doc.: ieee 802.11-15/1120r0 submission buffer status report slide 1 date: 2015-09-12 authors: alfred...
TRANSCRIPT
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1120r0
Submission
Buffer Status Report
Slide 1
Date: 2015-09-12
Authors: Name Affiliation Address Phone email
Alfred Asterjadhi
Qualcomm
5775 Morehouse Dr. San Diego, CA, USA
Simone Merlin [email protected]
Bin Tian [email protected]
Carlos Aldana 1700 Technology Drive San
Jose, CA 95110, USA [email protected]
George Cherian 5775 Morehouse Dr. San
Diego, CA, USA
Gwendolyn Barriac [email protected]
Hemanth Sampath [email protected]
Menzo Wentink
Straatweg 66-S Breukelen, 3621 BR Netherlands
Richard Van Nee [email protected]
Albert Van Zelst [email protected]
Rolf De Vegt 1700 Technology Drive San
Jose, CA 95110, USA [email protected]
Sameer Vermani 5775 Morehouse Dr. San
Diego, CA, USA [email protected]
Tevfik Yucek 1700 Technology Drive San
Jose, CA 95110, USA
VK Jones [email protected]
Youhan Kim [email protected]
1 Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al.
September 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1120r0
Submission Slide 2
Authors (continued):
Name Affiliation Address Phone email
Kiseon Ryu
LG Electronics
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul 137-130,
Korea [email protected]
Hyeyouong Choi [email protected]
Jinyoung Chun [email protected]
Jinsoo Choi [email protected]
Jeongki Kim [email protected]
Giwon Park [email protected]
Dongguk Lim [email protected]
Suhwook Kim [email protected]
Eunsung Park [email protected]
HanGyu Cho [email protected]
Jinmin Kim [email protected]
Shahrnaz Azizi
Intel
2200 Mission College Blvd, Santa Clara, CA 95054
Eldad Perahia [email protected]
Robert Stacey 2111 NE 25th Ave, Hillsboro
OR 97124, USA +1-503-724-893 [email protected]
Po-Kai Huang [email protected]
Qinghua Li [email protected]
Xiaogang Chen [email protected]
Chittabrata Ghosh [email protected]
Rongzhen Yang [email protected]
Laurent cariou [email protected]
1 Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al.
September 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1120r0
Submission Slide 3
Authors (continued)Name Affiliation Address Phone email
Ron Porat
Broadcom
Matthew Fischer [email protected]
Sriram Venkateswaran
Tu Nguyen
Vinko Erceg
Lei Wang
Marvell
5488 Marvell Lane, Santa Clara, CA, 95054
858-205-7286 [email protected]
Hongyuan Zhang
Yakun Sun [email protected]
Liwen Chu [email protected]
Jinjing Jiang [email protected]
Yan Zhang [email protected]
Rui Cao [email protected]
Sudhir Srinivasa [email protected]
Saga Tamhane [email protected]
Mao Yu [email protected]
Edward Au [email protected]
Hui-Ling Lu [email protected]
1
Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al.
September 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1120r0
Submission Slide 4
Authors (continued)
James Yee
Mediatek
No. 1 Dusing 1st Road, Hsinchu, Taiwan
+886-3-567-0766 [email protected]
Alan Jauh [email protected]
Chingwa Hu [email protected]
Frank Hsu [email protected]
` 1 Thomas Pare
Mediatek USA
2860 Junction Ave, San Jose, CA 95134, USA
+1-408-526-1899 [email protected]
ChaoChun Wang [email protected]
James Wang [email protected]
Jianhan Liu [email protected]
Tianyu Wu [email protected]
Russell Huang [email protected]
` 1
Name Affiliation Address Phone email
1
Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al.
September 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1120r0
Submission Slide 5
Authors (continued)
Name Affiliation Address Phone email
Phillip Barber
Huawei
The Lone Star State, TX [email protected]
Peter Loc [email protected]
Le Liu F1-17, Huawei Base, Bantian,
Shenzhen +86-18601656691 [email protected]
Jun Luo 5B-N8, No.2222 Xinjinqiao
Road, Pudong, Shanghai [email protected]
Yi Luo F1-17, Huawei Base, Bantian,
Shenzhen +86-18665891036 [email protected]
Yingpei Lin 5B-N8, No.2222 Xinjinqiao
Road, Pudong, Shanghai [email protected]
Jiyong Pang 5B-N8, No.2222 Xinjinqiao
Road, Pudong, Shanghai [email protected]
Zhigang Rong 10180 Telesis Court, Suite 365, San Diego, CA 92121
Rob Sun 303 Terry Fox, Suite 400 Kanata, Ottawa, Canada
David X. Yang F1-17, Huawei Base, Bantian,
Shenzhen [email protected]
Yunsong Yang 10180 Telesis Court, Suite 365, San Diego, CA 92121
Zhou Lan F1-17, Huawei Base, Bantian,
SHenzhen +86-18565826350 [email protected]
Junghoon Suh 303 Terry Fox, Suite 400 Kanata, Ottawa, Canada
Jiayin Zhang 5B-N8, No.2222 Xinjinqiao
Road, Pudong, Shanghai +86-18601656691 [email protected]
1 Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al.
September 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1120r0
Submission Slide 6
Authors (continued)Name Affiliation Address Phone email
Thomas Derham Orange
1 Yasushi Takatori
NTT
1-1 Hikari-no-oka, Yokosuka, Kanagawa 239-0847 Japan
Yasuhiko Inoue [email protected]
Yusuke Asai [email protected]
Koichi Ishihara [email protected]
Akira Kishida [email protected]
Akira Yamada
NTT DOCOMO
3-6, Hikarinooka, Yokosuka-shi, Kanagawa, 239-8536,
Japan [email protected]
m
Fujio Watanabe 3240 Hillview Ave, Palo
Alto, CA 94304 watanabe@docomoinnovatio
ns.com
Haralabos Papadopoulos
1 Fei Tong
Samsung
Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS (U.K.)
+44 1223 434633 [email protected]
Hyunjeong Kang Maetan 3-dong; Yongtong-Gu
Suwon; South Korea +82-31-279-9028 [email protected]
m
Kaushik Josiam 1301, E. Lookout Dr, Richardson TX 75070
(972) 761 7437 [email protected]
Mark Rison Innovation Park,
Cambridge CB4 0DS (U.K.) +44 1223 434600 [email protected]
Rakesh Taori 1301, E. Lookout Dr, Richardson TX 75070
(972) 761 7470 [email protected]
Sanghyun Chang Maetan 3-dong; Yongtong-Gu
Suwon; South Korea +82-10-8864-
1751 [email protected]
1 Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al.
September 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1120r0
Submission Slide 7
Authors (continued)
Name Affiliation Address Phone email
Bo Sun
ZTE
#9 Wuxingduan, Xifeng Rd Xian, China
Kaiying Lv [email protected]
Yonggang Fang
Ke Yao
Weimin Xing
Brian Hart Cisco Systems
170 W Tasman Dr, San Jose, CA 95134
Pooya Monajemi [email protected]
Joonsuk Kim
Apple
Aon Mujtaba [email protected]
Guoqing Li [email protected]
Eric Wong [email protected]
Chris Hartman [email protected]
1
Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al.
September 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1120r0
Submission Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al.
Introduction
• One of the main features introduced in 11ax is UL MU operation– AP allocates UL resources used by multiple STAs to transmit their data
• For an efficient allocation the AP needs to know UL buffer status (BS) of its STAs. The BS knowledge allows the AP to: – Allocate resources to those STAs that have something to transmit in UL– Calculate correctly the UL resources needed by the STAs
• We propose to specify a BS report mechanism that:– Relies on QoS Control field and its enhancements for improving BS
report– Allows solicited or unsolicited delivery of the buffer status reports
• Delivery is performed using commonly expected 11ax frame exchanges
Slide 8
September 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1120r0
Submission
Summary of Proposal
• AP elicits for BS reports via the Trigger frame– The AP can indicate whether it is soliciting BS information for:
• E.g., a particular TID (per-TID), for all TIDs (all-TID), with different granularity, …
• STA delivers BS report in QoS Control of QoS Data/Null frames– Per-TID BS info. is contained in Queue Size/TXOP Duration Requested
subfield• Note: This is the same signaling that is used for HCCA
• Note: Delivering BS information with different granularity, for the solicited and unsolicited case, is beneficial as well (see Appendix). The signaling for this case is currently TBD
Slide 9 Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al.
September 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1120r0
Submission
“BS report” frames: Details
• STA reports BS info. in the QoS Control field of frames it transmits:– Queue Size is reported when AP is in control of UL TX parameters (e.g., MU)– TXOP Duration Requested when non-AP STA is in control of them (e.g., SU)
Slide 10 Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al.
September 2015
“BS Report”
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1120r0
Submission Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al.
BS Report mechanism: Overview
• STAs implicitly report their BS information in “BS report” frames– A “BS report” frame is any frame that contains QoS Control field
• AP can explicitly solicit particular BS info. in “BS polling” frames– The frame carrying the Trigger is proposed to act as a “BS polling” frame
• It can explicitly contain the type of BS information requested– E.g., Per-TID versus all-TID “BS report” (eventually the TID for which the
per-TID polling refers to)– Requested granularity for the BS info (i.e., units different from default)
Slide 11
September 2015
QoS Data
QoS Data
Trigger
QoS Data Ack
DL Data 3
DL Data 5
BA/QoS Data
BA/QoS Data
Beacon
BA
Buffer Status Report
Trigger
QoS Data/Null
Ack
SUMU
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1120r0
Submission Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al.
Summary
• We propose to re-use the QoS Control field for reporting BS– When carried in QoS Data/Null frame it allows per-TID “BS report”
• We also propose a simple BS signaling mechanism that enables:– AP to solicit BS information from STAs with different granularity
• Future extensions are possible to enable BS reports with different granularity
Slide 12
September 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1120r0
Submission Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al.
Straw Poll 1
• Do you support using the QoS Control field in QoS Data and QoS Null frames to report per-TID Buffer Status information?
Slide 13
September 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1120r0
Submission Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al.
Straw Poll 2
• Do you support that an AP can poll STAs for buffer status reports using the frame carrying the trigger info?– The poll can request for specific buffer status information with TBD
granularity.
Slide 14
September 2015
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1120r0
Submission
APPENDIX
September 2015
Slide 15 Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al.
doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1120r0
Submission
QoS Control field: Overview
• Current format of QoS Control field carries per-TID queue size/duration:– Queue Size ranges from 0 to 64 768 Octets, with a unit of 256 Octets– TXOP Duration Requested ranges from 0 to 8160 us, with a unit of 32 us
• However, HE transmit rates are expected to be highly flexible:– Covering a wider range (from ~416Kbps (@2.5MHz) to up to ~10?Gbps (@160MHz))– Hence, these limitations in BS info. signaling will lead to inefficient allocations
• E.g. 1: AP allocates low rate RU to STA that signaled 256 Bytes of UL Data– But STA actually has less (e.g., 128 Bytes) UL to be delivered in the 256 Octet RU
• An RU of ~5ms for UL TX@416Kbps requires that all UL MU STAs transmit for 5ms!– When time needed by the STA is actually half of that (50% of MU resource is wasted)
• E.g., 2: AP allocates high rate RU to STA that signaled >64 KB of UL Data– But STA actually has more (e.g., 640 KB) UL to be delivered in the 64KB Octet RU
• An RU of ~1 ms for UL TX@500Mbps is enough to transmit only 10% of its UL– When the STA could actually support transmitting at higher rates to deliver its UL (resource was
underused)
• Similar observations apply to the TXOP Duration Requested subfield as well
Slide 16
September 2015
Alfred Asterjadhi, et. al.