development and optimization of a novel t7 polymerase ... · 11.05.2020 · a t7 polymerase can...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Title 1
Development and optimization of a novel T7 polymerase-independent Marburg virus 2
minigenome system. 3
4
Authors 5
Bert Vanmechelena, Joren Stroobantsb, Kurt Vermeireb, Piet Maesa,# 6
7
Affiliations 8
aKU Leuven Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Rega Institute, 9
Laboratory of Clinical Virology, Leuven, Belgium. 10
bKU Leuven Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Rega Institute, 11
Laboratory of Virology and Chemotherapy, Leuven, Belgium. 12
#Author for correspondence 13
Piet Maes, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Herestraat 49, box 1040, BE3000, Leuven, 14
Belgium, Tel. +32 16 321 309, [email protected] 15
16
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 12, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.088211doi: bioRxiv preprint
2
Abstract 17
Marburg virus (MARV) is the only known pathogenic filovirus not belonging to the genus 18
Ebolavirus. Minigenomes have proven a useful tool to study MARV, but all existing MARV 19
minigenomes are dependent on the addition of an exogenous T7 RNA polymerase to drive 20
minigenome expression. However, exogenous expression of a T7 polymerase is not always 21
feasible and acts as a confounding factor in compound screening assays. We have developed 22
an alternative minigenome that is controlled by the natively expressed RNA polymerase II. We 23
demonstrate here the characteristics of this new system and its applicability in a wide range of 24
cell types. Our system shows a clear concentration-dependent activity and outperforms the 25
existing T7 polymerase-based system at higher concentrations, especially in difficult-to-26
transfect cell lines. In addition, we show that our system can be used for high-throughput 27
compound screening in a 96-well format, thereby providing an attractive alternative to 28
previously developed MARV minigenomes. 29
30
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 12, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.088211doi: bioRxiv preprint
3
Introduction 31
Marburg virus (MARV) is a highly pathogenic virus that was first discovered in 1967 in 32
Germany (Siegert, Shu, Slenczka, Peters, & Muller, 1967; Smith, Simpson, Bowen, & Zlotnik, 33
1967). MARV is the only known member of the genus Marburgvirus, one of the five genera in 34
the family Filoviridae (Amarasinghe et al., 2019). The best-known member of this family is 35
Ebola virus (EBOV), which has caused two large outbreaks in the past few years and 36
consequently has been the center of most filovirus-related research in the past decade (Rojas et 37
al., 2020). Similarly to EBOV, MARV outbreaks are typically associated with a very high case-38
mortality rate. While advances have been made for Ebola virus disease in recent years, there 39
are still no licensed therapeutics or vaccines available for Marburg virus disease (MVD)(WHO, 40
2018). Because of this lack of virus countermeasures, WHO has listed MVD as a ‘priority 41
disease’ for research and development (Mehand, Al-Shorbaji, Millett, & Murgue, 2018). 42
However, studies involving live MARV are difficult to perform due to its classification as a 43
biosafety level 4 (BSL-4) pathogen (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2009). 44
An alternative to handling infectious virus is the use of MARV minigenomes to study different 45
aspects of the viral life cycle. In a minigenome system, the leader and trailer region of the 46
genome are placed adjacent to a reporter gene and transfected into target cells alongside the 47
different components of the viral polymerase complex (Wendt, Bostedt, Hoenen, & Groseth, 48
2019). Once the different viral proteins are expressed, they form polymerase complexes and 49
bind to transcripts of the minigenome, leading to the expression of the reporter gene. The use 50
of easily detectable reporters, such as luciferase or green fluorescent protein (GFP), in a BSL-51
2 setting, has enabled the widespread use of minigenome systems for viral research, although 52
their applicability is usually limited to studying a specific phase of the viral life cycle, i.e., virus 53
replication and/or transcription (Hoenen, Groseth, de Kok-Mercado, Kuhn, & Wahl-Jensen, 54
2011). 55
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 12, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.088211doi: bioRxiv preprint
4
The first MARV minigenome was developed over 20 years ago, employing a chloramphenicol 56
acetyltransferase as a reporter gene (Muhlberger, Lotfering, Klenk, & Becker, 1998). Since 57
then, several variations of this minigenome have been made, aimed at improving its usability 58
by replacing the reporter gene with different types of luciferases, GFP or even dual reporters, 59
although the general design of the minigenome has been conserved (Schmidt & Muhlberger, 60
2016). In all currently existing MARV minigenome systems, the minigenome is placed 61
immediately downstream of a T7 RNA polymerase promoter that controls the expression of the 62
minigenome and ensures the generation of 5’ ends with minimal overhang. On the 3’ end, a 63
self-cleaving hepatitis delta virus ribozyme (HdVRz) is attached to the minigenome to ensure 64
the generation of defined 3’ ends, which are necessary for replication activity. 65
Although a potent T7 RNA polymerase promoter is now widely used to drive expression in 66
viral minigenome systems, it does have certain drawbacks that limit its usability. As the T7 67
polymerase is derived from bacteriophages, it is not naturally expressed in mammalian cell lines 68
and thus needs to be provided separately (Lieber, Kiessling, & Strauss, 1989). There are several 69
ways to enable expression of a T7 polymerase in mammalian cells, such as co-transfection of 70
an additional plasmid encoding for a T7 polymerase, or infection of cells with T7-expressing 71
recombinant virus (e.g. replication-deficient vaccinia virus (MVA-T7))(Sutter, Ohlmann, & 72
Erfle, 1995). However, plasmid-based expression of a T7 polymerase can be difficult to achieve 73
in certain cell lines, while the use of MVA-T7 can lead to cytotoxicity, limiting the usability of 74
T7 polymerase-driven systems in certain cell lines (Jordan, Horn, Oehmke, Leendertz, & 75
Sandig, 2009; Nelson et al., 2017; Walpita & Flick, 2005). An example of such a cell line is the 76
Rousettus aegyptiacus-derived RoNi/7.1 cell line. This is particularly troublesome when 77
studying MARV, as Rousettus aegyptiacus bats are known to be the natural reservoir of MARV 78
(Towner et al., 2009). A T7 polymerase can also act as a confounding factor in compound 79
screening assays. Most minigenome systems used for antiviral compound screening are limited 80
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 12, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.088211doi: bioRxiv preprint
5
to detecting polymerase (co-factor) inhibitors. As such, the classes of compounds that are likely 81
to show activity in these assays (e.g. nucleoside analogs) are also the ones that might inhibit T7 82
polymerase activity, potentially resulting in high rates of false positivity. 83
In this article, we describe the development and optimization of a MARV minigenome system 84
under the control of a mammalian RNA polymerase II promoter. We show that this system is 85
operational in a variety of cell lines and can be used as a high-throughput compound screening 86
assay, providing a valid alternative for the widely used T7 polymerase-based systems. 87
88
Results and Discussion 89
Development of a polymerase II-driven MARV minigenome 90
One of the key applications of minigenomes is the screening for viral polymerase inhibitors, 91
highlighting the need for a system that is independent from exogenous polymerases. The 92
necessary addition of such secondary polymerases, like the T7 polymerase, acts as a difficult-93
to-correct confounding factor. Conversely, in minigenomes using promoters targeting 94
polymerases natively expressed in mammalian cell types, this confounding does not occur, as 95
off-target inhibition of the host’s RNA polymerase will also directly affect cell viability. RNA 96
polymerase II is the enzyme responsible for the generation of mRNA precursors in all 97
eukaryotic cell types and as such provides an interesting alternative to the bacteriophage-98
derived T7 polymerase(Woychik & Hampsey, 2002). Furthermore, it has previously been 99
shown that RNA polymerase II can be used to drive the expression of viral reverse genetics 100
systems (Griffin et al., 2019; Martin, Staeheli, & Schneider, 2006; Nelson et al., 2017; Wang 101
et al., 2015). To generate an RNA polymerase II-driven MARV minigenome, the trailer and 102
leader regions of MARV, flanking an eGFP reporter gene, were cloned into the pCAGGS-103
3E5E-EBOV-eGFP vector, resulting in an antisense MARV minigenome under the control of 104
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 12, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.088211doi: bioRxiv preprint
6
the potent CAG promoter (Figure 1A). In addition, the trailer and leader regions of MARV 105
were flanked by a self-cleaving hammerhead ribozyme and a HDV ribozyme, respectively, to 106
ensure defined 5’ and 3’ ends. Transcription of this minigenome by the cellular RNA 107
polymerase II and subsequent cleavage of the ribozyme sequences allows the minigenome to 108
be bound by the viral polymerase (L) and its co-factors (NP, VP30 and VP35), which are 109
provided in trans. The viral polymerase will then transcribe the reporter gene encoded by the 110
minigenome, producing a measurable eGFP signal. Initial transfection tests showed that this 111
CAG-controlled minigenome had only limited activity (~25%) compared to the T7-driven 112
MARV minigenome (Figure 1B). We hypothesized that the lack of minigenome activity (as 113
evidenced by a weak GFP signal) was due to an incompatibility of the used hammerhead 114
ribozyme with the MARV trailer region. As is the case for EBOV, the MARV trailer contains 115
multiple conserved and self-complementary motifs, allowing the formation of secondary RNA 116
structures. One of these structures is an RNA hairpin that is presumably recognized by the viral 117
polymerase and acts as the replication promoter (Crary, Towner, Honig, Shoemaker, & Nichol, 118
2003; Volchkov et al., 1999). Because the formation of this hairpin is crucial for viral 119
replication to occur, the incorporation of a flanking ribozyme sequence that generates defined 120
5’ ends containing the necessary motifs for secondary structure formation is indispensable to 121
ensure minigenome activity and needs to be incorporated into the ribozyme design. As the 122
genome ends of EBOV and MARV are highly conserved, we initially assumed we could reuse 123
the hammerhead design used for EBOV in the MARV minigenome. This design is a type I 124
hammerhead ribozyme, in which stem I is formed by pairing of the first eleven nucleotides of 125
the virus trailer with a complementary motif at the 5’ end of the ribozyme sequence (Figure 126
2A). However, even though the first ~20 nucleotides of the EBOV and MARV genomes are 127
highly conserved, the upstream motifs differ, resulting in the formation of slightly different 128
hairpin structures (Figure 2B). We hypothesized that these minor but distinct differences in 129
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 12, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.088211doi: bioRxiv preprint
7
structure and especially in the position of the EBOV and MARV trailer hairpins result in altered 130
minigenome activity. Predictive modelling of RNA secondary structures in the EBOV trailer 131
shows that a hairpin is formed at the very end (nt 1-54) of the sequence and that the addition of 132
a hammerhead ribozyme, incorporating the first eleven nucleotides of the virus trailer, abolishes 133
the formation of this hairpin. Conversely, the MARV hairpin is located slightly downstream (nt 134
12-62) and its formation is predicted to be unaffected by the addition of the ribozyme, thereby 135
resulting in the attempted formation of two large secondary structures separated by only one 136
nucleotide. Presumably, the presence of another large structure in the proximity of the 137
hammerhead ribozyme results in sterical hindrance, preventing the ribozyme from being formed 138
or cleaving itself, thereby yielding an inactive minigenome transcript. 139
To overcome the lack of minigenome activity, we sought to reduce this sterical hindrance by 140
altering the relative size and position of the ribozyme and hairpin structures. However, simply 141
adding a spacer sequence between the ribozyme and the MARV trailer hairpin to increase the 142
distance between these two structures, or otherwise altering the sequence of the 3’ end of the 143
ribozyme was not feasible, as the beginning of the MARV trailer forms part of stem I of the 144
ribozyme. As such, modifications could only be made by mutating the 5’ end of the ribozyme 145
sequence. Initially, we attempted to mimic the EBOV situation, in which the ribozyme and 146
trailer hairpin share part of their sequence, resulting in the preferential formation of the 147
hammerhead ribozyme. However, sequentially increasing the size of the first stem of the 148
hammerhead to incorporate part of the hairpin sequence did not significantly increase 149
minigenome activity (data not shown), presumably because the majority of the hairpin structure 150
could still be formed. Because lengthening the stem of the ribozyme proved unsuccessful, we 151
explored the opposite by shortening the stem as much as possible. The first eleven nucleotides 152
at the 5’ end of the MARV trailer sequence, which represent one of the complementary strains 153
that form stem I of the hammerhead ribozyme, do not belong to the trailer hairpin. Mutating the 154
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 12, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.088211doi: bioRxiv preprint
8
nucleotides at the 5’ end of the ribozyme that are complementary to these eleven nucleotides 155
will therefore reduce base pairing in the ribozyme stem and consequently shorten the length of 156
the stem without altering the MARV trailer sequence. As shown in Figure 3, each additional 157
mutation that shortened the ribozyme stem and, consequently, increased the length of the spacer 158
between the ribozyme and the trailer hairpin, resulted in an increase of minigenome activity 159
(Fig 3A), with a maximum at a shortening of four nucleotides, corresponding to a remaining 160
stem length of six base pairs. Further shortening the stem leads to a rapid loss of activity, in 161
accordance with predictive RNA secondary structure modelling calculating the probability of 162
the hammerhead structure being formed. Based on these findings, the six-basepair-stem 163
hammerhead design was selected for further validation. 164
Comparison of the T7 and RNA polymerase II MARV minigenomes 165
To qualitatively compare the optimized polymerase II-driven minigenome with the T7-166
polymerase control, HEK293T cells were transfected with MARV support plasmids and 167
varying amounts of MARV minigenome plasmid. pCAGGS-T7 was added to all wells 168
transfected with the T7 minigenome. Cells were incubated for 72 hours in an IncuCyte 169
incubator, measuring cell density and fluorescence at distinct time points. As shown in Figure 170
4A, eGFP expression for both systems was almost undetectable after 24 hours but increased 171
steadily over time. Both systems’ activity was dependent on the amount of minigenome 172
transfected, with the T7 polymerase system reaching its optimum at lower concentrations (400 173
ng), while the polymerase II minigenome was more efficient when using higher amounts of 174
plasmid (750/1000 ng). Using more than 1000 ng minigenome plasmid did not result in 175
additional gain of activity (data not shown). Taken together, these data show that, at higher 176
plasmid concentrations, the polymerase II-driven MARV minigenome outperforms the T7 177
polymerase system while displaying a similar time-dependent activity. 178
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 12, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.088211doi: bioRxiv preprint
9
To explore the cell dependency of the MARV minigenome system, we next compared the 179
activity of the T7 polymerase and polymerase II-driven minigenomes in HEK293T cells and 180
five additional cell lines (Figure 5). One of the drawbacks of T7 polymerase-dependent systems 181
is that the T7 polymerase is not natively expressed in most mammalian cell lines and needs to 182
be supplied either by co-transfection or through transduction with the MVA-T7 vaccinia virus. 183
However, supplementing the transfection mix with an additional (T7) plasmid reduces 184
transfection efficiency, while not all cell lines are equally suited for transduction. This is 185
particularly true for R. aegyptiacus cell lines, which are known to die rapidly when transduced 186
with MVA-T7 (Jordan et al., 2009). As R. aegyptiacus bats are the natural host for MARV, the 187
availability of a minigenome that can be employed in these cell lines is a highly desired tool for 188
MARV research. Therefore, in addition to cell types commonly used in varying types of 189
filovirus research (Albarino et al., 2013; Enterlein et al., 2006; Tsuda et al., 2015), such as 190
African green monkey Vero E6 cells, hamster-derived BHK21 and BSR-T7/5 cells and the 191
human HEK293T and Huh-7 cell lines, we tested our system in the R. aegyptiacus RoNi/7.1 192
cell line, all. For this experiment, all cell lines were transfected with 1000 ng of either the T7 193
polymerase- or polymerase II-driven MARV minigenome, encoding a Renilla luciferase as 194
reporter gene. After 72 hours, cells were lysed and luciferase activity measured. As summarized 195
in Figure 5, the activity of the polymerase II system was comparable to or higher than the 196
activity of the T7 system. Especially in the difficult-to-transfect Vero E6 and RoNi/7.1 cells, 197
the polymerase II system clearly outperformed the T7 system. The only exception was the BSR-198
T7/5 cell line, where the T7 system yielded higher luciferase levels than the polymerase II 199
system. This cell line is a modified clone of the BHK21 cell line that stably expresses T7 200
polymerase (Buchholz, Finke, & Conzelmann, 1999). Presumably, this native expression of T7 201
polymerase contributes to the increased activity of the T7 polymerase-driven minigenome in 202
this cell line. Together, these results show that the polymerase II system can be successfully 203
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 12, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.088211doi: bioRxiv preprint
10
used in a wide variety of cell lines suitable for filovirus research, including cells from R. 204
aegyptiacus bats, the natural hosts for MARV. 205
The polymerase II system as a tool for antiviral research 206
One of the primary applications of minigenome systems is their use in antiviral compound 207
screening. Even though they can only detect polymerase (cofactor) inhibitors, their ease of use 208
makes them an often sought-out alternative to working with live virus. To show that the 209
polymerase II system presented here can be used for antiviral screening, HEK293T cells were 210
transfected with the polymerase II minigenome and all pCAGGS MARV support plasmids. Six 211
hours post transfection, cells were transferred to a 96-well plate prefilled with a dilution series 212
of ribavirin. Ribavirin is a broad-spectrum antiviral compound that is used for the treatment of 213
viral hemorrhagic fevers, respiratory syncytial virus infections and hepatitis C virus infections, 214
although its use is not recommended for the treatment of flavivirus and filovirus infections due 215
to a lack of proven clinical benefit (Huggins, 1989). Nonetheless, ribavirin possesses detectable 216
in vitro anti-MARV activity in the polymerase II MARV minigenome system with an IC50 217
value of 23.7 µM (CC50: 90.9 µM), in accordance with previous results obtained using a T7-218
driven MARV minigenome (Figure 6)(Uebelhoer et al., 2014). 219
To efficiently use a minigenome system for compound screening, scaling up is necessary to 220
reduce the monetary and time cost per compound. By performing transfections in T-75 flasks, 221
using the inexpensive PEI as a transfection reagent and subsequently transferring the transfected 222
cells to 96-well plates filled with compound, well-to-well variation is minimized, increasing 223
the reliability of the obtained results. Using this method, the polymerase II MARV minigenome 224
system was shown to have a Z’ score of 0.8, indicating a highly robust assay (Zhang, Chung, 225
& Oldenburg, 1999). 226
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 12, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.088211doi: bioRxiv preprint
11
In conclusion, we present here a novel MARV minigenome system. By specifically tailoring 227
the hammerhead ribozyme sequence to that of the MARV trailer, the minigenome could 228
effectively be placed under the control of an RNA polymerase II promoter. The system shown 229
here represents the first MARV minigenome that can work independently from the addition of 230
an exogenous polymerase, allowing the system to be used in a high-throughput manner and in 231
a wide range of cell lines while concurrently avoiding the lower specificity typically observed 232
with T7 polymerase-based systems. 233
234
Materials and methods 235
Cell lines 236
Cell lines used for this study were human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293T), African green 237
monkey kidney cells (Vero E6; American Type Culture Collection, C1008), hamster kidney 238
fibroblasts (BHK21, BSR-T7/5), human hepatocellular carcinoma cells (Huh-7) and kidney 239
fibroblasts from the fruit bat Rousettus aegyptiacus (RoNi/7.1), kindly provided by Prof. M.A. 240
Müller, Charité, Berlin, Germany. All cell lines were maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle 241
Medium (DMEM; Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine 242
serum (FBS; Biowest, France), with the exception of the BHK21 cells, which were maintained 243
in Minimal Essential Medium (MEM) Rega-3 (Thermo Fisher Scientific ) + 10% FBS. 200 mM 244
L-glutamine (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was added to the BHK21, Huh-7, BSR-T7/5 and 245
RoNi/7.1 cell medium. Additional supplements were 1% sodium bicarbonate (Thermo Fisher 246
Scientific) for Huh-7 and BHK21 cells, 1% sodium pyruvate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 247
RoNi/7.1 cells and 1% Non-Essential Amino Acids (NEAA; Thermo Fisher Scientific) for Huh-248
7 and RoNi/7.1 cells. Used antibiotics were 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin (Thermo Fisher 249
Scientific) for Vero E6, BSR-T7/5, Huh-7 and RoNi/7.1 cells, 0.5% Geneticin (InvivoGen, 250
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 12, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.088211doi: bioRxiv preprint
12
France) for BSR-T7/5 cells and 1% Gentamicin (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 0.2% Fungizone 251
(Thermo Fisher Scientific) for Vero E6 cells. 252
Minigenome design and construction 253
The artificial T7-3M-Luc-5M minigenome and plasmids encoding the MARV L, NP, VP30 and 254
VP35 proteins were kindly provided by Prof. Stephan Becker. The T7-3M-eGFP-5M 255
minigenome was made by replacing the Renilla luciferase gene in the T7-3M-Luc-5M 256
minigenome with an eGFP gene through assembly of PCR fragments using the NEBuilder HiFi 257
DNA assembly cloning kit (New England Biolabs, MA, USA). A modified version of this 258
minigenome, containing a multiple cloning site and a hammerhead ribozyme (HHRz) sequence 259
between the T7 promoter and MARV trailer sequence (T7-HHRz-3M-eGFP-5M), was made 260
by mutagenesis PCR using the site-directed mutagenesis kit (New England Biolabs). Additional 261
mutants of this intermediate vector were generated through site-directed mutagenesis of the 262
HHRz sequence. Each of the resulting MARV minigenomes was then cloned into the 263
pCAGGS_3E5E_eGFP vector, which was a gift from Elke Mühlberger (Addgene plasmid # 264
103054). SacI-HF (New England Biolabs) was used for restriction digestion, followed by 265
vector-insert ligation using the Quick Ligation kit (New England Biolabs) to generate the 266
original and mutated pCAGGS-HHRz-3M-eGFP-5M vectors. Sanger sequencing was used to 267
confirm the sequence of all vectors. pCAGGS-3M-Luc-5M minigenomes were made using the 268
same approach. 269
Transfection and eGFP imaging 270
TransIT transfection reagent (Mirus Bio, WI, USA) and Lipofectamine LTX were used 271
according to the manufacturer’s instructions. TransIT-293 was used for the transfection of 272
HEK293T cells, TransIT-LT1 for the transfection of BHK-21J, Huh-7 and Vero E6 cells and 273
Lipofectamine LTX for the transfection of BSR-T7/5 and RoNi/7.1 cells. One day prior to 274
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 12, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.088211doi: bioRxiv preprint
13
transfection, cells were seeded in 6-well plates at sufficient density to reach 80-90% confluence 275
at the time of transfection. The next day, a mixture consisting of 3:1 (DNA:reagent) transfection 276
reagent and 1000 ng pCAGGS-L, 500 ng pCAGGS-NP, 100 ng pCAGGS-VP35, 100 ng 277
pCAGGS-VP30 and 1000 ng pCAGGS-HHRz-3M-eGFP-5M/pCAGGS-HHRz-3M-rLuc-5M 278
or 1000 ng T7-3M-eGFP-5M/T7-3M-rLuc-5M and 1000 ng pCAGGS-T7 was added to each 279
well. Six hours post transfection, cells were trypsinised and transferred to a 96-well plate (5 x 280
104 cells/well), prefilled with 100 µl DMEM +2% FBS/well. When using rLuc as a reporter, 281
plates were incubated at 37°C for 72 hours prior to assessing luciferase activity using the 282
Renilla-Glo Luciferase Assay System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Readout of eGFP was 283
done by incubating and monitoring plates at 37°C for 72h in an IncuCyte® (Essen BioScience 284
Inc., Ann Arbor, MI, USA) for real-time imaging, or by incubating at 37°C for 48h and 285
subsequently adding 6 µM Hoechst 33342 nucleic acid stain (Thermo Fisher Scientific) as a 286
background stain for high content imaging analysis, performed on an Arrayscan XTI (Thermo 287
Fisher Scientific). Fluorescence signal was generated by exciting the cells with the following 288
wavelengths: 386-23 nm (Hoechst) and 485-20 nm (eGFP), and images were taken with a 10X 289
objective. Exposure times and objective offsets were kept constant for each imaging plate. A 290
custom analysis protocol was developed in-house using the Cellomics SpotDetector 291
BioApplication. First, a background reduction was performed on both channels to ensure 292
positive signals. Second, nuclei were detected using a dynamic tresholding method based on 293
differences in intensity peaks. Next, eGFP signals were detected using a fixed-intensity 294
threshold based on images acquired from the eGFP positive control. Additional parameters 295
were determined to remove non-nuclei and non-eGFP objects (false positive signals). Lastly, 296
the percentage and number of eGFP positive cells was calculated using the Cellomics software. 297
For compound screening, transfections were done in T-75 flasks using polyethylenimine 298
(Polysciences Inc, PA, USA). Transfections were done according to the manufacturer’s 299
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 12, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.088211doi: bioRxiv preprint
14
instructions, using 8 µg pCAGGS-L, 4 µg pCAGGS-NP, 800 ng pCAGGS-VP35, 800 ng 300
pCAGGS-VP30 and 8 µg pCAGGS-HHRz-3M-eGFP-5M for each flask. 301
RNA secondary structure modelling and statistical analyses 302
Secondary structure modelling of the hammerhead ribozyme and MARV/EBOV trailer hairpins 303
was done using the RNAstructure Fold and MaxExpect web servers 304
(https://rna.urmc.rochester.edu/RNAstructureWeb/). Comparisons of minigenome activity and 305
associated statistical analyses were done using GraphPad Prism 8.2.0. Z-factor calculations for 306
compound screening were done using the equation: Z = 1- [(3σC+ + 3σC-)/(µC+ - µC-)](Zhang et 307
al., 1999). Positive control wells were transfected with all elements of the minigenome assay, 308
while the pCAGGS-L plasmid was omitted from the negative controls. 309
310
Acknowledgments 311
The authors wish to thank prof. E. Mühlberger, Boston University, MA, USA for providing the 312
pCAGGS_3E5E_eGFP plasmid, prof. S. Becker, Philipps-Universität, Marburg, Germany for 313
providing the T7-3M-Luc-5M minigenome and MARV support plasmids, and Prof. M.A. 314
Müller, Charité, Berlin, Germany for providing the RoNi/7.1 cell line. The authors also wish to 315
thank Winston Chiu and Leentje Persoons for excellent technical assistance. BV is supported 316
by a FWO SB grant for strategic basic research of the “Fonds Wetenschappelijk 317
Onderzoek”/Research foundation Flanders [1S28617N]. This work is also supported by 318
‘Interne Fondsen KU Leuven / Internal Funds KU Leuven’ project 3M170314 awarded to KV 319
and PM. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to 320
publish or preparation of the manuscript. 321
322
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 12, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.088211doi: bioRxiv preprint
15
Declarations of interest 323
None 324
325
Author contributions 326
BV, JS and PM conceived the experiments. BV and JS performed the experimental work. BV, 327
KV and PM wrote the main manuscript. KV and PM supplied laboratory materials and funding. 328
All authors revised and approved the manuscript. 329
330
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 12, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.088211doi: bioRxiv preprint
16
References 331
Albarino, C. G., Uebelhoer, L. S., Vincent, J. P., Khristova, M. L., Chakrabarti, A. K., McElroy, A., . . . 332 Towner, J. S. (2013). Development of a reverse genetics system to generate recombinant 333 Marburg virus derived from a bat isolate. Virology, 446(1-2), 230-237. doi: 334 10.1016/j.virol.2013.07.038 335
Amarasinghe, G. K., Ayllon, M. A., Bao, Y., Basler, C. F., Bavari, S., Blasdell, K. R., . . . Kuhn, J. H. (2019). 336 Taxonomy of the order Mononegavirales: update 2019. Arch Virol, 164(7), 1967-1980. doi: 337 10.1007/s00705-019-04247-4 338
Buchholz, U. J., Finke, S., & Conzelmann, K. K. (1999). Generation of bovine respiratory syncytial virus 339 (BRSV) from cDNA: BRSV NS2 is not essential for virus replication in tissue culture, and the 340 human RSV leader region acts as a functional BRSV genome promoter. J Virol, 73(1), 251-259. 341
Crary, S. M., Towner, J. S., Honig, J. E., Shoemaker, T. R., & Nichol, S. T. (2003). Analysis of the role of 342 predicted RNA secondary structures in Ebola virus replication. Virology, 306(2), 210-218. doi: 343 10.1016/s0042-6822(02)00014-4 344
Enterlein, S., Volchkov, V., Weik, M., Kolesnikova, L., Volchkova, V., Klenk, H. D., & Muhlberger, E. 345 (2006). Rescue of recombinant Marburg virus from cDNA is dependent on nucleocapsid 346 protein VP30. J Virol, 80(2), 1038-1043. doi: 10.1128/JVI.80.2.1038-1043.2006 347
Griffin, B. D., Leung, A., Chan, M., Warner, B. M., Ranadheera, C., Tierney, K., . . . Kobasa, D. (2019). 348 Establishment of an RNA polymerase II-driven reverse genetics system for Nipah virus strains 349 from Malaysia and Bangladesh. Sci Rep, 9(1), 11171. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47549-y 350
Hoenen, T., Groseth, A., de Kok-Mercado, F., Kuhn, J. H., & Wahl-Jensen, V. (2011). Minigenomes, 351 transcription and replication competent virus-like particles and beyond: reverse genetics 352 systems for filoviruses and other negative stranded hemorrhagic fever viruses. Antiviral Res, 353 91(2), 195-208. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2011.06.003 354
Huggins, J. W. (1989). Prospects for treatment of viral hemorrhagic fevers with ribavirin, a broad-355 spectrum antiviral drug. Rev Infect Dis, 11 Suppl 4, S750-761. doi: 356 10.1093/clinids/11.supplement_4.s750 357
Jordan, I., Horn, D., Oehmke, S., Leendertz, F. H., & Sandig, V. (2009). Cell lines from the Egyptian fruit 358 bat are permissive for modified vaccinia Ankara. Virus Res, 145(1), 54-62. doi: 359 10.1016/j.virusres.2009.06.007 360
Lieber, A., Kiessling, U., & Strauss, M. (1989). High level gene expression in mammalian cells by a 361 nuclear T7-phase RNA polymerase. Nucleic Acids Res, 17(21), 8485-8493. doi: 362 10.1093/nar/17.21.8485 363
Martin, A., Staeheli, P., & Schneider, U. (2006). RNA polymerase II-controlled expression of 364 antigenomic RNA enhances the rescue efficacies of two different members of the 365 Mononegavirales independently of the site of viral genome replication. J Virol, 80(12), 5708-366 5715. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02389-05 367
Mehand, M. S., Al-Shorbaji, F., Millett, P., & Murgue, B. (2018). The WHO R&D Blueprint: 2018 review 368 of emerging infectious diseases requiring urgent research and development efforts. Antiviral 369 Res, 159, 63-67. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2018.09.009 370
Muhlberger, E., Lotfering, B., Klenk, H. D., & Becker, S. (1998). Three of the four nucleocapsid proteins 371 of Marburg virus, NP, VP35, and L, are sufficient to mediate replication and transcription of 372 Marburg virus-specific monocistronic minigenomes. J Virol, 72(11), 8756-8764. 373
Nelson, E. V., Pacheco, J. R., Hume, A. J., Cressey, T. N., Deflube, L. R., Ruedas, J. B., . . . Muhlberger, E. 374 (2017). An RNA polymerase II-driven Ebola virus minigenome system as an advanced tool for 375 antiviral drug screening. Antiviral Res, 146, 21-27. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2017.08.005 376
Rojas, M., Monsalve, D. M., Pacheco, Y., Acosta-Ampudia, Y., Ramirez-Santana, C., Ansari, A. A., . . . 377 Anaya, J. M. (2020). Ebola virus disease: An emerging and re-emerging viral threat. J 378 Autoimmun, 106, 102375. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2019.102375 379
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 12, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.088211doi: bioRxiv preprint
17
Schmidt, K. M., & Muhlberger, E. (2016). Marburg Virus Reverse Genetics Systems. Viruses, 8(6). doi: 380 10.3390/v8060178 381
Siegert, R., Shu, H. L., Slenczka, W., Peters, D., & Muller, G. (1967). [On the etiology of an unknown 382 human infection originating from monkeys]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr, 92(51), 2341-2343. doi: 383 10.1055/s-0028-1106144 384
Smith, C. E., Simpson, D. I., Bowen, E. T., & Zlotnik, I. (1967). Fatal human disease from vervet monkeys. 385 Lancet, 2(7526), 1119-1121. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(67)90621-6 386
Sutter, G., Ohlmann, M., & Erfle, V. (1995). Non-replicating vaccinia vector efficiently expresses 387 bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase. FEBS Lett, 371(1), 9-12. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00843-388 x 389
Towner, J. S., Amman, B. R., Sealy, T. K., Carroll, S. A., Comer, J. A., Kemp, A., . . . Rollin, P. E. (2009). 390 Isolation of genetically diverse Marburg viruses from Egyptian fruit bats. PLoS Pathog, 5(7), 391 e1000536. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000536 392
Tsuda, Y., Hoenen, T., Banadyga, L., Weisend, C., Ricklefs, S. M., Porcella, S. F., & Ebihara, H. (2015). An 393 Improved Reverse Genetics System to Overcome Cell-Type-Dependent Ebola Virus Genome 394 Plasticity. J Infect Dis, 212 Suppl 2, S129-137. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu681 395
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2009). Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical 396 Laboratories, 5th Edition: HHS. 397
Uebelhoer, L. S., Albarino, C. G., McMullan, L. K., Chakrabarti, A. K., Vincent, J. P., Nichol, S. T., & 398 Towner, J. S. (2014). High-throughput, luciferase-based reverse genetics systems for 399 identifying inhibitors of Marburg and Ebola viruses. Antiviral Res, 106, 86-94. doi: 400 10.1016/j.antiviral.2014.03.018 401
Volchkov, V. E., Volchkova, V. A., Chepurnov, A. A., Blinov, V. M., Dolnik, O., Netesov, S. V., & Feldmann, 402 H. (1999). Characterization of the L gene and 5' trailer region of Ebola virus. J Gen Virol, 80 ( Pt 403 2), 355-362. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-80-2-355 404
Walpita, P., & Flick, R. (2005). Reverse genetics of negative-stranded RNA viruses: a global perspective. 405 FEMS Microbiol Lett, 244(1), 9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2005.01.046 406
Wang, J., Wang, C., Feng, N., Wang, H., Zheng, X., Yang, S., . . . Ding, Z. (2015). Development of a reverse 407 genetics system based on RNA polymerase II for Newcastle disease virus genotype VII. Virus 408 Genes, 50(1), 152-155. doi: 10.1007/s11262-014-1137-x 409
Wendt, L., Bostedt, L., Hoenen, T., & Groseth, A. (2019). High-throughput screening for negative-410 stranded hemorrhagic fever viruses using reverse genetics. Antiviral Res, 170, 104569. doi: 411 10.1016/j.antiviral.2019.104569 412
WHO. (2018). Marburg virus disease fact sheet. Retrieved 07-01-2020, from 413 https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/marburg-virus-disease 414
Woychik, N. A., & Hampsey, M. (2002). The RNA polymerase II machinery: structure illuminates 415 function. Cell, 108(4), 453-463. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00646-3 416
Zhang, J. H., Chung, T. D. Y., & Oldenburg, K. R. (1999). A simple statistical parameter for use in 417 evaluation and validation of high throughput screening assays. Journal of Biomolecular 418 Screening, 4(2), 67-73. doi: Doi 10.1177/108705719900400206 419
420
421
422
423
424
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 12, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.088211doi: bioRxiv preprint
18
Figures 425
426
Figure 1 427
Exchange of the T7 promoter by a mammalian CAG promotor leads to a significant loss of 428
MARV minigenome activity. (A) Schematic representation of the pCAGGS-HHRz-3M-eGFP-429
5M minigenome, made by replacing the T7 promoter of the T7-3M-eGFP-5M plasmid by a 430
CAG promoter and a 5’ hammerhead ribozyme (HHRz). HdVRz = hepatitis delta virus 431
ribozyme. (B) Comparison of the T7 polymerase and RNA polymerase II eGFP minigenome 432
systems. HEK293T cells were transfected with 1000 ng of the indicated minigenome, as well 433
as all necessary support plasmids. Images were taken 48 hours post transfection. Cells are 434
stained with Hoechst 33342 as background staining (shown in blue), eGFP-expressing cells are 435
shown in green. 436
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 12, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.088211doi: bioRxiv preprint
19
437
Figure 2 438
Secondary structure modelling of RNA structures. (A) Type I hammerhead ribozyme used in 439
the initial pCAGGS-HHRz-3M-eGFP-5M minigenome. The arrow indicates the position at 440
which the ribozyme cleaves. This corresponds to the start of the EBOV/MARV trailer, which 441
is integrated into the 3’ end of the ribozyme sequence (marked in black) to ensure the generation 442
of an exact 5’ end. (B) Comparison of the hairpin structures formed at the 5’ end of the EBOV 443
and MARV trailers shows that the EBOV hairpin is positioned at the very end of the sequence 444
while the MARV hairpin is shifted 11 nucleotides inwards. The start of each sequence is 445
indicated with an arrow, while the residues marked in black correspond to the nucleotides 446
incorporated into stem I of the hammerhead ribozyme. 447
448
449
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 12, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.088211doi: bioRxiv preprint
20
450
Figure 3 451
Shortening the ribozyme stem increases minigenome activity. (A) Transfection of HEK293T 452
cells with different mutants of the pCAGGS-HHRz-3M-eGFP-5M minigenome shows that 453
minigenome activity can be increased by reducing complementarity between the ribozyme and 454
the MARV trailer. Shortening by 3-5 nucleotides significantly increases activity, with an 455
optimum at a residual stem length of six base pairs. Data from three independent experiments, 456
done in triplicate. Error bars indicate the standard error of mean. Significance testing was done 457
using one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test for multiple comparisons: * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, 458
**** p<0.0001. RFU = Relative fluorescence units, obtained by normalizing the amount of 459
cells/well. (B) Schematic comparison of the unmodified (left) and the maximally active (right) 460
ribozyme-trailer junctions. Nucleotides that are mutated to shorten the ribozyme stem are 461
marked in red, their complementary partners that will act as additional spacers between the 462
ribozyme and the MARV trailer in cyan and the rest of the MARV trailer in blue. See also 463
supplementary table S1. 464
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 12, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.088211doi: bioRxiv preprint
21
465
Figure 4 466
Comparison of the T7 polymerase- and RNA polymerase II-driven minigenome systems. (A) 467
HEK293T cells were transfected with 1000 ng of T7 polymerase- or polymerase II-driven 468
MARV minigenome and observed for 72 hours in an IncuCyte. Both systems displayed a 469
similar time-dependent gain in eGFP expression, with the RNA polymerase II system reaching 470
significantly higher expression levels. (B) While the T7 polymerase-driven MARV 471
minigenome reaches its maximum activity at lower amounts of minigenome plasmid used, the 472
RNA polymerase II-driven minigenome displays a clear concentration-dependent effect and 473
outperforms the T7 system at higher plasmid concentrations. Data from three independent 474
experiments, performed in triplicate in 6-well plates. Error bars indicate the standard error of 475
the mean. eGFP expression is measured as the total green signal area, normalized for the amount 476
of cells/well. Significance testing was done using multiple t-tests, correcting for multiple 477
comparisons using the Holm-Sidak method: * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001, **** p<0.0001. 478
See also supplementary table S1. 479
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 12, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.088211doi: bioRxiv preprint
22
480
Figure 5 481
Minigenome activity comparison in different cell lines. Different cell lines were transfected with 482
all support plasmids and 1000 ng of the T7 polymerase-driven or the modified RNA polymerase 483
II-driven MARV minigenome containing a Renilla luciferase. Data is summarized from three 484
independent experiments, performed in triplicate. RLU = Relative luciferase units, background-485
corrected. Significance testing was done using multiple t-tests, correcting for multiple 486
comparisons using the Holm-Sidak method: * p<0.05. See also supplementary table S1. 487
488
489
490
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 12, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.088211doi: bioRxiv preprint
23
491
Figure 6 492
Ribavirin displays selective anti-MARV activity in vitro. HEK293T cells were transfected with 493
the modified RNA polymerase II-driven MARV minigenome and, after 6 hours, transferred to 494
96-well plates prefilled with dilutions of ribavirin. After 48 hours, a clear dose-dependent 495
reduction in minigenome activity was observed. Data from three independent experiments, 496
performed in triplicate. Significance testing compared to the untreated control (0 µM) was done 497
by two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test: * p<0.05, **** p<0.0001. See 498
also supplementary table S1. 499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 12, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.088211doi: bioRxiv preprint
24
Supplementary data 507
Supplementary table S1 508
Detailed overview of the statistical test results obtained in figures 3, 4, 5 and 6. 509
510
Source data 511
Figure 3-source data 512
Data used to create the graph in figure 3. 513
Figure 4-source data A 514
Data used to create the graph in figure 4A. 515
Figure 4-source data B 516
Data used to create the graph in figure 4B. 517
Figure 5-source data 518
Data used to create the graph in figure 5. 519
Figure 6-source data 520
Data used to create the graph in figure 6. 521
522
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted May 12, 2020. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.11.088211doi: bioRxiv preprint