dcsi meeting a-f accountability january 2017€¦ · the ratings in this report are for...
TRANSCRIPT
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
DCSI Meeting A-F Accountability
January 2017Office of School Improvement, Accountability and Compliance
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Agenda
• A-F Accountability Overview
• Domain V
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
House Bill 2804Timeline
Date Activity
December 1, 2016 TEA adopted a set of indicators for A–F ratings.
December 16, 2016TEA released data tables, domain methodologies, and domain targets to districts
via TEASE.
December 30, 2016
TEA released 2015–16 A–F Ratings report to the legislature, showing “the ratings
that each district and campus would have received for Domains 1–IV for the 2015–
16 school year had the A–F rating system been in place.”
December 30, 2016 TEA released 2015–16 A–F ratings included in the report to districts via TEASE.
By January 6, 2017 TEA posts the 2015–16 A–F Ratings report to its public website.
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
House Bill 2804Timeline
Date Activity
January 10, 2017 The 85th Texas Legislature convenes for 140 days.The regular session ends May 29, 2017.
Late January 2017Additional calculation tables, reports, and training materials provided to ESCs and districts to the extent possible
By Summer 2017Districts and campuses report to TEA which three indicators will be used for Domain V
and the criteria that will be used to measure performance in those indicators.
By Spring 2018Districts and campuses assign themselves a rating for each of the three indicators used for
Domain V and an overall rating of A, B, C, D, or F for Domain V.
By August 15, 2018TEA assigns each district and campus an overall rating of A, B, C, D, or F and a rating for
each domain beginning with the 2017–18 school year.
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
House Bill 28042015-2016 A-F Ratings Report
The December 30, 2016, report
shows the ratings that each district and campus would have received for Domains 1–IV for the 2015–16 school year had the A–F rating system been in place.
is a 494-page PDF that includes ratings for districts and campuses and correlations between each domain rating and student demographics by district and campus type.
includes three pages of 32 important caveats.
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
House Bill 28042015-2016 A-F Ratings Report
The December 30, 2016, report is not
actual district and campus ratings that carry with them the possibility of interventions or sanctions.
an inference on district and campus performance in the 2015–16 school year.
a predictor of future district or campus performance or ratings.
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
House Bill 28042015-2016 A-F Ratings Report
Executive Summary (six pages)
House Bill 2804
Requirement for 2015–16 Ratings Report
Process for Determining Domain Indicators and Construction
A–F Overview
A–F Accountability System (five pages)
Domain I: Student Achievement
Domain II: Student Progress
Domain III: Closing Performance Gaps
Domain IV: Postsecondary Readiness
Additional Indicators Considered
Timeline for Implementation
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
2015-2016 A-F Ratings to 85th Texas Legislature
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Overview
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Guiding Principals of A-F Accountability
Should not be built on a forced distribution so that some percentage of campuses must get an A or F
Should be based on criteria meaningful to ensure our students are prepared for success
Should be mathematically possible that all campuses can achieve an A rating
Ratings should be based on stable criteria
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
A-F Caveats Per TEA
ca·ve·atˈkavēˌat,ˈkävēˌät/
a warning or proviso of specific stipulations, conditions, or limitations.
The ratings in this report are for informational purposes to
meet a legislative requirement. No inferences about district or
campus performance in the 2015-2016 school year should be
drawn from these ratings, and these ratings should not be
considered predictors of future district or campus
performance ratings. Campus and district ratings for 2017-
2018 will use different data and different indicators than were
used for this report.
For a complete list of A-F caveats, please refer to pgs. 11-14 of
A-F Report
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
A-F Caveats Per TEA
ca·ve·atˈkavēˌat,ˈkävēˌät/
a warning or proviso of specific stipulations, conditions, or limitations.
The provisional ratings in this report are not
accompanied by the full system of explanatory
materials, data tables, and data downloads that will
accompany the A-F ratings assigned in 2017-2018.
Pg. 12
For a complete list of A-F caveats, please refer to pgs. 11-14 of
A-F Report
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
A-F Caveats Per TEA
ca·ve·atˈkavēˌat,ˈkävēˌät/
a warning or proviso of specific stipulations, conditions, or limitations.
The final methodology to determine the overall rating
label, including the process to convert the domain
outcomes to a scale that can be weighted across the
five domains, will be developed with further
stakeholder input and is expected to be adopted in the
Texas Administrative Code in Spring 2018.
Pg. 13
For a complete list of A-F caveats, please refer to pgs. 11-14 of
A-F Report
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
A-F Caveats Per TEA
ca·ve·atˈkavēˌat,ˈkävēˌät/
a warning or proviso of specific stipulations, conditions, or limitations.
The data used is the same for Index 2 in
2016.
Pg. 13
For a complete list of A-F caveats, please refer to pgs. 11-14 of
A-F Report
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
A-F Caveats Per TEA
ca·ve·atˈkavēˌat,ˈkävēˌät/
a warning or proviso of specific stipulations, conditions, or limitations.
These ratings only include students who are
economically disadvantaged; it does not
specifically include any racial or ethnic
group.
Pg. 13
For a complete list of A-F caveats, please refer to pgs. 11-14 of
A-F Report
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
A-f List of Indicators I-III
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Domains I-IV Targets
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Domain I: Student Achievement
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
• Level III
• Level III
Domain I
Advanced Level III
Final Level II
Level II Satisfactory Standard
Performance Index FrameworkIndex 1 Level of Performance 2016-2017
Five Domain FrameworkDomain I Levels of Performance 2017-2018
Index 1
Level II Satisfactory Standard
Domain I: Student Achievement
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Domain I: Student Achievement
Domain I
Advanced Level III
Final Level II
Level II Satisfactory Standard
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Domain I: Student Achievement
Domain I
Advanced Level III
Final Level II
Level II Satisfactory Standard
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Domain I: Student Achievement
Domain I
Masters
Meets
Approaches
100
100
100
1 P
oin
t fo
r Ea
ch P
erc
en
tage
of
Test
Re
sult
s
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Domain I: Student Achievement
100
100
100
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Domain I: Student Achievement Sample
100
100
100
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Domain I: Student Achievement Sample
100
100
100
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Domain II: Student Progress
100
100
100
Last Year’s STAAR Scale
Score
This Year’s STAAR Scale
Score
STAAR Progress Measure
ELL Progress Measure
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Domain II: Student Groups Evaluated
100
100
100
All Student
Two Or More Races
HispanicAfrican American White American Indian
PacificIslander
Asian Special Education ELL
Minimum Size Requirement = 25 for Subgroups
10 for All Students Group
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Domain II: Calculation
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Domain II: Calculation
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Domain II: Calculation
100
100
100
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Domain II: Targets
100
100
100
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Domain III: Closing Performance Gaps
Domain III
Advanced Level III
Final Level II
Level II Satisfactory Standard
Economically Disadvantaged
Group Only
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Domain III: Closing Performance Gaps
Domain III
Advanced Level III
Final Level II
Level II Satisfactory Standard
Economically Disadvantaged
Group Only
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Domain III: Closing Performance Gaps
Domain III
Masters
Meets
Satisfactory
100
100
100
1 P
oin
t fo
r Ea
ch P
erce
nta
ge o
f Te
st
Res
ult
sEc
on
om
ica
lly D
isa
dva
nta
ged
Gro
up
O
nly
Economically Disadvantaged
Group Only
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Domain III: Closing Performance Gaps
100
100
100Economically
Disadvantaged Group Only
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Domain III: Closing Performance Gaps
100
100
100Economically
Disadvantaged Group Only
Calculate the predicted Domain I Score usingy = mx+b
(For appropriate District or campus Type)
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Domain III: Closing Performance Gaps
100
Economically Disadvantaged
Group Only
Y is the predicted Domain I Score
X is the percentage of students who areEconomically disadvantaged
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Domain III: Closing Performance Gaps
100Economically
Disadvantaged Group Only
Sample ElementaryY = -.100992x + 47.31887Economically Disadvantaged: 4.8%Y = -.100992(4.8) + 47.31887Y = 46.8Actual Domain I Score (for Eco. Dis) is 39Actual – Predicted = Domain III Score39 – 46.8 = -7.8Campus has earned a Domain III Letter Grade of D
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Domain III: Targets
100
100
100
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Domain II: Targets
100
100
100
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Domain IV: Post Secondary Readiness Elementary Schools
100
100
100
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Chronic Absenteeism Rate Methodology
100
100
Non-Mobile Students
At or above 83% Membership
Non-Mobile Students
Below 83% Membership
Absent at least 10% days Eligible to
attend
Not absent at Least 10% days
Eligible to attend
Absent at least 10% days Eligible to
attend
ChronicAbsenteeism
IndicatorScore
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Domain IV: Post Secondary Readiness Middle Schools
100
100
100
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Domain IV: Post Secondary Readiness High Schools and K-12
100
100
100
*Annual 9-12 Dropout Rate (if longitudinal graduation rate is not available)
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Domain IV: Post Secondary Readiness High Schools and K-12
100
100
100
2015-2016 2016-2017
Class of 2015 Longitudinal graduates who graduate under:- Recommended High School Plan
(RHSP)- Distinguished Achievement Plan
(DAP)- Foundation High School Plan with
Endorsement (FHSP-E)- Foundation High School Plan with
Distinguished Level of Achievement (FHSP-DLA)
Class of 2017 longitudinal graduates who graduate under one of the following plans:- Foundation High School Plan with
Endorsement (FHSP-E)- Foundation High School Plan with
Distinguished Level of Achievement (FHSP-DLA)
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Domain IV: Post Secondary Readiness High Schools and K-12
100
100
100
2015-2016 2016-2017
2014-2015 annual graduates who do at least one of the following:- Complete CTE-Coherent Sequence
of courses- Complete one or more AP/IB
courses- Complete 12 hours of earned
postsecondary credit - Achieve TSI benchmark on TSIA,
SAT, or ACT
2016-2017 annual graduates who do at least one of the following- Complete CTE-Coherent Sequence
of courses/earn industry (nationally recognized) certification
- Perform at or above criterion score on one or more AP/IB examinations
- Complete 12 hours or more of earned postsecondary credit
- Achieve TSI benchmark on the TSIA, SAT, or ACT
- Enlist in the US Armed Forces
REACHING NEW HORIZONS
© 2016 Region One Education Service Center
Post
Sec
on
dar
y R
ead
ines
s
STAAR Postsecondary Readiness
Final Level II Performance
Graduation Rate or Dropout Rate
Graduation Diploma Plan
Post Secondary Component
Performance Index FrameworkIndex 4
Post
Sec
on
dar
y R
ead
ines
s
Attendance/Chronic Absenteeism Rate; Annual
Dropout Rate
Graduation Rate
Graduation Diploma Plan
Post Secondary Component
Five Domain FrameworkDomain IV
Postsecondary Readiness at a Glance
2015-2016 2017-2018
REACHING NEW HORIZONS
© 2016 Region One Education Service Center
Past Considerations
REACHING NEW HORIZONS
© 2016 Region One Education Service Center
Domain IV: Postsecondary Readiness High School and District Preliminary Work in Progress Reports
January 1 Reports
Complete CTE Coherent Sequence
Complete one or more AP/IB
Complete 12 hours or more of earned postsecondary credits
Achieve TSI benchmark on TSIA, SAT, or ACT
2017-2018Complete CTE coherent sequence of
courses/earn industry (nationally recognized) certification
Perform at or above criterion score on one or more AP/IB examinations
Complete 12 hours or more of earned postsecondary credit
Enlist in the U.S. armed forces
Achieve TSI benchmark on TSIA, SAT, or ACT
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Domain IV: Calculation
100
100
100
© 2017 Region One Education Service Center
School District Evaluation of PerformanceCommunity and Student Engagement (C.a.S.E)
HB 5 2015-2016 TAA Guidance on C.a.S.E
© 2017 Region One Education Service Center
School District Evaluation of PerformanceCommunity and Student Engagement; Compliance
Statutory Reporting and Policy Requirement for district and each campus
Texas Education Code, §39.0545
Category and Programs Fine arts Wellness and physical
education Community and
parental involvement 21st century workforce
development Second language
acquisition program Digital learning
environment Dropout prevention
strategies Educational programs
for gifted and talented
District Requirements
District Assigns and Reports Ratings District Reports Compliance
Exemplary Recognized Acceptable Unacceptable
0 – No (Not in Compliance)1 – Yes (In Compliance)
Overall Performance
No later than August 8 of each year, the district shall report each performance rating to the agency and make the performance ratings publicly available as provided by the commissioner rule.
© 2017 Region One Education Service Center
Community and Student Engagement; Compliance Tool
http://www.esc1.net//site/Default.aspx?PageID=2100
https://prodev.esc1.net/surveys/LandingPage.aspx
HB5 Page
HB5 Tool
© 2017 Region One Education Service Center
Complete Steps 1, 2 & 3
1
2
3
http://www.esc1.net//site/Default.aspx?PageID=2100
© 2017 Region One Education Service Center
Automatic Confirmation and email will be sent
© 2017 Region One Education Service Center
House Bill 2804
Student & Community
Domain V
Extended Educational Program
Opportunities
A, B, C, D, or F
Transition to Domain V
Indicator 2015-2016 (used for January 2, 2017
Report)
2017-2018
Community and Student Engagement (CaSE)
Not Applicable Three as chosen,locally determined, and reported for each district and campus. All three CaSEindicators as well as the overall Domain V indicator will be rated A, B, C, D, F
© 2017 Region One Education Service Center
Domain V Timeline
Districts and Campuses report to
TEA which 3 indicators will be used and the
criteria used to measure performance
in the indicators
Districts and campuses assign
themselves a rating for each of the 3 indicators
used for Domain V and an overall
rating of A,B,C,D, or F
Summer 2017 Spring 2018
Districts Report
Domain V Ratings
Summer 2018
© 2017 Region One Education Service Center
REACHING NEW HORIZONS
© 2016 Region One Education Service Center
HB5: the Transition to Domain VC.a.S.E. Year Submission
Dates
Deadline for
Districts to
Post Ratings
HB 5
2013-2014 First Submission:
No later than June 26
Resubmission:
No later than July 24
August 82014-2015 First Submission:
No later than June 25
Resubmission:
No later than July 23
2015-2016 First Submission:
No later than June 23
Resubmission:
No later than July 21
August 72016-2017 First Submission:
No later than June 22
Resubmission:
No later than July 20
TEA Required to
Report Local
Performance on TEA
Website
Categories Self-Rated Ratings Region One Rating
Tool
No later
than October 1
Fine arts Wellness and
physical education Community and
parental involvement
The 21st Century Workforce Development program
The second language acquisition program
The digital learning environment
Dropout prevention strategies
Educational programs for gifted and talented students
Exemplary
Recognized
Acceptable
Unacceptable
Collaboratively
created tool with
Region One and
districts, with
indicators
REACHING NEW HORIZONS
© 2016 Region One Education Service Center
Transition to Domain VC.a.S.E. Year Submission
Dates
TSDS Data Element Deadline for
Districts to
Submit Ratings
Districts and Campuses still
Required to Rate all CaSe
Indicators
HB5
and
HB 2804
(Domain V)
2017-2018
First
Submission:
No later than
June 22
Resubmission:
No later than
July 20
First-Case-Choice-Code
Indicates the first choice of three
of the eight community and
student engagement indicators
Second-Case-Choice-Code
Indicates the second choice of the
three of the eight community and
student engagement indicators
Third-Case-Choice-Code
Indicates the third choice of the
three of the eight community and
student engagement indicators
CaSE Ratings-Criteria-Link
Indicates the internet website link
to the CaSE ratings criteria that are
used by the LEA and campuses to
determine the ratings for the LEA
and campuses
Final Due Date
May 4, 2018
• Fine arts• Wellness and physical
education• Community and parental
involvement• The 21st Century Workforce
Development program• The second language
acquisition program• The digital learning
environment• Dropout prevention strategies• Educational programs for gifted
and talented students
REACHING NEW HORIZONS
© 2016 Region One Education Service Center
2017 ©Region One Education Service Center
Contacts
Division of Instructional SupportOffice of School Improvement, Accountability and Compliance
Dr. Belinda S. Gorena, Administrator956 984-6173
Ruben Degollado, Coordinator956 984-6185
Benjamin Macias, Evaluation and Assessment Specialist956 984-6234