dmitry maslov nispacee 2014 conference caf in tatarstan
TRANSCRIPT
Dmitry MASLOV ▪ Liliya NURGATINA
Raising Effectiveness and Quality in Public Administration through Application of the Common Assessment Framework (CAF Model): Tatarstan Case
KAZAN (VOLGA REGION) FEDERAL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Government vs. Governance in Central and Eastern Europe From Pre-Weberianism to Neo-Weberianism? May 22-24, 2014, Budapest, Hungary
Quality ▪ Total Quality Management ▪ Business Models vs. Public Sector ▪ CAF ▪ Europe ▪ Enables ▪ Results ▪ Self-assessment ▪ External feedback ▪ National Correspondents ▪ Tatarstan ▪ QMS-Index ▪ QMS Dashboard
Plan
Keywords
Producer oriented vision Quality = features of the product or service itself Quality = meet the requirements of the standard Quality = «Do things right!»
Customer oriented vision Quality = «fitness for use» Quality = satisfaction of the customer/user/client/citizen Quality = «Do the right things!»
Quality = ?
Do the right things right!
• Results orientation • Citizen/Customer focus • Leadership and constancy of purpose • Management by processes and facts • People development and involvement • Continuous learning, innovation and
improvement • Partnership development • Social responsibility
Total Quality Management
Deming PDCA cycle
• ISO 9000 • LEAN • Kaizen • 6 Sigma • EFQM Excellence Model • etc.
Total Quality Management
Business Methods in Public Sector
Common Assessment Framework The CAF, inspired by the EFQM Excellence Model, is offered as an easy to use tool to assist public sector organisations to introduce Total Quality Management principals thought the comprehensive self-assessment framework
Launch of the CAF
CAF Objectives
• To introduce public administrations into the culture of excellence and the principles of TQM;
• To guide them progressively to a fully-fledged PLAN-DO-CHECK-ACT cycle;
• To facilitate the self-assessment of a public organisation in order to obtain a diagnosis and a definition of improvement actions;
• To act as a bridge across the various models used in quality management, both in public and private sectors;
• To facilitate bench learning between public sector organisations.
Origin and growth of CAF
• First version of CAF launched in 2000 at the European Quality Conference in Lisbon.
• In 2001, a network of national CAF correspondents and the EIPA CAF Resource Centre (CAF RC) were created following the decision of the Directors-General in charge of public service.
• Celebration of 2000 CAF users in 2010, for the moment more than 3000 registered CAF users.
• CAF model translated into 22 languages (including Russian) • CAF 2013 version launched at the 5th European CAF Users’
Event, Oslo, Norway (September 2012). • Sustainable CAF dynamic , with CAF users events, trainings,
national conferences.
Over 3000 registered CAF users in 45 countries and the European institutions
European Institutions and EC: GS Council of the EU DGA2, European Court of Auditors, Europol, EC DG
Admin, EC DG Trans, EC DG Trade, ERA, ECDC, Committee of the regions
Italy 401 Czech Republic 68 EU Institutions and EC 12
Poland 318 Romania 49 Bulgaria 11
Belgium 308 Greece 48 Turkey 8
Germany 266 Spain 46 Latvia, UK 7
Denmark 248 Slovakia 48 Netherlands 6
Portugal 145 Switzerland 24 Ireland, Sweden, Macedonia 5
Hungary 106 France 21 Russia 4
Finland 103 Cyprus 19 Croatia, Iceland 3
Austria 92 Bosnia-Herzegovina 18 China, Namibia, Ecuador 2
Dominican Republic 86 Estonia 18 Tunisia 2
Norway 85 Lithuania 20 Kosovo, Montenegro, Serbia 1
Slovenia 70 Luxembourg 12 Morocco, Brazil, Chile 1
Find out more at caf.eipa.eu
CAF Growth in Europe
228 registered CAF Users in 2005 2066 registered CAF Users in 2010
CAF Model
Enablers criteria
LEADERSHIP
Fields of attention: The examples (not compulsory)
= Good Practices
1.3 1
2
3
4
5
1.4
1.1 1.2
CRITERIA
STRATEGY & PLANNING
PEOPLE
PARTNERSHIPS & RESOURCES
PROCESSES
Example: Criterion 2. Strategy & Planning
2.4 Plan, implement and review innovation and change
2.3 Communicate and implement strategy and planning throughout the whole organisation and review it on a regular basis
9. Key performance Results
2.2 Develop strategy and planning taking into account the gathered information
2.1 Gather information on present and future needs of stakeholders as well as
relevant management information
2. Strategy and Planning
Results criteria
Perception
6.2 6.1
CITIZEN/ CUSTOMER-ORIENTED
RESULTS
CRITERIA PEOPLE RESULTS
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
RESULTS
KEY PERFORMANCE
RESULTS External Internal
6
7
8
9
Performance
Example: Criterion 6. Citizens/Customer-oriented results
6.1 Perception measurements
6.2 Performance measurements
6. Citizen/Customer- oriented Results
CAF Process Baselines
Quality development and self-assessment is a joint project for managers and employees. Knowledge lies in the mind of the people at the workplace. Self-assessment is a unique opportunity to gain overview of the overall strengths and areas of improvement of the organisation – it should not be seen as just another project but rather the platform of all organisational development. Diagnosis are based on consensus on strengths and areas of improvement for each sub criterion with proposed concrete improvement actions related to the areas of improvement. A prioritised action plan should be in line with the strategy of the organisation.
Self-assessment
How to evaluate?
Sub
criterion
1.1.
Strong points
(this is what the
organisation is strong at
with regard to this sub
criteria)
Improvement areas
(this is what the
organisation has to
improve)
…
…
…
…
…
…
Improvement actions
(which are the concrete actions we
propose)
Score
CAF 10 steps
Reason for using CAF
EIPA CAF Resource Centre 2011
Timeframe improvement process
1. Initiation 2. Self-Assessment 3. Improvements
January 2013 February - March March - June July -> Dec 2014
- Project set up - Organisation - Planning - Communication
- Assessment groups - Training - Awareness - Self-assessment - Findings
- Prioritisation - Action plan - Programme - 10 projects
- Implementation - Monitoring - Evaluation - Adjustments - Communication - ALL staff!
CAF users
EIPA
CA
F R
eso
urc
e C
entr
e 2
01
1
CAF External Feedback
A network of CAF Correspondents
CAF in Russia
CAF in Tatarstan
In 2012 Kazan (Volga region) Federal University (KFU), supported by the government of Tatarstan Republic, signed a bilateral agreement with the European Institute of Public Administration (EIPA) and became National partner in field of distributing CAF Model in Russia (with focus on Tatarstan and Volga region).
CAF in Tatarstan
In 2013 in the framework of this agreement KFU School of Public Administration have implemented three activities: 1. Training and Site visits to European CAF user in Germany, Netherlands and Belgium for civil servants of Tatarstan Republic in April; 2. CAF training in Kazan in August for 150 civil servants delivered by EIPA experts; 3. First International Quality Conference in Kazan in December for 200 participants with contributes from National Ministries and Agencies, Administration of the President of Russian Federation, EIPA experts, CAF practitioners from Norway, Lithuania, Slovenia.
CAF in Tatarstan
In 2013 KFU School of Public Administration has implemented a research project “Methodology of analysis and evaluation of effectiveness and quality in public administration (Volga region case)”.
QMS-Index
Quality Management System Index (QMS-Index) is a set of indicators characterizing the level of quality management system in organisation.
QMS-Index is harmonized with the criteria of the CAF Model and the EFQM Excellence Model
One of the main QMS-Index feature is involving employees in the process of diagnostic self-assessment which covers various aspects of the organisation in the framework of desired and achieved level of quality management system
QMS allows to find gaps of misunderstanding between managers and employees.
QMS-Dashboard
QMS-Dashboard
QMS-Dashboard
Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
School Of Public Administration
e-mail: [email protected] www.hspa.kpfu.ru
Dmitry Maslov [email protected]