division of applied social sciences community survey research class 2013 contact: professor david...
TRANSCRIPT
Ashland Area Survey
Division of Applied Social Sciences Community Survey Research Class
2013Contact: Professor David O’Brien –
Overview
Does the survey sample accurately represent the population?
• American Community Survey (OSEDA)—5 year average—2007 to 2011
• Compared gender, age, education, and income
Gender Comparison
Census MO City of Ashland Outside Ashland 65010 and 65039
49%
43% 43%
51%
57% 57%
MaleFemale
Age Comparison
18 to 24 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 64 65+
18% 16% 16%
33%
17%
8%
16%19%
41%
16%
1%
11%
16%
50%
22%
Census MO Census 65010 and 65039 Survey Data
Education Comparison 65010
Less than high school
High school Associate degree Bachelor degree Graduate degree
4%
48%
11%
27%
10%
1%
33%
16%
25% 25%
Census 65010 Survey Data 65010
Education Comparison 65039
Less than high school
High school Associate degree
Bachelor degree Graduate degree
13%
57%
5%
14%10%
4%
34%
12%
29%22%
Census 65039 Survey Data 65039
Income Comparison
Census MO Census 65010
Survey Data 65010
Census 65039
Survey Data 65039
Median family
income$47,202 $58,176
$60,000 to $89,999 $67,103 $60,000 to
$89,999
Mean family
income$62,979 $65,206 $76,269 $74,691 $77,159
In Conclusion
• Trends between survey respondents and the surrounding population:– Gender: slightly higher percentage females– Income: higher mean income– Age: skewed to older individuals– Education: higher percentage with graduate
degrees
Community Identity Defined
• A group and/or location with shared values,
goals and/or habits among its members.
• Community identity is therefore subject to:— Social organizations & institutions
— Economic organizations & institutions
— Political institutions, affiliations & law
Respondent Overview
• Average residency duration is 17 years
• 69% are married
• 26% are retired
• 57% are female
• 51% have a bachelors degree or higher
• 88% own their home
• 38% have children under the age of 18
Q. 7 - Where do you feel the greatest sense of belonging?
City of Ash-land12445%
Jefferson City155%
City of Columbia27
10%
So. Boone County
8732%
Other238%
Q. 23 & 24 - In what location do you and other members of your
household work?
Ashland Columbia Jefferson City So. Boone county
Other
46
168
53
2114
55
125
38
177
RespondentOther
Q. 8 - What connects you to Ashland?
Friends
Family
School
Long T
erm Resid
ence
Neighbours
Employment
Business
Place of B
irth
Farm
No Ties
Other
196170
144129
9667 61
43 31 31 27
Q. 9 - Are you or a family member active in local
organizations?
Church
Sports
Team
PTA/School B
oard/Sc
hool
Fratern
al/Se
rvice
Group
Business
Organiza
tionOth
er
Youth Gro
up
Community Deve
lopment
Veteran's G
roup
Labour U
nion
Women's G
roup
Agricu
ltural
Associa
tion
105
6354
3929 27 24
14 13 8 8 6
Q. 10 - On a scale of 1-4, how important are the following?
Community Sa
fety
Quality
of Educa
tion
Cost of L
iving
Loca
tion
Friendsh
ip & Neigh
bours
Sense
of Community
Comm & Rec F
aciliti
es
Health Se
rvice
s
Population Si
ze
Church
Community Eve
nts
3.83.6 3.6 3.5
3.43.3
3.0 2.9 2.92.7 2.7
Q. 11 - Rank your agreement with the following on a scale of 1-5.
4.1
3.9
3.6 3.6 3.6 3.63.5
2.7
2.1
In Conclusion
• Respondents identified family, friends & school as their strongest social connections
• Community safety was ranked most important aspect of community
• Shared community activities – church and community events - were ranked least important
Frequency of Purchasing
Two Part question:
Please Select
Never, Once in a while, Most of the time or Always – to best
describes how often you use the following Ashland services.
And
If you select “Never” or “Once in a while”, for any item please
indicate where you usually go for service.
Auto Repair
Columbia Jeff City elsewhere
70%
22%
8%
Where else?
33%
32%
24 %
11%
Never Once in a while Most of the time
Always
Banking
19%
15%
22%
44%
Never Once in a WhileMost of the Time Always
Columbia
Jeff City
Elsewhere
Online
72%
19%
8%1%
Where else?
Restaurants
Columbia Jeff City Elsewhere
86%
12%2%
Where else?
11%
66%
20%
3%
Never Once in a while Most of the time
Always
Pharmacy
54%28%
12%
7%
Never Once in a while AlwaysMost of the time
Columbia Jeff City Elsewhere Online
82%
11%5% 2%
Where else?
Quality, Service, Price
Please Select
Quality of Product/Service, Convenience, Price – to best describe
what is most important when making purchasing decisions.
Hair Cut/Salon/Manicure
18-24 25-34 35-44 45-64 65+
2
13
22
47
15
04
9
54
32
1
19 19
48
11
Quality of Service Convenience Price
18-24 25-34 35-44 45-64 65+0
12 14
53
19
1
811
46
33
2
13
22
49
11
Quality of Service Convenience Price
Hardware and Building Materials
Where do people purchase food?
Category Frequency Percent Community Garden 10 2.8CSA 5 1.4Convenience Store 44 12.1FM: Ashland 126 34.7FM: Columbia 48 13.2FM: Jeff City 13 3.6Food Pantry 6 2.3Grocery store 351 96.7Local producer 41 11.3Church 16 4.4Restaurants 218 60.1Roadside 34 9.4U-pick 16 4.4
Shopping Choices
10%18%
72%
My shopping choices can change things in this com-
munity disagreeundecidedagree
8%
19%
73%
Voting with my shopping dol-lar makes a difference
disagreeundecidedagree
16%
18%66%
I shop locally to support exist-ing Ashland businesses.
disagreeundecidedagree
76%
11%13%
My shopping choices have NO effect on the Ashland Com-
munity.disagreeundecidedagree
In Conclusion
• Residents are largely seeking services in Columbia
• Convenience is a large factor determining consumption choices– But what is convenient? Ashland? Columbia?
• Residents believe they can make a difference in their community with their purchasing dollars
• City Limit Residents would participate in curbside recycling
Economic Development Findings
Presented by: Gary Glass, Lucas Lopez, Lindsey Saunders, Maria Rodriguez-
Alcala and Andrew Vanengelenhoven
Economic Development Issues that Matterto Ashland City Residents
87%82%
75%70%
65%
40%
68%
52%55%
52%
22%
3%
*Two variables with same percentages were bundled
Community
FamilyEducation
Gender
Income
EconInactive
Economic Development Issues that Matter to Ashland City Residents (cont’d)
• Attached to Ashland as a community.
• Family matters.• Are highly educated.• Slightly more females responded.• High HH earnings (>$60k)• Economically active population.
Ashland Services (cont.)
Note: OLS used to test 7 predictors (2 dummy variables created) (only those significant are depicted in table). All three depicted in table tested significant at .05 level.
Support Predictors for Specific Services
Note: Regressions were run for 7 predictors (only those tested significant depicted).1. People with children’s mean = 2.88; People with no children’s mean = 3.44; N=155 at .038 level.2. Women’s mean = 3.70 ; Men’s mean = 2.82; N=140 at .041 level.3. People >65’s mean = 3.59; People 35-44 yrs’ mean = 2.86; N=140 at .002 level.4. Income <$29k’s mean = 4.48; Income >$90k’s mean = 3.23; N=142 at .021 level.5. People >65’s mean = 3.80; People 18-34 yrs’ mean = 3.31; N=142 at .063 level.6. Income <$29k’s mean = 4.05; Income >$90k’s mean = 3.06; N=140 at .076 level.7. People >65’s mean = 3.66; People 34-44 yrs’ mean = 3.06; N=140 at .089 level.8. Income <$29k’s mean = 4.05; Income >$90k’s mean = 3.13; N=143 at .060 level.9. Income <$29k’s mean = 4.05; Income >$90k’s mean = 2.66; N=141 at .002 level.
10.Income <$29k’s mean = 4.48; Income >$90k’s mean = 3.23; N=142 at .021 level.
Support for a Commercial Development Tax
Note: Percentages are rounded so may not add to exact total.*Includes those that "somewhat support" and "strongly support.” **Includes those that "strongly oppose" and "oppose."
Overall, respondents DO SUPPORT, with the exception of the area near the
airport.
Support Predictorsfor Commercial Development
Note: Pearson correlation used for all except #2 for which two independent samples t-test was used; 10 predictors were tested (only significant ones are depicted)1. Two variables tested significant: Sense of community is important (p<.01) and Shopping choices can change my community
(p<.05). For both N=195.2. Females mean = 3.54 and Males mean = 3.07 for values 1 through 5. N=196 and p<.05.3. Only one variable tested significant: Sense of community is important (p<.01;with N=195).4. N=179; p<.01.5. Two variables tested significant: Sense of community is important and Shopping choices can change my community. For both
N=196 and p<.05.6. Two variables tested significant: Sense of community is important (p<.05) and Shopping choices can change my community
(p<.01). For both N=195.
Downtown Revitalization Importance
• Lower income respondents show a higher interest in sidewalk improvement, landscaping and parking (based on ANOVA with p<.05).
Overall, respondents prioritize road improvement in the downtown area.
In Conclusion
• We analyzed respondents from within the city limits.
• Respondents generally agree the city needs more revenue to maintain or improve services, but are unwilling to pay for it.
• However, when asked about specific services, there is support for paying taxes for street maintenance, parks & rec, storm water, and police, particularly among women, lower-income groups and older people.
• Respondents in general support funding commercial development. They are particularly interested in downtown development, but don’t want to invest around the airport. – Downtown focus is on: improve roads, sidewalks & parking.