7/30/2019 Debate Scorecard

1/3

Debate Scorecard: Techniques of PersuasionPoliticians most powerful arguments can be misleading. In fact, research shows were oftenswayed by faulty logic. As you listen to the presidential candidates debate the issues, give them

the logic check-up. If you catch a candidate using one of these techniques, record the

examples in the spaces provided.

Techniques Candidate A Candidate B Candidate CAppeal to Emotion

Bandwagon

Card StackingFalse Cause

False Dilemma

Glittering GeneralitiesHasty Generalization

Name Calling

Slippery SlopeTestimonialAppeal to Emotion: Summons fear, anger or pity to secure listener support.

If we dont fight crime my way, your child wont feel safe walking the streets.

Bandwagon: Encourages the listener to do something because its the popular thing to do.

More and more of us want new blood in Washington, and were voting for Jones.

Card Stacking: Presents the evidence in a partial or slanted way.The average income is rising - technically correct, but only the top 10% incomes are up.

False Cause: Insists that one event caused the other just because it came first.

As soon as Jones was elected, savings banks began to fail.False Dilemma: Poses only two choices when there are a variety of possibilities.

Choose Smith and youll get inflation; choose Jones and the budget will be balanced.Glittering Generalities: Says little specifically, but conveys emotion.

John Jones has made this nation a better place.

Hasty Generalization: Bases a conclusion on insufficient evidence.

Dropping out of school must be a problem because I saw an article about it.

Name Calling: Uses negative labels to stigmatize opponents.My opponent is a card-carrying liberal.

Slippery Slope: Claims that an event will lead to an uncontrollable chain reaction.

First they outlaw machine guns, and then theyll take your hunting rifles.Testimonial: Convinces only through the endorsement of a respected personality.

If hes okay with General Colin Powell, then hes okay with me.

7/30/2019 Debate Scorecard

2/3

A Viewers Guide to Political DebatesVoters typically identify candidate debates as the most influential source of information received

during a campaign. Because of their importance, this guide describes commonly used debateformats, questioning techniques, and guidelines for viewing a debate. It is designed to be useful

in viewing presidential, state, and local debates.

The Structure of DebatesDebates use a variety of formats. Since 1992, the general election presidential debates have alsofeatured multiple formats including a town hall meeting with citizen questioners.

Most debates impose time limits on answers to ensure that all candidates have equal opportunity

to respond. The debates may focus on a wide range of issues or may target a particular themesuch as education or the economy. General election presidential debates usually divide the time

between foreign and domestic topics.

Candidates may have an opening statement, or a moderator may introduce each candidate andbegin questioning immediately. In most debates, candidates have closing statements.

Questions guide the content of debates. There are three types of questions: initial, follow-up, and

cross-examination. Initial questions get the debate started by asking candidates to explain or

defend a position or compare it to an opponents Initial questions may be hypothetical, phrasedin the form, What would you do if...? Follow-up questions are directed at a candidate after an

answer is given. Their purpose is to probe the original response by asking for elaboration or

clarification. Follow-up questions may be asked immediately after an initial response is given orafter all candidates have answered the initial question. Cross-examination questions are asked by

one candidate to another. A separate time can be set aside for cross-examination questions or

they may be included as follow-ups.Questions may be posed to candidates from a variety of sources. In primary and local debates,

experts on the topic debated may serve as panelists. A single moderator, usually from the media,

or a panel of media representatives or subject experts are the most common questioners. Manydebates, especially at the local level, allow for questions from the audience at some point in the

debate. The Richmond town hall meeting in 1992 was the first general election presidentialdebate to involve citizen questioners.

7/30/2019 Debate Scorecard

3/3

How to get the most out of a political debate:Focus your attention on a few key points. Know what it is you want in an office holder, thenwatch and listen to see which candidate best fits your ideal. The following suggestions will help

guide you:

Set aside your partisan views. Listen to the debates to learn as much as possible about allcandidates and their positions.

Pay close attention to the candidates when they talk about how to solve problems. Listencarefully for comparisons candidates make between or among their programs and their

opponents.

Identify the candidates debate strategy. Does the candidate speak directly to the issues,

provide specifics, and present new policies or information? Does the candidate evasively

answer questions to suit his/her agenda?

Identify the images which candidates try to create for themselves. Most candidates try to

portray themselves as leaders and identify themselves with cherished American values while

suggesting that their opponents lack these qualities. What in the responses supports theirclaims?

Be aware of the technical limitations of televised debates. Television works by showing

action. To create action and minimize monotony, directors sometimes include reactionshots to show one candidates response to an opponents statement. This can draw your

attention away from what is being said. It is wise to remember the role of action shots when

watching the debates.

Consider the questions asked by the panelists. The essence of the debate is comparison andcontrast. How do the questions themselves shape the debate?

Dont watch a debate to determine a winner or loser. Instead, evaluate each candidateaccording to your own personal ideas and standards. Focus on the question, Who would

make a better president, senator, governor, legislator, county clerk?