do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? a meta-analysis steven b. robbins,...
TRANSCRIPT
Do Psychosocial and Study Skill Factors Predict College Outcomes? A Meta-Analysis
Steven B. Robbins, Kristy Lauver,
Huy Le and Daniel Davis, Ronelle Langley, & Aaron Carlstrom
Presented by Andriette Vaughn
Radford University
Purpose
• To determine if psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes– Current national debate over what constructs to
use when choosing college applicants• Are standardized achievement and/or high school
GPA better predictors of college outcomes?
Literature Review• 1984 - 2004• Methods
– Electronic Sources• PsycINFO• Educational Resources Information Center
– Manual Search (1991-2000)• Journal of Counseling Psychology• Journal of Counseling and Development• Research in Higher Education• Journal of Higher Education• Sources sited in the reference sections of literature reviews, articles, and
studies from prominent sources
Literature Review
• Studies– 408 were found
– 109 were used• 299 were excluded due to data that was unusable and/or a
population that did not coincide with our population of interest
Issues to Consider
• What constitutes college outcome?– Performance
• Class or subject matter achievement, typically measured by GPA
– Persistence • Retention: length of time a student remains enrolled
in an institution.
• Lack of clearly defined and adequately measured predictors
Dependent Measures• Achievement Motivation
• Academic Goals
• Institutional Commitment
• Perceived Social Support
• Social Involvement
• Academic Self-efficacy
• General Self-concept
• Academic-related Skills
Studies to Include
• Included both a measure of the PSF constructs and an outcome measure of college success
• Limited to studies examining full-time students enrolled at a 4-year, higher education institution in the United States
ResultsRetention 90%
ConfidenceInterval (r)
90%ConfidenceInterval (ρ)
90%Credibility
IntervalPredictor K N r Lower Upper ρ Lower Upper Lower Upper % var.
acct.AchievementMotivation
7 3,208 .105 .042 .168 .066 .042 .168 -.083 .214 28.03
AcademicGoals
33 20,012 .210 .160 .261 .340 .270 .410 -.062 .742 6.60
InstitutionalCommitment
28 20,741 .204 .150 .258 .262 .192 .331 -.105 .628 4.60
SocialSupport
26 11,624 .199 .142 .255 .257 .193 .321 -.068 .583 7.39
SocialInvolvement
36 26,263 .166 .132 .201 .216 .183 .249 .037 .657 9.60
AcademicSelf-efficacy
6 6,930 .257 .243 .272 .359 .354 .363 .347 .370 95.50
General Self-concept
6 4,240 .059 .007 .109 .050 -.001 .101 -.076 .175 17.79
AcademicRelated Skills
8 1,627 .298 .099 .497 .366 .126 .606 -.065 .797 5.08
ResultsGPA 90%
ConfidenceInterval (r)
90%ConfidenceInterval (ρ)
90%Credibility
IntervalPredictor K N r Lower Upper ρ Lower Upper Lower Upper % var.
acct.AchievementMotivation
17 9,330 .257 .221 .292 .303 .263 .344 .136 .471 11.64
AcademicGoals
34 17,575 .155 .135 .175 .179 .157 .201 .052 .306 20.56
InstitutionalCommitment
11 5,775 .108 .075 .141 .120 .088 .151 .016 .223 25.75
SocialSupport
33 12,366 .096 .075 .118 .109 .087 .130 -.015 .232 27.13
SocialInvolvement
33 15,955 .124 .098 .150 .141 .114 .168 -.015 .297 14.87
AcademicSelf-efficacy
18 9,598 .378 .342 .413 .496 .444 .548 .275 .717 7.67
General Self-concept
21 9,621 .037 .006 .068 .046 .012 .080 -.109 .201 17.76
AcademicRelated Skills
33 16,282 .129 .098 .161 .159 .121 .197 .035 .283 23.86
Potential Moderators• Types of measures used; Diversity of scales supposedly
measuring the same construct
• College Adjustment Process
• Institutional size
• Institutional differences
• Literature ranges across many psychological and educational content domains
• Differences in sample characteristics (I.e. gender, race, background, individual differences, seniors vs. first years, etc)
Conclusion• Measures of psychosocial and study skill factor
constructs are correlated with retention as a measure of college success.
• Measures are also correlated with with GPA across most (90%) of situations
• Psychosocial and study skill factors are shown to be better predictors of college outcomes than SES, standardized achievement, and high school GPA,
• There is a need to incorporate Psychosocial and study skill factors into the prediction of college outcome