diabetes and fracture risk iwo 18-09-13
DESCRIPTION
Tenslotte zal Prof. Dr. Joop van den Bergh het fractuurrisico bij patiënten met DM type 1 en 2 bespreken: hoe relevant is het verhoogde fractuurrisico bij jonge patiënten met DM type 1? Zijn adipeuze patiënten met DM type 2 beschermd tegen osteoporose? Welke determinanten spelen een rol bij het fractuurrisico bij DM type 2?TRANSCRIPT
Diabetes Mellitus and Fracture Risk
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Prevalence of Diabetes in the Netherlands
• 800.000 pa8ents – 700.000 DM type 2
– 100.000 DM type 1
• Yearly incidence: 81.000 (>1.500 / week)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 mannen vrouwen
incidentie (per 1.000)
leeftijd (jaren)
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
DM type 1
• Modest reduc8on in BMD – LS Z-‐score: -‐0.22
– TH Z-‐score: -‐0.37
• Hip fracture RR: 6.9 (3.2-‐14.9)
• Lack of data for other fracture sites
Vestergaard 2007
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
DM type 2
• Average higher BMD – LS Z-‐score: +0.41
– TH Z-‐score +0.27
• Overweight
• Expected lower fracture risk
Vestergaard 2007
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Associa8on between bone mineral density and type 2 diabetes mellitus
Ma et al. Eur J Epidemiol (2012) 27:319–332
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Meta-‐regression
• Posi8ve associa8on with higher BMD levels in diabe8cs – younger age – male gender – higher body mass index
– higher HbA1C
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Longitudinal BMD changes: more rapid bone loss in DM type 2
Fracture Interven8on Trial (total hip)
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
More rapid bone loss in DM type 2
• At the hip: – FIT Keegan at al. 2004
– Health ABC Schwartz et al. 2005 – MrOS Strotmeyer et al. 2008
– SOF Schwartz et al. 2013
• No differences at the radius – Krakauer et al. 1995 – Schwartz et al. 2013
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
DM type 2: hip fracture risk
• Age adjusted RR = 1.4 (1.2 – 1.5)
• Mul8variable adjusted (age, BMI, BMD) RR = 1.7 (1.3 – 2.2)
Vestergaard 2007 Janghorbani 2007
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
DM type 2: any fracture risk
• Age adjusted RR = 1.0 (0.6 – 1.6)
• Mul8variable adjusted (age, BMI, BMD) RR = 1.2 (1.01 – 1.5)
Vestergaard 2007 Janghorbani 2007
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Fracture predic8on in DM type 2
Schwartz et al. JAMA 2011: 2184-‐2192
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Schwartz et al. JAMA 2011: 2184-‐2192
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Schwartz et al. JAMA 2011: 2184-‐2192
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
The FRAX score tends to underes8mate risk in pa8ents with DM type 2
Schwartz et al. JAMA 2011: 2184-‐2192
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Leslie et al. JBMR 2012: 2231-‐2237
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
DM type 2 more likely to fracture at given BMD
• Cause? – More frequent falls
– Diabe8c bone fragility – Aspects of bone strength not captured by BMD/DXA
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Falls: not the whole story
• DM2 is s8ll associated with higher fracture risk ajer adjustment for fall frequency – WHI Bonds et al. 2006 – Rolerdam study de Liefde et al. 2005
– Health, Ageing Study Strotmeyer et al. 2005
– SOF Schwartz et al. 2001
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Diabe8c bone fragility possible contribu8ng factors
• Bone turnover • Microarchitecture • Geometry
• Material proper8es • Rela8onship with glycemic control (HbA1C)
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Bone turnover
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Bone turnover
• Reduced bone forma8on – Bone biopsy: lower bone forma8on rate
– Compared with controls: postmenopausal women (n= 5 vs 4)
Manavalan et al. JCEM 2012: 3240
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Microarchitecture: HR-‐pQCT distal radius
Patsch et al. JBMR 2013: 313
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
DMFx had 4.7-‐fold greater porosity than DM
Patsch et al. JBMR 2013: 313
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Geometry: (p)QCT in DM type 2
• Higher volumetric BMD, especially trabecular BMD
• Modest reduc8on in cross sec8onal area • Load to strength ra8o
– Similar for hip, spine
– Reduced in radius and 8bia – In spite of higher BMD
Melton et al. 2008 and Patsch et al. JBMR 2013: 313
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Material proper8es: AGEs
• Advanced Glyca8on End products (AGEs) – Formed by nonenzyma8c reac8on between glucose and protein
– Accumulate in collagen (and other structures) – Form cross-‐links that increase s8ffness of collagen and reduce
osteoblast func8on
Wang et al. 2002 and Willet et al. 2013
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Advanced Glyca8on End products (AGEs)
AGEs form on different molecules as collagen, laminin and elas8n. This alters the physiological proper8es of the matrix and increases its s8ffness
Hegab et al. World J Cardiol 2012; 90–102
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Glycemic control and fractures
Schneider et al. Diabetes Care 2013:1153
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Glycemic control and fractures
Schneider et al. Diabetes Care 2013:1153
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Oei et al. Diabetes Care 2013:1619
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Oei et al. Diabetes Care 2013:1619
Schneider et al. Diabetes Care 2013:1153
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
HSA = hip structural analysis (on DXA)
Oei et al. Diabetes Care 2013:1619
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Oei et al. Diabetes Care 2013:1619
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Possible contributors to bone fragility in DM type 2
• Deficits in:
– Geometry
– Cor8cal microarchitecture (porosity) – Material proper8es
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Effect of treatment on hip fracture
HbA1C Odds ra8o
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Related to hypoglycemia / fall incidents
HbA1C Odds ra8o
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Diabetes Medica8on: Effect on bone
• Meqormin One RCT (meq & SU) • Sulfonylureas
• Insulin Observa8onal
• TZD RCT (fracture as AE)
• Incre8n based RCT (fracture as SAE) – DPP-‐4 inhibitors – GLP-‐1 agonists
• SGLT2 inhibitors Lack of data Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
ADOPT trial: Increased risk in women (not men) treated with rosiglitazone
Kahn et al. Diabetes Care 2008:845–851
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
TZDs and fractures Meta-‐analysis of 5 RCTs
• Women OR 2.2 (1.6-‐3.0)
• Men OR 1.0 (0.7-‐1.4)
• Dura8on 1-‐4 years
Loke et al. 2009
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Insulin
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
DPP-‐4 inhibitors: Meta-‐analysis (SAEs)
Moname et al. Diabetes Care 2011:2474
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Effect of diabetes treatments on bone
• Poten8al (indirect) effect of insulin
• TZDs should be avoided in women at higher risk of fracture
• Poten8al posi8ve effect of DPP4-‐inhibitors?
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Specific an8-‐osteoporosis therapy in DM type 2
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Observa8onal studies
• Diabetes does not seem to affect the fracture-‐preven8ve poten8al of bisphosphonates and raloxifene.
• The low-‐turnover state of diabetes thus does not seem to be a hindrance to the effect of bisphosphonates and raloxifene.
• Pa8ents with diabetes should receive an8-‐osteoporo8c treatment in the same way as non-‐diabe8c pa8ents
Vestergaard et al. Calcif Tissue Int 2011:209
Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Summary
• DM type 1 and 2 associated with higher risk of fracture
• At the same BMD, DM2 are at higher risk • DXA T-‐score and FRAX predict fracture in DM type 2, but
underes8mate the risk
• More frequent falls (hypoglycemia?) and poorer bone quality probably contribute to higher fracture risk
• Bone proper8es are altered in DM type 2 – decreased diameter – increased cor8cal thickness and porosity – lower bone forma8on
– Effect on cross-‐links of higher AGEs Copyright
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh
Summary
• Fracture risk is higher with increased HbA1C • Intensive control does not increase fractures
– (except one study) • Diabetes medica8on can affect bone
– TZD: increased fracture risk in women
– Insulin? • Limited data on efficacy and safety of an8-‐osteoporosis
therapy in DM type 2 – Alendronate: 1 BMD study – Raloxifene: decrease of VF incidence Copyrig
ht
Dr. J.P.W. van den Bergh