detailed design review p11451
DESCRIPTION
Detailed Design Review P11451 . Cook Stove Test Stand Group February 4 th 2011 David Sam (ME) Huseyin Zorba (ISE) Phillip Amsler (ME). Agenda. Project Inputs Bill of Materials Modifications to Test Stand Project Outputs Issues. DESIGN INPUTS. Customer Needs. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Detailed Design Review P11451
Cook Stove Test Stand GroupFebruary 4th 2011
David Sam (ME)Huseyin Zorba (ISE)Phillip Amsler (ME)
![Page 2: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Agenda• Project Inputs• Bill of Materials• Modifications to Test Stand• Project Outputs• Issues
![Page 3: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
DESIGN INPUTS
![Page 4: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Customer NeedsRevision #: 3
Customer Need # Importance Description Comments/Status
CN1 1 Accurate Statistical Results:Repeatable results, minimize variability and quantify uncertainty
Main customer need, by minimizing variability we can achieve repeatable results and quantify our uncertainty.
CN2 1 Develop and document standardized water boil test Document a water boil test or modified water boil test with a test procedure and user manual.
CN3 1 Develop and document standardized quick stove test
Create and document a quick stove test procedure for teams to test variations with instant feedback. By changing one input, user should be able to identify the impact in the output. This test should have a user manual.
CN4 1 Develop and document a field like test
Create and document a test procedure to test the stove under Haitian cooking style which may include longer time to boil. Procedure should be documented with a user manual.
CN5 1 Measure efficiency and it's uncertainty Measure the efficiency of the thermal versus chemical energy used.
CN6 1 Safety Test stand should be safe to operate for untrained users.
CN7 1 Benchmark against other stoves
Test and compare our stove versus rebar stove or another kind of stove under same test conditions. This will allow comparison of results such as fuel usage, emissions, and time to boil
CN8 1 Quantify emissions Greenhouse gases such as CO.
CN9 2 Quantify particulate matter Any solid matter output from the stove into the surrounding environment.
CN10 2 Durable Test stand should be durable and able to withstand years of testing
CN11 2 Ease of use Test stand should be ergonomic and easily used by one user. Also testing should be easily performed by an untrained user.
CN12 2 Easily transportable Test stand should be easily transportable by one user
![Page 5: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Engineering SpecificationsRevision #: 3Engr. Spec.
# Importance Source Specification (description) Unit of Measure
MarginalValue
Ideal Value Comments/Status
ES1 1
CN1, CN2, CN3, CN4,
CN7Repeatable time to boil Standard
deviation (%) <20% <10% Boiling time (mins) is an output of the WBT and customer need is to have these results be repeatable and to minimize variability
ES2 1
CN1, CN2, CN3, CN4,
CN7
Repeatable specific fuel consumption
Standard deviation (%) <20% <10%
Ratio of total amount of fuel (wood or charcoal) used to the amount of water (grams fuel/ grams of water) from WBT; this is a specification that can be used in benchmarking.
ES3 1
CN1, CN2, CN3,CN4, CN5, CN7
Repeatable thermal efficiency of stove
Coefficient of Variation (%) <20% <10%
Ratio of the work done by heating and evaporating water to the energy consumed by the fuel source. The thermal efficiency should be repeatable to ensure validity of testing.
ES4 1
CN1, CN2,CN3, CN4 CN7
Repeatable fuel rate consumption
Standard deviation (%) <10% <5%
Fuel rate consumption (g/min), by obtaining repeatable results, we can observe the differences in setting up the fuel source and lighting procedure to help us determine the best method and which is conserve fuel the best. Fuel consumption is defined as the amount of fuel to produce a unit output. (How much fuel to boil water)
ES5 1
CN1, CN2, CN3, CN4,
CN7
Repeatable firepower Standard deviation (%) <10% <5%
Firepower (Watts) is the rate of fuel energy consumed by the stove per minute which can give us the power output of the stove in watts. This can be calculated from WBT data and could also be useful benchmarking.
ES6 1
CN1, CN2, CN3, CN4, CN7, CN8
Accurate emission measurements
Std Dev g (grams)
<2.0 grams
< 1.0 grams
Based on Aprovecho WBT emission performance testing, cook stoves should emit less than 20 grams of CO and most forced air stoves emit less than 10 grams so we will look for a std dev less than 10%. (<2.0 grams)
ES7 1 CN6, CN10Number of accidents # Accidents 1 out of
30 tests 0Accidents relating to any burns, cuts, and shock should be zero for maximum safety during a standard WBT or any other test. This test stand must be safe for general use.
ES8 1CN2, CN3, CN4, CN8
User manual ease # Questions <3 0Through documentation, any user should be able to read and set up the test stand and perform testing without any questions. User manual should include detailed pictures and explanations.
ES9 2
CN1, CN2, CN3, CN4, CN7, CN9
Accurate particulate measurements Std Dev (mg) <150 mg <50 mg
Based on Aprovecho WBT emission performance testing, cook stoves should emit less than 1500 grams of particulate matter so we will be looking for a std dev less than 10% (<150 mg)
ES10 2CN11CN12
Set up time minutes <20 < 10Related to ease of use, set up time for any single user should not take longer than 20 minutes. Goal would be 10 minutes from transporting stand and equipment to loading fuel and lighting fuel by one user.
![Page 6: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
System Level Work
InputsTest Standards
a)Charcoalb)Stove (Any Kind)c)Test Type (Short, Relevant, WBT)d)Lighting Technique
SYSTEM
Outputsa)Emissionsb)Solid Wastesc)Test Timed)Efficiencye)Statistical Accuracy
![Page 7: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
System Level Work
Improvement Assessment
Change in Design Waste Management
Impact Assessment
Ecological Health
Inventory
Quantify:Raw Material,Energy,Waste Perform the Test
Goal
Project Scope
![Page 8: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Fish Bone
![Page 9: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Risk List
![Page 10: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Integrated Test Strategy
• Performed 1 Comparison Test – Boiling Times were found for 3 different stoves
• The data outputs are shared among PM’s• New Tests are scheduled for the following days
– Flow Rate– Skirt Size– Pot Shape
![Page 11: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Bill of Materials
![Page 12: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
DESIGN OUTPUTS
![Page 13: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Proposed Test Stand
![Page 14: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Modifications on Test Stand
SET-UP TIME≈ 5 MINUTES
![Page 15: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Modifications for Measurement
• OLD • NEW
![Page 16: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Modifications for Measurement
OLD
NEW
![Page 17: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Improved Functionality
• New thermocouple mount – New steel mount to replace previous wooden
mount. Mount is also insulated to reduce impact of ambient temperatures on water temperature readings.
• Test stand now has two handles and larger wheels to provide easier transportation. – Test stand can be transported by one user and is
very durable.
![Page 18: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Improved Mass Measurements
• By sealing openings in the bottom of the test stand, “noise” in mass measurements have been improved. The impact of wind has a substantially smaller impact on the test stand. Mass measurements from Stovetec stove support the test stand improvements.
![Page 19: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Installation of CO monitor
• New monitor has been installed in the exhaust stream of the test stand.
• It allows USB interface to recover data instead of burdening tester with recording data every minute.
![Page 20: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Design Calculations
![Page 21: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Convective Heat Transfer
Stove
q
q
q
• Assume Stove is a cylinder D~15”, H~20”A=.6m2
• h (air free convection) range 5-10 W/m2K – Use 10 for conservative value
• Ts~600°C• T∞ range -10°C to 30°C
• q=h*A*(Ts-T∞)• Hot q=3420W• Cold q=3660W• Δq =240W or ~5% of total output of
stove (using 5kW output)
![Page 22: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
• Use area and temperatures from previous– Ts~600°C=873K– T∞ range -10°C to 30°C=263K to 303K– A=.6m2
• Assume Steel (ξ=.07)• q=σ*ξ*A*(Ts
4-T∞4)
– σ=5.6703E-8 W/m2K4
• Hot q=1363W• Cold q=1372W• Δq=9W or ~.2% of total output of stove
(using 5kW output)
Radiation Heat Transfer
Stove
q
q
q
![Page 23: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Turbulent Air Flow
Distance Air Velocity 1 Air Velocity 2 Air Velocity 3 Average Air V Dist (r)(in) (ft/min) (ft/min) (ft/min) (ft/min) (ft)
0 977.7 -0.250.5 999 1091 952 1014.0 -0.20833
1 1062 1056 1033 1050.3 -0.166671.5 1131 1059 1056 1082.0 -0.125
2 1074 1025 1022 1040.3 -0.083332.5 1076 1007 1025 1036.0 -0.04167
3 1064 1027 1011 1034.0 03.5 1054 992 1025 1023.7 0.041667
4 1053 986 1027 1022.0 0.0833334.5 1074 1026 1026 1042.0 0.125
5 1124 1016 1041 1060.3 0.1666675.5 990 1001 1019 1003.3 0.208333
6 946.3 0.25
*inert picture of Anemometer in Chimney
![Page 24: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Turbulent Air Flow Cont.
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Flow Rate
Air Velocity 1
Air Velocity 2
Air Velocity 3
Average Air V
Average Vel
Distance from Center (ft)
Flui
d Ve
locit
y (ft
/min
)
![Page 25: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Volumetric Flow Calculation
Ring Velocity (ft/min) dA ft2 Flow CFM1 985 0.0600 59.122 1032 0.0491 50.663 1059 0.0382 40.424 1047 0.0273 28.545 1031 0.0164 16.866 1031 0.0055 5.62
SUM 201
Numerical Integration Uniform Flow Assumption
Average Vel 1037 ft/minStdDev 22.0 ft/minArea 0.196 ft^2
Flow Rate 204 CFMMin 199 CFMMax 208 CFM
![Page 26: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
CO Output
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.50
102030405060708090
100
CO (ppm) vs Time (not actual data)
Time (min)
Co (p
pm)
dA
– When given ppm vs. time take integral using differential area with trapezoid method.
![Page 27: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
CO continued
• After integrating and taking sum of differential areas, then units = ppm*min
• Using standard air 1ppm CO=1.23mg CO per m3 air.– ppm is a mass concentration of CO compared
to the fluid it is in.• Finally convert 204 CFM to 5.777 m3 /min• Then
dA
dt
d(pp
m)
min]/[777.5*][
]/[23.1*min]*[][ 33
airmppm
airmmgCOppmAreaCOm
![Page 28: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Analysis
![Page 29: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
CO
![Page 30: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
CO
• In a water boil test, CO emissions should be lowest during the simmer phase, however during these three tests there is a spike or “noise” during the simmer phase in all three instances. – Hypothesis– Charcoal is shifting position during the simmer
phase, creating abnormalities in CO emissions.– Test – Place stove in test stand and record emission data for
Stovetec stove during combustion without pot of water. Every five minutes, stir charcoal around in stove and after recovering CO data from logger, determine if at every 5 minute interval there was a significant shift in CO emissions.
![Page 31: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Water Temperature
![Page 32: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Water• When boiling water, a temperature between 99-100 oC
should be reached to accurately determine boiling point.– Hypothesis – cold ambient temperature is impacting the
thermocouple’s accuracy when collecting temperature data. The thermocouple can be modeled as a fin as heat is lost from the tip of the wire inserted into the water to the base of the thermocouple where temperature is read.
– Test – With new insulated thermocouple, boil a pot of water and move the thermocouple to various locations in the pot, not just the center of the pot and observe any differences in temperature. Also note if water actually reaches 100 oC against a non-insulated thermocouple.
![Page 33: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Weight-Before
![Page 34: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Weight-After
![Page 35: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Combined Data
![Page 36: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Efficiency
![Page 37: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Data Comparison
![Page 38: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Issues
![Page 39: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Particulate MatterOptical Light Scattering Monitoring Method• Most accurate way to test emissions
through light scattering monitors. Data can be benchmarked and compared with published water boil data from established laboratories.
• Can provide real-time results, used to analyze particulate emissions during each phase of the water boil test.
• Very expensive and systems can be very fragile.
• Depending on light scattering device, may need to take passive measurements through sampling air from the exhaust stream.
Gravimetric Pump and Filter Method
• Through a gravimetric pump, particulate matter from a sample of the air stream is collected onto a filter.
• Filter is tared before measurements occur and then weighed after to obtain a total particulate mass measurement for a whole water boil test.
• Does not provide real time results and difficult to set up a system to determine emissions during different phases of testing.
• Tends to be more of a quantitative test, comparing one stove to another within our own test stand instead of benchmarking against published data.
![Page 40: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Light Scattering Method
• Sensidyne Nephelometer
• Provides real time results
• Data logging, internal pump, selective sample rates
• Operating temperature, 0 – 50 Celsius
• $2,750.00
![Page 41: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Gravimetric Pump and Filter Method
• Airmetrics MiniVol Users Guide
• Create a sample stream from exhaust and measure PM emissions
• Weigh the PM collected onto filters
• Quantitative method to compare stove emissions within our own test stand
![Page 42: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Particulate Matter Testing• Optical Light Scattering Monitoring Method
– Most accurate way to test emissions through light scattering monitors. Data can be benchmarked and compared with published water boil data from established laboratories.
– Can provide real-time results, used to analyze particulate emissions during each phase of the water boil test.
– Very expensive and systems can be very fragile.– Depending on light scattering device, may need to take passive measurements through sampling
air from the exhaust stream.
• Gravimetric Pump and Filter Method– Through a gravimetric pump, particulate matter from a sample of the air stream is collected onto
a filter.– Filter is tared before measurements occur and then weighed after to obtain a total particulate
mass measurement for a whole water boil test.– Does not provide real time results and difficult to set up a system to determine emissions during
different phases of testing.– Tends to be more of a quantitative test, comparing one stove to another within our own test stand
instead of benchmarking against published data.
![Page 43: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Error Testing and Benchmarking
• Test a range of stoves to get an idea of variability from wind, humidity, stove size, temperature, and other variabilitys.
• Test other stoves (i.e.. Rebar) for emissions– Compare to published WBT data– Check if test stand has systematic or arbitrary errors
• If test is successfully repeatable then we will know how the P11461 stove compares.
![Page 44: Detailed Design Review P11451](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816582550346895dd824f8/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Questions?