covid 19 individual behavioral change for social good · 1. introduction theories emerge from...
TRANSCRIPT
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp 1318 [email protected]
International Journal of Management (IJM)
Volume 11, Issue 6, June 2020, pp. 1318-1331, Article ID: IJM_11_06_120
Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/issues.asp?JType=IJM&VType=11&IType=6
ISSN Print: 0976-6502 and ISSN Online: 0976-6510
DOI: 10.34218/IJM.11.6.2020.120
© IAEME Publication Scopus Indexed
COVID 19 – INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIORAL
CHANGE FOR SOCIAL GOOD
Dr M. Meher Karuna
Associate Professor, Institute of Public Enterprise, Hyderabad, India
Dr S. Vivek
Assistant Professor, Institute of Public Enterprise, Hyderabad, India
ABSTRACT
Social Marketing is an important discipline in Marketing Management. One of the
perspectives of social marketing is the application of marketing tools to bring in
change in the individual behavior for social good. Society is the group of social
animals living together with some of the defined norms and most of the undefined
norms for individual and social betterment. Social Marketing is the process of setting
an objective for a better society, designing a detailed pre-plan report, planning and
execution through the application of marketing tools, conceptualizing and delivering
nudges for an individual or social behavioral change resulting in a paradigm shift in
the country’s development process.
The world is experiencing a never imagined situation with the spread of COVID
19, a word that is erecting our spine and quivering our body. COVID 19 is a
communicable disease spreading by a virus called Corona. The bless in disguise is that
it spreads only through saliva, mucus and phlegm entering through mouth, nose and
eyes. Hence, it is an individual that should take care of self and in turn the society. One
should not get in contact with the affected person. There is a possibility that the virus
may come in contact with an individual by touch of any object or person. In such case,
one has to ensure not touching one’s eyes, nose and mouth. Remedy is frequent hand
wash.
The present study is an attempt to understand the application of social marketing
concepts and tools to fight with COVID 19 emphasizing on the positioning strategy. It
is a descriptive research study based on the secondary sources of information.
Key words: COVID 19, Social Good, Remedy, social marketing, Marketing
Management
Cite this Article: Dr M. Meher Karuna and Dr S. Vivek, COVID 19 – Individual
Behavioral Change for Social Good, International Journal of Management, 11(6),
2020, pp. 1318-1331.
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/issues.asp?JType=IJM&VType=11&IType=6
COVID 19 – Individual Behavioral Change for Social Good
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp 1319 [email protected]
1. INTRODUCTION
Theories emerge from practical situations observed and developed. Social Marketing theories
emerged from behavioral change theories and cognitive theories. Social Marketers identify an
issue, plan for individual behavioral change, develop stage by stage change expectations for a
longer duration and measure the change occurred in individuals and the impact on the society.
Social learning and communication theories also play major role in Social Marketing. Social
Marketers assume that change will not occur suddenly. For example, one individual may
suddenly decide to change himself from his past behavior, but if enquired, there will be a root
grown from a seed sowed sometime back and nurtured with structured communication
sponsored regularly. Social Marketing objective is to bring social change but not individual
change. When individual change itself has a strong root cause, how a social change can be
brought in no time?
Cognitive Theories are also important in Social Marketing to understand the thought
process of the set target group to direct the behavior with appropriate stimuli. Social cognitive
theory postulates that human behavior is reciprocally determined by internal personal factors
(Knowledge and self-efficacy) and environmental factors (levels of deprivation or availability
of facilities)[1]
Fundamental principles at the core of social marketing practice have been used to help
reduce tobacco use, stop the spread of HIV / AIDS, prevent malaria, make wearing a bike
helmet a social norm etc.[2] All those cases had time to plan and execute the principles.
The present situation is a major challenge to the Governments leaving no time to plan,
prepare and position. But India is handling the situation by bringing individual and social
change within no time. Planning and execution are simultaneous and success is expected.
2. PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION
Marketing starts from identifying the problem in the market. As such the social marketing
also identifies the social problem in the society. Sensing the issue springs from intuition and
slowly blossoms into a defined problem. Once the problem is defined, designing social
marketing strategy and executing the same are important initiatives that determine the
success.
The problem of COVID 19 was identified on 30th December, 2019 with the release of a
notification by Wuhan Municipal Health Commission stating that there is an unknown disease
that needs to be taken care..[3] Initially, the world apprehended that it was a virus attack in
only Wuhan, China. The place of origin of the Virus was Huanan Market, a sea food market
in Wuhan, China. Later, on 7th January, 2020, National Institute of Viral Disease Control and
Prevention recognized a novel virus named, Corona[4] and the first genetic code was released
on 12th January to World Health Organization (WHO). On 20th January, 2020, China National
Health Commission revealed that the virus is human to human transmissible.[5]As it has
become pandemic, WHO released a strategic preparedness and response plan on 3rd February,
2020.[6]
The first case outside China was recognized in Thailand on 13th January[7] Coming to
India, on 30th January, 2020, the first case has been noticed in Trissur district of Kerala. A
student from Kerala studying in Wuhan University returned home affected with COVID
followed by two more students from the same University returned to their home town in
Alappuzha district and Kasaragod district on 2nd and 3rd February, 2020 consecutively.
Though there were cases in India during January, 2020, as the students were from China,
still there was an apprehension that it is with the people of China only. On 2nd March two more
cases were identified in Delhi, the duo was returned from Italy. One case was admitted in
Dr M. Meher Karuna and Dr S. Vivek
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp 1320 [email protected]
Hyderabad; a 24 year old young software engineer travelled from Bangalore and had a travel
history from UAE. Indian governments became more alert and acted fast on their strategies.
The situation was alarming; the governments started their initiatives towards curbing the virus.
2.1. Strategic Initiatives
In India, the first case was identified on 30th January, 2020. On 31st January, the Office of
Prime Minister and the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare started surveillance activities
by establishing a Strategic Health Operations Center (SHOC) by the National Centre for
Disease Control (NCDC).All International Airports were given instructions to scan the
individuals.
Owing to the COVID spread identified in the country, there are no more deliberations on
prevention. However, it can be seized and controlled in the best possible way. Therefore, the
objective is to identify the individuals affected and stop further spread. Indian population is
138 crores and it is a developing country. It has only 0.55 beds for 1000 population.[8]During
the process of identifying the affected individuals, there is a possibility of spreading the virus
to other individuals. The only option is LOCKDOWN. Lock the unaffected people and
identify the affected and cure. It is estimated that there will be 7 to 8 lakh crore loss to India
for 21 days lockdown.[9] Extended lockdown may cause a loss of $234.4 billion.[10]Health is
given priority over Wealth by the Indian Government. A fast paced strategy of Social
Marketing to bring in the individual change and social change at a time has been executed
with one word. The word is ‘Lockdown’. It has been positioned in the individual mind that
has fear of losing health, in turn life and hope to live better. The caption written on the
subconscious mind is ‘Stay Home, Stay Safe.’
3. SEGMENTATION, TARGETING AND POSITIONING (STP):
3.1. Segmentation
Segmentation is dividing the market into a homogenous part or grouping the customers based
on the homogeneity. In case of COVID 19, the pre-requisite is administrative ease. Hence, the
segmentation is based on the geography and governance. It is easy to achieve the objective by
controlling the cases, state wise. Central Government advised the states to deal with the cases
and control the boundaries. Each state has become a segment in identifying the cases and
controlling the further spread under the guidance of the Central Government. All the states in
the country have closed their borders with the neighboring states. Further to this, based on the
number of cases and severity, the country has been divided into red zone, orange zone and
green zone.
3.2. Targeting
Central Government is analyzing the cases in the states and targeting on the states which need
more help depending on the challenge that the state is facing. However, the country has been
divided into three zones identified with three colors, red, orange and green.[11]
Green Zone: The districts with no COVID cases.
Orange Zone: The districts with less than 15 identified COVID cases and no increase in the
cases.
Red Zone: The districts with more than 15 identified COVID cases.
Government is targeting the Red Zones to control the pandemic. Government is Targeting
Orange zone and Green zones to relax the restrictions.
COVID 19 – Individual Behavioral Change for Social Good
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp 1321 [email protected]
3.3. Positioning
Positioning is occupying a special place in the mind of an individual. It is a strategic and
tactful act of a marketer to occupy a special place in the mind and retain there for a specified
period till the objective is attained. “Positioning is what you do to the mind of a prospect. That
is, you position the product in the mind of the prospect.”[12]Today, we are in a world of
information and widespread communication. Minds are full of information from various
sources and sources are also varied and multiple in nature due to the technological
advancements. But the interesting nature of a human mind is that it receives filters and retains
what is intended by the mind. Hence, it is the right intention that is important for both the
sender and receiver. In Social Marketing, it is an expectation of an individual behavioral
change for social benefit. Both the marketer and the prospect will be sharing the benefit being a
part of the society.
In case of COVID, what is the intended individual behavior change that the government is
expecting to get away the virus from the country? The intended behavior is the value
proposition in this social marketing activity. The value propositions are stay home and stay safe.
Government is expecting the public to stay at home to control the spread of virus.
In case of Social Marketing, Positioning has eight R’s that explain the strategy depicted in
the following diagram.
Figure 1 Positioning
Source: Prepared by authors.
Right Intention: Health is given priority over Wealth. Though lockdown leads to an
economic downturn, being a developing economy, percentage of individuals living under
poverty line is high; it is a sacred intention of the Government prioritizing health over wealth.
Right Stimulus: what will be the action that can be expected from individual, hand wash,
boost immunity, maintain social distance, stay home, self-quarantine and complete lockdown?
Individuals are expected to stay at home. To bring the behavioral change, the whole country is
locked. The announcement of Janata Curfew and its successful execution voluntarily acted as a
pre-launch stimulus and also as a test marketing initiative. The whole country was alerted and
brought to unity by clapping at 5pm that created a sense of responsibility on everyone to fight
with the new Virus. Behavioral change has been implanted in the minds of the people.
Everyone eagerly waited to get the next instruction to follow. Lockdown announcement was a
Dr M. Meher Karuna and Dr S. Vivek
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp 1322 [email protected]
thunderous announcement that was not expected by many, but soon realized the significance
of it and everyone has become a part of it.
Strengthening the positioning: It is an important initiative to alert the society and rejuvenate
the society to continue their committed behavior. For which, on 5th April, there was a call on
lighting a lamp at 9pm. It is an act of strengthening the positioned message by a stimulus.
Right Message: ‘Stay Home, Stay Safe.’ The government wants to identify the affected people
and control the spread among the non-affected people. The message is clear, you are safe at
your home, and outside is a virus. Subliminally, it is communicating that there is a threat
outside. If the message is to ask the individual to lockdown for oneself, it may not strike the
minds. Hence, the whole country is lockdown that implies everyone has to stay home and stay
safe. The message is a forced announcement for individual and social good.
Right Medium: All means of communication completely indulged in spreading the message.
Coronavirus has become a buzz word in every nook and corner of the country. Every celebrity
volunteered to spread the message. Every artist communicated through his art. Everyone
started communicating to every other individual to protect the society in one’s own way.
Right Person: Prime Minister, Chief Ministers and Health Ministers are only making
announcements to showcase the importance of the situation. Prime Minister has become a
leader, everyone else follows. Everyone is eagerly waiting for the message from Prime
Minister and Chief Ministers and accepting the message with high respect and positive mind.
Right Method: Daily essentials are made available. Government aid to the needy people by
supplying the essential commodities along with the money is the right support to ensure them,
stay home. People are allowed to go out to get items of emergency. Police are vigilant on the
movements of the public. Essentials and Emergencies are open for happy stay at home. After
taking the situation into control and getting the right situation analysis and opinions of the
Chief Ministers of each state, lockdown was extended further till 3rd May, 2020.
Right Time: Virus has just entered the country, but not spread much. The time of lockdown
was not early, not late. It was the right time that was announced. There were 236 positive cases
in India by 21st March, 2020.[13] It is the right time, the country decided to shut down.
Right Change: There is a significant behavioral change in Indians during this lockdown time
as expected by the Government that resulted in controlling COVID 19. The change in mass
India is a great success. The country is united.
3.4. Individual Behavioral Change
The never imagined situation emerged in ahasty way has impacted the individual behavior and
has brought out a sea change. Given the choice of two alternate means of understanding
behaviour and trying to bring about change in the world, it is necessary to consider which
approach is best suited to achieving results on the scale demanded by the environmental and
public health challenge, and whether the individualistic approaches, that currently seem
hegemonic, pose undue risks to achieving society's desired aims regarding challenges.[14] A
study that had been taken up by Fudan University on energy behavior of individuals has
considered four main aspects: (1) awareness raising and behavior forming; (2) approaches to
encourage behavior change; (3) beyond the barriers and the constraints; and (4) systems and
mechanisms for the long-term engagement.[15] All such aspects need to be examined during the
present situation.
Lot many changes occurred during this lockdown in relation to the work using virtual
reality. There is an every need for the organizations also to rethink on the work related
individual changes that may emerge after coming out of this critical situation. In the current
era, characterized by dynamic societal, technological, and economic changes as well as an
COVID 19 – Individual Behavioral Change for Social Good
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp 1323 [email protected]
increasing diversity in the workforce, previous approaches to individual work behaviour are
being challenged (Schalk et al. 2010).
There is a lot of change in the individual behavior during the lockdown period that was
achieved through the strategic execution of Social Marketing Concepts. In addition, especially
for workers in highly demanding jobs, such as physicians, who have to survive heavy patient
demands over a longer period of time, it seems to be important to train them in necessary
communication and political skills that manage the physician–patient relationship.[16]
4. METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY
The behavioral change is the result of the lockdown initiative and positioning strategy executed
by the Central and State Governments. This paper is an attempt to measure the effectiveness
and efficiency of the states by using spatial maps and Multi-Dimensional Scaling (MDS). The
two dimensions taken are number of cases recorded in the States and the number of cases cured
and the fatalities. It is clear that the less number of cases indicates effectiveness and the
cases cured denote efficiency. Rank order is prepared based on the results of the MDS.
Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS Statistics 22) and MS Excel are used for
calculations and diagrammatic presentations.
Data has been taken from 24th March, 2020 to 15th April, 2020.[17] The duration is the first
lockdown period of 21 days. Out of all the states in the country, 26 states and 4 union
territories have recorded corona virus affected cases during this period. Out of 30 states and
UTs, 7 states and UTs have recorded only single digit cases. Therefore, those states have not
been considered for the study. Out of the 23 remaining states taken for analysis, Delhi is an
outlier in both effectiveness and Efficiency. It is the worst affected state and not able to
manage the cases efficiently. It will not fit into the diagram being an outlier. Therefore, Delhi
is not incorporated in the MDS diagram.
To ascertain the number of cases, there are number of other variables to be considered. As
the problem is related to the population and their spread in the state, Population, area of the
state in square kilometers and density of population that means the number of individuals live
in a square kilometer have been taken as the variables to compare with the number of cases.
The correlation is measured among the number of cases and the other variables. The following
tables show the correlation coefficients.
Table 1 Correlation between the No. of Cases Recorded during the First Lockdown and Population of
the States
Number of cases during
lockdown
Population
Number of cases during
lockdown
Pearson Correlation 1 .411
Sig. (2-tailed) .051
N 23 23
Population of the State Pearson
Correlation
.411 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .051
N 23 23
Dr M. Meher Karuna and Dr S. Vivek
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp 1324 [email protected]
Table 2 Correlation between the No. of Cases Recorded during the First Lockdown and Area of the
States
Number of cases during
lockdown
Population
Number of cases during
lockdown
Pearson
Correlation
1 .565**
Sig. (2-tailed) .005 N 23 23
Area of the State in
SKMs.
Pearson
Correlation
.565** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .005 N 23 23
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)
Table 3 Correlation between the No. of Cases Recorded during the First Lockdown and Density of
Population of the States
Number of cases during
lockdown
Population
Number of cases during
lockdown
Pearson Correlation 1 .319
Sig. (2-tailed) .137
N 23 23
Density of Population Pearson
Correlation
.319 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .137
N 23 23
Among the three variables, all the three variables are positively correlated with the
number of cases identified in the states. The correlation coefficient between the population and
the number of cases identified is 0.41 and the correlation coefficient between the density of
population and the number of cases identified is 0.32. Both are positively correlated but the
relation is weak. However, the correlation coefficient between the area of the states and the
number of cases identified in the states is 0.56, which is considered as a significant positive
correlation. Therefore, effectiveness is measured based on the number of cases in relation to
the area of the states. The following table shows the effectiveness of the states presented in the
rank order.
4.1. Effectiveness and Efficiency
Peter Drucker, the management guru, coined the two words to understand the management
capabilities. “Effectiveness means doing the right thing and efficiency means doing it right.” [18] It is important that during crisis, no manager can be tolerated for non-performance. Both
Central and State Governments completely focused on the issue of the hour instead of treating
the issue as one of the important issues and dealing along with the other activities. It is a war
like situation, where the Government takes tough decisions to overcome the situation. There is
no other situation than this would arise in the world to talk about effectiveness and efficiency.
In this study, the right thing is controlling the number of COVID cases (Doing the right thing)
and efficiency is managing the cases by controlling deaths and curing more patients (Doing
things right).
COVID 19 – Individual Behavioral Change for Social Good
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp 1325 [email protected]
Table 4 Effectiveness of the States during the First Lockdown Period
State
No. of Cases
during
Lockdown
Area of the State
(Square
KM)
No. of cases
per
SKM
Effectiveness (No. of
cases
per 10000 SKMs.)
Delhi* 1609 1484 1.084232 10842
Maharashtra 3086 307713 0.010029 100
Tamil Nadu 1241 130058 0.009542 95
Rajasthan 1096 242239 0.004524 45
Madhya Pradesh 1055 308245 0.003424 34
Uttar Pradesh 760 240928 0.003154 32
Telangana 584 112077 0.005211 52
Andhra Pradesh 523 162968 0.003209 32
Jammu and
Kashmir
303 125535 0.002414 24
Kerala 285 38863 0.007333 73
Karnataka 264 191791 0.001376 14
West Bengal 222 88752 0.002501 25
Haryana 185 44212 0.004184 42
Punjab 166 50362 0.003296 33
Bihar 78 94163 0.000828 8
Outlier.
Sources: Compiled by the authors. Data collected from https://www.careerpower.in/largest-state-
india.htmland https://www.thehindu.com/data/article31254718.ece/inline/
State of Delhi: In Delhi, 1609 cases have been recorded. When it is compared with the area of
the state, the cases are 10842 per 10,000 SKM. In other states, it is 100 or below 100 cases
recorded per 10,000 Square Kilometer.If the score of effectiveness is high means the state is
ineffective because of more number of cases recorded.
Once the cases are recorded in the States, it is the efficiency of the states to cure the
patients and reduce fatalities. All the states have prepared emergency strategies to treat the
patients. Doctors and Hospital staff are working for 24 hours in all the states. Their services
during this exigency are commendable. Some of the doctors getting affected and few of them
sacrificed their lives.
To bring balance between the cases cured and the fatalities, Number of deaths has been
subtracted from the number of cases cured. The efficiency of the state is the cases recorded
minus cases cured minus fatalities. Efficiency of the states is depicted in the following table.
Odisha 58 155707 0.000372 4
Assam 35 78438 0.000446 4
Uttarakhand 34 53483 0.000636 6
Himachal Pradesh 33 55673 0.000593 6
Jharkhand 27 79714 0.000339 3
Chhattisgarh 15 135191 0.000111 1
Andaman and
Nicobar
11 8249 0.001333 13
Dr M. Meher Karuna and Dr S. Vivek
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp 1326 [email protected]
Table 5 Efficiency of the States during the First Lockdown Period
State
No. of Cases during
Lockdown
No. of Cases
Cured
Fatali ties Final Cases after deducting
fatalities
Efficie ncy
Andaman and
Nicobar
11 10 0 10 91
Kerala 285 245 3 242 85
Chhattisgarh 15 9 0 9 60
Bihar 78 37 1 36 46
Himachal Pradesh 33 16 1 15 45
Odisha 58 19 1 18 31
Telangana 584 186 18 168 29
Uttarakhand 34 9 0 9 26
Karnataka 264 82 13 69 26
Haryana 185 43 3 40 22
West Bengal 222 51 10 41 18
Rajasthan 1096 164 3 161 15
Tamil Nadu 1241 180 15 165 13
Assam 35 5 1 4 11
Jammu and Kashmir 303 38 4 34 11
Punjab 166 27 13 14 8
Uttar Pradesh 760 74 13 61 8
Gujarat 896 73 36 37 4
Maharashtra 3086 300 194 106 3
Andhra Pradesh 523 20 14 6 1
Madhya Pradesh 1055 64 53 11 1
Delhi 1609 51 38 13 1
Jharkhand 27 0 2 -2 -7
Sources: Compiled by the authors. Data collected from https://www.careerpower.in/largest-state-
india.htmland https://www.thehindu.com/data/article31254718.ece/inline/
It can be understood that Andaman and Nicobar is the most efficient in managing the cases
followed by Kerala. Kerala is the state that is doing things right by executing the lockdown
strictly. Though the cases increased rapidly to 285, most of the cases are cured and the
fatalities are reduced. Efficiency of the states is clearly depicts the performance in managing
the cases in the above table.
4.2. Multi-Dimensional Scaling
Multi-Dimensional Scaling (MDS) is a procedure that enables a researcher to determine the
relative image of a set of objects. Researchers may use measures in making judgements using
objective dimension that has quantifiable attributes. Therefore, the dimensions taken in this
study are objective in nature. Effectiveness and Efficiency are plotted on X Axis and Y Axis
respectively that shows High or Low. The values are projected positive and negative from the
mid-point of the data arranged in a descending order to get an image of high and low. To avoid
the concentration at the central point where both the axis intersects, 5 points are added to each
value obtained, on both the dimensions.
COVID 19 – Individual Behavioral Change for Social Good
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp 1327 [email protected]
Figure 2 Multi-Dimensional Map of Effectiveness and Efficiency of the States during First lockdown period
It is evident that the states which are both effective and efficient categorized as High,
High, cases high in effectiveness but low in efficiency are categorized High, Low, cases
which are Low effective and high in efficiency are shown Low, High and the states scored
low in both are categorized Low, Low. The following table shows the categories.
Table 6 States scored High in Effectiveness and High in Efficiency
States scored High in Effectiveness and High in Efficiency
Andaman and Nicobar 20.5 High 79.4 High
Chhattisgarh 32.5 High 48.5 High
Bihar 25.5 High 34.7 High
Himachal Pradesh 27.5 High 34 High
Odisha 29.5 High 19.5 High
Uttarakhand 27.5 High 15 High
Karnataka 19.5 High 14.6 High
West Bengal 8.5 High 7 High
States scored Low in Effectiveness and High in Efficiency
Kerala -49.5 Low 73.4 High
Madhya Pradesh -10.5 Low 20.5 High
Telangana -28.5 Low 17.5 High
Haryana -18.5 Low 10.1 High
States scored High in Effectiveness and Low in Efficiency
Assam 29.5 High -10.1 Low
Jammu and Kashmir 9.5 High -10.3 Low
Jharkhand 30.5 High -28.9 Low
States scored Low in Both Effectiveness and Efficiency
Rajasthan -21.5 Low -6.8 Low
Tamil Nadu -71.5 Low -8.2 Low
Punjab -9.5 Low -13.1 Low
Uttar Pradesh -8.5 Low -13.5 Low
Gujarat -22.5 Low -17.4 Low
Maharashtra -75.5 Low -18.1 Low
Andhra Pradesh -8.5 Low -20.4 Low
Source: Prepared by authors.
Dr M. Meher Karuna and Dr S. Vivek
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp 1328 [email protected]
The study is relative among the states. It is evident that the states which have recorded
more number of cases managed well in curing and reducing fatalities. Kerala, MP, Telangana
and Haryana are the states that are recording COVID cases, but showing efficiency in treating
the patients and controlling the states. The states, like Assam, Jammu and Kashmir and
Jharkhand recorded less number of cases, but they are not able to treat the patients well. The
states like Rajasthan, TN, Punjab, UP, Gujarat, Maharashtra and Andhra Pradesh are
ineffective in controlling the number of cases and not able to treat the cases afterwards may be
due to more number and widespread area, such states need more attention.
5. CONCLUSION
Social Marketing initiatives by the Central and State Governments could bring in change in
individual behaviors for social good. The strategy of lockdown is the only option available
with the governments to control the number of cases registering and to manage the affected
individuals to safeguard the country. The word, ‘Lockdown’ has been positioned well in the
minds of all the sections in the country and showing the positive results. As there is a positive
correlation between the number of cases recorded and the area of the state in square kilometers,
it can be an important variable to measure the number of cases. Interpretations on effectiveness
and efficiency are relative among the states, but not in absolute measurement.
6. FUTURE MANAGEMENT STUDIES
The same analysis can be done for the second stage of lockdown and can be compared the
differences in the two phases of lockdown. COVID life cycle can be prepared to understand
various stages of its growth to predict the death of the virus. India can be compared with other
countries and can be understood the effectiveness and efficiency of our country in comparison
with the regions of the world. People perceptions can be collected after impact and during the
impact to analyze the positioning success.
KEYNOTES
1. Bandura A (1986), Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive
Approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.
2.“Social Marketing, influencing behaviours for good”, Nancy R. Lee, Philip Kotler, Sage
Publications.
3.https://www.who.int/csr/don/05-january-2020-pneumonia-of-unkown-cause-china/en/
4China CDC Weekly.Wuhan, Hubei Province. 2 (5): 79–80. ISSN 2096-7071
5."China confirms human-to-human transmission of coronavirus". The Guardian.
6.https://www.who.int/publications-detail/strategic-preparedness-and-response-plan-for-the-
new-coronavirus 7https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/13-01-2020-who-statement-on-
novel-coronavirus-in-thailand
8.https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2020/03/24/is-indias-health-infrastructure-
equipped-to-handle-an-epidemic/
9 https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/finance/worlds-biggest-lockdown-
may-have-cost-rs-7- 8-lakh-crore-to-indian-economy/articleshow/75123004.cms
10.https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indicators/extended-lockdown-to-
cause-234-4-billion-economic-loss-says-barclays/articleshow/75136935.cms
11.https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/coronavirus-india-red-orange-green-zones-to-mark-
coronavirus-spots-in-country-2210381
12. A. Ries& Jack Trout, ‘Positioning: The Battle for your mind’, Warner books, New York.
COVID 19 – Individual Behavioral Change for Social Good
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp 1329 [email protected]
13.https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/covid-19-total-236-
coronavirus-cases-in-india-says-icmr/articleshow/74739018.cms?from=mdr
14. Chatterton, Tim, (2017), ‘What should be the focus of ‘Behaviour Change: ‘Individuals or
Society’.,Social Business. 2017, Vol. 7 Issue 3/4, p229-240. 12p.
15. Jiang, Ping; Chen, Yihui; Xu, Bin; Dong, Wenbo; Kennedy, Erin. “Building Low carbon
communities in China: The role of Individual’s behaviour change and engagement”. Energy
Policy. Sep2013, Vol. 60, p611- 620. 10p.
16. Editorial on Long Term Developments in Individual Work Behaviour: Patterns of
Stability and Change by Rene Schalk et.al, Journal of Occupational and Organizational
Psychology, The British Psychology Society.
17. https://www.thehindu.com/data/article31254718.ece/inline/
18. What makes an effective executive? By Peter F Drucker, Harvard Business Review
REFERENCES
[1] Centers for disease Control and Prevention. (2020), Corona Virus Disease, 2019,
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-nCoV/index.html.
[2] World Health Organization. (2020), Corona Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic,
https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019.
[3] Yousif, R. (2014) "Measuring the effectiveness of demarketing in influencing consumer
behavior of individuals." International Journal of Business Management & Research 4.5:
31.
[4] WHO. (2020), https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-
2019/situation-reports/.
[5] Andersen, A.R, & Kotler (2003). Strategic Marketing for non-profit organizations, Prentice
Hall, NJ.
[6] Upreti, R. A. S. H. M. I., and R. I. T. U. Singh. (2017) "Differences in development of
adaptive behavioral skills among mentally challenged children with their birth order." Int J
Human SocSci 7: 23-28.
[7] Gerald Hastings, (2007), Social Marketing, Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington, USA.
[8] Hair, Black, Babin, Anderson and Tatham, (2008), Multivariate Data Analysis, Pearson
Education, South Asia.
[9] Varghese, Reney, T. Selvin Norman, and Samuel Thavaraj. (2015)"Perceived stress and self
efficacy among college students: A global review." International Journal of Human
Resource Management and Research 5.3: 15-24.
[10] Nancy R. Lee & Philip Kotler (2011), Sage Publications India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
[11] Hastings, G., Angus, K., Bryant, C. (2011), Sage handbook of social marketing. Thousand
Oaks, Sage.
[12] Weinreich, N.K. (2010). Hands on social marketing: A step-by-step guide. Thousand Oaks,
Sage.
[13] Moses, Chinonye. (2014) "Entrepreneurship Education and Student's Life Challenging
Situations: An Empirical Study of Covenant University, Ota, Ogun State, Nigeria."
International Journal of Business and General Management (IJBGM) 3.4: 1-10.
[14] Secord, P. F., & Backman, C. W. (1961). Personality theory and the problem of stability
change in individual behavior: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Review, 68(1),
21–32. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045625.
Dr M. Meher Karuna and Dr S. Vivek
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp 1330 [email protected]
[15] Corr, P. J. (2001). Testing problems in J. A. Gray's personality theory: A commentary on
Matthews and Gilliland (1999). Personality and Individual Differences, 30(2), 333–352.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00028-3.
[16] Anggara, Sahya. (2016) "Implementation of the integrated services policy in bppt west
java province." International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 5.4: 7-13.
[17] G. Matthews and K. Gilliland (1999), Personality and Individual Differences, Doi.org.
[18] Matthew W. Kreuter, Victor J. Strecher, (1996), Do tailored behavior change messages
enhance the effectiveness of health risk appraisal? Results from a randomized trial, Health
Education Research, Volume 11, Issue 1.
[19] Cox, J.C., Smith, V.L. & Walker, J.M. (1988) Theory and individual behavior of first-
priceauctions. Risk Uncertainty, 1, 61–99.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055565.
[20] Meher Karuna, M & Mahesh, P (2019), “Trident Approach of Social Marketing in Indian
Context”, Rai Management Journal ISSN No 0975-4326) Vol XIV Issue II.
[21] Upreti, R. A. S. H. M. I., and R. I. T. U. Singh. (2017) "Differences in development of
adaptive behavioral skills among mentally challenged children with their birth order." Int J
Human SocSci 7: 23-28.
[22] Bandura A (1986), Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive
Approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.
[23] Nancy R. Lee, Philip Kotler, (2011), “Social Marketing, influencing behaviours for good”,
Sage Publications.
[24] World Health Organization, https://www.who.int/csr/don/05-january-2020- pneumonia-of-
unkown-cause-china/en/.
[25] China CDC Weekly. Wuhan, Hubei Province. 2 (5): 79–80. ISSN 2096-7071.
[26] "China confirms human-to-human transmission of coronavirus". The Guardian.
[27] WHO.https://www.who.int/publications-detail/strategic-preparedness-and- response-plan-
for-the-new-coronavirus.
[28] WHO.https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/13-01-2020-who-statement-on- novel-
coronavirus-in-thailand.
[29] Brookings.edu,https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2020/03/24/is-indias- health-
infrastructure-equipped-to-handle-an-epidemic/.
[30] Economic Times. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/finance/worlds-
biggest-lockdown-may-have-cost-rs-7-8-lakh-crore-to-indian-
economy/articleshow/75123004.cms.
[31] EconomicTimes.https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indicators/ extended-
lockdown-to-cause-234-4-billion-economic-loss-says- barclays/articleshow/75136935.cms.
[32] NDTV.https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/coronavirus-india-red-orange-green- zones-to-
mark-coronavirus-spots-in-country-221038.
[33] Peter Drucker. What makes an effective executive? Harvard Business Review reprints,
617-783-7500.
[34] Rick Wartzman, (2020) What Peter Drucker knew about 2020., Harvard Business Review,
HBR.Org. 2014.
[35] Trending Searches, https://covid-19.ebscomedical.com/.
[36] Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Estimation of Cornoavirus Disease Case –
Fatality Risk in Real Time.
COVID 19 – Individual Behavioral Change for Social Good
http://www.iaeme.com/IJM/index.asp 1331 [email protected]
[37] Shaw, Alan, (2018), Using the Social Return on Investment Framework to Evaluate
Behavior Changes of Individuals Living With Learning Difficulties, Social Marketing
Quarterly. Dec2018, Vol. 24 Issue 4, p281-298. 18p.
[38] Fiksenbaum, Lisa; Marjanovic, Zdravko; Greenglass, Esther, (2017), ‘Financial Threat and
Individuals’ Willingness to Change Fianancial Behaviour’, Review of Behavioral Finance,
2017, v. 9, iss. 2, pp. 128-47.
[39] Chatterton, Tim, (2017), ‘What should be the focus of ‘Behaviour Change: ‘Individuals or
Society’, Social Business. 2017, Vol. 7 Issue 3/4, p229-240. 12p.
[40] Jiang, Ping; Chen, Yihui; Xu, Bin; Dong, Wenbo; Kennedy, Erin. (2013) “Building Low
carbon communities in China: The role of Individual’s behaviour change and
engagement”. Energy Policy. Sep, Vol. 60, p 611-620. 10p.
[41] Schalk, R., Van Veldhoven, M. J. P. M., De Lange, A. H., De Witte, H., Kraus, K.,
Stamov-Roßnagel, C., Zacher, H. (2010). Moving European research on work and ageing
forward: Overview and agenda. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology,
19, 76–101.
[42] Editorial on Long Term Developments in Individual Work Behaviour: Patterns of Stability
and Change by Rene Schalk et.al, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,
The British Psychology Society.
[43] Prajod Sunny and Ajimon George, (2018) Determinants of Behavioral Intention to Use
Mobile Wallets –A Conceptual Model. Journal of Management, 5(5), pp. 52–62.
[44] N. Natesh and N. Shobha Rani, (2018) Customer Puzzled Behavioral Analysis -A Step
Towards Valuing Customer’s Interests, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering
and Technology, 9(7), pp. 365–374.