coupling solid-aqueous-gas phases of carbon and nitrogen across topographic gradients and extreme...
TRANSCRIPT
Coupling Solid-Aqueous-Gas Phases of Carbon and Nitrogen
Across Topographic Gradients and Extreme Weather Events
Sandra Petrakis1, Rodrigo Vargas1, Angelia Seyfferth1, Shreeram Inamdar1
Introduction Results: Rewetting of soils Results: Changes over time
1Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware
“This project was supported by Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grants
Program award no. 2013-02758 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture.”
Figure 5 – Percent Carbon (a) , percent Nitrogen (b), and C:N ratio (c), for all soil locations
before and after the re-wetting experiment.
Table 1 – Changes in magnitude of GHG Fluxes during the experiment. Arrows are
arranged by phase and soil location. Color indicates GHG, (CO2: black, N2O: purple, CH4:
green) Arrow size represents the intensity of fluxes, (Large arrows; largest fluxes, medium
arrows; moderate-high fluxes, small arrows; low gas flux, smallest arrows; very low gas flux).
Eh and pH values are in parentheses, respectively.
Table 2 – CO2 equivalencies (CO2 eq) of GHG fluxes in g m-2 day -1, and the percent CO2
equivalent each soil location contributed. IPCC 2013 report values for 100 year GWP
accounting for situations with and without Carbon Climate Feedback.
Figure 3 – Comparisons of CO2 (a, b, c,
d), CH4 (e, f, g, h) and N2O (i, j, k, l) to
soil moisture, for each of the 5 phases,
by soil location.
Figure 4 – Comparisons of CO2 to CH4 (a,
b, c, d), N2O to CH4 (e, f, g, h) and CO2 to
N2O (i, j, k, l) for each of the 5 phases, by soil
location.
Conclusions
Water pulses suppressed CO2 fluxes but enhanced CH4 in Creek and
Wetland soils, while N2O increased in Upland and Lowland soils.
There is not necessarily a trend with θ and GHG fluxes grouped by
phase.
Redox conditions could provide the information of conditions which
drive greenhouse gas production following extreme pulse events.
With GWP accounting for carbon-climate feedback, Upland and
Lowland soil types contributed the greatest percentage of GHGs in
terms of CO2 equivalent.
Extreme water pulses can drive responses of gas fluxes not captured
by a linear empirical model.
(GWP values taken from Table 8.7 of Myhre, G., D. Shindell, F.-M. Bréon, W. Collins, J. Fuglestvedt, J. Huang, D. Koch, J.-F. Lamarque, D. Lee, B. Mendoza, T. Nakajima, A. Robock, G.
Stephens, T. Takemura and H. Zhang, 2013: Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the
Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex and P.M.
Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA).
Figure 2 – Time series of GHGs (CO2 CH4, and N2O) and Soil Moisture for Wetland (a, b, c, d) Creek (e,
f, g, h), Upland (i, j, k, l) and Lowland (m, n, o, p) soils. Vertical lines represents the application of a water
pulse. Roman numerals I-V denote time periods (phases) of the experiment.
Extreme weather events influence the full range of greenhouse gas
(GHG) fluxes from soils, impacting the global warming potential
(GWP) of terrestrial ecosystems.
Soils exposed to extreme precipitation events may experience shifts in
GHG fluxes.
We seek to understand the influence of these extreme pulses of
water, because water is known to be important to biogeochemistry
and GHG fluxes from soils.
We used extreme pulses of water for a rewetting experiment to
explore GHG flux responses of four different soils representative of
a watershed.
Soil samples were collected by removing the upper 10 cm of soil
by inserting 20 cm diameter PVC rings across a hillslope transect
in a forested watershed within the Maryland Piedmont region.
Upland forested soils in this region are described as Glenelg
series. Soils were collected from Wetland, Creek, Upland and
Lowland locations within the watershed.
Soils were placed in the lab, allowing us to manipulate soil
moisture via six pulses of water which were applied over the
duration of the experiment, while maintaining temperature (21 to
23° C).
Continuous measurements of GHGs were taken using an
LI8100-A multiplexed system with automated chambers, and a
Picarro G2508 measured CO2, CH4, and N2O in primary soil
collars.
Figure 1 – Output screen of the Picarro G2508.
Study site and methods