dae joon hwang, ph.d. prof., sungkyunkwan university [email protected] 8 th june 2011 transformation...

Dae Joon Hwang, Ph.D. Prof., Sungkyunkwan University

[email protected]

8th June 2011

Transformation to Smart Education

TowardSmart_8Jun2011_DJHwang

Smart e-Learning Conference 2011, Moscow, 8 June 2011, Russian Federations

I. Background

II. Smart Innovation in Education and Learning

III. Scope of Smart Innovation

IV. Conclusion

Summary


I. Background


Smart innovation emerges as a new paradigm of advanced knowledge based society for work, service, education/learning, government administration, and living

Direction of education policy planning

– National competence center -> inside and outside of the world class university

– Best in the world (competition) -> Best for the world(cooperation), importance of glocalization

– Evidence-based policy planning and decision making from data based: use of advanced management strategy Roles of university

– Hub of knowledge ecosystem: focused on knowledge sharing, dissemination, and creation rather than knowledge delivery

– Development of globally competitive human resources: diversification of students

– Driving force for education innovation Instructor centered -> student centered, education consumer centered Growth of foreign students and their nationality: 9.6% decrease of students of age 18 in 2019, increase in mobility ->

popularity of foreign language lectures, increased awareness of multiculturalism Education/learning space integration: offline lecture + e-learning + teaching/learning + media technology

Operational strategy

– e-Learning became one pillar of competence management , (eg) EU’s Tencompetence project

– Provide diverse learning environments: flexible learning platform, formal, non-formal education/learning

– Globalization : standardization of student affairs/administration/operation systems and their interoperability, promotion of international open standards

– Operation of education programs: Regular course oriented -> regular courses + special courses

– Global information sharing system: IPR management, Digital library

– Diversification of educational resources: OER, cloud computing

Changes in Education Environment


Driving Forces for Innovation

Technology

Globalization

DemographyDemography


*Source: Jung & Latchem, A model for e-education: Extended teaching spaces and extended learning spaces. British Journal of Educational Technology,

42(1), 6-18. 2009)

Extended Learning Environment


Evolution of Technology based Learning

ICT Based

e-LearningU-Learning

Smart Learning

CAI,CMC

Learning Management System,

Web based Instruction

MobileLMS

Flexible Learning Framework

CD, Diskette, CAI applications

Internet, Web, e-Learning contents

eBook, digital textbook,

mobile ContentsVR, AR, simulations

OER, learning cloud,Intelligent Tutoring

System, SNS

Learningplatform

Resources

Facilities

Period

Desktop PC

After 1996

PC,Wired Internet

After 2003

Notebook PC, Tablet PC,PDA, Wireless Internet

After 2005

Smart phones, pads, slate PC, eBook reader ,

IPTV

After 2010


Digital Native Digital Immigrant

(Neo-Millennial) Learners Teachers

• Parallel process• Random access to interactive media• Interact/network simultaneously to

many

• Singular process• Linear, logical sequential access• Interact/network simultaneously to few

• Just in time learners• Instant access • Learning is relevant, instantly useful

and fun

• Just in case learners• Delayed/differed access, rewards &

gratification• Learning is to teach to the curriculum

guide and standardized tests

How to Educate…

Who you are…


Educational Technology

Learning methods

Learning Environment Design

Instructional design

Instructional systems design

Performance technology

Available Resources for Help


Methods Application Areas

Mobile-distance learninge-learning, m-learning, distance education

Problem-based learning

Seriously applied in medical educationAdapted to engineering education

Scenario-based learningHeavily used to forecast and solve Business problems in abruptly changing situation

Simulation-based learning

Spaceship, Aviation, Military training

Anchored InstructionIntegration of diverse contents including math, culture, social studies and language

Action learningCorporate training and problem solving for urgent issues

II. Smart Innovation in Education and Learning• Classroom level• Institution level• Global level


Factors of Smart Education/Learning

Instructional modes

Student factors

Learning activities

Input constructs Processing Outcomes

Student perceived outcomes


How to Change

Respond to rapid change– Industries are reinventing, renovating and repurposing– Creating new opportunities


Smart Education/Learning

Smart education/learning is about how to implement education and learning by leveraging both open and

closed innovations to achieve the context of innovation in education and learning. – by Dae Joon Hwang


Pedagogy – Instructional modes: traditional, blended, and flexible– Learning design

Technologies – Smart devices– International open standards– Integrated learning platform

Securing educational resources– Open educational resources : OCW, OSS, and best practices– Cloud computing

Nurturing human resources– Faculty – Tutors– Administration staffs

Quality management Outcome based Performance monitoring system: real time and non-real time

How to make organizational changes: unfreezing-> moving-> institutionalizing Increase awareness to understanding of multiculturalism Localization

– Awareness of different culture

Context of Smart Education and Learning

*Source: J. Hamilton, S. Tee, Smart utilization of tertiary instructional modes, Computers & Education 54(2010)TowardSmart_8Jun2011_DJHwang

Communicationskills

EmotionSensitivity

Interpersonalskills

Creativity

Collaborationcooperation

Problemsolving

Intellectualflexibility

What We Learn

Power of working together

for digging out problems and creating better solutions


Learning Design Standard: IMS LD

Goal: develop a framework including elements specifying teaching and learning

Characteristics

– Based on EML

– Modeling for specifying learning unit Activities Multi-actors Resource and service

– Platform independency

– Neutral to pedagogy

– Integration with XML

– Diminish gab between design

and delivery

B

C

B

C

B

C

B

C

*Source : IMS Global, IMS Learning Design, 2009


Collaborative Learning on Multi-Platforms

Collaborative Learning

Multi-chatting

Goal

Pre-Learning

LC 1LC 2

Evaluation

LC n

In sequence

LC 3

LC 4LC m

Decide learning content

Reference

Reference

Supplementary learning

Evaluate goal set up prior to learning

Goal

Pre-Learning

LC 1

LC2

Evaluation

LCn

In sequence

Out-com

e

Advanced learning

AL

Summary

MoodleSakai

Supplementarylearning


Running Scenarios on icampus


Parallel Model Implementation using Multi-board


Graphical Learning Design: TELOS

*Source : Dae Joon Hwang, OSS based learning design system development, KERIS, 2010, Seoul, Korea. TowardSmart_8Jun2011_DJHwang

Learning Design: LAMS


Content Development

• Open access to educational resources: OER, OCW, cloud• Content packaging: coarse-grained (SCORM), fine-grained (IMS CC)• Sharing and reusability: One source multiple platform


• Integrated learning supporting tool running on “Blue” smart terminal

InfoSearch

PersonalEducational Info

Group based

VideoContent

LectureMaterial

Infrastructure

‘Anyone,Anytime, and Anywhere’

⑦ Wireless Training Institute

‘Participation,Communication, and Share’

CIC Solution

③ Digital Teaching Aid ⑤ Remote Lecture ④ Digital Discussion ⑥ Educational PC Mgmt

System

Learning device

‘No Book, No Notes, and No Pen’

① Educational PC② e-board, e-Book

⑧ Course homepage ⑨ Educational operation system ⑩ Integrated education portal

u-Education Service on Creative Intelligence Campus: Samsung SDS



TJHwowardSmart_7Jun2011_Dang

Organizational change process occurs through three phases: unfreezing-> moving-> institutionalizing sequence by Lewin(1947)

– Unfreezing phase: Creation of guiding coalition for championing change Creation and communication of the new vision to both internal and

external stakeholders

– Moving Actual implementation of change through the establishment of new

procedures and patterns of behavior consistent with the new vision, acting on budget constraints, target, schedules, and reward system

Characterized by an experimental trial and error approach -> fits with the firm’s internal and external context

– Institutionalizing Institutionalization of the new order, through consolidating the

improvements achieved in the previous stage and preventing a slip back to the antecedent status quo

How Open Innovation to Go


Priority of Professor’s Competency

Aspects of attitude – Communication (20)– Cooperation (20)– Open mind (12)– Sprit of professional (7)– Understanding of learners (2)

Aspects of technology – Counseling/advice (16)– Media design (21)– Development of e-Learning system (23)– Management of e-Learning system (22) – Management of learning (4)– Data and information retrieval (11)– Use of information (15)– Use of computer SW (10)– Evaluation (6)– Inspection (19)– Monitoring (13)

Aspects of knowledge– Teaching-learning theory (8)– Adult learning theory (18)– Instruction strategy (3)– Understanding of e-Learning system (13)– Knowledge of subject (1)– Organization of content (5)– Requirement analysis (9)

•Source: Soon-jung, Hong et. all, The study of identifying competency model for professor in distance education, Vol.10, No. 2., 2004.


Competency of Tutors

Category of tutor’s competence – Common competency

Basic knowledge competency Common value competency

– Role specific competency Administration of academic affairs Learning motivation Learning guidance Counseling

Summary of tutor’s roles – Understanding of e-Learning and the Cyber Home Learning System– ICT literacy – Mentoring capability for personal learners– Positive thinking– Enthusiasm and aggressiveness– Sprit of service– Rapid feedback– Online communication capability– Process management ability– e-Learning overall process monitoring capability– Expertise on learning content– Personalized learning activity management– Expertise on counseling


Nurturing HR

Competency of Administration Staff

Category of administration staff’s competence – Common competency

ICT literacy Communication skills

– Role-specific competency Planning : mid-, long-term university growth plan, managerial strategy management, peculiar characterization management, budget management, rules and organization, partnership, and auditing Learning: curriculum management, learning design, management of taking lecture, learning management, evaluation management, certificate management, credit exchange management Personnel and general affairs Admission Financing Student support School register School affairs

•Source: KERIS, Training manual for professors and administration staffs of Cyber Universities, CR 2007-21, 2007.


Smart Learning Platform: 4CSoft

Source: 4CSoft Inc., Nov. 2010


Technologies

EducationalIdeology

Objectives

Technology(Social Network)

Culture1 Culture2

Interaction between Ideology and

Technology


Scale of innovation

Open Access Initiatives

• International organizations• UNESCO has reads OER since 2002 • UNESCO IITE’s report of OER for CIS, China, and Japan in 2011

• Country• UK: 2009: JISC/HEFCE/Academy initiate nationwide OER project• China: CORE (China Open Resource for Education), 2005, 44 Open universities + 26

Education Associations joined, 170 courses available(130subjects)• Korea: KOCW since 2007, Official announcement of university information in 2010,

102 universities joined, 1,298 courses available• Japan: JOCW since 2005, 43 organizations joined (23 universities, 16 corporations, 4

NGOs),1,798 courses available(1,523 in Japanese, 275 in English)• Taiwan: TOCWC since 2008, 21 universities joined

• Thailand: TCU since 2005, TCU-LMS and OER in use

• Universities

• MIT in USA initiated OCW in 2003

• OU in UK: OpenLearn, LabSpace in 2006

• Sookmyung womens university operates SNOW since 2009, 4,612 video courses

• Non profit organizations: World OCW Consortium, GLOBE, Curriki

*Source : Dae Joon Hwang, Digital education and Korean policy for promotion of OER, KOCW association symposium, Feb., 2011., Seoul, Korea.


Open Sourcing of Educational Resources

• OER

• OCW: MIT, OU, JOCW, KOCW, UNESCO, GLOBE

• OSS: ReCource, Sakai, Moodle, www.sourceforge.com

• Best practices: IMS Campus

• Cloud computing: SaaS, PaaS, IaaS

*Source : Dae Joon Hwang, Digital education and Korean policy for promotion of OER, KOCW association symposium, Feb., 2011., Seoul, Korea.


Open access to educational resources

New Education and Learning Environment

Cloud

applicatio

ns

Cloud computing

Learning

Cloud :

Learning

platforms,

Tools


Scalable of Smart Innovation in Education and Learning

Size of input domain

Sca

le o

f sm

art

inn

ova

tio

n

Component

level

Classroom level

Institution level

Inter-institution level

State level

Inter-state level (global)

Device technology & tools

Pedagogy

Learning design & management

Instruction modes

Student management

CEO leadership

Collaboration & SNT

Marketing strategy Financing, Performance management

Nurturing competence of HR

Contents development

Open standards: Learning technology interoperability

Recruiting students

Quality assurance

Open Education Resources

Partnership

National framework

National quality assurance

Government support

Legal foundation

Multicultural understanding

Localization support

Global partnership


Initiatives in Smart Innovation

Scale

Dep

art

men

t

Department

InternationalInstitutions

School

College

Country-wideInstitutions

Goal and objectivesTechnology Pedagogy Playfulness Performance

managementInternational standards

Multiculturalismimplementation

InnovationReadiness

e-Teacher Training Information System

Cyber Home Learning System

Korean Mobile Campus Projects

TOCW

Digital Textbook In Korea

SCU Mobile Learning Platform


JOCW

MIT OCW

UNESCO OER

TCU

CORE

OpenLearn

KOCW

IV. Conclusion


Conclusion

Leverage both open and closed innovations to achieve smart innovation in education

and learning based on its context

Exploit educational resource available to achieve smart innovation in education and

learning: instructional modes, pedagogy, technology, deep connection, creative

education, learning design, platform, OER, and cloud etc….

Smart education means more than adoption of smart technologies in education ,so it

must be holistically approached .

Nurturing competitive human resources their performance management become

more critical.


Thank You감사 합니다

Dae Joon Hwang, Ph.D., Prof., Sungkyunkwan University [email protected]


Smart e-Learning Conference 2011, Moscow, 8 June 2011, Russian Federations

dae joon hwang, ph.d. prof., sungkyunkwan university [email protected] 8 th june 2011 transformation...

Documents

education environment

flexible learning platform

education innovationinstructor

knowledge sharing

ipr management

knowledge delivery development

world class university

sungkyunkwan university