digital communications i: modulation and coding course

36
Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course Spring- 2013 Jeffrey N. Denenberg Lecture 9a: Mod/Demod Trade- offs

Upload: candid

Post on 09-Feb-2016

58 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Spring- 2013 Jeffrey N. Denenberg Lecture 9a: Mod/Demod Trade-offs. Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course. Last time, we talked about:. The properties of Convolutional codes. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Digital Communications I:Modulation and Coding Course

Spring- 2013Jeffrey N. Denenberg

Lecture 9a: Mod/Demod Trade-offs

Page 2: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 2

Last time, we talked about: The properties of Convolutional codes. We introduced interleaving as a

means to combat bursty errors by making the channel seem uncorrelated.

We also studied “Concatenated codes” that simply consist of inner and outer codes. They can provide the required performance at a lower complexity.

Page 3: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 3

Today, we are going to talk about:

Shannon limit Comparison of different modulation

schemes Trade-off between modulation and

coding

Page 4: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 4

Goals in designing a DCS Goals:

Maximizing the transmission bit rate Minimizing probability of bit error Minimizing the required power Minimizing required system bandwidth Maximizing system utilization Minimize system complexity

Page 5: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 5

Error probability plane(example for coherent MPSK and MFSK)

[dB] / 0NEb [dB] / 0NEb

Bit

erro

r pro

babi

lity

M-PSK M-FSK

k=1,2

k=3

k=4

k=5

k=5

k=4

k=2

k=1

bandwidth-efficient power-efficient

Page 6: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 6

Limitations in designing a DCS Limitations:

The Nyquist theoretical minimum bandwidth requirement

The Shannon-Hartley capacity theorem (and the Shannon limit)

Government regulations Technological limitations Other system requirements (e.g

satellite orbits)

Page 7: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 7

Nyquist minimum bandwidth requirement

The theoretical minimum bandwidth needed for baseband transmission of Rs symbols per second is Rs/2 hertz.

T21

T21

T

)( fH

f t

)/sinc()( Ttth 1

0 T T2TT20

Page 8: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 8

Shannon limit Channel capacity: The maximum data rate

at which error-free communication over the channel is performed.

Channel capacity of AWGV channel (Shannon-Hartley capacity theorem):

][bits/s1log2

NSWC

power noise Average :[Watt]power signal received Average :]Watt[

Bandwidth :]Hz[

0WNNCES

W

b

Page 9: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 9

Shannon limit … The Shannon theorem puts a limit

on the transmission data rate, not on the error probability: Theoretically possible to transmit

information at any rate , with an arbitrary small error probability by using a sufficiently complicated coding scheme

For an information rate , it is not possible to find a code that can achieve an arbitrary small error probability.

CRb bR

CRb

Page 10: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 10

Shannon limit …C/W [bits/s/Hz]

SNR [bits/s/Hz]

Practical region

Unattainableregion

Page 11: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 11

Shannon limit …

There exists a limiting value of below which there can be no error-free communication at any information rate.

By increasing the bandwidth alone, the capacity can not be increased to any desired value.

WC

NE

WC b

02 1log

WNNCES

NSWC

b

0

2 1log

[dB] 6.1693.0log

1

:get we,0or As

20

eNE

WCW

b

0/ NEb

Shannon limit

Page 12: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 12

Shannon limit …

[dB] / 0NEb

W/C [Hz/bits/s]

Practical region

Unattainableregion

-1.6 [dB]

Page 13: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 13

Bandwidth efficiency plane

R<CPractical region

R>CUnattainable region

R/W [bits/s/Hz]

Bandwidth limited

Power limited

R=C

Shannon limit MPSKMQAMMFSK

510BP

M=2

M=4

M=8M=16

M=64

M=256

M=2M=4M=8

M=16

[dB] / 0NEb

Page 14: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 14

Power and bandwidth limited systems

Two major communication resources: Transmit power and channel bandwidth

In many communication systems, one of these resources is more precious than the other. Hence, systems can be classified as: Power-limited systems:

save power at the expense of bandwidth (for example by using coding schemes)

Bandwidth-limited systems: save bandwidth at the expense of power (for example

by using spectrally efficient modulation schemes)

Page 15: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 15

M-ary signaling Bandwidth efficiency:

Assuming Nyquist (ideal rectangular) filtering at baseband, the required passband bandwidth is:

M-PSK and M-QAM (bandwidth-limited systems)

Bandwidth efficiency increases as M increases.

MFSK (power-limited systems)

Bandwidth efficiency decreases as M increases.

][bits/s/Hz 1log2

bs

b

WTWTM

WR

[Hz] /1 ss RTW

][bits/s/Hz log/ 2 MWRb

][bits/s/Hz /log/ 2 MMWRb

Page 16: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 16

Design example of uncoded systems Design goals:

1. The bit error probability at the modulator output must meet the system error requirement.

2. The transmission bandwidth must not exceed the available channel bandwidth.

M-arymodulator

M-arydemodulator

][symbols/s log2 MRRs [bits/s] R

ssbr RNER

NE

NP

000

)( ,)(0

MPgPNEfMP EBs

E

Input

Output

Page 17: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 17

Design example of uncoded systems …

Choose a modulation scheme that meets the following system requirements:

5

0

10 [bits/s] 9600 [dB.Hz] 53

[Hz] 4000 with channel AWGNAn

Bbr

C

PRNP

W

56

2

50

02

02

0

2

10103.7log

)(102.2)/sin(/22)8(

67.621)(log)(log

[Hz] 4000 [sym/s] 32003/9600log/8modulationMPSK channel limited-Band

MMPP

MNEQMP

RNPM

NEM

NE

WMRRMWR

EB

sE

b

rbs

Cbs

Cb

Page 18: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 18

Choose a modulation scheme that meets the following system requirements:

5

0

10 [bits/s] 9600 [dB.Hz] 48

[kHz] 45 with channel AWGNAn

Bbr

C

PRNP

W

561

5

0

02

02

0

2

0

00

10103.7)(12

2104.12

exp2

1)16(

44.261)(log)(log

[kHz] 45 [ksym/s] 4.384/960016)/(log16MFSK channel limited-power / small relatively and

[dB] 2.861.61

MPPNEMMP

RNPM

NEM

NE

WMMRMRWMNEWR

RNP

NE

Ek

k

Bs

E

b

rbs

Cbs

bCb

b

rb

Design example of uncoded systems …

Page 19: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 19

Design example of coded systems Design goals:

1. The bit error probability at the decoder output must meet the system error requirement.

2. The rate of the code must not expand the required transmission bandwidth beyond the available channel bandwidth.

3. The code should be as simple as possible. Generally, the shorter the code, the simpler will be its implementation.

M-arymodulator

M-arydemodulator

][symbols/s log2 MRRs

[bits/s] R

ss

ccbr R

NER

NER

NE

NP

0000

)( ,)(0

MPgpNEfMP Ecs

E

Input

Output

Encoder

Decoder

[bits/s] RknRc

)( cB pfP

Page 20: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 20

Design example of coded systems …

Choose a modulation/coding scheme that meets the following system requirements:

The requirements are similar to the bandwidth-limited uncoded system, except that the target bit error probability is much lower.

9

0

10 [bits/s] 9600 [dB.Hz] 53

[Hz] 4000 with channel AWGNAn

Bbr

C

PRNP

W

system limited-power :enough lowNot 10103.7log

)(400032003/9600log/8

modulationMPSK channel limited-Band

96

2

2

MMPP

MRRMWR

EB

bs

Cb

Page 21: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 21

Design example of coded systems

Using 8-PSK, satisfies the bandwidth constraint, but not the bit error probability constraint. Much higher power is required for uncoded 8-PSK.

The solution is to use channel coding (block codes or convolutional codes) to save the power at the expense of bandwidth while meeting the target bit error probability.

dB 16100

9

uncoded

bB N

EP

Page 22: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 22

Design example of coded systems

For simplicity, we use BCH codes. The required coding gain is:

The maximum allowed bandwidth expansion due to coding is:

The current bandwidth of uncoded 8-PSK can be expanded by still 25% to remain below the channel bandwidth.

Among the BCH codes, we choose the one which provides the required coding gain and bandwidth expansion with minimum amount of redundancy.

dB 8.22.1316)dB()dB()dB(00

coded

c

uncoded

b

NE

NEG

25.140003

9600loglog 22

kn

knW

MR

kn

MRR C

bs

Page 23: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 23

Design example of coded systems …

Bandwidth compatible BCH codes

0.41.331061274.36.221131272.27.111201272.36.2251632.28.1157630.28.1126311010 95 BB PPtkn

Coding gain in dB with MPSK

Page 24: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 24

Design example of coded systems …

Examine that the combination of 8-PSK and (63,51) BCH codes meets the requirements:

[Hz] 4000[sym/s] 39533

96005163

log2

C

bs W

MR

knR

910

1

54

2

4

000

10102.1)1(1

1043102.1

log)(

102.1sin22)( 47.501

jnc

jc

n

tjB

Ec

sE

s

rs

ppjn

jn

P

MMPp

MNEQMP

RNP

NE

Page 25: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 25

Effects of error-correcting codes on error performance

Error-correcting codes at fixed SNR influence the error performance in two ways:1. Improving effect:

The larger the redundancy, the greater the error-correction capability

2. Degrading effect: Energy reduction per channel symbol or coded bits for

real-time applications due to faster signaling. The degrading effect vanishes for non-real time

applications when delay is tolerable, since the channel symbol energy is not reduced.

Page 26: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 26

Bandwidth efficient modulation schemes

Offset QPSK (OQPSK) and Minimum shift keying Bandwidth efficient and constant envelope

modulations, suitable for non-linear amplifier M-QAM

Bandwidth efficient modulation Trellis coded modulation (TCM)

Bandwidth efficient modulation which improves the performance without bandwidth expansion

Page 27: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 27

Course summary In a big picture, we studied:

Fundamentals issues in designing a digital communication system (DSC) Basic techniques: formatting, coding,

modulation Design goals:

Probability of error and delay constraints Trade-off between parameters:

Bandwidth and power limited systems Trading power with bandwidth and vise versa

Page 28: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 28

Block diagram of a DCS

FormatSourceencode

Channelencode

Pulsemodulate

Bandpassmodulate

FormatSourcedecode

Channeldecode

Demod. SampleDetect

Channel

Digital modulation

Digital demodulation

Page 29: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 29

Course summary – cont’d In details, we studies:

1. Basic definitions and concepts Signals classification and linear systems Random processes and their statistics

WSS, cyclostationary and ergodic processes Autocorrelation and power spectral density

Power and energy spectral density Noise in communication systems (AWGN) Bandwidth of signal

2. Formatting Continuous sources

Nyquist sampling theorem and aliasing Uniform and non-uniform quantization

Page 30: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 30

Course summary – cont’d1. Channel coding

Linear block codes (cyclic codes and Hamming codes) Encoding and decoding structure

Generator and parity-check matrices (or polynomials), syndrome, standard array

Codes properties: Linear property of the code, Hamming

distance, minimum distance, error-correction capability, coding gain, bandwidth expansion due to redundant bits, systematic codes

Page 31: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 31

Course summary – cont’d Convolutional codes

Encoder and decoder structure Encoder as a finite state machine, state

diagram, trellis, transfer function Minimum free distance, catastrophic codes,

systematic codes Maximum likelihood decoding:

Viterbi decoding algorithm with soft and hard decisions

Coding gain, Hamming distance, Euclidean distance, affects of free distance, code rate and encoder memory on the performance (probability of error and bandwidth)

Page 32: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 32

Course summary – cont’d1. Modulation

Baseband modulation Signal space, Euclidean distance Orthogonal basic function Matched filter to reduce ISI Equalization to reduce channel induced ISI Pulse shaping to reduce ISI due to filtering at

the transmitter and receiver Minimum Nyquist bandwidth, ideal Nyquist

pulse shapes, raise cosine pulse shape

Page 33: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 33

Course summary – cont’d Baseband detection

Structure of optimum receiver Optimum receiver structure

Optimum detection (MAP) Maximum likelihood detection for equally likely

symbols Average bit error probability Union bound on error probability Upper bound on error probability based on

minimum distance

Page 34: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 34

Course summary – cont’d Passband modulation

Modulation schemes One dimensional waveforms (ASK, M-PAM) Two dimensional waveforms (M-PSK, M-

QAM) Multidimensional waveforms (M-FSK)

Coherent and non-coherent detection Average symbol and bit error probabilities Average symbol energy, symbol rate,

bandwidth Comparison of modulation schemes in terms of

error performance and bandwidth occupation (power and bandwidth)

Page 35: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 35

Course summary – cont’d1. Trade-off between modulation and coding

Channel models Discrete inputs, discrete outputs

Memoryless channels : BSC Channels with memory

Discrete input, continuous output AWGN channels

Shannon limits for information transmission rate Comparison between different modulation and

coding schemes Probability of error, required bandwidth, delay

Trade-offs between power and bandwidth Uncoded and coded systems

Page 36: Digital Communications I: Modulation and Coding Course

Lecture 13 36

Information about the exam: Exam date:

8th of March 2008 (Saturday) Allowed material:

Any calculator (no computers) Mathematics handbook Swedish-English dictionary

A list of formulae that will be available with the exam.