detection of the footprint of natural selection in the genome
TRANSCRIPT
A brief history of natural selection
• Darwin began formulating his theory of natural selection in the late 1860
• Wallace help Darwin in his studies
• The descent of species from common ancestors were well accepted
• Natural selection took a harder time to be accept
Signatures of selection
• High proportion of function altering mutations
Prolonged period can increase the fixation rate ofbeneficial function-altering mutations
• Reduction in genetic diversity
The selected allele rises to fixation, bringingwith it closely linked variants
• High-frequency derived alleles
In a selective sweep, derived alleles linked to the beneficial allele can hitchhike to high frequency
Time
Kelley, J.(2007)
Signatures of selection
• Differences between populations
Positive selection may change the frequency ofan allele in one population but not in another
• Long haplotypes
Selected allele may rise in prevalence rapidlyenough that recombination does not break downthe association with alleles at nearby loci.
Methods for detect microevolution selection
Based on high frequency derived alleles
Tajima’s D statistical test
Detect - Positive - Balancing
Based on long haplotypes
Extended haplotype homozygosis (EHH). statistical test
TI
MET
IM
E
Frequency spectrum
Linkage disequilibrium
Vitti, J.(2013)
Detect - Partial or
incomplete selective sweep
- Balancing
Methods for detect microevolution selection T
IM
E
Wright’s fixation index (Fst)
Population differentiation
Composite methods
Detect:- Positive - Negative
Allele frequencies
Combine the results of one or a
few tests for many variants
Combine the results of many tests at a
single site
Fst
IHS (kind of LD)
XP-EHH
Vitti, J.(2013)
Traces of selection
• High Fst values for the 99 flanking DNA sites on LCT locus.
• REHH was estimated to be extremely high
• Selective sweep acting since 2000-20000 years ago
Gene under selectionLCT
Kelley, J.(2007)
Bibliography•Vitti, J. J., Grossman, S. R., & Sabeti, P. C. (2013). Detecting natural selection in genomic data. Annual Review of Genetics, 47, 97–120.
http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-111212-133526
• Kelley, J. L., & Swanson, W. J. (2008). Positive selection in the human genome: from genome scans to biological significance. Annual Review of
Genomics and Human Genetics, 9, 143–160. http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164411
• Ridley, M. (2004). Evolution. Evolution. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-6133-5
• Sabeti, P. C., Schaffner, S. F., Fry, B., Lohmueller, J., Varilly, P., Shamovsky, O., … Lander, E. S. (2006). Positive natural selection in the human lineage.
Science (New York, N.Y.), 312(5780), 1614–1620. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1124309
•Oleksyk, T. K., Smith, M. W., & O’Brien, S. J. (2010). Genome-wide scans for footprints of natural selection. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal
Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 365(1537), 185–205. http://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0219