district elections for_city_council
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: District elections for_city_council](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061117/54586707af79594f558b5319/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
At-Large vs. District Elections
Consequences for Representation
![Page 2: District elections for_city_council](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061117/54586707af79594f558b5319/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Advantages of At-Large Systems Members represent the whole city, not just
their own district. Reduced divisiveness and factions.
Voters can choose from a broader base of candidates.
No battles over how to draw district lines.
![Page 3: District elections for_city_council](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061117/54586707af79594f558b5319/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Advantages of District Elections Encourages personal campaigning. Encourages attention to neighborhood
concerns. Easier for new candidates to win election. Lower cost of campaigning. Enhances descriptive representation and
shared policy views/ideology.
![Page 4: District elections for_city_council](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061117/54586707af79594f558b5319/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 Original goal: eliminating Black disenfranchisement when a group is prohibited or discouraged from
voting.
Later extended to vote dilution of Blacks and language minorities. when the votes of a group are manipulated to count
less than those of another group (Whites).
![Page 5: District elections for_city_council](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061117/54586707af79594f558b5319/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Reynolds v. Sims (1964) Voting includes “all action necessary to make a
vote effective.”
White v. Regester (1973) Multimember districts are unconstitutional if they
dilute minority votes.
Thornburg v. Gingles (1986)
At-large elections often present an unconstitutional dilution of minority vote strength.
![Page 6: District elections for_city_council](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061117/54586707af79594f558b5319/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Use of Electoral System by City Size
Small (<25,000 pop.)
Medium (25,000-199,999)
Large (>200,000)
At-large 59% 58% 13%
District 24% 27% 49%
Mixed 17% 18% 38%
Source: National League of Cities, 2003.
![Page 7: District elections for_city_council](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061117/54586707af79594f558b5319/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
How At-Large Systems Dilute
City X 9 seats 2/3 White 1/3 Black
Likely result of at-large elections: 9 White council members
WhiteVoters
BlackVoters
![Page 8: District elections for_city_council](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061117/54586707af79594f558b5319/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Music for the Prom
10 students gather to choose five songs to feature at the school prom. Six students like top-forty. Four prefer hip-hop.
Under normal circumstances, the group might agree to choose three top-forty and two hip-hop tunes.
However, if they voted using the winner-take-all voting method, all five selections would be Top Forty.
Source: Lani Guinier: The Tyranny of the Majority (1994)
![Page 9: District elections for_city_council](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061117/54586707af79594f558b5319/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
How District Systems Help
City X 9 seats 2/3 White 1/3 Black
Likely result of district elections: 6 White council members, 3 Black
WhiteVoters
BlackVoters
![Page 10: District elections for_city_council](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061117/54586707af79594f558b5319/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Complications…
If racial and ethnic groups are not residentially segregated, district elections will not result in proportional representation.
Cracking & Packing
![Page 11: District elections for_city_council](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061117/54586707af79594f558b5319/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
![Page 12: District elections for_city_council](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061117/54586707af79594f558b5319/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
![Page 13: District elections for_city_council](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061117/54586707af79594f558b5319/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
![Page 14: District elections for_city_council](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061117/54586707af79594f558b5319/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
The Bottom Line:
While the ability of at-large districts to represent Blacks has improved dramatically in recent decades… …Blacks are most equitably
represented by district elections.
![Page 15: District elections for_city_council](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061117/54586707af79594f558b5319/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Black Representation All cities:
.82 in at-large systems 1.06 in district systems .77 in mixed systems
Southern cities: .71 in at-large systems .95 in district systems .72 in mixed systems
Source: Susan Welch, “The Impact of At-Large Elections on the Representation of Blacks and Hispanics.” Journal of Politics 52, 4 (Nov. 1990).
Representational parity = 1.0
![Page 16: District elections for_city_council](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061117/54586707af79594f558b5319/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Latinos are abysmally underrepresented in all systems. District elections do not promote more
equitable representation for Latinos. Latinos have fared quite well in at-large
systems in California.
Latino Representation
![Page 17: District elections for_city_council](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061117/54586707af79594f558b5319/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Latino Representation All cities:
.47 in at-large systems .38 in district systems .56 in mixed systems
In California: .48 in at-large systems .27 in district systems .17 in mixed systems
Representational parity = 1.0
![Page 18: District elections for_city_council](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061117/54586707af79594f558b5319/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
What Helps Latinos? Latinos do better under district systems
in cities with more residential segregation.
Latinos do better under district systems as their proportion of the population increases (>20%). .65 for at-large systems .71 for district systems
![Page 19: District elections for_city_council](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061117/54586707af79594f558b5319/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
What About Hayward?
Would district elections bring descriptive representation for Hayward Latinos?
Latino Residential Segregation Menlo Park: .75 Oakland: .70 Hayward: .29 Fremont: .18 Alameda: .18 San Leandro: .19
Source: US Census
![Page 20: District elections for_city_council](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061117/54586707af79594f558b5319/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Guinier’s Critique District elections are a short-term fix
that merely move the effect of racial prejudice from the voting booth to the process of government. Elected minorities are then outvoted by more
numerous White elected officials.
Surrounding districts are made even more white.
![Page 21: District elections for_city_council](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061117/54586707af79594f558b5319/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
What is Representation?
Descriptive Representation vs.
Substantive Representation
![Page 22: District elections for_city_council](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022061117/54586707af79594f558b5319/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Summing Up
District elections are better at providing descriptive representation for blacks, but have a mixed record for Latinos.
District elections may hamper substantive representation and ultimately limit minority political power.