copyright 2008 abb - 1 all rights reserved optical arc flash protection and installation experience...
TRANSCRIPT
Cop
yrig
ht 2
008
AB
B -
1
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Optical Arc Flash Protection and Installation Experience
Boris A. Vega
Regional Sales Manager, ABB Inc.
MEMSA Annual Meeting and Technical Symposium
September 4, 2008
Cop
yrig
ht 2
008
AB
B -
2
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Discussion Topics
Arc Flash Hazards – Cause, Effect, Energy Levels and PPE.
Optical Arc flash protection.
Reducing Clearing Time and Comparison of Mitigating Options.
Optical Arc Protection Case Study and Conclusions.
Cop
yrig
ht 2
008
AB
B -
3
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
5 to 10 arc flash accidents occur daily in the United States
Capshell, Inc. - Chicago based research firm
specializes preventing workplace injuries and death
“One large utility has discovered an average of 1 arc-flash injury every 18 months for the past 54 years.”
IEEE Std 1584 – 2002, 10.3
Arcing Incidents Do Happen
Cop
yrig
ht 2
008
AB
B -
4
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Hot gases, melt drops and thermal radiation may cause damage even farther away
A rapid temperature rise may lead to a violent explosion
Toxic chemical compounds may be formed at high temperatures
An uncontrolled arc causes
Arc Flash Hazards
Cop
yrig
ht 2
008
AB
B -
5
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Arc Flash Hazards
Electric Arcs can reach temperatures of 34,000˚F.
The arcs can vaporize metal, burn skin, and ignite clothing.
Vaporized copper expand 67,000 times in volume.
High pressures can develop in enclosures, causing covers and molten metal to fly.
The intensity of an arc may exceed normal office lighting by 2,000 times.
Cop
yrig
ht 2
008
AB
B -
6
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Causes of Internal Arc Faults
Failure to follow operating procedures.
Tools, foreign objects, rodents, etc.
Gradual component or insulation breakdown due to ageing.
Improper maintenance.
Operation outside the rating envelope.
Mechanical and interlock failures.
Cop
yrig
ht 2
008
AB
B -
7
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Breaker Racking Arc Accident
Cop
yrig
ht 2
008
AB
B -
8
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
When?
With operator workingin the switchgear, 65%
Without operator,25%
With operator in front of a closed door, 10%
Arc Flash Hazards
Cop
yrig
ht 2
008
AB
B -
9
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Arc Flash Accident
Cop
yrig
ht 2
008
AB
B -
10
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
NFPA Hazard Levels
Hazard Risk
CategoryTypical Personal Protective
Equipment (PPE)
Required Minimum Arc
Rating (cal/cm2)
0
Non-melting, flammable materials with at least 4.5 oz/yd2
N/A (1.2)
1 FR pants and FR shirt, or FR coverall 4
2 Cotton underwear, plus FR shirt and FR pants
8
3
Cotton underwear, plus FR shirt and FR pants and FR coverall 25
4
Cotton underwear, plus FR shirt and FR pants and multilayer flash suit
“Moonsuit” 40
Cop
yrig
ht 2
008
AB
B -
11
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Typical PPE Suit Requirements
0 1 2 3 4
Cop
yrig
ht 2
008
AB
B -
12
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Clearing Time is Critical
IEEE 1584™ Final Step in Incident Energy Calculation For applications up to 15 kV
For applications above 15 kV
x
x
nf D
tECE
610
2.0
251012.5
D
tVIxE bf
where:
t = arcing time = relay time + breaker time
cal/cm2
cal/cm2
Cop
yrig
ht 2
008
AB
B -
13
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Clearing Time is Critical
Time Overcurrent protection can take several cycles even seconds to operate
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
ArcFlash
System
Diff (87)
Inst OC(50)
TOC (51)
Min (ms)
Max (ms)
Operating Time (ms)
Cop
yrig
ht 2
008
AB
B -
14
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Optical Arc Flash Protection
Detects light flash
Supervised by current Tripping normally requires both light and fault current
First generation – Introduced in the early 1990’s Uses single-point light receptors (lens sensors)
Second generation – Introduced in 1999 Uses “long fiber” continuous optical sensors
Extremely fast – typical 2.5 ms operating time
Cop
yrig
ht 2
008
AB
B -
15
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Typical Optical Fiber Sensor Routing
Cop
yrig
ht 2
008
AB
B -
16
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Effect of Reduced Clearing Time
Cop
yrig
ht 2
008
AB
B -
17
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Reducing Relay Time
Temporary instantaneous settings for faster operation (+) Fairly fast (about 2 cycles)
(+) Inexpensive to implement
(–) Activation requires operator action
(–) Normal coordination may be sacrificed
(–) Failure to deactivate could result in undesired tripping
Install high impedance bus differential protection (+) Fairly fast (about 2 cycles)
(–) Requires CTs on all circuits… expensive to implement
(–) Concerns with CT saturation
(–) Cannot protect feeder cable zone areas
Cop
yrig
ht 2
008
AB
B -
18
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Reducing Relay Time
Install zone interlocking scheme (+) Fairly fast (5 -10 cycles); some delay required for blocking
(+) Inexpensive to implement
(–) Requires communication between devices
Install dedicated optical arc flash protection (+) Ultra fast (2.5 ms or 0.15 cycles)
(+) Fairly inexpensive to implement
(+) No coordination with downstream devices required
(+) Can support sectionalized arc flash zones and circuit breaker failure schemes
Cop
yrig
ht 2
008
AB
B -
19
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Arc Flash Relays – Case Study
Detromovice Power Plant – Czech Republic – June 26, 2002 Closed breaker racked in (mechanical interlocks bypassed) Minimal damage
Soot damage – confined to the affected frame Breaker rosette connectors replaced, breaker cell cleaned No injuries!
Cop
yrig
ht 2
008
AB
B -
20
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Arc Flash Relays – Case Study
Fertilizer plant – Uusikaupunki, Finland – 2003
Event occurred one day after arc flash relay installed
Event resulted from operation error Disconnect switch failed to interrupt capacitive current on an
energized, unloaded cable
Fault cleared before any significant damage occurred
Plant was restored to service in about 4 hours
No injuries!
Cop
yrig
ht 2
008
AB
B -
21
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Optical Arc Flash Relay Applications
Ideally suited to gear with sealed interrupters (vacuum, SF6) Where no exposed arcing normally takes place
Application in air magnetic gear requires study Where arcing takes place within arc chutes
Successfully tested with 1200A, 500MVA GE Magneblast™ breakers
More tests on low voltage switchgear planned
Cop
yrig
ht 2
008
AB
B -
22
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Conclusions
Fast response is critical to minimizing arc flash hazards
Faster clearing times yields many benefits Lower incident energy
Lower hazard levels
Lower PPE levels
Optical arc flash relaying among the fastest available protection
Actual arc flash events have proven optical arc flash protection works
Cop
yrig
ht 2
008
AB
B -
23
All
Rig
hts
Res
erve
d
Thank You