creating high impact learning experiences through the use ...• link to sacs assessment • create...
TRANSCRIPT
Creating High Impact Learning Experiences through the Use of a Model for Evidence-Based Teaching
January 24, 2019 | jngi.org AAC&U Annual Meeting
Stephanie M. Foote, Ph.D.Assistant Vice President for Teaching,Learning, and Evidence-Based PracticesJohn N. Gardner InstituteFor Excellence in Undergraduate Education
Andrew K. Koch, PhDPresident & Chief Operating OfficerJohn N. Gardner InstituteFor Excellence in Undergraduate Education
Resche Hines, PhDAssistant Vice President for Institutional Research and Effectiveness, Stetson UniversityFellow, John N. Gardner InstituteFor Excellence in Undergraduate Education
Learning OutcomesAs a result of attending this session, participants will:
• Describe components of the Model for Evidence-Based Practices
• Differentiate sources of evidence that may be collected and used to understand student learning outcomes
• Evaluate current and promising practices through short case studies that apply the model
• Develop a preliminary plan to apply the model to their own course redesign process
AAC&U Annual Meeting | jngi.org
Presentation OutlineI. Why Take an Evidence-Based Approach?
II. Introduction to the Model for Equity and Evidence-Based Teaching
III. Case studies highlighting how the model has been applied to redesign “gateway” or foundational courses in various disciplines and outcomes of these efforts
IV. Application of the model to your own courses
AAC&U Annual Meeting | jngi.org
Why Take an Evidence-Based Approach?
AAC&U Annual Meeting
Why – The Practical
Why – The Practical
Why – The Truth As Supported by Scholarship
•
• 32 institutions
• Average DFWI Rate = 25.1%
• Range of 5.66% - 48.89%
The Data –U.S. History Survey Courses
AAC&U Annual Meeting 2019 | jngi.org
Gender, Income & First-Generation Status Matter
AAC&U Annual Meeting 2019 | jngi.org
The Data –U.S. Survey Courses (Gender)
27.18%
22.67%
31.26%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
Male Female Unspecified
Average DFWI Rate by Gender
DFWI Rate Average
AAC&U Annual Meeting 2019 | jngi.org
28.49%
22.65%
24.64%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
Pell Eligible Not Pell Eligible Unknown
Average DFWI Rate by Pell Eligibility
DFWI Rate Average
The Data –U.S. Survey Courses (Income)
AAC&U Annual Meeting 2019 | jngi.org
26.13%
22.41%
30.50%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
First Generation Not FG Unknown
Average DFWI Rate by First Generation Status
DFWI Rate Average
The Data –U.S. Survey Courses (First Generation)
AAC&U Annual Meeting 2019 | jngi.org
Race / Ethnicity Matter
AAC&U Annual Meeting 2019 | jngi.org
AAC&U Annual Meeting 2019 | jngi.org
28.26%
32.85%
40.51%
17.37%
42.37% 41.73%
21.36%
31.42%
17.75%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
45.00%
History
AverageDFWI Rate by Ethnicity and Race
DFWI Rate
Average
AAC&U Annual Meeting 2019 | jngi.org
28.26%
32.85%
40.51%
17.37%
42.37% 41.73%
21.36%
31.42%
17.75%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
45.00%
History
AverageDFWI Rate by Ethnicity and Race
DFWI Rate
Average
Gateway Course Performance is a DIRECT Predictor of Retention
AAC&U Annual Meeting 2019 | jngi.org
AAC&U Annual Meeting 2019 | jngi.org
History
AverageDFWI Rate by Retention Status
DFWI Rate
Average
19.27%
42.87%
85.54%
6.21%
28.45%
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
Retained Student Choses to Leave Institution Required Student to Leave
Graduated UnknownStudent Chose
to Leave
AAC&U Annual Meeting 2019 | jngi.org
History
AverageDFWI Rate by Retention Status
DFWI Rate
Average
19.27%
42.87%
85.54%
6.21%
28.45%
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
Retained Student Choses to Leave Institution Required Student to Leave
Graduated UnknownStudent Chose
to Leave
Why – The Truth As Supported by Scholarship
The Color Line
Why – The Truth As Supported by ScholarshipThe Gateway Course Completion Line
Why – The Truth As Supported by ScholarshipThe Gateway Course Completion Line
Why – The Truth As Supported by ScholarshipThe Gateway Course Completion Line
Why – The Truth As Supported by Scholarship
Gateway courses are a place and space where the color line manifests itself today. Through unintentional but nevertheless harmful use of unquestioned practices, race, ethnicity, and family wealth remain the best predictors of who does or does not succeed in and complete college. But through this application of evidence-based practices, this need not be the case.
Model for Evidence-Based Teaching
AAC&U Annual Meeting
AAC&U Annual Meeting | jngi.org
The Equity and Evidence-Based Teaching Model
1. Draft goals for student learning in your gateway
course(s) informed by evidence
2. Explore relevant evidence and resources
3. Draft a plan to redesign portions of your course and collect evidence
4. Finalize plan for course redesign and assessment
5. Teach the redesigned portion of the course
(and gather evidence of results!)
6. Analyze and use results to plan for next time
you teach
Course Redesign Framework
AAC&U Annual Meeting | jngi.org
Course Redesign Framework
AAC&U Annual Meeting | jngi.org
Assessment Cycle
AAC&U Annual Meeting | jngi.org
3) Interpret Evidence
4) Implement Change
2) Gather Evidence
1) Identify Outcomes
Maki, P. (2004)
Methods to Assess OutcomesIndirect
• Proxy measures that stand for the construct of interest• Self-reported comments that reveal a perceived increase in understanding or
appreciation• An indirect measure is something a student might tell you he or she has
gained, learned, experienced, etc. (Aka: self-reported data; e.g., surveys, interviews, focus groups, etc.)
Direct• Demonstration of abilities, information, knowledge, etc. as the result of
participation in a program or utilization of a service• A direct measure is tangible evidence about a student’s ability, performance,
experience, etc. (e.g., performances, papers, common assignments, tests, etc.)
AAC&U Annual Meeting | jngi.org
(Friedman and Foote, 2017)
Case Studies
AAC&U Annual Meeting
Case Study 1: Nevada State College
AAC&U Annual Meeting | jngi.org
• Public college located in Henderson NV with an enrollment of 4,915 (fall 2018)
• Nevada State College focused on two areas: Course redesign and the integration of academic services/assistance (Course Assistants)• College Math• Introductory Biology• College Composition
• Guiding Principles: Provide sense of purpose, inspire curiosity, address multiple skill sets, invite collaboration, promote critical thinking/metacognition
(Scinta, 2016)
Case Study 1: Nevada State College
AAC&U Annual Meeting | jngi.org
G2C Students
Non-G2CStudents
Retention 83% 77%
Good Academic Standing
(GPA > 2.0)
74% 65%
Resiliency 54% 41%
Case Study 2: University of West Georgia• Total Enrollment: Record 13,520 in fall 2017• Students must take 1 World (HIST 1111/1112) and 1 US (HIST
2111/2112) in order to graduate• AY16: A Plan is Born
• Link to SACS Assessment• Create Standard Learning Outcomes• Align Course Assignments to SLOs• Early Formative Assessment and Feedback within First 3 Weeks• Pilot among Lead Faculty in AY17• Goal: 20% DFW Rates
• AY17: Piloted Among Lead Faculty• AY18: Implemented Across All Sections
• Link with SACS assessment and LEAP-West
AAC&U Annual Meeting | jngi.org
(Vasconcellos, 2018)
Case Study 2: University of West GeorgiaSuccess with G2C• Current G2C Reach for HIST 2111
• Fall 2018: 7 Faculty and 482 students• Spring 2019: 8 Faculty and estimated 614 students
• DFW RatesAY Average pre-G2C 23%• Fall 2016: 17.6% (pre-G2C)• Fall 2018 (to date): 11.3%
Professors Report:• More student engagement• Higher midterm exam grades• Student improvement based on specific feedback• Fewer Ws (3 sections with 0!)
AAC&U Annual Meeting | jngi.org
(Vasconcellos, 2018)
Case Study 3: Lansing Community College• Public college founded in 1957, is the third-largest community college in
Michigan, serving a six-county area and enrolling more than 17,000 students each year.
• Operation 100% brings together all of our student success and/or institutional improvement efforts and initiatives under one cohesion-building umbrella.• Guided Pathways (Michigan Center for Student Success)• Gateways to Completion (Gardner)• Michigan Gateways Project (Gardner)• Advising• Web Refresh• My Academic Pathway• AAC&U Equity & Inclusive Excellence• AACC Pathways Project
AAC&U Annual Meeting | jngi.org
(Rife, 2016)
Case Study 3: Lansing Community CollegeCourse Redesign 2013-16
o Principles of Accounting Io Foundations for Physiologyo US History, 1877 to Presento Intermediate Algebrao Composition
2016-19o Intro to Computer Programmingo Precalculus Io Introduction to Sociology
AAC&U Annual Meeting | jngi.org
Outcomes• Decreased DFWI rates
• Adopted College Policy requiring all faculty to use centralized, digital grading tool, available to students 24/7, and provide early and often feedback for students
• Adopted digital IDEA form in order to provide timely feedback to teachers, from students
• Sample course improvements . . . . (Rife, 2016)
AAC&U Annual Meeting | jngi.org
Case Study Guiding Questions
• Which case resonates with you most?
• How might you adapt this work or use it to inform your evidence-based approach?
• What resources/support/evidence might you need to take an evidence-based approach?
AAC&U Annual Meeting | jngi.org
Applying the Model
AAC&U Annual Meeting
AAC&U Annual Meeting | jngi.org
The Equity and Evidence-Based Teaching Model
1. Draft goals for student learning in your gateway
course(s) informed by evidence
2. Explore relevant evidence and resources
3. Draft a plan to redesign portions of your course and collect evidence
4. Finalize plan for course redesign and assessment
5. Teach the redesigned portion of the course
(and gather evidence of results!)
6. Analyze and use results to plan for next time
you teach
Course Redesign Categories
AAC&U Annual Meeting | jngi.org
Course Redesign Categories
AAC&U Annual Meeting | jngi.org
Course Redesign Categories
AAC&U Annual Meeting | jngi.org
Course Redesign Categories
AAC&U Annual Meeting | jngi.org
Applying the Model1. Draft goals for student learning in your gateway course(s)
informed by evidence2. Explore relevant evidence and resources (What type of course
redesign might you engage in?)3. Draft a plan to redesign portions of your course and collect
evidence (What will you do first? How will you assess your course redesign elements?)
4. Finalize plan for course redesign and assessment5. Teach the redesigned portion of the course (and gather evidence
of results!)6. Analyze and use results to plan for next time you teach
AAC&U Annual Meeting | jngi.org
Thank You!
AAC&U Annual Meeting | jngi.org
Andrew K. Koch, Ph.D.President & Chief Operating OfficerJohn N. Gardner InstituteFor Excellence in Undergraduate [email protected]
Resche Hines, Ph.D.Assistant Vice President for Institutional Research and Effectiveness, Stetson UniversityFellow, John N. Gardner InstituteFor Excellence in Undergraduate [email protected]
Stephanie M. Foote, Ph.D.Assistant Vice President for Teaching,Learning, and Evidence-Based PracticesJohn N. Gardner InstituteFor Excellence in Undergraduate [email protected]