do we live in a quantum world? advances in multidimensional coherent spectroscopies refine our...
TRANSCRIPT
Do we live in a quantum world? Advances in multidimensionalcoherent spectroscopies refine our understanding of quantumcoherences and structural dynamics of biological systemsAndrea Nagy, Valentyn Prokhorenko and RJ Dwayne Miller
The issue of quantum effects in biological functions reduces to
determining the relevant length and/or time scales over which
phase relationships (coherence) in the wave properties of
matter are conserved and lead to observable interference
effects. Recent advances in femtosecond laser-based two-
dimensional spectroscopy and coherent control have made it
possible to directly determine the relevant timescales of
quantum coherence in biological systems and even manipulate
such effects, respectively, and also provide direct information
on the interactions between the different degrees of freedom
(electronic and nuclear) with sufficient time resolution to catch
the very chemical processes driving biological functions in
action. The picture that is emerging is that there are primary
events in biological processes that occur on timescales
commensurate with quantum coherence effects.
Addresses
Departments of Chemistry and Physics, and the Institute for Optical
Sciences, 80 St George Street, University of Toronto, Toronto,
Ontario, Canada
Corresponding author: Miller, RJ Dwayne
Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2006, 16:654–663
This review comes from a themed issue on
Biophysical methods
Edited by Arthur G Palmer III and Randy J Read
Available online 18th September 2006
0959-440X/$ – see front matter
# 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
DOI 10.1016/j.sbi.2006.08.012
IntroductionThe question posed in the title of this review refers to the
relative importance of quantum mechanical effects with
respect to biological functions — processes that necessa-
rily occur on the mesoscale (dimensions of single proteins
as a lower limit), where quantum effects are expected to
converge to the classical limit. In this context, the relative
importance of quantum effects in biological systems has
been debated since the very birth of quantum mechanics
[1]. It has been well established since then that matter has
wave properties that require a quantum mechanical treat-
ment. However, it is equally well established that the
wave properties of matter only manifest their effect when
the phenomenon of interest involves motions on length
Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2006, 16:654–663
scales comparable to the de Broglie wavelength of the
constituent matter. An effective argument can be made
that any quantum effect would be negligible on the global
scale of the protein function. (The de Broglie wavelength
of a 30 kDa protein moving at thermal velocity is
�10�11 cm, which is negligible compared to typical pro-
tein motions involved in biological functions.) However,
the relevant motions involved in transition state processes
of the actual chemical processes driving the biological
response can typically be described by superposition of
more localized motions with smaller effective mass,
where the de Broglie wavelength is no longer negligible
and a quantum mechanical description is needed. (The
de Broglie wavelength of a carbon atom moving at the
speed of sound along the reaction coordinate is 0.03 nm,
which is greater than a typical displacement of heavy
atoms along reaction coordinates and large enough for
significant quantum effects.) In this regard, the single
most important distinguishing feature that separates
quantum mechanics from classical mechanics is the
underlying phase of the wave-function. It is not possible
to properly describe the constructive and destructive
interference effects of the wave properties of matter
without considering the relative phase relationships.
There can be a dramatic increase in transmission prob-
ability through barriers (e.g. transition states) for con-
structive interference effects relative to destructive
interference effects. In this regard, a central tenet of
biology is that Nature has evolved to optimize functions;
this tenet pertains to all length scales. At the molecular
level, the posed question can be rephrased to: do biolo-
gical systems exploit the phase of the wave properties of
matter to optimize their functionality?
To address this question, we need to consider the coher-
ence of the underlying wave functions. As with all wave
sources, interference effects only occur over length and
time scales for which the phase of the wave or coherence
is conserved. For example, the interference between two
monochromatic laser beams gives a light-dark fringe
pattern that can extend for meters, whereas the inter-
ference observed for an incandescent light bulb extends
only over a few microns. The importance of wave coher-
ence can be appreciated by considering the displacement
of a surfer to shore (as the target state) for well-formed
waves off Hawaii, as apposed to the motion of our intrepid
surfer in the chaotic seas off England. In the former case,
the motion is highly directed, whereas in the latter the
motion in which the wave coherence is quickly lost could
www.sciencedirect.com
Multidimensional coherent spectroscopy Nagy, Prokhorenko and Miller 655
be described as random diffusive motion. The efficiency
in realizing the target state is significantly higher for
conditions leading to constructive interference along
the target pathway. For quantum systems, the conserva-
tion of relative phase relationships is referred to as quan-
tum coherence [2]. The associated time and length scales
of coherence over which interference effects can be
observed are perhaps the most central part of this issue.
If the process occurs over length or time scales that are
much longer than those over which the phase correlation
is conserved, both constructive and destructive interfer-
ence effects occur and quantum interference averages out
and vanishes. At this point, it needs to be recalled that
biological processes occur in the condensed phase, in
which random fluctuations of the environment lead to
dephasing (T2) and fast relaxation processes (T1) that
contribute to the net loss of coherence or phase relation-
ships. To address this issue, information is needed on the
loss in amplitude of the phase dependence or decoher-
ence times of the relevant degrees of freedom (electronic,
nuclear) in relation to the biological process of interest.
For instance, decoherence times for vibrational motions
are typically on the order of picoseconds, whereas elec-
tronic dephasing times are on the 10–100 fs timescale
[3,4]. These are phenomenally short timescales and
require femtosecond (10�15 s) laser pulses to probe the
relevant issues. There are, however, biological processes,
such as energy transfer and barrier crossing events, as
depicted in Figure 1, that occur on timescales that are
Figure 1
Representative examples of quantum effects in biological systems. (a) Excit
chromophores (monomers) in close proximity can have sufficient dipole–dip
effects in which the initial degenerate states are split into two new (exciton)
in the protein environment can modify the site energies and potentially spat
(b) Interfering wave functions at conical intersections. In nuclear configuratio
that create seams connecting the reactant surface to the product surface in
the wave function in the product channel. The schematic is specific for bR.
bond in concert with bond softening along this axis [43��]. The biological pr
non-radiative relaxation of the retinal chromophore, both processes occurrin
possible that the protein structure constrains thermal fluctuations to favor c
this point for optimal efficiency in the face of such competition.
www.sciencedirect.com
comparable to the decoherence times. It is in these cases
that one can ask anew what the likelihood is that Nature
has even harnessed the purest form of quantum effects in
optimizing functions.
This question is intriguing, and technologically and the-
oretically challenging at the same time. It is only recently
that advances in spectroscopy have been made that
enable coherence effects in biological systems to be
appropriately addressed to probe this fundamental issue.
It needs to be emphasized that the general motivation for
the various spectroscopic advances has been unrelated to
the stated question. This issue of quantum effects is still
speculative and is discussed in the spirit of this type of
review, an ‘opinion’ on where we think some fundamen-
tal advances may be forthcoming beyond the immediate
goals of the current research.
Recent technological advances inmultidimensional coherent laserspectroscopyTwo general forms of multidimensional spectroscopy will
be discussed, namely non-linear four-wave mixing invol-
ving two time variables, in particular 2D spectroscopy, and
coherent control. Both methods are very analogous to
NMR. The major distinction is that these coherence
spectroscopies use laser pulses in the visible and IR region,
and thus address changes in electron distribution and
nuclear displacements, respectively, as opposed to probing
on formation and spatially directed excited state energy. Two
ole interaction to experience constructive and destructive interference
states (D is the interaction energy). Small changes in charge distribution
ially direct excited state energy in the process of light absorption.
n space, there are narrow regions in the potential energy surface
which only minute motions of the heavy atoms are enough to localize
The reaction involves small torsional motions along the C13–C14
ocess of photoisomerization is in strict competition with the very fast
g within electronic and vibrational decoherence timescales. It is
onstructive interference of the principle reactive modes through
Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2006, 16:654–663
656 Biophysical methods
and manipulating nuclear spins [5]. The important differ-
ence with respect to NMR is that the manipulation of
population and coherences in the electronic and vibra-
tional degrees of freedom can be directly related to reac-
tion dynamics on timescales well outside the range of
NMR. The current state of laser technology enables the
probing of the very fastest events in Nature with few
femtosecond time resolution. Figure 2 shows a typical
experimental setup for 2D spectroscopy and the associated
information content. In the case of coherent control, the
spectral amplitude and phase are manipulated to provide
multiple variables, but typically in a single beam approach
(Figure 3). The perturbations due to these shaped pulses
are deliberately targeted to affect or to control photoche-
mical and photobiological processes, resulting in active
intervention. Inverting the pulse shapes found with coher-
ent control protocols to molecular details [6] is not yet as
well defined as inverting measured maps in 2D experi-
ments, and one is still limited to asking fairly qualitative
questions for systems as complex as biological ones.
Figure 2
2D spectroscopy. (a) Experimental setup. Schematic showing a femtosecon
specifically generate the beams in the correct spatial relationship for phase
a local oscillator for phase-sensitive detection. The DO approach [44–46,47
either correlating the noise in a symmetric arrangement or anti-correlating th
sequence is shown at the bottom. The delay between the initial excitation a
excitation wavelength (n1) and the signal field radiating from the sample is d
dimension (n3) in a 2D plot. This information is collected as a function of pro
function of time. (b) Information content in 2D spectroscopy. The signal alo
spectrum (shown at bottom). The signal along the anti-diagonal is the homo
off-diagonal peaks directly give the coupling between states/modes (D from
excited state features off-diagonal that can be readily assigned as they are
different colors and signs) and red shifted relative to the fundamental due to
if the plot is elongated along the diagonal, the absorption spectrum is inhom
(homogeneous) gives direct information on the coupling of the energy levels
Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2006, 16:654–663
2D spectroscopy of biological systems2D IR spectroscopy of protein dynamics
Recent work has focused on exploiting the information on
dynamics and structure that is simultaneously accessible
with 2D IR. This connection is essential to understanding
the structure-function relationships of biological mole-
cules. The key terms for the intramolecular and inter-
molecular interactions are the anharmonic components in
the potential energy surface, which rapidly fluctuates in
time. This information is contained in the off-diagonal
features in the 2D spectrum (Figure 2b) and in the time-
dependent evolution of the frequency–frequency corre-
lations, as evident from the changing shapes in the 2D
spectra. Considerable effort is being directed towards the
study of various conformational states of model polypep-
tides [7–9,10�], polynucleotides [11�,12], photo-induced
unfolding processes [13,14] and coupling between vibra-
tions [15,16]. There are now double-resonance methods
[17�,18], akin to NMR, and even 3D methods on the
horizon [19].
d laser beam coming into a diffractive optic (DO) that is designed to
-matched four-wave mixing, along with a reference beam to serve as�] solved the phase stability problem for heterodyne detection by
e noise in an optical system with inversion symmetry. The pulse
nd rephasing pulse (t1) is Fourier transformed to provide the
etected in a spectrometer to provide the second frequency
be delay (T) to map out the frequency–frequency correlation as a
ng the diagonal is identical to a 1D frequency domain absorption
geneous linewidth, isolated from the signal rephasing. The
Figure 1a) and information on spectral diffusion. There are also
opposite in sign (increased absorption with excitation denoted by
the anharmonic progression in excited state levels. From inspection,
ogeneously broadened. The time it takes to become symmetric
to the surroundings.
www.sciencedirect.com
Multidimensional coherent spectroscopy Nagy, Prokhorenko and Miller 657
Figure 3
Coherent control experimental setup. Schematic showing a closed-loop experiment [48] in which the signal monitoring the amount of a target
state is used as feedback to a pulse-shaping system. The feedback typically employs a genetic search algorithm for solving multivariable
problems to either increase or decrease the amount of target state. The pulse shaper can be either a programmable acoustic filter (as shown)
or a spatial light modulator based on liquid-crystal displays. It is now possible to modulate both the spectral amplitude and phase to create
nearly any desired pulse shape. By modulating the phase, it is possible to have different colors arrive at different times and imprint phase
information on the molecular system through the excitation of a superposition state. The phase dependence gives direct information on the
importance of quantum coherence effects in the system response.
A new probe of protein dynamics is now available that
provides information on both structure and dynamics.
One can foresee rapid advances in this area, whereby
several different combinations of isotopic labeling and
double-resonance 2D IR methods are used to map out
key elements in the early phases of protein folding and
other structurally relevant protein motions.
Direct probes of the hydrogen-bond network in
liquid water
To understand protein structure and dynamics, one
should start with the host medium. In this regard, one
of the most important recent advances in 2D IR spectro-
scopy has been the study of the hydrogen-bond network
in liquid water. By tuning to the OH stretch frequency of
liquid water, around 3400 cm�1, it is possible to directly
access information about the hydrogen-bond network, the
very forces that give rise to water’s special properties. The
anomalously broad spectrum of the OH stretch [20–22] is
a direct consequence of the structural heterogeneity of
the dynamic structure of liquid water. The stronger the
hydrogen bond between waters, the more red shifted is
the OH stretch frequency, as electron withdrawal in
forming the hydrogen bond weakens the OH bond.
The proper interpretation of this line-shape with respect
to the degree of hydrogen bonding and the making and
breaking of hydrogen bonds is one of the longest standing
problems in spectroscopy. This is because the
www.sciencedirect.com
information content of 1D spectra (absorption) cannot
distinguish between such classic issues as homogeneous
or inhomogeneous broadening. Resolution of this issue
requires a second time variable to spread out the frequen-
cies in time and to directly observe the effect of the
fluctuations of the surrounding waters on the frequency
spectrum.
The first work to address this problem used three-pulse
photon echo approaches to study HOD in D2O as a model
system for H2O [23,24�]. The first frequency-resolved 2D
IR spectrum of water exploited the longer lived nature of
the OD vibration in the HOD/H2O model system [25��].The OD stretch is spectrally well isolated from other
resonances in the spectrum of water, and serves as a
reference in which there are no resonant interactions
between the OD stretch and the surrounding waters with
respect to effects on the frequency correlations. Consis-
tent with the previous three-pulse photon echo studies,
this work found that the spectrum of HOD/H2O is
inhomogeneously broadened out to �1 ps. The 2D spec-
trum beautifully depicted the frequency correlations and
persistent memory in the liquid. The results for this
reference system (no resonant interactions) need to be
compared to results for pure H2O, in which the coupling
coefficients/frequency modulation of the OH stretch to
the various degrees of freedom could be enhanced under
the fully resonant conditions of the hydrogen-bond
Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2006, 16:654–663
658 Biophysical methods
Figure 4
2D IR spectroscopy of water. (a) HOD/H2O. Schematic 2D plot showing the observations of Asbury et al. [25��]. (Note that the figure is rotated
908 from Figure 2b.) The OD stretch at 2500 cm�1 is markedly inhomogeneously broadened (elongated along the diagonal), with loss of frequency
correlations extending beyond 1 ps. The signal showed frequency-dependent broadening on early timescales and spectral diffusion on the
same timescale as hydrogen-bond formation and breaking. Reprinted with permission from [25��]. (b) H2O. 2D IR spectrum of pure H2O [26��].
Note the more than order of magnitude faster memory loss in the bath correlations (signal becomes symmetric along the diagonal in <100 fs)
and energy relaxation pathways in relation to isotopic water studies. This difference was attributed to enhancement of the resonant coupling
mediated through hindered rotations or librations between neighboring waters. Adapted from [26��]. (c) Loss of memory and energy relaxation
pathways of liquid H2O. Each higher frequency mode is a harmonic of a lower frequency mode. All relaxation pathways in pure H2O can relax
into lower energy modes with conservation of energy in a nearly perfectly matched resonant network on a 100–200 fs timescale, consistent
Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2006, 16:654–663 www.sciencedirect.com
Multidimensional coherent spectroscopy Nagy, Prokhorenko and Miller 659
network. The challenge has been that the concentration
of pure H2O is 55 M and one needs path lengths on the
order of 400 nm to avoid high optical density effects from
distorting the pulses as they propagate through the med-
ium. The last remaining barriers to studying pure liquid
H2O were overcome in a recent study employing a unique
combination of nanofluidics and diffractive optics [26��].The H2O spectrum was determined to be inhomogen-
eously broadened and this long-standing problem was
finally resolved. Interestingly, the frequency correlations
for H2O were predominately lost within 50 fs, in stark
contrast to the much longer lived correlations for isotopic
water (Figure 4).
We now have a fairly complete map of the energy
relaxation pathways in liquid water (Figure 4). Energy
relaxation and exchange pathways occur at the maximum
rate — that of mixing through the highest frequency
intermolecular type of motion (librations). There is also
evidence that small perturbations, such as lowering the
temperature by only 108, have a profound effect on the
frequency correlations, so much so that decoherence
effects slow down for sufficiently long enough to engage
quantum-type effects, such as the formation of excitonic
coupling among water molecules [27]. Liquid H2O is
truly a marvel.
2D electronic spectroscopy — direct probes of energy
transfer in photosynthesis
Significant progress in understanding light-driven primary
events during photosynthesis has been made over the past
approximately 20 years. From the simple picture of For-
ster-like energy transfer (incoherent or random jumping of
excitation between chromophores), the paradigm has
changed to include the exciton concept [28], whereby
energy migration is essentially delocalized among strongly
coupled chromophores faster than bath randomization of
the phase of the excited state wave function [29]. To
visualize and spatially resolve the energy transfer process,
the first 2D electronic (2D-E) experiment on the Fenna-
Matthews-Olson (FMO) complex, the photosynthetic
light-harvesting complex from green sulfur bacteria, was
conducted [30��,31��]. This antenna complex is composed
of three identical proteins arranged in a trimeric unit, with
each unit containing seven bacteriochlorophylls in a spe-
cific structural arrangement. The absorption spectrum has
been assigned to a linear combination of seven exciton
states that form as a result of the electronic interaction
between primarily nearest neighbors [32]. The question
that naturally arises is whether or not there are specific
pathways for energy transfer in this spatial arrangement of
chromophores. 2D-E provides a complete map in the
(Figure 4 Legend Continued) with the largest effective couplings to interm
depicted in stop frame fashion (�10 fs time steps) for two central waters to
frequency modulation. This motion also enables relaxation pathways betwe
Despite this fast relaxation and frequency modulation, energy transfer is fou
correlation, suggesting that even the primary excitations of liquid H2O can t
www.sciencedirect.com
spectral domain of energy transfer and relaxation processes
in a single measurement.
This study found that excitation transfer did not follow a
simple funnel-like energy cascade from higher lying
energy states to lower energy states in which all possible
pathways were involved. Rather, there were specific path-
ways through which the energy flowed and some possible
pathways appeared to be decoupled (Figure 5). This
finding is significant as it indicates a spatial correlation
to the energy flow. The implications are that there are
constructive and destructive quantum interference
effects occurring that lead to specific pathways that more
strongly focus the excitation to the trap pigment (bacter-
iochlorophyll number 3). This prospect requires that the
electronic coherence time be sufficiently long to support
such interference effects. These experiments were con-
ducted at 77 K, at which the electronic coherence time
(100–300 fs) is comparable to the spatial migration of the
excitation energy [33]. It would be very interesting to see
if these coherence effects survive at room temperature to
play a role in the light-harvesting process. At the very
least, this work brings to our attention that light-harvest-
ing systems are working close to the quantum coherence
limits for exploiting quantum interference effects for
optimizing energy transfer efficiency.
Coherent control studies of biologicalsystemsThere is a long history of using coherent control as an
elegant demonstration of the fundamental differences
between classical and quantum mechanics, that is to
say, the transfer of coherence from laser excitation to
quantum states of matter has been used to create con-
structive and destructive pathways and thereby control
the flow of matter waves [34]. It is only recently that
coherent control protocols have been exploited to probe
underlying issues of quantum coherence in biological
systems, and whether or not such complex systems could
be manipulated [35].
Control of energy transfer in light-harvesting systems
The first coherent control study of a biological process
was the work by Herek et al. [35,36��]. This group
focused on controlling the energy transfer pathways of
the antennae complex from the bacterial light-harvesting
(LH2) system. They used the change in the energy
transfer efficiency from the initially excited donors (car-
otenoids) to surrounding bacteriochlorophylls as feed-
back in a closed-loop pulse-shaping system. The
results were especially interesting in that, even for a
system as large as LH2, they were able to demonstrate
olecular librations. The effect of correlated librations (long arrows) is
show the effect of this motion on the hydrogen bond and associated
en intramolecular stretch and bend modes (shown as short arrows).
nd to occur on timescales comparable to the loss of frequency
ake on delocalized excitonic character.
Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2006, 16:654–663
660 Biophysical methods
Figure 5
2D-E of energy transfer in FMO. (a) Structure of the FMO complex, with light numbers giving the physical structure of the bacteriochlorophylls.
The color scheme indicates the assigned excitons numbered from 1–7, with 1 being the lowest energy exciton [30��]. With the previous assignment
of the spatial arrangement of the excitons [32], the 2D information gives a femtosecond time-resolved picture of energy transfer with nanometer
spatial resolution. It appears there are interference effects that spatially direct the energy transfer pathways so that no more than two or three
steps are involved in transmitting the absorbed energy to the energy trap (bacteriochlorophyll number 3). (b) 2D spectrum from which the
physical picture shown in (a) was derived. The 1D spectrum is shown at top and color coded to match the spatial assignment of the excitons
shown in (a) and shows the spreading out in frequency space of the different interactions in the 2D spectrum. The off-diagonal features evolve
in time to map out the energy transfer pathways [30��]. A detailed comparison to theoretical treatments of the electronic couplings between
bacteriochlorophylls and quantum interference effects is given in [31��]. Reproduced with permission from [31��].
some degree of control over the flow of excitation energy.
They were able to quench energy transfer by a factor of
30% and demonstrated that the degree of quenching
depended on the phase profile of the pulse. The opti-
mized pulse shape was found to be composed of a ‘comb’
of separated pulses; this comb structure appears to be a
general feature of controlling complex molecules [37�].The period between subpulses was in resonance with the
160 cm�1 mode of the carotenoids, which corresponds to
the torsional bending of the C–C backbone; this mode is
believed to facilitate the internal conversion from the S2
and S1 electronic surfaces [36��]. The energy transfer
step to the bacteriochlorophylls occurs almost exclusively
from the excited S2 state of the carotenoid. It was argued
that displacing this 160 cm�1 mode increased the rate of
non-radiative relaxation and thereby increased the
quenching of energy transfer. They were not able to
show increased energy transfer or constructive interfer-
ence effects.
These experiments were done at relatively high pulse
energies, where singlet–singlet annihilation effects can
contribute and even access intermediate states that could
potentially lead to complex kinetics [38�]. The phase-
dependent component observed in these experiments is
considered to be the coherent control contribution to the
optimal pulse shape. By examining b-carotene as a model
Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2006, 16:654–663
system for the LH2 carotenoids and phase-only control in
an open-loop experiment, Hauer et al. [39�] demonstrated
that, under electronically resonant conditions, it is possi-
ble to enhance the excitation of certain Raman active
modes over others. This very recent finding is all the more
significant as the electronic dephasing time of the elec-
tronic resonance enhancement is expected to be on the
order of 100 fs or less, which is shorter than the time
between subpulses in the crafted pulses; presumably
pathways for the laser field interaction that couples upper
excited states account for the additional enhancement.
So far, only quenching of energy transfer in LH2 has been
observed. If the above mechanism is correct, then it
should be possible to couple to modes that avoid relaxa-
tion paths, so that both constructive and destructive
interference pathways are demonstrated. By selectively
exciting the higher frequency skeletal modes around
1500 cm�1, rather than the low-frequency modes, it
should be possible to avoid the conical intersection in
the excited states of carotenoids that leads to non-radia-
tive relaxation and increase the net quantum yield for
energy transfer [36��]. This new insight is intriguing and
offers great potential for learning details of biological
systems that would be impossible without the advent
of the optical control knobs provided by coherent control
protocols to turn on and off different processes.
www.sciencedirect.com
Multidimensional coherent spectroscopy Nagy, Prokhorenko and Miller 661
Figure 6
Coherent control of retinal isomerization in bR. (a) Optimization process
using a genetic search algorithm to shape the laser pulse for increasing
the effective quantum yield for photoisomerization of retinal in bR. The
baseline (thick black line) for no control is given by the amount of cis-
photoproduct observed for unstructured transform-limited pulses. Blue
circles are the best results in a ‘population’ of trial pulses within the
genetic algorithm rule set and the green squares are the average values
for the whole population. (b) Wigner transform of the optimal pulse. The
complex regular feature in the electric field amplitude (forcing function)
contains frequency components corresponding to the low-frequency
torsional mode involved in the isomerization process and its harmonics
(�200 cm�1). This pulse shape was found to be sensitive to the specific
phase of the different frequency components, indicating the
isomerization step conserves coherence through a critical seam in
nuclear configuration space, as schematically represented in Figure 1b,
to the point that the reaction yield can be optically manipulated through
phase control. Figure adapted from [43��].
Coherent control of biological function:
photoisomerization of retinal — the primary step
of the proton pump
The photoisomerization of retinal provides a nearly ideal
system to probe whether there are conserved phase rela-
tionships in barrier crossing events of biological systems.
This process occurs in competition with the extremely fast
non-radiative relaxation of the retinal excited state. In
solution phase, the photoisomerization of retinal results
in many different photoisomers with quantum yields typi-
cally on the order of a few percent. In a protein environ-
ment, the photoisomerization of retinal in, for example,
bacteriorhodopsin (bR) exhibits only one photoproduct,
which involves isomerization along the C13–C14 bond
with a quantum yield of 65% [40]. It is clear that the
protein structure is imposing constraints on the fluctua-
tions along this reaction coordinate. Equally important is
the speed of this biological process. This reaction occurs
within 200 and 500 fs for the primary event behind vision
and proton translocation in bR, respectively [41,42]. These
timescales are close to the expected decoherence time-
scales of the optically excited vibrational wave packets and
enable the imprinting of phase information in the excited
state using trial pulses to test for coherence effects.
The first experiment to demonstrate control over a bio-
logical function is the very recent work of Prokhorenko
et al. on bR [43��]. These experiments introduced the
constraint of constant actinic energy during pulse shaping
and optimization, and the use of weak excitation condi-
tions relevant to biological processes. Weak field control
was used to eliminate possible multiphoton processes and
to ensure that the electronic levels probed are the same as
those in the actual biological process. It was found that
the absolute quantum yield for photoisomerization of bR
could be enhanced from 65% to 85% or suppressed to
45%, giving an overall range of manipulation of the
reaction coordinate of more than 40%. The optimized
pulse shapes were quite interesting. Using a Wigner
transform, the electric field amplitude of the measured
shaped pulse could be projected as a function of time and
frequency to get a direct feeling for the forces the mole-
cule was experiencing through the applied field. The
optimal pulses showed a highly periodic shape, with
features that closely match the low-frequency torsional
mode of retinal that is involved in the isomerization step.
The anti-optimal pulse that suppresses the isomerization
was also interesting in that the frequency modulation of
the electric field corresponds to a different frequency that
is aperiodic. The frequency in the anti-optimal pulse
would be akin to pushing a child on a swing out of phase
to dampen the amplitude of the swing motion. The basic
findings are summarized in Figure 6 (and a physical
picture of the photo-induced steering of the reaction is
shown in Figure 1b). In relation to the question posed in
this review, this work provides evidence that quantum
coherence effects not only persist along reaction
www.sciencedirect.com
coordinates in biological systems but also can be signifi-
cantly manipulated. The degree to which protein struc-
ture imposes correlations to favor quantum interference
effects awaits further exploration of model systems.
Concluding remarksMultidimensional coherent spectroscopies (2D and
coherent control) are beginning to address key issues
with respect to connecting our understanding of the
quantum world to the biological world in which we live
Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2006, 16:654–663
662 Biophysical methods
— how Nature has exploited the correspondence princi-
ple that connects quantum mechanics to continuum
mechanics to harness chemical and solar energy to per-
form functions. The current picture is that there are
correlations imposed on biologically relevant systems,
whether they be frequency correlations in the dynamic
structure of liquid H2O, energy transfer in light-harvest-
ing complexes or the actual motions of heavy atoms in a
biological process (bR), that operate on timescales com-
parable to decoherence timescales and thus involve con-
served phase relationships or quantum coherence effects
to a certain extent. The degree to which the structural
correlations in biological systems have been optimized to
take advantage of constructive and destructive interfer-
ence effects is still an open question; however, the issue
of whether or not quantum interference effects can man-
ifest themselves in biological functions has been
answered. Purely quantum effects can play a role in
optimizing function. It is highly probable that such effects
have been explicitly exploited for the execution of bio-
logically important functions whereby the particular path-
way is in strong competition with very fast dissipation
processes that are unavoidable in large molecules with a
myriad of anharmonically coupled degrees of freedom.
For example, key primary energy transfer and photoi-
somerization steps, which serve as the powerhouse for
life, are in competition with the very fast relaxation of
carotenoid excited states and occur right at the coherence
limit; constructively interfering correlations (structurally
imposed) could make a significant difference to the over-
all efficiency, as demonstrated by the coherent control
studies of bR (>20%). Enhancements of this magnitude
would provide strong filter functions for structural opti-
mization. The challenge will be to extend coherent multi-
dimensional spectroscopies in which 2D methods are
combined with pulse-shaping protocols of coherent con-
trol to extract information on mode-specific couplings and
conserved phase relationships in biological response func-
tions. It is exactly this kind of information that we need to
understand the structure-function relationships of biolo-
gical systems and how the wave properties of matter play
a role.
AcknowledgementsRJDM would like to thank the Natural Sciences and Engineering ResearchCouncil of Canada and the Canada Research Chair program for support.The authors thank A Paarmann for help with the figures.
References and recommended readingPapers of particular interest, published within the annual period ofreview, have been highlighted as:
� of special interest�� of outstanding interest
1. Schrodinger E: What is Life?: The Physical Aspects of the LivingCell with Mind and Matter and Autobiographical Sketches.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
2. Glauber RJ: Quantum theory of optical coherence. Phys Rev1963, 130:2529-2539.
Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2006, 16:654–663
3. Bardeen CJ, Shank CV: Ultrafast dynamics of the solvent-solute interaction measured by femtosecond four-wavemixing: LD690 in n-alcohols. Chem Phys Lett 1994,226:310-316.
4. Cong PJ, Deuel HP, Yan YJ, Simon JD: Ultrafast electronicdephasing dynamics of large molecules in room-temperatureliquids studied by variable pulse-width tunable femtosecondtransient absorption-spectroscopy. J Luminescence 1994,60-61:699-702.
5. Mukamel S: Multidimensional femtosecond correlationspectroscopies of electronic and vibrational excitations.Annu Rev Phys Chem 2000, 51:691-729.
6. Cardoza D, Langhojer F, Trallero-Herrero C, Monti OLA,Weinacht T: Changing pulse-shape basis for molecularlearning control. Phys Rev A 2004, 70:053406.
7. Hamm P, Lim MH, Hochstrasser RM: Structure of theamide I band of peptides measured by femtosecondnonlinear-infrared spectroscopy. J Phys Chem B 1998,102:6123-6138.
8. Woutersen S, Hamm P: Nonlinear two-dimensional vibrationalspectroscopy of peptides. J Phys Condens Matter 2002,14:R1035-R1062.
9. Zanni MT, Ge NH, Kim YS, Decatur SM, Hochstrasser RM:The temperature dependent structure distribution of a helicalpeptide studied with 2D IR spectroscopy. Biophys J 2002,82:14A.
10.�
Park J, Hochstrasser RM: Multidimensional infraredspectroscopy of a peptide intramolecular hydrogen bond.Chem Phys 2006, 323:78-86.
The power of 2D IR spectroscopy is demonstrated with for an acylprolinedipeptide. At least two different intramolecular hydrogen-bonded struc-tures were revealed that are fairly rigid and undergo internal dynamicexchange.
11.�
Maekawa H, Toniolo C, Moretto A, Broxterman QB, Ge NH:Different spectral signatures of octapeptide 3(10) and alpha-helices revealed by two-dimensional infrared spectroscopy.J Phys Chem B 2006, 110:5834-5837.
This work discusses the use of cross-peaks in assigning specific struc-tures and the potential of 2D IR to follow the role of 310- and a-helicalconformations in early events of protein folding.
12. Smith AW, Chung HS, Ganim Z, Tokmakoff A: Residual nativestructure in a thermally denatured beta-hairpin. J Phys Chem B2005, 109:17025-17027.
13. Bredenbeck J, Helbing J, Behrendt R, Renner C, Moroder L,Wachtveitl J, Hamm P: Transient 2D-IR spectroscopy:snapshots of the nonequilibrium ensemble during thepicosecond conformational transition of a small peptide.J Phys Chem B 2003, 107:8654-8660.
14. Chung HS, Khalil M, Tokmakoff A: Nonlinear infraredspectroscopy of protein conformational change duringthermal unfolding. J Phys Chem B 2004, 108:15332-15342.
15. Hahn S, Kim SS, Lee C, Cho M: Characteristic two-dimensionalIR spectroscopic features of antiparallel and parallel beta-sheet polypeptides: simulation studies. J Chem Phys 2005,123:084905.
16. Fang C, Wang J, Charnley AK, Barber-Armstrong W, Smith AB,Decatur SM, Hochstrasser RM: Two-dimensional infraredmeasurements of the coupling between amide modes of analpha-helix. Chem Phys Lett 2003, 382:586-592.
17.�
Rubtsov IV, Kumar K, Hochstrasser RM: Dual-frequency 2D IRphoton echo of a hydrogen bond. Chem Phys Lett 2005,402:439-443.
A significant advance in 2D IR to include multiple resonances in analogy toheteronuclear NMR. This work expands upon the first report [18] todetermine the coupling between NH and C O modes in forming hydro-gen bonds and the positive correlation of these modes to the bath(modulation of the hydrogen bond strength through solvent fluctuationsaffects both modes in the same way).
18. Rubtsov IV, Wang JP, Hochstrasser RM: Dual-frequency 2D-IRspectroscopy heterodyned photon echo of the peptide bond.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100:5601-5606.
www.sciencedirect.com
Multidimensional coherent spectroscopy Nagy, Prokhorenko and Miller 663
19. Hamm P: Three-dimensional-IR spectroscopy: beyond thetwo-point frequency fluctuation correlation function.J Chem Phys 2006, 124:124506.
20. Zolotarev VM, Mikhlinov BA, Alperovich LI, Popov SI: Dispersionand absorption of liquid water in the infrared and radio regionsof the spectrum. Opt Spectrosc 1969, 27:430-432.
21. Hale GM, Querry MR: Optical constants of water in the 200 nmto 200 mm wavelength region. Appl Opt 1973, 12:555-563.
22. Eisenberg D, Kauzmann W: The Structure and Properties of Water.New York: Oxford University Press; 1969.
23. Stenger J, Madsen D, Dreyer J, Nibbering ETJ, Hamm P,Elsaesser T: Coherent response of hydrogen bonds in liquidsprobed by ultrafast vibrational spectroscopy. J Phys Chem A2001, 105:2929-2932.
24.�
Nibbering ETJ, Elsaesser T: Ultrafast vibrational dynamics ofhydrogen bonds in the condensed phase. Chem Rev 2004,104:1887-1914.
A comprehensive review of our current understanding of hydrogen-bonddynamics.
25.��
Asbury JB, Steinel T, Stromberg C, Corcelli SA, Lawrence CP,Skinner JL, Fayer MD: Water dynamics: vibrational echocorrelation spectroscopy and comparison to moleculardynamics simulations. J Phys Chem A 2004, 108:1107-1119.
This article gives a good, concise account of experiment and theory forstudying hydrogen-bond dynamics.
26.��
Cowan ML, Bruner BD, Huse N, Dwyer JR, Chugh B,Nibbering ETJ, Elsaesser T, Miller RJD: Ultrafast memory lossand energy redistribution in the hydrogen bond network ofliquid H2O. Nature 2005, 434:199-202.
This work solved the issue concerning the inhomogeneous/homoge-neous nature of the OH vibrations, reporting on the hydrogen-bondnetwork of liquid H2O by introducing nanofluidics and diffractive opticsto 2D IR. Nanofluidics have potential applications in areas currently usingmicrofluidics.
27. Paarmann A, Kraemer D, Cowan ML, Bruner BD, Miller RJD,Huse N, Dwyer JR, Nibbering ETJ, Elsaesser T: Ultrafastphenomena XV. In Springer Series in Chemical Physics. Edited byMiller RJD, Weiner AM, Corkum P, Jonas DM. Berlin: Springer;2006:in press.
28. Davydov AS: Theory of Molecular Excitons. New York: PlenumPress; 1971.
29. van Amerongen H, Valkunas L, van Grondelle R: PhotosyntheticExcitons, edn 1. Singapore: World Scientific Co; 2000.
30.��
Brixner T, Stenger J, Vaswani HM, Cho M, Blankenship RE,Fleming GR: Two-dimensional spectroscopy of electroniccouplings in photosynthesis. Nature 2005, 434:625-628.
The first report of 2D-E spectroscopy of a biological system. This workgives femtosecond time resolution with nanometer spatial resolution forthe energy transfer process in the model light-harvesting FMO complex.
31.��
Cho MH, Vaswani HM, Brixner T, Stenger J, Fleming GR: Excitonanalysis in 2D electronic spectroscopy. J Phys Chem B 2005,109:10542-10556.
A detailed theoretical analysis of the electronic couplings that were usedto give a spatial/temporal map of energy transfer in [30��].
32. Louwe RJW, Vrieze J, Hoff AJ, Aartsma TJ: Toward an integralinterpretation of the optical steady-state spectra of the FMO-complex of Prosthecochloris aestuarii. 2. Exciton simulations.J Phys Chem B 1997, 101:11280-11287.
33. Cho MH, Fleming GR: The integrated photon echo andsolvation dynamics. II. Peak shifts and two-dimensionalphoton echo of a coupled chromophore system. J Chem Phys2005, 123:114506.
34. Shapiro M, Brumer P: Principles of the Quantum Control ofMolecular Processes, edn 1. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2002.
35. Herek JL, Wohlleben W, Cogdell RJ, Zeidler D, Motzkus M:Quantum control of energy flow in light harvesting.Nature 2002, 417:533-535.
www.sciencedirect.com
36.��
Wohlleben W, Buckup T, Herek JL, Motzkus M: Coherent controlfor spectroscopy and manipulation of biological dynamics.Chemphyschem 2005, 6:850-857.
This paper gives both more experimental details on the study described in[35] and further predictions for testing their proposed mechanism ofcontrol. A discussion of future applications of coherent control in biologywith respect to studying mode-selective chemistry is given.
37.�
Prokhorenko VI, Nagy AM, Miller RJD: Coherent control of thepopulation transfer in complex solvated molecules at weakexcitation. An experimental study. J Chem Phys 2005,122:184502.
This work was a necessary precursor to the study of biological moleculesto show that coherent control under weak field conditions could beemployed to ensure the states prepared by the laser excitation pertainto the same levels involved in light activated biological processes.
38.�
Papagiannakis E, Vengris M, Valkunas L, Cogdell RJ, vanGrondelle R, Larsen DS: Excited-state dynamics of carotenoidsin light-harvesting complexes. 2. Dissecting pulse structuresfrom optimal control experiments. J Phys Chem B 2006,110:5737-5746.
This paper describes studies of the effects of high excitation energies,typically used in coherent control studies, that lead to new relaxationpathways and intermediates not found under low excitation and need tobe taken into account in determining the dynamics under coherent controlat high excitation.
39.�
Hauer J, Buckup T, Motzkus M: Enhancement of molecularmodes by electronically resonant multipulse excitation:further progress towards mode selective chemistry.J Chem Phys 2006, 125:061101.
Open-loop control of b-carotene as a model for biological systems showsselective coherent excitation of Raman active modes in the excitedelectronic state.
40. Tittor J, Oesterhelt D: The quantum yield of bacteriorhodopsin.FEBS Lett 1990, 263:269-273.
41. Mathies RA, Cruz CHB, Pollard WT, Shank CV: Directobservation of the femtosecond excited-state cis-transisomerization in bacteriorhodopsin. Science 1988,240:777-779.
42. Schoenlein RW, Peteanu LA, Mathies RA, Shank CV: The firststep in vision - femtosecond isomerization of rhodopsin.Science 1991, 254:412-415.
43.��
Prokhorenko VI, Nagy AM, Waschuk SA, Brown LS, Birge RR,Miller RJD: Coherent control of retinal isomerization inbacteriorhodopsin. Science 2006, in press.
Enhancement and suppression of the functional response of a biologicalsystem is reported. The control involves the displacement of heavyatoms, that is, control of the efficiency with which work is done by thebiological system in a manner consistent with exploitation of quantumcoherence effects.
44. Ogilvie JP, Cowan ML, Armstrong MR, Nagy AM, Miller RJD:Diffractive optics-based heterodyne detected three-pulsephoton echo. In Springer Series in Chemical Physics. Edited byMiller RJD, Murnane MM, Scherer NF, Weiner AM. New York:Springer-Verlag; 2003,71:571-573.
45. Dadusc G, Goodno GD, Chiu HL, Ogilvie J, Miller RJD:Advances in grating-based photoacoustic spectroscopyfor the study of protein dynamics. Isr J Chem 1998,38:191-206.
46. Goodno GD, Dadusc G, Miller RJD: Ultrafast heterodyne-detected transient-grating spectroscopy using diffractiveoptics. J Opt Soc Am B 1998, 15:1791-1794.
47.�
Cowan ML, Ogilvie JP, Miller RJD: Two-dimensionalspectroscopy using diffractive optics based phased-lockedphoton echoes. Chem Phys Lett 2004, 386:184-189.
This is an extension of the work discussed in [41], which first solved phasestabilization of photon echo spectroscopy using both anti-correlatednoise and variable glass delays in the interferometer design for thesecond independent time delay needed for 2D spectroscopy.
48. Judson RS, Rabitz H: Teaching lasers to control molecules.Phys Rev Lett 1992, 68:1500-1503.
Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2006, 16:654–663