d4.2. /d 2.4. concept for evaluation of spf version 2sepemo.ehpa.org › uploads › media ›...
TRANSCRIPT
page 1 of 18 Version 2.0
D4.2. /D 2.4. Concept for evaluation of SPF
Version 2.2 A defined methodology for calculation of the seasonal performance
factor and a definition which devices of the system have to be
included in this calculation.
Heat pumps with hydronic heating systems
Date of delivery: 2012-05-31
Contract No.:
IEE/08/776/SI2.529222
Authors:
Andreas Zottl, AIT
Roger Nordman, SP
Co-Authors
Michel Coevoet, Edf
Philippe Riviere, Armines
Marek Miara, ISE Frauenhofer
Anastasia Benou, CRES
Peter Riederer, CSTB
The sole responsibility for the content of this document lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European
Communities. The European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.
page 2 of 18 Version 2.0
Content
FOREWORD ......................................................................................................................................................... 3
NOMENCLATURE .............................................................................................................................................. 3
SEASONAL PERFORMANCE FACTOR (SPF) EVALUATION .................................................................. 4
SYSTEM BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................................... 4 SYSTEM BOUNDARIES – HEATING MODE:............................................................................................................. 5
SPF-calculation – heating mode: .................................................................................................................. 6 SYSTEM BOUNDARIES – COOLING MODE: ............................................................................................................ 8
SPF calculation – cooling mode: .................................................................................................................. 9 SPF calculation – simultaneous cooling and heating mode: ....................................................................... 10
OPERATING MODES ....................................................................................................................................... 11
SPACE HEATING ................................................................................................................................................ 11 DOMOSTIC HOT WATER ..................................................................................................................................... 11 COOLING ........................................................................................................................................................... 11 DEFROST MODE ................................................................................................................................................. 11
Direct electric defrosting ............................................................................................................................. 12 Hot gas defrosting ....................................................................................................................................... 12 Reverse cycle defrosting .............................................................................................................................. 12
COMPARISON OF THE SYSTEM- BOUNDARIES IN STANDARDS AND THE SYSTEM –
BOUNDARIES OF THE SPF-CALCULATION METHODOLOGY ........................................................... 13
LITERATURE .................................................................................................................................................... 16
ANNEX – CALCULATION EXAMPLE .......................................................................................................... 17
EXAMPLE-A HEAT PUMP WITH ELECTRIC BACK UP ............................................................................................ 17 EXAMPLE-B HEAT PUMP WITH ADDITIONAL GAS HEATING ................................................................................ 18
D4.2. Concept for evaluation of SPF
page 3 of 18 Version 2.0
Foreword
The aim of this document is to define the system boundaries for calculating the SPF for
heating and cooling of heat pump systems. Defining the system boundaries has direct impact
on the necessary measurement equipment to measure the needed parameters for the
calculation of the different SPF. For this reason the document should be revised after the first
measurement period to see if the defined system boundaries can be measured in the field or if
there have to be some adoptions.
Nomenclature
Q C produced cooling energy of the CU for cooling [kWh]
E S_fan/pump electrical energy use of the CU- heat sink: fan or brine/well pump [kWh]
E B_fan/pump electrical energy use of the building fans or pumps [kWh]
E CU electrical energy use of the CU [kWh]
E bt_pump electrical energy use of the buffer tank pump [kWh]
SH space heating [-]
DHW domestic hot water [-]
HP heat pump [-]
CU Cooling unit [-]
SPF i Seasonal performance factor (Index: H for heating, C for cooling) [-]
COP Coefficient of performance [-]
EER Energy efficiency ratio [-]
SEER Seasonal energy efficiency ratio [-]
For heating mode:
Q H_hp quantity of heat of the HP in SH operation [kWh]
Q W_hp quantity of heat of the HP in DHW operation [kWh]
Q HW_bu quantity of heat of the back-up heater for SH and DHW [kWh]
E S_fan/pump electrical energy use of the HP source: fan or brine/well pump for
SH and DHW
[kWh]
E B_fan/pump electrical energy use of the heat sink (building): fans or pumps for
SH and DHW
[kWh]
E bt_pump electrical energy use of the buffer tank pump [kWh]
E HW_hp electrical energy use of the HP for SH and DHW [kWh]
E HW_bu energy use* of the back-up heater for SH and DHW [kWh]
*for additional heating other then electrical back up heater the energy content of
the fuel demand has to be taken
For cooling mode:
D4.2. Concept for evaluation of SPF
page 4 of 18 Version 2.0
Seasonal Performance Factor (SPF) evaluation
D4.2.-“Concept for evaluation of SPF” describes a standard evaluation method for monitoring
results to get data for quality characteristics for heat pump systems and technologies. This
SPF calculation method also provides the possibility to include the impact of auxiliary devices
like brine pumps and fans on the performance of the heat pump system, which will be taken
into account by the definition of different system boundaries.
The methodology of calculating the SPF makes it possible to compare the heat pump system
with common heating systems like oil or gas. By this comparison it is also possible to
calculate the CO2- and primary energy reduction potential from different heat pump systems
compared to other heating systems.
This evaluation method is based on a harmonised monitoring methodology, also developed in
the “SEPEMO” project, which allows disposing all necessary measurement data for applying
the evaluation method presented in this document.
System boundary description
The definition of the system boundaries influences the results of the SPF depending on the
impact of the auxiliary drives. Therefore the SPF should be calculated according to different
system boundaries. This will reflect the impact of the different devices on the performance of
the system.
Due to the fact that the units can operate in heating and/or cooling mode the system
boundaries and the SPF-calculation methodology is separated for heating and cooling mode.
According the described system boundaries the SPF can be calculated for cooling, space
heating and domestic hot water production.
For systems with an additional heating system other than an electrical back up heater (e.g. oil,
gas or biomass) the quantity of heat and the energy content of the fuel demand have to be
determined for calculating SPFH3 and SPFH4. The energy content can be determined by
measuring the fuel demand and multiplying with the calorific value of the fuel. For additional
solar thermal systems the electric auxiliary energy to run the system has to be measured.
With the heat energy delivered to the heating system by the additional heating the energy
supply ratio of the heat pump system is calculated.
The following definitions of the system boundaries are a general description for all different
heating and cooling systems considered in the project SEPEMO. Therefore the possibility to
realise the measurement can be slightly different for the different systems, but it is possible to
have correct comparisons within the different systems e.g. Air/Water with another Air/Water
system. For technical reasons Air/Air systems can only be measured and analysed according
to SPFH3 / SPFH4 and SPFC3.
D4.2. Concept for evaluation of SPF
page 5 of 18 Version 2.0
System boundaries – heating mode:
SPFH1:
This system contains only the heat pump unit. SPFH1 evaluate the performance of the
refrigeration cycle. The system boundaries are similar to COP defined in EN 14511 [1],
except that the standard takes, in addition, a small part of the pump consumption to overcome
head losses, and most part of fan consumption.
SPFH2:
This system contains of the heat pump unit and the equipment to make the source energy
available for the heat pump. SPFH2 evaluate the performance of the HP operation, and this
level of system boundary responds to SCOPNET in prEN 14825 [2] and the RES-Directive [3]
requirements1.
Note: COP in EN 14511 and SCOPNET in prEN 14825 are more or less between SPFH1 and
SPFH2 (see table 1 at the end of the document)
SPFH3:
This system contains of the heat pump unit, the equipment to make the source energy
available and the back up heater. SPFH3 represents the heat pump system and thereby it can be
used for comparison to conventional heating systems (e.g. oil, gas,…). This system boundary
is similar to the SPF in VDI 4650-1 [4], EN 15316-4-2 [5] and the SCOPON in prEN 14825.
For monovalent2 heat pump systems SPFH3 and SPFH2 are identical.
SPFH4:
This system contains of the heat pump unit, the equipment to make the source energy
available, the back up heater and all auxiliary drives including the auxiliary of the heat sink
system. SPFH4 represents the heat pump heating system including all auxiliary drives which
are installed in the heating system.
space
heatig buffer
tank
hot
water
tank
heat
pump
SPFH1
SPFH2
SPFH3
SPFH4
Figure 1: Example scheme for a heating system
1 For compact heat pumps having built-in electric backup heaters, this would constitute a problem, since the SPF
is normally attributed the product, and then SPFH3 is easier to evaluate in praqctice.. 2 Monovalent heat pumps are heat pumps without supplemental (backup) heating.
D4.2. Concept for evaluation of SPF
page 6 of 18 Version 2.0
SPF-calculation – heating mode:
In this chapter the formulas for calculating the SPF for heating mode together with the energy
flowcharts for the different system boundaries are described.
heat pump
heat
source
fan or pump
Back-up
heater
bu
ildin
g fa
ns o
r p
um
ps
SPFH1
SPFH2
SPFH3
SPFH4
QH_hp
QW_hp
QHW_bu
EB_fan/pumpEHW_buEbt_pumpEHW_hpES_fan/pump
Figure 2: energy flow chart for the heating mode
hpHW
hpWhpH
HE
QQSPF
_
__
1
hpHWpumpfanS
hpWhpH
HEE
QQSPF
_/_
__
2
buHWhpHWpumpfanS
buHWhpWhpH
HEEE
QQQSPF
__/_
___
3
heat pumpheat
source
SPFH1 QH_hp
QW_hp
EHW_hp
heat pump
heat
source
fan or pump
SPFH2 QH_hp
QW_hp
EHW_hpES_fan/pump
heat pump
heat
source
fan or pump
Back-up
heater
SPFH3 QH_hp
QW_hp
QHW_bu
EHW_buEHW_hpES_fan/pump
D4.2. Concept for evaluation of SPF
page 7 of 18 Version 2.0
pumpfanBbuHWpumpbthpHWpumpfanS
buHWhpWhpH
HEEEEE
QQQSPF
/____/_
___
4
heat pump
heat
source
fan or pump
Back-up
heater
SPFH4
bu
ildin
g fa
ns o
r p
um
ps
QH_hp
QW_hp
QHW_bu
EB_fan/pumpEHW_buEbt_pumpEHW_hpES_fan/pump
D4.2. Concept for evaluation of SPF
page 8 of 18 Version 2.0
System boundaries – cooling mode:
SPFC1:
This system contains only the cooling unit. SPFC1 evaluate the performance of the
refrigeration cycle. The system boundaries are similar to EER defined in EN 14511 [1],
except that the standard takes, in addition, a small part of the pump consumption to overcome
head losses, and most part of fan consumption.
SPFC2:
This system contains the cooling unit and the equipment to dissipate the heat energy. The
system boundaries compares to SEERON in prEN 14825 [2].
Note: EER in EN 14511 and SEERON in prEN 14825 are more or less between SPFC1 and
SPFC2 (see table 1 at the end of the document)
SPFC3:
This system contains the cooling unit, the equipment to dissipate the heat energy and all
auxiliary drives of the cooling system. SPFC3 represents the cooling system including all
auxiliary drives which are installed in the cooling system.
SPFC4:
This system contains the cooling studied cooling system and possible additional cooling
systems. In this analysis it is assumed that additional, supplementary, cooling systems are
autonomous from the studied system. This level corresponds to the total cooling system
performance for a building.
space
cooling
buffercooling
unit
SPFC3
SPFC2
SPFC1
Supplementary
cooling unit
SPFC4
Figure 3: Example scheme for a cooling system
D4.2. Concept for evaluation of SPF
page 9 of 18 Version 2.0
SPF calculation – cooling mode:
In this chapter the formulas for calculating the SPF for cooling mode together with the energy
flowcharts for the different system boundaries are described.
cooling
unitfan or pump
bu
ildin
g fa
ns o
r p
um
psheat
sink
SPFC1
SPFC2
SPFC3
ES_fan/pump ECU Ebt_pump EB_fan/pump
Supplementary
cooling unit
QC
QC_BU
SPFC4
EC_BU
Figure 4: energy flow chart for the cooling mode
CU
C
CE
QSPF 1
CUpumpfanS
C
CEE
QSPF
/_
2
cooling
unitQC
heat
sink
SPFC1
ECU
cooling
unitfan or pump
SPFC2
ECUES_fan/pump
QC
heat
sink
D4.2. Concept for evaluation of SPF
page 10 of 18 Version 2.0
pumpfanBpumpbtCUpumpfanS
C
CEEEE
QSPF
/__/_
3
BUCpumpfanBpumpbtCUpumpfanS
BUCC
CEEEEE
QQSPF
_/__/_
_
4
cooling
unitfan or pump
bu
ildin
g fa
ns o
r p
um
psheat
sink
SPFC1
SPFC2
SPFC3
ES_fan/pump ECU Ebt_pump EB_fan/pump
Supplementary
cooling unit
QC
QC_BU
SPFC4
EC_BU
SPF calculation – simultaneous cooling and heating mode:
For systems operating simultaneously in cooling and heating mode, e.g. for domestic hot
water production, the fraction of heat delivered to the system has to be taken into account
when calculating the different combined SPF according to the system boundaries.
cooling
unitfan or pump
bu
ildin
g fa
ns o
r p
um
ps
SPFC3
heat
sink
QC
ES_fan/pump ECU Ebt_pump EB_fan/pump
D4.2. Concept for evaluation of SPF
page 11 of 18 Version 2.0
Operating modes
The heating and cooling systems can be operated in different modes. The most common
operating modes for combined systems can be defined as:
space heating and domestic hot water operation
cooling and domestic hot water operation
space heating, cooling and domestic hot water operation
Therefore the heat meters or flow meters and temperature sensors have to be integrated into
the system as described in deliverable D4.1 - guideline for heat pump field measurements, to
be able to evaluate the system efficiency according to the different system boundaries and
depending on the operating modes.
Especially for Air to water systems the defrost mode has to be considered when calculating
the SPF.
Space heating
The system is operating in this mode to provide heat to the heating distribution system.
Domostic hot water
The system will operate in this mode to provide heat to the domestic hot water tank.
For monobloc/compact heat pumps supplying space heating and domestic hot water, it is
often due to practical reasons not possible to separate measurements of the heat delivered to
space heating and to domestic hot water. In these cases the useful energy supplied by the heat
pump can be identified in two ways:
1. By monitoring the total heat generated by the heat pump before the three-way valve
2. By monitoring the space heat output from the heat pump and to monitor the hot water
consumed by the end user (flow and temperature), and to correct the useful energy by
tank losses (based on lab measurements or calculations).
The first option is the more accurate method, but needs intrusive measurements in the heat
pump, which are costly and could affect end user guarantees. The second option is based on
extremely good precision of the hot water measurements, and the use of either experience
values or mathematical models for assessing the DHW tank losses. Depending on the
installation location (living space or technical room) the useful energy can be calculated for
space heating.
Cooling
The system will operate in this mode to cool the building.
Defrost mode
Air to water heat pump systems have to be operated in defrost mode for deiceing the
evaporator in winter time when the air humidity causes icing of the out door heat exchanger.
There are different possibilities for defrosting, the 3 most common strategies are:
Direct electric defrosting
Hot gas defrosting
Reverce cycle defrosting
D4.2. Concept for evaluation of SPF
page 12 of 18 Version 2.0
Direct electric defrosting
For calculating the SPF (Figure 5), the additional electrical energy demand for operating the
defrost heating has to be added. As described in the chapter “system boundaries” the electric
energy demand for defrosting should be a part of EHW_hp.
Figure 5: direct electric defrosting
Hot gas defrosting
When calculating the SPF for systems with hot gas defrosting (Figure 6) no additional
measurement and calculation is necessary. The used hot gas for defrosting will decrease the
heating capacity of the system, which will be recorded by the heat meter.
Figure 6: hot gas defrosting
Reverse cycle defrosting
Systems with reverse cycle defrosting will extract heat from the heating system during defrost
operation. This heat is not usable for the heating distrubtion system and has to be subtracted
form the heat delivered to the system when calculating the SPF. As described in Figure 7 it
has to be differentiated between the heat out put of the heat pump (Qhp) and the useful heat
delivered to the building by the heat pump (Qhp-useable).
hp
hp
E
QSPF
defelechp
hp
EE
QSPF
_
D4.2. Concept for evaluation of SPF
page 13 of 18 Version 2.0
Figure 7: reverse cycle defrosting
Comparison of the system- boundaries in standards and the
system – boundaries of the SPF-calculation methodology
There are different existing standards and regulations for calculating the SPF. These
calculation methodologies are mainly based on input from the testing standard EN 14511. The
system boundaries of testing standards are however focused on the heating or cooling unit
itself. For comparing test results of the units with other units, the system integration is not
taken into account. Therefore these standards do not include the entire energy consumption of
the auxiliary drives on the heat sink and heat source side. The following descriptions show the
differences between the system boundaries for field measurements and testing standards. The
aim is to point out the difference between field testing and testing on a test rig, which does not
necessarily mean that there should be no differences as this is not possible for practicable
measurement systems in the field. The main difference of the evaluation methodologies is that
testing is focused on the unit and the field measurements are focused on the system. For field
measurements measuring the proportional energy input on the heat sink and heat source side
requires high efforts for the measurement equipment and can not be realized within the
common field measurement methodology.
Hence the system boundaries for testing and field measurements will be slightly different, this
has to be a taken into account when comparing calculated SPF and measured SPF.
EN 14511: This standard describes the testing procedure to calculate the COP or EER. The
average electrical power input of the unit within the defined interval of time is obtained from:
the power input for operation of the compressor and any power input for defrosting;
the power input for all control and safety devices of the unit and;
the proportional power input of the conveying devices (e.g. fans, pumps) for ensuring
the transport of the heat transfer media inside the unit.
This equates to the system boundary of SPFH1/SPFC1, with the difference being, that
SPFH1/SPFC1 does not include the proportional energy input of the auxiliary devices.
EN 15316 4-2: This standard describes a calculation Bin method for energy consumption,
starting from, among other, heating load evolution, heating curve of the heat pump, climate
conditions and standard heat pump testing points. This method standardizes boundary
contains the heat pump unit, the equipment to make the source energy available, internal and
external boilers and back-up heaters. This equates to boundary SPFH4. The difference is that
hp
defhphp
E
QQSPF
_
D4.2. Concept for evaluation of SPF
page 14 of 18 Version 2.0
SPFH4 include the buffer tank pump that supplies water to the SH water circuit and that in the
standard EN 15316-4-2 the thermal losses of the heating system are calculated.
Figure 8: system boundary EN 15316-4-2
prEN 14825:
The calculation methodology and the measurement procedure of this standard are based on
the standard EN 14511. Therefore the auxiliary drives are mentioned partly in the SCOP
calculation. SCOPNET is more or less similar to SPFH2 and SCOPON/SEERON to SPFH3/SPFC2.
prEN 14825 makes a difference between SCOPON / SEERON and SCOP / SEER as they
exclude electricity consumption of thermostat off mode, stand-by modes or crankcase heater.
Unlikely EN 15316-4-2, different running conditions are set, according climate (3 zones: cold,
average, warm) and space heating emitters, what gives SCOP/SEER for heat pump whose
features are known at 6 tested conditions.
European Directive 2009/125/EC Lot 1:
Calculation of energy consumption in Lot 1 is quite similar to prEN 14825, except that heat
demand included more items in addition to heat load, like buffer heat losses and distribution
heat losses as it is mentioned in the EN 15316-4-2.
Lot 10:
Similar to prEN 14825
VDI 4650-1: The SPF calculation according to this regulation includes the heat source
auxiliary drives, the back up heater and the auxiliary drive energy for space heating (for
D4.2. Concept for evaluation of SPF
page 15 of 18 Version 2.0
pressure losses of the condenser) as mentioned in the EN 14511. This equates to the system
boundary of SPFH3, but the difference is the proportional energy input of the auxiliary devices
on the heat sink side.
The following table 1 gives an overview of the difference between the defined system
boundaries for evaluating the measurement data and existing standards.
Component SP
FH
1/C
1
SP
FH
2/C
2
SP
FH
3
SP
FH
4/C
3
EN
14
51
1
EN
15
31
6 4
-2
VD
I46
50
-1
prE
N1
48
25
*
Lo
t 1
Lo
t 1
0
Compressor x x x x x x x x x x
Brine
fan/pump --- x x x
head
losses x x
head
losses
head
losses
head
losses
Back-up --- --- x x --- x x x x x
Buffer tank
pump --- --- --- x --- x --- --- x ---
SH DHW
fans/pumps --- --- --- x
head
losses X**
head
losses
head
losses
head
losses
head
losses *refers to SCOP and SEER
**see figure 5 (system boundary EN 15316-4-2)
Table 1: comparison of system boundaries
D4.2. Concept for evaluation of SPF
page 16 of 18 Version 2.0
Literature
[1] EN 14511, Air conditioners, liquid chilling packages and heat pumps with electrically
driven compressors for space heating and cooling, March 2008
[2] prEN 14825, Air conditioners, liquid chilling packages and heat pumps, with electrically
compressors, for space heating and cooling- Testing and rating at part load conditions and
calculation of seasonal performance, November 2009
[3] RES Directive, DIRECTIVE 2009/28/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND
OF THE COUNCIL, April 2009
[4] VDI 4650-1, Calculation of heat pumps Simplified method for the calculation of the
seasonal performance factor of heat pumps Electric heat pumps for space heating and
domestic hot water, March 2009
[5] EN 15316-4-2, Heating systems in buildings – Method for calculation of system energy
requirements and system efficiencies – Part 4-2: Space heating generation systems, heat pump
systems, September 2008
D4.2. Concept for evaluation of SPF
page 17 of 18 Version 2.0
Annex – calculation example
Example-A: heat pump with energy supply ratio of 94 %
hpHW
hpWhpH
HE
QQSPF
_
__
1
buHWhpHWpumpfanS
buHWhpWhpH
HEEE
QQQSPF
__/_
___
3
hpHWpumpfanS
hpWhpH
HEE
QQSPF
_/_
__
2
pumpfanBbuHWhpHWpumpfanS
buHWhpWhpH
HEEEE
QQQSPF
/___/_
___
4
additional
electric heating
additional gas
heating
additional solar
heating
SPFH1 - 5,0 5,0 5,0
SPFH2 - 4,3 4,3 4,3
SPFH3 - 3,6 3,4 4,5
SPFH4 - 3,3 3,2 4,2
additional
electric heating
additional gas
heating
additional solar
heating
Q H_hp [kWh] 12000 12000 12000
Q W_hp [kWh] 3000 3000 3000
Q HW_bu [kWh] 1000 1000* 1000
E S_fan/pump [kWh] 500 500 500
E B_fan/pump [kWh] 300 300 300
E HW_hp [kWh] 3000 3000 3000
E HW_bu
[kWh] 1000 1176** 25***
* efficiency gas boiler 85
%
** measured fuel demand
121 m³ gas, calorific heat
of gas 9,7 kWh/m³
*** electric energy demand
of the circulating pump in
the solar system
D4.2. Concept for evaluation of SPF
page 18 of 18 Version 2.0
Example-B: heat pump with energy supply ratio of 66 %
hpHW
hpWhpH
HE
QQSPF
_
__
1
buHWhpHWpumpfanS
buHWhpWhpH
HEEE
QQQSPF
__/_
___
3
hpHWpumpfanS
hpWhpH
HEE
QQSPF
_/_
__
2
pumpfanBbuHWhpHWpumpfanS
buHWhpWhpH
HEEEE
QQQSPF
/___/_
___
4
additional
electric heating
additional gas
heating
additional solar
heating
SPFH1 - 5,0 5,0 5,0
SPFH2 - 4,3 4,3 4,3
SPFH3 - 2,0 1,8 6,2
SPFH4 - 1,9 1,7 5,5
additional
electric heating
additional gas
heating
additional solar
heating
Q H_hp [kWh] 9000 9000 9000
Q W_hp [kWh] 1500 1500 1500
Q HW_bu [kWh] 5500 5500* 5500
E S_fan/pump [kWh] 350 350 350
E B_fan/pump [kWh] 300 300 300
E HW_hp [kWh] 2100 2100 2100
E HW_bu
[kWh] 5500 6471** 140***
* efficiency gas boiler 85
% ** measured fuel demand
667 m³ gas, calorific heat of gas 9,7 kWh/m³
*** electric energy demand
of the circulating pump in the solar system