copyright 1998 r.h. rasche ec 827 macroeconomic models iii
TRANSCRIPT
Copyright 1998 R.H. Rasche
EC 827
Macroeconomic Models III
Copyright 1998 R.H. Rasche
Macroeconomic Models
Conditional Forecasting
Copyright 1998 R.H. Rasche
Sources of Exogenous Shocks to Macroeconomy
Fiscal Shocks - changes in government purchases (G) or net taxes (T)
Monetary Shocks - Changes in the Nominal Money Stock or its growth rate
Supply Shocks - changes in the level of “natural output”
Copyright 1998 R.H. Rasche
Macro Model - Basic Graphsr
Y
Y
pSP
LP
LM
IS
IS = Commodity Mkt Equilibrium
LM = Asset Market Equilibrium
SP = Short-Run Phillips Curve
LP = Long-Run Phillips Curve
YN = “natural output”
YN
Copyright 1998 R.H. Rasche
Macroeconomy - Initial Conditions
Assume:
– Initial inflation rate = 0.0
– Initial Real Output = Natural Output
– Initially no unexpected inflation (actual and expected inflation are equal)
– Nominal Money Stock is held constant at some value M0.
Alternative initial conditions are possible (e.g. positive inflation and expected inflation); but these parameters keep difficulties to a minimum.
Copyright 1998 R.H. Rasche
Unanticipated Fiscal Stimulus I
r
Yp
SPLP
LM
IS
1. IS curve shift up (or right) as a result of increase in G or decrease in T.
2. Economy moves along fixed SP curve if action is not anticipated.
3. Output increases, but p must also increase.
4. p >0 means P increases and M/P falls inducing shift in LM
IS’
YYN
Copyright 1998 R.H. Rasche
Unanticipated Fiscal Stimulus II
r
Yp
SPLP
LM
IS’
Y
LM’
1. Positive inflation generates higher pricelevel.
2. Higher Price level with fixed Nominal Money Supply reducessupply of Real Balances
3. LM curve Shifts up
4. Real interest rateincreases; real outputfalls, inflation is lower,but still higher thaninitial value (0.0)
YN
Copyright 1998 R.H. Rasche
Unanticipated Fiscal Stimulus III
r
Yp
SPLP
IS’
Y
LM’
1. Left with a situationwhere inflation turnedout to be different thanagents forecast it to be(YN < Y).
2. State of the economycan’t remain here indefinitely unless weassume that agents never correct their forecast errors!
YN
Copyright 1998 R.H. Rasche
Unanticipated Fiscal Stimulus IV
Three Potential Outcomes:
1. The LM curve continues to adjust back towards the initial level of income. Why? People would have to be continually re-adjusting to the shock
2. The IS curve shifts left again, e.g. if there has been a temporary government program which has now ended
3. The fiscal shock generated some positive effect on YN, e.g. education spending.
Copyright 1998 R.H. Rasche
Anticipated Fiscal Stimulus I What happens to the economy if the fiscal stimulus is
announced in advance of the action.
Depends on whether agents think that the announcement is credible. Talk is cheap; if not believed then it is the same as making no announcement.
If announcement is credible, then effect on economy depends on how agents forecast.
Copyright 1998 R.H. Rasche
Anticipated Fiscal Stimulus II If agents make forecasts based only on history of
economy, then the prospective fiscal change is not something they consider in constructing their forecasts.
Their expectations of future inflation do not depend on information about future fiscal policy.
– any changes in inflation resulting from the preannounced policy are unexpected changes
– economy reacts as to the unanticipated stimulus
If so: at time of the stimulus, inflation expectations adjust, SP curve shifts.
Copyright 1998 R.H. Rasche
Anticipated Fiscal Stimulus -Perfect Foresight
r
Yp
SPLP
LM1. At the announcement, the SP shifts upwards, then the policy shifts the IS out.
2. People forecast higher inflation, which rapidly shifts the LM curve left, until output returns to natural levels.
3. The inflation rate will remain high until the policy is reversed.
IS
SP’
LM’
Copyright 1998 R.H. Rasche
Fiscal Stimulus What is the initial effect of a fiscal shock in an
environment where agents make perfect forecasts of inflation, or the ultimate effect in a world where agents make forecasting errors but eventually will correct them?
on real output?
– on the price level?
– on inflation?
– on real interest rates?
– on nominal interest rates?
Copyright 1998 R.H. Rasche
Deficits and Inflation What is the impact of the deficit created by the fiscal
stimulus (anticipated or unanticipated) on:
– interest rates?
– sustained inflation?
– the price level?
Copyright 1998 R.H. Rasche
Unanticipated Money Supply Stimulus
r
Yp
SPLP
LM
IS
1.LM curve shifts downas nominal money supply is increased.
2. Economy moves along fixed SP curve if action is not anticipated
3. Output increases, but p must also increase
4. p > 0 means P increases and M/P is somewhat reduced which induces an offsetting shift in LM
LM’
YYN
Copyright 1998 R.H. Rasche
Unanticipated Monetary Stimulus II
r
Yp
SPLP
IS’
Y
LM’
1. Left with a situation where inflation turned out to be different than agents forecast it to be (YN < Y).
2. State of the economy can’t remain here indefinitely unless we assume that agents never correct their forecast errors!
3. Will the policy be cancelled? Will inflation cut the LM back? Will YN increase?
YN
Copyright 1998 R.H. Rasche
Anticipated Monetary Stimulus I
Issues here are the same as in fiscal policy:
– is the pre-announced policy taken seriously, so that agents react to the information?
– how do agents make forecasts of inflation (form inflation expectations)
– if agents make forecast conditional on future values of exogenous (including fiscal and monetary policy variables, how accurate are their forecasts and are they free to act?
Copyright 1998 R.H. Rasche
Anticipated Monetary Stimulus II
Any revision of inflation forecast based on policy announcement means that SP curve will shift when policy is implemented.
Perfect forecast of the inflation effects of the announcement means that SP intersects LP at the new actual inflation rate and Y = YN
IS-LM intersection will have to occur at. Y=YN for all markets to be in equilibrium.
Copyright 1998 R.H. Rasche
Anticipated Monetary Stimulus III
r
Yp
SPLP
LM
IS
SP’
1. Since Y must = YN, new IS-LM intersection must occur at Y=YN.
2. Increase in P that results from a perfect forecast of inflation will shift the LM back to its original position (since IS is not shifted by monetary stimulus).
3. real rate unchanged
4. ex-post nominal rate higher.
LM’
Copyright 1998 R.H. Rasche
Anticipated Monetary Stimulus IV
Does this end the story of the response to a monetary stimulus when conditional forecasts of inflation are accurate?
Depends on the nature of the monetary shock
– changes in the level of the nominal money stock.
– changes in the growth rate of the nominal money stock.
Copyright 1998 R.H. Rasche
Anticipated Monetary Stimulus V
Change in the level of Money Stock
– agents who make perfect inflation forecasts will realize that no future changes in price level are required to maintain IS/LM intersection at YN
– such agents will forecast zero inflation for future periods.
Copyright 1998 R.H. Rasche
Anticipated Increase in Level of Nominal Money Stock
Ultimate Effects in Expectational Equilibrium:
– real interest rate (r) is unchanged
– p = pe = 0 again
– Y = YN again
– implies that demand for real balances is unchanged
Conclusion: P must change proportional to the change in M!
Copyright 1998 R.H. Rasche
Anticipated Increase in Growth Rate of Nominal
Money Stock Permanent change in the growth rate of the nominal money stock.
– Agents who make perfect conditional forecasts of inflation based on this path for exogenous variable will see that continuous inflation is required to keep real balances unchanged so that LM curve will continue to intersect IS at YN.
– SP curve will remain permanently higher.
– Inflation expectations will be validated.
Copyright 1998 R.H. Rasche
Sustained Inflation Sustained inflation is always a monetary phenomenon!
– other sources of shocks to the economy can change the price level (transitory inflation) but a continuing inflation requires continuous growth in the nominal money stock.
p must be equal to M growth to keep IS/LM intersection at Y = YN in expectational equilibrium
Copyright 1998 R.H. Rasche
Anticipated Shocks and Forecasting Techniques
Initial reaction of economy to anticipated shocks depends critically upon theory of how expectations are formed
Competing theories
– Adaptive or backward looking expectations - inflation expectations (forecasts) are conditioned only on history of economy
– Rational or forward looking expectations - inflation expectations (forecasts) are conditioned on future paths of exogenous variables