department of technology management 1 comparative logistics capabilities between europe and asia jan...
TRANSCRIPT
/department of technology management
1
Comparative logistics capabilities between Europe and Asia
Jan C. FransooTechnische Universiteit Eindhoven
/department of technology management
2
Asia comparison
• learnings across developing regions: Chinese coastal zones with Central-Europe, Chinese inland zones with Eastern Europe, what are good policies for national/provincial governments to boost development
• role of industrial and logistics parksboth: governments as "client" or "problem-
owner" rather than industry as such• best practices of companies• study on ports with Chung-Yee Lee, HKUST
/department of technology management
3
Supply Chain Management and the Transportation Infrastructure in Europe
Jan C. FransooTechnische Universiteit Eindhoven
/department of technology management
4
Position of CE (not: CEE)?
• CE as a source• CE as a postponement center• CE as a market
in all scenarios: component sourcing from Far East
/department of technology management
5
Transportation perspective in Europe
/department of technology management
6
European Commission (2001)
• White paper: European Transport Policy in 2010
• Congestion:– 10% of road network:
7,500 km– 20% of rail network:
16,000 km– Costs: 0.5% of GDP
(1.0% by 2010)– Forecast 50% increase
of goods traffic by road in 2010
/department of technology management
7
Use of transport modes (EU-15; Gtkm)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Road Rail River Sea Pipeline
19802001
/department of technology management
8
Road
• Road carries 44% of freight• (and also 79% of passenger transport)• Each day 10 hectares are covered by road
infrastructure• Car fleet expands by 3 million cars every
year
/department of technology management
9
Rail
• From 1970 to 1998: from 21% to 8% freight marketshare
• Average speeds of international rail freight: 18km/h
• 600 km of track closed every year
• EU: investments to stimulate rail
• Industry: no confidence in rail (strikes, no single operator, unreliable, …)
/department of technology management
10
Water
• Growth in short sea shipping matches road growth– Administrative (customs)
difficulties largely resolved– Huge growth potential
• Inland waterways largely unused– 9% of freight in
Rhine/Main/Danube network– 1 barge = 110 trucks
• Slower modes require smarter networks: joint operations of sea and inland terminals
/department of technology management
11
/department of technology management
12
Research questions & opportunities (1)
• Operation of joint terminals network as single virtual terminal– dynamic inventory positioning in network– inventory allocation and reallocation while in transit– queuing effects at terminals– service concepts
• How independent are SC structures from transportation infrastructures, or does road always provide the option to execute any sc structure? What about other sectors than electronics?
/department of technology management
13
Research questions & opportunities (2)
• Industrial / logistics parks strategy strongly dependent on role:– source: manufacturing and capability driven, must
be reachable for components in efficient way, taxes; industrial parks and logistics parks can develop separately; example: Philips campus in Poland
– postponement center: closer to market, more supply chain / logistics driven, likely to be positioned aligned with terminals in network,; industrial parks (postponement center) and logistics parks aligned. Customization in Prague
– market: supply chain design very strongly based on transportation network and shifting center of gravity within Europe. Network role of Constanta – Vienna axis
/department of technology management
14
Research questions and opportunities (3)• your input