design considerations

15
Design Considerations ams: E p =7 TeV E A =E e Z/A (10 33 ) cm -2 s -1 with Beam Power 100 MW (wall plug) : O(100) fb -1 ≈ 100 * L(HERA) synchronous ep and pp operation Two solutions e LHC tunnel (Ring-Ring - RR) Superconducting ERL (Lin

Upload: caden

Post on 24-Feb-2016

33 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

LHC hadron beams: E p =7 TeV E A = E e  Z /A Luminosity O (10 33 ) cm -2 s -1 with Beam Power 100 MW (wall plug) Integrated e ± p : O(100) fb -1 ≈ 100 * L(HERA)  synchronous ep and pp operation Two solutions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Design Considerations

Design ConsiderationsLHC hadron beams: Ep=7 TeV EA=EeZ/A Luminosity O (1033) cm-2s-1 with Beam Power 100 MW (wall plug)

Integrated e±p : O(100) fb-1 ≈ 100 * L(HERA) synchronous ep and pp operation

Two solutions e Ring in the LHC tunnel (Ring-Ring - RR) Superconducting ERL (Linac-Ring -LR)

Page 2: Design Considerations

Physics and Range

New Physics

High precisionpartons in plateauof the LHC

Nuclear

Structure& dynamics

High Density Matter

Large x

eQ statesGUT (δαs=0.1%)Excited fermionsHot/cold spotsSingle topHiggsPDFs Multi-JetsDVCSUnintegrated partonsSaturationVector MesonsIP - gravitonOdderonsNC couplingssin2ΘBeautyCharm Partons in nucleiShadowing….Q2 = 4momentum transfer2 x = Bjorken x: fraction of p’s momentum

Physics

Page 3: Design Considerations

TOBB ETU

KEK

LHeC - Participating Institutes

Page 4: Design Considerations

Accelerator: Ring - Ring

Baseline Parameters and Installation ScenariosLattice Design [Optics, Magnets, Bypasses]IR for high Luminosity and large Acceptancerf Design [Installation in bypasses, Crabs?]Injector Complex [Sources, Injector]Injection and DumpCryogenics – work in progressBeam-beam effectsImpedance and Collective EffectsVacuum and Beam PipeIntegration into LHCe Beam PolarizationDeuteron and Ion Beams

5.3m long(35 cm)2

slim + light(er)3080 magnetsPrototypes:BINP-CERN

LHeC Ring Dipole Magnet

.12-.8T1.3kA0.8MW

Workpackages as formulated in 2008, now in the draft CDR

Page 5: Design Considerations

Novosibirsk dipole prototypemeasured field reproducible to the required 2 10-4

CERN prototype under test

3080 dipoles336+148 F+D

Injector to Ring – similar to Linac design [R+D]

Magnets

Page 6: Design Considerations

Bypassing CMS

RF

Page 7: Design Considerations

Bypassing ATLAS

For the CDR the bypass conceptswere decided to be confined toATLAS and CMS

Page 8: Design Considerations

Ring: Dipole + Quadrupole Magnets

5m long(35 cm)2

slim + lightfor installation

BINP &CERNprototypes

736 magnets1.2 m long

Page 9: Design Considerations

LINAC - Ring

Baseline Parameters [Designs, Real photon option, ERL]Sources [Positrons, Polarisation]Rf DesignInjection and DumpBeam-beam effectsLattice/Optics and Impedance Vacuum, Beam PipeIntegration and LayoutInteraction RegionMagnetsCryogenics

Workpackages as formulated in 2008, now in the draft CDR

1056 cavities66 cryo modules per linac721 MHz, 19 MV/m CWSimilar to SPL, ESS, XFEL, ILC, eRHIC, Jlab21 MW rf Cryo 29 MW for 37W/m heat loadMagnets in the 2 * 3 arcs: 600 - 4m long dipoles per arc 240 - 1.2m long quadrupoles per arc

IP2

Linac (racetrack)inside the LHC foraccess at CERNTerritoryU=U(LHC)/3=9km

Page 10: Design Considerations

60 GeV Energy Recovery Linac

CERN 1 CERN 2

Jlab BNL

Two 10 GeV energy recovery Linacs, 3 returns, 720 MHz cavities

Page 11: Design Considerations

CDR draft

LINAC 60 GeV ERL

Page 12: Design Considerations

CDR draft

Page 13: Design Considerations

Design Parameters electron beam RR LR LR*)

e- energy at IP[GeV] 60 60 140luminosity [1032 cm-2s-1] 13 10 0.4polarization [%] 40 90 90bunch population [109] 20 1.0 1.5e- bunch length [mm] 10 0.3 0.3bunch interval [ns] 25 25 50transv. emit. gex,y [mm] 0.58, 0.29 0.05 0.1rms IP beam size sx,y [mm] 30, 16 7 7e- IP beta funct. b*x,y [m] 0.18, 0.10 0.12 0.14full crossing angle [mrad] 1 0 0geometric reduction Hhg 0.75 0.91 0.94repetition rate [Hz] - - 10beam pulse length [ms] - - 5ER efficiency - 94% - average current [mA] 131 6.4 0.27tot. wall plug power[MW] 100 100 100

proton beam RR LRbunch pop. [1011] 1.7*) 1.7tr.emit.gex,y [mm] 3.75 3.75spot size sx,y [mm] 30, 16 7b*x,y [m] 1.8,0.5 0.1bunch spacing [ns] 25 25

RR= Ring – RingLR =Linac –Ring

Parameters from Draft CDRRing: with 1o as baseline : L/2Linac: clearing gap: L*2/3

LHC “ultimate” p beam used*) : 1.7 probably conservative

Design also for D and A (LeN = 1031 cm-2s-1)

*) pulsed, but high energy ERL not impossible

Page 14: Design Considerations

LS3 --- HL LHC

LHeC Tentative Time Schedule

Page 15: Design Considerations

title