = 493 (1970 National Register).
The data in Table 11.70 must be regarded as semiquantitative.Figures 11.12 and 11.13, which compare earth and planetary physi-cists with earth and space scientists, depict the ditferences in
these data for the two groups.
We shall now examine the data on earth and planetary physicistsin greater detail-self-identification, degree background, work ac-tivities and competence, and changes in these characteristics withtime.
9 9
1554 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
TABLE II.70b Primary and Secondary Work Activity of UnIversity-
Employed Physicistsa
Primary Work Secondary Work Activity(%)
Activity Research Teaching Other Primary Totals(%)
Research and 16.9
developmentb
Teaching 29.4
Other 2.1
23.7
7.32.9
6.5 47.1
1.3 44.0
3.8 8.8
a.All degrees included, N = 13,532 (1970 National Register).
DDevelopmunt and design = 0.6 percent of primary research and de-
velopment activity.
TABLE II.70c Primary and Secondary Work Activity of University
Employed American Geological Institute Scientistsa
Primary Work Secondary Work Activity(%)
,- Activity Research Teaching Other Primary Totals(%)
Research and 6.9 11.1 3.6 21.6
developmentbTeaching 39.0 12.6 13.4 65.0
Other 3.2 10.0 13.4
a10.1 degrees included, N = 5479 (Ar/7 erican Science Manpower 1968).
'Development is generally negligible.
TABLE II.70d Primary and Secondary Work Activity of University-
Employed American Meteorological Society Scientistsc
Primary Work Secondary Work Activity(%)Activity Research Teaching Other Primary Totals(%)
Research andb
22.2 20.2 13.5 55e7
developmentTeaching 18.7 2.1 6.6 27.4
Other 6.5 13.3 16.9
a.All degrees included, N = 782 (American Science Manpower 1966).o Development is generally negligible.
100
MaNpowor 2f-z!;,1 l555
TEACHING
MANAGEMENT andOTHER
FIGURE 11.12 Work activities of universistyemployed earth andplanetary physicists.
11515HP
TEACWNG
MANAGEMENT andOTHER
FIGUREII.13 Work activities of unlVrsityemployed geoscientistsand meteorologists.
101
1556 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
The composition of earth and planetary phyt4ies, based on self-
identification of its manpower, appears n Table 11.71. We empha-
size that the group is constructed from people generally identi-
fiable as physicists who are working in earth and planetary physics;
the distribution of self-identification that is found by reading
across the top row of Table 11.71 is a description of thOse people
rather than a means of identifying them. The nature of professional
self-identification becomes clearer as one reads down the columns
of the table, noting that, for example, 51.5 percent of the ALP
space physicists are working In earLh and planetary physics, 13.7
percent In astronomy, 8.4 percent in plasmas and fluids, and 2b.4
percent in various other subfields. There are, of course, self-
identified physicists in the AGI and American Meteorological
Society portions of the Register who are not counted in the verti-
cal totals of this table.Table 11.72 shows the degree background of earth and planetary
physicists. Engineering and astronomy account for most of the
nonphysI,:s PhD's.The detailed list of work specialties on the Register that we
have defined as earth and planetary physics appears in Appendix B,
with the numbers of PhD's and non-PhD's engaged in each. No one
specialty is preeminent, so that in discussing this subfield the
-characteristics of earth and planetary physicists arc -.t domi-
nated by some highly specialized particular research-lutarest
group.
TABLE 11.71 Professional Self-Identification of Earth and Plane-
tary Physics PhD's
Subfield ofEmployment
Self-Identification
SpacePhysi-clst
Armos-phericPhysi-cist
Geo-physi-cist
Astro-physi-cist
Physi-cist Other
Earth andplanetary
26.1% 16..4% 7.3% 8.4% 30.7% 11.1%
51.5% 70.8% 55.2% 14.3% 2.0%
Astronomy 13.7% - - 48.7% 0.5%
Astrophysics ._ - - 14.3% 1.0%
Plasmas andfluids
8.4% 6.0% 10.4% - 6.4%
Other sub-fields
26.4% 23.2% 34.4% 20.2% 90.5%
Total N's 367 168 96 428 10,969 2824
102
TABLE 11.72
Comparison of Field of PhD Degree by Panel (Employment Specialty), 1968 and 1970
Physics
Total Pia
% PhD's in
Physics
PhD's in Other Fields
(only for >5% of
total)
Subfield
1968
1970
1968
1970
1st Field 71968
Z1970
2nd Field %196871970
Total
14,087
16,248
79.9
78.8
Eng.
8.7
10.0
-Subtotal physics
13,389
15,614
82.2
80.5
Eng.
9.0
10.3
-Astrophysics and
123
relativity
252
84.6
70.2
Astron.
15.4
25.0
Atomic, molecular,
998
and electron
1,065
81.3
77.8
Chem.
10.5
13.0
Eng.
6.1
6.5
Elementary-particle
1,289
1,409
97.8
97.8
-Nuclear
1,794
1,782
92.6
90.6
-Plasmas and tluids
930
1,104
63.7
64.1
Eng.
99.1
29.2
-Condensed-matter
4,064
4,157
82.6
80.5
Eng.
9.5
12.9
Earth and planetary
567
712
79.4
77.9
Fag.
9.2
8.4
Astron.
5.3
8.0
Physics in biology
203
274
56.7
60.2
Biol.
23.6
25.5
Eng.
9.9
6.9
Optics
743
1,078
81.8
78.1
Eng.
11.6
15.0
-Acoustics
295
324
70.5
70.1
Eng.
20.0
22.8
Other
5.1
Miscellaneous
2,383
3,457
77.3
79.0
Eng.
8.7
5.3
Other
6.8
5.3
Subtotal astronomy
698
634
35.4
36.0
Astron.
58.5
57.4
aTotal with known employer.
1558 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
The relations between subf1e1ds can be explored with Register
data in two ways, first, by asking those working in a subfield
at a cvildin time t..; list Qpocific research areas in which they
have varying degrees of scientific competence, and second, by
examining longitudinal data for evidence of subfield mobility
in both subfield of employment and that of first competence.
Table 11.73 presents, for earth and planetary physics PhD's,
the distribution of competence among other subfields. Astronomy
is a prominent type of competence, but some additional analysis
is required to see the pattern of subfield competence characteris-
tic of earth and planetary physicists. This analysis requires the ;
weighting of the citation frequency against the relative sizes of
the cited subfields. The appropriate value of subfield relation-
ship is obtained from the overall frequency of secondary compe-
tence weighted by the ratio of the populations of the subfield
under consideration divided by that of the subfield of relation-
ship. An alternative approach is that the relation rate is pro-
portional to th-.! intrinsic relation probability scaled by the cor-
responding density of available relationships; in other words, the
rate depends on the transition probability times the density of
states. The extreme right-hand nolumn of Table 11.73 gives the
results, weighted and averaged.
TABLE 11.73 Additional Competence of Earth and Planetary Physi-
cists, 1970: Subfield Citation Frequencies by Level of Competence
PhysicsSubfield
Subfield 1,evel of Competence(%) Weighted
PhD Popu-Cre3t-Average Ci-
lation est Second Third Fourth tation(%)
Earth and plaae-tary
710 66.0 51.6 39.5 37.9 49.0
Astronomy 630 6.7 7.8 11.6 10.6 11.3
Nuclear 1780 5.0 4.6 5.7 5.9 2.1
Elementary-par-ticle
1410 2.2 2.5 3.7 2.9 1.4
Condensed-mat-ter
4160 3.8 6.4 6.7 6.4 1.0
Atomic, molecular,and electron
1070 3.3 4.3 5.4 6.7 3.3
Plasmas and 1100 3.3 4.7 7.1 6.4 3.4
LluidsOptics 1080 5.0 7.4 5.0 5.5 3.4
Miscellaneous 3460 5.9 10.1 13.5 14.5 2.3
No response (aspercentage of
2.0 3.8 7.9 16.9
710)
104.
1559
The pattern of intellectual relationship that emerges CV'm the
analysis of the earth and planetary groups is not surprising; whatis remarkable is that it is a quantified pattern. Averaging the
secondary competences and weighting gy the overall distribution ofphysics activity, we find that earth and planetary physiciots re-late 57 percenr to oLi,cr e9rth and planetary specialties, 15 per-
. and 13 percent to the combined sub-cent to astronomy specialtiesfields atomic, molecular, and electron physics; optics: and plas-
mo :. and fluids. Fifteen percent relate to other specialties.A ranking of subfields can be constructed on the basis of
degree of competence within and outside subfields. Table 11.74
presents the results. The major feature of the table is thatelementary-particle, nuclear, and condensed-matter physics aredistinctly self-contained; plasmas and fluids; earth and planetaryphysics; and atomic, molecular, and electron physics overlap othersubfields to an intermediate degree; optics and acoustics arestrongly outward oriented. The evidence for real.or latent subfield
mobility is for the most part stronger for non-PhD's than forPhD's, a situation that would suggest lower inertia for the non-PhD resulting from a lesser commitment ,af expertise and project
responsibility.
TABLE 11.74 Competence Overlap
PhysicsSubfield
CompetenceCompetence
in Other Subfields/Additionalin Subfield of Employment
PhD's Non-PhD's
Condensed-matterElementary-particleNuclearEarth and planetaryPlasmas and fluidsAtomic, molecular,
and electron
0.380.660.771.051.281.30
0.610.931.071.241.611.90
Astrophysics andrelativity
1.47 1.60
Acoustics 1.61 1.21
Optics 1.80 0.97
Physics in biology 2.33 3.08
Weighted average 0.90 0.88
So far in this Chapter we have dealt with horizontal distribu-tions of characteristics in 1970. We now look at patterns ofchange between 1968 and 1970.
In the past two years (1968-1970)the number of PhD's working inearth and planetary physics grew from 567 to 712, a 25 percent in-crease in subfield population. Non-PhD's increased by 12 percent
from 599 to 673. In 1964 there were 309 PhD's in this subfield. A
1 0
1560 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
TABLE LL.75 Age Distributions of PhW's in Earth and PlanetaryPhysics
Age of Cohortin 1970 No. In 1968 No. in 1970 Cohort Change
<27 2 5 3
27-31 57 157 10032-36 141 169 28
37-41 128 140 12
, 42-46 80 94 14
47-51 73 71 -2
52-61 64 66 2
>61 22 10 -12
TOTAL 567 712 145
look at the age distribuLions and net changes is provided byTable 11.75.
Seventy-one percent of the net growth resulted from new PhD's.The 1970 median age of the new entrants was less than 31; themedian age of the subfield as a whole was 37.8 years in 1968 and37.4 in 1970.
When we look at subfield changes between 1968 and 1970 wefind a new characteristic-a large turnover of manpower has oc-curred. Only 55.6 percent of those working in earth and plane-tary physics in 1970 were working in it in 1968; 33.6 percentof the 1968 population apparently left the subfield. This trendis typical of other subfields, as Table 11.76 shows. The firstcolumn shows the input of 1968 people to the subfield in 1970.Another input comes from persons who responded to the Registerin 1970 but not in 1968; about 2600 of the 16,600 1970 PhD'sin the physics section of the Register did not respond in 1968.Most of these people were in the less than 30-year-old cohort.However, we have 1968 data on 82 percent of the 1970 respondents,thus the mobility pattern in Table 11.76 is representative.
In addition to the magnitude and direction of the interchangeof scientists between earth and planetary physics and other sub-fields, the median age of each mobile element also appears inTable 11.76. The age distribution of those who left is for themost part the same as for those who remained. The pattern of sub-field relationships implied by actual changes in subfield workis remarkably similar to that found in the investigation of sub-field competence of earth and planetary physicists (see Table11.73). In these mobility patterns we note that 56 percent ofthe subfield population remains in it as compared with the 49percent average citation frequency of the subfield as an area ofsecondary competence. The most likely subfield move, astronomy,has a weight of 10.7 percent, much like the 11.3 percent probabil-ity for secondary competence in astronomy. On the whole, the pat-
106
TABLE 11.76
Subfield Mobility of Earth and Planetary PhD's, 1968 to 1970
Physics
Subfield of Employment
Entrants from 1968 Subfields
Exits to 1970 Subfields
Weighted-
Distribution
of Entrants(Z)
Percentage
of 1970(%)
No.
Med. Age
No.
Med. Age
Earth and planetary
55.6
323
38.5
323
38.5
55.6
Astronomy
9.5
55
35.4
37
37.7
10.7
Nuclear
4.0
23
35.2
932.5
1.6
Elementary-particle
4.8
28
33.0
15
37.7
2.4
Condensed-matter
4.5
26
38.5
17
40.0
0.8
Plasmas and fluids
4.0
23
36.2
735.5
2.6
Atomic, molecular,
and electron
3.3
19
39.2
939.5
')..)
Irk
Optics
3.3
19
39.9
15
39.0
2.2
.....1
Ln
cr`
1-,
Acoustics
Astrophysics and
relativity
0.3
1.4
2 8
45.5
32.5
9 6
55.5
42.5
0.7
4.0
Miscellaneous
9.5
55
44.7
52
40.0
2.0
Total, longitudinal
581(1970)
486(1968)
Register
Median age
38.3
38.6
Earth and planetary
interchange
Entrants
258
Departures
163
Total horizontal
712
567
Register
aDerived by weighting figures in this column by the distribution of physicists among subfields.
VICO;IC!I IN PFILPH:LIVF
torn of interchange ot workertt is similar to Li, t. pattern ol
tapping subfield competence.We have ranked the physics sublields In fable 11./7 according
to the longitudinal probability of remaining, which we have called
sul.field solidarity. L'or comparison with horizontal patterns olsecondary scientitio competence, we have also calculated a mobilityoverlap arca in a manner that corresponds formally to the compe-tence overtop area shown for the suhfields in Table 11,74, Again,the general features of the longitudinal and horizontal distribu-tions ore much the same. We have taken this analysis one step fur-
ther and looked at the changes Ln first competence between 1968
and 1970. The results are tabulated in Table 11.78 and the now
familiar sequence of subfields again results, Three categories
emerge: First, the independent, static category always contains
elementary-particle, nuclear, and condensed-matter physics. An
Intermediate category consists of plasmas and fluids; earth and
planetary physics; and atomic, moiecular and electron physics.*
TABLE 11.77 Subfteld Mobility 1968 to 1970: Ranking by Subfield
Solidarity
Physics Solidaritya
Mohilityb 1968, 1970 Samples
Subfield (%) Overlap(%) N 1968 N 1970
Elementary-particle 84.1 0.19 1063 1209
Nuclear 83.2 0.20 1390 1673
Condensed-matter 81.1 0.23 3245 3755
Plasmas and fluids 68.2 0.47 836 824
Acoustics 66.5 0.49 257 249
Atomic, molecular,and electron
56.2 0.78 283 925
Physics in biology 55.7 0.78 201 180
Earth and planetary 55.6 0.78 581 486
Astrophysics andrelativity
42.1 1.38 195 121
Optics 37.4 1.70 847 637
Miscellaneous 48.7 1.04 2718 1883
Physics (weightedaverage)
66.2 0.51
Astronomy 80.7 483 657
Total 1968 and 1970 12,599
samples
aSubfield unchanged, 1968-1970, as a fraction of 1970 total.bNewccmers 1 - Solidarity
Those Who Remained Solidarity
With a mlnor deviation in the measured first competence mobility.
108
Manpower Data 1563
TABLE Ii.78 First Competence Mobility: Ranking by Subfield
PhysicsSubfield SolidarityMa Mobility Overlap
b
Elementary-particle 67 0.43
Condensed-matter 66 0.52
Nuclear 66 0.52
Plasmas and fluids 54 0.85
Earth and planetary 50 1.00
Acoustics 44 1.27
Physics in biology 43 1.32
Optics 42 1.38
Atomic, molecular,and electron
40 1.56
Astrophysics andrelativity
36 1.78
Astronomy 54 0.85
Miscellaneous 38 1.63
a.
bSubfield unchanged, 1968-1970, as fraction of 1970 total.
Newcomers 1 - Solidarity
Those Who Remained = Solidarity
A third category, with large overlap and mobility, includes optics
and astrophysics and relativity. Acoustics and physics in biology
show rather more overlap than mobility, placing them somewhere
between intermedian and high-overlap mobility categories. The
assumed relation between competence and mobility is well borne
out in the data: The susceptibility implied by the large sub-field overlap is matched by a significant flow of manpower over
time.Table 11.79 presents the pattern of change based on first com-
petence for earth and planetary physicists. The turnover of 52
percent is comparable te.th the average citation of competence
outside the subfield, 51 percent, the complement of the average
internal citation probability of 49 percent in Table 11.73. The
directionality of competence mobility with respect to the other
TABLE 11.79 First Competence Mobility:Earth and Planetary Physics, 1968-1970
Changes for PhD's in
First Competencein 1968
First Competence in 19701968 TotalEarth and Planetary Other
Earth and planetaryOther1970 Total
231269
500
234 465
12,511
109
1564 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
subfields is the same as that given in the static overlap pat-tern and, as we have seen, the same as that manifest in actualsubfield mobility.
We ne.z.t examine the recent growth pattern of earth and plane-tary physics. Under normal conditions we would expect growth totake place in a pattern commensurate with the pattern of overlap.The interchange among subfields reflects this pattern, bu- recentgrowth does not. In Table 11.80, expectations are compare(. 'th
changes from 1968 to 1970. The normal entering distribution,column 3, is proportional to the product of the total overlapwith the other subfields, column 2, and the size of populationsin those subfields, column 1. These data come directly fromTable 11.73. Only the relative size of expected entering groupshas significance, and we have set a numerical absolute value of30 for the grouping of plasmas and fluids; optics; and atomic,molecular, and electron physics for ease of comparison with theactual net flux of PhD's given in column 4. Comparison of normaland actual patterns of flux show a large number of people arecoming from astronomy, three times the number expected on thebasis of overlap-circulation characteristics. The flow of PhD'sfrom traditional physics subfields, elementary-particle, nuclear,and condensed-matter physics, is only 50 percent higher th.anmight be expected for isotropic growth. The importance of ihe re-lationship with astronomy was suggested in the analysis of theelite group of earth and space scientists at the beginning of thischapter. The flow of manpower from the, traditional physics sub-fields is not sufficiently large to indicate substantial relief ofthe stress of limited resources that is said to exist. Althoughthe data suggest no anomalous impedance to mobility, there is nosign of an enhancement that might be desirable.
To what extent is employer mobility a factor in subfield mobil-ity? How much research redirection takes place in periods of un-changed institutional affiliation compared with changes concurrentwith employer mobility? Table 11.81 shows subfield mobility ac-
TABLE 11.80 Normal and Actual Flux Distributions by Source
Source
Source Overlap Normal Actual NetPopula- Distri- Entrant PhD Entranttion bution Distribution
a Distribution
Astronomy 630 11.3Plasmas and fluids; 3250 11.1atomic, molecular,and electron; andoptics
Elementary-parti- 7350 4.5cle, nuclear, andcondensed-matter
6 18
30 30
27 43
a(Population) x (Overlap), in arbitrary units.
110
Manpower Data 1565
TABLE 11.81 Earth and Planetary Physics Subfield Mobility withand without Concurrent Employer Change: Number of PhD's and
Median Age
Employer1968-1970
E&P1968Number
LeftE&P
E&P Both1968 and1970
EnteredE&PNumber
E&P1970Number
NetE&PChange
University 169 54 115 87 202 33
Industry 77 28 49 61 110 33
Government 101 31 70 28 98 -3
Research center 58 14 44 21 65 7
Other 9 5 4 5 9 0
Unchanged, sub-total
414 132 282 202 484 70
Median age 39.3 39.0 39.2 39
Changed, subtotal 72 31 41 56 97 25
Median age 32.4 33.5 33.9 33
Total 486 323 258 581 95
Median age 38.6 38.5 38.3
cording to type of employing institution. Of 589 earth and plane-tary physics PhD's in 1970, 16.7 percent had changed employersince 1968; half of these 97 PhD's were under 34 years of age,and 58 percent of this employer mobile group entered earth andplanetary physics for the first time. The other 42 percent hadbeen working in this subfield before they changed jobs. The re-maining 83.3 percent of the 1970 earth and planetary physicistswere still employed by the same type of institution as in 1968.
This employer static group was divided approximately 42 percentto 58 percent between newcomers and older established scientists.
Although employer mobile PhD's were somewhat more likely tohave changed into earth and planetary physics than employer staticones, such a large age difference appears between those who
changed and those who were static that typical early career ef-fects account for employer changes more than would effects re-sulting from the subfield.
The composition of the 1970 earth and planetary physics PhDgroup is summarized in Table 11.82.
Among the employer static new earth and planetary physicists,
industry showed the largest fractional growth (55 percent), uni-
versities somewhat less (43 percent), and other types of employ-
ment little increase.If in the future one anticipates a larger commitment to earth
and planetary physics as a result of employer mobility, the pat-
tern of employer interchange between 1968 and 1970 should be ex-
amined. Table 11.83 records the employer changes of earth and
planetary physicists from 1968 to 1970. One seventh (14.7 percent)
made such changes; of these, three fourths (73 percent) were uni-
versity related-young PhD's leaving and some older ones returning.
1 I 1
1566 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
TABLE 11.82 Mobility Composition of Earth and Planetary Physics
PhD Population
Source Number Percent Median Age
New PhD's 145 20 31.5
Employer mobile PhD's 97 13 33.9
Employer static PhD'sNew to earth and 202 28 39.0
planetary physicsIn earth and planetary 282 39 39.2
physics in 1968
TOTAL 726 100 37.4
The pattern of interchange between the university and other typesof employment appears in Table 11.84.
TABLE 11,83 Changes in Employer, 1968 to 1970, for 502 PhD's
Working in Earth and Planetary Physics: Number and Median Age
1570 EmployerTotal 1968 Employer
1968 Universy Industry Government Research Centers OtJa_ Distribution
Empioyer No. Age No. Age No. Age No. Age No, Age Nc. Age
University 17b 38.4 9 30.7 11 33.5 8 32.0 k 29.4 208 37.2
Industry 4 33.5 79 41.2. - 2 34.5 2 40.5 87 40.9
GovernmentResearch center
8
2
34.5J4.5
1
1
49.545.5
1044
39.945.5
2
58
40 s7 33.5
11566
39.739.7
Other 8 31.8 2 44.5 3 29.5 2 36.: 19.5 26 34.5
Total 1970 198 37.7 92 40.7 122 39.4 72 38.5 36.5 502 38.9
distribution
274 changed employment; 428 rema!ned In the same typo of employing institution; total with employment
known in both years was 502.
TABLE 11.84 University and Other Employment Interchanges in Earthand Planetary Physics, 1968 to 1970
1968 Employer
1970 EmployerUniversity Other
University 176 32
Other employment 22 272
112
Manpower Data 1567
11.2 Samples of Special Pop':lations
11.2.1 .CAREER CHOICES OF TALENTED MALE STUDENTS
At the start of the 1960's one sometimes heard it argued that wecould and should greatly expand our national production of scien-tists by encouraging a larger proportion of the talented youngpeople to choose scientific careers. Such arguments were based onthe belief that of the population of people with the necessary apti-tudes, only a minute fraction was going into science. Although thefeeling that the United States needed more scientists was greatlymuted by the end of the 1960's, one heard increasingly often thecomplaint that the best students were turning away from science.The bases for these arguments and complaints were sometimes merelysubjective impressions, sometimes extensive statistics, such asthose of Harmon* correlating,IQ scores with the obtaining of doc-torates,.or those of Nichols' on the study plans and career aspira-tions of National Merit Scholarship semifinalists. Having accessto information on the life-long career activities of a group ofpeople selected for academic aptitude with unusual care and thorough-ness at the time of their graduation from high school, and withoutbias among fields, we undertook to investigate the distribution ofthese people among careers and ways in which this distributionmight have changed during the last several decades.
11.2.1.1 Nature of the Sample
The Summerfield Scholarships, established at the University ofKansas in 1929, are awarded each year to male graduates of highschools.in the state on the basis of competitive examinations fol-lowed by person-by-person scrutiny. Occasionally they are awardedalso to students already at the University. The awards have highprestige and are much sought after; they are made on the basis ofscholarly promise alone, without bias for or against any field ofstudy and without regard to the financial resources of the student.After the award is made, the.student's financial resources are in-vestigated and he is supplied with whatever supplemental assistancehe needs to pursue his studies without financial worry. If, as isnearly always the case, the student's university work fulfills ex-pectations, the scholarship is renewed each year until he graduates.
Each year the University issues a list of all alumni of thisprogram, giving for each alumnus any advanced degrees he has 're-ceived and his present employment.5 From 1933 to 1969 there were509 alumni, of whom 18 had died and 13 were incompletely traced.Figure 11.14 shows the number of Summerfield graduates by year ofbachelor's degree. The numbers have fluctuated considerably fromyear to year, because of secular trends and because the number of
*Harmon, L. R., Science, 133, 679 (1961).tNichols, R. C., Science, 144, 1315 (1964).5Pamphlets titled University. of Kansas Summerfield Scholars issuedeach April by the University of Kansas.
113
1568 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
30
2 5
.=-
J.A.1
-1.;:'-
, 4.... .4.
, ,..... ' q4
',14'......#''' '
..,,,
-37.-141,77.47z.r7177,777Z7rt.-mr!,..-y.,,,,,,,,,.=,, ,
c,...-:: ,r,,
1935 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965
FIGURE 11.14 Graduates of the Summerfield Scholar program byyear of graduation.
1970
scholarships that can be awarded in any year depends on the finan-
cial needs of the recipients. As the average number of scholars
per year has risen only slightly from the mid-1930's to 1969, while
the enrollment at the University has more than quadrupled duringthe same interval, it is reasonable to guess that the standardshave risen at least slightly, though perhaps not greatly, as alter-
native scholarships and the like may have become more available.
According to informal estimates by administrators and others famil-
iar with the program, these alumni are probably typical of about
the top 3 or 4 percent of graduates of the University of Kansas
(henceforth referred to as KU). To gauge what this means on an
overall national scale one must rate KU bachelor's degree holders
relative to those of other institutions. According to a recent
compilation,* KU baccalaureates accounted for 373 of 80,978 U.S.
PhD's in the years 1960-1966 (a fraction 0.0046). As the 1968-
1969 enrollment was 16,964, compared with a national total of 5.77
million in four-year institutions (fraction 0.0029), it is probably
conservative to conclude that the Summerfield Scholars have an abil-
ity level characteristic of the top 3 or 4 percent of U.S. college
graduates.It is interesting to compare the characteristics of this sample
with those of Nichols's+ sample of National Merit Scholarship semi-
finalists. This category of students comprises a rather larger
*Doctorate Recipients from United States Universities 1958-1966.
(NAS Publication 1489) Washington, D.C.: National Academy of
Sciences, 1967.+Nichols, R. C., Science, 1443 1315 (1964).
114
Manpower Data 1569
frac:ion of college enrollments than the Summerfield Scholars do ofKU enrollment; however, their selection process, based on test scoresalone, is less careful and is not subject to modification after en-trance into college. Only a small fraction of the National MeritScholarship semifinalists applying for Summerfield Scholarshipsreceive them. More serious, however, is that Nichol's data con-
sisted only of career choices, expressed before entering college,and major fields of undergraduate study, whereas the Summerfielddata refer to career positions into which the men settled a numberof years after graduation. Nichols also gave some figures foranother sample, of somewhat lower average ability, on changes incareer choice between.the year_of entry into college and the yearof graduation. These figures, unfortunately given for only oneclass, show such large changes that one is uncertain whether tointerpret secular changes in career choices expressed on enteringcollege as reflecting ultimate careers or as reflecting improvedcounselling.
11.2.1.2 Statistics on Eventual Careers
Figure 11.15 shows the percentages of Summerfield Scholars graduat-ing in various time intervals who have gone into each of severalprofessions. Cross-hatched bars represent career positions, blankbars represent graduate or professional school students, and thebars with a question mark represent Prlduates with undergraduatemajors in the field indicated but t- Alom no data on present ac-
tivity are available. (Past experience suggests that most of these
are actually.graduate students.) The data shown by the cross-hatched bars were based on the following definitions of the variousprofessional fields:
1. Natural science and mathematics. Includes all those whosetitles suggest that they teach science at the college level or en-gage in pure or applied research or its supervision. Psychology
is included but not anthropology.2. Engineering. Includes all those whose titles suggest that
they perform or supervise engineering work or teach engineering.
3. Medicine. Includes MD's engaged in any medicine-relatedwork, dentistry, and possibly one or two other fields.
4. Law. Includes those engaged either in private law practiceor as attorneys for business or public organizations.
5. Cavernment administration. Includes administrators in na-tional, state, or local agencies, other than military personnel.
6,--Tiusiness. Includes administrators in private business or-ganizations, exclusive of attorneys and those involved solely in
research or engineering work. Includes accountants.
7. Social science teaching and research. Includes college fac-
ulty in social sciences, history, and anthropology and scholars inthese fields employed elsewhere (but not in high school teaching).
8. Humanities. Includes college faculty in literature, philos-ophy, and the like, independent writers, etc., but not clergy, highschool teachers, artists, or musicians.
11 5
1570 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
9. Miscellaneous: Includes high school and grade schoolteachers, educational administrators at all levels, artists and
musicians, military personnel, clergy, journalists, architects,
and pharmacists.NATURAL SCIENCESand MATHEMATICS 30%
ENGINEERING30%
20% 20%
10% 10%
20%
10%
1932 41 47 50 55 60 6.3-40 -46 -49 -54 59 64 69
LAW
o 932 41 47 50 55 60 65-40 -46 -49 -54-59 6469
EMEPACCOM11:10
SOCIAL SC(ENCES( TEACHING and-RESEARCH)
20%
10% P
171 [1 7932 41 47 50 55606-40 -46 -49 -54 59.6469
01932 41 47 50 55 GO 65
/P
0
2
0
0
SMgig
20%
10%
01932 41 47 50 55-40 -46 -49 - 54-59
-40 -46 -49 -54 59 64-69
GOVERNMENTADMINISTRATION
20%
10%
HUMANITIES
7
1932 41 47 50 55 60 65
20%
10%
20%
10%
20%
10%
0932 41 47 50 55 60 65
-40 -46 -49 -54.59 6469 -40 -46 -49 -54-5944 69
MEDICINE
932 41 47 50 5560 65-40 -46 -49 -54 59 64 69
BUSINESS
932 41 47 50 55 60 65-40 -46 -49 -54-59.6469
MISCELLANEOUS
FIGUTE 11.15 Percentages of Summerfield Scholars, graduating invarious time intervals, who have settled in various professions.
Years of graduation are given at the bottom, the numbers of graduates
in the various periods being1932-40: 95 1955-59: 64
1941-46: 53 1960-64: 88
1947-49: 44 1965-69: 90
1950-54: 56
Shaded bars are men in jobs, unshaded bars are graduate andprofessional students, and question marks are uncertain cases)
classified by field of degree.
advanced
116
Manpower Data 1571
To the extent possible, graduate and professional students wereassigned to one of these categories. Obviously students assigned
to one could be expected sometimes to go into careers in another.
Such a change is especially likely -mong students in the social
sciences, who will often enter government or business. Medical
students, in marked contrast, nearly always continue in medicine.It should be noted that the career distributions for the 1932-1940
classes were made from data available in the early 1950's; those
for subsequent classes were made from 1969 or 197J data. 'A com-
parison of the early and recent data for the 1941-1946 sample showed
few career changes except for the expected migration, with increas-
ing age, of a minority of-the scientists and engineers into busi-
ness or other administration.Figure 11.16 is an attempt to compare the Summerfield Scholar-
ship data with those of Nichols on National Merit Scholarship semi-
finalists. The wide bars at the right and left of each diagramrepresent the Summerfield data for students graduating in each of
two decades; as before, cross-hatching represents jobs, open spaces
graduate or professional students, and question marks uncertain
cases classified by undergraduate major. Nichols's data are repre-
sented in part by the narrow bars in between, which show pre-enroll-
ment (freshman) choices of undergraduate major subject, averaged
for the college entry years shown. The dumbbells'represent thecorresponding pre-enrollment preferences for eventual careers. As
the change in career choices from freshman to senior years was
available for only ()lie class (entry 1957, graduation 1961), no
precise three-year averages can be given for the senior year choices;
instead, the lines with x's at the ends have been drawn in the
1958-1960 column at a height equal to the height of the dumbbell
times the 1957-1961 ratio of senior-year to freshman-year prefer-
ences. The narrow bars for medicine refer to those planning en-
rollment in premedical curricula; no enrollment bars are given for
law, because it is not an undergraduate option; all majors in so-
cial sciences (like the graduate students in Figure 11.15) were
placed under social science teaching and research; humanities were
treated similarly.So far we have concentrated on changes with time, and the Sum-
merfield data are too sparse to permit subdividing them by field of
science as well as by time period. If all data for classes 1950
are taken together, we find that of the 50 or 60 men assigned to
natural science in Figure 11.15, at least 15 have entered physics.
Two more, both with bachelor's degrees in engineering physics, are
members of the American Physical Society (APS). If we restrict at-
tention only to those in nonstudent jobs, the ratio is 13 or 14 of
33 or 34. Clearly physics has been getting more than its share of
those especially gifted men. However, the data are not sufficient
to refute the speculation that in the last decade physics has drawn
fewer such men than, say, biology. Of the 13 in what are clearly
physics jobs, the two oldest are APS Fellows; the others (PhD's
since 1962, except.possibly for one undated case) are a little young
for this rank; only one is neither a PhD nor a graduate student and
probably is finishing.a thesis.
117
1572 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
A similar analysis of Summerfield graduates prior to 1950 shows11 physicists from among 28 natural scientists. Of the 11, allbut one have PhD's and six are APS Fellows.
NATURAL SCIENCESand MATHEMATICS ENGINEERING
40%MEDICINE
40% 40%
30% 30%00%
20% 20% 20%
10% I 0% I 0 %
0
7950 1958 196 1960 1950 1958 1961 1960 950 1958 196 1960
59 -60 - 63 -69 -59 -60 -63 69 - 59 - 60 - 63 - 69
20%LAW
20%
10%
0
GOVERNMENTADMINISTRATION BUSINESS
20%
10% I 0 %
0.0/4
0-00-0IZI
01950-59
196069
1950-59
01960 1950 1960-69 -59 - 69
SOCIAL SCIENCES
20%(TEACHING ond RESEARCH)
20%
10%
1950 98 9-59 -60 - 63
1960- 69
10%
0
HUMANITIES
959 1958 196 1960-60 - 60 63 - 69
FIGURE 11.16 Comparison of Summerfield-Scholar (SS) and MeritSemifinalists (MS, from Nichols) data. The broad bars at the leftand right are the SS data of Fig. 11.2, averaged 1950-59 and 1960-69, respectively. The narrow bars in between are the intended un-dergraduate majors of the MS samples. The dumbbells are careerintentions at time of entry into college; the lines with x's arethese multiplied by the ratio of senior to freshman intentions for
the 1957-61 class.
118
Manpower Data 1573
11.2.1.3 Conclusions
In general the two sets of data in Figure 11.16 appear reason-ably compatible, when one makes allowance for their obviouslimitations, for example, that increasing age increases theprobability of involvement in business and government adminis-tration or that not all students planning to entev medicine en-roll in an explicitly premedical major. Neither set of data givesconvincing support for Nichols' implied conclusiol that tal-ented students are becoming less likely to adopt careers in basicscience. The slight decrease in the level indicated by the dumb-bells in Figure 11.16 between 1958-1960 and 1961-1963 could wellhave resulted from improved counseling, that is to say, from adecrease in the difference between the dubbell and x levels, orthe ultimate career choice. In regard to engineering, however, allthree types of data suggest that Nichols may well have been correctin concluding that the inclinations of talented students towardthis field is decreasing. If this finding is true--and better sta-tistics would be needed to establish it with certainty--it couldhave important implications for the role of pure-science fields inthe economy. It would partially nullify the argument, often madecurrently, that the increasing sophistication of engineering edu-cation is causing engineers (especially PhD's) to take over therole formerly played by physicists as the best reservoir of talentfor technological tasks involving new and unfamiliar ideas. Al-
though engineering training may be improving, this improvement maybe offset by a decreasing number of the most highly talented youthwho elect it; if so, it may be as necessary now as in earlier de-cades to draw on the pure scientists for technological innovations.
The data on physicists in the Summerfield sample, given in thelast paragraphs of Section 11.2.1.2, suggest that the ability levelof the sample is about that of APS Fellows and show that among natu-ral science students at this ability level, nearly a third have en-tered physics in the last few decades. (In the Nichols sample, fromone half to a little less than one third of the National Merit Schol-
arship semifinalists planning majors in natural science fields
planned to major in physics.) But a decline in enrollments in phys-
ics in the last few years, relative to other sciences, is suggestedby the Nichols data and cannot be refuted by the Summerfield data.
11.2.2 PHYSICS DOCTORATES WHO HAVE LEFT PHYSICS
A significant number of people, after beginning a career in physics,even with a doctorate, eventually move into other sciences or en-gineering or into entirely nonscientific fields. Projections of
the balance between supply and demand in future years, such as thoseattempted in Chapter 12 of Volume I of Physics in Perspective, needto take into account this portion of the population. In planningboth the scale and nature of graduate education in physics, onewould like to know, among other things, to what extent these peopleare misfits who should never have studied physics and to what ex-tent they represent an important channel for cross-fertilization ofother professions, scientific, administrative, or educational. The
study we report here was a highly preliminary one designed to ex'
119
1574 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
plore one possible means of getting answers to some of these ques-
tions.Examination of a list of nearly 500 people who had received doc-
torates in physics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology(MIT) between 1935 and 1959 revealed a number who, from their ad-dresses or other information, were not in academic physics depart-
ments in 1970, These people were queried by mail regarding the wayin which their careers have developed and the relation, if any, oftheir physics training to their present work. Replies received from
slightly less than half indicated the following:
1. Only about one fifth said that more than half of their pres-ent work involved physics by extrapolation; therefore, one can guessthat approximately one fourth of the MIT physics doctoral alumni ofthis vintage have moved into work that is primarily outside thescope of physics...
2. About one fourth of the responses were from presidents orvice presidents of companies working in communication, data proces-sing, geophysics, and space and defense systems. This number ex-
trapolates to about one in 14 of all physics PhD alumni. As ex-
pected, these men were somewhat older than the others, having re-ceived their doctorates some 25 ± 6 years previously; it had been
14 ± 7 years since the majority of their work involved physics.But all thought that their physics background was helpful to them
in their present positions.3. A somewhat larger fraction--corresponding to about one in
nine of all the alumni studied---were now directors of research orengineering development in high-technology companies. They were
somewhat younger than the group described in 2 above, 20 years onthe average having elapsed since receiving the doctorate, and the
present work of about 30 percent involved physics.4. A third large group--extrapolating to about one in 12 of the
alumni--were working in universities but not in physics departments.
5. A fourth and somewhat smaller group was self-employed, do-ing technical consulting for industry and the government. Approxi-
mately half of their york was still related to physics.
The greater proportion of alumni, who have moved out of physics,
is shown in Table 11.85. Actually, the figures in the table prob-
ably reflect two effects. One is that motion away from physics is
cumulative: opportunities to move into other professions, particu-
larly administration, increase with the years, and once one has left
physics one is unlikely to return. Another factor, however, has
been the evolution of the physics enterprise. The vast expansion
of university staffs and industrial physics research in the 1950's
and 1960s created a great demand for physicists, including senior
ones, which may have acted to keep a larger proportion of people in
the profession than was the case for the same age groups in earlier
years. In the 1970's a reversal of this trend may well occur. In-
terestingly, none of the persons surveyed spent more than six years
in a physics department after receiving the PhD.
A valuable product of the survey, though one rather difficult to
convey in a brief sumthary, was the collection of free-language com-
12 0
Manpower Data 1575
ments by the respondents. In these comments, and in their responsesto questions on the value and relevance of their physics education,the overwhelming majority affirmed that their education in physicsresearch had been of value in their careers. Moreover, threefourthi of them said that their training in physics also had beenof value to them for reasons other than its relevance to their work.Although research training was iometimes cited for its value inteaching methods of thought and working philosophy that may be ap-plicable to other types of problems, there was an even strongeremphasis by many respondents on the exhortation that graduate train-ing in physics should not be allowed to be too specialized. Coursesin classical theoretical physics were the ones most often cited asbeing of particular value.
This study, incomplete though it is, gives some support for theview that doctoral training in physics, if not too narrowly special-ized, can serve as a useful one of many possible channels for pro-viding the nation with a diverse and innovative population of edu-cational and industrial administrators.
TABLE 11.85 Estimates of the Migration of MIT Physics Doctoratesfrom Physics, as of 1970
Year of PhDTotal Estimated No. FractionAlumni Who Left Physics Leaving
1935-1940 62 36 0.581941-1945a 56 14 0.25
1946-1949 73 23 0.321950-1954 160 50 0.31
1955-1959 139 27 0.20
Total, 1935-1959 490 150 0.31
aThe World War II years are separated, even though this makes thetime intervals in the table unequal in duration.
1 2 1
III
DATA ONFUNDINGANDCOSTS
111.1 General Survey of the Various Sources of Supportfor Physics Research
111.1.1 SOURCES OF INFORMATION AND DIFFICULTIES IN THEIR USE
The chapters of this report dealing with the funding of physics areall concerned with the support of research in physics, or of activ-ities directly related to the research enterprise, as distinguishedfrom the role of physics in such activities as general education,developmental engineering, and industrial production. Even so,
ambiguities can arise in regard to how research is to be distin-guished from these other activities and, of course, where the linesare to be drawn separating research in physics from research in
other sciences and engineering. So perhaps we should begin this
chapter with a few words about the delineation of our subject.The conventional categories of research, for example, in the
tables published by the NSF in its periodic report, FederaZ Fundsfor Research, Development, and Other Scientific Activities, arebasic research, applied research, and development. Basic research
is defined as "exploration of the unknown...primarily motivated by
the desire to pursue knowledge for its own sake." Applied research
is described as "finding the means to meet a recognized need." De-
velopment is defined as "systematic use of knowledge...directed tothe production of useful materials, devices, systems, and methods."
Although the distinction among these three activities provides auseful way of ordering one's thinking, it is difficult to make thesedistinctions precise or quantitative, because they depend---espe-cially in the case of basic versus applied research---on knowing
motivation. What is applied research in the mind of an administra-tor or official of a granting agency may be basic research to the
1576
122
Data on FUnding and Costs 1577
person doing the work, or vice versa. ln recording their use offunds, different agencies may draw the dividing line in differentplaces. For these and related reasons, we have chosen, in all ourcollection and analysis of funding data, to concentrate on research,without attempting to distinguish basic from applied, and to defineit in the following way: Research is the generation of new knowledgethat, soon after its generation, becomes a part of the publicly a-vailable archive of knowledge. A useful corollary of this defini-tion is that research activity in physics can be studied throughthe primary journals, books, and other publications of the field.
The overlap of physics with other scientific and engineeringfields is, of course, substantial. The nature and extent of thisoverlap are discussed in some detail in Section IV.1.1, in whichwe show that the citation structure of the scientific and technicalliterature can be used to provide a reasonably logical and objectivedefinition of the boundary between two adjacent fields. Althoughapplication of this technique to the separation of funding for phys-ics from that for other fields would be prohibitively laborious, itcan be used, as described there, as a check on the reasonableness
of the intuitive decisions on what is and is not physics that onemust make in the course of assembling data. A few checks of thissort that we have made have given us confidence that the defini-tions of physics that we have used in the presentation of our dataar- reasonably consistent with the objective definition.
'lthough we have tried to apply our own definitions of research,physics, and even support whenever possible and to do so consistent-ly, most of our data-gathering activities have had to rely exten-sively on the records of various organizations, particularly govern-ment agencies, and on the categories in which these records are kept.Because of the difficulties with definitions, to which we have justalluded, one is entitled to view all such data with some suspicion,and one would like to be able to check data derived from one sourceagainst those derived from a more or less independent source. Thesources from which we have been able to obtain useful data on fund-ing are the following:
1. Detailed records of federal agencies, studied with the aidof officials of these agencies. These records have been our prin-cipal source of information about the funding of physics by theDOD, NSF, AEC, and NASA.
2. Government publications prepared for other purposes. Theseinclude, in particular the FederaZ Funds series* and the annualStatistical Summary of the AEC Physical Research Program.
3. The acknowledgment of research support usually made in re-search articles in journals.
4. Queries made to small but carefully selected samples of uni-versities and industrial research organizations.
5. Mention of government support made by respondents to thequestionnaire for the National Register of Scientific and TechnicalPersonnel.
*Federal Funds for Research, Development, and Other ScientificActivities, issued periodically by the NSF.
123
1578 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
The data obtained from source 1 are described in Section 111.2.Those obtained from source 4 are discussed in Section 111.3 and111.4 and those from sources 3 and 5 are the subject of the para-
graphs immediately following.
111.1.2 NONDOLLAR DATA RELEVANT TO THE DISTRIBUTION OF SUPPORT
111.1.2.1 Distribution of Support Acknowledged in Journal ArticZes
It is a fairly consistent custom in the physics literature for pa-
pers reporting work that has received support from sources outside
the institutions with which the authors are affiliated to containan acknowledgment of this support. By counting such acknowledg-
ments one can get a good deal of information about the sources of
support for work performed in various types of institutions and its
distribution among the subfields of physics. The information is in-complete, of course, for the dollar amount is never stated and therelative contributions of different sources, when there is more
than one, are not indicated. However, if reasonable allowance is
made for these ambiguities, the results can provide a useful check
on.funding information obtained in other ways.In our survey, members of the Statistical Data Panel examined
all the articles published in a two-month period in 14 AIP journals
and 29 non-AIP journals. The months used depended on availability,
but all issues were published between mid-1969 and mid-1970. The
total number of papers examined was 1200, 834 from AIP journals and
366 from non-AIP journals. Since the total number of physics paperspublished by U.S. authors in a year is estimated to be about 14,000,*
the sample represents slightly less tha..1 one tenth of the annual
U.S. output of published physics papers. The distribution between
AIP journals and non-AIP journals (mostly European) in the sample
was rough]y consistent with the known publication pattern of U.S.
work.tThe survey was conducted in the following way. All papers in
each issue selected were examined. Only those papers that were
regarded as physics and the authors of which were affiliated with
an institution in the United States were counted. For each physics
paper a subfield assignment was made and the nature of the perform-
ing ingtitution and sources of support acknowledged were recorded.
If no external source of support was acknowledged, support was cred-
ited to the authors' institution. Many complicated cases were en-
countered involving papers in which the authors represented several
institutions, multiple sources of support were mentioned, and par-
tial support was acknowledged. To increase ehe manageability of
the data, the Panel chose as the least count 0.5, so that no paper
*Physics in Perspective, VolumeTable XIV.11.
+compare, for example, Table IV.Perspective, Volume II, Part B,
II, Part B, Figure XIV.32 or
3 (in Chapter IV), also Physics inTable XIV.9.
Data on Rolding and Costs 1579
was divided between more than two performer-support combinations,
with omissions, when necessary, being assigned to the last-men-
tioned institutions or sources. A somewhat arbitrary decision on
division of support among institutions or sponsors was required for
about half of the papers%The results are presented in a series of tables, which record
the counts of various subfield-source-performer combinations.
Table 111.1 shows acknowledged sources of support by subfield.
Table 111.2 is a similar table but includes only research performed
in universities. Table 111.3 shows the institutional affiliation
of authors of journal articles by subfield. Tables 111.4, 111.5,
and 111.6 show the patterns of support of the three major federal
funding agencies for physics research by performing institution and
subfield. The general picture resulting from these tables will be
compared in Figure 111.1 with that based on statements about gov-
ernment support made by respondents to the National Register. Both
types of figures, which suffer, of course, from lack of calibration
in dollars, will be compared with dollar data obtained from recordsot government agencies in the following subsection.
TABLE 111.1 Acknowledgment of Support in Journal Articles,
by Subfielda,h
Source ofSupport ASg ANE EP NP PSF CM ESP
No-phys Acoost Opt
OtherPhys. Total Percent
University 2.5 :9.(I 19.5 21.5 15.5 65.0 4.0 1.0 2.0 8.0 19.5 187.5 15.6
rmin 10.0 50.0 18.5 13.0 17.0 126.5 14.5 - 13.0 18.0 13.5 294.0 24.5
NASA 4.5 20.0 1.0 2.0 7.5 14.5 26.5 - 2.0 7.0 6.5 91.5 7.6
AEC - 19.0 54.0 72.5 15.0 77.0 3.0 3.5 6.0 250.0 20.8
NSF 5.0 28.0 21.5 22.5 13.0 51.0 8.0 1.0 7.0 11.0 169.0 14.1
Other gov. 1.0 7.0 2.0 2.0 2.5 25.0 - 4.0 1.0 6.5 3.0 54.0 4.5
Industry - 14.0 0.5 2.5 76.0 1.0 - 5.0 19.0 12.5 131.0 11.0
Nonprofit 1.5 1.0 0.5 - 5.5 1.0 2.5 0.5 12.5 1.0
Private 1.0 2.5 2.5 0.5 2.0 - - 1.0 9.5 0.8
TOTAL 23.0 169.5 120.0 137.0 74.5 442.5 58.0 5.0 24.0 71.5 73.5 1200.0 100.0
'Entries nre numbers of papers sampled acknowledging support from the given source. with occnsIonnlfractional allocations an discussed in the text.
-Subfield abbreviations used are A&R. astrophysics and relativity; AME, atomic, molecular, and electronphysics; EP, elementary-particle physics; NP, nuclear physics: P&P, plasmas nnd fluids; CM, physics ofcondensed matter; ESP, earth nnd planetary physics; giophys. biophysics; Acoust, acoustics; Opt, optics.
125
1580 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
TABLE 111.2 Sources of Support Acknowledged in Journal Articles
from Universities, by Subfielda b
Soorce ofSupport A48 AMP. EP NP P4F CM E41. Acoust Opt
otherPhys. Total Percent
University 2.5 29.0 19.5 21.5 11.5 65.0 1.0 2.0 7.5 20.5 186.0 24.5DOD 10.0 37.0 17.5 7.5 11.5 88.0 4.0 5.0 9.0 9.0 198.5 26.1NASA 2.5 11.5 0.5 4.0 10.0 18.0 1.0 4.5 2.5 54.5 7.2AFC 7.5 42.0 31.5 7.0 26.0 2.0 - 1.5 1.5 119.0 15.7NSF 5.0 28.0 21.5 22.0 13.0 51.0 7.0 1.0 6.5 12.0 167.0 22.0Other Rev. 1.5 - 1.5 10.0 - 1.0 1.5 4.0 19.5 2.6Industry - - - 1.0 - 1.0 0.1Nonprofit 1.5 - 0.5 2.5 - - 0.5 - 5.1) 0.7Private 1.0 1.5 2.5 0.5 2.0 - - 1.0 8.5 1.1
TOTAL 20.0 117.0 102.0 86.0 53.0 255.5 34.0 10.0 31.0 50.5 759.0 100.0
,'Entrles ar :lumbers of papers, as Is Table 111.1.
'Subfield abbreviations used are the same as those Identified In Table 111.1, footnote 6.
TABLE 111.3 Institutional Affiliation of Authors of Journal,Articlesa b
Type ofInstltution Afar AME EP NP PLF CM E&P Fiophys Acoust Opt Other Phys. Total
University 19 119 104 86 54 255 34 4 10 31 47 763Industry - 18 1 2 7 87 7 7 20 16 165Nonprofit 3 2 14 - 6 - 29Gov. in-house 2 13 2 6 4 35 8 1 5 10 4 89Federally
funded re-search anddevelopmentcenter
1 17 14 39 8 57 11 - 2 4 6 159
TOTAL 22 171 121 136 74 448 60 5 24 71 73 1205
Entries are numbers of papers, as in Table 111.1
'Subfleld abbrevlatIons used are the same as those identified in Table 111.1, footnote b.
1. 2 6
Data on Funding and Costs 1581
TABLE 111.4 Distribution of Papers Acknowledging Support by the
Department of Defense, by Subfielda"'")
InstitutionPerformingReported Work ASR NNE EP NP PSI, CM ESP Aeousr Opt
otherPhys. Total
University 10.0 31.0.,17.5 7.5 11.5 88.0 4.0 5.0 9.0 8.5 198.0
DOD lab or.bon PERM:-
5.5 1.0 4.0 2.0 26.5 8.5 7.0 5.5 1.0 61.0
Industry 2.0 - 1.5 3.5 11.0 1.0 1.0 0. 3.5 22.0Other 5.5 - - - 1.0 1.0 - . 0.5 11.0
TOTAL 10.0 50.0 18.5 11.0 17.0 126.5 14.5 13.0 MO 13.5 294.0
lEntries are numbers of papers, as in Table 111.1
ISubfield abbreviations used are the same as those identified in Table 111.1, footnote b.
'Federally funded research and development center.
TABLE 111.5 Distribution of Papers Acknowledging Support by the
Atomic Energy Commissiona,o
InstitutionPerforming OtherReported Work AME EP NP PfiF CM ESP Opt Phys. Total
AEC FFRDC 10.5 12.0 38.0 7.5 47.0 1.5 2.0 4.5 123.0University 7.5 42.0 31.5 7.0 25.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 118.5
Industry - - - 2.0 - - - 2.0
Other 1.0 - 3.0 0.5 3.0 - - 7.5
TOTAL 19.0 54.0 72.5 15.0 77.5 3.5 3.5 6.0 251.0
Entries are numbers of papers, as in Table III.1.
Subfield abbreviations are the same as those identified in0 Table 111.1, footnote n.-Federally funded research and development center.
TABLE 111.6 Distribution of Papers Acknowledging Support by the
National Aeronautics and Space Administrationa'b
InstitutionPerforming OtherReported Work A&R AME EP NP P&F CM ESP Acoust Opt Phys. Total
University 2.5 11.5 - 0.5 4.0 10.0 18.0 1.0 4.5 3.0 55.0NASA lab orNASA MX" 2.0 7.0 1.0 0.5 2.0 3.0 5.5 - 1.0 3.5 25.5
Industry 1.0 - 1.0 0.5 04, 4.0 1.0 - - 8.0
Other 0.5 - - - 1.0 -\
- 1.5 - 3.0
TOTAL 4.5 20.0 1.0 2.0 6.5 14.5 27.5 2.0 7.0 6.5 91.5
aEntries are numbers of papers, as in Table III.1.
Subfield abbreviations used are the same as those identified in TableooFeaglirfhded research and development center.
127
1582 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
OEFENSE
ATOMIC ENERGY
SPACE
EDUCATION
HEALTH
HOUSING, PUB. WORN],TRAN3R and URBAN DEV.
AGA IC.,NAT. RESOURCE,and RURAL DEV.
OTHER GOVT.
NO GOVT.SUPPORT
..,...//,,.;%
E
E:
0 10 20 30 40 50% 50% 40 30 20 10 0
FRACTION OF REGISTRANTS FRACT ON OF PUBLICATIONS
DOD
AEC
NASA
NSF
OTHER GOVT.
NO GOV T.SUPPORT
FIGURE 111.1 Comparisons of sources of government support reportedby respondents to the 1970 National Register (left, shaded bars for
PhD's, unshaded for non-PhD's) with those acknowledged in a sampling
of 1969 journal articles (right). The lengths of the bars on the
left here represent the fractions of thote (PhD's or non-PhD's)
answering "yes" or "no" to the government support question who men-
tioned support from the Program listed at the left; percentagesadd to more than 100% because of multiple-support cases. The lengths
mf the_bars on the right, on the other hand, were obtained from the
last column of Table 111.1 and thus dc add to 100%. The lines in the
middle column indicate the correspondences between the categories of
agencies used in the two studies, which are roughly one-to-one in
some cases but are many-to-one in others.
111.1.2.2 Statements on Government Support by Respondents to the
National Register Questionnaire
One of the questions on the form for the National Register of Sci-
entific and Technical Personnel deals with government support. In
1970 it was worded as follows:
Is ANY of your work being supported or sponsored by U.S.
government funds? [Choices: yes, no, don't know] If
yes, is your work related to any of the following pro-
grams: [Choices: agriculture, atomic energy, defense,education, health, housing, international, natural re-sources, public works, rural development, space, trans-
portation, urban development, other program (specify)]
Like the acknowledgments of support discussed previously, these
questions yield data on only the number of individuals who indicate
that they receive some type of government support; a physicist who
receives $500 for summer salary supplementation and one who re-
ceives $50,000 for a major research project are equated. Table 111.7
128
Data on Funding and Costs 1583
shows the distribution of responses to the first part of the ques-tion. About 90 percent of the PhD's and 80 percent of the non-PhD's answered with yes or no. The ratio of yes answers to thetotal respondents declined between 1968 and 1970, for both PhD's(0.67 -4. 0.60) and non-PhD's (0.59 0.52). Thus there seems tohave been a decrease during this period in the proportion of physi-cists receiving federal support.
American Science Manpower presents comparable figures for otherfields in 1968. Although 62 percent of physicists, all degrees,received federal support in 1968, only 43 percent of those in allfields included in this publication received such support. Theonly fields that depended more heavily on federal funds than physicswere atmospheric and space sciences (88 percent) and agriculturalsciences (70 percent).
TABLE 111.7 Government Support by Academic Degreea
U.S. GovernmentSupport
YesNoDon't knowNo answer
TOTAL
PhD Non-PhDNumber Percentage Number
9,956 59.9 10,1884,958 29.8 5,626
230 1.4 789
1,487 8.9 3,102
16,631 100.0 19,705
Percentage
51.728.64.0
15.7
100.0
aData from the 1970 National Register of Scientific and Technical
Personnel.
Responses to the second part of the Register question give anindication of the sources of government support in 1970. However,the programs listed are more in the nature of functional fieldsthan either disciplines or activities of specific agencies. Forexample, it is not clear where a person who had support from theNSF physics program would be able to respond. This ambiguityshould be kept in mind in examining the distribution of responSespresented in Table 111.8. The main findings indicated by thisTable are the following:
1. Defense, atomic energy, and space programs provide supportfor the highest proportion of both PhD's and non-PhD's.
2. A higher proportion of non-PhD's than PhD's receives supportfrom defense activities, and a lower proportion of non-PhD's thanPhD's receives support from atomic energy programs. The distribu-tion of support from other government programs is much the same forPhD's and non-PhD's.
129
1.584 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
TABLE Iu.s States Sources of Government Support, by Degreea
Source
PhD Non-PhD
Number Percentage" Number Percentageb
Defense 3,941 39.6 5,023 49.3
Atomic energy 3,235 32.6 1,838 18.0
Space 2,176 21.9 2,215 21.7
Education 1,049 10.5 1,141 11.2
Health 541 5.4 437 4.3
Housing, publicworks, transporta-tion, and urbandevelopment
309 3.2 328 3.2
Agriculture, naturalresources, and rural
262 2.7 293 2.8
,levelopment
other 1,037 10.4 929 9.1
TOTAL 12,550° 12,204°
aData from the 1970 National Register of Scientific and Technical
Personnel.bPercent of those with government support (that is, of the 9956
PhD's and 10,188 non-PhD's) who indicate support from a particular
program. These percentages do not add to 100 because of multiple
responses.
Includes multiple responses. Apparently 2594 PhD's and 2016 non-
PhD's indicated more than one source of government support.
Figure 111.1 compares the distribution of support among agen-
cies, based on Table 111.8, with the distribution of support acknow-
ledged in journal articles (described in Section 111.1.2.1). The
distributions are similar, with one exception: the other govern-
ment category for each of the two types of data constitutes a
somewhat smaller percentage than one would expect from the presumed
correspondence wilh several categories of the other. The major
conclusion from the figure is, however, that the fraction of papers
in Tables 111.1---111.6 that did not acknowledge any government
support probably is about the same as the fraction that, indeed,
had no such support.
111.2 Support of Physics Research by Major Government Agencies
That most of the funds for physics research in the United States
come from a small number of government agencies made it possible
for the Data Panel, in collaboration with liaison representatives
130
Data on Funding and Coato 1585
of these agencies, to ob,;:ain a reasonable picture of the magnitudeand distribution of the greaCer part of these funds. By detailedexamination of the records of the agencies, it was possible to ob-tain dollar amounts for the expenditures on research in each of anumber of subfields of physics, using definitions of research andof the boundaries of subfields that would be consistent from agen-cy to agency. This procedure was much more satisfactory for ourpurposes than simply recording the categories into which the agen-cies organized their expenditures, as these categories are oftennot comparable from one agency to another and do not correspond tothe subfield division used by the Physics Survey. This detailedsurvey of the funding of physics research was, however, deficientin a number of respects: Agencies providing only minor support tophysics were not included, and even within the major agencies, theactivities of some subdivisions were omitted; also, subfields suchas physics in biology and earth and planetary physics, in whichphysics penetrates a large neighboring discipline, were coveredonly imperfectly. Nevertheless, the tables we will present show areasonably valid picture of the funding pattern for most of physics.
111.2.1 DETAILED PARTIAL DATA
Table 111.9 gives the data obtained from the government agenciesthat are the chief sources of support for physics research. Thedefinitions of the subfields used were essentially those describedin Section IV.1.1. However, there is no miscellaneous category(which accounts for about 4 percent of the U.S. physics literature*);for the entries of this table, all support for miscellaneous physicswas assigned to the most nearly appropriate one of the remainingsubfield categories, including the interfaces, earth and planetaryphysics and physics in biology, which are not represented by rowsof the table because their funding is inseparable from that of non-physics disciplines.
Table 111.10, similar to Table 111.9, shows the distributionof DOD funding among the three major services.
It is interesting to compare these totals (which of course re-quire some supplementationsee Critique of the Data, Section111.2.2) with DOD's breakdown according to discipline.t Apparently
most of what DOD classifies as general physics is physics researchby our definition; most of what it classifies as nuclear physicsis not; significant amounts of what we classify as physics researchare found in other of the categories, such as chemistry or mater-ials research.
111.2.2 CRITIQUE OF THE DATA
Our first objective is to make some rough estimates of the magnitudeof the expenditures for physics research by agencies or portions of
*Physlcs /n Perspective, Vol. II, Part B, Table XIV.1l .
tPhysics in Perspective, Vol. I, Table 10.A.10.
131
1586 PHYSICS iN PERSPECTIVE
TABLE 111.9 Expenditures by Federal Agencies for Research Ln the
Various Suhflelds of Physics, 1967-1970u
Suh-h
Dollars per Fiscal Year (in millions)
field Agency 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970
A&R DOD° 2.5 2.8 3.4 2.5 3.1 2.3
AEC 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.1 1.3
NASAd
- - - - - -
NSF - 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.1 0.8
Total 3.3 3.7 4.3 3.7 4.3 4.4
AME DOD° 4.4 4.4 4.4 3.7 4.8 4.4
AFC dNASA
4.11.9
4.91.8
5.11.3
5.41.4
5.81.2
6.11.1
NSF 1.6 1.0 2.2 2.1 1.7 1.5
Total 12.0 12.1 13.0 12.6 13.5 13.1
EP DOD° 7.4 7.6 7.3 7.7 2.6 2.3
AECj
NASA,
87.20.1
.97.5
0.1107.8
0.05113.40.05
118.7-
120.6-
NSF 4.4 7.0 9.5 10.5 12.9 12.1
Total 99.1 112.2 124.6 131.7 134.2 135.0
NPL3 DODc
9.6 7.9 6.4 4.6 4.9 4.4
AEC d51.6 61.1 69.7 73.3 77.5 83.8
NASA 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.4 1.4 .1.2
NSF 4.9 12.3 12.2 15.4 16.4 10.0
Total 66.6 81.9 89.1 94.7 100.2 99.4
P&F DODc 3.6 4.0 3.9 4.4 4.2 4.3
AEC'i
NAS"8.55.6
9.25.7
9.75.4
11.05.0
11.53.5
11.82.4
NSFJ - 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.7 1.0
Total 17.7 19.0 19.2 20.7 19.9 19.5
CM DODc,g
16.8 17.5 16.9 16.4 18.6 17.0
AEC 21.9 24.6 26.5 28.3 29.4 29.9
NASAd 2.8 3.8 3.5 4.1 3.3 3.4
NSF 4.0 5.4 5.6 5.8 6.0 6.1
Opt
Totalc
DOD
45.5
3.1
51.3
2.9
52.5
3.3
54.6
3.7
57.3
3.8
56.4
3.5
AEC 1.0 1.3 1.7 1.4 1.7 1.9
NASAd 0.4 0.7 0.9 1,3 1.4 1.3
NSF - - - - -
Acoust
Totalc
DOD
4.5
0.6
4.9
0.8
5.9
0.8
6.4
0.8
6.9
1.8
6.7
1.4
AEC - - - - - -
NASAd 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.03 0.02 0.02
NSF - 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Total 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.8 1.8 1.4
I_ 3 2
Pqta on YUNilAkj (MI C(Mt0 1587
TABLE 111.9 Expenditures hy Federal Agencies for Research in the
Various Subfields of Physics, 1967-1970 (continued)
Sub-.
Dollars per Fiscal Year (in mil:lions)
field Agency 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970
All DOD 48.0 47.9 46.4 43.8 43.8 39.6
sub-f ie Ids
AEC ,
NASA"175.111.4
l99.5
12.8221.412.0
234.013.3
245.710.8
255.49.4
NSF 14.9 25.8 29.7 34.1 37.8 31.5
Total 249.4 286.0 309.5 325.2 338.1 335.9
aThe interfaces, earth and planetary physics and physics in biology,are omitted from this table, because their funding is difficult toseparate from that of the relevant nonphyslcs disciplines.
Suhfleld abbreviations used are the same as those identified inTable iI1.1, footnote h.
`Data from the fiscal supplement 6.1, "Defense Research Sciences"only; see "Critique of the Data" (Section 2.2) for rough estimatesof the expenditures under element 6.2, Exploratory Development.Also, only funding by the three services has been included (seeTable III.10); see Section 111.2.2.
!Data for activities of the Office of Advanced Research and Tech-nology only; see Critique of the Data, Section 111.2.2 for roughestimates of expenditures by the Office of Space Sciences and Ap-plications and other NASA subagencies.
Data gathered separately and in somewhat greater detail than for
the other subfields: See Volume II, Part A, Chapter II, especial-ly Tables 11.9 and 11.10. Both operations and construction of fa-cilities are included; they are listed separately in the tables
cited. The figures refer to basic research only and thus may failto include some work that would.qualify as research under the defi-nition used elsewhere in the table.
fEntries undoubtedly too low: See Section 111.2.2.5.
cSupport from the Advanced Research Projects Agency through inter-disciplinary materials research laboratories is not included onthis line: See Critique of the Data, Section 111.2.2 and Table
111.11.
agencies not included in the preceding tables. One of the most
useful sources of information for this purpose is the acknowledg-ment of research support in journal articles, the general pattern
of which has already been discussed. We have supplemented thisgeneral study with some special samples of papers acknowledgingDOD or NASA support.
133
1.588 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
TABLE IIT.I0 Expenditures by the Three Services of the Department
of Defense'4 for Research In the Various Subflelds of Physics,
1964--1970, with Estimates for 1971'
Subfleld ServiceholincrLper1964
Fiseal Year Cin1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971
Army 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.01 0 0 0 (0)
Navy 1.1 1.1 1.5 2.0 1.2 1.6 1.2 (0.5)
Alr Force 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.5 1.1 (0)
AME Army 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.6 (0.5)
Navy 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.5 (0.6)
Alr Force 3.3 3.3 3.4 3.3 2.7 3.8 3.3 (3.7)
EF Army 0.02 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.07 0 0 (0)
Navy 6.3 6.3 6.2 6.1 6.5 1.3 1.4 (1.6)
Air Force 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.3 0.8 (0.3)
1IP Army 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.3 (0.4)
Navy 6.6 6.8 6.8 7.4 6.1 4.0 3.9 (3.3)
Air Force 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 (0)
PO' Army 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.3 (0.4)
Navy 0,8 0.8 0.9 0.9 2.0 1.7 1.7 (3.1)
Air Force 2.2 2.3 2.6 2.5 2.2 2.2 2.3 (1.9)
CM Army 3.7 3.7 3.9 3.9 3.2 3.9 3.7 (3.8)
Navy 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.9 2.7 4.4 3.4 (3.7)
Air Force 11.0 11.4 11.9 11.0 10.5 10.4 10.0 (9.2)
Opt Army 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.5 (0.6)
Navy 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.9 1.3 1.5 1.5 (1.5)
Air Force 1.9 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.9 1.6 1.5 (1.2)
Acoust Army 0 0 0.02 0.02 0 0 0.05 (0.02)
Navy 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.8 1.3 (0.3)
Air Force 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (0)
'11(ata from the fiscal supplement 6.1, "Defense Research Sciences" only; see Critiqueof the Data, Section 111.2.2 for rough estimates of the expenditures under element
6.2 "Exploratory Development." Also, only funding by the three services has been
included (see Table 111.10); see Section 111.2.2.
hAs in Table 111.9, the interfaces, earth and planetary physics and physics in biology,
are omitted.
°Subfield abbreviations used are the same as those identified in Table 111.1, foot-
note 1.
.1Totals in this row do not quite agree with Table 111.9, for the data were compileddifferently and, in particular, may reflect different assignments of long-term ex-
penditures to years.
131
1)(.0;(2 o Pui !Ina an Coe to 1589
111.2.2.1 Miacalancous Defenae Agencl,ca in OOP
In regard to support for physics research, the most important ofthe DOD agencies other than the three services has been the Ad-vanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA). During the 1960's, ARPAprovided large-scale support for the creation and operation ofinterdisciplinary materials research laboratories at some dozenuniversities. The sums disbursed by ARPA for this purpose areshown in the top line of Table 111.11.
TABLE 111.11 Support of Interdisciplinary Materials ResearchLaboratories by the Advanced Research Projects Agency
Support (in millions of dollars) per Fiscal YearActivity 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971
Interdisciplinarymaterials researchlaborapriesa
16.2 17.5 17.7 16.7 1.4 9.6 5.9 4.0
Physics 10.2 11.0 11.2 10.5 0.9 6.0 3.7 2.9
aSupport provided by the Advanced Research Projects Agency of the
Department of Defense.
Rough estimates of approximate amount allocable to physics (0.63xthe support received by interdisciplinary materials research labora-tories from the Advanced Research Projects Agency).
A sizable part of this support went for buildings and centralfacilities usable by workers in several disciplines, so it is lesseasy to estimate the amount allocable to physics than it is for in-dividual-grant support. A sampling of records of 5 of the 12 lab-oratories showed a fraction 0.30 of the participating faculty mem-bers to be in physics or applied physics departments. However,much physics work in the laboratories is done by faculty of otherdepartments (especially electrical engineering and metallurgy ormaterials science). A better indication of the distribution ofeffort among disciplines is provided by counts of publications.We have examined over 600 papers from four of the laboratories andfind that about 63 percent of them can be classified as physics,largely condensed matter but with a sizable component also in atom-ic, molecular, and electron physics. Of the laboratories not sur-veyed in this count, some are known to have slightly more emphasison physics than those surveyed, some slightly less. It seems rea-sonable to make a rough estimate of ARPA support of physics re-search in the interdisciplinary laboratories by multiplying thetop row of Table 111.11 by the factor 0.63; the results are shownin the bottom row. This augmentation of the amount spent for con-densed-matter and atomic, molecular, and electron physics by thethree services (Table 111.9) is considerable; it was relatively
135
1590 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTTVE
largest in the years prior to 1967, when the laboratories were inthe growing phase.
The ARPA has also spent smaller sums in other types of supportof physics research, as have several other defense agencies in ad-
dition to the three services. To obtain information on the dis-tribution of DOD support within its subagencies, we sampled allpapers in a one-month period in all primary Journals published by
the AIP. In this sample there were 129 papers from U.S. institu-tions acknowledging DOD support. The distribution of these amongperforming institutions and supporting subagencies appears in
Table III.12. When allowance is made for the exclusions in thepresent sample and for the less complete range of journals covered,
the distribution over institutions is reasonably consistent with
that in Table 111.4 and the distribution of papers among the three
services is reasonably similar to the distribution of funds dis-
played in Table 111.10. Thus it is logical to assume that, exceptfor the broad'institutional grants not reflected in the table and
the ARPA support of materials laboratories, DOD support of physics
research through other defense agencies has been slightly less than
one tenth of that provided by the three services listed in Table
III.10.
1I1.2.2.2 Physics Research Support under DOD's Fiscal Category 6.2
Category 6.2, Exploratory Development, involves expenditures twoto three times larger than category 6.1, Defense Research Sciences.If even a small fraction of 6.2 is physics research by our defini-tion, it may significantly augment the total from category 6.1,which we have presented in Tables 111.9 and 111.10. With the co-operation of the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, we wereable to trace the fiscal categories under which the 70 papers ofour sample reporting Air Force support were funded. (The figure)70, is greater than the Air Force total in Table 111.12 because ofa number of cases in which multiple support was acknowledged.) The
distribution of these 70 papers is shown in Table 111.13.If these figures can be regarded as typical, it would be reason-
able to augment the DOD totals in Tables 111.9 and 111.10 by about20 percent to allow for the support jf physics research, as we havedefined it, through funds in category 6.2. The total augmentationfrom this source and that discussed in the previous paragraph wouldbe about 25 percent to 30 percent.
111.2.2.3 Other NASA Support for Physics
The picture of NASA's support for physics research can vary enorm-ously depending on where the boundaries of physics are placed.Satellite-based lunar and space physics research, although withinthe scope of the Physics Survey Committee, is often difficult toseparate from astronomical and earth-science research, and some-times even from nonresearch activities conducted simultaneously;in any event, it is exceedingly expensive. As these extraterres-
136
Data on FUnding and Costs 1591
TABLE 111.12 Distribution among Performing Institutions andSources of Support of a Sample of U.S. Papers AcknowledgingSupport from the Department of Def.msea
Performing Institutions andSources of Support
PapersNumber Percent (N = 129)
Performing Institution
University 99 77
Industry 21 16
Government (non-DOD) laboratory 1 1
Other (including federally fundedresearch nod development centers)
8 6
Source of Support within DOD
ArmyARO Durham 17.5 14
Other 7.5 6
Navy
ONRc
24 19
Other 4 3
Air Force
AFOSRd 48 37
Other 19.5 15
Other defense agencies 8.5 7
aWhen more than one DOD subagency was acknowledged, or when twocollaborating performers each acknowledged DOD support, fractionalweights were assigned. Work at DOD-operated laboratories or otheragencies receiving DOD funds is included, as is that of all feder-ally funded research and development centers. Support from theAdvanced Research Projects Agency is included only when specific-ally related to the research report (not merely support of inter-disciplinary materials research laboratories).
Army Office of Research at Durham, North Carolina.cOffice of Naval Research.
dAir Force Office of Scientific Research.
137
1592 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
TABLE 111.13 Categories under Which Support Was Granted for WorkReported in 70 Physics Research Papers Acknowledging Funds fromthe Air Force
DOD Category Number of Papers
Defense research sciences (6.1) 58
General physics, nuclearphysics, and astronomy and astrophysicsOther categories (chemistry, electronics,etc.)
Exploratory development (6.2) 12
34
024
trial programs have been discussed at length elsewhere,*,t we shalltry merely to develop a rough picture of the extent of NASA fund-ing of laboratory, theoretical, and terrestrial field work. We
shall not discuss the last of these in any detail; it will sufficeto remark that in a sampling of papers appearing in journals in theearth sciences the content of which is largely physics, we foundthe sources of support acknowledged to be distributed among a widevariety of agencies, with DOD and NSF each acknowledged consider-ably more often than NASA; for extraterrestrial research the pro-portions were reversed.
Of greater concern is the distribution of support for the coresubfields of physics among the different branches of NASA. Thisagency's report on its university program* providea a helpful guide,since, according to Table 111.6, of 59.3 NASA-supported papers insubfields other than astrophysics and relativity and earth andplanetary physics, 34.5, or 58 percent, were from universities. Aperusal of this document shows that about 94 of the 172 items clas-sified by NASA as physics were operating under a current grant orcontract in September 1969. However, only about 79 of these were
in the core subfields of physics. Some approximate figures for theannual rate of funding reported there appear in Table 111.14. Here,
the category "Other NASA" represents for the most part fundingthrough the various NASA in-house laboratories; the funds in generalcame from the Office of Advanced Research and Technology or the Of-fice of Space Science Applications but in proportions that are notrevealed in the data. The figures of Table 111.14 need to be sup-plemented by estimates of physics work appearing in the listingsunder other classifications than physics. A sampling of the list-ings has convinced us that the amount of such university work in
*NASA's University PPogram (Office of University Affairs, NASA,
1970). Mispagination made our survey incomplete, hence our use of
the words "about" and "approximate" in the text.
tPhysics in Perspective, Vol. II, Pare B, Chapter IX.
138
Data on ainding and Costs 1593
the physics subfields covered by Table 111.14 was rather less thanthe amount given in the Table, though quite possibly over half asgreat. Thus, the total FY 1970 NASA support for university work inthese subfields was doubtless in the range of $3 million to $4 mil-lion, and probably closer tc the lower figure.
TABLE 111.14 Approximate Distribution among Subfields of Supportfrom the National Aeronautics and Space Administration in 1969(FY 1970) for Physics Research a in Universities
PhysicsSubfield
NASA Fundine (FY 1970) (in millions af dollar-a)b
OART OSSA': Other NASA
Atomic, molecular,and electron
0.27 0.19 0.19
Plasmas and fluids 0.43 0.10 0.34Condensed-matte 0.07 0.13 0.18Other subfields 0.15 0 0.05
TOTAL 0.92 0.32 0.76
aResearch classified by NASA as physics.
bOffice of Advanced Research and Technology.cOffice of Space Science Applications.
dliot including earth and planetary physics, astrophysics andrelativity, and physics in biology.
A tempting procedure for estimating the amount of NASA supportthrough divisions other than the Office of Advanced Research andTechnology (essentially the Office of Space Science Applications)for the core subfields represented in Table 111.14 is the follow-ing: Combine the estimate just given for total NASA support ofwork in these subfields in universities with the assumption thatthe ratio of support for nonuniversity work (for example, in in-dustry or in-house laboratories) to that for university work isthe same as the ratio of numbers of publications as given inTable 111.6. Unfortunately, this assumption does not always seemto be a reasonable ond: Well over half of the NASA-supported pa-pers in this table are from universities, yet even our highestestimate for the dollar amount of support of such work is lessthan half of the amount recorded in Table 111.9 for support by theOffice of Advanced Research and Technology alone. Exanination ofparticular subfields reveals that this discrepancy is not presentfor atomic, molecular, and electron physics but is pronounced forplasmas and fluids and condensed-matter, as well as for the sumof the remaining core subfields. In general, we can wTite, usingan obvious notation for different camponents.of expenditure F,
139
1594 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
+ FNASA OART Other
= Fu + Fnon-U
= F (1 + 25 (1)
34.5 r)where the first line represents the division between sources offunding within NASA, the second line the division between perform-ers receiving the funds, and, in the third line, the ratio 25/34.5
is the ratio of papers sampled from nonuniversity to university per-formers in Table 111.6, and r is the ratio of cost to NASA per non-university paper supported to cost per university paper supported.(As in Table 111.14, we are excluding the important interfaces,earth and planetary physics, astrophysics and relativity, and phys-
ics in biology.) Even with what would seem to be the quite extremeassumptions Fu = $4 million, r = 3, Equation (1) still gives for
only a minor fraction of FOART.F
OtherSince NASA does not contribute much of the support for the most
expensive types of research in elementary-particle, nuclear, andplasma physics (although it does support some research on plasmas),it is not unreasonable to make a rough estimate of the total amountof NASA support for research in the core subfields from the countsof papers in Table 111.1. Such an estimate gives, for example, aNASA activity equal to about 39 percent of that of the NSF. This
estimate again would be consistent with augmenting the NASA figure
given in Table 111.9 by no more than about one third. Thus we be-
lieve that a minor augmentation of this order is the appropriate
one for the core subfields. The large expenditures that NASA cer-
tainly makes in physics-related fields are undoubtedly concentratedin the astronomical and earth and planetary subfields.
Before concluding this section we should comment on the unusual-ly wide range of numbers that one can obtain for NASA support ofresearch by consulting different sources. For example, the figures
reported in the NSF's Federal Funds for Research, Development, and
Other Scientific Activities show some $90 million for basic researchin elementary-particle physics, whereas one almost never encountersan elementary-particle physics paper with an acknowledgment to NASA.
Apparently a different definition is being used. The same NSF pub-
lication reports nearly $60 million of NASA funds for basic research
in universities, and a comparable figure for applied research anddevelopment in universities, whereas the grants and contracts listed
in NASA's University Program as active in any given year add to a
much smaller figure. Clearly, definitions of what is included are
critical in interpreting dollar figures. We believe that the fig-
ures we have developed here, although only approximate, are rea-
sonably correct for NASA's support of publishable physics researchin the core subfields.
nther Federal Agencies
According to Table 111.1, the number of physics papers citing sup-port frt.= federal agencies other than DOD, AEC, NASA, and NSF is
Data on FUnding and Costs 1595
a fraction about 0.067 of the number citing support from these a-gencies; if we restrict ourselves to the core subfields (excludingastrophysics and relativity, physics in biology, and earth and plan-etary physics) the fraction is 0.077. Undoubtedly, the agency re-sponsible for most of this other government support is the NationalBureau of Standards; however, occasional support from the Depart-ment of Health, Education and Welfare (especially in physics inbiology) and from other agencies is encountered. Table 111.15 showsthe distribution of support by the National Bureau of Standards inFY 1970. Figures for the Office of Standard Reference Data areseparated.from the others; although for the most part this work isnot the generation of entirely new knowledge, it represents a con-solidation of knowledge that is vital for the progress of researcheffort and provides an example that other research-supporting a-gencies would do well to emulate.
TABLE 111.15 Amounts Expended by the National Bureau of Standardsfor the Support of Physics Research and Consolidation of FesearchResults, FY 1970
PhysicsSubfield Research Units
aOSRD Total
Astrophysics andrelativity
0 0 0
Atomic, molecular,and electron
2.53 0.55 3.08
Elementary-particle 0.43 0.02 0.45
Nuclear 1.42 0.04 1.46
Plasmas and fluids 1.08 0 1.08
Condensed-matter 2.80 0.40 3.20
Earth and planetary 0.30 0 0.30
Physics in biology 0.05 0 0.05
Optics 0.74 0 0.74
Acoustics 0.33 0 0.33
Miscellaneous physics 0.72 0.15 0.87
TOTAL 10.39 1.16 11.55
aOffice of Standard Reference Data.
111.2.2.5 Consistency of the Funding Picture
It has become clear in the course of this discussion that.one canget wildly different numbers for the funding of research in anysubfield of physics, depending on the definitions one uses of re-search and of the scope of the various subfields. Our philosophyhas been to identify funding levels for research, be it basic orapplied, defined as the production of new knowledge that becomespart of the generally accessible.public record and to delimit
141
1596 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
physics from other disciplines and the subfields from one anotherby judgments that will be consistent with the pattern of citationsin the research literature (see Section IV.1.1). Thus one shouldbe able to compare the funding figures that we have developed withthe acknowledgments of research support found in a random sampleof papers in the literature, as given in Table 111.1. One doesnot expect proportionality of dollars with acknowledgments: Somesubfields are much more expensive than others; some agencies con-centrate on the support of expensive subfields or the support ofexpensive facilities in these subfields; with some subfields oragencies, support may tend to be more nearly total than in others.But one would.like to feel that any differences in the patterns ofdollar support and acknowledgments are reasonable, with allowancefor known effects of these kinds.
Figure 111.2 shows this comparison. In regard to the distribu-tion among agencies, shown at the top of the figure, the compari-son is quite reasonable: The vastly larger relative dollar expen-ditures by the AEC are understandable in view of the great expenseof the large machines used in elementary-particle and nuclear phys-ics and to some extent also in plasma physics; these are supportedalmost entirely by AEC. The same factors account for the anomaliesin the distribution over subfields, shown at the bottom of the fig-ure.
A detailed breakdown by both agency and subfield is hardly worthmaking, as the entries in Table 111.1 suffer from small-number sta-tistics. However, examination of the entries does reveal at leastone shortcoming in the funding figures of Table 111.9: The figuresfor funding of research in plasma physics and the physics of fluidsby the NSF are undoubtedly too small. Apparently a considerableamount of work supported as engineering, mathematics, or some othernonphysics discipline actually appears in the physics literatureas physics.
111.3 Industrial Support of Physics Research
The fairly large contribution of industrial organizations to thesupport of physics research in the United States, although almostentirely localized in their laboratories, is not easy to isolate,because the same organizational units often perform not only re-search but development and other activities. Therefore, we decidedto investigate this support by requesting relatively detailed in-formation from a small but representative group of industrial lab-oratories. As a by-product, useful data relevant to other portionsof this report were obtained; these will also be presented andcross-referenced from the appropriate other sections.
111.3.1. RATIONALE OF THE SAMPLING APPROACH
Because we are interested in the support of research, defined asthe production of published new knowledge, we undertook first tofind out how the volume of publication in physics journals is dis-tributed among U.S. industrial laboratories. By counting publica-
142
Data on Funding and Costs 1597
tions in physics journals listed in the Corporate Index section otthe 1969 Science Citation Index, we identified about 40 labora-tories with high publication rates in physics. The leading 25 ofthese are listed in Table 9.3 of Volume I of Physics in Perspec-tive. The extent to which U.S. industrial research is concentratedin these leading companies can be ascertained by comparing the to-tal of their publications with the total published from all U.S.industrial sources. One can do this crudely by comparing the total
AEC
Ararat 000
I:. : ! . ,,,t . : . , ,r'M'I"'-:, . , : .r.
3- NASA
SF77771
I
50 100 150 200DOLLARS (PA)
250 300 350
A and R
4:7224.4. AME
f Mnri 16 3 I Vn9 'nn fa Fa 07n% /ZeZad roe KOZli Wn rff a I re
n' /an. Me rn,7/Z. fannZ.
ninZ P and F
gOP
ACOUS
,C PA
NP
EP
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140DOLLARS (A)
FIGURE 111.2 Comparison of estimated dollar distribution of federalfunding with counts of physics papers acknowledging federal support.Shaded bars are totals for FY 1969 from Table 111.9, terminated insome cases by regions of opposite shading to take account of aug-mentation estimates in Section 111.2.2. Open bars (arbitrary scale)are proportional to number of acknowledgments in Table 111.1. Top:distribution over major agencies, work in all subfields exclusiveof earth and planetary physics and physics in biology. Bottom: dis-tribution over subfields for work funded by the four major agencies.Note differing scales of dollars.
143
1598 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
of 2179 papers from the 25 companies in Table 9.3 with the total
estimated physics papers from all U.S. industrial organizations,
2900, given in Table XIV.11 of Volume II, Part B of Physics in
Perspective. The ratio of these two numbers is 0.75; however, one
might doubt the validity of this comparison, since one group of
papers represented publications in any kind of journals deemed to
be physics journals and the other represented research articles in
physics appearing in any publication covered by Physics Abstracts.
However, the ratio is remarkably close to that obtained in an inde-
pendent sampling of articles in some 16 journals in which 216 ar-
ticles from these 25 companies were found compared with a total of
293 from all industrial organizations. The ratio of these two num-
bers is 0.74. Thus it is fairly safe to conclude that a sample
drawn properly from these 25 organizations and others of only
slightly lower productivity should be adequate to characterize
physics research in U.S. industry as a whole.
A representative gample from industry should have two character-
istics: It should contain proper representation from both large
and small laboratories, and it should take into account the dif-
ferent research patterns typifying different types of industries
(electronic, aerospace, chemical, and the like). We sought detailed
information from 21 companies, fairly evenly distributed among six
types of industry shown in the tables that follow. Confidentiality
of replies was promised, and usable data were received from 18 of
the 21.To make it as convenient as possible for our respondents to
2,ive answers that would have a relatively clearly defined meaning,
we requested data from only a single organizational subunit of
each company, generally the one with the greatest research activ-
ity in physics. For each subunit we requested the following infor-
mation:
1. Staff: total professional staff; number working as physi-
cists; physics and nonphysics doctorates; theoretical physicists.
2. Costs: total cost for all work done by the research unit;
relative cost per professional for physics and nonphysics work;
fraction of costs paid by company, government, and other sources.
3. Publications: fractions of work appearing in publications,
patents, under security classification, or for internal use only;
number of published papers in all fields; number published in AIP
journals.4. Time trends: changes since two, five, and ten years ago in
physics manpower, cost per professional per year; expected changes
in manpower in the next two or five years.
Our respondents were asked to select the administrative subunit
on which to report in such a way that its characteristics would
typify the greater part of the physics research done by the com-
pany.
LII.3.2 RAW DATA
Table 111.16 shows the staff composition of the organizational
units sampled. The reader must be cautioned against drawing infer-
144
TABLE 111.16
Manpower Data from 18 Industrial Research Organizations (1970)
Types of Industry
Communica-
Optical
tfon and
or Other
Aircraft
Total
Types of Data
Electronic
Other
Instru-
and
Chem.and
Misc.
Units
Supplied
Data Proc.
Electronic
mentation
Space
Metallurg.
Mfg.
Sampled
No. of companies
44
23
32
18
sampled
Total tech. staff
882
928
50
358
597
578
3375
professionals in
units sampled
Doctorates on
627
462
21
192
364
260
1926
tech. prof. staff
Fraction
0.71
0.47
0.42
0.54
0.63
0.45
0.57
Range
0.67-0.97
0.40-0.94
0.36-0.48
0.45-0.76
0.48-0.77
0.37-0.54
Physicists in
302
255
30
275
65
126
1053
units sampled
Fraction
0.34
0.28
0.60
0.77
0.11
0.22
0.31
Range
0.20-0.90
0.17-0.81
0.60-0.60
0.56-1.0
0.06-0.13
0.20-0.23
PhD physicists
272
194
16
150
47
76
755
Fraction
0.90
0.76
0.53
0.55
0.72
0.60
0.72
Range
0.70-0.90
0.63-1.0
0.47-0.60
0.46-0.76
0.46-0.87
0.51-0.71
Theoret. physicists
52
19
055
78
141
Fractional growth
total phys. staff
Since 1960
0.3010.02
0.2310.70
--
0.4010.85
0.5510.20
-Since 1965
-0.08+0.04
-0.15+0.10
0.4010.10
010.30
0+0.10
0.2010.05
-0.02
Since 1966
-0.0110.07
-0.1410.05 -0.0510.15 -0.2510.05 -0.05+0.07
-0.02±0.07
-0.11
Est. by 1975
0.0210.05
-0.0910.11
0.1510.15
0.0510.05
0.1010.05
0.0510.05
0.014
qAverages weighting each organization's percentage by the size of staff involved. Numbers following ±
are standard deviations for the group.
1600 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
ences about the total research staffs of the various types of in-
dustries from the data shown. Each company supplied data only fora certain organizational subunit, so chosen that its work in phys-ics could be considered typical of that of the company as a wholebut by no means necessarily having the same proportion of physi-cists and nonphysicists as would obtain for those engaged in re-search throughout the company. Caution also is necessary in regardto other characteristics of the sample. For example, that the ra-tio of physicists to total staff is smaller for the chemical andmetallurgical and miscellaneous manufacturing categories than forthe others may well result from the obviously lesser physics ori-entation of the research programs of these types of companies. Be-cause of this lessev orientation toward physics, they are lesslikely to have an organizational subunit with a high proportion ofphysicists.
The proportion of theoretical physicists is highest in the com-munication and electronic data-processing, aircraft and space,and chemical and metallurgical industries and is low elsewhere.This circumstance undoubtedly affects the relative cost of physicsresearch.
The final rows of the table show a fairly consistent picture ofgrowth during the early 1960's, retrenchment at the end of the1960's and anticipated modest growth in the 1970's. As might beexpected, there are substantial fluctuations from company to com-pany within each group. Not surprisingly, the most violent fluctu-ation has occurred in the aircraft and space companies.
Table 111.17 gives a similar presentation of data on the cost
TABLE 111.17 Funding Data from 18 Industrial Research Organiza-tions (1970)
Types of DataSupplied
Type of IndustryCommunica-tion and OtherElectronic Elec-Data Proc. tronic
Opticaland OtherInstru-mentation
Air-craftandSpace
Chem.andMetal -
lurk.Misc.Mfg.
Cost of work ($K)per professionalper year
65 67 65 51 49 62
Range 51-80 53-94 60-70 35-75 50-70 45-76
Approx. physicistcost/mean cost
1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 0.93 0.90
Average fractionalincrease in cost/professionalSince 1960 0.60 0.56 - 0.45 0.50 0.55
Since 1965 0.18 0.23 0.30 0.27 0.35 0.23
Since 1968 0.13 0.08 0.10 0.15 0.30 -
Average fractionof costs sup-ported byOwn companyGovernment
0.980.02
0.850.15
0.440.56
0.280.72
1.000
1.000
146
Data on Atnding and Costs 1601
of research and other work performed by the units sampled. Althoughthere is again some fluctuation from organization to organizationwithin each group, the average cost of work per professional staffmember is remarkably constant among groups. Also, the cost perstaff member for work in physics is always considered as close tothe average of all work done by the organizations. The middle linesof the table indicate a fairly steady increase in the cost of re-search during the past decade, at a rate of about 4.5 percent peryear.
The last two rows of the table are significant, for any estimateof the contribution from private enterprise to the support of phys-ics research must take into account that an appreciable fractionof the wori done in industrial laboratories is supported not by thecompanies concerned but by the government. This proportion is par-ticularly high in the instrumentation and aircraft and space cate-gories. However, some companies in other categories operate come-pletely federally funded research and development centers; theseare excluded from both our present sampling and the analysis thatfollows.
Table 111.18 presents statistics on research publications by theunits sampled. The ratio of papers appearing in AIP journals to thetotal is a rough, though by no means infallible, measure of the de-gree of emphasis on physics in these organizations. The ratios cor-relate generally with the fraction of staff who are physicists,shown in Table 111.16. The chemical and metallurgical and miscel-laneous manufacturing categories have the lowest figures. The mis-cellaneous category also has a rather low fraction of its physicsresearch appearing in published form; however, this finding may bean artifact of the choice of organizational subunits. The amount ofwork eventuating in patents seems to be particularly high in theoptical and instrumentation category, and the chemical and metal-lurgical laboratories have a substantial number of doctoral-levelstaff members who publish little.
111.3.3 ANALYSIS AND INFERENCES REGARDING INDUSTRIAL FUNDING
Our procedure for estimating the amount of support contributed byU.S. industry to research in physics will be, in essence, to findthe expenditure for such research by the organizational units ofthe sample and to multiply this by the ratio of the total amountof U.S. industrial physics research to that performed by the or-ganizations sampled. We shall try to do this in as thorough a man-ner as possible, taking account of possible differences in the re-search patterns of different types of companies. We should pointout, however, that our sample is not only fairly representative ofthe distribution of physics research over different types of com-panies but even constitutes a large fraction of the total popula-tion we wish to consider, in that the organizations sampled contri-bute nearly one third of all the physics publications from U.S.industrial laboratories, and the total output from the companiesin which these suborganizations reside is about two-thirds of thenational total. Consequently, our extrapolation will not have to
be by a large factor.
147
TABLE 111.18
Publications by Industrial Research Organizations in a One-Year Period (1969-1970)
Type of Industry
Communica-
tion and
Types of Data
Electronic
Other
Supplied
Data Proc.
Electronic
Optical
or Other
Instru-
mentation
Aircraft
and
Space
Chem. and
Metallurg.
Misc. Mfg.
Total
Units
Sampled
No. of companies
4
sampled
42
33
218
Total papers pub-
705
lished by units
sampled
425
37
195
157
240
1759
os o to
No. of papers in
288
AIP journals
Average fraction
of physics work :
161
19
71
22
53
614
Published
0.89±0.05
0.72±0.13
0.70±0.10
0.80
0.68±0.28
0.42±0.30
=0.75
Appearing as.
0.09±0.06
patents
0.23±0.05
0.13±0.08
0.04±0.03
0.02±0.02
0.08
-
For internal
0.02±0.05
or classified
use only
0.05±0.05
0.17±0.02
0.16±0.02
0.30±0.30
0.50±0.35
-
Publications per
1.00±0.65
0.87±0.30
2.00±1.20
1.15±0.10
0.41±0.10
0.92±0.08
0.91
PhD staff membera
aAverages weighting each organization proportionally to its size. Numbers after ± arestandard deviations
for each group.
Pata on Funding and Costs 1603
An essential ingredient of the extrapolation to national totals
is a knowledge of the ratio of physics research publication by the
units sampled to that from all U.S. industrial organizations. We
shall assume that this ratio is given by the ratio of numbers of
research papers in AIP journals. The entries in the third column
of Table 111.18 give the number of such papers for each categoryof the organizations sampled. Respondents were instructed to in-
clude only research papers and letters, not abstracts. For compar-ison, we have sampled all AIP -esearch journals, the more important
ones for a two-month period, others for a one-month period, and
base recorded the number of articles of which the first-named authorwas attached to an industrial research organization. The resultingfigures extrapolate to a yearly total of about 1470 papers. Thisfigure should have a sampling probable error of the order of 5 per-
cent.The figures in Table 111.18 require a slight correction before
they can be compared with the one just derived. In the estimatedyearly total, 1470, each paper is counted but once; each was as-signed to the institution of the first-named author, or, equiva-lently, each sponsoring institution was assigned a fractionalweight when there was ,ollaboration between institutions. Thefigures in Table 111.18 undoubtedly have no such fractional weight-ing for collaborative efforts. A rough sampling of papers suggeststhat the correction for this effect should amount to about 10 per-cent. Accordingly, we estimate that the fraction of the U.S. indus-
trial research effort in physics accounted for by our sample is
approximately
614Fraction = - 0.38.
1.1 X 1470(2)
To estimate the distribution of physics publishing activityamong the types of industrial organizations, we again made use of
the sample of AIP journals mentioned previously, developing ageneral classification of each performing institution into one of
the six categories used in the preceding tables or, occasionally,
relegating it to an unclassified or unknown category. The resultsappear in the first column of Table 111.19. If, for want of betterinformation, we assume that the few companies in the other or un-
known category resemble the weighted average of the others in such
respects as fraction of physics work supported by government and
fraction published, we can infer a set of weights with which the
six categories we sampled should be combined to give a reasonable
national average. These weights are shown in the second column of
Table 111.19; merely for comparison, we show in the penultimate
column, in parentheses, the distribution of papers in AIP journals
from the units in our sample, that is, the ratios of the third
line of Table 111.18 to the total in the final column. The general
resemblance of these to the numbers in the column showing weight
factors justifies the statement that our sample is fairly repre-
sentative of the distribution of physics research among different
types of companies.
149
1604 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
TABLE 111.19 Contributions of Different Types of Industries toPhysics Publication and Support of Published Research
Type ofIndustry
Papers inan AIPJournalSample
WeightFactorAdopted
$Million Lontri-bution to Fund-
Fraction of ing from Re-AIP Papers in sources of Sam-Sampled Or- pled Organize-ganizations tions [Eq. (2)]
Communication andelectronic dataprocessing
104 0.37 (0.47) 16.3
Other electronic 59 0.22 (0.26) 10.9Optical or otherinstrumentation
26 0.10 (0.03) 0.6
Aircraft andspace
39 0.14 (0.12) 3.2
Chemical and met-allurgical
33 0.12 (0.04) 2.0
Misc. manufactur-ing
10 0.05 (0.09) 3.0
Other or unknown 22 -
TOTAL 293 1.00 (1.00) 36.0
We shall try to estimate the support of physics research fromcompany funds by first estimating the amount of such support foreach category of units in our sample and then combining these withsuitable weights. For a crude first approximation, one could ig-nore the differences between different types of industries andtake the expenditure for our whole sample allocable to publishedresearch and divide it by the ratio (2). But to get the first ofthese quantities we must make allowance for all works not beingdestined for publication and for support of some work from govern-ment funds. Thus for any organization or group of organizations wehave
Ecompany expenditure allocable=
to published physics research
= cph
N phf'F'ub Fown, (3)
where c h is the cost of work per physicist staff member, that isto say, the product of the two top rows of Table 111.17, Nph isthe number of physicists , fpub is the fraction of physics work pub-lished, and Sown is the fraction of work supported from companyfunds. In writing this equation we assume that the last fractionis about the same for physics as for other kinds of work of theorganizational units sampled. With an average of about $60,000 foroph. 0.75 for fpub, and 0.85 for Sown, we get about $40 millionfnr the quantity -(3) for our entire sample. Dividing by the 0.38
1"!
Data on Raiding and Costs 1605
of Eq. (2) gives a roughly estimated national expenditure of$105 million annually of industrial funds for publishable physicsresearch.
A more refined calculation would evaluate Eq. (2) separatelyfor each category I of organizations in our sample and combinethese according to the formula
national expenditure of industrial fundsEUS allocable to published physics research
EI
= 1.1 P (AIP).US PI
(AM (4)
where wr is the weight factor given in Table 111.19, P.T(AIP) isthe number of AIP papers from category I (third row of Table111.18), PUS(AIP) = 1470 is the estimate given for the number ofpapers published annually in AIP journals from U.S. industrialorganizations, and the factor 1.1 is the multiple authorship cor-rection we have already used in deriving Eq. (2). The result isclose to the rough estimate of the preceding paragraph:
EUS
= $98 million (5)
for the one-year period, mid-1969 to mid-1970. The Ey values usedin this calculation are given in the last column of Table 111.19.
111.3.4 CRITICAL COMMENTARY
There are several possibilities for systematic errors in thisestimate, though we hope that none are catastrophically large.We have mentioned the assumption that the fraction Fowm given inTable 111.16 is applicable to the physics portion of the work.Another question concerns the assumption that the costs of physicswork can be estimated from the top rows of Table 111.17 and thefraction of the staff who are identified as working as physicists.As we shall see in Section IV.1.3, many papers whose content isclearly physics are produced by persons who identify primarilywith some other discipline. There is a compensating effect inthat some of the work published by physicists may pertain to anonphysics discipline; moreover, that our questionnaire referredto people working as physicists helps to reduce the overlap ef-fect. The alternative assumption that the funds expended by theorganizational units sampled were distributed between physics andnonphysics in proportion to the amounts of physics and nonphysicspublication undoubtedly greatly overestimates the expenditure onphysics. If one assumes the ratio of AIP publications to totalpublications in physics as about 0.6, this approach would lead toan expenditure on physics about half again as great as that which
we have derived. In view of the higher rate of publication in
physics than in the more applied disciplines, this discrepancy isby no means unreasonable. Thus we believe that the value given in
151
1606 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
Eq. (5), although it may be a slight underestimate, is probably a
fairly realistic figure.The fraction of physics costs supported from government sources
is appreciable: The weighted average of the entries in Table
111.17 is about 0.15. It is interesting to compare this ratio with
the ratio of papers from industrial performers acknowledging gov-
ernment support to those acknowledging no such support. The latter
ratio can be obtained from Tables 111.1, 111.4, 111.5, and 111.6
and is about 0.19. This amount may be a slight underestimate, for
it refers only to the three leading government agencies (that is,
leading in the support of physics research). The difference be-
tween the two figures is not unreasonable, for government support
often is only partial, and the more expensive projects are more
likely to be undertaken with such support.Support of work in industrial laboratories from sources other
than the company or the federal government seems to be negligible.
We must reiterate that the organizations surveyed were selected
to be representative of the greater portion of physics research in
industry leading to publication; they were undoubtedly not typical
of the total employment of physicists in industry. As an example
of a difference, 72 percent of the physicists in the survey have
a PhD degree, but only 39 percent of the physicists employed by
industry have a PhD, according to the National Register. Again,
the growth of physics staff from 1960-1968 and its recession from
1968.-1971, shown for our sample by the entries in the lower rows
of Table 111.16, differ slightly from the statistics on the na-
tionwide employment of physicists in industry obtained from the
National Register*: The PhD's employed in industry, whose number
might be expected to correlate with the total staffs of the re-
search-oriented organizations, appear to have increased monotoni-
cally, according to the National Register, and more rapidly in the
last decade than the figures in Table 111.16 indicate.
Wa have searched for correlations between the answers to vari-
ous questions by the respondents in our sample. A number of cor-
relations emerge in a least-squares analysis at better than a 95
percent significance level, although their relationship to cause
and effect is not always clear:
1. The cost per professional increases appreciably with in-
creasing fraction of the professionals who are PhP's and decreases
slightly with increasing size of the organization.
2. The ratio of cost per professional for physics to that
for other work is less the higher the fraction of physicists who
are theorists; an experimental physicist seems to cost slightly
more than an average professional, a theoretical physicist only
about 70 percent as much.3. Physicists seem to be more heavily supported by the govern-
ment than other professionals and non-PhD physicists much more so.
4. The fraction of physics research published correlates posi-
tively with both the fraction of physicists who are PhD's and the
American Science Manpower (National Science Foundation, biennial).
152
Data on Funding and Costs 1607
fraction of government-supported research.5. The total number of publications of an organization (in all
fields) correlates strongly with the number of PhD physicists. The
number of papers in AIP journals per PhD physicist correlates neg-
atively with the number of non-AIP physicists.
111.4 Physics Research Support from University Funds
111.4.1 INTRODUCTION
Although everyone knows that some portion of the research done inU.S. universities is supported from the resources of the universities,there have been only guesses as to the amount of thls support. To
obtain a quantitative estimate, the Data Panel sought the coopera-tion of a number of university physics departments in filling out arather detailed questionnaire about departmental research activities.As a by-product, some information about purely educational matterswas collected also.
Being aware of the excessive demands on university departmentsfor the completion of questionnaires and of the difficulty of get-ting prompt and uniform responses to questionnaires distributed inan-i-mpeponal way, we decided to sample only a small number of in-stitutions in which we had close personal contacts. This procedureled immediately to the problem of taking adequate account of thediversity of types of universities. Probably the most importantdifference is between the major research institutions and those inwhich research is less prominent, either in volume or intensity.We distributed our sample over three ranges of size and, withineach size range, over two levels of distinction, measured by theoften-cited "Cartter ratings."* The following six groupings re-
sulted.
1. A, Faculty size L' 50, or among the top ten universities involume of physics publication, Cartter rating "distinguished" or"strong."
2. B, Faculty size > 50, Cartter rating not "distinguished" or"strong."
3. C, Faculty size between 30 and 50, Cartter rating "good" orabove, not in group A.
4. D, Faculty size between 30 and 50, Cartter rating below"Good."
5. E, Paculty size 30 or below, Cartter rating given.6. F, Faculty size below 30, no Cartter rating given.
Non-PhD-granting institutions were not sampled, because studies ofpublication patterns (see Figure 111.11) have shown that theseaccount for no more than a few percent of research publication in
*Cartter, A. An Assessment of Quality in Graduate Education.
Washington% D.C.: American Council on Education, 1966.
153
1608 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
physics (although, curiously, for a somewhat higher fraction of
abstracts in the Bulletin of the American Physical Society). We
requested completiqn of questionnaires from two institutions of
each of the six types, except A, B, and D, from which we sought
four, one, and one, respectively, Eight of the 12 were returned.
The composition of the sample was as follows: A, 3; B, 1; C, 1;
D, 0; E, 2; and F, 1.The design of the questionnaire reflected our desire to ask for
information that would be reasonably easily and unambiguously avail-
able in most departmental records and, at the same time, relevant to
our concerns. Although we consulted several present or past chairmen
of physics departments before crystallizing it, the questionnaire
finally adopted achieved these goals only imperfectly. The philos-
ophy was to divide support of research into three categories: first,
faculty time (including overhead); second, equipment, nonfaculty
staff, and miscellaneous items; and third, space. Although a few
institutions keep records of the distribution of faculty time among
different kinds of activities, such as teaching and research, most
do not; therefore we requested information only on number of faculty
at each rank taking part in research, class-contact hours for them,
and amount of their time for which outside support was received.
By combining these data with information on time actually spent in
research from two or three institutions, we hoped to get plausible
estimates fur the others. University support for equipment and non-
faculty staff we hoped to estimate by ascertaining the difference
in total costs for these purposes and support received; unfortunately,
incompleteness and ambiguity in the data rendered these sources of
information highly questionable. In regard to space, we requested
information on the amount of space used for research and on the
fraction of building construction costs that came from university
funds. Questions also were included on number of publications,
changes in costs in the last two years, numbers of graduate and
undergraduate students, and instructional effort devoted to non-
science majors, teachers, and others.The responses were of variable quality, as analyses in subsequent
sections will show.
111.4.2 RAW DATA
Table 111.20 shows the principal data received from the eight re-
sponding physics departments, totaled for the different subfields
of physics. The data are not complete; in a few cases appropriate
entries have been estimated from other sources and these are identi-
fied in the footnotes to the table.
Table 111.21 presents the data by subfield and summed over the
responding universities. The reader should note that some data are
for all eight universities, some for seven, some for only four.
111.4.3 CORRELATIONS IN THE DATA
The contribution of universities to the support of research, our
major concern, comes in large part from support of the time faculty
members devote to research. Our first task was to estimate this
151
Data on nolding and Costa 1609
time. Since the productive output for which universities are sup-
ported consists almost entirely of research and teaching (with a
broad interpretation of both), one should count as time devoted to
research not only time spent in the direct performance of research
but also an appropriate fraction of time spent on departmental admin-
istration, service to the scientific community, and like activities.
Unfortunately, most university departments keep no records of how
their faculties distribute their time among teaching, research, ad-
ministration, and other activities. However, in the course of pre-
paring our questionnaire, we learned of a few universities that
keep such records and decided to estimate faculty time allocable to
TABLE 111.20 Characteristics of Physics Research at SelectedUniversities
Type of Institution and Institution Number (in parentheses)
Types of Data Collected A (1) A (2) A (3) B (4) C (5) E (6) E (7) F (8)
Cartter ratinga D S S G G A G -
Faculty in researchb
97 38 77 50.2 37.7 24 22 16.6
Nonfaculty staff° ? ? 100 12 10.5 4 13 3.7
Average class-contacttawk per facultyin research
6.0' 5.4e 2.93 2.55 2.64 5.75 2.60 5.18
Publications in year f 71 846 117 108 54h 40 31 41
No. of publicationswithout outside support
tSupport from outside
(in $ millions)
1
- 2.57 5.20
1
2.64
-
-
0 -
0.76
-
Man-months faculty timesupported from outside
525 88 251 156 164 60 47.5 13.5
Sq ft used for research./(in thousands)
138.5 46.2 116.3 67.0 60.0 12.3 63.0 16.1
Fraction of plant costfrom outside
0.14 0.25 0.05 0.35 0 0.375 0
No. undergrad. majors 366 217 60 226 82 90 22 168
No. graduate students 274 171 165 190 123 90 72 72
Fraction of teaching for 0.05 0.2- 0.15 0.23 0.35 0.15 0.20
nonscience majorsk 0.4
Overhead factorl 0.54 0.47m 0.45 0.57 0.46 '0.70" 0.36 0.49
aD distinguished; S strong; G good; A adequate plus.
.1)Defined as ranks professor through instructor; research associates, etc. excluded. "In re-
search" refers to those with any current research activity, a category comprising from 68 to
88 percent of the total faculty for the instit.itions sampled.
Temporary and permanent PhD-level staff in residence and active in research, not alreadycounted in the line above. Some respondents seem to have misunderstood this question.dProbably not correct--exactly the same for every rank and subfield.
ePerhaps with a slightly different definition from that for the other institutions.
fResearch papers and letters.
gApproximate number from the Source Index of the Science Citation Index.hProm number of papere on which a department member was an author divided by average number of
authors for U.S. physics papers.
iNonfederal funds were 0.001 of total.
jUsually net (assignable space), rather than gross.
kUsually measured in terms of student credit hours.zNot including employee benefits (of the order of 0.15 of salaries).
mOn-campus work only.
"Obtained by subtracting estimated benefits from a total presumably including these.
TABLE 111.21
Distribution of Effort among Subfields for a Sample of
Universities°'b
Manpower and
Funding Data
A&R
AME
NP
EP
PSF
CM
ESP
Opt
Acoust
Bio-
phys
Other
Phys
Faculty active
in research°
(8)
15.0
30.1
61.4
95.7
21.1
78.2
17.0
3.3
9.9
25.0
13.0
Nonfaculty staffd
in research (8)
2.2
7.0
20.1
30.9
3.0
14.8
00
066.0
0
Man-months of out-
side support of
faculty time, in
yaar (7)
40.0
116.7
226.4
370.3
52.0
268.0
88.0
7.3
7.0
22.0
38.0
1-,
cr% o
Man-months of out-
side support of fac-
ulty time, in year,
per faculty member
in research (7)
2.9
4.4
4.2
4.5
2.5
3.7
5.7
2.6
2.6
0.9
4.5
Outside support, in
year (in
$ thousands) (4)
163
928
3617
3663
286
1361
192
99
0950
91
Outside support, in
20
37
82
44
18
35
128
e0
11
20
year, per total
staff in research
(in $ thousands) (4)
aFigures in parentheses in the first column give the number of universities in the sample for which the
datJm in question was available; entries are totals for this group of universities or, where indicated,
averages representing quotients of two such totals.
Subfield abbreviations used are the same as those identified in Table 111.1, footnote b.
Entries are fractional because some faculty members were assigned partly to one subfield and partly to
a another.
Temporary or permanent, PhD level.
Totals probably are low because one institution apparently failed to
report postdoctorals.
One return listed support In optics but no staff in optics.
Data on Molding and Coate 1611
research for all universities by combining detailed data for these
few universities with data on teaching loads from all, the expecta-
tion being that it would be possible to establish a plausible in-verse correlation of time spent on research with teaching loads.
Our success in this endeavor wag only partial, as the universityhaving the most- detailed in(ormation did not return our question-
naire.Let us consider frst the extent to which teaching loads appear
to be correlated with other factors of interest. Figure 111.3shows the sort of plot we would like to construct, depicting thefraction of faculty time allocable to research effort as a functionof the average number of class-contact hours per week per facultymember. The two points plotted represent time spent in actual per-formance of reseal..ch, as es.imated for faculty of universities 5(rough estimate only) and 8 of Table 111.20. Because a certainfraction of administrative and other time is really allocable to
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
4 6 8 10
AVERAGE CLASS CONTACT HOURS PER WEEK
FIGURE 111.3 Correlation of fraction of faculty time spent onresearch with average class-contact hours per week. Both figuresrepresent averages over all parts of the year during which thefaculty numbers in question were on campus. The shaded region, tobe reproduced in Figure 111.4, represents the range within whichwe believe that the average relation is fairly sure to lie.
1 5 7
1612 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
research, these points provide rough lower limits for time spent on
research. Common sense and general experience also provide some
guides to how the curve should be drawn. For example, it is gen-
erally conceded that approximately 12 contact hours per week research
simply disappear. On the other hand, low numbers of class-contact
hours of course imply high concentration on research but do not
mean that essentially all faculty time is allocable to research (as
it could be in a noneducational research institution), for some will
be devoted to administrative problems concerning graduate students
and to nonclass educational activities for them. From data on such
activities provided by one institution, we estimate that the extrap-
olation of the curve to the vertical axis should not have an ordi-
nate higher than about 0.8. Combining these considerations with the
ywo points shown, we have estimated rough upper and lower bounds
for the fraction of time allocable to research, as shown by the
two straight lines in the figure. The proper curve would undoubt-
edly not be a straight line, but we have not attempted to introduce
this refinement into the bounds.What is important, of course, is the difference between this
time allocable to research and the amount of faculty time supported
by funds from outside sources. In Figure 111.4, faculty time sup-
ported by outside funds is plotted against class-contact hours for
the seven universities for which reliable teaching data were avail-
able. Reproduced on the same plot are the upper and lower bounds
to total time allocable to research, which were drawn in Figure
111.3. The uncertainty in the difference--the university-supportedtime--is considerable and will be reflected in the estimates made
in Section 111.4.4.In connection with the plots in Figures 111.3 and 111.4, it is
interesting to see to what extent teaching loads are correlated
with other variables. One might expect, for example, that therewould be a significant inverse correlation with number of publica-tions per faculty member. Such a finding was not true of our
sample, as Figure 111.5 shows. A plot of publications per PhD staffmember in research (faculty plus nonfaculty) shows no correlation;one is tempted to conclude that at institutions with a less favor-
able climate for research the staff members choose probleme thatwill require less expenditure of time to produce a publication.
Another factor could be that some of these institutions have ahigher ratio of graduate students to faculty than the institutions
with lower teaching loads. The relevance of this factor is shown
by Figure 111.6, which depicts a positive correlation of publica-
tion rate with the ratio of graduate students to faculty.The Cartter rating seems to correlate significantly with a
number of variables. These include teaching loads (Figure 111.7),publication rate (Figure 111.8), and per capita costs and funding
(Figure 111.9).Figure 111.10 shows the distribution of what might be called the
intensity of support among different subfields. The upper part ofthe figure, which is more meaningful than the lower because it isbased on data from all eight institutions, shows the variation amongsubfields in the fraction of time of faculty members active inresearch that was supported from sources outside the university.
158
1.0
x I 0.8
cc
>- wu,
_a
u 0.64u.zo g
_aco 0
u 0.44 4la U.)-
1 IXZ4 a.2 0.2
Data on Funding and costa 1613
IP ,//''' / /iNIllir ,
0
o0
WPVrs7AA ,0
,.. gre4
\I
2 4 6 8 10 12
AVERAGE CLASS CONTACT HOURS PER WEEK
FIGURE 111.4 Points: manyears of faculty time supported fromsources outside the university, per faculty member in research, for
each of seven universities, plotted as a function of average classcontact hours per week for these same faculty members. Shaded strip:
range of probable fractions of time allocable to research, from
Figure 111.3 The distances of the points below the upper and lowerboundaries of the shaded region thus represent university contributions to the support of research via faculty time, per faculty member.
z2
ceQ. la
CO 2z0 21= ) 15 ri- I tj03 40 LLa.
W 00 2 4 6 8 10
AVERAGE CLASS CONTACT HOURS PER WEEK
FIGURE 111.5 Illustration of the lack of correlation between number
of research publications per year per faculty member and averageclasscontact hours per week. Points represent universities 3
through 8 of Table 111.20.
00
000
12
159
1614 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
o
o o
o o
3 4
GRADUATE STUDENTS PER FACULTY IN RESEARCH
5
FIGURE III.6 Correlation of publications per year per staff member(faculty or nonfaculty PhD level) in research with number of grad-uate students per faculty member in researcft. Points for univer-sities 3 to 8 of Table 111.20.
This amount might be regarded as a measure of the intensity with
which research in the various subfields is pursued, plus the ease
of getting support. The lower part of the figure, based on datafrom only four universities, shows the distribution in amount of
dollar support per staff member (faculty and nonfaculty). This dis-
tribution presumably depends on both the intensity with which re-search is pursued and the costliness of research in different sub-
fields. Because of the rather large statistical fluctuations inthe data, items other than those represented by bars of reasonable
length (proportional to number of faculty or staff members, respec-tively, involved in the average) should be viewed with caution.Nuclear; atomic, molecular, and electron; and elementary-particlephysics rank high in time supported, but nuclear physics is much
higher than these other two subfields in dollars per person, pre-
sumably because most of the elementary-particle physicists in uni-
versities are theorists and because experimental work in atomic,
molecular, and electron physics is less expensive. Physics in
biology ranks especially low in both parts of the figure.Outside support from sources other than the federal government
was negligible in our sample, amounting to about $12,300 for the
four universities giving full support data, compared with a total.
support of $11.2 million. This number, however, is based on only
two projects.' and it appears low in comparison with an earlier
analysis of sources of research support cited in journal articles,*
which showed 14.5 acknowledgments of nongovernment, nonuniversity
support compared with 558.5 acknowledgments of government support.
*Performed by Panel member R.. W. Keyes, 12/22/70.
Phys2cs Manpower 1969. New York, N.Y.: American Institute ofPhysics, 1969 (pp. 26, 47).
160
6
Data on Puit'lly cz I Coota 1615
08
0
.. ___.
MTWGUMHED STRONG GOOD ADEQUATE N3T RATED
FIGURE 111.7 Correlation of teaching loads with Cartter rating,for universities 3 through 8 of Table 111.20.
00
00
0
0
IISTINGUISHED STRONG GOOD ADEQUATE NOT RATED
FIGURE 111.8 Correlation (negative) of publication rate withCartter rating, for universities 1 and 3 to 8 of Table 111.20.
100
0
010
X 0(X
0X
X
NSTMUISHED STRONG GOOD ADEQUATE NOTRATED
FIGURE 111.9 Correlation of Cartter rating with outside supportper faculty in research (circles) and nonsalary cost of research(crosses). Circles fol. universities 2,3,4, and 7 of Table 111.20;
crosses for 2 to 5, 7 and 8.
1616 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
6
O 5
La
1
3
I. 2
0
0
0
g
0
0
o
o
,,0
cP
0
..-
00
cb
-
o
a
0
-m
0
oo
8
o
o
0
oo
00
&o
ATOMIC,EARTH ASTROPH PLASMA
C NT OEANO Mr: tt EM. MOL O
I NUCLEAR ANO OP TICS ACOU MSTICS ANO ONO&AARTICte ANO
PLANETARY RELATIVITY FLUI0ELECTRON
o
0
o
0
o
Oo
00
o
FIGURE III.10 Subfield distribution of average man-months of out-side faculty salary support (top half, points for eight universities)and average dollar support per faculty member (lower half, points
for four universities) . Horizontal bars have ordinates representingweighted averages over all institutions and lengths proportional tototal number of faculty members involved.
As indicated in Table 111.20, the ratio of undergraduate majors
to graduate students varied among the institutions sampled from 0.3
to 2.3, with an overall average of about one. Although our sample
included only PhD-granting institutions, this ratio is almost rh-
same as the ratio of national.totals of undergraduate majors a :
graduate students in physics.TTable 111.20 also shows that approximately one fifth of the
teaching effort (in student hours) in the departments sampled isdirected toward students whose major fields are or will be otherthan science or engineering. A small fraction of the undergraduateswho do not go on to graduate work, and a majority of the graduatestudents, is destined sooner or later to become teachers; however,only a few of the institutions sampled devoted any specific teachingeffort in the physics departments to instructing graduate studentsin the art of teaching.
Estimates of the change, in the past two years, in universityfunds explicitly expended for research varied from department todepartment, from a decrease of 10 percent (contraction of department)to an increase of 20 percent. A rough weighted average of all in-
stitutions would yield an increase of about 7 percent.
1.62
Data on Funding and Coots 1617
111.4.4 ESTIMATES OF THE AMOUNT OF RESEARCH SUPPORT CONTRIBUTED BYTHE UNIVERSITIES
In attempting to draw conclusions about all physiLs research in U.S.academic institutions on the basis of our sample, we must considerfirst how representative it is and what fraction of U.S. academicphysics it represents. In regard to representativeness, Figure111.11 compares the relative volume of published material in the
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
SIZE LARGEPRESTIGE HIGHER LOWER
MEDIUM SMALLMGHER LOWER HMHER LOWER
FIGURE 1.11.11 Distribution of physics research papers over dif-ferent types of U.S. academic institutions. The categories A to Fare those described in Section 111.4.1. The broad bars show thefraction of U.S. academic papers in the 1967 Physical Peview orig-inating from each of these six types of institutions and from non-PhD-granting institutions. The narrow bars show the distributionof total publications over the eight departments of our sample.
six categories of our sample with the relative volume from each ofthese categories in the 1967 Physical Review. A seventh category,non-PhD institutions, is included in the Physical Review data forcompleteness. Our sample is about right for the small institutionstaken together (E and F, tha non-PhD category being negligible), isa little high lor the large institutions (A and B), and is defi-cient in the medium-sized institutions (C and D). However, itscomposition is fairly representative, and any errors resulting from
133
1618 l'IriNICN IN 19.:1611.:CTIVE
its distribution are probably much less than other uncertainties In
the estimates that we will develop.Because the data from institution L were deficient or unreason-
obit! in several respects and our sample was slightly overweightedin Category A, we shaft make our estimates of university fundingon the basis of the other seven Institutions, assuming them to con-stitute a properly distributed sample of all institutions. There
are at least three possible measures for the size of this sample:One can compare the sample with all. U.S. academic institutions inregard to voLume of publication, number of graduate students, oruumber of doctoral. degrees granted. Thu results of such compari-sons appear in Table 111.22. With due regard for the caveats in
TABLE t11.22 Approzhhite Range of Support (in millions of dollars)of Physics Research by U.S. Academic Institutions through LoadedFaculty Salaries in the Academic Year 1968-1969
Fraction ot AcademicWork Assumed Sampled
Fraction of Faculty Research TimeUniversity Supported
Range Mean
0.156 - 0.357 0.257
0.058 L2.6 - 28.8 28.8
0.0685 (mean 14.8 - 34.0 24.4
0.079 17.1 - 39.2 28.1
the figures for the upper extreme of the ranges indicated, we shallassume that the seven institutions account for a fraction of thesupport of physics research by U.S. academic sources amounting tobetween $0.058 million and $0.079 million in academic year 1968-1969.
Consider first the support contributed through the time thatfaculty members devote to research. If we take the distance ofeach point in Figure I[I.4 below the upper and lower boundaries,respectively, of the shaded region, weight by the number of facultymembers involved, and average for the seven institutions, we obtaina fraction oE faculty time allocable to research and supported byuniversities in the range 0.156 to 0.357. The corresponding esti-mates of university-supported faculty man-years of research are41.4 and 97.7, respectively. With a mean overhead factor forthese universities of about 0.5 (see Table 111.20) and a mean 12-month salary of about $16,000, we estimate this university con-tribution at about $24,000 per man-_year; thus, the effective cua-tribution oE these seven universities through support of facultytime was, according to our estimates, in the range $993,000 to
$2.272 million. Combining these bounds with the estimates given inthe preceding paragraph, we obtain the estimates shown in Table111.22 for that part of the contribution of U.S. universities tothe support of physics research in 1969 associated with their
104
Data on Ftinciing and Costs 1619
support of loaded faculty salaries. Thus we estimate this contribu-tion at about $24 million, with an accuracy that should be within afactor of 2 in either direction.
The second of the categories of support mentioned in the Intro-duction, equipment and non faculty staff, is much less amenable toquantitative assessment but seems Likely to constitute an amountconsiderably smaller than the other two categories, space and fac-ulty time. Our original hope had been to estimate this quantity byfinding the difference between the figures provided for (a) non-salary cost of research and outside support received and (b) thatpart allocable to faculty-salary support. Unfortunately, not allthe departments supplied these figures, and some of those that didmisinterprete.: the question, with the result that the quantitiesto be subtracted were not comparable. A more promising approach isto look at a sample of papers in the literature (see Section 111.1)and note the frequency and characteristics of papers ori6ivating inuniversities and not acknowledging support from nonuniversitysources. In the sample studied, about 24 percent of the articleoriginating in universities appeared to have only university support.This figure is higher than that suggested by the sketchy data inTable 111.20 and also higher than that found in a more recent studyof a.smaLler sample; tberefore, it may have included a number of.papers with outside support that the authors failed to acknowledge.Ln this more recent sample, we found that the names of the authorsof papers without outside support were more often those of facultymembers than was true of the supported papers, and there was a pre-dominance of theoretical over experimental papers. Although thenonf .ulty authors are osiona1ly senior research associates andthe like, probably the w:t: majority of them is graduate studentsor postdoctorals, these categories being represented in comparablenumbers. A rough estimate of the mean salary of these authorswould b.:. about $6000 per year. Overhead for them should be lessthan for Zaculty members (for example, smaller offices) but not asmuch less as the bare salaries; we shall assume a mean value of$5000 per year. If we assume that the average paper without outsidesupport requires an amount of nonfaculty time of the order of twothirds the amount of faculty time involved in the average of allpapers, we have
(total nonfaculty timewithout outside support)
3(total faculty timex = 0.16.
[supported or not])
(university support throughnonfacultv time) 11
(university outside0.16 x
94 = 0.073.support through facultytime)
(6)
(7)
This amount is much smaller than our earlier estimate , f the frac-
tion of faculty research time that is university supported (0.83 to
0.59). Probably some of the nonfaculty time spent on projects that
1 6 5
1620 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
have outside support is not fully covered by this support; however,all indications are that the university-supported portion of suchtime is much less than for faculty members, and as the loaded salaryrate is less than half that for faculty members, we cannot escapethe conclusion that this category of university support is muchsmaller than that provided through faculty time.
There is some further evidence, although sketchy, that supportsthis conclusion. For example, about 0.18 of the beyond-second-yeargraduate student population is supported by teaching assistantships.0These are probably the main source of university support of suchstudents. The number of graduate students past the second year isabout half the total number* or almost twice the number of facultyactive in research (Table 111.20). If the research involvement ofgraduate students with teaching fellowships is assumed to be some-what less intense than that of other students at the same level, say,about equal to that of faculty members, one gets an estimate forthe graduate student part of the left of Eq. (6) of the order oftwice the value given there. This amount is not large, as thesalary factor for these students will be smaller than is assume'2in Eq. (7). Yet another source of information is the data.on PhD-level nonfaculty staff provided by our sample. About 0:17 of thisstaff time was university supported, of which no more than 0.01 wasattributable to classroom teaching. Thus the contribution of thisdoctoral-level staff to the left of Eq. (6) would be only 0.16 timesthe ratio of time spent on research by these staff members to thatspent by fa,.ulty, a number doubtless considerably less than 1 (seeTable III.20).
We consider last the resources contributed by universities in
support of research through plant construction. To develop an esti-
mate one muct decide on a way of converting capital investment in
the past into equkalent current expenditure. Suppose a building
that would cost C"" dollars to reproduce today was constructed at
time At in the past, costing C dollars at that time. We shall
assume
(0) -cEAtC = C e . (8)
If these C dollars had remained in the university's endowment, with
the income spent each year, the income foregone each year would be
where for a reasonably conservative investment policy 13 = 0.04.
For a large number of institutions i we therefore have
-aAtIncome foregone = B <e > EC(0)
'
. (9)
where the angular brackets imply an average over all the Ati's,
weighted in proportion to their Ci(0)es, in other words, with each
yearly unit of At having a weight proportiond to the dollar value
of construction in that year. This we assume to be given by
''Physics Mdnpower 1969, New York: N.Y.: American Institute of
Physics, 1969 (p. 49).
Data on Funding and Costs 1621
weight ae-yAt
Combining Eqs. (9) and (10) we get
(
Income foregone = 11-- EC.(°)y+a 2
(10)
A further intangible but economically real factor should probablybe added: The money invested in a building is not liquid and itsunrivailability hampers the economic freedom of the institution. Weshall rather arbitrarily assume that this effect can be taken intoaccount by adding about 0.01 to the 13 in Eqs.(1) and (11) ; this isroughly equivalent to a policy of amortizing the investment overabout one century. The value of a can reasonably be taken from theaverage increase in construction costs over the past 15 years,namely, a = 0.04 per year. Gamma can be estimated either by sub-tracting a from the average rate of increase of funds for physicsin the United States, which, from Figure X.3 of Volume I ofPhysics in Perspective, was approximately 0.13 per year, or, alter-natively, can be set roughly equal to the rate of growth of PhD-level manpower in U.S. universities, which, from Table XII.9 of thesame volume, has been about 0.10. Averaging these two estimatesand taking our sample of seven universities as representative ofbetween 0.058 and 0.079 of the U.S. academic enterprise, we get
Effective contribution of U.S. academicinstitutions to the support of physicsresearch, through building construction
- 0.05 m 0.095 $75 X 310,7000.135 0.058 to 0.079
= $10.4 million to $14.1 million (12)
for the academic year 1968-1969. We have used a value $75 forthe cost per square foot of assignable space, about 1.5 times thecost per square foot of growth space; the figure, 310,700 squarefeet, is just the sum of the products of square feet by fractionof cost from university funds, using the entries in Table 111.20.
To summarize our calculations, we estimate that the total con-tribution to physics research from U.S. university funds in theacademic year 1968-1969 was probably a little more than $40 million,over half of it through support of faculty time and most of therest through plant construction. This estimate could easily be toosmall or too large by a sizable fraction of its value.
1622 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
111.5 Growth in Costs of Research in Physics
The cost of research in physics, measured, for example, by dollarsper professional man-year, has been steadily rising. It is g-eneral-ly accepted that this increase is compounded in comparable amountsfrom the general decrease in purchasing power of the dollar and asophistication factor resulting from the increasing complexity ofequipment required to expand research into new and ever more dif-ficult areas. Comments on this sophistication factor appear occa-sionally in the reports of the subfield panels, for example, inFigure XI.1 of Volume II, Part B, of Physics in Perspective (costsof nuclear magnetic resonance equipment) or in the tables of Chap-ter II of Volume II, Part A (listing characteristics of accelera-tors throughout the world). Our contribution to this subject willbe minor, consisting merely of an analysis of some figures issuedby the AEC* and some estimates of cost escalation obtained in oursurvey of industrial funding (Section 111.3).
The AEC's Statistical Summary series* annually reports dollarexpenditures, scientific man-years of effort, and other statisticspertaining to various parts of their physical research program.For each of the years, 1960-1970, we have compared the reportedcost for various categories of AEC work with the reported numberof scientific man-years, a figure that apparently includes facul-ty and other types of professional employees but not graduate stu-dents, even though they may be paid. We have computed these ratiosfor the categories, high-energy physics, low-energy physics, andmetallurgy and materials. Metallurgy and materials consists large-ly, though by no means entirely, of research in physics of con-densed-matter.
The principal results obtained from the AEC data are presentedin the two top curves of Figure 111.12. Here, the cost in thou-sands of dollars per scientific man-year is plotted against year.The AEC Statistical Summaries report expenditures in federallyfunded research centers of the AEC and in the AEC contract programor universities separately. The figures used here for universitiesrepresent the total program expenditure not just the AEC contribu-tion. The dashed line in each part of the figure, drawn at arbi-trary height, shows the behavior of the general price index forfederal government purchases of goods and services. At the bottom1)f the figure analogous data on changes in cost per man-year forresearch in physics, obtained from the Survey of Industrial Labor-atories (Section 111.3), are shown.
Although the trends in the AEC data are partially obscured bylarge apparently random fluctuations, the steady increase in dol-lars per man-year on the average is evident. The straight lines,which were fitted to the logarithm of the dollar expenditure perman-year by the method of least-squares, have slopes of 3.0 percentper year for work in universities and 6.1 percent per year for thefederally funded research and development centers. The fluctua-
A Statistical Summary of the Physical Research Program (U.S.Atomic Energy Commission, annual).
168
70
cc> 60
-JJ CCo drz
w 50
ozcc> cc
z 40cr(/) uj
a_
30
80
70
`c 60o
u,>-
LIG 50
3 CCL" oa_
0
301960 1965 1970
FIGURE 111.12 Top: growth in costs of AEC research programs in
areas predominantly physics, per scientific man-year, 1960-1970.
Circles and full line: programs in federally funded research cen-
ters. Crosses and dashed line: programs in universities. The lines
in both cases are least-squares fitted through 1969. Middle curve:
price index for government purchases. Bottom: research costs per
scientific man-year for the six categories of industrial labora-
tory surveyed in Table 111.17.
tions appear to consist mainly of some kind of budgetary artifact.
For example, the low cost in the federally funded research and de-
velopment centers in 1966 results almost entirely from reports from
both the Cambridge Electron Accelerator and the Princeton-Pennsyl-
vania Accelerator of 200 more man-years of effort in 1966 than in
Data on Funding and Costs 1623
INDUSTRIALLABORATORIES
1960 1965 1970
0
0 X
0
X
0
X
FF RC's
EDUCATIO N ALINSTITUTIONS
.- PRICEINDEX
.....
169
1624 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
1965 or 1967, without any comparable nnomaly in the reported Lotalfunding. In general, most flscutationF in tLe cost per man-year inthe figure represent fluctuations in man-years of effort reportedrather than in dollar expenditures fn.. the Physical Research Pro-gram.
If the various subfields are separated, the flucutations are,of course, even more pronounced, Least-squares fits to the datagive the result r.own in Table 111.23. One must be cautious ininterpzeting tnee numbers, however. First, they are E.ubject tochanges in definitions; what is recorded as nuclear physics wasknown as nuclear structure physics earlier in the decade, becamelow-energy physics in 1963, and was further affected by the intro-duction of a 1.udget line for mt7dium-energy physics in 1966. In1966, many of the funds of low-energy physics were apparently al-located to the medium-energy program without any comparable changein manpower, leading to a rather large anomaly in the cost perman-year in nuclear physics in universities from 1965 to 1966.
The penultimate row of Table 111.23 gives the average rate ofincrease in cost per man-year reported by our sample of industriallaboratories (Section 111.3).
All the figures, even including those from the industrial sur-vey, may be somewhat too low to reflect adequately the Soph:f.stica-tion factor, in that all groups undoubtedly suffered a certainamount of so called "belt tightening" during the late 1960's.
TABLE 111.23 Rates of Increase (percent per year) in Cost perScientific Man-year in Different Parts of the Atomic Energy Com-mission Research Program in Physics (FY 1960-1970) and in U.S.Industrial Laboratories
AEC Category and Location of WorkIndustry FFRDC" University Industry
AEC Program CategoryHigh energyLow energyMetallurgy andmaterialsTotal of above
AEC averageIndustrial laboratoriesPrice index
8.1 0.83.0 -0.26.4 4.4
5.8 2.9
3.8
2.94.7
aFederally funded research and development center
170
IV
DATA ONTHE
LITERATUREOF PHYSICS
IV.1 Production and Distribution
IV.1.1 PROBLEMS OF DISCIPLINE AND SUBFIELD CLASSIFICATION:OVERLAPS
In Section 11.1.1 we discussed the problems of determining who isand is not a physicist and assigning physicists to the varioussubfield panels of the Physics Survey. Similar problems arisein the enumeration and classification of physics publications.In "Dissemination and Use of the Information of Physics,"* forexample, tables and figures showed the relative proportions ofthe physics literature in different subfields, countries, andtypes of institutions. Construction of these tables required an-swering, for each paper sampled, two questions: first, "Is itphysics?" and if the answer was affirmative then, "To which sub-field should it be assigned?" More important, an intelligent un-derstanding of the structure and dynamics of the physics enter-prise requires a knowledge of the extent to which one subfieldoverlaps another and the extent to which research in physics over-laps activities In related disciplines such as chemistry, engi-neering, ,.nd eart.1 sciences. Answers to these questions usuallyhave to ble based cn subjective judgments. However, careful subjec-tive judrommts c.0 be much better than sloppy ones, and there are
Physics in Perspective, Volume II, Part B, Chapter XIV; condensed
version in Volume I, Chapter 13.
1625
171
1626 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
objective methods of getting the answers that, though moderatelylaborious and not necessarily unique, are by no means impossibfeto use and, without excessive labor, can provide at least spdf-checks on the correctness of subjective judgments.
There are a variety of measures of the relatedness of differentparts of the scientific literature that, though subjective in thatthey depend on the judgments of individuals, are objective, in thesense in which the term is used here, in that they constltute astatistical verdict of the entire scientific community. These mea-sures are based on citations of one paper by another. Suppose thattwo groups of papers, i and j, have been selected in any manner.As a measure of the relatedness of i to j we may take any of thefollowing:
1. The fraction of the references in papers of group i that areto papers of group j, averaged with the fraction of j's referencesthat are to papers of i;
2. The fraction of the references of i that are also referencesof j, averaged with the fraction of j's references that are sharedby i (the concept* of bibliographic coupling);
3. The number of papers in all areas that contain cltations toboth a paper of i and one of j (the cocitation concept1).
Suppose that the universe of scientific literature we wish to con-sider has been divided into a number of groups i, j, ..., and sup-pose for simplicity that each of these groups contains the samenumber of papers. .(This is to avoid having a large group appear es-pecially close to the others simply because of its size.) Then byusing any of the three criteria-most simply the first one-one candefilletherelatednessofinjbyammber.with the proper-csties
1 > C.. = C.. > 0,
Ec.. = 1.so
(1)
(2)
We would like to be able to interpret these numbers geometrical-ly by assigning to each group i a point in a space of some dimen-sionality and so placing these points that cij is a universal de-creasing function of the distance of point i from point j. Al-though this, of course, can be done only approximately in any smallnumber of dimensions, there are mathematical procedures for locat-ing the points in a space of any assumed dimenspnality in such away as to give the best possible approximatiop.J For our purposeit will suffice to consider a simpler problem, that of assigning
*Kessler, M.M. American Documentation, 14, 10 (1963): 16, 223(1965); Price, D. J. de S. Science, 149, 510 (1965).
tSmall, H. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,in press.
§Kruskal, J. B. Psychometrika, 29, 1 (1964).
172
Data on the Literature of Thysics 1627
positions to a number of borderline groups i, relative to other
groups k whose positions are taken as given. The simplest such
case would be, for example, one in which one locates the groups
i on a one-dimensional scale between, say, pure physics (assigned
coordinate xi< = 0) and pure chemistry (assigned coordinate
xez = 1). Almost as simple would be the assignment of positions
in a triple overlap area, say, that of atomic physics, condensed
matter, and optics, with each of these subfields assigned to one
corner of an equilateral triangle in a two-dimensional space. In
assigning positions to groups i in the overlap region, we would
like to make the assignment self-consistent in the sense that the
position allotted to any given i would be a weighted average of
the positions allotted to other areas with which it is connected,
with weights cij. In other words, we would like to get a solution
of the equations' +
r r. p9P Eqa ck, (3)
a
where p and q now run only over groups in the overlap region, and
runs over all the groups whose coordinates we have agreed to fix
in advance. For the physics-chemistry case, for example, this
would mean that all areas a considered to be unquestionably physics
are assigned Ra = 0, and all those considered to be unquestionably
chemistry are assigned fib = 1. In matrix form the solution to Eq.
(3) can be written
r = (1 - c') c Rs (4)
and the solution is unique as long as the matrix (1 - c') is non-
singular. Now the series
1 - c' = 1 - c" - c".2 - (5)
converges if the matrix c' is bounded with a bound less than unity.
And since Eq. (2) is equivalent toa9Pqa
a(6)
a slight generalization of a familiar argument* shows that c is
indeed so bounded unless there exist groups q, which are not con-nected to any of the given groups a by any chain of citation con-nections. Barring this possibility then, we can say that anygiven group q is, for example x percent chemistry and (1 )
percent physics, or that it is x percent atomic physics, y per-
cent condensed-matter physics, and (1 -x - y) percent optics.
*Courant, R., an? lalbert, Aiethods of Mathematical Physics
(Interscience, rck, 1953), Vol. I, p. 19.
173
1628 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
Although the groups i that. we have been talking about may becomposed by any procedure that selects a reasonably coherent groupof papers-for example, they might be composed by using the finestsubdivisions of the Physics Abstracts subject classificationscheme-it is interesting to note that an algorithm for computergeneration of clUsters of closely related papers, based on thestatistics of citations, has been developed and is rather effec-tive*.
As an example of what can be done with this approach, considerthe question: Should work on quantum fluids be considered in theprovince of the Panel on Plasma Physics and Physics of Fluids orshould it be grouped with solid-state physics in the province ofthe Panel on Physics of Condensed-Matter? A sampling of citationsin a number of theoretical and experimental papers on quantum flu-ids in Physical Review Letters and Physical Review A gave the fol-lowing distribution for the cited papers:
Quantum fluids 72
Other physics of fluids 2
Solid-state physics 19
Instrumentation 1
The Intuitive judgment of the panelists that quantum fluids shouldbe grouped with condensed-matter is confirmed.
A number of spot checks of this sort were made to verify thereasonableness of the assignment of papers by panelists to variousdisciplines and subfields or to an overlap area. These checksgenerally confirmed the intuitive assignments, although occasional-ly they showed the assignment to be wrong.
Some rough indications of the extent of the overlap among thedifferent subfields, the ambiguity in the definition of the bound-aries between physics and neighboring disciplines, and the un-certainties in each of these two measures can be obtained from theresults of classification of papers in two samples drawn'fromPhysics Abstracts by a member of the panel. These are presentedin Tables IV.1 and IV.2, respectively. For the sample of TableIV.1, a restricted definition of overlap areas and an inclusivedefinition of physics were used: A physics paper was not assignedto an overlap area between two subfields unless it was really dif-ficult to decide to which it should be given; similarly, paperswere considered as physics unless they belonged fairly indisput-ably to some other discipline. For the sample in Table IV.2, incontrast, a liberal definition of overlap and a fair definition ofthe boundaries of physics were used: A paper was assigned to anoverlap area of bdo or more physics subfields whenever a reasonablecase could be made for its belonging in each of them; a paper wasconsidered as physics only if its relation to the rest of physicswas judged to be closer than its relation to the more central
*Price, N., and S. Schiminovich, Information Storage and Retriev-al, 4, 271 (1968); Schiminovich, S. Ibid., 6, 417 (1971).
1-.
n3
TABLE IV.1
Distribution of a Sample of U.S. Papers from Physics Abstracts among Subfields of Physics on
the Basis of an Inclusive Definition of Physics and a Restricted Definition of Overlapa
Papers Judged as
Papers Judged
Overlapping This
as Within This
Subfield and
Subfield
Subfield
Another
Number Overlapping Each of Other Subfields
No.
Fraction
No.
Fraction
A&R
AME
EP
NP
P&F
CM
E&P
PB
Opt
Acoust
Misc
A&R
9
AME
82
EP
61
NP
47
P&F
54
CM
245
E&P
36
PB
9
Opt
21
Acoust
13
Misc
18
Total
Physics 595
0.90
1
0.84
16
0.95
3
0.90
5
0.86
9
0.93
19
0.78
10
0.45
11
0.49
22
0.59
9
0.72
7
56 = 112
0.10
0.16
0.05
0.10
0.14
0.07
0.22
0.55
0.51
0.41
0.28
- - - - - - 1 - - - -
- - 1 4 5 - - 4 - 9
- - - 3 - - - _ - - -
- 1 3 - - - - - - 1
- 4 - - - 2 3 - - -
- 5 - - 2 - - - 8 2 2
1 - - - 3 - - 1 4 1 -
- - - - - - 1 - 5 5 1
- 4 - - 8 4 5 -
- - - - - 2 1 5 - - 1
- 2 - 1 - 2 - - 1 1 -
Nonphysics
6%
2
aSubfield abbreviations used are: A&R = astrophysics and relativity; AME = atomic, molecular, and electron
physics; EP = elementary-particle physics; NP = nuclear physics; P&F = plasma physics and physics of flu-
ids; CM = condensed-matter physics; E&P = earth and planetary physics; PB = physics in biology; Opt = op-
tics; Acoust = acoustics; Misc = miscellaneous.
TABLE IV.2
Distribution of a Sample of U.S. Papers from Physics Abstracts among Subfields of Physics on
the Basis of a Fair Definition of Physics and a Liberal Definition of Overlapa
Subfield
Papers Judged
as within
This Subfield
Papers Judged as
Overlapping This
Subfield and
Another
Number Overlapping Each of the Other Subfields
A&R
AME
EP
NP
P&F
CM
E&P
PB
Opt, Acoust
and Misc
No.
Fraction
No. Fraction
A&R
60.67
30.33
--
1-
--
2-
1.0.4
AME
33
0.60
22
0.40
--
-5
510
1-
1
...1
I-
EP
26
0.84
50.16
1-
-3
--
1-
-
NP
45
0.79
12
0.21
-5
3-
-3
--
1
°P&F
17
0.63
10
0.37
-5
--
-4
-1
CM
138
0.82
31
0.18
-10
34
-1
112
E&P
13
0.65
70.35
21
1-
-1
-1
1
PB
30.60
20.40
--
--
-1
1-
-
Op, Ac,
& Misc
32
0.67
16
0.33
-1
-1
112
1-
-
Total
Physics
313
74
108
=2
Nonphysics
6(13.5%)
51
49
24
28
-4
aSubfield abbreviations used are the same as those identified in Table IV.1, footnote a.
Data on the Literature of Physics 1631
areas of some other discipline such as chemistry or engineering.The study depicted in Table IV.2 was done before the panel decidedto separate optics and acoustics from the miscellaneous category,thus these are grouped together.
Although most of the subfields show more overlap in Table IV.2than in Table IV.1, as one would expect, a few do not, and thisfinding must be attributed to statistical fluctuations. From therwo tables together it is evident that the subfields that are mostnearly self-contained are elementary-particle physics, nuclearphysics, probably astrophysics and relativity, and condensed-mat-ter. For the first three this finding is undoubtedly the result oftheir being so specialized; for condensed-matter, it is probablydue to the vast size of the subfield. Optics and acoustics appearto have large overlaps with other subfields, as does earth andplanetary physics also. Atomic, molecular, and electron physicsand plasma physics and physics of fluids have moderately highoverlap. Among the core subfields, condensed-matter has the larg-est absolute overlap into other disciplines simply because of itslarge size, but percentagewise the overlap of atomic, molecular,and electron physics into other disciplines (principally chemistry)is greater. The data on overlap into nonphysics disciplines aremuch less meaningful, of course, for the peripheral subfields ofphysics, since their coverage in Physics Abstracts is often incom-plete. (This situation is especially true for physics in biology.)
A different type of measure of the overlap of physics with otherdisciplines can be obtained from the professional self-identifica-tion of the authors of physics papers. As we shall see in SectionIV.1.3, about half of the authors of papers covered by PhysicsAbstracts identify primarily with a nonphysics discipline eventhough, according to Table IV.2, 87 percent of the papers socovered probably lie on the physics side of a fair boundary.
IV.1.2 SAMPLING OF ABSTRACT JOURNALS
Our objectives in sampling entries in abstract journals were toget information about
1. The distribution of physics publications among subfields;2. The geographic distribution of total publication and of
work in each subfield;3. The degree of correlation between the country or region in
which work is done and the country or region in which it is pub-lished;
4. Changes in time in some of these quantities;5. The distribution of U.S. work in the various subfields
among different types of performing institutions;6. Any differences between theoretical and experimental papers
in regard to the previous five categories. (We classified papersas theoretical when they did not contain any, new experimental re-sults or report the testing ef new experimental techniques.)
To achieve most of these objectives one needs to know the loca-tion of the performing institution and, for U.S. papers, its iden-
177
1632 PHYSICS fN PERSPECTIVE
titY. In Physics Abstracts this information became available only
in 1969, so our sampling from this source (our most extensive
sampling project) was confined to this one year. Nuclear Science
Abstracts has recorded the performing institution for a number of
years; therefore, we studied small samples from this source for
both 1964 and 1969.The principal results from our sampling study of 1969 issues
of Physics Abstracts have been given previously* and will not be
repeated. We shall merely recapitulate the ground rules for the
study and add a couple of supplementary tables. Two physicists (R.
W. Keyes, C. Herring) performed the sampling, one looking at all
entries in 13 of the 26 issues for 1969 with numbers ending in 5,
the other looking at all entries in 16 of the issues with numbers
ending in 0. Entries not in the category "published research papers"
were discarded. Published research papers were defined as presenta-
tions of new research results in articles or letters in periodicals
or books available on the open market; this definition excluded
theses and reports available only from a research institution,
agency, or clearinghouse, also patents, reviews, popularizations,
and abstracts of talks unaccompanied by a text. Each paper not so
discarded was classified into one of the ten subfields of physics
corresponding to the panels of the Physics Survey or into a miscel-
laneous physics category or (in rare cases) as outside physics.
These judgments were made subjectively by each sampler but accord-
ing to the guidelines described in Section IV.1.1. Each paper was
assigned to a country of origin according to the location of the
first-named institution in the by-line, except when the institu-
tion was operated by an international organization, then the
assignment "international" was used. Papers for which no institu-
tion was named were distributed statistically among performing
regions by noting the location of the publisher of the paper and
using the correlation found for other papers (or ocCasionally by
direct sampling of journals) between region of publication and
region of performance. For papers from U.S. institutions, the
institutions were further classified as academic, industrial,
government in-house laboratories, federally funded research and
development centers (i.e., national laboratories), or other.
Table IV.3 obtained from the Keyes half of the sample, shows
how publications reporting work performed at various types of U.S.
institutions were distributed among journals and books published
in different locations. Journals of the AIP are listed separately
from other U.S. publications. The AIP journals reCeive about 54
percent of the U.S. work, a fraction that is fairly constant among
all types of institutions. Note, however, that the definition of
physics used in this sampling was the inclusive one employed in
developing Table IV.1; if the fair definition used in Table IV.2
had been used, the AIP percentage undoubtedly would be moderately
higher.
*PhysIcs In Perspective, Vol. II, Part B, Tables XIV.9, XIV.10, and
XIV.11 and Figures XIV.31 and XIV.32.
178
Data on t:lc Literature of Physici; 1633
TABLE IV.3 Place of Publication of Physics Papers from DifferentTypes of U.S. Institutionsa
PerformingInstitution
TotalPapers
Publication inb
Other U.S.AIP Publica-Journal tions
Foceigu Publications
U.K.
ContinentalW. Europe
Academic 386 206 86 29 65
Industrial 146 80 40 14 12
Govt. (in-house)laboratory
61 27 16 4 14
Federally fundedresearch anddevelopmentcenter
67 40 10 2 15
Other 13 8 1 1 3
T(YTAL 673 361 153 50 109
PERCENT 100 54 23 7 16
aDlta from sample drawn from Physics Abstracts in 1969.'Articles published in Eastern Europe, Japan, and other t,:'gion:.;are omitted from this table; according to Table XIV.9 ofVolume II, Part B of Physics in Peropective, these constitut-4only about 2 percent of the total number of physics papers.
TABLE IV.4 Distribution of Physics Ressarchferent Ty) .s of Performing Institutions
Papers Among Dif-
PerformingInstitution
TotalPapers
SubfieldsbAME &P&F
EP &NP CM
Opt, Acoustic,Misc E&P
Academic 389 82 76 135 42 50
Industrial 148 17 4 96 22 9
Govt. laboratoryDOD 24 2 2 11 4 4
NASA 13 1 1 2 2 7
Other 26 8 4 6 2 6
Federally fundedresearch and de-velopment center
AEC 64 9 18 28 7 2
Other 6 0 0 1 1 4
Other 15 3 2 5 2 2
TOTAL 694 122 107 284 82 84
a Subfield abbreviations used are the same as those identified in
Table IV.1, footnote a.bAstrophysics and relativity and physics in biology are excludedfrom the subfield breakdown hilt included in the total.
179
l6.1.=. PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
Table IV.4, also based on the Keyes sample, gives the distribu-
tion of U.S. papers among different tnes of U.S. performing insti-
tutions in somewhat more detail than w:As given previously.* De-:
spite small-number statistics, suolt trends as the emphasis of
NASA laboratories on earth and plo.nttay physics and that of non
laboratories on condensed-matter are evident.Table IV.5, based on the sampling of Nuclear Science Abstracts,
shows the geographical distribution of nuclear physics work in
1964 compared with 1969. The last column shows, for comparison, the
distribution obtained from the 1969 sampling of P:v.sics Abstracts.
This comparison gives a clue to the relArive cove.-ge of the twoabstracting services. In all tables sort, sampling fluctpa-
tions are probably rather larger tiv. ,ne uld infer from the NI
rule, since the papers are not rece: o -andom but in groups
corresp,,nding to issues of journals .ss. Conferences have an
especially serious effect, since a large conference, even if inter-national, held in country A results in a large burst of papers fromA's delegation. This effect may partially, though by no means en-tirely, explain the spectacular shift in relative positions ofFr4nce Ind West Germany between 1964 and 1969.
A cl-,tic of Nuclear Science Abstracts against Reftrativnyi
nurnaT, Ft:ail:a for 1965 and 1969 indicated that Nuclear ScienceAbstracts misses few Soviet papers that satisfy the criteria thatwe have used for inclusion, probably only a few percent. It seems,
however, that Nuclear Science AbstracLs misses many more of thepapers in the other countries of Eastern Europe, possibly about
one third. (Many of the relevant journals are not even on the list
scanned by Nuclear Science Abstracts.) Coverage of Japanese-language material in Nuclear Science Abstracts appears to be good.
IV.1.3 THE WORLD'S POPULATION OF PUBLISHING PHYSICISTS
IV.1.3.1 Goals
Although there are many sources of information about people whomight be called physicists-for example, the files of the NationalRegister, membership lists of scientific societies, and data on
recipients of degrees-it is widely recognized that a large propor-tion of these people dc not engage in research, at least if this
activity is defined aa acrk leading to publication in the archivalresearch literature. It would be interesting to know how many
people there are who engage in this activity, how they are distri-
buted among the major nations, and something about their produc-'tivity. For example, how are they distributed in regard to the
frequency with which they publish? How extensively is collabora-tion involved in their publication? How do these characteristics
vary with geographic area?Although a number of pertinent statistics about publications in
physics have been collected by the Data Panel and others and are
PhysIcs In Perspective, Volume II, Part B, Table XIV.11 and Figure
XIV.32.
180
TABLE IV.5
Comparison of the Geographical Distribution of Institutions Publishing Papers Listed in
Samples from NuclearScience Abstracts in 1964 and 1969a
Location of Performing
Institution
1964
1969
Theoret
Exp
Total
Theoret
Exp
Total
1969 Phys. Abst.1)
United States
69
114
183
(0.34)
146
219
365
(0.33)
(0.27)
Other No. America
89
17
(0.032)
25
/6
51
(0.046)
(0.059)
So. America
24
6(0.011)
51
6(0.005)
(0.002)
United Kingdom
916
25
,1.046)
29
35
64
(0.058)
(0.039)
France
950
59
(0.11)
18
36
54
(0.049)
(0.025)
W. Germany
711
18
(0.034)
35
70
105
(0.095)
(0.11)
Other W. Europe
18
47
102
(0.19)
45
79
124
(0.11)
(0.11)
U.S.S.R.
28
61
89
(0.165)
69
65
134
(.12)
k0.14)
Other E. Europe
712
19
(0.035)
22
27
49
(0.044)
(0.049)
Africa
26
8(0.015)
69
15
(0.014)
(0.016)
Japan
511
16
(0.030)
20
21
41
(0.037)
(0.055)
India
412
16
(0.030)
33
19
52
(0.047)
(0.023)
Other Asia
61
7(0.013)
61/
18
(0.016)
(0.021)
Australia and N.Z.
26
8(0.015)
66
12
(0.011)
(0.021)
International centers
03
3(0.006)
47
11
(0.010)
Unknown
--
(0.047)
World total in sample
539
(1.00)
1101
(1.00)
427
Fractions of the world total appear in parentheses.
Fractions for nuclear.physics papers in the samples from Physics Abstracts 1969 reported in Table XIV.10
(a and b) of Volume II, Part B, of Physics in Perspective.
1636 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
summarized in other volumes of Physics in Perspective,* suchcounts of papers do not answer all the questions posed in the pre-ceding paragraph. They show, for example, that the United Statescurren tly publishes about one third of the physics research paperscovered by Physics Abstracts but leave unanswered the questionwhether the United States might have more than one third of thepublishing physicists who are less productive than average of lessthan one third who are more productive.
IV.1.3.2 Methodology
The study we report was made on the papers in Physics Abstractsfor the five years 1965-1969. Its geographic bias thus reflectsthat of Physics Abstracts, .rid we have not attempted to correctfor this. Our sample consisted of all names in the following fiveintervals of the alphabet:
Bacchi to Backhurst (inclusive)Edelman to Edmonds (inclusive)Kini to Kinzly (inclusive)Ovsyuk to Ozawa (inclusive)Vasudevan to Vavilov (inclusive)
All names in any of the 1965-1969 author indexes that were in anyof these intervals were recceded, and the total number of papersreferenced for each such name was tabulated.
Each name was then assigned to a nation or geographic region.To make this assignment, a variety of measures had to be employed.Fortunately, many of the names could be found in the publicationsWho Is aiblishirg in Science and International Directory of Re-search and Development Scientists, issued by the Institute forScientific Information. Names for which no address was located inthese publications were checked against the membership directoryof the APS, or the author's institution as recorded in PhysicsAbstracts (1969 only)% Physikalische Berichte, or the title pageof the original paper. By these and (occasionally) other means,national identification was achieved for essentially all names inthe sample.
From these data we tabulated the number of authors in the al-phabetical intervals sampled who had written one, two, or any num-ber, s, of papers in the given five-year period and the number ofthese in each country or region. The relative numbers from thedifferent countries will not, of course, be highly reliable, forit couid well have happened that, for example, the alphabeticalintervals chosen provided an underrepresentation of Russiannames or an overrepresentation of those of some other nationality.However, as fairly reliable data are already availablet on thenational and regional distribution of total papers published, itis sufficient if the present study merely supplies reasonably re-
Volume II, Part B, Chapter XIV; condensed version in Volume I,Chapter 13.-I-Physics in Perspective, Volume II, Part B, Tables XIV.10a andXIV.10b.
1 8 2
Data on the Literature of Physics 1637
liable data on how prolific the authors of different nations are.Such data are presumably not sensitive to alphabetical selection,though they are subject to limitations resulting from the smallsize of the sample.
A much more serious worry in regard to the interpretation ofthe data is the question of how many of the authors should bedesignated physicist. Not only dues Physics Abstzacts cover amoderate amount of material that is closer to chemistry, engineer-ing, geology, or some other science than to physics, but manypeople who consider their primary professional affiliation to bewith one of these other disciplines occasionaLly write papprs thatare well within the scope of physics. A sampling of physics papersfor a period of years will reveal many authors who do not considerthemselves physicists. To provide a rough estimate of this effect,the U.S. authors in our sample were checked against the listi1 4f!sin American Men ofScience. The professional identification ofthe authors listed in this publication was recorded. Many of theauthors in our sample were not so listed, but it is reasonable tosuppose that the distribution of their professional identifica-tions would not be greatly different from that of the others.
IV.1.3.3 Raw Results
Table IV.6 shows the distribution of authors in regard to number
TABLE IV.6 Distribution of Authors in the Alphabetical IntervalsSampled, by Geographical Location and Number of Papers Contributedto the Listings of Physics Abstructs in 1965-1969
CountryorRegion
No. of Authors Whose Aames Papers Fraction
Auth- Appeared on per Total of Papers Frac-ors 1 2 3-4 25 papers Author Papers Sampled tiona
United 138 56 27 27 28 3.03 418 0.36 0.34States
United 55 27 7 10 11 2.82 155 0.13 0.08
KingdomOther W. 68 34 11 12 11 2.71 184 0.16 0.19Europe
U.S.S.R. 35 20 1 9 5 3.94 138 0.12 0.19Other E. 9 4 1 2 2 3.4 31 0.03 0.01Europe
Japan 36 10 6 9 11 4.75 171 0.15 0.06
Other 7 3 1 2 1 2.1 15 0.01 0.05AsiaOther 12 8 1 1 2 2.8 34 0.02 0.06
Worldtotal
360 162 55 79 71 3.19 1147 1.00 1.00
arrom Physics in Perspective, Volume II, Part B, Tables XIV.10aand XIV.10b.
183
l638 PHYSICS fN MISPECTIVE
TABLE W.7 Professional SelfIdentification of U.S. Authors inthe Physics Ahstlucts Sample
Discipl:aeor Group ofDisciplines Designations Useda
Physics Physics (9) ; nuclearphysics (4); solidstatephysics (3); physics,mathematics (2); physics,biophysics (2); theoretical physics (2); 6other combinations containing the word physics
Fields difficult Electrical engineering,to assign solidstate physics;
applied mathematics,continuum mechanics;mechanics, metrology;physiological optics;vision
Astronomy Astronomy (2); astronomy, astrophysics;theoretical astrophysics
Chemistry Physical chemistry (6);physical and inorganicchemistry; chemistry;agricultural chemistry
Metallurgy, etc. Physical metallurgy(2); ceramics; ceramics,metallurgy; physicalmetallurgy, electronmicroscopy; materialsscience, metallurgy
Biology Zoology; biochemistry;anatomy
Total, alldisciplines
No. ofAuthors
Papers byTheseAuthors
28 101
4 25
4 25
9 37
6 18
3 4
63 227
aThe word, or words between semicolons are those used by an authorto describe his field in American Men of Science. If more thanone author used the same words. Cle number of such authors is indicated in parentheses.
184
Data on the Literature of Physics 1639
of papers published during the five-year interval and geographicareas in which they were based. It also compares the geographicdistribution of the papers with that in the more comprehensiveliterature sample. Our sample undercountS"papers from the U.S.S R.and overcounts those from the United Kingdom; the numbers fromother regions are in reasonable agreement.
Table IV.7 shows the distribution of profess:.)nal identifica-tions of those U.S. authors who could be located in Alerican Menof Science. Note that at least half of the aathors identify witha discipline outside physics, although these authors, as might beexpected, contribute a slightly smaller fraction of the total pa-pers.
IV.1.3.4 Discwsion and Analysis
Our goal was to find out how many people are engaged in the re-search enterprise of physics. Unfortunately, this population isfar from stationary in time. New people are continually entetingand many leave. It has often been said, in fact, that many authorspublish only one paper during their lifetime, for example, a thesis.We would Like if possible to sepafate these authors from those witha continuing commitment-not necessarily lifelong-to research activ-ity. A plausible though far from unique way of making such a sepa-ration is suggested by the semilogarithmic plot in Figure IV.1.Here, the points representing number of authors associated with sor more papers in our five-year sample lie reasonably well on astraight line for s >2, but the point for s =.1 lies well abovethe line. Now there is a simple model that would predict a straightline for such a plot, namely, one that assumes that each authorpublished at randon._.tires with an average rate r papers per yearand that the distribution of authors per unit range of r is expo-nential:
n(r)dr = ve-ardr . (7)
Indeed, according to the Poisson distribution, the fraction ofauthors of productivity r who publish s papers in At years is
e [rt]s
fractions:
Combining Eqs. (7) and (8) we get for the number of authors pub-s papers in At years
(8)
Ats
No) =s!
Jo
-ar -rAtve e -
vAts
+ At)s+1
and the number publishing 8 or more papers is
00
( At yE N(,-) a a + At
183
(9) ,
(10)
UI
1640 IN PERSPXCT1VE
E3
NUMBER OF AUTHORS IN SAMPLE,PUBLISHING 5 OR MORE PAPERS IN 5 YEARS
(A A CA 01 -4 a) 400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
i
1
;
/////
o
-
FIGURE IV.1 Semllogarithmic plot of cumulative totals from the
last line of Table IV.I, showing the excessive number of one-paper
authors.
The form (7) that we have assumed for n(f) is rather arbitrary and
doubtless less accurate than one more like Locka's law*
17(s-)
m s-2 for At equal to a lifetime
or its generalizations, but it is clear :hat the large value for
Price, D. J. de S. Little Science, Big Science. New York, N.Y.:
Columbia University Press, 1963, pp. 42 et seq.
186
on ihe Lito.rature of Physics 1641
8 = 1 must come from a peak in n(r) as very low r. So we shallundertake to analyze our data under the crude assumption that thereare simply two populations of authors, those who publish once andthose who publish continuously, the continuously publishing groupshaving a distribution of the form (7) for their rates of publica-tion.
Accordingly, we shall undertake to fit the data of Table IV.6by assuming that for any particular geographic region the numberof authors attached to s papers in our sample is given by Eq. (9)
for s 2, but that for s = 1 it is the sum of Eq. (9) and a termcAt. Table IV.8 shows the results obtained by fitting the threeparameters v, a, and C to the total number of authors, the numberwith two or more papers, and the number with five or more. Theparamenters so obtained can be used to predict the number asso-ciated with either three or four papers, and this number can becompared with the observed number as a check on the model, as we.5. In the table.
Comparing the top line of the table with the bottom one, we seethat the number of transients, or one-paper authors, appearing inthe five-year period is only a fraction of the population esti-mated to be active in research. The active population figure, ofcourse, includes an allowance for those authors who are consideredto be in research but who, through chance or their possession of alow publication rate, do not happen to have published any papersduring the five-year period sampled. (This allowance factor is ob-vious, for the entries in the last column of the table are largerthan the author entries in Table IV.6.) If one wishes to excludesuch low publishers from the total considered to be part of theresearch community, one can compute a new total from the samemodel by emoloying a lower cutoff in the integration on r.
The totals for limited sections of the alphabet must still beconverted into totals for the whole alphabet, and, less trivially,the distribution of authors between those who would be designatedphysicists and those who would be associated primarily with someother scientific or engineering discipline must be estimated. Theconversion to the entire alphabet can be made in either of two
TABLE IV.8 Fit of World and U.S. Data of Table IV.6 to theThree-Parameter Model Described in Section IV.1.3.3
Parameters andAssociated Quantities World Data U.S. Data
5 = number of transientsv
a, yearsN(3) + N(4), predictedN(3) + N(4), observedNumber permanently inresearch = v/a
82.1 20.6792 362.8
2.04 2.1670 29
72 27
388 16o
187
1642 PHYSICS IN PERSPNTIVE
ways: We can compare the number of columns of the author index
sampled with the total size of this index, or we can compare the
number of papers associated with names in the sample with the to-
tal number of papers in Physics Abstracts. The second approach is
less straightforward, for one must allow for multiple authorship
of papers. Thus LE N authors publish P papers in a given interval,
with an average of 7 authors per paper and an average of 1-7 papers
associated with each author, we have
PiT? = 17-13 . (11)
We can get N for, say, a given volume of Physics Abstracts, from
the number P of papers in it, an estimate of p from Table IV.6,and an estimate of m from some other source. With the estimatem = 2.06, obtained from a rather limited sample of articles,* and
with 15 = 2.52 from Table IV.6, we get, for the entire five-year
period, a total of about 138,000 authors publishing one or morepapers. The uncertainties entering into this estimate are such
that it is only to be regarded as a rough check on the estimate
obtained from the size of the fraction of the author index that
was sampled, which was 0.00280 of the alphabet. Dividing this num-
ber into the total of 360 authors in Table IV.6 yields a value of
127,500 for the number of authors contributing items to Physics
Abstracts in this five-year period. The agreement between the twofigures being reasonable, we shall perform all further calcula-tions using the assumption that 0.00280 of the entire population
has been sampled.The most plausible way t. make the division between physicists
and nonphysicists is simpl/ to add to the total of authors in the
physics row of Table IV.7 one half of the total for the next rowand to consider the other half of this row and all the remaining
rows as nonphysicists. This procedure gives 32/63 as the physicist.
component of the sample. One might wonder whether the fraction de-
termined in this way to be physicists would depend un the numberof papers published, but in the data from which Table IV.7 wasprepared such dependence seems to be slight. 01 final estimates
of the number of persons identifying themselves as physicists and
with a continuing actpity in physics research, as of the averageth.e 1967, are obtairied by multiplying the figures in the last
row of Table IV.8 by 32/63 (0.00280):
Number in the world = 70,400;Number in the United States = 30,500.
These numbers are, of course, quite crude, as the discussion
of their derivation makes clear. Still, it is impress±ve that
they are so large. For example, the U.S. figure may be compared
with the total of 32,500 physicists in the 1968 National Register,
a figure one might expect to contain many nonpublishing people,
or with the unduplicated meT1iershi0 of all member societies of the
AIF, 42,700 in 1967, a number that doubtless not only contains
*Physlcs sn Perspective, Volume II, Part B, Chapter XIV, Sectior4.5.
188
04? Utorattiro of Phy:7:ca 1643
many nonpublishing people but also many who identify primarily
with another discipline.One other feature, evident in Table IV.6, should be noted: The
average number of papers associated witil a given author is much
higher in Japan (4.75) than for the world as a whole (3.19). Al-
though the Japanese sample was fairly small (36 authors), the
difference is nearly two and one half standard deviations and
could well be significant.
IV.1.4 PHYSICS THESES
To provide information about physics theses to the Physics Survey
Committee, the Data Panel examined all the abstracts in the phys-
ics section of Dissertation Abstracts* from January through June
1970. The theses represent degrees awarded in 1969. Each thesis was
classified according to physics subfield, whether it was experimen-
tal or theoretical, and size of the PhD program of the university.
The size classification was based on the list of PhD-awarding.,
institutions appearing in the March 1969 issue of Physics Today.'
Any institution listed as awarding 20 or fewer PhD's in the five-
year period, 1962-1967, was regarded as having a small program;
those awarding more than 20 PhD's in that period were classified
as large programs. P.'!ysics Todzy lists 137 PhD-awarding institu-
tions, and 67 of these are small programs, so that 20 is about a
median size for that time interval. About 10 percent of the PhD's
were awarded by the small programs, according to the list in
Physif Tochy.The following limitations on data from Dissertation Abstracts
must be noted:
1. Not all PhD-granting institutions send their theses toDissertation Abstracts. Four of the large programs and nine of
the small ones, which were responsible for 11.5 percent of the
PhD degrees reported by Physics Toay are not covered by Disserta-
tion Abstracts. Furthermore, not all participating institutions
send all their theses to Dissertation Abstracts.2. Classification by subject field is made by the author
of the thesis; therefore, it is not certain that all theses
listed under physics represent work performed for a degree in
physics.The total number of theses in the sample was 597, which can be
compared with about 1400 PhD's in physics awarded in 1969. Thus,
total numbers per year can be estimated by multiplying the numbers
in the sample by 2.34. Since the sample is for half a year, we as-
sumed that about 85 percent of all physics theses appear in Disser-
tation Abstracts.The results are summarized in Table IV.9. The first two columns
give the number of theses in the sample by subfield and size of
* Dissertatton ALstructs internationcti,, periodical publication of
University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Michigan.t Physics Today, 22(3), 46 (March 1969).
1 9
1644 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
LV.9 Production of Physics Theses in 1969
Theses LnSample Percentage Percentage Percentage
Sub- Large Small Est. NRC of all Theoreti- Small Univ.
fielda
Univ. Univ. Totalb Total 0 Physics(%) cal(%) (%)
A&R 5 3 19 - 1.3 100 38
AME 37 17 127 127 9 39 31
EP 64 16 188 220 15 55 20
NP 80 16 225 188 16 28 17
P&F 29 1 70 85 5 67 3
P 22 1 54 6. 4 61 -
F 7 0 16 24 1.2 86 -
CM 189 57 577 360 41 22 23
66!' 23 10 77 6 39 30
PA 2 0 5 - 0.3 - -
Opt 15 2 40 16 3 6 12
Acoust 9 1 23 11 2 50 10
Misc, 15 6 49 304 4 67 29
general
TOTAL 468 129 1400 - - 35 22
aSubfield abbreviations used are the same as those identified inTable IV.1, footnote a.bObtained by multiplying the sum of the numbers in the preceiingtwo columns by 2.34°Doctorate Recipients fh,7 U.S. Universities 1969.
PhD program. The third column gives the estimated total number oftheses in each subfield, obtained by multiplying the sum of thefirst two columns by 2.34. The fourth column compares these num-bers with those obtained from Doctorate Recipients frow Un.z.:tedStates Universities 1969,* for those subfields for which there isa roughly equi 'alent NRC category. Many theses that belong in asubfield apparently appear in the general and other categories ofDoctorate Recipients. The fifth column lists the percent of thesesin each subfield according to the sample. The numbers are obtainedby dividing column 3 by 1400. The sixth column gives the percentageof theoretical theses, defined as those that contain no new experi-mental information. The differences among subfields are not unex-pected. The final column lists the percentage of theses from uni-versities with small PhD programs.
To investigate changes in the distribution or number of theseswith time, the Data Panel also surveyed the abstracts of physicstheses in the January through June issues of Dissertation Abstractsfor 1966. These abstracts refer to theses awarded in 1965. The num-bers appear in Table IV.10, which is similar to Table IV.9. Com-
*Doctorate Recipients fry 77 United States Universities, annual
publication of the National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
190
TABLE IV.10
a on thte Literature of Phyviva 1645
Production of Physics Theses in 1965
Theses inSample Percentage Percentage Percentage
Est. NRC of all Theoreti- Small Univ.
TotalbTotal
a Physics(Z) cal(%) (%)
Sub- Large Smallfield
aUniv. Univ.
A&R 8 0 18 1.8 62d
0
AME 32 10 96 111 9 36 24
EP 65 2 153 180 15 63 3
NP 88 3 208 158 20 30 3
P&F 25 1 60 - 6 58 4
P 22 1 53 5 _ _
F 3 0 7 32 0.6 - -
CM 146 19 378 299 36 23 12
E&P 26 6 73 - 7 31 19
PB 3 1 9 - 0.9 0 -
Opt A 1 11 13 1.1 20 -
Acoust 0 0 0 7 0 -
Misc, 16general
1 39 122 4 75
TOTAL 413 44 1045 - - 34 9
aSubfield abbreviations used are the same as those identified inTable IV.1, footnotehObtained by multiplying the sum of the numbers in the precedingtwo columns by 2.29.cpoctorate Recipients Prim U.S. Universities 1958-1966.arwo experimental studies of gravity and one cosmic-ray experimentwere classified as astruphysics and relativity.
parison of the two tables shows a growth in the number of thesesin all subfields. Significant changes in the distribution are dif-ficult to find, although the decrease of the fraction of theses innuclear physics and the increase in the fraction in condensed-mat-ter are perhaps meaningful. The fraction of theoretical theses al-so did not change. The most striking difference is the increase inthe proportion of PhD's awarded by institutions that were classi-fied as small on the basis of the 1962-1967 listing. In 1965, theseinstitutions awarded 9 percent of the PhD's included in the Disserl-tation Abstracts sample, consistent with the number of such pro-grams obtained from the Physics Today list, 10 percent. By 1969,these same institutions awarded 22 percent of the PhD's. In fact,according to these samples, 57 percent of the increase in PhD pro-
duction from 1965-1969 is in the small institutions (201 of 355).A slight distortion of the comparison results from an increase inthe coverage of Dissertation Abstracts between 1965 and 1969, whichincluded two of the large institutions awarding 82 PhD's in the1962-1967 period and nine additional small programs responsivle for22 PhD's.
191
1646 PHYSiCS IN PERSPECTIVE
TABLE IV.I1 Distribution of Citations In Journals of the insti-
tute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Percentage of
Total citations Citations to Physics Cita-
Journal to Physics U.S. Physics tions to U.S.
'eel.' Citations .Journals Percent Journals Journals(Z)
1965 13,763 3015 22 2437 81
19,9 1,643 293 18 210 72
i':34 1,567 331 21 110 33
IV.1.5 PHYSICS CITATIONS IN THE ENGINEERING LITERATURE
Several surveys of sources of citations to the journal literature
in publications of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics
Engineers (IEEE) (formerly the American Institute of Electrical
Engineers and the Institute of Radio Engineers) have been made.*
The substantial number of citations to the physics literature in-
dicate continuing dependence of electrical and electronics engin-
eering on physics, Idt,le IV.II show!, the distribution of citations.
The category, 1v5ics lournals, includes the following: all
journals publish, by the AI?, Soviet Physics JETP, Proceedings of
th,2 Phyoical Journal of the Physica! Society of Japan
Journal of P;,,, of Solids, Canadian Journal of
Physics, Proc, the Royal Society, Journal of Mathematics
and Physics, ft fiir Physik, Anna/en der Physik, Japanese
Journal of 'op .ysics, Physica, Philosophical MagaZine, andHelvetica 1.,';41.oq ,eta, Of course, there are other physics journals,
but others do not apllear in the list of journals cited. A more dif-
ficult proulem pertain,1 to interdisciplinary journals such asNature. Undoubtedly, a certain amount of physics is represented in
citations Lire, but, as r'iere is no way to measure this
amount, ,hey a. not counted in the citations to physics journals.
,physics journals have accounted for about 20 per-
cent of L. - journal citations in the electrical engineering literd-
ture for many years. The ratio persisted through the rapid expan-
sion of the IEEE publication program during the 1950's.
The other striking feature of the table is the steady growth
of the fraction of citations to journals published in the United
States. The same trend would certainly emerge in counts of physics
publications, but it is interesting and perhaps more significant
to see it confirmed by a study of the use of the literature.
Coile, R.C. IEEE Transactions on English Writing and SPeech.
EWS-12, 71 .(1969); Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers,
38, 1380 (1950); Journal of Documentation (London), 8, 209 (1952);
Dalzisl, C. F. Electrical Engineering, 57, 110 (1938); Library
Quarterly, 7, 354 (1937).
1.D2
1647
PV.2 Use and Usefulness
Numerous small sampling and observational studies of the use ofthe literature of physics were made during the course of the Phy-5ics Survey and have been reported, together with earlier studiesby others, in Chapter XIV of Volume IL, Part 8, of Physics inPerapectfve. The purpose of this section is to add a small post-script to what was written then by describing one further studythat was not then sufficiently advanced to discuss. Even now, onlysketchy results are available, so the methodology may be of morevalue than the results.
The study was designed to find out how well the typical activeresearch physicist succeeds in maintaining awareness of work pub-lished in other countries that has an important bearing on hisown interests. This question is basic to many decisions on informa-tion services: Elaborate schemes to imprlve current awareness arehardly worthwhile, for example, if physicists are already in touchwith all the information they are interested in trying to assimi-late. The key words in the question we hoped to answer are "impor-tant bearing on ;:is own interests." Although one might argue thatmany physicists do not know what is important to their own interests,one is usually on rather shaky ground in trying to overrule thejudgment of the persons whose interests are involved. Consequently,the best way to set up a study of this'question would seem to beto base it on value judgments of the individuals concerned, whichwas the approach adopted in our study.
A physicist, whose own interests led him to scan a rather widerange of literature on condensed-matter, selected numbers of ar-ticles from those he encountered in browsing through non-U.S. pub-licationsarticles that he considered likely to appeal to the in-terests of some 30 of his colleagues. From time to time he pro-vided each of these colleagues with a one-paragraph resume of thoseaspects of a paper likely to interest him and the bibliographicreference. Such distributions were made only after at least sixmonths had elapsed from the time the article became available inthe library but less than 18 months after this time. The colleaguewould examine the material arid answer two types of questions aboutit, as shown on the form reproduced in Figure 1V.2. The questionsof II enabled the returns to be analyzed in such a way as to makethe results almost independent of the quality of the initial selec-tion of articles: Only returns on which 11.1 or 11.2 were checkedwere counted. There were no failures to respond.
Some typical preliminary results appear in Table 1V.12. Thenumbers are so small that sampling errors could be substantial,but they suggest that about half of the non-U.S. literature itemsthat U.S. physicists would e interested in taking time to examinemay fail to come to their attention within the first year aftertheir appearance. The loss entailed is considerably mitigated, how-ever, by the general redundancy of the literature: In many casessimilar results or ideas are put forward by several investigators.
The study was so designed that figures could be separately tabu-lated for experimentalists and theorists and for articles in foreignlanguages. Further studies of this sort would be of substantial in-
terest.
193
1648 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
I. Previous familiarity with the item. (Check one.)
I. I had previously seen enough of this
item to evaluate its degree of inter-
est for me.
2. I had heard of this Item, but had not
evaluated Its interest.
3. I had not heard of this item, but was
already aware of results equivalentto those quoted in the communication
on it.
4. I had not heard of this item, and was
not aware of the reiults quoted in the
communication on it.
11. Interest in this item. By checking one of
the three alternatives below, please indi-
cate whether this item was of low, medium
or high interest to you, the boundaries be-
ing defined by whether it was of greater or
lesser interest to you than (a) median of
all articles of which you read at least the
abstract, or (b) the median of all articles
of which you read nearly 'all of the text.
1. Interest of this < median of ab-
stracts.
2. Median of read abstracts <interest
of this < median of read articles.
3. Interest of this > median of read
articles.
FIGURE IV.2 Evaluation form for physicists queried about journal
articles.
:AZt,1 r,fr,!P,I!,UW (.7.1 1649
TABLE IV.12 Familiarity of a Sample of Physicists with Resultsof Interest to Them Published in Non-U.S. Journals and Availablefor at Least Six Monthsb
Degree of Interest°At Least as High asMedian of Abstracts Higher than MedianRead (Categories of Articles Read
Degree of Famiiiarity 11.2 4. 113) (Category 11.3)
Seen or heard of: 12 4
Evaluated. (Cate- 11 3
gory I.1)Not eva1Uated 1 1
(Category 1.2)Not heard of: 12 4
Aware of ;imilar 6 1
results (Category3)
Not aware of re- 6 3
sult (Category 4)
aRespondents were theoreticians in nine cases, experimentalists in15.
bEntries are numbers of cases.cIn addition to the 24 cases tabulated, there were six discardedreplies checking item 11.1.
19 5
V
INDEX
OFDATA
This chapter is devoted to a crude hut, it is hoped, usable index
to socioeconomic data contained in all the volumes of Physics in
Perspective, including the present one. (Data of a purely scien-
tific rather than socioeconomic nature are not included in thisindex, although they occur frequently in the earlier volumes. Dia-
grams that are schematic, rather than quantitative, are also omitted.)
The organization of the index is based on the categories of inde-pendent and dependent variables that we described in Section 1.2.1.
Each table or figure has been classified, first, according to the
nature of the quantity tabulated or plotted as ordinate and, second,
according to the variable or variables on which its functional de-
pendence is shown. Using the terms "dependent variable" and "inde-pendent variable" for these two categorieg, respectively, we shall
arrange the index according to the various combinations as follows:
DEPENDENT VARIABLES
People. Numbers or proportional amount ofMdnpower, (Employable) (ME)
Manpower, (Students) (MS)
Money. Dollar figures or proportional amounts ofFunding ($F) . Money assigned to broad programs of scientific
research, etc.Other money ($0). Salaries, income, GNP, costs of equipment, etc.
PUblications (P). Numbers or Frup ortional amounts of articles,
books, etc.Miscellaneous (Misc.). All quantities plotted or tabulated, other
than people, money, or publications.
1650
190
INDEPENDENT VARIABLES
Physics, chemistry, geology, etc. or, occasionally,physical sciences, biological sciences, etc.
Smalior groupings than the above, mol-; t often the
subfields of physics.Activi*. Such distinctions such as basic and applied research,
development, manageme'nt, teaching, etc.Geogy.(Th?..o.a6. Distinction of one country or one region from another.D:titution or type of institution. This may refer to one or more
specific Institutions performing work in physics or, more often,to the distinction between types of institutions, such as uni-versities, Industrial laboratories, government laboratories.
Support souce. Agency or sector of the economy from which workis suppocted.
[4-Vreo, or mrnk. Most.often this contrasts holders of doctoraldegrees (usually designated "PhD," though ScD, etc. are included);sometimes academic faculty rank is used or, for students, thelevel.
Age.
For a given dependent variable, not all the independent variablesjust listeewill be of interest. For example, the last two arerelevant only if the dependent variable is one of the "people" type.In the tables below, only the more important independent variablesare used. We have omitted those that were found to occur seldom ornever among the tables listed.
Whenever a table or figure specializes its data to one or severalvalues of an independent variable, there is an index entry corres-ponding to this variable. If the data refer to only one value ofthe variable (e.g., if the variable is subdiscipline and the datarefer only to nuclear phynics9, the entry is the numeral 1, or, incertain important cases, a special abbreviation--when the datarefer to the United Stated, the entry in the Geographical column is"U.S."; when they refex to physics, that in the Discipline column is"P". If they refer to two v,)lues of the independent variable, theentry is 2; this entry is alx.o usually used, for example, when thedata contrast one subfield with all the rest of physics. If the
data are separated accotding 1:o more than two values of the inde-pendent variable, the ertr,:l X.
The right half of each Andex page contains additional informationthat may be useful.
Source. This is an abbreviated clue to the source of the data. Notall sources are identified, but the following are (thoUgh onlyin cases where the natt,re pf the source was obvious to the.indexer): The National Registerof.Scientific and Technical Per-sonnel (R); other quenionnoires to individuals or to organiza-tions (Quest.); recordu nf government agencies supporting R&D(Ag); records of other erwmlizations (Rec); abstracting-indexingpublications (A&I); recaeth journals (x); scientific and tech-
f) 7
1652 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
nicai literature in general (Lit.); editors (Eds.); interviews(Int.).
Hemzrks. Any combination of words or symbols that will provide,within the small space available, a clue to the subject matterof the index entry. For the subfields of physics correspondingto the panels of the Physics Survey, the usual abbreviations areused: Astrophysics and Relativity (A&R); Atomic, Molecular, andElectron Physics (AME) ; Elementary-Particle Physics (EP); Nuc-lear Physics (NP); Plasma Physics and Physics of Fluids (P1.5,F1.);Physics of Condensed Matter (CM) ; Earth and Planetary Physics(ESPP); Physics in Biology (Ph. in Biol.); Optics (Opt.);.Acoustics (Acoust.).
/tem. Preceding the colon is the relevant volume of Physics in Per-spective; following it is the figure (F) or table (T) number or,occasionally, some other designation to identify data material.
CPOSS entries. When a figure or table supplies data of more thanone of the dependent-variable types enumerated above (e.g., sup-plies both funding and manpower data), it will, of course, beentered in more than one place in the index. In such cases,each entry contains, in the last column, the abbreviations for:the dependent variables of the other entries.
We have tried to follow as literally as possible the indexing
scheme just described. For example, tables giving mean salaries of
different types of people are indexed under $O, not ME; ages areunder Misc., though age distributions are under ME; a plot of wordsper year in journals is Misc., not P. But in many cases, hasty andrather arbitrary decisions had to be made, of which we shall try
to list some of the most conspicuous. Data on number of peoplechanging between one employment or specialty and another betweentwo given years are usually identified by a 1 in the "rime" column,
as they approximate the value of a time derivative evaluated at one
time. Data on degrees granted have been assigned to the ME category
not the MS. The identification of interdisciplinary areas may notalways have been consistent: an area whose physics component is onlyone of our subfields (e.g., E&PP) may have components belonging to
two or three major disciplines, and if these are separated in atable, a 2 or an X in the discipline column is appropriate, eventhough there is a 1 in the subdiscipline column. Even fuzzier is
the situation with regard to commercial products, etc.: often
these have been associated regularly with a nonphysics discipline(e.g., electrical engineering) to justify a 1 in the "Discipline"
column. Data referring in one sense to one value of an independentvariable but in another sense to two or more values (e.g., scientistsworking in the U.S. but classified according to country of origin)are usually given a 2 or an X in the relevant column.
The arrangement of the index is as follows: Each of the Tables
V.1 to V.10 is devoted to a particular one of the depcndent vari-ables and in some cases to the combination U.S. physics, of thegeographical and discipline variables, or to the remaining combina-tions (including the combination of U.S. with any other disciplineor with a multiplicity of disciplines in which physics might be in-
cluded). Within each of the tables, the entries are arranged in theorder of the entries in the first column--X, 2, 1 (or U.S. or P,
198
ol Da:',a 1653
when aP propriate). no entryand under each of these in the orderof entries in the second column. Further ordering is not by entriesin the other columns but is sequential through the four volumes ofPhipticil Pcpavccti,v.?. Thu tables are
Table V.1Tab1e V.2Table V.3Table V.4Table V.5Table V.6Table V.7Table V.8Table V.9Table V.10
manpower (Employable)--U.S., PhysicsManpower (Emplovable)--Other Than (U.S., Physics)Manpower (Students)Funding--U.S., PhysicsFunding--Other Than (U.S., Physics)Other MoneyPublications--U.S., PhysicsPubiicationsOther Than (U.S., Physics)MiscellaneousU.S., PhysicsMisce11aneous--other Than (U.S., Physics)
199
TABLE V.1 Manpower (Employable)--U.S.
Physics
1-,
cl,
Lri .p..
Sub-
disci-
pline
Institu-
tion
(or Type)
Degree Age
or
or
Rank
Exp.
Support
Activity
Source
Time
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
X X X X X X X X 2 2 2 1 1
1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2
1 X X 1 x 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 ? ? 2 2 2 2 2 ^ 2 _̂ 2 2
Source
Remarks
"Cross
Item
Entries
RInstitutional distrib.
I:F4.8
REmp. patterns
1:T12.9
REmp. patterns
I:T12.10
REmp. patterns
I:T12.13
REmp. patterns
IIC:TII.12
RNonacad. emp.
IIC:TII.2
RTypes of insts.
IIC:TII.47
RDistrib. of emp.
ITC:TII.48
RSubfield distrib.
IIC:TII.14
RGov & Industry
IIC:FII.7
RStudents & PhD's
IIC:TII.24
RUniv. emp.
I:T12.12
Quest.
Univ. sample
IIC:TIII.21
$F
RProgram elements
I:App.4A
$F
RMigration
I:T4.81
RMigration, pl. phys.
I:F4.B.1
RMigration, NP
l:F4.B.2
RMigration, EP
I:F4.B.3
RMigration, ANE
I:F4.B.4
RMigration, CM
I:F4.B.5
RMigration, A&R
I:F4.B.6
RMigration, Opt.
I:F4.B.7
RMigration, Ph
in Biol. I:F4.B.8
RMigration, Acoust.
I:F4.B.9
RMigration, E&PP
I:F4.B.10
RMigration, P1.;iF1
I:F4.B.11
Zoo
TABLE V.1
Manpower (Employable)--U.S.
Physics (cont.)
Sub-
Institu-
Degree Age
disci-
tion
Or
Or
Support
pline
(or Type)
Rank
Exp.
Activity
Source
Time
Source
Remarks
Item
Cross
Entries
1
21
X1
11
X1
21 2 2 '2 1
21 1
21 X
1X
11
1X
1
11
1X
2
12
2
11
11
11
11
11
R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R
Subfield distrib.
Subfield distrib.
Work activities
Foreign born
Foreign born
S,;bfield distrib.
NP projections
NP projections
NP projections
Comp. of subfields
Acoust. vs other
E&PP field mobility
E&PP etc.
Authors per paper
Birth & citizenship
Noncitizens
Federal support
Transition matrix
Ages
Youth vs mature
Opt. changes
Transition matrix
Subfield mobility
Competence vs emp.
Extern. competence
I:F4.2
I:F4.3
I:F4.7
I:T8.10
Misc.
I:F8.9
IIA:TII.27
IIA:TII.23
SF,Misc.
IIA:TII.24
$F,Misc.
IIA:T1I.25
SF,Misc.
IIA:TIII.4
IIA:FVI.1
IIF:TIX.3
IIB:TIX.5
I:F13.20 )
Misc.
I1C:TII.10
IIC:TII.10
IIC:TII.18
IIC:TI1.25
IIC:TII.26
IIC:FII.4
IIC:TII.27
IIC:TII.28
Misc.
IIC:TII.29
IIC:TII.35
IIC:TII.36
2 0 Z
TABLE V.1
Manpower (Employable)--U.S.
Physics (cont.)
Sub-
disci-
pline
Institu-
tion
(or Type)
Degree Age
Or
or
Rank
Exp.
Activity
Support
Source
Time
X1
1X
11
X1
1X
21
X1
1X
21
X1
X1
rX
1a,
v,
X1
1a%
X1
12
XX
12
X2
12
X2
12
X2
12
X2
12
X1
21
X1
21
22
12
X1
22
X1
2X
12
X1
2X
12
X
Cross
Source
Remarks
Item
Entries
Mob. & competence
IIC:FII.6
Subfield distrib.
IIC:TII.41
MS
Self-identification
IIC:TII.46
E&PP self-identificationIIC:TII.70
Add. competence E&PP
IIC:TII.71
Competence overlap
IIC:TII.74
E&PP mobiiity
IIC:TII.76
Subfield mobility
IIC:TII.77
Subfield mobility
IIC:TII.78
E&PP mobility
IIC:TII.79
Mobility vs overlap
IIC:TII.80
NP vs total physicists
IIA:TII.26
AME physicists
IIA:TIII.2
Emps. of opt. scientistsIIA:TV.1
Acoust. vs aiLphysics
IIA:FVI.2
E&PP emp. patterns
IIB:TIX.6
Ph. in Biol.
IIB:TXI.1
NP vs total physicists
IIA:FII.19
AME physics
IIA.FIII.5
SF,P
AME population
IIA:TIII.1
AME physicists
IIA:TIII.3
B.
Opt. scientists
IIA:TV.2
Acoust. vs all physics
IIA:FVI.3
Acoust. vs all physics
IIA:TVI.3
B.
Ph. in Biol.
IIB:TXI.2
Rec.
Meeting attendance
IIB:FXIV.48
TABLE V.1
Manpower (Employable)--U.S. Physics
(cont.)
Sub-
disci-
pline
Institu-
tion
(or Type)
Degree
Age
or
or
Rank
Exp.
Activity
Support
Source
Time
Source
Remarks
Ite=
Cross
Entris
1X
1X
RE&PP
1:F4.17
SF
1X
XR
NP
I:F4.29
1X
XR
AME
I:F4.39
SF
1X
XR
CM
I:F4.45
SF
1X
XR
Opt.
I:F4.52
SF
1X
XR
Acoust.
I:F4.61
SF
1X
XR
Pl.&Fl.
I:F4.70
SF
1X
X1
Rec.
EP manpower
IIA:TI.3
.)-
1X
21
XRec.
AEC program in EP
IIA:TI.7
as
Lre
1X
2Quest.
Univs. granting NP PhD
IIA:TII.30
-..i
1X
1R
Acoust. subdivisions
IIA:TVI.4
1X
12
RE&PP mobility
IIC:TII.81
Mis.:.
1X
12
RE&PP emp. shifts
IIC:TII.83
12
11
RE&PP emp. shifts
IIC:TII.83
1R
A&R
I:F4.78
SF
11
REP
I:F4.18
SF
11
RNP
I:F4.30
SF
11
RAME
I:F4.40
SF
11
RCM
I:F4.46
SF
11
ROpt.
I:F4.53
SF
11
RAcoust.
I:F4.62
SF
11
RPl.&Fl.
I:F4.71
SF
1X
Quest.
& Ag.
NP in U.S.
IIA:TII.9
1x
1Quest.
& Ag.
Univ. manpower NP
IIA:TII.I1
SF
203
co
204
TABLE V.1
Manpower (Employable)--U.S. Physics (cont.)
Sub-
disci-
pline
Institu-
tion
(or Type)
Degree
Or
Rank
Age
Or Exp.
Activity
Support
Source
Time
Source
Remarks
ite-7
Cr..ss
1 1NP projects
New NP facilities
ITA:III.:5
SF
11
Ag.
NP projects
SF,Misc.
12
NP projections
IIA:T11.17
1NP projections
IIA:TII.2i
1NP projections
1NP projections
IIA:T11.20
1NP projections
IIA:TII.21
SF,M:s:.
NI' projections
12
XNP physicists
11
Acoust. subdivisions
1x
Ag.
Controlled Thermonec.
12
A&R manpower
1x
R & Rec. Growth of acoust.
IIC:TiI.2
12
1A&R subspecialties
1X
1E&PP
IIC:FII.12
11
XAge distrib. E&PP
. 75
11
1E&PP mobility
11
1E&PP mobility
X1
Institutional distrib.
X2
1Institutional distrib.
XX
1Age profiles
XX
2Quest.
Rank structure
1:19.5
XX
1Quest.
Age-rank structure
I:F9.9
X1
2Rec.
List of univs.
I:App9A
X1
Phys. teachers
1:T11.1
:7F.S0
TABLE V.1
Manpower (Employable)--U.S. Physics (cont.)
Sub-
Institu-
disci-
tion
pline
(or Type)
Degree
Or
Rank
Age
Or
Exp. Activity
Support
Source
Time
X X
1 2
X1
X1
X1
2
X1
X1
X1
2
X1
XX
1
X1
2
X1
11
X1
X1
X1
X1
X1
X1
X1
11
X2
1
X1
1
X2
1
X2
X1
X1 1
21
X
21
X
21
2X
12
Source
Remarks
Item
Cross
Entries
205
Emp. patterns
I:T12.11
Median ages
I:T12.14
Misc.
Manag. responsibilities I:T12.15
R,Quest.Flux of emp.
I:F12.19
New & replacement emp.
I:T12.19
New employment
I:T12.26
Physics teachers
IIB:TXIII.1 $F,$0,
Misc.
IIB:FXIII.5
Misc.
IIC:TII.13
IIC:TII.15
IIC:FII.2
IIC:TII.21
IIC:TII.23
Misc.
IIC:TII.34
IIC:TII.37
IIC:TII.38
IIC:TII.39
IIC:TII.42
IIC:TIII.20 $F,MS,
P,Misc.
I:F9.3
Quest.
Educ. & emp. pipeline
Emp. distrib.
Federal support
Activities nonacad.
Distrib. of activities
Age & activities
Subfield mobility
Labor force
Labor force
Emp. by sector
Work activities
Quest.
Univ. sample
BNL & ORNL
Emp. trends
First emp.
Emp. projections
National labs.
I:F12.12
I:F12.15
I:F12.21
I:F9.4
1-,
oNoN o
206
TABLE V.1
Manpower (Employable)--U.S. Physics (cont.)
Sub-
Institu-
disci-
tion
pline
(or Type)
Degree
or
Rank
Age
or Exp.
Activity
Support
Source
Time
Source
Remarks
Item
Cross
Entries
1X
2Age vs rank
I:F9.8
Misc.
11
XX
1Academic insts.
I:F9.10
$0
11
XX
1Nonacademic insts.
I:F9.11
$0
12
1Teachers vs others
I:T11.2
$0,$F
12
XR,other
Industry & business
I:T12.16
11
1X
Educ. insts.
I:F12.14
11
21
Nonacad. em. proj.
I:T12.24
1 '
1X
XInd. physicists
I:F12.24
11
XX
Govt. physicists
I:F12.25
1X
XQuest,R
ASM vs AIP
IIC:TII.1
1X
Quest,R
ASN vs BLS
IIC:TII.3
11
X1
Distrib. of activities
IIC:TII.19
11
X1
Distrib. of activities
IIC:TII.20
1.
1X
XRes. vs teaching
IIC:TII.22
1 12 2
X 1
1 1
Activity distrib.
Development
IIC:FII.8
IIC:TII.43
12
X1
R&D vs non-R&D
IIC:TII.44
12
Quest.
PhD's granted
I:
.A.1
X1
Manpower flow
MS
XX
Freshmen thru faculty
I:T12.1
MS
XRec.
AIP placement reg.
I:F12.18
Misc.
1X
Unemployment
I:F12.20
1X
Emp. projections
I:T12.27
1X
Prod. projections
I:T12.28
1X
Grads. & enrollments
I:F12.26
MS
1X
PhD projections
I:T12.29
TABLE V.I
Manpower (Employable)--U.S. Physics (cont.)
Sub-
Institu-
disci-
tion
pline
(or Type)
Degree
or
Rank
Age
or
Exp.
Support
Activity
Source
Time
1 2 X
X
1 1 1
2X
1
11
1X
1
12
1
1.1'
1
1-
1X
1
asas
1X
2
I-
11
21
22
1
2X
1
X1
Source
Cross
Remarks
Item
Entries
Prod. & use projections I:T12.30
E&PP etc.
IIB:TIX.7
Quest.
Teacher backgrounds
IIB:FXIII.3
Age distrib.
IIC:TII.6
Birth & citizenship
IIC:TII.8
Federal support
IIC:TII.16
Subfield mobility
IIC:TII.30
Subfield mobility
IIC:TII.31
Subfield mobility
IIC:TII.32
Subfield mobility
IIC:TII.33
Competence vs emp.
IIC:FII.5
Educ. mobility
IIC:TII.40
MS
Govt. support
IIC:TIII.7
Govt. support sources
IIC:TIII.8
Support sources
IIC:FIII.1
207
1662 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
TABLE V.2 Manpower (Employable--Other than (U.S., Physics)(No tables in this category have a breakdown by age.)
Otxel-
loh- Intel-r,tiun
li,cre
or
- ^Cross
zraph, pline
X P
X P
plioe lor rype: Rank Activity 4ource rime Source Remarks Item Entries
X CitizenshipDistrib. of authnts
115.8
IC:T1V.h111 sr ,
X
A
PO, tdoct ora I s
Sci. h enz./PoPi :Fil.1 sr
X Scl. h eng. :711.Z
A1.1.0ther Authors
A 1 A1.1.....ther Set, h eng.iGSP :FE.5
1 Postdoe. p. 18.6
1 It Country of PhDEmp. destinattonscontr.' led theruunue.
:18.11
H Destinations 1C:111.11
Ahl Prolific..., function IC:T1V.8 Misc.
..
Set. & ng.c I zensbtp
NeNE. Sel. tea:hers:TN.4:F11.4
Quest. Phys. teachers :F11.5
Rec. Women doctorates :712."
X
rs
X Des, PhD's A postdoci,x Faculty pro leer ions
Ems. trends
CI12.8:T12.22:1I2.25
r, R A611, field of PhD :IB:TVIII.1
2 int. undergrad. majors illi:TIX.:
rs H ',APP. etc. IID:TIX.5
vs R Self-identification IICE111.41,
rs R EMT 1iC:FII.11
Quest. Fields of work haegreelIC:TII.b0rs Quest. :lot. membership IIC:T11.10vs H Environ. net. 11C:111.1.3
X EAPP. tnsts.
vs eell-idenelfi,ation IIC:T1V.7
vs
Posedoc. plans I :TR. 7
Rec. Maio, ind. 141.1s. ICt9.2Q.03t. e,zard of doctorates 1:F12.1
us H M.L. bachelors 1:F12.7vs Rec.otherDegree recipients ItE12.8
Hes. a:civ. I. support I112.17
Us A
purse. PhD's granted Np etc. IIA:111.29
R. &coos. posedocs.us R Phys. chem. specialeleslle:TX.1
X It Phys. aileron. ins.. IIC:111.47vs R Phys. A aileron. 11C:FII.9vs
us
R Fmplover distrib. 11C:TIY.48R Univ. activities
vs R Academic rtink EIC:711.50vs R Theory vs expt. IIC111.51vs R Degree level HE:711.52us 2 R Field of degree IIC:711.55
R Addielonal competence Ile:TII.S6
PS It Growth of MKR Mobility AhR, FE.PP !IC:TH.58
US X 1 ft AO' mobility 11CF11.10vs g E8P lic:T11,54
vs X X K Faculty, FAPP 11CTI1.64
US X X RegrOo prod. IICITIT.bb
2 1 R PhD prod. E. utilix. IIC:T1I.67.
U5 2 2 X R Environ. scientists IIC711.615
US 2 1 R Enirun. scientists 11C:71I.69
US X EAPP TIC:111.70
US Quent. Ind. manpower IIC:TIII.16
US 2 R UM emp. IIA:11V.8
vs 2 X R CM vs all phys. IIA:TIV.9
1 R Ante.. manpower Iill:TVIII.2
X Geosei. projectiong I111FIX.17
PS X X Ceoscieneists
CS R Geoscientlacs IIC:FII.IJ
US Foil profs. I79.6US Unemployment 1F12.4VA Faculty projections 1:712, 11
US GNP factors 1712.23A SO.Misc.US Livilign cmp. I712.23D
US SP mobility IIAITII.28
US 1.ne. Teacher backgrounds 11E:F1111.2
US Nese. Students & teachers IIII:EXI11.4 MS
441 Paper.% per author IIC:FIV.1
Juent. TIn diserib. IIB:EXIV.6
208
TABLE V.3
Manpower (Students)--U.S.
(None of the reports give data on students
outside the U.S.
Sub-
Insti-
Degree
Disci- disci-
tution
or
Support
Cross
pline
pline
(or Type)
Level
Source
Time
Source
Remarks
Item
Entries
X X X
H.S. enrollments
I:F11.3
1Quest.
-Career choices
I:T12.2
XQuest.
Choices of major
I:F12.6
1X
H.S.. sci. enrollments
IIB:FX11I.1
11
Students & PhD's
IIC:TII.24
ML
1R
Subfield distrib.
IIC:TII.41
ME
X1
Manpower-flow
I:F12.5
ME
XX
Freshman thru faculty
I:T12.1
ME
1X
% entering grad. sch.
I:F12.9
XI
Quest.
Student support
I:T12.5
IQuest.
Citizenship & sex
I:T12.6
2X
Grads. & enrollments
I:F12.26
ME
XI
Quest.
Educ. & emp. pipeline
IIB:FXIII.5
ME
1R
Educ. mobility
IIC:TII.40
ME,Misc.
2I
Quest.
Univ. sample
IIC:TIII.20
$F,ME,P,)
Misc.
)
1X
Fed. support
I:p12.10
$F
2Grad. stipends
I:T12.4
XX
Projections of pop.
I:T12.20
XProjections of pop.
I:F12.22
XEnrollment projections
I:T12.21
X1
Students & teachers
IIB:FXIII.4
ME
209
TABLE V.4
Funding--U.S.,
Physics
Sub-
discipline
Institution
(or Type)
Support
Source
Time
Source
X1
1Quest.
X1
XX
Ag.
X2
1Ag,other
XX
Quest.
X1
XAg.
X1
XAg.
X1
XAg.
X1
1Ag.
X1
1Ag.
X2
I-,
crs
crs
t--
X X XX
2 2 XAg.
XX
XAg.
XX
1Ag.
X1
1Ag.
XX
1Ag.
21
Ag.
210
2 1x
X1 x
Quest,Ag.
Ag.
1X
X1
XX
1X
X1
XX
1X
XAg.
1X
X1
XX
Cross
Remarks
Item
Entries
Univ. Sample
II:TIII.21
ME
Program elements
1:App.4A
Basic phys. funds
I:F5.2
Fed. & ind. funding
I:T5.2
Biophys. facilities
I:T9.8
$0
AEC
I:F10.4
NSF
IF10.5
DOD
I:F10.6
ARO
I:T10.A.12
NBS
I:T10.A.18
NP projections
IIA:TII.23
ME,Misc.
NP projections
IIA:T11.24
ME,Misc.
NP projections
IIA:TII.25
ME,Misc.
Ag. expenditures
.IIC:TIII.9
DOD expenditures
IIC:TIII.10
NASA support
IIC:TIII.14
NBS expenditures
IIC:TIII.15
Funding distrib.
IIC:FIII.2
P
AME physics
IIA:FIII.5
ME,P
CM vs all physics
IIA:TIV.1
EP expenditures
IIA:TI.6
EP cost projections
IIA:TI.10
EP cost projections
IIA:TI.11
EP cost projections
IIA:TI.12
EP cost projections
IIA:TI.13
EP expenditures
IIA:FI.21
EP cost projections
IIA:FI.23
EP cost projections
IIA:FI.24
TABLE V.4
Funding--U.S., Physics
(cont.)
Sub-
Institution
Support
Cross
discipline
(or Type)
Source
Time
Source
Remarks
Item
Entries
1X
XEP cost projections
IIA:FI.25
1X
XEP cost projections
IIA:FI.26
1X
XAg.
NP costs
IIA:FII.18
1X
Ag.
EP
I:F4.17
ME
11
Ag.
EP
I:F4.18
ME
1X
Ag.
NP
I:F4.29
ME
12
1Ag.
VP
I:F4.30
ME
1X
Ag.
-I:F4.39
ME
12
1Ag.
I:F4.40
ME
1X
Ag.
CM
I:F4.45
ME
12
1Ag.
CM
I:F4.46
ME
11
Ag.
Opt.
I:F4.52
ME
12
1Ag.
Opt.
I:F4.53
ME
1X
Ag.
Acoust.
I:F4.61
ME
12
1Ag.
Acoust.
I:F4.62
ME
1Ag.
PL&Fl.
I:F4.70
ME
12
1Ag.
Pl.&Fl.
I:F4.71
ME
12
1Ag.
A&R
I:F4.78
ME
1X
Rec.
LAMPF
I:F5.17
$0
1X
Rec.
NAL
I:F5.18
$0
1X
Ag.
EP expenditures
IIA:FI.22
1X
Ag.
NP support
IIA:FII.17
$0
1X
Quest.,Ag.
NP funding
IIA:TII.9
11
Quest.,Ag.
Univ. funding NP
IIA:TII.11
ME
11
Univ. NP projects
IIA:TII.12
Misc.
11
Natl. lab. NP projects
IIA:TII.13
Misc.
11
NP projects
IIA:TII.14
ME,Misc.
12
New NP facilities
IIA:TII.15
ME
211
TABLE V.4
Funding--U.S.,
Physics
(cont.)
Sub-
discipline
Institution
(or Type)
Support
Source
Time
Source
Remarks
Item
Cross
Entries
11
Ag.
NP projects
IIA:TII.16
ME,Misc.
12
NP projections
IIA:TII.17
ME,Misc.
1NP projections
IIA:TII.18
ME,Misc.
12
NP projections
11A:TII.19
ME,Misc.
12
NP projections
1IA:TII.20
ME,Misc.
1.
2NP projections
IIA:TII.21
ME,Misc.
12
NP projections
IIA:TII.22
ME,Misc.
1X
XAg.
AME
IIA:FIII.4
11
1Ag.
NSF proposals AME
IIA:FIII.7
Misc.
11
1Ag.
NSF proposals AME
IIA:FIII.8
Misc.
1X
Underwater & geoacoust.
IIA:TVI.2
1X
XAg.
Acoust.
IIA:FVI.4
1X
1Acoust. subdivisions
IIA:TVI.4
ME
1X
Projections AC areas
IIA:FVI.5
1X
XAg.
AME & Pl. support
IIA:FVII.3
1X
1Phys. of Fl.
IIA:sec.VII8.2
11
Ag.
A&R funding
IIB:TVIII.4
11
XAg.
NASA space phys.
IIB:FIX.19
X1
XAg.
AEC labs.
1:F9.15
X1
Teaching expenditures
IIB:TXIII.1
ME,$0,Misc.
11 1
Quest.
Quest.
.R
Ind. public & support
Univ. sample
Salary costs
IIC:TIII.19
IIC:TIII.20
I:T11.2
P
ME,MS,P,Misc.
ME,S0
12
XQuest.
Ind. funding
IIC:TIII.17
11
1Quest.
Univ. salary support
IIC:TIII.22
XAg.
Federal support
I:F1.1
XAg.
Federal support
I:F5.16
TABLE V.4
Funding--U.S., Physics (cont.)
Sub-
Institution Support
discipline
(or Type)
Source
Time
Scurce
Cross
Remarks
Item
Entries
1
Ag.
Basic phys.
I.F10.3
Ag.
Physics/total budget
1:F10.7
Ag.
NASA
I:T10.A.14
1Ag.
Teaching phys.
Salary costs
I1T11.1
1:T11.3
Ag.
Educ. expenditures
I:F11.6
1Ag.
Federal res. obligs.
IIB:TXIII.3
1Rec.,other
Info. services
IIB:FXIV.9 )
I:F13.5
)
1Ag.
Federal obligs.
IIC:TII.17
1Ag.
IDL support
I1C:TIII.11
2I
',I
TABLE V.5
Funding--Other than (U.S., Physics)
Geo-
graphic
Discipline
Sub-
discipline
Support
Source
Time
Source
Remarks
Item
Cross
Entries
X1
R&D/GNP
I:F8.1
ME
XR&D
I:F8.2
X2
R&D
1:F8.3
X1
Know-how sales
I:F8.6
$0
U.S.
XX
1Ag.
AEC labs
I:F9.16
U.S.
XX
1Ag.
Ag. distrib.
I:T10.A.1
U.S
.X
X1
Ag.
Ag. distrib.
I:T10.A.2
U.S.
XX
1Ag.
Ag. distrib.
I:T10.A.3
U.S.
XX
1Ag.
Ag. distrib.
I:T10.A.4
U.S.
XX
1Ag.
AEC
I:T10.A.6
U.S.
X1
Ag.
DOD
I:T10.A.10
U.S.
X1
2Ag.
Air Force
I:T10.A.11
U.S.
XX
1Ag.
Dept. of Agric.
I:T10.A.15
U.S.
X2
1Ag.
Commerce
I:T1C.A.17
U.S.
XX
Ag.
NP funding
IIA:TII.10
U.S.
X1
X1
Ag.
Plasma support
IIA:pp.725-6
Mis
c.U.S.
XAg.
Environ. Sci.
IIB:TIX.12
U.S.
X1
Ag.
Environ. Sci.
IIB:FIX.14
U.S.
XX
1Ag.
Environ. Sci.
IIB:TIX.11
U.S.
X1
Ag.
OSSA budget
IIB:TIX.20
U.S.
2X
Ag.
Phys. & Environ. Sci.
I:F5.1
U.S.
21
Ag.
NSF
I:T10A.8
U.S.
2A&R recommendations
IIB:TVIII.5
U.S.
21
A&R recommendations
IIB:TVIII.6
U.S.
2Ag.
R&D obligs.
IIB:TIX.10
U.S.
11
Ag.
NSF atmos. sci.
IIB:TIX.13
U.S.
1Atmos. sci.
IIB:FIX.15
U.S.
1NCAR appropriations'
IIB:FIX.16
*.o
TABLE V.5
Funding--Other than (U.S., Physics)
(conL)
Geo-
graphic
Discipline
Sub-
discipline
Support
Source
Time
Source
Remarks
Item
Cross
Entries
U.S.
11
XAg.
NSF atmos. sci.
IIB:TIX.14
U.S.
11
CAS recommendations
IIB:TIX.15
U.S.
1X
1X
Ag.
NSF geosci.
IIB:TIX.16
U.S.
11
1X
Ag.
NSF geophys.
IIB:TIX.17
U.S.
11
XAg.
NSF oceanog.
IIB:TIX.18
U.S.
11
Ag.
OSSA typical
IIB:TIX.19
U.S.
2X
Surveys
R&D etc.
I:F10.1
U.S.
XX
Ag.
Basic res.
I:F10.2
U.S.
XX
Ag.
Ag. distrib.
I:T10.A.5
U.S.
1X
Ag.
NSF
I:T10.A.7
U.S.
2X
Ag.
DOD vs NSF
I:T10.A.9
U.S.
1X
Ag.
Navy
I:T1O.A.13
U.S.
12
Ag;
NIH
I:T10.A.16
U.S.
21
Ag.
Interior
I:T10.A.19
U.S.
XR&D
I:F12.2
U.S.
XInd. R&D
I:F12.3
U.S.
1X
Fed. support & GNP
I:F12.10
MS
U.S.
2X
Sources of R&D funds
I:F12.11
U.S.
XBasic res.
I:F12.13
U.S.
2Basic res. vs all R&D
I:T12,18
U.S.
Accelerators
IIA:TII.2
Misc.
2 1
5
TABLE V.6
Other Money
Sub-
Geo-
Disci- disci-
graphic
pline
pline
ox X X X X
216
U.S
.X
U.S
.X
U.S.
XU.S.
X
U.S.
PX
U.S.
PX
U.S.
P1
U.S.
P1
U.S.
P
U.S.
P
U.S.
P
U.S.
P
U.S.
P
Insti-
tution
(or Type)
Degree
Or
Rank
Age
Or Exp. Activity
Time
Source
Remarks
Item
Cross
Entries
1 1 X X
Exports & imports
Electronic trade
Wages
Prices
I:F7.4
IIA:TIV.7
I:F4.106
IF4.107
XMfg. output
I:F4.108
XLabor costs
I:F4.109
1GNP
I:T7.2
1GNP & energy
I:F7.10
Misc.
1Relative R&D costs
I:T8.1
1Know-how sales
I:F8.6
SF
XWage payments
IIB:FXII.1
XConsumer prices
IIB:FXII.2
X xMan-hour productivity
Unit labor costs
IIB:FXII.3
IIB:FXII.4
XU.S. trade
I:T7.3
XU.S. trade
I:F7.3
1Rec.
Prerun costs
IIB:FXIV.21
21
Ag.
Cost increase
IIC:TIII.23
1Costs/man-yr.
I:T5.1
XX
Ag.
AEC costs
IIC:FIII.12
XRec.
LAMPF
I:F5.17
SF
XRec.
NAL
IF5.18
SF
11
X1
Academic insts.
I:F9.10
ME
11
X1
Nonacademic insts.
I:F9.11
ME
X1
11
Salaries
I:F9.12
11
1X
1Salaries
I:F9.13
11
1X
1Salaries
I:F9.14
TABLE V.6
Other Money
(cont.)
Geo-
graphic
Disci-
pline
Sub-
disci-
pline
Insti-
tution
(or Type)
Degree
Age
Or
Or
Rank
Exp. Activity
Time
Source
Remarks
Item
Cross
Entries
U.S.
PX
XQuest.
Biophys. facilities
I:T9.8
$F
U.S.
P1
21
RTeacher salaries
I:T11.1
$F,ME
U.S.
P1
21
RSalaries
I:T11.1
ME,$F
U.S.
P1
X1
New accelerators
IIA:TII.8
Misc.
U.S.
.P
XTeacher salaries
IIB:TXIII.1
ME,$F,
Misc.
U.S.
P2
21
Salaries
IIB:TXIII.2
U.S.
1X
Cost/scientist
I:F9.1
U.S.
XGNP factors
I:T12.23A
Misc,ME
U.S.
XGNP components
I:T12.23B
U.S.
XGNP
IIA:FII.17
$F
U.S.
XRec.
Semicond. sales
IIA:F1V.2
U.S.
XMagnetics sales
IIA:FIV.3
U.S.
XElectronic purchases
IIA:FIV.4
U.S.
1Semicond. sales
IIA:TIV.2
U.S.
1Unit costs of teachingIIB:TXIII.4
U.S.
.1
Rec.
Runoff costs
IIB:FXIV.22
XNMR equipment
I:F4.101
11
Types of accelerators IIA:TII.4
Misc.
XRec.
Phys. Abstr. price
IIB:FXIV.14
Misc.
1Rec. & J. Journal prices & costsIIB:FXIV.24
1Lit.
Book prices
IIB:FXIV.44
1X
Core memory
I:F4.111
1X
Minicomputers
I:F4.112
1X
Computer costs
I:F7.2
Misc.
11
XCore memory costs
IIB:FXII.6
11
XMinicomputer costs
IIB:EXII.7
X1
Computer installationsI:F7.1
Timekeeping devices
IIB:XIITH.1
XCosts of NMR
IIB:FXI.1
9 1
'7
TABLE V.7
Publications--U.S., Physics
Subdiscipline
Institution
Support
Source
Time
Source
Remarks
Item
Cross
Entries
X1
A&I
Distribution
XJ.
Phys. Rev.
I:T9.9
X1
A&I
Exp. & theor. papers
IIA:TIII.5
X1
A&I
Distrib. of papers
IIB:TXIV.11
X1
A&I
Papers produced
IIB:FXIV.32
)
I:F13.18
)
X1
J.
Author affiliations
IIC:TIII.3
X1
A&I
Performing inst.
IIC:TIV.4
21
A&I
Theses
IIC:TIV.9
21
A&I
Theses
IIC:TIV.10
X1
X1
J.
Support acknowledgments
IIC:TIII.2
X2
Scientific publicity
IIB:FXIV.49
)
I:F13.29
XX
Age of citations
IIB:FXIV.35
)
I:F13.21
)
X1
J.
Support acknowledgments
IIC:TIII.1
X1
J.
Support acknowledgments
IIC:FIII.2
X1
1J.
Papers supported DOD
X1
1J.
Papers supported AEC
IIC:TIII.5
X1
1J.
Papers supported NASA
IIC:TIII.6
X1
A&I
Distrib. of U.S. papers
IIC:TIV.1
X1
A&I
Distrib. of U.S. papers
IIC:TIV.2
21
A&I
AME physics
IIA:FIII.5
SF,ME
2J.
Age of cits. in revs.
)
I:F13.25
)
1X
1J.
E&PP papers
IIB:TIX.9
1J.
JASA papers
IIA:TVI.5
11
J.
Acoust. subdivisions
IIA:TVI.6
ME
TABLE V.7. Publications--U.S.,
Physics
(cont.)
Subdiscipline
Institution
Support
Source Time
Source
Remarks
Item
Cross
Entries
1J.
Growth of acoust.
IIC:TII.2
ME
1A&I
Major ind. labs.
I:T9.3
1A&I
Types of ind. labs.
I:T9.4
1Quest.
Univ. sample
IIC:TIII.20
$F,ME
)
MS,Misc.)
1Quest.
Teaching vs rating
IIC:FIII.7
1Quest.
Publs. vs rating
IIC:FIII.8
1Quest.
Support vs rating
IIC:FIII.9
1J.
Size of insts.
IIC:FIII.11
11
Quest.
Ind. publs. & support
IIC:TIII.19
$F
1J.
Journal time lags
IIB:FXIV.25
)
I:F13.14
)1
1Quest.
Publs. vs teaching
IIC:FIII.5
11
Quest.
Publs. vs students
IIC:FIII.6
1Eds.
Fate of manuscripts
IIB:FXIV.26
A&I
Citation statistics
IIB:FXIV.37
)
I:F13.22
)1
J.
DOD support
IIC:TIII.12
1J.
Support sources
IIC:FIII.1
ME
219
TABLE V.8
Geo-
graphic
X X X X X X X X X 2
U.S.
I-,
cr.
U.S.
L's
- 22
0
Publications--Other than (Physics, U.S.)
Disci- Subdis-
pline
cipline
Time
Source
.Remarks
Item
Cross
Entries
PX
1A&I
Distrib. by countries
1:T8.3
P1
2AM
CM publ.
IIA:TIV.3
P1
A&I
Regions work vs pr!.!.
IIB:TXIV.9
PX
1A&I
Geog. distrib. of work
IIB:TXIV.10
P2
1A&I
Abstr. jrnl. coverage
IIB:FXIV.12
PX
1A&I
Papers produced
IIB:FXIV.31
I:F13.17
1A&I
Authors
I:T8.2
ME
P1
A&I
Region of publ.
IIC:TIV.3
P1
1A&I
Geog. distrib.
IIC:TIV.5
21
J.
IEEE citations
IIC:TIV.11
X1
Ag.
DOD categories
IIC:TIII.13
21
Quest.
Ind. publ.
I1C:TIII.18
X1
A&I
Citation matrix
IIB:FXIV.29
PX
1A&I
Papers & theses
IIA:TIII.4
P1
1Quest.,Int.
Quality of CM papers
IIA:TIV.10
Misc.
PX
A&I
Specializ, of jrnls.
IIB:FXIV.28
I:F13.15
Misc.
P1
Lit.
Cits. in rev. lit.
IIB:TXIV.14
PX
J.
Age of citation of revs.
IIB:TXIV.15
P1
1A&I
Cits to rev. lit.
IIB:TXIV.16
PLit.
Purpose of books
IIB:TXIV.21
P1
A&I
Quality & cits; CM
IIB:FXIV.36
PX
A&I
Rev. articles
IIB:FXIV.39
PX
A&I
Abstr. jrnl. entries
IIB:FXIV.10
I:F13.6
P1
A&I
Abstr, jrnl. entries
IIB:FXIV.11
I:F13.7
P1
A&I
Jrnl. prolificness
IIB:FXIV.13
l:F13.8
P1
A&I
Phys. abstr. entries
IIB:FXIV.17
I:F13.11
P1
J.
Citations from Phys. LW.
IIB:FXIV.30
I:F13.16
TABLE V.9
Miscellaneous--U.S., Physics
Subdis-
cipline
Insti-
tution
(or Type)
Degree
or
Rank
Support
Source
Time
X1
1
X1
1
X2
X2
X2 X
X1
X1
2
X1
1X
11
1X
X1
X1
1X
11
X1
1X
11
XX
1X
11
X1
2
11
11
11
11
11
12
12
12
12
12
Cross
Source
Remarks
Item
Entries
Quest.
Salary support
IIC:FIII.10
Foreign-born
I:T8.10
ME
NP projections
IIA:TII.23
ME,$F
NP projections
IIA:TII.24
$F,ME
NP projections
IIA:TII.25
$F,ME
Authors per paper
IIB:FXTV.34
I:F13.20
ME
Specialties vs areas
IIC:TII.4
Median ages
IIC:TII.7
Transition matrix & age
IIC:TII.25
ME
Age distribs.
IIC:TII.28
ME
Rec.
Accelerator utilization
IIA:TI.8
Rec.
Accelerator capabilities IIA:TI.9
Accelerators & reactors
IIA:TII.3
Census of accelerators
IIA:TII.5
Census of reactors
IIA:TII.6
Accelerators shut down
IIA:TII.7
New accelerators
IIA:TII.8
$0
E&PP ages
IIC:TII.83
Accelerators
IIA:TII.2
$F
Univ. NP project sizes
IIA:TII.12
$F
Natl. lab. NP projects
IIA:TII.13
$F
NP projects
IIA:TII.14
ME,$F
Ag.
NP projects
IIA:TII.16
$F,ME
NP projections
IIA:TII.17
$F,NE
NP projections
IIA:TII.18
$F,ME
NP projections
IIA:TII.19
$F,ME
NP projections
IIA:TII.20
$F,ME
NP projections
IIA:TII.21
$F,ME
221
TABLE V.9
Miscellaneous--U.S., Physics (cont.)
Insti
Degree
Subdis
tution
or
Support
-Cross
cipline
(or Type)
Rank
Source
Time
Source
Remarks
Item
Entries
12
NP projections
$F,ME
11
1Ag
NSF proposals AME
IIA:FIII.7
$F
11
1Ag.
NSF proposals AME
IIA:FIII.8
$F
11
Univs.& acoust.speciattiesIIA:App.A
11
Govt. labs. acoust.
IIA:App.B
11
2ESPP ages
IIC:TII.81
ME
11
1E&PP ages
ME
XX
Major labs.
I:T9.1
XX
1Quest.
Agerank structure
I:F9.9
X1
Quality categories
I:T9.7
X2
XAge vs employment
I:T12.14
XX
Quest.
Numbers of faculties
IIB:FXIII.6
X1
Teachertime distrib.
IIB:TXIII.1
ME,$F,$0
XX
1Ag.
Info, anal. centers
IIB:TXIV.19
X1
1Age 6, activities
ME
X1
Quest.
Univ. sample
IIC:TIII.20
$F,ME,MS,P
1X
2Age vs rank
I:F9.8
ME
11
Quest.
Res. vs teaching
IIC:FIII.3
11
1Quest.
Support vs teaching
IIIC:FIII.4
XPhDgranting univs.
I:F9.5
2Rec.
Dept. size
I:F9.6
XQuest.
Phys. faculties
I:F11.2
XEmpl. ads
I:F12.16
XRec.
AIP placement
I:F12.18
1Scientific meetings
IIB:TXIV.17
XRec.
Page charge honoring
IIB:FXIV.23
XLength of papers
IIB:FXIV.33
I:F13.19
11
Median ages
IIC:TII.31
ME
Index. of Data 1677
TABLE V.10 Miscellaneous--Other than (U.S., Physics)
Sub- Instl-C00- 1114cl- 114ci- teflon Support
graphic pline Nine (or Type) Source rime Source Remarks ItemCross
Entries
1CSU I:App.RAX Rec. Arcelerature 1.5 GeV 1:14.2X Accelerators 1:F8.8
R Cltieenship 8 age 1:111.8 MERec. Accelerators 1.5 GeV 114:11.4
X Rec. Storage rings 114:11.5X Rec. Accelerator A reactor loc. 1 IA . F 1 I . 7
X A&I Conc. of jrnl,. I 111:FX1V. 21
GNP energy 1:F7.10 SO
1
Semicond. mfgrs. IA:TIV. 5Computer innovations 118:114.6Accelerator location, 1 14:72. 3
2 Energy I:11.42 Le,munic. media
Dept. sloe I :F9. IU.S. X 'Nest. Aptitude scores 1:112.3U.S. X Plasma grants 11A:pp.725-6
X Rec, new starts 1111:118.21U.S. X Data centers I1B:IXApp.BU.'i. Median ages Atat 1IC:TII.54
Telecommunications 1:F4.341. . Energy l:.1.9U. S Univ. fiscal troubles'
Rec. Committees USC 1:114.1U. S. Employment ads 1:F12.11U. S . GNP facrors I:112.234 SO,ME
Growth industries l:T12.23CAg. Reactors IIA:TI1.1
U.S. AN. Nuclear power plants 11A:Fl1.2U.S. AR. Info, anal. centers IIB:FXIV.48 1:F13.28
X Ittest.t1nt. Communic. media IIB:FXIV.4 l:F13.3X Atilt, pmts. etre. IIB:FXIV.15 1:F13.10X All Abstr. Jrnts. IlB:FXIV.I6X Lit. Rev. lir. 1111:FX1V.402 Q cst.Int. Tlme In cvmmunic. IIB:EXIV.3 I:413.3
Plasma expts. 1:48.65Jury ratings 1:F5.4Jury ratings 1:F5.6Jury ratings 1:F5.7Jury ratings 1:F5.8Jury ratings 1F5.9Jury ratings 1:75.10Jury ratings 1 '5.11Jury ratings 1,5.12Jury ratings l:F5.13Extrinsic vs Intrinsic 1:75.14Extrinsic vs intrinsic 1:F5.15Jury ratings 1:App.5A-5D
est.1nt.Types of accelerators 114:111.4Quality of CM papers IIAITIV.I0
SO
Rec. Pev. Jrnts. circ. IIB:FXIV.45
xLit.
441Kinds of rev. lit. IIB:FXIV.46 I:F13.26Emphasis in Jrnts. IIB:XIVApp.AAbstr. A title Jrnts. I111:711V.IAbstr. Jrnts. 118:1014.2litle Jrnts. IIB:TXIV.3Secondary services 1111:11(IV.4
Abstr. Jrnl. indexes IIBITOIV.5Secondary services I1B:TXIV.6 ICTI3.1
1 Energy prod. 1:14.3J. Jrnl. time lags .14:TXIV.8 1:113.2
Age of Jrn1s. rend tt8:TXIV.12 1:113.3Quest. Oral communication 118:11014.18A&I Interdisc. Jrnls. IIB:1XIV.20Int. Info. transmission 118 :FXIV./ I:F13.4Int. Info. transmission 11B:FXIV.8Rec. Phys. abstr. etre. IIB:FXIV.14 1:F13.9 SOJ. Jrnl. bulk C. price Ild:FX17.18
Rec. Jrnl. circa. 1111:FXIV.19 1:F13.13J. Bulk of Jrnlm. IIB:FXIV.20 1:F13.12
Ala Jrnl. specialisation Ila:FXIV.28 IIFI3.15 P
7ueat.A.51 Roy. lit. 114:FXIV.4I l:F13.24Ata Rev. lit. CM
xComputer efficiency l:F1.2Semicond. innovations 114:114.4
SO
Discoveries vs exploit. 1:11.1Laser power 11A:FIV.IComputer generations IIA:FIV.5Timekeeping devices SO
223
APPENDIX A:SELECTED TABLESFROM THE PHYSICSPORTION OF THENATIONAL REGISTER OFSCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICALPERSONNEL
The next few pages reproduce the 1964, 1968, and 1970 questionnaire
forms. After these follow the tables; their content has been de-
scribed in Section 11.1.2. The number following the T in the up-
per left-hand corner of each table designates the type of table,
as labeled in the first column of Table 11.4 of the text. The
labeling of the rows and columns corresponds to the choices of-
fered on corresponding questions of the National Register form;
the numbers in parentheses at the heads of the columns of Table 11.4
can be used to locate these on the 1970 form. Each table is given
an identifying number at the right.
A variety of abbreviations is used in the tables. Those per-
taining to the various subfields are the following;
AO, Astrophysics and relativityAME, Atomic, molecular, and electron physics
EP, Elementary-particle physicsNP, Nuclear physicsF, Physics of fluidsP, Plasma physicsP&F, Plasma physics and physics of fluids
CM, Condensed-matter physicsE&P, Earth and planetary physicsBIO, Physics in biologyOPT, Optics
1678
224
Appendix A 1679
ACOUST, Acoustics
ASTRON, Astronomy (all areas other than astrophysicsand relativity)
MISC, Miscellaneous physics
Many of the tables have subrows labeled with N, H, V, and sometimesHP. Here, N is the number of registrants relevant to the given boxof the table, H is the percentage that this box comprises of thehorizontal total in the table, V is the percentage that this boxcomprises of the vertical total, and HP is the value of the columnvariable at the indicated percentage of the horizontal total. Forexample, in the columns labeled salary ranges , as in Table 12, anentry, 50 = s, in the HP subrow means that s is the median salaryfor the row in question. A statement, dimension-001 01, meansmerely that there is no specialization other than that indicatedfor dimensions 002 and 003.
225
1680 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
NATIONAL REGISTEROF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL PERSONNEL
ore THE FELD OF PHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY coNouctro DeAMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS
3. I.. 113.1 ****** R. YORR POW Ol. ,0017.13 PRY 01 IIONA L ecrgece POUND, .0.
:sinetinr" .18::::;*.:1. .tInvi:;E::;s. .1i.:: ::::::*:: i'41' 11. :.::17115111511,:: . :FiF * ii7;:17.1'26WiA'n.:.::1F.:.....r.ipiABAhE'f,s1F:Eajirl"s'iSi'..vs... siNT Nswcps IN .. INK tin 'DM
1 .1. YODR N OR .10.1111 SI 3. I' I* iNCORPI.P............ CO../ INP....vioN .30Y/. ROLL .143
P ..... . SU. OLI ..... III. CO. l IN01..0
NOTE II you ham. resmtved and completed Nattongl Register nue...mire from one of the other ores...bons listed bove
sinc. MArch I. l'AM. pl.. wnte the name ol the orgsnagbon her. ileo. piesse ,,,,,plete pro, I. 99a 99 1), bAck of the questMnnaire. give your social security number. date and signature,aml reboil in the eni hand envelope.
SW A.
.. . - __...
I . /I or tmetn a on co ..... OP WM. ;3 113 OR Co. /R OP BSCONCI. S sl.... Os. I1 IICIVOM. OltotaU7/00 0 I ..te
CA 1
3 .1P11... .... .....L2 4 U. : I NON . .monansro ....14.nt ...el, ...11.1[ . 1.1 ,,go POO 0 % . pop ug uee,t. xeto
--.. ._-___----------- ----....------_--.--_--........--s I regsnl myself profeutonally as a I ar 1 'check only one)
Xi X Astronomer 1,-.) at . Chemist,..1,,, . Ling.. ZI ei - psychnlogDt
:Ix - limloOst III PI .Econompt ;:".'n, - Nlphematician 0 IM -Sociologist
;2 .1 Mu31.1 SclentIO 0 XI Engineer :IP, MeornIngist 0 In -Slatisucian
7,10 -Geologist ::: PI - Phssicist CIXII- Other soccifyi
EDUCATION - ... . .......
7 CoLLsos UNorts,1 ow 0.1. INSTIPUTION il...... ou ..1 .0.3 ...JonIP NY 1301.3
MINOR
6 .
. .
... ..-. ..... --CURRENT PPOrraistONAL EMPLOYMENT
st Please check the bos which most fully describes yout current employment status. Check only one
fl i . Full-time Professionally employed rj i -Student, part-time employed C , Not employed, and not reeking
l"., a Part-lame prefermonally employedICiraduate Araimants up. this code, employment
0 S Full.urne profeulanally empb,yed, OS -Student. not DeployedDa - Employed. but nut in professional work
Porttime student (.: 6 Not employ ed. and seeking mnpIoy ment CI o Retired
9 1,9,9 gi9, 999,, a pp..., principal employ .r and actual plsce of employment. lt .4.3 RI... Im/..1.. ...RI ORR. OD..IS 1.1 um... R. ORR IS .
.....1 re...hi m.w.m. 03.3.., ...IRO 3,R ..r ,.......n1 tetip end vlol
HI Check the boa of the category which M most appropriate, for your present principal ernployer. Cheek only one,
n I YRIVTY INIRIATIIT um 11USINFAIS 0 C CAMS -COHMISSIONPM CORPS
0 . finy.rkert.orElr fl L . semersny SERVICE c-rier. DUTY
il t . etILLesic Ug UNI.RAITY. omen TIIN IILIIICL SCHOOL 0 II IIYUY. IDIYUMNRYNT OKNEY
161... 3....1 43; ...I; .....ilatkillai 1110 S . NONPROFIT NOSPITL 0. (71.1Nic
CI Si Str.biet. scsuot. I-1K NONPROFIt OHIINIZTION. OTHFR TIIAN IHRSPITL.CLINIC. OR F.DUCATIONL INSTITUTION
n . SCCoNSRy SCHOOL OR SCHOOL STRUM
CI I irtfIES1. COvICIANSICHT. CIVILIAN KHPLOYKS 0 r OTHCH lorNIFFI
IL Plea.* itive the princip& service you perfonn or product on whtch you work.
12 .Fzn:ntth4 tcocoortun,,,,,ztlif: Itityaenta tat vier= ar.allution moat closely related to Your P_RESEta ...Pl./TIMM
th
NA/APA.floSeiaII, TM.
-PLEASE COMPLETE OTHER MOE-
226
"3o3umr
Appendix A 1681
CURRINY PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYMENT 4 oNIINIII.0. . .... ..-- . _ ..... .. .. _ ... .
13 Number your tint and eeconol moot important kind ul act.. ty. in terms of workitut USW IlarotwI, by entering "I' 0,1 'nn the pproprigte line. berm.I 0000.tar00 OR ALIIINIIIIIIAIHON Or KEEKARCH ANO I 114 SW RFECARCIIIIEVElorlarNT
n . tEr1,1r0 RINEARCHA YANA...NI OR AVIIINIIITM A/ION Or OTIIVII THAN I DEVI WIWI Wr 011 lortioN
RISCANI11 ANO 14,01.01,0 Mt I CtINMILTING4 11 Al 11100 .01..1..1,14.... 0.01 ill 1011 10....1,. - . .. . .....- -- . ...if I. ,A....4:(.1.11,...Y.oru/..sol.nkrkt.trr.1 .soup:,,,,Iteodi ,,,,r.szlmoirlsent. htrro,:ransl.Gucemnuan funds' 17) Yea r.1 N^ E Don'l know
C t Agriculture Li . Educetion LI r Natural resource. C a- Other program I epee... )0 I -Atomic energy CI 4 Health tj r - Public worksCI i NNW. On Intetnattonal CI s SPIes
NO71: Solar/ mad Ineiona Inhumation Is rogardad as lantlnantlal and 111 be used far alatIntalat parposas nly. It 01NO1In mainsail Ill 517 UST lint will allow It la be Ideallflml milk yna.
IS tIASIC ANNUAI. SALARY (JAN 1200 Please give the Wale nnual salary emactated wlth yuur principal professionalemployment as of Jan 1904.
$If madenurIly mployed, cheek whether sslary is for CI 9.10 Inn. nr 0 11-12 tom.
4::::r... ,..;"::::.,:. 'Z",...::, ".:',.:V.,1",:;,t;....t.":,"::,';',:',":.7..;1!,;.'7.V..':',"7:La:::711::: ' :1`.: `" ``^^ ""' '"'.." """"'la rsilmATED GROSS ANNUAL PROFESSIONAL INCOME. tJan I to Dee 31, 12041 Please grce your estimated gra.. Pro
fessional income from all prelmatnnal &cll... for the year winch wIll end December 31, 1964
eh. sone... 0rts000 .
IS. lintoniany year. nf proles...n.1 work xperience, including teaching. have you hed? 1 I
44111tTIFIE COMPI TINE!,
Pi From Om Accompanying pectaltor. Ii.l. soIett and enter en the Idles below in deermumg trier the four petlaileff in which youformat,or you have kour greatest mienune cumprtence, booed on your total cduralional mul werk emN.T.,..
Greatest Third:fr,..... amity TIO NoWarr awrIalir TillySecond Fourth:14..... SmitT TM* Nawiw SywHilr 1.11
ISA I. your protessranal competence primarily characterited at n Theoretual 0 Lam...mental 0 Oathaw.LANGUAGE AND AREA KNOWLEDGE!)PI FOREIGN LANGUAGE Lot the language. (other then English/ in which You have knuwledge and indicate w.th cheekmark 1 y ) Your ProSereney.
II rmo have nn Imesgr lenguage oneperenra. cherk hers p
PROFICIENCYNY 0CILITY CN READ OHEcN to TRNELATE TECHNICAL .Nowgoog.ways IIIILIvER
CON...VMS EEC...IC/IL NTicLE MUT CNSNHE or LacTURII ,,,,,,,,.... 01.1 OWN UE yEE ALNoLiAGE.1LISO11.0.4 OrU111, INaO *SOLI .......T. CO1441011.LutisTLY riCHLLT FLU ..... SALT 1001.111114 ENOLIEM 1.1{. V 41;1.'4 cTION
7
. .
20 AREA KNOWLEDGE. LIS( the foreign enuntriee or U. S. geographic area. in which you ha taut mian.1 etweialireIlongained by residence, research, or talluel.TOT.. ..... . .
COUNTRY OR WallIDENCE ON ' williwo ON NOWAK or TOUR KNOWLECON ON ECiaLIZATIONOPECIALilATION EECiay.IlEO
. .- - . . . .....-..-.21. socirry MF.MRF.RSIIIP Circle the number In frnot of sll soelenes of which you are member. For write-tn. Include onlynatinnAl prolemiunal soGetles and me ulentdring wdrds In lull,
Sal. AMERICAN lairs:car 'HMIS'S SW ANERICAN ASTRONOMICAL ROCIETYfrt. OPTICAL INICItly Or AmERICA
SW AMERICAN CROSTALLOCNAPHIC ASSOCIATION503. ACOMITICAL /WETS or AMERICABO nom, Or RHEOLOCE SW OTIICIUY opreira.Sal AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF OPIESICII Tr...cora/ 1/4 NONE
22. Plea. glue mailing Or forwarding address through which you c. always be reached if different Iran, address on reverseside.
C/O New., MOW City SW. Us GA.10NA/1... 1.0 Nemo!
OCIL CCURITT NO II 1
23. If you wok to add to the ...eve information concerrung your prof...renal employMOO Or Solailiagiono. Pie.. COOITHenrbelay/ ur on en ...wheel Am., referring to item numbers where appropriate.
2 9 7
................IN.s ColumN
1682 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
1968 NATIONAL REGISTEROF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL PERSONNEL
ry cyr PHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY cONrIllt Itr, DI 7411.AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF 114.TISICS
ma glom ...I ffffff Air. ir1)0,11 M.. VONA /OW>40 1/14. N1110NAL C110.105 1,11.04011014
!..,'" 1" ,r.:r: ,:.':....'8 %'.7".17..b,,1'... f'71:.1:::,'.,"+''....!n',';:ot''.....p,""ZI':17.tik117::":::.7", ':.:711'.:'%1:1:117.:!!'Z'171'; Aa:::"117:7Voltrr:
Ao....,...... ......... .1....,. 4...1 ..... A4o..., 400 I .1 Ao .44 8 mot 4. ama..1 ta........ tiol IN loloolan al awn...
.,,.., ....or 11N . 11 ,. DA rm.7 i
atimot (,,...11111 1111 {1411,11 011110N.1. If111.11,111 1,1,111./.1. 4.1 ,111.1311.1 .11./ 10T. *Vit. ,10N1 111,0111 11 1111M ff 011 111./.11 1 oftenreo w, ,,..,.,01..E t . 01./11 NTI alsoall allca./over 440 TOUR, roar., 1114 cram ca fkencot.13
_J
NOTE If you haw. r.diVed .111 oonploo4101.notool Ilertioter 1110.11110mme OM. Um nt the other orgonnotiona hated obove
soror Marrh I. 19614, ohm.. urn. Om non. of the wannitatmo lime.
nem. consplo. give your mem' seeltrite Danilor, il.a... and nowturr iwiuw. nal ret ttttt in the ewlweal onvelim.
ViTA 1r DAM or. P,X101 , ,,,,, Oa yonta,
,..1,..,11, 0. .11. 04 ,,,,, cm 0C114 LOU.,
0. aLuDDIA ,11001. aeou.ilou1111
, ma"ll '
4 .1.11,111.10
IDLIC,IIIIN4 4 ,/,, v . Dowaw . IN 01.11
OOIN 1411.011
: II ,00 .a. 3 .tudent. eht.,e myr name. , o Spolma. fondue. i 1 7 SlMItaa, Drt-Orne
PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYMENT 1
R Ohm; your ,Inploy.... 0.0.[2. I Employed full.mn. 03 - UnromloyM nrol ...king moployment 0 4 ,Nmoto.41:11grel and not etokIng 05- Retired
01' Emphierd pond..9 Plea.. gloi, noTr. Ot P7.0104 prIompul employ.r of
mlfemployed write in ...11"), oentol plce of employment, ond title of
pres.nt pontion.
wow d town'. minor., woDO,A..1 plan, uf 0110,1.1..1 Dar A OOM
TO. ut smont goollanItofl4 if oarlarM Ay a unltIO. mho,. nr UM.. mil,.
10 Check1,(C,L.L.L.QL4
Ifright
the how of N. wtegtiry which la moot ppropnaw for your prevent princlpol employer (check only one).
t roivarg tnoorrtor no 1,11.107441 R. 4 - STATIC OuvrataNgter
I . Illttr.REPLOYILIPLI II . IRTERNATIONAL.AORTICY
1 COI.LIDM OR IDIMERSITY. OTHER TM,. latIOCAL 5111001. 0 14 .0THER GOVERNIMEHT AGENCY Oroaa.
I. larIlICAL WHOM.0 la .PRIVATR linriTAL OR CLINIC
17 - 40/11oR COI LRCEEi ...NONPROFIT IIIISPITAL OR CLINIC
. OrCONOAFT OR ELEMENTARY SCIIOOL 15.TICIt1. 000101071T ORGAHMAT/UN. OTHER THAN HOSPITAL
I rEORHAL GOVERNIMINT.-CIOILIAN naLorttCLINIC. Olt EDUCATIONAL nerrertrowe
. COPRA MILITARY SERVICE...ACME DUTT LI OTHER tOorar I
odditionany mmIoyed, enter on the line 01 N.the category moot appropriate to thot employer
II. Number your Arrt &ad wand most Important king of ctivity, In termo of working time devoted. by entering .1- and "2" on N.
opproprim Imm below.71 . reolongurrer rot AnroIl ,,,,, ION Or RESEARCH 4 or.073..npur.m.
AND VIIVELOPIIENTM TrArr Or IMUOMENT
10. MAHAGrAlr.NT OW ADMINISTRATION Or OTHER THAN Ss- OICSICN
It00r114041 AIIII DEVISLOPMENT IT DATA COMPILATION. CRoccsAwn
.. PARIC RFAILARCH24 . CONSULTING
4 APPLIRD R0111401111,A -SALMI. MAR/CHUNG. PURCHASING. LIITIMATING
I Ttol(1111.,4IS REPORT OR OTEIR TECHNICAL WMITINC. znalmn OTHER Opoltrl
M . ItoDIPERHT OR SUMMAR 14000O1I1
I2. la ANY of your work Smog supportrd or sponoorol by U. S. Government fund., 0 Yoe 0 No 0 Don't knowIf yes, I. your work reiated to eny of Ne folloveing prose....0 a - Agriculture 0 a - fleold, 0. - Publ. work. 0 N - Urban dem1oprnem
0 N - Montle energy 0 . Hou.ing 0 II - Rurol dmeloprornt 0 Othor pro(ram (apeelfy)
O c - Defetwe 0 0 - International 0 L . Spoce
0 o - Education 0 H Natural resources 0 g - TramparatIon
228
01. .loo. rI"loi01
Appendix A 1683
PROPIMSIONI. ENO.," MEN( ,..., ,, , 1 ,li From the eperteltrae Idi rot. oo-erlyall, iirIPTI And 1.1 Nub rho. nOtolort .1o1 T.,11111,. Lpeti.ity Pinot .,1,,...1, ir111A1 lo TAWFIIINFN I prorripal rolpioyment or w rd. in Pour .1mcisIty .1 it I. not No the lot
n,,.....
Atop "ow other o !eolith eloo.ialtreo tr. which P1111 Wee eotopetorwe
TWO IhITTNATIAP, 1,1. rd...wat rate
two foodNum. 'W.I.,' VI.T MOTO,. Apormity Till
NOTI. Salm and loam inlatmalion is to ddddd as aanlidsnlial and will II used Ist stalleisal AO sssss only. II will NOTIs tal sssss In any toy IAA will allow N la Is Identillad with you.
III CPA ItArIll: ANfiVAL SAI,ARV PO., ,ore tire Ira.", Almost oars. arowrand ...Mr dtot projtroal proltroolonal work to lltem.o., torroirrd dollar.
$If .11:4.11.11, ..0 l'in .11 rho k ohethor "hay to fro ; , A lo moo ot j I II
15 ENTIMATFU (kNOSN ANNUAL l'Itt/FESSIIINAL INCUME tJan I to Pee 31. 111611) PITA. RIAn yoot ettOnstrd WM. IlloolAI!flan AU ptoIrwaunI ctorthee for the your
A
r.::.......:.....1 Y.r.d...r...1 i...... o al.l. Non... redo... Ed pada...rod ...oar.. ,e,iodo 1.re ..r.ro tot..t. d..,.,0,,.., 1 ........., ,,A.o...
IA Ilol ntAny pests Al prolrilionI work trepertence, Including ',WINNE, hare you hod? I 1LANOU.CIE NO AREA K00WLE00E1 . . , .
17 FtalIEII:54 LANCUAGF. Loa the language' (other than Farglishl In *high 500 haw. corntretrnee nd indicate your pron....CIES.If yoti ha. or tor lore err ...,,Airtior. rfoo k her . r ;
Nm 0.LNuysas,,
PROFICIENCY
NO nALITAALACTO
C NNA'S CILITTTo gAiN sssss
TACNNICLTOY sssss
CN ill0TTCHNICLertgt.
Col coVN Ulla
00ANON/L.0G.Ur CN TUM all A.
S.,' =7.CYO, ssssss I.,
10010.11.1.11.
01.11.011.1H 611.
WI.,
a
0 U 0
CATION
II ARFA KNOWLEIXIE Lot the lUrelEn uuntrIes Ul whIC you ha e knowledge gained by residence or ssss rgh.
COUNTAT TOTI. sssss1111PDANCE
rlA 1.111.VIAITAD NATUAA Or TOUR ANOTALCOOt
PROFESSIONAL IDENTIFICATIONII
19 I regard iny.relf profrATOOlsny TO 10111
20 SnatInrTlY. ,,N:(F.51,51.211SIIIPC.he.etstlkle,...:31,1:1:1y104 tors lo.r, LItilSor. orDes of which you are member. For write-ins Include only0 A . ARYAN,. TOTOWA!. nociErr 0 J . A 11010, IN INSTITUTE or ArONNAUTIIE A ASTEUNAOTICSH 0-.I. 50,ISTY or ATOTIOCA
r .auntrartraf. ilarlATT or asterucaI:1 .A.1001,04 $OPITTIT IDS METAL.LI I.. 4510110:AN 04111151 larIrTYLI ...Ww1Wr1 Or loIrOloCy La M . 10010t/MKNT 100IETY Or AMFRICALI g . AIIIMICAN 000AN1AltoN or 01110100 701PHEMS r..I N . SOED-PT Poll APPITTO Ant:TROTH:OPT0 r . A10318.11 401I1000111CAL snorrr Er P.SIOMA PI AIGMA
0 Il .APIEMICAN r11197 ALI...0141.111e AASOCIATION ij T OTHERS Io.ollvl0 11 . AMENICAN ASSOCIATION Or PIIESIcISTIs IN MEDICINE U 001100
21, /lease give marlin, ar for...Mine :Marro, through whIch you can alwaye b. trurhed d different horn satire.. ahoy..
c,o N..eder 1.11.1 .11. MAI. 2igs C.I.
DrE sssssss 0 SIONTuss oPi.... Ass I 41 Non.
sOCIAL ECUSIT ccpurrio
2 2 9
1684 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
SPECIALTIES LISTFOR use WITH
1968 NATIONAL REGISTER OF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL PERSONNEL
In the section PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYMENT on the l'inN National Register (Nest tinsire yuu alerequested to idea tIme tho list the specialty most closely related to Sottr present employment and other specialtiesin which you may have aingietence (item Eli Meuse use the specially tole fram this selected hal; if you select the"Other" category, me that code number and write in your Mel specialty title.
Amami.012 I 0 Applied osmotic, outeuments 111Y1 appsulutn12211 . Arthilesturst 41.1.111C101215- hat and healing1,1241 3 kelt...wool(i2T 1 . - In hum..01964 Met hanteal ))))) I and shut03277--Mumal ...menu and moo012.1 None
tir11137.1rheetl;01111-1.1101sonks01141--lInderumet roundat to1- Nher (musty(
* Mole ass1 asolosobe physics01411.- A101111C, 10111, and nodamise helm,03415.Atenne motet and anundsme01431 Atom ttruclure and sperIrs01442-4ltemeal bond, and 117.1111C01444 --/lef11011 parsmagnette retonsnee1114e tmport and trattering phenomena.01411.. Neu tpettoutspy014111.- MitlecOlar mom. and matt.Olt 17 Nock. magneto resonant.
Operifyi
Ihretmempskluaflint nAnlenna theory0M24-.Plearical rnensuranentt and intonanentl01631Electromagratic waves01910FJeetrinnagnette was< propardm03617Plettron drum.011413EleUreu microscopy. ion npoct01673-47a. slotharge036111 --Magnetism0.1,11Mason and luen dem.01721Moromm03911PlImell electronics01149Osanturn Outmost01710.4.0.111 interactions01761.-.X.ny Phenomena01772X.rsy technology01291--Othe lipmfy I
Pieetrooks0311 1 4 glutton balloonnoll....Elevinin rule,011110.Elertroche desire circuitry011141Elertrontet inttnitnentstion03115 Electron mouton031163-13.10317 Oman electron.13311104seme00ductor docketO 3911Soisl tute electronics03996-0ther ispersfylglemetuary particles04010Coame rayst140111High enettg 1,41kr...9904016High mergy phenomenaO 4044Parlicleu n3IPhertentrath Dell computer analysis04091Other lipkifyWellman01119Aftlytteal merhane.04127-21.11istm and flight dynamics04135Elsokity041.3Frktion01150High immure physics041n11Impoct phenomena04176Initruments and nkuurensenti04192Phu lipmfyiOpeke044 I nAtomphe rie and mace optics04424Cane, colon/miry04432Fiber maks041.40Cecommal optics114612-11Ungraph10457Infounation tharorg commtotteldons, image
valuer.:04445Infrared phenomena04473In0nferonM7194481Lawn04515 ens.04113Cipokal losIrmems, technique. and &MatO 4531Optirol material.O 4549Photography.04556Plus1es/ moles0,161Phykolomeal rooks04572Properties of thin film,04580Radionletry, photometryNat 4.....ggeemkkory04697-0thee repent)/
hut.. puska11411 - Arre 1.1 sou. Jetelo1r111412 Nemons04214 -Moslem rottener114:42 ..N1Idelif kart.. besoeting042in Nueleat spertrotsopy049.69...Rsolistion elle.01215.-Hadotarme materals tiolutet04211.Reaston1/4117Shieldin404300.--Othet Itpreifyl
PMsles fit 1.11.04 911 Ae todynamirs04'21.--Aermoll04939-11oundary layer effects01917-4A019, and jetO 4954Comptestihle fluid dynsinksthlOntpinunts plenommeol04790ltigh temperatute new04111.--Inempresohle fluid dynamic.041112Magnetts flunl dynamo:4041120Plasou pity..041311liarelmed gas flow1M5411Wwriort Meluding MAIM nu.).)41113--Shock stave phenomena114561--Struture and prompt. nf Mods04579Superfluidily1141149.--Trani00n pheminsens, diffusion044 1 1 Tutbulence0140419Youstity04044Mthee upeeifyl
saki sm. phydes01017.Cerstniet115015Cooperstive phenomenananvrCollallographyomit Dim... tinotwtthg nuwo050111Dokkationi and pluckily0511mDynamies of emstsi landsninl4Ekine15 properties of totem and ontrIlont05042Electrun emissionO 111 fsFetrommutiun0512 siligh mimeo and gigues05132-1Menul frictionnV140-1Inee effech and diffution05157Luminescencenf toOptical mopertiet05173Pannugnettun and diamagnetism01111Photoconduetivity and Isla& phenomena05215 Plsoloeleetrie phenomena05223.Pieeneleelrkity and ferroelectrieity05231Quantum meehanirs of mild,01249Radiation damage05250-0oIc9tatee phenomena05264-4enneondortors05272Supereondortivity01280-0-t0ue structure and Mottles05314Miennal conduction in Mid ilste05.121Thin Mins05397-011.1 !specify/
Thormal Arks135413ColoMM0905421ileat tranamilato05439High temperature ohms"05447Low temperature physics05454Tenmersture and its measurement05461Therrna1 alwarrtiev05470Thermodynamies05411Thennodynatnie relation,. equations of tttttO 5511ThermodynamieO 5195Other (tpectly1
Oeltor plusies ogrotioldu05611Cnostuts. Misdeeds. units. metrology.
eoneersion Won05.629.--Eperm conversion problem05637Meld theory05945H4h mourn techniques05652Kinetie05660Many bodh;*JrieoryO 56711Mathentalkal ohmic.O 56116Moutour, effort05710Physical metalliargy057211Physica1 properties of materials05930Clumtunt mechanics05741Radiation gild health physicsO 5751 Relstisity ond remotion.05769Stallatical mechanics07777Mom of physics and/ne MornontyO 57115Tesehing of physics gild/or astronomy05793Other (mu-PP
230
Aolordomy
00011-A609101lry00026-Astrophysa010114-Calosual meanies011042-Camu . moan, intarplanatary medium00019-Ciantology and samallary00061-flosign a/ noronattlicad insinuormste2011--91slasets1IX1111.-Nsogatmet. gtwblIc atrimomyWM-01w of mink aye00121-Phimael0 01 Aatronotnical sources00111-Physics al Me intantallm00141-PlAnea.00111-11adia Atir000nly00166-21psa Autonomy(4174-Sfeannoopy Attnnanial minas0111112-Star syslems and slailnical stronomy0021es-Stellar energy gaserstion. nueloogenah.
Iteller vulationfe1224-71. ea00212-Ve9able 6111100299-0ther Opacity)
ABroopbarle dada. mai dynodes19919-Aerorany19921-A1mo auermam19911-Annaphea chemistry and radioacliory1.1941-Atmolpholo dynamics and thrinalynamics19930-Almaephene eloaricity111901-Altrapturoc optics and 11011110*PAM-Auras. irglow199114-Cloud and prectintallon physics20016-Counn rays20024-lovaphery2111112-Mommetearology20040-Mwrimel20011-NinneriarruilSeiL1211091- Plaintive tmospheres211011-Andiallry Hader200111-Turhulonce and diffusion20099-.00m IsPailid
IMPB1B441011410122- Ilmeloariaty10110-411Aoplice10141-11knystems. amid communications10137-9lo4ormics and bloonergetke10101-Biotramport, membrane einem10111-Collider101119-Crysial iryhy10411-Met10421-Malaular10499--011wr Wa/
Appendix A 1685
Modoni ehoodotry20114-Catalan and unlace themotry20121-4 !urinal and pate equilibria202.10-Chemnal limas. ass pima and
pineal...natty202411-Chorndal Minna liquid plum20133-Colloid channtry20201 -Crystallogaphy211271 -1' Its ion Ministry202119- linap transfer and rolaanun piano.211111- Manses and a Motives20121-Fused ulliJii119.-Iligh tempt aline chem.,20141- Ion any nd membrane phenomena10114-Neva idled.10101-14quid slain and solutions. electrolyles
and non elecontytrs20110-Molocular pectroacopy203111.-Moleoular $1.111.20412-.8490<as and adlochonisiry20120-Polption in bull. morphology. pax
Hansom.. sinology. and mechanical
204111-=kr: in solution; thennodaiimicsilrydnelaamics. and pectrnscopy
204412-Ousnium ond silence theory10411-11a4lotion and hol.alom elvemniry20401--Solid date chem..,10417 -1 hone hemntry20492-011so Opecifyl
Soise/Mmenery opedsMse20119-Amonomy20721-Aurona. airglow20111-Cann, ay.20741-0ennispeenrn20730-Inutplanetary panicle, and Oda2079/1-I00aphery20779-Lam and planetary geophysia/MolneY201114-Ma1delorylsok panicles and oases20111I-Planoary almopherne20819--Solar physics10914-Tektlits and molearires201821-0thor (1Pool(1)
Meldemeft gaphyola20911 -EAploranon scheming20921-Eiryinralion geophysics parity20911-Faploation pi/physic.. magnetic201441-0eomagnetion and elecolay209311-0ralry20966-Marino geophaics20971-Phakal propane, of mhos! morale209112-Anomie narys21014-Tectonics (including hat Pool21022-Vokanology21097-)10or (speci(y)
OT11OR MELDS OF SCIENCE
00102-Almorylork Minxes01901 -amnia061109-MIMI
011607-Mathonaties24000-Comp10a Science091101-Mansties
12100-Agvicullur9 Sciences12609-Biological and Biomedical Sciences
14704-Prychaogy13206-Ant0eoparyy19700-Ecanorroa11804v-Linguistes18901-radical Science191101,-Salok,0
21101-00w r (specify)
231
L686 PHYSICS IN PERSITCTIVE
Pare
4:18.111:1.7= .
1970 NATIONAL REGISTEROF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL PERSONNEL
IN TN, 111111 110 PHYSICS ANn IN TI.IE FIELO OF ASTRONOMY CCOMe rrn nY rowOwira licur. INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS
134 4441 1111111 II...1 heer 10114 av/ 4oAk 10.1AND 11. 44110.11 IIIMCII rtn.DATION
va ... 4e1a .,1 .....4 I.. 0.4 An.0.0,, A.110/.000,5. A44..4.4 4.44.44 I 2,....41 11.4m, 4...... ge......,..4.4.,,,,,,,A ,A,,... ,,,..,,
..,',...7,:s,,7A".1.4.4!".....1f4...."41 1.4..."ll'Itr.' A.474.4.4 :1.747:17.:7/ 4:.4.4...7%n 'I.:4; r.;"::.;...r 1..;:.74Z.:..:,.4...11.AT.:174.41."...7.Lott"..7
.......44 NT 1,24w.mA41 1..6,, 02444 . AN4.404 . NAAR o. ON tyre
r- .) ..... t om Int .141.11 01.1.1.01.4. .11e1111, 0.010 14,104 rt.e.4140,11 I. 00 111In. leel, orforn 41. 61.01111 nair /IAN ANIAMDms ADAC att. 4MA.4 ant coax.,,... . a. Venn NI.. Ann Annell. AM%......01 103 'One 4041. /Iv COO( IA .Dcaf ea
._
!WTI: If you tiave ,,,I and complete) a Saila.) IlrgaTIT? ).10.011.1., from one .1 the other orgo.rationo 1101.1 Above
1e1. I 10'1 1,1e.oe utile Ine n.one 1.1 IR. urgAnitAlion Ilery.
flew.. i Orly Hen, 1. Cyr Tour loyal *acorn', number, 441, ATM so/naturebelow, and rrturn in the rneloaell 4nvniolor
VITA r ..1 -. - ..... : ..... on .n..4 1 ..... o amainu CoUnter or 4 045
11,,,. Oar Tor COUN1NV Or 1510 Csansa1005CIL 41150011004 ' ;I: I . MAI..Cl . rOrle
3 C111/.0.1.11.
.1. 1.4 , II 0 nreelle ...sat/0
DUCATION .- .. -.... .. ...... -. -_-,o61.4.24 10411,11.101 011, 0111eri 0.111,110n VerleC ''. "l'' MAJOR Minna
Ia0111II. .. . r,,,,, I btairee. .I
U TOU are algal«. atterubnit C011ege or univenny..aeek Your status
LI a STVDENT 4111.1..T110, 0 I STODENT PAIIT.TIME
PROFESSIONAL IOENTIFICATION1 L.8 1 regsrd myself prolesonnally aa o fan/ !cheek one)
LI .51.,101110101,1101 E] 11elletTAI.I1Inneellell 0 III MEDICAL PHYSHAST
0 444. AA roorn re leo, CI 144. IA.4cTRDNIC 1111141CIAT0 01 PHYSICIST
0 444 .ATISOOPHERIC PHYSICIST 0 214 OKoVIITHICIAT0 VI .OADIOLOGICAL PHYSICIST
0 oN.Ielovetrstruir C Ill IttAI,T11 PHYRICIST 0 511.11PACIC PHYSICIRT
2 Sto.r111:141CAL PHYSICIST 0 Vs HISTORIAN Or 11100I1, 0 AM 01111.11 IseeolvI
PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYMENT: I9 Cheek your rinploynent status.
0 t MISLOYCII ',MAIM 0 2 .11Nalrelartan ND SERSING /1410.11YirareT 0 I leer ElS0'1.0YRD AND NOT C.; 6 RETIRED
7.13 /01P1.010. PART TIMESEEMING IMPLOYMENT
10 Please give natns of preoent protein.) etnployrr tifNell-entployed write us "sr1I-1. actual place of employinrnt. and title of
preeant pottriCitt.. . .
Nam. or elver. ev.ariral vmelerrern.0.1 plat! sr eliftployniwn1 ,eI7 .1 natal
rine a anent pnenu.nRAO. II InT41114 a 040.4124 mina.. er tomer Ila.t
11 Check the boo nf the y411.4017 which to most eppronnatefor your present principal employer (cheek only one)
0 I . rklv ATE 1141/11.110. OR 10-SINISS0 I. STATE 000E001PE0'T
I 1 I . RELy.Es rt.oro u0 II. INTERNATIONAL AGENCY
0 3 . COLLEGE on tortvEurry. OTHER THAN SEDIC el. ecitout. 0 it OTHER GOVIOINMENT AGENCY IcwIrl
0 . SIZOICAL SC11001.C so PRIVATE IMSPITAL ule Clinic
0 TO . J11641011 COLLEGEn is NONPROFIT HOSPITAL ON CLINIC
0 4 .1IRCONDARY OR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SySTEM0 T. SuNPRONT, ONITAO12..1004. OTHER THAN HollerrAL
0 3. VISDISRAL GOVERNMENT-CIVILIAN EMPLOYEECLINIC. OR ISOCCATIONAL INSTITUTION
0 4. f.IIIPHR MILITARY allIV/CE--ACTIVE mrry0 OTHER Innleel
ll additionally employed. *DIM' on Ihr U.! 52 Ihf,ught the category mat FproprIate to tRA1 .1.1..y.r
12 Number your Prat and eeeolvt moat Important kindof activity, no terms of worktno Unut devoted, by @Meting 1" and
on the GPFropriate hoes belowIN MANAGISMENT OR ADMINISTRATION fly RTMEARCII
4 . DISVFLOPMENT
AND DIVIRLOFSIENT14 . TINT DEVELuralINT
34 MANAGENDIT OR ADMINISTRATION Or 0TRISR 4.perelratTHAN slaltAIIC/1 AND DRELoSsolter II . DATA COMPILATION. PROCZARINO
I. RAMC REI1EARCII34 CONSULTING looe1TrI ..
I APPLIED RUMAIMISU . SALSA. MARRILTING. 1.0110114100. tortMATINO
ITrACHIHOit SOPORT oR OTHZR TECHNICAL wRITING. ODITING OTHER tuvrtert ......
los MUTTONS? 00 sinum APPEAR=
232
ea inev/1111 .
Mil Metre
Appendix A 1687
PROFESRIONAL litinTtNtiklEMPLOYMENT13 From the pacislnie lift free overlrall.s.lret AM enter both thr number ..1 litle of the scientific specialty must closely relates!
to your PAIP.S.S:LiT principal einploytnent, or write in your 111,421.11y d it la not Oil the Itst
Rioar. Sr...e.R In,
I I I. ANY of roar worm heir, Aupported or sponsored by I:. h Government bands. .. Nes ..-: Nu .-.. Don t know
II yrs. is your work re:Ated to any of I}, following progrAms',..; A - ACX111.1.TIlls* TJ g . 0141.711 '' 1 . PIhl 1. woot,A ..7 N 11111,4% orsEt.orKeNT
:-.1 Airolditi riililitir LI r . trws1,1: .-.', s . to,r14....10,.t !Awns', ..1 IITIII1I ClIIII.MAX Irr,I...3 C IIICYCHtE (3 6 I4TE00AIIIIN1.L] II E01104TI114 Li II 117110A1. IINIIIIIECIPI ....; Id TKANSPOn 14 row
NOTI, Salary dd !nesse Infertnallee Is aaaaaaa 11 as confidential and will be used fer otalistioal purposes on. II will NOT
be rel I. asy ay Mat will allow 11 I. be Identified Ile you.
IS 1970 BASIC ANNUAL SALARY. Please 0i10 the hien? Annual salary associated with yoor principal professional work to Onnearest hundred dollars
If academically employed. cheek whether salary is for 0 9-10 moo. or 0 11-12 mos. 8
.t.stertttatt" `:..;";::4::',1 ''''''''''''''''''''''' 4.1r491:1.1.4.117,::::..r.1:1.7.7.1:1:...:g.:::::..,'".. '''' '"" -. l"''''' ''"""*.
iii ESTIMATED GROSS ANNUAL PROVILSSIONAI. INCOME I.Iu/i 1 to Dec. 31, 19701 Please give your timated gross mom.from I1 professional eats...iv for the year
8
iliwas /iiiwil roorowl.sal Iiwiwie la ALL Mamma. www.. N. rretwokiiiii1 wilviiiw eirioaina twair raises aerate 4.410110w. plus Wm.., am,111..Xs., Iswwwww .4.1
IT. How many years of professional work roper:eon, thchsehttg te.chthg. b., yon had Jseiutnne Cori ''''' CFI --
specialties in which 10.1Enter only ...en-
Xwewl. l'alr
apww1m. Tale
IX Frnin the rye...rain. list (see overleaf), select and enter on the lines lielow in decreasing order the (ourcurrently hoe. ,LiouT al '''' xl .01,0111IC competen. ased on your tout educational and nark elthersence.title ureendiratiolis
Grestell Third:0 wrow Nesemltr Tals
,,,,,,...,
Sr** Is1 Fourth:tr aiser seeostir 1111.
IX* Is vorr pmfesonnal competence primarily characterized OM i-7; Theoretical 0 Experimental .....] Both
LANGUAGE AND AREA KNOWLEDGEIf FOREIGN LANGUA(1E List the languages tother than English) in
II you hAre no fore.11 language competence. check here LI
.. - .
CNCONVEOGIE
Nsca C 1.1[CTISMII
LaNCUatietal. ' ..''' ...'' MT ,Ma rumern.r
.
which you have competence arid indicate
PROPICIENC1WAVE rClal Tv ; rNTO WIANLATE TLCISOMCAL
l lCHNIC a . 41. I...1 sOUPWAI. ' eon OWN..,. ...
lave maw........ wialwal romp.. . aM
..
.
. .
1
.... . '.
your
NKAO
UitiOwn.ew.vv
..P.
proficiencies.
OlaitANOWLCala411111' CAM r11II A A
NUPIUM OrCOPINUNI,
CaTION
20 AREA KNOWLEDGE 1.1s1 the fnreign countries of which you hat*. a knowledge ginned by residence or resew. 11.
COUNT..,..y....,,...j.n. 1,....,o,......., . NATURE Or TOUR kNOWLKOC
I1
.
II
I
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATION: 1II. SOCIETY &FFILIATION, Cheek the appropnate boxes for all Societies of which you are a member For writs-Ina include
only national profesional societies Ariel use identslying word* in lullCI I .MititICAN Pirtitle*I. 411011,0 0 is. MEKICAN 101.11770 III. 11741.8(.] I. 01011,1. ilrleIrrit MI' /.....iiii, 0 II i 010:01041 74001,141 04.11,4Li I miollierIcI. dnetrry or *strafes 0 Is-Mona:MO, NeWle, or 4111.010 4rl s.artetrry III X 11E111.0.9 :1 11.01101149 11111 Air1.1.1r.l. SerOTHIACCII,
o 6 4*0111149 AXAUCIATION Oa 1.004115 TEACHRIta :Ils.sysC. II-AmaXICAM ANTIthiiiiIiiiriAil. prin.:, ;3 III. AiIiiri11.,Iii m4140471,1019 vox 71111 MIN ANIIirALSIT lir
0 1. 4,11E01049 COY STALL.. PM, APOCIATION Milr.Nliir.
(T1 I.AMEXICAM Altat/rIATION Olu PISTMICIPIM IN 5111110100 7...; PP .11111Ella wpowNe
0 s.. AMERICAN INsTrrt711101 AIDIONACTIrn AIDIRIM0111, L.', N. iiititiit.
a Please give mailing or foneardIng ddrre Luuugh which you can Always be reached if ddlerent from address Above.
,.., P.m.. Ream CII, Rm. Zwe Cads
1 SIGNATURE, I Naas. /Ilan rull Nimei
80CIAL Iteuritifir weCOLI,
2 3 (3
688 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
1.01
SPECIALTIES LISTFOR USE W1T1/
1970 NATIONAL REGISTER OF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL PERSONNEL
In the sections PROFESSIONAL EMPIA)YMENT and SCIENTIFIC COMPETENCE on the 1970 Na-tional Register Questionnaire you are requested 19 select from this list the specialty most closely related to yourpresent employment (nem IN and those in which you consider you have your zreatest professional competence(item 191. Please usc the specialty title from this list; if you select the "Other" category, use that code numberand write in your own brief specialty title.
Acouak,s771Architectural 3C011a1CS5772-1 Ie artng5773Music5774Noise5775Shock waves5776Speech5777Ultrasonics57711Underwater sound5791VibrationsS7119-0ther (speedy)
Atom. and Mokcoks5741--Atomic and molecular iims5792Atomic, molecular, and electron beams5793Atoms with Z...25794Collision processes5795Free radicals5796-11ydrogen and helium atoms5797-1norganic molecules5799--Macromolecules and polymers5801Mesic and muonic atoms and molecules3902Organic molecules5909Other (specify)
SlopItylies5961Hioacoustics5962Bioeleetricity5963Bioenergetics5964Riological molecules5965Rio-optics5966-1Iealth and medical physics5969Other (specify)
Electromagnetism5811Electrical quantifier and their measuremeri5912Generation of electromagnetic waves51113Infrared, visible, and ultraviolet radiation51114Interaction of electromagnetic waves with
mmter51115Magnetism5916Propagation of electromagnetic waves5817Radiowaves and microwaves51118X-rays and gamma rays5919Other (specify)
Elementary Particles and Fields51121--Cosmic rays5922Electromagnetic fields, photons5923Gravitational fields, gravitons5924-11adrons5825Leptons5826Quantum field theory5829Other (specify)
Fluids583IDispersions and colloids5832Ek.tric discharges5833Fluid mechanics5834Gasea51135lontration5836Liquids5837Magnetofluid dynamics5838Plmmas51141Quantum fluids5849Other (sPecify)
insfromenbtion5971Antennae, radiators5972Astronomical5973-13cam handling5974Circuits and circuit elements5975--Communication5976Electronic5977Energy conversion5978Nigh pressure5981High temperature5982Information storage5983Lasers and masers5984Measuring, testing, and calibrating5995Microscopes5986NMR-EPR5987Nuclear reactors5988Particle accelerators5991Particle and beam sources5992Particle detectors5993 Photographic5994Plasma containment5995Radio and microwave5996Ra4io astronomy5997Semiconductors5998Spectroscopes6001Telescopes6002Thermometric60(13--Vacuum6004X-ray6009--Other ;specify)
Mechanics
5851Analytical mechanics5852Celesdal mechavcs51153Cortimuun. mechanics5954Elasticity5955Friction5856Many body theory5857Measurement of mechanical properties5858Plasticity5861-0uantum mechanics5862Statistical mechanics5869Other (specify)
Nuclei5871Nuclear decay and radioactivity5872Nuclear reactions and scattering5873Nuclear structure and energy levels5879Other (sPecify)
0005881Colorimetry3882--Geometric optics58113Holography51184Umn5885Non-linear optics5886Photography5887Photometry, radiometry, and illumination5888Physical optics5891Spectroscopy5892Vision5899Other (specify)
3 1
Physkal Chemistry
567ICatalysis5672Chemical and phase equilibria5673Chemical kinetics, gas phase and photo-
chemistry5674Chemical kinetics, liquid pham5675Colloid chemistry5676Crystallography5677Electruchemtstry5678Electrot.7c spectroscopy, including far UN.5681Enerpy transfer and relaxation pnxeNses56112Equilihrium and thermodynamic relationships56113East rentions5684Flames and explosives56115.Fused salts5686High temperature chemistry5687Interfacial chemistry5688Ion exchange and membrane phenomena5692Liquid state and solutions; electrolytes and
non-electrolytes5693Molecular spectroscopy5694Molecular structure5695Nuclear and radiochemistry5696Quantum and salence theory5697Radiation and hot-atom chemistry5698Scattering phenomena5701Solid state chendstry5703Thermochemistry5709Other (specify)
Solid-Earth Geophysks
516IExploration, gravity5162Exploration, magnetic5163Exploration seismology5164Geomagnetism and paleomagnetism5165Gravity5166Heat flow5167Physical properties of natural materials5168Scismology5171Tectonics5172Volcanology5179Other (specify)
Solids
5901Acoustic properties5902--Alloys5903Crystal growth5904Crystal structure5905Dendrites and composites5906Dieledrics59157Diffusion in solids5908Electron states5911Electron transport and carrier properties5912Imperfections5913Interaction of radiation with solids5914Lattice mechanics5915Luminescence5916Magnetic properties5917Magnetic retunance5918Mechan iCal properties5921Metallic conductors5922Mossbauer effect5923Non-crystalline states5924Optical properties51125Semiconductors5926Solid state devices5927Superconductors5928.Surfaccs. interface% films593IThermal properties of solids5939Other (upecify)
Appendix A 1689
Thermal Physics5941-11igh temperature physics5942Kinetic theory5943Low temperature physics5944Phase transitions, changes of slate5945Statistical mechanics5946Thermal measurement techniques5947Thermal properties5948 Thermodyna mica5931Transport phenomenaS959--Other fsPeelfyi
AtrimspheHe Stolen,. and Dynamics991Arronomy4992Airseu interaction4993Atmospheric chemistry and radioactivity4994Atmospheric dynamics, thermodynamics4995Atmospheric electricity4996Atmospheric optics and acoustics4997Aurora, airglow49911Cloud and precipitation physics5001Cosmic rays5002Ionosphere5003Mcsometcorology5004Mierometeorology5005Numerical modeling5006Planetary atmospheres5007--Radiative transfer5008Turbulence and diffusion5009Other (specify)
Solar-Planetary RelationshiP.5331Aeronomy5332--Aurora and airglow5333Cosmic rays5334Geomagnetic pulsations5335Interplanetary particles and fields5336--lonosphere5337Magnetosphetie particles and waves5338Solar and planetary physics5341Solar wind5349Other (sPecify)PtanctoloRY5301Interplanetary matter5302Lunar and planetary geology5303Lunar and planetary geophysics5304Meteorites and tektites5305Planetary at mospheres5306Planetary magnetic fields5309Other (specify)Additional Astrophyskal Specialties6011Binary stars6012Clusters6013Comets, meteors, interplanetary medium6014Cosmology6015Galaxies6016-1nterstellar medium6017Planets and satellites6018Quasars, pulsars, X-ray sources602IStellar composition6022Stellar evolution6023The Sun6029Other (specify)Other Specialties603IHistory of physics or astronomy6032Mathematical physics6033Philosophy of physics or astronomy6034Physics information, dissemlnation and
retrieval6035Relativity, gravitation6036Teaching of physics or astronomy6037Units, constants, standards, conversion factors6039Other (specify)
OTHER FIELDS OF SCIENCE5350Atmospheric Sciences5760Chemistry5360Earth Sciences6210Mathematics6330Computer Science6350Statisties6590Agrkultural Science6580Biological and Biomedical Sciences
6790Psycholoo6900Anthropology7050Economics7160Linguistics7270Political Science7360Sociology9990Other (specify)
235
r cr, 0
0123 PRImARY
C1rtNSION-CCI
011465104-00
010ENS1Ls-ce
PFIP ACT1V
6AS1C RCS
A)PIIEC RES
CEvEl..OESICN
MAKAG - R.0
MANAG - OTPER
TEACHING
OINCR
NO RESPONSE
707Al
CINENsioN-001
OINENsInN-002
GIMENSION-003
PASIC 875
APPLIE0 RES
0EvE140EsION
MANAG - R.0
MANAG - OTHER
TEACHING
OTHER
NO RESPONSE
707A1
5011, ACTIVITY BY 2NOAAY %CM ACT,=OPLCIER.SPECIALIY OF
P. O
151 CCPP: ICIAL ALE PA,EL GAWP:
'v.'s C.LLEr4 CF 001,1051/v
----- ----- .-Fcc% -VARY AcT1- VITY
BASIC APPI. rEdil, rv,A,; P&NSC TEJO.
REs
4E5
CES
RC
LIPE4
-16,: 01,-ER
N197
46
IR
15
2120
150
H8.5
5:8
2.9
.5
65.7
8.2
41.1
3.7
Y.
A11
82.c
'1 8
m39
145
it
19.2
312.1
1.8
1.4
vSg.i
IA
1.1
1.1
23.6
8.4
F.
s1
1
h7.
]7.]
?
V38.5
23.1
7.7
2....
.5
1.2
r4
;Ii
28
2li
9H V
26.9
13:0
.9
8.1
:521
1:4
5.1
4 5
2.4
4.5
3N
49
6I
39
215
8H
60.9
2.3
13.9
2.3
V11:766
365
6.3
i42
NAt%
ii;
1
i,
4H
69.9
9.4
1.6
V54.6
60.6
14:3
31.2
97.4
35.2
w5
21
75
11
3.1
6.1
21.5
15.6
V26.1
6.1
.3
.3
.5
.5
.3
1.4
P. r V
2975
N622
84
214
401
2585
367
H36.6
7.7
1.0
2.6
4.9
31.9
4.5
y99.9 100.0 100.0 100.0
59.9 100.1 ICC.1
0mo
151 COPPS 10146 ,111 PANE/. GROUPS
EPP& PRIVATE MOSTA'',
91
525
58
HOA
12.5
114
8.0
v3Z:7
1.7
20.2
3.4
36.8
14.1
N359
154
447
232
625
128
H24.5
10.5
30.4
15.8
.4
1.7
11.3
V01.0
12.7
64.7
51.4
4.1
36.6
4C.5
N1
113
35
32
53
28
M1.2
52.8
13.9
12.7
2.0
1.2
11.1
V.7
11.0
5.5
7.1
3.4
4.4
6.8
A70
437
124
122
12
85
N7.7
48.3
13.7
13.5
1.3
7.2
V15.8
36.2
19.3
82.4
17.6
150
N1
11
3.a
661
.8
4.8
48.5
1.3
V.2
.4
1.2
18.0
2.9
12
231:1
N2
m14.3
26.6
28.6
V.2
.2
.4
N9
41
16
13
13
128iti
11
5.8
26.5
10.3
8.4
6.5
.6
28.4
V2.0
3.4
2.5
2.9
6.6
1.5
10.7
6 m v N443
1208
641
451
148
68
410
11
11.8
32.2
17.1
12.0
3.9
1.6
IC.9
99.5 100.0
99.9 100.0 100.1 100.0 1CC.0
CO.P, LUAU
P.0
8658. ICIAL
155
1C4'
12.1 1CC.1
43 9
37.1
11
,tc
1.1
91.; 13
ICC.1
i26
1:2 1CC.1
02.7
5!1 1Cg2
3.8
4.3
244
4028
2.2 1Cr.1
2e.4
45.8
r32
18.8 1CC.1
.1
.4
ICVA 10138.G
21.0
2.3
677
5125
ic.e
95.5
ICC.1 1CC.2
103
729
14.1 1CC.0
28.5
19.4
39
1466
5.4 1C0.0
2C.6
5.1
13
252
5.2 1CC.1
3.4
6.7
74
4C4
8.2
55.5
1913
24.1
3127
13.6 1CC.0
8.0
4.5 7
100:3
21
155
13.5 ICO.0
5.5
40
10
IcC.0 100.0
16.3
1.4
381
3752
10.2
55.5
ICO.0 1CC.0
Al
A2 23
6
121 PAIRARV wma ActIvIlv HV 2hCIAR/ WORM ACI.EPPLOYER.SPECIALTY OF COPP. GEGREE
SITT4:88/ riV cr.,. 141.11. ALL PAK L G9CUPS
0 M hS ON-CC
_MAI L091Rhst.41-f(OCAALEETC.
SECCh -CARY Am- VIII,
86114 ACT1V
IlAhi Mt. CfirEL 81430
84411C 0E143
NO
RES
CES
155.
OTHER
-INC 072.E6 RESP. TOTAL
1451C PES
h18
135
346
12P
111
7C3
H3it.23
2.6
19.2
.4
6.9
16.2
15.6 100.4
V63.3
2808
62.5
7.7
69.7
s3 a
C.
4e
,f
APPLIED RES
496
23
31
56
111
41
15
230
H!?:153
;-.2
.,.,
25.9
2.6
16.1
111.2
20.3
.4
44
11:9
5.4 100.6
26.6
19.1
OEVEL4OESTOR
42
H15.i
61.1
15.4
7.4
11
2C.2
2C.9
102031:
.9
4.R
MAVAG - 50
N1.0
1.9
86
105
12
641
46
33t
H4Z:2
ik..1
14:
99'1
41
14.3
11.7 160.1
RARAO
OTHER
41
le
15
41
2.1-
5.1
2.2
34.8
4.5
2.3
2.7
3.2
H6.!
32.6
13.8 1CC.0
TEACHING
14
.11
1.6
7.4
14
11
50.1
25.0
25.0
140.0
OTHER
V N1.3
11
7.4 4
634
.3
H2,4
11.8
17.8 10C.G
ea
37.
20.6
5.i
1.7
2.1
2.3
NO RESPONSE
N1.6
2.7
1.6
3.2
5.1
36
34
Htgo.o teg..c
rTOTAL
NV192
414
63
216
19
66
238
220
1448
16.4
25
as
H13.3
28.6
4.4
14.9
2.7
4.6
16.4
14.2 ICC.I
va
V79.9 100.1 100.0
99.9 100.0 100.0 1CC.0 166.4 ICC.0
I-,
OTMENSICh-001
PHD
0I6E25I09-002
1S1 CUSP, TPTAL ALL PANEL GPCUPS
DIMENSION-003
rP1,1 RESEARCH CEhttR
OASIC RES
0 6!1
14.5
2121
260
153
_192
835
H3
.2
7.Z
18.3
3 C 1CC.0
V'
51.6
24.4
56.5
10.0
73.2
420
63.8
44.5
APPLIED RES
N153
61
118
E2
128
549
0.9 11.5
22.3
15.5
!:
137.h
5.3
99.9
H
lii
30
11
41i.1
27.3
5.S
5.3
28.2
OEVEL,OESIGN -
- N
.6
12.3
56.5
38.3
H21.5
46.2
16.9
6.2
4.!
4.! 10011
V4.8
6,0
5.3
1.9
H7
131
132
MANAG -_840
N101
133
25
15
j4i
29.3
38.6
7.2
4.3
2.0
0.
9.9 1CC.0
34.7
26.8
12.0
23
23
75.0
2.5
11.4
11.3
18.4
MANAG - OTHER
N1
42
17
H11.8
17.6
11.8
17.6
5.9
23.5
11.8 1CC.0
TEACHING
N.7
.6
1.0
1.4
1.2
1.5
.7
.9
N VOTHER -
-21
13
24
2
V7.2
2.6
1.0
1.9
10.0
41 10
52
199.9
2.6
H40.4
25.0
3.8
7.7
3.6
NO RESPONSE_ _
g34
34
707AL
NVNCI
1C0.0
11.
1.3
----------
H1in
2:1,1
1i27
115.2
1.1
4.4
14.1
16.0 100.0
26
82
264
30
1677
100.0
99.9 100.2 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.1 115.1 100.1
237
A3
A9
6721 PRIMARY
CIPENSIOE.-CCI
WENS 04-CC2
011411.5 UN-003
PRIM 4011V
BASIC PCS
APPLIFO RCS
CLVEL.DESIGN
HANAG - 4.0
KAHAG - OTHER
TEACHING
OTHER
NO RESPONSE
TOTAL
0154E6510N-001
0INFNSIGN-002
0INENSICN-0O3
BASIC RES
APPLIED KIS
DEVEL4DESIGN
MANAG
MANAG - OTHER
TEACHING
OTHER "
NO RESPONSE
TOTAL
vrAF ACTIVITY
PHO
15T
CPI.:
PmD
1ST
Lep*
157 INUATV
ECI.Rt 1013L
OTHER 4h0.4
eASIC
RES
N H V N43
H27.4
v50.0
ft
54
14.3
V3.5
N H11A
V N12.8 4
m5.0
v473.213.0
N H23.129
v22.1
N6
H5.6
V7.0
N Hv N
-86
H10.6
v10
0.1
COMPT 707at
AO RESPU6sE
N it v V V V iy
150.0
V100.0
V H
.4
100.0
%CPR ACI.EmPLOY19.SPECIALIY OF COPP. OEGREE
A5
ALL PANEL 0R0URS
sEcc4 -CART 4C1I- VITT
APPL. CEvEL MANRG NI610
5.0)
-1NG c.ER taSp. TOTAL
165
CES
0o
340
34
63
21N
41:0'
11.1
1.2
14.e
13.9 21
36.7
18.5
39.2
6.1
453?
28.O
310
20
:5
25
; 1 tql
1.4
12.7
11.9
1.1
17.2
15.9
3.2 12C.0
6.5
37.0
31.6
4.3
24.1
20.0
3.2
14.3
74
2I
21
33.3
19.0
9.5
4.8
14.3
4.5
7.4
2.5
.9
2.4
4.! IC'i.CE
Is
612
eIC:
44n
).0
16.0
6.0
12.0
8.13 1Cc.C.
28.4
,.6
54.0
5.4
9.6
5.1
1.)
s7
12
17
73
tc
6.3
8.8
10,..,
ICC.?
15.2
21.3
28.8
1.5
3f4
15.3
16.4
7.6
S.E
11.141
3.7
17.1
159
261.8 10721.i
7.1
31
29
IC.4
13.9
10.1
18
10
010
14
31
IC7
16.8
9.3
5.6
11.2
9.3
11.1
29.0
49.9
11.0
18.5
7.6
25.5
9.0
11.2
19.6
13.1
1E
16
.
IV8.? ITO
155
54
79
47
111
125
154
615
19.0
6.6
9.7
5.4
13.6
15.3
19.4 10-.0
100.0 100.0
99.9 100.0
99.9 1C0.0 1CC.0 100.1
ALL PANEL GROUPS
I100.0
1CO.
A6
33.3
.3
11
1CC.0
180.0
.3
11
100.0
1130.0
33.3
.3 -
12
50.0
100.0
100.0
.5
150.0
50.0 100.02
33.3
,3
.5
3,6
376
-
-1CC.0 IMO
94.7
98.2
3 .e377
383
.k
.1
9 8.4 100.1
100.0
100.0
99.9
1CC.0 10C.1
/- o kID
1A
12: PRIMARY 8064 ACTIVITY ry 240249 leCAA ACT.EMPLCYER.SPECIALIY
018185104-CC1
ke PHD
01828SIO9-002
1ST CCPPt IC7AL ALL 82461 CPCUP
01M185116-CC3
!WS CLLLEGE CR 131EEPSIIY
STCC5 -ow,
PRIM AMY
EASIC APPL. [EVE( PAn4C
RES
mES
DES
A.0
ILASIC kEt
k162
159
20
k11:)
4.2...!1
36:1
h26
xi
47
16
APPLIED RES
V H 9ii:;
t.i.
11..;
11:(
0I4EL4GCSIGN
11 m
24n 199 219
3.i
h46AO - 8.0
V2.1
' '
05.3
3.6
h6
19
eH
10.9
34.5
14.5
.9
3.2
3.3
A1
NAAAC - OTHER
V H6.g
6.g
5.;
1
.9
1 0
2.0
II
8526
1544
16
TEACHING
V .i2:2
2!:3
.11:;,
27:3
vOTHER
14
91
40
21
H.33.1
17.4
7.4
.e
NO RESPONSE
V II6.0
3.6
3.7
101
H
TOTAL
N669
566
244
55
H11.1
11.5
4.8
1.1
V100.0
99.9 100.0 100.0
DINEASICN-001
AC APO
0IMENSION-002
151 COPP: TOTAL ALL PANEL GROUPS
DIME8SION-003
EPP: PaIVATE IACUSTRY
BASIC RES
n103
22
11
54.2
11.6
6.6
NAPPLIED RES
v129
la;
hl
118
H7.4
17.4
40.7
9.7
DiVELDESIGN
-M - -
41'1
115.1
41;1
39'4
..f 39!8
30.g
8?1)
rt
918
3.11i
2244
21"
%MOW -.
1140
v H1.2
37.4
29.2
PANAC - -OTHER
V6.3
22.6
16.1
n133 len 21.3
OP CORP, 0E08E1
ACT1- 54111.
pA%sc TEACh
AO
CILA
-141 Cut-ER REIP. IOTAL
4.16
413
7c7
2564
-1
=1"
I6-'1
"-"L'.-1
24 64,9
11.0
41.3
.C.3
271
11
49
:41
.626.7 "a "."'"i
t.0
7.1
6.6
!.c
6.
9.114012.1 ICC(21
.6
1.1
.2
1..
29
74
55
3.6
12.4
12.7
7.1
49.9
1.0
.9
1.0
.2
1.1
46
73
1)
10
52.2
14.8
12.5 ICC.0
4.1
1.6
.7
1.7
193
176
661
1762
10.1
31.5 1C0.1
11:7
25.1
4C./
34.2
416
921
121
3.3
13.2
7.4
17.4 ICC.0
2.0
1.6
1.1
1.3
2.4
1C3
IC3
1C24 1CO.0
205
979
710
1650
5057
4.0
19.2
13.4
12.4 1CC.0
100.1 100.0 1CC.1 1CC.0 1CC.0
3.1
l811
711 IC110
22
80
112
3,1 IN
1.3
.9
18.6
4.1 1C0.1
10" 21"
14.3
It" 33"
2.2 XI
5!; 3M
13i1
12.1
Itill
14e1
ii0
9.6
.7
14.1
7.5 1(0.0
40.8
e.s
12.9
14.3
16.4
15.5
11.A
1i.2 IC4.55
17.
2!/
316C?
!!!!
?!.CC,
39
2IT
52.9
11.8 100.0
1.5
.9
.4
.3
506.S
3!1
21!;
11'4'
ts".o8
3205
33.6
16.1
24.2
112.4
70
7C
100.0 10C.0
15.7
1.3
10.4
ill
11'3
14.1 ilEi
99.9 100.1
95.9
55.9
99.9
A7
AIL
TEACHING
t3Ti"
-- -
no RESPONSE_
70)8E
_.i
V.6
5.0
6.2
27.6
%t
tt
H5.9
5.9
5.9
- -Z-- -
11.85
2021
51,121
53.:
H V6.3
9.9
6.9
6.4
n H v IIk!? iln Wi
V.k
99.9 100.1
99.9 100.0
239
1-,
crs
MD 6,
12s PRImAgy mORR ACIIVITY 81 241'465, hePR ACI.EMPLCVER.SPECIALIv OF CUP.
CIPFh510N-CCI
N0 14.0
01P285108.-002
151 CLPP: TCTAL ALL PAhEi GAELPS
Di.thSICN-OC3
LPPT 0091Rh*.hT-FECCPAL
TC.
5E,f4 -0889 A011- 9115
PAD, ACT1V
625I0 APFL. rEvEL PAhAC hAhAC 784(8
he
AES
ALS
[CS
8.0
Cr8CP
-INC C18E1I RES..
BASIC RES
14
33
37
4IC
92
39
m8.1
4.0
1.0
2.4
22.5
8.5
v2
7.6
APPLIED RtS
N148
260
ili1
417
"il
114g
"Al
HIii
15.6
16.8
27.4
12.4
1.2
1.2
2C.6
4.8
V68.2
20.8
59.9
51.4
12.4
34.4
18.1
20.7
OEVELCESIGN
N10
8;7
.
H4.9
42./
47
23
22.8
11.2
2.4
.t
13.1
2.4
v4.6
11.4
10.8
1C.8
5.8
3.1
5.3
2.3
MANAG - 11.0
n41
383
35
235
64
H7.4
49.4
13.4
.6
13.2
7,1
MANAG
OTHER
Z16.1
30.6
15.7
23
11
21
41:1
9.4
12.3
15.9
15.6
VTA
/:t
, 9.9
N4
C:i
118:i
11.1
TEACHING
M H7.1
7.1
35.7
21.4
V.5
.2
212;
OTHER
N14
14
51;1
15;
-9!1
27S1
7.1
5.5
9.5
2.0
26.9
12.6
V10.6
9.0
4.1
6.6
27.0
15.6
13.2
14.5
NO RESPONSE
N45
H
TOTAC
Ii81
n217
769
434
213
89
32
514
220
H8.7
30.9
17.4
0.8
3.6
1.3
20.7
8.6
V100.0 100.0
99.8 100.1 100.1 100.1 100.1 ICO.0
018E851018-001
NO PHO
DIMENSION-002
1ST COPP: TOTAL qt. PANEL GRCUPS
OIMINSION..003
EPPI RESEARCH CFNI:R
BASIC RES
N64
16
820
67
57
H27.6
6.9
3.4
8.6
21.9
24.6
V46.7
37.0
4C.0
APPLIED RES
N38
27;T
9.6
16.7
80
27
450
5H
1C.3
et
1.5
19.0
- V
tki4 IN
5.7
,i11:1
D6.3
8.7
13.3
27.6
13.2
OEVEL.DESIGN
N4
43
33
122
H3.8
40.6
31.1
.9
2C.8
2.1
V6.9
10.6
19.9
2.1
12.2
2.6
MANAG - 840
N45
20
10
18
11
H3.7
41.7
18.5
v6.9
19.5
12.0
43:i
16.7
10.2
919
9.6
MANAG ... OTHER
N9
84
12
3H v
14.1
21.4
19.0
im 28,
2.6
5.4
16.7
6.6
1:1
TEACHING
N1
11
1H
25.2
25.0
25.0
v__
..6
.9
9:1
OTHER
e4
10
211
H12
25
9.6
4.8
12.0
2.4
13.3
13.1
V10.3
/8:!
4.8
8.3
43.5
6.7
6.1
9.6
-NO RESPONSE
13
100.0
v
_
NTOTAL
H
58
231
166
48
2B
3!1
21!1
Iii2
N6.8
27.1
19.5
5.6
13.4
v100.0
99.9
99.9 100.1 100.0 100.0 10C.0
49.9
(AGREE A9
10180
4C9
59.5
1,830
ICO.0
16.;
1CC.0
2.0
6.1
1C01.t
19.1
1Li14
99.9
2;1
1C0.0
IC.?45
14:5
;488
100.0
1CO.0
232
100.0
241
27.3
Imo
30.9
1CLC,t
17.5
108
1C0.1
12.7
42
1CO.0
9:1 C3.5
100.0
9.8 13
100.0
1;1
99.5
1C0.1
A10 24
0
1-,
ONvpLA
4121 PF104PI. heRF ACTIVITY RY 24^443 6CRA 1CT.EHPLC314.SPECIALT3 OF CLHP. CEGAIE
CINENSI04-CCI
KC opic
0IMENSION-102
151 CCAPt 1C131 ALL PANTE '.:FCLIFS
0IMEN5I015-0O3
CPPA OTHER 6:C4N
SECCh -(463 ACIA- VITY
RIM ACT1V
eAsIc APPL. CE-L 04.46 01.1C 11400
he
P4ES
+ES 4 CP:
46C
C11.16
-16C (DER 9E5P. 1CTAL
BASIC RES
1429
56
15
30
29
116
H25.0
4.1
5.2
1.i
12.4
23.1
23.1 1CL.0
APPLIE0 RES
V5.6
3.5
8.5
.2
8.c
5.2
1.9
3.4
h21
34
4::
21
2.37
H6.9
14.3
16.9
13.1
2.1
92.4
29:1
5:3 loc.,-
516.4
11.4
26.4
44..
1.2
12.2
IC.6
1.4
7.1
CEVEL4CESIG14
N1
IA
4t
2Z
12
444
V.4
4.4
20.6
.5
1.1
2.1
N45,40 - 646
Pi
2.3
29.5
9.1
13.6
4.5
4:5
27.3
9.1
99.9
.E
54
68
11
25
12
43
11 4
lil
H4.4
17.9
6.0
73.6
7.7 Icc.c
6.3
22.9
7.E
5.6
6.4
1.5
.5
5.4
MANAG - OTHER
V)7.1§
r.1
NIIC
63
70
287
H22
IQ
12
7 .7
3.3
4.2
38.3
22.0
24.4 1CC.1
TEACHING
V151
76
17.1
58.5
10,9
4.2
f.'s
N326
1181
2125
H4.0
4.6
2.6
.2
17.5
15.3
55.6 ICC.0
OTHER
V66.4
34.3
39.0
7.1
68.7
56.6
76.9
63.2
N13
29
le
IC
23
26
41
97
235
H5.1
11.4
6.3
3.9
9.0
10.2
16.1
38.0 ICO.0
V10.2
9.8
11.3
14.3
5.4
ILA
7.1
6.3
7.6
NO RESPONSE
h H1011.8 1C1!
V_
7.7
3.5
TOTAL
N120
297
141
70
425
108
576
1535
3,61
H3.8
8.6
4.2
2.1
12.7
5.6
11.1
45.6
99.9
V100.1 100.0
99.5 100.0 100.1 100.1 ICC.0 ICC.0
99.9
0I13ENSION-001
NO Phe
0I0E13SI014-002
1ST CCPP: TOTAL ALL PANEL Cocos
CINENSION-0O3
EPP* NO 0E56e35E
BASIC RCS
h4
26
_Ii
33.3
1C0.0
APPLIE0 RES
V111:1
100.0
.3
N H
OEVEL40ESIGN
N N VRAMAG - Rf0
H VHMO - OTHER
N1
1
10C.G
. 100.0
V20.0
TEACHING
N1
H50.0
50.1 110.1
V-100.0
.1
OTHER
N H VNe RESPONSE
--R
.2017
2017
14
100.0 160.0
VICC.0
99.6
TOIA1
NI
52
2C16
2026
.1
99.6
99.9
V160.0
-
100.0
100.0
loc.0 106.0
All
Al2
241
111 gi
r4 it
-
2414.
tAk) frit
13114111#311
Sft
nil3iIA
PHOU1NENCIU4-00 Ws COLLEGE OP 1141VERSITY Al 5DIN1A5M-00. PRIMARY AO, TOTAL Ph0114PAAI1A L P N -141
V 84.8 d1 4.60A3214 14 2 h
91.31E P--- -------*: 25.8PAN418 P
VN
1.1 2.7
1.1 4.02 22
PAN5811, A.(
PAN51110
PAIS1P CP 12
VIi
.74VPAN61C Ft N
V 1.f 5!,1
PAN9IOPTICS ---NV
V .6PAN715 [ P N 1
P4962810 I.
v .111
,i.4
.I .1 .1 .361.4
91.2 2 4 e4 et
1.0 92.0 .1 .4 .430 119
.1
i .1 1.3 sPf 4i!!i
7117---41 -XI.
.i .2 79.4 92.9 05.82 208 221 429
.; 1!; 131 .1 2,74
*I
.1 .1 .1.22
.f .4 I.i .1 1.,
7 2
2.4 1.6 6.1 13.6 1.1 1.9 i.6 6.6 8.2) 11 161 --4-11
9
.9 4.f 2.5 3.6
11 114 3.; 3tg .1 102-94 Vit1,4 11 1044 7.3 3.,
..1 1.t .1
.1 Il 1.1 iN.1 1.1
.1 11 1.1 ;:l
1.9 2.1 1.f 1.?2 45 524,1
I /0 431 I;611;12 1.: 15r4 149 161; 1.1 1 .9 21. 5.2
.1 056., 1.1 2. .6 1./ 1:1
1.1 16 27 4 .494.4 1,4 2.6 3.2
61 11
2.129 I.! 3.1 511 2.; 48( 4.0 1nPANIOIACOUSTICS N 1
.f14
!1 1.i InPAN11-151451110N--9
PANIOINISC M
12.6 1
.2 5.4
.81 14 *
1 .4 7191.1 61:1 21 2 : Z71
V
6.7 .
7.1 2.9 2!6 2.1 3.6 3.6 3.6 2:6 5.6 8.1 6.1 4.1 ,!1 589 32;.1 Lill
'104 EffiKANNV
118 44( 100,1 Ogg 262 21;- 141 123 271 93 36t Lent 151 7341100.0 100.4 100.3 100.2 174.4 192.8 105.8 101.9 102.6 101.5 101.1 100.0 100.6 102.4 104.4 10 .0
D1x04510.5-001 PHD11~6104-002 IOPI01,06510U-003 P510A
:AV
V
PAN2 TA X E
-PAPTIIE P
PA94111 P
PA7:5517
PAN513IPV
1-PANSIP LF
VPA.461C
VPAN7SS T-1i
VPAN81810
pAmlosicousvics
-P8911.1514STION----11V
PAN161NISCV
-NTRESPOISTUTAL 64014
RY ACT1 TOTAL KNOWN12
124 4 48).7 14.8 24 3._1.i
2 1.1 66-9 6!1 .1
2 11 912.5 4.11 11.1 712.1 4.1 3.S 3.8
101
41. 72.0 1.5 49.5
4 56 60
1 104
1.7 .1 2.6 83.6 _28;6
1 43Iii 74'1 MI 78.i2.3
107 57 1 4
8.3 18.6 3.7 6.2 8.4 4.; 7.1
.1 1.1
.7
-Psdi9tOPTICS--P7-- -5361.6 1.1 A
1.43 3
2.1
.t
61 446.i4. i
1
16 23 27 1i3 143 61100.1 107.1 100.0 102.v 174.8 10.2 176.1
11 19
4.1- i 2.1 .5As 1
3 i 2813
!I '5:6
LI 4 .1 4.2 sil 5.3 7,4114 321 23 20 3.4
27 1
it iii
1.9 71 10.5 27.1:93 321' 5.9 4.1 6.8
1.1 2.315
3.0 5. 4.520- 162
91a.1 1.1 lg. 4. 1. 3. 41i 1
III 4./ 7.1 4.8 401 9.1 t.021
42/11
12.1 10.6 31.: 0 13!1 6.8 14.1. 22! UN2- '3 8-.f _784 1 16-- 3 -11784.5 3.4 .6 .6 18.2 2.4 3.4 3.3
f4
1.
101.3 104.3
243
12 1 1 2 IS41. .8
6.4 54? .1 4.i 5:1 6-.' IP3. .8 69.6 .1 2. 3.2
2.426 S
-47.1 .1 N2.1338 3) 47651 4.0 6.8 54i2 37.2 13.7
24 919 115 44 610 138 359441
99.8 101.4 104.8 104.3 104.2 109.1 101.1
A 16
f.144.43109-002
EMPI GOV1RNNEHT-FEOCPAL TIC.
1,11meNtui-001
PHD
Al7
DIM1;t1104003
PRIMARY ACT1 TOTAL 69019
P511I1A
I. R
N16
V76.2
.4
I.i
P54214 H I.
N V736.;
2.1
4ID
12.1
13
23
6.1
4.1
2.7
3.t
7.3
855.
0
20:.I
14
2120
P64116 P
H1
37-H
101
2.4
,is
1.0
86.0
5.6
2:1
1.6
1.1
.)
4.
4.6
4.7
V1.3
I.i
4.1
2.i
1.1
7.1
5.7
6.7
PANAM P
k
P5951111
X---30
31
11
12
25
4.6
2.1
461.2
2.1
32.0
2.9
I./
1.0
3.5
PANSB1P
N1.0
3.4
I7
P4451P C 6
41---
31.1 __2.1 _________2111
4Ia _f1.11
II __14
11
.?
21
99
2.i
1.4
IAANISIC
N11
4.6
3.1
2.1
V4.4
6.1
63.1
63.3
71.2
3.i
2.7
S2i2
31
.1
i41q
41.
2.9
7.2
4.;
22.1
2.1
12!:
83:2
i20.0
21.4
8.5
PM:7:S C F-
11
22.1
47
lOs
2-
i3
4'e
1122
17 a
24?-,
2129
PAN41610
g9.5
4.I
2.1
2.0
11.9
2.0
5.2
91.1
.4
i
70.5
IS
1.3
2si
1.4
PANIO:ACOUSTICS
N2.1
1.
5.4
4.8 6:1 42.
1.7
3.7
4.1
2.1
7.2
Is
./
0)
6.
2.
49,4
V4.1
141:
2.1
1--
i19
43-
Ia
99
8/0191GPTICS
N
2.
3.8
51
114011-L5:ASTRO?:
-N
-I
15
1/I
494
1.0
1.0
67.0
2.0
2.1
6.8
VG 5E57.09-.8
/iV
2.1 2
3.!
4.f
64_ 53
21!
1:1
5.1
10./
6.4
48.7
57.1
10.5
PAN16:9151
42
796
20
144
TOTAL 4004N
N21
96
43
107
49
44
9/
373- 149
25
101
59
109
147
35
1377:0
-V
104.9 103.1 102.2
99.4 143.1 183.5 173.2 101.2 102.8 100.0 102.1 103.5 100.8 100.4 103.0 107.2
as9DCO
0INTNSIO4..001
PHO
0111[4SM-502
CORI RESEARCH CENTER
A19
014145104-003
PRIMARY ACT: TOTAL KNOWN
sP59I14 C R
-9
1.5
68.2
I4
849214 14 F
41.4
.8
1.2
.)
5.2
IIll
221
1.2
1.3
4.1
OS
-38
--1757131E-7-
1,4144:4 P
NII a .0
9.3
.
1.5
2eS
5.1
4.1
poi
1.4
3.1 14
4247
V
16/1
12.1 'IA
-TATISAIF
4.5
31
11.2
8/.9
244
1.1
24,1
2.!
2.3_12.0
4.1
1.4
12.:
18.2
23.1!
F----
1.0
60.8
3.0
24.4
2.5
3.3
4.1
2.I
4.
P445018
N2
1.1
2.9
212
1.0
1.1
86.1
55.:
.1
1.1
-
2.4
N4
2.9
.i
4.1
6.4
-PAN51P E-
PAN6IC 0
4 VV3
4.0 9
62.2
90.1
80i2
ill:
4.4
4.1
4.:
1 1
-46
118
164
0
11
4
19
4.1
3.3
6.
10.9
20
195
11.6
9.0
.1
2.
14.4
2.5
6.8
79.0
3.1
4.1
23.2
13.1
2./
9.6
15.1
21!1
-PA717:5 C-P--------- N
11
-52-
4V
4./
.4
57.1
4.1
Iel
14.?
1.9
:32
4 1
PAN81210
N V./
55_
0,2
..1-
PA
N9
I OP
TIC
S-N
45
9
PANIO:ACOUSTICS
NV-i1T11.1 -74----.4 -----T.4-21.-1.f
45q---a
5.8
2.4
6.1 5.1--
1.1
.1
.1
11
1.2
60.09
.114
.0
PANI6INISC
V N,.t
10
2.7 4
41.0
12!i
62s
A-PAN11,151ASTRON----7:
27
'A59
NO RESPONSE
14V
1.1
2./
2.4
5.4
3.1
3.9
3.0
7.7
3-
11
'4
4-
2-
1-
6.1 133
1.1
51./
3911
;11
18
8It
2
TOTAL KNO.N
N22
100
223
409
74
131
205
162
91
23
82
11
69
204
33
1510fl
v99.9 104.0
99.9 100.1 162.4 190.2 180.1 102.8 104.4 104.0 104.8 100.0 104.1 103.4 106.2 111.1
011-14.!;14%-f4.1
pun
rir,nslo-.-c.)
fhP; 01N18 8N0.N
019.1.1,1(0:-0C1
1,81..APY 4CTI 70141 ISONN
e1
110
N10u.0
75:0
3.2
6.4
5.6
6.1
3.h
.d 4
12
4e.i-
4A
2.1
3.1
4!1
.4
5.42
7.t
1.3
V
7:4011 P
'
27-
484.4
3.2
3.44
1.61
4li
2.1
6.2
42
P20141-. P
h
- N
2.1
6.i
6.4 10
5.6
360:f
47:1
12.?
7.6
li
1.;
1.1
6.3 7
8.1
17.8
V79":11
13
519
113e
PA,..4tF
2.5
66.2
3.1
7.177
PANC8:i.
h1
116
16
4
PAN5SP E F'
V N3.1 1'
.t
14./ 1
1
1.8
5.4
3.0
i-
10
"i2
4'-'iZ
11
2,5
PA46sE A
V2.k
3.1
.8
66.7
60.9
76.8
2.5
4.2
1.5
as lt>
M2
52
287
452
5..;
l'..!
4c2
V5.0
3.1
4.0
13.1
s.i
13.2
22!Y
e./
3.1
PAK7:5 E P-- "---
R6.1
71.7
-
19
14.t
13.5
14Ti1
2.i
-e.g
-
6.1
--
---
4.5
37.3
12.9
.4
2./
k.11
r:Aa:31t,
N1
62.5
4.8
521
2.4
23
'Al
13.1
1.1
L.4
P44910771E5'
'- -1"
4-
29
13
26
14
459
P417101AMST1E5
v10.0
1.6
7.6
4.2
4.5
57.d
6.1
10.8
7.7
N66!9
313
1q
1./
P4111-15:4S3RO7g --
h16.7
1.k
24
3477.4
2.2
4.6
P:%lett 15E
33
54
117
14
114
1.1
2.4
6./
1.0
4.2
8.3
..t
13.3
51.3
51.4
18.2
1
-2
715
N6
40
32
124
15
18
33
116
14
6e
45
15
31
2.8
37
7..
100.0 102.5 103.1 100.6 166.8 119.0 176.9 102.3 104.2 101.4 100.0 100.0
99.9 104.5 105.4 10..8
245
*71 SPFC ca ENO BY SPEC Of 1ST cow, OF EMPLOYEA.EACPARV 6680 ACEIVI(V.00Cvtc0011.1.11uN-071 Pap0.45100-n02 tOPI'T0T81800wwDia:345134-601 PRI.Aftv ACT: 64SIC P.85253CH SUB- Emn OF Empl.. SPeC.
PAhCi. P4Nii P4A1-1. p39ck PAWL PANIL PANLL P44LL PAntt PAUpl. ?ANIL PANEL PANEL ra.aa NO 70143.10:11.0 15T Comp 1 : 3 4 52 5C 5 5 7 A 9 10 11-15 16 REOP: 11146813
2.49134 C atf'
11017.1, .) .). .4 f 2 1
c 22.2 1.0 1./ ..9
1S7
P4714 P E il 4 4 a is ig1!1
-34- 1 S40
PL..:11 Pv .1, XI 1.1 .1 7.7 1..4 Z.1 -2.1 3.1 16.7 1.' 9.1 1.9 9.95 I
7 53:: 7'.gI ,
2./ .8 11.61 24 11. 438
3 11 24 661 .1 ii lil3.2 2.
3 S 1 12 1 743V 1:: 7:42 2.5 92.1 .6 3.4 1.9 2. .3 5.9 5.6 13.5
P44419 P.4 20.4 17.0
P.:454:F N 55n 1.1 21?i 12.1 1.'i2
2.1 .k 1.6 3.i 0.:PANALIP ------r,---- 7
1.1 111.1. a 5.1Z .3 !,
5 7.1
P2450 L FV11
.2 .!5 2 IOU 210 110 1v 1.4 3
1.04
I.t .1 1.i 4.2l 3 173
PAX4111 h ii. 3 'IS.3 62.6 92.4 81./ 1.9 2.3 _1;9 2.0 21 1.1 1.!
.3 445.6 1.9
63(als E PVN
I.a 6.6 .6 11.1 19::, I.; e!it 41.Z --1. 14.1 21.0 23.7 .4 107.0 -25101 In'A
2 141 1 32 6 3 .70
PANA10i0 -I,1
.2
.1-
.12
.1 _y..a 1.995 t
69.3
2.
1 51 1
2.6 0.60,
5 ;1 4 lb' /.2!PC89:7P111S N 1 12 2 52.6 1.4
c5,..1u,AccusTics7--- 4------ '6 -"D.2_ A _ 2.i. .L 1.3 3.1 1.2 3.2 50.a 1.8 2.0 4.1
.! .1 .1 .4 1.) .1 40!1 .4 1.4 'In 13
/ .1 8N 2 3 1;7
.3 '11- .81.2 2.5 5.4 1..3Pamll-15,45TRON
1-11,191179M'
43c,
n0.71cPC..q.
C1002.1. F.413.9_
011.,45164-001t.167J,S169-002111...115156-007
A20
4 10 7 6_760:
V4
1.8 2.0 1.2 1.n 5.4 2.7 3.7 1.2 2.0 3.8 21 5.1 3.: 511 22.! !in3 10 6 6 6 11 45
m 147 502 414 717 140 226 374 1549 323 157 7 4 4 54 5,LCV -----'100.0 101.1 100.1 100.2 167.7 192.9 142.9 101.7 102.7 101.6 1021)2 102M 101!7 10i.:7 135.9 104.9
pH')thP: TOTAL KhOwNPAIPARY &CT: &MHO 9151.6.6CH A21
n 7 Z I 7 9V .2 1.5 4.1
:s:17:: : '-'
4F ---...2"4-. !,le 7 2.2 3.6 1.1 .9 1.1 3.3 7.6
72 1 9'
..1 A 29 10
12!? 1.i 4.1 3 12
ri' 5. i r. i
pAh4117 P1,1
24 -2/ -- I 2
7 53.1 8.4 7 .9 .a .9 3.18 4 3
3.9i6
5._ .3.1-33
h 9 4 316 2.1 1
6!t,254
Pl.h54IF__28.6 4.t 26!i__71.1 5./ 3.: 4!? 2r; 6.9_22.2_ 2.: 2.3 .2.?
16J8. 11.1
88956:1,Vn
14.1 3.i .,1 -11.'1 -3.1.--,0 13 1.; 2./ 2.9 2.0 2.74 Ili
2./ .i 7.1 0274 35?: .,,
1,8450 C F-------- rt-- 1-- 2.42.1 1.1 1.0 1.0
410.0
12 4 1 15 5 'AS'
m4 2.i -1.1 24!1 es: 201 --21 5.1 3.4 3.6 2.0 1.4 13.5 10.6
24441C mV 14.3 5.`
1 23 11 2 69 a 6 58 9 813
PAN7:5 C P WV 14.2 15.9 4.4 5!/ 13f1 IA 8fi 711N 9.4 11.1 14.5 _7.6 12.4 ._11.z 24.3 33.9
.! .i66
2./86
p41.81210 14
V4
50.4 0 10.2 1.1 3.2
1.6 i 50.: 1.t .519.7
P4N0I0PT1C5--------4' r 28 52.7
3 4 iS 71.4 6.4 5.1 11.1
? lea5..1
4.2 15 L 100
P6011-15:15TALN- Z ..71 241V
1.5 1.3 .1
1
,. -
.. 74.3
59!; 1sn
2-4-639
1
2.0 I.iA 2 7$P641013COU57155 N
14.3 19.1 1 3.6 16.2 11.6
7.0
2. .6
P4h161815CAf
5 4 / 3 5 a '15 1 17.2.1 60'
1.5
4,5 3.0 4.0 6.: 1.6 4.0 5.t9 343
80 PESPC4.1C ----ft 1 --II° -2.4 -2.0'01-41 6006n n 7 145 45 750 153 111 264 054 III lb 754 i01
24.3 12.914
114.4 105.5 102.1 101.2 173.3 135.6 170.3 102.2 105.4 500.0 101.4 104.0 101.9 103.6 113r4 lit:2
oil SPEC OF END AY SPEC OF 157 CONE% SY EMPLOYEA.PAIMAAY VORA ACE16116.0EGOEF
016E445104-001
PNO
pE5EN1103-002 TrouTEITAL 6601,6
5E4CtAles-OUS
P616,444Y ALTE nEvu
e45ioN
559- FIELD
OF
FNPL
SPEC.
PANIL'pANEL PAUL PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA'AL PANEL PAma, PANEL 044a
910
M11 Pf:a NO
TOFAL
TUPELO 15E-COPP - -
-
12
3-
456
55
5a
7a
9ESP. (6056
p4.1i8 L 8
N1.1
.1
1,47
,086
R E
46,!1
6.1
6.1
33.1
11.1
1.1
1.1
12.t
6.;
6.7
24
PIN111 P
N10
14
10
FAH4iN P
i.':
62.5
3).1
429
2.f
20.g
2.!
i2
16;1
v25.0
94.4
I6.;
13.1
4A 10.1
50.0
3.6
1,14541F
N7
46.;
2.f
212.1
5.3
25.0
16.6
23
PAN5BIP
n3.6
31
V
54.6
04,1510 c
FV
66.g
13.1 4
1.1
2.!
1 4
5E13
66.f
60.0
2.1
5.4
5.3
5.0is
PAU61C-9
g-----
13
13
Pc4N1UPE1C5
V 44
16.;
25.1
1,1611$ I P
N100.0
16.7
1).1
7573
:00:g0
25.S
14.1
25.0
21
36
v17.3
503
2!(.9
PA491810
nI.e
4.0
I./
5./
64.4
gf
PhnlOgACOUSTICS-
R22.2
2.1
62!g
12.t
6.;
14. 12
3.3
P66411-1514578074
41
...1
P.
P3.161nI5r
- - -N ------- -1---7
vv6
250.0
1;1
I1;1'
CD
'6'1'1=4
N6.3
4.4
6.3
62:::
10.,
6.1
12.1
44.!
25.:
15.6i
675
b--.
FIN06109-0u2
INPI Mit KNOWN
01.1/116.-001
PRINAAY ALTI NANAG -- 114D
01006104-001
PNO
9-1130.1 10013 100n 994.! 158.7 166.; 159.i 102n 1001.8 100.9 105n 100n 100.0 105.3 100.0 105.1
p4L1t0 c 0
661.6
.t
4
P4...1.1A P I
it
41.1
,I,Ini
1.0
61431C P-
NU4a:g
5.9
I.?
4./
1.1
3./
31.i.
2.g
4.1
8!!
49
I.
1.1
5.6
PAN41N P
N1.)
72.1
5.6
1
Ii
8I
S)
5236
92.0
1.1
1.5
2 4
2.1
4!1 - --
1II
9.0
19,1,/
71.1
2.1
1.9
2.i
2.
7.6
14.3
4.0
7.3
5.7
13.0
PANSA1F
NA 705.1
41.1
1.6
2.g
2..,
2.9
v:
-7
16
384
PAII.11sP
Pa
245
48
231
3.9
467
2.6
.1
43 86.5
38.7
2.0
..,
P457.4P L-T------
42
3.0
1.3
2.;
?I:
PA46iC 6
2.6
1.1
75.0
66.5
79.8
1.6
3.9
254
45
99
3.0
2.9
3.0
4.9
5.7
e.0
PAN715 1 Er--
418.i
14.1
5.?
6.?
5.6
6.g
71!1
3.1
26.2 211
10.1
14
167.S
135
N10
31811
2.e4
PAN6E610
v1.1
.6
.1
53.9
4.1
1.5-
10.4
2.2
p6N940PTICS--
41 1 _______
17
.t
1.4
.5
6
2.1
3.!
41:15
1.1
.59
1.4
26.6
.11.4
.1
TN
7.1
515
6.6
1.1
6N
PANIOSAEDUME8
N21.8
14
49
7
PAN11-151ASTRON--N
----
1.1
.3
14
94
2.0
72.1
1.6
5.7
10a
3 - 't;
V1.3
1.4
04916:9151
1":
17
817
4.t
16
465.7
.9
3;1
?,61
6234
91.1 _14_51
6.??
1.9
4.8
3.9
10.8
4.9
8.0
5.9
9.0
52.0
46.3
16.7
118111.1%01:14
- -
if.
-11
7I3
68
169
72
42
124
415
102
71
201
666/
510
67
1464
100.0 102.7 100.1 100.9 175.- 186.4 129.7 101.2 103.9 100.e 103.1 102.9 103.1 104.9 105.4 107.6
A2.
247
sTi 56F1 01
010
11! 1
01tWF 1ST COmP BY ENPLEWIA.P141hAlly 6244 7CTIVITY.CEC4EE
DININSIO9.001
P
013E45104-002
F001-7011111NO2N
0190610s-001
14114ANY AETI 641.46
011414
7.171 PANEL rAhEL
PANEL pANLL PANEL pa::112 PAUL Mal
747.ii. 1117a 74;Z TY--
SUCTIO 1ST COMP
----
454
5E
56
78
910
11-15
16
6ESP.'61CNN
A214
P.s114 C A
42
39
00.211. M E
466.7
17
41
.9
30 -
-4
.6
57.1
3.7
9.7
p 111tE P
41
51
9.3
7.3
61i
9
4.i
684
75.4
3.1
4.8
6.1
91!1
7.9
163
-
11.1
":
6.g
16.,
2.9
1.1
7.13.429 P
PAN5Ast
V Ni
10!g
9.1 151
91
PAN5917
rvl
50.0
33.1
1.g
PA1.671. M
PAW15 L P
P1451P C F
N V V N23.F-12.g
3.g
33.1
50.0 100.3
66.,
19
100.0
33.1
22.4
76.1
i;32
75A
25.1
19.1
- 1;1
14.5
10.9
26.1
1.9
:::
1.1
s., 8)
1Z
fa
P 4491210
V N
10.1
.1
IN
5C.1
.9
.6
35
p.V, 4ISP TICS
N4.
3.
7.18
61.1
4.11
5T:
1f
1t
9.1
PAsIOI1C0USTI3.5--
N1
a4
110
-1.6
66.7
1.2
1.6
1.6
Pa411-154511104
N8.1
14
1-.
P291619151
41
80.8
1.t
39
il2
.....1
V33.1
12.g
4.g
7.1
14.i
3.g
14.4
10.1 41N 54.7
28.9
c:,
7%11.-NA
P.
321
11
6i
61!
610
T.3
- V- 100.0 191 .0 100.1 100.1 150.0 200. 1461 101% 100.0 100.a 100!1 100.1
100!.0 101!a 105!Z 10.1T!
01m.4%1US-001
P40
1 1,,h1i"%-u02
003 TUTAL 11401.
01104.110--Oui mr447 ALT* itAcNtNG
FAhlt4 E. 4
-h
46
.1
IN
IN
p59.11 h F
s00.E.
.4
170
74
114
17
474
s242
rvoli:
P20.5
.6
1.1
.1
- 1
.4
1.6
23
1111
4.7
4.9
440
7.2
1.9
3.1
56.5
1.4
..9
.6
.3
1.3
1.4
77
7331
1i1
9.4
2.PA14311 P
4a
S34
4!1
3.:
84:1
.1
.4
2In
3.2
5.2
2.;
9.1
9.6
11.1
PASAIF
----
Z-1
179
1Z6
143
22
po6.7.63P
hv1
40.7
8.4
SE.0
1.6
3611
41
110
2.1
!Iil
ransiv C F
Z.4 1
2.1
62.2
16.1
.1
2.g
1.1
120
97
217
15
1.1
2.4
).6
PANCIC N
01V14
.4 7
714
82.6
90.7
66.1
1.7
2.g
11
it
2.6
4.9
6.6
34
4276
P AN7,5 I. P
v N5.4
.6
1.8
9.7
5.a
6711
2.i
16.7__16.2
23.2
./
11!1 201
21.2
1092
P9493610
PAW/701)MS-
N59!g
2:1
-
3.1
3.8
1.4
2.4
421 9 6
2.3
94
.1
.41
.1
.4
.2
.1
-799
P44101ACOUS712.5
1
-V
---i0N---i.1- .)
.1
.4
.2
7!:
5.2 549
3.6
?
1.1
I:g
4il
210
17
14t2.4
5.2
100!1
9g:9 101:a 103!! 18/n 184N 1819 10t:2 107:2 107:t 101:8 100!1' Ida
14,1!f 1049
.!
44!.!
106.7
4038
66
Pah
it-1
51,4
5110
71 -
9i
*5-
17
88 -
z3
1.1
19
.
YSTIES174114- '4-
N_)
111
_4.
8.9
4.6
4 1
5 6
_4.1
33i
37.
411
i6.
151
5.71
5033
42.2
31=
.2
110
13
19
1 --
7 --
*-.
66
12
33
.2
2.5 6
51.484.0
2.6
1.2
3.4
6765
35
884
1136
PAh163N1SE
V1.
COLT
.0 ?.?:0 O V I I P T T T . O . 0 T2 V T 9 0 9 - 0 0 9 V 0 IP 0 0000 C 0 0 I, I... bo 0 0 C
2 « V ! « -: « .
.<- < I 4 k , - 7.: !: k. ,
!... ;556 7.4 17,
'
. ., ,, .-, .., .., 4 I". 2 0 5:51
1 . 7 e 2 2 e 222..
fig ! n 1/1 4^ 13 . 4 ;;;
... x =, m
.., ... , ,,c0 ... -. .. ,.. -. 0 en Zt. 7, , .... I. 0 .. 7 T V T 2 0 0.. 577,,:z
r., r., r, 11 TI 7
n. .4-7f 1 ,L4 ; 2 4rn , I ,,i ...
!. Tfl. ,...! .... _ 1
, r. 22 - 2,11 101 000 2IT . . . I
I
C 00 Ofl
...II. ... .4 0 Tr 1 C 60411 0 In
1
.
17T 0 .
02i .
2 01 I
I 1 73
....-..
......° 1
!
T.90.4 .42.242.422242:[2.2.3<2.24:.<2,42G4 *1.47 <2,4.7.442.2.4.2..2.2.11177.2.24542 F 7 e
8 ,
I
,
I i
F... i
,
V OZ ' AA 1
I
. ,
,... , ..,
.., 4., .,, i
... Z,-; 2 , - -.: -i.< v,
,,, - . . o .40
I ,,.. I: =Ca v.
..... 2202.r.-o, cr. 0.44,-, .r...800N.-,..00. 0- F
I ...4
.. .0.
bo . . T I
T Z
Coss T I- 0 N - , 1. 0 2 , a, .... .... 0 = e... co :
...'n.
N., Z .... . .2. s - 0000.....,100.000400T*0:,-...T.2 P..-
:ALI ...,,. ..,,....! , ,-.....
.°,..,-".-V.- , 0
. ,.S.
. . ... 0.
T 1.. so ....- . ... . I. . 7". 0N
6.< 1 .P V r
« 4 ..
1
. , ',. : - i
i 0
ON .-s .... 0, 0 N 70
I 7.1 . L'1:1.40 : : i 0. m
X W,4=0 .....N.NI.A...........0.1,118.46.^NTTTONT.. 0081
i 0 I- i ID
= .8 NI I. IN 7: Z
aVa a w 1.0 OSI IWN N VI , %A 0 J. ; 0 a ^ Jr a WO. N .. 4d I N
LOYX.....7VC.2.13.7..1, J.C::;.1 W 717 4 ..7 I 40 . N., .:: D. :
7 I I
7 4 2. 2 71
C72 1. . . 0 Lss .
I 4.4 0 os.../0004 ...
L-;27.,,«L«.1::,.;,<1..<4.. I 0x. r . - ,
10 in/ - na ...N 21,-, . : 7. ! j : ,«.
,.. .ag, !
« ..«.*. .« .,....,.. .« 000....NN.Vn
1,4.0710.2014.441072.04eN .71 to
(
,
-,,,p . 1 7C. :40
061. 060 0 0 ..a.. ,... .11 8. IT.. N N 10 74
1'.. I. NI 0 S nf
! el...11, 11. II, CD 4 ... - 0, sk 0. y 0..p.0 D0 ....... ,...1t4J4......2e.14.0N0 NNWNNo. lAyN. ..... .....414 WN .1-0 17 ll 7 rtt
70 0. et ft I! 0.41.61 LI 8.. 8.. Nn N 1.0 0 an 0 VI Pa us 5 5 «i' a
-« . ON 17 .7 Fun ne . ,... ,..6 Is. u....40...,.....100 00.00,....NOT.7.-.0104.4...NO, ... Z.5: 00.1.0.1 , I- .8.8 n. T
,
00 8....n. 5 .
..... ,,,, - .... ......... C T ... V N i 0 J 0 , 0 U
na N O 0 as T 0 ...... ....... ,.... ' Z.J.
i
:=1:=1. IT err
, 8. . es
0. V 8. ,,. I 0 ,.. . 7...1
........ . . on e e ye,. ma N '''fIZ N 0 . no, 4.. CNN 4.. 4... ..... - 0 0 ....1 .
1.,...00220300......N.00400030.-.610 ...cp..... 0.!.. &,!... 0., to I-
,,..i 0 47J. IV 60 Ps N .... g :' i...,...
. . . 7,.1
, _ . _ .. Dcw..4 mwm,C,««««.121-440QuopoC«
074 LIN WI r
se 0 V 0 8. N
8. vs* - 0 0
r i'sl . . " ' - .... 00 0« W. I
... 0 . to... ' 0 e . te arn,,...... 4 N 60 IS N ... 0 a 021
., t St 711 .... ..c ,.. 0. 0 C. - O. p 40 on . - 7, I
08030.1.0;.0000000000.0.-.0N606WWWN0a 0000.Nb2N4 Co20. ...... 0.... I- I
; J .7 02 I
0101 ..,...s 84 s.. . N 0 So N N -1 La 0 C. 0 . N 4n 1
8 . .... .... 0, N IN N ea an.
2.I 0....C,T,P0040,0000100.6.00001046......4.2 N. ON r..08N IT.-TaIs ! L- ,...L- 7 1
55. -, Y. NO Z ... ....0 on n
II. 0 IV in ...11
? 0 I
... owr . - `1,-.-..........,..... ..4.40.4...o...-... - . 0 T I ,,...... ,ss, .0 48 T 8 "...oz., .... . s Los ...,. ,s, .... as ,...... Cl .... IN .... .. .-. .,-,n W4r.e.ore Z . I
,....4.««00,00...«,....,«mo«ogwa«.2 0 0, .......0.00.4.0.00 41,N00 0001, 04.....0. TI- I
i -....
.1:
I1;
I
pNNN0.071.304NVO,O,N.4444N040,0o-owo404..s0ozo0.4.49-.0.17.,. n.nzo4
weft VO
- " 4 4 !
I
-Pd -4z
44 ...... ..44NASMIN P.W,Or4,11. C4.
sryr
moo od..rot 4 Po .41
fy.4,
T.
Mftx000.44094N04,401z440.4z.w.p.,,04---;0::,1:!.1004':-..,.-. ... 414 , 4,12f . 4-4'4'4. - r. .. -... . 4, .. . ..,c; -.2
74
.... ..N. ftnoann7 170..n-IN,.....,ON4P.4.......fteo.. 4,..,
0.2t-',%T 4,.; 4 ' 4 -:. ; 4 -. , .....
.. 2 ;
-,
.
. -...-,..., '''...:4T':!-IT:---71"'1,.......... .....--. -:::4: '1'2":
. .. Ng .. 1, .4,0 ,/r
' .4., ... 2.
e. I. .../..,
I .3 0..i 2
f
nz.PftM....P.4N0,044NN..74007NN.N.no o' ". '"'"--: ....r 4 . so. zo,o, .
I
. .
1 .; ;, 4 . -. ..- . , 4 ^_. +, + + 0,
I
I
7N ..... wor.n0s.-s .s
.'14*'T*9"".'t2. --; '!--7.r.-a.: A. ', !"'. . .. .. - N oo.;. eN n = r,
0 , I .!
mrs,s0 0. 0 0,0,110/=avh,r,..-,,,,,,,,r,-.CV,.-0 ..... I ,.... 0 n -- ..D 7 ... 1 N N 40 ea, 241 .1'0.1 .. I...MN 0 e . . .
. ..0 .....!
..1.1-°-Z -*,
_ , ...-
1
-I
. - ... 0,.. .
i-s--1.=: A A`44'.4 . 0%
I 1
".'=.: . t -: -9
S rtsr412.,0 Or'''' ....71" '".4 .4';-4 ' Z
-. ..47..1
7TPom;;Erpl I. p .14 . . ...
1I
...(14.
4I
,4
-......,.-" --:....---:..... ! '947:f1-1:"0 ::-"-:, .-.;tro al rP'... r
f:I; . I 4 .., I
i
. I 2 ;1
-°"°' ,....1 ': 9:
. , .Z. . .- . ...41 . .%. . 4 40 XI N n .., 0O z I
%0 OoZ C ozz..044 ...P. aozonao47. 5,...: .4-404.7. 44.44441,Nrr04040. -..,.;,,n .....,c.2.1... c. . . .. ,....:
,0
ii a....r: 4 4i
t 1-,
. -0 . .
I,1C./...,.m.r.ro 4..n nt 'net ...,...,...r. --, 8
I
, 1, . .7 , - i " ,
I '.3tZ't1
...OUY X 47 ... X . X.OZP1.72,2XPTZ.272iX>ZP4rXi. .....47.2..40.2.Z0Z>2.7>Vit>=.2i4a,2>
. I !
!!
I
......I
1
,
1 1 Ls, 5,., ,
1. . ,.I 5 z .
ni
.
, , , ,. r-,:-
....,...,, . . . . 01.,..,., - . - a....!..- -,0.
C. C. C. , . a . . . 0 - . ..; s; LI 7 . u g L Z L,
. ,. 2 '4: ! t.'.1 3-:;::..! it, " ; "I
,-_,
L :1 6 :: ..: :. :. E: :::- :.' ' n'SC. .x.- 00 2.
0"0 C. C. a C. . . C. 0 a a a61.
1704
PE 0 , 7 7 0 '6 7 7 7 '7 7 7:1
1r.
A ;, fr
2 7.:Crtin no 7 C . ,
!
I ,
SOLT
<2,7<<0.4244!,C4 ... . r<,!<,<X<0.001.Z
;
:
CT
1 StE
CZ14.C.E.GZCZCZCZ<Z<R<Z<Z<41,7
i t
I i I
I I
i qa,m
.. . Iv
I
,
I
t
Mi <2,
,1
-, 7;?,
_ - ....! -
...cn
L. L _I..., ;
-- .
.-:f r I .
! T 2 I
7..7. 0 I
I
' 7. ; :: ,. . I
ly.. .PI,1., PT
0 V. 7 .M;... 77 .70 ' w <.70
..< :.. 4;0 0.0 -0 E: ,..
2.. 106
7; ; I
4J
L: 7 ,
.44
. 7 f 7 7 V l./4 0.10,p0.0
I
. 74
r ir
4 -
.'17, f. r. . r ,
: c,c2,,,. :.,'..
Ca ., .:,!....!, ..1., -.
1 . MN &
,
t 4G0,7 -. - .
,
..... ,
..............7. , ,
E.D ... 1
. .. _ .. 2., y 1,,.. ! ',': ..., .1,..
i 4 16 I. IM0A. W r 0.N04.4 0,..4
:4....<7,...11.0.r...g.s.N. 'L.
OP Ira :.-:.1;=%;;:w 77- ;
;' .
'
.. !
-,...., . - -, 7 7_ ..
.. .
v11.44s6 16 00:1 . r 0 0 .
- ....., ,, .... .., , . i
n LS S ..rn 6,1 S./64v... .4 ,
0 6.
4 .
' V . ; t; i it 0 l se 01 ....WO a ,
,p1.46../
0 M 0 '
!
.0. , . i . i
J 0 77, r_t :s F... rz: :-, 7 'r '.
. ,
I
0u,,,...,...me.,...< wm0ON.....ON..0 ,..........
, Z.; . ,
1,1 4 v. I V. V. 0 .0 V. ;
e e I 1
i
fft.) 1.10..0r !OPUO.ON 0...00. CI
i i
1 I
.; _,.. ,
I
f-,, - ,
1
. - -1 -, 1
0 1. ,,,d ...) , 0 opv.c..............41 c.....,...yos,,,,,,,..,,,
. . 40.4 4 .6 4 , 4 .6., v 4 . 4.. i .6.i 464 C,...,VI4 2,612.6.<6.1. P
:-. ., _
I
. Pt .- IS
314 VP< v6.4.44.. 4.444 44 4 0 4 4 Pa 4 4 4 .4
.60. .4. .11. .0.414,1:106.0....4.0014014 IT 4.4,1.4
. 6. 0 , *A V. 04 09 41 P. 0.14
0 N n U. nil.. V 'PK< v 4. 64. p
i
1
i 1;
i I
, i 1
! !
I
N... 0 0 A.1 < 446.1014 0184
g . ,[1. p.p.. <I 1.6 sp . r , r p.. 0174,1<-40004,1 ....... 0,..000,04
, H 0 0 0 0. ....'
I
'0 .0 !
6.3 '.,Z kL0.... 1...61 ZP.P. ;OH 1
o ON N o o i
i
.... ',671:Et...Elia:07.".:E:.....-.1
90L
;? V VV VM V V NOM,'
= " t n f n 26r.
,00 000
10.2 .x0 X.M
*tir . X ... 2,..0..g...,.-..........,,:cg
0.
e i e 71. , ..
I
, .
. .
. .11 . , 0 N
0...... o o Pt
.. . 3 .t
0 .0
m IS . tol,o to A 0 to, to,
. 0. IN 0.....04.00.17. N+) g N
UT I. . 1.:.
; . Z . - . . . . . .
0 . .. J. :' D. P.454N7 ONNPN 0,00. ON
O o o 4 '0 4 o . o ON ..... NW. OA
; p 17. . N
; jes
;
t, 0 sw 7 %, .. ,,,,,,ho, ,4044 mm
;
m P. r..... e r , ?
.41 ...... Y.. OW 1.
r". 0 . O. N c 1. .
..... 0.0.10400.0.0.1. 1
I
O .1 ON .. . . N . . sm ....I
.. . m . ... N.. ...
M. 1.00.roy..7.05117.0N ....... Ni0.0.
O N 0 :=1*...r.!';7.r.nr..,,.... AMPW4...4000.11.4NOO.ftv.p.410..100
TI SOH OF EMP BY 51,1C OF 15T COMP 6Y EPPLOYEA.PRIMAPY 6055 ACIIIIITY.CEGRE.
EIPW.104-001
40 PHD
014E5SI04-002
EP7 1 TOTAL itnnwg
-
ot.th51it..-001
88141:15 ACT: HASIC 679135Cm
tuft- F1910
OF (M. SPEC.
FAINtL PAN(L PANEL PANUL PANEL PAttFL PANEL PANtL PA461. PA.FEC PANEL P8466 PANEL PANEL NO
4TC1AL
SUEIFLO 1ST COMP -
--
'
12
34
:A
;11
56
74
910
11-15
16
8958.- MIA
34
1.1
v49111 1 A
N56
81.2
.1
22
770
V
72:1
-
I.;
.S
_ _
161219 /4
E4
1V
.3
1.1
2.2
16!2
1.1
2.1
5.5
:1 -1)111
1
./
3?.:42
210
0441
5
-5..i
2405
.6
68.0
2.8
1.0
6.1
9.1
12.9
wo.419 p
477
179
1-/
2.;
.
1.)1
29
3.
1./
PA4SA1F
V1.1
3.7
89.8
1.
.9
.7
.9
N4
1.,
5.5
9.1
11f1
97
1.1
.1
.i
19!121
3.7
2SN
2!1
.4
I./
1.4
1.1
.i
2.:
1./
2.5
1845819
41
12
130
V3.4
-
81:t.
-11:
7..1
-2.5
.2
...
1.2
1.6
P44517
I. i
N-
1.t
.1
.i
61;i'
84?!
24!t
2:1
3.1
1.1
I.i
3.66
1.I
1.1
P11%61E R
-4,
786
15
16
10::9.
222
884
.11
2zZ
2.9
'
7.3
1.)
1.2
23.0
1.5
9.9
54.0
2.7
11.9
25.9
10.
1.6
9.1
19.0
28P
2471
5C P
N.
6In
PAN51010
V./
2.i
./
1.I.
71!1
13 r
3.6
N-
2./
-35 -
14"!
06491011ES
.6
1./
712
.15
9.4
.3
.4
33.
3.3
16
48
6591
it
S3.0
P41.10:4EOUSTICS
N..
4.9 _2.7
13.6
50.0 .
4,.._4A
.7
1./
25
let
il
n41115165TRON
N4
t
79.7
71N
:1
121
1/.;
.1
4!2
14.
1.4
44.357
Z2.41
F..,
2i416,,,Ist
419
li
16
5.6
54
3.5
3.6
5.1
3.7
5.g
ZN
4;2
6.5
1.3-
3.i
4.!
5971
,4
41
a?
C.3
8/
141
22/
lai
222
192
165
Ok
3420
,4
7145'1"4:
-----1 ---
100
100 IA 101ifi
163.0 189.5 179.4 102.4 103.1101!! 100 loln
100.9 103.6 101.1 106.5
016141104-001
NO PHD
OIPL91109-002
157, TOTAC 64009
01.14.111-063
PRI9.49y AEI: APPLIE0 RESCAICH
_
4.
Z2
11 -
--1
310
P.,%1I?
r.
140.D
.4
1.2
.1
P4214 4 L
564
74
24
115
163
v1.9
3.2
2.5
3.1
4.7./
P1531E P
4-
45.4
2.i
7.8
2.2
11
13
11.1,7
7.5
4:11
7./
36!1
4.5
.6
.4
44
9IA
P44414 P
29
51ti
91,,Etr
M.i
;i
.1
_*1 _.
101 ....
,.sii.f
1!!
4.1
16.1
72 1
1.
Z./
.I.Z
2:1
3.1
13.1
1.1
.!
14
3.6
7.5
7.7
215
1.4
.4
66.5
.6
paaNDO
Ni
337
40
,1
.6
1.5
5.9
1.5
1.1
rii
1
10
,_ Ig
XIg.
PAAssP C F -
43
1.9
80.4
19.1
-1
119
37
147 '
12
-1 -
- -
.7
V1.0
1.8
5.4
3.1
1.5
5.4
PF0.61C N
m221
.4
68.3
00.4
71.0
1.6
.6
388
8610
70.9
_ill
el
IOa
1_1001
P4471S C P-----
n14.1
11.1
9.7
13..
424
2/
2.1
II!?
" 8
7t2
la /
0.07
41t
31
32117:
pA.:8:810
9.4
1.4
1.4
.7
57.6
3 6
1.1
2.9
4.7
1.0
ILO
9.7
11
k2
14
23
PA49*PT1CS
V1.
.4
.7
1./
.7
77!6
N4SH A
'
9n "7:1
627t
S9
67
YPAh10:4COUSTICS
N23R4
2.1
2.1
4.1 1
8.7
813:80
10.6
8.3
10.4
21.1
230
13
421,1
ot
.1
n.4
21.2_
.!
.6
6.0
7.7
PAM-15183780N
N2
13
74
.4
.6
:i
1.t
13.3
-60!--1.I
2.1
PA4161011SE
440.0 I
74
Ifi
10
013
11
SO
31
740
051
20
__-.20.0.
5-0_ 11.1,
6.5
6.2
6.?
6.1
7.0
12.7
7.9
4.7
12.9
67.1
46.3
21.1
NU RESPONSE
10
22
a2
11
41
28
66
10741 74194
h7
161
46
202
754
1Sd
20
725
277
FS
912
67
3475
100.0 1011t1 100.!1; 10;i14 168.3 160.4 170.9 101.8 100.6 100.0 100.9 101.9 105.9 101.1 101.6 106.0
253
.11 SPEC OF EPP SY SPEC OF 1ST COMP SY EPPLOYEM.PAINA4v 10184 ACTIVITY.GEGAEE
;-35
01910%104-001
ha PRO
Elmr4t104-002-EmP1 TOTAL mum- -
_--
-010161104-003
1.0114111 ACT: UEVEL
DESIGN
SUB- FIELD
OF Wt. SPEC. ----- ----- ----- - ---- -----
PANCL PA:.EL PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA4LL PANLL pANEL PNEL PANEL PANEL PANEL NO
TOIAL
SUFFLD 101 COPP-
-1
2-
34-
54 -- 58
-
56
7'
89
10
11-15 '16- RESPE ENCUM
PAN1:4 E 4
0:1-
h1
PA12:4
FrE
v20.0
0./
.1
2.i
il
m9
--3
IT
3a
4,
2.4
2.5
4.0
9.1
3.9
1-.1
12.5
1.1
2.1
3.6
874111 P
4
201
2.0
35.S
4,4
2.1
2./
.1
1./
624
1.3
1.4
P14414 P
20.0
.1
to
189
14
45.0
71.8
.0
PA45418
41
9.1
.1
1./
2.0
1./
732.1
12.1
63!g
1.1
.8
2./
2.9
44
1.1
1.0
74458:
A7-
72
213
1.2
07.5
15.2
.1
.5
.5
.6
PARS8P 0 F
m1
229
016
2.2
2.4
73.7 100.0
20.3
2.;
1.3
IA
3.0
MEM
Ir71
5258 ----r-
t39
41
V167
P1..715 G P
V20.0
18J-
a7.t
13.1
10.7
71.1
8.0
9.1
10.0
7.t
4.
8.9
25.7
23.7
01
212
51
2)
VN
5.0
2.6
0.
1.1
2.9
1.
PANP:O10
5
ptu.1JPTICS
R2.1
.648.0
4-
4.3
N9
220
315
PA41011COOMG5
X25.0
1./
5.1
4.i
10!1
84
2571
71!!
2.1
4./
6.1
14.1
24111
.1
81!/
1.4
4.0
P3911-15:44TBON
m6
13
1./
2.9
5it
2.1
1;5
1./
54.2
1.1
2.4
1.9
1.4
P116:PISC ---------N---------1-
Cr----7---- 7
11
39
20.0
2.6
10.0
0.3
1.6
2.2
10.7
11261- 9.1
5.i
4.7
12.;
71!e
421;
2-1!7
-4
N4
27
13
12
45
ED
VI:L'24:4
536
21
64
38
846
361
21
*
11
169
84
21
411
31
1449
00
------U ----100.0 102.9-103.0
-102.4 173:7 200:0 178.3-102.3 100.0 100.1 101.4 100.2 100.1-101.5 100.3 103.a
OtRINSIER-001
NO P40
rt,,,,:iwi-ooz
CO0, torn xtio.N
A 3
6.
UIA.?.51l,-033
PRIPAP.1 AC11 11140 -- 60
8.51,4 6
.,
4 E
rAttts4 P
1,2453:F-
PG4413:P
P19.50
CT
'PASEIE 4
pA4700 t-
F4s61710
PANS:OPTICS-
P10101ACOUSTICS
P1411-15105T509
00u10=mtst
lgais,NKL-
4 V 9 V 4 v I. V
766 7
333
5S!7
4.1 5
10.6
.
54.1
- 5-
735.7
6.0
50.1
70111
.i
.4
4.1
.1-
v N Al 0 m v
33.1
4 V h :
1
.9 4
3.4
7.1---3.1
V 4 72
817.0 1
2.2
v 4 4101
1
,.9
7.1 -64
14
117
99.9 101.1
N V133.1
47
99.9
.1
13
14
)69
2.1
7.1
3.1
2.1
1.1
4.1
4.1
2.8
1.6
9.3
.1
2_
.__
7_
2_22
.6
1.4
3.7
1.4
2i1
1.1
2.;
5.;
5.1
I.:
A4f1
16.;
in0.:
66.i
1.1
;-3!1
2.1
2.T- it.i
.1
1.!--TD----2::
4.0
10
171.4
16.
1
.81.
9.9
0-0N
20!!
'
00:2
2.!
..1
10.1--
71
tii
3./
311
1.4
0N,
12.t
19./
71!1
1.4
347
-13.6
7.0
211.2111 AN
6to -
i70
1.0
67.1
.6
A 22.2
2.0
3.
4.3
635.1
2/
tI
11_254
-
2.1 --1.1 --3./--11!:
11.:
114 -Xi- --;, -14.4---64 -11.1 --19!*6
72.1
1.1
2.4
2.1
5.9
.1
81:/
3./
3!!
3.
15I1
14
1.3
1.4
12.t
7A 11.1
4!;
5.; 23A
7!!
3.;
5131 604 Ca 211):
723
47
48
14
6/
294
70
IT
317
14/
27
508
54
1419
166.8 178.4 169.3 102.7 104.2 111.9 100.3 101.3 103.7 103.4 102.0 104.0
rt 5PIC OF thP BY SPIE OF 15T 104P BY ENPLOYEA.PalvAdy WORK ACT IvIrY.CECAEE
004t5105-001
NO P40
I-,
-4
CD
kr,
DINFA104-002
COPS TOTAL KNOWN
CIPENJ1C,-u01
P.I.AN. ALT. hmti; --
__PAnti. 0641-1.
SOFRO 157 CONP
12
p64114 1 4
0
044214 6 t
7r
50.z
P3gC P
%
P.../414 P
7V
14.3
PAN5Alf
ri
- v
°MCA
P611.
1
5o,g
-1;.1
33.1 1
100.0
24411
4 2.3
lit
10.1
-
4./ ./ 1
B.
148
100.0
PANEL
54
SSA 6
54.5
9.1
36.: 11
154.5
7./
53.8 7-
53.8
7.3
7./
23.1
-
11
153.8
PAh501P
Pr V
P6951P t F
N
PA.1611 N
- ----- : v
14.1
P45715 / P
5
24591010
v N
PAN4:1071C5
V N2
14.3
Zp4U10:.tCOOST1CS
VPA5t1-1514STROV
ri
0,..16:P1tC
v7.1
nt
'314V11:f:,
N14
-V- - 103.0
(wok:my-1
ma ere)
01hEN104-00
CMPI TOTAL 1040.8
DIPthS11.1.-Ou
A.RINAKY 4[31 TkACNING
vP102(5 h t
h92.9
45
62.
7.3
41
78.2 2
3.6
5.1
1.1
1.i
-
St
100.0
De
8_1.7
1.11
.4
-
.1
.4
131:
-
109
100.0
T64310 P
-
N.-
1V
1.4
P14418 P
N2
PIN5ASF -
v
2.6
PANSCIP
N li
PAVSIP C F
vPAuctC R
N v8.1
PANT'S C P-N v
PL4011110
11'444:OPTICS
6V
7.1-
R.
PA510:4CONiTICS
N1
V-------
-1.4
P4411-15:457710h
-
5 VPANI6INISC
V_15!1_
N-
It
7i
V100.0 100.0
.Ub- FttlD
CF
WI,. SPFC. ----- ----- ----- ----- --_-
PAttil
Pah
a.Pc.tt, PANEL Mai. PAK'. PANEL PAKL PANEL NO
TOTAL
t.
56
78
910
11-15
16
;ESP. 16Crk
73
12
1.6
31.1
2.6
.1
t
6.1
2.2
4.1
1.1
25.:
..0.1
.1
75.0
20.0
2.
3.4
/a
..
1.4
26
61.16
2.1
6.0
6.7
16.2
...2 2
175.0 603
.1
17
6./
681.11
12.-;
3;1
?.1-
---I--
t:
'A
14
41.7
11.1
6.3
8.
9. 11.2
th.3
10
8.1
.I.
3.!
I15
.9
2.6
,35.1
1.!
2.1
J5!!
6.1
12
78!?
115
/eirl
6.41..;
14
i9
3Sv
IIS'
2.4
8.3
3.0
3.4
6.1
2I
26.7
8.1
16.7
33.1-2v.
8.3
25.0
671;
tat!
3211
15
123
24
3114
41
12
4e6
Po
411
175.0 160.1 100.6 100.0
99.9 101.9 102.2
99.4 100.9 101.0 101.5
l2
14
3
12
7.1
0.
135
2.1
1.0
...,
4.8
4.i
IA5.1
2.2
2.;
327
i1
5.1
3.1
1.3
.4
2.3
2.0
22
IS
71.9
2.5
3.1
1.I
4.3
75--
2.6
li
:1
5ili
2
2.1
K2
13
215
78.9
46.9
.2
15
22-
520
Ci
78.9
68.8
2.5
.7
1.0
1.3
5.1
6.1_6M_
14
2
3.1
o!?
-2.1
1.;
.1
oi!I --i-J- 1.)
3.1-- 6,!1
:!5
s..:
I:::
-1,:iii
-
21
l
9:2;6
3:130
:52ii
46:31
ill
'I
lel
.1
.1
.7
3SO
75.0
I.0
1.0
1.4
I .1
15.:
152 25!!
41.3
11.1 103
2i3Il
72.7
221
2409
- 011-
33
,ha
4,13
71
;'=
"28
2941
304
3418
178.9 160.8 102.5 100.0 10u.0 100.0 100.0
99.r 100.6 101.1 101.3
255
.13 SPEC OF EPP EV SPEC OF 1ST COMP 5! EMPlOVER,PRIpARY SOAR ACtIVITV.OEGAIE C1..16104-001 NO PIM OW81104-002 -111P1 TOTAL-ANONN "
Nei45104-001 PRIMART 411s 1.11CR ANOvn -- 5n8- F1110 CF ENPL. SPEC. ----- ----- ------ ----- ------
SU3FLO 1ST CChP PANLIPANELPTLWIELPANCIPA4ELPANELPr.EL PANEL 55441 PANEL 534E1 PANEL PANEL AU ICIAL
1 2 4 SA SE 5 6 7 8 V IC 11-15 16 AESP. 'Av.%
P441:4 I A 7N / 1 4
7'.0 3.6 .7 1
014311 7 21.6
17
.1 6.0 1.2 7 I
8!) I.) 3.6 1.; 5.1 3.1 40
577214 A E - m '4
1 .2 1.1 3.1 I!: 31
P EN5AIF V .1
6:1 71!7 7./ 7.1 4.5 4.1 10.8 1.4 2.4
3.6 42.1 1:1 iN
PA.:4t4 P N 2 2 _
P4951117
VN 1.i 23.1 3 3.5 1
1.4 S IS
MAK-8
IN'
4 2./
23.1
7./
21.4
72 3.5 4
123q11.1 1.5 2.4 1.e SI
. I. 1.i
A ./ .7 1 .1
1.3 1
.5
F1153P 4 F 3 I . 9 2 at
8.4
2:1 60.3 4.7
49 7 2 63 P137sS I P
13.11 4.0 5.1 Si 141
12.1 118
P446(810 ;
- 7 I 6- 7" II ::i 6i'
1 57.0 1.4
PAn9toPEICS V 4 5
1.4
.i
2.1 I5.i 100.8 21.6 I4!. 3.1 620:1
63f; 3.i 3.! 4!: 10.! 1/!I
P5411-15:ASTRON N 25.0 1
21.6 3.5 6
2.6 1.1 1:1
P4%10:4COUST1CS 1W11
2 72 16
PA.(16t.ISC V Pf 4 -5 11 6- 15
1i(1 I 9
1.4 117.11
4 64.3 1.1 18 7
2.5 3:
V 42.9 12.9 14.n 10.0 6.5 4.9 10.1 71!! 46M 3-.?7,
13.0 24.0 6.0 46.2 Qllt.r,..-:(i.%
i
4 25 2t
138 6 4 2 1 .(... *J
16 tli
134 82 21 E13 18 4.233 8 -- - m ----100.0 100.0 100.0 102.1
1231.1 100.8 I211.1 tan 103.3 100.0 102.0 99.9 100.1 101., 102.7 101.4
001W-10s-001 NO Pn0 IniK.I39-662 CAP( TOTAL 84044
A - 01,-*,:1'A-cu3 PEIPAAv ALT) 1081 ANOvN
P1L1s4 L ( 4 2 1 12 24 s 128 - - :::: 1
N
4
4 61.0 1.9 1.7 1.6 .4 1.2 3.2 411
ii ii
493 A2
6 1 7 i/ 2!;
2.; 1!; .! 2.t 128
2.1_ 43.4 831
5.2
V% 7-77.67 1 .1 3.6.4.0.8
2 I 3 11 5 7
P4141% P 144 4".80")."'.5 '4 'V LI I:
6 1
4 4 71 21 244
1
1.2 3d ,ta
5.6%5517 Y. 1.0
1 21.; 115.? 6E6 I.t 1.1 1.5 1.6 2.8 6.4 1.1 1.t __II
1:8 7.3 m.1
- 242 53 8 - 3-- 17 58
9 21
i1.01.3.1.663!33.140.51.81.4 2.1 .9 1.3 1.8 1.0 .8 7.6 6 411--
P34;51P N -I 6 108 94 3).4 .1 .9 4 6 5 .1 NI .2 IN
83.4.8 L-F--t, - I 'a tzt 87.5
145 436 57 14 3 - i'
- 9 5 08 9 1.6 - 2 5 6 1.6 1.2
./ .7
6i.0 85.9 72.9 2.0 2.7 2.1 1.5 1.3 2.0 1.5 1.3 .1
PA96:C 8 3 76 111 56 56 4 39 8 486 91 3231 ;
1.0 11.0 2.9 4.4 15.1 1.8 10n /1.1.? 4!! 7!6 IiI3
5.5 2.0 0.1 12.5 23.1 P19715 L 7,----- 97 1, I ! 11 415 2 14
P4481010
.i .i .1 1.6 .4 1.-
9 - 27 71 14 se(
12 465.31.4.7 1.3 6.5 1.2 2.t lit
5 69 4 6 21 'I; .13
.9 .2 PANTICPTICS-171 --- - 1-- 111 - 6 16 16 41.6
4.5 9.1 5.8 12.1 60.1 1.5 4.5 5.5 5.2 13.4 27 2E3 37 17 1106 - II 15 326 37 2129 49" "9 4:: .4 .7 .7
104610:1COUSTICS t 1.0 14.6 1.0 1.1 4.3
2 36 15 5.c
1
.! 't
-- .?
6 42.11( 1 i2 62'9 1.3 1.4 4.6
n7 m3mil-tatimaaar----, 7
21 1.2
1 78 13 7,7
NO 3LsPovr -- ----il ----- -- 3 - II 27 - 40 F. 7 56 7
4!1 271!1
682 rA416tolsc
Z 7.0 .i
.z .2 .8 .2 .2 .8 .1 69.Z 1.0 I.f .711.; -- -
8 " 32783511"1"""1"4"41 425 53.4 1 1 5 7 6 2 44.87.76.610.411.46.7173.4 5..8 31.7
FOAL ANC.% 11 11 471
103 693 616 1215 371 227 595 2494 635 140 1917 713 396 5173 711 15,41
101.0 101.2 100.2 100.9 164.8 164.7 172.9 107.1 107.2 107.0 161.1 101.3 1C2.0 101.6 101.2 104.1
0INFJ.5!0% -001
PHD
01.thSlfs-002
EmP SPEC, PANEL GROUP 1 --
g 8
011.i-1.11LN-003
FPPI TOTAL 89099
111"C 1'11 --- --- -- if -- -- ---- - - --- ----e7!1- -66?1--.7!! --so!Z--se-1
94.1 ---21-71 --xEci.1
6.63
61!1 ico.i
HP
25. 30.1
50. 33.9
75. 39.1
APPLIED_ILLS____
1--_-
14-A
HP
25. 31.4
50.48 2;i75.34.8 2.4
kt.6Elt015119 -.---79 9
2.1
.1-----
HP
25. 40.8
50. 42.0
75. 43.1
214AG - 11.10_
151
5.!
17.1---7.1 -id
4N
HP
25. 34.5
50. 42.0
73 44.3
HANAC._,_D1151.1_
k2.4
4.1--
33.1
V.3
gP
244 43.3
50. 52.0
75. 65.8
02.i
302.1
21!i
fo.1--35:3--r8i
14.i
7r!;
HP
25. 32.0
SC. 34.7
73. 4C.8
Y2.1
7.1
.02
HP
25. 27.0
50. 37.0
75. 47.0
0S.1 --1.1
FA
s
mp
25. 27.6
50. 12.0
75. 16.3
_LLA
CH
I.r.
WiRF3poksp
IUTAL________
loca 100V) 1.,11
-40!Z ICG9 Ise.1-lec.1
lei!? pr.!
-
HP
25- 30.9
$5. 34.7
73. 4L.e
otH-..3inS-001
PHD
--itr.MIE;I:t2i -P;S,,TAILT.P..h"cut 2 '- " 1
-
,....slc ALS
N2
95
105
85
74
42
13
a6
33
5C5
V'100.0
66.4
54.6
46.2
36.5
30.2
23.6
33.3
26.1
23.1
50.0
47.5
112
25. 30.3
50. 33.2
62PLIE0 RES
421
53
30
17
12
a4
21
144
14.7
14.8
16.3
11.5
10.9
14.5
16.7
8.7
7.7
13.9
_HP
25. _31.0_ __30. 34.5
75..41.6 ,
L Yel..1151C9
.1
2.1
1.f
1.?.
2.1
LI
4.1
12
V1.7
14.5
71, 55.1
N.NAG - 1.0
N1
13
11
23
IS
12
32
222
.7
3.6
6.0
15.5
13.6
21.0
12.5
6.2
15.4
7.1
__23._37.1____50._53.0_ 75.
P .AG - OTPEA
NI
21
57
5y
.7
.6
.5
3.4
6.4
9.1
4.1
e. i
7.1
2 f1
_hP
21. 41.8____5G. 47.0_
75. 52.1
1f.CHING
N11
.14
217.
1285.i
264.!
242.;
23.11
20.1
43.1
23.1
33.i
213.41
__
______
hp__ 25. 32.4
50. 37.5
75. 45 )
O71-ER
12
114
V11
111
11
1.1
4.1
15.4
16.7
1.3
HP
_25. 33.3____50. 56.5
75. 62.0
nd CSPON!E
11
57
3.S
2.0
.t
2.1.1
3.1
8.7
7.1
2.21
._HP 25.
30.2_ __50. 34.5
75. 47.0
TOTAL
92
143
347
184
148
110
55
24
23
13
610E5
103.0 100.0 100.0 vox 100.1
99.9
94.11 ICO.0 tcc.o lec.i 1C0.0 100.0
HP
23. 31.2
5-3. ss.1
7s. 41.-.! 25
7
___OtrENSIEINtf0
EIHANSION -00
PP -vim
GA
C00
3E
DINENSION -00
EmP3 TOTAL 14084
211
338
182
106
OAS1C RES
:440.__
13;
4411
0/0.
07_
7s61
1 .4
36.
66
18
7
7_11
.__I
WL
29.2
14.
01C
.0
t 120
.49:
:; 1C
0.
APPLIED RES
05
14
11
47
56;231.;3_2.375.341.1_333.1_56i___
DEVEL.OESIGN
3.,
L,___257.17_3201
ii..1
55.1
4.1_
1.1
_ 2.
13.
1_2
16
NANAG - R.0
__Ip60
161
lip
15. 34..T50. 43a
1.17t_,A11;71122.1___111./__15.t
21.1 3s,a_24.!
HANAG - OTHER
2:1
h
4,.._
2_...
675.
11:3
.70_
11__
_2.L
_L.3
8.i
201
is.1
33
:(ACHINO
16
1.3
51:1_st;43.15210.175.25111.12311
151.8__1161__10.;
10.i
20.1
_117.1
/1
OthER
7.
29
15. 2
9.11
-307
,- S
lat 1
"175
-34.
1c.
g9
.6
NO RESPow.1
HP
--23
.30.6
tz
11
ta.A
10.
39
268
IOTAI
1035
1r9
;11
,As ,A 31
24
100!3 1001.1 ICC.i
10!1 10?.i
HP-257.73-076-50. S .
7 0 40.1.
100.0
DIMENSION -001
p40
8-1M1115Z8212f-Faisc,EiitenEING1°"---4--7--5-1---
61111 .A
N5!1; 41" 4240
121
65
2/.3
31
25.4
IIP
25. 10.11
sn.7.,5.2
'271. A,..a3 '
APPLIED RES
N14
V1530
15-.1;
15!;
14!:
10!1
11.5
ht.-
-25r
_..1
1.8
50.-37
OLVEL.DESIGN
03.1 423 1.0
1.0
2.1
.8
HP
75. 10.6
___511._33 3
750_39.7
HANAG - 84
*3
le
19
46
62
31
1.5
3.4
5.6
14.6
26.1
25.4
.,
25.
40.1
10T
_A3.
/23i
L19.
6_11A460 - MLA
.1.3
1.1
t!S
7!?
9!1
AP
73. 31.11-...-..50.
44.6
.___
_332
1 i9
.1_
11.04140
014!1
21,1.0
279.1
22:4 zzn
zt:1
MP
29. '
2.6_
10. 3
7.9_
7.3t
_44.
6___
01011
04
2.9
132.
:1.
:1.
7.1
HP
231.
_11.
4-10
."_3
7.11
71. 45 I
NO RESPONSE
..
59
67
.;
3V
1.9
1.1
2.7
1.9
2.9
tIP__
_251
5.1_
30.41.2_
75._ 40.11.
fOYAL
11
25.0 9
17.3
620.0
16.;
215.4
23.1
60.1
17.3
33!;
7./
7.1
G./
7.1
13
25.0
3IC.0
536.5Mt
1.i
6.i
7.)
120
.0
35.4
6. 1
471!1
257
14.6 47
2.6
197
11.1 69
3.9
21!/
275
32!
1
40
2.2
10E9 91t1 101:1 tot!Z ton! taHl taca tcc!i tto!I tca.Z t!Ill
t'd Hp
254_32.1____501_37.6_ _ 75. 44.6
0
4c, vr
N .
0 w. .0 0 P
1
',ON ,m 0 "8
° ; g C°
I T.
!Z".... V.1110.
Moor leZZZ 11 000 000 WNr
.4.1z 4" 4" 4:" 4"
N Ti N
NI I
F g, g 2P . . .
. .6 'L. 2 0 0 0
1 e. U. 0 0 00". Oa"' 1 g 0 0 T .1? 0
0 . .
a N 10 0 MA a 60W F t g IJ:47 V...t. I
4' "...
g 1. I M
N .0 VI M
0 W i 4t Lel .. ., ... 1 1 .
v .. . .
0 1
NWro t :C: g:ON ert 71F4r2 0 r I '
N . .
10..0 Om r. 1
6 . b
ts. . ° I
i tz L4 r 7;
6 N W .
4. 4, I.
A
LILT
ft
ncz T.12 Z.Z Z.Z ZwZ X..c2 ZcZ I 0 V II 0, 0 NI IC 87, I
I I
,
V 0 0 Zrl.
0 0 V 0 :21,
.1 T 0 T V IT ;: VI
.. . ...! ..1 .
.. . .0! es
: . 0
. I
- r.. r C-. f.
. . . . . . .6 . . V 0 VA. riii To , IN 0 . 0 0 loo 0. CP., Ow L. .. m .... 1... ..... N Ooro 011.. 0.00 .0.06. at Jr .1. NUN> ro00 C 0 0 0 CL I* Nisi kW...
i r F.
- sw 0 N rN :14
,w0 Oro NA] rr rb NN v cr ,
L , a L
I
L . N N 4:1
or 1. r r- ,--=
. . , .. .....
IN N 0 IN 0 / Ow ... , LW. kr. 4 'row :,....
.... . ..
Woo 7.
0
N
:
Or
N N
7 a N LI
I--,
....1
I--,
.C,
0151.4510h-001
PHD
01h155104-002
EPP SPECI PANEL GROLP 5 -- P 1 f
..C1PC15/11-003_11.P1 IL7.41_85C86__
6ASIC .ES
..
I- -60 --1-24-
v50.0
59.6
39.2
HP
25. 30.6
50. 14.4
-94-
12.9
75. 40.8
e2
25.3
75. 42.0
75. 42.0
lc!:
75. 43.3
1.4
75- 44.5
t1
25.4
75. 44.8
.i
75. to.a
1
2.9
75. 7.1
?an
C..:
/.... 4,-6
150
38.3
75. '5 5
194
21.2
75. /1.4
/A
2.3
75. 4.1.1
ea
9.2
75. /2.9_
5.5
75. 59.5
232
25.4
75.
6.7
75. 56.4
le
2.0
75. 44.9
10E1 10ttt
75. 43.0
'57-11-1T--
30.3
24.4
45
24
23.9
18.9 -i.6
i1.2
te!:
222.8 4
1.3
1.1
42
31
22.3
26.0
5-------
19.7
17.2
7.1
57.1
3115-77:1----
iltemItU RtS
h1
27
90
v50.0
23.7
28.5
HP
25. 31.7
50. 15.9
Ti-VEL.LES:GN ----- N
._.
HP
25. 32.0
50. 14.5
1..1.1G--
Pi-f
r.-
- -n
-v
.1.t
MP
25. 37.8
50. 42.9
23,
.6
HP
25. 39.5
50. 45.8
-TEACHI'he
12
3-----1
19.7
10.3
21.4
14.3
003--247g
61.7
14
21!1
27.2
2e.:
14.1-
,1!1-33.1
12
17-----
1.6
6.9
1.1
N14
72
V12.3
22.0
HP
25. 33.0
50. 37.9
20
93-
132.6
31.0
21.4
14.3
21n 33.1
1-i-THER
.4
MP
25 36.4
50. 62.0
.1 4
3-
2.1
3.9
tee-
127
4;.4
55.4
I1.6
7.1
33.,
.6/
NO PESPGNSE
-6-441------
DImENSION-001
V11,661,1;.!,-003
VASIC aES
Aev1.1t0 81.5
.
I'VE/405MS
P.
4V
3.5
1.1
HP
25. 11.6
53. '9.1
--
4--
-7
114
3t6
V10%0 1.150 111.:
HP
25. 12.4
5o. f1.2
PHD
SPAct. PANEL 08012_6.-- C rL.
EPP: lUIAL 86416h
1295
548
00.0
60.3
44.1
hP
25..50.4
50. 34.0
N119
303
V24.1
24...
_-- HP__ 25..11.2
50. 3,.0
11
11
24
V2.2
2.1
HP .
25. 11.5
50. 35.1
- 1
2- 2
23
1.0
6.9
14.3
2.6
61-
21----14
7
55.9
91.:
57.5 ICC.G 1CC.Z 17-1!C
97.5
195
104
29.4
22.8
39
16
23!Z
17.t
42.1 0 .0.i
22.6
15.0
125
82
14.6
16.0
30
42.3
.5
527
113
19.1
24.6
20
23
97
1881
11.7
21.5
14.1
20.0
14.3
21.3
4I
71
195
2.3
.i
1.6
2.9
14.3
2.4
mAvAG - 8.0
PS4
49
.5
3.9
PP
15. 32.1_____50. 43.a__
42
19
11
3454
1
24.6
17.8
17.2
16.3
10.1 20.0
- OTNER
Is
313
V.6
1.0
HP__ 25. io.a
50. 45.5
10
36
4.5
7.9
152
105
22.9
23.0
13
10
33
11.6
7.0
9.3
4.7
8.6
2.5
TEACHING
46
262
V9.4
21.1
_HP___2.0- 32 9
30. 37.5
42
25
17
10
651.
224.6
33.4
26.6
28.6
21.0
40.0
OTHER
N5
10
I.n
.8
5____50. 45 5
43
.6
1.1
16
72.4
1.5
lan
66
1it
3.5
7.5
7.2
5.;
14.3
1.3
ND RESPONSE
__
%6
24
V1.2
1.9
HP_25.!_32.1____50 10.1
55
166
2.9
4.7
43
2.6
14.3
2.1
TOTAL
N V100.6
91.1
4t4.1
54T.
25. 31.7
50. 36.4
74152
510EA 10,4?? 100n 100!? 100.0 100.2 100.0
DIML3:5103.-.501. _FNU
W.:I5C611.13ti9"""
" °
-86516
CIM
5SI(
-N-5
3RFS
N48
118
61
561
501Et
_2C.A
4111115 PtS
NII
35
23
23
4Ile
.
50221E1.720.275'V'
19.J .21:1 .10:9_12.1
:25.0_
11.1_
et31L.DESIG9
N3
37
__.
_ 3.5
1.6
135
1.1
3.4
10
Hp 25.
26./
350. 12.e
75. 36.3
mv.AC - PeD
N7
619
70
450.2,1*.,.. 3.10514;3.523.5
2723 35,11_24./40.t1
25.A
1[9
_15.1
64440 - 016E6
....._
..__
.!'io
..
25.
33.3._._50.1;10. 1.575, ii.9_,0.-___.5
IA
.V.1
3l
?
lt6C6l4C
,70
33.9
50.6311-1.1754.910H
13.1
'Li_ 24.2
10,S. ZIA
11:1
6a636
Iv
SS
2____ 4
29._29.5_50.5;Ls_0.605.10.0.
__1.13
1.A 29325.1 __NA
LN
he 0.E1(03*5E
N3
1.4
.6.1
gP
25. 54.2
50.40.0 2.175.':i.6
i'l
10341.
64
193
133
Ili
60
SI
33
12
1:1
lip _25..31.9 .._5g00.I00.1720zL999.9 le0.2 .100.0
99.0
icr.S 105.0 (00.0 100.0
_______
3,1g
c.:N
C65
17N
-001
eN0
013.,si,N_Qc2
tmp 563(01 vANEL GRONP
JCPNA51e9-00.1_.[NP: 7u191._AN0139
t;SIC ,15
N v NP
25. 30.5
40PLIE0 RES
h v HP
25m 32.8
6 -- el°
79!1
6140i
!.53.31.
-5-316
50. 34.5
75. 44.3
16
4.
2.6
8.0
3.9
50. 37.5
75. 49.5
.4
.!
.1
I31
50. 34.5
05. 395
1I.t
6:4
7.1
50m 40.3
75. 43.3
1
3.6
-50. 49.5
75. 52.0
55!2
8.3
37.0
45X-16.A
1CO.A
100.13--;A!!
14.0
16.7
20--
7.3
1.5
ri.v1.1.065IG3*
V HP
25.
29.5
39.0
44.5
87.1.30 - 4o0
3* v HP
25
.ilitaG ..-dliTElt---- ii------
V ..P
25.
411.1 I
2.6 -a
22.2
61
322.2
9.1
50.0
22
8.0
27.4
-....
14.8
45.5 -T7:i
1.5
TELC1.117,1
N v Hp
25.
32.6
5-15
"Ir
-e12
.522.1
19.6
' 28.6
50. 38.4
75. 46.8
12.6
1.A
1.A
3.6
50. 37.0
75. 43.3
57
20.6
1511IER
V HP
25.
30.8
3.A
51.8
ha 113500990
N v 30
25.
-rum
32.0
31.7
22
2.9
3.9
50. 34.5
75. 37.0
'
39
66
56
'26
100.1 100.1 100.9 100.1
50. 37.0
75. 6.5
1 A
N v HP
55.
)6-
100.0
27-----11
99.9 100.1 ICO.t
ICC.1
10C.0
101!t
261
C181-H5104-41
Pt°
-01:4HilEit-101--E14/516711PNOING"12-3-"-"""
BASIC hES
N30 '
79
43
26
5024.i:.287775;93;.116.4
ton
7.1 3.1
7.1
..1
205
19.0
APPLIE0 RES
N32
117
76
SO
39
14
19
10
37.2
42.9
15.2
31.4
27.1
17.3
33.9
25.6
_RP
_250_32.0____50. 26.6.
75. 44.2_
Tqua.OF51...N
N4
17
IS
83
33
3
4.7
6.2
6.3
5.0
2.1
3.8
5.4
7.7
AP___25. 12.A____50.. 36.8
75. 41.3
mANAG - 11,0
P7i4G - OTHER
2362
18.;
25.0
33.6
56
5.2
s.:
811
204.Z
26'.
314.1
312.1
26,3
251.2
12. i
12.i
lin
25
53
53
2.3
.74.2
3.1
3.5
3.6
11.9
7.7
12.1
11P
ZS. 31.3
50..44.5_
75 57.5
36
3.3
itACHING
771
21
20
26
22
N9
66
1
8.1
11.4
9.7
12.6
18.1
27.5
16.1
15.4
37.5
25.0 XI 100.0
v HP___25. 34.4
_50.43.5
75* 51.2
WER
24
35
2.1
1.5
1.4
3.1
3.;
5.0
23.6
10.1
12.i
233
25.0
3.1
ItP__118_11.3.____10. 47.0
.75. 51.9
NO RESPONSE
4.23.31.8
I2.i
74
41
53
63
124
2.2
TOTAL
___IVIP
25. 35.5_
50.4Z1.1__*4.75.24.7 1.9
N10 3 1
"1 10;:t
915; 10;41
00" 10 5t 1301 m:4 100.8 0 1003
;111.
25. 32.9
50.038.700* 75. 57.1 1*
*1
*2
0*
*
eihsosinh-cht
PhD
.01qh5turi7n02._(PP SPLCs.PADEL r,ROUFAILf.t AGGUSTIO
CI4fhsft4,-0O3
ENP: 10/AL KhChh
EPP1110 RES
07400E5M/1
MANAG - 6.0
34.6
.75. 43.9
15.1
6.9
12.2
7.1
3.3
10.0
7.1
8.1
213.11
17N
N10
14
23
10
910
38.5
47.2
43.1
20.4
22.0
37.0
.117
_15. Ja.1____508 3E.1
75 44.4_
'vl
11.5
4.2
S.2
8.2
2.4
33
34
I
ItE..
2111
.2__
__ia
it.d_
15. 43.1
N30
le
17
10
4
5.6
17.12
32.7
41.5
37.0
20.0
PP
25. 40.4
_50._45./____75. 11.1
43
20.0
21.4
8.1
106
32.7
16.7
21.1
33.1
68
21.0
14,S4G - UFO/
i:,
11
t1
2
1.4
3.1
2.0
1.7
10.0
PP _25._311.3_ _50.32.0_
75. 57.6
h4
12
12
10
83
4
15.4
16.7
20.7
20.4
19.5
11.1
20.0
HP
25. 34.0___50.An.,
75. 48.4
ft-ACHING
1
8.3
72.
2
159
35.1
20.0
18.2
J
PINEK
N4
31
22
31
18
5.6
5.2
2.0
4.9
10.Ci
14.3
25.0
20.0
5.6
NP
25..35.1____50._47.0._
75s_63.3
No RESPONSE
N3
I2
22
11
4.2
2.0
2.
7.4
10.0
40.0
3.4
____
25- 34.1 ___50. 55.8.
75. 57.6
TuTAl
N26
72
58
49
41
27
20
14
12
S324
100.0 100.2 100.0
95.9 100.0
99.9 100.0
99.9
99.9 100.0 100.0
.101___25....33.3.____10._40.1__
75. 59.1 __.
__
__
_._
I-,
.4
01M0.3106-0001
PHD
-glit01PFNSION:00
IMP SPIALF1/44GROUPS 11-15 -- ASIRORGPV
Si41. 13
--P1PINTa 4
V6-21Z---12g---674!---1-54.10---47-7;;11---;5.01
HP
25. 30.3
50. 34.16
75. 11.3
-41
6.3----
29./
866.7
750.0
-370
50.5
I100.4
al CO- Ti t 5
r1.1
12!1
ca
4.3
7:5
HP
25. 29.2
50. 32.5
39.3
210.0
16./
49
7.7
275.
DEati7E110W------11
3
2.0
1.0
41.1
HP
25. 27.8
50. 32.0
75. 19.5
814140-=-R.0
67
II
13
3.5
10.3
16.3
HP
25. 39.4
50. 56.1
75. 55.5
14
29.2
-4.3
-
10.t
723.3
30.t
451
8.1
16.1---1111/
NANT0-=-07141
V.)
7.4
3.1-
HP
25. 37.0
50. 41.2
75 45.8
33
1.6
Trieffirhe
1149-
20
17.1
16!)
HP
25. 31.0
50. 34.3
75. 42.6
14.1
315.0
25.0
325.0
106
17.1
WIRER
N V.4
3.8 1.4
-. --
----2.1
HP
25. 30.0
SO. 32.8
75. 35.8
WirkftPOR11--------N
5.4
16.7
1.1
22
V1.9
1.0
No
25. 28.9
50. 33.1
75. 55.8
-
3.1
7ZTIL
N V-101?k 101(.1
1-0j(.1 100.9 IOC!!
HP
25. 30.6
50. 3.0
75. 43.4
-11MIEHI -MisChi;LIT12.1:8""p "
99.t.100.1
ICC.2
1C01
100.t 100.3.?
100.;
HASIC aEs
V204.!
75.8
7!1
5!t
HP
252._30.4_
70. 26.1
71. 41.6
49
3:1
2.1
4.1
3.t
3.1
1!!
APPI110 RFS
N34
126
77
70
V15.6
17.6
13.1
13.4
HP
25t_.32.1_____30. 30.2_
75. 41.1
SR
10.5
35
12.0
13
5.2
16
9.3
54.8
435
12.6
20.0
.
DEVELIDESIGN
II
024
16
V3.6
3.4
2.1
1.1
HP
23t_32 0.___ 30. 21 0
75. 56 0._
21
1.3
2.t
1.3
1.8
80
2.1
MANAG - 8.0
N/
43
69
99
V1.1
6.0
11.1
18.9
H__25. 79.1___50
46.0
75. 42.7
121
21.9
80
27.5
50
20.2
30
17.4
10
9.5
1,
0.10.8
120.0
NANAG - OTHER
Ni
77
43
72
V2.2
3.0
7.3
13.0
lip_251,._10.5
50mAk.1____15m_53.1
SO
16.3
2"
38.6
46
17.8
349.01
43
17.3
115
46.4
11N 84
40.8
101 /
17!!
31.1
60!2
360
10.4
11!1
360.0
TEACHING
N449
511:71
449.3.
4in
V HE-_21. )3 3_-__50. 39 8_
15. 49
OTHER
11
17
43
40
19
7.6
6.0
6.8
3.6
HP
21._33.0____50. '8.9_
71. 11.2_
19
3.4
4!1
S!!
41
21.3
010 RESPUNSE
.4
211
if4
211
;IP
50. 52.0_ .,75. 57.6
*29
416.4
2.8
31.7
43.8
3.0
60
2.0
__251-13.0._
TOIAL
Nvi2.1 10Z1.; 1038.1 2032.3
33.0
50.
15. 41.4
10119.0
9i4.1
172
95.9
ICS
1CC.0
33
99.9
1452
100.0
5100.0
263
A53
;1!&071.;11/Ttyl
4CTIVITY By ENPI.CVER, EPPLOYPENTSPECIALTY, CEGREE
214nN4=2.11 t;:;;SattelETt4MetniVe"""
Oh114 ACTIV
EISIC itS
APPLIE0 6E5
LEvel'OESIGN
MAVAG - 9.0
__
MV.AG - 01610.
TEACHING
UlHER
N0 ACSPUNSE
AGE
_.. V60E4
--
20
20-24 25-29 30-34 351.39 40-44 45-49
50-54-55=59-60L14-65-69
N4
665
IQII
566
341
2E7
25._29.980.0,,081611.s".412432.3.
23.4 .
135
69
57
2!!
21
FIP-25.11.550.3;6.6 R.975.30.0
14
2 t
25. 29.6
50. S1.9
"75. ZL.4
N3
15
30
V.9
4.1
6!)
73.;
IIP
--25.-40.2
50. ;17- '675.1)1.5
7.1
28
77
76
87
57
.3
1.275
2.3
96.4
. 9.6. 11.8
. )2.
1.
___5074;121/n752L5121
5.00
Sin
32.9
7.
79
42
3
HP
25. 10.5
so. il.e
'475.
"-'3-
L5._,:.4_50.210n75.214_23.i___11.121.L-35___2.;
122.1
2.:
4.8
4!:
6!1
42
12
.13.1.
8.9
6/n 61!4 3
152.1
2.3
4.1
CVER_TCTAI.
69
66CFN
_27.1 _33.92___16.1
7.1
NC
-RESP.
in 63
Pi
6,3
10
7.2
64.1
1.Z
29.5
52!3
23_
12.!
155
W1 46.1
!.4
193
TOTAL
51003
7021
6411
444
L25
.11
300.
051.
1012
.168
.W01
.2.1
.84.
93i.i_loo.Labot:i ell Ico_:1 INg_isto!?
GieeNsloo-ool
PHO
j IPi55ien-002_ EPP SPEC: 71394E 41.1.
PANEL 18P085
PI:174't r007
EPP: 1.10TE 14CuSt8y
I.
127
2,0
165
95
51
22
14.0
24.9
21.1
15.0
9.9
9.1
2.
o.
e.
12.
6
hE
25..30.6
50. 34.1.
75. 39.4
1C
i1
4.31
V
AP6LIE0 RES
h38
183
515
3E6
208
149
57
33
20
11482
49.1
49.3
40.0
32.0
29.0
23.6
25.6
25.6
33.
12.5
39.0
33.1
v H.e___ 25._31.1
50. 35.2
75. 42.0
A56
CEyt.L.0251741
N28
87
61
36
19
10
93
I255
7.5
8.3
6.1
5.7
3.7
4.1
7.0
3.8
4.1
12.5
6.7
HP_ _. 258 31.6____50. 35.5
75. 41.6
HA-:AG - 8.0
N9
104
157
222
210
119
52
33
61
920
2
2.4
10.1
20.8
35.8
40.9
49.2
40.3
42.3
25.0
12.5
24.2
66.7
HP___25. 30.2
50. 43.0._
.25. 51.0
KAIC - OTHER
fi6
17
11
36
50
20
15
2171
1.6
1.6
2.5
S./
9.7
8.3
11.6
7.1
8.3
4.5
1.2___25s-39.6_50. _45.1_
Z5. 41.0
1f6C6141
N4
21
.4
.3
.2
..
.2
50. 34.5____15. 39.1_
24-1
01978
N16
39
12
16
14
11
12
75
4161
4.31.74.22.5
3.7
4.5
9.3
9.0
20.8
50.0
4.2
HE_25,_3206
3 .
9.
46 62501144E
N4
17
11
15
IS
35
272
1.1
1.6
1.4
2.4
2.1
1.2
3.9
2.6
1.9
.--
NP _25. 31.6 _50. 50.0
75. 46.9
lolN
41!,1 loM 14:1 ta loi!..
1042.O 1001.5
ee2.; 100.8 180Si 1003
79141
h HP___25. 32.3
52. 37.7_
75. 44.9
17 AA
nvP910247-6CIIVITV 87 EMPLC-VER, EMPI.07NENT SPECIALTY. CECREE
VI9ENSI1.%-021
PHD
01H00.164-.02
E.P SPEC: TOTAL ALL PANEL
qi40
uvS
UlliEhslr5-003
EmPs GOVERN0E5T-FluE1181. 51L.
AGE
Pioi
r A
r.v
tvLi
tr 2
0-24
25-
29 3
0-34
153
9-41
3L44
-45z
49 5
0=-5
4-53
-z56
-611
L434
-65z
£9-0
t914
0-4
NO
1,1-5
vol
0.41
)ci
2311
14;"
102.
t12
!0_1
61,1
_23.
132
,40
12.1
_47.
0.11
1.11
121.
1)H
P25
. 31.
550 16.0
75. 42.0
ApPLIE0
29
20
52
32
25. 12.0.
502.2.3"75!9:2.8!"
15!1
15.1
'1_
21r0
_.1
1.(9
,_21
21'4
3 _1
,29.
74
A57
CIVEL.DItIGN
13
11
ti
z4
p25._.10.10.0 l.17,
zt
.Lla
_ _
_IA
____
140
149
03.1
30- 11.0
427
44
71
82
48
79
21
10
.9..
;1"0,_
25._
i0.2
_ _
so.
3;;.7
1.1
15!6
i(1.9
.10.
3-4
31.4
54.5
_26
.3__
!.4.2
.__1
0.3
14.1
__21
:!
evA
G- OTHER
3.1
2.1____33
15,1 _14.i
_3:1_
______ __ _
L___1538.0___50._12.8_2.075.2;1.
1.6_6.9
17
14
14
ItACHWG
N1
z4
-- -
--
iftil
.--2
5.--
20.5
-- 5
0,-.
3L0-
'675.
44.5
23,0
s7
D1010
HP
25. r
6;7-
50-4
5;fi
75-.
-42.
1_2
,?1
3.8
1.1
1.1
11.1
_12.
L1A
./___
212
NO RE:SPONSE
N4
175.2ii.5.2.;___23._:1.3___)71__ .5.4___3.121
-4
i-.
I. TIE
I.
124
342
215
254
203
88
UD
,9
29.
9g0s4.1110.03.110/42..1110.1..1110.1_59.4_110:8 JCL! _H!;._111561-LL4:1_11/11.11
6101
5:10
.1-0
01?,
14HaWV:=281-t-:-4SEA0 Ep.Ahr
0,-..ic
r1N
111
2.9
185
124
112
36
II
962.4
52.3
41.4
39.6
32.2
29.8
25.8
23. 1
60.t
1c0.
1 42
n._
50. 3
5.6
. _15
. .i.1
4valt0 RES
N47
165
119
96
5933
la
10
1540
71.0
32.1
79.8
29.4
23.1
27.3
15.2
25.6
10.0
.28.2
HO
_ 21
.. 32
.2._
...5
0. 3
1.9
75. 4
3.1.
A
D.VEL.6E5r.11
04
713
14
79
42
167
3.9
4,5
3.5
2.1
3.5
3.3
3.0
2.6
3.5
35.8_.
.75.
45.
0MANAG - 930
N2
27
05
78
90
41
30
11
.0
342
1.1
5.3
16.3
23.9
35.3
33.9
45.5
43.6
20
18.4
5._
39.0
_50
._ 5
5.7_
.25
. 49.
7NM.AA - 11111(9
NI
I1
44
I1
.6
.2
1.5
1,6
3.3
1.5
2.6
14
____
____
____
____
__H
P__
_21.
1_41
.8__
50t_
44.4
_ 25
..51.
21:4[1114
N V11
1 R
if -
- -
- -
- ----ti -- -----
- ------------
0 --
a - -
"I o
4 --- 2--------1
I57
4.4
3.5
2.5
2.1
1.6
1.1
4.5
10.0
2.8
HP
25. 31.0
50. 14.8
75. 42.2
W-C-0 E5-0-691----N
6I---
36
I./
211
I.t
IA
2.1-
.1
HP
25. 32.2
506 17.8
75. 46.6
194
121
255-
121
-46
-10----10-----1-1912
140.! 100.0 180.0
97.6 108.0 100.1 220.0 1CC.1 ICC.0 100.0 100.0
HP
25. 32.4
50. 32.8
154 44.5
2 6
5
.58 AGE BY PR1PARY A1.115111 BY EMPLOYER. EPPLOYMENT 514E11411Y. CEGAtt
V1mI1SION-PC1
PHD
VIPINSIGN-O02
rop
OCTAL ALL PANEL GROUPS
DIMI45I56-003
054541 OTHER 460445
AGE
t.:o; 4114
-11.1
20-24 25-29 30-14 35-39 40-44 41-49 50-5454-59-60=24-2::,,U.:
0:0-,-;0C4-Nsv.
64511. 767
h4171
74
45
18
20
i3.3 0.274,20.4111.8..20.6 .
1:9.;
101_10,1
:4.3_ .in
4 -25- 2v.0
50.
4454541110 APS
N2
415.1.2
24n
192.I.
2G!2
15n
2C.4
25.i
5 3
15 4
5-6
'in
-
4 -- 25. 31.8
SC. 17.5
75. 47.5.
61vE1.065101
14
37
25. U.)
50JI!..5 3.875- i3.0
1.1
22?
45.1 1._
1.7
1.5
A59
PANAG - Rol)
N9
18
26
17
12
51
102
18.
SO.144.34.97S.1).0.927.1
17.5
18.4
8.1 _03_11,6 111.
42Sm
0. 41
50
PA./4G - 014E8
44
49
15
15
3.3
4.9
10.9
15.6
221.1.
.123 .0.8._1).3
0.1
4 --2:.
36.4
So. 43.7
75. 5:0
911
ICACHILG
714
10
67
1
----------,.----2.T,-,,;u----so.64'i!!1;i., 7,7_14.4 __11.7___12.8
50,5
303
'5,3 jscj
49
0 IHER
N12
16
17
710
11
10
13
.,_34.1so:%1.0_8. ii l21.,g .5_2.1_104
__15
.1 _
21v
3 __
3! e
4___)A,1
50.0'
1 2.
41
25
_
NO RESPONSE
4,
31
117
'.0
9.4_2,4__
4--.
li:741.
..4. __25.
0,1zi..1.1.635.1:11.2.1._5.1
1.4
....
123
184
1344
96
97
77
41
50.._
______4-.25.i...39-4420.7Lef1.0749.943.1120.5
.1.0
002_
100.
12-0
)0,9
_1a9
A-5
9.24
100
..12
...11
11.8
c1osH4T.144-0C1
PHO
A60
.'E'r!':W: gi_m,5/01LTN!,Ati..PA,Itc,w015.-
u.lic -Fi
41067
5501
1123
717
80.0
50.13
42.6
35.2
2d0
V hP
25m 30 A
50. 35 1
7s. 40.3_
A1111E0 RES
H1
3V
20.0
1/.4
54.6
I7.t
16.2
HP
25-.21.6
50- 36.0
75. 41.1_
14,,11.nEslcu
u41
125
79
49
V2.4
2.41
2.5
1.0
RP
25.5 21.5____50-
35.4
-75. 42.8
MANAG - 6.0
N12.22
la.1
P.:
111'53
v HP___25m_38.9
-50m 45.5
15m 49.9
141.4l10 - 01616
6IS
52
77
136
V.8
1.4
2.4
5.5
HP__.2.5m 40.0
50. 45.9_
75. 42.2
tEACVING
IS213
1153
699
637
15.1
25.0
26.2
25.5
HP
25. 32 8
50- 38.2_
75. 46.2
41NER
44
43
119
14
37
V2.4
2.0
2.2
1.5
HP
_25- 32.7
.50. 341.5
75- :2.9
11554045E
315
79
65
58
1.1
1.8
2.15
2.3
up
25. 42.9 .. 50. .41
S43
7. 47.4
F4412.1.
71
516011
441.7
310.
2494
;/0.
201300.05y2037),00.1,;(204.4.400.0
425
179
83
54
33
16
5599
21.8
18.5
13.2
13.2
14.3
23.1
34.5
12.11
101
13.8g
124.
g10
2.8
7.1
al5.4
31
17
13
64
1370
1.1
1.8
2.1
1.5
1.7
1.3
2.1
215.1
2!5.
3213.2
2293
12!!!
3.11
17N 15.i
187
0.6
510
es
9.1
251
72
11.4
202
32
7.6
138
2%
3.1 t!'il
91
26
4180
72
26.1
26.0
32.0
37.8
39.4
33.3
25.0
36.8
42
27
26
27
23
15
398
2.2
2.8
4.1
6.6
10.0
14.2
2.5
46
22
23
11
76
357
2.4
2.3
3.6
2.7
3.0
7.7
2.2
__
.
1153
916
631
41.54
231
76
_
11229
19
100.1
100.1
100.8
93.4
1LC.t
95.1104.1 100.0
6
10 A.1 hY 2810619 ACTIVIly or L4PLCYL9. 1023.0901E41 SPALIALIV. Lt6096
314145104-001
40 PHD
01424511y-602
102 SPTC) TOTAL ALL PANEL GaCUPS
010ENSION-001
OPP, CULEGE CR UNIVCRSITY
ACE
f Ali 2011,/
_C992 TCTAL 40
W.41'.' :0-24 25-27 10-34 35-19 40-44 45-44 SC-.84-594.19-80ZG4-88=E9-
64.-RA000-0E50:
0:S1C ALS
..
:C4
17.1
419
111
20
17
53
29
__
425. 25.6".650t7.2;.5".575iag.34° -4°4° -"A--- Z'A
tV.L.9962
6221.10 RtS
34
161
11
20
22
16
6I
3)4H
6.5
6.1
6.0
o,/
30.9
9.9
9,7
..9
_5
254 26.1
sn. 25.8
75. 1).7
_.2
6.6
3A1E1e0 .;104
h4
31
17
14
__1.2___.1.i
04
--
--- 4 25.-26.4
250.
12 3
.0"725- 11.2-2"
1.1
la
1,1_
114060 - 660
N10
512
a10
425. 34.5
50. 48.8 1.078.548.8
2.9 _ .s.o
s.I _._2.I.___2.L_
______.111_
.
Ps.LC - U1NER
Ii5
70
20
17
.1AO. Z6.1 2°75. 5z!.5 6.1
_5.4
:3_5
3/0.
03.
1z5
.1_
hP
25. 34.0
ILACHINC
331.
z011
2,In
5P.1
6121
61!3
77.1
_Ja
n .1
ci.1
_11
0.1_
,.(3_
.3M
..n.
?y
- --
- -
-7--HP -- 25. 27.0
50. 11.8
75. 41.7
OVER
24
59
24
73
43
I20
_-
1.656.21i.9 2.475.20.2 1.5
Cei
4.0
.5.8
_244
NO 065,NINSE
N10
55
24
92
42
21
1
I!?
/4
2s,
1.9
W 2.4
51.....6
75.20
1.0
222
1,9
10
7.
_1,2
_1,4
20
1-'
7,761
N523
2651,
927
39
203
1E0
105
tog
22
52
/-
__ _ __ ______ '4. _ 2......6.t,01.15100.211.59491!:0sLi00.LLOO.0
ice.
c..ic
w.a
___9
1.1_
1co.
cata
.cis
aa_i
goa
....)
1' ID134104-001
ND 600
IrInI27--E:rgAIFTtl:CZt/at.""CL "CU"
45246
11
192
i.-)ii 4ii
41
48
39
31
22
19
12
67
1
V1.4
4.3
2.9
4.0
3.1
._
____Pe__ 25. 29.9
50. 35.6
75. 43.0
3.3
3.7
3.8
7.0
10.0
3.6
dePLILD RCS
1.4
23
466
476
297
219
155
09
42
17
21
1702
1
32.9
Y2.1
35.1
31.5
36.5
.118_25. 29.0
50. 33.7_
75. 41.3_
26.5
27.4
26.4
18.9
20.0
50.0
33.4
25.0
3IV3,OOLSI114
h18
321
146
19v
124
27
LI
24
15
11195
Iv
25.7
16.-1*
25.6
21.5
17.3
MP._ 21. 28.9
50= 33.1
75. 10.0
14.4
16.6
15.1
12.7
10.0
22.4
25.0
N10160 - 66u
N30
152
tes
202
350
94
42
22
1 *
874
2V
7.7
11.3
19.7
20.2
SO
s. 4
1.3
75*
470
27.1
25.0
26.4
24.4
10.0
16.4
50.0
MANAG - UTI,16
N2
4n
117
1114
27
EB
34
21
17
1511
V2.9
4.7
9.7
11.4
12.1
25'
50. /99.
75. 46.4
15.1
12.0
13.1
10.9
50.0
10.0
12
19
TEACHING
_he
.33A1
.
h V.3
.!.:'
,.1
HP
50. 17.4
75. 4c.0
A.6
2.2
.4
6ThO8
_254_32.4___.
_
N24
164
20?
Bh
so
59
31
le
74
674
v35.7
16.6
15.0
4.5
7.0
he.
.22..28.4
.50. 32.7.
75. 40.2
10.1
11.4
11.3
7.9
40.0
12.6
NG 509PCSSE
11
111
15
712
15
33
I73
V1.4
1.0
1.1
.6
1.7
2.6
.9
3.1
3.3
10.0
1..
-- ____
._ ___ -
PP ...21. 31.6
90. 40.5
75. .0.4
: WILL
N70
1100
list;
q21
717
!,,-4
125
35,9
-V H
P254.30./00.650nt.)00.17V:04(4.70C°"C"
100.2
49.9
_102.S
._..
.
1.601.
100.17
IN:I
10(4
,1
267
n.7
618 ACC By PRIPARY ACTIVITY C173.451E-4-001 NO FND OIMEASIC4-1102 f7P 5020 1,17165114-G7.1 EmP: CGYORNoTht-EFLEAL
1,..1h-At714
CASIC 7E7
4v0111.0 RIS N V
HP
CLVEI..DESIGN N V
_. HP
02,00 - 4.0 N 330
MANAC - ONICR 4 4
TEATNICG N
01818 4 4
NO R15PON0E
- 4 70241. N
4.
7.(7.4:104-001 NO 070 MNO:88i -M75,5%424100WA001
cASIC ITS 6 AriP
31.71.110 RES N v
H13.__25-....1.9
OLVFL.LESICh N
HP
By ENPLCYER, EPPLONNINT SPECIALTY. (ECRU TOTAL 61.1 PA5fl GROUPS
LTC.
H3...1EP
AGE
20 20-24 25-24 30-34 25-34 40-44 45.49 50-54-55-,59 6C-84-05-459.-W-Nak
IT 5 105 I 78
3
47 36 24 3 4 .454.01.1.916.615!15.0 12.2 11.4 2.4 10.2 25.0
20 210 247 170 III 90 51 27 a I
45.5 44.11 41.4 40.m 37.7 30.4 24.3 26.5 21.6 25.0 25- 24.3 to. 44.2 75. 41.9
20.; 4''t 10(1 .2.7 .2.i IN 0:1 .,11
_
2.) 7.1
25- 29.1 50. ,.1.4 .
7S. 42.1-
4 .21 C8 78 71 56 e7 40 14
25. 16.0 * 50.',14.111.4151.4;1.623*' 32.5 41.4 39.2_27.6
P.i
21 27 14 19 2
25- 12.2 S0.4,..S.6 6.1
7.1 1c.1 14.i 140A
5 6 1 1 1 '775.-51.6 .5 1.0
UTP.
416 704
25.6
964 1
37.4 25.0
211 6.4 /5.0
477 19.2
V.I.
IS .6
257 1041 ._Z5.0
46 1.6
2541 4 160.0 10k4
50.113.0'
7 58 64 35 24 27 16
_25. 25.015.15,3pli.710.775.6.:;.7 9.2_ 7.8 524
7.1
1 7 10 6
25- i1.3 2.350.1*4.7 1.775-1S1.0
I...1.3 11-1Cel 0.1
44 513 59C 41/ 313 296 210 102 37 12 1 30.100.15n2,.599.8110izz.404.0 100.0.100.0 15050_ 19s5.__53.1_1Msg
""'S 6 47 5L 25 14 22 12 1 2
25. 27.20"!-50.: 131.027.42,193;011.6 16.3 21.8 15.0 14.3
236 26.4
2 36 GS 56 44 34 14 10 13..2 18.3 34.9 35.7 40.5 26.3 25.5 50.0
21.Z
_50. 37.3. 75- 43.9
269 30.7
110 12.6
114 13.0 100.0
44 5.0
2 10 29 23 10 9 4 1 2 16.2 15.0 15.7 14.6 8.3 7.5 7.3 5.4 14.3
.25- 28.8 .50- 33.5 15.2
7241.0 - 7.0 N V
.75
1.11 4.3 129 25N 29!3 2c:a ,..?. 213 18.9 ___50. 63.7-... 75.. 410
13. 5!2 6.2 4.? 5.1) 12.1 J.L 14.]
SO. 31.0 75o 58.7
_111'_____23.
40.811 - OTHER h V
NP___25-_3.3.5
1EACHING V HP
1 A i .a
* 25- 29.5_ _50. 59.5 75- 57.0
5o.0
1 16 25 17 10 11 4 1 2 1
9.1 7.4 10.6 10.0 8.3 10.6 7.3 5.0 14.3 50.0 _25. 10.6 60. 16.1 11- 44.5
_
2.1 1.f 1,i 3 1 .5 5.0
25. 20.9 5C. 17.0 75. .4.1
3 5
. _
11 140 176 1 7 15 1 120 20 14 2 1034 1310 /2.
...Jv.0 :0- p4.2 70-'12.V0.1 Q4.9 100.1 100.0 100.0 Imo
4 .5
611,077 II
NO kE5P0451 NV
HP
INT,L
-
85 9.7
is 1.6
779 1
Imo 100.0
....____
14 AGE BY PRIPARvikilvITT BY EMPLCYrf. El:PLC:PENT 5111E161JY, OEM(
DI9E6SID1-)01
he PHO
114I6 GIO%-002
EPP Svc. IOTAL ALL PANEL CROUPS
OINE5S10%-003
EPP: 018E8 85048
AC
E
11:0 1EA 20-24
25-29.30.-34
35234'
40-4
4-45
49.5
13-.
54-5
5-35
8-6-
51-6
4---
W-1
12gh
BASIC 3E6
N11
51
25
II
94
2I
116
V NP
-
23. 26.1
7'85u...110%9 3.475.211.7IS'
1 1
....nut) 465
979
89
36
12
16
10
5'4
1243
V- 4.4
o4
9 5
50. 11.4-
7.1
3 2
4.5
5.9
75. 37.8'
1.2
1.7
2.2
6.8
cCotoustOri
3350.112 19225215
.L.1.1
232
33
35
35
24
.475.61!.4
6.655.7;1.1 75:425,94ii.1"4.;
_10.
4
83
562
400
337
243
8.73
27
28.B".750FT.096.215V4i.164.4
_626
3.;
24
84
14
29
23
4,715.9;:.13 6.1
121
55.1
2:4
I.:
1.3
1 1
50. ze.3
/54 31.5
167
946
725
SIR
118
357
41
hi_
45
1.2
marac - 6.0
45,_22:4
II
11
_ __
0.4
__63
---4
A3
7112
.!762.1_1413_69:4
--6.
1151
-__
_7.1
1L0
-_41
70;-
112
11
179
188
107
17.'4
4
411,
1---
11.8
7.4L
HAnAG - OTHER
HP
25.-31a-1'250.331.9
TEACHING
NP N Hp-
25.
51 V
80.7
3 _i
.1 1.0312793
07018
-------
NO RESPONSE
TOIAL
HP
25.-25.2
N49.
14
3588
14
99.2_140.1_14.0.0
011.ENtIt!n-001
NO
86S1C rtS
APATIEU RES
HP
PHD V N HP
_25...28.7!°
20.1.00.130rs22.99.97g042.(100.1.100.0___99.5_100.0_100.1_180.4
P" EL G8CUP5
3t7.3 PO
:4;
1in
.
26.0 _ .50. 28.1! 7 734 32.0
__!E1
_972
936
582
420
8501837.524..375441.024.2
438
439
465
264
162
710.831 112.1151,1314.9 4.4
499
271
328
149
.5
1.3
7.0
13.6
20.2
50. 41.7__
75. 46.2
0.1
I:I
i:;
g:; al
504.
..18.
1__
75! 46.6
9:
6. 311
20.2
121
7.9
323
21.0
5;
6.
110
19.5
81
9.3
199
22.8
7;
3.
5.
43.3
1158E
4.8
20.2
10
27.8 2
5.6
85
32
15.59"
97.4
I3606
4.8
20.4
DEVEC;GESION
433
21
6.0
6.3
32.5
1677
4.2
25.6
MANAG 7 RAD
95
44
11.3
11.3
32.5
I1716
4.8
9.6
411.1
214400 - OTHER
112_
__23
116.4
163
23.6
8.5 29
1.9
9:2
57
38
10.4
11.5
a6.6
61124
28.6
6.4
If2014121G
V HP
21.
279
1122
883
546
371
34.2
20.7
23.0
22.7
21.4
20 0
50. 33.5 _
75. 43.9
4.9
7.6
8.9
4.4
6.6
8KO. .12.6 _
75. 41.2
32
131
72
32
27
3.9
2.4
1.9
1.3
1.6
26.8
SO. 10.8
75" 4(1.6
208
23.8
208
149
38.0
45.0
14
61.2
1410
10
4213
41.6
23.9
14
38.9
OTHER
11E___25._27
1.8
15
1.7
6-11
6!(01
9.i
Itn
38.3
NG RESPONSE
V25.
11
I0
2.4
1.0
I
2.5
164
2.1
1
2.8
It ItL
V25.
BIG
5471
3844
24119
1132
94.9
44.4
49.9 18B.0 100.1
27.0
50. I74
75. 41.7
1511
100.0
874
100.2
543
331
100.0
99.5 100.0
121
21 17643
100.1 100.0
36
100.1
269
ortfpfp0.1 676101 00 EPPLOPE61 SPEC1,117 70 Sfl 60 CfC,Et
luli,7 SIsIUS - S0UUE61
..fs.
0.0.0.0
,t.
.7106.0.1
_TL
0TP_
FAL
ITA
TU
5..
0010,
SE:
011
ILILL
L60.0
,0.0
100017
MO ;5.1i
_
63.: 1S.!
11
7.7
7.7 1110.01
--is
11
m107.0
1CU.0
-1
11
iII
20.0
60.0
20.0
100.0
A67
r___L___ i
p16
.130
.011.1
100.7
1_1-9
A9
U.
H10.3
16.6
23.1
1.7
2.6 100.1
100.0
100.0
II100.0
100.0
__
ON_
is:1, 2_30:0
twi:g
A_
__L
100.7
160.0
11,..15_05L306L
IL_
L__
O16.7
06.7
10.7
$60.1
15_9110
-H
21
h11.0
67.6
9.5
16.0
4.0
96.1
2 -7
-0
16.1A0
__
19
63
it
I5
121
15.1
52.1
21.5
6.6
6.1 100.0
Ti TooLG044T STATUS 00 1101000001 SPECIALTS
SEI 110 000400
STULOT St400 - S000001
ono oA wol - P.0
1E.
5(5111,0
vqq(!yth! MANI
.
05000
SPIC. Of T04.011441
91:::
S:::
ACT
TCTA1
jtto
o.!
h10
0.0
100.0
A% h
000.
010
0.0
IAA
_y h
P Ch
000.
0
A__210
I.10
0.0
J L_UPT
.11_4COUS
2L_
14
_11,
11 1
1101
12t
1
100.0
100.0
latAL
is60.0
40.0
100.0
271
76 lmol0twik7 :16,mS ho mml[6mr5r 6,([11010 py tit el 6fiAti
1.16Cf6) $76001 - %71.4.tmt
pm, c,
St. - fOtt. mati.
t .04.00.441 .61406S
LULL
EYMI.GymrsT
1::E!
S'61
001
3674
64
't
0.0.
19_
6
17.6
15.1
14.1
50.0 21.:
1_7
16.7
50.0
1.9
10.0
57.5
100.0
loo.O L
1
2701
05.0
.6
15.1 1
100.0
7.1
1711
.01004
7.1
90.:
V.__
3f
P*1
m
2
103.
: 6
CP
m 0.
71.7 9
23.5 2
50.0
7.5
100.0
f.00.5 100.0
100.
1
16.g
4
I_S
417
2_119
.-
1.C.ACCUi
-ft M
100.0
m100.0 1
1_
(00.
0
272
H16.7
66.7
S11
26.7 1
9.1
4
10U
.11
10.5
50.0
1 .:64
a
MI 6a .1
4.-100:f)
12t
4.0 190.0
609 toolC,mthl 47411.1 09 461.1036E61 4014;141.13 61 SFA By C4G407
1100641 STATUS - 17110(87
21t7, UR hmr
01.4;
Si 4
4 O
lLc
4414
4N3
LoF1.07HOL_SIU415. _
-U11714
Sof C.
001' 14Tof 94
1.4!10
561:
T4P
11: T
C11
.
1 ,.
7.9
64'..
; 4.1
1
II17
.:3.
110
04.1
490
7;!:
i!';
4.2.
;z.
:It.
AI
171
_11
94
.
m1.1
74.9
1.1
12.4
2.1 100.0
11.!
674
1
.4.:
.II
124.)
4:
A70
ten 61:1
2.!
6.:
2.:
99:1
11236
73.7
2.:
tolli
6.: 101',10
!''.?i
0.3
1.7
7N
19.8
60.9
2.6
4.9
3.
9
Al v.
i10.1
10rJ,
__M._
79.
41
412
:,4:!
N03.0
02.3
3.9
7.9
2.91
4II__
1V
1^11
H4.0
62.0
6.0
14.0
6.0 100.0
M.
07 _
L. 26
.2
230
m01.6
41.7
6.1
11.3
1.0
97.1
-16._11060_
1^
Z__
14
46.2
41.1
1.1
6.2
100n-
It.
20
.10.
1.11
1._ 132
m19.2
60.7
2.1
12.1
2.1 101.1
16 01S
12t
!...L
33.7
194
1.5
16.0
5.0
47.9
1.711
22i1
12
402.
__111. 3112
m19.0
60.7
4.0
12.5
1.8 100.0
273
F+
019 1.,PLC ..... STATUS Of 1P1000641 SPIC YYYYY 07 910 05 OtC.Itt
0100
151
SfiT
uS -
Slu
tffhl
510 - 1.411117
.1LC
YL,
17_3
7...4
1 -
FuLL
PAM?
- 11.1
(1.[
t _AA
50.0
1
....
44.7
440.;
41,
..
II
9± at.;
Uh[9,
0410P
het
("INFO
SIlf
0E14
0/1 5.4. 1041
50.0
IOC.:
4.;
4.; I
CC
.;
0. 413.0
4.1
1
100.1
9.:
'
1000.
IA f
A N*0
0.0
100.
0
PO
1L1
H00.0
-6-S
*7
3---
-11
0.0
00.0
TI
3N
100.
0
1_70.0
100.0
°i
:.9 el
1.1000
100.
0
010
21
h66.7
33.1
100
.4;
S LAV
-h
2.?
M66.7
0).1
...11
2_6C
.CU
Sft
11
h50.0
00.0
100.
0
11,1
5 A
SIP
LA11
19
12
17h
7.7
09.7
7.1
13.4
IVC.0
.1.1.A
lSt-
--Y
1026
-3--
-13
i_05
h01.3
471.0
IDE
AL
h--
. 10.
101
h11.4
57.4
2 7
1.7 12
-4.0
13.1 15
-19.9
7.7
4.10
1
100.0
lig:-
74 1.8109.1.1 1.41US 61 IPPLOYMENT SPECIALTY 61 SEX MY DECKEE
610004.3 $71701 - SNOW
Pm0 ç4OI - 0 6114
70,1 - 1014 MALE
FEAALE
Mk_
1.1041,10
$:r.
(I,
CINLI
SPEC. Of 141P113414(61
10.4
M7.; 63).1
S.:
16!;
N10
zip
1.; 140!II
2.:
2
996.:
LAT
.10.1
74.1
3.7
1.6
14
MI!! -7;;411
3.2
13.7
ilgrf
aTo
40
954
M61::
4.3
12.2
4:: 10;4.0
fPI
20
it
1If
_1
AI
16.0
62.3
2.0
6.7
2.6 104.0
41 P
010______PL
111
NSO
17.7
2.5
11.0
4.; 1!:
iPAP
ft
lJt____1__
II
3-A 4
__JII
..
17.4
69.2
2.6
9.2
3.6 100.0
1,5
vD
A__[..
N__IIL__IIN)
41
119
.1
13.1
65.6
4.9
11.9
41
IgSi
-S4P
970
100
22.3
61.7
3.6
7.6
2.1
810
lc__
m70 62.3
5.7
11.1
5.7 100.1
5Oh
NIL_
OR 11_28
7231
h37.3
42.1
6.4
11.2
1.0 100.4
N._
IL_
.01
.h
46.3
41.3
1..3
*4.0
1.1 100 .1
11,11_111ot.
)151
h14.5
66.3
2.6
10.1
2.1 toi-..1
111.1.11L.
5r9 17 3071
1!!!
MAL__
P.
7.19
E310
161___607
192
3914
.18.7
60.5
4.1
12.4
4.1
61.9
275
A72
279 2091074247 11410 tV EPPLOYPENT 125114112 27 121 Iv 2606111
99Or427 94A7u9
604-SIU0141.t0.4401.4
51* - .211
0%92002
1221.014121L-112111.5_-_
UMW
374C.
ig:
SC::
4E1 Zit: 10741
444
241
4_____/__
pi
17.2
1.2
1.2
4Ulf
m96.0
1.1
2.1
.1
.1
.2 1C0.0
3_10
21241
II
16
1
.011
g2.51
H94.4
1.1
1.0
.1
4.e
477
ITV
162
21.:
1g.10
11M
41.0
.1.4
.
34
/54
_1_
Lf
m96.2
1.2
.9
.3
1.0
99.4
Al 2
4Ill
i_i
__-
rM
922
1.7
1.1
.4 100.0
....1
LO
5 PO
121041 __16_-___12
2_J
P_ 1101._
CD
m96.6
1.4
1.1
.2
.7 100.0
412____11. 4J3S
M17.0
1.2
1.0
.1
.3
.4 104.0
A73
2122
4____606
I-4---. -1
1101
II96.2
1.1
.4
.1
1.0 100.0
I1420
h05.4
__I
_L._
Z'41
11
92.5
3.0
.4
.1
.7
99.1
_l__112.
2l____11141
JA____12
115___I
2011
H95.4
1.6
1.1
.1
1.3
.7 100.0
10.6L0115---
407
52
3.1
93.9
3.4
.6
1.7
.6 100.0
_11_4TS'
II_ 2
2ill
m97.2
1.5
.5
.2
.3
.7 000.0
'0
21.0_ 42
1131
m94.0
:03
.4
.2
1.3
.9 103.0
_155170
245 _112.
MU
_N
90.2
1.0
1.1
.1.6
.2 1
2.0
-276
411 10P1.0Y4ENT STAN!,
FY
(Y
146V
.141
2.p.(1111, 6r yEK 6r
1.1.E.,.Et
1.1110.Nt SUMS - hr4-Cri.Otst.0.46010.
2,2 u
14
-
-
f4Pkuvr0.1
/WA
F4,
11
SIAM: UN
F14
.1/
4114
1,C
it4k
5-46. (.3
:12PLEYN,47
11-4
1121
3eer:
3.1
16621
12201
144
.4
2
N66./
31.3
10.1.0
Awe
6le
7
1.ea.!
11:1
13 .3
6.7
1.1i1.47
/21
;V
42
36
421.6
11.1
5.2.
2.X
101..1
41.
1.24
11
21
I.77.4
12.4
3.2
3.2
1.i
4.2.4
N4
I
b0.12
:P.1
172.t
1-,
....4
4h P
N1
1...3
11
lce.0
IC.C.
1-1
.1_12..;
.1
7I.
4
11
37.5
12.5
I.:6.0
I49
65.7
116_1.7
4
6.1
4.5
2.0
12 '0.0a
_LP
1.
12
m56.3
25.0
4.3
s.3
.29.9
^122C.0
111.0
41.
14-
-
1611
6-
-11.
!7.1
99.4'
44
32
116.0
101.0
71
4122
75.4
19.4
10C.C.
71
1.
7..3
111
70.3
17.e
2.0
6.9
1.0
10Y
.0
11.61Al
.7
1.
:4i
I.,
72.1
25.5
4.4
4.6
2.0
.2
102.0
2 7
7
19 161.6006161 012106 00 1.,10,1.L61 006C1600
174 1.7
CI.G4f1
511,01A1 513.100 - 806-1110E61,4644c,6
- 7.0 600
St. -
4.1%.%06M
7.7qC!"361 317,1y3 Uh(60
;It
uZEZ:
S:1:
677
70761
JL. 6.8
:7.
19:
.rof's
17!
:2.
1207:0
Itel.'
201:
42:1
5::
2IC 10r.:
"-
-67A
16
6.6
1/..
29
41
1.06
17010721
70.1
15.6
2.6
4.6
A7
5
t1_I_
0.7
2)
h6
64 m
h87.1
6.7
1.6
2.3
.3
1.2 100.0
F.
in?
6
65.0
22.9
3.6
7.0
1.1
7
101:0
FJ
041
4:!)- II!:
.21!
31:
.1
I.: -5:!:
h1,0
xl_111.
130 .7801
76.9
13.4
1.6
4.4
1.3
99.1
_N
430
66
LI.
13_
2.0
12.0
2.1
2.4
ell
85
1.8
00
J24
N.
76.6
12.1
3.2
6.6
1.6 100.0
h.
1143
69.
i03
.15
1802
m91.6
3.6
2.1
1.2
.4
.6
92.9
11:A1(72.13_
h(66
29_ .0
2._i
4781
m44.4
2.9
.9
.3
.7
.9 100.7
9_ 2.18
7t.0
14.4
2.9
4.9
1.9 100.7
x85E'
2)5.___102.__103____32____50_ 7041
90.0
3.6
1.6
2.7
.5
1.6 100.1
/e........1251_1182_ 35V
_..en
220 19810
n73.9
9.0
2.
3.1
.3
1.5
99.9
79 W10 ..... 57670 By BPPL016161 SPEC16007 OV SEA Pe EtCATt
1--. V 1
-.1
14
SNOW STATUS - 606-1710160.I.70.C66
v,c Cn
StA - FE6.LE
LIILC/oLl'1_114iVI
P ' m : N H N 1
111;4'
111:: 11::
Srt:
I/
33.)
61.7
11.1
18.: 11.1 160
Lal
215
.461.5
21.1
60.7 15.:
1.1
15.:
I1
401
TCTAL
SPEC. OF
IAIS
/A.(
/LP
EmPLOYPENT
10J
100.0
100.0
1000.1
.
4VI
_UL/
71 q m II
75,0
21.0
1
ICC.: L
...._
P_100.0 4---
1
ICC.0 1
-LAIL.
760.0
20.0
100.0
HIL
.11.6
11._
____
0_11
____
____
_L_
11
20.8
8.1
16.7
2.8 100.0
_.0.
_...0
,71
/1.7
70
26
I.
2114
70.1
12.1
6.1
6.1
3.0
100.0
111
N54.5
2.3
_1
9.1
9.1 100.0
SI
61
113
_f__CPT
54.5
11.2
21.2
3.0
1.0
99.9
L___
)6.4
3.7
9.1
65.5
100!!
__
_1_2
1_
IL_
h46.4
29.0
3.2
16.1
3.2
:v.v
NiNf
21
qi
67
,.
_I,
m62.1
11.4
7.1
17.5
.7
(.7 100.1
h536_
130
h1
0_
1)
611
-1111A1
m61.1
16.6
__115_
5.4
16.2
.7
1.6
04.9
279
4u4.
5-
-4 4.
1.,,
g
5
I 1
00 . 'OP V ON .0
e.
,441s4...e.11Cq
I
Valtnat'n't MOS0024:48a2 ,
1734
..... 545 EX
11
I 1:4
1 I 2
1
!;
r
0.4,09. 0 0.44/0,
=19
*0
.4;
""'"11:19g112.
2. X.E
=1'
--- M*1000.04
t., tn
1 =
t'a g .".^!
1735
22.22.22. I
C
C
Olxp
_Ett_SELE._- 46 F
7172 OF F.1.00/14 -
TOTAL 100101
F1ELO CF
P.r
CAM-al-- 0
6111.
A63
22
152
h4.0
14.0
4.0
1.3
00.0
I./
1.1
01.9
V10.0
!malt' .
'13-_,L
77.8
19.0
.,..z____17.1
2C.1
.Li
14.1
11.1
32
26.1
154
.I.1
59.7
031.1
1.1
1.3
11.1
V
_11131.1.41121116
ft__1
0.7
11.3 IC
7.1
24.1 2
21.
33.3
27.0
1. __-_
17
70.1
11.4
100.0
1
/.....741_,E.3__._...z, 9
8.1
_ z___
1.5
1.4
_3.1.,
.1
51.3
1.3
1
.9
12
1
1.1
1.1 It
44.4
1.1
42.7
r16.7
4.1.4.4_1_1/201.11___ ft____
I..1
12.9
I7.1
14.4 .
7.1 I
11.3 .
it
37.5
10.0
12.1
_ IC0.0
r
IA.ALrilhi________Ti
I
1.033_
14
1.0 Li_
7.1
1.4
5i
147
N.1
40.1
.7
2.7
51.3
3.4
1.4
100.0
rauks 14049
8.1
20.1
12.1
28.6
13.8
11.1
11.1
21.6 /
1CO.71
H57.1
42.9
V
0C_A
1SP
.511
b1.4 0
1.4 1
1.---..-
1.2
l'o
.40.0
46.1
11.3
_ 100.0
V
tahu
.h
12
2.0
:31
_ D_. 21
3.2
22?
14.1 14
6
2.6
610
.2.1
11.n
1.4
2.5
,..4
.
2.1
1.1
107.1
v100.0
102.1 101.2
44.4
IC1.1
11.1
91.1
51.4
A51
FIELO OF 700 by 7417411 4066 ACTIVITY 81.
t..
- 18
TYPE OF EPPLOVER - TOTAL 44984
FIELO CF 760
ImPLEVER ASO
700101.191-SPECIALTy
PACE- 21
pi/ AAAA 1_4[71v1Ty
CHL._01Z7
POTS A5790
7410
6101
04290 F,17g:
REV. TOTAL
DASIC AtS
91
194
l32
2233
i27.6
41.9
50.0
_11,1____,9
32.0
40.0
_ACcrl
41.6
6071IE0 RES
N1
80
11
11
116
0,
694
27.6
.1
.9 100.1
_____I
V26.6
09.1
32.0
10.0
70.0
20.7
Otti1.0005761.
9 N00.0
100.0
.1
.6
86942 - 440
N1
41
,2
ss"
1P A
1.1
1.6
IC0.0
r14.3
Me
4.0
20.0
IC.1
76762 - OTHER
N4
______ _100.n_ ----
_100.0
V1.0
.7
ILACNING
N1
11
231
I1
109
.14__1,4,1
1.8
01.4
.9
11.9
V28.6
11.4
31.3
__21
31.0
20.0
50.0
20.4
OTHER RhOwN
0 V90 61170951
h12
714
045.7
7,1
7.1
11,9
V2.9
16.7
1.0
2.6
TOTAL
m7
414
4100
52
534
1 5
77.1
1.1
47
.9
, 99 9
__N. V
100.1
100.3 100.0
100.0 100.0
100.0
14.7
2 i :
) ,
APP SPLC__,. 5
0.2
140C OP IPP1.01214
101AL 44684
91110
--0611C_AL1
11
a _-_271
CP 960
A83
71.6
1I
20
20
I,
42-- 211
200
IA
0 44.4
H2.1
V42.1
14.4
640 31.1
210
21.1
25.0
14.2
...ALCM(' RFS,
R.
1122
L11-----1-___-1-
2l0
11
1.3
41.7
.4
31.9
loS
1.1 1000
V210
_Iltr
ti...g
.CLU
LY__
_ft1
.240 li
7.1
26.1
210 110 240
216
1.
40
61.3
120
100.1
VSO
....._
13.1
..a4_
r_ 3
.111
...__
_IL_
___
.110 ea.
.6
I.)34
2----
111
H20
6-70
_.1 0
.11
27.5
10
100.1
V15.6
120
Tel
Tel
110 100
110
......
e.A
NA
4m.D
IALI
__N
____
______
IA
II
30.,
___I
31.1
DO
4,9
VTFAck1.16
MA
1.0
111
14
4e2
70
1.1
106
24_
H1.2
31e2
1.2
1.6
-6..._..3_
41.4
2.1
10 10161
V15.6
160
21.4
2166
12.9
110
17.5
21.2
_altE
llarg
ig__
_n_
i1
' hSlel
.L42.9
16160
V
_30 PFSPONSE
A.6II
1
.4
.6
I2_____
29H
62.1
2.4
27.6
6.4
100.0
V_t
ali&
____
_21
_12
20
_.lo
ll7.1
20 100
20
304_
__It
g1104
__11
-11_
7.1
10
H1.7
44.1
24.2
1.7
.7 100.0
V100.1
91..
99.9
99.9
99.9
IC
0.1
100.
0 IC
h.0
h.
4110 FIELO OF PHD BY PRINARY 4CR0
.....1
EPP SPEC
6CP
t...1
TYPE OF EMPLOYER
TOTAL 11610611
CF
EARTH
PRIMARY A6711077
CHEN
SC1
ACTIVITY IlY EOPLOYER ARJ EMPLOYMENT SPECIALTY
;17: IT
PRO
OTHER
NO
PMI'S ASTAC
PATH
E1CL E4666 1111084
2ESP TOTAL
BASK RES
N17
1313
23
5130
614
1574
PI
4.2
V52.0
39.2
33.3
27.3
62.5
24.2
22.2
72.1
17.9
PPPPP (0 RES
N33
2441
I166
14
2081
M30
.2
12.6
.5
.1
21.1
1.6
.2
160.0
V17.7
66.7
19.2
66.7
1.1
34.4
30.9
1.1
21.2
0E0EL00ESIGN
N2
111
15
96
H2.0
62.7
15.1
100.0
V1.1
2.4
2.8
2.4
0A9A0
1140
N26
1344
161
2455
H5.7
9.1_
2.2
17.0
.6
99.9
V14.0
31.1
10.3
6.1
15.1
5.6
10.1
NANAG .. OTHER
X4
93
114
4116
H3.4
00e2
.9
12.1
3.4
100.0
V2.2
2.6
1.1
2.9
11.1
2.2
TEACHING
N19
757
51
qB
74
893
M2.1
44.6
.6
.3
11.0
.11
.4
100.0
V10.2
22.6
45.5
37.5
18.2
19.4
18.2
21.5
OTHER 104064
N2
40
10
52
m3.0
76.9
11.1
91.9
V1.1
1.2
1.9
1.3
NO RESPONSE
N3
7k
41
66
H3.5
90.7
4.7
1.2
750.1
V1.6
2.3
.7
2.6
-
2.1
TOTA1
N106
33347
611
II
530
36
22
6157
m4.5
el
00.5
:1
.3
.2
12.4
.9
.5
420,0
V100.1
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.1
100.0
100.1
100.0
100.0
100.1
283
.10...aopowcpww ' II:1;ow .... ,., ...... v....
.. "..
1
.1.*:41...9-1'.
^.1 ,
1
1!
-E
y F:Tr2,1War,y
74-.I9
1738
7 LI
9
441'11,F
D-01.011:1
T10161. 40C40
71140 OF 960
AIM( Af%
N-
15
I110
I__
IL
1_
202
..9
___.1_
71.0
2.4
1.1
7.6
0100 0
V
_ASP1.117
as.
M57.7 100.0
219.0
29.4
37.5
215,
1
12.1
71
41.1
19.0
1.8
v
1.7
It'
100.0
M.6
76.2
9.9
19.0
v7.7
.f1 7/4-71,0.510_4___6____
32.6
23.$
in
101.8 7
32.3
60.7
32.0
1'I0
12.1
1.4
1.0
14.5
1.0
11.1
100.0
5.1
V1.1
5.4
29.0
4.1
2b14.6C__:_ittO______ 4 H
_I___ ..._
3.1
104_
1
79.6
9.4
71
t4 .7
1
.9
_1641.1
v
MAIA0 -1. 07414
1,_
14.1
20.0
Ir.,
22
19.1
12.2
19.6
22.2
100.0
77.8
V
1169.0147
ri2I
tt_l_
1.)
IV
4.8ti
1.1
II
191
H1.3
66.1
2.0
1.1
3.3
12.6
.7
.2
100.0
v
11141.1 10046
h7.7
14.0
17.6
90.0
82.5
26
11-
11.3 3
11.1
11.1
14.2
2.13
0?WI
1.0
3.0
4.1
6.1
100.0
V
_Nr2
ALI
PA
ISII
N
3.1
5.4
25.0
1.9
22.2
3.1
2027
.6)
62.7
1
6.2
24
300.0
m V
_112
IAL_
k2.4
1.9
11.1
2.2
_24.
____
_1_
2.0
.1
II.2
__A
l __
..-1
078.1
1.6
.4
.1
119
1.0
9 .0
V .1
1219
90.9
H V100.0 100.0 100.1
89.9 100.0 100.0
490
91.9
100.0
100.0
6010 FIELD 01 000 87 PitImAav KOK AC014111 01
EoP SPEC
10 ACOUS7
POI OF 169101E0
TOTAL 44046
FIELO CF Pop
00101E. ANO E41L094147 SPEC
11910
01420
40
_241130144 ACTIVITY
0H7H
501
8625
65200
6620
8101 411044 04044
0112TOM
BASIC 660
N1
26
I10
I19
h--t
a--it
s'0.6
25,0
2.6
100.1
v25.0
11.5
1(0.0
13.5
9.1
11.0
060L11,0 065
ft
41
72
M9
V61,9
320
1I14
3.8
22.6
1.8
.1
94.6
425.0
50.0
31.7
15.0
32.4
16.4
100.0
32.1
00971,010104
h13
H910
21
12.5
6.3
10
400.1
4.4
v5.7
2.7
1.1
RANAG - 0.0
N1
154
11
6.
m1.'
1.5
729.:
.1
16.1
29.0
14.0
100.1
31.0
V39.0
50.0
1
MANAG - OTHER
44
m41.1
21
/
300,0
v1.0
__13.0_14.3
2.7
9.1
1.2
%ACHING
N1
18
16
459
H1,7
44.4
21.1
6.0
1C0.0
VMO
16.7
21.6
16.4
18.2
010E6 44064
h12
6.7
11.1
16
V8.3
8.1
5.6
NO 01580650
6O
IIt
H12.7
21.1___
TOTAL
V3.5
4.1
3.4
h4
2227
41.9
_14
70.1
41
74
11
1.1___.3_00.0
10
1324
99 9
vl
100.0
V100.0 100.0 100.0
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.1
100.0
283
-
.--2.--'
.. . .. .,. :::1
tl "...'-..t .. .......... .. ..14.
J..., -....... ........... ..,_.... .; - --:,_
1:
1740
7.7Z)
a
;TO MitemSC APIA IT ACE.
eoP
torm
onSPEC AAAAA AMD DitAff
olmenr.84
;02
01610 ak-00
LAr SPECT TOTAL ALL PANEL GROUPS
ACE
ACADEMIC RANA
92314 20-24 25-20 10-w03-3.-.0.,00-4... 50,54-35-50-10-64 115.43
7:ta-Igh 115p.- -
DEAN
:1
52
!!
.N. 11
Z!1
I:4
.4
- ow
so. 44.3
FALL P0Uf
3:1
IN 21.71
,r.:
31!..:
3:!:
3.t6.0
11'3
31!/
1r.;
21.1
A
AS12C 0007
--- ---Z9P
70!... 04.4
02
20. 07.5
- --
1.1
ti3 An 1ln
IN
.:1
02.?
3!3
1.1
..t WI 1..1
""' "07 --------i,
32.).0.i--Xt WI -111:
3!:
-
1:1
.t
.I -
.4
I.
WI 21.:
1%1TAUCTO4
6
____50.Mi._ 2!: _ 11
!:
'.1
.1
.1
.i
Ill.1
1!1
f:
ft
.:
.1
./
.1
.1
.1
I.i
1um.,
..___,P-.3/0 . _
,_
1.
3. ..,
.1
.
"" "" -------:
40:1 ICI
;!:
111
.7
.5
AHP
50. )0.3
1.1
1...;
3.1
-k5"----
----
1P10:-20.4
-!7
./
12!:
!I
.3
./- 1
./
2.
WHIM
N'1 1)1/11
-__.NO AFSPOMSE
i,50._,..v...___to_____
___
9._
_119 1:!1
11!)
1:7.1
149
5:;!:
51!:
5:!1
317.1
42!1
::!;
II.:
I--.
77760.
-'1
7- j"
-1-
1"g
--43
1--1
72P
. -74
2! iA
VI-
PO 1-0141 at - 01ct - 991 1:1± 1001;
4,I.L00.
1 O.
.4.
..
10 .
..
1.
.
s..1
31-0.5imr-0(3
91
7 AENSION-001
Mc PME,
S :0104-00
LOP SPILT TOIAL ALL PANEL 000475
24/
_.1_
il.
500 30.7
FULL /001
.1
.1
!I
:1
25
el
el
el le; 17.1
In
0 .P
50. y2,1
ASSOC PAO/
A.t
!TI- In
3!1
4!:
4!1
7!)
711
10111
1.!1
mP
50* 40.0
- -
--:.
---
-i -
-et
et -
el - - el
el -
el --.!1
.2.1
el
4.1
in
ml
500 )5.7
**
1407AuC109
41
719
11:
r.1
in _,l/
el
el _el
_in
2.1
..;
15.0
5.1
HP
50. 31.) --
LECluit4
k.1
!I
n.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
..i
nO
.3
t 0 ASSr
-Ze
"" 32'1
-0---
12-- 41
-17-
5-
4-1 --- J _ _
I.
159
.0
1.1
1.1
.7
.3
.5
.4
.0
.0
.0
HP
SO. 29.5
10"
-- ---------- :
----
311 -MI
1!: -3!)
!I
.1
.1
.1
.1
Illl
70.1
01010
II,
50. 27.2
04
:4
_ .1
.1 _
.)
SS
_ _____ _
.4
4so. 24.1
1.4
01
.4
NO 91100030
:100.0
6t!1
::!1
11II
11:1
Ill1
11!:
eel Tin AS 019 00n 132N 01!!
TOTAL
--------- -
5P
301.0011123 2t3n eIll IWO lign al Slt 3039 001!1.20SN WI 12:!1 Icon
HP
50. 17.,
287
'.4..
24
1. -.7 19017NE 13 -1.070100.10261.20(91 SetC14777.010otE
$1,...,...
07 So
-4,
...1.1,.-411.40311
,0.
--- : -- 3: 1:00- Vit 'C.:! :1.0.0!
90
TOIAL
'
...hi
1e:9
14.:
24.9
74.9 19.21.1231.-1hC1.4
::,9--00.
NP
2S-.1 2
"Sc. .!...
.175. 17.3
I-
'.3
-__ ___ALVIi
I.t
.7,4,,
':
,2
2.
,fl.
4-
-7, 11.0
v-1;.'
-.
-9
-I
9
II-11.402
h74
..
_.
6:t
1611:::
li.1
.2.4
m
10-16.4770
.to
25. 171-7
...50.,-;i... 2.02,.. TO
25. 11.0
SS. 12.4
rt. 11.9
17.1,4,.
.:
.:
21:: oin
15:i
ZP
2se'i.o
"vo.11.34..675!11!..1
7C-14.100
e96
%,
:3
1:1
li:: :t:i 11:1- 4
"2S.
19.1
SC. 17.6
71. 14.4
21-34000
h1.6
47
20 4
TO
M w.2
-
HP
254 14.9
SO. 22.0
3:3 7f:-
90 29.133:i
11:Z
1,..1o.
N73
tl
490
'..;
3-4
3:1
241 :::; le;:i
--1Ci::
me Af,:.407
,...7
2h. 23.6
50. 27.9
79. II./
1.
A)
IS
I.
322
III-
25. 14. .. ".'574 .311.119.0)Si3ILI 3.1
- 6.3
ICO.0
40/40 7,0Ah
!:
Wi 23N 1;!
1,12.1
in
.1
1:0f:
4.P__ 25 11.2._
50. 11.1
734 17.1
-211. .'(.
Ll......7..-.:C,
Low 27.0 IC117 ALA 744i0 ZA7u75
Ct.-091,1-0C)
1.7
SAL 17,574 0919 - .2 .01
_404002 2CLO
h9in
43
2.1
-
I"- 121!t
429.'1:1.1
.492. :.1
'IS.
6.4
2t]
41!
A
40.6
4.,
27.0.1
.3
12.1
11:9
77
29 0.2
90e
1.5
7910.2
_13,11.922
yh139
1(.0
12.3
311.6
r.8
72
*2
121.4- Ir.1
.
.1mO
21. 11.5
SC. 12.)
* 13. 13.2
9.:
_17r.11000___
_11
16!
421
:7
25. i].5 2:350i3i: 967:479.
i 1
h 9.i
21
11!4
Si!:
A"
:g------
V.1
3.0
20.7
60.6
.2
1.2
11.1
.20mZi.100.
I:
*il
tli
.....7
mO
220 I3.6
70. 11.9
24. II.)
CI:
..2) 'CZ
4i
kJ
MP
21. 00.4
sc. 20.9
25 . 21.0
.23,_116104_________ :!.____. ___________ _ .i.
ili
,21 Al . siii-
.3
2.0
7:1
30:9
74:7
71 2s 22.3
sc. 4
3.74
79. 37..5
1.9
12.3
-3.07717-
y.1
2.
13:2
11:3 ;K:r 2.3 "S:t
:1
1.0
211
SS
IC
7102
mo
25. 12.0
106 11.9
lte .7,7
.111.2257115L_______ Li_ 1
2.412
It,
1.1
l .
2 _Itl. id,:f_
1!.:
.0.,. i7... .....
11..
4.4
1..
T"'_'....na'' .___;:_.
1..1_
2:!:
2I:9
19:6
,I:3
11:3
3:3
!F,
3" 3:N
8.12 501867 111 1014t INCOPE 65 EMPLCY14,16PLCVP1h1 SW1401.0E00E1
01M17.51414-001
PNO
019LNS1Ch-003
1441
SAL 64508 PAIWAIE IhOU 1114
OINEN1105-002
ePP Sp4C1 TOTAL ALL PANEL
ClUPS
'1:a0/4-
. 0.0E4 5.0,
11.0-
tg I7T In! Ilin! ----. 7.f..... 7711.1i
0.0
13.9
7.0
1.9
11.9
24.9
340'35.01'7 51,:-KMCV
U. 104 1,070
h5
4
NP
25.
2.4
50..
4.6
75.
1.2
6-10,900
N5
--------7-;----
-
ikg
-
re
23.
9.4
O.
10.1
' 75.
; .7.6
11-11.900
le
320
IA"
7.1
10C :1
oP
25. 11.8
SO. 13.7
75. 13.5
14-16,900
Na
I6
42/
16
411
------------------ 1%-I8
-.---2-5i1
44-.;11:150i11
i.5174375. L3
17-19.900
11.0 1V2:2
-,-,-
2560.61°150. 11.41173!Iii.2 11
-4-
Jo.° -li:1
945
20-24.900
h
2S-34.900
q -
OP
25. 20.6 1"50.7i2.1"
15. 33.s"
h
--1
'1'
.1
1 ill 111
--:1
-..,!011
t,
,,
112
.2.
- *8
.:Z
111--'1,1
4-22.: 20
74.000.
IIP
25. 26.0
50. 29.0
'675. 22.0
a '
41
I:I
nil til ---2:-.141
NU PESPON1E
7 HP25. 32.8
SO. 52.5
:1754 76.2
M....
.
.....____110.__2,._lia_50,1.31.11514875.2442.1!,...293_74;_i81.10112.1
101AL 10044
I.1
610
:6
495
1012
1013
715
197
40
1495
..gR__.2,4.16.0.50.' 2114918'275VA' e9.0 U.'
5.8
'100.1
lgi-2411(-.41-00
tia SPEC1 OCTAL ALL MAL CAMPS
.14..21..1,1.412110
01074117h-1103 W.
SAL
%Safi C00,01ihP1S1
- FEOERAL LIG.
g11.t 11"1
vWO /0:0
ii41.9i,
gm_
2Se
8.0
150.1,2:.3
75. 10.6
---25.g SAO
6.1
1.1
OP
25.
2.4
SO.
4.9
75.
7.3
V25.0
70.0
.7
44
3.2
.9
11-109:::
.1.1,166_9170
HP
25. 11.1"".10.911.5
75. 1).2
16.1
9.2
V g v1.1:
1P1
*.!
I.18'ITil
i/r.21.100
HP
S. 14.6
50. 15.4
74. 16.2
m 1I..
646
09.6
.6
..i---Oil "CU
ilil
lar..2.4.900
OP
25. 170
50. 18.3
75. 11.2
-11
*.i
1*,1 lil
*I
16.1
e4.1
' 1081Z
.2.1.314100
V
.1,:p
25. 20.9
50. 22.3
75. .2.7
*
v.
____.
4.1 '541.1 -414----1002.;
00
25. 27.4
50. 33.5
75. 61.0
,
.3
1.1 100.0
1.0
V
3.0.111.5022455-.:.-
h,
eti a
I .
_4
If _
308
-25.
1005
14
25.
.111
SOZ
st."
1".5
7591
1.;7
3..'
ITOTAL 7.4774
N -.t
111.
1._i
h.1
ili-1
41__
Lc1
_24:
Lila
"L
- "
43:1_
A 9
5
A 9
6
V OP
25. 26.5
SO. 29.1
/S. i2.2
-71.-74;1-
.112 SA1444 tv T6741. Ihr.CPE 6, E4v4Cvt.i.PLC76141 5,101SL/4.01CM
61.1.c.1Ch-Cci
Ps0
LA40.1ith-002
FP,
5PEC7 70761 410 P6511. GJC995
541 075( : 61%(44Lp C114
-664A 4
135 740L5 65C51
1161. 5.703
h
.1
1.0t.0
14
"11-
PP
2U44.2.0
1250.
4.0
712:-%
4.
6.0
2-10.904
2:
2..i 1
V."
9..1
11.4
4.:
917.5
11-15.4,2
...
25.
5.6
4C.
1.6
71. 13.4
14-16.905
s.
5
25. 11.7
5012.5
-
it. 13.)
,...
-
__
__ 7'.
.._
_.
.._
fi
91/.1
_11711000
h
31 :;:i.i. 1
5:14
1..C6
.0
25. 14.7
5c. 15.5
* 75. 11.2,
:.11.
25. 12.7
50. 16.5
1*
754 .1.2
*
25-14000
',;
145
254 20.9504 .2 ...;1.6".4
h
150
411
5.204
4152:e!
20-24.400
%
"
11.;
:::i'-311
---
14
256 26.1
504 29.0
/54
*
15.0004
hI
124
114
he 41)60751
pp
254 33.3
52. 53.9
754 75.1
.1-
11:1 sekt
C.2
42
10
62)
11
12
152
61
2.11.i7
5.6,9i111.025.0
1/ 6
I 5
101.1. 440%4
17 S
N4
)1
151
25e
554
516
24
24
1161
PP
256
220
17.0 !
504 1..5 _ .754 21.2
**
h2
.0
6.5
0.1
13.6
11.1
12 1
14
C190,114..,-4.21
V.,
$41. L45E1 019[6 440.1
106.0
-1-14154.105-001-61,11
014,51C4-Le2
(m10 14,C1 141AL 45a. PAN,5 ti.CuPs
75.0
t.0
-14-1CC3.1
_2.16'000
hp
25. if.1
1506
5.1
756
6.2
20.2
5.4
12.c
11.0
P21.
t.4
1950. 21.3
756 10.1
IS127.1131
V7i.4
7/.1
I/.9
at.t
22...1
11.1
79.4
.6_9i0i
sP
25. 11.2
50. 12.2
75. 75.1
6.7
15.5
il
1.0
17.5 -P0.6
7:-.17-lit?.1
SP
254 15.2 "050I'i71.277.3754 16.1
1:i
./7-1541ZO__
-11------- -
-
23 -13.1:--6-3 U
hi
5!, iil
gP
254 11.2 "544212.2""75:211.1
______
__
__
i__, 124
5.6 ra. -75.0
liti..I
_21t14..30(1_
4254 20.0
504 21.7 ..'754t.ii.37"
h1.i
121
41
.
V.
2.1
75.0
- .0
Iii:1
1)4000t
,4254 22.1
504
5.9
7541!.522.'
7-5
',7,
10.:
12.:
3.2
2C.7 100.0
11.2
5.4
hp
27. 29.4
SC. 42.1
1>.. /1.3
..i
22.r.
12.4
21.)
22.3
731 At
4.12 __1:1-.
'1,
10,3
r254.1).1 -
50 11.3
75. 21.3
_..6.
to.
II.nt
,:t7.1_
...1.4,-2.-1.6.1 ...1 v...1_
4.5. -
290
7012 111.4,5 Of OCTAL 17C01,t AV EPOI0102.(60606161 0,61s610,61CO23
FI:MP:g3
r..11 SPICI OCTAL 41( AA % AA
C4Cu6S
2406,61og-021
11.7
741 risft HI v;pc,s,
SILAL V
117 1651.1 44C51 --..- ----- -----
'11(.1"1121:0 Wi 110; 119!..i 231?i 1;2.0
37.0e 11100. N;:k
4):COO1:62,020
hIS
2-17.000
II
40a-
-11.--,1,900
Z1..3
N
21,10.100
VP1
10.5
17-19.600
hgo
1/
-----01-. s-- - - -
S";271PiL
IC
2---.
11:1
F5. 15.5
SO. 17.
lo-26.600
05-17000
'
Vh
- 41
1;8:i
128:3
-..1'SO
a
HP
:7. 210
70. 22.5
TS. 21.0
35.000.
h2.:
13:3
HP
25. 10.5
SO. 20.5
750 10.0
03 0172057E
h/ii
-
11112L'""4.- ----
'I6.)
31.1- 57:i -06.4-- - - 90 -100.S
I--1
HP
210 120
SO. 20.0
77. MI
4,
..1
i1E[REM- M :Ow 1,,i;A 15W0M,P,"0705
l..n
2.020 6.006
h.
147
12
6I
m00.7
5.6
2.6
.5
.I
171
215
..._
_
IL
.9
ICC.
-24
5'
"1.2
Se. 1
-
7- 6
-_61_
P..0
.1-sI
I-10.402
hlg.
906
7*
77
4!1.1
.2.
.2
..2
4.7
54
411:4
71
1.7
44.9
.5
.5
.0
11-11.100
N2
2-' 4.1
;54-5 I" ":"
Ii...._
1-1
i;:Z
;I:1
:if
'I
LI/ Ifil
1SS
1.152
14-16.000
I.25. To 6270.94441672". *44 -2
I
----
-
'55
:7:8
.1
2.1
16.0
60.9
.2
.1
41,
23. if 9 -".'s "Li: 5633/L-. ii-b -1-"-
--lt"-2.'
11-19.960
NI*
4.1"I41*
01.6
2012*
62
o.(
66.4
155.4
1.0
71.2
1.1
1)
3[24
427. 6.7
* 50.11.92..7
3757.0A-
1C-24.900
15-34.900
hI*1
42.It/** 346
1412
I
'
::
::::
---- .._ _____.
4*.L.Ii7
11:4, WO ,26:0
__:;
______. 2C.11'IN
It
. V
.1
1.2
!..i
ill
4).0
90.7
111
256 :1.0
SO. )7.1
*
75, V1.1
*-4'.'
-**1-10.4." -
19.000.
NI
5.
41
241
204
17
170
,V.,..2i_;
sa..
.z0s. d., t.$ . t$.9 .7$:1
3 1
7.1
h.2
.4
I.O
7.4
1.6
40 0
100
1
10 411PCIASE
h70
40
7.,
et
64
87
II
444
SC,
h1.2
13.1
11.0
13.6
01.0
16.6
17.2
2.6
100.0
(C712-2210.61:-----*Z?
- 25.21G.711.31.7072/124."2/2117.10?..1.4-140
1
VP
21.5i1.2 2.750!b17.4"*'7511).11'*3
!I.;
?!'
4" 1.01!° -------
A99
A10
0
291
TI SALA,. 65 70I2L 1NLCPF ev ENPLCVE3.EPPLC.PEN1 5P.CIALTE,C8C411
0145110E-001
141 PHO
01hINSI15-003
SP,Et PANEL 040LP I
--
AL
014EN51114-003
EPP
SAL 6ASE: UNIV - S POS. SALAR V
124
4,052
l't1"
18.9
lie; 1
14!;
'
HO
10141.
14.9 3s.a. 8FSP. 440.2.
____ . _ _ __
...._
.100.0
'42:i
U:004 6,000
h1
100.0
,,:11
2)2.0
50.
4.0
75.
6.0
6-10,900
33
1881
100.0
50.0
HP
25.
4.6
in. 7,
79. 10.3
VIU:8
114
11-13000
k mP
25. 01.0
50. 12.5
75 .
13.3
-TO
IOLJ
16.7
14-16,900
9 HP
25. 11.8
50. .2.5
75. 11.3
17-19,900
N ts1
20-24000
N m
-25-
3403
00A H
1
VJ154004!
11_-_-
4 VNO 8E5P095E
NI.--,
H.
...4
lOTKE-81461W
N6
.2,
H16./
50.0
733
100.0
mHP
25.
6.5
50. 10.0
75. 11.8
M1MENS101.m001__N0 P40
01111451119-102
V.P Wei PANEL G801.0 i .. A 0 2
018195105-023
EPP
SAL UASE, UNIV - 12 OGS.
A10
:USLE2 8.000
N2
51
2
HP
22g.0
50.
4.0
75.
6.0
0.1-4
100.0
7-139:i
6-10,900
Nl
100.0
1.
HP
25.
0.8
50.
9.5
75. 10.3
14
1.20 9
liq.1
11-13.900
N2
HP
25. 11.6
50.61f.5
75. 13.3
H10040
---10
14-16.900
4
33.3
HP
25. 11.8
50. 12.5
75. 13.3
17-19000
N It_
V70.24.400
N H V'I
,A10
1
75.34.400
N.:.:.1
H VAionn.
N_--
H VNO RESPONSE
N12
H._
100,A
10041_
HP --2--5--2-2.5
50. 3 .0
75. 32.5
59
TOTAL KNOWN
N2
33
H25.0
37.5
17.5
100.8
Hp
25.
tAIL____50?_10.11_
isila
.ttz 5ALa.,7 87 TOTAL 1NCCPE 87 EPPLOV18,6PPLCYPENT SPECIAL170E6AEC
0tmLh5f05-00i
014F%slrH-002
01S11.519,-001
NO PHD
(46 spECt IcIAL ALL PANEL 00CUP5
50p
,f,AL SASE: 941, - q PCS. sAtAR
ea:0.00-
14.0-
.110-
8.0
0.9
t3.1
10.s
1111
17.0-
14.9
11-045
70.0-
24.9
4,051
24.0
)4.4350.
MEP 8.U..0
.
sl
.--..._-
i_
--11
:?__
1:1
.
HP
25.
2:1
54.
4.1
74.
0-10000
42
265
---: .
-`
- --
ih----
-11
1 12
11.
6.11
m,
25. O ..
io-
q.1
/5.
121
4101
tir
/.1.4
St:7
11-13000
REP. ANC46 67
6.2
308
4...9
10.1
31.9
.!
7.7
22:9
-
HP
25.
9.4
50. 10.8
74. 12.4
14-16000
N1
2 1
87
30
119
HP
25. 11.3
50. 12.7
75. 14.0
-154.0 ----
Y,
:1
1;:t-
12:4
il.i
17-19000
50
40
0
2.8
12.3
.6.d. 32.8
38.5
"RI
HP
25. 12.4
50. 14.8
75. 16.3
20-2400
410
21
-4'3
;1-
'al
il:S
. Al
_IC
0,0
-2.1
HP
25. 14.4
50. 16.0
75. 17.9
/-1'
itt itS
182:
3lo
g.8
,25-34.900
32
HP
25. 20.8
50. 23.3
75. 27.5
135,000.
mg
190)1
I
tiN
NO RESPOVEC
HP
25. 11.8
50. 12.5
75. 13.3
RP
25114.1611150PIL0-8.375;ZIT:5
36
TW
A'.
KN
ON
NN
10d
411
192
61
I)
410
13.7
52.0
24.3
7.7
1.6
.5
.i
r1
OIMENSION-001
1.-004---Z5-
161-5"--1(61---11. 12.2
DIMENSION-002
4P SPECg TCIAL ALL PANEL GROUPS
01NENsION-003
CPP
SAL eASE: UNIV - 12 PCS.
MNDER_11.0C0._______N
115
H1;:i
il
v HP
254
2.1
50.
4.2
75.
6.3
0-10.ion
19_202_1
Hp V HP
.1-4
=-1
5 21
0 4.
.
V HP
V HP
/11.2-5.3.00
4 HP
8.6
91.0
.5
14.1
78.9
.S.
25.
8.5
50.
9.4
75. 10.2
25.14.300
.7
t6.8
79.4
25. 11.2
50. 1i.1
75- 13.1
3A--27!0--an
16
t5.I
75.9
25. 13.4
50. 14.8
75. 15.9
1-271
2413
513
3.2
15.2
70.2
25 15.3
50. 17.4
75. 18.7
324
4:a
25. 10.8
50. 20.2
75. 9.6
1
5.0
578-15;0
35-3
50.1
"3Q-10t!S
95.1
14.7
-Teo
.2.7
27.3
1.0
26.1
" I0t!S
.6
15.0
3 105.51
.1
7.0
.: "21
6 -100i8
.2
2.5
.5
.9
6.4
20.6
72.7
15.000.
HP
25 20.0
50. 23.6
75. :sot
m U711J 7- ---1-671
sg-..3
10------icro.t
2.9
2,.!
1u 0
. 0
.1. I
-N"EmnIE------6----rr4-:
25- 2
-541-1.15-;!r
.175
-33.3
2A2
A.-
--10
0
H
.r544
44
HP
25.
8.9
50. 10.7
75. 13.3
155
256
218
112
47
34
11
13000
814
TOTAL KNOwN
NIA 6
91.6
76
L__u
a_5. 8
4.7
t
A10
4
293
i-A
101A1 An044
N15
261
1150
1299
895
748
339
68
147
4775
s4
1.
.4
5.5
24.1
27.2
15.7
15.7
7.1
1.4
100.1
ts
H9
".75
13.4
59..16.2
75. 19,9
CO
Um-CS-
C:04:001 --h0 -0H0
01MENSIO4 -002
kW' SATC: TOTAL ALL PA4EL CACUPS
.A106
014ANSILIN-001E8A.551. FASE. GOVERhAE.51 - ALCSITAL ETC.
t1t1)E11 d
. OG
G__
h29
,H
100.0
100.0
100.0
30.7
.3
H P
25.
2.0
50.
4.0
75.
6.0
6510.900._._______h_____
H977.1
1.1
1.1
1-1--q913
76.0
.2
.1
17.3
3.2
HP
25.
8.5
50.
9.5
75. 10.7
,22____456
.6
-
95.4
-"-IX
H8
22.9
88.8
14.7
20.7
HP
25. 11.6
50. 12.4
75. 17.2
15=14.100__
4 HA- --.7'3 -9/'7
10
te,
ei
lqa..
1.
10.3
92.2
13.3
25.5
HP
29.14.6
50. 15.4
75. 15.2
11=11.101_
4_
H!
ati '
,.."
HP
25. 17.5
50. 1:. 4
6.3
93.5
:3
:6
4.0
21.2
75. 19.2
2117241900
_AI H
.k
2.8
7.'1
91`.
87
-ter
Ocl
i--
v.?
1.2
'
6.5
95.2
9.3
17.2
HP
25. z...
50. 22.2
75. 23.6
25=35.100_ ____21 4
.I
f'
.1
Z1.1
2ii!!
1.13 lei!!
HO
20e 26.7
50.29.5
75. 32.2
114.0013.
---1
--30A
80.S
---1 -100.g
.6 100.0
1.3
.1
HO
25. 30 0
50. 35 0
75. 67.5
210_RESEQ454
ft
222.
i -25
!225
.3.1
-1.
27S
.t24
114 '
25' '3" 96".512.2 .8275-41;-2
374
169
75
2324
TOTAL 19049
_If
___.
.3-.
1_22
.2-2
9.3
zLo_
...,_
__La
.-9
9.9-
he
[5
4.2
56 Lt./
.5. ....
. 112 SALA1, 5v 10141 INCOPE Pi E.PLCTEA.P.ALCTFENT SPACIAL17,0EG8EE
OlmENSIOT.-001
h0 PHO
CIW5St0n-202
Cm.. sPAct ictAL ALL PA4E1 CACUPS
GleTNS1Ch-001
Eh?
541 45E: 7815811 15005145
SALAA
111 Thc'S A8,051
1-NCOMP---
--
--
0:!09 418:9 111.77 1141.1i
111'1; 23;0.; Ie.; 35.04 .0157. R21- -
U-Xttt 0.030
I.
13e
14
11
051
-25.-9 35:1
5-10.901
HP
25.
1.3
50.
4.1
75.
7.0
42
191
4
MP
25.
8.7
50.
9.5
75. 10.3
11.6 "i:i
17
691
Y-
II.?
:I1/
2:7
11-17.900
h4
t5:
161
990
i23::
12:I
:1
:1
18 1057
-I2.2 43:1
HP25.11.6
50. 12.4
75. 11.2
14-16,900
52
5144
1079
I2
31
1213
II
- 11:i
1:: IN :I.?
.1
.I
HP
25. 14.4
50. 15.3
75. 16.2
-71:1 Ti.1
17-19,900
ht
10
931
q_
9187
73f
:4
11 12.!
707.Z
.1
20-24.900
HP
25. 17.1
150. 18.1
75. 19.1
222
I47
612
.12.2-1!!
14
505
------ -------------
h
-----5:11-- :1---:$ - i:i - i'Ls
174:i -
:I
9.5 - 16.9
HP
25. 20.2
50. 21.8
75. 23.4
25-14,900
al
15
11
109
294
4422
ti----
1i
1:i
?;
IN .12:4-
o.1 LIM
HP
25. 24.0
50. 27.5
75. 31.4
35,000.
ht
344
65
'X RESPOSSE
PiP
25. 30.7
50. 44.5
.175. 72 2
.4- 13.0 lo0.7---14
7.4
44
24
74
04
62-
32
19
Ag
2
100:1:.
Z.6
17.9
58.6
PO.---25.111.0 1.95050..823.57SC a.110.5_6.2
A116
105
A10
5
112 SALAvlr Bv TPTAL INCOME BV EPPLOVER.E0PLCVMENT SPECTALlv.OECOEE
OW1745104-001
NO PHO
OIMEOSIC'-002
EPP SPEC: TOTAL ALL pAhEL CROUPS
.
01.ENS104-003
EMP
SAL BASE: 8E014601 CENTER
SALRA v
115 TOLS :NOS,
N'O
.d 0,
11 0- 140.-
7C.C-
LS.9
16.9
1179.4
2 4.9
34.4 15cw AEU,.
KA
cha.
09028 5.000
11
415
ft _100.0_
11111.1
HP
2Vi:62.0
50.
4.0
75.
6.0
11.1
-.6
8-10.900
h19
740
--1
--1(1 --- ---
1-
HP
25.
6.8
50.
9.5
75. 10.3
11-13,900
N7
154
--- ---------1).--------1::i-13:I-
1161
14-16,900
le
25. 11.6
150. 14.4 1.975. 13.2
12
179
2:6
i!..1
?A::
-ra
-130:1
HP
25. 14.6
50. 15.4
75. 16.2
17-19.900
N12
176
2 __148
1VI
.
I:I
It:2
1.1 150:1
HP
25. 17.6
50 18.4
75.
L92
20-24,900
N1
41
114
4126
V--
;2
3.9
2:% r.'
NP
25. 20.9
50. 22.2
75.
25-34.900
73 6
3.4
NS
41
3SO
2;9 -it:1 III-
2.6 "9:8
35,000.
NHP
25. 25.9
50. 28.9
75. 32.0
Tr
52:I 48:8 ---1Q-gli
NO RESPONSE
161P
25. 30.0
50. 35.0
75. 67.5
1-+
.4
-16----/57-T2
A3.5
30.4
11.4
07
428
23
.
%JD
m.6
6.6
23.0
26.1
20.2
17.1
6.0
.i-
114
C91-illi-
n. 13.9
25. 16.5-
P .
TOTAL KNONN
N4
47
164
106
144
122
43
innuf0:061_Loo pj__ZIT_13.350±:lo.3
..25_.__11.4
(16E65109-002
EPP SPECS TOTAL ALL PANEL LRCM'S '
0_64
____M
OlmrhS1E4-003
ErP
SAL 8457, OTHER 80069
1,DES
11412__
A:1
ri)
:1
31.1 .13:3
H161_,Att
,=,...0__________T
25.
2.0
50.
4.1
75.
6.1
&a 8V1-
A.1-
-11-
A.1
.900
N
-11-117.9 Si!?
22.9
72.6
.2
aHP
25=
11.4
AO.
9.2
75. 10.1
H1!3
ifa--21!1
.1
" logi
14-16 900
I-1
.! lN--5!?:
HP
25. 10.7
50. 11.9
75. 13.0
2.0
23.3
71.4
10.0
13.1
27.4
32 lUil2
.4
3.0
24.3
70.7
9.7
18:1
12.2.11.500
m1025. 12.5
50. 1,4.4
75. 15.7
1.1
9.6
411?,--/dri
49523
.3
2.4
23.1
63.1
1.8
6.9
2o-24.900
HP
25. 14.9
50. 16.4
75. 18.1
.4 N
.11
.1
7.1--14--11!;--AlW
9 10la
gP
25. 19.0
"50.10.4 "7521/3.125.°
-2.7
4.3
23=34900
It H
4.i
8.1-
11±
. 131
.240
f.8
15.000*
V HP
25. 20.1
50. 23.6
75. 28.8
.2
1.0
4.0
22.2
78.3
2.7
1.6
9 loon
As.A
s-.S
Rd-
-1C
IA -
ZS
3ZO
.1
.1
.5
2.8
d1.1
90:i
.9 21712:9
HP
25* 22.5
50. 33.0
78! 63.8
NO RfLPONLE
N N264.1
26!1
-2S
4.1i
ri.i2
s.3- 1.4
1.1
211 lot!?
Al.C
7
HP
28!
7 7
50. 10 7
-1129-...A.E.12111(212-11.365
!/31
!CI
329 Ian_
TOTAL 10106N
295
I-.
.4.1
HP
25.
6.0
50. 15.5
75. 21.3
C141245101-001
NO PNO
U.
L156451d!..202_.221P SPLEL.TCTAL ALL PANEL 08E5075
L-NP
SAL pASE: TOIAL KhEwN
h97.3
7.2
.5
3280
593
100.0
577
17
14-3154 4.020
h3
75.5
.7
.1
177,04---5.44---
HP
25.
2.1
50.
4.1
75.
6.2
8-10.900
N178
1441
83
1171
1631
H10.9
88.4
.5
.2
.1
100.1
11-13000
HP
25.
8.5
se.
9.3
75. 10.2-
h12
469
2456
a1
..
.4
11
1.2_
2.2 230
::::
1105
2944
V23 0
72 2
.3
. .1
_al
'friP--.
2-57.11T.3".55020sii.2228.4175. Oa"
93
2855
14-26000
N5
60
1i
17-19.560
h6
94" 375
1430
21
1.41_123.2_
22.1
17.5
8C.1
.1
125-4 it-2-1"15bP13-- 1'2'970. 16
r--I
.3
/67
20.1
7'
2.1
.
el
32
1865
40- -25.-1-7J--'3504/178.113.675. g.o--
-'
II
20.24.500
N2
420
73
247
1187
138
1529
Ha1
.3
1.3
4.8
15.8
77.6
.1
Y3
___...2
.0_ _2.6
14,3
07.4
.2
__I...0_12:A
HP
25. 20.2
50Z-21.6
75. 23.4
25-34.900
h1
311
23
160
530
18
128
H1
V0
.4
1.5
3.2
22.0
12.8
11M
hIS. 74:3--.
.1_
44
2.4
11.8--547.3
gAl 1.3
2.7
4.0
36.9
54.4
6ss
81
20
1654
354000.
24
11,
zs.s _.150. ad .115, 15.1_04_
9.5_1841____6221:1_
40 RESPONSE
'4
60
124
175
156
106
51
27
7934
706
h8.5
17.6
24.6
22.1
15.0
7.2
3.8
1.0
lb/II-TROCR
J4E---25'12.1310055C;a1.°2750751p11.41350---507----02--3745-12204
100.0
h6.1
16.2
24.8
22.4
13.0
11.0
4.8
.7
500.2
HP
259 11.3
50. 14.4
75. 16.2
hp
254
8.7
50. 11.0
754 I..,
772
-tL-'Y
T10141. 15C00E 77 14PLOYF8.IPPLETPih1 5P3rIALTY.EE08EE
EINE57(5-CU1
PHO
el.1,.sic%-eo2
4PP ;PTO: TOAL ALL RAH L
0000
PS
OlPthSION-C(
EPP
SAL PAST: hC pS:ENSE
sALAa
115 fpA'S msE51
u5CcR 4.0-
17.0- 14.v- I7.C- 2C.O-
50
TOTAL
INURE
6.6
10.9
12.9
16.3
11.4
24.9
'4.9 15-0.
RE7S01:NiTi:Ni
293
6.0CJ
5. o10, -
Hp
25.
2.0
50.
4.0
71.
6.0
8-10.4CC.
29
Til
11-17.7PC
i.-160J0e
N1
21;
I
V hI00.0
ICC.0
100.0
.P
25. 14.0
5C. 15.5
75. 16.3
6.4
311
17-19.930
h h10
2.6
100.A
20-21.100
6
1.:-ISSA
.25m15.1C0
N100.0
1HP
25. 21.3
50. 22.5
75.
hA
35.000
N 14
_11.1211-3t0',N-
11
95.4
NO RESPONSE
.N
1634
33.i
33.1
13.!
All0
17) cf7i,,..221P 140
Ctu
mrx
. l#
1.14 B1 A.
,iAfter.1.11 52IC0111.1f(A11
1I1(
6510
9-00
101
oixr
AS
IC1-
0.72
722 SPIC$ PAUL
C67
7.3,
7- 4 . 4
(4)".
cot '
It*C
htif
ghrm
,.4
0/7
7,1
iou.
:..7
114.8.
,C.-
(1112 U.S.
42 .- WIT
E.%
I(15
V 5112 1A551.
_U-k
V 5552 (Salt
UnN
r0
:4-20
3;a
66. r
10- 14
366
461.0
12- 19
415
462.1
44-44
22
17.7
13
46.1
50-74
86
58-11
4S
60-68
91
450.0
65-69
II
IQ
0701
14161 00001
9126
99_0
43 4E0POISt
NI
7. 50.
/C1
Q...
8)41.
911
P.V4121,
,,,,,
611
5.0.
fl.
*11
7.5-
al [{514
/It ..4A.
(1314
S.," IL,
I
2.1
7
/6. r
3
2.1
29
69.0
1.
2
21.9
LI54
61.0
r
16.1
1
2.9
47
Z14
64
16
TO
14
II2.8
18.0
41.2MO
61.1
16.2
4I.
135
II
3.2
1.
.4
1.1
24.0
5.4
1/.5
12.1
5.4
15.0
25.3
41
22?
lu
225
11.8
11.1
5.9
6..1
29.7
5.9
.62.5
1 r.:
11
.1
III5
8.1
00.1
04-1
51.1
22
41
711
16.2
16.2
9.;
7,5
16.4
9.1
81.5
19.1
11
'I
24
17
14.5
14.3
71 8
26.6
65.2
14.0
11
72
50.0
50-0
50.0
190.6
48
100.11
100.0
100.3
112
45
9129
6 r
910.
95
Se55
.4
6.6
17.6
3.5
70.2
26.3
3.5
62.0
12.6
.4
1I
11
42
'2'0
51.0
50.0
.0.0
- 21.0
42.0
35.0
3/.0
33..
46.6
37.0
34.6
35.0MO
34.6
42 V
i
4711 (171/o430I9 00(
340c0SiCN-001
albrksirs-ol:
Pno
(004103 Cf
81010 SI 0C4.1.4100810007[C(4416.01061t
_ -
r;41.4.1ov-oos
197SPOCI
1!,..":!'
11X. 2 -
:D:u1
11161.,----- 4.6.- 1ATm
-41L
411
ALL
AIX
414. -
U.S.
40%- CM/
U.S.
00,.-
CI111 U.1.
C111/
U.S.
30405
4.0.
U.S.
40301 uns.
(14471
WIZ
CIII1
uot[Mt[Mt
le.4 [Mt C1112
u04
31670 .....
6141m
CIT12
C1711 C1122 00141
41,709 70
23-24
01
II
11
12
451.3
50.7
37.7
30.0
30.*
50.0
25-26
9173
220
72
ILI
11
V137
ZO
Ztie
m79.0
1.3
13.0
4.5
1.1
74.4
14.3
5.1
03.7
13.0
1.3
5.7-34
201
2IV
00
Z3
1:85
07
305
40
5170
874.5
.5
5.1
10.7
.5
.8
.3
17.0
77.9
2.1
87.4
19.2
1.4
15-19
3123
172
15
01
124
51
7151
36
119*
1-,
g45.4
.5
11.7
10.0
5.2
.4
44.3
50.5
5.7
110.5
14.1
.5
..41
(Jn
40-44
ft
Ill
214
14
3II)
30
3112
14
1141
4.5
77.7
20.3
2.0
80.2
0.4
-
45-46
470
129
11
_1.0
71
40
3102
I/
1Its
001.4
.9
254
1.e
3.0
43.3
J4.1
Z.
49.5
41..
.4
998
5,54
M M40
11.4
1
1.0
916.1
7.1
11
1.6
1.8
114
13.2
25.0
11.6
°A
04.1
3SG
7.1
5.4
5,-49
014
11
I17
V1
26
I64.0
4.0
26.0
4.0
66.0
26.0
4.0
04.0
69-44
20
31
23
0af
275
m80.0
17.0
8.0
00.0
70.0
91.2
8.0
05-09
3II
515
14
M76.6
21.4
78.6
21.4
140.0
70
0019
51
a45.1
16.7
03.1
16.7
100.0
03141 6.10,04
0.
005
0111
317
A74
15
115
231
24
340
141
14
SIC/
13.1
.1
24
.1
.5
71.11 234
2.5
64.7
13.4.
1.1_
64 AU/MASI
VP 504
34.4
,.42.0
43.0
31.0
53.5
44.2- 37.0
21.3
54.3
16.8
35.2
45.6
-33.1
14.5-31.2-
113 1121/24S4IP 440 70414147.07.111111.
01004S109-001
01
0I0I3SIC.-002
POO
01.143104-013
IPP 1.7.02_104E1. CROUP
84.427.1.040040.1 SPEC1647,010421
3.- 3 p
U.S.
91404. -- %ONUS
4.4.
41214
41.4
all
PLL
414
1.1.
404
8.,.
nON-
CIII1 1.4
40.-
Cittl U.S.
%C.-
CIII1 U.S.
42461
4.0.
U.S.
*MS 6.1.
148.:
11711 11111
0..
01111 lITI1
2144. (171/.11711
uNit
2116104141.
6141. CI112 1111201712
12481
U%0111 20
4
20-24
20-29
196
219
0,
1444
56
8219
01
270.2
.8
5.7
16.1
3.0
75.2
22.0
3.0
81.0
16.3
.8
30-34
h143
131
103
38
3.8
116
8316
120
*.18
.70.0
.6
6.3
26.0
.6
1.6
77.0
27.5
1.6
78.4
20.4
1.2
3S-39
2.1
24
68
47
201
16
3210
II
4002
67.2
7.9
22.0
1.3
1.0
67.2
31.8
1.0
76.2
22.0
1.1
46-04
%100
i28
05
1110
74
1.1
.1
1124
41.4
1.1
10.4
23.4
.5
2.1
54.5
10.4
2.1
70.5
71.4
1.6
US
US
45-49
hTO
64
"2
270
35
216
92
150
m-
60.0
22.4
8.4
1.1
1.0
a..
37.7
1.0
89.7
8.4
1.1
50-34
21
74
20
77e
44
471.1
18.4
10.3
71.1
14.4
00.5
101.0
55-39
4II
82
17
220
ZS
.61.0
24.0
1.0
60.0
20.0
8.0
107.2
60-64
N1
8$
11
11
472.7
72.7
27.0
100.0
es-el
71
22
12
51.3
33.3
8.1
18.3
11.3
8.3
101.2
70
00E4
3
13022
101.;
100.0
TOTAL 44044
4114
7142
263
10
32
991
Ott
12
1151
289
17
19-20
061.0
_.5
9.9
18.4
.7
_2.2
61.8MO
2.2
SO..Me
1.2
NO 201204S1
tI
1i
2'
4S0.0
50.0
40.0
40.0
151.1
vP
504
33.4
32.0
34.7
30.0
37.0 30.5--
31.6
35.4
30.5
30.2
38.0
35.1
30.2
3
41I4 C1712,47.16 6.3 3Ou4047 27
Ct./51,144-001
01
01.15:114-242
772
6141.
6, ult.11.7q.0 .....
sculi6(77.62c4t6
41.745103-001
190 771c4
76%44
:43,7
4.5.
0I.1u
47,G4 t1..
4.4.!Wm
6111
613.
641
611
111.
P11
U.-.
:1112
SO.-
:1712
CITI:
141
J.S.
C1111Wit
347
u.S.
(1111
504-
C1112
(III!
6.0
u.S.
15107.
.C.uS
slat.
4167.
u.S.
f. au,
clra (11:2
£6471
73166.
46.31) 20
20-24
I. 0
24-21
.111
22
26
12
I.3
21
22201
20
53211
.34.7
..
3.1
4.0
.4
.9
16.1
12.1
.9
S1.1
9.0
1.3
34-34
4131
1.4
74
61
146
106
10
006
Si
.472
.T4.1
.6
5.1
16.7
.6
1.1
.2
74.4
22.3
2.1
11.6
16.9
1.1
35-3e
.231
I26
6,
12
I212
42
17
271
t6
3331
.64.5
4.3
II./
.4
3.6
.11
66.1
27.0
3.1
1.6
19.0
.6
42-44
ft
233
274
WS
217
31
Elf
44
Z374
32.5
,
17.5
II.)
2.4
71.1
24.4
2.:
St.1
If.*
.16
44-41
144
7.2
II
1147
46
1221
IZ
7:.a
.MI
1.7
I3.3
4.6
I.:
1.1
.6
16.4
11.2
2.1
12.1
S.:
2.9
43.54
I.
I/
21
4.2
26
4I
113
4./..1
17.1
4.1
6.:
74.)
21.1
4.1
SI!:
6.:
Ss-SI
mII
III
I41
11
I41
II
SI
(10
60-64
4
11.6 21
1.9
M S
1.4
71
1.:
14.S
23
ZZ.6 6
1.9
1176.2
.13
1.9
1.9
I31
_.
74.2
22.6
3.2
14.2
21.11
_16.4
3.2
64-61
4-S
1IS
h70.0
33.4
6.:
6C.1
31.3
6.1
3:13.5
72
arat
...
3II
30
.021
42..0
10.3
SC.G
1.2.1
11141. 441.1
41361
II
l72
225
442
11176
404
64
1174
220
ZI
1426
074.6
4.4
11.3
.6
2.3
.2
74.7
22.2
2.4
46.1
12,..)
1.2
43 4E7.71 E
4 4
40 SC
37.4
62.6
43.S
36.1
36.4
36.1MO
37.4
11.1
00.5
30.2
11.6 18.1
47.0
rt)
C11
17IN
SN
IF A
m0
0001
4114
4 O
F 4
1410
0I5E
4St3
m-0
0101
019E
4414
4-00
2P
,913
0141
1411
02-0
03/P
P 0
740_
784a
CIC
iP
Or
4r.1
.1.0
4.12
191.
1 $9
,C14
119.
1310
10_1
___
20 -
A11
5.
1,5.
P1,
11,
V.:.
40-
PIP
IN6.
440
m-
C11
11 U
.S.
8147
111.
04-
ALL
ALL
ALL
C11
11 4
.1.
4044
1 6.
4.LL
ALL
ALL
U.S
.40
40$
640.
0440
C11
14 C
1111
1.90
4C31
_11.
1.11
1eU
N. S
int
Clii
i01
4121
_114
19 8
1811
1C
111/
C11
1/ C
111/
701
04._
890(
1 70
_845
20-2
4
21-2
94
622
61
144
62
4)6
312
910
.474
1__.
11,5
All
1.4
114.
4Ito
)05.
?7._
Ho
._).
11_,
____
____
____
30-1
44.
112
013
/41
1I
111
007
126
24I
ISI
.7 5
167
.7.7
.772
.9 2
4.14
.1, j2
..4 J
5.1
_2.9
12-3
114
74I
t.z)
2T
SIT
290
231
114
--__
_...-
..-,.,
...79
-.--
02!P
-20
.2A
F__
__02
.5I.S
_M
g
I... 4
40-4
4...
..._1
4'__
____
_676
.'4..
____
__19
1.:_
_101
.:___
___
3,.
676.
24 _
3,02
.;t.,
i19
5.21
10 1"/ -
-.--
I/
UI
Ul
45.4
99 4
$a70
.01
172
.1.3
21.)
9.0
2.5
5721
271
.)26
.12.
3IS
1
92.5
5.0
1.3
SO
40-1
4.
4112
171
2-
36.2
6.4
6.3
2520
244
I41
i.5
.:53
.762
.64.
393
.66.
4
1013
-09
g9
910
1919
67.4
52.6
100.
0
60.0
44
45
43.6
544
.415
.69
(4-6
9
9 Ii
44.4 6
77
16
t10
0.0
70t9
006
7.1
1I
J00.
0I
1014
1 14
069
N
61.7
342
03.3
5ga
744
110
66.2
33.3
249
716
717
498
TO
a57
616
.7 .1
2.2_
.2 _
1.7.
_.3
,65.
929
.02.
156
.512
.2_1
.4
m.)
RE
4P09
$tN
e1
'1
1.
21
.--
---
V; t
o-.
6167
:11
.- -
--3
2.0
:45.
413
3.: .
32.4
42.0
--7
3).3
-29.
3 r7
.139
.9-1
9.3
66.7
03.3
35.9
-35
.6 -
01.2
' I0.
1 --
----
7-
301
4111 CIFIFIN1H1p Ah0 /0UN5RI OF
011,411111-001
CI
01/IS11.14)02
100
1111(4111-001 FP SI.F2
4411.
41450
GROW,
41 422111.0101021T
11 -
SPC214211.112006(
U.S.
1111.1
',ONUS
014IN
N.R.
41814
ALL
ALL
ALL
ILL
ALL
ALL
U.S.
404-
CITII
U.S.
606-
C1111 U.S.
104-
[ITU U.S.
90465 4.4.
U.S.
MOWS 094.
04410
(1112
21111
1114EMI
21111
U44 EMI
CIIII
Us'
61414 VIAIN OIRTH EMI21I12 21111
Mu.
um314
/0-74
--
100.0
100.0
100.0
29-2I
9$4
26
2I
74
83
SO
4I
63
83.1
3.1
1.2
1.1
1.1
03.1
12.3
4.4 650
9.2
10
30-39
h126
17
70
1A
127
34
3536
26
2166
N14.9
.6
4.0
16.9
.6
la
76.9
71.7
1.0
41.9
14.9
1.2
35..39
I01
113
26
384
.3
14
28
1126
H04.9
.0
10.2
21.9
2.3
67.6
32.
2.3
27.1
21.9
.4_
41-41
916
11
95
9750
t40
10
44
S-4
...1
H17.1
1.1
11.6
1.2
1.0
38.2
40.8
1.0_19.4
10.2
LACS
41-46
.4
11
10
s3
31
14
114
440
066.6
20.0
1.3
4.3
64.6
21.2
6.3
91.2
6.4
52-54
913
IIf
4I
16
"m
77.2
22.2
5.6
50-09
44 9
770.1
2I
72
110
70.0
20.0
10.0 100.0
10
60-64
i20
.010.0
30
243-19
80.0
20.1
40.0
20.0
100.0
2500.:
100.fl
70 I 0224
9
TOTAL 114001
U374
I4
7777
114
1311
550
511
460
76
4042
889
.01)
.314
.22.
8.2
49.6 270
2.6
44.9
14.1
82
hJ RESPONSE
VP
SO.
34.9
C2.0
34.3
41.6
34.9
31.0
37.4-
!Lit
54.$
1s.o
17.6
-76.
1)5
.0 -
12.0
A11
6
111
C17
1/46
1910
£00
100
0007
02
0151
9 11
7 00
5.19
P10
941.
11 5
P17
.141
.t9,0
1051
13.
7LI
Nfo
stcl
-not
0161
6010
4-00
2P
OD
-U.S
. SM
.10
060
la--
--A
LLA
ll11
1.61
.1.
All
U.S
.N
O,-
CI f
it u.
S.
400-
WIZ
U.S
.H
O..
0171
2 U
.S.
0139
uS 9
.5.
U.S
.90
031
040.
GA
o0ao
t01
711
0111
0U
oK01
010
0111
2T
.6__
_0_1
112_
C12
12__
!!46_
109
19_6
7101
. 039
78 0
1111
_017
12.E
1111
3011
1___
___
1110
10 2
3
20-2
44
i:
.2
-V
000.
000
0.0
100.
0
25-2
94
662
212
31
9614
510
112
a10
7N
92.1
1.7
1.1
10.3
2.6
1.02
_._0
1.0
140_
40_6
6.1_
10.3
3.4_
30-3
49
236
220
522
41
240
740
242
525
319
1174
.6.6
6.3
16.3
.61.
3.3
75.2
23.2
1.6
11.1
16.3
1.6
F. 1
15-1
94
157
227
51S
Us
sss
169
ita
292
ii___
__ s
A.s
.611
.221
.12.
195
032
.22.
175
.121
.14.
.._.
.
...4
40-4
46
111
149
193
110
691
170
2019
002
.1.5
25.6
00.0
1.1
62.6
15.6
1.6
69.5
10.5
45-9
99
671
1711
5
01,0
RI
155
119
61
129
__A
l., 2
7.3
3.9
43.0
6.3
51-5
4It
36it
315
243
6:3
45N
56.5
32.3
4.6
4.6
55.5
36.1
4.6
95.4
4,6
____
__55
-59
016
12!
1612
129
29w
13.2
3.41
.455
.241
.43.
4 00
0.0
---
00-6
46
I6
66
1414
N57
.162
.907
.142
.010
0.0
65-4
9I.
39
10 9
0910
.9
aI
21
33
M66.7
33.3
66.7
33.1
100.
0--
_12
1111
001
0614
"6
760
I7
160
147
204
377
430
727
',.9
5014
112
1116
H66
.5 _
___,
A74
_15.
0_11
4_ *
a2.1
00 R
ES
PO
NS
E:
...;
31.1
66.1
33.1
66.1
33.1
3-
----
----
0P 5
0o36
.1-0
-.0-
-33.
3-13
.1-3
5.2-
-32.
11--
39;1
20:3
--31
.0--
311.
9-I
I.0-
37.6
-35.
3-31
1 -
17.0
- -
303
6111 cm:141614 AmO C0124/41. OA
81418 82, ACI.IPPL070E41
SPACtiLT,.0101 01
21..1.8
01214010s-00k
47
0161611414-0c;-
P.:-
.________
VINENS100:,,!-
'..4%
SpICI
PANEL
C0042P 6 - C
4
U.S.
0111M
004421
51016
4.5.
41411m
Ali
ALL
Ali-ALL- 41.1
'
ALL
U.S.
404-
C1112
U.S.
404.
C1111
0.0.
40)-
C1111
U.S.
60908
M.0.
U.S.
404u: WA.
CA240
ACE
C1112
C1112
WA
ClItt
CI112
u4A
PIM C1110
842
01419
51319
1114124C1T11 EIT1/ C111/
1CIAL.,__
14001 ,,..0
8 H
20-24
100,13
100.0
100.0
20-71
416
10
14
65
14
1426
81
7416
45
17
516
_-
.H
60.6
1.9
2.7
13.2
.2
.1.2
.2
52.6
14.1
1.4
84.5
13.0
2.3
10-14
m447
11
63
206
.24
i2
461
273
24
1014
205
20
1262
4 0
75.0
642
I
1.1 5
5.0
PI
16.1
111
.) 6
1.9
.2
.2
29
I1
70.1.
648
21.6
246
2.2
21
41.9
16.5
..1.6
702
161
12
025
11-11
M89.9
-.1
-41
0.8
12.:
.6
2.1
.1
.1
70.1
20.6
3.4
01.3
11.1
1.1
40-44
/4
462
107
80
1)
412
195
14
08?
89
671
UI
68.9
.10
.910
,11.9
.063.9
21.1
...2.1
16.7
1).3
4-- V
4541
N317
371
29
112
340
107
12
424
29
6106
ln
N73.4
.1
16.1
6.3
.1
2.4
74.1
21.1
2.6
42.4
4.3
1.3
00-34
CO
131
21
71.
8131
33
I166
71
11,
70.2
73
3
IS.)
23
1.0 4
.6
4.6 5
4.6
71.1 76
20.1 27
4.6 5
41.4
4.0
.6
101
43
108
51.51
m M ft
67.6 17
2.0
21.3
27
3.7 1
70.4
17
MO 28
4.6 1
93.5
3.1
2.0
60
166
40 44
I1.5
M N
26.1 pl
40.9
17
1.1 1
16.1
23
42.4 15
1.1 2
MS
1.1
47
1
_
43
65-09
24
13.5
39.0.
2.3
4.7
11.5
41.9
4.7
07.7
2.3
79
UmEA
46
1
10.0
63
110
10
N 6
60.0
3014
133
30.0.
417
544
15
1016
1004
3412
561
14
4211
1006L 124048
101
44
3110
m11.6
.6
10.1
1).)
.4
2.9
.1
.1
73.4
21.0
2.6
81.1
11.4
1.3
MO RESPONSL
4I
12
I2
2I
4I
9129
50.
20.0
33.4
34.41)
23.0
32.2
40.0
47.1
3.7
14.4
20.0
40.0
7e.0
-14
.s-3
1:0-
1.5.
11-40.0
11.6
20.0
37.0
80.3
20.0
34.7-31.7 -33.4"36.3 - -
304
111 0111/tSSAIF 440 0004149 OF
L10045104-001
01
0W45101-002
FAO
V.:.
MIL
61410
80
(1112
01111
8, 407,44P1.0114807
40403 4141A-
U.S.
4017.-
Uh6
(1112 C111/
10ECIALT0,0100ff
0.9.
51316
C1112 U.S.
404-
Use
C1111 LIM
ALL
CITIt U.S.
use
6116
ALL
ALL
ALL
NOSUS N.A.
U.S.
41110 61010 0111i
ALL
ALL
MONUS 040.
GAAAC
01111 Cltli /OTAL
04..SER
20
___..
20-24
25-29
Aet
5:
774
43
74
75
56
A80.2
5.6
2.3
8.1
_3.5
96.0
10.5
3.5. 16.0
6.1
5.0
30-14
A142
28
29
13
154
38
3161
29
I191
A12.9
1.0
4.1
14.9
.5
1.4
74.0
19.5
1.5
03.4
14.9
1.5
35-14
N102
I10
20
110)
31
112
20
2114
A74.1
81.4
14.9
1.0
40-44
M64
218
71
6at
ti
0179
I119
m20.6
. :
1.1
15.1
5.9
.6
_5.0
71.1
21.6
.5.0
90.4
6.7
2. ;
45-49
444
I2
/1
II
20
71
82
&I
A71.4
1.0
2.4
16.0
4.:
75.1
24.7
02.1
9.9
2.5
50-14
442
72
142
91
72
256
_13.0
3.7
5.417.0
14.7
5.6
Ie.)
3.7
55-19
A26
626
634
34
A82.4
_17.4
60.4
17.4
100.0
60-64
M9
2.
62
10
10
60.0
20.0._
100.0.
61.41
'
hS
2S
27
A71.4
28.6
71.4
26,6
.100.:
10
U914
M1
3I
_.....__
425.:
74.0
24.0
75.0
25.:
TuIAL
430u4
N441
212
46
71
15
563
144
IS
414
75
IS
724
74.1
..
.3_
I.7
5.1
.10-1
19.4
2.1
12.4
I7.4
.2.1
41 RESP041i
VP 50*
37.2
44.1
32.0
43.4
34.6
37.0
40.6
31.1
38.5
40.6
36.1
34.1
35.7-
37.5
305
.71) (IIILINSUIP
rcumay OF
N664SIO0-121
01
013145106,092 NO
JImINS104-0113_ ESP 5F1G1 PANEL
U.S.
.U.S.
(III/
SIAM 11,1
AC1,108,1015E61
GOOUP I - 1110
61419
%ONUS 610111 -
90s-
CIVIL U.S.
424-
LIM U00
CITI2 G1112
SP(CIA00.02WF
-
[1112 U.S.
NON-
UNA
CIIII CITIi
C1112
UNA
-ALL
U.S.
SIATH
ALL
N0060
61618
£1.
9.6.
6ImTm
III -
U.S.
CITIi
ALL
- ALL
NONUS UNA.
C1112 C1112
. GRANO
TOIAL
04024 20
VI
20.24
N 8
2,-29
912
14
32
735
419
_-
800.1
7.7
10.3
62.1
17.9
69.7
10.3
30-14
N57
2'4
157
11
160
969
_21
82.6
2.9
13.0
1.4
02.6
15.9
1.4
67.0
13.0
11.36
N4111
34
1ce
71
52
56
5.4
7.1
1.6
65.7
12.5
1.1
92.9
7.1
42-44
V.
47
17
11
7le
._.
m60.7
14.1
25.0
60.7
18.1
75!11
25.0
F-.
41-41
927
4e
I:9
73)
12
36
44
979.0
5.6
16.7
2.0
60.6
18.4
91.7
2.8
5..
CIN
C)
50-54
P.
16
62
IS
81
25
227
_22.2
7.4
1.1
66.1
29.6
5,1
55-59
P.
6I
10
III
H 7.
54.5
16.:
9.1
44.: 6
16.4
9.1
90.9 6
9.1
660-64
H100.:
100.0
100.0
63-69
N1
11
2
---
150.11
50.
00. 0
100.0
70
MR
.0
12
23
331.1
66.7
100.0
,
TOTAL 4401.4
N21)
231
211
1215
58
4247
27
0277
1.1
,4
77.6
20.9
1.4
59.2
9.7
1.1
40 0(111049E
--14
50-,- 34.)
00.0
47.4
35.1
--37.0-
-67.0
31.4
41;5
'64.5
'
3 ()
-3
A12
0.
..
111 [1411401.1, At& 10001R1 OF 81418 84 4CF.F.P1.044(61
010[61109-061
01
014143109-002
PHD
pi!tsslek-073
1.P 5PECt p4514 GROUP 9 -_OPT1CS
5.4(.14,1,,00CR1L
-
U.S.
IIRTh
604,05
NA-.
615Th
-ill
ALL
--41.4
All
-ALL
All
V.I.
604-
[1112
U.S.
N04-
CIII1 U.S.
NON- MU U.S.
NOkUS 0.0.
U.S.
NONUS
ONT.
GRAND
11114 11112
CII12 ChM_ 0%4
11112 C1711
646
61A15
01810
01873SIM
CIII4
SITIO 10101
u4074 /0
-
20-20
25-29
949
10
21
69
14
376
10
284
78.0
4.5
11.4
2.6
3.4
78.4
18.2
3.4
84.0
11.4
2.3
30-34
11:1
_2.;
_2:!:
1,!:
2.1_
"7_
ch
11-39
Nlks
25
30
27
-
155
59
7184
12
2221
h-,
n.70.1
11.3
14,s
.4
s.?
70,1
26.7
34
84.1
14.5
.9
40-44
nIIS
3Id
17
1118
15
7139
17
160
H71.9
1.9
11.3
10.6
3.11
.4
73.8
21.9
4.0
80.9
10.6
2.1
45-09
-
%109
Al
72
108
34
2117
7144
79.0
19.5
4.9
1.4
10-50
Pt
.0
13
16.0
6.2
..;54
71.6
II
22.2
5
4.2
76
93.8
56.2
81
'5-59
N70.6
113
1
61_12 .0
1,1
45
14
57
11
0,2
60-64
h N II
__Jo.) 31
65 .9
23.7
11
24.4
3
6.7
46.6
43
95.6
.1
7 1
1,7 1
2.?
45
JO
66.7
1
2.2
10
t
22.2 _2.2
4 .;
65-69
015
11
317
63
22
,2.1 1
124
82,5
2502
124
91.7
0.2
4.2,
70
OVER
54
I1
5-5
110
111
9.1
45.5
05.5
9.1
90.9
9.1
70TAL 490.0
h .-
6!)
9121
111
676
2432
200
34
982
111
14
1110
..14.1 1
_..811119.17 _O3.?_:213.0
,1
0.6
1,4.05.5_10.0_1.5_
11
90 AESPONSE
N m VP 504
700.0
36.5
00.3
(05.0
37.0
38.3
39.9
40.9
100.0
19.)--36.4--75,8-
-35:11
06.3
36.0
30.5
01.2
307
A12
1
-------
--
CITI/FAS9111
10101741, OF 5119999 My 401.1012099l041
UlmE451u4-001
01
71036.0170-022
99412
01+14512;0-003
2mp 5PLE, PA4(1. GBOv, 10 - AC989S71L5
58E018817.M110
0.8.
61A1m
..009
61414
0.99.
61614
ALL
all
ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL
0.5.
60.- LW/ U.S.
h04-
71110
U.S.
404-
LIFIZ 99.5.
404U5
4.4.
U.S.
406115
UhK.
0690
12:4.
C171/ 71110
U44
C1112
LIII/
087
Mit
CITI1
1244
BLOT( 111117m
111619911711[MI
[1112
701AL
11..066 20
4
20-24
9.
IS-21
N25
96.2
IS
I26
211
11
3.11 7
96.2
$6
14
1.8 2
100.0 60
11
12
30-34
SS
1)
16.4
2.4
4.2
15.3
0.5
77.0.
11.4
11.3
If.)
.1
194
15-14
944
35
645
a
_0.8 6
16
119
74.8
1.7
5.1
1.5
10.2
76.3
13.6
10.2
39.8
6,1
1.7
40-44
4'0
61
:34
11
242
741
m64.4
12.2
14.3
4.1
69.4
26.5
4.1
88.7
14.3
1....
45-49
iN
33
7I
33
080
141
44
M63.0
17.1
2.4
80.5
19.5
97.6
2.4
CT
1,.)
.
50.56
Ait
87
it
62
29
29
M77.4
20.7
6.9
70.4
20.7
6.1
200.0
55-39
Nti
Im
90.0
10.0
II
270
00
90.0 _70.0
11
3
104.1 15
15
60-04
417
3
9-
60.0
20.0
100.0
60.49
--97.0_...-
-..30.0
15
"I
I.Ii
91.
:11
6. )
91
6.3
100.0
70
afflt
.1
41
60.4)
20.0
.110
4.1
41
.0
20.
0
100.0
OCTAL 54044
4161
212
24
13
263
56
13
306
24
2330
9.6
7.2
1.9
79.2
16.9
1.1
97.7
7.2.
.6
NO 60570451
M
------4-io.-
40.s
--
40.3 -41.6-
374-
41.2
11.5
14.5
-
3 6
8
A12
2
4111 CITI/EnSHIP 450 C0.4160 CE 51914 00 ALC,E7PLOYMEN1
4104ln-001
01
04000AL4001
POD
014E131:1-001
:PP SptC; PANEL MOS 1I-15 - 6518040.7
SPEC
01(8tE
-
U.S.
61111
4055.54191n
5.4..
elefn---
'
AIL-ACI.---41:4- ---Iii --ell -ACC-- -
u..
40,-
41114
U.S.
50.-
Mil
0.4.
401-
C1112
U.S.
4040
N./.
U.S.
40401
Uhe.
C9140
ALI
Elm
olio
,...,
cut I
I11111
U44
Clill
(Mt
549
0191
961
8.16
6141
4. C
ITIt
(111
1(1
611
1018
1
tAnfe 20
20-24
2,29
49).
21
2I
96
12
1me
12
101
n86.2
1.8
2.1
8.3
.910
.1-_
'111
.0.1
89.9
1.3
1.8
10-14
::
141
11
21.
s164
32
5170
25
120
381.3
.1
3.4
12.1
2.5
111.8
15.8
87.:
12.3
.5
15-19
914
14
15
11
14
30
_2.1 1
91
10
1107
n64.2
13.1
14.0
.9
2.8
69.2
28.0
2.8
65.0
14.0
.9
14-1
0-44
950
10
11
60
21
10
11
81
451
cr,
414.1
12.1
11.6
74.1
25.9
66.4
11.6
5.4
4...4,0
NSI
12
22
21
17
4)
346
964.5
25.0
6.3
4.2
64.6
15.4
29.6
6.)
9.;
50-54
A21
41
121
72
27
170
90.0
10.0
55-99
9 9Is
61.9
713.2
1
4.8
II
61.9
311.!
20
95.2
9.!. -
21
6V-64
4 nId
72.0
5
20.0
Z
11.0
'le
72.0eo
t28.0
__92f_
25
65-69
n4
8.
22
I)
1)
461.5
23.1
15.f._
61.5
23.1
140 000.0
1: . 11E4
M1
11
34
11
4
50.0.
90.g
44.7
.49.7
16,7._._
043644 10044
01467
364
10
413
490
140
11
$64
70
764)
.9
18.3
10.9
_.6
2.0
.26.2
21.8
2.0
86.0
10.4
1.1
00 11040041E
11
11
VP
5 0;
/00.0
14.0
- 'ZOO
44.0
34.8
42.0
1591-- --
-100.0
34.0
28.3
100.0
25.3
14.9
34.8
37.0
34.9
309
4,12
.3
- --
.111 CIII215S01P 480 2004147 PC 6133m elf A66,1686010E41 S6CCIA1.17,03..122
P-1214
C1014111,-001
01
4.9.
4191m
.6141-NSIC4-062
PHD
610E45104-001
11.8 ..P$C8 ram'. 00o? 18 - i$C
U.S.
61.1m
AL1
ILL
ALL
ALL
ALL
ALL
NO4US 6141m
U...
40.-
,1112 U.S.
NON-
C111! U.S.
sn,-
LIIII U.S.
40405 h.R.
U.S.
40465 644.
CA440
Lt..
11112 CIIII
Uslt
C1112 CIII2
UNk
C1112 C1112
Ust
61410 61316 31914 C1TI2 C1112 CIT12 ICIAL
USUL#
20
20-24
3.
142
29
16
11
119
28
i209
IS
4232
84.9
.9
3.4
7.4
41.1
.4
.4
115.1
12.1
2.2
90.1
8.2
1.7
)0-)4
3.
3.11
16
22
6.
16
11
At6
86
26
649
65
724
44.4
.1
.8
2.6
9.1
2.5
.1
.1
85.4
11.9
2.8
89.4
9.4
1.0
15.39
4475
614
64
13
462
98
13
521
64
6591
480.3
1.0
5.7
10.6
2.2
81.2
16.5
2.2
416.2
10.6
1.0
_
1-,
...4
40-44
8421
176
2C2
10
424
95
10
500
20
5529
CM
m79.6
.6
11.6
1.6
1.9
40.2
18.0
1.9
95.1
1.6
.9
F.
45-49
h467
I60
1,l
113
-469
80
II
540
19
3562
N$1.1
.4_ 10.7
1.4
.2
2.1,
81.5
14.2
.2.1
96.1
3.4
.5
42-54
3231,
416
81
9240
45
9281
85
214
.80.)
1.4
Lt.:
2.7
.1
1.1
81.6
II.1
3.1
95.6
2.7
1.7
3155.59
205
34
7204
41
6247
II255
0M
61.6
11
11.)
2.7
2.0
.4
1.6
16.1
2.4
96.1
3.1
60-64
3.
114
29
126
19
917$
)2
144
72.4
'
1.1
19:t
1.4
4.9
71.9
21.2
4.9
97.)
1.6
1.1
45-69
3.
IC/
2/4
IC4
24
9135
137
74.5
1.5
17.5
6.:
75.9
17.5
6.6
41.5
1.5
74
0,4
N91.4
TOUL 040.4
II
34
62
42
42
14.3
127
412
205
591
32
2414
542
96
3109
209
34
3552
.0
v.)
5.6
2.6.
.1
82.0
15.1
2.7
91.2
3.4
1.0
40 425101,4
5
vm
100.:1
1.00.0
10C.0
55-0
.00_1
47,0
4.-.6
- 41
.4 -
42;1
; -44
;342
.2--
SS
;10.
-19.
341
;
71)
1,11
1.55
,411
450
tyy4
tx 0
7 51
.406
80
f14r
L0rp
09.
V1,
1451
04,0
01P
1016
510-
0,1
NO
71.7
4910
6-00
7 (A
P 3
1:(1
7 A
IL Ik
on 1
4017
67U
.S.
41.1
1440
541
5110
160.
9.61
4111
All
alal
All
11.1
.41
.1.
6175
-LO
Ut U
.S.
hO..
cti I
L U
.S.
404-
G11
51 U
.S.
8,15
4553
hot
.U
.S.
9055
1 05
4.1.
6490
4:t
111
G11
5151
5411
111
(list
u. 1
4553
Gil
itS
h 41
155
4118
4 G
I 41h
G11
1 L
Gill
G11
13 1
LP
AL
Al2
_5:
1-' J c
n1-
10
040.
80 0
1,
70-2
4
21-2
9
5)5-
34
93-3
9
40-4
4
4.5-
59
3C-5
4
55-5
9
'1'4 7
N 4 II V It h h V 4 4
36.
301
1510
01.0
1450
11.1
7:70
11.1
4139
71.0
5..4
915
.2
720
74.3 14
374
.7
105
1n:
69
1716
9 17
371.
:15
2
1 1
2
.2 1 .1 3
40.6
Id2.
4 It .0 17 .5 14 . 15 .8 3
.5
0 .9 3 7.7
_
120 1
- 0.
3
045.
4
206
4.5
275
8.5
367
16.4
313
11.0
119
16.2
120
19.5
, 103
33.1
_ 712.
0 77
17,4
310
.843
.7
30.5
0
.
215
,511
.5...
/
0117
1615
.1.4
310
1514
.5.5
290
0
11.3
.2
101
115.
4.4
413
4.7
.3
15_1
.3 10 2.1.
02
1
. f._
_-_,
I__
51
(903
SO
11
5.3
3.1
34.9
36.9
10.1
0
401
I15
0)1.
1.1
.511
.4
019.
1511
1.11
.1.1
11.0
00.'0
191
4125
.21.
2
101
1130
.03.
0
420
9235
.52.
9
614
59
16.1
7.3
411
4721
.8,
2.1
707
i44
20.1
i_4.
5
101
;17
21.1
1_2.
4
113{
L3
14.0
i___
5.0_
hi15
25.0
1_ 6
.11
24;
421
.3L
_4.0
1663
142
9
:241_2.6
SI
1
20.3
i3.
339
.4! 3
6.3
1
200
1440
14.5
1111
501
.1*
7643
12.5
2213
On
g
1840
11.2
932
95.0
674
14.4
421
_91.0
791
96.3 55
96.0
1449
067
.3 1084
.737
.9
00.0
119
3122
.67.
0
093
4015
.11.
1
734
37
16.0 269
19
12.5
010
1Z
e5.
11.
5
410
4.0
.8
la7
2.0
.7.2
103
3.5
.1
23
.7_7
.0
51
3,0_
1.0
1919
197
12
5.3
10.5
34.9
34.7
i
1994
VLS
I
II3
123
063.
1.1
ILI
57
1t
1605
2.3
71.6
511
1502
2.1
.110
.1
4473
34.
574
.6
151
108
12.
30
0 1.
5.4
1130
8_7
1.0
1410
46.
769
.1_
41
40)
1115
175
70...t___.,1_ 70.4
113
3._
69.4
.134
.419
.033
.3-3
0.9-
37.0
300
2521
1110 90
1
001
431
794 11
1461
2 19.
44-4
4
63-c
3
In 8
040
4
7,...
741.
0.50
.o9 ..
50 0
1590
418
k II h k 94:
:6
17.4
-
.113 21117,550.31 440 (75418. 04 8141m N.
1.14.0.4.091143. 10.CIAL10.U10660
Al2
-..
-
pt.4
,-10
.-40
01-
olcih111.5-0:2
50 890
1140511,14-621
oor 59EC0 ALL ..521. CPdArS
50hes HILI.
21111 u.l.
535.
21111
eh;
[lilt Wit ur:.
a
100.0
26
58
104
1
2.2
3.7
10.0.
.1
130
169
610
21
2.)
2.6
9.4
.3
59
101
Wm
75
1.4
1.6
701
.4
081
U.I(R
24.
0...
1.111/
028
8.35-
[tilt 1
A80.0
.1
25-79
I.
5A.4
2
H62.4
JO-34
1583
1
64.1
1. -39
87106
?
H880
.1
4)-45
1.147
-9
0.1376
1
50-54
716
41
1.7
21 :9
16
113
110
4
4.5__ 4.4
.2
III
CO
2
6.2
2.2
.1
99
?I
6.3
1.1
.3
60
9
6.7
la
le
4e
5
2.8
6.2
.9.
671
12
01.2
1.1_6.1
.1_._.
211
k
_152
1.3
7.1.
2.6
70
0826
I.
19
2
.9
02.6 .__
6.7
1016L 140.4 -
14
16898
7344
473
1236
51
H84.5
1.9
4.2
6.3
.3
0.0 800,045,
412
25
1
04
--YP
504
72.1
32.4
12.0
4.5
30.0
10.0
11.4
20.7 '
7.1
30.0
5.5.
U.S.
01111
61.1h
hay-
Citil
41.1..
ALL
01110 U.S.
sr403
OS.
6141H alillm
ALL
'
Ott
-
0.1.
U.S.
BIRTH 21112
ALI
60405
CM:
eli
-
00.0.
GRAM
CIT12 70163 I
'
100.0
100.1
11
0657
145
31
692
301
II
Ulf
3.0
.2
61.6
14.0
1.2
16.7
10.1
3.2
161
'
111
156
601
395
5744
ele
144
4544
301
.2
64.1
12.1
3.0
61.8
100
23411
610
116
3o06
311
20
4171
2.4
.1
81.7
11.6
0.5
90.0
7.9
1.9
66
24
2:1a
227
72
2144
114
51
2104
2.6
.1
.2
60.1
0.0
2.9
93.4
4.5
7.0
5.
315116
151
88
1730
40
26
1790
2.9
.2
60.4
4.5.
1.1
46.6
7.2
1.4
41
21908
124
43
1.411
22
35
1575
2.6
.1. 79.4
7.9
2.7
96.4
1.4
2.2
II
11
792
69
35
SO
10
14
1186
0.5
.1
.3
88.4
7.:
3.9
91..8
1.1
2.1
20
494
il
20
546
814
465
3.5
87.4
9.0
1.5
96.6
.9_2.5
10
1112
24
11
Ill
1i
347
!,.
56c9
60
?q
?LA
_. ...
.2.6
51
114
15
148
3155
1.2
.6
116.5
9.1
3.4
98.5
2.6
1.9
219
22
23
23
5.7
539
81.6_ .7.7
14911
2110
6.7
576
100,
17460
1244
452
19161
433
2.7
.2
86.3
10.7
2.1
910
6.4
2.)
22
14
634
S5
44
4.5
4.5
71.1
01.6
9.1
11.3
11.4
11.4
12.6
18.8
31.4
12.4' 30.6'
32.4
32.6
26.7'
30.1-122
711 8001110141 EMPLOVER 61 EPP607EP, 84POCTP/6i SFOC ...... 010411
14.0 OR 601
POO
(RP SPEC - 70641
!OPE OF MP10TER
__00SLESEA.0_30113 .
P61061E 16005117
40011101AL imP10714
C011
PRly
PES
010
140 100.1
C1P 010E4
4.6. Folm.
A 1
27
h M)
)1
SI
1.7
II110.11
J[221
.9
.6
.2
.6
97.5 1CC.0
IS
SS
41
217
1726
1805
.1
19
1
.1_0 97,9
94.1
h4
GOY. 1 - MERU. E10 01
2.7
.1
14
1414
1461
1.9
.2
.1
1.0
31.46.1
101t.11.,
.5
17.1 100.0
:37
J.13i AKIL(POLII
01616 10049
I. .4
16
IF
115
791
140
1.9
1.1
,1 -
...1_
1:1_
.1;46 1,1;1 MO
RESPONSE
M
AN.
N_I
PL#
4_.?
IPill
103
03 0
034
100.0 100.0
h k.9
.1
.4
.1
.7
17.4 100.0
0440
7;072 PHO
IMP
400171Chill 000SCsER
1.--
231
130
320
1101
.1
.4
.2
.1
.4
96.7 100.1
PRIVATE 191061116
N41
231
1201
5346
.1
1
000.6 - (600041 ETC k
16
51
.6
.2
RatAtth_1111.11.R_JI-IL_J
.1
.3
076E8 660611
52
23
21
.8
.7
WI RESPONSE
M.
JWIAL
36-30
.4
A.2
Al2
d
6 96.6
13c,
t_t
11
2109
2141
.1
11.6
19.4
11
621_81)
.1
.8
97.1
YR.%
252
3449
1602
.1_.
.14
99 6 10C
2074
2026
100.0 100.0
.7
90.2 100.0
313
J. ci
ZE
-- --
!
.,2Cd
P. NI
..... ...
t
9`S
NS 13 5
II
,..At°4r. 9
1768
-I
a. Z.
en
---a 2i :a-- ---
!
;44..J
.1 5
ri '5 "::, ,s
-11 f
i 1 1
1 '1 9 -.....
. .
1 1 -I "1 5;AF.42.1g:2127:71
1*"..:27.3"11 1 1 -.1
° *A"..:1,4:74S1
1 '1 ml
j
V.5 '4-44
x=a;aessIzx
Ulg 5 1g 1
5
Cr)
". ^. .
1
. It . It '''t'1r r.
44 .4-47
'-:
------.41-;.1 Z4^4.1
;4 -o
,
9 k
1 1zr" 4"44-. ..1° Z'
,
2.
N
1-............,..
-----,
rtt:1:4T121:.7'111
APPENDIX B:ALLOCATION OFNATIONAL REGISTERSPECIALTIES TOPHYSICSSUBFIELDS
1772
PP 1
PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
A&R
PhD's Non-Ph s
5823 Gravitational fields,gravitons
26 8
6014 Cosmology 16 8
6015 Galaxies 45 176018 Quasars, pulsars, x-ray
sources84 40
6035 Relativity, gravitation 77 35
PP 2 AME
5673 Chemical kinetics, gasphase, and photochem-istry
26 18
5684 Flames and explosives 8 325693 Molecular spectroscopy 101 515694 Molecular structure 26 175696 Quantum and valence theory 22 9
5791 Atomic and molecular ions 51 38
5792 Atomic, molecular, andelectron beams
106 66
5793 Atoms with Z > 2 47 17
5794 Collision processes 208 935795 Free radicals 6 7
5796 Hydrogen and helium atoms 22 30
5797 Inorganic molecules 3 9
5798 Macromolecules and polymers 69 245801 Mesic and muonic atoms and
molecules11 7
5802 Organic molecules 8 105809 Other (atoms and molecules) 52 285942 Kinetic theory 14 4
Overlap Group
5861 Quantum mechanics (1/2) 295986 NMR-EPR instrumenta-
tion (1/4)5
Spectroscopy (1/2)5678 Electronic spectroscopy
including far uv7
5891 Spectroscopy 71 755998 Spectroscopes 5 12
X rays (1/5)5818 X rays and gamma rays 12 156004 X-ray instrumentation 8 13
Modern optics (1/4)5698 Scattering phenomena 3 3
5814 Interaction of electromag- 27 19
netic waves with matter5884 Lasers 82 71,
5885 Nonlinear optics 20 105983 Lasers and masers 6 10
Appendix B 1773
PP 3 EP
5821 Cosmic rays
5822 Electromagnetic fields,photons
5824 Hadrons5825 Leptons5826 Quantum field theory
5829 Other (elementary-par-tidies and fields)
PhD's Non-PhD's
9994
741
94129111
41
48
3124273
66
Overlap Group
5861 Quantum mechanics (1/4) 14 3
Beams (1/2)
5973 Beam handling 8 6
5988 Particle accelerators 63 40
5991 Particle and beam sources 5 5
5992 Particle detectors 21 26
PP 4 NP
5695 Nuclear and radio
chemistry
6 13
5697 Radiation and hot-atomchemistry
5 7
5871 Nuclear decay and radio
activity
132 84
5-872 Nuclear reactions andscattering
593 279
5873 Nuclear structure andenergy levels
400 198
5879 Other (nuclei) 220 186
5966 Health and medicalphysics
162 336
5987 Nuclear Reactors 128 138
Overlap Group
X rays (1/5)5818 X rays and gamma rays 12 15
6004 X-ray instrumentation 8 13
Beams (1/2)
5973 Beam handling 8 6
5988 Particle accelerators 63 40
5991. ,Particle and beamsburces
5 5
5992 Particle detectors 21 26
1774 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
PP 5
PP 6
P&F
PhD's Non-PhD's
5831 Dispersions and colloids 8 /
5832 Electric discharges 51. 375833 Fluid mechanics 257 1455834 Gases 20 135835 Ionization 1 55836 Liquids 23 215849 Other (fluids) 24 385853 Continuum 63 245937 Magnetofluid dynamiOs 28 115838 Plasmas 488 2115994 Plasma containment 8 12
Overlap Group
Thermal (3/10)5682 Equilibrium and thermo- 2 1
dynamic relationships5941 High-temperature physics 8 45944 Phase transitions and 14 9
changes of state5945 Statistical mechanics 20 85946 Thermal measurement 5 7
techniques5947 Thermal properties 4 65948 Thermodynamics 5 95951 Transport phenomena 14 85959 Other (thermal physics) 6 55981 High temperature instru- 0
mentation6002 Thermometric instrumen- 0 3
tation5775 Shock waves (4/5) 28 38
CM
5671 Catalysis 5 25674 Chemical kinetics, liquid 4 1
phase5676 Crystallography 48 385692 Liquid state and solu- 10 6
tions; electrolytes andnonelectrolytes
5701 Solid-state chemistry 23 95815 Magnetism 33 41-5841 Quantum fluids 53 225856 Many-body theory 31 145858 Plasticity 7 35862 Statistical mechanics 52 115902 Alloys 54 295903 Crystal growth 43 315904 Crystal structure 30 29
PP 6
Appendix 13 1775
CM
5905 Dendrites and composites
5906 Dielectrics5907 Diffusion in solids5908 Electron states5911 Electron transport and
carrier properties
PhD's Non-PhD's
6
4146
139156
3
33
17
55
87
5912 Imperfections 105 42
5914 Lattice mechanics 60 34
5915 Luminescence 66 41
5916 Magnetic properties 242 125
5917 Magnetic resonance 258 126
5918 Mechanical properties 89 50
5921 Metallic conductors 29 17
5922 MOssbauer effect 74 36
5923 Noncrystalline states 34 17
5924 Optical properties 218 110
5925 Semiconductors 305 254
5926 Solid-state devices 311 237
5927 Superconductors 174 91
5928 Surfaces, interfaces,films
260 232
5931 Thermal properties ofsolids
33 39
5939 Other (solids) 145 135
5943 Low-temperature physics 158 92
5978 High-pressure instru-mentation
8 10
5982 Information storage 20 27
5997 Semiconductors 10 28
Overlap Group
Mechanics (1/4)5861 Quantum mechanics 14 3
NMR & EPR (3/4)5986 NMR-EPR instrumentation 15 14
Mechanical (1/2)5854 Elasticity 10 5
5855 Friction 1 4
6003 Vacuum 11 38
Ultrasound (/3)5777 Ultrasonics 51 52
5901 Acoustic properties 20 10
X rays (3/5)5818 X rays and gamma rays 36 45
6004 X-ray instrumentation 24 39
Measurement and instru-ments (1/2)
5811 Electrical quantities and 10 26
their measurement
3 2 1
1776 PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
PhD's Non-PhD's
PP 6 CM
Overlap Group
5857
5913
5976
Measurement of mechan-ical properties
Interaction of radiationwith solidsElectronics
13
94
51
23
64
160
6009 Other (instrumentation) 41 1086037 Onits, constants, sten-
dards, conversion factors2 6
Shock waves (1/5)5775 Shock waves 7 9
Thermal (7/10)5682 Equilibrium and thermo-
dynamic relationships4 3
5941 High-temperature physics 19 8
5944 Phase transitions, changesof state
33 20
5945 Statistical mechanics 47 18
5946 Thermal measurementtechniques
11 16
5947 Thermal properties 10 15
5948 Thermodynamics 12 20
5951 Transport phenomena 33 19
5959 Other (thermal physics) 13 12
5981 High-temperature instru-mentation
1 4
6002 Thermometric instrumenta-tion
1 6
Modern optics (1/4)5698 Scattering phenomena 3 4
5814 Interaction of electromag-netic waves with matter
27 19
5884 Lasers 20 10
5885 Nonlinear optics 20 10
5983 Lasers and masers 6 10
PP 7 E&P
4991 Aeronomy 24 27
4992 Air-sea interaction 1 4
4993 Atmospheric chemistry andradioactivity
11 7
4994 Atmospheric dynamics,thermodynamics
7 17
4995 Atmospheric electricity 6 9
4997 Aurora, airglow 9 20
4998 Cloud and precipitationphysics
16 15
PP 7 E&P
5001 Cosmic rays5002 Ionosphere5003 Mesometeorology5004 Micrometeorology5005 Numerical modeling5006 Planetary atmospheres5007 Radiative transfer5008 Turbulence and diffusion5009 Other (atmospheric struc-
ture and dynamics)5028 Rocket meteorology5031 Satellite meteorology5161 Exploration, gravity5162 Exploration, magnetic5163 Exploration, seismology5164 Geomagnetism and paleomag-
netism5165 Gravity5166 Heat flow5167 Physical properties of
natural materials5168 Seismology5171 Tectonics5172 Volcanology5179 Other (solid-earth geo-
physics)5185 Physical oceanography5191 Underwater sound5199 Other (oceanography)5302 Lunar and planetary geology5331 Aeronomy5332 Aurora and airglow5333 Cosmic rays5334 Geomagnetic pulsations5335 Interplanetary particles
and fields5336 Ionosphere5337 Magnetospheric particles
and waves5350 Atmospheric sciences5360 Earth sciences
Overlap Group
Solar/planetary (1/2)5338 Solar and planetary
physics5341 Solar wind5349 Other (solar/planetary)6023 Sun4996 Atmospheric optics and
acoustics (1/2)
Appendix 5 1777
PhD's Non-PhD's
6 4
28 34
1 5
0 5
13 9
14 8
31 21
12 1018 17
0 0
0 0
2 5
5 3
24 235 12
3 8
1 1
16 9
12 24
1 0
0 0
21 8
11 14
0 0
10 14
7 10
23 12
23 16
11 30
7 3
26 14
17 20
78 50
33 4624 39
26 20
11 5
6 5
46 21
15 12
L778
PP
PHYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
8 PB
5688 Ion exchange and membranephenomena
5962 Bioelectricity5963 Bioenergetics5964 Biological molecules5969 Other (biophysics)6580 Biological and biomedical
sciences
PhO's Non-Phi:Os
3
21
8
86
89
44
4
12
8
27
4934
Overlap Group
Hearing (2/5)5772 Hearing 6 6
5776 Speech 7 4
5961 Bioacoustics 3 2
Bio-optics (1/3)5892 Vision 3 2
5965 Bio-optics 2 2
PP Optics
5813 Infrared, visible, and uvradiation
42 142
5881 Colorimetry 7 16
5882 Geometric optics 31 208
5883 Holography 74 94
5886 Photography 24 114
5887 Photometry, radiometry,and illumination
39 209
5888 Physics optics 98 144
5899 Other (optics) 104 286
5985 Microscopes 6 19
5993 Photographic instrumenta-tion
7 43
Overlap Group
Measurement and instru-ments (1/2)
5811 Electrical quantities andtheir measurement
10 26
5857 Measurement of mechanicalproperties
13 23
5913 Interaction of radiationwith solids
94 64
5976 Electronlcs 51 160
6009 Other (instrumentation) 41 108
6037 Units, constants, stan-dards, conversion factors
2 6
Spectroscopy (1/2)
324
Appendix B 1779
PP 9 Optics
Overlap Croup
5678 Electronic spectroscopyincluding far uv
5891 Spectroscopy5998 Spectroscopes
Bio-optics (2/3)5892 Vision5965 Bio-optics
PhO's Non-Phi:Os
7
71
5
7
6
6
75
12
5
4
Modern optics (1/2)5698 Scattering phenomena 6 7
5814 Interaction of electromag-netic waves with matter
55 38
5884 Lasers 163 1415885 Nonlinear optics 41 205983 Lasers and masers 12 21
5996 Atmospheric optics andacoustics (1/2)
15 12
PP 10 Acoustics
5771 Architectural acoustics 10 35
5773 Music 8 7
5774 Noise 33 120
5778 Underwater sound 155 407
5781 Vibrations 21 55
5789 Other (acoustics) 33 57
OverZap Group
Ultrasound (1/3)5777 Ultrasonics 26 26
5901 Acoustic properties 10 5
Hearing (3/5)5772 Hearing 9
5776 Speech 9 6
5961 Bioacoustics 5 3
PP 11 Astrophysics
6011 Binary stars 23 19
6012 Clusters 14 1
6016 Interstellar medium 66 32
6021 Stellar composition 32 29
6022 Stellar evolution 50 22
6029 Other 129 85
12 Astronomy
5852 Celestial mechanics 61 69
1780
PP 13
PRYSICS IN PERSPECTIVE
Interplanetary
5301 Interplanetary matter5304 Meteorites and tektites
5305 Planetary atmospheres5306 Planetary magnetic fields
5309 Other (planetology)6013 Comets, meteors, inter-
planetary medium6017 Planets and satellites
PhD's
9
5
30
2
6
15
26
Non-PhD's
2
11
2
6
10
18
PP 14 Instrumentation
5972 Astronomical 32 29
5996 Radio astronomy 39 17
6001 Telescopes 5 14
PP 15 Overlap with E&P (1/2)
5338 Solar planetary physics 26 20
5341 Solar wind 11 5
5349 Other (solar/planetary) 6 5
6023 Sun 46 21