delta undulator magnet: concept and project status...delta undulator magnet: concept and project...
TRANSCRIPT
Delta undulator magnet: concept and project status
*Work has been supported by NSF grant DMR 0225180 and PHY-013150+ Supported by DOE Office of Science
Part - II: beam test at ATF in BNL+
M. Babzien, D. Davis, M. Fedurin, K. Kusche, J.Park, V. Yakimenko, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, USA
Alexander Temnykh, CLASSE, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
Part – I: concept and model construction*Alexander Temnykh, CLASSE, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
FLS 2010, SLAC March 1-5, 2010 2
• Delta undulator magnet concept.– Two considerations
• On-axis vacuum• Radiation damage
• Model construction– Magnetic field properties– Vacuum
• Beam test at ATF BNL • Conclusion
Outline
FLS 2010, SLAC March 1-5, 2010 3
1. Compact box-like frame: prototype dimension ~150mmx150mm2. Full polarization control3. Sqrt(2) stronger field in planar mode and ~2X stronger in helical mode in compare with
conventional / Apple II type undulators.
Two AP (adjustable phase**) undulators assembled in one device.
Potential applications: ERLs, XFELs , (storage rings?)
*A. Temnykh, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 11, 120702 (2008).**Basic theory: Roger Carr, Nucl. Instr. And Meth. A 306(1991) 391-396
Delta undulator magnet concept
FLS 2010, SLAC March 1-5, 2010 4
*See Ref: P. Elleaume, et al., Design considerations for a 1 A SASE undulator, NIMA, 455(2000) 503-523
25m long Delta and 25m long APS U33 undulator structures comparison
Delta undulator magnet concept
FLS 2010, SLAC March 1-5, 2010 5
Historical excurse - similar designs
Pavel Vobly, HELICAL UNDULATOR FOR PRODUCINGCIRCULARLY POLARIZED PHOTONS, In proccedings of the workshop on new kinds of positron sources for linear collider, March 4-7, 1997. SLAC-R-502, CONF-970374, pp. 429-430
**J. Bahrdt, et al., UNDULATORS FOR THE BESSY SOFTX- RAY FEL, Proccedings of the 2004 FEL Conference, pp. 610-613.
Apple-II (left) and Apple –III (right) **
Delta undulator magnet concept
FLS 2010, SLAC March 1-5, 2010 6
Four channels from on- axis area to outside. Model in Ref*:
B = 0.05cm; L = 1.57cm; L/B = 31.5a (transmission probability) = 0.12*
Molecular conductance for 4 channels:C [L/s] = 4 x 11.6 x a x B [cm] / per 1cm of length
Ni plated PM blocks outgassing rate (after 48hrs, 120degC baking) has been measured in Ref **: R~4 x 10^-12Torr/L/sec/cm^2 or less **
The pressure differential between on-axis and outside will be:
5mm IDbore
0.5mm wide slit
dP = Q / C = 3.1415*0.5*4e-12/(4*11.6*0.12*0.05) = 2.3e-11Torr (0.02nTorr!)
*John F. O'Hanlon, A Users Guide to Vacuum Technology, Second Edition, pp.33 – 37** Yulin Li, ADC In-Vacuum Undulator Magnet Material Out-gassing Test Report Feb. 20, 2008
On-axis vacuum
FLS 2010, SLAC March 1-5, 2010 7
Radiation damage consideration
radiuselectron classical - factor, icrelativist - charge,nuclear - where erZ γ
Major source of radiation - high energy electrons scattered on the residual gas.
x
a
dx
θ
s
Small angle Coulomb scattering cross section :
High energy electron flux rate though cylindrical surface of radius “a” as function of residual gas density ngas and distance s:
2
22
2
24)(asrZn
qIsF egas
e
e
γπ
=
( ) ;1422
min2
22
2
θθγσ
+=
Ω erZ
dd
FLS 2010, SLAC March 1-5, 2010 8
Radiation damage consideration
][][][102.8sec]/[ 25' mSnTPAIradD b ⋅⋅⋅×= −
Critical dose Dc ~ 2Mrad (NbFeB 40SH, 1% demagnetization), see Ref *
Assuming Z=7.5 (worst case), 5mm bore, 5GeV beam energy and that all scattered electrons deposit energy into ~5mm layer around bore (required simulation) we can estimate the rate of the dose accumulation as:
* A. Temnykh, NIMA, Volume 587, Issue 1, 11 March 2008, Pages 13-19
Estimated life time for 5 and 25m undulators as function of on-axis residual gas pressure.
As a life time criteria we used ~1% demagnetization of undulator “downstream” end.
The undulator temperature lowering will•Decries out-gassing, lower pressure•Increase radiation resistivity.
FLS 2010, SLAC March 1-5, 2010 9
Model construction steps
Assembly start Test assembly and dimensions check
Model in vacuum vessel Transport from Cornell to BNLMagnet field measurement and tuning
Model parameters
•PPM structure•NbFeB (40SH) Br =1.25T, Hci > 20Koe•Period 24mm•Length ~ 30cm•Bmax (designed) in helical mode ~1.0T•Bmax (designed) in planar ~ 1.4T
FLS 2010, SLAC March 1-5, 2010 10
Model construction: magnetic field tuning
Conventional setup. For field analysis used B2E software from ESRF
1. Hall probe sensor (HGT-2101) mounted on sliding stage
2. Sliding stage
By along magnet TrajectoryOptical phase errors,
RMS ~2.0deg
“By” tuning with Hall probe
(1)
(2)
FLS 2010, SLAC March 1-5, 2010 11
Model construction: field properties in helical mode
Measured field components Trajectory X-ray Spectra
Helical mode, left circular polarization (phase between vertical and horizontal pairs 900)
Helical mode, right circular polarization (phase between vertical and horizontal pairs -900)
FLS 2010, SLAC March 1-5, 2010 12
Planar mode, - 45deg linear polarization (phase between vertical and horizontal pairs 180deg)
Model construction: field properties in planar mode
Planar mode, +45deg linear polarization (vertical and horizontal pairs in phase)
Measured field components Trajectory X-ray Spectra
Note: B1 and B2 two orthogonal field component tilted relative horizontal and vertical axis by 45deg.
FLS 2010, SLAC March 1-5, 2010 13
Model construction: vacuum property
RGA spectraH2 (~89%)
H2O(5.2%) Nitrogen/CO(5.7%)
Assembled model bake out.After 80hrs, 55degC baking Pmin ~ 40nTMeasured pumping speed 7.7litr/sec.
Outgassing rate: 2.77e-7 Torr litr/sec
FLS 2010, SLAC March 1-5, 2010 14
Beam test
ATF beam parameters:Energy in range from 52MeV to 72MeVNormalized emittance 1e-6 m*radBunch charge ~ 500pCRepetition rate ~ 1.3 pulse/sec
Two major goals:1. Get experience in transportation, installation, test mechanics.
(No problems with transportation and installation, mechanics work OK)2. Characterize (verify) undulator radiation properties
Delta undulator installed in BL2 ATF.
ATF beam line #2 schematic
FLS 2010, SLAC March 1-5, 2010 15
Delta undulator
Flat mirror
InSb(77K) detectorMaximum sensitivity at 4500nm
Narrow band pass filters
Beam line elements
Electron beam
Movable Collimator
Parabolic mirror
Optical diagnostics scheme
Beam test
FLS 2010, SLAC March 1-5, 2010 16
Undulator in planar mode.
5300nm wavelength radiation as function of the electron beam energy.
Signal confirmed 1.28T peak field in undulator
Undulator in helical mode. 4520nm (bottom) and 3600nm (right) wavelength radiations versus beam energy. Both data confirmed 0.93T field amplitude.
Beam test
FLS 2010, SLAC March 1-5, 2010 17
60 MeVEb = 58MeV
66 MeV64 MeV62 MeV
Radiation cone spatial distribution as function of beam energy measured with collimator 2D scan.
Scanning range: -20+20mm, -23+27mm, Step: 5mm Collimator: 12.7mm diameter
Undulator in helical mode, 4520nm radiation (fundamental harmonics)
Beam test
FLS 2010, SLAC March 1-5, 2010 18
Encountered problem:
Undulator field focusing effect
( );
21
2
2max
ρBLB
f ⋅=
; stiffness beam - length;undulator - field;peak undulator - length; focal a is where max
ρBLBf
For undulator in planar mode and 60MeV beam it gives:
plane onein focus ;17cmf =
For helical mode and 60MeV beam:
planesboth in focus ;31cmf =
Strong focusing in planar mode made beam line optics match very difficult. Higher beam energy would be better.
Beam test
FLS 2010, SLAC March 1-5, 2010 19
Conclusion
1. We developed concept and built short model of “Delta” undulator magnet.
2. Mechanical, magnetic and vacuum properties of the magnet have been tested.
3. The beam test confirmed the basic characteristics of the magnetic field: 0.93T in helical mode and 1.27T in planar.
4. Future plans – under consideration.
I would like to thank David Rice, Sol Gruner, Donald Bilderback and Maury Tigner for support. My special thanks to Yulin Li and Karl Smolensky as well as vacuum group for useful discussions and help in the model construction.
Acknowledge