dap ruling

Upload: ray-maynard-bacus

Post on 02-Jun-2018

236 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    1/62

    rl

    G.R. No. 209287 -

    MARIA CAROLINA

    P.

    ARAULLO, Chairperson,

    Bagong Alyansang Makabayan; JUDY M.

    TAGUIW

    ALO, Professor,

    University

    of

    the

    Philippines Diliman,

    Co-Chairperson, Pagbabago;

    HENRI

    KAHN,

    Concerned

    Citizens Movement;

    REP. LUZ

    ILAGAN,

    Gabriela Women s

    Party Representative;

    REP. CARLOS

    ISAGANI

    ZARATE, Bayan Muna Partylist

    Representative;

    RENATO

    M.

    REYES, JR., Secretary General

    of

    BAYAN; MANUEL K. DAYRIT,

    Chairman, and Kapatiran Party;

    VENCER MARI

    E.

    CRISOSTOMO,

    Chairperson, Anakbayan;

    and VICTOR VILLANUEVA,

    Conyenor

    Youth Act

    Now v.

    BENIGNO SIMEON

    C. AQUINO

    III, President of

    the Republic of the Philippines;

    PA

    QUITO N.

    OCHOA,

    JR.,

    Executive

    Secretary; and FLORENCIO B. ABAD,

    Secretary

    of

    the

    Department

    of

    Budget

    and

    Management.

    G.R. No. 209135 - AUGUSTO L.

    SYJUCO, JR.,

    Ph.D. v.

    FLORENCIO

    B. ABAD, in his capacity

    as

    the

    Secretary

    of

    Department

    of

    Budget and

    Management; and

    HON.

    FRANKLIN

    MAGTUNAO DRILON, in his

    capacity

    as

    Senate

    President

    of

    the

    Philippines.

    G.R. No. 209136 - MANUELITO R. LUNA v. SECRETARY

    FLORENCIO ABAD, in his official capacity as

    Head

    of the Department

    of Budget and Management; and EXECUTIVE SECRETARY

    PA

    QUITO

    OCHOA,

    in his official capacity as

    Alter

    Ego

    of

    the

    President.

    G.R. No. 209155 - ATTY. JOSE

    MALVAR VILLEGAS,

    JR. v.

    THE

    HONORABLE EXECUTIVE

    SECRETARY PAQUITO

    N. OCHOA,

    JR.;

    and

    THE SECRETARY

    OF BUDGET AND

    MANAGEMENT

    FLORENCIO B. ABAD.

    G.R. No. 209164 -

    PHILIPPINE CONSTITUTION ASSOCIATION

    PHILCONSA),

    represented

    by DEAN

    FROILAN

    M. BACUNGAN,

    BENJAMIN

    E.

    DIOKNO

    and LEONOR

    M.

    BRIONES

    v.

    DEPARTMENT

    OF

    BUDGET

    AND

    MANAGEMENT and/or HON.

    FLORENCIO B. ABAD.

    G.R. No. 209260 -

    INTEGRATED BAR

    OF THE

    PHILIPPINES

    IBP)

    v.

    SECRETARY

    FLORENCIO B. ABAD OF

    THE DEPARTMENT

    OF

    BUDGET

    AND

    MANAGEMENT

    DBM).

    G.R. No. 209442 - GRECO ANTONIOUS BEDA B. BELGICA,

    BISHOP REUBEN

    M. ABANTE

    and

    REV.

    JOSE

    L.

    GONZALEZ

    v.

    PRESIDENT

    BENIGNO

    SIMEON

    C. AQUINO

    III,

    THE SENATE OF

    THE PHILIPPINES, represented

    by

    SENATE PRESIDENT

    FRANKLIN M. DRILON;

    THE HOUSE OF

    REPRESENTATIVES,

    represented

    by

    SPEAKER FELICIANO BELMONTE, JR.; THE

    EXECUTIVE

    OFFICE, represented by

    EXECUTIVE SECRETARY

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    2/62

    Separate Opinion

    2

    G.R. Nos. 209287, 209135,

    et al

    PAQUITO

    N.

    OCHOA,

    JR.; THE

    DEPARTMENT

    OF

    BUDGET

    AND

    MANAGEMENT, represented

    by

    SECRETARY

    FLORENCIO ABAD;

    THE DEPARTMENT

    OF

    FINANCE, represented

    by SECRETARY

    CESAR V. PURISIMA;

    and THE

    BUREAU

    OF

    TREASURY,

    represented

    by

    ROSALIA

    V.

    DE LEON.

    G.R. No. 209517- CONFEDERATION FOR UNITY, RECOGNITION

    AND

    ADVANCEMENT

    OF

    GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES

    COURAGE),

    represented

    by its 1st Vice

    President,

    SANTIAGO

    DASMARINAS,

    JR.; ROSALINDA NARTATES,

    for herself and as

    National President of the Consolidated Union of Employees National

    Housing

    Authority

    (CUE-NHA);

    MANUEL BACLAGON, for

    himself

    and as

    President

    of

    the

    Social

    Welfare

    Employees Association

    of the

    Philippines,

    Department of

    Social

    Welfare

    and Development

    Central

    Office

    SWEAP-DSWD CO); ANTONIA PASCUAL, for herself and as

    National

    President

    of

    the

    Department of Agrarian

    Reform

    Employees

    Association (DAREA); ALBERT MAGALANG, for himself

    and

    as

    President of the Environment

    and

    Management

    Bureau

    Employees

    Union EMBEU); and MARCIAL ARABA,

    for

    himself and

    as

    President

    of the Kapisanan Para Sa Kagalingan ng

    mga

    Kawani ng MMDA

    KKK-MMDA)

    v.

    BENIGNO SIMEON C. AQUINO III, President

    of

    the Republic of the Philippines, PAQUITO OCHOA, JR., Executive

    Secretary;

    and

    HON.

    FLORENCIO B. ABAD, Secretary of the

    Department

    of

    Budget and Management.

    G.R. No. 209569 - VOLUNTEERS AGAINST

    CRIME

    AND

    CORRUPTION (VACC),

    represented

    by DANTE LA. JIMENEZ v.

    PAQUITO N. OCHOA, Executive Secretary,

    and

    FLORENCIO B.

    ABAD, Secretary of the Department of Budget

    and

    Management.

    Promulgated:

    Ju1y 1 2014 .

    J /

    SEPARATE OPINION

    BRION, J :

    Preliminary Statement

    I submit this Concurring and Dissenting Opinion to reflect my

    views on the constitutionality

    of

    the Disbursement Acceleration Program

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    3/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* , -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    :DAP; $*< )&1 )=#>"="*&)*? @A

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    4/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* E -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    P150 Billion or almost 15 times the PDAF caseREentanglement with the

    unconstitutional PDAF; personalities at thevery highest level in both the

    Executive and the Legislative Departments of governmentR $*)B IA*"1 A*)B $%" $& 1&$W" $*< H"7 $1 $ *$&)+*7 B$**+& $*< 1G+A>< *+& @"

    #"%B")O"< &+ @" H"$W +% G"1)&$*& )* 1A##+%&)*? &G"1" #%)*B)#>"1. K=+*?

    &G"= $%" &G" %"?)=" +I &G" rule of lawHG"%" H" B$**+& $II+%< &+ I$)>R +A%

    B+*1&)&A&)+*$> system of checks and balances $*< +I &G" separation of

    powers &G$& )*" "II"B& &G$&

    +A% %A>)*?7 ")&G"% H$M7 H)>> G$O" +* &G" )*1&)&A&)+*1 $*< +II)B)$>1 )*O+>O"& &G$& @"I+%" $*M =$11)O"

    $B" B+A>< 1"& )*7 &G" D+A%& 1G+A>"1& )&1 *$=" $>1+ @" $M +% #"%B"#&)+*1 +I =)1G$*)*?7

    B+O"% A#7 HG)&"H$1G +% A*$BB"#&$@>" %A>)*? ^ B+A>< $>%"$)1= $*< O"="*& +I &G" &G%"" ?%"$& @%$*BG"1 +I ?+O"%*="*&. The

    peoples inevitable question could then be: who else is there to trust?

    FGA17 &G)1 D+A%& 1G+A>< @" $1 &G+%+A?G $1 #+11)@>" )* &G" G$*)*? +I

    &G)1 B$1"7 =$W)*? 1A%" &G$&7 $& &G" O"%M >"$1&7 @+&G &G" %"$>)&M $*< #"%B"#&)+*

    +I )&1 )*&"?%)&M H+A>< @" )*&$B&. F+H$%< &G+%+A?G>M

    "QG$A1& &G" > &G" )11A"1 @"I+%" A1 ^ @+&G "Q#%"11 $*< )=#>)"AB)+?)B.

    FG)1 1#)%)& H$1 $##$%"*&>M &G" %"$1+* HGM &G" ="=@"%S)*SBG$%?"7 J.

    _AB$1 C"%1$=)*7 1AII"%"< "$"$1"< I+% #%+?%$=1 $*< #%+`"B&1 )"O$%)&$&)+* #%+`"B&1 I+% D+=#+1&">$ a$>>"M $*< U$O$+ (%)"*&$>. bcK +* &G" U)1@A%1"="*& KBB">"%$&)+*

    T%+?%$=7 (B&. 67 238,7 $& G&HHH.?+O.#Gd238,d83d36dZ$S+*S&G"S)

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    5/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 9 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    L11A"1

    ]* &G" B+*1&)&A&)+*$>)&M $*< O$>)"%$&)+* T%+?%$= :UKT;7 0$&)+*$> CA

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    6/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* Y -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    +H1X

    V. eG"&G"% +% *+& &G" %">"$1" +I A*#%+?%$=="< IA*>M G"$%< +* &G)1 #+)*&. FG" )*B>A1)+* +I &G)1 )11A"7

    )* =M O)"H7 H$1 $ O"%M ?++< B$>> +* J. C"%1$=)*N1 #$%& $1 $ B+*1"ZA"*B"1 +I +A% %A>)*? B$**+& @" >"I& +A& H)&G+A& %)1W)*? &G"

    BG$%?" &G$& H" G$O" @""* >"11 &G$* &G+%+A?G $*< G$O" =$A1)+*1 +I J. C"%1$=)* &+ &G" "Q&"*& +H $*< $>M7 L G+>< &G$&X

    $; &G" D+A%& G$1 `A%)1$&"1 &G" #%)*B)#>"1 +I BG"BW1 $*< @$>$*B"1 $*)&M +I &G"

    TUKV $*< I+A*< &G" 1M1&"= &+ @" A*B+*1&)&A&)+*$> I+% )&1 1"#$%$&)+* +I #+H"%1 $*< &G" BG"BW $*$*B" #%)*B)#>"1. FG"1" B+*1&)&A&)+*$> &%$*1?%"11)+*1 %"1A>&"< I%+= &G"

    )%%"?A>$%)&)"1 $*< $*+=$>)"1 &G$& $&&"*"="*&$&)+*.

    CA& "O"* @"I+%" &G" D+A%& B+A>< %A>" +* &G" B+*1&)&A&)+*$>)&M +I &G"

    TUKV7 &G" B+*&%+O"%1M &G$& )& ?"*"%$&"< G$< 1#)>>"< )*&+ $*< G$< B%"$&"M +1"< &+ &G" #A@>)B HG"* $ 1"*$&+%7 BG$%?"< H)&G $*+=$>)"1%"?$%"$% G)1 *$=" &G%+A?G $ #%)O)>"?"

    1#""BG.Y

    L* %"1#+*1"7 &G" ?+O"%*="*& :&G%+A?G &G" U"#$%&="*& +I CA

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    8/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 5 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    FG" UKT7 >)W" &G" TUKV7 )*O+>O"< &G" )=#>"="*&$&)+* +I &G" *$&)+*$>

    @A

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    9/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 4 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    "*$@>"< &G" hQ"BA&)O" &+ 1"BA%" &G" O+&"1 I+% &G" B+*O)B&)+* +I I+%="% DG)"I

    JA1&)B" /"*$&+ D+%+*$ $*< &G" I)>)*? +I )=#"$BG="*& BG$%?"1 $?$)*1& I+%="%

    (=@A" &G" )=#"$BG="*& B$1" $?$)*1& &G"

    I+%="% DG)"I JA1&)B" H$1 @"I+%" &G" !"*$&".82 L*&"%"1&)*?>M7 @+&G 1"*$&+%1

    H"%" %"B)#)"*&1 +I TUKV IA*"="*&$&)+*

    +I TUKV IA*> $@+A& &G"

    )=#"$BG="*&7 >)W"H)1" %"B")O"< $M BG$%?"M I%)?G&"*)*? )* $>> &G"1" 1"%)"1 +I "O"*&1 )1 &G$& &G"

    )>>"?$>)&)"1 ^ @$1"< +* B+*?%"11)+*$> )*O"1&)?$&)+*189$*< &G" )*)&)$> BG$%?"1

    %"B"*&>M @%+A?G& @M &G" (=@A"O">1 +I &G" hQ"BA&)O".86

    2382. !"*$&+% K%%+M+ B>$)=1 &G$& $I&"% I+%="% DG)"I JA1&)B" D+%+*$N1 B+*O)B&)+*7 $*+&G"% T8 @)>>)+* I%+=

    &G" U)1@A%1"="*& KBB">"%$&)+* T%+?%$= :UKT; H$1 $ !&$*$7 J%.7

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    10/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 83 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    FGA17 HG$& $##"$%1 &+ @" )*O+>O"< )1 not a one-time and one-shot act

    of corruption@M +*" +% $ I"H ?+O"%*="*& +II)B)$>17 @A& @M $ host of public

    officials HG+1" IA*B&)+*1 $*< )*&"%"N1 &%A1&7 &G" D+A%& =A1& *+H M

    "Q"%B)1" )&1 $%"

    &G" A*B+*1&)&A&)+*$>)&M +I &G" UKT )* &G" 1$=" . F+ 1G)%W I%+= &G)1 %"1#+*1)@)>)&M )1 &+

    B+*1"*& &+ &G" #"%O"%1)+* +I +A% %"#A@>)B$* H$M +I >)I".

    K& )&1 H+%1&7 &G" B+*&)*A$&)+* +I &G" #%"1"*& 1M1&"=17 )I &%A"7 B$* >"$)B $BB+A*&$@)>)&M &G$& +A% D+*1&)&A&)+* G$1 "*1G%)*"> "*G$*B"

    &%$*1#$%"*BM $*< #A@>)B $BB+A*&$@)>)&M. FG$& &G+1" HG+ "%%"< =A1& 1AII"% )1 $

    B+*1"ZA"*B" &G$& "O)>>"?$> $*< A*B+*1&)&A&)+*$> $B&.

    V+% "$1" +I #%"1"*&$&)+*7 &G)1 D+*BA%%)*? $*< U)11"*&)*? (#)*)+* 1G$>>

    #%+B""< A*>+H)*? 1&%AB&A%"X

    A.

    Factual Antecedents

    1.

    The DAP and its origins

    a. The Memoranda from DBM Secretary Florencio

    Abad to the President

    B. Preliminary Matters

    1.

    The Courts expanded power of judicial review

    2.

    Prima facie showing of grave abuse of discretion

    a. The lack of audit findings does not negate grave

    abuse of discretion

    3.

    Transcendental importance of the issues presented by

    the petitions

    4.

    Justiciability and Political Questions

    5.

    The Courts boundary-keeping role in times of political

    upheaval

    C. Substantive Matters

    1.

    The DAP violates the principles of checks and balances

    and the separation of powers that the 1987 Constitution

    integrated in the budgetary process

    a. The principle of separation of powers and checks

    and balances in the budgetary process

    84 FG" 8456 D+*1&)&A&)+* G$1 " +* fKBB+A*&$@)>)&M +I TA@>)B (II)B"%17g7

    1"B&)+* +*" +I HG)BG #%+O))B +II)B" )1 $ #A@>)B &%A1&. TA@>)B +II)B"%1 $*< "=#>+M""1 =A1&7 $& $>> &)="17

    @" $BB+A*&$@>" &+ &G" #"+#>"7 1"%O" &G"= H)&G A&=+1& %"1#+*1)@)>)&M7 )*&"?%)&M7 >+M$>&M7 $*"$1"< $* officialstatement,&G%+A?G &G" UCP H"@1)&"7 "Q#>$)*)*? &G$& &G" $=+A*&1 %">"$1""$1"1 I%+= UKT H"%" =$"?)1>$&+%1g @"B$A1" the DAP had been in

    existence since the latter part of 2011.

    L* &G" B+A%1" +I G"$%)*? &G"1" #"&)&)+*17 &G" %"1#+*+%"*B)+ K@$"$1"1 G$O" %"B"*&>M @""* &+A&"< $1 p@%)@"17N p%"H$%"%$&)+*

    T%+?%$= :UKT;

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    14/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 8E -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    +#"%$&""$1"< T"%1+*$> !"%O)B"1 :T!; K##%+#%)$&)+*1 ^]*%">"$1"< iT!j $##%+#%)$&)+*1 HG)BG H)>> >$#1" $& &G" "*< +I Vs

    23882. Vs 2388 Unreleased Appropriations - ]*%">"$1"< $##%+#%)$&)+*1

    :slow moving projects$*< #%+?%$=1 I+%

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    15/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 89 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    QQQ mQQ QQQ

    22. TUKV :a$%)+A1 +&G"% >+B$>

    #%+`"B&1;

    Y7933 For Augmentation

    The President approved these requests.2E

    !A@1"ZA"*&>M7 !"B%"&$%M K@$< 1"*& &+ &G" T%"1))$*B"1 )* I)1B$> M"$% :FY; 2388

    B+%%"1#+*"&"< +% )?*="*&.

    FG" UCP 1&$&"< &G$& &G" 1$O)*?1 +A& +I &G" 2388 -KK H"%" &+ @" #++>"< I+%

    &G" I+>>+H)*? #A%#+1"1X

    1.1 &+ #%+O) $>>+&="*& B>$11

    $>>+B$&)+* $1 $ %"1A>& +I +*S?+)*? #%)+%)&M #%+`"B&1 $*"&"< +% >+&="*&17 of national government agencies as of June 30, 2012.

    FG" UCP 1&$&"< &G$& &G" 1$O)*?1 +A& +I &G" 2382 -KK B+%%"1#+*>"< #+1)&)+*1 $*< &+ B+=#>"&"< +% $11

    $>>+B$&)+* $1 $ %"1A>& +I +*S?+)*? #%)+%)&M #%+`"B&1 $*> >$#1" $&

    &G" "*< +I &G" M"$%R

    2. KO$)>$@>" @$>$*B"1 I%+= B+=#>"&"< +% )"% @""*

    %">"$1"< &+ 0-K.24

    L* $ May 20, 2013 Memorandum7,3&G" UCP 1&$&"< &G$& )& G$< )"< I+% &G" I+>>+H)*?

    #A%#+1"1X

    9.8 &+ $A?="*& $$11 $>>+B$&)+*

    $1 $ %"1A>& +I +*S?+)*? #%)+%)&M #%+`"B&1 $*< implementation of newactivities :".?.7 )*B%"$1"d)">+&="*&.

    KBB+%M7 all unobligated balances at the end of every quarter,

    @+&G I+% B+*&)*A)*? $*< BA%%"*& $>>+&="*&17 1G$>> @" H)&G"< &+

    IA*< I$1& =+O)*? #%+?%$=1d#%+`"B&1. FG" $>>+&="*&1 &+ @" H)&G$)= &G$& &G"

    UKT )1 unconstitutionalI+% O)+>$&)*? !"B&)+* 297 #$%$?%$#G 9,2$*< !"B&)+*

    24 G&HHH.)["< @$>$*B"1 $*< &G")% /"$>)?*="*& &+ IA*< &G"

    bA$%&"%>M iUKTj.,8 /"1#+*$H 1G$>> @" #$11"< $A&G+%)[)*? $*M &%$*1I"% +I $##%+#%)$&)+*1R G+H"O"%7 &G" T%"1)$H7 @" $A&G+%)["< &+ $A?="*& $*M )&"= )* &G"

    ?"*"%$> $##%+#%)$&)+*1 >$H I+% &G")% %"1#"B&)O" +II)B"1 I%+= 1$O)*?1 )* +&G"% )&"=1 +I &G")% %"1#"B&)O"$##%+#%)$&)+*1.

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    18/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 85 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    247 #$%$?%$#G 87 K%&)B>" aL7,, $1 H">> $1 !"B&)+* 867 K%&)B>" aLL,E +I &G"

    8456 D+*1&)&A&)+*.

    Discussions

    B.

    Preliminary Matters

    FG" BG$>>"*?"1 $?$)*1& &G" UKTN1 B+*1&)&A&)+*$>)&M H"%" I)>"< H)&G &G"

    D+A%& &G%+A?G #"&)&)+*1 I+% certiorari$*< #%+G)@)&)+* A*M )*O+W" &G" D+A%&N1 #+H"% +I `A %"O)"H.

    -)O"* &G"1" B)&"< =+> &G" B+*" Y9 #"&)&)+* %"ZA)%"1. FG" %"=$)*M #%+O)$%)IM &G" D+A%&N1 $##%+$BG"1 )* ?)O)*?

    B$1"1.

    K1 L "Q#>$)*"< )* Imbong7 &G" D+A%& A*O)*? $B&A$> "

    %)?G&1R

    :2;

    &G" traditional justiciable cases $1 A*&d1.

    FG" #%"1"*& #"&)&)+*1 $>>"?" &G$& ?%$O" $@A1" +I 1 H)&G)* &G"

    &G)%< W)*< $@+O"7 i.e., &G" > @" #$)< +A& +I &G" F%"$1A%M "QB"#& )* #A%1A$*B" +I $* $##%+#%)$&)+* =$ +I $>> &G" "Q"BA&)O" $H1 @" I$)&GIA>>M "Q"BA&" 57 238E.

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    19/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 84 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    the Executive)&+ "*1A%" &G$& &G" @+A*"1 +I D+A%& G$1 @""* "Q#%"11>M B)&"M I>"1G"< +A& &G" ="$*)*? +I f`A #+H"%7g *+& +*>M @M

    B+*I)%=)*? &G" ="$*)*? +I &G" &"%= $1 A*)1G"< @M >$H.

    JA #+H"% includes the duty of the courts of justice &+

    1"&&>" actual controversies )*O+>O)*? rights which are legally

    demandable and enforceable7 AND&+ )B17 "=#G$1"1 $*< A*)" $

    completely new power and duty&+ &G" JA$BW +% "QB"11 +I `A%)1M )* %"1#+*1" &+ &G" JA)&)B$> &+ &G" 1+B)"&$> &"< I%+= &G"1" #$1&

    `A %A>)*?1.

    ]*Mg `A1&)B)$@>" B$1" HG)BG

    "?$>

    %)?G&1 =A1& "Q)1&. 0+&$@>M7 even if the requirements under the traditional

    definition of judicial power are applied7 &G"1" %"ZA)1)&"1 $%" B+=#>)"< H)&G

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    20/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 23 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    +*B" ?%$O" $@A1" +I O"M7 a matter is ripe I+% $%"$& +I &G" BG$>>"*?"< $B&)+*7

    &G"* &G" B+*&%+O"%1M B$**+& @A& $>%"$"< >$H +% %A>" )1 1G+H* &+ $##>M *"B"11$%)>M G$1 locus standi

    1)*B" $ B+*1&)&A&)+*$> O)+>$&)+* B+*1&)&A&"1 $* $II%+*& +% )*`A%M &+ &G" $II"B&">7 $ >"11 1&%)*?"*& %"ZA)%"="*& +I locus standi

    +*>M *""" B$1" +I &G)1 &M#" I%+=

    &G" #A%" +% ="%" +#)*)+* &G$& B+A%&1 B$**+& %"*"1 +* hierarchy of courts $*< transcendental

    importance7 I$% I%+= @")*? ?%+A*M %""O"> +I B+A%& &G$& 1G+A>< G$*" &G" B+*&%+O"%1M7 $1 M

    HG"* $ #"&)&)+* )*O+>O"1 $ =$&&"% +I &%$*1B"*< )& @"

    +H"% B+A%&7 @$1"< +* )&1

    B+*1))1G"1 &G" *""< I+% &G" D+A%&N1 "Q"%B)1" +I

    "Q#$*"$%>M 1$&)1IM &G"1" %"ZA)1)&"1 $1 "Q#>$)*">+&="*&1 $*)1G &G" 1"B+*< %"ZA)%"="*& +I

    &%$*1B"*" &G" B+*B"#& +I &%$*1B"*

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    24/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 2E -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    &G" ?+O"%*="*&R $*< (3)&G" >$BW +I $*M +&G"% #$%&M H)&G $ =+%" >)+*1 =+%" A*>"11 G$>&")&M7 &G" hQ"BA&)O" )1 "O"*

    *+H "*?$?"< )* $ f1G$="g B$=#$)?* &+ #%+< #"+#>" &+ #$M &G")% &$Q"1. LI

    &$Q"1 H)>> B+*&)*A" &+ @" I$)&GIA>>M #$) )=#+%&$*B" I+% &G" #"+#>" &+ W*+H G+H &G")% &$Q =+*"M )1

    1#"*& +% =)11#"*&7 $*< &+ @" )*I+%="< $1 H">> &G$& &G"M G$O" &G)1 %)?G&.

    V+% $*+&G"%7 &G" #"&)&)+*"%1N 1"%)+A1 $>>"?$&)+*1 +I B+*1&)&A&)+*$>

    O)+>$&)+* @M &G" hQ"BA&)O" x )* &%$*1I"%%)*? $##%+#%)$&)+*1 >+H$@>" &%$*1I"% +I

    $##%+#%)$&)+*1 A*" aL +I &G" D+*1&)&A&)+* as

    admitted by the respondents themselvesx 1$&)1IM &G" 1"B+*< $&)+*1 $%" B>"$%7 #$&"*& $*< +I A&=+1& ?%$O)&MR &G"M $II"B& &G" O"%M *$&A%"

    +I +A% %"#A@>)B$* 1M1&"= +I ?+O"%*="*&.

    _$1&>M7 ?)O"* &G" )*&%)*1)B *$&A%" +I &G" #"&)&)+*1 $1 &$Q#$M"%1N 1A)&1 :&+

    #%"O"*& H$1&$?" $*< =)1$##>)B$&)+* +I IA*

    "Q"BA&)O" $B&;7 &G"%" B$* %"$>>M @" *+ +&G"% #$%&M H)&G $ =+%" )&M &G$* &G" #"&)&)+*"%17

    1A)*? $1 &$Q#$M"%1 $*< )*O+W)*? $ #A@>)B %)?G&.

    (O"% $*< $@+O" &G"1" $%"< &G" 1&$&A&+%)>MSB%"$&"< #+%W @$%%">

    1M1&"= &+ @" A*B+*1&)&A&)+*$> I+% O)+>$&)*? &G" B+%" "< &G$& &G" >"?)1>$&+%N1 post-enactment participation

    )* &G" $%"$1 +I project identification7 fund release$*< fund realignment

    +% %+>" )* &G" implementation +% enforcement of the GAAs $%" @"M+*.FG" D+A%&

    #"%&)*"*&>M %A>"> &G" I+%"?+)*? %"$1+*17 &G" D+A%& G"%"@M $H HG)BG 1)=)>$%>M

    EY Kilosbayan, Incorporated v. Guingona, Jr.7 -./. 0+. 88,,697 P$M 97 844E7 2,2 !D/K 883.E6 Supra *+&" 83.

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    25/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 29 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    $>>+H >"?)1>$&+%1 &+ H)">< $*M I+%= +I #+1&S"*$B&="*& $A&G+%)&M )* &G"

    )=#>"="*&$&)+* +% "*I+%B"="*& +I &G" @A

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    26/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 2Y -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    was also a practice during the execution stage of a GAA and which was

    simply embodied in the GAA provisionsx &G"* &G"%" )1 "O"%M %"$1+* I+% &G"

    D+A%& &+ 1ZA$%">M %A>" +* &G" B+*1&)&A&)+*$>)&M +I &G" hQ"BA&)O"N1 $B&)+* )*

    >)?G& +I &G" 1"%)+A1*"11 +I &G" $>>"?$&)+*1 +I B+*1&)&A&)+*$> O)+>$&)+*1 )* &G"

    #"&)&)+*1.

    L* I$B&7 &G" *$&A%" $*< $=+A*&1 +I &G" #A@>)B IA*O"< $%" =+%"

    &G$* "*+A?G &+ 1+A*< $>$%= @">>1 &+ &G)1 D+A%& )I H" $%" &+ =$)*&$)* I"$>&M &+

    +A% %+>" $1 &G" ?A$%M +* >"&&"%1 +I %"ZA"1&

    1A@=)&&"< &+ A1 @M &G" !"*$&+%1g 1G+A>< *")&G"% "1B$#" &G" D+A%&N1 $&&"*&)+*

    *+% 1G+A>< &G" D+A%& ?>+11 +O"% )&. V%+= &G" O"%M 1&$%&7 G)1 1&$&"="*& B$1& $much darker cloud +* &G" O$>)"7 G$1 $* "II"B& +* B+*?%"11)+*$> +O"%1)?G&. FG"

    I$B& &G$& )*"?)1>$&+%1 $%" ?)O"* #+1&S"*$B&="*& %+>"1 )* &G")=#>"="*&$&)+* +I &G" @A

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    27/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 26 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    )11A"1 &G$& $%" )*G"%"*&>M susceptible of being decided on grounds

    recognized by law.98

    L* B+*&%$"?)1>$&)O" +% "Q"BA&)O" @%$*BG +I &G" ?+O"%*="*&R )& )1 B+*B"%*"< H)&G )11A"1

    )&M +I $ #$%&)BA>$% ="$1A%".92

    eG"%" &G" )11A"1 1+ #+1"< $%" #+>)&)B$>7 &G" D+A%& *+%=$>>M B$**+& assume

    jurisdiction A*M 1G+H* &G" &"Q&A$> >)=)&1 &+&G" hQ"BA&)O"N1 #+H"% +O"% &G" )=#>"="*&$&)+* +I &G" -KK7 #$%&)BA>$%>M )*

    &G" G$*)*? $*< =$*$?"="*& +I IA*)BMS=$W"%1 &+ 1&)=A>$&" &G"B+A*&%MN1 "B+*+=M $*< )=#%+O" "B+*+=)B ?%+H&G. V%+= &G)1 #"%1#"B&)O"7

    B+*1&)&A&)+*$> #%+O)1)+*1 &+ABG)*? +* "B+*+=)B =$&&"%1 $%" A* &%$*1>$&)+* +I &G"

    hQ"BA&)O"N1 "B+*+=)B `A1&)I)B$&)+* I+% &G" UKT ^ $%" $ >)=)&$&)+*1 $##>)B$@>" &+ &G" means I+% $BG)"O)*?

    &G"=. These legal limitations are precisely at the core of the issues

    presented to us in these challenges to the constitutionality of the DAPs

    creation and implementation; the issues before us are legal ones, not

    economic or political.

    98 Integrated Bar of the Philippines v. Zamora7 ,42 TG)>. Y85 :2333;.92 Taada v. Cuenco7 83, TG)> 83987 83Y5 :8496;.9, !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* +I JA1&)B" TA*+ )*Integrated Bar of the Philippines v. Zamora7 supra *+&" EY.

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    28/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 25 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    V+% &G)1 %"$1+*7 L G$O" @%A1G"< $1)$%?">M "B+*+=)B #%$B&)B$>)&M %"$1+*1.

    5.

    The Courts boundary-keeping rolein times of political upheaval

    K1 $ I)*$> *+&" +* &G" #%+B" $1#"B&17 L @">)"O" &G$& &G" #%"1"*&

    B$1" #%+O))=)&1 1"& @M &G"

    D+*1&)&A&)+* @"&H""* $*< $=+*? &G" I $1 &G" =")=)&1 )* &G"

    "Q"%B)1" +I #+H"% @M "$BG @%$*BG +I ?+O"%*="*&. e" &G"* +@1"%O"< &G$&

    &G"1" B+*1&)&A&)+*$> @+A*)&)B$> "QB)&"="*&7 $*< )& )1 &G" D+A%&N1 %+>" &+ B>$%)IM

    $*< %")*I+%B" &G" #%+#"% $>>+B$&)+* +I #+H"%1 1+ &G$& &G" A"*B".

    e" B>$%)I)"< &G$& $>&G+A?G H" =$M7 )* "II"B&7 *A>>)IM ?+O"%*="*&$> $B&)+*1

    $@G+%%"*& &+ &G" D+*1&)&A&)+*7 H" )*? HG"*

    B$1"1 +I *$&)+*$> )*&"%"1& %"$BG &G" D+A%&7 $*< G$O" A1"< )&1 ?A)"1 &+ M &G" &%$ `A1&)B)$@>" B+*&%+O"%1)"1&G$& >"< &+Angara7 @A& $>1+ &G" "Q)1&"*B" +I ?%$O" $@A1" +I > B$%%M $ >+& +I &%A&G $*> $%" &G" ="$)=1 I+% $A&G+%)&M @A&

    &G" 8456 D+*1&)&A&)+* G$1 &$W"* )& +*" 1&"# IA%&G"%X H" *+H $>1+

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    29/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 24 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    ZA"1&)+*1 &G$& =$M G$O" B+=" H)&G &G" B+*&%+O"%1M. FG)1 "Q#$*1)+*

    *"B"11$%)>M ?)O"1 %)1" &+ $ G+1& +I ZA"1&)+*1X does our constitutional duty

    end with the determination of the presence or absence of grave abuse of

    discretion and the decision on the constitutional status of a challenged

    governmental action? To what extent can we, acting within our judicial

    power and the power of judicial review, clarify the consequences of our

    decisionu

    /"B"*& `A%)1#%A$%)IM &G" $##>)B$&)+* +I &G" >$H $*< +I +A%

    M $%)1" $?$)* @"B$A1" +I &G" B+=#>"Q)&M $*M +A% %A>)*? )*Atong Paglaum v. Comelec99+* &G" %"ZA)%"="*&1

    &+ ZA$>)IM $1 $ #$%&M>)1& A*)1& 1M1&"=. K1 H">>7 H" #%+O))*"1 )* Republic v. CA and Molina9Y+* G+H &+ )*&"%#%"& $*< $##>M

    K%&)B>" ,Y +I &G" V$=)>M D+O" &+ B>$%)IM

    &G" $##>)B$&)+* +I &G" +#"%$&)O" I$B& )&M $*< &G" #+&"*&)$> B+*1"ZA"*B"1 A*+H.

    C.

    Substantive Matters

    1.

    The DAP violates the principles of

    checks and balances and the separation of

    powers that the 1987 Constitution

    integrated in the budgetary process

    a.

    The principles of separation of

    powers and checks andbalances in the budgetary

    process

    FG" %"B"*&Belgica %A>)*? ?$O" &G)1 D+A%& &G" +##+%&A*)&M &+ " +I 1"#$%$&)+* +I #+H"%1 $1 $##>)"< )* &G"

    @A

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    30/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* ,3 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    ?+O"%*="*& #>$M1 )* &G" I+%=A>$&)+*7 "*$B&="*&7 $*< )=#>"="*&$&)+* +I &G"

    *$&)+*$> @A

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    31/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* ,8 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    $##%+#%)$&)+*1 @)>>. This budget contains the appropriations recommended

    by the President for the operation of the government.95

    eG)>" &G" T%"1)$**)*? $*< %"B+=="*" D+*?%"11 )1 1+ >)=)&"" S &G" $A&G+%)&M &+ A>&)=$&">M )BM $*< 1#"*" aLL +I &G"

    D+*1&)&A&)+* 1""W1 &+ "*1A%" &G$& HG)>" D+*?%"11 )1 ?)O"* &G" #+H"% +I

    $##%+#%)$&)+*7 )& =A1& A*

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    32/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* ,2 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    B+*?%"11)+*$> @A

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    33/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* ,, -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    process. CM I$B)>)&$&)*? &G" A1" +I IA*$11)I)"< $1 1$O)*?1 &+ I)*$*B"

    )&"=1 +&G"% &G$* I+% HG)BG &G"M G$O" @""* $##%+#%)$&"

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    34/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* ,E -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    IA*$H. _)W"H)1"7

    $##%+#%)$&"< IA*$&)O" @%$*BG +I ?+O"%*="*&X HG$& )&"=d1 +I "Q#"*

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    35/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* ,9 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    !)?*)I)B$*&>M7 &G)1 %"$)B$&)+* +I

    !"B&)+* 29:9; $*< &G" &%"$&="*& +I )&1 "QB"#&)+* )1 *+& $& $>> *"H &+ &G" D+A%&

    $1 H" G$O" #%"O)+A1>M %A>"< +* &G)1 #+)*& )*Nazareth v. Villar.Y4 e" &G"*

    1$)< 1&)>> @" &G$& &G" @A

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    36/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* ,Y -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    L* 1"O"%$> B$1"17 &G" D+A%& %A>"< &G$& $B&A$> 1$O)*?1 =A1& "Q)1& @"I+%"

    &G" #+H"% &+ $A?="*&7 A*>+H"< &G" T%"1)M

    B+>>)$&)+* +I !"B&)+* 8Y:9;7

    K%&)B>" aLLL +I &G" 846, D+*1&)&A&)+* :#%"1"*&>M !"B&)+* 29:9;7 K%&)B>" aL +I

    &G" 8456 D+*1&)&A&)+*;.

    L*Demetria7 &G" D+A%& *+&"< &G$& &G" >""H$M ?%$*&"< &+ #A@>)B +II)B"%1

    )* A1)*? IA*>+&&"< I+% $##%+#%)$&)+*1 &+ $A?="*& +&G"% )&"=1 )* &G" -KK)1 >)=)&"< 1)*B" !"B&)+* 8Y:9;7 K%&)B>" aLLL +I &G" 846, D+*1&)&A&)+*

    :>)W"H)1" $ @+)*? )* Sanchez v. Commission of Audit762IA%&G"%

    "=#G$1)[)*? &G$& f[a]ctual savings )1 $ sine qua non &+ $ O$>)< &%$*1I"% +I

    IA*)M B$%%)"< +A&. First, &G"%" =A1& @" 1$O)*?1 )* &G"

    #%+?%$=="< $##%+#%)$&)+* +I &G" &%$*1I"%%)*? $?"*BM. Second,&G"%" =A1& @"

    $* "Q)1&)*? )&"=7 #%+`"B& +% $B&)O)&M H)&G $* $##%+#%)$&)+* )* &G" %"B")O)*?

    $?"*BM &+ HG)BG &G" 1$O)*?1 H)>> @" &%$*1I"%%". 222 :8456;.68 L. E25 :2335;.6, L

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    37/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* ,6 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    0")&G"% B$* 1$O)*?1 @" A1"< &+ IA*< #%+?%$=1 $*< #%+`"B&1 *+&

    $##%+#%)$&"< I+% @M D+*?%"11.

    L* Sanchez v. Commission on Audit76EH" *+&"< &G$& &G" )>>"?$>)&M +I&G" &%$*1I"% +I IA* -+O"%*="*&

    :DILG; &+ &G" (II)B" +I &G" T%"1)M I%+= &G" >$BW +I $B&A$>

    1$O)*?17 @A& I%+= &G" >$BW +I $* $##%+#%)$&)+* &G$& $A&G+%)["1 &G" A1" +I

    IA*+?MN1 (DOSTs; 1$O)*?1 &+ IA*< )&1 "=#>+M""1N @"*"I)&1 A*+?M T"%1+**"> )* -+O"%*="*&. e" 1$)< &G$& $>&G+A?G &G" 1+A%B" +I

    IA*7 )&1 A1" &+ IA*< @"*"I)&1 I+% HG)BG

    *+ $##%+#%)$&)+* G$< @""* #%+O)"$1"$&"< !"B&)+*1 24 $*< 29:9;7 K%&)B>" 24 +I &G" 8456 D+*1&)&A&)+*.

    FGA17 1$O)*?1 B$**+& @" A1"< &+ $A?="*& *+*S"Q)1&"*& )&"=1 )* &G"

    -KK. eG"%" &G"%" $%" *+ $##%+#%)$&)+*1 I+% B$#)&$> +A&>$M )* $ 1#"B)I)B

    $?"*BM +% #%+?%$=7 I+% "Q$=#>"7 1$O)*?1 B$**+& @" A1"< &+ @AM B$#)&$>

    "ZA)#="*& I+% &G$& #%+?%$=. 0")&G"% B$* 1$O)*?1 @" A1"< &+ IA*< &G" G)%)*?+I #"%1+**">7 HG"%" $ #%+?%$=N1 $##%+#%)$&)+* $B" )* &G" -KK1I+% Vs1 23837 2388 $*< 2382. FG"1" B+*?%"11)+*$> >)=)&$&)+*1 $%" $1

    I+>>+H1X

    i.

    definition of savings

    FG" -KK1 +I 23837 2388 $*< 2382 $>> G$O" )M #%+O)

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    38/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* ,5 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    Meaning of Savings xxx. Savings %"I"% &+ #+%&)+*1 +% @$>$*B"1 +I $*M

    #%+?%$=="< $##%+#%)$&)+* )* &G)1 KB& I%"" I%+= $*M +@>)?$&)+* +%"*BA=@%$*B" HG)BG $%"X

    :); 1&)>> $O$)>$@>" $I&"% &G" B+=#>"&)+* +% I)*$> &)*? )* )=#%+O"< 1M1&"=1 $*< "II)B)"*B)"1 $*< &GA17

    "*$@>"< $?"*B)"1 &+ =""& $*< "11"%

    B+1&.

    Augmentation )=#>)"1 &G" "Q)1&"*B" )* &G)1 KB& +I $ #%+?%$=7$B&)O)&M7 +% #%+`"B& H)&G $* $##%+#%)$&)+*7 HG)BG A#+*

    )=#>"="*&$&)+* +% 1A@1"ZA"*& "O$>A$&)+* +I *""> $ *+*S"Q)1&"*& #%+?%$=7$B&)O)&M7 +% #%+`"B&7 @" IA*M >)=)& &G" hQ"BA&)O"N1 "Q"%B)1" +I &G"

    #+H"% &+ $A?="*&7 $1 &G"M 1&%)B&>M $@>" @$>$*B"; I%+=

    &G)1 #%+?%$=="< $##%+#%)$&)+*.

    ,.

    FG$& &G" $O$)>$@>" @$>$*B" @" "="*&$&)+* +I ="$1A%"1 &G$& %"1A>&"< )*

    )=#%+O"< 1M1&"=1 $*< "II)B)"*B)"17 "*$@>)*? $?"*B)"1 &+

    =""& $*<

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    39/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* ,4 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    E.

    FG$& &G" $O$)>$@>" @$>$*B" @" A*+@>)?$&"< +% A*"*BA=@"%"M $M1 1G$>> @" $O$)>$@>" I+% %">"$1" $*< +@>)?$&)+* I+% $

    #"%)+< "Q&"*>+H"< &+ @" $>>+&&")?$&"< $*< %">"$1"< A*&)> Vs 2388R

    IA* Vs 2382R $*< IA* Vs 238,.

    FG" "Q&"*"&"M7 &G" #%+O)1)+*1 "II"B&)O">M ?%$*&"< &G" hQ"BA&)O" I>"Q)@)>)&M )*

    )=#>"="*&)*? &G" -KK7 $*< $>1+ "*1A%"< &G$& #A@>)B IA*> @" 1#"*& $1

    $##%+#%)$&" +A&>$M1 A*"$1"1 $*< +@>)?$&)+*1 1G$>> @" 1A@=)&&"< &+ &G" !"*$&" D+==)&&"" +* V)*$*B"$*< &G" \+A1" D+==)&&"" +* K##%+#%)$&)+*1.

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    40/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* E3 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    iii.

    general prohibition

    against impoundment

    of releases

    _$1&>M7 )* $1+ #%+G)@)&"< &G" "11 )* $BB+%"1 $* -+O"%*="*& CA

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    41/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* E8 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    >$H7 &G" T%"1)$H.

    FG" -KK7 G+H"O"%7 )* B+*1)" B)%BA=1&$*B"1&G$& =)?G& %"*"="*&$&)+* +I $>> +I )&1 $##%+#%)$&)+*1

    )=#%$B&)B$@>" +% )=#+11)@>"7 $A&G+%)["< &G" T%"1) @A

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    42/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* E2 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    H)&G)* &G" -KKN1 Vs. (&G"%H)1"7 &G"M 1G$>> %"O"%& @$BW &+ &G" -"*"%$> VA*< @" A*$O$)>$@>" I+% "Q#"*"?)1>$&)O" "*$B&="*&.52

    e.

    the sources of DAP fundscannot qualify as savings

    i.

    unobligated allotments

    K1 L "$%>)"% "=#G$1)["+&&"< I+% #$%&)BA>$% $##%+#%)$&)+*1

    =$M +*>M @" A1"< &+ $A?="*& +&G"% )&"=1 )* &G" -KK HG"* &G"%" $%" $B&A$>

    1$O)*?1. FG" UKT7 @M #++>)*? IA*$&"< &G)1 B%)&)B$> %"ZA)%"="*& $1 &G" 1+A%B"1 +I UKT

    IA*)IM $1 1$O)*?1.

    L* #++>)*? &+?"&G"% fA*+@>)?$&"< $>>+&="*&1g5,&+ $A?="*& +&G"% )&"=1

    )* &G" -KK7 &G" UKT A1"< IA*%"$>+&&"< @A& G$< M"&

    &+ @" +@>)?$&"< +% 1#"*& I+% )&1 )*&"*>M $?%"" H)&G J. D$%#)+

    &G$& &G"1" IA*> $1 )* &G" (A&>$M1 :D(;R

    ,.8.2 P$)*&"*$*B" $*< (&G"% (#"%$&)*? hQ#"*1"1 :P((h; %">$&"< &+ &G"

    )=#>"="*&$&)+* +I #%+?%$=1 $*< #%+`"B&17 $1 H">> $1 B$#)&$>)["< P((hi.j

    FG)1 H)&G )1 B+*&%$%M &+ &G" )*&"*& $*< >$*?A$?" +I !"B&)+* Y8 +I

    &G" 2388 -KK7 $*< !"B&)+* Y9 5E HG)BG "Q&"*)?$&"< $>>+&="*& %"I"%1 &+ &G" #+%&)+* +I %">"$1"< $##%+#%)$&)+*1 HG)BG G$1 *+& @""*

    "Q#"*"$1"1 $*< +@>)?$&)+*1 1G$>> @"

    1A@=)&&"< &+ &G" !"*$&" D+==)&&"" +* V)*$*B" $*< &G" \+A1" D+==)&&"" +*

    K##%+#%)$&)+*17 ")&G"% )* #%)*&"< I+%= +% @M H$M +I ">"B&%+*)B

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    43/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* E, -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    &+?"&G"%7 #%+O)M @" B+*1) &G" "*< +I Vs 2382. VA*"&">M > @" B+*1)M)*? &G"1" B+*B"#&1 &+ &G" P((h $*< D( >"$$#1" =+*&G>M7 $*< &GA1 $*M IA*>+&&"< I+% &G" =+*&G >"I& A*A1"< ZA$>)I)"1 $1 1$O)*?17 H)&G &H+ "QB"#&)+*1X

    :8; P((h HG)BG under the GAA can be declared as savings only in the

    last quarter+I &G" Vs $*< :2; expenditures for Business-type activities7

    HG)BG A*)?*""&">M $%" D( $1 1$O)*?1 )* &G" =)+*? @"I+%" &G" "*< +I &G" &H+SM"$% #"%)+< HG"* 1ABG IA*> @" +@>)?$&"" P((h I+% Vs 2382 I%+= J$*A$%M &+ JA*" 2382

    =$M @" B+*1))IM

    $1 1ABG.

    L* &G)1 >)?G&7 0CD 0+. 9E8 I+1&"%"< $ B+*1&)&A&)+*$> )>>"?$>)&MX &G"

    #%"=$&A%" H)&G +I A*+@>)?$&"< $>>+&="*&1 #"%&$)*)*? &+ B$#)&$> +A&>$M1

    $*< P((h $1 +I JA*" ,37 2382 A* "$%>M

    $=+A*&"< &+ $ #%"1) +A&>$M1 A*"$1"1 $*< +@>)?$&)+*1 1G$>> @" 1A@=)&&"< &+ &G"!"*$&" D+==)&&"" +* V)*$*B" $*< &G" \+A1" D+==)&&"" +* K##%+#%)$&)+*1.

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    44/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* EE -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    +O"%%)" aL +I &G"

    D+*1&)&A&)+*.5Y

    i.1 final discontinuance or

    abandonment

    L >)W"H)1" $?%"" H)&G J. D$%#)+N1 BG$%$B&"%)[$&)+* +I &G" I)*$>

    >A1&%$&)+* +I &G"

    )=#+11)@)>)&M +% *+*SI"$1)@)>)&M +I $ #%+`"B& &G$& `A1&)I)"< )&1 )?*="*&d/">+B$&)+* +I D$#)&$> (A&>$M1. FG" $=+A*&

    $##%+#%)$&"< )* &G)1 KB& I+% $BZA)1)&)+*7 B+*1&%AB&)+*7 %"#>$B"="*&7%"G$@)>)&$&)+* $*< B+=#>"&)+* +I O$%)+A1 D$#)&$> (A&>$M1 =$M @"%"$>)?*")?*="*&d%">+B$&)+* +I D$#)&$>

    (A&>$M1 1G$>> @" $&)O" >M 1G+H &G$& &G"

    %"$>>+B$&)+* +I A*+@>)?$&"< $>>+&="*&1 #"%&$)*)*? &+ B$#)&$> +A&>$M1 H$1 =$"?)1>$&)O" " aL +I &G" 8456 D+*1&)&A&)+* %"$> #$11"< @M &G" D+*?%"11 1G$>>7 @"I+%" )& @"B+="1 $ >$H7 @" #%"1"*&"< &+ &G"

    T%"1)> 1)?* )&R +&G"%H)1"7 G" 1G$>> O"&+ )& $* $*< #%+B""< &+ %"B+*1) &G" P"=@"%1 +I 1ABG \+A1" 1G$>> $?%"" &+ #$11 &G"

    @)>>7 )& 1G$>> @" 1"*&7 &+?"&G"% H)&G &G" +@`"B&)+*17 &+ &G" +&G"% \+A1" @M HG)BG )& 1G$>>>)W"H)1" @" %"B+*1)> @"> B+==A*)B$&" G)1 O"&+ +I $*M @)>>&+ &G" \+A1" HG"%" )& +%)?)*$&"< H)&G)* &G)%&M > G$O" &G" #+H"% &+ O"&+ $*M #$%&)BA>$% )&"= +% )&"=1 )* $*

    $##%+#%)$&)+*7 %"O"*A"7 +% &$%)II @)>>7 @A& &G" O"&+ 1G$>> *+& $II"B& &G" )&"= +% )&"=1 &+HG)BG G"

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    45/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* E9 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    A*+@>)?$&"< $>>+&="*&1 $*< A*%">"$1"< $##%+#%)$&)+*1 I+% 1>+H =+O)*?

    #%+`"B&1 &+ @" =)1#>$B"

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    46/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* EY -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    L* +&G"% H+% #%+?%$=. (*B" $ #%+?%$= )1 I)*$>>M +&&"< IA*"$1"< $##%+#%)$&)+*155I+%

    1>+HS=+O)*? #%+`"B&1.

    FG" hQ"BA&)O" M )"% "Q#>$)*"%"$$*B"1 +I #%+?%$=="< $A&G+%)[$&)+*1 d $##%+#%)$&)+*1

    #A%1A$*& &+ >$H :".?. -"*"%$> K##%+#%)$&)+*1 KB&; +% +&G"% >"?)1>$&)O" "*$B&="*&7 1&)>> $O$)>$@>" I+% %">"$1".K**"Q K7 JA*" 297 2382 P"=+%$*

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    47/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* E6 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    G$< @""* )=#+A*"$% #%+G)@)&)+* $?$)*1& )& )* &G"

    -KK.

    g. Qualifications to the

    Presidents flexibility inbudget execution

    FG"ponencia7 )* BG$%$B&"%)[)*? &G" hQ"BA&)O"N1 $B&)+*1 )* I+%=A>$&)*?

    &G" UKT7 #+)*&"< +A& &G$& :1; &G" UKT )1 H)&G)* &G" T%"1)$&" $*< )=#>"="*&R $*< :2; &G" T%"1)"Q)@)>)&M )* @A

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    48/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* E5 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    :#%+`"B&d#%+?%$=d$B&)O)&M; &+ $*+&G"% HG"%" @+&G #A%#+1"1 $%" B+O"%"< @M &G"

    1$=" )&"= +I "Q#"*

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    49/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* E4 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    I+% "B+*+=)B B+*B>A1)+*1. e" $%"7 $I&"% $>>7 $ B+A%& +I >$H @+A*< &+ =$W"

    )&1 "?$> B+*1) +A&B+="17 )*B>AM +@1"%O"< &G$& &G" UKT IA* +A&>$M I+% &G" D(KN1 fLF

    L*I%$1&%AB&A%" T%+?%$= $*< G)%)*? +I $)&)?$&)+* "Q#"%&1gR 43 :)));

    B$#)&$> +A&>$M I+% &G" TG)>)##)*" K)% V+%B"N1 f(*SC$1" \+A1)*? V$B)>)&)"1

    $*< D+==A*)B$&)+*1 hZA)#="*&gR 48 $*< :)O; B$#)&$> +A&>$M I+% &G"

    U"#$%&="*& +I V)*$*B"N1 fLF L*I%$1&%AB&A%" P$)*&"*$*B" T%+`"B&.g

    V+% )*1&$*B"7 &G" UKT I$B)>)&$&"< IA*

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    50/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 93 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    $)&)?$&)+* "Q#"%&17g 42 B$#)&$> +A&>$M I+% &G" U"#$%&="*& +I

    V)*$*B"N1 fLF L*I%$1&%AB&A%" P$)*&"*$*B" T%+`"B&g4, $*< B$#)&$> +A&>$M I+%

    &G" TG)>)##)*" K)% V+%B"N1 f(*SC$1" \+A1)*? V$B)>)&)"1 $*< D+==A*)B$&)+*

    hZA)#="*&.g4E0+*" +I &G" $##%+#%)$&)+*1 HG)BG IA*< &G"1" #%+`"B&1 G$< $*

    )&"= I+% B$#)&$> +A&>$M7 $*< M"&7 &G" UKT )*&%+ $##%+#%)$&)+*7

    &G" &%$*1I"% +I IA* #%+G)@)&)+* A*" aL +I &G" 8456 D+*1&)&A&)+*.

    V+% "=#G$1)17 I+% &G" #+H"% +I $A?="*&$&)+* &+ @" O$>)M "Q"%B)1"$HIA> %">"$1" +I &G" ]*#%+?%$=="< VA*< )* &G" 2388

    $*< 2382 -KK1. K1 $* $1)"?)1>$&)O" G)1&+%M +I &G"

    #%+O)1)+* >)=)&)*? &G" %">"$1" +I &G" ]*#%+?%$=="< VA*< +*>M HG"*

    +%)?)*$> %"O"*A" &$%?"&1 G$O" @""* "QB""A1)+*.

    FG" ]*#%+?%$=="< VA*< )* @+&G &G" 2388 $*< &G" 2382 -KK1

    %"ZA)%"1 $1 $ B+* %"O"*A" &$%?"&1 I+% &G$& M"$%. FG)1

    %"ZA)%"="*& G$< @""* H+%M &G" 1$=" #G%$1"+>+?M )* !#"B)$>

    T%+O)1)+* 0+. 8 )* &G" 2388 -KK $*< )* !#"B)$> T%+O)1)+* 0+. 8 )* &G" 2382

    -KKX

    8. /">"$1" +I VA*" aLL +I &G" D+*1&)&A&)+*7 QQQ

    42 FG" UKT7 )* +% K"B&%+*)B )##)*" K)%I+%B"N1 f(*SC$1" \+A1)*? V$B)>)&)"1 $*< D+==A*)B$&)+*

    hZA)#="*&7g &G" UKT $A?="*&"< 1"O"%$> $##%+#%)$&)+*1 +I &G" TG)>)##)*" K)%I+%B" H)&G B$#)&$> +A&>$M&+&$>)*? &+ T24.5 =)>>)+*. 0+*" +I &G"1" $##%+#%)$&)+*1 G$< $* )&"= I+% D(.

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    51/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 98 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    C+&G !#"B)$> T%+O)1)+*1 )* &G" 2388 $*< 2382 -KK1 B+*&$)*7 $>1+ )*

    &G" 1$=" >$*?A$?"7 $ #%+O)1+ $A&G+%)[)*? &G" A1" +I B+>>"B&)+*1 $%)1)*? I%+=

    1+A%B"1 *+& B+*1)>+H1

    &G" A1" +I 1+A%B"1 *+& B+*1) %"O"*A" =$M @" A1"< &+ B+O"% $##%+#%)$&)+*1 )* &G" ]*#%+?%$==" #%+O)1)+* %"ZA)%)*? &G$& %"O"*A"

    B+>>"B&)+*1 I)%1& "QB""< &G" +%)?)*$> %"O"*A" &$%?"&1. L* &G" )*&"%#%"&$&)+* +I

    1&$&A&"17 &G$& HG)BG )=#>"="*&1 &G" "*&)%" 1&$&A&" 1G+A>< @" $##>)"< %"*.49

    0")&G"% 1G+A>< $ #%+O)1+ @" ?)O"* $* )*&"%#%"&$&)+* &G$& %"*

    #G%$1" )& ZA$>)I)"1 "*&)%">M )*A&)>". LI H" $%" &+ I+>>+H JA1&)B" U"> D$1&)>>+N1$%?A="*& &G$& !#"B)$> T%+O)1)+* 0+. 8 $>>+H1 &G" A1" +I B+>>"B&)+*1 $%)1)*?

    I%+= 1+A%B"1 *+& B+*1)"$1" +I ]*#%+?%$=="< VA*< H$1 I)%1& B+* #%+O)1)+* 1+ &G$&

    &G" %">"$1" +I IA*> @"=$>"B&)+*1 I+% &G" "*&)%" M"$% "QB""< &G"

    +%)?)*$> %"O"*A" &$%?"&1. K>>+H =" &+ "=#G$1)["7 G+H"O"%7 &G$& reference

    to revenue collections for the entire year under this special provision

    pertain only to regular income sources or those covered by the same

    set of assumptions used in setting the computation of revenue targets

    for the year as reflected in the BESF.It should not, therefore, include

    new sources of income not considered nor identified in the originalrevenue projections. 0")&G"% 1G+A>< )& B+O"% 1+A%B"1 +I )*B+=" *+&

    49 FG)1 #%)*B)#>" )1 "Q#%"11"< )* &G" =$Q)= Ut magis valeat quam pereat7 &G$& )17 H" BG++1" &G"

    )*&"%#%"&$&)+* HG)BG ?)O"1 "II"B& &+ &G" HG+>" +I &G" 1&$&A&" ^ )&1 "O"%M H+%< . Inding v. Sandiganbayan7

    -./. 0+. 8E,3E67 8E JA>M 233E7 E,E !D/K ,557 E3,7 $1 B)&"< )* Philippine Health Care Providers v. CIR7-./. 0+. 8Y6,,37 !"#&"=@"% 857 2334.

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    52/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 92 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    B+*&"=#>$&"< A* $11A=#&)+*1 A1"< )* 1"&&)*? &G" %"O"*A"

    &$%?"&1.4Y

    FGA17 $1 )& H$1 I)%1& )*&"*

    %"O"*A" &$%?"&1 G$< @""* ="&7 $*< 1+A%B"1 *+& B+*1)A %"O"*A" &$%?"&1 G$< @""* "QB"" %"O"*A" &$%?"&1

    =$M @" A1"< )1 HG"* &G" +%)?)*$> %"O"*A" &$%?"&1 G$< @""* "QB""A %"O"*A" &$%?"&1 &+ >"B&)+*1 G$>+H &G" A1" +I

    1+A%B"1 +I IA*$&&"% G$< *+& @""* ="&7 &G"* )& B+A>< G$O" 1&$&"< )& )* $ >$*?A$?" B>"$%>M

    #+)*&)*? &+H$%)B +I &G"TG)>)##)*"1 I%+= J$*A$%M +*" &+ U"B"=@"% &G)%&MS+*"7 &H+ &G+A1$*< *)*"7

    "QB"#& HG"%" +&G"%H)1" 1#"B)I)B$>>M #%+O) ="=@"%1 +I &G" \+A1"

    +I /"#%"1"*&$&)O"1 &+ +O"%%)"="*&$&)+* +I !#"B)$> T%+O)1)+* 0+. 8 )* &G" 2334 -KK. FG$& &G)1

    $&&"=#& G$< *+& 1ABB"""="*&$&)+* +I &G" !#"B)$>

    T%+O)1)+* 0+. 8 )* &G" 2334 B+*&)*A"< $1 &G" hQ"BA&)O" B+*1&%A"< )& &+ @"="$*& &G$& &G" >$&&"%N1 )*&"%#%"&$&)+* +I &G)1 !#"B)$> T%+O)1)+* H$1 &G" &%A"

    )*&"%#%"&$&)+* +I D+*?%"11. FG)1 )*&"%#%"&$&)+* H$1 B$%%)"< )*&+ &G" >$*?A$?"

    +I !#"B)$> T%+O)1)+* 0+. 8 HG"* )& H$1 %"S"*$B&"< )* &G" 1A@1"ZA"*& M"$%17

    )*B>A )* &G)1 B$1".

    4. The operative fact doctrine:

    concept, limits, and application to the

    DAPs unconstitutionality.

    4Y T%"1) -$["&&" a+>A=" 839 0+. 87 #. 2YE7 available

    at G&HHH.> 0+. 988Y7 V+A%&""*&G D+*?%"117 available at G&HHH.)=2.#

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    53/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 9, -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    L ?"*"%$>>M $?%"" H)&G J. C"%1$=)*N1 B+*B>A1)+* +* &G" +#"%$&)O" I$B&

    +H I+% &G" D+A%&N1

    B+*1))["< ="$*)*?.

    F+ $##%"B)$&" &G" B)%BA=1&$*B"1 +% 1)&A$&)+*1 HG"* &G" )"$%%">$&)+*17 )*. bA"1&)+*1 +I %)?G&1 B>$)="< &+ G$O" @"B+=" O"1&")?G& +I &G" *$&A%" @+&G +I &G" 1&$&A&" $*< +I )&1

    #%"O)+A1 $##>)B$&)+*7 >S)*B>A1)O" 1&$&"="*&

    +I $ #%)*B)#>" +I $@1+>A&" %"&%+$B&)O" )*O$>))1G"< %A>"

    :W*+H* $1 &G" void ab initiodoctrine; &G$& $* fA*B+*1&)&A&)+*$> $B& )1 *+& $>$HR )& B+*I"%1 *+ %)?G&1R )& )=#+1"1 *+ B+*&"=#>$&)+*7 $1 )*+#"%$&)O" $1 &G+A?G )& G$ 1M1&"= B$=" )* &G" 84931

    HG"*7 )* 1"O"%$> B$1"17838&G" D+A%& B+*1)$%$&)+*

    +I A*B+*1&)&A&)+*$>)&M +I &G" P+%$&+%)A= >$H1 +* B+*&%$B&1 $*< +@>)?$&)+*1.45 ,35 ]! ,687 ,85S,847 Y3 !. D&. ,86.44 FG" O+)< ab initio7 California Coastal Commission: Retroactivity of a Judicial Ruling of

    Unconstitutionality7 8E UAW" h*O&>. _. c T+>oM V. 2E97 29Y.838 !"" &G" I+>>+H)*? B$1"1 +IMontilla v.Pacific Commercial, 45 TG)>.7 8,, :849Y; $*. 6,5 :849Y;.

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    54/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 9E -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    U"1#)&" &G" )*O$>)"< &G$& &G"

    )*O$>)$)=1 I+% A*#$)< 1$>$%)"1 1G+A>< *+& #%"`A+M"" HG+ G$$)= H)&G &G" >"< &G" %A**)*? +I &G" #%"1B%)#&)O" #"%)+

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    55/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 99 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    L* &G" >$*?A$?" +I $* K="%)B$* !A#%"=" D+A%& "Q)1&"*B" +I $ 1&$&A&"7 #%)+% &+ 1ABG $ )&Mj7 )1 $* +#"%$&)O" I$B& $*< =$M G$O" B+*1"ZA"*B"1

    HG)BG B$**+& `A1&>M @" )?*+%"$%$&)+*. FG" "II"B& +I &G" 1A@1"ZA"*& %A>)*? $1 &+)*O$>)$&)+*17 )*.g839 :"=#G$1"1 1A##>)"$)*""7 $1 I+>>+H1X

    FG" %A>"7 +*>M

    $##>)"1 $1 $ =$&&"% +I "ZA)&M $*< I$)% #>$M. L& *A>>)I)"1 &G" "II"B&1 +I $*

    A*B+*1&)&A&)+*$> >$H @M %"B+?*)[)*? &G$& &G" "Q)1&"*B" +I $ 1&$&A&" #%)+% &+$ )&M )1 $* +#"%$&)O" I$B& $*< may have

    consequences which cannot always be ignored.FG" #$1& B$**+& $>H$M1

    @" "%$1"< @M $ *"H `A 1+ %A>"< )* &G)1 1$=" B$1"7 the operative fact doctrinedoes not

    always apply $*< )1 *+& $ *"B"11$%M B+*1"ZA"*B" +I "O"%M >)I)B$&)+* +I &G" "II"B&1 +I HG$& A1"< &+ @" $ O$>)< >$H H+A>< %"1A>& )*

    inequity$*< injustice. Where no such resulting effects would ensue, the

    general rule that an unconstitutional law is totally ineffective should

    apply.

    KM7 &G" 1&%)B&"1& W)*< +I 1B%A&)*M 1G+A>< @" $BB+%$)= &G" @"*"I)& +I &G" +#"%$&)O" I$B& )$*B" I%+= $* "Q#%"11 #%+O)1)+* +I &G" D+*1&)&A&)+* $*< 1G+A>$HN1*A>>)I)B$&)+* &+ %"B+?*)[" &G$& #%)+% &+ )&1 *A>>)I)B$&)+*7 )& H$1 $ >"?$> %"$>)&M

    &G$& ?+O"%*"< #$1& $B&1 +% +=)11)+*1. feG$&"O"% H$1 $&)O" +% &G" "Q"BA&)O" $B& H$1 )* +#"%$&)+* 1G+A>< @" M %"B+?*)[")B$&)+* +I &G" *"H

    >$H. The Court never looked far back enough to address the cause of

    the invalidity, for which reason we find nothing in our jurisprudence

    that extended the operative fact doctrine to validate the invalidated law

    itself or to absolve its proponents.

    b. Application

    -)O"* &G" `A%)1#%A1 HG+ A*)B +II)B)$>1 %"1#+*1)@>" I+%

    &G" "1&$@>)1G="*& $*< )=#>"="*&$&)+* +I &G" UKT.

    e)&G %"1#"B& &+ &G" #%+?%$=17 H+%W1 $*< #%+`"B&17 I fully agree with

    J. Bersamin &G$& &G" DAP-funded programs, works and projects B$* *+

    >+*?"% @" A*+*" $1

    &G"M H"%" A*)

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    57/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 96 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    FG" +I 0CD 0+. 9E8 $*< HG+7 $1 $A&G+%7

    B$**+& @" 1$)< &+ G$O" %">)"< +* )& )* &G" B+A%1" +I )&1 +#"%$&)+*. !)*B" G"

    A1)+* 1G+A>< $##>M &+ $>> +&G"%1 HG+1" +*>M >)*W &+ &G" UKT

    )1 $1 )&1 $A&G+%17 )=#>"="*&+%1 +% #%+#+*"*&1. LI &G"1" #$%&)"17 I+% &G")% +H*

    %"$1+*17 H+A>< B>$)= &G" @"*"I)& +I &G" M 1G+H &G")% ?++< I$)&G %">)$*B"R ?++IS>"O)&$&" I%+= $ >$H +% ="$1A%" &G$& G$1

    I$>>"* < $##>M ^ &G" UKT )1 $ O+)< ="$1A%" HG)BG )1

    >.

    FG" ?++< I$)&G A*< @" distinguished from the

    good faith considered from the perspective of liability. L& H)>> @" %"B$>>"" A*$H +* #A@>)B +II)B"%1 &G$& #A@>)B $BB+A*&$@)>)&M #+&"*&)$>>M )=#+1"1 a

    three-fold liability criminal, civil and administrative against a public

    officer. K %A>)*? +I &G)1 W)*< B$* +*>M B+=" I%+= $ &%)@A*$> H)&G )$@)>)&M $*< HG"%" &G" ?++< +% @$ +%

    $)*? $*< H" B$**+& $&)*? G)1 < +&G"%H)1" "*`+M )* $* $11"11="*& +I G)1

    #"%I+%=$*B" +I "

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    59/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* 94 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    !"B%"&$%M K@$1+ &%A"7 s+A% \+*+%.

    JA1&)B" C%)+*X K*< )* I$B&7 G+H =$*M M"$%1 H"%" M+A )* D+*?%"11u

    !"B%"&$%M K@$1+ )*O+>O"< )* @A

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    60/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* Y3 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    FG" "QBG$*?"7 &+ =M =)*$)= @M &G" %"1#+* )=#>)B$&)+*1 +I HG$& G" H$1 $HM"% $*< H)&G $& >"$1& 82 M"$%1 +I "Q#"%)"*B" @"G)*< G)= $1 $

    B+*?%"11=$* HG+ H$1 "O"* &G" DG$)%=$* +I &G" \+A1" K##%+#%)$&)+*1

    D+==)&&""7 )& )1 )*B+*B")O$@>" &G$& G" )&M +%

    A*B+*1&)&A&)+*$>)&M &G$& &$)*&"< G)1 @%$)*BG)>"

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    61/62

    !"#$%$&" (#)*)+* Y8 -./. 0+1. 2342567 2348,97 et al.

    L* &G"1" >)?G&17 H" 1G+A>< &$W" &G" A&=+1& B$%" )* HG$& H" " +I >$H7

    1"#$%$&)+* +I #+H"%17 $*< BG"BW1 $*< @$>$*B"1 =$M G$O" @""* B+=#%+=)1"# &G" %"#A&$&)+* +I

    &G)1 D+A%& +% &G" 1&$@)>)&M +I +A% B+A*&%M.

    JA1&)B" C"%1$=)*X

    0+7 $##%+#%)$&)+*1 @"I+%" M+A $A?="*&"< @"B$A1" &G)1 )1 $ B%+11 @+%"$% $1 I$% $1 L $= B+*B"%*" B+*1&%)B&"< @M &G)1 #%+O)1)+*u

    !"B%"&$%M K@$ $1 )* &G" \+A1" +I /"#%"1"*&$&)O"1R &G$&N1 G+H H" 1$Hy

    :)*&"%%A#&"

  • 8/11/2019 Dap Ruling

    62/62

    Separate Opinion

    6 G.R. Nos. 209287 209135

    et al.

    To be very clear about our positions we can only apply the operative

    fact doctrine to the programs, projects and works that can no longer he

    undone and where the beneficiaries relied in good faith on the validity

    of

    theDAP

    The authors, proponents and implementors

    ofDAP

    are

    not

    among

    those who can seek coverage under the doctrine; their

    link

    to the DAP was

    merely to establish and implement the terms that we now find

    unconstitutional.

    The matter of their good faith in the performance

    of

    duty or its

    absence) and their liability therefor,

    i

    any, can be made onlv by the proper

    tribunals, not by this Court in the present case.

    Based on these premises, I concur that the DAP is unconstitutional

    and should be struck down. I likewise concur in the application of the

    Operative Fact Doctrine as I have explained above and adopted by the

    ponencia.

    RTURO

    D.

    BRION

    Associate Justice