cost assgn
TRANSCRIPT
Table of Contents
1.0 Uniform costing..........................................................................................................2
1.1 Pre-requisites for Uniform Costing.......................................................................2
1.2 Advantages of Uniform Costing...........................................................................3
1.3 Disadvantages of Uniform Costing.......................................................................4
1.4 Example of Uniform Costing................................................................................5
2.0 Value-added Statement..............................................................................................6
2.1 Problems in preparation of VAS...........................................................................6
2.2 Advantages of Value-added Statement.................................................................7
2.3 Disadvantages of Value-added Statement.............................................................8
3.0 Presentation of Information to Management.........................................................10
Implication of Cost Management Information...........................................................10
3.1 Competitive pricing............................................................................................11
3.2 Monitoring and Controlling Costs......................................................................11
3.3 Strategic Planning...............................................................................................12
Reference...........................................................................................................................13
BM054-3.5-2 COST AND MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING
1.0 Uniform costing
Uniform costing defined as “the use by several undertakings of the same costing
systems, i.e. the same basic costing methods, principles and techniques.” (LCCI, 1986,
p.302) Uniform costing cannot be considered as a distinct method of costing formally.
The basic idea behind uniform costing is that the different concerns in an industry should
adopt a common method of costing and apply uniformly the same principles and
techniques for better cost comparison and common good (ICAI, n.d.).
1.1 Pre-requisites for Uniform Costing
To implement a successful uniform costing in an industry, there must be a spirit
of co-operation and mutual trust prevailing among the participating firms. No
competition and hatred should exist among participant members. All the firms in the
industry must be willing to share and furnish relevant information with no concealment.
There should be a frequently mutual exchange of ideas. Moreover, the superior firms
should take the lead towards sharing their experience and expertise with the minor firms
to enable the latter to improve their performance.
Besides that, uniformity must be established with regard to three matters. The first
is size of the various units covered by uniform costing (ICAI, n.d.). The size of units
should be more or less the same which are to be brought under uniform costing. Units
differing in size should be classified in a number of categories according to their size.
Since the cost structure in an organization is influenced by its size, the classification of
units based on their size would make the cost statements of these units more comparable.
Next is the uniformity in production methods (ICAI, n.d.). All units in an industry
should use uniform methods of production. The third point would be accounting methods,
principles and procedures used. In fact, the uniformity should be achieved in respect of
methods of valuing inventory, cost unit, classification of costs and its components, basis
of allocation and apportionment of overheads and joint cost, methods of depreciation,
treatment of notional expenses, preparation of cost statements, reports and their
submission schedule and etc.
UCTI (UC2F0909AF) P
age 2
CHEONG KAH MUN (TP018096)
BM054-3.5-2 COST AND MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING
1.2 Advantages of Uniform Costing
One of the greatest advantages of a uniform costing system for an industry is the
ability to make cost comparisons. Comparison made under such circumstance provide
objective basis, thus management can use it as guideline to self-examine their operation
and control costs effectively and efficiently. Moreover, the benefits derived are not only
those of price fixing, but also of the competition in efficiency of operation that develops
from such a comparison. Ordinarily, rumours and hearsay drift through the various
organizations in regard to costs of manufacture, and no doubt the comparisons would be
able to dispel these unfounded rumours (Halligan, 1928). In fact, uniform costing is also
very helpful in comparing the production efficiency of two units at the time of an
amalgamation and merger (Jawahar-Lal 2008, p.968).
The trend toward uniform cost accounting in all industries generally, has
improved competition and has promoted more intelligent competition based upon a more
intimate knowledge of the cost of manufacture and marketing (Halligan, 1928). It
managed to restrict unfair price competition and hence for restoring discipline and order
in applied industries (Walker and Mitchell, 1996). This improvement occurred during the
period of investigation and development of the uniform system of accounting. The
industry key companies will undoubtedly assume the leadership. In the process
comparing methods used, the companies will find that the "other fellow" has some good
ideas. They would discover that each of them has some distinctive feature of value, but at
the same time some cost elements have been ignored. This development period will
stimulate interest among the accountants of companies actively engaged in the work that
have some good influence in promoting more intelligent competition, providing other
economic forces do not befog the field too greatly, such as violent fluctuations in the
prices of raw material, or decided overproduction beyond the consuming power of the
buying public .
The management will be saved of botheration of developing and introducing a
costing system of theirs. The time and cost incurred on designing and establishing a
costing system is likely to be saved. A uniform costing system for the firms in the same
UCTI (UC2F0909AF) P
age 3
CHEONG KAH MUN (TP018096)
BM054-3.5-2 COST AND MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING
industry is provided for the adoption of similar undertakings. Since the system is devised
by manual consultation and after considering the difficulties and circumstances prevailing
in the various undertakings, therefore it is readily adopted and successfully implemented.
1.3 Disadvantages of Uniform Costing
However, it is not easy to implement uniform costing in an industry due to the
differing circumstances in which firms operate (Dutta, 2009, pg.18-7). Individual firms in
the industry may differ in nature of work, conditions and organizational characteristics. In
case the differences are significant and there are no way to eliminating them, the adoption
of uniform costing would be unworkable.
Besides that, this system of costing tends to suggest a single price within the
industry which may lead to monopolistic tendencies (Solomons, 1950). On account of a
single market entity controlling supply, degree of price and supply control
exerted by the industry is greater. All the firms in the industry may act in a
concerted manner by curtailing supplies and thereby resulting in artificially raising price
of products.
In fact, uniform costing requires utmost cooperation, openness and confidence
among members of the industry group. But there would be some of the firms are hesitant
towards the use of this costing system. They may not be willing to reveal data or
information to the trade association for the fear of confidential information being passed
on to competitors. Even all firms are willing to share the information, it is possible that
the data provided may not be accurate. The firms may accidentally or intentionally reveal
the wrong information. As the result, the utility of the system lost.
The expenses needed for hundreds firms, big or small, public or private, in an
industry, to implement similar undertakings in their costing system definitely would be a
very big figure. Large and medium size firms may have the ability to pay for it, however
small or new established firms cannot afford it. The high installation cost would increase
the burden of the weaker firms. Some of the small size firms would rather adopt their
UCTI (UC2F0909AF) P
age 4
CHEONG KAH MUN (TP018096)
BM054-3.5-2 COST AND MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING
own costing system which best suited their environment. Therefore, the workability of
uniform costing would be a big problem.
1.4 Example of Uniform Costing
The News Print Service Bureau, an association of newsprint paper manufacturers,
is one of the outstanding examples of an industry which adopting uniform costing
(Halligan, 1928). This association conducts a monthly comparison of the cost of
converting pulp wood into paper, excluding the material and marketing costs so that by
no stretch of imagination could its activities be construed as an attempt at fixing prices.
This monthly exchange of costs, supplemented by numerous operating efficiency data, is
based upon a uniform classification of accounts contained in the association's manual,
which has been universally adopted by all companies in the industry, so that all figures
are comparable and every member is talking the same language. These comparisons are
now, after so many years' operation, a fixture in the newsprint paper industry and are
veritable score cards registering monthly the results of the competition in efficiency
going on among the association members.
UCTI (UC2F0909AF) P
age 5
CHEONG KAH MUN (TP018096)
BM054-3.5-2 COST AND MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING
2.0 Value-added Statement
The Institute of Cost and Management Accountants define added value as “the
increase in realizable value resulting from an alternative in form, location or availability
of a product or service, excluding the cost of purchased materials or service.” In short,
value added equal to sales revenue less materials and service purchased. It represents the
wealth the firm has been able to create by the efforts of its employees. (LCCI, 1986, p.
303)
The implementation of value added statement (VAS), in addition to an income
statement, a balance sheet and a cash flow statement, developed since 1970s in Britain. In
fact, the value added statement involves a recasting of the data contained in income
statement. Besides than showing the firm’s added value, the statement also illustrates
how the value added is shared between employees, the providers of capital and
government.
The publication of value-added statement is apparently adopts a broader
stakeholder-oriented viewpoint in compared with the income statement which is focus on
shareholders’ perspective only. It is recognize the fact that other members of a society
have a stake in corporate performance. Therefore, various professional reports in Britain
such as The Corporate Report and Green Paper support the inclusion of value added
statement in company financial reports.
2.1 Problems in preparation of Value-added Statement
However, the firms would be complied with two major problems in preparation of
value added statement. The first problem would be treatment of depreciation. Firms
would have to choose between gross value added approach and net value added approach.
In gross value added approach, depreciation is excluded from the calculation of value
added and is reported with retained earnings in the statement of changes in equity as a
‘distribution’ of value added. In contrast, depreciation is treated as a deduction from sales
in the calculation of value added in net value added approach.
UCTI (UC2F0909AF) P
age 6
CHEONG KAH MUN (TP018096)
BM054-3.5-2 COST AND MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING
Some firms favour the former one because the sum of depreciation and retained
earning shows the amount of the value added that is available for reinvestment. It would
be difficult to be determined if depreciation is included with bought-in materials and
services. Nevertheless, the net value added approach is preferred because the use of gross
value added involves double-counting, as the supplier of a depreciable asset will include
its sale as part of value added, while the purchaser will not deduct depreciation from sales
revenue in calculating its value added. The arguments above are illustrating the fact that
both approaches should also be included in the value added statement.
The next problem is to identify which taxes should be reported in the value added
statement as a distribution to government. Most British companies choose to report only
corporate income tax because it can help in avoiding subjective decisions about which
payments to governments and their instrumentalities should be shown as the
government’s share of value added. Sales and excise taxes are excluded from value added
based on idea that the government sector has played no role in the wealth created by the
firm. The taxes are not shown as distribution to government as the view of ‘government
as public sector’ is not supported by most company (Meek & Gray, 1988).
2.2 Advantages of Value-added Statement
Annual report is an important medium by which a corporation communicates
information to a diverse set of users. In fact, value-added statement is always packaged as
social responsibility reporting. It is believed that through the supplemental disclosures in
the VAS, the company can reach out to new or expanded audience and thereby enlarge
the scope of interest in the company (Meek & Gray, 1988). Beside of maintaining the
primary orientation of its traditional financial statements towards shareholders, VAS also
provides information to other groups that may be meaningful to them. The good name of
company would be dispersed to society and thus establish a superior corporate image.
The VAS has been indirectly become one of the effective marketing tools.
In addition, the VAS can also be a motivation tool for employees. Income
statement just shows profit which is the reward of shareholders but not employees. Few
workers are said to be enthusiastic about maximizing somebody else's reward, and,
UCTI (UC2F0909AF) P
age 7
CHEONG KAH MUN (TP018096)
BM054-3.5-2 COST AND MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING
therefore, a profit statement has little interest or motivational value for employees. In
contrast, the VAS reflects the wealth created by the firm to which employees contribute
and the distribution to them of a portion of wealth. When fully informed about VA, they
should be better motivated to work, be more cooperative and more identified with their
company. The illustration of reward to employees will enhance their attitudes to work
and thus reduce industrial disputation. In short, the value added reporting produces a
good organizational climate for labor by high lighting its contribution to the final results
of the firm (Riahi-Belkaoui, 1999, p.9).
The Corporate Report (ASSC) regards value added as a more preferable way of
describing performance. Product-based approach in VAS is more objective than profit-
based approach in income statement. Profits measure only shareholder’s share of a
company’s result of activities, while value assessed statements focus attention on the
success of a company in creating wealth and generating national income (Porwal, 2001,
p.233).
Besides than the focus of VAS, the net value added is a better index of
performance than net profit, especially in cases where arbitrary and in corrigible
accounting techniques result in recognition of an accounting loss rather than an
accounting profit (Sinha, 1983).
Also, the value added-based ratio analysis may provide a better index for the
measurement of managerial efficiency (Ball, 1968) and vertical integration (Morley, 1979). The
VA/payroll ratio makes it easier for the company to introduce a productivity bonus scheme
for employees. Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd. is the best known, have introduced such
schemes to enhance productivity. The employees receive bonus payments according to a
formula based on demonstrated improvements over time in the ratio (Morley, 1979).
2.3 Disadvantages of Value-added Statement
However, inclusion of VAS in an annual report can cause confusion with the
income statement, especially in cases when the trend of VA and earnings are different (Morley,
1979). What would those who are financial illiterate reading the annual report infer if he
UCTI (UC2F0909AF) P
age 8
CHEONG KAH MUN (TP018096)
BM054-3.5-2 COST AND MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING
saw that VA was rising while earnings were falling? Suppose a company's sales for the
year were $500, bought-in costs of $300 and it paid $250 in wages. In these
circumstances VA for the year would be $500- $300 = $200, for that would be the value
placed on the company's efforts by its customers. However, a loss of $50 has been made.
What has happened here is that the team has earned $200 of VA but has over-distributed
to employees. In effect, shareholders have lost $50 of the company's reserves, as this is
the excess of wages over VA. The shareholders can rightly say they have lost value to the
extent of $50, but the VAS is not a report on shareholders' welfare. It is a report on the
welfare of a more broadly defined team, and that team taken as a whole has benefited by
value added of $200.
The next disadvantage of the VAS is that it raises a new danger of inefficient
management, since managers may wrongly seek to maximize their company's VA rather
than profit. This unsound advice could lead to grossly wasteful decisions in which
shareholders' capital would be dissipated in subsidizing uneconomic output and eventual
liquidation of company (Morley, 1979). For example, a company have choices between
self-manufacture or external supply of a component. The misled manager might choose
manufacturing when he discovers that the cost of direct material is lower than supplier’s
price, as the bought-in cost would be decrease and the VA would be increase. Yet, he
might have ignored about the cost of direct labour which is higher than the difference
between direct material and supplier’s price. In this case, the shareholders' earnings
would be fallen. The VA-maximizer would, therefore, be dissipating shareholders' capital
by manufacturing instead of buying in.
Last but not least, the objection of VAS is related to the preparation of VAS. Its
inclusion in the annual report would involve extra work, therefore extra costs and delay
and also a slight loss of confidentiality in view of the additional disclosure involved. In
practice the extra work, cost, and delay have proved to be negligible. Also, VA
Statements are flagrantly improperly regulated. No framework and standards have been
designed especially for VA Statement. Accountants have no guidelines to refer when
preparing VA Statement. Indeed, an unscrupulous accountant could manipulate the
choice of methods of VA calculation to produce almost any VA figure desired.
UCTI (UC2F0909AF) P
age 9
CHEONG KAH MUN (TP018096)
BM054-3.5-2 COST AND MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING
3.0 Presentation of Information to Management
Degree of detail in information presented to management varies in accordance
with the recipient (LCCI, 1986). The data presented to higher management should be
fewer details. Comprehensive production cost data is presented to lower management
whereas only the summary figures are presented to higher management.
Next, the scope of information would also be different. The information to lower
management only covers the relevant section of the organization (LCCI, 1986).
Production manager only presented to production statistics and sales information to sales
manager. While, to correspond with wide scope of responsibilities, top management
needs all ranges of data to assist them in decision making.
In fact, the lower level management needs to have access to on-the-spot
information (LCCI, 1986). They are the one who leading the daily operation, thus any
incident happened which effect the process should be informed to lower level manager.
But, the top management would just have to view information presented on a regular
basis. They just want to check on the statistic to ensure the progression of the project is
under control.
The presentation of information is also following concept of ‘management by
exception’ (LCCI, 1986). Only variances or exceptions from budgets are highlighted to
management. This is to help managers to better utilize their time by concentrating only
on essential areas.
Implication of Cost Management Information
Cost management information would be able to help management improves
financial performance. A cost management approach recognizes that all strategic,
operational, and financial issues are interrelated. Cost management information can help
companies improve their financial and operational performance and better address an
array of management issues. Improved cost information enables companies to price
UCTI (UC2F0909AF) P
age 10
CHEONG KAH MUN (TP018096)
BM054-3.5-2 COST AND MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING
product and services more competitively, reduce and control operation costs, and upgrade
strategic planning efforts (George, 1989).
3.1 Competitive pricing
For many organizations, securing or maintaining market position depends on
effectively pricing the services offered. Determining competitive yet profitable prices for
services requires a comprehensive knowledge of the cost, overhead, and potential sales
volume. While supply and demand issues, market considerations, and environmental
factors still form the foundation of a sound pricing policy, it is also important to properly
apply cost information.
Using the product margin reports the cost, margin, and profitability at current
gross charges for both individual products and for the entire product line can be easily
evaluated (George, 1989). And through various discount and product volume levels,
management can more effectively evaluate the potential effects of a variety of
assumptions on pricing and profitability (George, 1989). All these evaluation would
improve the basis for competitive pricing decisions.
By including accurate cost information in pricing decisions, management is able
to achieve profitability and understand the implications of various price and risk levels.
While each competitive opportunity should be evaluated based on its relative importance,
the proper interpretation and use of cost management information provides a means to
achieve sound, profitable pricing guidelines (George, 1989).
3.2 Monitoring and Controlling Costs
The performance reporting capabilities of a cost management system give
management information to better monitor and assess the financial results of day-to-day
decisions. Starting with summary performance information, "management by exception"
can be used to determine which cost centers are performing significantly above or below
expectations. More importantly, this report pinpoints the primary reasons, such as an
efficiency variance, for unexpected performance.
UCTI (UC2F0909AF) P
age 11
CHEONG KAH MUN (TP018096)
BM054-3.5-2 COST AND MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING
Cost management information enhances the ability to measure financial
performance by providing the necessary framework to better monitor, control, and reduce
costs. Cost management information can use to compares budgeted and earned amounts
with actual results on a regular basis. With this information, the performance of each
manager or department can be accurately measured. A cost management system can also
provide information that is critical to pinpointing management's strengths and
weaknesses and is a key to implementing performance-related incentive compensation
programs.
3.3 Strategic Planning
The key objectives for strategic planning are to provide a clear direction for an
organization and to minimize the effects of future uncertainties. Before expanding an
existing service or introducing a product line, an analysis should be performed to
determine the resources required to produce an increased volume of products.
Product cost information can augment a company's strategic and operational
planning efforts. Bringing this information into the strategic planning process enables
executives to analyze the return on investment in conjunction with competition and
demand, maximizing the application of resources (George, 1989). With accurate cost
information, management can position the company to increase market share and
profitability by selectively expanding products that are most attractive to investors.
A cost management system provides information to help managers determine
where to invest limited capital and human resources. Product cost determination
information can provide the cost and revenue component necessary for strategic planning.
The cost and operational data generated by a cost management system help management
optimize strategic planning directives.
UCTI (UC2F0909AF) P
age 12
CHEONG KAH MUN (TP018096)
BM054-3.5-2 COST AND MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING
Reference
Printed resources
1. Dutta, M. 2009, Cost Accounting: Principles and Practice, Pearson Education,
India
2. Jawahar-Lal 2008, Cost Accounting, 4th ed., McGraw-Hill, India
3. LCCI 1986, LCCI Study Pack: Cost Accounting, Professional Publications, Kuala Lumpur
4. Porwal, L. S. 2001, Accounting Theory-3E, McGraw-Hill, India
5. Riahi-Belkaoui, A. 1999, Value Added Reporting and Research: State Of The Art,
Greenwood Publishing Group.
6. Sinha, G. 1983, Value Added Income, Book World, Calcutta
Electronic resources
7. Ball, R.J. 1968, ‘The Use of Value Added in Measuring Efficiency’, Business
Ratios, pp.5-11.
8. George, M. J. K. 1989, ‘Cost Management Information Improves Financial
Performance’, Healthcare Financial Management. Retrieved 12 July, 2010, from
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3257/is_n5_v43/ai_7589597/
9. Halligan, C. W. 1928, ‘The Relation of Uniform Cost Accounting to Competition’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 139, Stabilization of Commodity Prices, pp. 74-79. Retrieved 12 July, 2010, from JStor: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1017508
UCTI (UC2F0909AF) P
age 13
CHEONG KAH MUN (TP018096)
BM054-3.5-2 COST AND MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING
10. ICAI n.d. Uniform Costing and Inter Firm Comparison. Retrieved 10 July, 2010, from www.icai.org/resource_file/18861sm_finalnew_cp9.pdf
11. Morley, M. F. 1979, ‘The Value Added Statement in Britain’, The Accounting
Review, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 618-629. Retrieved 10 July, 2010, from JStor:
http://www.jstor.org/stable/245988
12. Solomons, D. 1950 ‘Uniform Cost Accounting-A Survey’, Economica, New Series, vol. 17, no. 67, pp. 237-253. Retrieved 9 July, 2010, from JStor: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2549718
13. Walker, S. P. & Mitchell, F. 1996, ‘Propaganda, attitude change and uniform costing in the British printing industry: 1913-1939’, Accounting, Auditing &Accountability Journal, vol.9 no. 3, 1996, pp. 98-126. Retrieved from Emerald Insight: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?issn=0951-3574&volume=9&issue=3&articleid=869673&show=pdf&PHPSESSID=kvs46bgsfi7nou0hbueq6gpgo5
UCTI (UC2F0909AF) P
age 14
CHEONG KAH MUN (TP018096)