developing effective physical fitness testing standards ... · mandated fitness testing in schools...
TRANSCRIPT
Networks: An Online Journal for Teacher Research
Volume 18 | Issue 2 Article 5
11-26-2016
Developing Effective Physical Fitness TestingStandards for Pre Service Physical EducatorsKory HillJacksonville State University, [email protected]
Roland Thornburg
Follow this and additional works at: http://newprairiepress.org/networks
Part of the Teacher Education and Professional Development Commons
This Full Article is brought to you for free and open access by New Prairie Press. It has been accepted for inclusion in Networks: An Online Journal forTeacher Research by an authorized administrator of New Prairie Press. For more information, please contact [email protected].
Recommended CitationHill, Kory and Thornburg, Roland (2016) "Developing Effective Physical Fitness Testing Standards for Pre Service PhysicalEducators," Networks: An Online Journal for Teacher Research: Vol. 18: Iss. 2. https://dx.doi.org/10.4148/2470-6353.1004
Networks:Vol.18,Issue2 ISSN2470-6353 Fall2016
Hill&Thornburg 1
EmployingActionResearchtoDevelopEffectivePhysicalFitnessTestingStandardsforPre-Service
PhysicalEducatorsKoryHill-JacksonvilleStateUniversityRolandThornburg-JacksonvilleStateUniversity
Abstract
Physicaleducatorsareoftenheldtoahigherstandardofphysicalfitness.Theabilitytoeffectivelyconveytheimportanceofphysicalfitnessmaydependupontheabilitytoappearphysicallyfit.Theabilitytoperformataminimallevelofproficiencyonfitnesstestswasdeemedimportantbythefacultyofonephysicaleducationteachereducationprogram(PETE).Inanactionresearchevaluation,thefacultyexaminedstandardspresentedintheliterature,aswellasquestionnaireresponsesbystudents,todevelopreasonablepassingscoresforphysicaleducationmajors.ResultsindicatedthestudentsarereceptivetominimalstandardsandtheinitialstandardsareachievablebymoststudentsinthePETEprogram.Keywords:fitnesstesting,PETEprogram,fitness
ThedevelopmentofphysicalfitnessisagoalformostK-12physicaleducation
programs.Standardsatstateandnationallevelsstresstheimportanceofensuringstudentsachieveandmaintainahealth-enhancinglevelofphysicalfitness(AlabamaDepartmentofEducation[ALSDE],2012b;NationalAssociationforSportandPhysicalEducation[NASPE],2013).Physicallyfitchildrenarelikelytoenjoyanimprovedqualityoflife.Thesechildrenarealsolesslikelytobeobeseortosuffertheearlystagesofvariousmetabolicdisorders.Further,theytendtohavemoreself-confidence,bettermentalhealth,andbetteracademicperformance(Janssen&LeBlanc,2010;Strong,Malina,Blimkie,Daniels,Dishman,Gutin,B.,Pivarnik,2005).Whilesomestudiesreportmoderatecorrelationsbetweenchildhoodandadultphysicalfitness,strongercorrelationsexistbetweenasedentarylifestyleduring
An On-line Journal for Teacher Research
Networks:Vol.18,Issue2 ISSN2470-6353 Fall2016
Hill&Thornburg 2
childhoodandoneduringadulthood.Obesechildrenaremorelikelytobeobeseadults,andfitchildrenaremorelikelytobefitadults(Baranowski,Mendlein,Resnicow,Frank,Cullen,&Baranowski,2000;Janz,Dawson,&Mahoney,2000;Telama,Yang,Viikari,Välimäki,Wanne,&Raitakari,2005;Trudeau,Laurencelle,&Shephard,2004).Giventhevalueplacedontheacquisitionoffitnessandfitnessknowledge,assessmentisinevitable.WelkandMeredith(2008)contendedthatfitnesstestingisimportantforavarietyofreasons:1)itstressestheimportanceoffitnessforall,2)itprovidesinformationteacherscanusetomakeinformedprogramchanges,3)itteacheschildrenvaluableself-assessmentskills,4)itaidsingoalsetting,and5)iteducatesstudentsandparentsaboutthecognitiveaspectsoffitnessandhowitisdeveloped.Someexpertsstronglyquestionthevalueoftop-down,mandatedfitnesstestinginschools(Harris,2006;Wrench&Garrett,2008);however,criticismsofK-12fitnesstestingtendtorevolvearoundtheinappropriateuseofscoresandafailuretolinkassessmentwithinstruction.Fewerappeartobecriticaloftheactualpracticeofassessingfitness.Whetherornotoneagreeswiththevalueorneedforfitnesstesting,therealityissuchthatphysicaleducatorsmustbeknowledgeableonthematter.Insomestates,state-widephysicalfitnesstestinginpublicschoolsisrequired(MorrowJr.&Ede,2009).Mostuniversityphysicaleducationteachereducation(PETE)majors(tobeidentifiedascandidates)inPETEprogramswillhavetheresponsibilityofhelpingK-12studentsachieveandmaintainhealth-enhancinglevelsoffitness.Onecouldarguethatthesecandidatesneedtobeabletodemonstratetheirownmaintenanceofhealth-enhancingfitnesslevels.
SomePETEfacultyhaveexpressedthebeliefthatcandidatesshouldundergothesameteststheywillonedayadministertostudents(Baghurst&Bryant,2012).Throughthisprocessoflearningbydoing,candidatesmaygainadeeperunderstandingoffitnessconceptsandtestprocedures.Completingteststhataresimilartothoseadministeredtostudentsmayallowcandidatestobetterunderstandtheemotionsofstudenttest-takers,aswellas,perhaps,toidentifytestproblemsandpitfallsthatwouldnototherwisebeapparent.Therepetitionshouldalsomakethetestsmorefamiliarandprovidecandidateswiththeskillsandconfidenceneededtoreliablyadministertheteststogroupsofstudents.Universally,allteachers,regardlessofthecontenttheyteach,arewell-servedto“walkamile”intheirstudents’testingshoes.Whenteachersinallareasbecomebetteracquaintedwiththevarioustestsrequired,theentireteachingprofessionisstrengthened.
Candidatesshouldbeconsciousoftheirownfitnesslevelsbecausetheyareoftenheldtohigherstandardsoffitnessthanothereducationprofessionals.Whitley,Sage,andButcher(1988)reportedthatphysicaleducationteachersengagedinregularcardiovascularfitnessweremorelikelytoincludeaerobicconditioningcontentintheircurricula.Researchershaveshownthataphysicaleducationteacher’sbodyfatpercentagecaninfluencestudents’willingnesstoacceptfitnessinformationandengageinexercise(Melville&Maddalozzo,1988).Tomeasurethis,researchershadthesameteacherdeliverfitnessinformationviavideototworandomlyselectedgroupsofstudents.Theonlydifferencebetweenthegroupswasthat,inonevideo,theteacherwaswearingafatsuit.Thestudentswhowatchedthefatsuitversionofthevideoscoredloweronretentiontestsandtendedtoviewtheteacheraslesslikableandashavinglessexpertise.Spittle,Petering,KremerandSpittle(2012)reportedthatpre-servicephysicaleducationteacherself-perceptionsoffitnessandappearancearerelatedtophysicaleducationteacher
Networks:Vol.18,Issue2 ISSN2470-6353 Fall2016
Hill&Thornburg 3
stereotypes.Theirstudyshowedthatfitandphysicallycompetentphysicaleducatorstendtobeviewedasmoreknowledgeable.Finally,physicaleducatorswhomaintainahighdegreeoffitnessaremorelikelytoleadbetterqualitiesoflife,tobetterperformdailyrigorousworkactivities,andtobetterserveaseffectiveandcrediblerolemodels(Hetland&Strand,2010;Staffo&Stier,2000).
Rolemodelingisavaluabletoolformotivatingandinforminglearners.Unfortunately,justasstudentscanbepositivelyinfluencedbyhealthymodelbehavior,theycanbenegativelyinfluencedbyunhealthymodelbehavior.Administratorschargedwithhiringphysicaleducationteachersalsobelieveintheimportanceofpositiverolemodeling.Jenkins,Garn,andJenkins(2005)reportedthatoverweightjobcandidateswithhighGPAswerelessfavoredbyadministratorsthannormal-weightjobcandidateswithaverageGPAs.Manypeopleincorrectlybelievethatfatalwaysequalsunfit(Blair,Cheng,&Holder,2001;Blair&Church,2004;O’Donovan,Blazevich,Boreham,Cooper,Crank,,Ekelund,&Stamatakis,2010).Physicalinactivitydoescontributetoweightgain(Janssen&LeBlanc,2010;LaMonte&Blair,2012),andstudents,parents,andadministratorsmayincorrectlyassumethatafatphysicaleducationteacherislazyandphysicallyinactive.
PETEcandidateswilleventuallyberesponsibleforteachingfitness,which,inmostschools,willinvolvetheadministrationoffitnesstests.Thus,animportantfunctionofphysicaleducatorsistoeffectivelyadministerfitnesstestsforprogramimprovementandgreaterfitnessawareness(Welk,2008).Ideally,ascandidatesprogressthroughaPETEprogram,theywillgrowfamiliarwiththebenefitsoffitnesstestingandthechallengesassociatedwithfitnesstestadministration.Somestudentshavenegativefeelingstowardsfitnesstesting.Candidatesshouldthereforebeawareofpotentialstudentanxiety,embarrassment,andnervousnessduringthetestingprocess(Wrench&Garrett,2008).Goingthroughthisprocessthemselvesshouldhelpcandidatesdevelopasenseofempathyandlearntothinkcriticallyaboutwaystoalleviatethestressthataccompaniesfitnesstesting.
ActionResearchWebelievedthemosteffectiveformofstudyforourresearchsettingtobeanaction
researchmethodology,whichwasdefinedbyParsonsandBrown(2002)asfollows:Actionresearchisaformofinvestigationdesignedforusebyteacherstoattempttosolveproblemsandimproveprofessionalpracticesintheirclassrooms.Itinvolvessystematicobservationsanddatacollectionwhichcanbeusedbythepractitioner-researcherinreflection,decision-makingandthedevelopmentofmoreeffectiveclassroomstrategies.(p.55)Withthegoalofidentifyingfitnesstestcut-offscoresthatareeffectiveandfairfor
candidates,wesoughttopromotechange.Theinclusionofstakeholderswasimportantbecausethedecisionstobemadewereintendedtochangecandidates’habitsandattitudestowardsfitness.Brydon-Miller,Greenwood,andMaguire(2003)suggestedthatonegoalofactionresearchistogenerateknowledgethatwillhelpadvancecommunityandindividualwell-being.
Networks:Vol.18,Issue2 ISSN2470-6353 Fall2016
Hill&Thornburg 4
Actionresearchhasbeendescribedasaprocesswherebycommunitiesreflectuponandimprovetheirownpracticebylinkingreflectionandaction.Forthisstudy,theactionresearchmodelfollowedwasdescribedbyAltrichter,Kemmis,McTaggart,andZuber-Skerritt(2002)asconsistingoffourphases:1)planning,2)acting,3)observing,and4)reflecting.
Giventheassumptionthatafitnesstestingrequirementhasthepotentialtobetterpreparephysicaleducators,thisactionresearchstudywasconductedtoanswertwoquestions:1)Whatarecandidates’currentattitudesandbeliefsregardingfitnesstesting?and2)Whatarereasonablecut-offscoreswithwhichtobegininourparticularsetting?Inanefforttoanswerthesetwoquestions,weinitiatedareviewoffitnesstestcriteria,administeredthecurrentstatefitnesstestforgrades3through12toourcandidatesandanalyzedtheresults,andgatheredcandidateinputregardingattitudesandpreferencesconcerningfitnesstestingasaPETEprogramrequirement.
PlanningReview of Published Fitness Values
Theplanningphasebeganwithareviewofpreviouslypublishedfitnessstandards.Normativestandardsandcut-offscoresusedinothersituationswerereviewedtoestablishinitialvalidcut-offscoresforourparticularsetting.Fitnesstestvaluesandcoincidingevaluativecategorieswereobtainedfor:1)theFitnessgram(Mahar&Rowe,2008;Plowman&Yan-ShuLiu,1999;Welk,Going,Morrow,&Meredith,2011),2)theAmericanCollegeofSportsMedicine(ACSM)FitnessTest(Dwyer&Davis,2008),and3)afitnesstestcreatedbytheCanadianSocietyforExercisePhysiology(2003).ThePETEfacultyreviewedboththepublishedvaluesandthecandidates’scoresfrompriorsemestersandagreeduponsuggestedpass/failcut-offscorestoproposetothecandidates.Whencomparingthefitnesssubtestscoresneededforanindividualtobecategorizedashealthy(normallythe20thto25thpercentile),weelectedtogowiththelowestvalue.Forexample,whencomparingthenumberoflapsneededonthePACERtestforfemalestobeconsideredhealthy,onetestreported33laps,another36laps,andthethird41laps.Wethusused31lapsforourcut-offvalue,assumingthat,inthefuture,itwouldbepreferabletoraisestandardsthantolowerstandards.
Creating a Questionnaire for Our Students Inadditiontodemographicinformation,thequestionnaireattemptedtogatherdata
onPETEstudents’attitudesandperceptionsofmandatoryfitnesstesting.Thequestionnairecontainedthreeparts:twotopicsonabipolaradjectivescale(eightadjectivepairs),sixratingscalequestions,andthreeopen-endedquestions.
Thetwobipolaradjectivetopicsposedtothecandidateswere:1)physicalfitnesstestsand2)thepracticeofmakingphysicaleducationmajorspassaphysicalfitnesstestasagraduationrequirement.Theparticipantswereaskedtothinkaboutthetopicstatementandrespondbymarkingthescaletoshowhowtheyfelt.Thesevenpointscalesrangedasfollows:fair-unfair,harmful-helpful,necessary-unnecessary,negative-positive,useful-useless,discouraging-encouraging,valuable-worthless,bad-good.Theeightadjectivepairswereinstrumental(e.g.useful-useless;helpful-harmful),ratherthanaffective(e.g.exciting-
Networks:Vol.18,Issue2 ISSN2470-6353 Fall2016
Hill&Thornburg 5
boring;pleasant-unpleasant)innaturebecausesuchadjectivetypeshavebeensuccessfullyusedinthephysicalsemanticdifferentialsthatassessattitudestowardsphysicalactivity(Rhodes,HuntMatheson,&Mark,2010).
Thesecondpartofthequestionnairecontainedquestionsrequiringresponsesonaratingscalethatrangedfromstronglydisagreetostronglyagree.Questionsaskedaboutcurrentfitnesslevels,opinionsofphysicaleducationteachersasrolemodels,andperceptionsofthelocusofcontrolwithrespecttofitness.
Thefinalsectioncontainedthreeopen-endedquestions:1)Inyouropinion,whatisthelongestamountoftimeitshouldtakea20-year-oldphysicaleducationmajortorunamile?2)AssumethisuniversityinstitutedamandatoryfitnesstestforallPETEmajors.Whatshouldhappentostudentswhofail?3)Makeanyadditionalcommentsyouwouldlikeonthistopic.
ActionTheactionphaseconsistedofadministeringthefitnesstestandthequestionnaires
tothePETEcandidates.Inbothinstances,theresearchquestionsweresharedwiththecandidatesbecausetheywereparticipantsinthestudyand,asparticipants,theywereallowedtoseetheresultsandprovidefeedbackatanypoint.Thegoalsofpromotingpositivechangeinourteacherpreparationprogramwereexplicitlystated,andeffortsweremadetocreateacollaborativeenvironment.
Candidates DataweregatheredfollowingInstitutionalReviewBoardapproval.Participationin
thefitnesstestwaspartofarequiredclassactivity.Thesubmissionofscoresandcompletionofthequestionnairewerevoluntary.Allparticipantssignedaconsentform.
Theparticipatingcandidatesconsistedofphysicaleducationmajorsatamid-sizedregionaluniversityinthesoutheasternUnitedStates.Enrollmentisapproximately9,000students,with85%ofthestudentsenrolledinundergraduateprograms.Malescomprise40%andfemalescomprise60%ofthestudentpopulation.AfricanAmericanscomprise30%,white65%,andallotherethnicitieslessthan5%.ThemajorityofthePETEstudentsareconsideredtraditionalcollegeage(between18and22yearsold).Participantsinthestudyrangedfrom18to39years,butthevastmajoritywereunder24yearsofage.
Fitness Testing of Candidates Thefitnesstestwasadministeredtothecandidatesaspartofaclassexercise.The
fourtestcomponentsadministeredweretheV-sit,theprogressiveaerobiccardiovascularendurancerun(PACER),thepush-upsandthecurl-ups.Theproceduresdescribedinthestatetestmanualwerefollowed(ALSDE,2012a),andcandidatesweregivenanexplanationofthetestandademonstrationofhowtoperformeachtestcomponent.Candidateswerealsoshowntheproposedcut-offscorescreatedbythePETEfaculty(valuesshownintable1).Thoughthecandidateswereinformedthatthesecut-offscoreswerenotyetineffect,theywereencouragedtoattempttosurpassthecut-offscoresasameansofself-assessment.Duetoabsenteeism,injuryandnon-compliance,noteverycandidatecompletedeverytestcomponent.
Networks:Vol.18,Issue2 ISSN2470-6353 Fall2016
Hill&Thornburg 6
Table 1: Departmentally proposed cut-off values for PETE candidates
Age PACER(laps) Push-ups Curl-ups V-sit(inches) Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Women29&under 51 31 14 6 17 16 13 1630to39 45 29 13 6 15 15 13 1540to49 32 24 12 5 14 14 12 1250&over 22 19 8 3 12 9 10 8
Candidate Questionnaires Thefinalstepinthedatagatheringprocesswastogatherinformationoncandidate
attitudesandopinionsregardingfitnesstestingand,morespecifically,theuseofmandatorycut-offpassingvalues.Becausesomecandidatescouldnotparticipateinthefitnesstestduetoinjuryorillness,theNvalueforthequestionnaire(N=48)wasgreaterthanthatforthefitnesstest(N=43).Questionnaireswereadministeredtothreeclassesbydepartmentfaculty.Theaverageagewas22.4±5.3,and44%ofthecandidateswerefemale.
DataAnalysisWhiletheestablishmentofcut-offvalueswasasubjectiveexercise,thevalueswere
notchosenarbitrarily.Instead,thefacultychosethevaluesbasedonareviewofthecandidatescoresandthenormativevaluesassociatedwiththebottomquintileofvaluesreportedfortheFitnessgram,theACSMFitnessTest,andtheCanadianFitnessTest.Thecandidatescoreswerethencomparedtotheproposedcut-offvaluestoseewhatthepassingratewouldhavebeenhadthecut-offvaluesbeenineffect.
ThequestionnairedatawereenteredintoanSPSSversion21(SPSSIBM,NewYork,U.S.A)spreadsheetandreversecodedwherenecessarysothathigherscoresona1to7or1to5scalewerealwaysindicativeofamoredesirablebelieforattitude.Thedescriptivedatawerecomputed,andaprinciplecomponentanalysis(CPA)wasperformedonthesemanticdifferentialtopicstoexaminetheirusefulnessandtoidentifypotentialareasfordatareduction.TheCPAexploredtwoattitudetopics:1)physicalfitnesstests(TestAttitude)and2)thepracticeofmakingphysicaleducationmajorspassaphysicalfitnesstestasagraduationrequirement(MandatoryTestAttitude).Theratingscalequestionsweretotaledandoverallmeanswerecomparedaccordingtogenderandperceivedcurrentfitnesslevel.Lastly,thethreeopen-endedquestionswereorganized:responsesaboutanappropriatemileruncut-offweresimplysummed,responsesregardingthesuggestedproceduretofollowintheeventoftestfailureweregroupedbytheme,andresponsesforanyadditionalcommentswerecodedaspositive,negative,orneutral.
Networks:Vol.18,Issue2 ISSN2470-6353 Fall2016
Hill&Thornburg 7
ObservingFitness Test Results
Atotalof43students,16(37%)femaleand27(63%)male,completedthetestduringarequiredphysicaleducationcourse.Themeanageoftheparticipantswas22.8±5.8.Priortotestadministration,candidateswereshownthenewlyproposedcut-offscoresandadvisedthatapassingscorewouldeventuallybeneededtograduate.Passingratesforeachtestcomponentwerethencalculatedusingthecut-offscores;theseareshownintable2.Table 2: Passing rates with proposed HPER department fitness test cut-off scores.
PACER Push-ups Curl-ups V-sit
Male(n=27) 71% 86% 93% 100%
Female(n=16) 43% 100% 100% 100%
Questionnaire Results Theresponsestothebipolaradjectivetopicsforbothconcepts,TestAttitudeand
MandatoryTestAttitude,werepositive.Forbothtopics,theresponsesweregenerallyconsistentwhencomparedwiththevariousadjectivepairs.ForTestAttitude,theonlyadjectivepairwithlowerscoresthantherestwastheencouraging–discouragingpair.ForMandatoryTestAttitude,alleightadjectivepairsweresimilar.Thesemanticdifferentialsforboththe8-itemFitnessTestobject(α=.871)andthe8-itemMandatoryFitnessTestobject(α=.944)werefoundtobehighlyreliable.Descriptivestatistics,presentedintable3,indicatedthatrespondentsheldpositiveattitudestowardbothfitnesstestsingeneralandthepracticeofmandatingfitnesstestsforphysicaleducationmajorsinparticular.Avisualinspectionofthemeansindicatedoverwhelminglypositiveattitudesandconfirmedthet-tests.Acomparisonofmeansindicatedthatbothfitnesstests(t(47)=9.24,p<.001)andmandatoryfitnesstest(t(47)=7.18,p<.001)totalsweresignificantlygreaterthananeutralscore.Table 3: Descriptive statistics for bipolar adjective pairs.
Semanticdifferentialitems Mean SDPhysicalfitnesstests
Fitnesstestsarefair/unfair 5.69 1.82Fitnesstestsarehelpful/harmful 5.77 1.51Fitnesstestsarenecessary/unnecessary 5.69 1.61Fitnesstestsarepositive/negative 5.52 1.64Fitnesstestsareuseful/useless 5.88 1.77Fitnesstestsareencouraging/discouraging 4.96 1.52Fitnesstestsaregood/bad 5.65 1.44
Networks:Vol.18,Issue2 ISSN2470-6353 Fall2016
Hill&Thornburg 8
Fitnesstestsarevaluable/worthless 5.60 1.87Overall 5.59 1.65
Thepracticeofmakingphysicaleducationmajorspassaphysicalfitnesstestasagraduationrequirement
Fitnesstestrequirementsarefair/unfair 5.77 2.04Fitnesstestrequirementsarehelpful/harmful 5.75 1.72Fitnesstestrequirementsarenecessary/unnecessary 5.38 1.96Fitnesstestrequirementsarepositive/negative 5.56 1.75Fitnesstestrequirementsareuseful/useless 5.58 1.90Fitnesstestrequirementsareencouraging/discouraging 5.46 1.76Fitnesstestrequirementsaregood/bad 5.71 1.71Fitnesstestrequirementsarevaluable/worthless 5.73 1.83Overall 5.62 1.84
Note:N=48.Responsesweregivenona7-pointscale,with1beingthemostnegativeresponseand7beingthemostpositiveresponse.
Thedescriptivedatafortheratingscalequestionsrevealedgenerallypositiveresponsesregardingfitnesstestingforphysicaleducationmajors.Usinga5-pointscalerangingfromstronglydisagreetostronglyagree,withhighervaluesindicatinggreaterfavorability,themedianandmeanvaluesforallsixquestionsweremorepositivethananeutralscoreof3.0.Thedescriptivedataareshownintable4.Table 4: Descriptive statistics for Likert-type rating scale questions.
Likert Type Question N Median Mean SD It is important that physical education teachers be able to demonstrate a high level of fitness.
48 5 4.21 1.15
A minimum level of physical fitness should be required of physical education teachers.
48 4 3.48 1.35
For a physical education teacher, being physically fit makes one a better role model.
48 5 4.56 0.9
Knowing a physical fitness test must be passed in order to graduate will motivate me to engage in regular health-enhancing physical activities.
48 5 4.33 1.1
aPhysical education majors have little control over their own physical fitness levels.
48 4.5 4.23 1.02
My current physical fitness level is satisfactory for a physical educator.
47 4 3.89 1.37
Note:Responsesweregivenona5-pointscale,with1beingstronglydisagreeand5beingstronglyagree.aSince,onthisitem,alowscoreindicatesapositiveperception,thescoresforthisitemwerereversedwhenthedatawereanalyzed(1=stronglyagreeand5=stronglydisagree).
Aone-wayANOVAshowedthattheperceptionsofmalesandfemalesdidnotdiffer.Similarly,perceptionsoffitnesstestingwerenotinfluencedbytherespondents’current(albeitself-identified)fitnesslevels.Lastly,thetotalscoresforallratingscalequestions
Networks:Vol.18,Issue2 ISSN2470-6353 Fall2016
Hill&Thornburg 9
weresignificantlyhigherthanwhatwouldhavebeenobservediftherespondentshadselectedneutralforeachitem.Inotherwords,opinionswereclearlypositive.
Thefinalthreequestionsonthequestionnairewereopen-ended.Theresponsestothesequestionsarerepresentedgraphicallyinfigure1.Whenaskedaboutthehighestacceptablemile-runtimelimitforaphysicaleducationmajor,participantsrepliedwithamediantimeofroughly10minutes.Whenaskedwhatshouldhappentocandidateswhofailedthefitnesstest,mostcandidatesfavoredgivingthemmorechancestopass.
Figure1:Responsestoopen-endedquestions
Networks:Vol.18,Issue2 ISSN2470-6353 Fall2016
Hill&Thornburg 10
Nearly88%oftherespondentsbelievedthatcandidatesshouldhavetopassaphysicalfitnesstest;however,theyalsobelievedthatcandidatesshouldbeallowedmultipleattempts,withsuggestionsrangingfromoneadditionalattempttounlimitedattempts.Whengivenachancetoopineaboutanymatterrelatingtothestudy,only11respondents(23%)chosetodoso.Sixresponseswereclassifiedaspositive,threeasnegative,andtwoasneutral.Negativecommentsindicatedthatfitnesstestingwasa“wasteoftime”or“unfair.”Positivecommentsgenerallysupportedfitnesstestingasameansofraisingstandardsandpromotingprofessionalism.Thetwoneutralcommentsofferedsuggestionsregardingproceduralimprovementsfortestadministration.
ReflectingTheresultsindicatedthatphysicaleducationmajorsinthestudiedPETEprogram
appearedsupportiveofeffortstoimplementafitnesstestingcomponent.Evidencefurtherindicatedthatcandidateswerewillingtomakethetestingrequirementapositiveaccountabilitymeasure.Anexaminationofthecandidates’actualfitnesstestscoresrevealedthatthemajorityhadthecapacitytomeettheminimumsuggestedstandards.ThecomponentraisingthegreatestconcernwasthePACERforfemales,withapassrateofonly43%.However,femalesperformedextremelywellontheotherthreecomponents.Malesperformedextremelywellonthev-sitandcurl-ups,withroomforimprovementonthepush-upsandPACER.Asanindicationthatcandidatescanexpendgreatereffortwhenchallenged,oncecut-offscoresweresharedpriortotesting,themalePACERandv-sitscoresimprovedsignificantlyfromprevioussemesters.Thus,withmoreincentivetoreachhigherbenchmarks,candidatesmayperformbetter.Itisimportanttonotethatsomecandidateslikelystoppedperformingoncethecut-offscoreswereexceeded,eventhoughtheyhadnotreachedexhaustionandcouldhavecontinued.Inthefuture,itispossiblethatafitnesscertificatecouldbeawardedtocandidateswhogobeyonddepartmentalstandards.Whenthecut-offscoreswereshowntothecandidates,theirresponsesseemedtosuggestthattheywanttobeheldaccountableformaintainingaminimumleveloffitness.Thisresultwassupportedbythequestionnaireresponses.Whenaskedaboutanappropriateminimummileruntimeforphysicaleducationmajors,themediansuggestionwas10minutes,whichisequivalenttotheminimumfemalePACERscoreof30laps(31lapswasthecut-offscoreforfemalesunder30yrs.).Thedisplayofpositiveattitudesandincreasedeffortassociatedwiththerevealofdepartmentalcut-offscoresmaysuggestthatstandardscanbeslowlyincreasedoverafewyearsascandidatesacclimatetothenewrequirementsandcontinuetosupporttheinclusionofmandatoryfitnessstandards.
Thequestionnairerevealedpositiveattitudestowardfitnesstestsandthepossibilityofmandatingsuchtestsforphysicaleducationmajors.Boththeratingscalequestionsandthesemanticdifferentialitemsindicatedthatstudentsbelievephysicaleducationteachersshouldmaintainaminimumleveloffitnesstobeeffectiveprofessionalsandcompetentrolemodels.Theseviewsremainedstrongregardlessofgenderorperceivedcurrentfitnesslevels.Onemightexpectstudentsperceivingthemselvesaslessfittobelesslikelytohavepositiveattitudestowardmandatoryfitnesstests,butthiswasnotthecase.Itishopedthatwiththeintroductionofmandatoryfitnesstesting,eventhelessfitstudents,realizingtheimportanceofmaintainingtheirfitness,willbemotivatedtoimprove.Wewereencouragedtoobservenodifferenceinattitudesaccordingtogender.
Networks:Vol.18,Issue2 ISSN2470-6353 Fall2016
Hill&Thornburg 11
Fitnesstestsinotherarenas,suchasthemilitaryandfire-fighting,haveattimesbeenviewednegativelyasveiledattemptstoforcefemalestofail.Thefemalesinthisstudydidnotappeartohavenegativeviewsoffitnesstestingand,infact,hadhigherpassratesthanthemales.
Adialoguehasalreadybegunaboutdirectionsforfuturepractice.Giventhecyclicalorspiralingnatureofactionresearch(Altrichter,Kemmis,McTaggart,&Zuber-Skerritt,2002),asresearchers,wefeltitnecessarytoconsiderwhatchangeswillbenecessarygoingforward.Additionally,inactionresearch,thesharingofresultsiscritical.Whendiscussingthecut-offfitnessrequirements,thefacultysharedthestudyfindingswithcandidates,whoshouldbeawarethattheirvoicesareheardregardingprotocolsandprocedures.Candidatesinthisstudysupportedmultiplepassattemptsforthefitnesstest;thus,allinvolvedshouldworktogethertoestablishprotocolstoallowforformativeassessment.
Asstakeholders,PETEcandidatesshouldknowthattheirinputisvaluedandnecessarythroughouttheactionresearchprocess.TheevidenceintheactionresearchshowedthatthePETEcandidatesbelievedfitnesswasimportantandthattheybelieveditwaspartofbeingaprofessionalintheirchosenfield.Whenintroducingthemandatoryfitnesstestingrequirementtocandidates,itwillbeimperativetostressthepositiveeffectitwillhaveonraisingtheirlevelsofprofessionalismandtheircredibilityintheK-12community.Candidatesshouldknowthataminimumrequiredleveloffitnessisnotapunitiveactionbeingforcedonthemfromabove,but,rather,anattempttoraisestandardsthatothercandidatesclearlysupport.
ReferencesAlabamaDepartmentofEducation(ALSDE).(2012a).AlabamaPhysicalFitness
Assessment:TestAdministratorManual.Retrievedfromhttp://www.alsde.edu/home/general/hpeinformation.aspx
AlabamaDepartmentofEducation(ALSDE).(2012b).CoursesofStudyforPhysicalEducation.RetrievedNovember27,2013,fromhttp://alex.state.al.us/standardAll.php?subject=PE1&summary=1
Altrichter,H.,Kemmis,S.,McTaggart,R.,&Zuber-Skerritt,O.(2002).Theconceptofactionresearch.TheLearningOrganization,9(3),125–131.doi:10.1108/09696470210428840
Baghurst,T.,&Bryant,L.C.(2012).DoasIsay,notasIdo:Improvingtheimageofthephysicaleducationprofession.Strategies,25(4),11–13.
Baranowski,T.,Mendlein,J.,Resnicow,K.,Frank,E.,Cullen,K.W.,&Baranowski,J.(2000).Physicalactivityandnutritioninchildrenandyouth:anoverviewofobesityprevention.PreventiveMedicine,31(2),S1–S10.
Blair,S.N.,Cheng,Y.,&Holder,J.S.(2001).Isphysicalactivityorphysicalfitnessmoreimportantindefininghealthbenefits?MedicineandScienceinSportsandExercise,33(6;SUPP),S379–S399.
Networks:Vol.18,Issue2 ISSN2470-6353 Fall2016
Hill&Thornburg 12
Blair,S.N.,&Church,T.S.(2004).Thefitness,obesity,andhealthequation.JAMA:TheJournaloftheAmericanMedicalAssociation,292(10),1232–1234.
Brydon-Miller,M.,Greenwood,D.,&Maguire,P.(2003).Whyactionresearch?ActionResearch,1(1),9–28.doi:10.1177/14767503030011002
CanadianSocietyforExercisePhysiology(CSEP).(2003).TheCanadianphysicalactivity,fitnessandlifestyleapproach(CPAFLA)3rdedition.CanadianSocietyforExercisePhysiology.
Dwyer,G.B.,&Davis,S.E.(Eds.).(2008).ACSM’shealth-relatedphysicalfitnessassessmentmanual(2nded.).Philadelphia,PA:WoltersKluwer/LippincottWilliams&Wilkins.
Harris,J.(2006).Areviewofchildren’sfitnesstesting.EuropeanPhysicalEducationReview,12(2),201–225.doi:10.1177/1356336X06065359
Hetland,K.M.,&Strand,B.(2010).ADescriptiveAnalysisofUndergraduatePETEProgramsintheCentralDistrict.TheICHPER-SDJournalofResearchinHealth,PhysicalEducation,Recreation,Sport&Dance,5(1),3–9.
Janssen,I.,&LeBlanc,A.G.(2010).Reviewsystematicreviewofthehealthbenefitsofphysicalactivityandfitnessinschool-agedchildrenandyouth.InternationalJournalofBehavioralNutritionandPhysicalActivity,7(40),1–16.
Janz,K.F.,Dawson,J.D.,&Mahoney,L.T.(2000).Trackingphysicalfitnessandphysicalactivityfromchildhoodtoadolescence:TheMuscatinestudy.MedicineandScienceinSportsandExercise,32(7),1250–1257.
Jenkins,J.M.,Garn,A.,&Jenkins,P.(2005).Preserviceteacherobservationsinpeercoaching.JournalofTeachinginPhysicalEducation,24(1),2-23.
LaMonte,M.J.,&Blair,S.N.(2012).Physicalactivity,fitness,andmortalityrates.InC.,Bouchard,S.N.,Blair,&W.Haskell,(Eds).PhysicalActivityandHealth(2nded.,pp.167–184).Champaign,IL:HumanKinetics.
Mahar,M.T.,&Rowe,D.A.(2008).PracticalGuidelinesforValidandReliableYouthFitnessTesting.MeasurementinPhysicalEducationandExerciseScience,12(3),126–145.doi:10.1080/10913670802216106
Melville,D.S.,&Maddalozzo,J.G.(1988).Theeffectsaphysicaleducator’sappearanceofbodyfatnesshasoncommunicatingexerciseconceptstohighschoolstudents.JournalofTeachinginPhysicalEducation,7,343–352.
MorrowJr,J.R.,&Ede,A.(2009).Researchquarterlyforexerciseandsportlecturestatewidephysicalfitnesstesting:ABIGwaistoraBIGwaste?ResearchQuarterlyforExerciseandSport,80(4),696–701.
NationalAssociationforSportandPhysicalEducation(NASPE).(2013).NASPENationalStandardsforPhysicalEducation.StandardsandPositionStatements.RetrievedNovember27,2013,fromhttp://www.aahperd.org/naspe/standards/nationalstandards/pestandards.cfm
O’Donovan,G.,Blazevich,A.J.,Boreham,C.,Cooper,A.R.,Crank,H.,Ekelund,U.,Stamatakis,E.(2010).TheABCofPhysicalActivityforHealth:aconsensusstatementfromthe
Networks:Vol.18,Issue2 ISSN2470-6353 Fall2016
Hill&Thornburg 13
BritishAssociationofSportandExerciseSciences.JournalofSportsSciences,28(6),573–591.doi:10.1080/02640411003671212
Parsons,R.,&Brown,K.(2002).Teacherasreflectivepractitionerandactionresearcher.Belmont,CA:Wadsworth/Thomas.
Plowman,S.A.,&Yan-ShuLiu,N.(1999).Norm-referencedandcriterion-referencedvalidityoftheone-milerunandPACERincollegeage.MeasurementinPhysicalEducation&ExerciseScience,3(2),63.
Rhodes,R.,HuntMatheson,D.,&Mark,R.(2010).Evaluationofsocialcognitivescalingresponseoptionsinthephysicalactivitydomain.MeasurementinPhysicalEducationandExerciseScience,14(3),137–150.doi:10.1080/1091367X.2010.495539
Spittle,M.,Petering,F.,Kremer,P.,&Spittle,S.(2012).Stereotypesandself-perceptionsofphysicaleducationpre-serviceteachers.AustralianJournalofTeacherEducation,37(1),2.
Staffo,D.F.,&Stier,W.F.(2000).TheUseofFitnessTestsinPETEPrograms.JournalofPhysicalEducation,Recreation&Dance,71(5),48–52.doi:10.1080/07303084.2000.10605146
Strong,W.B.,Malina,R.M.,Blimkie,C.J.,Daniels,S.R.,Dishman,R.K.,Gutin,B.,Pivarnik,J.M.(2005).Evidencebasedphysicalactivityforschool-ageyouth.TheJournalofPediatrics,146(6),732–737.
Telama,R.,Yang,X.,Viikari,J.,Välimäki,I.,Wanne,O.,&Raitakari,O.(2005).Physicalactivityfromchildhoodtoadulthood:a21-yeartrackingstudy.AmericanJournalofPreventiveMedicine,28(3),267–273.
Trudeau,F.,Laurencelle,L.,&Shephard,R.J.(2004).Trackingofphysicalactivityfromchildhoodtoadulthood.MedicineandScienceinSportsandExercise,36(11),1937–1943.
Welk,G.J.(2008).Theroleofphysicalactivityassessmentsforschool‐basedphysicalactivitypromotion.MeasurementinPhysicalEducationandExerciseScience,12(3),184–206.doi:10.1080/10913670802216130
Welk,G.J.,Going,S.B.,Morrow,J.R.,&Meredith,M.D.(2011).Developmentofnewcriterion-referencedfitnessstandardsintheFITNESSGRAM®Program.AmericanJournalofPreventiveMedicine,41(4),S63–S67.doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.07.012
Welk,G.J.,&Meredith,M.D.(Eds.).(2008).Fitnessgram/ActivitygramReferenceGuide.Dallas,TX:TheCooperInstitute.
Whitley,J.D.,Sage,J.N.,&Butcher,M.(1988).Cardiorespiratoryfitness:RolemodelingbyP.E.instructors.JournalofPhysicalEducation,Recreation&Dance,59(7),81.
Wrench,A.,&Garrett,R.(2008).Pleasureandpain:Experiencesoffitnesstesting.EuropeanPhysicalEducationReview,14(3),325–346.doi:10.1177/1356336X08095669
Networks:Vol.18,Issue2 ISSN2470-6353 Fall2016
Hill&Thornburg 14
Zhu,W.,Mahar,M.T.,Welk,G.J.,Going,S.B.,&Cureton,K.J.(2011).Approachesfordevelopmentofcriterion-referencedstandardsinhealth-relatedyouthfitnesstests.AmericanJournalofPreventiveMedicine,41(4),S68–S76.
Zhu,W.,Plowman,S.A.,&Park,Y.(2010).Aprimer-testcenteredequatingmethodforsettingcut-offscores.ResearchQuarterlyforExerciseandSport,81(4),400–409.