csiro 2016 community wellbeing and responding to change … · 18/11/2016  · 2016 adapting to...

14
CSIRO 2016 Community Wellbeing and Responding to Change survey Western Downs and eastern Maranoa LAND AND WATER Research Team: Dr. Andrea Walton| Dr. Rod McCrea | Prof Rosemary Leonard 18 November 2016

Upload: others

Post on 04-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CSIRO 2016 Community Wellbeing and Responding to Change … · 18/11/2016  · 2016 Adapting to Change perceptions: Modest scores …varies across the region What’s important for

CSIRO 2016 Community Wellbeing and Responding to Change surveyWestern Downs and eastern Maranoa

LAND AND WATER

Research Team: Dr. Andrea Walton| Dr. Rod McCrea | Prof Rosemary Leonard

18 November 2016

Page 2: CSIRO 2016 Community Wellbeing and Responding to Change … · 18/11/2016  · 2016 Adapting to Change perceptions: Modest scores …varies across the region What’s important for

What we did: Repeat CWB survey from 2014

Feb 2016

SAMPLE: N = 500100 x• Dalby• Chinchilla• Miles / Wandoan• Tara• Roma

In town = Out of town

ABS representative• age, gender, and employment

2

Page 3: CSIRO 2016 Community Wellbeing and Responding to Change … · 18/11/2016  · 2016 Adapting to Change perceptions: Modest scores …varies across the region What’s important for

What we measured: Telephone survey

1. Community Wellbeing– 15 different dimensions

2. Community Resilience– Adapting and responding to

change

3. Attitudes and feelings towards CSG

4. Expected Future Community Wellbeing

• 120 questions

• 30 minutes

3

Page 4: CSIRO 2016 Community Wellbeing and Responding to Change … · 18/11/2016  · 2016 Adapting to Change perceptions: Modest scores …varies across the region What’s important for

Community Wellbeing: 2016 to 2014Only five dimensions significantly different

Reduced dimensions

• Employment and job opportunities

• Community cohesion

Improved dimensions

• Roads

• Environmental management for the future

• Quality of environment (dust, noise, air)

Overall community wellbeing: Similar - no real change

4

Page 5: CSIRO 2016 Community Wellbeing and Responding to Change … · 18/11/2016  · 2016 Adapting to Change perceptions: Modest scores …varies across the region What’s important for

Most important wellbeing dimensions: 2016

5

Page 6: CSIRO 2016 Community Wellbeing and Responding to Change … · 18/11/2016  · 2016 Adapting to Change perceptions: Modest scores …varies across the region What’s important for

2016 Adapting to Change perceptions: Modest scores …varies across the region

What’s important for feeling like adapting well to change

Local planning LeadershipInformation accessWorking togetherCommunity commitmentBeing listened toHaving a sayCommunity trustJobs, business opportunitiesEnvironmental management

6

3.04

3.21

2.83

3.13

3.06

3.33

1 2 3 4 5

Dalby

Chinchilla

Miles

Tara

WD region

Roma

Perceived adapting score

Page 7: CSIRO 2016 Community Wellbeing and Responding to Change … · 18/11/2016  · 2016 Adapting to Change perceptions: Modest scores …varies across the region What’s important for

2016: Coping with drought v coping with CSG

7

3.03.1

2.8

3.13.0

3.3

3.03.1

2.8

2.5

2.9 2.9

1

2

3

4

5

Dalby Chinchilla Miles Tara Western Downs Roma

Pe

rce

ive

d c

op

ing

sco

res

CSG activities Drought

Page 8: CSIRO 2016 Community Wellbeing and Responding to Change … · 18/11/2016  · 2016 Adapting to Change perceptions: Modest scores …varies across the region What’s important for

CSG Attitudes – still a range of views, slightly more negative in 2016

9%

33%

36%

14%

8%

13%

33%35%

12%

7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

Reject Tolerate Accept Approve Embrace

Pe

rce

nta

ge o

f p

arti

cip

ants

2014 2016

8

Page 9: CSIRO 2016 Community Wellbeing and Responding to Change … · 18/11/2016  · 2016 Adapting to Change perceptions: Modest scores …varies across the region What’s important for

2016: Attitudes toward CSG –still vary across the region

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Reject Tolerate Accept Approve Embrace

Pe

rce

nta

ge o

f p

arti

cip

ants

Dalby

Chinchilla

Miles

Tara

Roma

9

Page 10: CSIRO 2016 Community Wellbeing and Responding to Change … · 18/11/2016  · 2016 Adapting to Change perceptions: Modest scores …varies across the region What’s important for

2016: CSG Attitudes – Out-of-town residents still less positive

10%

34%

36%

12%

9%

16%

33%34%

13%

5%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

Reject Tolerate Accept Approve Embrace

Pe

rce

nta

ge o

f p

arti

cip

ants

In town

Out of town

10

Page 11: CSIRO 2016 Community Wellbeing and Responding to Change … · 18/11/2016  · 2016 Adapting to Change perceptions: Modest scores …varies across the region What’s important for

Future Community wellbeing – Most expect it to stay the same

In 2014 • Slightly negative outlook

Not borne out in 2016

In 2016 • Most people expect it to stay

the same

• Still slightly negative

11

29%

57%

14%

Decline

Stay the same

Improve

Page 12: CSIRO 2016 Community Wellbeing and Responding to Change … · 18/11/2016  · 2016 Adapting to Change perceptions: Modest scores …varies across the region What’s important for

Thank You

Presentation title | Presenter name12 |

Page 13: CSIRO 2016 Community Wellbeing and Responding to Change … · 18/11/2016  · 2016 Adapting to Change perceptions: Modest scores …varies across the region What’s important for

LAND AND WATERDr. Andrea Walton

t 07 3833 5675e [email protected]

LAND AND WATERDr. Rod McCrea

t 07 3833 5677e [email protected]

LAND AND WATER

Page 14: CSIRO 2016 Community Wellbeing and Responding to Change … · 18/11/2016  · 2016 Adapting to Change perceptions: Modest scores …varies across the region What’s important for

Community wellbeing dimensions

Presentation title | Presenter name | Page 143.8

2.2

2.6

2.8*

2.9*

3.0

3.2

3.4

3.4

3.4

3.6

3.7

3.7

3.9

3.9*

3.9

3.8

3.1*

2.6

2.3

2.7

3.0

3.1

3.4

3.3

3.6*

3.5

3.6

3.8

3.9

3.5

3.9

1 2 3 4 5

Overall community wellbeing

Employment and business opportunities

Decision making and citizen voice

Roads

Environmental management

Community trust

Community participation

Social interaction

Services and facilities

Community cohesion

Built environment

Income sufficiency

Health

Personal safety

Environmental quality

Community spirit

2014

2016

statistical difference p < .05