discussions on workdose planning
DESCRIPTION
PSB H- Injection - Design Technical Meeting – 3 rd July 2013. Discussions on Workdose Planning. Radiation Protection Assessment: Objectives. From RP presentation (R. Froeschl) @ H0/H- Dump Review. Design Beam Parameters : 2% of 1e14 proton pulses (160MeV, over 4 dumps). - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
En
gin
eeri
ng
Dep
art
men
tEN
DISCUSSIONS ON WORKDOSE PLANNING
PSB H- Injection - Design Technical Meeting – 3rd July 2013
7/3/2013 Marco Garlasché
En
gin
eeri
ng
Dep
art
men
tEN
Marco Garlasché
Radiation Protection Assessment: Objectives
2mSv per person/intervention/year
Design Beam Parameters:2% of 1e14 proton pulses (160MeV, over 4 dumps)
7/3/2013
From RP presentation (R. Froeschl) @ H0/H- Dump Review
Presentation RF (@17/04/2013)
En
gin
eeri
ng
Dep
art
men
tEN
• (Dose on coils can be tolerated)Review definition of WDP
Bakeout
Design Issues (plug-in)
SiC preferred
Optimize design:• Shielding at intervention
positions• Shielded container for
BSW4 transport
SiC chosen as baseline
Note taken for design
7/3/2013 Marco Garlasché
Radiation Protection Assessment: Conclusions
En
gin
eeri
ng
Dep
art
men
tEN
Marco Garlasché7/3/2013
Radiation Protection Assessment: WD Planning
WDP (@17/04/2013)
En
gin
eeri
ng
Dep
art
men
tEN
Marco Garlasché7/3/2013
General recurrence values to be reviewed. Are they accepted by all?
Baseline design (*):• Evaluation by EN/HE of BSW4 transport time (with shielding box) • Alignment:
o 1 or 2 persons?o check and complete re-alignment of magnets have same timeo Alignment of chamber missing/not needed
• Update of task times / interventions?
What about other sectorization proposals?• Task times / interventions• definition of new locations
Radiation Protection Assessment: WD Planning
(*) SiC, no bake-out, Plug-in system, current sectorization
What do we need?
WDP (@17/04/2013)