dap ruling
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
1/62
rl
G.R. No. 209287 -
MARIA CAROLINA
P.
ARAULLO, Chairperson,
Bagong Alyansang Makabayan; JUDY M.
TAGUIW
ALO, Professor,
University
of
the
Philippines Diliman,
Co-Chairperson, Pagbabago;
HENRI
KAHN,
Concerned
Citizens Movement;
REP. LUZ
ILAGAN,
Gabriela Women s
Party Representative;
REP. CARLOS
ISAGANI
ZARATE, Bayan Muna Partylist
Representative;
RENATO
M.
REYES, JR., Secretary General
of
BAYAN; MANUEL K. DAYRIT,
Chairman, and Kapatiran Party;
VENCER MARI
E.
CRISOSTOMO,
Chairperson, Anakbayan;
and VICTOR VILLANUEVA,
Conyenor
Youth Act
Now v.
BENIGNO SIMEON
C. AQUINO
III, President of
the Republic of the Philippines;
PA
QUITO N.
OCHOA,
JR.,
Executive
Secretary; and FLORENCIO B. ABAD,
Secretary
of
the
Department
of
Budget
and
Management.
G.R. No. 209135 - AUGUSTO L.
SYJUCO, JR.,
Ph.D. v.
FLORENCIO
B. ABAD, in his capacity
as
the
Secretary
of
Department
of
Budget and
Management; and
HON.
FRANKLIN
MAGTUNAO DRILON, in his
capacity
as
Senate
President
of
the
Philippines.
G.R. No. 209136 - MANUELITO R. LUNA v. SECRETARY
FLORENCIO ABAD, in his official capacity as
Head
of the Department
of Budget and Management; and EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
PA
QUITO
OCHOA,
in his official capacity as
Alter
Ego
of
the
President.
G.R. No. 209155 - ATTY. JOSE
MALVAR VILLEGAS,
JR. v.
THE
HONORABLE EXECUTIVE
SECRETARY PAQUITO
N. OCHOA,
JR.;
and
THE SECRETARY
OF BUDGET AND
MANAGEMENT
FLORENCIO B. ABAD.
G.R. No. 209164 -
PHILIPPINE CONSTITUTION ASSOCIATION
PHILCONSA),
represented
by DEAN
FROILAN
M. BACUNGAN,
BENJAMIN
E.
DIOKNO
and LEONOR
M.
BRIONES
v.
DEPARTMENT
OF
BUDGET
AND
MANAGEMENT and/or HON.
FLORENCIO B. ABAD.
G.R. No. 209260 -
INTEGRATED BAR
OF THE
PHILIPPINES
IBP)
v.
SECRETARY
FLORENCIO B. ABAD OF
THE DEPARTMENT
OF
BUDGET
AND
MANAGEMENT
DBM).
G.R. No. 209442 - GRECO ANTONIOUS BEDA B. BELGICA,
BISHOP REUBEN
M. ABANTE
and
REV.
JOSE
L.
GONZALEZ
v.
PRESIDENT
BENIGNO
SIMEON
C. AQUINO
III,
THE SENATE OF
THE PHILIPPINES, represented
by
SENATE PRESIDENT
FRANKLIN M. DRILON;
THE HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES,
represented
by
SPEAKER FELICIANO BELMONTE, JR.; THE
EXECUTIVE
OFFICE, represented by
EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
2/62
Separate Opinion
2
G.R. Nos. 209287, 209135,
et al
PAQUITO
N.
OCHOA,
JR.; THE
DEPARTMENT
OF
BUDGET
AND
MANAGEMENT, represented
by
SECRETARY
FLORENCIO ABAD;
THE DEPARTMENT
OF
FINANCE, represented
by SECRETARY
CESAR V. PURISIMA;
and THE
BUREAU
OF
TREASURY,
represented
by
ROSALIA
V.
DE LEON.
G.R. No. 209517- CONFEDERATION FOR UNITY, RECOGNITION
AND
ADVANCEMENT
OF
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
COURAGE),
represented
by its 1st Vice
President,
SANTIAGO
DASMARINAS,
JR.; ROSALINDA NARTATES,
for herself and as
National President of the Consolidated Union of Employees National
Housing
Authority
(CUE-NHA);
MANUEL BACLAGON, for
himself
and as
President
of
the
Social
Welfare
Employees Association
of the
Philippines,
Department of
Social
Welfare
and Development
Central
Office
SWEAP-DSWD CO); ANTONIA PASCUAL, for herself and as
National
President
of
the
Department of Agrarian
Reform
Employees
Association (DAREA); ALBERT MAGALANG, for himself
and
as
President of the Environment
and
Management
Bureau
Employees
Union EMBEU); and MARCIAL ARABA,
for
himself and
as
President
of the Kapisanan Para Sa Kagalingan ng
mga
Kawani ng MMDA
KKK-MMDA)
v.
BENIGNO SIMEON C. AQUINO III, President
of
the Republic of the Philippines, PAQUITO OCHOA, JR., Executive
Secretary;
and
HON.
FLORENCIO B. ABAD, Secretary of the
Department
of
Budget and Management.
G.R. No. 209569 - VOLUNTEERS AGAINST
CRIME
AND
CORRUPTION (VACC),
represented
by DANTE LA. JIMENEZ v.
PAQUITO N. OCHOA, Executive Secretary,
and
FLORENCIO B.
ABAD, Secretary of the Department of Budget
and
Management.
Promulgated:
Ju1y 1 2014 .
J /
SEPARATE OPINION
BRION, J :
Preliminary Statement
I submit this Concurring and Dissenting Opinion to reflect my
views on the constitutionality
of
the Disbursement Acceleration Program
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
3/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* , -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
:DAP; $*< )&1 )=#>"="*&)*? @A
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
4/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* E -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
P150 Billion or almost 15 times the PDAF caseREentanglement with the
unconstitutional PDAF; personalities at thevery highest level in both the
Executive and the Legislative Departments of governmentR $*)B IA*"1 A*)B $%" $& 1&$W" $*< H"7 $1 $ *$&)+*7 B$**+& $*< 1G+A>< *+& @"
#"%B")O"< &+ @" H"$W +% G"1)&$*& )* 1A##+%&)*? &G"1" #%)*B)#>"1. K=+*?
&G"= $%" &G" %"?)=" +I &G" rule of lawHG"%" H" B$**+& $II+%< &+ I$)>R +A%
B+*1&)&A&)+*$> system of checks and balances $*< +I &G" separation of
powers &G$& )*" "II"B& &G$&
+A% %A>)*?7 ")&G"% H$M7 H)>> G$O" +* &G" )*1&)&A&)+*1 $*< +II)B)$>1 )*O+>O"& &G$& @"I+%" $*M =$11)O"
$B" B+A>< 1"& )*7 &G" D+A%& 1G+A>"1& )&1 *$=" $>1+ @" $M +% #"%B"#&)+*1 +I =)1G$*)*?7
B+O"% A#7 HG)&"H$1G +% A*$BB"#&$@>" %A>)*? ^ B+A>< $>%"$)1= $*< O"="*& +I &G" &G%"" ?%"$& @%$*BG"1 +I ?+O"%*="*&. The
peoples inevitable question could then be: who else is there to trust?
FGA17 &G)1 D+A%& 1G+A>< @" $1 &G+%+A?G $1 #+11)@>" )* &G" G$*)*? +I
&G)1 B$1"7 =$W)*? 1A%" &G$&7 $& &G" O"%M >"$1&7 @+&G &G" %"$>)&M $*< #"%B"#&)+*
+I )&1 )*&"?%)&M H+A>< @" )*&$B&. F+H$%< &G+%+A?G>M
"QG$A1& &G" > &G" )11A"1 @"I+%" A1 ^ @+&G "Q#%"11 $*< )=#>)"AB)+?)B.
FG)1 1#)%)& H$1 $##$%"*&>M &G" %"$1+* HGM &G" ="=@"%S)*SBG$%?"7 J.
_AB$1 C"%1$=)*7 1AII"%"< "$"$1"< I+% #%+?%$=1 $*< #%+`"B&1 )"O$%)&$&)+* #%+`"B&1 I+% D+=#+1&">$ a$>>"M $*< U$O$+ (%)"*&$>. bcK +* &G" U)1@A%1"="*& KBB">"%$&)+*
T%+?%$=7 (B&. 67 238,7 $& G&HHH.?+O.#Gd238,d83d36dZ$S+*S&G"S)
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
5/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 9 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
L11A"1
]* &G" B+*1&)&A&)+*$>)&M $*< O$>)"%$&)+* T%+?%$= :UKT;7 0$&)+*$> CA
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
6/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* Y -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
+H1X
V. eG"&G"% +% *+& &G" %">"$1" +I A*#%+?%$=="< IA*>M G"$%< +* &G)1 #+)*&. FG" )*B>A1)+* +I &G)1 )11A"7
)* =M O)"H7 H$1 $ O"%M ?++< B$>> +* J. C"%1$=)*N1 #$%& $1 $ B+*1"ZA"*B"1 +I +A% %A>)*? B$**+& @" >"I& +A& H)&G+A& %)1W)*? &G"
BG$%?" &G$& H" G$O" @""* >"11 &G$* &G+%+A?G $*< G$O" =$A1)+*1 +I J. C"%1$=)* &+ &G" "Q&"*& +H $*< $>M7 L G+>< &G$&X
$; &G" D+A%& G$1 `A%)1$&"1 &G" #%)*B)#>"1 +I BG"BW1 $*< @$>$*B"1 $*)&M +I &G"
TUKV $*< I+A*< &G" 1M1&"= &+ @" A*B+*1&)&A&)+*$> I+% )&1 1"#$%$&)+* +I #+H"%1 $*< &G" BG"BW $*$*B" #%)*B)#>"1. FG"1" B+*1&)&A&)+*$> &%$*1?%"11)+*1 %"1A>&"< I%+= &G"
)%%"?A>$%)&)"1 $*< $*+=$>)"1 &G$& $&&"*"="*&$&)+*.
CA& "O"* @"I+%" &G" D+A%& B+A>< %A>" +* &G" B+*1&)&A&)+*$>)&M +I &G"
TUKV7 &G" B+*&%+O"%1M &G$& )& ?"*"%$&"< G$< 1#)>>"< )*&+ $*< G$< B%"$&"M +1"< &+ &G" #A@>)B HG"* $ 1"*$&+%7 BG$%?"< H)&G $*+=$>)"1%"?$%"$% G)1 *$=" &G%+A?G $ #%)O)>"?"
1#""BG.Y
L* %"1#+*1"7 &G" ?+O"%*="*& :&G%+A?G &G" U"#$%&="*& +I CA
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
8/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 5 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
FG" UKT7 >)W" &G" TUKV7 )*O+>O"< &G" )=#>"="*&$&)+* +I &G" *$&)+*$>
@A
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
9/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 4 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
"*$@>"< &G" hQ"BA&)O" &+ 1"BA%" &G" O+&"1 I+% &G" B+*O)B&)+* +I I+%="% DG)"I
JA1&)B" /"*$&+ D+%+*$ $*< &G" I)>)*? +I )=#"$BG="*& BG$%?"1 $?$)*1& I+%="%
(=@A" &G" )=#"$BG="*& B$1" $?$)*1& &G"
I+%="% DG)"I JA1&)B" H$1 @"I+%" &G" !"*$&".82 L*&"%"1&)*?>M7 @+&G 1"*$&+%1
H"%" %"B)#)"*&1 +I TUKV IA*"="*&$&)+*
+I TUKV IA*> $@+A& &G"
)=#"$BG="*&7 >)W"H)1" %"B")O"< $M BG$%?"M I%)?G&"*)*? )* $>> &G"1" 1"%)"1 +I "O"*&1 )1 &G$& &G"
)>>"?$>)&)"1 ^ @$1"< +* B+*?%"11)+*$> )*O"1&)?$&)+*189$*< &G" )*)&)$> BG$%?"1
%"B"*&>M @%+A?G& @M &G" (=@A"O">1 +I &G" hQ"BA&)O".86
2382. !"*$&+% K%%+M+ B>$)=1 &G$& $I&"% I+%="% DG)"I JA1&)B" D+%+*$N1 B+*O)B&)+*7 $*+&G"% T8 @)>>)+* I%+=
&G" U)1@A%1"="*& KBB">"%$&)+* T%+?%$= :UKT; H$1 $ !&$*$7 J%.7
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
10/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 83 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
FGA17 HG$& $##"$%1 &+ @" )*O+>O"< )1 not a one-time and one-shot act
of corruption@M +*" +% $ I"H ?+O"%*="*& +II)B)$>17 @A& @M $ host of public
officials HG+1" IA*B&)+*1 $*< )*&"%"N1 &%A1&7 &G" D+A%& =A1& *+H M
"Q"%B)1" )&1 $%"
&G" A*B+*1&)&A&)+*$>)&M +I &G" UKT )* &G" 1$=" . F+ 1G)%W I%+= &G)1 %"1#+*1)@)>)&M )1 &+
B+*1"*& &+ &G" #"%O"%1)+* +I +A% %"#A@>)B$* H$M +I >)I".
K& )&1 H+%1&7 &G" B+*&)*A$&)+* +I &G" #%"1"*& 1M1&"=17 )I &%A"7 B$* >"$)B $BB+A*&$@)>)&M &G$& +A% D+*1&)&A&)+* G$1 "*1G%)*"> "*G$*B"
&%$*1#$%"*BM $*< #A@>)B $BB+A*&$@)>)&M. FG$& &G+1" HG+ "%%"< =A1& 1AII"% )1 $
B+*1"ZA"*B" &G$& "O)>>"?$> $*< A*B+*1&)&A&)+*$> $B&.
V+% "$1" +I #%"1"*&$&)+*7 &G)1 D+*BA%%)*? $*< U)11"*&)*? (#)*)+* 1G$>>
#%+B""< A*>+H)*? 1&%AB&A%"X
A.
Factual Antecedents
1.
The DAP and its origins
a. The Memoranda from DBM Secretary Florencio
Abad to the President
B. Preliminary Matters
1.
The Courts expanded power of judicial review
2.
Prima facie showing of grave abuse of discretion
a. The lack of audit findings does not negate grave
abuse of discretion
3.
Transcendental importance of the issues presented by
the petitions
4.
Justiciability and Political Questions
5.
The Courts boundary-keeping role in times of political
upheaval
C. Substantive Matters
1.
The DAP violates the principles of checks and balances
and the separation of powers that the 1987 Constitution
integrated in the budgetary process
a. The principle of separation of powers and checks
and balances in the budgetary process
84 FG" 8456 D+*1&)&A&)+* G$1 " +* fKBB+A*&$@)>)&M +I TA@>)B (II)B"%17g7
1"B&)+* +*" +I HG)BG #%+O))B +II)B" )1 $ #A@>)B &%A1&. TA@>)B +II)B"%1 $*< "=#>+M""1 =A1&7 $& $>> &)="17
@" $BB+A*&$@>" &+ &G" #"+#>"7 1"%O" &G"= H)&G A&=+1& %"1#+*1)@)>)&M7 )*&"?%)&M7 >+M$>&M7 $*"$1"< $* officialstatement,&G%+A?G &G" UCP H"@1)&"7 "Q#>$)*)*? &G$& &G" $=+A*&1 %">"$1""$1"1 I%+= UKT H"%" =$"?)1>$&+%1g @"B$A1" the DAP had been in
existence since the latter part of 2011.
L* &G" B+A%1" +I G"$%)*? &G"1" #"&)&)+*17 &G" %"1#+*+%"*B)+ K@$"$1"1 G$O" %"B"*&>M @""* &+A&"< $1 p@%)@"17N p%"H$%"%$&)+*
T%+?%$= :UKT;
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
14/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 8E -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
+#"%$&""$1"< T"%1+*$> !"%O)B"1 :T!; K##%+#%)$&)+*1 ^]*%">"$1"< iT!j $##%+#%)$&)+*1 HG)BG H)>> >$#1" $& &G" "*< +I Vs
23882. Vs 2388 Unreleased Appropriations - ]*%">"$1"< $##%+#%)$&)+*1
:slow moving projects$*< #%+?%$=1 I+%
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
15/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 89 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
QQQ mQQ QQQ
22. TUKV :a$%)+A1 +&G"% >+B$>
#%+`"B&1;
Y7933 For Augmentation
The President approved these requests.2E
!A@1"ZA"*&>M7 !"B%"&$%M K@$< 1"*& &+ &G" T%"1))$*B"1 )* I)1B$> M"$% :FY; 2388
B+%%"1#+*"&"< +% )?*="*&.
FG" UCP 1&$&"< &G$& &G" 1$O)*?1 +A& +I &G" 2388 -KK H"%" &+ @" #++>"< I+%
&G" I+>>+H)*? #A%#+1"1X
1.1 &+ #%+O) $>>+&="*& B>$11
$>>+B$&)+* $1 $ %"1A>& +I +*S?+)*? #%)+%)&M #%+`"B&1 $*"&"< +% >+&="*&17 of national government agencies as of June 30, 2012.
FG" UCP 1&$&"< &G$& &G" 1$O)*?1 +A& +I &G" 2382 -KK B+%%"1#+*>"< #+1)&)+*1 $*< &+ B+=#>"&"< +% $11
$>>+B$&)+* $1 $ %"1A>& +I +*S?+)*? #%)+%)&M #%+`"B&1 $*> >$#1" $&
&G" "*< +I &G" M"$%R
2. KO$)>$@>" @$>$*B"1 I%+= B+=#>"&"< +% )"% @""*
%">"$1"< &+ 0-K.24
L* $ May 20, 2013 Memorandum7,3&G" UCP 1&$&"< &G$& )& G$< )"< I+% &G" I+>>+H)*?
#A%#+1"1X
9.8 &+ $A?="*& $$11 $>>+B$&)+*
$1 $ %"1A>& +I +*S?+)*? #%)+%)&M #%+`"B&1 $*< implementation of newactivities :".?.7 )*B%"$1"d)">+&="*&.
KBB+%M7 all unobligated balances at the end of every quarter,
@+&G I+% B+*&)*A)*? $*< BA%%"*& $>>+&="*&17 1G$>> @" H)&G"< &+
IA*< I$1& =+O)*? #%+?%$=1d#%+`"B&1. FG" $>>+&="*&1 &+ @" H)&G$)= &G$& &G"
UKT )1 unconstitutionalI+% O)+>$&)*? !"B&)+* 297 #$%$?%$#G 9,2$*< !"B&)+*
24 G&HHH.)["< @$>$*B"1 $*< &G")% /"$>)?*="*& &+ IA*< &G"
bA$%&"%>M iUKTj.,8 /"1#+*$H 1G$>> @" #$11"< $A&G+%)[)*? $*M &%$*1I"% +I $##%+#%)$&)+*1R G+H"O"%7 &G" T%"1)$H7 @" $A&G+%)["< &+ $A?="*& $*M )&"= )* &G"
?"*"%$> $##%+#%)$&)+*1 >$H I+% &G")% %"1#"B&)O" +II)B"1 I%+= 1$O)*?1 )* +&G"% )&"=1 +I &G")% %"1#"B&)O"$##%+#%)$&)+*1.
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
18/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 85 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
247 #$%$?%$#G 87 K%&)B>" aL7,, $1 H">> $1 !"B&)+* 867 K%&)B>" aLL,E +I &G"
8456 D+*1&)&A&)+*.
Discussions
B.
Preliminary Matters
FG" BG$>>"*?"1 $?$)*1& &G" UKTN1 B+*1&)&A&)+*$>)&M H"%" I)>"< H)&G &G"
D+A%& &G%+A?G #"&)&)+*1 I+% certiorari$*< #%+G)@)&)+* A*M )*O+W" &G" D+A%&N1 #+H"% +I `A %"O)"H.
-)O"* &G"1" B)&"< =+> &G" B+*" Y9 #"&)&)+* %"ZA)%"1. FG" %"=$)*M #%+O)$%)IM &G" D+A%&N1 $##%+$BG"1 )* ?)O)*?
B$1"1.
K1 L "Q#>$)*"< )* Imbong7 &G" D+A%& A*O)*? $B&A$> "
%)?G&1R
:2;
&G" traditional justiciable cases $1 A*&d1.
FG" #%"1"*& #"&)&)+*1 $>>"?" &G$& ?%$O" $@A1" +I 1 H)&G)* &G"
&G)%< W)*< $@+O"7 i.e., &G" > @" #$)< +A& +I &G" F%"$1A%M "QB"#& )* #A%1A$*B" +I $* $##%+#%)$&)+* =$ +I $>> &G" "Q"BA&)O" $H1 @" I$)&GIA>>M "Q"BA&" 57 238E.
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
19/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 84 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
the Executive)&+ "*1A%" &G$& &G" @+A*"1 +I D+A%& G$1 @""* "Q#%"11>M B)&"M I>"1G"< +A& &G" ="$*)*? +I f`A #+H"%7g *+& +*>M @M
B+*I)%=)*? &G" ="$*)*? +I &G" &"%= $1 A*)1G"< @M >$H.
JA #+H"% includes the duty of the courts of justice &+
1"&&>" actual controversies )*O+>O)*? rights which are legally
demandable and enforceable7 AND&+ )B17 "=#G$1"1 $*< A*)" $
completely new power and duty&+ &G" JA$BW +% "QB"11 +I `A%)1M )* %"1#+*1" &+ &G" JA)&)B$> &+ &G" 1+B)"&$> &"< I%+= &G"1" #$1&
`A %A>)*?1.
]*Mg `A1&)B)$@>" B$1" HG)BG
"?$>
%)?G&1 =A1& "Q)1&. 0+&$@>M7 even if the requirements under the traditional
definition of judicial power are applied7 &G"1" %"ZA)1)&"1 $%" B+=#>)"< H)&G
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
20/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 23 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
+*B" ?%$O" $@A1" +I O"M7 a matter is ripe I+% $%"$& +I &G" BG$>>"*?"< $B&)+*7
&G"* &G" B+*&%+O"%1M B$**+& @A& $>%"$"< >$H +% %A>" )1 1G+H* &+ $##>M *"B"11$%)>M G$1 locus standi
1)*B" $ B+*1&)&A&)+*$> O)+>$&)+* B+*1&)&A&"1 $* $II%+*& +% )*`A%M &+ &G" $II"B&">7 $ >"11 1&%)*?"*& %"ZA)%"="*& +I locus standi
+*>M *""" B$1" +I &G)1 &M#" I%+=
&G" #A%" +% ="%" +#)*)+* &G$& B+A%&1 B$**+& %"*"1 +* hierarchy of courts $*< transcendental
importance7 I$% I%+= @")*? ?%+A*M %""O"> +I B+A%& &G$& 1G+A>< G$*" &G" B+*&%+O"%1M7 $1 M
HG"* $ #"&)&)+* )*O+>O"1 $ =$&&"% +I &%$*1B"*< )& @"
+H"% B+A%&7 @$1"< +* )&1
B+*1))1G"1 &G" *""< I+% &G" D+A%&N1 "Q"%B)1" +I
"Q#$*"$%>M 1$&)1IM &G"1" %"ZA)1)&"1 $1 "Q#>$)*">+&="*&1 $*)1G &G" 1"B+*< %"ZA)%"="*& +I
&%$*1B"*" &G" B+*B"#& +I &%$*1B"*
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
24/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 2E -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
&G" ?+O"%*="*&R $*< (3)&G" >$BW +I $*M +&G"% #$%&M H)&G $ =+%" >)+*1 =+%" A*>"11 G$>&")&M7 &G" hQ"BA&)O" )1 "O"*
*+H "*?$?"< )* $ f1G$="g B$=#$)?* &+ #%+< #"+#>" &+ #$M &G")% &$Q"1. LI
&$Q"1 H)>> B+*&)*A" &+ @" I$)&GIA>>M #$) )=#+%&$*B" I+% &G" #"+#>" &+ W*+H G+H &G")% &$Q =+*"M )1
1#"*& +% =)11#"*&7 $*< &+ @" )*I+%="< $1 H">> &G$& &G"M G$O" &G)1 %)?G&.
V+% $*+&G"%7 &G" #"&)&)+*"%1N 1"%)+A1 $>>"?$&)+*1 +I B+*1&)&A&)+*$>
O)+>$&)+* @M &G" hQ"BA&)O" x )* &%$*1I"%%)*? $##%+#%)$&)+*1 >+H$@>" &%$*1I"% +I
$##%+#%)$&)+*1 A*" aL +I &G" D+*1&)&A&)+* as
admitted by the respondents themselvesx 1$&)1IM &G" 1"B+*< $&)+*1 $%" B>"$%7 #$&"*& $*< +I A&=+1& ?%$O)&MR &G"M $II"B& &G" O"%M *$&A%"
+I +A% %"#A@>)B$* 1M1&"= +I ?+O"%*="*&.
_$1&>M7 ?)O"* &G" )*&%)*1)B *$&A%" +I &G" #"&)&)+*1 $1 &$Q#$M"%1N 1A)&1 :&+
#%"O"*& H$1&$?" $*< =)1$##>)B$&)+* +I IA*
"Q"BA&)O" $B&;7 &G"%" B$* %"$>>M @" *+ +&G"% #$%&M H)&G $ =+%" )&M &G$* &G" #"&)&)+*"%17
1A)*? $1 &$Q#$M"%1 $*< )*O+W)*? $ #A@>)B %)?G&.
(O"% $*< $@+O" &G"1" $%"< &G" 1&$&A&+%)>MSB%"$&"< #+%W @$%%">
1M1&"= &+ @" A*B+*1&)&A&)+*$> I+% O)+>$&)*? &G" B+%" "< &G$& &G" >"?)1>$&+%N1 post-enactment participation
)* &G" $%"$1 +I project identification7 fund release$*< fund realignment
+% %+>" )* &G" implementation +% enforcement of the GAAs $%" @"M+*.FG" D+A%&
#"%&)*"*&>M %A>"> &G" I+%"?+)*? %"$1+*17 &G" D+A%& G"%"@M $H HG)BG 1)=)>$%>M
EY Kilosbayan, Incorporated v. Guingona, Jr.7 -./. 0+. 88,,697 P$M 97 844E7 2,2 !D/K 883.E6 Supra *+&" 83.
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
25/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 29 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
$>>+H >"?)1>$&+%1 &+ H)">< $*M I+%= +I #+1&S"*$B&="*& $A&G+%)&M )* &G"
)=#>"="*&$&)+* +% "*I+%B"="*& +I &G" @A
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
26/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 2Y -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
was also a practice during the execution stage of a GAA and which was
simply embodied in the GAA provisionsx &G"* &G"%" )1 "O"%M %"$1+* I+% &G"
D+A%& &+ 1ZA$%">M %A>" +* &G" B+*1&)&A&)+*$>)&M +I &G" hQ"BA&)O"N1 $B&)+* )*
>)?G& +I &G" 1"%)+A1*"11 +I &G" $>>"?$&)+*1 +I B+*1&)&A&)+*$> O)+>$&)+*1 )* &G"
#"&)&)+*1.
L* I$B&7 &G" *$&A%" $*< $=+A*&1 +I &G" #A@>)B IA*O"< $%" =+%"
&G$* "*+A?G &+ 1+A*< $>$%= @">>1 &+ &G)1 D+A%& )I H" $%" &+ =$)*&$)* I"$>&M &+
+A% %+>" $1 &G" ?A$%M +* >"&&"%1 +I %"ZA"1&
1A@=)&&"< &+ A1 @M &G" !"*$&+%1g 1G+A>< *")&G"% "1B$#" &G" D+A%&N1 $&&"*&)+*
*+% 1G+A>< &G" D+A%& ?>+11 +O"% )&. V%+= &G" O"%M 1&$%&7 G)1 1&$&"="*& B$1& $much darker cloud +* &G" O$>)"7 G$1 $* "II"B& +* B+*?%"11)+*$> +O"%1)?G&. FG"
I$B& &G$& )*"?)1>$&+%1 $%" ?)O"* #+1&S"*$B&="*& %+>"1 )* &G")=#>"="*&$&)+* +I &G" @A
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
27/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 26 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
)11A"1 &G$& $%" )*G"%"*&>M susceptible of being decided on grounds
recognized by law.98
L* B+*&%$"?)1>$&)O" +% "Q"BA&)O" @%$*BG +I &G" ?+O"%*="*&R )& )1 B+*B"%*"< H)&G )11A"1
)&M +I $ #$%&)BA>$% ="$1A%".92
eG"%" &G" )11A"1 1+ #+1"< $%" #+>)&)B$>7 &G" D+A%& *+%=$>>M B$**+& assume
jurisdiction A*M 1G+H* &G" &"Q&A$> >)=)&1 &+&G" hQ"BA&)O"N1 #+H"% +O"% &G" )=#>"="*&$&)+* +I &G" -KK7 #$%&)BA>$%>M )*
&G" G$*)*? $*< =$*$?"="*& +I IA*)BMS=$W"%1 &+ 1&)=A>$&" &G"B+A*&%MN1 "B+*+=M $*< )=#%+O" "B+*+=)B ?%+H&G. V%+= &G)1 #"%1#"B&)O"7
B+*1&)&A&)+*$> #%+O)1)+*1 &+ABG)*? +* "B+*+=)B =$&&"%1 $%" A* &%$*1>$&)+* +I &G"
hQ"BA&)O"N1 "B+*+=)B `A1&)I)B$&)+* I+% &G" UKT ^ $%" $ >)=)&$&)+*1 $##>)B$@>" &+ &G" means I+% $BG)"O)*?
&G"=. These legal limitations are precisely at the core of the issues
presented to us in these challenges to the constitutionality of the DAPs
creation and implementation; the issues before us are legal ones, not
economic or political.
98 Integrated Bar of the Philippines v. Zamora7 ,42 TG)>. Y85 :2333;.92 Taada v. Cuenco7 83, TG)> 83987 83Y5 :8496;.9, !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* +I JA1&)B" TA*+ )*Integrated Bar of the Philippines v. Zamora7 supra *+&" EY.
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
28/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 25 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
V+% &G)1 %"$1+*7 L G$O" @%A1G"< $1)$%?">M "B+*+=)B #%$B&)B$>)&M %"$1+*1.
5.
The Courts boundary-keeping rolein times of political upheaval
K1 $ I)*$> *+&" +* &G" #%+B" $1#"B&17 L @">)"O" &G$& &G" #%"1"*&
B$1" #%+O))=)&1 1"& @M &G"
D+*1&)&A&)+* @"&H""* $*< $=+*? &G" I $1 &G" =")=)&1 )* &G"
"Q"%B)1" +I #+H"% @M "$BG @%$*BG +I ?+O"%*="*&. e" &G"* +@1"%O"< &G$&
&G"1" B+*1&)&A&)+*$> @+A*)&)B$> "QB)&"="*&7 $*< )& )1 &G" D+A%&N1 %+>" &+ B>$%)IM
$*< %")*I+%B" &G" #%+#"% $>>+B$&)+* +I #+H"%1 1+ &G$& &G" A"*B".
e" B>$%)I)"< &G$& $>&G+A?G H" =$M7 )* "II"B&7 *A>>)IM ?+O"%*="*&$> $B&)+*1
$@G+%%"*& &+ &G" D+*1&)&A&)+*7 H" )*? HG"*
B$1"1 +I *$&)+*$> )*&"%"1& %"$BG &G" D+A%&7 $*< G$O" A1"< )&1 ?A)"1 &+ M &G" &%$ `A1&)B)$@>" B+*&%+O"%1)"1&G$& >"< &+Angara7 @A& $>1+ &G" "Q)1&"*B" +I ?%$O" $@A1" +I > B$%%M $ >+& +I &%A&G $*> $%" &G" ="$)=1 I+% $A&G+%)&M @A&
&G" 8456 D+*1&)&A&)+* G$1 &$W"* )& +*" 1&"# IA%&G"%X H" *+H $>1+
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
29/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 24 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
ZA"1&)+*1 &G$& =$M G$O" B+=" H)&G &G" B+*&%+O"%1M. FG)1 "Q#$*1)+*
*"B"11$%)>M ?)O"1 %)1" &+ $ G+1& +I ZA"1&)+*1X does our constitutional duty
end with the determination of the presence or absence of grave abuse of
discretion and the decision on the constitutional status of a challenged
governmental action? To what extent can we, acting within our judicial
power and the power of judicial review, clarify the consequences of our
decisionu
/"B"*& `A%)1#%A$%)IM &G" $##>)B$&)+* +I &G" >$H $*< +I +A%
M $%)1" $?$)* @"B$A1" +I &G" B+=#>"Q)&M $*M +A% %A>)*? )*Atong Paglaum v. Comelec99+* &G" %"ZA)%"="*&1
&+ ZA$>)IM $1 $ #$%&M>)1& A*)1& 1M1&"=. K1 H">>7 H" #%+O))*"1 )* Republic v. CA and Molina9Y+* G+H &+ )*&"%#%"& $*< $##>M
K%&)B>" ,Y +I &G" V$=)>M D+O" &+ B>$%)IM
&G" $##>)B$&)+* +I &G" +#"%$&)O" I$B& )&M $*< &G" #+&"*&)$> B+*1"ZA"*B"1 A*+H.
C.
Substantive Matters
1.
The DAP violates the principles of
checks and balances and the separation of
powers that the 1987 Constitution
integrated in the budgetary process
a.
The principles of separation of
powers and checks andbalances in the budgetary
process
FG" %"B"*&Belgica %A>)*? ?$O" &G)1 D+A%& &G" +##+%&A*)&M &+ " +I 1"#$%$&)+* +I #+H"%1 $1 $##>)"< )* &G"
@A
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
30/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* ,3 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
?+O"%*="*& #>$M1 )* &G" I+%=A>$&)+*7 "*$B&="*&7 $*< )=#>"="*&$&)+* +I &G"
*$&)+*$> @A
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
31/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* ,8 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
$##%+#%)$&)+*1 @)>>. This budget contains the appropriations recommended
by the President for the operation of the government.95
eG)>" &G" T%"1)$**)*? $*< %"B+=="*" D+*?%"11 )1 1+ >)=)&"" S &G" $A&G+%)&M &+ A>&)=$&">M )BM $*< 1#"*" aLL +I &G"
D+*1&)&A&)+* 1""W1 &+ "*1A%" &G$& HG)>" D+*?%"11 )1 ?)O"* &G" #+H"% +I
$##%+#%)$&)+*7 )& =A1& A*
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
32/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* ,2 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
B+*?%"11)+*$> @A
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
33/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* ,, -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
process. CM I$B)>)&$&)*? &G" A1" +I IA*$11)I)"< $1 1$O)*?1 &+ I)*$*B"
)&"=1 +&G"% &G$* I+% HG)BG &G"M G$O" @""* $##%+#%)$&"
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
34/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* ,E -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
IA*$H. _)W"H)1"7
$##%+#%)$&"< IA*$&)O" @%$*BG +I ?+O"%*="*&X HG$& )&"=d1 +I "Q#"*
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
35/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* ,9 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
!)?*)I)B$*&>M7 &G)1 %"$)B$&)+* +I
!"B&)+* 29:9; $*< &G" &%"$&="*& +I )&1 "QB"#&)+* )1 *+& $& $>> *"H &+ &G" D+A%&
$1 H" G$O" #%"O)+A1>M %A>"< +* &G)1 #+)*& )*Nazareth v. Villar.Y4 e" &G"*
1$)< 1&)>> @" &G$& &G" @A
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
36/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* ,Y -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
L* 1"O"%$> B$1"17 &G" D+A%& %A>"< &G$& $B&A$> 1$O)*?1 =A1& "Q)1& @"I+%"
&G" #+H"% &+ $A?="*&7 A*>+H"< &G" T%"1)M
B+>>)$&)+* +I !"B&)+* 8Y:9;7
K%&)B>" aLLL +I &G" 846, D+*1&)&A&)+* :#%"1"*&>M !"B&)+* 29:9;7 K%&)B>" aL +I
&G" 8456 D+*1&)&A&)+*;.
L*Demetria7 &G" D+A%& *+&"< &G$& &G" >""H$M ?%$*&"< &+ #A@>)B +II)B"%1
)* A1)*? IA*>+&&"< I+% $##%+#%)$&)+*1 &+ $A?="*& +&G"% )&"=1 )* &G" -KK)1 >)=)&"< 1)*B" !"B&)+* 8Y:9;7 K%&)B>" aLLL +I &G" 846, D+*1&)&A&)+*
:>)W"H)1" $ @+)*? )* Sanchez v. Commission of Audit762IA%&G"%
"=#G$1)[)*? &G$& f[a]ctual savings )1 $ sine qua non &+ $ O$>)< &%$*1I"% +I
IA*)M B$%%)"< +A&. First, &G"%" =A1& @" 1$O)*?1 )* &G"
#%+?%$=="< $##%+#%)$&)+* +I &G" &%$*1I"%%)*? $?"*BM. Second,&G"%" =A1& @"
$* "Q)1&)*? )&"=7 #%+`"B& +% $B&)O)&M H)&G $* $##%+#%)$&)+* )* &G" %"B")O)*?
$?"*BM &+ HG)BG &G" 1$O)*?1 H)>> @" &%$*1I"%%". 222 :8456;.68 L. E25 :2335;.6, L
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
37/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* ,6 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
0")&G"% B$* 1$O)*?1 @" A1"< &+ IA*< #%+?%$=1 $*< #%+`"B&1 *+&
$##%+#%)$&"< I+% @M D+*?%"11.
L* Sanchez v. Commission on Audit76EH" *+&"< &G$& &G" )>>"?$>)&M +I&G" &%$*1I"% +I IA* -+O"%*="*&
:DILG; &+ &G" (II)B" +I &G" T%"1)M I%+= &G" >$BW +I $B&A$>
1$O)*?17 @A& I%+= &G" >$BW +I $* $##%+#%)$&)+* &G$& $A&G+%)["1 &G" A1" +I
IA*+?MN1 (DOSTs; 1$O)*?1 &+ IA*< )&1 "=#>+M""1N @"*"I)&1 A*+?M T"%1+**"> )* -+O"%*="*&. e" 1$)< &G$& $>&G+A?G &G" 1+A%B" +I
IA*7 )&1 A1" &+ IA*< @"*"I)&1 I+% HG)BG
*+ $##%+#%)$&)+* G$< @""* #%+O)"$1"$&"< !"B&)+*1 24 $*< 29:9;7 K%&)B>" 24 +I &G" 8456 D+*1&)&A&)+*.
FGA17 1$O)*?1 B$**+& @" A1"< &+ $A?="*& *+*S"Q)1&"*& )&"=1 )* &G"
-KK. eG"%" &G"%" $%" *+ $##%+#%)$&)+*1 I+% B$#)&$> +A&>$M )* $ 1#"B)I)B
$?"*BM +% #%+?%$=7 I+% "Q$=#>"7 1$O)*?1 B$**+& @" A1"< &+ @AM B$#)&$>
"ZA)#="*& I+% &G$& #%+?%$=. 0")&G"% B$* 1$O)*?1 @" A1"< &+ IA*< &G" G)%)*?+I #"%1+**">7 HG"%" $ #%+?%$=N1 $##%+#%)$&)+* $B" )* &G" -KK1I+% Vs1 23837 2388 $*< 2382. FG"1" B+*?%"11)+*$> >)=)&$&)+*1 $%" $1
I+>>+H1X
i.
definition of savings
FG" -KK1 +I 23837 2388 $*< 2382 $>> G$O" )M #%+O)
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
38/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* ,5 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
Meaning of Savings xxx. Savings %"I"% &+ #+%&)+*1 +% @$>$*B"1 +I $*M
#%+?%$=="< $##%+#%)$&)+* )* &G)1 KB& I%"" I%+= $*M +@>)?$&)+* +%"*BA=@%$*B" HG)BG $%"X
:); 1&)>> $O$)>$@>" $I&"% &G" B+=#>"&)+* +% I)*$> &)*? )* )=#%+O"< 1M1&"=1 $*< "II)B)"*B)"1 $*< &GA17
"*$@>"< $?"*B)"1 &+ =""& $*< "11"%
B+1&.
Augmentation )=#>)"1 &G" "Q)1&"*B" )* &G)1 KB& +I $ #%+?%$=7$B&)O)&M7 +% #%+`"B& H)&G $* $##%+#%)$&)+*7 HG)BG A#+*
)=#>"="*&$&)+* +% 1A@1"ZA"*& "O$>A$&)+* +I *""> $ *+*S"Q)1&"*& #%+?%$=7$B&)O)&M7 +% #%+`"B&7 @" IA*M >)=)& &G" hQ"BA&)O"N1 "Q"%B)1" +I &G"
#+H"% &+ $A?="*&7 $1 &G"M 1&%)B&>M $@>" @$>$*B"; I%+=
&G)1 #%+?%$=="< $##%+#%)$&)+*.
,.
FG$& &G" $O$)>$@>" @$>$*B" @" "="*&$&)+* +I ="$1A%"1 &G$& %"1A>&"< )*
)=#%+O"< 1M1&"=1 $*< "II)B)"*B)"17 "*$@>)*? $?"*B)"1 &+
=""& $*<
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
39/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* ,4 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
E.
FG$& &G" $O$)>$@>" @$>$*B" @" A*+@>)?$&"< +% A*"*BA=@"%"M $M1 1G$>> @" $O$)>$@>" I+% %">"$1" $*< +@>)?$&)+* I+% $
#"%)+< "Q&"*>+H"< &+ @" $>>+&&")?$&"< $*< %">"$1"< A*&)> Vs 2388R
IA* Vs 2382R $*< IA* Vs 238,.
FG" "Q&"*"&"M7 &G" #%+O)1)+*1 "II"B&)O">M ?%$*&"< &G" hQ"BA&)O" I>"Q)@)>)&M )*
)=#>"="*&)*? &G" -KK7 $*< $>1+ "*1A%"< &G$& #A@>)B IA*> @" 1#"*& $1
$##%+#%)$&" +A&>$M1 A*"$1"1 $*< +@>)?$&)+*1 1G$>> @" 1A@=)&&"< &+ &G" !"*$&" D+==)&&"" +* V)*$*B"$*< &G" \+A1" D+==)&&"" +* K##%+#%)$&)+*1.
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
40/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* E3 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
iii.
general prohibition
against impoundment
of releases
_$1&>M7 )* $1+ #%+G)@)&"< &G" "11 )* $BB+%"1 $* -+O"%*="*& CA
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
41/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* E8 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
>$H7 &G" T%"1)$H.
FG" -KK7 G+H"O"%7 )* B+*1)" B)%BA=1&$*B"1&G$& =)?G& %"*"="*&$&)+* +I $>> +I )&1 $##%+#%)$&)+*1
)=#%$B&)B$@>" +% )=#+11)@>"7 $A&G+%)["< &G" T%"1) @A
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
42/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* E2 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
H)&G)* &G" -KKN1 Vs. (&G"%H)1"7 &G"M 1G$>> %"O"%& @$BW &+ &G" -"*"%$> VA*< @" A*$O$)>$@>" I+% "Q#"*"?)1>$&)O" "*$B&="*&.52
e.
the sources of DAP fundscannot qualify as savings
i.
unobligated allotments
K1 L "$%>)"% "=#G$1)["+&&"< I+% #$%&)BA>$% $##%+#%)$&)+*1
=$M +*>M @" A1"< &+ $A?="*& +&G"% )&"=1 )* &G" -KK HG"* &G"%" $%" $B&A$>
1$O)*?1. FG" UKT7 @M #++>)*? IA*$&"< &G)1 B%)&)B$> %"ZA)%"="*& $1 &G" 1+A%B"1 +I UKT
IA*)IM $1 1$O)*?1.
L* #++>)*? &+?"&G"% fA*+@>)?$&"< $>>+&="*&1g5,&+ $A?="*& +&G"% )&"=1
)* &G" -KK7 &G" UKT A1"< IA*%"$>+&&"< @A& G$< M"&
&+ @" +@>)?$&"< +% 1#"*& I+% )&1 )*&"*>M $?%"" H)&G J. D$%#)+
&G$& &G"1" IA*> $1 )* &G" (A&>$M1 :D(;R
,.8.2 P$)*&"*$*B" $*< (&G"% (#"%$&)*? hQ#"*1"1 :P((h; %">$&"< &+ &G"
)=#>"="*&$&)+* +I #%+?%$=1 $*< #%+`"B&17 $1 H">> $1 B$#)&$>)["< P((hi.j
FG)1 H)&G )1 B+*&%$%M &+ &G" )*&"*& $*< >$*?A$?" +I !"B&)+* Y8 +I
&G" 2388 -KK7 $*< !"B&)+* Y9 5E HG)BG "Q&"*)?$&"< $>>+&="*& %"I"%1 &+ &G" #+%&)+* +I %">"$1"< $##%+#%)$&)+*1 HG)BG G$1 *+& @""*
"Q#"*"$1"1 $*< +@>)?$&)+*1 1G$>> @"
1A@=)&&"< &+ &G" !"*$&" D+==)&&"" +* V)*$*B" $*< &G" \+A1" D+==)&&"" +*
K##%+#%)$&)+*17 ")&G"% )* #%)*&"< I+%= +% @M H$M +I ">"B&%+*)B
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
43/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* E, -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
&+?"&G"%7 #%+O)M @" B+*1) &G" "*< +I Vs 2382. VA*"&">M > @" B+*1)M)*? &G"1" B+*B"#&1 &+ &G" P((h $*< D( >"$$#1" =+*&G>M7 $*< &GA1 $*M IA*>+&&"< I+% &G" =+*&G >"I& A*A1"< ZA$>)I)"1 $1 1$O)*?17 H)&G &H+ "QB"#&)+*1X
:8; P((h HG)BG under the GAA can be declared as savings only in the
last quarter+I &G" Vs $*< :2; expenditures for Business-type activities7
HG)BG A*)?*""&">M $%" D( $1 1$O)*?1 )* &G" =)+*? @"I+%" &G" "*< +I &G" &H+SM"$% #"%)+< HG"* 1ABG IA*> @" +@>)?$&"" P((h I+% Vs 2382 I%+= J$*A$%M &+ JA*" 2382
=$M @" B+*1))IM
$1 1ABG.
L* &G)1 >)?G&7 0CD 0+. 9E8 I+1&"%"< $ B+*1&)&A&)+*$> )>>"?$>)&MX &G"
#%"=$&A%" H)&G +I A*+@>)?$&"< $>>+&="*&1 #"%&$)*)*? &+ B$#)&$> +A&>$M1
$*< P((h $1 +I JA*" ,37 2382 A* "$%>M
$=+A*&"< &+ $ #%"1) +A&>$M1 A*"$1"1 $*< +@>)?$&)+*1 1G$>> @" 1A@=)&&"< &+ &G"!"*$&" D+==)&&"" +* V)*$*B" $*< &G" \+A1" D+==)&&"" +* K##%+#%)$&)+*1.
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
44/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* EE -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
+O"%%)" aL +I &G"
D+*1&)&A&)+*.5Y
i.1 final discontinuance or
abandonment
L >)W"H)1" $?%"" H)&G J. D$%#)+N1 BG$%$B&"%)[$&)+* +I &G" I)*$>
>A1&%$&)+* +I &G"
)=#+11)@)>)&M +% *+*SI"$1)@)>)&M +I $ #%+`"B& &G$& `A1&)I)"< )&1 )?*="*&d/">+B$&)+* +I D$#)&$> (A&>$M1. FG" $=+A*&
$##%+#%)$&"< )* &G)1 KB& I+% $BZA)1)&)+*7 B+*1&%AB&)+*7 %"#>$B"="*&7%"G$@)>)&$&)+* $*< B+=#>"&)+* +I O$%)+A1 D$#)&$> (A&>$M1 =$M @"%"$>)?*")?*="*&d%">+B$&)+* +I D$#)&$>
(A&>$M1 1G$>> @" $&)O" >M 1G+H &G$& &G"
%"$>>+B$&)+* +I A*+@>)?$&"< $>>+&="*&1 #"%&$)*)*? &+ B$#)&$> +A&>$M1 H$1 =$"?)1>$&)O" " aL +I &G" 8456 D+*1&)&A&)+* %"$> #$11"< @M &G" D+*?%"11 1G$>>7 @"I+%" )& @"B+="1 $ >$H7 @" #%"1"*&"< &+ &G"
T%"1)> 1)?* )&R +&G"%H)1"7 G" 1G$>> O"&+ )& $* $*< #%+B""< &+ %"B+*1) &G" P"=@"%1 +I 1ABG \+A1" 1G$>> $?%"" &+ #$11 &G"
@)>>7 )& 1G$>> @" 1"*&7 &+?"&G"% H)&G &G" +@`"B&)+*17 &+ &G" +&G"% \+A1" @M HG)BG )& 1G$>>>)W"H)1" @" %"B+*1)> @"> B+==A*)B$&" G)1 O"&+ +I $*M @)>>&+ &G" \+A1" HG"%" )& +%)?)*$&"< H)&G)* &G)%&M > G$O" &G" #+H"% &+ O"&+ $*M #$%&)BA>$% )&"= +% )&"=1 )* $*
$##%+#%)$&)+*7 %"O"*A"7 +% &$%)II @)>>7 @A& &G" O"&+ 1G$>> *+& $II"B& &G" )&"= +% )&"=1 &+HG)BG G"
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
45/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* E9 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
A*+@>)?$&"< $>>+&="*&1 $*< A*%">"$1"< $##%+#%)$&)+*1 I+% 1>+H =+O)*?
#%+`"B&1 &+ @" =)1#>$B"
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
46/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* EY -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
L* +&G"% H+% #%+?%$=. (*B" $ #%+?%$= )1 I)*$>>M +&&"< IA*"$1"< $##%+#%)$&)+*155I+%
1>+HS=+O)*? #%+`"B&1.
FG" hQ"BA&)O" M )"% "Q#>$)*"%"$$*B"1 +I #%+?%$=="< $A&G+%)[$&)+*1 d $##%+#%)$&)+*1
#A%1A$*& &+ >$H :".?. -"*"%$> K##%+#%)$&)+*1 KB&; +% +&G"% >"?)1>$&)O" "*$B&="*&7 1&)>> $O$)>$@>" I+% %">"$1".K**"Q K7 JA*" 297 2382 P"=+%$*
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
47/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* E6 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
G$< @""* )=#+A*"$% #%+G)@)&)+* $?$)*1& )& )* &G"
-KK.
g. Qualifications to the
Presidents flexibility inbudget execution
FG"ponencia7 )* BG$%$B&"%)[)*? &G" hQ"BA&)O"N1 $B&)+*1 )* I+%=A>$&)*?
&G" UKT7 #+)*&"< +A& &G$& :1; &G" UKT )1 H)&G)* &G" T%"1)$&" $*< )=#>"="*&R $*< :2; &G" T%"1)"Q)@)>)&M )* @A
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
48/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* E5 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
:#%+`"B&d#%+?%$=d$B&)O)&M; &+ $*+&G"% HG"%" @+&G #A%#+1"1 $%" B+O"%"< @M &G"
1$=" )&"= +I "Q#"*
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
49/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* E4 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
I+% "B+*+=)B B+*B>A1)+*1. e" $%"7 $I&"% $>>7 $ B+A%& +I >$H @+A*< &+ =$W"
)&1 "?$> B+*1) +A&B+="17 )*B>AM +@1"%O"< &G$& &G" UKT IA* +A&>$M I+% &G" D(KN1 fLF
L*I%$1&%AB&A%" T%+?%$= $*< G)%)*? +I $)&)?$&)+* "Q#"%&1gR 43 :)));
B$#)&$> +A&>$M I+% &G" TG)>)##)*" K)% V+%B"N1 f(*SC$1" \+A1)*? V$B)>)&)"1
$*< D+==A*)B$&)+*1 hZA)#="*&gR 48 $*< :)O; B$#)&$> +A&>$M I+% &G"
U"#$%&="*& +I V)*$*B"N1 fLF L*I%$1&%AB&A%" P$)*&"*$*B" T%+`"B&.g
V+% )*1&$*B"7 &G" UKT I$B)>)&$&"< IA*
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
50/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 93 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
$)&)?$&)+* "Q#"%&17g 42 B$#)&$> +A&>$M I+% &G" U"#$%&="*& +I
V)*$*B"N1 fLF L*I%$1&%AB&A%" P$)*&"*$*B" T%+`"B&g4, $*< B$#)&$> +A&>$M I+%
&G" TG)>)##)*" K)% V+%B"N1 f(*SC$1" \+A1)*? V$B)>)&)"1 $*< D+==A*)B$&)+*
hZA)#="*&.g4E0+*" +I &G" $##%+#%)$&)+*1 HG)BG IA*< &G"1" #%+`"B&1 G$< $*
)&"= I+% B$#)&$> +A&>$M7 $*< M"&7 &G" UKT )*&%+ $##%+#%)$&)+*7
&G" &%$*1I"% +I IA* #%+G)@)&)+* A*" aL +I &G" 8456 D+*1&)&A&)+*.
V+% "=#G$1)17 I+% &G" #+H"% +I $A?="*&$&)+* &+ @" O$>)M "Q"%B)1"$HIA> %">"$1" +I &G" ]*#%+?%$=="< VA*< )* &G" 2388
$*< 2382 -KK1. K1 $* $1)"?)1>$&)O" G)1&+%M +I &G"
#%+O)1)+* >)=)&)*? &G" %">"$1" +I &G" ]*#%+?%$=="< VA*< +*>M HG"*
+%)?)*$> %"O"*A" &$%?"&1 G$O" @""* "QB""A1)+*.
FG" ]*#%+?%$=="< VA*< )* @+&G &G" 2388 $*< &G" 2382 -KK1
%"ZA)%"1 $1 $ B+* %"O"*A" &$%?"&1 I+% &G$& M"$%. FG)1
%"ZA)%"="*& G$< @""* H+%M &G" 1$=" #G%$1"+>+?M )* !#"B)$>
T%+O)1)+* 0+. 8 )* &G" 2388 -KK $*< )* !#"B)$> T%+O)1)+* 0+. 8 )* &G" 2382
-KKX
8. /">"$1" +I VA*" aLL +I &G" D+*1&)&A&)+*7 QQQ
42 FG" UKT7 )* +% K"B&%+*)B )##)*" K)%I+%B"N1 f(*SC$1" \+A1)*? V$B)>)&)"1 $*< D+==A*)B$&)+*
hZA)#="*&7g &G" UKT $A?="*&"< 1"O"%$> $##%+#%)$&)+*1 +I &G" TG)>)##)*" K)%I+%B" H)&G B$#)&$> +A&>$M&+&$>)*? &+ T24.5 =)>>)+*. 0+*" +I &G"1" $##%+#%)$&)+*1 G$< $* )&"= I+% D(.
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
51/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 98 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
C+&G !#"B)$> T%+O)1)+*1 )* &G" 2388 $*< 2382 -KK1 B+*&$)*7 $>1+ )*
&G" 1$=" >$*?A$?"7 $ #%+O)1+ $A&G+%)[)*? &G" A1" +I B+>>"B&)+*1 $%)1)*? I%+=
1+A%B"1 *+& B+*1)>+H1
&G" A1" +I 1+A%B"1 *+& B+*1) %"O"*A" =$M @" A1"< &+ B+O"% $##%+#%)$&)+*1 )* &G" ]*#%+?%$==" #%+O)1)+* %"ZA)%)*? &G$& %"O"*A"
B+>>"B&)+*1 I)%1& "QB""< &G" +%)?)*$> %"O"*A" &$%?"&1. L* &G" )*&"%#%"&$&)+* +I
1&$&A&"17 &G$& HG)BG )=#>"="*&1 &G" "*&)%" 1&$&A&" 1G+A>< @" $##>)"< %"*.49
0")&G"% 1G+A>< $ #%+O)1+ @" ?)O"* $* )*&"%#%"&$&)+* &G$& %"*
#G%$1" )& ZA$>)I)"1 "*&)%">M )*A&)>". LI H" $%" &+ I+>>+H JA1&)B" U"> D$1&)>>+N1$%?A="*& &G$& !#"B)$> T%+O)1)+* 0+. 8 $>>+H1 &G" A1" +I B+>>"B&)+*1 $%)1)*?
I%+= 1+A%B"1 *+& B+*1)"$1" +I ]*#%+?%$=="< VA*< H$1 I)%1& B+* #%+O)1)+* 1+ &G$&
&G" %">"$1" +I IA*> @"=$>"B&)+*1 I+% &G" "*&)%" M"$% "QB""< &G"
+%)?)*$> %"O"*A" &$%?"&1. K>>+H =" &+ "=#G$1)["7 G+H"O"%7 &G$& reference
to revenue collections for the entire year under this special provision
pertain only to regular income sources or those covered by the same
set of assumptions used in setting the computation of revenue targets
for the year as reflected in the BESF.It should not, therefore, include
new sources of income not considered nor identified in the originalrevenue projections. 0")&G"% 1G+A>< )& B+O"% 1+A%B"1 +I )*B+=" *+&
49 FG)1 #%)*B)#>" )1 "Q#%"11"< )* &G" =$Q)= Ut magis valeat quam pereat7 &G$& )17 H" BG++1" &G"
)*&"%#%"&$&)+* HG)BG ?)O"1 "II"B& &+ &G" HG+>" +I &G" 1&$&A&" ^ )&1 "O"%M H+%< . Inding v. Sandiganbayan7
-./. 0+. 8E,3E67 8E JA>M 233E7 E,E !D/K ,557 E3,7 $1 B)&"< )* Philippine Health Care Providers v. CIR7-./. 0+. 8Y6,,37 !"#&"=@"% 857 2334.
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
52/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 92 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
B+*&"=#>$&"< A* $11A=#&)+*1 A1"< )* 1"&&)*? &G" %"O"*A"
&$%?"&1.4Y
FGA17 $1 )& H$1 I)%1& )*&"*
%"O"*A" &$%?"&1 G$< @""* ="&7 $*< 1+A%B"1 *+& B+*1)A %"O"*A" &$%?"&1 G$< @""* "QB"" %"O"*A" &$%?"&1
=$M @" A1"< )1 HG"* &G" +%)?)*$> %"O"*A" &$%?"&1 G$< @""* "QB""A %"O"*A" &$%?"&1 &+ >"B&)+*1 G$>+H &G" A1" +I
1+A%B"1 +I IA*$&&"% G$< *+& @""* ="&7 &G"* )& B+A>< G$O" 1&$&"< )& )* $ >$*?A$?" B>"$%>M
#+)*&)*? &+H$%)B +I &G"TG)>)##)*"1 I%+= J$*A$%M +*" &+ U"B"=@"% &G)%&MS+*"7 &H+ &G+A1$*< *)*"7
"QB"#& HG"%" +&G"%H)1" 1#"B)I)B$>>M #%+O) ="=@"%1 +I &G" \+A1"
+I /"#%"1"*&$&)O"1 &+ +O"%%)"="*&$&)+* +I !#"B)$> T%+O)1)+* 0+. 8 )* &G" 2334 -KK. FG$& &G)1
$&&"=#& G$< *+& 1ABB"""="*&$&)+* +I &G" !#"B)$>
T%+O)1)+* 0+. 8 )* &G" 2334 B+*&)*A"< $1 &G" hQ"BA&)O" B+*1&%A"< )& &+ @"="$*& &G$& &G" >$&&"%N1 )*&"%#%"&$&)+* +I &G)1 !#"B)$> T%+O)1)+* H$1 &G" &%A"
)*&"%#%"&$&)+* +I D+*?%"11. FG)1 )*&"%#%"&$&)+* H$1 B$%%)"< )*&+ &G" >$*?A$?"
+I !#"B)$> T%+O)1)+* 0+. 8 HG"* )& H$1 %"S"*$B&"< )* &G" 1A@1"ZA"*& M"$%17
)*B>A )* &G)1 B$1".
4. The operative fact doctrine:
concept, limits, and application to the
DAPs unconstitutionality.
4Y T%"1) -$["&&" a+>A=" 839 0+. 87 #. 2YE7 available
at G&HHH.> 0+. 988Y7 V+A%&""*&G D+*?%"117 available at G&HHH.)=2.#
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
53/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 9, -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
L ?"*"%$>>M $?%"" H)&G J. C"%1$=)*N1 B+*B>A1)+* +* &G" +#"%$&)O" I$B&
+H I+% &G" D+A%&N1
B+*1))["< ="$*)*?.
F+ $##%"B)$&" &G" B)%BA=1&$*B"1 +% 1)&A$&)+*1 HG"* &G" )"$%%">$&)+*17 )*. bA"1&)+*1 +I %)?G&1 B>$)="< &+ G$O" @"B+=" O"1&")?G& +I &G" *$&A%" @+&G +I &G" 1&$&A&" $*< +I )&1
#%"O)+A1 $##>)B$&)+*7 >S)*B>A1)O" 1&$&"="*&
+I $ #%)*B)#>" +I $@1+>A&" %"&%+$B&)O" )*O$>))1G"< %A>"
:W*+H* $1 &G" void ab initiodoctrine; &G$& $* fA*B+*1&)&A&)+*$> $B& )1 *+& $>$HR )& B+*I"%1 *+ %)?G&1R )& )=#+1"1 *+ B+*&"=#>$&)+*7 $1 )*+#"%$&)O" $1 &G+A?G )& G$ 1M1&"= B$=" )* &G" 84931
HG"*7 )* 1"O"%$> B$1"17838&G" D+A%& B+*1)$%$&)+*
+I A*B+*1&)&A&)+*$>)&M +I &G" P+%$&+%)A= >$H1 +* B+*&%$B&1 $*< +@>)?$&)+*1.45 ,35 ]! ,687 ,85S,847 Y3 !. D&. ,86.44 FG" O+)< ab initio7 California Coastal Commission: Retroactivity of a Judicial Ruling of
Unconstitutionality7 8E UAW" h*O&>. _. c T+>oM V. 2E97 29Y.838 !"" &G" I+>>+H)*? B$1"1 +IMontilla v.Pacific Commercial, 45 TG)>.7 8,, :849Y; $*. 6,5 :849Y;.
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
54/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 9E -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
U"1#)&" &G" )*O$>)"< &G$& &G"
)*O$>)$)=1 I+% A*#$)< 1$>$%)"1 1G+A>< *+& #%"`A+M"" HG+ G$$)= H)&G &G" >"< &G" %A**)*? +I &G" #%"1B%)#&)O" #"%)+
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
55/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 99 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
L* &G" >$*?A$?" +I $* K="%)B$* !A#%"=" D+A%& "Q)1&"*B" +I $ 1&$&A&"7 #%)+% &+ 1ABG $ )&Mj7 )1 $* +#"%$&)O" I$B& $*< =$M G$O" B+*1"ZA"*B"1
HG)BG B$**+& `A1&>M @" )?*+%"$%$&)+*. FG" "II"B& +I &G" 1A@1"ZA"*& %A>)*? $1 &+)*O$>)$&)+*17 )*.g839 :"=#G$1"1 1A##>)"$)*""7 $1 I+>>+H1X
FG" %A>"7 +*>M
$##>)"1 $1 $ =$&&"% +I "ZA)&M $*< I$)% #>$M. L& *A>>)I)"1 &G" "II"B&1 +I $*
A*B+*1&)&A&)+*$> >$H @M %"B+?*)[)*? &G$& &G" "Q)1&"*B" +I $ 1&$&A&" #%)+% &+$ )&M )1 $* +#"%$&)O" I$B& $*< may have
consequences which cannot always be ignored.FG" #$1& B$**+& $>H$M1
@" "%$1"< @M $ *"H `A 1+ %A>"< )* &G)1 1$=" B$1"7 the operative fact doctrinedoes not
always apply $*< )1 *+& $ *"B"11$%M B+*1"ZA"*B" +I "O"%M >)I)B$&)+* +I &G" "II"B&1 +I HG$& A1"< &+ @" $ O$>)< >$H H+A>< %"1A>& )*
inequity$*< injustice. Where no such resulting effects would ensue, the
general rule that an unconstitutional law is totally ineffective should
apply.
KM7 &G" 1&%)B&"1& W)*< +I 1B%A&)*M 1G+A>< @" $BB+%$)= &G" @"*"I)& +I &G" +#"%$&)O" I$B& )$*B" I%+= $* "Q#%"11 #%+O)1)+* +I &G" D+*1&)&A&)+* $*< 1G+A>$HN1*A>>)I)B$&)+* &+ %"B+?*)[" &G$& #%)+% &+ )&1 *A>>)I)B$&)+*7 )& H$1 $ >"?$> %"$>)&M
&G$& ?+O"%*"< #$1& $B&1 +% +=)11)+*1. feG$&"O"% H$1 $&)O" +% &G" "Q"BA&)O" $B& H$1 )* +#"%$&)+* 1G+A>< @" M %"B+?*)[")B$&)+* +I &G" *"H
>$H. The Court never looked far back enough to address the cause of
the invalidity, for which reason we find nothing in our jurisprudence
that extended the operative fact doctrine to validate the invalidated law
itself or to absolve its proponents.
b. Application
-)O"* &G" `A%)1#%A1 HG+ A*)B +II)B)$>1 %"1#+*1)@>" I+%
&G" "1&$@>)1G="*& $*< )=#>"="*&$&)+* +I &G" UKT.
e)&G %"1#"B& &+ &G" #%+?%$=17 H+%W1 $*< #%+`"B&17 I fully agree with
J. Bersamin &G$& &G" DAP-funded programs, works and projects B$* *+
>+*?"% @" A*+*" $1
&G"M H"%" A*)
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
57/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 96 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
FG" +I 0CD 0+. 9E8 $*< HG+7 $1 $A&G+%7
B$**+& @" 1$)< &+ G$O" %">)"< +* )& )* &G" B+A%1" +I )&1 +#"%$&)+*. !)*B" G"
A1)+* 1G+A>< $##>M &+ $>> +&G"%1 HG+1" +*>M >)*W &+ &G" UKT
)1 $1 )&1 $A&G+%17 )=#>"="*&+%1 +% #%+#+*"*&1. LI &G"1" #$%&)"17 I+% &G")% +H*
%"$1+*17 H+A>< B>$)= &G" @"*"I)& +I &G" M 1G+H &G")% ?++< I$)&G %">)$*B"R ?++IS>"O)&$&" I%+= $ >$H +% ="$1A%" &G$& G$1
I$>>"* < $##>M ^ &G" UKT )1 $ O+)< ="$1A%" HG)BG )1
>.
FG" ?++< I$)&G A*< @" distinguished from the
good faith considered from the perspective of liability. L& H)>> @" %"B$>>"" A*$H +* #A@>)B +II)B"%1 &G$& #A@>)B $BB+A*&$@)>)&M #+&"*&)$>>M )=#+1"1 a
three-fold liability criminal, civil and administrative against a public
officer. K %A>)*? +I &G)1 W)*< B$* +*>M B+=" I%+= $ &%)@A*$> H)&G )$@)>)&M $*< HG"%" &G" ?++< +% @$ +%
$)*? $*< H" B$**+& $&)*? G)1 < +&G"%H)1" "*`+M )* $* $11"11="*& +I G)1
#"%I+%=$*B" +I "
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
59/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 94 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
!"B%"&$%M K@$1+ &%A"7 s+A% \+*+%.
JA1&)B" C%)+*X K*< )* I$B&7 G+H =$*M M"$%1 H"%" M+A )* D+*?%"11u
!"B%"&$%M K@$1+ )*O+>O"< )* @A
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
60/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* Y3 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
FG" "QBG$*?"7 &+ =M =)*$)= @M &G" %"1#+* )=#>)B$&)+*1 +I HG$& G" H$1 $HM"% $*< H)&G $& >"$1& 82 M"$%1 +I "Q#"%)"*B" @"G)*< G)= $1 $
B+*?%"11=$* HG+ H$1 "O"* &G" DG$)%=$* +I &G" \+A1" K##%+#%)$&)+*1
D+==)&&""7 )& )1 )*B+*B")O$@>" &G$& G" )&M +%
A*B+*1&)&A&)+*$>)&M &G$& &$)*&"< G)1 @%$)*BG)>"
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
61/62
!"#$%$&" (#)*)+* Y8 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.
L* &G"1" >)?G&17 H" 1G+A>< &$W" &G" A&=+1& B$%" )* HG$& H" " +I >$H7
1"#$%$&)+* +I #+H"%17 $*< BG"BW1 $*< @$>$*B"1 =$M G$O" @""* B+=#%+=)1"# &G" %"#A&$&)+* +I
&G)1 D+A%& +% &G" 1&$@)>)&M +I +A% B+A*&%M.
JA1&)B" C"%1$=)*X
0+7 $##%+#%)$&)+*1 @"I+%" M+A $A?="*&"< @"B$A1" &G)1 )1 $ B%+11 @+%"$% $1 I$% $1 L $= B+*B"%*" B+*1&%)B&"< @M &G)1 #%+O)1)+*u
!"B%"&$%M K@$ $1 )* &G" \+A1" +I /"#%"1"*&$&)O"1R &G$&N1 G+H H" 1$Hy
:)*&"%%A#&"
-
8/11/2019 Dap Ruling
62/62
Separate Opinion
6 G.R. Nos. 209287 209135
et al.
To be very clear about our positions we can only apply the operative
fact doctrine to the programs, projects and works that can no longer he
undone and where the beneficiaries relied in good faith on the validity
of
theDAP
The authors, proponents and implementors
ofDAP
are
not
among
those who can seek coverage under the doctrine; their
link
to the DAP was
merely to establish and implement the terms that we now find
unconstitutional.
The matter of their good faith in the performance
of
duty or its
absence) and their liability therefor,
i
any, can be made onlv by the proper
tribunals, not by this Court in the present case.
Based on these premises, I concur that the DAP is unconstitutional
and should be struck down. I likewise concur in the application of the
Operative Fact Doctrine as I have explained above and adopted by the
ponencia.
RTURO
D.
BRION
Associate Justice