contamination report - 20 gordon parade & 28 salisbury street

302
REPORT NO. 210061 SOIL INVESTIGATION AND PRELIMINARY REMEDIATION STUDY FOR 20 GORDON PARADE AND 28 SALISBURY STREET, YARRAVILLE, VICTORIA ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES VIC REPORT TO FASTNET CONSULTING PTY LTD DATE OCT 2010 VERSION 2

Upload: castrangilbert

Post on 06-Mar-2016

228 views

Category:

Documents


11 download

DESCRIPTION

Soil investigation and preliminary remediation study for 20 Gordon Parade and 28 Salisbury Street, Yarraville, Victoria, Australia.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

REPORT NO. 210061

SOIL INVESTIGATION AND PRELIMINARY REMEDIATION STUDY FOR 20 GORDON PARADE AND 28 SALISBURY STREET, YARRAVILLE, VICTORIA

ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES VIC REPORT TO FASTNET CONSULTING PTY LTD DATE OCT 2010 VERSION 2

Page 2: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Environmental Earth Sciences VIC was requested by Fastnet Consulting (Fastnet) to undertake a soil investigation and preliminary remediation feasibility study for 20 Gordon Parade and 28 Salisbury Street, Yarraville, Victoria (the site). The site also covers the Salisbury Street road reserve which is owned by Maribyrnong City Council and separates the two properties. Fastnet have requested this work to determine the chemical status of soil at the site and compare it to previous data. We further understand that Fastnet are looking to potentially develop the site for medium density residential land use. As such, this work will also be used to determining the feasibility of the proposed development. The site is part of the Stony Creek flood plain and, based on the information available, it has been historically used for the disposal of municipal and construction waste, which was generated during the construction of the Westgate Bridge. The fill material disposed in the area was never capped however, after 1970 it was landscaped to create the Westgate Golf Course (located immediately east of the site) and the vacant properties at Gordon Parade and Salisbury Street. During filling activities, the bed of Stony Creek was relocated to approximately 30 metres east of the site and enclosed within a bluestone cobble lined drain (now concrete lined). Several previous environmental investigations have been undertaken at the site, including an environmental site assessment undertaken by Site Remediation Services (SRS) at 20 Gordon Parade and 28 Salisbury Street in 2002. The investigation indicated that soil concentrations of heavy metals, total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) were in excess of applicable guidelines. Additionally, potential for acid sulfate soils and the presence of asbestos were indentified onsite. Our investigation included sampling from 14 test pits across the site and laboratory analysis of selected samples for chemicals of potential concern (CoPC). Laboratory results indicated that concentrations of heavy metals (arsenic, copper and lead in particular), TPH, benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) and total PAH in soil were above human health guidelines. The identified volume of contaminated soil is approximately 7,400 m3, and ranges in depth between 0.5 and 3.3 mBGL across the site. Asbestos was identified at depths between 0.1 and 1.5 mBGL in four of seven samples analysed. Several samples were reported with high sulfur concentrations, however their actual and potential acidity was demonstrated to be very low due to the self buffering capacity of the soil. Samples collected from within the Salisbury Street road reserve reported the second highest concentration of total PAH (162.6 mg/kg) and the highest concentration of TPH (82,500 mg/kg). It is estimated that the road reserve alone contains approximately 1,560 m3 of impacted material. A feasibility study determined that the most viable and likely successful remediation option for the site is a cap and containment system. A cap and containment system would see contaminated soil remain in-situ beneath an engineered clay cap constructed across the surface of the entire site. This cap would remove the potential exposure pathways of soil, minimise infiltration of water through fill material and effectively manage leachate through a leachate collection system. This option is considered to be the most viable for remediation of

Page 3: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc

the site as it: • successfully removes potential exposure pathways of soil; • meets the requirements of Melbourne Water for development in areas prone to

inundation; • effectively manages potential contaminant migration within the perched water table;

and • is more cost effective than the other remediation options. It is highly likely however, that further environmental investigations will be required in addition to implementation of the cap and containment system (if undertaken). The further works, as well as their estimated costs and timeframe are outlined below: TABLE 1 FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL WORKS Works Importance Costs Timing

Environmental audit of the site mandatory $75,000.00 -

$100,000.00 Month 1 to Month 13

Additional soil sampling possible (based on auditor’s requirements)

$5,000.00 - $10,000.00 Month 2

Detailed groundwater assessment mandatory $35,000.00 -

$45,000.00 Month 2 to Month 6

Soil vapour assessment likely $20,000.00 - $25,000.00 Month 6

Human health & ecological risk assessment

likely (based on auditor’s requirements) $20,000.00 Month 7

Development of a Cleanup Plan mandatory $20,000.00 -

$25,000.00 Month 8

Development of an environmental management plan (EMP)

mandatory $5,000.00 Month 11

Cap and containment system desirable $400,000.00 to

$450,000.00 Month 11 to Month 12

Undertaking the works listed above, followed by the construction of the cap and containment system, is considered the most practical approach in successfully developing the site for its proposed medium density residential land use. The costs associated with undertaking the above scope of works is estimated at between $580,000.00 and $680,000.00 (excluding GST). The timeframe for undertaking the works, from the time of engaging an auditor to completion of the cap and containment system, is estimated at a minimum of 13 months. This investigation has been conducted for and is the property of Fastnet Consulting as per Environmental Earth Sciences VIC proposal PO210102 V2 dated 16 July 2010, with written confirmation to proceed with the assessment received on 26 July 2010.

Page 4: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc

Project Manager Jordan Fraser Environmental Engineer Project Director / Internal Reviewer Averyll Spinks Senior Environmental Scientist 210061_ReportV2.doc

Page 5: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1

2 OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................................. 1

3 SITE INFORMATION ................................................................................................... 2

3.1 SITE LOCATION 2

3.2 HISTORICAL INFORMATION 2

3.3 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 2

4 GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY ........................................................................... 3

4.1 GEOLOGY 3

4.2 HYDROGEOLOGY 3

5 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS .................................................................................... 4

6 ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES VIC INVESTIGATION ................................... 5

6.1 SITE INSPECTION 5

6.2 SOIL INVESTIGATION 5

6.2.1 Stratigraphy 6

6.3 GROUNDWATER 6

6.4 LABORATORY ANALYSIS 6

6.4.1 Analytical program 6

6.4.2 Quality assurance and quality control 7

7 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS ....................................................................................... 8

7.1 ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES 8

7.2 SOIL RESULTS 8

7.2.1 Inorganics 9

7.2.2 Organics 10

7.2.3 Asbestos 11

7.2.4 PASS 12

7.2.5 Salisbury Street road reserve 12

7.2.6 Comparison of results to previous data 12

8 REMEDIAL OBJECTIVES AND RESTRAINTS ..........................................................13

8.1 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 13

8.2 REMEDIATION CONSTRAINTS 14

9 EVALUATION OF REMEDIAL OPTIONS ...................................................................15

9.1 DO NOTHING 15

9.2 HUMAN HEALTH AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT 15

9.2.1 Summary 15

9.2.2 Limitations 16

Page 6: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc

9.2.3 Cost estimation 16

9.2.4 Viability 16

9.3 OFFSITE LANDFILL DISPOSAL 16

9.3.1 Summary 16

9.3.2 Limitations 16

9.3.3 Cost estimation 16

9.3.4 Viability 17

9.4 ONSITE TREATMENT 17

9.4.1 Biological treatment 17

9.4.2 Thermal treatment 18

9.4.3 In-situ stabilisation 18

9.5 OFFSITE TREATMENT 18

9.6 ONSITE SOIL CAPPING AND CONTAINMENT (RECOMMENDED) 18

9.6.1 Summary 18

9.6.2 Limitations 19

9.6.3 Cost estimation 19

9.6.4 Viability 19

10 LIKELY REQUIRED WORKS .....................................................................................20

10.1 REQUIRED WORKS 20

10.1.1 Environmental audit 20

10.1.2 Additional soil sampling 20

10.1.3 Groundwater assessment 20

10.1.4 Soil vapour assessment 21

10.1.5 Risk assessment 21

10.2 LIKELY SCHEDULE OF WORKS 21

11 SUMMARY .................................................................................................................21

12 LIMITATIONS .............................................................................................................23

13 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................24

FIGURES

TABLES

APPENDICES A PRELIMINARY SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS B PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG C GEOLOGICAL BORELOGS D LABORATORY TRANSCRIPTS & CHAIN OF CUSTODY FORMS E QUALITY ASSURANCE AND CONTROL PROCEDURES F PROVISIONAL TIMEFRAME

Page 7: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc 1

1 INTRODUCTION Environmental Earth Sciences VIC was requested by Fastnet Consulting (Fastnet) to undertake a soil investigation and preliminary remediation study for 20 Gordon Parade and 28 Salisbury Street, Yarraville, Victoria (the site). The site also covers the Salisbury Street road reserve which separates the two properties. The site is part of the Stony Creek flood plain and, based on the information available, it has been historically used for the disposal of municipal and construction waste which was generated during the construction of the Westgate Bridge. The fill material disposed in the area was never capped however, after 1970 it was landscaped to create the Westgate Golf Course (located immediately east of the site) and the vacant properties at Gordon Parade and Salisbury Street. During filling activities, the bed of Stony Creek was relocated to approximately 30 metres east of the site and enclosed within a bluestone cobble lined drain (now concrete lined). Before proceeding with the proposed development (potentially medium density residential), Fastnet have requested further delineation of fill material, particularly beneath the Salisbury Street road reserve. The findings of our investigation will be used to estimate the potential remediation requirements to assist in determining the feasibility of the development. This investigation has been conducted for, and is the property of Fastnet Consulting, as per Environmental Earth Sciences VIC proposal PO210102 V2 dated 16 July 2010, with written confirmation to proceed received on 26 July 2010. Environmental Earth Sciences VIC is not responsible for variations due to alterations of site conditions since the time of inspection, for example through illegal dumping of chemicals.

2 OBJECTIVES • The objective is to determine the chemical status of soil at the site and compare it to

previous data. We further aim to determine the feasibility of any remediation options. • To achieve this objective, the scope included: • review of previous environmental site investigation reports undertaken by SRS

Australia Pty Ltd (SRS); • further investigation into the extent and contamination status of fill and natural material

at 11 borehole locations across the site; • investigation into the extent and contamination status of fill and natural material at 3

targeted borehole locations beneath the proposed Salisbury Street extension footprint; and

• preparation of a preliminary feasibility study.

Page 8: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc 2

3 SITE INFORMATION

3.1 Site location The location of the site is shown on Figure 1, and the area of investigation is presented in Figure 2. The site is generally rectangular in shape and covers three separate parcels of land. The following details are provided for the site: Address: 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street Suburb/State: Yarraville, Victoria Lot/Plan or Crown: Lot 4 of land plan 76315 & Lots 1 and 2 of town plans 857507

and 908004 Council: Maribyrnong Land area: 3,752 m2 Planning Zone: Residential 1 Zone (R1Z) Planning Overlays: Development Contributions Plan Overlay (DCPO) Land Subject to Inundation Overlay (LSIO) The area of investigation also included the Salisbury Street road reserve, which covers approximately 700 m2 and is situated between the two properties. The total area under investigation was approximately 4,452 m2.

3.2 Historical information Detailed descriptions of site history have been given in several previous environmental reports (see Section 5). Based on a review of the available historical information, aerial photographs and Royal Historical Society of Victoria (RHSV) records, the site was originally located within a shallow gully formed by the flow of Stoney Creek. Sometime after 1921, the site and the surrounding area (now comprising some 15 hectares including the Westgate Golf Course) was filled with municipal waste from the municipalities of Maribyrnong and Hobson’s Bay. During the construction of the Westgate Bridge in the late 1960s and early 1970’s, additional fill, mostly construction waste, was again disposed of in the area. The fill material was not capped however, it was landscaped to create the Westgate Golf Course after 1970. During either the filling with municipal waste or the construction of the Westgate Golf Course, the bed of Stony Creek was moved approximately 30 metres east from the site and enclosed within a bluestone cobble lined drain (now concrete lined). No records relating to residential properties or other former developments at the site were identified.

3.3 Proposed development It is proposed that the site be developed for medium-density residential land use. The site is subject to inundation and as such, the proposed development must meet Melbourne Water’s requirements for development in flood prone areas. It is a requirement of Melbourne Water that finished floor levels are a minimum of 600 mm above the applicable flood level (4.25

Page 9: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc 3

metres AHD). According to recent survey information, the current surface level of the site is between 2.61 – 3.61 mAHD, therefore extensive filling will be required. A review of the preliminary conceptual development plans drawn by DPS Engineers (presented in Appendix A) indicated approximately 3,175 m3 of fill will be required across the site to meet the finished floor levels set by Melbourne Water. This fill may potentially act as part of an engineered cap across the site if this remediation option is pursued.

4 GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY

4.1 Geology The geology of the Yarraville area has been described in the Geological Survey of Victoria (1974), 1:63 360 Geological Map – Melbourne as predominantly consisting of Newer Volcanics basalt with sedimentary deposits of Coode Island Silt following the Stoney Creek and Yarra River systems. The Newer Volcanics formation is the major surface geological formation at the site and is described as olivine basalt, dark to light grey and coarsely vesicular with minor interbedded silty sand and baked soils. The basalt flow is part of the late Quaternary period of approximately 2 to 5 million years ago and is expected to be the major surface aquifer at the site. The recent Coode Island Silt (CIS) formation is identified to the east of the site and consists of silt, silty clay, sandy clay which is often dark grey with minor peat and shell beds. The CIS sediments are extensive in the area and in many places contain sufficient iron sulphides to produce a potential acid sulfate soil (PASS) when drained and exposed to oxidation. The regional topography is relatively flat with a gentle slope in an eastern direction towards the Yarra River. Site topography reflects that of the Yarraville area, sloping east toward the Stoney Creek canal.

4.2 Hydrogeology The Department of Natural Resources and Environment (DNRE) (1995) South Eastern Victoria Regional Aquifer Systems defines groundwater in the Upper Tertiary Aquifer System at the site as Segment C, with a Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) range of 3,501-13,000 mg/L. According to the State Environment Protection Policy (SEPP) (2002) Prevention and Management of Contaminated Land, the site requires the protection of the following beneficial uses: • maintenance of ecosystems; • stock watering; • industrial water use; • primary contact recreation; and • buildings and structures. Groundwater movement within this system occurs through fractures in the basalt and within partially weathered zones, formed between different lava flows of the Newer Volcanics

Page 10: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc 4

formation. Yields within bores situated in the Newer Volcanics basalt of this area are relatively low. They are generally between 0.5 and 3.0 L/sec due to the limited and varying weathering of the Quaternary basalt. Regional groundwater flow is expected to be in an east/south eastern direction.

5 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS Previous environmental assessments relating to the site include: • Dames & Moore (1993), Report on a Preliminary Environmental Assessment of Lot 4,

Salisbury Street, Yarraville; • Dames & Moore (1996), Environmental Site Assessment, Vacant Land, lot 4 Salisbury

Street, Yarraville; • SRS Australia Pty Ltd (2002), Environmental Site Investigation Report of Residential 3

Zoned, Land on Titles: Vol. 8780 Fol. 549 & Vol. 8780 Fol. 550, End of Gordon Parade, Yarraville, Victoria; and

• SRS Australia Pty Ltd (2002), Environmental Site Investigation Report of Residential 3 Zoned, Lot No. 3, End of Salisbury Street, Yarraville, Victoria.

Environmental Earth Sciences VIC conducted a review of the investigations undertaken by SRS in 2002. Test-pitting works conducted by SRS in 15 locations indicated that the natural surface was encountered at approximately 1.0 metre below ground level (mBGL) in the south western corner and approximately 3.2 mBGL in the north eastern corner of the Salisbury Street property. No sub-surface investigation was undertaken within the Salisbury Street road reserve. Fill material was found to consist of a wide variety of soild wastes including plastics, wood, metal, bricks, bluestone and general municipal garbage with varying amounts of soil, gravel and clay. Laboratory analysis of soil samples reported concentrations of heavy metals in excess of the National Environmental Protection Measure 1999 (NEPM) Health Investigation Levels (HILs) “A” for low density residential setting and “D” for medium to high density residential settings. Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) were found in excess of the NSW Department of Climate Change (DECC) and NEPM HIL A guidelines, respectively. Additionally, potential acid sulfate soils and the presence of asbestos were indentified onsite. Grab samples were collected from the perched water table which was encountered between 1.5 and 2.4 mBGL. Laboratory analysis reported concentrations of cobalt (Co), copper (Cu) and TPH in excess of applicable guidelines. Using the data obtained, SRS provided recommendations and cost estimates for the remediation of both the Gordon Parade and Salisbury Street properties. In order to develop the site for low density residential use, it was outlined that the contaminated material would require excavation and offsite disposal with additional monitoring and management, at a cost of approximately $ 2.85 million. In order to develop the properties for low density residential use, it was recommended that contaminated material be buried onsite and capped, with additional management and a groundwater investigation, at an estimated cost of $ 590,000.00.

Page 11: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc 5

6 ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES VIC INVESTIGATION

Environmental Earth Sciences VIC personnel undertook an initial site inspection on 5 August 2010 prior to site works. The inspection included a site walkover, visual inspection and service location undertaken by J.U.L.S. The field works, conducted on 9 August 2010, included targeted soil test pit investigation and sampling. A photographic log of site works is presented in Appendix B.

6.1 Site inspection At the time of our site inspection, the site was bound by residential properties to the north of Gordon Parade, the West Gate Golf Course to the east, commercial properties to the south and residential properties to the west. Primary site access was via the end of Gordon Parade. The site was vacant with no indications of former infrastructure. Grass covered the majority of the site and the only other vegetation present was a row of gum trees offsite to the east. Cut and fill activities are expected to have occurred at the site due to an abrupt change in surface level within the north eastern boundary of the site. Two stockpiles of soil were also present onsite at the time of inspection. Material within the stockpiles consisted of loose, grey/brown silty clay with sand and gravel.

6.2 Soil investigation On 9 August 2010, Environmental Earth Sciences VIC undertook a soil investigation which consisted of the excavation of fourteen test pits (TP1 – TP14) across the site using a sub-contracted excavator. Three of the fourteen test pit locations were located within the Salisbury Street road reserve. Samples were collected at the surface, at 0.5 m intervals or at distinct changes in lithology. Sixty-six discrete samples were collected from the test pits as well as six quality control samples. Soil samples for analysis were placed into laboratory prepared glass jars or sealable plastic bags, depending on the analyte to be tested. The jars and bags were labelled with the borehole number, depth of discrete sample collection, site reference and date before being placed in a cooler with ice. Samples were also selectively analysed in the field using a photoionisation detector (PID), which gives an indication of the likely presence of volatile hydrocarbons. The PID readings were generally low across the site (ranging between 0.0 ppm and 10.2 ppm), however elevated readings of 20.8 ppm and 25.4 ppm were recorded within test pits TP5 and TP9, at which strong hydrocarbon odours were noted. Following sampling, material from each test pit was reinstated at the depth from which it was excavated to reduce cross contamination between soil profiles. A small volume of soil not able to be reinstated was added to the two existing stockpiles onsite. All sampling procedures were undertaken in accordance with Environmental Earth Sciences Soil, gas and groundwater sampling manual (2009) and other relevant guidelines.

Page 12: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc 6

6.2.1 Stratigraphy Field observations such as soil colour, texture, pH and odour were used to identify changes in lithology. These observations are detailed within the geological borelogs presented in Appendix C. Several cross sections were developed using borelogs from the 2010 field investigation and those developed by SRS in 2001 (Figures 3-5). Fill material was encountered across the site to a depth ranging from approximately 1.8 to 3.8 mBGL. The depth of fill generally increased toward the east/south east of the site, with depth of fill greatest at test pit locations TP5 (3.8 m) and TP11 (>3.2 m). This material comprised of loose, brown silty clay with solid waste inclusions (plastics, wood, metal, bricks, bluestone and general municipal garbage) below a layer of stiff, brown silty clay. Underlying this infilled material in several locations was reworked natural silty clay with minor rubble (glass and wood) and weathered basalt floaters. The natural soil was generally described as being medium dense, grey clay with minor silt. This natural soil is considered to be primarily derived from weathered Newer Volcanics basalt, which was encountered at several test pits between approximately 2.2 and 3.4 mBGL. Soil considered to be derived from the CIS formation was encountered between 1.5 and 1.8 mBGL in test pits TP3, TP4, TP5, TP8, TP9 and TP10. Note that the loose, black, slightly clayey silt was saturated in the majority of these locations. Soil pH generally ranged between 6.0 and 8.0 at these locations. Inclusions of glass and timber in some locations indicated that the CIS sediments were likely to be reworked natural material. Soft, silty clay with dark staining and strong hydrocarbon odour was identified within the saturated zone at approximately 1.9 mBGL in test pits TP5, TP9 and TP11. Fill material immediately above the impacted zone within TP9 (within the Salisbury Street road reserve) was found to contain oily rags, rubber, damaged tins/drums and machinery parts.

6.3 Groundwater Groundwater at the site is expected to occur within the Newer Volcanics basalt at a depth of less than 10 mBGL. No groundwater was collected or analysed during the investigation. A perched water table was observed in the majority of the test pits at depths between 1.8 and 2.3 mBGL. This perched water table is believed to be due to the low permeability of natural clay limiting downward migration of infiltrated water.

6.4 Laboratory analysis The schedule for laboratory analysis was defined by the scope of our proposal and review of the previous environmental assessments. Soil samples were selected for analysis on the basis of their location, depth, field observations such as texture, colour, pH and PID reading, and location on the site relative to former sampling locations. Generally, samples from the fill material were selected for a wider range of analytes including CoPC identified in the previous investigations.

6.4.1 Analytical program Sixty-six discrete soil samples were collected from fourteen test pits during the soil investigation. Of these, fifty-nine samples were selectively analysed for a range of chemicals of potential concern (CoPC). Three blind duplicate (intra-laboratory) samples and three split

Page 13: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc 7

duplicate (inter-laboratory) samples were also collected and analysed for quality control purposes at a rate of 5.1 %. All soil analysis was undertaken by Australian Laboratory Services (ALS), Labmark and Australian Safer Environment & Technology (ASET), which are all NATA accredited for the methods used. Laboratory transcripts for soil samples are presented in Appendix D. Soil samples were selectively analysed for the following: • heavy metals (silver [Ag], arsenic [As], cadmium [Cd], chromium [Cr], cobalt [Co],

copper [Cu], mercury [Hg], molybdenum [Mo], nickel [Ni], lead [Pb], selenium [Se], tin [Sn] and zinc [Zn]);

• total and free cyanide; • TPH; • benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene (BTEX); • PAH; • phenols; • asbestos; • other analytes listed in the IWRG 621 screen; and • PASS analytes (including cation exchange capacity [CEC], organic carbon [OC], net

acid generating potential [NAGP], chromium suite and SPOCAS suite). Following the initial laboratory analysis, the following additional analysis was undertaken on selected samples: • Australian Standard Leachate Procedure (ASLP) for benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) on

samples TP6(0.0-0.1) and TP9(2.0-2.1); • ASLP for PAH on sample TP1(1.5-1.6); • ASLP for As on samples TP2(3.2-3.3) and TP7(2.0-2.1); • ASLP for Cu on sample TP10(1.8-1.9); and • TPH speciation on samples TP5(2.0-2.1), TP9(2.0-2.1) and TP11(1.9-2.0).

6.4.2 Quality assurance and quality control Quality control is achieved by utilising NATA accredited laboratories, using standard methods supported by internal duplicates, the checking of high, abnormal or otherwise anomalous results against background and other chemical results for the sample concerned. Quality assurance is achieved by confirming field or anticipated results based upon the comparison of field observations with laboratory results. In addition, the laboratory undertakes additional duplicate analysis as part of their internal quality assurance program on the basis of one duplicate for every 20 analysed. Field observations are compared with laboratory results when they are not as expected and confirmation, re-sampling and re-analysis are undertaken if results cannot be correlated. In brief, field duplicate results were generally within the acceptable range of reproducibility and all duplicates and standards were within the acceptable reproducibility range. Further to laboratory quality assurance, intra-laboratory comparison is achieved through comparison of analytical results of samples with their corresponding blind duplicate (BD). The split

Page 14: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc 8

duplicates were sent to Labmark and the results are the basis for the inter-laboratory comparison. The potential for cross contamination of samples from sampling equipment is considered to be very low due to sampling decontamination procedures. Full laboratory transcripts and chain of custody forms are presented in Appendix D, while further discussion on QA/QC is provided in Appendix E.

7 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

7.1 Assessment guidelines The results of the soil investigation have been assessed in reference to the following assessment guidelines: • National Environmental Protection Council (NEPC) (1999) – NEPM Ecological

Investigation Levels (EILs); o EILs provide guidance in relation to phytotoxic parameters for urban settings;

• NEPC (1999) – NEPM Health Based Soil Investigation Levels (HILs); o HILs provide guidelines for maximum allowable concentrations for a variety of

contaminants depending on land use. Refer to Table 1 for a copy of these guidelines;

• NSW DECC (1994) – Guidelines for Assessing Service Stations; o this document provides guidelines for contaminants commonly associated with

service station sites for which HILs have not been provided; • Victorian EPA Industrial Waste Resource Guidelines (IWRG) (2009) – Publication

IWRG621 - Soil hazard categorisation and management; o IWRG621 outlines the soil hazard categorisation threshold concentrations for soil

for offsite disposal; • Industrial Waste Management Policy (IWMP) on waste acid sulfate soils (WASS) &

EPA Victoria Publication 655.1 (1999); o the IWMP (WASS) outlines the requirements for management of WASS,

including reuse and disposal. Publication 655 provides an outline of WASS identification, assessment, classification and management requirements and methodologies; and

• West Australian Department of Health (WA DoH) (2009) – Guidelines for the Assessment and Remediation and Management of Asbestos-Contaminated Sites in Western Australia; o this publication is the adopted asbestos management document due to a lack of

Victorian and National legislation.

7.2 Soil results The soil on the site has been impacted by historical activities, namely the placement of fill material containing solid municipal and construction waste. A summary of soil laboratory

Page 15: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc 9

results is presented in Table 2 and described below. Complete laboratory transcripts are presented in Appendix D.

7.2.1 Inorganics Soil samples were analysed for Ag, As, Cd, Cr, Co, Cu, Hg, Mo, Ni, Pb, Se, Sn and Zn in both fill and natural material across the site. Concentrations of Cr (III & VI), Ag, Mo, Se and Sn were reported below the laboratory limit of reporting (LOR) or the applicable guidelines in each sample analysed. Concentrations of As, Cd, Co, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb and Zn were reported in excess of the applicable guidelines as detailed below. Samples exceeding NEPM HIL A and NEPM HIL D guidelines for the heavy metals of highest concentrations (As, Cu and Pb) are presented in Figures 6 to 8. Arsenic • detectable As concentrations ranged from 5 mg/kg to 590 mg/kg; • As was reported to be in excess of NEPM EIL and ‘fill material’ guidelines in 34 of the

55 samples analysed; • As was in excess of NEMP HIL A guidelines in samples TP1(0.4-0.5), TP3(2.0-2.1),

TP5(0.4-0.5), TP6(0.4-0.5), TP7(0.0-0.1), TP8(1.9-2.0), TP9B(2.5-2.6), TP10(1.4-1.5), TP12(1.9-2.0), TP13(1.5-1.6), TP14(0.9-1.0) and TP14(2.8-2.9);

• As was in excess of NEPM HIL D guidelines in samples TP2(3.2-3.3) and TP7(2.0-2.1) only; and

• As was in excess of IWRG guidelines for ‘Category C Contaminated Soil’ in TP2(3.2-3.3).

Cadmium • detectable Cd concentrations ranged from 2 mg/kg to 16 mg/kg; and • Cd was found to be in excess of NEPM EIL and IWRG guidelines for ‘fill material’ in

samples TP2(3.2-3.3), TP4(1.4-1.5), TP9B(2.5-2.6) and TP11(1.9-2.0). Cobalt • detectable Co concentrations ranged from 46 mg/kg to 320 mg/kg; and • Co was reported in excess of NEPM HIL A guidelines in samples TP2(0.4-0.5),

TP5(1.4-1.5), TP10(1.4-1.5), TP11(0.9-1.0) and TP14(0.4-0.5). Copper • detectable Cu concentrations ranged from 7 mg/kg to 2,000 mg/kg; • Cu was in excess of NEPM EIL and IWRG guidelines for ‘fill material’ in 29 of the 55

samples analysed; and • Cu was in excess of NEPM HIL A guidelines in samples TP10(1.4-1.5), TP10(1.9-2.0 –

split duplicate sample) and TP11(1.9-2.0). Mercury • detectable Hg concentrations ranged from 0.1 mg/kg to 2.6 mg/kg; and

Page 16: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc 10

• Hg was in excess of NEPM EIL and IWRG guidelines for ‘fill material’ in samples TP5(2.0-2.1), TP8(0.2-0.3), TP9B(2.5-2.6) and TP11(1.9-2.0);

Nickel • detectable Ni concentrations ranged from 5 mg/kg to 141 mg/kg; and • Ni was in excess of NEPM EIL and IWRG guidelines for ‘fill material’ in 18 of the 55

samples analysed. Lead • detectable Pb concentrations ranged from 14 mg/kg to 822 mg/kg; • Pb was reported in excess of NEPM EIL guidelines in samples TP3(0.4-0.5), TP3(1.4-

1.5), TP9B(2.5-2.6) and TP11(1.9-2.0); and • Pb was in excess of NEPM HIL A and IWRG guidelines for ‘fill material’ in samples

TP2(3.2-3.3), TP3(0.4-0.5), TP3(1.4-1.5), TP4(1.4-1.5), TP5(0.4-0.5), TP8(0.2-0.3), TP9B(2.5-2.6), TP10(1.4-1.5), TP11(0.0-0.1), TP11(1.9-2.0), TP12(0.4-0.5) TP13(0.0-0.1) and TP14(0.9-1.0).

Zinc • detectable Zn concentrations ranged from 44 mg/kg to 3,960 mg/kg; and • Zn was found to be in excess of NEPM EIL and IWRG guidelines for ‘fill material’ in 28

of the 55 samples analysed. Following the initial analysis, selected samples underwent ASLP analysis in order to determine the potential bioavailability (See Table 3). Analysis indicates that As and Cu in the samples analysed have some potential to become bioavailable however, they are either on or below the upper ASLP limits for categorisation as ‘Category C Contaminated Soil’. Bioavailability factors (BF) were not determined for Cu due to the lack of a total concentration in soil, however BFs of 2.4 % and 2.5 % determined for As, confirmed the low bioavailability of As in soil.

7.2.2 Organics Soil samples analysed for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB), phenolic compounds, monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (MAH), organophosphorus pesticides (OPP) and volatile halogenated compounds (VHC) each revealed concentrations that were below the laboratory LOR or applicable guidelines in both fill and natural material. Concentrations of BaP, total PAH and TPH were reported in excess of the applicable guidelines as detailed below. Note that samples exceeding NEPM HIL A, NEPM HIL D and NSW DECC guidelines are presented in Figures 9 to 11: PAHs • detectable BaP concentrations ranged from 0.6 mg/kg to 20.0 mg/kg; • BaP was reported to be in excess of NEPM HIL A guidelines in samples TP5(1.4-1.5),

TP8(0.9-1.0), TP9(1.9-2.0), TP11(2.9-3.0) and TP12(1.4-1.5); • BaP was in excess of NEPM HIL D guidelines in samples TP1(1.5-1.6), TP3(1.4-1.5),

TP6(0.0-0.1) and TP9(2.0-2.1); • detectable total PAH concentrations ranged from 0.6 mg/kg to 210.5 mg/kg;

Page 17: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc 11

• total PAH was found to be in excess of NEPM HIL A guidelines in samples TP3(1.4-1.5), TP5(1.4-1.5), TP11(2.9-3.0) and TP12(1.4-1.5); and

• total PAH was in excess of NEPM HIL D guidelines in samples TP1(1.5-1.6), TP6(0.0-0.1) and TP9(2.0-2.1).

TPH • detectable TPH (C6-C9) concentrations ranged from 30 mg/kg to 106 mg/kg; • detectable TPH (C10-C36) concentrations ranged from 140 mg/kg to 82,500 mg/kg; • TPH (C6-C9) was in excess of NSW DECC guidelines in sample TP9(2.0-2.1); and • TPH (C10-C36) was reported to be in excess of NSW DECC guidelines in samples

TP2(3.2-3.2), TP3(1.4-1.5), TP5(2.0-2.1), TP5(2.9-3.0), TP9(2.0-2.1), TP9B(2.5-2.6), TP11(1.7-1.8), TP11(1.9-2.0) and TP11(2.9-3.0).

Further analysis was undertaken in order to determine the potential bioavailability of BaP, total PAH and TPH within soil. Results indicate that BaP had a leachate concentration lower than the laboratory LOR in each of the three samples analysed. Phenanthrene was the only PAH to report a leachate concentration above the laboratory LOR, at 2.2 µg/L. The determined BF of 0.05% indicates that total PAHs in soil have a very low potential to become bioavailable. The leachate concentration for TPH was reported to be above the laboratory LOR for TPH (C16-C28) only in one of the two samples analysed. The determined BF of 18.5% indicates that TPH in soil also has a moderate to low potential to become bioavailable. Samples TP5(2.0-2.1), TP9(2.0-2.1) and TP11(1.9-2.0) underwent TPH speciation to determine the concentrations of aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbon fractions for assessment against NEPM HIL A and NEPM HIL D guidelines (See Table 4). Speciation results indicate that each sample was in excess of NEPM HIL A and NEPM HIL D guidelines for the aromatic TPH (>C16-C35) fraction, with concentrations ranging between 660 mg/kg and 8,590 mg/kg. Additionally, sample TP9(2.0-2.1) reported concentrations of the aliphatic TPH (>C16-C35) fraction in excess of NEPM HIL A guidelines. A soil silica gel cleanup (SGC) was undertaken on samples TP3(1.4-1.5) and TP11(1.9-2.0) to remove any polar natural organic carbons and display only non-polar components related to petroleum products. Results of the SGC are presented against the primary TPH results in Table 5. The results indicate that the samples contain some polar natural organic carbons, however the majority of TPH reported initially relate to petroleum products in soil.

7.2.3 Asbestos Asbestos was not visibly identified during the field soil investigation however, due to historical activities, seven soil samples were forwarded to ASET and analysed for the presence of asbestos. Results indicated that asbestos was detected in the following samples: • crysotile asbestos was identified in samples TP5(0.4-0.5), TP7(1.4-1.5), TP9(0.4-0.5)

and TP11(0.0-0.1); and • crocidolite asbestos was identified in sample TP7(1.4-1.5). The presence of crysotile asbestos in sample TP11(0.0-0.1) indicates that the site does not comply with the WA DoH remediation objectives for asbestos impacted sites, which require the top 10 cm of soil to be completely free of visible asbestos. Asbestos was also identified in the top 10 cm of soil in the SRS (2002) investigation at sample locations V5 and V6.

Page 18: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc 12

A review of the concentration of asbestos (%w/w) across the site against the WA DoH soil asbestos investigation criteria was beyond the scope of this investigation. However, the presence of asbestos to a depth of 1.5 mBGL will result in the soil (at the affected locations) being classified as ‘Category C Contaminated Soil’ (minimum) for potential offsite disposal purposes.

7.2.4 PASS Soil samples collected from the material representative of CIS sediments were selectively analysed for a range of PASS indicators. A summary of laboratory results for PASS samples are presented in Tables 6 and 7, with full laboratory transcripts presented in Appendix D. Five soil samples were analysed for total sulfur and compared to criteria for classification of acid sulfate soil (ASS) outlined in the EPA Victoria Publication 655.1. Results demonstrated that samples TP4(2.1-2.2), TP8(2.0-2.1), TP10(1.8-1.9) and TP11(1.9-2.0) contained elevated concentrations of sulfur. The sulfur concentrations between 0.13 and 0.73 % S indicated that the soil had the potential to become ASS when excavated (exposed to oxygen). Additional laboratory analysis was undertaken on samples TP4(2.1-2.2) and TP10(1.8-1.9), including peroxide oxidisable sulfur and chromium reducing sulfur suites, to determine the net acidity and actual risk of ASS production. Based on the results presented in Table 7, and comparison against the risk criteria listed in Table 8, sample TP4(2.1-2.2) is classified as ‘Class 1 No Risk – No Sulfur’. Please note that Class 1 soil is not ASS. Sample TP10(1.8-1.9) is classified as ‘Class 2 No Risk – Non Reactive’. Class 2 soil, while containing elevated sulfur levels, is completely self buffering and requires no form of management for PASS. These findings are confirmed by the complete absence of any actual acidity (reported as TAA) or potential acidity (reported as TPA) in both samples analysed for these parameters.

7.2.5 Salisbury Street road reserve The Salisbury Street road reserve covers approximately 700 m2 between the Gordon Parade and Salisbury Street properties. The area is owned by the Maribyrnong City Council and is intended to be developed as an extension of Salisbury Street (see Appendix A). Three test pits (TP7 – TP9) were excavated within the road reserve with samples analysed for a range of CoPC. The results reported elevated concentrations of heavy metals, PAH and TPH (outlined in Sections 7.2.1 and 7.2.2), as well as the presence of asbestos (Section 7.2.3). Samples analysed from test pit TP9 reported the second highest concentration of total PAH (162.6 mg/kg) and the highest concentration of TPH (82,500 mg/kg). It is estimated that the road reserve contains approximately 1,560 m3 of impacted material.

7.2.6 Comparison of results to previous data Test pits TP5, TP10 and TP12 were assessed to target the former test pit locations. This enabled some comparison between the soil chemical data obtained during each investigation. Generally, results obtained from targeted borehole locations indicated the following;

Page 19: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc 13

• As and Pb were reported to have slightly higher concentrations in the recent investigation;

• Co and Cu were reported to have significantly lower concentrations in this latest sampling event when compared to previous investigations;

• Zn was reported in significantly higher concentrations during this investigation; • total PAH was reported to have a much higher concentration in TP12(1.4-1.5) than its

comparison sample X7(1.5); and • TPH was reported to have a much higher concentration in TP5(2.0-2.1) than its

comparison sample V8(2.0). Analysis of the data across the entire site indicates that there are significant variations in contaminant concentrations reported in each investigation. Concentrations presented in Figures 6 to 11 demonstrate the following: • there are greater occurrences of BaP, total PAH and TPH (and at much higher

concentrations) in this investigation; • elevated TPH concentrations were generally reported at greater depths in this

investigation when compared to previous assessments; and • fewer locations reported concentrations of Cu in excess of applicable guidelines during

this investigation. The differences between chemical concentrations reported in each investigation are considered to be due to the heterogeneity of fill material across the site. Additionally, the lack of survey data of previous test pit locations meant that targeted locations were estimated and samples may therefore not be representative of the material analysed in 2002.

8 REMEDIAL OBJECTIVES AND RESTRAINTS

8.1 Regulatory framework The investigation levels for this site are dictated by the ultimate requirement for remediation of soil to a level that provides protection to potential beneficial users of land. In accordance with the SEPP, and the most likely future land use being residential with minimum soil access, the following beneficial uses are to be protected. • maintenance of highly modified ecosystems; • human health; • buildings and structures; and • aesthetics. The maintenance of natural and modified ecosystems, and production of food and fibre, are not considered relevant beneficial uses for this site due to the highly modified nature of the site (impacted by historical filling) and the current status of Edgars Creek (diverted and concrete lined). While all potential beneficial uses of land should be considered, these beneficial uses are not likely to require future protection.

Page 20: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc 14

The SEPP lists indicators and objectives for each beneficial use to be protected and in turn, lists the relevant guidelines. The NEPM HIL D investigation levels for soil are to be used in the assessment of contamination for the protection of human health and ecosystems at the site. The provisional NEPM EILs are derived from values supplied in ANZECC 1992a and from soil survey data from four Australian capital cities. The EILs for soil are limited and interim in nature and, although widely adopted, are based on total metal concentrations in soil, which bears little relevance to the protection of plant and soil fauna. In light of this, EIL values should be used as an indicator for potential ecological impact, with other factors considered in determining the potential for ecological impact.

8.2 Remediation constraints Prior to the assessment of available remedial technologies, it is important to identify the restraints of the site that will potentially impact on remediation. These are outlined as follows: • the subject site includes the Salisbury Street road reserve, which separates the

Gordon Parade and Salisbury Street properties. The road reserve covers approximately 700 m2 and contains a large volume of fill material, which is reported to contain concentrations of organic and inorganic chemicals above the adopted guidelines. The area is owned by the Maribyrnong City Council and would need to be included in any remediation activities undertaken prior to development of the site;

• the presence of CIS sediments across the site indicates the potential for acid sulfate soils to be generated during excavation activities (if any). Two soil samples analysed for PASS indicated that no risk exists within that material, however the inconsistent deposition of fill and natural material across the site may require some form of PASS management if excavation is to be undertaken;

• the variety of soil contaminants identified may influence which remediation techniques could be effectively implemented at the site. Treatment of inorganic and organic chemicals is generally undertaken using different methods, however integrating different types of remediation is a widely adopted practice. The presence of asbestos and inert waste (concrete, brick, etc) will also require remediation or management in order to protect the beneficial uses of the site;

• a perched water table was observed at approximately 1.8 to 1.9 mBGL, with relatively high recharge toward the east/south east of the site. This water may impact any remediation activities, as contamination has been identified within and below this saturated zone;

• no detailed investigations have been undertaken at the site to determine the chemical status of groundwater or its potential influence on future land use;

• site access occurs via Gordon Parade or Salisbury Street, which are both restricted for heavy vehicle access due to the narrow streets and low overhead power lines; and

• the size of the site also limits remediation technologies, as full excavation of the impacted material is likely to be extensive. Furthermore, the local residential setting requires strict environmental controls for several potential remediation options, as air quality, noise and aesthetic impacts (among others) will need to be managed.

Page 21: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc 15

9 EVALUATION OF REMEDIAL OPTIONS The SEPP outlines that where a state of pollution exists, the land must be cleaned up and/or managed so that: • there is no immediate threat to human health (onsite or offsite) or the environment

offsite; • contamination does not preclude protected beneficial uses of the relevant land use;

and • the risk of contamination from the site adversely affecting any beneficial use protected

under any SEPP offsite is reduced to a level acceptable to the Authority. The assessment of the practicability of remediation of soil contamination identified within the site boundary is provided in the following sections. The assessment includes the consideration of financial, logistical, technical and environmental issues.

9.1 Do nothing The “do nothing” option involves the site being left in its current condition with no remediation or management implemented. Onsite contamination has been identified in excess of the health investigation levels outlined for each potential land use, and ecological guidelines. If no remediation or management of land is undertaken, the current status of the site will not be acceptable for any land use outlined in the SEPP, including the proposed medium density residential. Additionally, the historic use of the site for the disposal of municipal and construction waste, as well as the extent of contamination identified onsite, ‘may’ trigger the EPA to require the site be cleaned up to reduce the risk to human health and the environment. Due to the reasons listed above, the “do nothing” option is not considered viable for the site.

9.2 Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment

9.2.1 Summary Assessment of current chemical levels in soil would be evaluated from a human health and ecological perspective to determine whether soil is safe to remain in-situ with no further management. A quantitative risk assessment would be achieved through: • a toxicity assessment involving research into the CoPC, their behavioural properties,

toxicology (including carcinogenicity) and dose-response relationships; • an exposure assessment that would consider different exposure scenarios for low-level

contaminants remaining in place, and provision of a series of settings to allow risk characterisation;

• a risk characterisation, which would aim to arrive at a series of site specific criteria values for soil, based on factors such as depth and position on the site; and

• a flora and fauna baseline study (if needed).

Page 22: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc 16

9.2.2 Limitations The high concentrations of several contaminants are such that they are likely to present a risk to human health and the environment if they remain in-situ without management following a risk assessment. Note however, that no groundwater or soil vapour assessments have been conducted at the site. Additionally, the site remains between 1.67 and 0.64 m below the applicable flood level, so further works would be required to meet the requirements of Melbourne Water.

9.2.3 Cost estimation The cost to undertake a Human Health & Ecological Risk Assessment is estimated at approximately $20,000.00. It is likely that further investigations are required at the site in order to determine the risks to human health and the environment (i.e. groundwater and soil vapour). These further works would be in addition to the estimated cost of a Human Health & Ecological Risk Assessment, and could potentially range between $20,000.00 and $50,000.00.

9.2.4 Viability This risk assessment may determine that no unacceptable risk exists with some identified contaminants remaining in place. However, it is likely that several contaminants, TPH and PAH in particular, are likely to remain a risk to human health and the environment if no further remediation or management is undertaken. In that instance, the site would remain unacceptable for any land use outlined in the SEPP, including the proposed medium density residential. The risk assessment is a viable option however, it may need to be incorporated with additional remediation and/or management works (such as soil capping [Section 9.6])..

9.3 Offsite landfill disposal

9.3.1 Summary Contaminated soil would be excavated and transported to an offsite landfill facility for disposal to allow development of the site following importation of clean fill material. The identified volume of contaminated soil is approximately 7,400 m3 (or approximately 11,100 tonnes).

9.3.2 Limitations One ‘Category A’ hotspot was identified in test pit TP9, which cannot be disposed offsite until it has been demonstrated to be immobile or has been immobilised (where required) with EPA approval. Additional leachability testing would be required prior to acceptance of the material by landfill. Landfill space for the disposal of 7,400 m3 may not be readily available. Further, offsite disposal would also result in up to 500 truck movements.

9.3.3 Cost estimation It is estimated that, on average, the top 1.95 m of soil across the site would require excavation and disposal. The depth of excavation in some areas, particularly the north east of the site, would be as shallow as 0.5 mBGL, while more impacted zones would require excavation down to 3.3 mBGL. The depth of impacted soil classified as ‘Category C’ material for offsite disposal is presented in Figure 12. The majority of contaminated soil would likely be disposed offsite as ‘Category C’ material, with an additional 90 m3 (135 tonne approximately) excavated and disposed from ‘Category

Page 23: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc 17

B’ hotspots (Refer to Figure 13 for these locations). The single ‘Category A’ hotspot (approximately 10 m3) would require onsite treatment and/or reclassification prior to offsite disposal. Based on current landfill disposal fees and estimated earthworks fees, the approximate cost of landfill disposal within Victoria would be in excess of $1.65 million. Approximately 10,575 m3 of imported clean fill material would then be required to bring the site surface level to a minimum of 600 mm above the applicable flood level (4.25 mAHD). The costs associated with acquiring, transporting and reinstating this amount of ‘fill material’ are estimated to be in excess of $210,000.00. Additional costs would be associated with the development of an environmental management plan (EMP) to provide controls during excavation and offsite transport, the supervision of remediation works and a soil validation program undertaken prior to soil reinstatement to ensure no contaminated material remains onsite.

9.3.4 Viability Offsite disposal to landfill is available in Victoria, however the waste hierarchy detailed in the SEPP states that offsite disposal is amongst the least preferred management options. Additionally, this volume of soil may not be readily accepted at metropolitan landfills, in particular the 100 m3 of ‘Category B’ material. This may result in greater costs associated with transport to an alternate landfill if required.

9.4 Onsite treatment Several physical, chemical and biological treatment options are available as onsite soil remediation techniques. The options detailed in the following sections have been proven effective in Victoria, however their viability is dependent on site conditions and the nature of soil contaminants. The implementation of any onsite treatment options would be undertaken following the development of a Cleanup Plan.

9.4.1 Biological treatment Biological treatment techniques, including bioremediation and phytoremediation, are cost effective treatment options which have been proven capable of effectively treating organic contaminants, particularly hydrocarbons, in soil. Additionally, the recovery and re-use of heavy metals is possible using phytoremediation techniques. The size of the site is the major limitation for biological treatment, as it may not be large enough to treat up to 7,400 m3 of impacted soil. Additionally, the presence of asbestos at depths between 0.1 and 1.5 mBGL would require additional management. Its inert characteristics prevent it from being effectively treated in-situ and, as such, it may require further delineation and management during any biological treatment. Environmental Earth Sciences VIC have extensive experience in biological treatment, including large phytoremediation projects. We consider this option potentially viable for the site, dependant on the following: • if the site does not have sufficient surface area for excavation and treatment activities,

a staged treatment approach may be required; • a risk assessment should be undertaken to assess the risk of heavy metal

concentrations in soil. If a risk is present, a biological method effective in heavy metal treatment (i.e. phytoremediation) or an alternate remediation option (i.e. stabilisation) should be integrated into the biological treatment process;

Page 24: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc 18

• asbestos impact should be delineated and effectively managed; and • odour, vapour and dust emissions must be managed due to the residential setting;

9.4.2 Thermal treatment Again, asbestos is a major limitation for thermal treatment, which involves heating the soil through steam injection or vitrification to increase the volatility of contaminants. Other limitations for the use of thermal treatment at the site include its high cost, high energy use, the presence of a perched water table within the impacted area and the production of volatile gas by-products during treatment. In-situ thermal treatment is considered a potentially viable remediation option for the site, however greater research into the option, with the above limitations considered, would be required.

9.4.3 In-situ stabilisation Soil stabilisation involves the addition of stabilising agents to soil to reduce the mobility of contaminants. Stabilisation is effective for inorganics such as heavy metals and asbestos, however it is less effective for the treatment of TPH and PAHs. Other limitations to the technique include the presence of a perched water table potentially requiring dewatering, and the risk (considered low) of solidified soil impacting future site use. In-situ stabilisation is also considered a potentially viable remediation option for the site, however as we are dealing with a range of organic and inorganic contaminants greater research would be required.

9.5 Offsite treatment The treatment options described above may also be undertaken offsite following the excavation and transport of impacted soil. Successful offsite treatment of impacted soil may result in it being available for beneficial reuse. Offsite treatment is considered potentially viable for this site subject to similar limitations as those relating to onsite treatment. However, the addition of increased cost and energy expenditure relating to the excavation and transport of approximately 7,400 m3 of soil mean that offsite treatment options are not favourable for the site.

9.6 Onsite soil capping and containment (recommended)

9.6.1 Summary The construction of a cap and containment system would allow impacted soil to remain in-situ beneath an engineered soil cap across the surface of the entire site. This cap would aim to remove the potential exposure pathways and minimise infiltration of water through fill material. Its design would also be modified to meet the requirements of Melbourne Water. Design details of the cap and containment system will be developed within a Cleanup Plan. Initial design specifications include the following: • a topsoil layer above the clay cap in unpaved areas; • guidelines outlined within EPA Publication 788 – Siting, design, operation and

rehabilitation of landfills indicate a minimum cap thickness of 1.0 m. However, at this stage, we consider a minimum cap thickness of 0.6 m across the site suitable.

Page 25: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc 19

• this will require the importation of approximately 2,670 m3 of material and will meet Melbourne Water’s requirements for finished surface levels within any open carports. In order to meet Melbourne Water’s requirements for finished surface levels beneath the proposed building areas (see DPS plans in Appendix A), an additional 970 m3 of material will be required. This will mean a total of approximately 3,640 m3 of clean fill material would need to be imported for the construction of the cap;

• an effective leachate collection system may need to be installed prior to the construction of the cap to manage the potentially contaminated perched water table. If needed, this system would include a leachate interception drain extending along the eastern boundary of the site, ending in a leachate sump. This sump would need to be pumped out and disposed to trade waste regularly; and

• an EMP to provide guidance during the construction and ongoing use of the cap.

9.6.2 Limitations • a minimum cap thickness of 0.6 m across the site would result in higher surface levels

than some of those shown in the DPS plans (access roads and eastern boundary). If these designs are final, excavation and management of soil in these areas would be required, thereby resulting in cost increases;

• the unconsolidated nature of fill material onsite may require geotechnical assessment and compaction prior to capping to ensure there is no risk of land subsidence;

• a groundwater investigation would be required to determine whether an ongoing source of contamination exists from the material remaining in-situ.

9.6.3 Cost estimation It is anticipated that the design of an engineered cap (detailed in the Cleanup Plan) would be undertaken by a suitably qualified engineer and will cost approximately $20,000.00 to $25,000.00. The preparation of an EMP will be undertaken by an environmental consultant and it is estimated to cost approximately $5,000.00. Both the Cleanup Plan and the EMP will be reviewed by an appointed Site Auditor for approval. The costs associated with the construction of the cap and containment system would be detailed within the Cleanup Plan, however preliminary estimates indicate that the construction may range from approximately $400,000.00 to approximately $450,000.00.

9.6.4 Viability This option is considered to be the most viable option for remediation of the site as it: • successfully removes potential exposure pathways to future onsite users; • meets the requirements of Melbourne Water for development in areas prone to

inundation; • effectively manages potential contaminant migration within the perched water table;

and • is more cost effective than the other remediation options. This option may not remove the risk of future impact to groundwater (and potentially surface water). Infiltration and leachate migration will be managed, however if an existing source of groundwater contamination is identified within the groundwater investigation and risk assessment, it may require ongoing monitoring and/or management.

Page 26: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc 20

10 LIKELY REQUIRED WORKS Based on the findings of our historical investigation, our site observations and reported soil chemical concentrations across the site, it is highly likely that further environmental investigations will be required in addition to any soil remediation or management undertaken at the site.

10.1 Required works

10.1.1 Environmental audit The site is currently zoned residential (R1Z) and will not require re-zoning for the proposed medium density residential development. However, the historical use of the site for disposal of municipal and construction waste means that it is likely that the Maribyrnong City Council will require an environmental audit of land to be undertaken by an EPA accredited environmental auditor prior to any future development. It is likely that this will be in the form of a 53V audit, which relates to “the risk of any possible harm or detriment to a segment of the environment caused by any industrial process or activity, waste, substance or noise” (EPA Publication 952.2, 2007). The costs of the Auditor’s component would be in addition to the costs of any further investigations required and may range between $75,000.00 and $100,000.00. This component of additional works is largely dependent on the required scope and the appointed Auditor.

10.1.2 Additional soil sampling The recommended sampling density outlined within Australian Standard AS4482.1 (1997) Guide to the sampling and investigation of potentially contaminated soil, Part 1: Non-volatile and semi-volatile compounds has already been met for the site. The observed discrepancies in soil data reported in the 2002 and 2010 investigations (detailed in Section 7.2.6) may cause the Auditor to request additional soil sampling and analysis to confirm the chemical status of soil at the site. Additionally, the Auditor may request targeted sampling to confirm the presence of highly elevated PAH and TPH concentrations. The scope of any additional soil sampling is likely to be relatively minor, with costs estimated at between $5,000.00 and $10,000.00.

10.1.3 Groundwater assessment No detailed groundwater investigations have been undertaken to determine the hydrological conditions and chemical status of groundwater beneath the site. A detailed groundwater investigation will be required to determine whether the site has impacted local groundwater conditions. The investigation would most likely involve: • preparation of a sampling and analysis plan (SAP); • the installation of a minimum of three groundwater bores; • a minimum of two rounds of groundwater sampling; • laboratory analysis for CoPC; and • assessment of groundwater conditions in relation to the potential future land use and

potential offsite receptors.

Page 27: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc 21

The costs associated with undertaking a detailed groundwater investigation at the site are likely to be between $35,000.00 and $45,000.00.

10.1.4 Soil vapour assessment The low concentration of volatile contaminants (BTEX, TPH[C6-C9]) across the site indicates that soil vapour intrusion at the site may not pose a great risk. However, the high concentrations of semi-volatile contaminants (PAH and TPH [C10-C36]) and the proposed residential land use mean that a soil vapour assessment would likely be required prior to any construction works. This is also dependent on the chemical status of groundwater beneath the site. A soil vapour assessment at the site is likely to cost between approximately $20,000.00 and $25,000.00.

10.1.5 Risk assessment If an onsite capping and retention system was developed at the site, a quantitative risk assessment would be required to ensure that contaminants do not pose a risk to human health or the environment if they were to remain in-situ. As detailed in Section 9.2, chemical levels in soil would be evaluated from a human health and ecological perspective. The costs associated with a Human Health & Ecological Risk Assessment are estimated at approximately $20,000.00.

10.2 Likely schedule of works The potential timeframe presented in Appendix F is based on our recommended remediation strategy (also detailed in Section 9.6) and estimates that completion of construction of the cap can occur within 13 months. This anticipated timeline allows for the majority of environmental works to be completed in 6 months following 1 month for an Environmental Auditor to be engaged and review the site history. The cap design and implementation is likely to then take 6 months, including approximately 6 weeks for construction. This timeframe presents the ‘best-case’ time estimate and is largely provisional as timing is dependent on the potential scope of required works. Furthermore, any additional works will require the approval by an appointed auditor before being undertaken as well as a review upon completion. Ongoing management would also likely be required following the development of the site to ensure the beneficial uses of land and groundwater remain protected. The scope of ongoing management will likely be detailed within an EMP and approved by the appointed auditor.

11 SUMMARY The soil investigation undertaken by Environmental Earth Sciences VIC demonstrated that soil at the site contains concentrations of heavy metals (As, Cu and Pb in particular), TPH, BaP and total PAH above human health and ecological guidelines. Laboratory results generally aligned with the data presented in the previous SRS (2002) soil investigations however, higher concentrations of PAHs and TPH were identified. Of note, was total PAH concentrations which ranged from 0.6 mg/kg to 210.5 mg/kg, and TPH (C10-C36) concentrations which ranged from 140 mg/kg to 82,500 mg/kg.

Page 28: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc 22

Asbestos was identified at depths between 0.1 and 1.5 mBGL in four of the seven samples analysed. Several samples were reported with high sulfur concentrations, however their actual and potential acidity was demonstrated to be very low due to the self buffering capacity of the soil. Several potential remediation and management options, including offsite landfill disposal, onsite treatment and offsite treatment were considered potentially viable options. However, they were not considered favourable due to their limitations and requirements for greater research and development. Limitations included factors such as minimal reduction of risk to human health or the environment, not complying with Melbourne Water requirements, poor financial viability and poor environmental outcome. A capping and containment system is considered the most viable option for remediation of the site. Impacted soil would remain in-situ beneath an engineered soil cap constructed across the surface of the entire site. This option is considered to be the most viable for remediation of the site as it: • successfully removes potential exposure pathways to future site users; • meets the requirements of Melbourne Water for development in areas prone to

inundation; • effectively manages potential contaminant migration within the perched water table;

and • is more cost effective than the other remediation options. Please note however, that it is highly likely that further environmental investigations will be required in addition to implementation of the cap and containment system (if undertaken). The further works, as well as their estimated costs and timeframe are outlined in Table 1. Undertaking the works listed in Table 1, followed by the construction of the cap and containment system, is considered the most practical approach in successfully developing the site for its proposed medium density residential land use. The costs associated with undertaking the scope of works is estimated at between $580,000.00 and $680,000.00 (excluding GST). The timeframe for undertaking the works, from the time of engaging an auditor to completion of the cap and containment system, is estimated at a minimum of 13 months.

Page 29: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc 23

TABLE 1 FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL WORKS Works Importance Costs Timing

Environmental audit of the site mandatory $75,000.00 -

$100,000.00 Month 1 to Month 13

Additional soil sampling possible (based on auditor’s requirements)

$5,000.00 - $10,000.00 Month 2

Detailed groundwater assessment mandatory $35,000.00 -

$45,000.00 Month 2 to Month 6

Soil vapour assessment likely $20,000.00 - $25,000.00 Month 6

Human health & ecological risk assessment

likely (based on auditor’s requirements) $20,000.00 Month 7

Development of a Cleanup Plan mandatory $20,000.00 -

$25,000.00 Month 8

Development of an environmental management plan (EMP)

mandatory $5,000.00 Month 11

Cap and containment system desirable $400,000.00 to

$450,000.00 Month 11 to Month 12

12 LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared by Environmental Earth Sciences VIC ABN 13 109 404 024 in response to and subject to the following limitations: 1. The specific instructions received from Fastnet Consulting; 2. The specific scope of works set out in PO210102 V2 issued by Environmental Earth

Sciences VIC for and on behalf of Fastnet Consulting, is included in Section 2 (Objectives) of this report;

3. May not be relied upon by any third party not named in this report for any purpose except with the prior written consent of Environmental Earth Sciences VIC (which consent may or may not be given at the discretion of Environmental Earth Sciences VIC);

4. This report comprises the formal report, documentation sections, tables, figures and appendices as referred to in the index to this report and must not be released to any third party or copied in part without all the material included in this report for any reason;

5. The report only relates to the site referred to in the scope of works being located at 20 Gordon Parade and 28 Salisbury Street, Yarraville (“the site”);

6. The report relates to the site as at the date of the report as conditions may change thereafter due to natural processes and/or site activities;

7. No warranty or guarantee is made in regard to any other use than as specified in the scope of works and only applies to the depth tested and reported in this report,

8. Fill, soil and rock to the depth tested on the site may be fit for the use specified in this report. Unless it is expressly stated in this report, the fill, soil and/or rock may not be suitable for classification as clean fill if deposited off site; and

Page 30: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc 24

9. Our General Limitations set out at the back of the body of this report.

13 REFERENCES ANZECC, 1992a, Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for the Assessment and

Management of Contaminated Sites. Department of Natural Resources and Environment (DNRE), 1995, Victorian Groundwater

Beneficial Map Series. South Eastern Victoria regional aquifer systems. Department of Primary Industries (DPI), 2003, Acid Sulfate Soil Hazard Maps and Guidelines

for Coastal Victoria. Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE), 2009, Victorian coastal acid sulfate

soils strategy. Environmental Earth Sciences Pty Ltd (2007) Quality Assurance and Environmental

Management Manual. Environmental & Earth Sciences Pty Ltd, 2005b, Soil, gas & groundwater sampling manual.

Work Instruction 01. EPA Victoria, 1999, Publication 655.1 – Information Bulletin Acid Sulfate Soil and Rock. EPA Victoria, 2001, Publication 788 Best Practice Environmental Management – Siting,

design, operation and rehabilitation of landfills. EPA Victoria, 2007, Publication 952.2 Environmental Auditor Guidelines for the Preparation

of Environmental Audit Reports on Risk to the Environment. Geological Survey of Victoria (GSV) (1974) Melbourne 1:63 360 Geological Series Map Part

7822, Zone 55, Sheet SJ 55-1. Industrial Waste Resource Guidelines – Publication IWRG621 ‘Soil Hazard Categorisation

and Management’. National Environment Protection Council (NEPC), 1999, National Environment Protection

(Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure. NSW Department of Environment and Climate Change, 2008, Service station sites:

assessment & remediation. SRS Australia Pty Ltd, 2002, Environmental Site Investigation Report of Residential 3 Zoned,

Land on Titles: Vol. 8780 Fol. 549 & Vol. 8780 Fol. 550, End of Gordon Parade, Yarraville, Victoria; and

SRS Australia Pty Ltd, 2002, Environmental Site Investigation Report of Residential 3 Zoned, Lot No. 3, End of Salisbury Street, Yarraville, Victoria.

Standards Australia, 2005, Guide to the investigation and sampling of sites with potentially contaminated soil. Part 1: Non-volatile and semi-volatile compounds. AS 4482.1.

Standards Australia, 1999, Guide to the investigation and sampling of sites with potentially contaminated soil. Part 2: Volatile Substances. AS 4482.1.

Victorian Government, 2002, State Environment Protection Policy (Prevention and Management of Contamination of Land). Victorian Government Printer.

Victorian Government Gazette (1999). Industrial Waste Management Policy (IWMP) Waste Acid Sulfate Soils (WASS).

Page 31: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc 25

West Australian Department of Health (WA DoH), 2009, Guidelines for the Assessment and Remediation and Management of Asbestos-Contaminated Sites in Western Australia.

Page 32: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

General Limitations 6 April 2009 Page 1 of 1

ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES GENERAL LIMITATIONS Scope of services The work presented in this report is Environmental Earth Sciences response to the specific scope of works requested by, planned with and approved by the client. It cannot be relied on by any other third party for any purpose except with our prior written consent. Client may distribute this report to other parties and in doing so warrants that the report is suitable for the purpose it was intended for. However, any party wishing to rely on this report should contact us to determine the suitability of this report for their specific purpose. Data should not be separated from the report A report is provided inclusive of all documentation sections, limitations, tables, figures and appendices and should not be provided or copied in part without all supporting documentation for any reason, because misinterpretation may occur. Subsurface conditions change Understanding an environmental study will reduce exposure to the risk of the presence of contaminated soil and or groundwater. However, contaminants may be present in areas that were not investigated, or may migrate to other areas. Analysis cannot cover every type of contaminant that could possibly be present. When combined with field observations, field measurements and professional judgement, this approach increases the probability of identifying contaminated soil and or groundwater. Under no circumstances can it be considered that these findings represent the actual condition of the site at all points. Environmental studies identify actual sub-surface conditions only at those points where samples are taken, when they are taken. Actual conditions between sampling locations differ from those inferred because no professional, no matter how qualified, and no sub-surface exploration program, no matter how comprehensive, can reveal what is hidden below the ground surface. The actual interface between materials may be far more gradual or abrupt than an assessment indicates. Actual conditions in areas not sampled may differ from that predicted. Nothing can be done to prevent the unanticipated. However, steps can be taken to help minimize the impact. For this reason, site owners should retain our services. Problems with interpretation by others Advice and interpretation is provided on the basis that subsequent work will be undertaken by Environmental Earth Sciences VIC. This will identify variances, maintain consistency in how data is interpreted, conduct additional tests that may be necessary and recommend solutions to problems encountered on site. Other parties may misinterpret our work and we cannot be responsible for how the information in this report is used. If further data is collected or comes to light we reserve the right to alter their conclusions. Obtain regulatory approval The investigation and remediation of contaminated sites is a field in which legislation and interpretation of legislation is changing rapidly. Our interpretation of the investigation findings should not be taken to be that of any other party. When approval from a statutory authority is required for a project, that approval should be directly sought by the client. Limit of liability This study has been carried out to a particular scope of works at a specified site and should not be used for any other purpose. This report is provided on the condition that Environmental Earth Sciences VIC disclaims all liability to any person or entity other than the client in respect of anything done or omitted to be done and of the consequence of anything done or omitted to be done by any such person in reliance, whether in whole or in part, on the contents of this report. Furthermore, Environmental Earth Sciences VIC disclaims all liability in respect of anything done or omitted to be done and of the consequence of anything done or omitted to be done by the client, or any such person in reliance, whether in whole or any part of the contents of this report of all matters not stated in the brief outlined in Environmental Earth Sciences VIC’s proposal number and according to Environmental Earth Sciences general terms and conditions and special terms and conditions for contaminated sites. To the maximum extent permitted by law, we exclude all liability of whatever nature, whether in contract, tort or otherwise, for the acts, omissions or default, whether negligent or otherwise for any loss or damage whatsoever that may arise in any way in connection with the supply of services. Under circumstances where liability cannot be excluded, such liability is limited to the value of the purchased service.

Page 33: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc

FIGURES

Page 34: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

0 80

Horizontal Scale in Metres

4020 10060

Title:

Client:

Location:

Drawn By:Project Man:

Date:Scale:

Job No:

Locality MapSource: Nearmap.com.au

20 Gordon Pde.and28 Salisbury St. Yarraville, VIC.Fastnet ConsultingLBJF As Shown 210061Figure 1

THE KNOW AND THE HOW

ENVIRONMENTALEARTH SCIENCES

Sept. 2010

NOR G DON PARADE

SAL SBU Y I R TRE TS E SITELOCATION

Page 35: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Title:

Client:

Location:

Drawn By:

Project Man:

Date:

Scale:

Job No:

Site Plan andSampling Locations20 Gordon Pde.and28 Salisbury St. Yarraville, VIC.Fastnet ConsultingLBJF As Shown 210061Figure 2

THE KNOW AND THE HOW

ENVIRONMENTALEARTH SCIENCES

N

Sept. 2010

Scale in Metres

0 5 10 15 20 25

EES test pit locations (2010)

SRS test pit locations (2001)

Site boundary

Cross section location(refer Figures 3, 4 and 5)

LEGEND:

TP1TP2

TP3

TP4

TP5TP6TP7 TP8

TP9TP10TP11

TP12TP13

TP14

V1 V2

V3V4V5

V7

XP2 XP3 XP6XP5XP4

XP11XP1 XP7

V8

V13

V6 Form

er Stony Creek Course

Westgate Golf Course

GORDON PARADE AA’

B’BC C’

SALISBURYSTREET

20 Gordon Parade

28 Salisbury Street

Salisbury Street Road Reserveony

r ena

New St C e k

Cal

Page 36: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Title:

Client:

Location:

Drawn By:Project Man:

Date:Scale:

Job No:

Conceptual

Cross Section A - A’

20 Gordon Pde.and

28 Salisbury St. Yarraville, VIC.

Fastnet Consulting

LB

JF As Shown

210061

Figure 3

THE KNOW AND THE HOW

ENVIRONMENTALEARTH SCIENCES

Sept. 2010

0 40

Horizontal Scale in Metres

2010 5030

TP1

NATURAL - Weathered, brown, vesicular basalt(Newer Volcanics)

FILL - Loose, black silt with minor clay(reworked Coode Island Silt sediments) Perched water

table

FILL - Loose, sandy clayey silt

FILL - Loose silty clay matrix with solid waste (plastic, glass, wood, bluestone, rubbish etc.)

NATURAL - Medium dense, grey/green clay

SRS-XP4TP1V77I-7TP3V77I-4

A � � �� A’

?

?

?

?

?

?

0

1

2

3

4

(m B

GL)

Page 37: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Title:

Client:

Location:

Drawn By:Project Man:

Date:Scale:

Job No:

Conceptual

Cross Section B - B’

20 Gordon Pde.and

28 Salisbury St. Yarraville, VIC.

Fastnet Consulting

LB

JF As Shown

210061

Figure 4

THE KNOW AND THE HOW

ENVIRONMENTALEARTH SCIENCES

Sept. 2010

0 8

Horizontal Scale in Metres

42 106

NATURAL - Weathered, brown, vesicular basalt(Newer Volcanics)

FILL - Loose, black silt with minor clay and wood,paper inclusions (reworked Coode Island Silt sediments)

Perched watertable

FILL - Loose, brown clayey silt

FILL - Loose, brown silty clay with solid waste (bluestone, wood, plastic, paper, rubbish etc.)

FILL - Loose black silt(Coode Island Silt)

Oil drum andmachinery inclusion

TP8TP7

B � � �� B’

TP9

N ATURAL - Dense, grey/blue clay

?

?

?? ?

?

(m B

GL)

0

1

2

3

4

Page 38: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Title:

Client:

Location:

Drawn By:Project Man:

Date:Scale:

Job No:

Conceptual

Cross Section C - C’

20 Gordon Pde.and

28 Salisbury St. Yarraville, VIC.

Fastnet Consulting

LB

JF As Shown

210061

Figure 5

THE KNOW AND THE HOW

ENVIRONMENTALEARTH SCIENCES

Sept. 2010

0 8

Horizontal Scale in Metres

42 106

NATURAL - Weathered, brown, vesicular basalt(Newer Volcanics)

??

?

? ?

?

NATURAL - Dense, grey/blue clay

Perched watertable

FILL - Loose, brown clayey silt with roots

FILL - Loose, brown silty clay with building rubble (bluestone and concrete)

FILL - Soft, dark, reworked natural silty clay

Rubbish inclusions(plastic, paper, glass)

FILL - Soft, black silty clay with reeds. Reworked Coode Island Silt

TP11TP13

C � � �� C’

TP10

0

1

2

3

4

(m B

GL)

Page 39: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Title:

Client:

Location:

Drawn By:Project Man:

Date:Scale:

Job No:

20 Gordon Pde.and28 Salisbury St. Yarraville, VIC.Fastnet ConsultingLBJF Sept. 2010As Shown 210061Figure 6

THE KNOW AND THE HOW

ENVIRONMENTALEARTH SCIENCES

N

Elevated Arsenic (As)Concentrations

Scale in Metres

0 5 10 15 20 25

EES test pit locations (2010)

SRS test pit locations (2001)

Site boundary

As concentration (mg/kg) / (sample depth in m)in excess of NEPM HIL A guidelines

As

concentration (mg/kg) / (sample depth in m)in excess of NEPM HIL D guidelines

LEGEND:

148(1.0)(2.9)406

GORDON PARADE

20 Gordon Parade

28 Salisbury Street

Salisbury Street Road Reserve

TP1113(05)TP2540(3.3)

TP3158(2.1)

TP4180(2.0)

TP5166(0.5)TP6114(0.5)TP7101(0.1)(2.1)406

TP8174(2.0) TP9278(2.6)TP10103(1.5)TP11

TP12111(2..0)TP13112(1.6)TP14148(1.0)(2.9)119

V1 V2120(0.1)

V3V4V5

V7190(0.2)

XP2 XP31501.5) XP6130(1.0)XP5140(1.0)XP4

XP11XP1

XP7

V8V6130(0.5)

V13

Former Stony Creek Course

Cre

a

New

Sto

ny

ek C

anl

Westgate Golf Course

SALISBURYSTREET

Page 40: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Title:

Client:

Location:

Drawn By:Project Man:

Date:Scale:

Job No:

Elevated Copper (Cu)Concentrations 20 Gordon Pde.and28 Salisbury St. Yarraville, VIC.Fastnet ConsultingLBJF Sept. 2010As Shown 210061Figure 7

THE KNOW AND THE HOW

ENVIRONMENTALEARTH SCIENCES

N

Scale in Metres

0 5 10 15 20 25

EES test pit locations (2010)

SRS test pit locations (2001)

Site boundary

Cu concentration (mg/kg) / (sample depth in m)in excess of NEPM HIL A guidelines

Cu

concentration (mg/kg) / (sample depth in m)in excess of NEPM HIL D guidelines

LEGEND:

1600(0.3)(1.0)4900

GORDON PARADE

20 Gordon Parade

28 Salisbury Street

Salisbury Street Road Reserve

TP1

TP2

TP3

TP4

TP5TP6

TP7 TP8TP9

TP101890(1.5)TP111190(2.0)TP12

TP13

TP14

V1 V222001700(0.1)(0.5)V3V4V5

V72700(0.5)

XP2 XP321002400(0.1)(05) XP6

XP51800(0.5)XP41600(0.5)XP11

XP1XP71900(0.5)

V824003200(0.5)(1.0)(2.0)4900V61300(0.5)

V13

Former Stony Creek Course

Cre

a

New

Sto

ny

ek C

anl

Westgate Golf Course

SALISBURYSTREET

Page 41: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Title:

Client:

Location:

Drawn By:Project Man:

Date:Scale:

Job No:

Elevated Lead (Pb)Concentrations20 Gordon Pde.and28 Salisbury St. Yarraville, VIC.Fastnet ConsultingLBJF Sept. 2010As Shown 210061Figure 8

THE KNOW AND THE HOW

ENVIRONMENTALEARTH SCIENCES

N

Scale in Metres

0 5 10 15 20 25

EES test pit locations (2010)

SRS test pit locations (2001)

Site boundary

Pb concentration (mg/kg) / sample depth (m)in excess of NEPM HIL A guidelines

Pb

concentration (mg/kg) / sample depth (m)in excess of NEPM HIL D guidelines

LEGEND:

337(1.5)(0.5)3600

GORDON PARADE

20 Gordon Parade

28 Salisbury Street

Salisbury Street Road Reserve

TP1

TP2485(3.3)

TP3731(0.5)(1.5)822

TP4337(1.5)

TP5394(0.5)TP6TP7 T3358(0.3) TP9773(2.6)

TP10325(1.5)TP11514683(0.1)(2.0TP12431(0.5)TP13326(0.1)

TP14354(1.0)

V1390(10.5) V2

V3V43300(0.5)V5420(05)

V7530(1.0)

XP2 XP3 XP6520(0.5)XP5XP4

XP11XP1

XP7

V8840(2.0)V63600(0.5)(1.0)420

V13

Former Stony Creek Course

Cre

a

New

Sto

ny

ek C

anl

Westgate Golf Course

SALISBURYSTREET

Page 42: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Title:

Client:

Location:

Drawn By:Project Man:

Date:Scale:

Job No:

Benzo(a)PyreneConcentrations >1.0 mg/kg20 Gordon Pde.and28 Salisbury St. Yarraville, VIC.Fastnet ConsultingLBJF Sept. 2010As Shown 210061Figure 9

THE KNOW AND THE HOW

ENVIRONMENTALEARTH SCIENCES

N

Scale in Metres

0 5 10 15 20 25

EES test pit locations (2010)

SRS test pit locations (2001)

Site boundary

BaP concentration (mg/kg) / sample depth (m)in excess of NEPM HIL A guidelines

BaP concentration (mg/kg) / sample depth (m)in excess of NEPM HIL D guidelines

LEGEND:

1.1(1.5)(1.5)6.0

GORDON PARADE

20 Gordon Parade

28 Salisbury Street

Salisbury Street Road Reserve

TP120.0(1.5)TP2

TP34.7(1.5)

TP4

TP51.5(1.5)TP62.4(1.5)TP7 TP81.6(1.5) TP91.1(1.5)(1.5)6.0

TP101.0(1.5)TP111.8(1.5)TP122.3(1.5)TP13

TP14

V1 V2

V3V4V5

V7

XP22.2(1.5) XP3 XP6

XP5XP4XP11

XP14.5(1.5)XP7

V8V61.1(1.5)

V13

Former Stony Creek Course

Cre

a

New

Sto

ny

ek C

anl

Westgate Golf Course

SALISBURYSTREET

Page 43: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Title:

Client:

Location:

Drawn By:Project Man:

Date:Scale:

Job No:

Total PAHConcentrations >20 mg/kg

20 Gordon Pde.and28 Salisbury St. Yarraville, VIC.

Fastnet Consulting

LBJF

Sept. 2010As Shown

210061

Figure 10

THE KNOW AND THE HOW

ENVIRONMENTALEARTH SCIENCES

N

Scale in Metres

0 5 10 15 20 25

EES test pit locations (2010)

SRS test pit locations (2001)

Site boundary

PAH concentration (mg/kg) / sample depth (m)in excess of NEPM HIL A guidelines

PAH concentration (mg/kg) / sample depth (m)in excess of NEPM HIL D guidelines

LEGEND:

39.0(1.0)(0.1)102.9

GORDON PARADE

20 Gordon Parade

28 Salisbury Street

Salisbury Street Road Reserve

TP1210.5(1.5)

TP2

TP344.0(1.5)

TP4

TP522.6(1.5)TP6

102.9(0.1)TP7

TP8

TP9162.6(2.1)

TP10

TP1127.6(3.0)

TP1226.8(1.5)TP13

TP14

V1 V2

V3V4V5

V7

XP221.9(1.0) XP3 XP6

XP5XP4

XP11

XP139.0(1.50)

XP7

V8V6

V13

Former Stony Creek Course

Cre

a

New

Sto

ny

ek C

anl

Westgate Golf Course

SALISBURYSTREET

Page 44: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Title:

Client:

Location:

Drawn By:Project Man:

Date:Scale:

Job No:

TPH (C -C ) Concentrations10 36Excess of NSW DECC Guidelines in

20 Gordon Pde.and28 Salisbury St. Yarraville, VIC.

Fastnet Consulting

LBJF

Sept. 2010As Shown

210061

Figure 11

THE KNOW AND THE HOW

ENVIRONMENTALEARTH SCIENCES

N

Scale in Metres

0 5 10 15 20 25

EES test pit locations (2010)

SRS test pit locations (2001)

Site boundary

TPH (C -C ) in mg/kg (sample depth in m)6 36

LEGEND:

102.9(0.1)

GORDON PARADE

20 Gordon Parade

28 Salisbury Street

Salisbury Street Road Reserve

TP1

TP21220(3.3)

TP34760(1.5)

TP4

TP54420

11,900(3.0)(2.1)TP6

TP7

TP8

TP982,500

3050(2.1)(2.6)

TP10

TP11239049102580

(1.8)(2.0)(3.0)

TP12

TP13

TP14

V1 V2

V3V4

210025,540

2580

(1.0)(0.5)(2.0)V5

V74065(1.0)

XP2XP3

21,2601400

(1.0)(1.5) XP610401490

(0.5)(1.0)XP5XP4

XP11

XP11090(1.0)

XP7

V8V1310

1310(0.2)

V13

Former Stony Creek Course

Cre

a

New

Sto

ny

ek C

anl

Westgate Golf Course

SALISBURYSTREET

Page 45: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Title:

Client:

Location:

Drawn By:

Project Man:

Date:

Scale:

Job No:

Depth of ‘Category C’Classified Soil20 Gordon Pde.and28 Salisbury St. Yarraville, VIC.Fastnet ConsultingLBJF Sept. 2010As Shown 210061Figure 12

THE KNOW AND THE HOW

ENVIRONMENTALEARTH SCIENCES

N

Scale in Metres

0 5 10 15 20 25

EES test pit locations (2010)

SRS test pit locations (2001)

Site boundary

Depth (mBGL)

LEGEND:

2.9

GORDON PARADE

20 Gordon Parade

28 Salisbury Street

Salisbury Street Road Reserve

TP12.1TP23.3

TP32.1

TP42.0

TP53.0TP63.0TP72.1

T32.0 TP92.6TP102.0TP113.0

TP122.5TP131.6TP142.9

V11.0 V20.5

V33.3V42.0V50.5

V7

XP22.0 XP31.5 XP61.0XP52.0XP40.5XP12.5

XP71.0

V82.0V61.0 Form

er Stony Creek Course

Cre

a

New

Sto

ny

ek C

anl

Westgate Golf Course

SALISBURYSTREET

Page 46: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Title:

Client:

Location:

Drawn By:

Project Man:

Date:

Scale:

Job No:

Locations of Category B’and Category A’ Hotspot

‘‘

20 Gordon Pde.and28 Salisbury St. Yarraville, VIC.

Fastnet Consulting

LBJF

Sept. 2010As Shown

210061

Figure 13

THE KNOW AND THE HOW

ENVIRONMENTALEARTH SCIENCES

N

Scale in Metres

0 5 10 15 20 25

EES test pit locations (2010)

SRS test pit locations (2001)

Site boundary

Depth of hotspot (m) - (Category B contaminant)

Depth of hotspot (m) - (Category A contaminant)

LEGEND:

2.1 (TPH)2.1 (TPH)

GORDON PARADE

20 Gordon Parade

28 Salisbury Street

Salisbury Street Road Reserve

TP11.5 (PAH & BaP)

TP23.3 (As)

TP3

TP4

TP52.1 (TPH)

TP60.1 (PAH & BaP)

TP7

T3

TP92.1 (TPH)

TP10

TP11

TP12

TP13

TP14

V1 V2

V3V40.5 (Pb)

V5

V7

XP2 XP31.0 (TPH)

XP6

XP5XP4XP1

XP7

V8V60.5 (Pb)

Former Stony Creek Course

Cre

a

New

Sto

ny

ek C

anl

Westgate Golf Course

SALISBURYSTREET

Page 47: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc

TABLES

Page 48: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc T1

TABLE 2 NEPM HEALTH BASED INVESTIGATION LEVELS (1999) Substance Health-based Soil Investigation Levels (mg/kg)

Exposure Settings A Ba Ca D E F

Aldrin + Dieldrin 10 40 20 50 Arsenic (total) 100 400 200 500 Benzo (a) pyrene 1 4 2 5

Beryllium 20 80 40 100 Boron 3,000 12,000 6,000 15,000

Cadmium 20 80 40 100 Chlordane 50 200 100 250 Chromium (III) 12% 48% 24% 60%

Chromium (VI) 100 400 200 500 Cobalt 100 400 200 500

Copper 1,000 4,000 2,000 5,000 Cyanides (complexed) 500 2,000 1,000 2,500 Cyanides (free) 250 1,000 500 1,250

DDT + DDD + DDE 200 800 400 1,000 Heptachlor 10 40 20 50

Lead 300 1,200 600 1,500 Manganese 1,500 6,000 3,000 7,500

Methyl Mercury 10 40 20 50 Mercury (inorganic) 15 60 30 75 Nickel 600 2,400 600 3,000

Total PAH 20 80 40 100 PCB’s (total) 10 40 20 50

Phenol 8,500 34,000 17,000 42,500 TPH C16-C35 aromatics 90 360 180 450 TPH C16-C35 aliphatics 5,600 22,400 11,200 28,000

TPH>C35 56,000 224,000 112,000 280,000 Zinc 7,000 28,000 14,000 35,000

Exposure Setting(s):

1. ‘Standard’ residential with garden/accessible soil (less than 10% intake of home grown produce; no poultry): this category includes children’s day-care, pre-schools etc.

2. Residential with substantial vegetable garden (contributing up to 50% of vegetable and fruit intake) and poultry providing all dietary egg intake and 25% poultry meat intake.

3. Residential with substantial vegetable garden (contributing up to 50% of vegetable and fruit intake); poultry excluded. 4. Residential with minimal opportunities for soil access includes high-rise apartments and flats. 5. Parks, recreational open space and playing fields: includes secondary schools. 6. Commercial/Industrial: includes premises such as shops and offices as well as factories and industrial sites. (If,

however, a commercial site is also used for residential purposes or regular soil access by children if possible then the appropriate ‘residential’ setting should be used.) It is assumed that thirty years is the duration of exposure.

7. a Site and contaminant specific. 8. Shaded column specifies the relevant guidelines for this investigation.

Page 49: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc T2

TABLE 3 ORGANIC AND INORGANIC SOIL RESULTS SUMMARY

Analyte Units LOR NSW DECC

NEPM 1999 EIL

NEPM 1999 HIL A

NEPM 1999 HIL D

Fill Material Cat C Cat B

TP1 (0.4-0.5)

TP1 (1.0-1.1)

TP1 (1.5-1.6)

TP1 (2.0-2.1)

TP2 (0.4-0.5)

TP2 (1.4-1.5)

TP2 (1.9-2.0)

TP2 (3.2-3.3)

TP3 (0.4-0.5)

TP3 (0-0.1)

TP3 (1.4-1.5)

TP3 (2.0-2.1)

TP3 (2.4-2.5)

Aluminium mg/kg 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <1 -

Arsenic mg/kg 5 - 20 100 400 20 500 2000 113 <5 37 30 42 73 24 590 53 5 77 158 19

Cadmium mg/kg 1 - 3 20 80 3 100 400 2 <1 <1 <1 <1 1 <1 16 2 <1 2 2 <1

Chromium (III+VI) mg/kg 2 - - - - - - - 59 31 - 28 29 47 - 126 92 20 - 65 36

Chromium (hexavalent) mg/kg 0.5 - 1 100 400 1 500 2000 - - <0.5 - - - <0.5 - - - <0.5 - -

Cobalt mg/kg 2 - - 100 400 - - - - - - - 183 - - - 46 - - - -

Copper mg/kg 5 - 100 1000 4000 100 5000 20000 265 7 23 15 728 115 106 358 463 26 474 202 16

Lead mg/kg 5 300 600 300 1200 300 1,500 6,000 191 14 60 32 155 108 87 485 731 21 822 198 26

Manganese mg/kg 0.1 - 500 1500 6000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <0.1 -

Mercury mg/kg 0.1 - 1 15 60 1 75 300 0.5 <0.1 0.1 <0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 1 0.7 <0.1 0.5 0.4 0.2

Molybdenum mg/kg 2 - - - - 40 1,000 4,000 - - <2 - - - <2 - - - 7 - -

Nickel mg/kg 2 - 60 600 2400 60 3,000 12,000 76 17 39 27 141 41 41 122 76 13 77 52 27

Selenium mg/kg 5 - - - - 10 50 200 - - <5 - - - <5 - - - <5 - -

Silver mg/kg 2 - - - - 10 180 720 - - <2 - - - <2 - - - <2 - -

Tin mg/kg 5 - - - - 50 500 - - - <5 - - - 202 - - - 268 - -

Zinc mg/kg 5 - 200 7000 28000 200 35,000 140,000 496 52 133 93 127 413 414 3960 810 50 1170 587 53

Cyanide (Free) mg/kg 1 - - 250 1000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Cyanide Total mg/kg 1 - - 500 2000 50 2,500 10,000 - - <1 - - - 1 - - - 8 - -

Fluoride mg/kg 40 - - - - 450 10,000 40,000 - - 80 - - - 180 - - - 120 - -

Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.6 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - - <0.5 <0.5 -

Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - <0.5 3.1 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - - 0.5 <0.5 -

Anthracene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - <0.5 4.4 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - - 0.8 <0.5 -

Benz(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - <0.5 18.1 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - - 4.1 <0.5 -

Benzo(a) pyrene mg/kg 0.5 - - 1 4 1 5 20 - <0.5 20 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - - 4.7 <0.5 -

Benzo(b) & (k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - <0.5 30.3 - - <0.5 <0.5 0.7 - - 7.5 <0.5 -

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - <0.5 15.5 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - - 3.2 <0.5 -

Chrysene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - <0.5 15 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - - 3.2 <0.5 -

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - <0.5 3.5 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - - 0.7 <0.5 -

Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - <0.5 38.2 - - <0.5 <0.5 0.9 - - 7.6 <0.5 -

Fluorene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.6 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - - <0.5 <0.5 -

Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - <0.5 12.2 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - - 2.7 <0.5 -

Naphthalene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - <0.5 0.8 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - - <0.5 <0.5 -

Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - <0.5 12.2 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - - 2.5 <0.5 -

Pyrene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - <0.5 37.2 - - 0.6 <0.5 1.2 - - 6.5 <0.5 -

Page 50: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc T3

TABLE 2 ORGANIC AND INORGANIC SOIL RESULTS SUMMARY (CONTINUED)

Analyte Units LOR NSW DECC

NEPM 1999 EIL

NEPM 1999 HIL A

NEPM 1999 HIL D

Fill Material Cat C Cat B

TP1 (0.4-0.5)

TP1 (1.0-1.1)

TP1 (1.5-1.6)

TP1 (2.0-2.1)

TP2 (0.4-0.5)

TP2 (1.4-1.5)

TP2 (1.9-2.0)

TP2 (3.2-3.3)

TP3 (0.4-0.5)

TP3 (0-0.1)

TP3 (1.4-1.5)

TP3 (2.0-2.1)

TP3 (2.4-2.5)

Sum of PAH mg/kg 0.5 - - 20 80 20 100 400 - <0.5 210.5 - - 0.6 <0.5 2.8 - - 44 <0.5 -

TPH C6 - C9 mg/kg 10 65 - - - 100 650 2,600 - <10 <10 - - <10 <10 <10 - - <10 <10 -

TPH C10 - C14 mg/kg 50 - - - - - - - - <50 <50 - - <50 <50 <50 - - <50 <50 -

TPH C15 - C28 mg/kg 100 - - - - - - - - <100 330 - - 250 <100 590 - - 1690 120 -

TPH C29-C36 mg/kg 100 - - - - - - - - <100 460 - - 390 <100 630 - - 3070 240 -

TPH+C10 - C36 (sum) mg/kg 50 1000 - - - 1,000 10,000 40,000 - <50 790 - - 640 <50 1220 - - 4760 360 -

Benzene mg/kg 0.2 1 - - - 1 4 16 - <0.2 <0.2 - - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - - <0.2 <0.2 -

Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.5 3.1 - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - - <0.5 <0.5 -

Toluene mg/kg 0.5 1.4 - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - - <0.5 <0.5 -

Xylene (m & p) mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - - <0.5 <0.5 -

Xylene (o) mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - - <0.5 <0.5 -

Aldrin + Dieldrin mg/kg 0.03 - - 10 40 - 1.2 4.8 - - <0.61 - - - <0.06 - - - <0.3 - -

chlordane mg/kg 0.03 - - 50 200 - 4 16 - - <0.61 - - - <0.06 - - - <0.3 - -

DDT+DDE+DDD mg/kg 0.05 - - 200 800 - 50 50 - - <0.61 - - - <0.06 - - - <0.3 - -

Organochlorine pesticides (sum) mg/kg 0.03 - - - - 1 - - - - <0.61 - - - <0.06 - - - <0.3 - -

Other organochlorine pesticides (sum) mg/kg 0.03 - - - - - 10 50 - - <0.61 - - - <0.06 - - - <0.3 - -

Phenol mg/kg 0.5 - - 8500 34000 - - - - - <1 - - <0.5 <1 - - - <1 - -

Phenols (halogenated) (sum) mg/kg 0.03 - - - - 1 10 320 - - <0.61 - - - <0.06 - - - <0.3 - -

Phenols (non-halogenated) (sum) mg/kg 1 - - - - 60 560 2,200 - - <1 - - - <1 - - - <1 - - Note(s):

1. - = not analysed or no guideline available; 2. LOR = laboratory limit of reporting; 3. Italic = result in excess of NSW DECC guidelines; 4. Bold = result in excess of NEPM EIL guidelines; 5. Underlined = result in excess of NEPM HIL A guidelines; 6. Shaded = result in excess of NEPM HIL D guidelines 7. Orange – in excess of ‘Fill Material’ guidelines; 8. Red = in excess of ‘Catergory C’ guidelines; 9. Blue = in excess of ‘Category B’ guidelines; and 10. Refer to Appendix D for complete transcripts.

Page 51: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc T4

TABLE 2 ORGANIC AND INORGANIC SOIL RESULTS SUMMARY (CONTINUED)

Analyte Units LOR NSW DECC

NEPM 1999 EIL

NEPM 1999 HIL A

NEPM 1999 HIL D

Fill Material Cat C Cat B

TP4 (0.4-0.5)

TP4 (0-0.1)

TP4 (1.4-1.5)

TP4 (2.1-2.2)

TP5 (0.4-0.5)

TP5 (1.4-1.5)

TP5 (2.0-2.1)

TP5 (2.9-3.0)

TP5 (3.9-4.0)

TP6 (0.4-0.5)

TP6 (0-0.1)

TP6 (1.4-1.5)

TP6 (1.9-2.0)

Aluminium mg/kg 1 - - - - - - - - - - <1 - - - - - - - - -

Arsenic mg/kg 5 - 20 100 400 20 500 2000 - <5 15 10 166 6 28 - 7 114 43 <5 55

Cadmium mg/kg 1 - 3 20 80 3 100 400 - <1 13 <1 3 <1 2 - <1 1 1 <1 <1

Chromium (III+VI) mg/kg 2 - - - - - - - - 21 21 - 55 10 - - 70 56 38 32 31

Chromium (hexavalent) mg/kg 0.5 - 1 100 400 1 500 2000 - - - <0.5 - - <0.5 - - - - - -

Cobalt mg/kg 2 - - 100 400 - - - - - - - 61 184 - - - - - - -

Copper mg/kg 5 - 100 1000 4000 100 5000 20000 - 28 334 22 553 118 171 - 24 242 247 18 38

Lead mg/kg 5 300 600 300 1200 300 1,500 6,000 - 31 337 15 394 56 104 - 33 147 175 26 90

Manganese mg/kg 0.1 - 500 1500 6000 - - - - - - <0.1 - - - - - - - - -

Mercury mg/kg 0.1 - 1 15 60 1 75 300 - <0.1 0.2 0.3 0.7 0.9 2.6 - 0.4 0.3 0.4 <0.1 0.2

Molybdenum mg/kg 2 - - - - 40 1,000 4,000 - - - <2 - - <2 - - - - - -

Nickel mg/kg 2 - 60 600 2400 60 3,000 12,000 - 29 54 17 80 14 7 - 34 69 48 47 28

Selenium mg/kg 5 - - - - 10 50 200 - - - <5 - - <5 - - - - - -

Silver mg/kg 2 - - - - 10 180 720 - - - <2 - - <2 - - - - - -

Tin mg/kg 5 - - - - 50 500 - - - - 6 - - 10 - - - - - -

Zinc mg/kg 5 - 200 7000 28000 200 35,000 140,000 - 54 745 76 717 579 310 - 52 472 439 92 251

Cyanide (Free) mg/kg 1 - - 250 1000 - - - - <1 - - - - - - - - - <1 -

Cyanide Total mg/kg 1 - - 500 2000 50 2,500 10,000 - 1 - 1 - - 19 - - - - <1 -

Fluoride mg/kg 40 - - - - 450 10,000 40,000 - - - 120 - - 190 - - - - - -

Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1 - <0.5 <0.5 -

Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1 - <0.5 <0.5 -

Anthracene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - 0.9 <0.5 <0.5 <1 - 1.8 <0.5 -

Benz(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - 2.3 <0.5 <0.5 <1 - 9.4 <0.5 -

Benzo(a) pyrene mg/kg 0.5 - - 1 4 1 5 20 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - 1.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1 - 12.4 <0.5 -

Benzo(b) & (k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - 2.6 <0.5 <0.5 <1 - 17.9 <0.5 -

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - 0.8 <0.5 <0.5 <1 - 7.4 <0.5 -

Chrysene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - 1.9 <0.5 0.6 <1 - 8.6 <0.5 -

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1 - 1.7 <0.5 -

Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - 4.5 <0.5 0.5 <1 - 15 <0.5 -

Fluorene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1 - <0.5 <0.5 -

Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - 0.8 <0.5 <0.5 <1 - 6.4 <0.5 -

Naphthalene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1 - <0.5 <0.5 -

Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - 2.9 <0.5 <0.5 <1 - 4.8 <0.5 -

Pyrene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - 4.4 <0.5 1.4 <1 - 17.5 <0.5 -

Page 52: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc T5

TABLE 2 ORGANIC AND INORGANIC SOIL RESULTS SUMMARY (CONTINUED)

Analyte Units LOR NSW DECC

NEPM 1999 EIL

NEPM 1999 HIL A

NEPM 1999 HIL D

Fill Material Cat C Cat B

TP4 (0.4-0.5)

TP4 (0-0.1)

TP4 (1.4-1.5)

TP4 (2.1-2.2)

TP5 (0.4-0.5)

TP5 (1.4-1.5)

TP5 (2.0-2.1)

TP5 (2.9-3.0)

TP5 (3.9-4.0)

TP6 (0.4-0.5)

TP6 (0-0.1)

TP6 (1.4-1.5)

TP6 (1.9-2.0)

Sum of PAH mg/kg 0.5 - - 20 80 20 100 400 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - 22.6 <0.5 2.5 <1 - 102.9 <0.5 -

TPH C6 - C9 mg/kg 10 65 - - - 100 650 2,600 <10 - <10 - - <10 30 42 <10 - <10 <10 -

TPH C10 - C14 mg/kg 50 - - - - - - - <50 - <50 <50 - <50 150 100 <100 - <50 <50 -

TPH C15 - C28 mg/kg 100 - - - - - - - <100 - <100 <100 - 150 4760 1810 <200 - 220 <100 -

TPH C29-C36 mg/kg 100 - - - - - - - <100 - <100 <100 - 120 7010 2510 <200 - 430 <100 -

TPH+C10 - C36 (sum) mg/kg 50 1000 - - - 1,000 10,000 40,000 <50 - <50 <50 - 270 11,900 4420 <100 - 650 <50 -

Benzene mg/kg 0.2 1 - - - 1 4 16 <0.2 - <0.2 - - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 -

Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.5 3.1 - - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 -

Toluene mg/kg 0.5 1.4 - - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 -

Xylene (m & p) mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 -

Xylene (o) mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 -

Aldrin + Dieldrin mg/kg 0.03 - - 10 40 - 1.2 4.8 - - - <0.03 - - <0.12 - - - - - -

chlordane mg/kg 0.03 - - 50 200 - 4 16 - - - <0.03 - - <0.12 - - - - - -

DDT+DDE+DDD mg/kg 0.05 - - 200 800 - 50 50 - - - <0.05 - - <0.12 - - - - - -

Organochlorine pesticides (sum) mg/kg 0.03 - - - - 1 - - - - - <0.03 - - <0.12 - - - - - -

Other organochlorine pesticides (sum) mg/kg 0.03 - - - - - 10 50 - - - <0.03 - - <0.12 - - - - - -

Phenol mg/kg 0.5 - - 8500 34000 - - - - - - <1 - - <1 <0.5 <1 <0.5 - - -

Phenols (halogenated) (sum) mg/kg 0.03 - - - - 1 10 320 - - - <0.03 - - <0.12 - - - - - -

Phenols (non-halogenated) (sum) mg/kg 1 - - - - 60 560 2,200 - - - <1 - - <1 - - - - - -

1,2-dichlorobenzene mg/kg 0.02 - - - - - - - <0.02 - - 0.03 - - - - - -

1,4-dichlorobenzene mg/kg 0.02 - - - - - - - <0.02 - - 0.04 - - - - - - Note(s):

1. - = not analysed or no guideline available; 2. LOR = laboratory limit of reporting; 3. Italic = result in excess of NSW DECC guidelines; 4. Bold = result in excess of NEPM EIL guidelines; 5. Underlined = result in excess of NEPM HIL A guidelines; 6. Shaded = result in excess of NEPM HIL D guidelines 7. Orange – in excess of ‘Fill Material’ guidelines; 8. Red = in excess of ‘Catergory C’ guidelines; 9. Blue = in excess of ‘Category B’ guidelines; and 10. Refer to Appendix D for complete transcripts.

Page 53: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc T6

TABLE 2 ORGANIC AND INORGANIC SOIL RESULTS SUMMARY (CONTINUED)

Analyte Units LOR NSW DECC

NEPM 1999 EIL

NEPM 1999 HIL A

NEPM 1999 HIL D

Fill Material Cat C Cat B

TP7 (0.9-1.0)

TP7 (0-0.1)

TP7 (2.0-2.1)

TP8 (0.2-0.3)

TP8 (0.9-1.0)

TP8 (1.9-2.0)

TP8 (2.0-2.1)

TP8 (2.4-2.5)

TP8 (2.9-3.0)

TP9 (0.4-0.5)

TP9 (0.9-1.0)

TP9 (1.9-2.0)

TP9 (2.0-2.1)

TP9B (2.5-2.6)

Aluminium mg/kg 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - <1 - - - - - - -

Arsenic mg/kg 5 - 20 100 400 20 500 2000 16 101 406 23 9 174 - - 14 6 20 19 - 278

Cadmium mg/kg 1 - 3 20 80 3 100 400 <1 1 <1 1 <1 2 - - <1 <1 <1 <1 - 10

Chromium (III+VI) mg/kg 2 - - - - - - - - 37 28 22 24 59 - - 44 45 12 - - 188

Chromium (hexavalent) mg/kg 0.5 - 1 100 400 1 500 2000 <0.5 - - - - - - - - - - <0.5 - -

Copper mg/kg 5 - 100 1000 4000 100 5000 20000 22 230 40 80 28 132 - - 12 59 157 484 - 255

Lead mg/kg 5 300 600 300 1200 300 1,500 6,000 29 190 198 358 26 144 - - 21 34 34 43 - 773

Manganese mg/kg 0.1 - 500 1500 6000 - - - - - - - - - 0.9 - - - - - - -

Mercury mg/kg 0.1 - 1 15 60 1 75 300 0.1 0.5 0.8 1.7 0.1 0.2 - - <0.1 <0.1 0.1 0.1 - 1.8

Molybdenum mg/kg 2 - - - - 40 1,000 4,000 <2 - - - - - - - - - - 10 - -

Nickel mg/kg 2 - 60 600 2400 60 3,000 12,000 39 47 53 17 25 94 - - 24 75 80 54 - 79

Selenium mg/kg 5 - - - - 10 50 200 <5 - - - - - - - - - - <5 - -

Silver mg/kg 2 - - - - 10 180 720 <2 - - - - - - - - - - <2 - -

Tin mg/kg 5 - - - - 50 500 - 13 - - - - - - - - - - <5 - -

Zinc mg/kg 5 - 200 7000 28000 200 35,000 140,000 58 307 122 114 45 614 - - 75 48 76 175 - 1810

Cyanide (Free) mg/kg 1 - - 250 1000 - - - - - - - <1 - - - - - - - - -

Cyanide Total mg/kg 1 - - 500 2000 50 2,500 10,000 <1 - - - 22 - - - - - - <1 - -

Fluoride mg/kg 40 - - - - 450 10,000 40,000 180 - - - - - - - - - - 50 - -

Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.6 4.2 <0.5

Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.6 <2.5 <0.5

Anthracene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.6 13 <0.5

Benz(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 - 0.7 - 2.1 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 0.9 13.1 0.7

Benzo(a) pyrene mg/kg 0.5 - - 1 4 1 5 20 <0.5 - 0.6 - 1.6 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 1.1 6 0.7

Benzo(b) & (k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 - 0.7 - 3 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 1.9 13 1

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 - 1 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 0.9 4.8 0.9

Chrysene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 - 0.6 - 1.8 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 0.7 15.1 0.8

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.6 <2.5 <0.5

Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 - 1.3 - 3.9 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 1.9 40.4 1

Fluorene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.6 3.1 <0.5

Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 - 0.9 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 0.7 3.5 0.7

Naphthalene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - 5 <0.6 <2.5 <0.5

Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 - 0.5 - 1.7 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 0.6 8.8 <0.5

Pyrene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 - 1.4 - 3.6 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 1.8 37.2 1.4

Sum of PAH mg/kg 0.5 - - 20 80 20 100 400 <0.5 - 5.8 - 19.6 <0.5 - - - - 5 10.5 162.2 7.2

Page 54: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc T7

TABLE 2 ORGANIC AND INORGANIC SOIL RESULTS SUMMARY (CONTINUED)

Analyte Units LOR NSW DECC

NEPM 1999 EIL

NEPM 1999 HIL A

NEPM 1999 HIL D

Fill Material Cat C Cat B

TP7 (0.9-1.0)

TP7 (0-0.1)

TP7 (2.0-2.1)

TP8 (0.2-0.3)

TP8 (0.9-1.0)

TP8 (1.9-2.0)

TP8 (2.0-2.1)

TP8 (2.4-2.5)

TP8 (2.9-3.0)

TP9 (0.4-0.5)

TP9 (0.9-1.0)

TP9 (1.9-2.0)

TP9 (2.0-2.1)

TP9B (2.5-2.6)

TPH C6 - C9 mg/kg 10 65 - - - 100 650 2,600 <10 - <10 - <10 <10 - - - - <10 <10 106 <10

TPH C10 - C14 mg/kg 50 - - - - - - - <50 - <50 - <50 <50 - - - - <50 <50 1160 <50

TPH C15 - C28 mg/kg 100 - - - - - - - <100 - <100 - <100 <100 - - - - <100 <100 32,700 1320

TPH C29-C36 mg/kg 100 - - - - - - - <100 - <100 - <100 140 - - - - 190 <100 48,600 1730

TPH+C10 - C36 (sum) mg/kg 50 1000 - - - 1,000 10,000 40,000 <50 - <50 - <50 140 - - - - 190 <50 82,500 3050

Benzene mg/kg 0.2 1 - - - 1 4 16 <0.2 - <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 - - - - 0.3 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.5 3.1 - - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Toluene mg/kg 0.5 1.4 - - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Xylene (m & p) mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Xylene (o) mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 - <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 - - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Aldrin + Dieldrin mg/kg 0.03 - - 10 40 - 1.2 4.8 <0.06 - - - - - - - - - - <0.6 - -

chlordane mg/kg 0.03 - - 50 200 - 4 16 <0.06 - - - - - - - - - - <0.6 - -

DDT+DDE+DDD mg/kg 0.05 - - 200 800 - 50 50 <0.06 - - - - - - - - - - <0.6 - -

Organochlorine pesticides (sum) mg/kg 0.03 - - - - 1 - - <0.06 - - - - - - - - - - <0.6 - -

Other organochlorine pesticides (sum) mg/kg 0.03 - - - - - 10 50 <0.06 - - - - - - - - - - <0.6 - -

Phenol mg/kg 0.5 - - 8500 34000 - - - <1 - - - - - - <0.5 - - - <1 <2.5 <0.5

Phenols (halogenated) (sum) mg/kg 0.03 - - - - 1 10 320 <0.06 - - - - - - - - - - <0.6 - -

Phenols (non-halogenated) (sum) mg/kg 1 - - - - 60 560 2,200 <1 - - - - - - - - - - <1 - - Note(s):

1. - = not analysed or no guideline available; 2. LOR = laboratory limit of reporting; 3. Italic = result in excess of NSW DECC guidelines; 4. Bold = result in excess of NEPM EIL guidelines; 5. Underlined = result in excess of NEPM HIL A guidelines; 6. Shaded = result in excess of NEPM HIL D guidelines 7. Orange – in excess of ‘Fill Material’ guidelines; 8. Red = in excess of ‘Catergory C’ guidelines; 9. Blue = in excess of ‘Category B’ guidelines; and 10. Refer to Appendix D for complete transcripts.

Page 55: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc T8

TABLE 2 ORGANIC AND INORGANIC SOIL RESULTS SUMMARY (CONTINUED)

Analyte Units LOR NSW DECC

NEPM 1999 EIL

NEPM 1999 HIL A

NEPM 1999 HIL D

Fill Material

Category C

Category B

TP10 (0.1-0.2)

TP10 (1.4-1.5)

TP10 (1.8-1.9)

TP10 (1.9-2.0)

TP10 (2.4-2.5)

TP11 (0-0.1)

TP11 (0.9-1.0)

TP11 (1.7-1.8)

TP11 (1.9-2.0)

TP11 (2.9-3.0)

TP12 (0.4-0.5)

TP12 (1.4-1.5)

TP12 (1.9-2.0)

Aluminium mg/kg 1 - - - - - - - - - <1 - - - - - <1 - - - -

Arsenic mg/kg 5 - 20 100 400 20 500 2000 48 103 - 33 9 10 - 98 100 15 42 36 111

Cadmium mg/kg 1 - 3 20 80 3 100 400 1 1 - 2 <1 <1 - 2 6 <1 2 <1 <1

Chromium (III+VI) mg/kg 2 - - - - - - - 43 30 - 136 44 26 - - 119 6 33 22 38

Chromium (hexavalent) mg/kg 0.5 - 1 100 400 1 500 2000 - - - - - - - <0.5 - - - - -

Cobalt mg/kg 2 - - 100 400 - - - - - - - - - 109 - - - 111 - -

Copper mg/kg 5 - 100 1000 4000 100 5000 20000 377 1890 - 641 12 66 - 593 1190 53 343 33 19

Lead mg/kg 5 300 600 300 1200 300 1,500 6,000 144 325 - 231 17 514 - 288 688 24 431 60 30

Manganese mg/kg 0.1 - 500 1500 6000 - - - - - 5.6 - - - - - <0.1 - - - -

Mercury mg/kg 0.1 - 1 15 60 1 75 300 0.3 0.6 - 0.4 <0.1 0.2 - 0.6 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.1 0.1

Molybdenum mg/kg 2 - - - - 40 1,000 4,000 - - - - - - - <2 - - - - -

Nickel mg/kg 2 - 60 600 2400 60 3,000 12,000 56 120 - 70 17 23 - 55 84 5 69 48 27

Selenium mg/kg 5 - - - - 10 50 200 - - - - - - - <5 - - - - -

Silver mg/kg 2 - - - - 10 180 720 - - - - - - - <2 - - - - -

Tin mg/kg 5 - - - - 50 500 - - - - - - - - 170 - - - - -

Zinc mg/kg 5 - 200 7000 28000 200 35,000 140,000 288 297 - 720 52 492 - 917 2080 79 2550 200 44

Cyanide (Free) mg/kg 1 - - 250 1000 - - - - <1 - <1 - - - - - - - - <1

Cyanide Total mg/kg 1 - - 500 2000 50 2,500 10,000 - <1 - 2 - - - <1 - - - - <1

Fluoride mg/kg 40 - - - - 450 10,000 40,000 - - - - - - - 320 - - - - -

Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - <0.5 - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5

Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - <0.5 - - - <0.5 <0.5 0.5 - <0.5 <0.5

Anthracene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - <0.5 - - - <0.5 <0.5 1 - 0.7 <0.5

Benz(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - 1.2 - - - <0.5 <0.5 2 - 2.4 <0.5

Benzo(a) pyrene mg/kg 0.5 - - 1 4 1 5 20 - - - 1 - - - <0.5 <0.5 1.8 - 2.3 <0.5

Benzo(b) & (k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - 2 - - - <0.5 <0.5 3 - 3.6 <0.5

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - 0.9 - - - <0.5 <0.5 1.3 - 1.6 <0.5

Chrysene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - 1.1 - - - <0.5 <0.5 2.1 - 2.4 <0.5

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - <0.5 - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5

Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - 2 - - - <0.5 <0.5 4.3 - 5 <0.5

Fluorene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - <0.5 - - - <0.5 <0.5 1.3 - <0.5 <0.5

Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - 0.8 - - - <0.5 <0.5 1 - 1.3 <0.5

Naphthalene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - <0.5 - - - <0.5 <0.5 0.8 - <0.5 <0.5

Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - 0.7 - - - <0.5 <0.5 4.3 - 2.6 <0.5

Pyrene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - 1.9 - - - <0.5 0.7 4.2 - 4.9 <0.5

Page 56: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc T9

TABLE 2 ORGANIC AND INORGANIC SOIL RESULTS SUMMARY (CONTINUED)

Analyte Units LOR NSW DECC

NEPM 1999 EIL

NEPM 1999 HIL A

NEPM 1999 HIL D

Fill Material

Category C

Category B

TP10 (0.1-0.2)

TP10 (1.4-1.5)

TP10 (1.8-1.9)

TP10 (1.9-2.0)

TP10 (2.4-2.5)

TP11 (0-0.1)

TP11 (0.9-1.0)

TP11 (1.7-1.8)

TP11 (1.9-2.0)

TP11 (2.9-3.0)

TP12 (0.4-0.5)

TP12 (1.4-1.5)

TP12 (1.9-2.0)

Sum of PAH mg/kg 0.5 - - 20 80 20 100 400 - - - 11.6 - - - <0.5 0.7 27.6 - 26.8 <0.5

TPH C6 - C9 mg/kg 10 65 - - - 100 650 2,600 - - - <10 - - - <10 <10 <10 - <10 <10

TPH C10 - C14 mg/kg 50 - - - - - - - - - - <50 - - - <50 70 <50 - <50 <50

TPH C15 - C28 mg/kg 100 - - - - - - - - - - 340 - - - 680 1760 1050 - 240 130

TPH C29-C36 mg/kg 100 - - - - - - - - - - 540 - - - 1710 3080 1530 - 500 120

TPH+C10 - C36 (sum) mg/kg 50 1000 - - - 1,000 10,000 40,000 - - - 880 - - - 2390 4910 2580 - 740 250

Benzene mg/kg 0.2 1 - - - 1 4 16 - - - <0.2 - - - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2

Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.5 3.1 - - - - - - - - - <0.5 - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5

Toluene mg/kg 0.5 1.4 - - - - - - - - - <0.5 - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5

Xylene (m & p) mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - <0.5 - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5

Xylene (o) mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - - - - <0.5 - - - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5

Aldrin + Dieldrin mg/kg 0.03 - - 10 40 - 1.2 4.8 - - - - - - - <0.12 - - - - -

chlordane mg/kg 0.03 - - 50 200 - 4 16 - - - - - - - <0.12 - - - - -

DDT+DDE+DDD mg/kg 0.05 - - 200 800 - 50 50 - - - - - - - <0.12 - - - - -

Organochlorine pesticides (sum) mg/kg 0.03 - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - - <0.12 - - - - -

Other organochlorine pesticides (sum) mg/kg 0.03 - - - - - 10 50 - - - - - - - <0.12 - - - - -

Phenol mg/kg 0.5 - - 8500 34000 - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - - <1 <0.5 - - - <0.5

Phenols (halogenated) (sum) mg/kg 0.03 - - - - 1 10 320 - - - - - - - <0.12 - - - - -

Phenols (non-halogenated) (sum) mg/kg 1 - - - - 60 560 2,200 - - - - - - - <1 - - - - - Note(s):

1. - = not analysed or no guideline available; 2. LOR = laboratory limit of reporting; 3. Italic = result in excess of NSW DECC guidelines; 4. Bold = result in excess of NEPM EIL guidelines; 5. Underlined = result in excess of NEPM HIL A guidelines; 6. Shaded = result in excess of NEPM HIL D guidelines 7. Orange – in excess of ‘Fill Material’ guidelines; 8. Red = in excess of ‘Catergory C’ guidelines; 9. Blue = in excess of ‘Category B’ guidelines; and 10. Refer to Appendix D for complete transcripts.

Page 57: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc T10

TABLE 2 ORGANIC AND INORGANIC SOIL RESULTS SUMMARY (CONTINUED)

Analyte Units LOR NSW DECC

NEPM 1999 EIL

NEPM 1999 HIL

A NEPM

1999 HIL D Fill

Material Category

C Category

B TP12

(2.4-2.5) TP13

(0.4-0.5) TP13

(0-0.1) TP13

(1.5-1.6) TP13

(2.0-2.1) TP14

(0.9-1.0) TP14

(1.6-1.7) TP14

(2.8-2.9)

Aluminium mg/kg 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Arsenic mg/kg 5 - 20 100 400 20 500 2000 74 8 90 112 7 148 <5 119

Cadmium mg/kg 1 - 3 20 80 3 100 400 1 <1 3 <1 <1 4 <1 2

Chromium (III+VI) mg/kg 2 - - - - - - - 97 36 85 - 97 92 <2 68

Chromium (hexavalent) mg/kg 0.5 - 1 100 400 1 500 2000 - - - <0.5 - - - -

Cobalt mg/kg 2 - - 100 400 - - - - - - - - 66 - -

Copper mg/kg 5 - 100 1000 4000 100 5000 20000 98 24 267 60 21 568 <5 175

Lead mg/kg 5 300 600 300 1200 300 1,500 6,000 142 38 320 93 38 354 <5 233

Manganese mg/kg 0.1 - 500 1500 6000 - - - - - - - - - - -

Mercury mg/kg 0.1 - 1 15 60 1 75 300 0.3 <0.1 0.5 0.4 0.1 0.6 0.6 0.5

Molybdenum mg/kg 2 - - - - 40 1,000 4,000 - - - <2 - - - -

Nickel mg/kg 2 - 60 600 2400 60 3,000 12,000 49 49 66 44 17 107 <2 69

Selenium mg/kg 5 - - - - 10 50 200 - - - <5 - - - -

Silver mg/kg 2 - - - - 10 180 720 - - - <2 - - - -

Tin mg/kg 5 - - - - 50 500 - - - - 33 - - - -

Zinc mg/kg 5 - 200 7000 28000 200 35,000 140,000 472 88 560 147 109 1130 <5 804

Cyanide (Free) mg/kg 1 - - 250 1000 - - - - - - - - - <1 -

Cyanide Total mg/kg 1 - - 500 2000 50 2,500 10,000 - - - 1 - - <1 -

Fluoride mg/kg 40 - - - - 450 10,000 40,000 - - - 160 - - - -

Acenaphthene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 -

Acenaphthylene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 -

Anthracene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 -

Benz(a)anthracene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 -

Benzo(a) pyrene mg/kg 0.5 - - 1 4 1 5 20 <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 -

Benzo(b) & (k)fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 -

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 -

Chrysene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 -

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 -

Fluoranthene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 0.8 <0.5 -

Fluorene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 -

Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 -

Naphthalene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 -

Page 58: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc T11

TABLE 2 ORGANIC AND INORGANIC SOIL RESULTS SUMMARY (CONTINUED)

Analyte Units LOR NSW DECC

NEPM 1999 EIL

NEPM 1999 HIL

A

NEPM 1999 HIL

D Fill

Material Category

C Category

B TP12

(2.4-2.5) TP13

(0.4-0.5) TP13

(0-0.1) TP13

(1.5-1.6) TP13

(2.0-2.1) TP14

(0.9-1.0) TP14

(1.6-1.7) TP14

(2.8-2.9)

Phenanthrene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 -

Pyrene mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - 0.6 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 0.7 <0.5 -

Sum of PAH mg/kg 0.5 - - 20 80 20 100 400 0.6 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 2 <0.5 -

TPH C6 - C9 mg/kg 10 65 - - - 100 650 2,600 <10 <10 - <10 <10 <10 <10 -

TPH C10 - C14 mg/kg 50 - - - - - - - <50 <50 - <50 <50 <50 <50 -

TPH C15 - C28 mg/kg 100 - - - - - - - 170 <100 - <100 140 270 110 -

TPH C29-C36 mg/kg 100 - - - - - - - 130 <100 - <100 140 540 280 -

TPH+C10 - C36 (sum) mg/kg 50 1000 - - - 1,000 10,000 40,000 300 <50 - <50 280 810 390 -

Benzene mg/kg 0.2 1 - - - 1 4 16 <0.2 <0.2 - <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 -

Ethylbenzene mg/kg 0.5 3.1 - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 -

Toluene mg/kg 0.5 1.4 - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 -

Xylene (m & p) mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 -

Xylene (o) mg/kg 0.5 - - - - - - - <0.5 <0.5 - <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 -

Aldrin + Dieldrin mg/kg 0.03 - - 10 40 - 1.2 4.8 - - - <0.12 - - - -

chlordane mg/kg 0.03 - - 50 200 - 4 16 - - - <0.12 - - - -

DDT+DDE+DDD mg/kg 0.05 - - 200 800 - 50 50 - - - <0.12 - - - -

Organochlorine pesticides (sum) mg/kg 0.03 - - - - 1 - - - - - <0.12 - - - -

Other organochlorine pesticides (sum) mg/kg 0.03 - - - - - 10 50 - - - <0.12 - - - -

Phenol mg/kg 0.5 - - 8500 34000 - - - <0.5 - - <1 <0.5 - - -

Phenols (halogenated) (sum) mg/kg 0.03 - - - - 1 10 320 - - - <0.12 - - - -

Phenols (non-halogenated) (sum) mg/kg 1 - - - - 60 560 2,200 - - - <1 - - - - Note(s):

1. - = not analysed or no guideline available; 2. LOR = laboratory limit of reporting; 3. Italic = result in excess of NSW DECC guidelines; 4. Bold = result in excess of NEPM EIL guidelines; 5. Underlined = result in excess of NEPM HIL A guidelines; 6. Shaded = result in excess of NEPM HIL D guidelines 7. Orange – in excess of ‘Fill Material’ guidelines; 8. Red = in excess of ‘Catergory C’ guidelines; 9. Blue = in excess of ‘Category B’ guidelines; and 10. Refer to Appendix D for complete transcripts.

Page 59: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc T12

TABLE 3 SOIL ASLP RESULTS

Analyte LOR Cat C

TP1 (1.5-1.6)

TP2 (3.2-3.3)

TP5 (2-2.1)

TP6 (0-0.1)

TP7 (2-2.1)

TP9 (2-2.1)

TP9B (2.5-2.6)

TP10 (1.8-1.9)

Arsenic 0.1 0.7 - 0.7 - - 0.5 - - -

Copper 0.1 200 - - - - - - - 2.6

Naphthalene 1 - <1.0 - - - - - - -

Acenaphthylene 1 - <1.0 - - - - - - -

Acenaphthene 1 - <1.0 - - - - - - -

Fluorene 1 - <1.0 - - - - - - -

Phenanthrene 1 - 2.2 - - - - - - -

Anthracene 1 - <1.0 - - - - - - -

Fluoranthene 1 - <1.0 - - - - - - -

Pyrene 1 - <1.0 - - - - - - -

Benz(a)anthracene 1 - <1.0 - - - - - - -

Chrysene 1 - <1.0 - - - - - - -

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 - <1.0 - - - - - - -

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1 - <1.0 - - - - - - -

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.5 1.0 <0.5 - - <0.5 - <0.5 - -

Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene 1 - <1.0 - - - - - - -

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 1 - <1.0 - - - - - - -

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 1 - <1.0 - - - - - - -

TPH C10 - C14 50 - - - <50 - - - <50 -

TPH C15 - C28 100 - - - 110 - - - <100 -

TPH C29-C36 50 - - - <50 - - - <50 -

TPH+C10 - C36 (sum) 50 - - - 110 - - - <50 - Note(s):

1. - = not analysed or no guideline available; 2. all units in µg/L, except As and Cu (reported in mg/L); 3. LOR = laboratory limit of reporting; and 4. Refer to Appendix D for complete transcripts.

Page 60: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc T13

TABLE 4 TPH SPECIATION RESULTS

Analyte Units LOR NEPM HIL A

NEPM HIL D

TP6 (0-0.1)

TP9 (2.0-2.1)

TP1 (1.5-1.6)

TP5 (2.0-2.1)

TP11 (1.9-2.0)

Aliphatic C16-C35 mg/kg 100 5,600 22,400 - 16,600 - 3,000 1,000

Aliphatic > C35 mg/kg 100 56,000 224,000 - 9,600 - 1,900 700

Aromatic C16-C35 mg/kg 90 90 360 - 8,590 - 2,160 660

Aromatic > C35 mg/kg 100 - - - 7,400 - 2,700 700 Note(s):

1. Bold = in excess of NEPM HIL A guidelines; 2. Shaded in excess of NEPM HIL D guidelines; and 3. Refer to Appendix D for complete transcripts.

TABLE 5 TPH SILICA GEL CLEANUP RESULTS

Analyte Units LOR Primary Result SGC Result Primary Result SGC

Result

TP3 (1.4-1.5)

TP3 (1.4-1.5)

TP11 (1.9-2.0)

TP11 (1.9-2.0)

TPH C10 - C14 mg/kg 50 <50 <50 70 <50

TPH C15 - C28 mg/kg 100 1,690 1,090 1,760 790

TPH C29-C36 mg/kg 100 3,070 2,070 3,080 1,120

TPH+C10 - C36 (sum) mg/kg 50 4,760 3,160 4,910 1,910

Note(s):

1. Refer to Appendix D for complete transcripts. TABLE 6 SUMMARY OF PASS RESULTS

Sample Depth Net acidity criteria (1-1000 tonnes)

Total sulphur - %S (oven-dry) Acid trail - mol H+ /tonne (oven-dry)

TP31 2.0-2.1 0.06 37.46

TP42 2.1-2.2 0.13 81.16

TP81 2.0-2.1 0.13 81.16

TP101 1.8-1.9 0.59 368.33

TP111 1.9-2.0 0.73 455.73

EPA 665.1 criteria 0.12/0.061 622/361 Note(s):

1. 1 criteria derived for medium to heavy clays and silty clays with approximate clay content > 40%; 2. 2 criteria derived for sandy loams to light clays with approximate clay content 5-40%; and 3. bold indicates concentration exceeds adopted EPA 665.1 criteria.

Page 61: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc T14

TABLE 7 SUMMARY OF PASS RESULTS CONTINUED Sample ID Depth Texture Acid^ Sulfur Buffering NAA NAB LR

Interval Group TAA TPA A - SPOS B - SCR ANC Ca + Mg SPOS SCR NA x 1.02 x 1.5 x BD

Units m kg H2SO4/T kg CaCO3/m3

TP3 2.0-2.1 3 --- --- --- --- 41.304 --- --- --- ---

TP4 2.1-2.2 2 <0.10 <0.10 1.22 0.18 26.265 8.87 1.22 -21.58 0

TP8 2.0-2.1 3 --- --- --- --- 50.004 --- --- --- ---

TP10 1.8-1.9 3 <0.10 <0.10 8.26 4.68 14.105 19.88 8.26 -9.43 0

TP11 1.9-2.0 3 --- --- --- --- 214.004 --- --- --- --- Note(s):

1. TAA total actual acidity; TPA titratable potential acidity (TSA = TPA-TAA); SCR chromium reducible sulfur; SPOS peroxide oxidisable sulfur; TOS total oxidisable sulfur; ANC acid neutralizing capacity; NA net acidity (sulfur + acid – buffering); OP oxidation potential; LR lime requirement;

2. *includes accounting for fineness factor (FF); ^ if pHKCl <4.5 determine retained acidity (SNAS) and determine NA as sulfur + acid + retained acidity– buffering; and 3. texture groups are: 1. Coarse = sands; 2. Medium = sandy loams/silts to light clays; 3. Fine = medium to heavy clays, silty clays 4. laboratory calculated ANC; and 5. ANC values derived from primary ANC value reported in %CaCO3.

Page 62: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc T15

TABLE 8 SOIL SULFIDE HAZARD CLASSES Risk No risk Risk

Hazard Class Class 1

‘No-sulfur’ Class 2

‘Non-reactive’ Class 3

‘Moderate Risk’ Class 4

‘High Risk’

Texture Group Sulfur NA Sulfur NA Sulfur NA Sulfur NA

1 (Coarse) 1 N/A >1 (<10)4 <3 >1 >3 >10 >5

2 (Medium) 2 N/A >2 (<20)4 <6 >2 >6 >20 >10

3 (Fine) 3 N/A >3 (<30)4 <9 >3 >9 >30 >15 Note(s): 1. all units in kg H2SO4 generated per tonne of soil 2. NA net acidity (sulfur + acid – buffering capacity) 3. Texture groups are: 1. Coarse: sands; 2. Medium: loams/silts-light clays; 3. Fine: medium to heavy clays, silty clays 4. sulfur levels exceeding the values in brackets require confirmation through incubation tests or weathering trials

Page 63: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc

APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Page 64: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street
Page 65: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street
Page 66: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street
Page 67: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc

APPENDIX B PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG

Page 68: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_Report.doc

Plate 1 - View of the site prior to works. Note the existing soil stockpiles and test pit

marker flags

Plate 2 - Excavation for test pit TP1

Page 69: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_Report.doc

Plate 3 - View of excavated test pit TP1

Plate 4 - View of perched water infiltration within test pit TP7

Page 70: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_Report.doc

Plate 5 - Hydrocarbon impacted fill material excavated from test pit TP9. Note the

presence of oil drums, rags and machine parts

Plate 6 - Perched water within test pit TP9 with a visible sheen on the surface

Page 71: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_Report.doc

Plate 7 - View of the site following test pit reinstatement

Page 72: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc

APPENDIX C GEOLOGICAL BORELOGS

Page 73: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Borehole Log:LOCATIONSURFACE ELEVATIONGROUNDWATERDRILL METHOD

JOB NUMBERDATUMDATE

PROJECT:

Logged by

Proj. Manager

STRATIGRAPHY

PID/FID pHSAMPLES

GRA

PHIC

LO

G

Dept

h m

etre

s

1.0

2.0

3.0

Dist

urbe

d

Undi

stur

bed

Lost

Dupl

icat

e

Moi

stur

e Co

nten

t

Back

grou

nd

Read

ing

pH -

soil

pH -

wat

er Odour Comments

NOTE: This bore log is for environmental purposes only and is not intended to provide geotechnical information.

Geological BorelogTP1Gordon Pde Lot

NGWE

TP

210061

9 August 2010

Fastnet

JF

JF

Fill: Loose, light brown/grey CLAYEY SILT with organic matter

Fill: Soft, grey SILTY CLAY with roots

Fill: Loose, brown SILTY CLAY with large bluestone and rubble inclusions

Minor rubbish (paper, glass, timber and steel) inclusions

Natural: Medium dense, brown SILTY CLAY with iron oxide staining

Becoming very moist

Natural: Saturated, grey/dark brown SILTY CLAY with weathered basalt rock inclusions

M1

D

D

M1

W

0

0

0

0 8.0

7.5

No odour throughout

Hole collapsing between 1.5 and 1.9 mBGL

EOH at 2.7 mBGL refusal on basalt

Page 74: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Borehole Log:LOCATIONSURFACE ELEVATIONGROUNDWATERDRILL METHOD

JOB NUMBERDATUMDATE

PROJECT:

Logged by

Proj. Manager

STRATIGRAPHY

PID/FID pHSAMPLES

GRA

PHIC

LO

G

Dept

h m

etre

s

1.0

2.0

3.0

Dist

urbe

d

Undi

stur

bed

Lost

Dupl

icat

e

Moi

stur

e Co

nten

t

Back

grou

nd

Read

ing

pH -

soil

pH -

wat

er Odour Comments

NOTE: This bore log is for environmental purposes only and is not intended to provide geotechnical information.

Geological BorelogTP2Gordon Pde Lot

NGWE

TP

210061

9 August 2010

Fastnet

JF

JF

Fill: Loose, brown CLAYEY SILT with sand and roots

Fill: Stiff, weathered, brown CLAY

Fill: Loose, brown SILTY CLAY with rubble and rubbish (glass, paper, steel)

Natural: Soft, grey/dark blue SILTY CLAY

Weathered basalt rock inclusions

Becoming saturated in clay lenses

D

D

M1

W

0

0

0

0

0.8

1.5

1.9

3.3

9.0

No odour

Organic odour

EOH at 3.4 mBGL refusal on basalt

Page 75: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Borehole Log:LOCATIONSURFACE ELEVATIONGROUNDWATERDRILL METHOD

JOB NUMBERDATUMDATE

PROJECT:

Logged by

Proj. Manager

STRATIGRAPHY

PID/FID pHSAMPLES

GRA

PHIC

LO

G

Dept

h m

etre

s

1.0

2.0

3.0

Dist

urbe

d

Undi

stur

bed

Lost

Dupl

icat

e

Moi

stur

e Co

nten

t

Back

grou

nd

Read

ing

pH -

soil

pH -

wat

er Odour Comments

NOTE: This bore log is for environmental purposes only and is not intended to provide geotechnical information.

Geological BorelogTP3Gordon Pde Lot

NGWE

TP

210061

9 August 2010

Fastnet

JF

JF

Fill: Loose, brown SANDY SILT with grass and roots

Fill: Loose, brow SILTY CLAY with weathered basalt floaters and rubbish (paper, glass bottles, rubber, wood)

Fill: Loose, black, fine grained CLAYEY SILT

Becoming moist

Natural: Dense, grey/dark blue CLAY with minor silt and weathered basalt inclusions

Extremely saturated

D

D

M2

M2

M3

W

0

0

4.5

1.4 8.0

7.5

No odour throughout

Point of water strike difficult to measure due to collapse of hole and amount of water

Page 76: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Borehole Log:LOCATIONSURFACE ELEVATIONGROUNDWATERDRILL METHOD

JOB NUMBERDATUMDATE

PROJECT:

Logged by

Proj. Manager

STRATIGRAPHY

PID/FID pHSAMPLES

GRA

PHIC

LO

G

Dept

h m

etre

s

1.0

2.0

3.0

Dist

urbe

d

Undi

stur

bed

Lost

Dupl

icat

e

Moi

stur

e Co

nten

t

Back

grou

nd

Read

ing

pH -

soil

pH -

wat

er Odour Comments

NOTE: This bore log is for environmental purposes only and is not intended to provide geotechnical information.

Geological BorelogTP4Gordon Pde Lot

NGWE

TP

210061

9 August 2010

Fastnet

JF

JF

Fill: Loose, light brown SANDY SILT with grass and roots

Fill: Stiff, brown SILTY CLAY sand, gravel, bluestone and steel inclusions

Becoming loose

Natural: Medium loose, dark grey/black, fine grained SILT

BD1

SP1

D

D

M2

0

0

0

1.2

1.8

0.6

7.0

6.0

No odour throughout

EOH at 2.4 mBGL refusal on basalt

Page 77: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Borehole Log:LOCATIONSURFACE ELEVATIONGROUNDWATERDRILL METHOD

JOB NUMBERDATUMDATE

PROJECT:

Logged by

Proj. Manager

STRATIGRAPHY

PID/FID pHSAMPLES

GRA

PHIC

LO

G

Dept

h m

etre

s

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

Dist

urbe

d

Undi

stur

bed

Lost

Dupl

icat

e

Moi

stur

e Co

nten

t

Back

grou

nd

Read

ing

pH -

soil

pH -

wat

er Odour Comments

NOTE: This bore log is for environmental purposes only and is not intended to provide geotechnical information.

Geological BorelogTP5Gordon Pde Lot

NGWE

TP

210061

9 August 2010

Fastnet

JF

JF

Fill: Loose, brown SILTY CLAY with grass

Fill: Stiff, grey/brown CLAY with bluestone rocks and rubble

Fill: Loose, brown SILTY CLAY with rubbish (plastic, glass, wood and paper) and bluestone and brick rubble

Fill: Soft, saturated, grey/dark grey CLAYEY SILT with dark staining and rubbish (paper, wood) inclusions

Natural: Firm, grey/dark blue CLAY with minor silt

D

D

M1

W

W

M2

0

0

0

0

0

0.6

1.8

12.6

20.8

6.4

7.5

8.0

No odour

HC odour

HC odour

No odour

Water strike at approx 1.8 mBGL

EOH at 4.5 mBGL target depth

Page 78: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Borehole Log:LOCATIONSURFACE ELEVATIONGROUNDWATERDRILL METHOD

JOB NUMBERDATUMDATE

PROJECT:

Logged by

Proj. Manager

STRATIGRAPHY

PID/FID pHSAMPLES

GRA

PHIC

LO

G

Dept

h m

etre

s

1.0

2.0

3.0

Dist

urbe

d

Undi

stur

bed

Lost

Dupl

icat

e

Moi

stur

e Co

nten

t

Back

grou

nd

Read

ing

pH -

soil

pH -

wat

er Odour Comments

NOTE: This bore log is for environmental purposes only and is not intended to provide geotechnical information.

Geological BorelogTP6Gordon Pde Lot

NGWE

TP

210061

9 August 2010

Fastnet

JF

JF

Fill: Loose, brown CLAYEY SILT with roots

Fill: Loose, light brown SILTY CLAY with plastic and paper rubbish and concrete and bluestone rubble

Fill: Becoming stiff, weathered CLAY with rubble

Natural: Medium dense, grey CLAY

Weathered basalt floaters

Natural: Weathered BASALT with dense grey clay

D

D

D

W

W

0

0

0

1.2

2.8

1.7

7.5

8.0

No odour throughout

Water strike at 1.9 mBGL

EOH at 2.5 mBGL refusal on basalt

Page 79: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Borehole Log:LOCATIONSURFACE ELEVATIONGROUNDWATERDRILL METHOD

JOB NUMBERDATUMDATE

PROJECT:

Logged by

Proj. Manager

STRATIGRAPHY

PID/FID pHSAMPLES

GRA

PHIC

LO

G

Dept

h m

etre

s

1.0

2.0

3.0

Dist

urbe

d

Undi

stur

bed

Lost

Dupl

icat

e

Moi

stur

e Co

nten

t

Back

grou

nd

Read

ing

pH -

soil

pH -

wat

er Odour Comments

NOTE: This bore log is for environmental purposes only and is not intended to provide geotechnical information.

Geological BorelogTP7Salisbury St - road reserve

NGWE

TP

210061

9 August 2010

Fastnet

JF

JF

Fill: Loose, brown CLAYEY SILT with grass and roots

Fill: Firm, brown SILTY CLAYwith gravel

Large bluestone and building rubble inclusions

Large weathered basalt floater inclusions

Plastic, paper and wood rubbish

Natural: Soft, grey CLAY with weathered basalt inclusions

D

D

D

W

0

0

0

0

0.6

1.2

0.1

1.2

8.0

7.5

No odour throughout

Water strike at 1.9 mBGL

EOH at 2.2 mBGL refusal on basalt

Page 80: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Borehole Log:LOCATIONSURFACE ELEVATIONGROUNDWATERDRILL METHOD

JOB NUMBERDATUMDATE

PROJECT:

Logged by

Proj. Manager

STRATIGRAPHY

PID/FID pHSAMPLES

GRA

PHIC

LO

G

Dept

h m

etre

s

1.0

2.0

3.0

Dist

urbe

d

Undi

stur

bed

Lost

Dupl

icat

e

Moi

stur

e Co

nten

t

Back

grou

nd

Read

ing

pH -

soil

pH -

wat

er Odour Comments

NOTE: This bore log is for environmental purposes only and is not intended to provide geotechnical information.

Geological BorelogTP8Salisbury St - road reserve

NGWE

TP

210061

9 August 2010

Fastnet

JF

JF

Fill: Loose, brown CLAYEY SILT with roots

Fill: Loose, brown SILTY CLAY with bluestone and brick rubble

Fill: Medium loose, dark grey/black SILT with brown, weathered silty clay lenses, minor wood and paper inclusions

Natural: Dense, grey/blue CLAY with minor silt and weathered basalt inclusions

D

D

W

W

M2

0

0

0

0

1.4

2.1

0.8

1.1

7.5

8.0

8.0

No odour throughout

Water strike at 1.9 mBGL

PASS sample

EOH at 3.2 mBGL target depth

Page 81: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Borehole Log:LOCATIONSURFACE ELEVATIONGROUNDWATERDRILL METHOD

JOB NUMBERDATUMDATE

PROJECT:

Logged by

Proj. Manager

STRATIGRAPHY

PID/FID pHSAMPLES

GRA

PHIC

LO

G

Dept

h m

etre

s

1.0

2.0

3.0

Dist

urbe

d

Undi

stur

bed

Lost

Dupl

icat

e

Moi

stur

e Co

nten

t

Back

grou

nd

Read

ing

pH -

soil

pH -

wat

er Odour Comments

NOTE: This bore log is for environmental purposes only and is not intended to provide geotechnical information.

Geological BorelogTP9Salisbury St - road reserve

NGWE

TP

210061

9 August 2010

Fastnet

JF

JF

Fill: Loose, brown CLAYEY SILT with roots and sand

Fill: Stiff, brown and grey CLAY with roots

Fill: Loose, black, fine grained SILT

Fill: Loose, brown SILTY CLAY with bricks, bluestone rubble and minor rubbish (paper and glass)

Oily rag, foam, rubber and drum parts within silty clay

Fill: Soft, grey/black silty clay with oil staining and weathered basalt floaters

Natural: Dense, grey/blue CLAY with minor silt

D

D

W

M2

0

0

0.6

25.4

7.0

8.0

No odour

Very strong HC/oil odour

No odour

Water strike at approx 1.9 mBGL

PASS sample

Lithology hard to distinguish due to hole collapse and water presence

EOH at 2.6 mBGL at target depth

Page 82: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Borehole Log:LOCATIONSURFACE ELEVATIONGROUNDWATERDRILL METHOD

JOB NUMBERDATUMDATE

PROJECT:

Logged by

Proj. Manager

STRATIGRAPHY

PID/FID pHSAMPLES

GRA

PHIC

LO

G

Dept

h m

etre

s

1.0

2.0

3.0

Dist

urbe

d

Undi

stur

bed

Lost

Dupl

icat

e

Moi

stur

e Co

nten

t

Back

grou

nd

Read

ing

pH -

soil

pH -

wat

er Odour Comments

NOTE: This bore log is for environmental purposes only and is not intended to provide geotechnical information.

Geological BorelogTP10Salisbury St Lot

NGWE

TP

210061

9 August 2010

Fastnet

JF

JF

Fill: Loose, dark brown CLAYEY SILT with roots and sand

Fill: Medium dense, brown, weathered CLAY

Fill: Loose, dark brown SILTY CLAY with brick and bluestone rubble and rubbish (plastic, paper and glass)

Fill: Soft, black SILTY CLAY with organic material (reeds)

Natural: Firm, grey/blue CLAY with minor silt

BD2

SP2

D

D

D

M1

W

M2

0

0

0

0

0.8

1.2

8.0

7.5

No odour

Minor organic odour

PASS sample

EOH at 3.0 mBGL target depth

Page 83: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Borehole Log:LOCATIONSURFACE ELEVATIONGROUNDWATERDRILL METHOD

JOB NUMBERDATUMDATE

PROJECT:

Logged by

Proj. Manager

STRATIGRAPHY

PID/FID pHSAMPLES

GRA

PHIC

LO

G

Dept

h m

etre

s

1.0

2.0

3.0

Dist

urbe

d

Undi

stur

bed

Lost

Dupl

icat

e

Moi

stur

e Co

nten

t

Back

grou

nd

Read

ing

pH -

soil

pH -

wat

er Odour Comments

NOTE: This bore log is for environmental purposes only and is not intended to provide geotechnical information.

Geological BorelogTP11Salisbury St Lot

NGWE

TP

210061

9 August 2010

Fastnet

JF

JF

Fill: Loose, brown SILTY CLAY with grass and roots

Fill: Stiff, brown SILTY CLAY with bluestone and concrete rubble

Becoming loose

Fill: Soft, dark grey SILTY CLAY with dark staining

Natural: Dense, grey/green CLAY

D

D

M1

W

0

0

0.8

10.2

7.5

8.0

No odour

HC odour Water strike at approx 1.9 mBGLPASS sample

Difficult to distinguish lithology at depth due to hole collapse and saturation

EOH at 3.2 mBGL hole collapse

Page 84: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Borehole Log:LOCATIONSURFACE ELEVATIONGROUNDWATERDRILL METHOD

JOB NUMBERDATUMDATE

PROJECT:

Logged by

Proj. Manager

STRATIGRAPHY

PID/FID pHSAMPLES

GRA

PHIC

LO

G

Dept

h m

etre

s

1.0

2.0

3.0

Dist

urbe

d

Undi

stur

bed

Lost

Dupl

icat

e

Moi

stur

e Co

nten

t

Back

grou

nd

Read

ing

pH -

soil

pH -

wat

er Odour Comments

NOTE: This bore log is for environmental purposes only and is not intended to provide geotechnical information.

Geological BorelogTP12Salisbury St Lot

NGWE

TP

210061

9 August 2010

Fastnet

JF

JF

Fill: Loose, light brown SILTY CLAY with rubbish (plastic, glass) and concrete rubble with steel wire

Shell inclusions

Fill: Medium dense, brown and orange weathered basaltic CLAY

Fill: Soft, grey and brown SILTY CLAY with weathered basalt floaters and glass and wood inclusions

Natural: Medium dense, grey CLAY with minor silt

Weathered basalt inclusions

BD3

SP3

D

D

W

M2

0

0

0

0

0.1

0.8

9.2

1.2

7.5

8.0

8.5

No odour

Slight HC odour

No odour PASS sample

EOH at 3.1 mBGL target depth

Page 85: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Borehole Log:LOCATIONSURFACE ELEVATIONGROUNDWATERDRILL METHOD

JOB NUMBERDATUMDATE

PROJECT:

Logged by

Proj. Manager

STRATIGRAPHY

PID/FID pHSAMPLES

GRA

PHIC

LO

G

Dept

h m

etre

s

1.0

2.0

3.0

Dist

urbe

d

Undi

stur

bed

Lost

Dupl

icat

e

Moi

stur

e Co

nten

t

Back

grou

nd

Read

ing

pH -

soil

pH -

wat

er Odour Comments

NOTE: This bore log is for environmental purposes only and is not intended to provide geotechnical information.

Geological BorelogTP13Salisbury St Lot

NGWE

TP

210061

9 August 2010

Fastnet

JF

JF

Fill: Loose, brown CLAYEY SILT with roots

Fill: Stiff, brown SILTY CLAY with minor concrete and bluestone rubble

Becoming loose

Fill: Soft SILTY CLAY with weathered basalt floaters

Natural: Medium dense, grey/blue CLAY

D

W

M2

0

0

1.2

0.9

8.0

8.5

No odour throughout

Water strike at approx 1.8 mBGL

EOH at 2.4 mBGL refusal on basalt

Page 86: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Borehole Log:LOCATIONSURFACE ELEVATIONGROUNDWATERDRILL METHOD

JOB NUMBERDATUMDATE

PROJECT:

Logged by

Proj. Manager

STRATIGRAPHY

PID/FID pHSAMPLES

GRA

PHIC

LO

G

Dept

h m

etre

s

1.0

2.0

3.0

Dist

urbe

d

Undi

stur

bed

Lost

Dupl

icat

e

Moi

stur

e Co

nten

t

Back

grou

nd

Read

ing

pH -

soil

pH -

wat

er Odour Comments

NOTE: This bore log is for environmental purposes only and is not intended to provide geotechnical information.

Geological BorelogTP14Salisbury St Lot

NGWE

TP

210061

9 August 2010

Fastnet

JF

JF

Fill: Loose, brown SANDY SILT with grass roots

Fill: Stiff, brown CLAY with weathered basalt floaters and roots

Garbage (plastic, glass, wood etc) in a loose, brown clay matrix

Fill: Medium dense, brown/grey CLAY with minor gravel

Natural: Medium dense, grey/green/blue CLAY with minor silt

Weathered basalt inclusions

D

D

M2

W

0

0

0.6

1.2

7.5

7.5

No odour throughout

Water strike at approx 1.8 mBGL

EOH at 2.9 mBGL refusal on basalt

Page 87: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc

APPENDIX D LABORATORY TRANSCRIPTS AND CHAIN OF CUSTODY FORMS

Page 88: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street
Page 89: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street
Page 90: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street
Page 91: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street
Page 92: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street
Page 93: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street
Page 94: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street
Page 95: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street
Page 96: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street
Page 97: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street
Page 98: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street
Page 99: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street
Page 100: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street
Page 101: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street
Page 102: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street
Page 103: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

EM1008731

False

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSISWork Order : EM1008731 Page : 1 of 78

:Amendment 1

:: LaboratoryClient Environmental Division MelbourneENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES: :ContactContact MR JORDAN FRASER Steven McGrath

:: AddressAddress P.O.BOX 2253FOOTSCRAY VIC, AUSTRALIA 3011

4 Westall Rd Springvale VIC Australia 3171

:: E-mailE-mail [email protected] [email protected]:: TelephoneTelephone +61 03 96871666 +61-3-8549 9600:: FacsimileFacsimile +61 03 96871844 +61-3-8549 9601

:Project 210061 QC Level : NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement:Order number ----:C-O-C number ---- Date Samples Received : 11-AUG-2010

Sampler : JF Issue Date : 27-AUG-2010Site : YARRAVILLE

71:No. of samples receivedQuote number : EN/010/10 63:No. of samples analysed

This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. All pages of this report have been checked and approved for release.

This Certificate of Analysis contains the following information:l General Commentsl Analytical Resultsl Surrogate Control Limits

Page 104: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

NATA Accredited Laboratory 825

This document is issued in accordance with NATA

accreditation requirements.

Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025.

SignatoriesThis document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories indicated below. Electronic signing has been carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.Signatories Accreditation CategoryPosition

Emily Yuen Senior Organic Instrument Chemist OrganicsMyles.Clark Acid Sulfate Soils Supervisor Bne Acid Sulphate SoilsMyles.Clark Acid Sulfate Soils Supervisor InorganicsNancy Wang Senior Semivolatile Instrument Chemist OrganicsNikki Stepniewski Non-metallic Supervisor InorganicsStephen Hislop Senior Inorganic Chemist InorganicsStephen Hislop Senior Inorganic Chemist Stafford Minerals - AYXingbin Lin Senior Organic Chemist Organics

Environmental Division Melbourne

4 Westall Rd Springvale VIC Australia 3171Tel. +61-3-8549 9600 Fax. +61-3-8549 9601 www.alsglobal.com

Page 105: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

3 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

General CommentsThe analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.

Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.

Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insuffient sample for analysis.

Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.

When date(s) and/or time(s) are shown bracketed, these have been assumed by the laboratory for processing purposes. If the sampling time is displayed as 0:00 the information was not provided by client.

CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society.LOR = Limit of reporting^ = This result is computed from individual analyte detections at or above the level of reporting

Key :

'Am' Amosite (brown asbestos)l

'Ch' Chrysotile (white asbestos)l

'Cr' Crocidolite (blue asbestos)l

Legend for Asbestos Type:l

't' Trace levelsl

'UMF' Unknown mineral fibresl

ANC Fizz Rating: 0- None; 1- Slight; 2- Moderate; 3- Strong; 4- Very Strong.l

Asbestos analysis was subcontracted to ASET.l

Asbestos Identification: Samples were analysed by Polarised Light Microscopy including dispersion staining.l

Confirmation by alternative techniques is recommended for samples where unknown mineral fibres are detected.l

EG048: EM1008731 #8 matrix spike failed for Total Hexavalent Chromium by Alkaline Digestion due to possible sample matrix interference. This has been confirmed by re-digestion and re-analysis.

l

EP066-EM/075-EM: Particular samples required dilution prior to analysis due to matrix interferences (dark colour). LOR values have been adjusted accordingly.l

EP071: EM1008731_24 LOR for particular sample raised due to high moisture content.l

EP071: Poor matrix spike recovery due to high level contaminants present in sample EM1008731-069.l

EP074-UT: particular sample ( EM-1008731-020) shows poor surrogates recovery due to matrix interferrence. Confirmed by re-analysis.l

EP074-UT: Particular sample ( EM-1008731-068) shows minor hit of 1,4 dichlorobenzene & 1,2 dichloro benzene. Confirmed by re-analysis.l

EP074-UT: particular smaple ( EM-1008731-MB,003,008,013,020,031,041,052,061,068), LOR has been raised for DCM due to laboratory background level.l

EP075(SIM): EM1008731-042 required dilution prior to analysis due to matrix interferences (internal standard responses could not be determined from neat). LOR values have been adjusted accordingly.

l

EP075(SIM): LOR for particular sample EM1008371-024 raised due to high moisture content.l

EP075(SIM): Sample EM1008731-018 shows poor surrogate recoveries. Confirmed by re-extraction and re-analysis.l

EP075(SIM): Sample EM1008731-025 shows poor duplicate results due to sample heterogeneity. Confirmed by re-extraction and re-analysis.l

EP075-EM: Poor recovery for some surrogates due to dilution required to analyse the sample.l

EP080/075(SIM): Sample EM1008731-040 shows poor surrogate recoveries due to the nature of the sample (charcoal). Confirmed by re-extraction and re-analysis.l

EP080: Poor surrogate recoveries for sample EM1008783-053 due to high moisture content.l

Liming rate is calculated and reported on a dry weight basis assuming use of fine agricultural lime (CaCO3) and using a safety factor of 1.5 to allow for non-homogeneous mixing and poor reactivity of lime. For conversion of Liming Rate from 'kg/t dry weight' to 'kg/m3 in-situ soil', multiply 'reported results' x 'wet bulk density of soil in t/m3'.

l

NAGP, Chromium Suite, SPOCAS and CEC conducted by ALS Brisbane, NATA Site No. 818.l

Retained Acidity not required because pH KCl greater than or equal to 4.5l

Page 106: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

4 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

This report has been amended as a result of a request to correct sample identification numbers (IDs) received by ALS from Jordan Fraser on 27/08/10. All analysis results are as per the previous report.

l

Page 107: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

5 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP2 (0.4-0.5)TP1 (2.0-2.1)TP1 (1.5-1.6)TP1 (1.0-1.1)TP1 (0.4-0.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-005EM1008731-004EM1008731-003EM1008731-002EM1008731-001UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EA055: Moisture Content26.720.7 15.1 22.8 12.5%1.0----^ Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C)

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES-------- 37 ---- ----mg/kg57440-38-2Arsenic-------- <1 ---- ----mg/kg17440-43-9Cadmium-------- 23 ---- ----mg/kg57440-50-8Copper-------- 60 ---- ----mg/kg57439-92-1Lead-------- <2 ---- ----mg/kg27439-98-7Molybdenum-------- 39 ---- ----mg/kg27440-02-0Nickel-------- <5 ---- ----mg/kg57782-49-2Selenium-------- <2 ---- ----mg/kg27440-22-4Silver-------- <5 ---- ----mg/kg57440-31-5Tin-------- 133 ---- ----mg/kg57440-66-6Zinc<5113 ---- 30 42mg/kg57440-38-2Arsenic<12 ---- <1 <1mg/kg17440-43-9Cadmium3159 ---- 28 29mg/kg27440-47-3Chromium7265 ---- 15 728mg/kg57440-50-8Copper

14191 ---- 32 155mg/kg57439-92-1Lead1776 ---- 27 141mg/kg27440-02-0Nickel52496 ---- 93 127mg/kg57440-66-6Zinc

EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS<0.10.5 0.1 <0.1 0.1mg/kg0.17439-97-6Mercury

EG048: Hexavalent Chromium (Alkaline Digest)-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.518540-29-9Hexavalent Chromium

EK026G: Total Cyanide By Discrete Analyser-------- <1 ---- ----mg/kg157-12-5Total Cyanide

EK040T: Fluoride Total-------- 80 ---- ----mg/kg4016984-48-8Fluoride

EP066: Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)-------- <5.00 ---- ----mg/kg0.10----Total Polychlorinated biphenyls

EP074A: Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons-------- <0.2 ---- ----mg/kg0.271-43-2Benzene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5108-88-3Toluene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5100-41-4Ethylbenzene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5108-38-3 106-42-3meta- & para-Xylene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5100-42-5Styrene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.595-47-6ortho-Xylene

Page 108: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

6 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP2 (0.4-0.5)TP1 (2.0-2.1)TP1 (1.5-1.6)TP1 (1.0-1.1)TP1 (0.4-0.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-005EM1008731-004EM1008731-003EM1008731-002EM1008731-001UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP074A: Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons - Continued-------- <0.2 ---- ----mg/kg0.2----^ Sum of monocyclic aromatic

hydrocarbons-------- <0.2 ---- ----mg/kg0.2----^ Sum of monocyclic aromatic

hydrocarbons

EP074I: Volatile Halogenated Compounds-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.0275-01-4Vinyl chloride-------- <0.01 ---- ----mg/kg0.0175-35-41.1-Dichloroethene-------- <0.6 ---- ----mg/kg0.475-09-2Methylene chloride-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.02156-60-5trans-1.2-Dichloroethene-------- <0.01 ---- ----mg/kg0.01156-59-2cis-1.2-Dichloroethene-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.0267-66-3Chloroform-------- <0.01 ---- ----mg/kg0.0171-55-61.1.1-Trichloroethane-------- <0.01 ---- ----mg/kg0.0156-23-5Carbon Tetrachloride-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.02107-06-21.2-Dichloroethane-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.0279-01-6Trichloroethene-------- <0.04 ---- ----mg/kg0.0479-00-51.1.2-Trichloroethane-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.02127-18-4Tetrachloroethene-------- <0.01 ---- ----mg/kg0.01630-20-61.1.1.2-Tetrachloroethane-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.0279-34-51.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.0287-68-3Hexachlorobutadiene-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.02108-90-7Chlorobenzene-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.02106-46-71.4-Dichlorobenzene-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.0295-50-11.2-Dichlorobenzene-------- <0.01 ---- ----mg/kg0.01120-82-11.2.4-Trichlorobenzene-------- <0.01 ---- ----mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of volatile chlorinated

hydrocarbons-------- <0.01 ---- ----mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of other chlorinated hydrocarbons

(VIC EPA 448.3)-------- <0.01 ---- ----mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of volatile chlorinated

hydrocarbons-------- <0.01 ---- ----mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of other chlorinated hydrocarbons

(VIC EPA 448.3)-------- <0.50 ---- ----mg/kg0.501330-20-7^ Total Xylenes

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.591-20-3Naphthalene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5208-96-8Acenaphthylene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.583-32-9Acenaphthene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.586-73-7Fluorene

Page 109: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

7 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP2 (0.4-0.5)TP1 (2.0-2.1)TP1 (1.5-1.6)TP1 (1.0-1.1)TP1 (0.4-0.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-005EM1008731-004EM1008731-003EM1008731-002EM1008731-001UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons - Continued<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.585-01-8Phenanthrene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5120-12-7Anthracene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5206-44-0Fluoranthene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5129-00-0Pyrene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.556-55-3Benz(a)anthracene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5218-01-9Chrysene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5205-99-2Benzo(b)fluoranthene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5207-08-9Benzo(k)fluoranthene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.550-32-8Benzo(a)pyrene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5193-39-5Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.553-70-3Dibenz(a.h)anthracene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5191-24-2Benzo(g.h.i)perylene

EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Halogenated)-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.0395-57-82-Chlorophenol-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.03120-83-22.4-Dichlorophenol-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.0387-65-02.6-Dichlorophenol-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.0359-50-74-Chloro-3-Methylphenol-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.0595-95-42.4.5-Trichlorophenol-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.0588-06-22.4.6-Trichlorophenol-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.03935-95-52.3.5.6-Tetrachlorophenol-------- <1.22 ---- ----mg/kg0.054901-51-3/58-90-22.3.4.5 &

2.3.4.6-Tetrachlorophenol-------- <0.6 ---- ----mg/kg0.287-86-5Pentachlorophenol-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.03----^ Sum of Phenols (halogenated)

EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Non-halogenated)-------- <1 ---- ----mg/kg1108-95-2Phenol-------- <1 ---- ----mg/kg195-48-72-Methylphenol-------- <1 ---- ----mg/kg11319-77-33- & 4-Methylphenol-------- <1 ---- ----mg/kg188-75-52-Nitrophenol-------- <1 ---- ----mg/kg1105-67-92.4-Dimethylphenol-------- <49 ---- ----mg/kg551-28-52.4-Dinitrophenol-------- <49 ---- ----mg/kg5100-02-74-Nitrophenol-------- <49 ---- ----mg/kg58071-51-02-Methyl-4.6-dinitrophenol-------- <49 ---- ----mg/kg588-85-7Dinoseb-------- <49 ---- ----mg/kg5131-89-52-Cyclohexyl-4.6-Dinitrophenol-------- <1 ---- ----mg/kg1----^ Sum of Phenols (non-halogenated)

EP075B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons-------- 0.8 ---- ----mg/kg0.591-20-3Naphthalene

Page 110: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

8 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP2 (0.4-0.5)TP1 (2.0-2.1)TP1 (1.5-1.6)TP1 (1.0-1.1)TP1 (0.4-0.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-005EM1008731-004EM1008731-003EM1008731-002EM1008731-001UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP075B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons - Continued-------- <0.6 ---- ----mg/kg0.583-32-9Acenaphthene-------- 3.1 ---- ----mg/kg0.5208-96-8Acenaphthylene-------- <0.6 ---- ----mg/kg0.586-73-7Fluorene-------- 12.2 ---- ----mg/kg0.585-01-8Phenanthrene-------- 4.4 ---- ----mg/kg0.5120-12-7Anthracene-------- 38.2 ---- ----mg/kg0.5206-44-0Fluoranthene-------- 37.2 ---- ----mg/kg0.5129-00-0Pyrene-------- 18.1 ---- ----mg/kg0.556-55-3Benz(a)anthracene-------- 15.0 ---- ----mg/kg0.5218-01-9Chrysene-------- 30.3 ---- ----mg/kg0.5205-99-2 207-08-9Benzo(b) &

Benzo(k)fluoranthene-------- 20.0 ---- ----mg/kg0.550-32-8Benzo(a)pyrene-------- 12.2 ---- ----mg/kg0.5193-39-5Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene-------- 3.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.553-70-3Dibenz(a.h)anthracene-------- 15.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5191-24-2Benzo(g.h.i)perylene-------- 210 ---- ----mg/kg0.5----^ Sum of polycyclic aromatic

hydrocarbons

EP075I: Organochlorine Pesticides-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.03319-84-6alpha-BHC-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.03118-74-1Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.03319-85-7beta-BHC-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.0358-89-9gamma-BHC-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.03319-86-8delta-BHC-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.0376-44-8Heptachlor-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.03309-00-2Aldrin-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.031024-57-3Heptachlor epoxide-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.035103-71-9cis-Chlordane-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.035103-74-2trans-Chlordane-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.03959-98-8Endosulfan 1-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.0572-55-94.4`-DDE-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.0360-57-1Dieldrin-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.037421-93-4Endrin aldehyde-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.0372-20-8Endrin-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.0333213-65-9Endosulfan 2-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.0572-54-84.4`-DDD-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.031031-07-8Endosulfan sulfate-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.0550-29-34.4`-DDT-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.0372-43-5Methoxychlor

Page 111: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

9 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP2 (0.4-0.5)TP1 (2.0-2.1)TP1 (1.5-1.6)TP1 (1.0-1.1)TP1 (0.4-0.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-005EM1008731-004EM1008731-003EM1008731-002EM1008731-001UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP075I: Organochlorine Pesticides - Continued-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.03----^ Sum of organochlorine pesticides-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.03309-00-2/60-57-1^ Sum of Aldrin + Dieldrin-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.05----^ Sum of DDD + DDE + DDT-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.0357-74-9^ Chlordane-------- <0.61 ---- ----mg/kg0.03----^ Sum of other organochlorine

pesticides

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons-------- <10 ---- ----mg/kg10----C6 - C9 Fraction<10---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg10----C6 - C9 Fraction<50---- <50 ---- ----mg/kg50----C10 - C14 Fraction

<100---- 330 ---- ----mg/kg100----C15 - C28 Fraction<100---- 460 ---- ----mg/kg100----C29 - C36 Fraction<50---- 790 ---- ----mg/kg50----^ C10 - C36 Fraction (sum)

EP080: BTEX<0.2---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.271-43-2Benzene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5108-88-3Toluene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5100-41-4Ethylbenzene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5108-38-3 106-42-3meta- & para-Xylene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.595-47-6ortho-Xylene

EP066S: PCB Surrogate-------- 55.8 ---- ----%0.12051-24-3Decachlorobiphenyl

EP074S: VOC Surrogates-------- 100 ---- ----%0.117060-07-01.2-Dichloroethane-D4-------- 90.4 ---- ----%0.12037-26-5Toluene-D8-------- 95.5 ---- ----%0.1460-00-44-Bromofluorobenzene

EP075(SIM)S: Phenolic Compound Surrogates67.6---- ---- ---- ----%0.113127-88-3Phenol-d6103---- ---- ---- ----%0.193951-73-62-Chlorophenol-D4104---- ---- ---- ----%0.1118-79-62.4.6-Tribromophenol

EP075(SIM)T: PAH Surrogates95.9---- ---- ---- ----%0.1321-60-82-Fluorobiphenyl93.1---- ---- ---- ----%0.11719-06-8Anthracene-d10108---- ---- ---- ----%0.11718-51-04-Terphenyl-d14

EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates-------- Not Determined ---- ----%0.1367-12-42-Fluorophenol-------- Not Determined ---- ----%0.113127-88-3Phenol-d6-------- Not Determined ---- ----%0.193951-73-62-Chlorophenol-D4

Page 112: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

10 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP2 (0.4-0.5)TP1 (2.0-2.1)TP1 (1.5-1.6)TP1 (1.0-1.1)TP1 (0.4-0.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-005EM1008731-004EM1008731-003EM1008731-002EM1008731-001UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates - Continued-------- Not Determined ---- ----%0.1118-79-62.4.6-Tribromophenol

EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates-------- Not Determined ---- ----%0.14165-60-0Nitrobenzene-D5-------- Not Determined ---- ----%0.12199-69-11.2-Dichlorobenzene-D4-------- Not Determined ---- ----%0.1321-60-82-Fluorobiphenyl-------- Not Determined ---- ----%0.11719-06-8Anthracene-d10-------- Not Determined ---- ----%0.11718-51-04-Terphenyl-d14

EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates82.6---- ---- ---- ----%0.117060-07-01.2-Dichloroethane-D497.2---- ---- ---- ----%0.12037-26-5Toluene-D8105---- ---- ---- ----%0.1460-00-44-Bromofluorobenzene

Page 113: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

11 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP3 (0.4-0.5)TP3 (0-0.1)TP2 (3.2-3.3)TP2 (1.9-2.0)TP2 (1.4-1.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-012EM1008731-011EM1008731-010EM1008731-008EM1008731-007UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EA055: Moisture Content28.428.6 47.8 18.5 19.2%1.0----^ Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C)

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES24---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg57440-38-2Arsenic<1---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg17440-43-9Cadmium106---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg57440-50-8Copper87---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg57439-92-1Lead<2---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg27439-98-7Molybdenum41---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg27440-02-0Nickel<5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg57782-49-2Selenium<2---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg27440-22-4Silver202---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg57440-31-5Tin414---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg57440-66-6Zinc----73 590 5 53mg/kg57440-38-2Arsenic----1 16 <1 2mg/kg17440-43-9Cadmium----47 126 20 92mg/kg27440-47-3Chromium----115 358 26 463mg/kg57440-50-8Copper----108 485 21 731mg/kg57439-92-1Lead----41 122 13 76mg/kg27440-02-0Nickel----413 3960 50 810mg/kg57440-66-6Zinc

EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS0.30.2 1.0 <0.1 0.7mg/kg0.17439-97-6Mercury

EG048: Hexavalent Chromium (Alkaline Digest)<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.518540-29-9Hexavalent Chromium

EK026G: Total Cyanide By Discrete Analyser1---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg157-12-5Total Cyanide

EK040T: Fluoride Total180---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg4016984-48-8Fluoride

EP066: Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)<0.50---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.10----Total Polychlorinated biphenyls

EP074A: Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons<0.2---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.271-43-2Benzene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5108-88-3Toluene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5100-41-4Ethylbenzene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5108-38-3 106-42-3meta- & para-Xylene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5100-42-5Styrene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.595-47-6ortho-Xylene

Page 114: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

12 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP3 (0.4-0.5)TP3 (0-0.1)TP2 (3.2-3.3)TP2 (1.9-2.0)TP2 (1.4-1.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-012EM1008731-011EM1008731-010EM1008731-008EM1008731-007UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP074A: Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons - Continued<0.2---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.2----^ Sum of monocyclic aromatic

hydrocarbons<0.2---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.2----^ Sum of monocyclic aromatic

hydrocarbons

EP074I: Volatile Halogenated Compounds<0.02---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0275-01-4Vinyl chloride<0.01---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0175-35-41.1-Dichloroethene<0.6---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.475-09-2Methylene chloride

<0.02---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.02156-60-5trans-1.2-Dichloroethene<0.01---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.01156-59-2cis-1.2-Dichloroethene<0.02---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0267-66-3Chloroform<0.01---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0171-55-61.1.1-Trichloroethane<0.01---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0156-23-5Carbon Tetrachloride<0.02---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.02107-06-21.2-Dichloroethane<0.02---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0279-01-6Trichloroethene<0.04---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0479-00-51.1.2-Trichloroethane<0.02---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.02127-18-4Tetrachloroethene<0.01---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.01630-20-61.1.1.2-Tetrachloroethane<0.02---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0279-34-51.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane<0.02---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0287-68-3Hexachlorobutadiene<0.02---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.02108-90-7Chlorobenzene<0.02---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.02106-46-71.4-Dichlorobenzene<0.02---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0295-50-11.2-Dichlorobenzene<0.01---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.01120-82-11.2.4-Trichlorobenzene<0.01---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of volatile chlorinated

hydrocarbons<0.01---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of other chlorinated hydrocarbons

(VIC EPA 448.3)<0.01---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of volatile chlorinated

hydrocarbons<0.01---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of other chlorinated hydrocarbons

(VIC EPA 448.3)<0.50---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.501330-20-7^ Total Xylenes

EP075(SIM)A: Phenolic Compounds----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5108-95-2Phenol----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.595-57-82-Chlorophenol----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.595-48-72-Methylphenol----<1.0 ---- ---- ----mg/kg1.01319-77-33- & 4-Methylphenol

Page 115: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

13 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP3 (0.4-0.5)TP3 (0-0.1)TP2 (3.2-3.3)TP2 (1.9-2.0)TP2 (1.4-1.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-012EM1008731-011EM1008731-010EM1008731-008EM1008731-007UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP075(SIM)A: Phenolic Compounds - Continued----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.588-75-52-Nitrophenol----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5105-67-92.4-Dimethylphenol----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5120-83-22.4-Dichlorophenol----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.587-65-02.6-Dichlorophenol----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.559-50-74-Chloro-3-Methylphenol----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.588-06-22.4.6-Trichlorophenol----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.595-95-42.4.5-Trichlorophenol----<2.0 ---- ---- ----mg/kg2.087-86-5Pentachlorophenol

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons----<0.5 <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.591-20-3Naphthalene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5208-96-8Acenaphthylene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.583-32-9Acenaphthene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5208-96-8Acenaphthylene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.583-32-9Acenaphthene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.586-73-7Fluorene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.586-73-7Fluorene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.585-01-8Phenanthrene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5120-12-7Anthracene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.585-01-8Phenanthrene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5120-12-7Anthracene-------- 0.9 ---- ----mg/kg0.5206-44-0Fluoranthene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5206-44-0Fluoranthene-------- 1.2 ---- ----mg/kg0.5129-00-0Pyrene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.556-55-3Benz(a)anthracene----0.6 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5129-00-0Pyrene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.556-55-3Benz(a)anthracene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5218-01-9Chrysene-------- 0.7 ---- ----mg/kg0.5205-99-2Benzo(b)fluoranthene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5218-01-9Chrysene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5205-99-2Benzo(b)fluoranthene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5207-08-9Benzo(k)fluoranthene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.550-32-8Benzo(a)pyrene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5207-08-9Benzo(k)fluoranthene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.550-32-8Benzo(a)pyrene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5193-39-5Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.553-70-3Dibenz(a.h)anthracene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5193-39-5Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5191-24-2Benzo(g.h.i)perylene

Page 116: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

14 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP3 (0.4-0.5)TP3 (0-0.1)TP2 (3.2-3.3)TP2 (1.9-2.0)TP2 (1.4-1.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-012EM1008731-011EM1008731-010EM1008731-008EM1008731-007UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons - Continued----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.553-70-3Dibenz(a.h)anthracene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5191-24-2Benzo(g.h.i)perylene

EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Halogenated)<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0395-57-82-Chlorophenol<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03120-83-22.4-Dichlorophenol<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0387-65-02.6-Dichlorophenol<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0359-50-74-Chloro-3-Methylphenol<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0595-95-42.4.5-Trichlorophenol<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0588-06-22.4.6-Trichlorophenol<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03935-95-52.3.5.6-Tetrachlorophenol<0.12---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.054901-51-3/58-90-22.3.4.5 &

2.3.4.6-Tetrachlorophenol<0.2---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.287-86-5Pentachlorophenol

<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03----^ Sum of Phenols (halogenated)

EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Non-halogenated)<1---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg1108-95-2Phenol<1---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg195-48-72-Methylphenol<1---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg11319-77-33- & 4-Methylphenol<1---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg188-75-52-Nitrophenol<1---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg1105-67-92.4-Dimethylphenol<5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg551-28-52.4-Dinitrophenol<5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg5100-02-74-Nitrophenol<5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg58071-51-02-Methyl-4.6-dinitrophenol<5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg588-85-7Dinoseb<5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg5131-89-52-Cyclohexyl-4.6-Dinitrophenol<1---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg1----^ Sum of Phenols (non-halogenated)

EP075B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.591-20-3Naphthalene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.583-32-9Acenaphthene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5208-96-8Acenaphthylene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.586-73-7Fluorene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.585-01-8Phenanthrene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5120-12-7Anthracene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5206-44-0Fluoranthene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5129-00-0Pyrene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.556-55-3Benz(a)anthracene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5218-01-9Chrysene

Page 117: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

15 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP3 (0.4-0.5)TP3 (0-0.1)TP2 (3.2-3.3)TP2 (1.9-2.0)TP2 (1.4-1.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-012EM1008731-011EM1008731-010EM1008731-008EM1008731-007UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP075B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons - Continued<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5205-99-2 207-08-9Benzo(b) &

Benzo(k)fluoranthene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.550-32-8Benzo(a)pyrene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5193-39-5Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.553-70-3Dibenz(a.h)anthracene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5191-24-2Benzo(g.h.i)perylene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5----^ Sum of polycyclic aromatic

hydrocarbons

EP075I: Organochlorine Pesticides<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03319-84-6alpha-BHC<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03118-74-1Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03319-85-7beta-BHC<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0358-89-9gamma-BHC<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03319-86-8delta-BHC<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0376-44-8Heptachlor<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03309-00-2Aldrin<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.031024-57-3Heptachlor epoxide<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.035103-71-9cis-Chlordane<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.035103-74-2trans-Chlordane<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03959-98-8Endosulfan 1<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0572-55-94.4`-DDE<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0360-57-1Dieldrin<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.037421-93-4Endrin aldehyde<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0372-20-8Endrin<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0333213-65-9Endosulfan 2<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0572-54-84.4`-DDD<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.031031-07-8Endosulfan sulfate<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0550-29-34.4`-DDT<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0372-43-5Methoxychlor<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03----^ Sum of organochlorine pesticides<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03309-00-2/60-57-1^ Sum of Aldrin + Dieldrin<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.05----^ Sum of DDD + DDE + DDT<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0357-74-9^ Chlordane<0.06---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03----^ Sum of other organochlorine

pesticides

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons<10---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg10----C6 - C9 Fraction----<10 <10 ---- ----mg/kg10----C6 - C9 Fraction

Page 118: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

16 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP3 (0.4-0.5)TP3 (0-0.1)TP2 (3.2-3.3)TP2 (1.9-2.0)TP2 (1.4-1.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-012EM1008731-011EM1008731-010EM1008731-008EM1008731-007UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Continued<50<50 <50 ---- ----mg/kg50----C10 - C14 Fraction

<100250 590 ---- ----mg/kg100----C15 - C28 Fraction<100390 630 ---- ----mg/kg100----C29 - C36 Fraction<50640 1220 ---- ----mg/kg50----^ C10 - C36 Fraction (sum)

EP080: BTEX----<0.2 <0.2 ---- ----mg/kg0.271-43-2Benzene----<0.5 <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5108-88-3Toluene----<0.5 <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5100-41-4Ethylbenzene----<0.5 <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5108-38-3 106-42-3meta- & para-Xylene----<0.5 <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.595-47-6ortho-Xylene

EP066S: PCB Surrogate80.1---- ---- ---- ----%0.12051-24-3Decachlorobiphenyl

EP074S: VOC Surrogates127---- ---- ---- ----%0.117060-07-01.2-Dichloroethane-D4112---- ---- ---- ----%0.12037-26-5Toluene-D8118---- ---- ---- ----%0.1460-00-44-Bromofluorobenzene

EP075(SIM)S: Phenolic Compound Surrogates----67.6 65.3 ---- ----%0.113127-88-3Phenol-d6----106 103 ---- ----%0.193951-73-62-Chlorophenol-D4----116 88.6 ---- ----%0.1118-79-62.4.6-Tribromophenol

EP075(SIM)T: PAH Surrogates----89.8 91.6 ---- ----%0.1321-60-82-Fluorobiphenyl----96.9 99.2 ---- ----%0.11719-06-8Anthracene-d10----109 107 ---- ----%0.11718-51-04-Terphenyl-d14

EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates72.2---- ---- ---- ----%0.1367-12-42-Fluorophenol71.2---- ---- ---- ----%0.113127-88-3Phenol-d675.1---- ---- ---- ----%0.193951-73-62-Chlorophenol-D458.4---- ---- ---- ----%0.1118-79-62.4.6-Tribromophenol

EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates80.0---- ---- ---- ----%0.14165-60-0Nitrobenzene-D579.5---- ---- ---- ----%0.12199-69-11.2-Dichlorobenzene-D478.4---- ---- ---- ----%0.1321-60-82-Fluorobiphenyl101---- ---- ---- ----%0.11719-06-8Anthracene-d1085.3---- ---- ---- ----%0.11718-51-04-Terphenyl-d14

EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates----103 101 ---- ----%0.117060-07-01.2-Dichloroethane-D4

Page 119: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

17 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP3 (0.4-0.5)TP3 (0-0.1)TP2 (3.2-3.3)TP2 (1.9-2.0)TP2 (1.4-1.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-012EM1008731-011EM1008731-010EM1008731-008EM1008731-007UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates - Continued----100 92.0 ---- ----%0.12037-26-5Toluene-D8----109 104 ---- ----%0.1460-00-44-Bromofluorobenzene

Page 120: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

18 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP4 (0.4-0.5)TP4 (0-0.1)TP3 (2.4-2.5)TP3 (2.0-2.1)TP3 (1.4-1.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-017EM1008731-016EM1008731-015EM1008731-014EM1008731-013UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EA009: Nett Acid Production Potential-39.4---- ---- ---- ----kg H2SO4/t0.5----^ Net Acid Production Potential

EA013: Acid Neutralising Capacity41.3---- ---- ---- ----kg H2SO4

equiv./t0.5----ANC as H2SO4

EA055: Moisture Content30.625.4 33.4 26.5 17.7%1.0----^ Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C)

ED007: Exchangeable Cations26.7---- ---- ---- ----meq/100g0.1----^ Exchangeable Calcium16.8---- ---- ---- ----meq/100g0.1----^ Exchangeable Magnesium1.8---- ---- ---- ----meq/100g0.1----^ Exchangeable Potassium2.4---- ---- ---- ----meq/100g0.1----^ Exchangeable Sodium

47.7---- ---- ---- ----meq/100g0.1----^ Cation Exchange Capacity<0.1---- ---- ---- ----meq/100g0.1----^ Exchangeable Aluminium55.9---- ---- ---- ----%0.1----^ Exchangeable Calcium Percent5.1---- ---- ---- ----%0.1----^ Exchangeable Sodium Percent

35.2---- ---- ---- ----%0.1----^ Exchangeable Magnesium Percent3.8---- ---- ---- ----%0.1----^ Exchangeable Potassium Percent1.6---- ---- ---- ----.0.1----^ Calcium/Magnesium Ratio

ED042T: Total Sulfur by LECO0.06---- ---- ---- ----%0.01----Sulfur - Total as S (LECO)

ED093S: Soluble Major Cations100---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg107440-70-2Calcium90---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg107439-95-4Magnesium220---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg107440-23-5Sodium40---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg107440-09-7Potassium

EG005S : Soluble Metals by ICPAES<1---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg17429-90-5Aluminium

<0.1---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.17439-96-5Manganese

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES----77 ---- ---- ----mg/kg57440-38-2Arsenic----2 ---- ---- ----mg/kg17440-43-9Cadmium----474 ---- ---- ----mg/kg57440-50-8Copper----822 ---- ---- ----mg/kg57439-92-1Lead----7 ---- ---- ----mg/kg27439-98-7Molybdenum----77 ---- ---- ----mg/kg27440-02-0Nickel----<5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg57782-49-2Selenium----<2 ---- ---- ----mg/kg27440-22-4Silver

Page 121: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

19 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP4 (0.4-0.5)TP4 (0-0.1)TP3 (2.4-2.5)TP3 (2.0-2.1)TP3 (1.4-1.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-017EM1008731-016EM1008731-015EM1008731-014EM1008731-013UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES - Continued----268 ---- ---- ----mg/kg57440-31-5Tin----1170 ---- ---- ----mg/kg57440-66-6Zinc158---- 19 <5 ----mg/kg57440-38-2Arsenic2---- <1 <1 ----mg/kg17440-43-9Cadmium

65---- 36 21 ----mg/kg27440-47-3Chromium202---- 16 28 ----mg/kg57440-50-8Copper198---- 26 31 ----mg/kg57439-92-1Lead52---- 27 29 ----mg/kg27440-02-0Nickel587---- 53 54 ----mg/kg57440-66-6Zinc

EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS0.40.5 0.2 <0.1 ----mg/kg0.17439-97-6Mercury

EG048: Hexavalent Chromium (Alkaline Digest)----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.518540-29-9Hexavalent Chromium

EK025G: Free cyanide by Discrete Analyser-------- ---- <1 ----mg/kg1----Free Cyanide

EK026G: Total Cyanide By Discrete Analyser----8 ---- 1 ----mg/kg157-12-5Total Cyanide

EK040T: Fluoride Total----120 ---- ---- ----mg/kg4016984-48-8Fluoride

EP004: Organic Matter2.4---- ---- ---- ----%0.5----^ Total Organic Carbon

EP066: Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)----<2.50 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.10----Total Polychlorinated biphenyls

EP074A: Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons----<0.2 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.271-43-2Benzene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5108-88-3Toluene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5100-41-4Ethylbenzene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5108-38-3 106-42-3meta- & para-Xylene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5100-42-5Styrene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.595-47-6ortho-Xylene----<0.2 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.2----^ Sum of monocyclic aromatic

hydrocarbons----<0.2 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.2----^ Sum of monocyclic aromatic

hydrocarbons

EP074I: Volatile Halogenated Compounds----<0.02 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0275-01-4Vinyl chloride----<0.01 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0175-35-41.1-Dichloroethene

Page 122: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

20 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP4 (0.4-0.5)TP4 (0-0.1)TP3 (2.4-2.5)TP3 (2.0-2.1)TP3 (1.4-1.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-017EM1008731-016EM1008731-015EM1008731-014EM1008731-013UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP074I: Volatile Halogenated Compounds - Continued----<0.6 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.475-09-2Methylene chloride----<0.02 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.02156-60-5trans-1.2-Dichloroethene----<0.01 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.01156-59-2cis-1.2-Dichloroethene----<0.02 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0267-66-3Chloroform----<0.01 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0171-55-61.1.1-Trichloroethane----<0.01 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0156-23-5Carbon Tetrachloride----<0.02 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.02107-06-21.2-Dichloroethane----<0.02 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0279-01-6Trichloroethene----<0.04 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0479-00-51.1.2-Trichloroethane----<0.02 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.02127-18-4Tetrachloroethene----<0.01 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.01630-20-61.1.1.2-Tetrachloroethane----<0.02 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0279-34-51.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane----<0.02 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0287-68-3Hexachlorobutadiene----<0.02 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.02108-90-7Chlorobenzene----<0.02 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.02106-46-71.4-Dichlorobenzene----<0.02 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0295-50-11.2-Dichlorobenzene----<0.01 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.01120-82-11.2.4-Trichlorobenzene----<0.01 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of volatile chlorinated

hydrocarbons----<0.01 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of other chlorinated hydrocarbons

(VIC EPA 448.3)----<0.01 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of volatile chlorinated

hydrocarbons----<0.01 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of other chlorinated hydrocarbons

(VIC EPA 448.3)----<0.50 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.501330-20-7^ Total Xylenes

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.591-20-3Naphthalene<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5208-96-8Acenaphthylene<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.583-32-9Acenaphthene<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.586-73-7Fluorene<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.585-01-8Phenanthrene<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5120-12-7Anthracene<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5206-44-0Fluoranthene<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5129-00-0Pyrene<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.556-55-3Benz(a)anthracene<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5218-01-9Chrysene<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5205-99-2Benzo(b)fluoranthene

Page 123: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

21 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP4 (0.4-0.5)TP4 (0-0.1)TP3 (2.4-2.5)TP3 (2.0-2.1)TP3 (1.4-1.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-017EM1008731-016EM1008731-015EM1008731-014EM1008731-013UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons - Continued<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5207-08-9Benzo(k)fluoranthene<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.550-32-8Benzo(a)pyrene<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5193-39-5Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.553-70-3Dibenz(a.h)anthracene<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5191-24-2Benzo(g.h.i)perylene

EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Halogenated)----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0395-57-82-Chlorophenol----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03120-83-22.4-Dichlorophenol----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0387-65-02.6-Dichlorophenol----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0359-50-74-Chloro-3-Methylphenol----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0595-95-42.4.5-Trichlorophenol----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0588-06-22.4.6-Trichlorophenol----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03935-95-52.3.5.6-Tetrachlorophenol----<0.60 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.054901-51-3/58-90-22.3.4.5 &

2.3.4.6-Tetrachlorophenol----<0.3 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.287-86-5Pentachlorophenol----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03----^ Sum of Phenols (halogenated)

EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Non-halogenated)----<1 ---- ---- ----mg/kg1108-95-2Phenol----<1 ---- ---- ----mg/kg195-48-72-Methylphenol----<1 ---- ---- ----mg/kg11319-77-33- & 4-Methylphenol----<1 ---- ---- ----mg/kg188-75-52-Nitrophenol----<1 ---- ---- ----mg/kg1105-67-92.4-Dimethylphenol----<24 ---- ---- ----mg/kg551-28-52.4-Dinitrophenol----<24 ---- ---- ----mg/kg5100-02-74-Nitrophenol----<24 ---- ---- ----mg/kg58071-51-02-Methyl-4.6-dinitrophenol----<24 ---- ---- ----mg/kg588-85-7Dinoseb----<24 ---- ---- ----mg/kg5131-89-52-Cyclohexyl-4.6-Dinitrophenol----<1 ---- ---- ----mg/kg1----^ Sum of Phenols (non-halogenated)

EP075B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.591-20-3Naphthalene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.583-32-9Acenaphthene----0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5208-96-8Acenaphthylene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.586-73-7Fluorene----2.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.585-01-8Phenanthrene----0.8 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5120-12-7Anthracene----7.6 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5206-44-0Fluoranthene----6.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5129-00-0Pyrene

Page 124: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

22 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP4 (0.4-0.5)TP4 (0-0.1)TP3 (2.4-2.5)TP3 (2.0-2.1)TP3 (1.4-1.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-017EM1008731-016EM1008731-015EM1008731-014EM1008731-013UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP075B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons - Continued----4.1 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.556-55-3Benz(a)anthracene----3.2 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5218-01-9Chrysene----7.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5205-99-2 207-08-9Benzo(b) &

Benzo(k)fluoranthene----4.7 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.550-32-8Benzo(a)pyrene----2.7 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5193-39-5Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene----0.7 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.553-70-3Dibenz(a.h)anthracene----3.2 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5191-24-2Benzo(g.h.i)perylene----44.0 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5----^ Sum of polycyclic aromatic

hydrocarbons

EP075I: Organochlorine Pesticides----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03319-84-6alpha-BHC----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03118-74-1Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03319-85-7beta-BHC----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0358-89-9gamma-BHC----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03319-86-8delta-BHC----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0376-44-8Heptachlor----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03309-00-2Aldrin----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.031024-57-3Heptachlor epoxide----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.035103-71-9cis-Chlordane----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.035103-74-2trans-Chlordane----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03959-98-8Endosulfan 1----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0572-55-94.4`-DDE----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0360-57-1Dieldrin----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.037421-93-4Endrin aldehyde----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0372-20-8Endrin----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0333213-65-9Endosulfan 2----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0572-54-84.4`-DDD----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.031031-07-8Endosulfan sulfate----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0550-29-34.4`-DDT----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0372-43-5Methoxychlor----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03----^ Sum of organochlorine pesticides----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03309-00-2/60-57-1^ Sum of Aldrin + Dieldrin----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.05----^ Sum of DDD + DDE + DDT----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0357-74-9^ Chlordane----<0.30 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03----^ Sum of other organochlorine

pesticides

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Page 125: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

23 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP4 (0.4-0.5)TP4 (0-0.1)TP3 (2.4-2.5)TP3 (2.0-2.1)TP3 (1.4-1.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-017EM1008731-016EM1008731-015EM1008731-014EM1008731-013UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Continued----<10 ---- ---- ----mg/kg10----C6 - C9 Fraction<10---- ---- ---- <10mg/kg10----C6 - C9 Fraction<50<50 ---- ---- <50mg/kg50----C10 - C14 Fraction1201690 ---- ---- <100mg/kg100----C15 - C28 Fraction2403070 ---- ---- <100mg/kg100----C29 - C36 Fraction3604760 ---- ---- <50mg/kg50----^ C10 - C36 Fraction (sum)

EP080: BTEX<0.2---- ---- ---- <0.2mg/kg0.271-43-2Benzene<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5108-88-3Toluene<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5100-41-4Ethylbenzene<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5108-38-3 106-42-3meta- & para-Xylene<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.595-47-6ortho-Xylene

EP066S: PCB Surrogate----56.8 ---- ---- ----%0.12051-24-3Decachlorobiphenyl

EP074S: VOC Surrogates----100 ---- ---- ----%0.117060-07-01.2-Dichloroethane-D4----87.8 ---- ---- ----%0.12037-26-5Toluene-D8----97.1 ---- ---- ----%0.1460-00-44-Bromofluorobenzene

EP075(SIM)S: Phenolic Compound Surrogates67.5---- ---- ---- 64.7%0.113127-88-3Phenol-d6107---- ---- ---- 102%0.193951-73-62-Chlorophenol-D485.1---- ---- ---- 82.4%0.1118-79-62.4.6-Tribromophenol

EP075(SIM)T: PAH Surrogates94.1---- ---- ---- 92.7%0.1321-60-82-Fluorobiphenyl96.3---- ---- ---- 90.6%0.11719-06-8Anthracene-d10111---- ---- ---- 108%0.11718-51-04-Terphenyl-d14

EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates----Not Determined ---- ---- ----%0.1367-12-42-Fluorophenol----Not Determined ---- ---- ----%0.113127-88-3Phenol-d6----Not Determined ---- ---- ----%0.193951-73-62-Chlorophenol-D4----Not Determined ---- ---- ----%0.1118-79-62.4.6-Tribromophenol

EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates----Not Determined ---- ---- ----%0.14165-60-0Nitrobenzene-D5----Not Determined ---- ---- ----%0.12199-69-11.2-Dichlorobenzene-D4----Not Determined ---- ---- ----%0.1321-60-82-Fluorobiphenyl----Not Determined ---- ---- ----%0.11719-06-8Anthracene-d10----Not Determined ---- ---- ----%0.11718-51-04-Terphenyl-d14

Page 126: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

24 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP4 (0.4-0.5)TP4 (0-0.1)TP3 (2.4-2.5)TP3 (2.0-2.1)TP3 (1.4-1.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-017EM1008731-016EM1008731-015EM1008731-014EM1008731-013UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates87.4---- ---- ---- 112%0.117060-07-01.2-Dichloroethane-D480.2---- ---- ---- 119%0.12037-26-5Toluene-D898.0---- ---- ---- 127%0.1460-00-44-Bromofluorobenzene

Page 127: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

25 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP5 (1.4-1.5)TP5 (0.4-0.5)TP4 (2.1-2.2)DUP1TP4 (1.4-1.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-022EM1008731-021EM1008731-020EM1008731-019EM1008731-018UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EA009: Nett Acid Production Potential-------- -23.5 ---- ----kg H2SO4/t0.5----^ Net Acid Production Potential

EA013: Acid Neutralising Capacity-------- 27.4 ---- ----kg H2SO4

equiv./t0.5----ANC as H2SO4

EA029-A: pH Measurements-------- 7.5 ---- ----pH Unit0.1----pH KCl (23A)-------- 6.6 ---- ----pH Unit0.1----pH OX (23B)

EA029-B: Acidity Trail-------- <2 ---- ----mole H+ / t2----Titratable Actual Acidity (23F)-------- <2 ---- ----mole H+ / t2----Titratable Peroxide Acidity (23G)-------- <2 ---- ----mole H+ / t2----Titratable Sulfidic Acidity (23H)-------- <0.02 ---- ----% pyrite S0.02----sulfidic - Titratable Actual Acidity (s-23F)-------- <0.02 ---- ----% pyrite S0.02----sulfidic - Titratable Peroxide Acidity

(s-23G)-------- <0.02 ---- ----% pyrite S0.02----sulfidic - Titratable Sulfidic Acidity (s-23H)

EA029-C: Sulfur Trail-------- 0.06 ---- ----% S0.02----KCl Extractable Sulfur (23Ce)-------- 0.10 ---- ----% S0.02----Peroxide Sulfur (23De)-------- 0.04 ---- ----% S0.02----Peroxide Oxidisable Sulfur (23E)-------- 26 ---- ----mole H+ / t10----acidity - Peroxide Oxidisable Sulfur

(a-23E)

EA029-D: Calcium Values-------- 0.25 ---- ----% Ca0.02----KCl Extractable Calcium (23Vh)-------- 0.47 ---- ----% Ca0.02----Peroxide Calcium (23Wh)-------- 0.21 ---- ----% Ca0.02----Acid Reacted Calcium (23X)-------- 106 ---- ----mole H+ / t10----acidity - Acid Reacted Calcium (a-23X)-------- 0.17 ---- ----% S0.02----sulfidic - Acid Reacted Calcium (s-23X)

EA029-E: Magnesium Values-------- 0.12 ---- ----% Mg0.02----KCl Extractable Magnesium (23Sm)-------- 0.22 ---- ----% Mg0.02----Peroxide Magnesium (23Tm)-------- 0.09 ---- ----% Mg0.02----Acid Reacted Magnesium (23U)-------- 77 ---- ----mole H+ / t10----Acidity - Acid Reacted Magnesium (a-23U)-------- 0.12 ---- ----% S0.02----sulfidic - Acid Reacted Magnesium

(s-23U)

EA029-F: Excess Acid Neutralising Capacity-------- 0.07 ---- ----% CaCO30.02----Excess Acid Neutralising Capacity (23Q)

Page 128: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

26 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP5 (1.4-1.5)TP5 (0.4-0.5)TP4 (2.1-2.2)DUP1TP4 (1.4-1.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-022EM1008731-021EM1008731-020EM1008731-019EM1008731-018UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EA029-F: Excess Acid Neutralising Capacity - Continued-------- 14 ---- ----mole H+ / t10----acidity - Excess Acid Neutralising

Capacity (a-23Q)-------- 0.02 ---- ----% S0.02----sulfidic - Excess Acid Neutralising

Capacity (s-23Q)

EA029-H: Acid Base Accounting-------- 1.5 ---- -----0.5----ANC Fineness Factor-------- <0.02 ---- ----% S0.02----Net Acidity (sulfur units)-------- <10 ---- ----mole H+ / t10----Net Acidity (acidity units)-------- <1 ---- ----kg CaCO3/t1----Liming Rate

EA033-A: Actual Acidity-------- 7.5 ---- ----pH Unit0.1----pH KCl (23A)-------- <2 ---- ----mole H+ / t2----Titratable Actual Acidity (23F)-------- <0.02 ---- ----% pyrite S0.02----sulfidic - Titratable Actual Acidity (s-23F)

EA033-B: Potential Acidity-------- 0.006 ---- ----% S0.005----Chromium Reducible Sulfur (22B)-------- <10 ---- ----mole H+ / t10----acidity - Chromium Reducible Sulfur

(a-22B)

EA033-C: Acid Neutralising Capacity-------- 2.68 ---- ----% CaCO30.01----Acid Neutralising Capacity (19A2)-------- 536 ---- ----mole H+ / t10----acidity - Acid Neutralising Capacity

(a-19A2)-------- 0.86 ---- ----% pyrite S0.01----sulfidic - Acid Neutralising Capacity

(s-19A2)

EA033-E: Acid Base Accounting-------- 1.5 ---- -----0.5----ANC Fineness Factor-------- <0.02 ---- ----% S0.02----Net Acidity (sulfur units)-------- <10 ---- ----mole H+ / t10----Net Acidity (acidity units)-------- <1 ---- ----kg CaCO3/t1----Liming Rate

EA055: Moisture Content20.427.9 47.2 12.7 35.7%1.0----^ Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C)

ED007: Exchangeable Cations-------- 19.2 ---- ----meq/100g0.1----^ Exchangeable Calcium-------- 14.5 ---- ----meq/100g0.1----^ Exchangeable Magnesium-------- 0.5 ---- ----meq/100g0.1----^ Exchangeable Potassium-------- 7.4 ---- ----meq/100g0.1----^ Exchangeable Sodium-------- 41.6 ---- ----meq/100g0.1----^ Cation Exchange Capacity-------- <0.1 ---- ----meq/100g0.1----^ Exchangeable Aluminium

Page 129: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

27 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP5 (1.4-1.5)TP5 (0.4-0.5)TP4 (2.1-2.2)DUP1TP4 (1.4-1.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-022EM1008731-021EM1008731-020EM1008731-019EM1008731-018UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

ED007: Exchangeable Cations - Continued-------- 46.1 ---- ----%0.1----^ Exchangeable Calcium Percent-------- 17.8 ---- ----%0.1----^ Exchangeable Sodium Percent-------- 34.9 ---- ----%0.1----^ Exchangeable Magnesium Percent-------- 1.2 ---- ----%0.1----^ Exchangeable Potassium Percent-------- 1.3 ---- ----.0.1----^ Calcium/Magnesium Ratio

ED042T: Total Sulfur by LECO-------- 0.13 ---- ----%0.01----Sulfur - Total as S (LECO)

ED093S: Soluble Major Cations-------- 40 ---- ----mg/kg107440-70-2Calcium-------- 60 ---- ----mg/kg107439-95-4Magnesium-------- 930 ---- ----mg/kg107440-23-5Sodium-------- <10 ---- ----mg/kg107440-09-7Potassium

EG005S : Soluble Metals by ICPAES-------- <1 ---- ----mg/kg17429-90-5Aluminium-------- <0.1 ---- ----mg/kg0.17439-96-5Manganese

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES-------- 10 ---- ----mg/kg57440-38-2Arsenic-------- <1 ---- ----mg/kg17440-43-9Cadmium-------- 22 ---- ----mg/kg57440-50-8Copper-------- 15 ---- ----mg/kg57439-92-1Lead-------- <2 ---- ----mg/kg27439-98-7Molybdenum-------- 17 ---- ----mg/kg27440-02-0Nickel-------- <5 ---- ----mg/kg57782-49-2Selenium-------- <2 ---- ----mg/kg27440-22-4Silver-------- 6 ---- ----mg/kg57440-31-5Tin-------- 76 ---- ----mg/kg57440-66-6Zinc6015 ---- 166 6mg/kg57440-38-2Arsenic<113 ---- 3 <1mg/kg17440-43-9Cadmium5821 ---- 55 10mg/kg27440-47-3Chromium59334 ---- 553 118mg/kg57440-50-8Copper73337 ---- 394 56mg/kg57439-92-1Lead4754 ---- 80 14mg/kg27440-02-0Nickel286745 ---- 717 579mg/kg57440-66-6Zinc

EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS0.20.2 0.3 0.7 0.9mg/kg0.17439-97-6Mercury

EG048: Hexavalent Chromium (Alkaline Digest)-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.518540-29-9Hexavalent Chromium

Page 130: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

28 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP5 (1.4-1.5)TP5 (0.4-0.5)TP4 (2.1-2.2)DUP1TP4 (1.4-1.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-022EM1008731-021EM1008731-020EM1008731-019EM1008731-018UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EK026G: Total Cyanide By Discrete Analyser-------- 1 ---- ----mg/kg157-12-5Total Cyanide

EK040T: Fluoride Total-------- 120 ---- ----mg/kg4016984-48-8Fluoride

EP004: Organic Matter-------- 9.9 ---- ----%0.5----^ Total Organic Carbon

EP066: Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)-------- <0.10 ---- ----mg/kg0.10----Total Polychlorinated biphenyls

EP074A: Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons-------- <0.2 ---- ----mg/kg0.271-43-2Benzene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5108-88-3Toluene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5100-41-4Ethylbenzene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5108-38-3 106-42-3meta- & para-Xylene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5100-42-5Styrene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.595-47-6ortho-Xylene-------- <0.2 ---- ----mg/kg0.2----^ Sum of monocyclic aromatic

hydrocarbons-------- <0.2 ---- ----mg/kg0.2----^ Sum of monocyclic aromatic

hydrocarbons

EP074I: Volatile Halogenated Compounds-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.0275-01-4Vinyl chloride-------- <0.01 ---- ----mg/kg0.0175-35-41.1-Dichloroethene-------- <0.8 ---- ----mg/kg0.475-09-2Methylene chloride-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.02156-60-5trans-1.2-Dichloroethene-------- <0.01 ---- ----mg/kg0.01156-59-2cis-1.2-Dichloroethene-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.0267-66-3Chloroform-------- <0.01 ---- ----mg/kg0.0171-55-61.1.1-Trichloroethane-------- <0.01 ---- ----mg/kg0.0156-23-5Carbon Tetrachloride-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.02107-06-21.2-Dichloroethane-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.0279-01-6Trichloroethene-------- <0.04 ---- ----mg/kg0.0479-00-51.1.2-Trichloroethane-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.02127-18-4Tetrachloroethene-------- <0.01 ---- ----mg/kg0.01630-20-61.1.1.2-Tetrachloroethane-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.0279-34-51.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.0287-68-3Hexachlorobutadiene-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.02108-90-7Chlorobenzene-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.02106-46-71.4-Dichlorobenzene-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.0295-50-11.2-Dichlorobenzene

Page 131: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

29 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP5 (1.4-1.5)TP5 (0.4-0.5)TP4 (2.1-2.2)DUP1TP4 (1.4-1.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-022EM1008731-021EM1008731-020EM1008731-019EM1008731-018UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP074I: Volatile Halogenated Compounds - Continued-------- <0.01 ---- ----mg/kg0.01120-82-11.2.4-Trichlorobenzene-------- <0.01 ---- ----mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of volatile chlorinated

hydrocarbons-------- <0.01 ---- ----mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of other chlorinated hydrocarbons

(VIC EPA 448.3)-------- <0.01 ---- ----mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of volatile chlorinated

hydrocarbons-------- <0.01 ---- ----mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of other chlorinated hydrocarbons

(VIC EPA 448.3)-------- <0.50 ---- ----mg/kg0.501330-20-7^ Total Xylenes

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.591-20-3Naphthalene<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5208-96-8Acenaphthylene<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.583-32-9Acenaphthene<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.586-73-7Fluorene<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- 2.9mg/kg0.585-01-8Phenanthrene<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- 0.9mg/kg0.5120-12-7Anthracene0.8<0.5 ---- ---- 4.5mg/kg0.5206-44-0Fluoranthene0.9<0.5 ---- ---- 4.4mg/kg0.5129-00-0Pyrene

<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- 2.3mg/kg0.556-55-3Benz(a)anthracene<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- 1.9mg/kg0.5218-01-9Chrysene<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- 1.9mg/kg0.5205-99-2Benzo(b)fluoranthene<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- 0.7mg/kg0.5207-08-9Benzo(k)fluoranthene<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- 1.5mg/kg0.550-32-8Benzo(a)pyrene<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- 0.8mg/kg0.5193-39-5Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.553-70-3Dibenz(a.h)anthracene<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- 0.8mg/kg0.5191-24-2Benzo(g.h.i)perylene

EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Halogenated)-------- <0.03 ---- ----mg/kg0.0395-57-82-Chlorophenol-------- <0.03 ---- ----mg/kg0.03120-83-22.4-Dichlorophenol-------- <0.03 ---- ----mg/kg0.0387-65-02.6-Dichlorophenol-------- <0.03 ---- ----mg/kg0.0359-50-74-Chloro-3-Methylphenol-------- <0.05 ---- ----mg/kg0.0595-95-42.4.5-Trichlorophenol-------- <0.05 ---- ----mg/kg0.0588-06-22.4.6-Trichlorophenol-------- <0.03 ---- ----mg/kg0.03935-95-52.3.5.6-Tetrachlorophenol-------- <0.05 ---- ----mg/kg0.054901-51-3/58-90-22.3.4.5 &

2.3.4.6-Tetrachlorophenol-------- <0.2 ---- ----mg/kg0.287-86-5Pentachlorophenol

Page 132: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

30 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP5 (1.4-1.5)TP5 (0.4-0.5)TP4 (2.1-2.2)DUP1TP4 (1.4-1.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-022EM1008731-021EM1008731-020EM1008731-019EM1008731-018UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Halogenated) - Continued-------- <0.03 ---- ----mg/kg0.03----^ Sum of Phenols (halogenated)

EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Non-halogenated)-------- <1 ---- ----mg/kg1108-95-2Phenol-------- <1 ---- ----mg/kg195-48-72-Methylphenol-------- <1 ---- ----mg/kg11319-77-33- & 4-Methylphenol-------- <1 ---- ----mg/kg188-75-52-Nitrophenol-------- <1 ---- ----mg/kg1105-67-92.4-Dimethylphenol-------- <5 ---- ----mg/kg551-28-52.4-Dinitrophenol-------- <5 ---- ----mg/kg5100-02-74-Nitrophenol-------- <5 ---- ----mg/kg58071-51-02-Methyl-4.6-dinitrophenol-------- <5 ---- ----mg/kg588-85-7Dinoseb-------- <5 ---- ----mg/kg5131-89-52-Cyclohexyl-4.6-Dinitrophenol-------- <1 ---- ----mg/kg1----^ Sum of Phenols (non-halogenated)

EP075B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.591-20-3Naphthalene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.583-32-9Acenaphthene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5208-96-8Acenaphthylene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.586-73-7Fluorene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.585-01-8Phenanthrene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5120-12-7Anthracene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5206-44-0Fluoranthene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5129-00-0Pyrene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.556-55-3Benz(a)anthracene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5218-01-9Chrysene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5205-99-2 207-08-9Benzo(b) &

Benzo(k)fluoranthene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.550-32-8Benzo(a)pyrene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5193-39-5Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.553-70-3Dibenz(a.h)anthracene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5191-24-2Benzo(g.h.i)perylene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5----^ Sum of polycyclic aromatic

hydrocarbons

EP075I: Organochlorine Pesticides-------- <0.03 ---- ----mg/kg0.03319-84-6alpha-BHC-------- <0.03 ---- ----mg/kg0.03118-74-1Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)-------- <0.03 ---- ----mg/kg0.03319-85-7beta-BHC-------- <0.03 ---- ----mg/kg0.0358-89-9gamma-BHC-------- <0.03 ---- ----mg/kg0.03319-86-8delta-BHC

Page 133: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

31 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP5 (1.4-1.5)TP5 (0.4-0.5)TP4 (2.1-2.2)DUP1TP4 (1.4-1.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-022EM1008731-021EM1008731-020EM1008731-019EM1008731-018UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP075I: Organochlorine Pesticides - Continued-------- <0.03 ---- ----mg/kg0.0376-44-8Heptachlor-------- <0.03 ---- ----mg/kg0.03309-00-2Aldrin-------- <0.03 ---- ----mg/kg0.031024-57-3Heptachlor epoxide-------- <0.03 ---- ----mg/kg0.035103-71-9cis-Chlordane-------- <0.03 ---- ----mg/kg0.035103-74-2trans-Chlordane-------- <0.03 ---- ----mg/kg0.03959-98-8Endosulfan 1-------- <0.05 ---- ----mg/kg0.0572-55-94.4`-DDE-------- <0.03 ---- ----mg/kg0.0360-57-1Dieldrin-------- <0.03 ---- ----mg/kg0.037421-93-4Endrin aldehyde-------- <0.03 ---- ----mg/kg0.0372-20-8Endrin-------- <0.03 ---- ----mg/kg0.0333213-65-9Endosulfan 2-------- <0.05 ---- ----mg/kg0.0572-54-84.4`-DDD-------- <0.03 ---- ----mg/kg0.031031-07-8Endosulfan sulfate-------- <0.05 ---- ----mg/kg0.0550-29-34.4`-DDT-------- <0.03 ---- ----mg/kg0.0372-43-5Methoxychlor-------- <0.03 ---- ----mg/kg0.03----^ Sum of organochlorine pesticides-------- <0.03 ---- ----mg/kg0.03309-00-2/60-57-1^ Sum of Aldrin + Dieldrin-------- <0.05 ---- ----mg/kg0.05----^ Sum of DDD + DDE + DDT-------- <0.03 ---- ----mg/kg0.0357-74-9^ Chlordane-------- <0.03 ---- ----mg/kg0.03----^ Sum of other organochlorine

pesticides

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons-------- <10 ---- ----mg/kg10----C6 - C9 Fraction<10<10 ---- ---- <10mg/kg10----C6 - C9 Fraction<50<50 <50 ---- <50mg/kg50----C10 - C14 Fraction140<100 <100 ---- 150mg/kg100----C15 - C28 Fraction230<100 <100 ---- 120mg/kg100----C29 - C36 Fraction370<50 <50 ---- 270mg/kg50----^ C10 - C36 Fraction (sum)

EP080: BTEX<0.2<0.2 ---- ---- <0.2mg/kg0.271-43-2Benzene<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5108-88-3Toluene<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5100-41-4Ethylbenzene<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5108-38-3 106-42-3meta- & para-Xylene<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.595-47-6ortho-Xylene

EP066S: PCB Surrogate-------- 63.1 ---- ----%0.12051-24-3Decachlorobiphenyl

EP074S: VOC Surrogates-------- 98.9 ---- ----%0.117060-07-01.2-Dichloroethane-D4

Page 134: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

32 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP5 (1.4-1.5)TP5 (0.4-0.5)TP4 (2.1-2.2)DUP1TP4 (1.4-1.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-022EM1008731-021EM1008731-020EM1008731-019EM1008731-018UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP074S: VOC Surrogates - Continued-------- 74.1 ---- ----%0.12037-26-5Toluene-D8-------- 41.0 ---- ----%0.1460-00-44-Bromofluorobenzene

EP075(SIM)S: Phenolic Compound Surrogates64.850.5 ---- ---- 67.1%0.113127-88-3Phenol-d610445.6 ---- ---- 107%0.193951-73-62-Chlorophenol-D488.09.6 ---- ---- 115%0.1118-79-62.4.6-Tribromophenol

EP075(SIM)T: PAH Surrogates93.990.9 ---- ---- 95.6%0.1321-60-82-Fluorobiphenyl92.898.6 ---- ---- 97.0%0.11719-06-8Anthracene-d1010991.6 ---- ---- 109%0.11718-51-04-Terphenyl-d14

EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates-------- 17.8 ---- ----%0.1367-12-42-Fluorophenol-------- 24.7 ---- ----%0.113127-88-3Phenol-d6-------- 26.0 ---- ----%0.193951-73-62-Chlorophenol-D4-------- Not Determined ---- ----%0.1118-79-62.4.6-Tribromophenol

EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates-------- 59.7 ---- ----%0.14165-60-0Nitrobenzene-D5-------- 62.4 ---- ----%0.12199-69-11.2-Dichlorobenzene-D4-------- 66.7 ---- ----%0.1321-60-82-Fluorobiphenyl-------- 55.2 ---- ----%0.11719-06-8Anthracene-d10-------- 68.8 ---- ----%0.11718-51-04-Terphenyl-d14

EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates96.3104 ---- ---- 107%0.117060-07-01.2-Dichloroethane-D410896.1 ---- ---- 100%0.12037-26-5Toluene-D811797.8 ---- ---- 111%0.1460-00-44-Bromofluorobenzene

Page 135: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

33 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP6 (1.4-1.5)TP6 (0.4-0.5)TP6 (0-0.1)TP5 (3.9-4.0)TP5 (2.9-3.0)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-027EM1008731-026EM1008731-025EM1008731-024EM1008731-023UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EA055: Moisture Content53.047.7 43.9 17.9 25.0%1.0----^ Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C)

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES7---- 43 114 <5mg/kg57440-38-2Arsenic

<1---- 1 1 <1mg/kg17440-43-9Cadmium70---- 38 56 32mg/kg27440-47-3Chromium24---- 247 242 18mg/kg57440-50-8Copper33---- 175 147 26mg/kg57439-92-1Lead34---- 48 69 47mg/kg27440-02-0Nickel52---- 439 472 92mg/kg57440-66-6Zinc

EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS0.4---- 0.4 0.3 <0.1mg/kg0.17439-97-6Mercury

EK025G: Free cyanide by Discrete Analyser-------- ---- ---- <1mg/kg1----Free Cyanide

EK026G: Total Cyanide By Discrete Analyser-------- ---- ---- <1mg/kg157-12-5Total Cyanide

EP075(SIM)A: Phenolic Compounds<1.0<0.5 ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5108-95-2Phenol<1.0<0.5 ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.595-57-82-Chlorophenol<1.0<0.5 ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.595-48-72-Methylphenol<2.0<1.0 ---- <1.0 ----mg/kg1.01319-77-33- & 4-Methylphenol<1.0<0.5 ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.588-75-52-Nitrophenol<1.0<0.5 ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5105-67-92.4-Dimethylphenol<1.0<0.5 ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5120-83-22.4-Dichlorophenol<1.0<0.5 ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.587-65-02.6-Dichlorophenol<1.0<0.5 ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.559-50-74-Chloro-3-Methylphenol<1.0<0.5 ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.588-06-22.4.6-Trichlorophenol<1.0<0.5 ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.595-95-42.4.5-Trichlorophenol<4.0<2.0 ---- <2.0 ----mg/kg2.087-86-5Pentachlorophenol

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons<1.0<0.5 <0.5 ---- <0.5mg/kg0.591-20-3Naphthalene-------- <0.5 ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5208-96-8Acenaphthylene-------- <0.5 ---- <0.5mg/kg0.583-32-9Acenaphthene

<1.0<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5208-96-8Acenaphthylene<1.0<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.583-32-9Acenaphthene-------- <0.5 ---- <0.5mg/kg0.586-73-7Fluorene

<1.0<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.586-73-7Fluorene-------- 4.8 ---- <0.5mg/kg0.585-01-8Phenanthrene

Page 136: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

34 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP6 (1.4-1.5)TP6 (0.4-0.5)TP6 (0-0.1)TP5 (3.9-4.0)TP5 (2.9-3.0)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-027EM1008731-026EM1008731-025EM1008731-024EM1008731-023UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons - Continued-------- 1.8 ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5120-12-7Anthracene

<1.0<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.585-01-8Phenanthrene<1.0<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5120-12-7Anthracene-------- 15.0 ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5206-44-0Fluoranthene

<1.00.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5206-44-0Fluoranthene-------- 17.5 ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5129-00-0Pyrene-------- 9.4 ---- <0.5mg/kg0.556-55-3Benz(a)anthracene

<1.01.4 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5129-00-0Pyrene<1.0<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.556-55-3Benz(a)anthracene-------- 8.6 ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5218-01-9Chrysene-------- 14.6 ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5205-99-2Benzo(b)fluoranthene

<1.00.6 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5218-01-9Chrysene<1.0<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5205-99-2Benzo(b)fluoranthene-------- 3.3 ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5207-08-9Benzo(k)fluoranthene-------- 12.4 ---- <0.5mg/kg0.550-32-8Benzo(a)pyrene

<1.0<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5207-08-9Benzo(k)fluoranthene<1.0<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.550-32-8Benzo(a)pyrene-------- 6.4 ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5193-39-5Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene-------- 1.7 ---- <0.5mg/kg0.553-70-3Dibenz(a.h)anthracene

<1.0<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5193-39-5Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene-------- 7.4 ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5191-24-2Benzo(g.h.i)perylene

<1.0<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.553-70-3Dibenz(a.h)anthracene<1.0<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5191-24-2Benzo(g.h.i)perylene

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons<1042 <10 ---- <10mg/kg10----C6 - C9 Fraction

<100100 <50 ---- <50mg/kg50----C10 - C14 Fraction<2001810 220 ---- <100mg/kg100----C15 - C28 Fraction<2002510 430 ---- <100mg/kg100----C29 - C36 Fraction<1004420 650 ---- <50mg/kg50----^ C10 - C36 Fraction (sum)

EP080: BTEX<0.2<0.2 <0.2 ---- <0.2mg/kg0.271-43-2Benzene<0.5<0.5 <0.5 ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5108-88-3Toluene<0.5<0.5 <0.5 ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5100-41-4Ethylbenzene<0.5<0.5 <0.5 ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5108-38-3 106-42-3meta- & para-Xylene<0.5<0.5 <0.5 ---- <0.5mg/kg0.595-47-6ortho-Xylene

EP075(SIM)S: Phenolic Compound Surrogates66.970.4 99.8 66.0 72.9%0.113127-88-3Phenol-d6107112 105 106 116%0.193951-73-62-Chlorophenol-D4

Page 137: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

35 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP6 (1.4-1.5)TP6 (0.4-0.5)TP6 (0-0.1)TP5 (3.9-4.0)TP5 (2.9-3.0)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-027EM1008731-026EM1008731-025EM1008731-024EM1008731-023UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP075(SIM)S: Phenolic Compound Surrogates - Continued89.793.7 91.7 86.1 91.2%0.1118-79-62.4.6-Tribromophenol

EP075(SIM)T: PAH Surrogates96.698.7 93.6 95.5 104%0.1321-60-82-Fluorobiphenyl86.2103 91.5 97.4 94.5%0.11719-06-8Anthracene-d10111115 94.8 108 122%0.11718-51-04-Terphenyl-d14

EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates11099.3 90.3 ---- 113%0.117060-07-01.2-Dichloroethane-D4102123 98.0 ---- 106%0.12037-26-5Toluene-D8112117 104 ---- 114%0.1460-00-44-Bromofluorobenzene

Page 138: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

36 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP8 (0.2-0.3)TP7 (2.0-2.1)TP7 (0.9-1.0)TP7 (0-0.1)TP6 (1.9-2.0)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-034EM1008731-033EM1008731-031EM1008731-030EM1008731-028UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EA055: Moisture Content16.032.2 17.4 26.2 23.8%1.0----^ Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C)

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES-------- 16 ---- ----mg/kg57440-38-2Arsenic-------- <1 ---- ----mg/kg17440-43-9Cadmium-------- 22 ---- ----mg/kg57440-50-8Copper-------- 29 ---- ----mg/kg57439-92-1Lead-------- <2 ---- ----mg/kg27439-98-7Molybdenum-------- 39 ---- ----mg/kg27440-02-0Nickel-------- <5 ---- ----mg/kg57782-49-2Selenium-------- <2 ---- ----mg/kg27440-22-4Silver-------- 13 ---- ----mg/kg57440-31-5Tin-------- 58 ---- ----mg/kg57440-66-6Zinc10155 ---- 406 23mg/kg57440-38-2Arsenic1<1 ---- <1 1mg/kg17440-43-9Cadmium

3731 ---- 28 22mg/kg27440-47-3Chromium23038 ---- 40 80mg/kg57440-50-8Copper19090 ---- 198 358mg/kg57439-92-1Lead4728 ---- 53 17mg/kg27440-02-0Nickel307251 ---- 122 114mg/kg57440-66-6Zinc

EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS0.50.2 0.1 0.8 1.7mg/kg0.17439-97-6Mercury

EG048: Hexavalent Chromium (Alkaline Digest)-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.518540-29-9Hexavalent Chromium

EK026G: Total Cyanide By Discrete Analyser-------- <1 ---- ----mg/kg157-12-5Total Cyanide

EK040T: Fluoride Total-------- 180 ---- ----mg/kg4016984-48-8Fluoride

EP066: Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)-------- <0.50 ---- ----mg/kg0.10----Total Polychlorinated biphenyls

EP074A: Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons-------- <0.2 ---- ----mg/kg0.271-43-2Benzene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5108-88-3Toluene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5100-41-4Ethylbenzene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5108-38-3 106-42-3meta- & para-Xylene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5100-42-5Styrene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.595-47-6ortho-Xylene

Page 139: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

37 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP8 (0.2-0.3)TP7 (2.0-2.1)TP7 (0.9-1.0)TP7 (0-0.1)TP6 (1.9-2.0)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-034EM1008731-033EM1008731-031EM1008731-030EM1008731-028UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP074A: Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons - Continued-------- <0.2 ---- ----mg/kg0.2----^ Sum of monocyclic aromatic

hydrocarbons-------- <0.2 ---- ----mg/kg0.2----^ Sum of monocyclic aromatic

hydrocarbons

EP074I: Volatile Halogenated Compounds-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.0275-01-4Vinyl chloride-------- <0.01 ---- ----mg/kg0.0175-35-41.1-Dichloroethene-------- <0.6 ---- ----mg/kg0.475-09-2Methylene chloride-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.02156-60-5trans-1.2-Dichloroethene-------- <0.01 ---- ----mg/kg0.01156-59-2cis-1.2-Dichloroethene-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.0267-66-3Chloroform-------- <0.01 ---- ----mg/kg0.0171-55-61.1.1-Trichloroethane-------- <0.01 ---- ----mg/kg0.0156-23-5Carbon Tetrachloride-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.02107-06-21.2-Dichloroethane-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.0279-01-6Trichloroethene-------- <0.04 ---- ----mg/kg0.0479-00-51.1.2-Trichloroethane-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.02127-18-4Tetrachloroethene-------- <0.01 ---- ----mg/kg0.01630-20-61.1.1.2-Tetrachloroethane-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.0279-34-51.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.0287-68-3Hexachlorobutadiene-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.02108-90-7Chlorobenzene-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.02106-46-71.4-Dichlorobenzene-------- <0.02 ---- ----mg/kg0.0295-50-11.2-Dichlorobenzene-------- <0.01 ---- ----mg/kg0.01120-82-11.2.4-Trichlorobenzene-------- <0.01 ---- ----mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of volatile chlorinated

hydrocarbons-------- <0.01 ---- ----mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of other chlorinated hydrocarbons

(VIC EPA 448.3)-------- <0.01 ---- ----mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of volatile chlorinated

hydrocarbons-------- <0.01 ---- ----mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of other chlorinated hydrocarbons

(VIC EPA 448.3)-------- <0.50 ---- ----mg/kg0.501330-20-7^ Total Xylenes

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons-------- ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.591-20-3Naphthalene-------- ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5208-96-8Acenaphthylene-------- ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.583-32-9Acenaphthene-------- ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.586-73-7Fluorene

Page 140: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

38 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP8 (0.2-0.3)TP7 (2.0-2.1)TP7 (0.9-1.0)TP7 (0-0.1)TP6 (1.9-2.0)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-034EM1008731-033EM1008731-031EM1008731-030EM1008731-028UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons - Continued-------- ---- 0.5 ----mg/kg0.585-01-8Phenanthrene-------- ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5120-12-7Anthracene-------- ---- 1.3 ----mg/kg0.5206-44-0Fluoranthene-------- ---- 1.4 ----mg/kg0.5129-00-0Pyrene-------- ---- 0.7 ----mg/kg0.556-55-3Benz(a)anthracene-------- ---- 0.6 ----mg/kg0.5218-01-9Chrysene-------- ---- 0.7 ----mg/kg0.5205-99-2Benzo(b)fluoranthene-------- ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5207-08-9Benzo(k)fluoranthene-------- ---- 0.6 ----mg/kg0.550-32-8Benzo(a)pyrene-------- ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5193-39-5Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene-------- ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.553-70-3Dibenz(a.h)anthracene-------- ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5191-24-2Benzo(g.h.i)perylene

EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Halogenated)-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.0395-57-82-Chlorophenol-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.03120-83-22.4-Dichlorophenol-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.0387-65-02.6-Dichlorophenol-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.0359-50-74-Chloro-3-Methylphenol-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.0595-95-42.4.5-Trichlorophenol-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.0588-06-22.4.6-Trichlorophenol-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.03935-95-52.3.5.6-Tetrachlorophenol-------- <0.12 ---- ----mg/kg0.054901-51-3/58-90-22.3.4.5 &

2.3.4.6-Tetrachlorophenol-------- <0.2 ---- ----mg/kg0.287-86-5Pentachlorophenol-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.03----^ Sum of Phenols (halogenated)

EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Non-halogenated)-------- <1 ---- ----mg/kg1108-95-2Phenol-------- <1 ---- ----mg/kg195-48-72-Methylphenol-------- <1 ---- ----mg/kg11319-77-33- & 4-Methylphenol-------- <1 ---- ----mg/kg188-75-52-Nitrophenol-------- <1 ---- ----mg/kg1105-67-92.4-Dimethylphenol-------- <5 ---- ----mg/kg551-28-52.4-Dinitrophenol-------- <5 ---- ----mg/kg5100-02-74-Nitrophenol-------- <5 ---- ----mg/kg58071-51-02-Methyl-4.6-dinitrophenol-------- <5 ---- ----mg/kg588-85-7Dinoseb-------- <5 ---- ----mg/kg5131-89-52-Cyclohexyl-4.6-Dinitrophenol-------- <1 ---- ----mg/kg1----^ Sum of Phenols (non-halogenated)

EP075B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.591-20-3Naphthalene

Page 141: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

39 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP8 (0.2-0.3)TP7 (2.0-2.1)TP7 (0.9-1.0)TP7 (0-0.1)TP6 (1.9-2.0)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-034EM1008731-033EM1008731-031EM1008731-030EM1008731-028UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP075B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons - Continued-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.583-32-9Acenaphthene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5208-96-8Acenaphthylene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.586-73-7Fluorene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.585-01-8Phenanthrene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5120-12-7Anthracene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5206-44-0Fluoranthene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5129-00-0Pyrene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.556-55-3Benz(a)anthracene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5218-01-9Chrysene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5205-99-2 207-08-9Benzo(b) &

Benzo(k)fluoranthene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.550-32-8Benzo(a)pyrene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5193-39-5Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.553-70-3Dibenz(a.h)anthracene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5191-24-2Benzo(g.h.i)perylene-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5----^ Sum of polycyclic aromatic

hydrocarbons

EP075I: Organochlorine Pesticides-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.03319-84-6alpha-BHC-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.03118-74-1Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.03319-85-7beta-BHC-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.0358-89-9gamma-BHC-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.03319-86-8delta-BHC-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.0376-44-8Heptachlor-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.03309-00-2Aldrin-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.031024-57-3Heptachlor epoxide-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.035103-71-9cis-Chlordane-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.035103-74-2trans-Chlordane-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.03959-98-8Endosulfan 1-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.0572-55-94.4`-DDE-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.0360-57-1Dieldrin-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.037421-93-4Endrin aldehyde-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.0372-20-8Endrin-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.0333213-65-9Endosulfan 2-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.0572-54-84.4`-DDD-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.031031-07-8Endosulfan sulfate-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.0550-29-34.4`-DDT-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.0372-43-5Methoxychlor

Page 142: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

40 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP8 (0.2-0.3)TP7 (2.0-2.1)TP7 (0.9-1.0)TP7 (0-0.1)TP6 (1.9-2.0)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-034EM1008731-033EM1008731-031EM1008731-030EM1008731-028UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP075I: Organochlorine Pesticides - Continued-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.03----^ Sum of organochlorine pesticides-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.03309-00-2/60-57-1^ Sum of Aldrin + Dieldrin-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.05----^ Sum of DDD + DDE + DDT-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.0357-74-9^ Chlordane-------- <0.06 ---- ----mg/kg0.03----^ Sum of other organochlorine

pesticides

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons-------- <10 ---- ----mg/kg10----C6 - C9 Fraction-------- ---- <10 ----mg/kg10----C6 - C9 Fraction-------- <50 <50 ----mg/kg50----C10 - C14 Fraction-------- <100 <100 ----mg/kg100----C15 - C28 Fraction-------- <100 <100 ----mg/kg100----C29 - C36 Fraction-------- <50 <50 ----mg/kg50----^ C10 - C36 Fraction (sum)

EP080: BTEX-------- ---- <0.2 ----mg/kg0.271-43-2Benzene-------- ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5108-88-3Toluene-------- ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5100-41-4Ethylbenzene-------- ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5108-38-3 106-42-3meta- & para-Xylene-------- ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.595-47-6ortho-Xylene

EP066S: PCB Surrogate-------- 87.0 ---- ----%0.12051-24-3Decachlorobiphenyl

EP074S: VOC Surrogates-------- 116 ---- ----%0.117060-07-01.2-Dichloroethane-D4-------- 104 ---- ----%0.12037-26-5Toluene-D8-------- 116 ---- ----%0.1460-00-44-Bromofluorobenzene

EP075(SIM)S: Phenolic Compound Surrogates-------- ---- 65.1 ----%0.113127-88-3Phenol-d6-------- ---- 104 ----%0.193951-73-62-Chlorophenol-D4-------- ---- 107 ----%0.1118-79-62.4.6-Tribromophenol

EP075(SIM)T: PAH Surrogates-------- ---- 93.7 ----%0.1321-60-82-Fluorobiphenyl-------- ---- 88.0 ----%0.11719-06-8Anthracene-d10-------- ---- 108 ----%0.11718-51-04-Terphenyl-d14

EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates-------- 92.5 ---- ----%0.1367-12-42-Fluorophenol-------- 88.2 ---- ----%0.113127-88-3Phenol-d6-------- 89.1 ---- ----%0.193951-73-62-Chlorophenol-D4

Page 143: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

41 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP8 (0.2-0.3)TP7 (2.0-2.1)TP7 (0.9-1.0)TP7 (0-0.1)TP6 (1.9-2.0)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-034EM1008731-033EM1008731-031EM1008731-030EM1008731-028UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates - Continued-------- 65.8 ---- ----%0.1118-79-62.4.6-Tribromophenol

EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates-------- 99.6 ---- ----%0.14165-60-0Nitrobenzene-D5-------- 91.4 ---- ----%0.12199-69-11.2-Dichlorobenzene-D4-------- 97.7 ---- ----%0.1321-60-82-Fluorobiphenyl-------- 110 ---- ----%0.11719-06-8Anthracene-d10-------- 102 ---- ----%0.11718-51-04-Terphenyl-d14

EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates-------- ---- 89.8 ----%0.117060-07-01.2-Dichloroethane-D4-------- ---- 98.8 ----%0.12037-26-5Toluene-D8-------- ---- 108 ----%0.1460-00-44-Bromofluorobenzene

Page 144: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

42 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP9 (0.4-0.5)TP8 (2.9-3.0)TP8 (2.4-2.5)TP8 (1.9-2.0)TP8 (0.9-1.0)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-039EM1008731-038EM1008731-037EM1008731-036EM1008731-035UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EA055: Moisture Content27.113.6 35.5 40.3 26.9%1.0----^ Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C)

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES1749 ---- 14 6mg/kg57440-38-2Arsenic2<1 ---- <1 <1mg/kg17440-43-9Cadmium

5924 ---- 44 45mg/kg27440-47-3Chromium13228 ---- 12 59mg/kg57440-50-8Copper14426 ---- 21 34mg/kg57439-92-1Lead9425 ---- 24 75mg/kg27440-02-0Nickel61445 ---- 75 48mg/kg57440-66-6Zinc

EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS0.20.1 ---- <0.1 <0.1mg/kg0.17439-97-6Mercury

EK025G: Free cyanide by Discrete Analyser----<1 ---- ---- ----mg/kg1----Free Cyanide

EK026G: Total Cyanide By Discrete Analyser----22 ---- ---- ----mg/kg157-12-5Total Cyanide

EP075(SIM)A: Phenolic Compounds-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5108-95-2Phenol-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.595-57-82-Chlorophenol-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.595-48-72-Methylphenol-------- <1.0 ---- ----mg/kg1.01319-77-33- & 4-Methylphenol-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.588-75-52-Nitrophenol-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5105-67-92.4-Dimethylphenol-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5120-83-22.4-Dichlorophenol-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.587-65-02.6-Dichlorophenol-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.559-50-74-Chloro-3-Methylphenol-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.588-06-22.4.6-Trichlorophenol-------- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.595-95-42.4.5-Trichlorophenol-------- <2.0 ---- ----mg/kg2.087-86-5Pentachlorophenol

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.591-20-3Naphthalene<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5208-96-8Acenaphthylene<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.583-32-9Acenaphthene<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.586-73-7Fluorene<0.51.7 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.585-01-8Phenanthrene<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5120-12-7Anthracene<0.53.9 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5206-44-0Fluoranthene<0.53.6 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5129-00-0Pyrene

Page 145: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

43 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP9 (0.4-0.5)TP8 (2.9-3.0)TP8 (2.4-2.5)TP8 (1.9-2.0)TP8 (0.9-1.0)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-039EM1008731-038EM1008731-037EM1008731-036EM1008731-035UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons - Continued<0.52.1 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.556-55-3Benz(a)anthracene<0.51.8 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5218-01-9Chrysene<0.52.2 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5205-99-2Benzo(b)fluoranthene<0.50.8 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5207-08-9Benzo(k)fluoranthene<0.51.6 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.550-32-8Benzo(a)pyrene<0.50.9 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5193-39-5Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.553-70-3Dibenz(a.h)anthracene<0.51.0 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5191-24-2Benzo(g.h.i)perylene

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons<10<10 ---- ---- ----mg/kg10----C6 - C9 Fraction<50<50 ---- ---- ----mg/kg50----C10 - C14 Fraction

<100<100 ---- ---- ----mg/kg100----C15 - C28 Fraction140<100 ---- ---- ----mg/kg100----C29 - C36 Fraction140<50 ---- ---- ----mg/kg50----^ C10 - C36 Fraction (sum)

EP080: BTEX<0.2<0.2 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.271-43-2Benzene<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5108-88-3Toluene<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5100-41-4Ethylbenzene<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5108-38-3 106-42-3meta- & para-Xylene<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.595-47-6ortho-Xylene

EP075(SIM)S: Phenolic Compound Surrogates95.664.9 94.1 ---- ----%0.113127-88-3Phenol-d678.1104 94.2 ---- ----%0.193951-73-62-Chlorophenol-D479.3110 82.0 ---- ----%0.1118-79-62.4.6-Tribromophenol

EP075(SIM)T: PAH Surrogates99.793.5 106 ---- ----%0.1321-60-82-Fluorobiphenyl10093.3 96.5 ---- ----%0.11719-06-8Anthracene-d1094.7104 101 ---- ----%0.11718-51-04-Terphenyl-d14

EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates90.3113 ---- ---- ----%0.117060-07-01.2-Dichloroethane-D496.6102 ---- ---- ----%0.12037-26-5Toluene-D8106112 ---- ---- ----%0.1460-00-44-Bromofluorobenzene

Page 146: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

44 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP10 (0.1-0.2)TP9B (2.5-2.6)TP9 (2.0-2.1)TP9 (1.9-2.0)TP9 (0.9-1.0)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-044EM1008731-043EM1008731-042EM1008731-041EM1008731-040UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EA055: Moisture Content26.038.5 43.5 46.4 21.9%1.0----^ Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C)

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES19---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg57440-38-2Arsenic<1---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg17440-43-9Cadmium484---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg57440-50-8Copper43---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg57439-92-1Lead10---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg27439-98-7Molybdenum54---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg27440-02-0Nickel<5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg57782-49-2Selenium<2---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg27440-22-4Silver<5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg57440-31-5Tin175---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg57440-66-6Zinc----20 ---- 278 48mg/kg57440-38-2Arsenic----<1 ---- 10 1mg/kg17440-43-9Cadmium----12 ---- 188 43mg/kg27440-47-3Chromium----157 ---- 255 377mg/kg57440-50-8Copper----34 ---- 773 144mg/kg57439-92-1Lead----80 ---- 79 56mg/kg27440-02-0Nickel----76 ---- 1810 288mg/kg57440-66-6Zinc

EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS0.10.1 ---- 1.8 0.3mg/kg0.17439-97-6Mercury

EG048: Hexavalent Chromium (Alkaline Digest)<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.518540-29-9Hexavalent Chromium

EK026G: Total Cyanide By Discrete Analyser<1---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg157-12-5Total Cyanide

EK040T: Fluoride Total50---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg4016984-48-8Fluoride

EP066: Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)<5.00---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.10----Total Polychlorinated biphenyls

EP074A: Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons<0.2---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.271-43-2Benzene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5108-88-3Toluene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5100-41-4Ethylbenzene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5108-38-3 106-42-3meta- & para-Xylene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5100-42-5Styrene<0.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.595-47-6ortho-Xylene

Page 147: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

45 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP10 (0.1-0.2)TP9B (2.5-2.6)TP9 (2.0-2.1)TP9 (1.9-2.0)TP9 (0.9-1.0)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-044EM1008731-043EM1008731-042EM1008731-041EM1008731-040UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP074A: Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons - Continued<0.2---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.2----^ Sum of monocyclic aromatic

hydrocarbons<0.2---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.2----^ Sum of monocyclic aromatic

hydrocarbons

EP074I: Volatile Halogenated Compounds<0.02---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0275-01-4Vinyl chloride<0.01---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0175-35-41.1-Dichloroethene<0.6---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.475-09-2Methylene chloride

<0.02---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.02156-60-5trans-1.2-Dichloroethene<0.01---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.01156-59-2cis-1.2-Dichloroethene<0.02---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0267-66-3Chloroform<0.01---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0171-55-61.1.1-Trichloroethane<0.01---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0156-23-5Carbon Tetrachloride<0.02---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.02107-06-21.2-Dichloroethane<0.02---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0279-01-6Trichloroethene<0.04---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0479-00-51.1.2-Trichloroethane<0.02---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.02127-18-4Tetrachloroethene<0.01---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.01630-20-61.1.1.2-Tetrachloroethane<0.02---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0279-34-51.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane<0.02---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0287-68-3Hexachlorobutadiene<0.02---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.02108-90-7Chlorobenzene<0.02---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.02106-46-71.4-Dichlorobenzene<0.02---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0295-50-11.2-Dichlorobenzene<0.01---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.01120-82-11.2.4-Trichlorobenzene<0.01---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of volatile chlorinated

hydrocarbons<0.01---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of other chlorinated hydrocarbons

(VIC EPA 448.3)<0.01---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of volatile chlorinated

hydrocarbons<0.01---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of other chlorinated hydrocarbons

(VIC EPA 448.3)<0.50---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.501330-20-7^ Total Xylenes

EP075(SIM)A: Phenolic Compounds-------- <2.5 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5108-95-2Phenol-------- <2.5 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.595-57-82-Chlorophenol-------- <2.5 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.595-48-72-Methylphenol-------- <5.0 <1.0 ----mg/kg1.01319-77-33- & 4-Methylphenol

Page 148: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

46 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP10 (0.1-0.2)TP9B (2.5-2.6)TP9 (2.0-2.1)TP9 (1.9-2.0)TP9 (0.9-1.0)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-044EM1008731-043EM1008731-042EM1008731-041EM1008731-040UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP075(SIM)A: Phenolic Compounds - Continued-------- <2.5 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.588-75-52-Nitrophenol-------- <2.5 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5105-67-92.4-Dimethylphenol-------- <2.5 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5120-83-22.4-Dichlorophenol-------- <2.5 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.587-65-02.6-Dichlorophenol-------- <2.5 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.559-50-74-Chloro-3-Methylphenol-------- <2.5 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.588-06-22.4.6-Trichlorophenol-------- <2.5 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.595-95-42.4.5-Trichlorophenol-------- <10.0 <2.0 ----mg/kg2.087-86-5Pentachlorophenol

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons----5.0 <2.5 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.591-20-3Naphthalene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5208-96-8Acenaphthylene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.583-32-9Acenaphthene-------- <2.5 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5208-96-8Acenaphthylene-------- 4.2 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.583-32-9Acenaphthene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.586-73-7Fluorene-------- 3.1 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.586-73-7Fluorene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.585-01-8Phenanthrene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5120-12-7Anthracene-------- 8.8 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.585-01-8Phenanthrene-------- 13.0 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5120-12-7Anthracene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5206-44-0Fluoranthene-------- 40.4 1.0 ----mg/kg0.5206-44-0Fluoranthene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5129-00-0Pyrene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.556-55-3Benz(a)anthracene-------- 37.2 1.4 ----mg/kg0.5129-00-0Pyrene-------- 13.1 0.7 ----mg/kg0.556-55-3Benz(a)anthracene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5218-01-9Chrysene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5205-99-2Benzo(b)fluoranthene-------- 15.1 0.8 ----mg/kg0.5218-01-9Chrysene-------- 10.2 1.0 ----mg/kg0.5205-99-2Benzo(b)fluoranthene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5207-08-9Benzo(k)fluoranthene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.550-32-8Benzo(a)pyrene-------- 2.8 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5207-08-9Benzo(k)fluoranthene-------- 6.0 0.7 ----mg/kg0.550-32-8Benzo(a)pyrene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5193-39-5Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.553-70-3Dibenz(a.h)anthracene-------- 3.5 0.7 ----mg/kg0.5193-39-5Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5191-24-2Benzo(g.h.i)perylene

Page 149: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

47 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP10 (0.1-0.2)TP9B (2.5-2.6)TP9 (2.0-2.1)TP9 (1.9-2.0)TP9 (0.9-1.0)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-044EM1008731-043EM1008731-042EM1008731-041EM1008731-040UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons - Continued-------- <2.5 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.553-70-3Dibenz(a.h)anthracene-------- 4.8 0.9 ----mg/kg0.5191-24-2Benzo(g.h.i)perylene

EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Halogenated)<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0395-57-82-Chlorophenol<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03120-83-22.4-Dichlorophenol<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0387-65-02.6-Dichlorophenol<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0359-50-74-Chloro-3-Methylphenol<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0595-95-42.4.5-Trichlorophenol<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0588-06-22.4.6-Trichlorophenol<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03935-95-52.3.5.6-Tetrachlorophenol<1.19---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.054901-51-3/58-90-22.3.4.5 &

2.3.4.6-Tetrachlorophenol<0.6---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.287-86-5Pentachlorophenol

<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03----^ Sum of Phenols (halogenated)

EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Non-halogenated)<1---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg1108-95-2Phenol<1---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg195-48-72-Methylphenol<1---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg11319-77-33- & 4-Methylphenol<1---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg188-75-52-Nitrophenol<1---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg1105-67-92.4-Dimethylphenol

<48---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg551-28-52.4-Dinitrophenol<48---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg5100-02-74-Nitrophenol<48---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg58071-51-02-Methyl-4.6-dinitrophenol<48---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg588-85-7Dinoseb<48---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg5131-89-52-Cyclohexyl-4.6-Dinitrophenol<1---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg1----^ Sum of Phenols (non-halogenated)

EP075B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons<0.6---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.591-20-3Naphthalene<0.6---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.583-32-9Acenaphthene<0.6---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5208-96-8Acenaphthylene<0.6---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.586-73-7Fluorene0.6---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.585-01-8Phenanthrene

<0.6---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5120-12-7Anthracene1.9---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5206-44-0Fluoranthene1.8---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5129-00-0Pyrene0.9---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.556-55-3Benz(a)anthracene0.7---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5218-01-9Chrysene

Page 150: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

48 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP10 (0.1-0.2)TP9B (2.5-2.6)TP9 (2.0-2.1)TP9 (1.9-2.0)TP9 (0.9-1.0)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-044EM1008731-043EM1008731-042EM1008731-041EM1008731-040UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP075B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons - Continued1.9---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5205-99-2 207-08-9Benzo(b) &

Benzo(k)fluoranthene1.1---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.550-32-8Benzo(a)pyrene0.7---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5193-39-5Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene

<0.6---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.553-70-3Dibenz(a.h)anthracene0.9---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5191-24-2Benzo(g.h.i)perylene

10.5---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5----^ Sum of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

EP075I: Organochlorine Pesticides<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03319-84-6alpha-BHC<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03118-74-1Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03319-85-7beta-BHC<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0358-89-9gamma-BHC<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03319-86-8delta-BHC<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0376-44-8Heptachlor<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03309-00-2Aldrin<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.031024-57-3Heptachlor epoxide<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.035103-71-9cis-Chlordane<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.035103-74-2trans-Chlordane<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03959-98-8Endosulfan 1<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0572-55-94.4`-DDE<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0360-57-1Dieldrin<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.037421-93-4Endrin aldehyde<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0372-20-8Endrin<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0333213-65-9Endosulfan 2<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0572-54-84.4`-DDD<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.031031-07-8Endosulfan sulfate<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0550-29-34.4`-DDT<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0372-43-5Methoxychlor<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03----^ Sum of organochlorine pesticides<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03309-00-2/60-57-1^ Sum of Aldrin + Dieldrin<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.05----^ Sum of DDD + DDE + DDT<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0357-74-9^ Chlordane<0.60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03----^ Sum of other organochlorine

pesticides

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons<10---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg10----C6 - C9 Fraction----<10 106 <10 ----mg/kg10----C6 - C9 Fraction

Page 151: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

49 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP10 (0.1-0.2)TP9B (2.5-2.6)TP9 (2.0-2.1)TP9 (1.9-2.0)TP9 (0.9-1.0)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-044EM1008731-043EM1008731-042EM1008731-041EM1008731-040UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Continued<50<50 1160 <50 ----mg/kg50----C10 - C14 Fraction

<100<100 32700 1320 ----mg/kg100----C15 - C28 Fraction<100190 48600 1730 ----mg/kg100----C29 - C36 Fraction<50190 82500 3050 ----mg/kg50----^ C10 - C36 Fraction (sum)

EP080: BTEX----0.3 <0.2 <0.2 ----mg/kg0.271-43-2Benzene----<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5108-88-3Toluene----<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5100-41-4Ethylbenzene----<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5108-38-3 106-42-3meta- & para-Xylene----<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.595-47-6ortho-Xylene

EP066S: PCB Surrogate56.5---- ---- ---- ----%0.12051-24-3Decachlorobiphenyl

EP074S: VOC Surrogates109---- ---- ---- ----%0.117060-07-01.2-Dichloroethane-D492.2---- ---- ---- ----%0.12037-26-5Toluene-D899.1---- ---- ---- ----%0.1460-00-44-Bromofluorobenzene

EP075(SIM)S: Phenolic Compound Surrogates----49.7 79.6 96.1 ----%0.113127-88-3Phenol-d6----43.6 102 99.2 ----%0.193951-73-62-Chlorophenol-D4----25.4 79.6 92.6 ----%0.1118-79-62.4.6-Tribromophenol

EP075(SIM)T: PAH Surrogates----86.0 98.7 98.8 ----%0.1321-60-82-Fluorobiphenyl----33.8 101 91.7 ----%0.11719-06-8Anthracene-d10----54.4 103 103 ----%0.11718-51-04-Terphenyl-d14

EP075S: Acid Extractable SurrogatesNot Determined---- ---- ---- ----%0.1367-12-42-FluorophenolNot Determined---- ---- ---- ----%0.113127-88-3Phenol-d6Not Determined---- ---- ---- ----%0.193951-73-62-Chlorophenol-D4Not Determined---- ---- ---- ----%0.1118-79-62.4.6-Tribromophenol

EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable SurrogatesNot Determined---- ---- ---- ----%0.14165-60-0Nitrobenzene-D5Not Determined---- ---- ---- ----%0.12199-69-11.2-Dichlorobenzene-D4Not Determined---- ---- ---- ----%0.1321-60-82-FluorobiphenylNot Determined---- ---- ---- ----%0.11719-06-8Anthracene-d10Not Determined---- ---- ---- ----%0.11718-51-04-Terphenyl-d14

EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates----101 82.9 95.3 ----%0.117060-07-01.2-Dichloroethane-D4

Page 152: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

50 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP10 (0.1-0.2)TP9B (2.5-2.6)TP9 (2.0-2.1)TP9 (1.9-2.0)TP9 (0.9-1.0)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-044EM1008731-043EM1008731-042EM1008731-041EM1008731-040UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates - Continued----32.6 103 94.1 ----%0.12037-26-5Toluene-D8----21.1 102 101 ----%0.1460-00-44-Bromofluorobenzene

Page 153: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

51 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP11 (0-0.1)TP10 (2.4-2.5)DUP2TP10 (1.9-2.0)TP10 (1.4-1.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-050EM1008731-049EM1008731-048EM1008731-047EM1008731-046UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EA055: Moisture Content32.710.5 29.7 39.6 19.7%1.0----^ Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C)

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES33103 <5 9 10mg/kg57440-38-2Arsenic21 <1 <1 <1mg/kg17440-43-9Cadmium

13630 <2 44 26mg/kg27440-47-3Chromium6411890 8 12 66mg/kg57440-50-8Copper231325 <5 17 514mg/kg57439-92-1Lead70120 <2 17 23mg/kg27440-02-0Nickel720297 6 52 492mg/kg57440-66-6Zinc

EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS0.40.6 0.5 <0.1 0.2mg/kg0.17439-97-6Mercury

EK025G: Free cyanide by Discrete Analyser<1<1 <1 ---- ----mg/kg1----Free Cyanide

EK026G: Total Cyanide By Discrete Analyser2<1 <1 ---- ----mg/kg157-12-5Total Cyanide

EP075(SIM)A: Phenolic Compounds<0.5---- <0.5 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5108-95-2Phenol<0.5---- <0.5 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.595-57-82-Chlorophenol<0.5---- <0.5 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.595-48-72-Methylphenol<1.0---- <1.0 <1.0 ----mg/kg1.01319-77-33- & 4-Methylphenol<0.5---- <0.5 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.588-75-52-Nitrophenol<0.5---- <0.5 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5105-67-92.4-Dimethylphenol<0.5---- <0.5 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5120-83-22.4-Dichlorophenol<0.5---- <0.5 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.587-65-02.6-Dichlorophenol<0.5---- <0.5 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.559-50-74-Chloro-3-Methylphenol<0.5---- <0.5 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.588-06-22.4.6-Trichlorophenol<0.5---- <0.5 <0.5 ----mg/kg0.595-95-42.4.5-Trichlorophenol<2.0---- <2.0 <2.0 ----mg/kg2.087-86-5Pentachlorophenol

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons<0.5---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.591-20-3Naphthalene<0.5---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5208-96-8Acenaphthylene<0.5---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.583-32-9Acenaphthene<0.5---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.586-73-7Fluorene0.7---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.585-01-8Phenanthrene

<0.5---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5120-12-7Anthracene2.0---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5206-44-0Fluoranthene1.9---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5129-00-0Pyrene

Page 154: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

52 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP11 (0-0.1)TP10 (2.4-2.5)DUP2TP10 (1.9-2.0)TP10 (1.4-1.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-050EM1008731-049EM1008731-048EM1008731-047EM1008731-046UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons - Continued1.2---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.556-55-3Benz(a)anthracene1.1---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5218-01-9Chrysene1.4---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5205-99-2Benzo(b)fluoranthene0.6---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5207-08-9Benzo(k)fluoranthene1.0---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.550-32-8Benzo(a)pyrene0.8---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5193-39-5Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene

<0.5---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.553-70-3Dibenz(a.h)anthracene0.9---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5191-24-2Benzo(g.h.i)perylene

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons<10---- <10 ---- ----mg/kg10----C6 - C9 Fraction<50---- <50 ---- ----mg/kg50----C10 - C14 Fraction340---- <100 ---- ----mg/kg100----C15 - C28 Fraction540---- <100 ---- ----mg/kg100----C29 - C36 Fraction880---- <50 ---- ----mg/kg50----^ C10 - C36 Fraction (sum)

EP080: BTEX<0.2---- <0.2 ---- ----mg/kg0.271-43-2Benzene<0.5---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5108-88-3Toluene<0.5---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5100-41-4Ethylbenzene<0.5---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5108-38-3 106-42-3meta- & para-Xylene<0.5---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.595-47-6ortho-Xylene

EP075(SIM)S: Phenolic Compound Surrogates116---- 99.4 93.2 ----%0.113127-88-3Phenol-d695.6---- 99.9 100 ----%0.193951-73-62-Chlorophenol-D496.4---- 86.5 80.1 ----%0.1118-79-62.4.6-Tribromophenol

EP075(SIM)T: PAH Surrogates98.6---- 99.7 96.6 ----%0.1321-60-82-Fluorobiphenyl92.9---- 99.1 102 ----%0.11719-06-8Anthracene-d10102---- 93.9 95.6 ----%0.11718-51-04-Terphenyl-d14

EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates88.9---- 89.0 ---- ----%0.117060-07-01.2-Dichloroethane-D484.8---- 87.6 ---- ----%0.12037-26-5Toluene-D890.6---- 94.6 ---- ----%0.1460-00-44-Bromofluorobenzene

Page 155: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

53 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP12 (1.9-2.0)TP12 (1.4-1.5)TP12 (0.4-0.5)TP11 (1.9-2.0)TP11 (1.7-1.8)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-056EM1008731-055EM1008731-054EM1008731-053EM1008731-052UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EA009: Nett Acid Production Potential-191---- ---- ---- ----kg H2SO4/t0.5----^ Net Acid Production Potential

EA013: Acid Neutralising Capacity214---- ---- ---- ----kg H2SO4

equiv./t0.5----ANC as H2SO4

EA055: Moisture Content41.929.5 11.4 22.9 27.6%1.0----^ Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C)

ED007: Exchangeable Cations33.2---- ---- ---- ----meq/100g0.1----^ Exchangeable Calcium17.1---- ---- ---- ----meq/100g0.1----^ Exchangeable Magnesium0.9---- ---- ---- ----meq/100g0.1----^ Exchangeable Potassium2.6---- ---- ---- ----meq/100g0.1----^ Exchangeable Sodium

53.7---- ---- ---- ----meq/100g0.1----^ Cation Exchange Capacity<0.1---- ---- ---- ----meq/100g0.1----^ Exchangeable Aluminium61.7---- ---- ---- ----%0.1----^ Exchangeable Calcium Percent4.8---- ---- ---- ----%0.1----^ Exchangeable Sodium Percent

31.8---- ---- ---- ----%0.1----^ Exchangeable Magnesium Percent1.7---- ---- ---- ----%0.1----^ Exchangeable Potassium Percent1.9---- ---- ---- ----.0.1----^ Calcium/Magnesium Ratio

ED042T: Total Sulfur by LECO0.73---- ---- ---- ----%0.01----Sulfur - Total as S (LECO)

ED093S: Soluble Major Cations60---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg107440-70-2Calcium240---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg107439-95-4Magnesium520---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg107440-23-5Sodium90---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg107440-09-7Potassium

EG005S : Soluble Metals by ICPAES<1---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg17429-90-5Aluminium

<0.1---- ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.17439-96-5Manganese

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES----98 ---- ---- ----mg/kg57440-38-2Arsenic----2 ---- ---- ----mg/kg17440-43-9Cadmium----593 ---- ---- ----mg/kg57440-50-8Copper----288 ---- ---- ----mg/kg57439-92-1Lead----<2 ---- ---- ----mg/kg27439-98-7Molybdenum----55 ---- ---- ----mg/kg27440-02-0Nickel----<5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg57782-49-2Selenium----<2 ---- ---- ----mg/kg27440-22-4Silver

Page 156: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

54 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP12 (1.9-2.0)TP12 (1.4-1.5)TP12 (0.4-0.5)TP11 (1.9-2.0)TP11 (1.7-1.8)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-056EM1008731-055EM1008731-054EM1008731-053EM1008731-052UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES - Continued----170 ---- ---- ----mg/kg57440-31-5Tin----917 ---- ---- ----mg/kg57440-66-6Zinc100---- 42 36 111mg/kg57440-38-2Arsenic6---- 2 <1 <1mg/kg17440-43-9Cadmium

119---- 33 22 38mg/kg27440-47-3Chromium1190---- 343 33 19mg/kg57440-50-8Copper688---- 431 60 30mg/kg57439-92-1Lead84---- 69 48 27mg/kg27440-02-0Nickel

2080---- 2550 200 44mg/kg57440-66-6Zinc

EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS1.20.6 0.6 0.1 0.1mg/kg0.17439-97-6Mercury

EG048: Hexavalent Chromium (Alkaline Digest)----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.518540-29-9Hexavalent Chromium

EK025G: Free cyanide by Discrete Analyser-------- ---- ---- <1mg/kg1----Free Cyanide

EK026G: Total Cyanide By Discrete Analyser----<1 ---- ---- <1mg/kg157-12-5Total Cyanide

EK040T: Fluoride Total----320 ---- ---- ----mg/kg4016984-48-8Fluoride

EP004: Organic Matter6.1---- ---- ---- ----%0.5----^ Total Organic Carbon

EP066: Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)----<5.00 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.10----Total Polychlorinated biphenyls

EP074A: Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons----<0.2 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.271-43-2Benzene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5108-88-3Toluene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5100-41-4Ethylbenzene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5108-38-3 106-42-3meta- & para-Xylene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5100-42-5Styrene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.595-47-6ortho-Xylene----<0.2 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.2----^ Sum of monocyclic aromatic

hydrocarbons----<0.2 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.2----^ Sum of monocyclic aromatic

hydrocarbons

EP074I: Volatile Halogenated Compounds----<0.02 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0275-01-4Vinyl chloride----<0.01 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0175-35-41.1-Dichloroethene

Page 157: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

55 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP12 (1.9-2.0)TP12 (1.4-1.5)TP12 (0.4-0.5)TP11 (1.9-2.0)TP11 (1.7-1.8)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-056EM1008731-055EM1008731-054EM1008731-053EM1008731-052UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP074I: Volatile Halogenated Compounds - Continued----<0.6 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.475-09-2Methylene chloride----<0.02 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.02156-60-5trans-1.2-Dichloroethene----<0.01 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.01156-59-2cis-1.2-Dichloroethene----<0.02 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0267-66-3Chloroform----<0.01 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0171-55-61.1.1-Trichloroethane----<0.01 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0156-23-5Carbon Tetrachloride----<0.02 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.02107-06-21.2-Dichloroethane----<0.02 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0279-01-6Trichloroethene----<0.04 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0479-00-51.1.2-Trichloroethane----<0.02 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.02127-18-4Tetrachloroethene----<0.01 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.01630-20-61.1.1.2-Tetrachloroethane----<0.02 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0279-34-51.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane----<0.02 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0287-68-3Hexachlorobutadiene----<0.02 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.02108-90-7Chlorobenzene----<0.02 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.02106-46-71.4-Dichlorobenzene----<0.02 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0295-50-11.2-Dichlorobenzene----<0.01 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.01120-82-11.2.4-Trichlorobenzene----<0.01 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of volatile chlorinated

hydrocarbons----<0.01 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of other chlorinated hydrocarbons

(VIC EPA 448.3)----<0.01 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of volatile chlorinated

hydrocarbons----<0.01 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of other chlorinated hydrocarbons

(VIC EPA 448.3)----<0.50 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.501330-20-7^ Total Xylenes

EP075(SIM)A: Phenolic Compounds<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5108-95-2Phenol<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.595-57-82-Chlorophenol<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.595-48-72-Methylphenol<1.0---- ---- ---- <1.0mg/kg1.01319-77-33- & 4-Methylphenol<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.588-75-52-Nitrophenol<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5105-67-92.4-Dimethylphenol<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5120-83-22.4-Dichlorophenol<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.587-65-02.6-Dichlorophenol<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.559-50-74-Chloro-3-Methylphenol<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.588-06-22.4.6-Trichlorophenol<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.595-95-42.4.5-Trichlorophenol

Page 158: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

56 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP12 (1.9-2.0)TP12 (1.4-1.5)TP12 (0.4-0.5)TP11 (1.9-2.0)TP11 (1.7-1.8)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-056EM1008731-055EM1008731-054EM1008731-053EM1008731-052UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP075(SIM)A: Phenolic Compounds - Continued<2.0---- ---- ---- <2.0mg/kg2.087-86-5Pentachlorophenol

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons<0.5---- ---- <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.591-20-3Naphthalene-------- ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5208-96-8Acenaphthylene-------- ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.583-32-9Acenaphthene

<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5208-96-8Acenaphthylene<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.583-32-9Acenaphthene-------- ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.586-73-7Fluorene

<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.586-73-7Fluorene-------- ---- 2.6 ----mg/kg0.585-01-8Phenanthrene-------- ---- 0.7 ----mg/kg0.5120-12-7Anthracene

<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.585-01-8Phenanthrene<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5120-12-7Anthracene-------- ---- 5.0 ----mg/kg0.5206-44-0Fluoranthene

<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5206-44-0Fluoranthene-------- ---- 4.9 ----mg/kg0.5129-00-0Pyrene-------- ---- 2.4 ----mg/kg0.556-55-3Benz(a)anthracene0.7---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5129-00-0Pyrene

<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.556-55-3Benz(a)anthracene-------- ---- 2.4 ----mg/kg0.5218-01-9Chrysene-------- ---- 2.8 ----mg/kg0.5205-99-2Benzo(b)fluoranthene

<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5218-01-9Chrysene<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5205-99-2Benzo(b)fluoranthene-------- ---- 0.8 ----mg/kg0.5207-08-9Benzo(k)fluoranthene-------- ---- 2.3 ----mg/kg0.550-32-8Benzo(a)pyrene

<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5207-08-9Benzo(k)fluoranthene<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.550-32-8Benzo(a)pyrene-------- ---- 1.3 ----mg/kg0.5193-39-5Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene-------- ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.553-70-3Dibenz(a.h)anthracene

<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5193-39-5Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene-------- ---- 1.6 ----mg/kg0.5191-24-2Benzo(g.h.i)perylene

<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.553-70-3Dibenz(a.h)anthracene<0.5---- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5191-24-2Benzo(g.h.i)perylene

EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Halogenated)----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0395-57-82-Chlorophenol----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03120-83-22.4-Dichlorophenol----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0387-65-02.6-Dichlorophenol----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0359-50-74-Chloro-3-Methylphenol

Page 159: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

57 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP12 (1.9-2.0)TP12 (1.4-1.5)TP12 (0.4-0.5)TP11 (1.9-2.0)TP11 (1.7-1.8)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-056EM1008731-055EM1008731-054EM1008731-053EM1008731-052UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Halogenated) - Continued----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0595-95-42.4.5-Trichlorophenol----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0588-06-22.4.6-Trichlorophenol----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03935-95-52.3.5.6-Tetrachlorophenol----<0.24 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.054901-51-3/58-90-22.3.4.5 &

2.3.4.6-Tetrachlorophenol----<0.2 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.287-86-5Pentachlorophenol----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03----^ Sum of Phenols (halogenated)

EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Non-halogenated)----<1 ---- ---- ----mg/kg1108-95-2Phenol----<1 ---- ---- ----mg/kg195-48-72-Methylphenol----<1 ---- ---- ----mg/kg11319-77-33- & 4-Methylphenol----<1 ---- ---- ----mg/kg188-75-52-Nitrophenol----<1 ---- ---- ----mg/kg1105-67-92.4-Dimethylphenol----<9 ---- ---- ----mg/kg551-28-52.4-Dinitrophenol----<9 ---- ---- ----mg/kg5100-02-74-Nitrophenol----<9 ---- ---- ----mg/kg58071-51-02-Methyl-4.6-dinitrophenol----<9 ---- ---- ----mg/kg588-85-7Dinoseb----<9 ---- ---- ----mg/kg5131-89-52-Cyclohexyl-4.6-Dinitrophenol----<1 ---- ---- ----mg/kg1----^ Sum of Phenols (non-halogenated)

EP075B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.591-20-3Naphthalene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.583-32-9Acenaphthene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5208-96-8Acenaphthylene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.586-73-7Fluorene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.585-01-8Phenanthrene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5120-12-7Anthracene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5206-44-0Fluoranthene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5129-00-0Pyrene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.556-55-3Benz(a)anthracene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5218-01-9Chrysene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5205-99-2 207-08-9Benzo(b) &

Benzo(k)fluoranthene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.550-32-8Benzo(a)pyrene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5193-39-5Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.553-70-3Dibenz(a.h)anthracene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5191-24-2Benzo(g.h.i)perylene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5----^ Sum of polycyclic aromatic

hydrocarbons

Page 160: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

58 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP12 (1.9-2.0)TP12 (1.4-1.5)TP12 (0.4-0.5)TP11 (1.9-2.0)TP11 (1.7-1.8)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-056EM1008731-055EM1008731-054EM1008731-053EM1008731-052UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP075I: Organochlorine Pesticides----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03319-84-6alpha-BHC----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03118-74-1Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03319-85-7beta-BHC----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0358-89-9gamma-BHC----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03319-86-8delta-BHC----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0376-44-8Heptachlor----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03309-00-2Aldrin----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.031024-57-3Heptachlor epoxide----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.035103-71-9cis-Chlordane----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.035103-74-2trans-Chlordane----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03959-98-8Endosulfan 1----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0572-55-94.4`-DDE----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0360-57-1Dieldrin----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.037421-93-4Endrin aldehyde----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0372-20-8Endrin----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0333213-65-9Endosulfan 2----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0572-54-84.4`-DDD----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.031031-07-8Endosulfan sulfate----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0550-29-34.4`-DDT----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0372-43-5Methoxychlor----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03----^ Sum of organochlorine pesticides----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03309-00-2/60-57-1^ Sum of Aldrin + Dieldrin----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.05----^ Sum of DDD + DDE + DDT----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.0357-74-9^ Chlordane----<0.12 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.03----^ Sum of other organochlorine

pesticides

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons----<10 ---- ---- ----mg/kg10----C6 - C9 Fraction<10---- ---- <10 <10mg/kg10----C6 - C9 Fraction70<50 ---- <50 <50mg/kg50----C10 - C14 Fraction

1760680 ---- 240 130mg/kg100----C15 - C28 Fraction30801710 ---- 500 120mg/kg100----C29 - C36 Fraction49102390 ---- 740 250mg/kg50----^ C10 - C36 Fraction (sum)

EP080: BTEX<0.2---- ---- <0.2 <0.2mg/kg0.271-43-2Benzene<0.5---- ---- <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.5108-88-3Toluene<0.5---- ---- <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.5100-41-4Ethylbenzene<0.5---- ---- <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.5108-38-3 106-42-3meta- & para-Xylene

Page 161: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

59 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP12 (1.9-2.0)TP12 (1.4-1.5)TP12 (0.4-0.5)TP11 (1.9-2.0)TP11 (1.7-1.8)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-056EM1008731-055EM1008731-054EM1008731-053EM1008731-052UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP080: BTEX - Continued<0.5---- ---- <0.5 <0.5mg/kg0.595-47-6ortho-Xylene

EP066S: PCB Surrogate----41.0 ---- ---- ----%0.12051-24-3Decachlorobiphenyl

EP074S: VOC Surrogates----92.2 ---- ---- ----%0.117060-07-01.2-Dichloroethane-D4----79.8 ---- ---- ----%0.12037-26-5Toluene-D8----83.9 ---- ---- ----%0.1460-00-44-Bromofluorobenzene

EP075(SIM)S: Phenolic Compound Surrogates85.0---- ---- 95.1 88.3%0.113127-88-3Phenol-d691.1---- ---- 82.7 95.1%0.193951-73-62-Chlorophenol-D480.4---- ---- 87.4 84.6%0.1118-79-62.4.6-Tribromophenol

EP075(SIM)T: PAH Surrogates87.9---- ---- 99.6 92.5%0.1321-60-82-Fluorobiphenyl87.0---- ---- 99.6 86.4%0.11719-06-8Anthracene-d1084.6---- ---- 97.4 90.1%0.11718-51-04-Terphenyl-d14

EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates----Not Determined ---- ---- ----%0.1367-12-42-Fluorophenol----Not Determined ---- ---- ----%0.113127-88-3Phenol-d6----Not Determined ---- ---- ----%0.193951-73-62-Chlorophenol-D4----Not Determined ---- ---- ----%0.1118-79-62.4.6-Tribromophenol

EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates----Not Determined ---- ---- ----%0.14165-60-0Nitrobenzene-D5----Not Determined ---- ---- ----%0.12199-69-11.2-Dichlorobenzene-D4----Not Determined ---- ---- ----%0.1321-60-82-Fluorobiphenyl----Not Determined ---- ---- ----%0.11719-06-8Anthracene-d10----Not Determined ---- ---- ----%0.11718-51-04-Terphenyl-d14

EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates80.6---- ---- 88.6 95.2%0.117060-07-01.2-Dichloroethane-D474.8---- ---- 81.9 87.2%0.12037-26-5Toluene-D871.6---- ---- 83.9 89.8%0.1460-00-44-Bromofluorobenzene

Page 162: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

60 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP13 (1.5-1.6)TP13 (0.4-0.5)TP13 (0-0.1)DUP3TP12 (2.4-2.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-061EM1008731-060EM1008731-059EM1008731-058EM1008731-057UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EA055: Moisture Content36.533.6 35.4 17.4 24.0%1.0----^ Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C)

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES-------- ---- ---- 112mg/kg57440-38-2Arsenic-------- ---- ---- <1mg/kg17440-43-9Cadmium-------- ---- ---- 60mg/kg57440-50-8Copper-------- ---- ---- 93mg/kg57439-92-1Lead-------- ---- ---- <2mg/kg27439-98-7Molybdenum-------- ---- ---- 44mg/kg27440-02-0Nickel-------- ---- ---- <5mg/kg57782-49-2Selenium-------- ---- ---- <2mg/kg27440-22-4Silver-------- ---- ---- 33mg/kg57440-31-5Tin-------- ---- ---- 147mg/kg57440-66-6Zinc5474 90 8 ----mg/kg57440-38-2Arsenic<11 3 <1 ----mg/kg17440-43-9Cadmium3297 85 36 ----mg/kg27440-47-3Chromium4798 267 24 ----mg/kg57440-50-8Copper122142 320 38 ----mg/kg57439-92-1Lead3949 66 49 ----mg/kg27440-02-0Nickel378472 560 88 ----mg/kg57440-66-6Zinc

EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS0.40.3 0.5 <0.1 0.4mg/kg0.17439-97-6Mercury

EG048: Hexavalent Chromium (Alkaline Digest)-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.518540-29-9Hexavalent Chromium

EK026G: Total Cyanide By Discrete Analyser-------- ---- ---- 1mg/kg157-12-5Total Cyanide

EK040T: Fluoride Total-------- ---- ---- 160mg/kg4016984-48-8Fluoride

EP066: Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)-------- ---- ---- <5.00mg/kg0.10----Total Polychlorinated biphenyls

EP074A: Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons-------- ---- ---- <0.2mg/kg0.271-43-2Benzene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5108-88-3Toluene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5100-41-4Ethylbenzene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5108-38-3 106-42-3meta- & para-Xylene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5100-42-5Styrene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.595-47-6ortho-Xylene

Page 163: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

61 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP13 (1.5-1.6)TP13 (0.4-0.5)TP13 (0-0.1)DUP3TP12 (2.4-2.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-061EM1008731-060EM1008731-059EM1008731-058EM1008731-057UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP074A: Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons - Continued-------- ---- ---- <0.2mg/kg0.2----^ Sum of monocyclic aromatic

hydrocarbons-------- ---- ---- <0.2mg/kg0.2----^ Sum of monocyclic aromatic

hydrocarbons

EP074I: Volatile Halogenated Compounds-------- ---- ---- <0.02mg/kg0.0275-01-4Vinyl chloride-------- ---- ---- <0.01mg/kg0.0175-35-41.1-Dichloroethene-------- ---- ---- <0.6mg/kg0.475-09-2Methylene chloride-------- ---- ---- <0.02mg/kg0.02156-60-5trans-1.2-Dichloroethene-------- ---- ---- <0.01mg/kg0.01156-59-2cis-1.2-Dichloroethene-------- ---- ---- <0.02mg/kg0.0267-66-3Chloroform-------- ---- ---- <0.01mg/kg0.0171-55-61.1.1-Trichloroethane-------- ---- ---- <0.01mg/kg0.0156-23-5Carbon Tetrachloride-------- ---- ---- <0.02mg/kg0.02107-06-21.2-Dichloroethane-------- ---- ---- <0.02mg/kg0.0279-01-6Trichloroethene-------- ---- ---- <0.04mg/kg0.0479-00-51.1.2-Trichloroethane-------- ---- ---- <0.02mg/kg0.02127-18-4Tetrachloroethene-------- ---- ---- <0.01mg/kg0.01630-20-61.1.1.2-Tetrachloroethane-------- ---- ---- <0.02mg/kg0.0279-34-51.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane-------- ---- ---- <0.02mg/kg0.0287-68-3Hexachlorobutadiene-------- ---- ---- <0.02mg/kg0.02108-90-7Chlorobenzene-------- ---- ---- <0.02mg/kg0.02106-46-71.4-Dichlorobenzene-------- ---- ---- <0.02mg/kg0.0295-50-11.2-Dichlorobenzene-------- ---- ---- <0.01mg/kg0.01120-82-11.2.4-Trichlorobenzene-------- ---- ---- <0.01mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of volatile chlorinated

hydrocarbons-------- ---- ---- <0.01mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of other chlorinated hydrocarbons

(VIC EPA 448.3)-------- ---- ---- <0.01mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of volatile chlorinated

hydrocarbons-------- ---- ---- <0.01mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of other chlorinated hydrocarbons

(VIC EPA 448.3)-------- ---- ---- <0.50mg/kg0.501330-20-7^ Total Xylenes

EP075(SIM)A: Phenolic Compounds<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5108-95-2Phenol<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.595-57-82-Chlorophenol<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.595-48-72-Methylphenol<1.0<1.0 ---- ---- ----mg/kg1.01319-77-33- & 4-Methylphenol

Page 164: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

62 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP13 (1.5-1.6)TP13 (0.4-0.5)TP13 (0-0.1)DUP3TP12 (2.4-2.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-061EM1008731-060EM1008731-059EM1008731-058EM1008731-057UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP075(SIM)A: Phenolic Compounds - Continued<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.588-75-52-Nitrophenol<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5105-67-92.4-Dimethylphenol<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5120-83-22.4-Dichlorophenol<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.587-65-02.6-Dichlorophenol<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.559-50-74-Chloro-3-Methylphenol<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.588-06-22.4.6-Trichlorophenol<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.595-95-42.4.5-Trichlorophenol<2.0<2.0 ---- ---- ----mg/kg2.087-86-5Pentachlorophenol

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons<0.5<0.5 ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.591-20-3Naphthalene-------- ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5208-96-8Acenaphthylene-------- ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.583-32-9Acenaphthene

<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5208-96-8Acenaphthylene<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.583-32-9Acenaphthene-------- ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.586-73-7Fluorene

<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.586-73-7Fluorene-------- ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.585-01-8Phenanthrene-------- ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5120-12-7Anthracene

<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.585-01-8Phenanthrene<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5120-12-7Anthracene-------- ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5206-44-0Fluoranthene0.6<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5206-44-0Fluoranthene-------- ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5129-00-0Pyrene-------- ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.556-55-3Benz(a)anthracene1.00.6 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5129-00-0Pyrene

<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.556-55-3Benz(a)anthracene-------- ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5218-01-9Chrysene-------- ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5205-99-2Benzo(b)fluoranthene0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5218-01-9Chrysene0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5205-99-2Benzo(b)fluoranthene-------- ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5207-08-9Benzo(k)fluoranthene-------- ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.550-32-8Benzo(a)pyrene

<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5207-08-9Benzo(k)fluoranthene<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.550-32-8Benzo(a)pyrene-------- ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5193-39-5Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene-------- ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.553-70-3Dibenz(a.h)anthracene

<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5193-39-5Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene-------- ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5191-24-2Benzo(g.h.i)perylene

Page 165: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

63 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP13 (1.5-1.6)TP13 (0.4-0.5)TP13 (0-0.1)DUP3TP12 (2.4-2.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-061EM1008731-060EM1008731-059EM1008731-058EM1008731-057UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons - Continued<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.553-70-3Dibenz(a.h)anthracene<0.5<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5191-24-2Benzo(g.h.i)perylene

EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Halogenated)-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.0395-57-82-Chlorophenol-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.03120-83-22.4-Dichlorophenol-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.0387-65-02.6-Dichlorophenol-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.0359-50-74-Chloro-3-Methylphenol-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.0595-95-42.4.5-Trichlorophenol-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.0588-06-22.4.6-Trichlorophenol-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.03935-95-52.3.5.6-Tetrachlorophenol-------- ---- ---- <0.23mg/kg0.054901-51-3/58-90-22.3.4.5 &

2.3.4.6-Tetrachlorophenol-------- ---- ---- <0.2mg/kg0.287-86-5Pentachlorophenol-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.03----^ Sum of Phenols (halogenated)

EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Non-halogenated)-------- ---- ---- <1mg/kg1108-95-2Phenol-------- ---- ---- <1mg/kg195-48-72-Methylphenol-------- ---- ---- <1mg/kg11319-77-33- & 4-Methylphenol-------- ---- ---- <1mg/kg188-75-52-Nitrophenol-------- ---- ---- <1mg/kg1105-67-92.4-Dimethylphenol-------- ---- ---- <9mg/kg551-28-52.4-Dinitrophenol-------- ---- ---- <9mg/kg5100-02-74-Nitrophenol-------- ---- ---- <9mg/kg58071-51-02-Methyl-4.6-dinitrophenol-------- ---- ---- <9mg/kg588-85-7Dinoseb-------- ---- ---- <9mg/kg5131-89-52-Cyclohexyl-4.6-Dinitrophenol-------- ---- ---- <1mg/kg1----^ Sum of Phenols (non-halogenated)

EP075B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.591-20-3Naphthalene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.583-32-9Acenaphthene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5208-96-8Acenaphthylene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.586-73-7Fluorene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.585-01-8Phenanthrene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5120-12-7Anthracene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5206-44-0Fluoranthene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5129-00-0Pyrene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.556-55-3Benz(a)anthracene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5218-01-9Chrysene

Page 166: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

64 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP13 (1.5-1.6)TP13 (0.4-0.5)TP13 (0-0.1)DUP3TP12 (2.4-2.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-061EM1008731-060EM1008731-059EM1008731-058EM1008731-057UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP075B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons - Continued-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5205-99-2 207-08-9Benzo(b) &

Benzo(k)fluoranthene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.550-32-8Benzo(a)pyrene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5193-39-5Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.553-70-3Dibenz(a.h)anthracene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5191-24-2Benzo(g.h.i)perylene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5----^ Sum of polycyclic aromatic

hydrocarbons

EP075I: Organochlorine Pesticides-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.03319-84-6alpha-BHC-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.03118-74-1Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.03319-85-7beta-BHC-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.0358-89-9gamma-BHC-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.03319-86-8delta-BHC-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.0376-44-8Heptachlor-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.03309-00-2Aldrin-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.031024-57-3Heptachlor epoxide-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.035103-71-9cis-Chlordane-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.035103-74-2trans-Chlordane-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.03959-98-8Endosulfan 1-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.0572-55-94.4`-DDE-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.0360-57-1Dieldrin-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.037421-93-4Endrin aldehyde-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.0372-20-8Endrin-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.0333213-65-9Endosulfan 2-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.0572-54-84.4`-DDD-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.031031-07-8Endosulfan sulfate-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.0550-29-34.4`-DDT-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.0372-43-5Methoxychlor-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.03----^ Sum of organochlorine pesticides-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.03309-00-2/60-57-1^ Sum of Aldrin + Dieldrin-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.05----^ Sum of DDD + DDE + DDT-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.0357-74-9^ Chlordane-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.03----^ Sum of other organochlorine

pesticides

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons-------- ---- ---- <10mg/kg10----C6 - C9 Fraction<10<10 ---- <10 ----mg/kg10----C6 - C9 Fraction

Page 167: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

65 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP13 (1.5-1.6)TP13 (0.4-0.5)TP13 (0-0.1)DUP3TP12 (2.4-2.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-061EM1008731-060EM1008731-059EM1008731-058EM1008731-057UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Continued<50<50 ---- <50 <50mg/kg50----C10 - C14 Fraction

<100170 ---- <100 <100mg/kg100----C15 - C28 Fraction<100130 ---- <100 <100mg/kg100----C29 - C36 Fraction<50300 ---- <50 <50mg/kg50----^ C10 - C36 Fraction (sum)

EP080: BTEX<0.2<0.2 ---- <0.2 ----mg/kg0.271-43-2Benzene<0.5<0.5 ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5108-88-3Toluene<0.5<0.5 ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5100-41-4Ethylbenzene<0.5<0.5 ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.5108-38-3 106-42-3meta- & para-Xylene<0.5<0.5 ---- <0.5 ----mg/kg0.595-47-6ortho-Xylene

EP066S: PCB Surrogate-------- ---- ---- 62.2%0.12051-24-3Decachlorobiphenyl

EP074S: VOC Surrogates-------- ---- ---- 101%0.117060-07-01.2-Dichloroethane-D4-------- ---- ---- 89.8%0.12037-26-5Toluene-D8-------- ---- ---- 101%0.1460-00-44-Bromofluorobenzene

EP075(SIM)S: Phenolic Compound Surrogates93.496.3 ---- 92.3 ----%0.113127-88-3Phenol-d680.898.9 ---- 94.7 ----%0.193951-73-62-Chlorophenol-D485.786.0 ---- 78.5 ----%0.1118-79-62.4.6-Tribromophenol

EP075(SIM)T: PAH Surrogates96.799.1 ---- 98.5 ----%0.1321-60-82-Fluorobiphenyl87.288.3 ---- 99.0 ----%0.11719-06-8Anthracene-d1089.693.0 ---- 91.6 ----%0.11718-51-04-Terphenyl-d14

EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates-------- ---- ---- Not Determined%0.1367-12-42-Fluorophenol-------- ---- ---- Not Determined%0.113127-88-3Phenol-d6-------- ---- ---- Not Determined%0.193951-73-62-Chlorophenol-D4-------- ---- ---- Not Determined%0.1118-79-62.4.6-Tribromophenol

EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates-------- ---- ---- Not Determined%0.14165-60-0Nitrobenzene-D5-------- ---- ---- Not Determined%0.12199-69-11.2-Dichlorobenzene-D4-------- ---- ---- Not Determined%0.1321-60-82-Fluorobiphenyl-------- ---- ---- Not Determined%0.11719-06-8Anthracene-d10-------- ---- ---- Not Determined%0.11718-51-04-Terphenyl-d14

EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates96.088.8 ---- 89.2 ----%0.117060-07-01.2-Dichloroethane-D4

Page 168: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

66 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP13 (1.5-1.6)TP13 (0.4-0.5)TP13 (0-0.1)DUP3TP12 (2.4-2.5)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-061EM1008731-060EM1008731-059EM1008731-058EM1008731-057UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates - Continued88.284.9 ---- 89.0 ----%0.12037-26-5Toluene-D892.386.8 ---- 90.1 ----%0.1460-00-44-Bromofluorobenzene

Page 169: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

67 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP5 (2.0-2.1)TP14 (2.8-2.9)TP14 (1.6-1.7)TP14 (0.9-1.0)TP13 (2.0-2.1)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-068EM1008731-067EM1008731-065EM1008731-064EM1008731-062UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EA055: Moisture Content13.735.8 26.6 26.8 41.3%1.0----^ Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C)

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES-------- ---- ---- 28mg/kg57440-38-2Arsenic-------- ---- ---- 2mg/kg17440-43-9Cadmium-------- ---- ---- 171mg/kg57440-50-8Copper-------- ---- ---- 104mg/kg57439-92-1Lead-------- ---- ---- <2mg/kg27439-98-7Molybdenum-------- ---- ---- 7mg/kg27440-02-0Nickel-------- ---- ---- <5mg/kg57782-49-2Selenium-------- ---- ---- <2mg/kg27440-22-4Silver-------- ---- ---- 10mg/kg57440-31-5Tin-------- ---- ---- 310mg/kg57440-66-6Zinc1487 <5 119 ----mg/kg57440-38-2Arsenic4<1 <1 2 ----mg/kg17440-43-9Cadmium

9297 <2 68 ----mg/kg27440-47-3Chromium56821 <5 175 ----mg/kg57440-50-8Copper35438 <5 233 ----mg/kg57439-92-1Lead10717 <2 69 ----mg/kg27440-02-0Nickel

1130109 <5 804 ----mg/kg57440-66-6Zinc

EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS0.60.1 0.6 0.5 2.6mg/kg0.17439-97-6Mercury

EG048: Hexavalent Chromium (Alkaline Digest)-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.518540-29-9Hexavalent Chromium

EK025G: Free cyanide by Discrete Analyser-------- <1 ---- ----mg/kg1----Free Cyanide

EK026G: Total Cyanide By Discrete Analyser-------- <1 ---- 19mg/kg157-12-5Total Cyanide

EK040T: Fluoride Total-------- ---- ---- 190mg/kg4016984-48-8Fluoride

EP066: Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)-------- ---- ---- <5.00mg/kg0.10----Total Polychlorinated biphenyls

EP074A: Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons-------- ---- ---- <0.2mg/kg0.271-43-2Benzene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5108-88-3Toluene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5100-41-4Ethylbenzene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5108-38-3 106-42-3meta- & para-Xylene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5100-42-5Styrene

Page 170: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

68 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP5 (2.0-2.1)TP14 (2.8-2.9)TP14 (1.6-1.7)TP14 (0.9-1.0)TP13 (2.0-2.1)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-068EM1008731-067EM1008731-065EM1008731-064EM1008731-062UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP074A: Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons - Continued-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.595-47-6ortho-Xylene-------- ---- ---- <0.2mg/kg0.2----^ Sum of monocyclic aromatic

hydrocarbons-------- ---- ---- <0.2mg/kg0.2----^ Sum of monocyclic aromatic

hydrocarbons

EP074I: Volatile Halogenated Compounds-------- ---- ---- <0.02mg/kg0.0275-01-4Vinyl chloride-------- ---- ---- <0.01mg/kg0.0175-35-41.1-Dichloroethene-------- ---- ---- <0.8mg/kg0.475-09-2Methylene chloride-------- ---- ---- <0.02mg/kg0.02156-60-5trans-1.2-Dichloroethene-------- ---- ---- <0.01mg/kg0.01156-59-2cis-1.2-Dichloroethene-------- ---- ---- <0.02mg/kg0.0267-66-3Chloroform-------- ---- ---- <0.01mg/kg0.0171-55-61.1.1-Trichloroethane-------- ---- ---- <0.01mg/kg0.0156-23-5Carbon Tetrachloride-------- ---- ---- <0.02mg/kg0.02107-06-21.2-Dichloroethane-------- ---- ---- <0.02mg/kg0.0279-01-6Trichloroethene-------- ---- ---- <0.04mg/kg0.0479-00-51.1.2-Trichloroethane-------- ---- ---- <0.02mg/kg0.02127-18-4Tetrachloroethene-------- ---- ---- <0.01mg/kg0.01630-20-61.1.1.2-Tetrachloroethane-------- ---- ---- <0.02mg/kg0.0279-34-51.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane-------- ---- ---- <0.02mg/kg0.0287-68-3Hexachlorobutadiene-------- ---- ---- <0.02mg/kg0.02108-90-7Chlorobenzene-------- ---- ---- 0.04mg/kg0.02106-46-71.4-Dichlorobenzene-------- ---- ---- 0.03mg/kg0.0295-50-11.2-Dichlorobenzene-------- ---- ---- <0.01mg/kg0.01120-82-11.2.4-Trichlorobenzene-------- ---- ---- 0.07mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of volatile chlorinated

hydrocarbons-------- ---- ---- 0.07mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of other chlorinated hydrocarbons

(VIC EPA 448.3)-------- ---- ---- 0.07mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of volatile chlorinated

hydrocarbons-------- ---- ---- 0.07mg/kg0.01----^ Sum of other chlorinated hydrocarbons

(VIC EPA 448.3)-------- ---- ---- <0.50mg/kg0.501330-20-7^ Total Xylenes

EP075(SIM)A: Phenolic Compounds----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5108-95-2Phenol----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.595-57-82-Chlorophenol----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.595-48-72-Methylphenol

Page 171: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

69 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP5 (2.0-2.1)TP14 (2.8-2.9)TP14 (1.6-1.7)TP14 (0.9-1.0)TP13 (2.0-2.1)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-068EM1008731-067EM1008731-065EM1008731-064EM1008731-062UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP075(SIM)A: Phenolic Compounds - Continued----<1.0 ---- ---- ----mg/kg1.01319-77-33- & 4-Methylphenol----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.588-75-52-Nitrophenol----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5105-67-92.4-Dimethylphenol----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5120-83-22.4-Dichlorophenol----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.587-65-02.6-Dichlorophenol----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.559-50-74-Chloro-3-Methylphenol----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.588-06-22.4.6-Trichlorophenol----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.595-95-42.4.5-Trichlorophenol----<2.0 ---- ---- ----mg/kg2.087-86-5Pentachlorophenol

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons<0.5<0.5 <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.591-20-3Naphthalene<0.5---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5208-96-8Acenaphthylene<0.5---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.583-32-9Acenaphthene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5208-96-8Acenaphthylene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.583-32-9Acenaphthene

<0.5---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.586-73-7Fluorene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.586-73-7Fluorene

<0.5---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.585-01-8Phenanthrene<0.5---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5120-12-7Anthracene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.585-01-8Phenanthrene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5120-12-7Anthracene0.8---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5206-44-0Fluoranthene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5206-44-0Fluoranthene0.7---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5129-00-0Pyrene

<0.5---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.556-55-3Benz(a)anthracene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5129-00-0Pyrene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.556-55-3Benz(a)anthracene

<0.5---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5218-01-9Chrysene0.5---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5205-99-2Benzo(b)fluoranthene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5218-01-9Chrysene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5205-99-2Benzo(b)fluoranthene

<0.5---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5207-08-9Benzo(k)fluoranthene<0.5---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.550-32-8Benzo(a)pyrene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5207-08-9Benzo(k)fluoranthene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.550-32-8Benzo(a)pyrene

<0.5---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5193-39-5Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene<0.5---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.553-70-3Dibenz(a.h)anthracene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5193-39-5Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene

Page 172: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

70 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP5 (2.0-2.1)TP14 (2.8-2.9)TP14 (1.6-1.7)TP14 (0.9-1.0)TP13 (2.0-2.1)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-068EM1008731-067EM1008731-065EM1008731-064EM1008731-062UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons - Continued<0.5---- <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5191-24-2Benzo(g.h.i)perylene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.553-70-3Dibenz(a.h)anthracene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5191-24-2Benzo(g.h.i)perylene

EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Halogenated)-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.0395-57-82-Chlorophenol-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.03120-83-22.4-Dichlorophenol-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.0387-65-02.6-Dichlorophenol-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.0359-50-74-Chloro-3-Methylphenol-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.0595-95-42.4.5-Trichlorophenol-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.0588-06-22.4.6-Trichlorophenol-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.03935-95-52.3.5.6-Tetrachlorophenol-------- ---- ---- <0.24mg/kg0.054901-51-3/58-90-22.3.4.5 &

2.3.4.6-Tetrachlorophenol-------- ---- ---- <0.2mg/kg0.287-86-5Pentachlorophenol-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.03----^ Sum of Phenols (halogenated)

EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Non-halogenated)-------- ---- ---- <1mg/kg1108-95-2Phenol-------- ---- ---- <1mg/kg195-48-72-Methylphenol-------- ---- ---- <1mg/kg11319-77-33- & 4-Methylphenol-------- ---- ---- <1mg/kg188-75-52-Nitrophenol-------- ---- ---- <1mg/kg1105-67-92.4-Dimethylphenol-------- ---- ---- <10mg/kg551-28-52.4-Dinitrophenol-------- ---- ---- <10mg/kg5100-02-74-Nitrophenol-------- ---- ---- <10mg/kg58071-51-02-Methyl-4.6-dinitrophenol-------- ---- ---- <10mg/kg588-85-7Dinoseb-------- ---- ---- <10mg/kg5131-89-52-Cyclohexyl-4.6-Dinitrophenol-------- ---- ---- <1mg/kg1----^ Sum of Phenols (non-halogenated)

EP075B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.591-20-3Naphthalene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.583-32-9Acenaphthene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5208-96-8Acenaphthylene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.586-73-7Fluorene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.585-01-8Phenanthrene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5120-12-7Anthracene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5206-44-0Fluoranthene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5129-00-0Pyrene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.556-55-3Benz(a)anthracene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5218-01-9Chrysene

Page 173: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

71 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP5 (2.0-2.1)TP14 (2.8-2.9)TP14 (1.6-1.7)TP14 (0.9-1.0)TP13 (2.0-2.1)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-068EM1008731-067EM1008731-065EM1008731-064EM1008731-062UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP075B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons - Continued-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5205-99-2 207-08-9Benzo(b) &

Benzo(k)fluoranthene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.550-32-8Benzo(a)pyrene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5193-39-5Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.553-70-3Dibenz(a.h)anthracene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5191-24-2Benzo(g.h.i)perylene-------- ---- ---- <0.5mg/kg0.5----^ Sum of polycyclic aromatic

hydrocarbons

EP075I: Organochlorine Pesticides-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.03319-84-6alpha-BHC-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.03118-74-1Hexachlorobenzene (HCB)-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.03319-85-7beta-BHC-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.0358-89-9gamma-BHC-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.03319-86-8delta-BHC-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.0376-44-8Heptachlor-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.03309-00-2Aldrin-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.031024-57-3Heptachlor epoxide-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.035103-71-9cis-Chlordane-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.035103-74-2trans-Chlordane-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.03959-98-8Endosulfan 1-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.0572-55-94.4`-DDE-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.0360-57-1Dieldrin-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.037421-93-4Endrin aldehyde-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.0372-20-8Endrin-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.0333213-65-9Endosulfan 2-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.0572-54-84.4`-DDD-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.031031-07-8Endosulfan sulfate-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.0550-29-34.4`-DDT-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.0372-43-5Methoxychlor-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.03----^ Sum of organochlorine pesticides-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.03309-00-2/60-57-1^ Sum of Aldrin + Dieldrin-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.05----^ Sum of DDD + DDE + DDT-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.0357-74-9^ Chlordane-------- ---- ---- <0.12mg/kg0.03----^ Sum of other organochlorine

pesticides

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons-------- ---- ---- 30mg/kg10----C6 - C9 Fraction<10<10 <10 ---- ----mg/kg10----C6 - C9 Fraction

Page 174: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

72 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP5 (2.0-2.1)TP14 (2.8-2.9)TP14 (1.6-1.7)TP14 (0.9-1.0)TP13 (2.0-2.1)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-068EM1008731-067EM1008731-065EM1008731-064EM1008731-062UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Continued<50<50 <50 ---- 150mg/kg50----C10 - C14 Fraction270140 110 ---- 4760mg/kg100----C15 - C28 Fraction540140 280 ---- 7010mg/kg100----C29 - C36 Fraction810280 390 ---- 11900mg/kg50----^ C10 - C36 Fraction (sum)

EP080: BTEX<0.2<0.2 <0.2 ---- ----mg/kg0.271-43-2Benzene<0.5<0.5 <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5108-88-3Toluene<0.5<0.5 <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5100-41-4Ethylbenzene<0.5<0.5 <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.5108-38-3 106-42-3meta- & para-Xylene<0.5<0.5 <0.5 ---- ----mg/kg0.595-47-6ortho-Xylene

EP066S: PCB Surrogate-------- ---- ---- 44.4%0.12051-24-3Decachlorobiphenyl

EP074S: VOC Surrogates-------- ---- ---- 106%0.117060-07-01.2-Dichloroethane-D4-------- ---- ---- 88.0%0.12037-26-5Toluene-D8-------- ---- ---- 98.8%0.1460-00-44-Bromofluorobenzene

EP075(SIM)S: Phenolic Compound Surrogates88.789.4 92.2 ---- ----%0.113127-88-3Phenol-d693.796.4 93.6 ---- ----%0.193951-73-62-Chlorophenol-D478.481.8 80.2 ---- ----%0.1118-79-62.4.6-Tribromophenol

EP075(SIM)T: PAH Surrogates95.696.2 96.3 ---- ----%0.1321-60-82-Fluorobiphenyl85.297.0 95.0 ---- ----%0.11719-06-8Anthracene-d1091.192.7 91.3 ---- ----%0.11718-51-04-Terphenyl-d14

EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates-------- ---- ---- Not Determined%0.1367-12-42-Fluorophenol-------- ---- ---- Not Determined%0.113127-88-3Phenol-d6-------- ---- ---- Not Determined%0.193951-73-62-Chlorophenol-D4-------- ---- ---- Not Determined%0.1118-79-62.4.6-Tribromophenol

EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates-------- ---- ---- Not Determined%0.14165-60-0Nitrobenzene-D5-------- ---- ---- Not Determined%0.12199-69-11.2-Dichlorobenzene-D4-------- ---- ---- Not Determined%0.1321-60-82-Fluorobiphenyl-------- ---- ---- Not Determined%0.11719-06-8Anthracene-d10-------- ---- ---- Not Determined%0.11718-51-04-Terphenyl-d14

EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates98.991.2 93.0 ---- ----%0.117060-07-01.2-Dichloroethane-D4

Page 175: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

73 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical ResultsTP5 (2.0-2.1)TP14 (2.8-2.9)TP14 (1.6-1.7)TP14 (0.9-1.0)TP13 (2.0-2.1)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1008731-068EM1008731-067EM1008731-065EM1008731-064EM1008731-062UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates - Continued91.885.3 87.8 ---- ----%0.12037-26-5Toluene-D893.085.7 91.2 ---- ----%0.1460-00-44-Bromofluorobenzene

Page 176: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

74 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical Results--------TP10 (1.8-1.9)TP8 (2.0-2.1)TP11 (2.9-3.0)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL--------09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

--------EM1008731-071EM1008731-070EM1008731-069UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EA009: Nett Acid Production Potential-46.0---- 9.2 ---- ----kg H2SO4/t0.5----^ Net Acid Production Potential

EA013: Acid Neutralising Capacity50.0---- 8.9 ---- ----kg H2SO4

equiv./t0.5----ANC as H2SO4

EA029-A: pH Measurements-------- 8.6 ---- ----pH Unit0.1----pH KCl (23A)-------- 7.5 ---- ----pH Unit0.1----pH OX (23B)

EA029-B: Acidity Trail-------- <2 ---- ----mole H+ / t2----Titratable Actual Acidity (23F)-------- <2 ---- ----mole H+ / t2----Titratable Peroxide Acidity (23G)-------- <2 ---- ----mole H+ / t2----Titratable Sulfidic Acidity (23H)-------- <0.02 ---- ----% pyrite S0.02----sulfidic - Titratable Actual Acidity (s-23F)-------- <0.02 ---- ----% pyrite S0.02----sulfidic - Titratable Peroxide Acidity

(s-23G)-------- <0.02 ---- ----% pyrite S0.02----sulfidic - Titratable Sulfidic Acidity (s-23H)

EA029-C: Sulfur Trail-------- 0.30 ---- ----% S0.02----KCl Extractable Sulfur (23Ce)-------- 0.57 ---- ----% S0.02----Peroxide Sulfur (23De)-------- 0.27 ---- ----% S0.02----Peroxide Oxidisable Sulfur (23E)-------- 170 ---- ----mole H+ / t10----acidity - Peroxide Oxidisable Sulfur

(a-23E)

EA029-D: Calcium Values-------- 0.47 ---- ----% Ca0.02----KCl Extractable Calcium (23Vh)-------- 1.10 ---- ----% Ca0.02----Peroxide Calcium (23Wh)-------- 0.62 ---- ----% Ca0.02----Acid Reacted Calcium (23X)-------- 312 ---- ----mole H+ / t10----acidity - Acid Reacted Calcium (a-23X)-------- 0.50 ---- ----% S0.02----sulfidic - Acid Reacted Calcium (s-23X)

EA029-E: Magnesium Values-------- 0.05 ---- ----% Mg0.02----KCl Extractable Magnesium (23Sm)-------- 0.16 ---- ----% Mg0.02----Peroxide Magnesium (23Tm)-------- 0.11 ---- ----% Mg0.02----Acid Reacted Magnesium (23U)-------- 92 ---- ----mole H+ / t10----Acidity - Acid Reacted Magnesium (a-23U)-------- 0.15 ---- ----% S0.02----sulfidic - Acid Reacted Magnesium

(s-23U)

EA029-F: Excess Acid Neutralising Capacity-------- 0.94 ---- ----% CaCO30.02----Excess Acid Neutralising Capacity (23Q)

Page 177: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

75 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical Results--------TP10 (1.8-1.9)TP8 (2.0-2.1)TP11 (2.9-3.0)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL--------09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

--------EM1008731-071EM1008731-070EM1008731-069UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EA029-F: Excess Acid Neutralising Capacity - Continued-------- 188 ---- ----mole H+ / t10----acidity - Excess Acid Neutralising

Capacity (a-23Q)-------- 0.30 ---- ----% S0.02----sulfidic - Excess Acid Neutralising

Capacity (s-23Q)

EA029-H: Acid Base Accounting-------- 1.5 ---- -----0.5----ANC Fineness Factor-------- <0.02 ---- ----% S0.02----Net Acidity (sulfur units)-------- <10 ---- ----mole H+ / t10----Net Acidity (acidity units)-------- <1 ---- ----kg CaCO3/t1----Liming Rate

EA033-A: Actual Acidity-------- 8.6 ---- ----pH Unit0.1----pH KCl (23A)-------- <2 ---- ----mole H+ / t2----Titratable Actual Acidity (23F)-------- <0.02 ---- ----% pyrite S0.02----sulfidic - Titratable Actual Acidity (s-23F)

EA033-B: Potential Acidity-------- 0.153 ---- ----% S0.005----Chromium Reducible Sulfur (22B)-------- 95 ---- ----mole H+ / t10----acidity - Chromium Reducible Sulfur

(a-22B)

EA033-C: Acid Neutralising Capacity-------- 1.44 ---- ----% CaCO30.01----Acid Neutralising Capacity (19A2)-------- 287 ---- ----mole H+ / t10----acidity - Acid Neutralising Capacity

(a-19A2)-------- 0.46 ---- ----% pyrite S0.01----sulfidic - Acid Neutralising Capacity

(s-19A2)

EA033-E: Acid Base Accounting-------- 1.5 ---- -----0.5----ANC Fineness Factor-------- <0.02 ---- ----% S0.02----Net Acidity (sulfur units)-------- <10 ---- ----mole H+ / t10----Net Acidity (acidity units)-------- <1 ---- ----kg CaCO3/t1----Liming Rate

EA055: Moisture Content1.530.5 <1.0 ---- ----%1.0----^ Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C)

ED007: Exchangeable Cations30.8---- 23.4 ---- ----meq/100g0.1----^ Exchangeable Calcium14.1---- 3.6 ---- ----meq/100g0.1----^ Exchangeable Magnesium1.6---- 0.3 ---- ----meq/100g0.1----^ Exchangeable Potassium0.9---- 0.9 ---- ----meq/100g0.1----^ Exchangeable Sodium

47.4---- 28.3 ---- ----meq/100g0.1----^ Cation Exchange Capacity<0.1---- <0.1 ---- ----meq/100g0.1----^ Exchangeable Aluminium

Page 178: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

76 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical Results--------TP10 (1.8-1.9)TP8 (2.0-2.1)TP11 (2.9-3.0)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL--------09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

--------EM1008731-071EM1008731-070EM1008731-069UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

ED007: Exchangeable Cations - Continued64.9---- 82.6 ---- ----%0.1----^ Exchangeable Calcium Percent2.0---- 3.3 ---- ----%0.1----^ Exchangeable Sodium Percent

29.7---- 12.9 ---- ----%0.1----^ Exchangeable Magnesium Percent3.3---- 1.2 ---- ----%0.1----^ Exchangeable Potassium Percent2.2---- 6.4 ---- ----.0.1----^ Calcium/Magnesium Ratio

ED042T: Total Sulfur by LECO0.13---- 0.59 ---- ----%0.01----Sulfur - Total as S (LECO)

ED093S: Soluble Major Cations160---- 2360 ---- ----mg/kg107440-70-2Calcium120---- 330 ---- ----mg/kg107439-95-4Magnesium120---- 160 ---- ----mg/kg107440-23-5Sodium70---- 70 ---- ----mg/kg107440-09-7Potassium

EG005S : Soluble Metals by ICPAES<1---- <1 ---- ----mg/kg17429-90-5Aluminium0.9---- 5.6 ---- ----mg/kg0.17439-96-5Manganese

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES----15 ---- ---- ----mg/kg57440-38-2Arsenic----<1 ---- ---- ----mg/kg17440-43-9Cadmium----6 ---- ---- ----mg/kg27440-47-3Chromium----53 ---- ---- ----mg/kg57440-50-8Copper----24 ---- ---- ----mg/kg57439-92-1Lead----5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg27440-02-0Nickel----79 ---- ---- ----mg/kg57440-66-6Zinc

EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS----0.9 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.17439-97-6Mercury

EP004: Organic Matter1.2---- 1.5 ---- ----%0.5----^ Total Organic Carbon

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons----0.8 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.591-20-3Naphthalene----0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5208-96-8Acenaphthylene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.583-32-9Acenaphthene----1.3 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.586-73-7Fluorene----4.3 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.585-01-8Phenanthrene----1.0 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5120-12-7Anthracene----4.3 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5206-44-0Fluoranthene----4.2 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5129-00-0Pyrene----2.0 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.556-55-3Benz(a)anthracene

Page 179: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

77 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical Results--------TP10 (1.8-1.9)TP8 (2.0-2.1)TP11 (2.9-3.0)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL--------09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

--------EM1008731-071EM1008731-070EM1008731-069UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons - Continued----2.1 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5218-01-9Chrysene----2.3 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5205-99-2Benzo(b)fluoranthene----0.7 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5207-08-9Benzo(k)fluoranthene----1.8 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.550-32-8Benzo(a)pyrene----1.0 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5193-39-5Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.553-70-3Dibenz(a.h)anthracene----1.3 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5191-24-2Benzo(g.h.i)perylene

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons----<10 ---- ---- ----mg/kg10----C6 - C9 Fraction----<50 ---- ---- ----mg/kg50----C10 - C14 Fraction----1050 ---- ---- ----mg/kg100----C15 - C28 Fraction----1530 ---- ---- ----mg/kg100----C29 - C36 Fraction----2580 ---- ---- ----mg/kg50----^ C10 - C36 Fraction (sum)

EP080: BTEX----<0.2 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.271-43-2Benzene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5108-88-3Toluene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5100-41-4Ethylbenzene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.5108-38-3 106-42-3meta- & para-Xylene----<0.5 ---- ---- ----mg/kg0.595-47-6ortho-Xylene

EP075(SIM)S: Phenolic Compound Surrogates----102 ---- ---- ----%0.113127-88-3Phenol-d6----88.3 ---- ---- ----%0.193951-73-62-Chlorophenol-D4----89.9 ---- ---- ----%0.1118-79-62.4.6-Tribromophenol

EP075(SIM)T: PAH Surrogates----100 ---- ---- ----%0.1321-60-82-Fluorobiphenyl----91.9 ---- ---- ----%0.11719-06-8Anthracene-d10----100 ---- ---- ----%0.11718-51-04-Terphenyl-d14

EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates----100 ---- ---- ----%0.117060-07-01.2-Dichloroethane-D4----93.2 ---- ---- ----%0.12037-26-5Toluene-D8----95.8 ---- ---- ----%0.1460-00-44-Bromofluorobenzene

Page 180: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

78 of 78:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Surrogate Control LimitsRecovery Limits (%)Sub-Matrix: SOIL

Compound CAS Number Low High

EP066S: PCB SurrogateDecachlorobiphenyl 2051-24-3 42.4 131

EP074S: VOC Surrogates1.2-Dichloroethane-D4 17060-07-0 80.0 120Toluene-D8 2037-26-5 81.0 1174-Bromofluorobenzene 460-00-4 74.0 121

EP075(SIM)S: Phenolic Compound SurrogatesPhenol-d6 13127-88-3 48.5 123.52-Chlorophenol-D4 93951-73-6 51.8 129.72.4.6-Tribromophenol 118-79-6 26.8 126.6

EP075(SIM)T: PAH Surrogates2-Fluorobiphenyl 321-60-8 57.9 125.2Anthracene-d10 1719-06-8 62.6 135.54-Terphenyl-d14 1718-51-0 63.7 135.2

EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates2-Fluorophenol 367-12-4 16.0 142.2Phenol-d6 13127-88-3 20.1 125.82-Chlorophenol-D4 93951-73-6 19.9 122.92.4.6-Tribromophenol 118-79-6 10.0 134.6

EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable SurrogatesNitrobenzene-D5 4165-60-0 24.5 123.21.2-Dichlorobenzene-D4 2199-69-1 24.3 122.92-Fluorobiphenyl 321-60-8 35.1 125.3Anthracene-d10 1719-06-8 40.8 129.94-Terphenyl-d14 1718-51-0 39.1 141.3

EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates1.2-Dichloroethane-D4 17060-07-0 59.0 126.2Toluene-D8 2037-26-5 59.5 128.64-Bromofluorobenzene 460-00-4 56.4 129.9

Page 181: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

False

QUALITY CONTROL REPORTWork Order : EM1008731 Page : 1 of 28

:Amendment 1

:: LaboratoryClient Environmental Division MelbourneENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES

: :ContactContact MR JORDAN FRASER Steven McGrath:: AddressAddress P.O.BOX 2253

FOOTSCRAY VIC, AUSTRALIA 30114 Westall Rd Springvale VIC Australia 3171

:: E-mailE-mail [email protected] [email protected]:: TelephoneTelephone +61 03 96871666 +61-3-8549 9600:: FacsimileFacsimile +61 03 96871844 +61-3-8549 9601

:Project 210061 QC Level : NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirementSite : YARRAVILLE

:C-O-C number ---- Date Samples Received : 11-AUG-2010Sampler : JF Issue Date : 27-AUG-2010

:Order number ----71:No. of samples received

Quote number : EN/010/10 63:No. of samples analysed

This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. All pages of this report have been checked and approved for release. This Quality Control Report contains the following information:

l Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report; Relative Percentage Difference (RPD) and Acceptance Limitsl Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report ; Recovery and Acceptance Limitsl Matrix Spike (MS) Report; Recovery and Acceptance Limits

Page 182: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

NATA Accredited Laboratory 825

This document is issued in accordance with NATA

accreditation requirements.

Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025.

SignatoriesThis document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories indicated below. Electronic signing has been carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.Signatories Accreditation CategoryPosition

Emily Yuen Senior Organic Instrument Chemist OrganicsMyles.Clark Acid Sulfate Soils Supervisor Bne Acid Sulphate SoilsMyles.Clark Acid Sulfate Soils Supervisor InorganicsNancy Wang Senior Semivolatile Instrument Chemist OrganicsNikki Stepniewski Non-metallic Supervisor InorganicsStephen Hislop Senior Inorganic Chemist InorganicsStephen Hislop Senior Inorganic Chemist Stafford Minerals - AYXingbin Lin Senior Organic Chemist Organics

Page 183: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

3 of 28:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

General CommentsThe analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.

Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.

Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insuffient sample for analysis.

Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.

Anonymous = Refers to samples which are not specifically part of this work order but formed part of the QC process lotCAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society. LOR = Limit of reporting RPD = Relative Percentage Difference# = Indicates failed QC

Key :

Page 184: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

4 of 28:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) ReportThe quality control term Laboratory Duplicate refers to a randomly selected intralaboratory split. Laboratory duplicates provide information regarding method precision and sample heterogeneity. The permitted ranges for the Relative Percent Deviation (RPD) of Laboratory Duplicates are specified in ALS Method QWI -EN/38 and are dependent on the magnitude of results in comparison to the level of reporting: Result < 10 times LOR:- No Limit; Result between 10 and 20 times LOR:- 0% - 50%; Result > 20 times LOR:- 0% - 20%.

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report

Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%)

EA013: Acid Neutralising Capacity (QC Lot: 1456094)

EA013: ANC as H2SO4 ---- 0.5 kg H2SO4/t <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No LimitAnonymousEM1008659-001

EA029-A: pH Measurements (QC Lot: 1456095)

EA029: pH KCl (23A) ---- 0.1 pH Unit 7.5 7.7 2.6 0% - 20%TP4 (2.1-2.2)EM1008731-020

EA029: pH OX (23B) ---- 0.1 pH Unit 6.6 6.6 0.0 0% - 20%

EA029-B: Acidity Trail (QC Lot: 1456095)

EA029: sulfidic - Titratable Actual Acidity (s-23F) ---- 0.02 % pyrite S <0.02 <0.02 0.0 No LimitTP4 (2.1-2.2)EM1008731-020

EA029: sulfidic - Titratable Peroxide Acidity (s-23G)

---- 0.02 % pyrite S <0.02 <0.02 0.0 No Limit

EA029: sulfidic - Titratable Sulfidic Acidity (s-23H)

---- 0.02 % pyrite S <0.02 <0.02 0.0 No Limit

EA029: Titratable Actual Acidity (23F) ---- 2 mole H+ / t <2 <2 0.0 No Limit

EA029: Titratable Peroxide Acidity (23G) ---- 2 mole H+ / t <2 <2 0.0 No Limit

EA029: Titratable Sulfidic Acidity (23H) ---- 2 mole H+ / t <2 <2 0.0 No Limit

EA029-C: Sulfur Trail (QC Lot: 1456095)

EA029: KCl Extractable Sulfur (23Ce) ---- 0.02 % S 0.06 0.07 23.2 No LimitTP4 (2.1-2.2)EM1008731-020

EA029: Peroxide Sulfur (23De) ---- 0.02 % S 0.10 0.10 0.0 No Limit

EA029: Peroxide Oxidisable Sulfur (23E) ---- 0.02 % S 0.04 0.03 36.4 No Limit

EA029: acidity - Peroxide Oxidisable Sulfur (a-23E)

---- 10 mole H+ / t 26 18 36.4 No Limit

EA029-D: Calcium Values (QC Lot: 1456095)

EA029: KCl Extractable Calcium (23Vh) ---- 0.02 % Ca 0.25 0.35 30.7 0% - 50%TP4 (2.1-2.2)EM1008731-020

EA029: Peroxide Calcium (23Wh) ---- 0.02 % Ca 0.47 0.49 4.3 0% - 20%

EA029: Acid Reacted Calcium (23X) ---- 0.02 % Ca 0.21 0.14 40.4 No Limit

EA029: sulfidic - Acid Reacted Calcium (s-23X) ---- 0.02 % S 0.17 0.11 40.4 No Limit

EA029: acidity - Acid Reacted Calcium (a-23X) ---- 10 mole H+ / t 106 71 40.4 No Limit

EA029-E: Magnesium Values (QC Lot: 1456095)

EA029: KCl Extractable Magnesium (23Sm) ---- 0.02 % Mg 0.12 0.16 24.4 No LimitTP4 (2.1-2.2)EM1008731-020

EA029: Peroxide Magnesium (23Tm) ---- 0.02 % Mg 0.22 0.23 5.5 0% - 50%

EA029: Acid Reacted Magnesium (23U) ---- 0.02 % Mg 0.09 0.07 27.4 No Limit

EA029: sulfidic - Acid Reacted Magnesium (s-23U)

---- 0.02 % S 0.12 0.09 27.4 No Limit

EA029: Acidity - Acid Reacted Magnesium (a-23U)

---- 10 mole H+ / t 77 58 27.4 No Limit

EA029-F: Excess Acid Neutralising Capacity (QC Lot: 1456095)

EA029: Excess Acid Neutralising Capacity (23Q) ---- 0.02 % CaCO3 0.07 0.06 17.5 No LimitTP4 (2.1-2.2)EM1008731-020

Page 185: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

5 of 28:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report

Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%)

EA029-F: Excess Acid Neutralising Capacity (QC Lot: 1456095) - continued

EA029: sulfidic - Excess Acid Neutralising Capacity (s-23Q)

---- 0.02 % S 0.02 <0.02 0.0 No LimitTP4 (2.1-2.2)EM1008731-020

EA029: acidity - Excess Acid Neutralising Capacity (a-23Q)

---- 10 mole H+ / t 14 12 17.5 No Limit

EA033-A: Actual Acidity (QC Lot: 1456096)

EA033: sulfidic - Titratable Actual Acidity (s-23F) ---- 0.02 % pyrite S <0.02 <0.02 0.0 No LimitTP4 (2.1-2.2)EM1008731-020

EA033: Titratable Actual Acidity (23F) ---- 2 mole H+ / t <2 <2 0.0 No Limit

EA033: pH KCl (23A) ---- 0.1 pH Unit 7.5 7.7 2.6 0% - 20%

EA033-B: Potential Acidity (QC Lot: 1456096)

EA033: Chromium Reducible Sulfur (22B) ---- 0.005 % S 0.006 0.006 0.0 No LimitTP4 (2.1-2.2)EM1008731-020

EA033: acidity - Chromium Reducible Sulfur (a-22B)

---- 10 mole H+ / t <10 <10 0.0 No Limit

EA033-C: Acid Neutralising Capacity (QC Lot: 1456096)

EA033: Acid Neutralising Capacity (19A2) ---- 0.01 % CaCO3 2.68 2.59 3.6 0% - 20%TP4 (2.1-2.2)EM1008731-020

EA033: sulfidic - Acid Neutralising Capacity (s-19A2)

---- 0.01 % pyrite S 0.86 0.83 3.6 0% - 20%

EA033: acidity - Acid Neutralising Capacity (a-19A2)

---- 10 mole H+ / t 536 517 3.6 0% - 20%

EA055: Moisture Content (QC Lot: 1449403)

EA055-103: Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) ---- 1.0 % 20.7 17.6 16.5 0% - 50%TP1 (0.4-0.5)EM1008731-001

EA055-103: Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) ---- 1.0 % 25.4 23.0 9.9 0% - 20%TP3 (1.4-1.5)EM1008731-013

EA055: Moisture Content (QC Lot: 1449404)

EA055-103: Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) ---- 1.0 % 47.7 49.3 3.1 0% - 20%TP5 (2.9-3.0)EM1008731-023

EA055-103: Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) ---- 1.0 % 13.6 17.0 22.5 0% - 50%TP8 (0.9-1.0)EM1008731-035

EA055: Moisture Content (QC Lot: 1449405)

EA055-103: Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) ---- 1.0 % 10.5 10.8 3.1 0% - 50%TP10 (1.4-1.5)EM1008731-046

EA055-103: Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) ---- 1.0 % 33.6 33.5 0.0 0% - 20%TP12 (2.4-2.5)EM1008731-057

EA055: Moisture Content (QC Lot: 1449406)

EA055-103: Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) ---- 1.0 % 30.5 28.1 8.2 0% - 20%TP11 (2.9-3.0)EM1008731-069

EA055: Moisture Content (QC Lot: 1451184)

EA055-103: Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) ---- 1.0 % 15.1 14.6 3.8 0% - 50%AnonymousEB1014189-015

EA055-103: Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) ---- 1.0 % 13.4 13.6 1.8 0% - 50%AnonymousEB1014189-041

ED007: Exchangeable Cations (QC Lot: 1454744)

ED007: Exchangeable Calcium ---- 0.1 meq/100g 26.7 28.0 5.0 0% - 20%TP3 (2.0-2.1)EM1008731-014

ED007: Exchangeable Magnesium ---- 0.1 meq/100g 16.8 17.6 4.6 0% - 20%

ED007: Exchangeable Potassium ---- 0.1 meq/100g 1.8 1.9 6.1 0% - 50%

ED007: Exchangeable Sodium ---- 0.1 meq/100g 2.4 2.5 4.1 0% - 20%

ED007: Exchangeable Aluminium ---- 0.1 meq/100g <0.1 <0.1 0.0 No Limit

ED042T: Total Sulfur by LECO (QC Lot: 1451827)

Page 186: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

6 of 28:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report

Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%)

ED042T: Total Sulfur by LECO (QC Lot: 1451827) - continued

ED042T: Sulfur - Total as S (LECO) ---- 0.01 % 0.06 0.07 0.0 No LimitTP3 (2.0-2.1)EM1008731-014

ED093S: Soluble Major Cations (QC Lot: 1449452)

ED093S: Calcium 7440-70-2 10 mg/kg 100 100 0.0 0% - 50%TP3 (2.0-2.1)EM1008731-014

ED093S: Magnesium 7439-95-4 10 mg/kg 90 90 0.0 No Limit

ED093S: Sodium 7440-23-5 10 mg/kg 220 230 5.1 0% - 20%

ED093S: Potassium 7440-09-7 10 mg/kg 40 50 0.0 No Limit

ED093S: Soluble Major Cations (QC Lot: 1454735)

ED093S: Calcium 7440-70-2 10 mg/kg 160 160 0.0 0% - 50%TP8 (2.0-2.1)EM1008731-070

ED093S: Magnesium 7439-95-4 10 mg/kg 120 120 0.0 0% - 50%

ED093S: Sodium 7440-23-5 10 mg/kg 120 120 0.0 0% - 50%

ED093S: Potassium 7440-09-7 10 mg/kg 70 80 0.0 No Limit

EG005S : Soluble Metals by ICPAES (QC Lot: 1449451)

EG005S: Manganese 7439-96-5 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.0 No LimitTP3 (2.0-2.1)EM1008731-014

EG005S: Aluminium 7429-90-5 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.0 No Limit

EG005S : Soluble Metals by ICPAES (QC Lot: 1454734)

EG005S: Manganese 7439-96-5 0.1 mg/kg 0.9 0.9 0.0 No LimitTP8 (2.0-2.1)EM1008731-070

EG005S: Aluminium 7429-90-5 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.0 No Limit

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES (QC Lot: 1449037)

EG005T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 1 mg/kg 2 2 0.0 No LimitTP1 (0.4-0.5)EM1008731-001

EG005T: Chromium 7440-47-3 2 mg/kg 59 51 14.2 0% - 20%

EG005T: Molybdenum 7439-98-7 2 mg/kg 4 5 0.0 No Limit

EG005T: Nickel 7440-02-0 2 mg/kg 76 71 6.0 0% - 20%

EG005T: Silver 7440-22-4 2 mg/kg 13 11 18.0 No Limit

EG005T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 5 mg/kg 113 96 16.4 0% - 50%

EG005T: Copper 7440-50-8 5 mg/kg 265 300 12.3 0% - 20%

EG005T: Lead 7439-92-1 5 mg/kg 191 217 12.9 0% - 20%

EG005T: Selenium 7782-49-2 5 mg/kg <5 <5 0.0 No Limit

EG005T: Tin 7440-31-5 5 mg/kg 355 331 7.0 0% - 20%

EG005T: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 mg/kg 496 527 6.0 0% - 20%

EG005T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 1 mg/kg 2 2 0.0 No LimitTP3 (0.4-0.5)EM1008731-012

EG005T: Chromium 7440-47-3 2 mg/kg 92 82 10.3 0% - 20%

EG005T: Molybdenum 7439-98-7 2 mg/kg 10 11 0.0 No Limit

EG005T: Nickel 7440-02-0 2 mg/kg 76 84 10.0 0% - 20%

EG005T: Silver 7440-22-4 2 mg/kg 5 5 0.0 No Limit

EG005T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 5 mg/kg 53 42 23.6 No Limit

EG005T: Copper 7440-50-8 5 mg/kg 463 520 11.6 0% - 20%

EG005T: Lead 7439-92-1 5 mg/kg 731 828 12.4 0% - 20%

EG005T: Selenium 7782-49-2 5 mg/kg <5 <5 0.0 No Limit

EG005T: Tin 7440-31-5 5 mg/kg 176 183 4.2 0% - 20%

Page 187: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

7 of 28:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report

Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%)

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES (QC Lot: 1449037) - continued

EG005T: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 mg/kg 810 930 13.8 0% - 20%TP3 (0.4-0.5)EM1008731-012

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES (QC Lot: 1449039)

EG005T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 1 mg/kg 1 1 0.0 No LimitTP6 (0-0.1)EM1008731-025

EG005T: Chromium 7440-47-3 2 mg/kg 38 37 0.0 0% - 50%

EG005T: Molybdenum 7439-98-7 2 mg/kg 8 7 0.0 No Limit

EG005T: Nickel 7440-02-0 2 mg/kg 48 42 12.6 0% - 20%

EG005T: Silver 7440-22-4 2 mg/kg 12 8 36.6 No Limit

EG005T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 5 mg/kg 43 40 9.2 No Limit

EG005T: Copper 7440-50-8 5 mg/kg 247 238 3.4 0% - 20%

EG005T: Lead 7439-92-1 5 mg/kg 175 173 1.3 0% - 20%

EG005T: Selenium 7782-49-2 5 mg/kg <5 <5 0.0 No Limit

EG005T: Tin 7440-31-5 5 mg/kg 95 97 1.9 0% - 50%

EG005T: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 mg/kg 439 425 3.2 0% - 20%

EG005T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 1 mg/kg 2 2 0.0 No LimitTP8 (1.9-2.0)EM1008731-036

EG005T: Chromium 7440-47-3 2 mg/kg 59 52 12.7 0% - 20%

EG005T: Molybdenum 7439-98-7 2 mg/kg <2 <2 0.0 No Limit

EG005T: Nickel 7440-02-0 2 mg/kg 94 93 0.0 0% - 20%

EG005T: Silver 7440-22-4 2 mg/kg 4 4 0.0 No Limit

EG005T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 5 mg/kg 174 148 16.5 0% - 20%

EG005T: Copper 7440-50-8 5 mg/kg 132 116 13.2 0% - 20%

EG005T: Lead 7439-92-1 5 mg/kg 144 167 15.1 0% - 20%

EG005T: Selenium 7782-49-2 5 mg/kg <5 <5 0.0 No Limit

EG005T: Tin 7440-31-5 5 mg/kg 799 680 16.1 0% - 20%

EG005T: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 mg/kg 614 595 3.3 0% - 20%

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES (QC Lot: 1449200)

EG005T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.0 No LimitTP11 (0-0.1)EM1008731-050

EG005T: Chromium 7440-47-3 2 mg/kg 26 27 4.2 0% - 50%

EG005T: Molybdenum 7439-98-7 2 mg/kg <2 <2 0.0 No Limit

EG005T: Nickel 7440-02-0 2 mg/kg 23 24 0.0 0% - 50%

EG005T: Silver 7440-22-4 2 mg/kg 5 6 0.0 No Limit

EG005T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 5 mg/kg 10 11 0.0 No Limit

EG005T: Copper 7440-50-8 5 mg/kg 66 68 4.2 0% - 50%

EG005T: Lead 7439-92-1 5 mg/kg 514 536 4.2 0% - 20%

EG005T: Selenium 7782-49-2 5 mg/kg <5 <5 0.0 No Limit

EG005T: Tin 7440-31-5 5 mg/kg 15 15 0.0 No Limit

EG005T: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 mg/kg 492 514 4.2 0% - 20%

EG005T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.0 No LimitTP13 (0.4-0.5)EM1008731-060

EG005T: Chromium 7440-47-3 2 mg/kg 36 38 3.2 0% - 50%

EG005T: Molybdenum 7439-98-7 2 mg/kg <2 <2 0.0 No Limit

Page 188: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

8 of 28:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report

Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%)

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES (QC Lot: 1449200) - continued

EG005T: Nickel 7440-02-0 2 mg/kg 49 48 0.0 0% - 20%TP13 (0.4-0.5)EM1008731-060

EG005T: Silver 7440-22-4 2 mg/kg 4 3 35.2 No Limit

EG005T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 5 mg/kg 8 9 12.4 No Limit

EG005T: Copper 7440-50-8 5 mg/kg 24 22 8.9 No Limit

EG005T: Lead 7439-92-1 5 mg/kg 38 32 17.8 No Limit

EG005T: Selenium 7782-49-2 5 mg/kg <5 <5 0.0 No Limit

EG005T: Tin 7440-31-5 5 mg/kg 11 17 40.5 No Limit

EG005T: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 mg/kg 88 67 26.7 0% - 50%

EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (QC Lot: 1449038)

EG035T: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.1 mg/kg 0.5 0.4 28.8 No LimitTP1 (0.4-0.5)EM1008731-001

EG035T: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.1 mg/kg 0.7 0.5 34.6 No LimitTP3 (0.4-0.5)EM1008731-012

EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (QC Lot: 1449040)

EG035T: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.1 mg/kg 0.4 0.3 0.0 No LimitTP6 (0-0.1)EM1008731-025

EG035T: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.1 mg/kg 0.2 0.2 0.0 No LimitTP8 (1.9-2.0)EM1008731-036

EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (QC Lot: 1449201)

EG035T: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.1 mg/kg 0.2 0.1 0.0 No LimitTP11 (0-0.1)EM1008731-050

EG035T: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.0 No LimitTP13 (0.4-0.5)EM1008731-060

EG048: Hexavalent Chromium (Alkaline Digest) (QC Lot: 1449399)

EG048: Hexavalent Chromium 18540-29-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No LimitTP1 (1.5-1.6)EM1008731-003

EG048: Hexavalent Chromium 18540-29-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No LimitAnonymousEM1008780-004

EK025G: Free cyanide by Discrete Analyser (QC Lot: 1449301)

EK025G: Free Cyanide ---- 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.0 No LimitTP4 (0-0.1)EM1008731-016

EK026G: Total Cyanide By Discrete Analyser (QC Lot: 1449415)

EK026G: Total Cyanide 57-12-5 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.0 No LimitTP1 (1.5-1.6)EM1008731-003

EK026G: Total Cyanide 57-12-5 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.0 No LimitTP10 (1.4-1.5)EM1008731-046

EK040T: Fluoride Total (QC Lot: 1449032)

EK040T: Fluoride 16984-48-8 40 mg/kg 80 80 0.0 No LimitTP1 (1.5-1.6)EM1008731-003

EP004: Organic Matter (QC Lot: 1448903)

EP004: Total Organic Carbon ---- 0.5 % 2.4 2.5 0.0 No LimitTP3 (2.0-2.1)EM1008731-014

EP004: Organic Matter (QC Lot: 1451345)

EP004: Total Organic Carbon ---- 0.5 % 6.6 6.5 0.0 0% - 50%AnonymousEB1014155-001

EP066: Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) (QC Lot: 1449129)

EP066-EM: Total Polychlorinated biphenyls ---- 0.10 mg/kg <5.00 <5.00 0.0 No LimitTP1 (1.5-1.6)EM1008731-003

EP074A: Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 1449031)

EP074-UT: Benzene 71-43-2 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 0.0 No LimitTP1 (1.5-1.6)EM1008731-003

EP074-UT: Toluene 108-88-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP074-UT: Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

Page 189: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

9 of 28:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report

Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%)

EP074A: Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 1449031) - continued

EP074-UT: meta- & para-Xylene 108-38-3 106-42-3

0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No LimitTP1 (1.5-1.6)EM1008731-003

EP074-UT: Styrene 100-42-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP074-UT: ortho-Xylene 95-47-6 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP074I: Volatile Halogenated Compounds (QC Lot: 1449031)

EP074-UT: 1.1-Dichloroethene 75-35-4 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.0 No LimitTP1 (1.5-1.6)EM1008731-003

EP074-UT: cis-1.2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.0 No Limit

EP074-UT: 1.1.1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.0 No Limit

EP074-UT: Carbon Tetrachloride 56-23-5 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.0 No Limit

EP074-UT: 1.1.1.2-Tetrachloroethane 630-20-6 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.0 No Limit

EP074-UT: 1.2.4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 <0.01 0.0 No Limit

EP074-UT: Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.0 No Limit

EP074-UT: trans-1.2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.0 No Limit

EP074-UT: Chloroform 67-66-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.0 No Limit

EP074-UT: 1.2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.0 No Limit

EP074-UT: Trichloroethene 79-01-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.0 No Limit

EP074-UT: Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.0 No Limit

EP074-UT: 1.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.0 No Limit

EP074-UT: Hexachlorobutadiene 87-68-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.0 No Limit

EP074-UT: Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.0 No Limit

EP074-UT: 1.4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.0 No Limit

EP074-UT: 1.2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 <0.02 0.0 No Limit

EP074-UT: 1.1.2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 0.04 mg/kg <0.04 <0.04 0.0 No Limit

EP074-UT: Methylene chloride 75-09-2 0.4 mg/kg <0.6 <0.6 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM)A: Phenolic Compounds (QC Lot: 1449269)

EP075(SIM): Phenol 108-95-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No LimitTP1 (1.0-1.1)EM1008731-002

EP075(SIM): 2-Chlorophenol 95-57-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 2-Methylphenol 95-48-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 2-Nitrophenol 88-75-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 2.4-Dimethylphenol 105-67-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 2.4-Dichlorophenol 120-83-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 2.6-Dichlorophenol 87-65-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 59-50-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 2.4.6-Trichlorophenol 88-06-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 2.4.5-Trichlorophenol 95-95-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 3- & 4-Methylphenol 1319-77-3 1.0 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 2.0 mg/kg <2.0 <2.0 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Phenol 108-95-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No LimitTP6 (0-0.1)EM1008731-025

EP075(SIM): 2-Chlorophenol 95-57-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

Page 190: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

10 of 28:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report

Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%)

EP075(SIM)A: Phenolic Compounds (QC Lot: 1449269) - continued

EP075(SIM): 2-Methylphenol 95-48-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No LimitTP6 (0-0.1)EM1008731-025

EP075(SIM): 2-Nitrophenol 88-75-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 2.4-Dimethylphenol 105-67-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 2.4-Dichlorophenol 120-83-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 2.6-Dichlorophenol 87-65-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 59-50-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 2.4.6-Trichlorophenol 88-06-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 2.4.5-Trichlorophenol 95-95-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 3- & 4-Methylphenol 1319-77-3 1.0 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 2.0 mg/kg <2.0 <2.0 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM)A: Phenolic Compounds (QC Lot: 1449271)

EP075(SIM): Phenol 108-95-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No LimitTP8 (1.9-2.0)EM1008731-036

EP075(SIM): 2-Chlorophenol 95-57-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 2-Methylphenol 95-48-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 2-Nitrophenol 88-75-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 2.4-Dimethylphenol 105-67-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 2.4-Dichlorophenol 120-83-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 2.6-Dichlorophenol 87-65-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 59-50-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 2.4.6-Trichlorophenol 88-06-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 2.4.5-Trichlorophenol 95-95-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 3- & 4-Methylphenol 1319-77-3 1.0 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 2.0 mg/kg <2.0 <2.0 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Phenol 108-95-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No LimitTP12 (1.9-2.0)EM1008731-056

EP075(SIM): 2-Chlorophenol 95-57-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 2-Methylphenol 95-48-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 2-Nitrophenol 88-75-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 2.4-Dimethylphenol 105-67-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 2.4-Dichlorophenol 120-83-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 2.6-Dichlorophenol 87-65-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 59-50-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 2.4.6-Trichlorophenol 88-06-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 2.4.5-Trichlorophenol 95-95-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): 3- & 4-Methylphenol 1319-77-3 1.0 mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 2.0 mg/kg <2.0 <2.0 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 1449269)

EP075(SIM): Naphthalene 91-20-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No LimitTP1 (1.0-1.1)EM1008731-002

EP075(SIM): Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Acenaphthene 83-32-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

Page 191: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

11 of 28:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report

Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%)

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 1449269) - continued

EP075(SIM): Fluorene 86-73-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No LimitTP1 (1.0-1.1)EM1008731-002

EP075(SIM): Phenanthrene 85-01-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Anthracene 120-12-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Fluoranthene 206-44-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Pyrene 129-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benz(a)anthracene 56-55-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Chrysene 218-01-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benzo(b)fluoranthene 205-99-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene 193-39-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 53-70-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 191-24-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Naphthalene 91-20-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No LimitTP6 (0-0.1)EM1008731-025

EP075(SIM): Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Acenaphthene 83-32-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Fluorene 86-73-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Phenanthrene 85-01-8 0.5 mg/kg 4.8 2.8 52.7 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Anthracene 120-12-7 0.5 mg/kg 1.8 1.0 53.8 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Fluoranthene 206-44-0 0.5 mg/kg 15.0 8.4 # 57.1 0% - 50%

EP075(SIM): Pyrene 129-00-0 0.5 mg/kg 17.5 8.8 # 65.7 0% - 50%

EP075(SIM): Benz(a)anthracene 56-55-3 0.5 mg/kg 9.4 5.1 # 59.0 0% - 50%

EP075(SIM): Chrysene 218-01-9 0.5 mg/kg 8.6 4.6 # 61.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benzo(b)fluoranthene 205-99-2 0.5 mg/kg 14.6 6.4 # 78.2 0% - 50%

EP075(SIM): Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 0.5 mg/kg 3.3 1.8 58.1 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 0.5 mg/kg 12.4 5.2 # 82.9 0% - 50%

EP075(SIM): Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene 193-39-5 0.5 mg/kg 6.4 2.9 # 76.4 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 53-70-3 0.5 mg/kg 1.7 0.8 76.1 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 191-24-2 0.5 mg/kg 7.4 3.3 # 76.8 No Limit

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 1449271)

EP075(SIM): Naphthalene 91-20-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No LimitTP8 (1.9-2.0)EM1008731-036

EP075(SIM): Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Acenaphthene 83-32-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Fluorene 86-73-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Phenanthrene 85-01-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Anthracene 120-12-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Fluoranthene 206-44-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Pyrene 129-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benz(a)anthracene 56-55-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

Page 192: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

12 of 28:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report

Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%)

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 1449271) - continued

EP075(SIM): Chrysene 218-01-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No LimitTP8 (1.9-2.0)EM1008731-036

EP075(SIM): Benzo(b)fluoranthene 205-99-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene 193-39-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 53-70-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 191-24-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Naphthalene 91-20-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No LimitTP12 (1.9-2.0)EM1008731-056

EP075(SIM): Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Acenaphthene 83-32-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Fluorene 86-73-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Phenanthrene 85-01-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Anthracene 120-12-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Fluoranthene 206-44-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Pyrene 129-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benz(a)anthracene 56-55-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Chrysene 218-01-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benzo(b)fluoranthene 205-99-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene 193-39-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 53-70-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 191-24-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 1449481)

EP075(SIM): Naphthalene 91-20-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No LimitAnonymousEM1008775-021

EP075(SIM): Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Acenaphthene 83-32-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Fluorene 86-73-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Phenanthrene 85-01-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Anthracene 120-12-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Fluoranthene 206-44-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Pyrene 129-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benz(a)anthracene 56-55-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Chrysene 218-01-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benzo(b)fluoranthene 205-99-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene 193-39-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 53-70-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

Page 193: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

13 of 28:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report

Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%)

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 1449481) - continued

EP075(SIM): Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 191-24-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No LimitAnonymousEM1008775-021

EP075(SIM): Naphthalene 91-20-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No LimitAnonymousEM1008796-018

EP075(SIM): Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Acenaphthene 83-32-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Fluorene 86-73-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Phenanthrene 85-01-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Anthracene 120-12-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Fluoranthene 206-44-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Pyrene 129-00-0 0.5 mg/kg 0.6 <0.5 25.4 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benz(a)anthracene 56-55-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Chrysene 218-01-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benzo(b)fluoranthene 205-99-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene 193-39-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 53-70-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075(SIM): Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 191-24-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Halogenated) (QC Lot: 1449128)

EP075-EM: 2-Chlorophenol 95-57-8 0.03 mg/kg <0.61 <0.61 0.0 No LimitTP1 (1.5-1.6)EM1008731-003

EP075-EM: 2.4-Dichlorophenol 120-83-2 0.03 mg/kg <0.61 <0.61 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: 2.6-Dichlorophenol 87-65-0 0.03 mg/kg <0.61 <0.61 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: 4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 59-50-7 0.03 mg/kg <0.61 <0.61 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: 2.3.5.6-Tetrachlorophenol 935-95-5 0.03 mg/kg <0.61 <0.61 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: 2.4.5-Trichlorophenol 95-95-4 0.05 mg/kg <0.61 <0.61 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: 2.4.6-Trichlorophenol 88-06-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.61 <0.61 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: 2.3.4.5 & 2.3.4.6-Tetrachlorophenol 4901-51-3/58-90-2

0.05 mg/kg <1.22 <1.22 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 0.2 mg/kg <0.6 <0.6 0.0 No Limit

EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Non-halogenated) (QC Lot: 1449128)

EP075-EM: Phenol 108-95-2 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.0 No LimitTP1 (1.5-1.6)EM1008731-003

EP075-EM: 2-Methylphenol 95-48-7 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: 3- & 4-Methylphenol 1319-77-3 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: 2-Nitrophenol 88-75-5 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: 2.4-Dimethylphenol 105-67-9 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: 2.4-Dinitrophenol 51-28-5 5 mg/kg <49 <49 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: 4-Nitrophenol 100-02-7 5 mg/kg <49 <49 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: 2-Methyl-4.6-dinitrophenol 8071-51-0 5 mg/kg <49 <49 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: Dinoseb 88-85-7 5 mg/kg <49 <49 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: 2-Cyclohexyl-4.6-Dinitrophenol 131-89-5 5 mg/kg <49 <49 0.0 No Limit

Page 194: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

14 of 28:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report

Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%)

EP075B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 1449128)

EP075-EM: Naphthalene 91-20-3 0.5 mg/kg 0.8 <0.6 21.9 No LimitTP1 (1.5-1.6)EM1008731-003

EP075-EM: Acenaphthene 83-32-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.6 <0.6 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 0.5 mg/kg 3.1 1.1 95.6 No Limit

EP075-EM: Fluorene 86-73-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.6 <0.6 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: Phenanthrene 85-01-8 0.5 mg/kg 12.2 3.0 # 120 No Limit

EP075-EM: Anthracene 120-12-7 0.5 mg/kg 4.4 1.3 108 No Limit

EP075-EM: Fluoranthene 206-44-0 0.5 mg/kg 38.2 11.6 # 107 0% - 20%

EP075-EM: Pyrene 129-00-0 0.5 mg/kg 37.2 10.3 # 113 0% - 20%

EP075-EM: Benz(a)anthracene 56-55-3 0.5 mg/kg 18.1 5.6 # 105 0% - 50%

EP075-EM: Chrysene 218-01-9 0.5 mg/kg 15.0 4.5 # 108 No Limit

EP075-EM: Benzo(b) & Benzo(k)fluoranthene 205-99-2 207-08-9

0.5 mg/kg 30.3 12.3 # 84.3 0% - 20%

EP075-EM: Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 0.5 mg/kg 20.0 6.7 # 99.6 0% - 50%

EP075-EM: Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene 193-39-5 0.5 mg/kg 12.2 4.0 # 101 No Limit

EP075-EM: Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 53-70-3 0.5 mg/kg 3.5 1.1 105 No Limit

EP075-EM: Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 191-24-2 0.5 mg/kg 15.5 5.0 # 102 0% - 50%

EP075I: Organochlorine Pesticides (QC Lot: 1449128)

EP075-EM: alpha-BHC 319-84-6 0.03 mg/kg <0.61 <0.61 0.0 No LimitTP1 (1.5-1.6)EM1008731-003

EP075-EM: Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) 118-74-1 0.03 mg/kg <0.61 <0.61 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: beta-BHC 319-85-7 0.03 mg/kg <0.61 <0.61 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: gamma-BHC 58-89-9 0.03 mg/kg <0.61 <0.61 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: delta-BHC 319-86-8 0.03 mg/kg <0.61 <0.61 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: Heptachlor 76-44-8 0.03 mg/kg <0.61 <0.61 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: Aldrin 309-00-2 0.03 mg/kg <0.61 <0.61 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: Heptachlor epoxide 1024-57-3 0.03 mg/kg <0.61 <0.61 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: cis-Chlordane 5103-71-9 0.03 mg/kg <0.61 <0.61 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: trans-Chlordane 5103-74-2 0.03 mg/kg <0.61 <0.61 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: Endosulfan 1 959-98-8 0.03 mg/kg <0.61 <0.61 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: Dieldrin 60-57-1 0.03 mg/kg <0.61 <0.61 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: Endrin aldehyde 7421-93-4 0.03 mg/kg <0.61 <0.61 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: Endrin 72-20-8 0.03 mg/kg <0.61 <0.61 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: Endosulfan 2 33213-65-9 0.03 mg/kg <0.61 <0.61 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: Endosulfan sulfate 1031-07-8 0.03 mg/kg <0.61 <0.61 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: Methoxychlor 72-43-5 0.03 mg/kg <0.61 <0.61 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: 4.4`-DDE 72-55-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.61 <0.61 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: 4.4`-DDD 72-54-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.61 <0.61 0.0 No Limit

EP075-EM: 4.4`-DDT 50-29-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.61 <0.61 0.0 No Limit

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 1449013)

EP080: C6 - C9 Fraction ---- 10 mg/kg <10 <10 0.0 No LimitTP1 (1.0-1.1)EM1008731-002

Page 195: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

15 of 28:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report

Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%)

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 1449013) - continued

EP080: C6 - C9 Fraction ---- 10 mg/kg <10 <10 0.0 No LimitTP6 (0-0.1)EM1008731-025

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 1449025)

EP080: C6 - C9 Fraction ---- 10 mg/kg <10 <10 0.0 No LimitTP11 (1.9-2.0)EM1008731-053

EP080: C6 - C9 Fraction ---- 10 mg/kg <10 <10 0.0 No LimitAnonymousEM1008780-004

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 1449031)

EP074-UT: C6 - C9 Fraction ---- 10 mg/kg <10 <10 0.0 No LimitTP1 (1.5-1.6)EM1008731-003

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 1449268)

EP071: C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 0.0 No LimitTP1 (1.0-1.1)EM1008731-002

EP071: C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 0.0 No Limit

EP071: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 0.0 No Limit

EP071: C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg 220 130 49.1 No LimitTP6 (0-0.1)EM1008731-025

EP071: C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg 430 330 25.2 No Limit

EP071: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 0.0 No Limit

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 1449270)

EP071: C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 0.0 No LimitTP8 (1.9-2.0)EM1008731-036

EP071: C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg 140 120 15.2 No Limit

EP071: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 0.0 No Limit

EP071: C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg 130 <100 24.9 No LimitTP12 (1.9-2.0)EM1008731-056

EP071: C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg 120 120 0.0 No Limit

EP071: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 0.0 No Limit

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 1449480)

EP071: C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 0.0 No LimitAnonymousEM1008775-021

EP071: C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 0.0 No Limit

EP071: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 0.0 No Limit

EP071: C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 0.0 No LimitAnonymousEM1008796-018

EP071: C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg 110 <100 11.8 No Limit

EP071: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 0.0 No Limit

EP080: BTEX (QC Lot: 1449013)

EP080: Benzene 71-43-2 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 0.0 No LimitTP1 (1.0-1.1)EM1008731-002

EP080: Toluene 108-88-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP080: Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP080: meta- & para-Xylene 108-38-3 106-42-3

0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP080: ortho-Xylene 95-47-6 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP080: Benzene 71-43-2 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 0.0 No LimitTP6 (0-0.1)EM1008731-025

EP080: Toluene 108-88-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP080: Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP080: meta- & para-Xylene 108-38-3 106-42-3

0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

Page 196: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

16 of 28:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report

Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%)

EP080: BTEX (QC Lot: 1449013) - continued

EP080: ortho-Xylene 95-47-6 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No LimitTP6 (0-0.1)EM1008731-025

EP080: BTEX (QC Lot: 1449025)

EP080: Benzene 71-43-2 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 0.0 No LimitTP11 (1.9-2.0)EM1008731-053

EP080: Toluene 108-88-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP080: Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP080: meta- & para-Xylene 108-38-3 106-42-3

0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP080: ortho-Xylene 95-47-6 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP080: Benzene 71-43-2 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 0.0 No LimitAnonymousEM1008780-004

EP080: Toluene 108-88-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP080: Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP080: meta- & para-Xylene 108-38-3 106-42-3

0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

EP080: ortho-Xylene 95-47-6 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit

Page 197: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

17 of 28:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) ReportThe quality control term Method / Laboratory Blank refers to an analyte free matrix to which all reagents are added in the same volumes or proportions as used in standard sample preparation. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor potential laboratory contamination. The quality control term Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) refers to a certified reference material, or a known interference free matrix spiked with target analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor method precision and accuracy independent of sample matrix. Dynamic Recovery Limits are based on statistical evaluation of processed LCS.

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report

Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report

Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%)

Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit

EA013: Acid Neutralising Capacity (QCLot: 1456094)

EA013: ANC as H2SO4 ---- 0.5 kg H2SO4/t ---- 1089.9 kg H2SO4/t 12775

EA029-B: Acidity Trail (QCLot: 1456095)

EA029: Titratable Actual Acidity (23F) ---- 2 mole H+ / t <2 -------- --------

EA029: Titratable Peroxide Acidity (23G) ---- 2 mole H+ / t <2 -------- --------

EA029: Titratable Sulfidic Acidity (23H) ---- 2 mole H+ / t <2 -------- --------

EA029: sulfidic - Titratable Actual Acidity (s-23F) ---- 0.02 % pyrite S <0.02 -------- --------

EA029: sulfidic - Titratable Peroxide Acidity (s-23G) ---- 0.02 % pyrite S <0.02 -------- --------

EA029: sulfidic - Titratable Sulfidic Acidity (s-23H) ---- 0.02 % pyrite S <0.02 -------- --------

EA029-C: Sulfur Trail (QCLot: 1456095)

EA029: KCl Extractable Sulfur (23Ce) ---- 0.02 % S <0.02 -------- --------

EA029: Peroxide Sulfur (23De) ---- 0.02 % S <0.02 -------- --------

EA029: Peroxide Oxidisable Sulfur (23E) ---- 0.02 % S <0.02 -------- --------

EA029: acidity - Peroxide Oxidisable Sulfur (a-23E) ---- 10 mole H+ / t <10 -------- --------

EA029-D: Calcium Values (QCLot: 1456095)

EA029: KCl Extractable Calcium (23Vh) ---- 0.02 % Ca <0.02 -------- --------

EA029: Peroxide Calcium (23Wh) ---- 0.02 % Ca <0.02 -------- --------

EA029: Acid Reacted Calcium (23X) ---- 0.02 % Ca <0.02 -------- --------

EA029: acidity - Acid Reacted Calcium (a-23X) ---- 10 mole H+ / t <10 -------- --------

EA029: sulfidic - Acid Reacted Calcium (s-23X) ---- 0.02 % S <0.02 -------- --------

EA029-E: Magnesium Values (QCLot: 1456095)

EA029: KCl Extractable Magnesium (23Sm) ---- 0.02 % Mg <0.02 -------- --------

EA029: Peroxide Magnesium (23Tm) ---- 0.02 % Mg <0.02 -------- --------

EA029: Acid Reacted Magnesium (23U) ---- 0.02 % Mg <0.02 -------- --------

EA029: Acidity - Acid Reacted Magnesium (a-23U) ---- 10 mole H+ / t <10 -------- --------

EA029: sulfidic - Acid Reacted Magnesium (s-23U) ---- 0.02 % S <0.02 -------- --------

EA029-F: Excess Acid Neutralising Capacity (QCLot: 1456095)

EA029: Excess Acid Neutralising Capacity (23Q) ---- 0.02 % CaCO3 <0.02 -------- --------

EA029: acidity - Excess Acid Neutralising Capacity (a-23Q) ---- 10 mole H+ / t <10 -------- --------

EA029: sulfidic - Excess Acid Neutralising Capacity (s-23Q)

---- 0.02 % S <0.02 -------- --------

EA033-A: Actual Acidity (QCLot: 1456096)

EA033: Titratable Actual Acidity (23F) ---- 2 mole H+ / t <2 -------- --------

EA033: sulfidic - Titratable Actual Acidity (s-23F) ---- 0.02 % pyrite S <0.02 -------- --------

EA033-B: Potential Acidity (QCLot: 1456096)

Page 198: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

18 of 28:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report

Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report

Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%)

Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit

EA033-B: Potential Acidity (QCLot: 1456096) - continued

EA033: Chromium Reducible Sulfur (22B) ---- 0.005 % S <0.005 -------- --------

EA033: acidity - Chromium Reducible Sulfur (a-22B) ---- 10 mole H+ / t <10 -------- --------

EA033-C: Acid Neutralising Capacity (QCLot: 1456096)

EA033: Acid Neutralising Capacity (19A2) ---- 0.01 % CaCO3 <0.01 -------- --------

EA033: acidity - Acid Neutralising Capacity (a-19A2) ---- 10 mole H+ / t <10 -------- --------

EA033: sulfidic - Acid Neutralising Capacity (s-19A2) ---- 0.01 % pyrite S <0.01 -------- --------

ED007: Exchangeable Cations (QCLot: 1454744)

ED007: Exchangeable Calcium ---- 0.1 meq/100g <0.1 84.61.47 meq/100g 10670.2

ED007: Exchangeable Magnesium ---- 0.1 meq/100g <0.1 89.40.77 meq/100g 11276.4

ED007: Exchangeable Potassium ---- 0.1 meq/100g <0.1 73.80.20 meq/100g 10070

ED007: Exchangeable Sodium ---- 0.1 meq/100g <0.1 80.60.51 meq/100g 10470

ED007: Cation Exchange Capacity ---- 0.1 meq/100g ---- 84.42.95 meq/100g 10470.1

ED007: Exchangeable Aluminium ---- 0.1 meq/100g <0.1 -------- --------

ED042T: Total Sulfur by LECO (QCLot: 1451827)

ED042T: Sulfur - Total as S (LECO) ---- 0.01 % <0.01 101100 % 13070

ED093S: Soluble Major Cations (QCLot: 1449452)

ED093S: Calcium 7440-70-2 10 mg/kg <10 10525 mg/kg 12187

ED093S: Magnesium 7439-95-4 10 mg/kg <10 89.025 mg/kg 11585

ED093S: Sodium 7440-23-5 10 mg/kg <10 103250 mg/kg 11086

ED093S: Potassium 7440-09-7 10 mg/kg <10 105250 mg/kg 10987

ED093S: Soluble Major Cations (QCLot: 1454735)

ED093S: Calcium 7440-70-2 10 mg/kg <10 -------- --------

ED093S: Magnesium 7439-95-4 10 mg/kg <10 -------- --------

ED093S: Sodium 7440-23-5 10 mg/kg <10 -------- --------

ED093S: Potassium 7440-09-7 10 mg/kg <10 -------- --------

EG005S : Soluble Metals by ICPAES (QCLot: 1449451)

EG005S: Aluminium 7429-90-5 1.00 mg/kg <1 1045 mg/kg 12080.0

EG005S: Manganese 7439-96-5 0.10 mg/kg <0.1 1075 mg/kg 12080.0

EG005S : Soluble Metals by ICPAES (QCLot: 1454734)

EG005S: Aluminium 7429-90-5 1.00 mg/kg <1 -------- --------

EG005S: Manganese 7439-96-5 0.10 mg/kg <0.1 -------- --------

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES (QCLot: 1449037)

EG005T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 5 mg/kg <5 11313.6 mg/kg 11980

EG005T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 1 mg/kg <1 1042.8 mg/kg 11785

EG005T: Chromium 7440-47-3 2 mg/kg <2 10160.9 mg/kg 11981

EG005T: Copper 7440-50-8 5 mg/kg <5 10955.1 mg/kg 12080

EG005T: Lead 7439-92-1 5 mg/kg <5 10254.9 mg/kg 11981

EG005T: Molybdenum 7439-98-7 2 mg/kg <2 1128.5 mg/kg 12080

Page 199: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

19 of 28:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report

Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report

Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%)

Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES (QCLot: 1449037) - continued

EG005T: Nickel 7440-02-0 2 mg/kg <2 11055.1 mg/kg 11781

EG005T: Selenium 7782-49-2 5 mg/kg <5 -------- --------

EG005T: Silver 7440-22-4 2 mg/kg <2 1135.23 mg/kg 11980

EG005T: Tin 7440-31-5 5 mg/kg <5 10526.3 mg/kg 12080

EG005T: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 mg/kg <5 105105 mg/kg 11181

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES (QCLot: 1449039)

EG005T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 5 mg/kg <5 11513.6 mg/kg 11980

EG005T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 1 mg/kg <1 1102.8 mg/kg 11785

EG005T: Chromium 7440-47-3 2 mg/kg <2 10260.9 mg/kg 11981

EG005T: Copper 7440-50-8 5 mg/kg <5 10855.1 mg/kg 12080

EG005T: Lead 7439-92-1 5 mg/kg <5 10254.9 mg/kg 11981

EG005T: Molybdenum 7439-98-7 2 mg/kg <2 1148.5 mg/kg 12080

EG005T: Nickel 7440-02-0 2 mg/kg <2 10955.1 mg/kg 11781

EG005T: Selenium 7782-49-2 5 mg/kg <5 -------- --------

EG005T: Silver 7440-22-4 2 mg/kg <2 1035.23 mg/kg 11980

EG005T: Tin 7440-31-5 5 mg/kg <5 10826.3 mg/kg 12080

EG005T: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 mg/kg <5 108105 mg/kg 11181

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES (QCLot: 1449200)

EG005T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 5 mg/kg <5 95.713.6 mg/kg 11980

EG005T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 1 mg/kg <1 90.82.8 mg/kg 11785

EG005T: Chromium 7440-47-3 2 mg/kg <2 84.860.9 mg/kg 11981

EG005T: Copper 7440-50-8 5 mg/kg <5 89.055.1 mg/kg 12080

EG005T: Lead 7439-92-1 5 mg/kg <5 88.054.9 mg/kg 11981

EG005T: Molybdenum 7439-98-7 2 mg/kg <2 1028.5 mg/kg 12080

EG005T: Nickel 7440-02-0 2 mg/kg <2 92.355.1 mg/kg 11781

EG005T: Selenium 7782-49-2 5 mg/kg <5 -------- --------

EG005T: Silver 7440-22-4 2 mg/kg <2 1085.23 mg/kg 11980

EG005T: Tin 7440-31-5 5 mg/kg <5 89.826.3 mg/kg 12080

EG005T: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 mg/kg <5 89.0105 mg/kg 11181

EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (QCLot: 1449038)

EG035T: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 1021.47 mg/kg 11971.9

EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (QCLot: 1449040)

EG035T: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 96.41.47 mg/kg 11971.9

EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (QCLot: 1449201)

EG035T: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 84.71.47 mg/kg 11971.9

EG048: Hexavalent Chromium (Alkaline Digest) (QCLot: 1449399)

EG048: Hexavalent Chromium 18540-29-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 83.140 mg/kg 12080

EK025G: Free cyanide by Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 1449301)

Page 200: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

20 of 28:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report

Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report

Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%)

Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit

EK025G: Free cyanide by Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 1449301) - continued

EK025G: Free Cyanide ---- 1 mg/kg <1 79.95 mg/kg 11978.4

EK026G: Total Cyanide By Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 1449415)

EK026G: Total Cyanide 57-12-5 1 mg/kg <1 11820 mg/kg 12387

EK040T: Fluoride Total (QCLot: 1449032)

EK040T: Fluoride 16984-48-8 40 mg/kg <40 83.8950 mg/kg 12080

EP004: Organic Matter (QCLot: 1448903)

EP004: Total Organic Carbon ---- 0.5 % <0.5 10343.5 % 12080.3

EP004: Organic Matter (QCLot: 1451345)

EP004: Total Organic Carbon ---- 0.5 % <0.5 99.91.3 % 11589

EP066: Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) (QCLot: 1449129)

EP066-EM: Total Polychlorinated biphenyls ---- 0.1 mg/kg <0.10 1030.5 mg/kg 13943

EP074A: Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1449031)

EP074-UT: Benzene 71-43-2 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 92.62.1 mg/kg 12080.0

EP074-UT: Toluene 108-88-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 87.82.1 mg/kg 12080.0

EP074-UT: Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 86.72.1 mg/kg 12080.0

EP074-UT: meta- & para-Xylene 108-38-3 106-42-3

0.5 mg/kg <0.5 86.14.2 mg/kg 12080.0

EP074-UT: Styrene 100-42-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 93.10.1 mg/kg 11776.0

EP074-UT: ortho-Xylene 95-47-6 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 88.32.1 mg/kg 12080.0

EP074I: Volatile Halogenated Compounds (QCLot: 1449031)

EP074-UT: Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 1080.1 mg/kg 11265.6

EP074-UT: 1.1-Dichloroethene 75-35-4 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 96.40.1 mg/kg 12270.8

EP074-UT: Methylene chloride 75-09-2 0.4 mg/kg <0.6 90.32.1 mg/kg 13175.3

EP074-UT: trans-1.2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 95.90.1 mg/kg 12179.0

EP074-UT: cis-1.2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 93.40.1 mg/kg 12280.0

EP074-UT: Chloroform 67-66-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 94.80.1 mg/kg 11570.4

EP074-UT: 1.1.1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 93.80.1 mg/kg 12072.0

EP074-UT: Carbon Tetrachloride 56-23-5 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 88.50.1 mg/kg 12065.5

EP074-UT: 1.2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 92.70.1 mg/kg 12871.6

EP074-UT: Trichloroethene 79-01-6 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 99.70.1 mg/kg 12475.7

EP074-UT: 1.1.2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 0.04 mg/kg <0.04 95.60.1 mg/kg 12080.0

EP074-UT: Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 89.20.1 mg/kg 13070.0

EP074-UT: 1.1.1.2-Tetrachloroethane 630-20-6 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 89.90.1 mg/kg 13070.0

EP074-UT: 1.1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 87.40.1 mg/kg 12675.7

EP074-UT: Hexachlorobutadiene 87-68-3 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 # 66.40.1 mg/kg 11868.4

EP074-UT: Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 1080.1 mg/kg 12479.7

EP074-UT: 1.4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 84.90.1 mg/kg 11672.3

EP074-UT: 1.2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 0.02 mg/kg <0.02 87.80.1 mg/kg 12080.0

Page 201: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

21 of 28:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report

Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report

Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%)

Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit

EP074I: Volatile Halogenated Compounds (QCLot: 1449031) - continued

EP074-UT: 1.2.4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 0.01 mg/kg <0.01 81.20.1 mg/kg 11873.0

EP075(SIM)A: Phenolic Compounds (QCLot: 1449269)

EP075(SIM): Phenol 108-95-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 77.210 mg/kg 12563

EP075(SIM): 2-Chlorophenol 95-57-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 84.610 mg/kg 12761

EP075(SIM): 2-Methylphenol 95-48-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 81.510 mg/kg 12761

EP075(SIM): 3- & 4-Methylphenol 1319-77-3 1.0 mg/kg <1.0 80.520 mg/kg 12367

EP075(SIM): 2-Nitrophenol 88-75-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 85.010 mg/kg 12454

EP075(SIM): 2.4-Dimethylphenol 105-67-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 82.010 mg/kg 12860

EP075(SIM): 2.4-Dichlorophenol 120-83-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 86.010 mg/kg 12161

EP075(SIM): 2.6-Dichlorophenol 87-65-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 90.410 mg/kg 12365

EP075(SIM): 4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 59-50-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 83.710 mg/kg 12064

EP075(SIM): 2.4.6-Trichlorophenol 88-06-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 88.910 mg/kg 12060

EP075(SIM): 2.4.5-Trichlorophenol 95-95-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 82.910 mg/kg 12462

EP075(SIM): Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 2.0 mg/kg <2.0 59.710 mg/kg 11410.4

EP075(SIM)A: Phenolic Compounds (QCLot: 1449271)

EP075(SIM): Phenol 108-95-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 10210 mg/kg 12563

EP075(SIM): 2-Chlorophenol 95-57-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 99.810 mg/kg 12761

EP075(SIM): 2-Methylphenol 95-48-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 82.810 mg/kg 12761

EP075(SIM): 3- & 4-Methylphenol 1319-77-3 1.0 mg/kg <1.0 82.120 mg/kg 12367

EP075(SIM): 2-Nitrophenol 88-75-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 10010 mg/kg 12454

EP075(SIM): 2.4-Dimethylphenol 105-67-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 80.910 mg/kg 12860

EP075(SIM): 2.4-Dichlorophenol 120-83-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 77.210 mg/kg 12161

EP075(SIM): 2.6-Dichlorophenol 87-65-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 10510 mg/kg 12365

EP075(SIM): 4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 59-50-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 99.710 mg/kg 12064

EP075(SIM): 2.4.6-Trichlorophenol 88-06-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 90.710 mg/kg 12060

EP075(SIM): 2.4.5-Trichlorophenol 95-95-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 89.310 mg/kg 12462

EP075(SIM): Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 2.0 mg/kg <2.0 59.810 mg/kg 11410.4

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1449269)

EP075(SIM): Naphthalene 91-20-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 91.410 mg/kg 11870

EP075(SIM): Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 84.710 mg/kg 12068

EP075(SIM): Acenaphthene 83-32-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 11710 mg/kg 11771

EP075(SIM): Fluorene 86-73-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 10510 mg/kg 12571

EP075(SIM): Phenanthrene 85-01-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 96.610 mg/kg 12068

EP075(SIM): Anthracene 120-12-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 96.510 mg/kg 11969

EP075(SIM): Fluoranthene 206-44-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 96.710 mg/kg 11969

EP075(SIM): Pyrene 129-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 97.010 mg/kg 11969

EP075(SIM): Benz(a)anthracene 56-55-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 10210 mg/kg 12264

EP075(SIM): Chrysene 218-01-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 10110 mg/kg 12367

EP075(SIM): Benzo(b)fluoranthene 205-99-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 95.810 mg/kg 12163

Page 202: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

22 of 28:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report

Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report

Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%)

Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1449269) - continued

EP075(SIM): Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 93.310 mg/kg 12666

EP075(SIM): Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 94.910 mg/kg 12167

EP075(SIM): Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene 193-39-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 10010 mg/kg 12559

EP075(SIM): Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 53-70-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 99.110 mg/kg 12559

EP075(SIM): Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 191-24-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 99.210 mg/kg 12359

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1449271)

EP075(SIM): Naphthalene 91-20-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 95.610 mg/kg 11870

EP075(SIM): Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 96.010 mg/kg 12068

EP075(SIM): Acenaphthene 83-32-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 91.810 mg/kg 11771

EP075(SIM): Fluorene 86-73-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 89.210 mg/kg 12571

EP075(SIM): Phenanthrene 85-01-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 92.010 mg/kg 12068

EP075(SIM): Anthracene 120-12-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 91.110 mg/kg 11969

EP075(SIM): Fluoranthene 206-44-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 92.910 mg/kg 11969

EP075(SIM): Pyrene 129-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 92.410 mg/kg 11969

EP075(SIM): Benz(a)anthracene 56-55-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 92.710 mg/kg 12264

EP075(SIM): Chrysene 218-01-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 89.010 mg/kg 12367

EP075(SIM): Benzo(b)fluoranthene 205-99-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 90.810 mg/kg 12163

EP075(SIM): Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 10010 mg/kg 12666

EP075(SIM): Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 10110 mg/kg 12167

EP075(SIM): Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene 193-39-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 12110 mg/kg 12559

EP075(SIM): Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 53-70-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 11710 mg/kg 12559

EP075(SIM): Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 191-24-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 # 13410 mg/kg 12359

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1449481)

EP075(SIM): Naphthalene 91-20-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 98.210 mg/kg 11870

EP075(SIM): Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 10110 mg/kg 12068

EP075(SIM): Acenaphthene 83-32-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 98.210 mg/kg 11771

EP075(SIM): Fluorene 86-73-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 97.810 mg/kg 12571

EP075(SIM): Phenanthrene 85-01-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 96.010 mg/kg 12068

EP075(SIM): Anthracene 120-12-7 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 96.810 mg/kg 11969

EP075(SIM): Fluoranthene 206-44-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 97.010 mg/kg 11969

EP075(SIM): Pyrene 129-00-0 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 99.010 mg/kg 11969

EP075(SIM): Benz(a)anthracene 56-55-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 98.410 mg/kg 12264

EP075(SIM): Chrysene 218-01-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 99.610 mg/kg 12367

EP075(SIM): Benzo(b)fluoranthene 205-99-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 98.210 mg/kg 12163

EP075(SIM): Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 97.310 mg/kg 12666

EP075(SIM): Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 96.310 mg/kg 12167

EP075(SIM): Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene 193-39-5 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 93.910 mg/kg 12559

EP075(SIM): Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 53-70-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 94.910 mg/kg 12559

EP075(SIM): Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 191-24-2 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 92.710 mg/kg 12359

Page 203: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

23 of 28:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report

Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report

Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%)

Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit

EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Halogenated) (QCLot: 1449128)

EP075-EM: 2-Chlorophenol 95-57-8 0.03 mg/kg <0.03 89.50.5 mg/kg 13939.8

EP075-EM: 2.4-Dichlorophenol 120-83-2 0.03 mg/kg <0.03 89.20.5 mg/kg 13535

EP075-EM: 2.6-Dichlorophenol 87-65-0 0.03 mg/kg <0.03 91.10.5 mg/kg 13636.7

EP075-EM: 4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 59-50-7 0.03 mg/kg <0.03 99.80.5 mg/kg 14145.2

EP075-EM: 2.4.5-Trichlorophenol 95-95-4 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 90.90.5 mg/kg 13741.4

EP075-EM: 2.4.6-Trichlorophenol 88-06-2 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 91.80.5 mg/kg 14342.2

EP075-EM: 2.3.5.6-Tetrachlorophenol 935-95-5 0.03 mg/kg <0.03 57.10.5 mg/kg 13941

EP075-EM: 2.3.4.5 & 2.3.4.6-Tetrachlorophenol 4901-51-3/58-90-2

0.05 mg/kg <0.05 72.11.0 mg/kg 14523.6

EP075-EM: Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 41.60.5 mg/kg 14425

EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Non-halogenated) (QCLot: 1449128)

EP075-EM: Phenol 108-95-2 0.1 mg/kg ---- 87.80.5 mg/kg 144441 mg/kg <1 -------- --------

EP075-EM: 2-Methylphenol 95-48-7 0.1 mg/kg ---- 88.00.5 mg/kg 13539.11 mg/kg <1 -------- --------

EP075-EM: 3- & 4-Methylphenol 1319-77-3 0.1 mg/kg ---- 80.21 mg/kg 17633.81 mg/kg <1 -------- --------

EP075-EM: 2-Nitrophenol 88-75-5 0.1 mg/kg ---- 85.50.5 mg/kg 14525.61 mg/kg <1 -------- --------

EP075-EM: 2.4-Dimethylphenol 105-67-9 0.1 mg/kg ---- 48.80.5 mg/kg 138101 mg/kg <1 -------- --------

EP075-EM: 2.4-Dinitrophenol 51-28-5 0.1 mg/kg ---- 26.73 mg/kg 13615.95 mg/kg <5 -------- --------

EP075-EM: 4-Nitrophenol 100-02-7 0.1 mg/kg ---- 96.43 mg/kg 15541.15 mg/kg <5 -------- --------

EP075-EM: 2-Methyl-4.6-dinitrophenol 8071-51-0 0.1 mg/kg ---- 54.73 mg/kg 13315.45 mg/kg <5 -------- --------

EP075-EM: Dinoseb 88-85-7 0.1 mg/kg ---- 71.63 mg/kg 136325 mg/kg <5 -------- --------

EP075-EM: 2-Cyclohexyl-4.6-Dinitrophenol 131-89-5 0.1 mg/kg ---- 38.33 mg/kg 169105 mg/kg <5 -------- --------

EP075B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1449128)

EP075-EM: Naphthalene 91-20-3 0.1 mg/kg ---- 90.80.5 mg/kg 13641.20.5 mg/kg <0.5 -------- --------

EP075-EM: Acenaphthene 83-32-9 0.1 mg/kg ---- 92.90.5 mg/kg 133480.5 mg/kg <0.5 -------- --------

EP075-EM: Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 0.1 mg/kg ---- 1000.5 mg/kg 13745.20.5 mg/kg <0.5 -------- --------

EP075-EM: Fluorene 86-73-7 0.1 mg/kg ---- 95.10.5 mg/kg 13649.60.5 mg/kg <0.5 -------- --------

Page 204: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

24 of 28:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report

Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report

Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%)

Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit

EP075B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1449128) - continued

EP075-EM: Phenanthrene 85-01-8 0.1 mg/kg ---- 93.20.5 mg/kg 13261.80.5 mg/kg <0.5 -------- --------

EP075-EM: Anthracene 120-12-7 0.1 mg/kg ---- 91.70.5 mg/kg 12761.30.5 mg/kg <0.5 -------- --------

EP075-EM: Fluoranthene 206-44-0 0.1 mg/kg ---- 94.50.5 mg/kg 13466.20.5 mg/kg <0.5 -------- --------

EP075-EM: Pyrene 129-00-0 0.1 mg/kg ---- 93.80.5 mg/kg 13267.50.5 mg/kg <0.5 -------- --------

EP075-EM: Benz(a)anthracene 56-55-3 0.1 mg/kg ---- 92.60.5 mg/kg 13364.90.5 mg/kg <0.5 -------- --------

EP075-EM: Chrysene 218-01-9 0.1 mg/kg ---- 92.50.5 mg/kg 13666.20.5 mg/kg <0.5 -------- --------

EP075-EM: Benzo(b) & Benzo(k)fluoranthene 205-99-2 207-08-9

0.1 mg/kg ---- 93.61.0 mg/kg 13365.40.5 mg/kg <0.5 -------- --------

EP075-EM: Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 0.1 mg/kg ---- 91.30.5 mg/kg 13162.40.5 mg/kg <0.5 -------- --------

EP075-EM: Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene 193-39-5 0.1 mg/kg ---- 94.10.5 mg/kg 14831.50.5 mg/kg <0.5 -------- --------

EP075-EM: Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 53-70-3 0.1 mg/kg ---- 96.20.5 mg/kg 14533.30.5 mg/kg <0.5 -------- --------

EP075-EM: Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 191-24-2 0.1 mg/kg ---- 94.80.5 mg/kg 15328.90.5 mg/kg <0.5 -------- --------

EP075I: Organochlorine Pesticides (QCLot: 1449128)

EP075-EM: alpha-BHC 319-84-6 0.03 mg/kg <0.03 95.80.5 mg/kg 13754.9

EP075-EM: Hexachlorobenzene (HCB) 118-74-1 0.03 mg/kg <0.03 95.60.5 mg/kg 13324.4

EP075-EM: beta-BHC 319-85-7 0.03 mg/kg <0.03 96.60.5 mg/kg 13847

EP075-EM: gamma-BHC 58-89-9 0.03 mg/kg <0.03 95.00.5 mg/kg 13560.3

EP075-EM: delta-BHC 319-86-8 0.03 mg/kg <0.03 93.80.5 mg/kg 13268.1

EP075-EM: Heptachlor 76-44-8 0.03 mg/kg <0.03 94.90.5 mg/kg 13261.4

EP075-EM: Aldrin 309-00-2 0.03 mg/kg <0.03 96.30.5 mg/kg 13163.1

EP075-EM: Heptachlor epoxide 1024-57-3 0.03 mg/kg <0.03 93.50.5 mg/kg 12967.9

EP075-EM: cis-Chlordane 5103-71-9 0.03 mg/kg <0.03 94.10.5 mg/kg 13738.8

EP075-EM: trans-Chlordane 5103-74-2 0.03 mg/kg <0.03 94.10.5 mg/kg 13365

EP075-EM: Endosulfan 1 959-98-8 0.03 mg/kg <0.03 95.80.5 mg/kg 13663.5

EP075-EM: 4.4`-DDE 72-55-9 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 90.10.5 mg/kg 13362.3

EP075-EM: Dieldrin 60-57-1 0.03 mg/kg <0.03 94.30.5 mg/kg 13467.6

EP075-EM: Endrin aldehyde 7421-93-4 0.03 mg/kg <0.03 95.70.5 mg/kg 17725.1

EP075-EM: Endrin 72-20-8 0.03 mg/kg <0.03 1160.5 mg/kg 13760.7

EP075-EM: Endosulfan 2 33213-65-9 0.03 mg/kg <0.03 93.50.5 mg/kg 13867.8

EP075-EM: 4.4`-DDD 72-54-8 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 94.70.5 mg/kg 13566.5

Page 205: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

25 of 28:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report

Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report

Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%)

Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit

EP075I: Organochlorine Pesticides (QCLot: 1449128) - continued

EP075-EM: Endosulfan sulfate 1031-07-8 0.03 mg/kg <0.03 94.60.5 mg/kg 14060

EP075-EM: 4.4`-DDT 50-29-3 0.05 mg/kg <0.05 92.40.5 mg/kg 13961

EP075-EM: Methoxychlor 72-43-5 0.03 mg/kg <0.03 98.40.5 mg/kg 13864.2

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1449013)

EP080: C6 - C9 Fraction ---- 10 mg/kg <10 12432 mg/kg 13371

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1449025)

EP080: C6 - C9 Fraction ---- 10 mg/kg <10 99.332 mg/kg 13371

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1449031)

EP074-UT: C6 - C9 Fraction ---- 10 mg/kg <10 98.233.1 mg/kg 12073.2

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1449268)

EP071: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <50 97.7479 mg/kg 12354

EP071: C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 88.61669 mg/kg 13474

EP071: C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 84.9436 mg/kg 14363

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1449270)

EP071: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <50 104479 mg/kg 12354

EP071: C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 76.31669 mg/kg 13474

EP071: C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 68.3436 mg/kg 14363

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1449480)

EP071: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <50 95.5479 mg/kg 12354

EP071: C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 81.61669 mg/kg 13474

EP071: C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 78.6436 mg/kg 14363

EP080: BTEX (QCLot: 1449013)

EP080: Benzene 71-43-2 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 1082 mg/kg 12270

EP080: Toluene 108-88-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 1122 mg/kg 12272

EP080: Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 1102 mg/kg 12468

EP080: meta- & para-Xylene 108-38-3 106-42-3

0.5 mg/kg <0.5 1254 mg/kg 13169

EP080: ortho-Xylene 95-47-6 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 1142 mg/kg 12472

EP080: BTEX (QCLot: 1449025)

EP080: Benzene 71-43-2 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 1012 mg/kg 12270

EP080: Toluene 108-88-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 99.52 mg/kg 12272

EP080: Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 95.62 mg/kg 12468

EP080: meta- & para-Xylene 108-38-3 106-42-3

0.5 mg/kg <0.5 97.24 mg/kg 13169

EP080: ortho-Xylene 95-47-6 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 96.62 mg/kg 12472

Page 206: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

26 of 28:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Matrix Spike (MS) ReportThe quality control term Matrix Spike (MS) refers to an intralaboratory split sample spiked with a representative set of target analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor potential matrix effects on analyte recoveries. Static Recovery Limits as per laboratory Data Quality Objectives (DQOs). Ideal recovery ranges stated may be waived in the event of sample matrix interference.

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report

Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike

HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES (QCLot: 1449037)

TP1 (1.0-1.1)EM1008731-002 7440-38-2EG005T: Arsenic 86.450 mg/kg 130707440-43-9EG005T: Cadmium 10250 mg/kg 130707440-47-3EG005T: Chromium 86.450 mg/kg 130707440-50-8EG005T: Copper 10350 mg/kg 130707439-92-1EG005T: Lead 92.650 mg/kg 130707439-98-7EG005T: Molybdenum 87.750 mg/kg 130707440-02-0EG005T: Nickel 10950 mg/kg 130707782-49-2EG005T: Selenium 96.750 mg/kg 130707440-66-6EG005T: Zinc 94.150 mg/kg 13070

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES (QCLot: 1449039)

TP6 (0.4-0.5)EM1008731-026 7440-38-2EG005T: Arsenic 77.750 mg/kg 130707440-43-9EG005T: Cadmium 99.450 mg/kg 130707440-47-3EG005T: Chromium 75.550 mg/kg 130707440-50-8EG005T: Copper # Not Determined50 mg/kg 130707439-92-1EG005T: Lead 97.250 mg/kg 130707439-98-7EG005T: Molybdenum 94.050 mg/kg 130707440-02-0EG005T: Nickel 84.650 mg/kg 130707782-49-2EG005T: Selenium 10550 mg/kg 130707440-66-6EG005T: Zinc # Not Determined50 mg/kg 13070

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES (QCLot: 1449200)

TP11 (1.7-1.8)EM1008731-052 7440-38-2EG005T: Arsenic 11650 mg/kg 130707440-43-9EG005T: Cadmium 96.350 mg/kg 130707440-47-3EG005T: Chromium 77.450 mg/kg 130707440-50-8EG005T: Copper # Not Determined50 mg/kg 130707439-92-1EG005T: Lead # Not Determined50 mg/kg 130707439-98-7EG005T: Molybdenum 10350 mg/kg 130707440-02-0EG005T: Nickel 71.850 mg/kg 130707782-49-2EG005T: Selenium 11150 mg/kg 130707440-66-6EG005T: Zinc # Not Determined50 mg/kg 13070

EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (QCLot: 1449038)

TP1 (1.0-1.1)EM1008731-002 7439-97-6EG035T: Mercury 84.25.0 mg/kg 13070

EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (QCLot: 1449040)

TP6 (0.4-0.5)EM1008731-026 7439-97-6EG035T: Mercury 86.65.0 mg/kg 13070

EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (QCLot: 1449201)

Page 207: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

27 of 28:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report

Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike

HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number

EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (QCLot: 1449201) - continued

TP11 (1.7-1.8)EM1008731-052 7439-97-6EG035T: Mercury 81.75.0 mg/kg 13070

EG048: Hexavalent Chromium (Alkaline Digest) (QCLot: 1449399)

TP2 (1.9-2.0)EM1008731-008 18540-29-9EG048: Hexavalent Chromium # 39.540 mg/kg 13070

EK025G: Free cyanide by Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 1449301)

TP6 (1.4-1.5)EM1008731-027 ----EK025G: Free Cyanide 79.25 mg/kg 13070

EK026G: Total Cyanide By Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 1449415)

TP2 (1.9-2.0)EM1008731-008 57-12-5EK026G: Total Cyanide 95.720 mg/kg 13070

EP066: Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) (QCLot: 1449129)

TP3 (1.4-1.5)EM1008731-013 ----EP066-EM: Total Polychlorinated biphenyls # 45.00.5 mg/kg 12367

EP074A: Monocyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1449031)

TP2 (1.9-2.0)EM1008731-008 71-43-2EP074-UT: Benzene 1152 mg/kg 13070108-88-3EP074-UT: Toluene 1102 mg/kg 13070

EP074I: Volatile Halogenated Compounds (QCLot: 1449031)

TP2 (1.9-2.0)EM1008731-008 75-35-4EP074-UT: 1.1-Dichloroethene 1052 mg/kg 1307079-01-6EP074-UT: Trichloroethene 96.32 mg/kg 13070108-90-7EP074-UT: Chlorobenzene 1102 mg/kg 13070

EP075(SIM)A: Phenolic Compounds (QCLot: 1449269)

TP2 (1.4-1.5)EM1008731-007 108-95-2EP075(SIM): Phenol 80.310 mg/kg 1307095-57-8EP075(SIM): 2-Chlorophenol 88.310 mg/kg 1307088-75-5EP075(SIM): 2-Nitrophenol 75.710 mg/kg 1307059-50-7EP075(SIM): 4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 75.010 mg/kg 1307087-86-5EP075(SIM): Pentachlorophenol 90.010 mg/kg 13070

EP075(SIM)A: Phenolic Compounds (QCLot: 1449271)

TP8 (2.4-2.5)EM1008731-037 108-95-2EP075(SIM): Phenol 93.210 mg/kg 1307095-57-8EP075(SIM): 2-Chlorophenol 93.610 mg/kg 1307088-75-5EP075(SIM): 2-Nitrophenol 83.810 mg/kg 1307059-50-7EP075(SIM): 4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 94.510 mg/kg 1307087-86-5EP075(SIM): Pentachlorophenol 75.910 mg/kg 13070

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1449269)

TP2 (1.4-1.5)EM1008731-007 83-32-9EP075(SIM): Acenaphthene 11510 mg/kg 13070129-00-0EP075(SIM): Pyrene 95.910 mg/kg 13070

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1449271)

TP8 (2.4-2.5)EM1008731-037 83-32-9EP075(SIM): Acenaphthene 93.410 mg/kg 13070129-00-0EP075(SIM): Pyrene 10010 mg/kg 13070

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1449481)

AnonymousEM1008775-026 83-32-9EP075(SIM): Acenaphthene 85.110 mg/kg 13070

Page 208: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

28 of 28:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report

Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike

HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1449481) - continued

AnonymousEM1008775-026 129-00-0EP075(SIM): Pyrene 78.410 mg/kg 13070

EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Halogenated) (QCLot: 1449128)

TP2 (1.9-2.0)EM1008731-008 95-57-8EP075-EM: 2-Chlorophenol # 63.80.5 mg/kg 1307059-50-7EP075-EM: 4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol # 69.80.5 mg/kg 1307087-86-5EP075-EM: Pentachlorophenol # 13.30.5 mg/kg 13070

EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Non-halogenated) (QCLot: 1449128)

TP2 (1.9-2.0)EM1008731-008 108-95-2EP075-EM: Phenol # 58.90.5 mg/kg 1307088-75-5EP075-EM: 2-Nitrophenol # 48.60.5 mg/kg 13070

EP075B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1449128)

TP2 (1.9-2.0)EM1008731-008 83-32-9EP075-EM: Acenaphthene # 65.20.5 mg/kg 13070129-00-0EP075-EM: Pyrene 93.40.5 mg/kg 13070

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1449013)

TP2 (1.4-1.5)EM1008731-007 ----EP080: C6 - C9 Fraction 99.328 mg/kg 13070

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1449025)

TP12 (1.4-1.5)EM1008731-055 ----EP080: C6 - C9 Fraction 73.728 mg/kg 13070

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1449031)

TP2 (1.9-2.0)EM1008731-008 ----EP074-UT: C6 - C9 Fraction 86.528 mg/kg 13070

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1449268)

TP1 (1.5-1.6)EM1008731-003 ----EP071: C10 - C14 Fraction 87.8479 mg/kg 13060----EP071: C15 - C28 Fraction 1111669 mg/kg 13060----EP071: C29 - C36 Fraction 123436 mg/kg 13060

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1449270)

TP9 (0.9-1.0)EM1008731-040 ----EP071: C10 - C14 Fraction 93.5479 mg/kg 13060----EP071: C15 - C28 Fraction 81.11669 mg/kg 13060----EP071: C29 - C36 Fraction 70.7436 mg/kg 13060

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1449480)

TP11 (2.9-3.0)EM1008731-069 ----EP071: C10 - C14 Fraction 100479 mg/kg 13060----EP071: C15 - C28 Fraction 73.21669 mg/kg 13060----EP071: C29 - C36 Fraction # Not Determined436 mg/kg 13060

EP080: BTEX (QCLot: 1449013)

TP2 (1.4-1.5)EM1008731-007 71-43-2EP080: Benzene 1192 mg/kg 13070108-88-3EP080: Toluene 1242 mg/kg 13070

EP080: BTEX (QCLot: 1449025)

TP12 (1.4-1.5)EM1008731-055 71-43-2EP080: Benzene 87.32 mg/kg 13070108-88-3EP080: Toluene 89.92 mg/kg 13070

Page 209: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

True

INTERPRETIVE QUALITY CONTROL REPORTWork Order : EM1008731 Page : 1 of 22

:Amendment 1

:: LaboratoryClient Environmental Division MelbourneENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES: :ContactContact MR JORDAN FRASER Steven McGrath

:: AddressAddress P.O.BOX 2253FOOTSCRAY VIC, AUSTRALIA 3011

4 Westall Rd Springvale VIC Australia 3171

:: E-mailE-mail [email protected] [email protected]:: TelephoneTelephone +61 03 96871666 +61-3-8549 9600:: FacsimileFacsimile +61 03 96871844 +61-3-8549 9601

:Project 210061 QC Level : NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirementSite : YARRAVILLE

:C-O-C number ---- Date Samples Received : 11-AUG-2010JF:Sampler Issue Date : 27-AUG-2010

:Order number ----No. of samples received : 71

Quote number : EN/010/10 No. of samples analysed : 63

This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. All pages of this report have been checked and approved for release.

This Interpretive Quality Control Report contains the following information:l Analysis Holding Time Compliancel Quality Control Parameter Frequency Compliancel Brief Method Summariesl Summary of Outliers

Environmental Division Melbourne

4 Westall Rd Springvale VIC Australia 3171Tel. +61-3-8549 9600 Fax. +61-3-8549 9601 www.alsglobal.com

Page 210: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

2 of 22:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analysis Holding Time ComplianceThe following report summarises extraction / preparation and analysis times and compares with recommended holding times. Dates reported represent first date of extraction or analysis and precludes subsequent dilutions and reruns. Information is also provided re the sample container (preservative) from which the analysis aliquot was taken. Elapsed period to analysis represents number of days from sampling where no extraction / digestion is involved or period from extraction / digestion where this is present. For composite samples, sampling date is assumed to be that of the oldest sample contributing to the composite. Sample date for laboratory produced leachates is assumed as the completion date of the leaching process. Outliers for holding time are based on USEPA SW 846, APHA, AS and NEPM (1999). A listing of breaches is provided in the Summary of Outliers.

Holding times for leachate methods (excluding elutriates) vary according to the analytes being determined on the resulting solution. For non -volatile analytes, the holding time compliance assessment compares the leach date with the shortest analyte holding time for the equivalent soil method. These soil holding times are: Organics (14 days); Mercury (28 days) & other metals (180 days). A recorded breach therefore does not guarantee a breach for all non-volatile parameters.

Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod

EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s)

EA013: Acid Neutralising CapacityPulp Bag

15-FEB-201109-AUG-2011TP3 (2.0-2.1), TP4 (2.1-2.2),TP11 (1.9-2.0), TP8 (2.0-2.1),TP10 (1.8-1.9)

19-AUG-201019-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 ü ü

EA029-A: pH MeasurementsSnap Lock Bag

17-NOV-201010-AUG-2010TP4 (2.1-2.2), TP10 (1.8-1.9) 19-AUG-201019-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 û üEA029-B: Acidity TrailSnap Lock Bag

17-NOV-201010-AUG-2010TP4 (2.1-2.2), TP10 (1.8-1.9) 19-AUG-201019-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 û üEA029-C: Sulfur TrailSnap Lock Bag

17-NOV-201010-AUG-2010TP4 (2.1-2.2), TP10 (1.8-1.9) 19-AUG-201019-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 û üEA029-D: Calcium ValuesSnap Lock Bag

17-NOV-201010-AUG-2010TP4 (2.1-2.2), TP10 (1.8-1.9) 19-AUG-201019-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 û üEA029-E: Magnesium ValuesSnap Lock Bag

17-NOV-201010-AUG-2010TP4 (2.1-2.2), TP10 (1.8-1.9) 19-AUG-201019-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 û üEA029-F: Excess Acid Neutralising CapacitySnap Lock Bag

17-NOV-201010-AUG-2010TP4 (2.1-2.2), TP10 (1.8-1.9) 19-AUG-201019-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 û üEA029-G: Retained AciditySnap Lock Bag

17-NOV-201010-AUG-2010TP4 (2.1-2.2), TP10 (1.8-1.9) 19-AUG-201019-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 û üEA029-H: Acid Base AccountingSnap Lock Bag

17-NOV-201010-AUG-2010TP4 (2.1-2.2), TP10 (1.8-1.9) 19-AUG-201019-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 û ü

Page 211: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

3 of 22:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod

EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s)

EA033-A: Actual AciditySnap Lock Bag

17-NOV-201010-AUG-2010TP4 (2.1-2.2), TP10 (1.8-1.9) 19-AUG-201019-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 û üEA033-B: Potential AciditySnap Lock Bag

17-NOV-201010-AUG-2010TP4 (2.1-2.2), TP10 (1.8-1.9) 19-AUG-201019-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 û üEA033-C: Acid Neutralising CapacitySnap Lock Bag

17-NOV-201010-AUG-2010TP4 (2.1-2.2), TP10 (1.8-1.9) 19-AUG-201019-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 û üEA033-D: Retained AciditySnap Lock Bag

17-NOV-201010-AUG-2010TP4 (2.1-2.2), TP10 (1.8-1.9) 19-AUG-201019-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 û üEA033-E: Acid Base AccountingSnap Lock Bag

17-NOV-201010-AUG-2010TP4 (2.1-2.2), TP10 (1.8-1.9) 19-AUG-201019-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 û ü

Page 212: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

4 of 22:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod

EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s)

EA055: Moisture ContentSnap Lock Bag

16-AUG-2010----TP8 (2.0-2.1), TP10 (1.8-1.9) 16-AUG-2010----09-AUG-2010 ---- üSoil Glass Jar - Unpreserved

16-AUG-2010----TP1 (0.4-0.5), TP1 (1.0-1.1),TP1 (1.5-1.6), TP1 (2.0-2.1),TP2 (0.4-0.5), TP2 (1.4-1.5),TP2 (1.9-2.0), TP2 (3.2-3.3),TP3 (0-0.1), TP3 (0.4-0.5),TP3 (1.4-1.5), TP3 (2.0-2.1),TP3 (2.4-2.5), TP4 (0-0.1),TP4 (0.4-0.5), TP4 (1.4-1.5),DUP1, DUP2, TP4 (2.1-2.2),TP5 (0.4-0.5), TP5 (1.4-1.5),TP5 (2.9-3.0), TP5 (3.9-4.0),TP6 (0-0.1), TP6 (0.4-0.5),TP6 (1.4-1.5), TP6 (1.9-2.0),TP7 (0-0.1), TP7 (0.9-1.0),TP7 (2.0-2.1), TP8 (0.2-0.3),TP8 (0.9-1.0), TP8 (1.9-2.0),TP8 (2.4-2.5), TP8 (2.9-3.0),TP9 (0.4-0.5), TP9 (0.9-1.0),TP9 (1.9-2.0), TP9 (2.0-2.1),TP9B (2.5-2.6), TP10 (0.1-0.2),TP10 (1.4-1.5), TP10 (1.9-2.0),TP10 (2.4-2.5),TP11 (0-0.1), TP11 (1.7-1.8),TP11 (1.9-2.0), TP12 (0.4-0.5),TP12 (1.4-1.5), TP12 (1.9-2.0),TP12 (2.4-2.5), DUP3,TP13 (0-0.1), TP13 (0.4-0.5),TP13 (1.5-1.6), TP13 (2.0-2.1),TP14 (0.9-1.0), TP14 (1.6-1.7),TP14 (2.8-2.9), TP5 (2.0-2.1),TP11 (2.9-3.0)

13-AUG-2010----09-AUG-2010 ---- ü

ED007: Exchangeable CationsSnap Lock Bag

05-FEB-201105-FEB-2011TP3 (2.0-2.1), TP4 (2.1-2.2),TP11 (1.9-2.0), TP8 (2.0-2.1),TP10 (1.8-1.9)

20-AUG-201019-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 ü ü

ED042T: Total Sulfur by LECOPulp Bag

05-FEB-201105-FEB-2011TP3 (2.0-2.1), TP4 (2.1-2.2),TP11 (1.9-2.0), TP8 (2.0-2.1),TP10 (1.8-1.9)

18-AUG-201016-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 ü ü

Page 213: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

5 of 22:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod

EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s)

ED093S: Soluble Major CationsSnap Lock Bag

05-FEB-201105-FEB-2011TP8 (2.0-2.1), TP10 (1.8-1.9) 20-AUG-201019-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 ü üSoil Glass Jar - Unpreserved

05-FEB-201105-FEB-2011TP3 (2.0-2.1), TP4 (2.1-2.2),TP11 (1.9-2.0)

20-AUG-201013-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 ü ü

EG005S : Soluble Metals by ICPAESSnap Lock Bag

05-FEB-201105-FEB-2011TP8 (2.0-2.1), TP10 (1.8-1.9) 20-AUG-201019-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 ü üSoil Glass Jar - Unpreserved

05-FEB-201105-FEB-2011TP3 (2.0-2.1), TP4 (2.1-2.2),TP11 (1.9-2.0)

20-AUG-201013-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 ü ü

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AESSoil Glass Jar - Unpreserved

05-FEB-201105-FEB-2011TP1 (0.4-0.5), TP1 (1.0-1.1),TP1 (1.5-1.6), TP1 (2.0-2.1),TP2 (0.4-0.5), TP2 (1.4-1.5),TP2 (1.9-2.0), TP2 (3.2-3.3),TP3 (0-0.1), TP3 (0.4-0.5),TP3 (1.4-1.5), TP3 (2.0-2.1),TP3 (2.4-2.5), TP4 (0-0.1),TP4 (1.4-1.5), DUP1,TP4 (2.1-2.2), DUP2, TP5 (0.4-0.5),TP5 (1.4-1.5), TP5 (3.9-4.0),TP6 (0-0.1), TP6 (0.4-0.5),TP6 (1.4-1.5), TP6 (1.9-2.0),TP7 (0-0.1), TP7 (0.9-1.0),TP7 (2.0-2.1), TP8 (0.2-0.3),TP8 (0.9-1.0), TP8 (1.9-2.0),TP8 (2.9-3.0), TP9 (0.4-0.5),TP9 (0.9-1.0), TP9 (1.9-2.0),TP9B (2.5-2.6), TP10 (0.1-0.2),TP10 (1.4-1.5), TP10 (1.9-2.0),TP10 (2.4-2.5),TP11 (0-0.1), TP11 (1.7-1.8),TP11 (1.9-2.0), TP12 (0.4-0.5),TP12 (1.4-1.5), TP12 (1.9-2.0),TP12 (2.4-2.5), DUP3,TP13 (0-0.1), TP13 (0.4-0.5),TP13 (1.5-1.6), TP13 (2.0-2.1),TP14 (0.9-1.0), TP14 (1.6-1.7),TP14 (2.8-2.9), TP5 (2.0-2.1),TP11 (2.9-3.0)

19-AUG-201013-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 ü ü

Page 214: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

6 of 22:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod

EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s)

EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMSSoil Glass Jar - Unpreserved

06-SEP-201006-SEP-2010TP11 (0-0.1), TP11 (1.7-1.8),TP11 (1.9-2.0), TP12 (0.4-0.5),TP12 (1.4-1.5), TP12 (1.9-2.0),TP12 (2.4-2.5), DUP3,TP13 (0-0.1), TP13 (0.4-0.5),TP13 (1.5-1.6), TP13 (2.0-2.1),TP14 (0.9-1.0), TP14 (1.6-1.7),TP14 (2.8-2.9), TP5 (2.0-2.1),TP11 (2.9-3.0)

17-AUG-201013-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 ü ü

Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved06-SEP-201006-SEP-2010TP1 (0.4-0.5), TP1 (1.0-1.1),

TP1 (1.5-1.6), TP1 (2.0-2.1),TP2 (0.4-0.5), TP2 (1.4-1.5),TP2 (1.9-2.0), TP2 (3.2-3.3),TP3 (0-0.1), TP3 (0.4-0.5),TP3 (1.4-1.5), TP3 (2.0-2.1),TP3 (2.4-2.5), TP4 (0-0.1),TP4 (1.4-1.5), DUP1,TP4 (2.1-2.2), DUP2, TP5 (0.4-0.5),TP5 (1.4-1.5), TP5 (3.9-4.0),TP6 (0-0.1), TP6 (0.4-0.5),TP6 (1.4-1.5), TP6 (1.9-2.0),TP7 (0-0.1), TP7 (0.9-1.0),TP7 (2.0-2.1), TP8 (0.2-0.3),TP8 (0.9-1.0), TP8 (1.9-2.0),TP8 (2.9-3.0), TP9 (0.4-0.5),TP9 (0.9-1.0), TP9 (1.9-2.0),TP9B (2.5-2.6), TP10 (0.1-0.2),TP10 (1.4-1.5), TP10 (1.9-2.0),TP10 (2.4-2.5)

20-AUG-201013-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 ü ü

EG048: Hexavalent Chromium (Alkaline Digest)Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved

20-AUG-201006-SEP-2010TP1 (1.5-1.6), TP2 (1.9-2.0),TP3 (1.4-1.5), TP4 (2.1-2.2),TP7 (0.9-1.0), TP9 (1.9-2.0),TP11 (1.7-1.8), TP13 (1.5-1.6),TP5 (2.0-2.1)

17-AUG-201013-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 ü ü

EK025G: Free cyanide by Discrete AnalyserSoil Glass Jar - Unpreserved

27-AUG-201016-AUG-2010TP4 (0-0.1), TP6 (1.4-1.5),TP8 (0.9-1.0), TP10 (1.4-1.5),TP10 (1.9-2.0), DUP2,TP12 (1.9-2.0), TP14 (1.6-1.7)

13-AUG-201013-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 ü ü

Page 215: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

7 of 22:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod

EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s)

EK026G: Total Cyanide By Discrete AnalyserSoil Glass Jar - Unpreserved

27-AUG-201016-AUG-2010TP1 (1.5-1.6), TP2 (1.9-2.0),TP3 (1.4-1.5), TP4 (0-0.1),TP4 (2.1-2.2), TP6 (1.4-1.5),TP7 (0.9-1.0), TP8 (0.9-1.0),TP9 (1.9-2.0), TP10 (1.4-1.5),TP10 (1.9-2.0), DUP2,TP11 (1.7-1.8), TP12 (1.9-2.0),TP13 (1.5-1.6), TP14 (1.6-1.7),TP5 (2.0-2.1)

16-AUG-201013-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 ü ü

EK040T: Fluoride TotalSoil Glass Jar - Unpreserved

16-AUG-201016-AUG-2010TP1 (1.5-1.6), TP2 (1.9-2.0),TP3 (1.4-1.5), TP4 (2.1-2.2),TP7 (0.9-1.0), TP9 (1.9-2.0),TP11 (1.7-1.8), TP13 (1.5-1.6),TP5 (2.0-2.1)

13-AUG-201013-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 ü ü

EP004: Organic MatterSnap Lock Bag

16-AUG-201016-AUG-2010TP8 (2.0-2.1), TP10 (1.8-1.9) 16-AUG-201016-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 ü üSoil Glass Jar - Unpreserved

16-AUG-201016-AUG-2010TP3 (2.0-2.1), TP4 (2.1-2.2),TP11 (1.9-2.0)

13-AUG-201013-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 ü ü

EP066: Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved

22-SEP-201023-AUG-2010TP1 (1.5-1.6), TP2 (1.9-2.0),TP3 (1.4-1.5), TP4 (2.1-2.2),TP7 (0.9-1.0), TP9 (1.9-2.0),TP11 (1.7-1.8), TP13 (1.5-1.6),TP5 (2.0-2.1)

17-AUG-201013-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 ü ü

EP074A: Monocyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsSoil Glass Jar - Unpreserved

23-AUG-201023-AUG-2010TP1 (1.5-1.6), TP2 (1.9-2.0),TP3 (1.4-1.5), TP4 (2.1-2.2),TP7 (0.9-1.0), TP9 (1.9-2.0),TP11 (1.7-1.8), TP13 (1.5-1.6),TP5 (2.0-2.1)

13-AUG-201013-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 ü ü

EP074I: Volatile Halogenated CompoundsSoil Glass Jar - Unpreserved

23-AUG-201023-AUG-2010TP1 (1.5-1.6), TP2 (1.9-2.0),TP3 (1.4-1.5), TP4 (2.1-2.2),TP7 (0.9-1.0), TP9 (1.9-2.0),TP11 (1.7-1.8), TP13 (1.5-1.6),TP5 (2.0-2.1)

13-AUG-201013-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 ü ü

Page 216: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

8 of 22:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod

EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s)

EP075(SIM)A: Phenolic CompoundsSoil Glass Jar - Unpreserved

22-SEP-201023-AUG-2010TP2 (1.4-1.5), TP5 (2.9-3.0),TP5 (3.9-4.0), TP6 (0.4-0.5),TP8 (2.4-2.5), TP9 (2.0-2.1),TP9B (2.5-2.6), TP10 (1.9-2.0),DUP2, TP10 (2.4-2.5),TP11 (1.9-2.0), TP12 (1.9-2.0),TP12 (2.4-2.5), DUP3,TP13 (2.0-2.1)

16-AUG-201013-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 ü ü

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic HydrocarbonsSoil Glass Jar - Unpreserved

22-SEP-201023-AUG-2010TP1 (1.0-1.1), TP2 (1.4-1.5),TP2 (3.2-3.3), TP3 (2.0-2.1),TP4 (0.4-0.5), TP4 (1.4-1.5),DUP1, TP5 (1.4-1.5),TP5 (2.9-3.0), TP5 (3.9-4.0),TP6 (0-0.1), TP6 (1.4-1.5),TP7 (2.0-2.1), TP8 (0.9-1.0),TP8 (1.9-2.0), TP9 (0.9-1.0),TP9 (2.0-2.1), DUP2,TP9B (2.5-2.6),TP10 (1.9-2.0), TP11 (1.9-2.0), TP12 (1.4-1.5),TP12 (1.9-2.0), TP12 (2.4-2.5),DUP3, TP13 (0.4-0.5),TP13 (2.0-2.1), TP14 (0.9-1.0),TP14 (1.6-1.7), TP11 (2.9-3.0)

16-AUG-201013-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 ü ü

EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Halogenated)Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved

22-SEP-201023-AUG-2010TP1 (1.5-1.6), TP2 (1.9-2.0),TP3 (1.4-1.5), TP4 (2.1-2.2),TP7 (0.9-1.0), TP9 (1.9-2.0),TP11 (1.7-1.8), TP13 (1.5-1.6),TP5 (2.0-2.1)

17-AUG-201013-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 ü ü

EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Non-halogenated)Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved

22-SEP-201023-AUG-2010TP1 (1.5-1.6), TP2 (1.9-2.0),TP3 (1.4-1.5), TP4 (2.1-2.2),TP7 (0.9-1.0), TP9 (1.9-2.0),TP11 (1.7-1.8), TP13 (1.5-1.6),TP5 (2.0-2.1)

17-AUG-201013-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 ü ü

Page 217: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

9 of 22:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod

EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s)

EP075B: Polynuclear Aromatic HydrocarbonsSoil Glass Jar - Unpreserved

22-SEP-201023-AUG-2010TP1 (1.5-1.6), TP2 (1.9-2.0),TP3 (1.4-1.5), TP4 (2.1-2.2),TP7 (0.9-1.0), TP9 (1.9-2.0),TP11 (1.7-1.8), TP13 (1.5-1.6),TP5 (2.0-2.1)

17-AUG-201013-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 ü ü

EP075I: Organochlorine PesticidesSoil Glass Jar - Unpreserved

22-SEP-201023-AUG-2010TP1 (1.5-1.6), TP2 (1.9-2.0),TP3 (1.4-1.5), TP4 (2.1-2.2),TP7 (0.9-1.0), TP9 (1.9-2.0),TP11 (1.7-1.8), TP13 (1.5-1.6),TP5 (2.0-2.1)

17-AUG-201013-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 ü ü

Page 218: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

10 of 22:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod

EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s)

EP080/071: Total Petroleum HydrocarbonsSoil Glass Jar - Unpreserved

23-AUG-201023-AUG-2010TP1 (1.0-1.1), TP1 (1.5-1.6),TP2 (1.4-1.5), TP2 (1.9-2.0),TP2 (3.2-3.3), TP3 (1.4-1.5),TP3 (2.0-2.1), TP4 (0.4-0.5),TP4 (1.4-1.5), DUP1,TP4 (2.1-2.2), TP5 (1.4-1.5),TP5 (2.9-3.0), TP5 (3.9-4.0),TP6 (0-0.1), TP6 (1.4-1.5),TP7 (0.9-1.0), DUP2,TP7 (2.0-2.1),TP8 (0.9-1.0), TP8 (1.9-2.0),TP9 (0.9-1.0), TP9 (1.9-2.0),TP9 (2.0-2.1), TP9B (2.5-2.6),TP10 (1.9-2.0), TP11 (1.7-1.8), TP11 (1.9-2.0),TP12 (1.4-1.5), TP12 (1.9-2.0),TP12 (2.4-2.5), DUP3,TP13 (0.4-0.5), TP13 (1.5-1.6),TP13 (2.0-2.1), TP14 (0.9-1.0),TP14 (1.6-1.7), TP5 (2.0-2.1),TP11 (2.9-3.0)

13-AUG-201013-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 ü ü

Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved22-SEP-201023-AUG-2010TP1 (1.0-1.1), TP1 (1.5-1.6),

TP2 (1.4-1.5), TP2 (1.9-2.0),TP2 (3.2-3.3), TP3 (1.4-1.5),TP3 (2.0-2.1), TP4 (0.4-0.5),TP4 (1.4-1.5), DUP1,TP4 (2.1-2.2), TP5 (1.4-1.5),TP5 (2.9-3.0), TP5 (3.9-4.0),TP6 (0-0.1), TP6 (1.4-1.5),TP7 (0.9-1.0), DUP2,TP7 (2.0-2.1),TP8 (0.9-1.0), TP8 (1.9-2.0),TP9 (0.9-1.0), TP9 (1.9-2.0),TP9 (2.0-2.1), TP9B (2.5-2.6),TP10 (1.9-2.0), TP11 (1.7-1.8), TP11 (1.9-2.0),TP12 (1.4-1.5), TP12 (1.9-2.0),TP12 (2.4-2.5), DUP3,TP13 (0.4-0.5), TP13 (1.5-1.6),TP13 (2.0-2.1), TP14 (0.9-1.0),TP14 (1.6-1.7), TP5 (2.0-2.1),TP11 (2.9-3.0)

16-AUG-201013-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 ü ü

Page 219: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

11 of 22:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod

EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s)

EP080: BTEXSoil Glass Jar - Unpreserved

23-AUG-201023-AUG-2010TP1 (1.0-1.1), TP2 (1.4-1.5),TP2 (3.2-3.3), TP3 (2.0-2.1),TP4 (0.4-0.5), TP4 (1.4-1.5),DUP1, TP5 (1.4-1.5),TP5 (2.9-3.0), TP5 (3.9-4.0),TP6 (0-0.1), TP6 (1.4-1.5),TP7 (2.0-2.1), TP8 (0.9-1.0),TP8 (1.9-2.0), TP9 (0.9-1.0),TP9 (2.0-2.1), DUP2,TP9B (2.5-2.6),TP10 (1.9-2.0), TP11 (1.9-2.0), TP12 (1.4-1.5),TP12 (1.9-2.0), TP12 (2.4-2.5),DUP3, TP13 (0.4-0.5),TP13 (2.0-2.1), TP14 (0.9-1.0),TP14 (1.6-1.7), TP11 (2.9-3.0)

13-AUG-201013-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 ü ü

Page 220: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

12 of 22:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Quality Control Parameter Frequency ComplianceThe following report summarises the frequency of laboratory QC samples analysed within the analytical lot(s) in which the submitted sample(s) was(where) processed. Actual rate should be greater than or equal to the expected rate. A listing of breaches is provided in the Summary of Outliers.

Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Quality Control frequency not within specification ; ü = Quality Control frequency within specification. Quality Control SpecificationQuality Control Sample Type

ExpectedQC Regular ActualRate (%)Quality Control Sample Type Count

EvaluationAnalytical Methods Method

Laboratory Duplicates (DUP)NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 14.3 10.01 7 üAcid Neutralising Capacity (ANC) EA013NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 33.3 10.02 6 üCations - soluble by ICP-AES ED093SNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 50.0 10.01 2 üChromium Suite for Acid Sulphate Soils EA033NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 20.0 10.01 5 üExchangeable Cations ED007NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 11.1 10.01 9 üFree Cyanide By Discrete Analyser EK025GNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 10.8 10.09 83 üMoisture Content EA055-103NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 28.6 10.02 7 üOrganic Matter EP004NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 14.3 10.06 42 üPAH/Phenols (SIM) EP075(SIM)NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 11.1 10.01 9 üPCB - VIC EPA 448.3 Screen EP066-EMNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 11.1 10.01 9 üSemivolatile Organic Compounds - Waste Classification EP075-EMNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 40.0 10.02 5 üSoluble Metals by ICPAES EG005SNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 20.0 10.01 5 üSulfur - Total as S (LECO) ED042TNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 14.3 10.01 7 üSuspension Peroxide Oxidation-Combined Acidity and

SulphateEA029

NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 11.1 10.02 18 üTotal Cyanide By Discrete Analyser EK026GNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 11.1 10.01 9 üTotal Fluoride EK040TNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 20.0 10.02 10 üTotal Hexavalent Chromium by Alkaline Digestion EG048NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 10.0 10.06 60 üTotal Mercury by FIMS EG035TNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 10.0 10.06 60 üTotal Metals by ICP-AES EG005TNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 11.8 10.06 51 üTPH - Semivolatile Fraction EP071NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 11.1 10.04 36 üTPH Volatiles/BTEX EP080NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 11.1 10.01 9 üVolatile Organic Compounds - Ultra-trace EP074-UT

Laboratory Control Samples (LCS)NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 14.3 5.01 7 üAcid Neutralising Capacity (ANC) EA013NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 25.0 5.01 4 üCations - soluble by ICP-AES ED093SNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 20.0 5.01 5 üExchangeable Cations ED007NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 11.1 5.01 9 üFree Cyanide By Discrete Analyser EK025GNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 28.6 5.02 7 üOrganic Matter EP004NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 7.1 5.03 42 üPAH/Phenols (SIM) EP075(SIM)NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 11.1 5.01 9 üPCB - VIC EPA 448.3 Screen EP066-EMNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 11.1 5.01 9 üSemivolatile Organic Compounds - Waste Classification EP075-EMNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 66.7 10.02 3 üSoluble Metals by ICPAES EG005SNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 20.0 5.01 5 üSulfur - Total as S (LECO) ED042TNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 5.6 5.01 18 üTotal Cyanide By Discrete Analyser EK026GNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 11.1 5.01 9 üTotal Fluoride EK040TNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 10.0 5.01 10 üTotal Hexavalent Chromium by Alkaline Digestion EG048NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 5.0 5.03 60 üTotal Mercury by FIMS EG035TNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 5.0 5.03 60 üTotal Metals by ICP-AES EG005TNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 5.9 5.03 51 üTPH - Semivolatile Fraction EP071

Page 221: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

13 of 22:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Quality Control frequency not within specification ; ü = Quality Control frequency within specification. Quality Control SpecificationQuality Control Sample Type

ExpectedQC Regular ActualRate (%)Quality Control Sample Type Count

EvaluationAnalytical Methods Method

Laboratory Control Samples (LCS) - ContinuedNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 5.6 5.02 36 üTPH Volatiles/BTEX EP080NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 11.1 5.01 9 üVolatile Organic Compounds - Ultra-trace EP074-UT

Method Blanks (MB)NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 33.3 5.02 6 üCations - soluble by ICP-AES ED093SNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 50.0 5.01 2 üChromium Suite for Acid Sulphate Soils EA033NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 20.0 5.01 5 üExchangeable Cations ED007NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 11.1 5.01 9 üFree Cyanide By Discrete Analyser EK025GNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 28.6 5.02 7 üOrganic Matter EP004NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 7.1 5.03 42 üPAH/Phenols (SIM) EP075(SIM)NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 11.1 5.01 9 üPCB - VIC EPA 448.3 Screen EP066-EMNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 11.1 5.01 9 üSemivolatile Organic Compounds - Waste Classification EP075-EMNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 40.0 5.02 5 üSoluble Metals by ICPAES EG005SNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 20.0 5.01 5 üSulfur - Total as S (LECO) ED042TNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 14.3 5.01 7 üSuspension Peroxide Oxidation-Combined Acidity and

SulphateEA029

NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 5.6 5.01 18 üTotal Cyanide By Discrete Analyser EK026GNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 11.1 5.01 9 üTotal Fluoride EK040TNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 10.0 5.01 10 üTotal Hexavalent Chromium by Alkaline Digestion EG048NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 5.0 5.03 60 üTotal Mercury by FIMS EG035TNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 5.0 5.03 60 üTotal Metals by ICP-AES EG005TNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 5.9 5.03 51 üTPH - Semivolatile Fraction EP071NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 5.6 5.02 36 üTPH Volatiles/BTEX EP080NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 11.1 5.01 9 üVolatile Organic Compounds - Ultra-trace EP074-UT

Matrix Spikes (MS)ALS QCS3 requirement 11.1 5.01 9 üFree Cyanide By Discrete Analyser EK025GALS QCS3 requirement 7.1 5.03 42 üPAH/Phenols (SIM) EP075(SIM)ALS QCS3 requirement 11.1 5.01 9 üPCB - VIC EPA 448.3 Screen EP066-EMALS QCS3 requirement 11.1 5.01 9 üSemivolatile Organic Compounds - Waste Classification EP075-EMALS QCS3 requirement 5.6 5.01 18 üTotal Cyanide By Discrete Analyser EK026GALS QCS3 requirement 10.0 5.01 10 üTotal Hexavalent Chromium by Alkaline Digestion EG048ALS QCS3 requirement 5.0 5.03 60 üTotal Mercury by FIMS EG035TALS QCS3 requirement 5.0 5.03 60 üTotal Metals by ICP-AES EG005TALS QCS3 requirement 5.9 5.03 51 üTPH - Semivolatile Fraction EP071ALS QCS3 requirement 5.6 5.02 36 üTPH Volatiles/BTEX EP080ALS QCS3 requirement 11.1 5.01 9 üVolatile Organic Compounds - Ultra-trace EP074-UT

Page 222: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

14 of 22:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Brief Method SummariesThe analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the US EPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. The following report provides brief descriptions of the analytical procedures employed for results reported in the Certificate of Analysis. Sources from which ALS methods have been developed are provided within the Method Descriptions.

Analytical Methods Method DescriptionsMatrixMethod

Asbestos Count on solid matrices using PLM conducted by Subcontracting LaboratoryAsbestos - Count (Solid) ASB-SOL SOILCoastech Research (Canada)(Mod.). NAPP = Acid Production Potential (APP or MAP- Maximum Acid Potential) minus Neutralising Capacity (ANC). NAPP may be +ve, zero or -ve.

Net Acid Production Potential EA009 SOIL

USEPA 600/2-78-054, I. Miller (2000). A fizz test is done to semiquanititatively estimate the likely reactivity. The soil is then reacted with an known excess quanitity of an appropriate acid. Titration determines the acid remaining, and the ANC can be calculated from comparison with a blank titration.

Acid Neutralising Capacity (ANC) EA013 SOIL

Ahern et al 2004 - a suspension peroxide oxidation method following the 'sulfur trail' by determining the level of 1M KCL extractable sulfur and the sulfur level after oxidation of soil sulphides. The 'acidity trail' is followed by measurement of TAA, TPA and TSA. Liming Rate is based on results for samples as submitted and incorporates a minimum safety factor of 1.5.

Suspension Peroxide Oxidation-Combined Acidity and Sulphate

EA029 SOIL

Ahern et al 2004. This method covers the determination of Chromium Reducible Sulfur (SCR); pHKCl; titratable actual acidity (TAA); acid neutralising capacity by back titration (ANC); and net acid soluble sulfur (SNAS) which incorporates peroxide sulfur. It applies to soils and sediments (including sands) derived from coastal regions. Liming Rate is based on results for samples as submitted and incorporates a minimum safety factor of 1.5.

Chromium Suite for Acid Sulphate Soils EA033 SOIL

A gravimetric procedure based on weight loss over a 12 hour drying period at 103-105 degrees C. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 102)

Moisture Content EA055-103 SOIL

Rayment & Higginson (1992) Method 15A1. Cations are exchanged from the sample by contact with Ammonium Chloride. They are then quantitated in the final solution by ICPAES and reported as meq/100g of original soil. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 301)

Exchangeable Cations ED007 SOIL

In-house. Dried and pulverised sample is combusted in a LECO furnace at 1350C in the presence of strong oxidants / catalysts. The evolved S (as SO2) is measured by infra-red detector

Sulfur - Total as S (LECO) ED042T SOIL

APHA 21st ed., 3120; USEPA SW 846 - 6010 (ICPAES) Water extracts of the soil are analyzed for major cations by ICPAES. The ICPAES technique ionises samples in a plasma, emitting a characteristic spectrum based on metals present. Intensities at selected wavelengths are compared against those of matrix matched standards. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3)

Cations - soluble by ICP-AES ED093S SOIL

(APHA 21st ed., 3120; USEPA SW 846 - 6010) (ICPAES) Soluble metals are determined following an appropriate soil / water extraction of the soil. The ICPAES technique ionises samples in a plasma, emitting characteristic spectrums based on metals present. Intensities at selected wavelengths are compared against those of matrix matched standards.

Soluble Metals by ICPAES EG005S SOIL

(APHA 21st ed., 3120; USEPA SW 846 - 6010) (ICPAES) Metals are determined following an appropriate acid digestion of the soil. The ICPAES technique ionises samples in a plasma, emitting a characteristic spectrum based on metals present. Intensities at selected wavelengths are compared against those of matrix matched standards. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3)

Total Metals by ICP-AES EG005T SOIL

AS 3550, APHA 21st ed., 3112 Hg - B (Flow-injection (SnCl2)(Cold Vapour generation) AAS) FIM-AAS is an automated flameless atomic absorption technique. Mercury in solids are determined following an appropriate acid digestion. Ionic mercury is reduced online to atomic mercury vapour by SnCl2 which is then purged into a heated quartz cell. Quantification is by comparing absorbance against a calibration curve. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3)

Total Mercury by FIMS EG035T SOIL

Page 223: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

15 of 22:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Analytical Methods Method DescriptionsMatrixMethod

USEPA SW846, Method 3060A. Hexavalent chromium is extracted by alkaline digestion. The digest is determined by UV-VIS spectrophotometer following pH adjustment and colour development using dephenylcarbazide. Each run of samples is measured against a five-point calibration curve. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Appdx. 2)

Total Hexavalent Chromium by Alkaline Digestion

EG048 SOIL

APHA 21st 4500 CN- C & N. Caustic leach extracts of the sample are distilled at natural pH. The distillates are analyzed for CN by Discrete Analyser.

Free Cyanide By Discrete Analyser EK025G SOIL

APHA 21st 4500 CN - C & N. Caustic leach extracts of the sample are distilled with sulphuric acid, converting all CN species to HCN. The distillates are analyzed for CN by Discrete Analyser. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 403)

Total Cyanide By Discrete Analyser EK026G SOIL

(In-house) Total fluoride is determined by ion specific electrode (ISE) in a solution obtained after a Sodium Carbonate / Potassium Carbonate fusion dissolution.

Total Fluoride EK040T SOIL

AS1289.4.1.1 - 1997., Dichromate oxidation method after Walkley and Black. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 105)

Organic Matter EP004 SOIL

(USEPA SW 846 - 8270B) Extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/MS and quantification is by comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 504)

PCB - VIC EPA 448.3 Screen EP066-EM SOIL

(USEPA SW 846 - 8015A) Sample extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/FID and quantified against alkane standards over the range C10 - C36. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 506.1)

TPH - Semivolatile Fraction EP071 SOIL

(USEPA SW 846 - 8260B) Extracts are analysed by Purge and Trap, Capillary GC/MS in partial SIM/Scan mode. Quantification is by comparison against an established multi-point calibration curves. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 501)

Volatile Organic Compounds - Ultra-trace * EP074-UT SOIL

Summation of MAHs and VHCsVolatile Organic Compounds - Ultra-trace - Summations

EP074-UT-SUM SOIL

(USEPA SW 846 - 8270B) Extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/MS in Selective Ion Mode (SIM) and quantification is by comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 502 and 507)

PAH/Phenols (SIM) EP075(SIM) SOIL

(USEPA SW 846 - 8270B) Extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/MS and quantification is by comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve. This technique is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 502)

Semivolatile Organic Compounds - Waste Classification

* EP075-EM SOIL

Summations for EP075 (EM variation)SVOC - Waste Classification (Sums) EP075-EM-SUM SOIL(USEPA SW 846 - 8260B) Extracts are analysed by Purge and Trap, Capillary GC/MS. Quantification is by comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 501)

TPH Volatiles/BTEX EP080 SOIL

Preparation Methods Method DescriptionsMatrixMethod

Rayment & Higginson (1992) method 15A1. A 1M NH4Cl extraction by end over end tumbling at a ratio of 1:20. There is no pretreatment for soluble salts. Extracts can be run by ICP for cations.

Exchangeable Cations Preparation Method

ED007PR SOIL

USEPA SW846, Method 3060A.Alkaline digestion for Hexavalent Chromium

EG048PR SOIL

APHA 21st ed., 4500 CN C & N. Cyanides in the soil are directly distilled from the soil at natural pH using a steam distillation aparatus.

Free Cyanide Preparation Method EK025 PR SOIL

APHA 21st ed., 4500 CN- C & N. Samples are extracted by end-over-end tumbling with NaOH.NaOH leach for TCN in Soils EK026PR SOIL(In-house) Samples are fused with Sodium Carbonate / Potassium Carbonate flux.Total Fluoride EK040T-PR SOILIn houseDrying at 85 degrees, bagging and

labelling (ASS)EN020PR SOIL

Page 224: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

16 of 22:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Preparation Methods Method DescriptionsMatrixMethod

10 g of soil is mixed with 50 mL of distilled water and tumbled end over end for 1 hour. Water soluble salts are leached from the soil by the continuous suspension. Samples are settled and the water filtered off for analysis.

1:5 solid / water leach for soluble analytes

EN34 SOIL

USEPA 200.2 Mod. Hot Block Acid Digestion 1.0g of sample is heated with Nitric and Hydrochloric acids, then cooled. Peroxide is added and samples heated and cooled again before being filtered and bulked to volume for analysis. Digest is appropriate for determination of selected metals in sludge, sediments, and soils. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 202)

Hot Block Digest for metals in soils sediments and sludges

EN69 SOIL

AS1289.4.1.1 - 1997., Dichromate oxidation method after Walkley and Black. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 105)

Organic Matter EP004-PR SOIL

(USEPA SW 846 - 5030A) 5g of solid is shaken with surrogate and 10mL methanol prior to analysis by Purge and Trap - GC/MS.

Methanolic Extraction of Soils for Purge and Trap

ORG16 SOIL

(USEPA SW 846 - 5030A) 5g of solid is shaken with surrogate and 10mL methanol prior to analysis by Purge and Trap - GC/MS.

Methanolic Extraction of Soils - Ultra-trace.

ORG16-UT SOIL

In-house, Mechanical agitation (tumbler). 20g of sample, Na2SO4 and surrogate are extracted with 150mL 1:1 DCM/Acetone by end over end tumble. The solvent is decanted, dehydrated and concentrated (by KD) to the desired volume for analysis.

Tumbler Extraction of Solids - VIC EPA Screen

ORG17A-EM SOIL

In-house, Mechanical agitation (tumbler). 10g of sample, Na2SO4 and surrogate are extracted with 20mL 1:1 DCM/Acetone by end over end tumble. The solvent is transferred directly to a GC vial for analysis.

Tumbler Extraction of Solids (Option B - Non-concentrating)

ORG17B SOIL

Page 225: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

17 of 22:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Summary of Outliers

Outliers : Quality Control SamplesThe following report highlights outliers flagged in the Quality Control (QC) Report. Surrogate recovery limits are static and based on USEPA SW846 or ALS-QWI/EN/38 (in the absence of specific USEPA limits). This report displays QC Outliers (breaches) only.

Duplicates, Method Blanks, Laboratory Control Samples and Matrix Spikes

Matrix: SOILCompound Group Name CommentLimitsDataAnalyteClient Sample IDLaboratory Sample ID CAS Number

Duplicate (DUP) RPDs EM1008731-025 206-44-0FluorantheneTP6 (0-0.1) RPD exceeds LOR based limits0-20%57.1 %EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic HydrocarbonsEM1008731-025 129-00-0PyreneTP6 (0-0.1) RPD exceeds LOR based limits0-20%65.7 %EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic HydrocarbonsEM1008731-025 56-55-3Benz(a)anthraceneTP6 (0-0.1) RPD exceeds LOR based limits0-50%59.0 %EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic HydrocarbonsEM1008731-025 218-01-9ChryseneTP6 (0-0.1) RPD exceeds LOR based limits0-50%61.0 %EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic HydrocarbonsEM1008731-025 205-99-2Benzo(b)fluorantheneTP6 (0-0.1) RPD exceeds LOR based limits0-20%78.2 %EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic HydrocarbonsEM1008731-025 50-32-8Benzo(a)pyreneTP6 (0-0.1) RPD exceeds LOR based limits0-20%82.9 %EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic HydrocarbonsEM1008731-025 193-39-5Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyreneTP6 (0-0.1) RPD exceeds LOR based limits0-50%76.4 %EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic HydrocarbonsEM1008731-025 191-24-2Benzo(g.h.i)peryleneTP6 (0-0.1) RPD exceeds LOR based limits0-50%76.8 %EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic HydrocarbonsEM1008731-003 85-01-8PhenanthreneTP1 (1.5-1.6) RPD exceeds LOR based limits0-20%120 %EP075B: Polynuclear Aromatic HydrocarbonsEM1008731-003 206-44-0FluorantheneTP1 (1.5-1.6) RPD exceeds LOR based limits0-20%107 %EP075B: Polynuclear Aromatic HydrocarbonsEM1008731-003 129-00-0PyreneTP1 (1.5-1.6) RPD exceeds LOR based limits0-20%113 %EP075B: Polynuclear Aromatic HydrocarbonsEM1008731-003 56-55-3Benz(a)anthraceneTP1 (1.5-1.6) RPD exceeds LOR based limits0-20%105 %EP075B: Polynuclear Aromatic HydrocarbonsEM1008731-003 218-01-9ChryseneTP1 (1.5-1.6) RPD exceeds LOR based limits0-20%108 %EP075B: Polynuclear Aromatic HydrocarbonsEM1008731-003 205-99-2 207-08-9Benzo(b) &

Benzo(k)fluorantheneTP1 (1.5-1.6) RPD exceeds LOR based limits0-20%84.3 %EP075B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons

EM1008731-003 50-32-8Benzo(a)pyreneTP1 (1.5-1.6) RPD exceeds LOR based limits0-20%99.6 %EP075B: Polynuclear Aromatic HydrocarbonsEM1008731-003 193-39-5Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyreneTP1 (1.5-1.6) RPD exceeds LOR based limits0-20%101 %EP075B: Polynuclear Aromatic HydrocarbonsEM1008731-003 191-24-2Benzo(g.h.i)peryleneTP1 (1.5-1.6) RPD exceeds LOR based limits0-20%102 %EP075B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Recoveries 1690337-001 87-68-3Hexachlorobutadiene---- Recovery less than lower control limit68.4-118%66.4 %EP074I: Volatile Halogenated Compounds1690583-005 191-24-2Benzo(g.h.i)perylene---- Recovery greater than upper control limit59-123%134 %EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Matrix Spike (MS) Recoveries EM1008731-052 7440-50-8CopperTP11 (1.7-1.8) MS recovery not determined, background

level greater than or equal to 4x spike level.

----Not Determined

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES

EM1008731-026 7440-50-8CopperTP6 (0.4-0.5) Matrix spike recovery not determined due to sample matrix interference.

----Not Determined

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES

EM1008731-052 7439-92-1LeadTP11 (1.7-1.8) MS recovery not determined, background level greater than or equal to 4x spike level.

----Not Determined

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES

EM1008731-026 7440-66-6ZincTP6 (0.4-0.5) MS recovery not determined, background level greater than or equal to 4x spike level.

----Not Determined

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES

Page 226: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

18 of 22:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Matrix: SOILCompound Group Name CommentLimitsDataAnalyteClient Sample IDLaboratory Sample ID CAS Number

Matrix Spike (MS) Recoveries - ContinuedEM1008731-052 7440-66-6ZincTP11 (1.7-1.8) MS recovery not determined, background

level greater than or equal to 4x spike level.

----Not Determined

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES

EM1008731-008 18540-29-9Hexavalent ChromiumTP2 (1.9-2.0) Recovery less than lower data quality objective

70-130%39.5 %EG048: Hexavalent Chromium (Alkaline Digest)

Total Polychlorinated biphenylsEM1008731-013 ----TP3 (1.4-1.5) Recovery less than lower data quality objective

67-123%45.0 %EP066: Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)

EM1008731-008 95-57-82-ChlorophenolTP2 (1.9-2.0) Recovery less than lower data quality objective

70-130%63.8 %EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Halogenated)

EM1008731-008 59-50-74-Chloro-3-MethylphenolTP2 (1.9-2.0) Recovery less than lower data quality objective

70-130%69.8 %EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Halogenated)

EM1008731-008 87-86-5PentachlorophenolTP2 (1.9-2.0) Recovery less than lower data quality objective

70-130%13.3 %EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Halogenated)

EM1008731-008 108-95-2PhenolTP2 (1.9-2.0) Recovery less than lower data quality objective

70-130%58.9 %EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Non-halogenated)

EM1008731-008 88-75-52-NitrophenolTP2 (1.9-2.0) Recovery less than lower data quality objective

70-130%48.6 %EP075A: Phenolic Compounds (Non-halogenated)

EM1008731-008 83-32-9AcenaphtheneTP2 (1.9-2.0) Recovery less than lower data quality objective

70-130%65.2 %EP075B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons

C29 - C36 FractionEM1008731-069 ----TP11 (2.9-3.0) Matrix spike recovery not determined due to sample matrix interference.

----Not Determined

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons

l For all matrices, no Method Blank value outliers occur.

Regular Sample Surrogates

Sub-Matrix: SOILCompound Group Name CommentLimitsDataAnalyteClient Sample IDLaboratory Sample ID CAS Number

Samples Submitted EM1008731-052 2051-24-3DecachlorobiphenylTP11 (1.7-1.8) Recovery less than lower data quality

objective42.4-131

%EP066S: PCB Surrogate 41.0 %

EM1008731-008 17060-07-01.2-Dichloroethane-D4TP2 (1.9-2.0) Recovery greater than upper data quality objective

80.0-120 %

EP074S: VOC Surrogates 127 %

EM1008731-020 2037-26-5Toluene-D8TP4 (2.1-2.2) Recovery less than lower data quality objective

81.0-117 %

EP074S: VOC Surrogates 74.1 %

EM1008731-052 2037-26-5Toluene-D8TP11 (1.7-1.8) Recovery less than lower data quality objective

81.0-117 %

EP074S: VOC Surrogates 79.8 %

EM1008731-020 460-00-44-BromofluorobenzeneTP4 (2.1-2.2) Recovery less than lower data quality objective

74.0-121 %

EP074S: VOC Surrogates 41.0 %

EM1008731-018 93951-73-62-Chlorophenol-D4TP4 (1.4-1.5) Recovery less than lower data quality objective

51.8-129.7 %

EP075(SIM)S: Phenolic Compound Surrogates 45.6 %

EM1008731-040 93951-73-62-Chlorophenol-D4TP9 (0.9-1.0) Recovery less than lower data quality objective

51.8-129.7 %

EP075(SIM)S: Phenolic Compound Surrogates 43.6 %

EM1008731-018 118-79-62.4.6-TribromophenolTP4 (1.4-1.5) Recovery less than lower data quality objective

26.8-126.6 %

EP075(SIM)S: Phenolic Compound Surrogates 9.6 %

Page 227: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

19 of 22:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Sub-Matrix: SOILCompound Group Name CommentLimitsDataAnalyteClient Sample IDLaboratory Sample ID CAS Number

Samples Submitted - ContinuedEM1008731-040 118-79-62.4.6-TribromophenolTP9 (0.9-1.0) Recovery less than lower data quality

objective26.8-126.6

%EP075(SIM)S: Phenolic Compound Surrogates 25.4 %

EM1008731-040 1719-06-8Anthracene-d10TP9 (0.9-1.0) Recovery less than lower data quality objective

62.6-135.5 %

EP075(SIM)T: PAH Surrogates 33.8 %

EM1008731-040 1718-51-04-Terphenyl-d14TP9 (0.9-1.0) Recovery less than lower data quality objective

63.7-135.2 %

EP075(SIM)T: PAH Surrogates 54.4 %

EM1008731-052 367-12-42-FluorophenolTP11 (1.7-1.8) Surrogate recovery not determined due to (target or non-target) matrix interferences

----EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates Not Determined

EM1008731-003 367-12-42-FluorophenolTP1 (1.5-1.6) Surrogate recovery not determined due to (target or non-target) matrix interferences

----EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates Not Determined

EM1008731-013 367-12-42-FluorophenolTP3 (1.4-1.5) Surrogate recovery not determined due to (target or non-target) matrix interferences

----EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates Not Determined

EM1008731-041 367-12-42-FluorophenolTP9 (1.9-2.0) Surrogate recovery not determined due to (target or non-target) matrix interferences

----EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates Not Determined

EM1008731-061 367-12-42-FluorophenolTP13 (1.5-1.6) Surrogate recovery not determined due to (target or non-target) matrix interferences

----EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates Not Determined

EM1008731-068 367-12-42-FluorophenolTP5 (2.0-2.1) Surrogate recovery not determined due to (target or non-target) matrix interferences

----EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates Not Determined

EM1008731-052 13127-88-3Phenol-d6TP11 (1.7-1.8) Surrogate recovery not determined due to (target or non-target) matrix interferences

----EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates Not Determined

EM1008731-003 13127-88-3Phenol-d6TP1 (1.5-1.6) Surrogate recovery not determined due to (target or non-target) matrix interferences

----EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates Not Determined

EM1008731-013 13127-88-3Phenol-d6TP3 (1.4-1.5) Surrogate recovery not determined due to (target or non-target) matrix interferences

----EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates Not Determined

EM1008731-041 13127-88-3Phenol-d6TP9 (1.9-2.0) Surrogate recovery not determined due to (target or non-target) matrix interferences

----EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates Not Determined

EM1008731-061 13127-88-3Phenol-d6TP13 (1.5-1.6) Surrogate recovery not determined due to (target or non-target) matrix interferences

----EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates Not Determined

EM1008731-068 13127-88-3Phenol-d6TP5 (2.0-2.1) Surrogate recovery not determined due to (target or non-target) matrix interferences

----EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates Not Determined

EM1008731-052 93951-73-62-Chlorophenol-D4TP11 (1.7-1.8) Surrogate recovery not determined due to (target or non-target) matrix interferences

----EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates Not Determined

EM1008731-003 93951-73-62-Chlorophenol-D4TP1 (1.5-1.6) Surrogate recovery not determined due to (target or non-target) matrix interferences

----EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates Not Determined

EM1008731-013 93951-73-62-Chlorophenol-D4TP3 (1.4-1.5) Surrogate recovery not determined due to (target or non-target) matrix interferences

----EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates Not Determined

EM1008731-041 93951-73-62-Chlorophenol-D4TP9 (1.9-2.0) Surrogate recovery not determined due to (target or non-target) matrix interferences

----EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates Not Determined

EM1008731-061 93951-73-62-Chlorophenol-D4TP13 (1.5-1.6) Surrogate recovery not determined due to (target or non-target) matrix interferences

----EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates Not Determined

EM1008731-068 93951-73-62-Chlorophenol-D4TP5 (2.0-2.1) Surrogate recovery not determined due to (target or non-target) matrix interferences

----EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates Not Determined

EM1008731-020 118-79-62.4.6-TribromophenolTP4 (2.1-2.2) Surrogate recovery not determined due to (target or non-target) matrix interferences

----EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates Not Determined

Page 228: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

20 of 22:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Sub-Matrix: SOILCompound Group Name CommentLimitsDataAnalyteClient Sample IDLaboratory Sample ID CAS Number

Samples Submitted - ContinuedEM1008731-052 118-79-62.4.6-TribromophenolTP11 (1.7-1.8) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-003 118-79-62.4.6-TribromophenolTP1 (1.5-1.6) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-013 118-79-62.4.6-TribromophenolTP3 (1.4-1.5) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-041 118-79-62.4.6-TribromophenolTP9 (1.9-2.0) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-061 118-79-62.4.6-TribromophenolTP13 (1.5-1.6) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-068 118-79-62.4.6-TribromophenolTP5 (2.0-2.1) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075S: Acid Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-052 4165-60-0Nitrobenzene-D5TP11 (1.7-1.8) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-003 4165-60-0Nitrobenzene-D5TP1 (1.5-1.6) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-013 4165-60-0Nitrobenzene-D5TP3 (1.4-1.5) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-041 4165-60-0Nitrobenzene-D5TP9 (1.9-2.0) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-061 4165-60-0Nitrobenzene-D5TP13 (1.5-1.6) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-068 4165-60-0Nitrobenzene-D5TP5 (2.0-2.1) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-052 2199-69-11.2-Dichlorobenzene-D4TP11 (1.7-1.8) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-003 2199-69-11.2-Dichlorobenzene-D4TP1 (1.5-1.6) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-013 2199-69-11.2-Dichlorobenzene-D4TP3 (1.4-1.5) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-041 2199-69-11.2-Dichlorobenzene-D4TP9 (1.9-2.0) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-061 2199-69-11.2-Dichlorobenzene-D4TP13 (1.5-1.6) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-068 2199-69-11.2-Dichlorobenzene-D4TP5 (2.0-2.1) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-052 321-60-82-FluorobiphenylTP11 (1.7-1.8) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-003 321-60-82-FluorobiphenylTP1 (1.5-1.6) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-013 321-60-82-FluorobiphenylTP3 (1.4-1.5) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-041 321-60-82-FluorobiphenylTP9 (1.9-2.0) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates Not

Determined

Page 229: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

21 of 22:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Sub-Matrix: SOILCompound Group Name CommentLimitsDataAnalyteClient Sample IDLaboratory Sample ID CAS Number

Samples Submitted - ContinuedEM1008731-061 321-60-82-FluorobiphenylTP13 (1.5-1.6) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-068 321-60-82-FluorobiphenylTP5 (2.0-2.1) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-052 1719-06-8Anthracene-d10TP11 (1.7-1.8) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-003 1719-06-8Anthracene-d10TP1 (1.5-1.6) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-013 1719-06-8Anthracene-d10TP3 (1.4-1.5) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-041 1719-06-8Anthracene-d10TP9 (1.9-2.0) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-061 1719-06-8Anthracene-d10TP13 (1.5-1.6) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-068 1719-06-8Anthracene-d10TP5 (2.0-2.1) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-052 1718-51-04-Terphenyl-d14TP11 (1.7-1.8) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-003 1718-51-04-Terphenyl-d14TP1 (1.5-1.6) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-013 1718-51-04-Terphenyl-d14TP3 (1.4-1.5) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-041 1718-51-04-Terphenyl-d14TP9 (1.9-2.0) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-061 1718-51-04-Terphenyl-d14TP13 (1.5-1.6) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates Not

DeterminedEM1008731-068 1718-51-04-Terphenyl-d14TP5 (2.0-2.1) Surrogate recovery not determined due to

(target or non-target) matrix interferences----EP075T: Base/Neutral Extractable Surrogates Not

Determined

Outliers : Analysis Holding Time ComplianceThis report displays Holding Time breaches only. Only the respective Extraction / Preparation and/or Analysis component is/are displayed.

Matrix: SOILAnalysisExtraction / Preparation

Date analysedDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) Days overdue

Days overdue

Due for extraction Due for analysisMethod

EA029-A: pH MeasurementsSnap Lock Bag

----10-AUG-2010TP4 (2.1-2.2), TP10 (1.8-1.9) ----19-AUG-2010 9 ----

EA029-B: Acidity TrailSnap Lock Bag

----10-AUG-2010TP4 (2.1-2.2), TP10 (1.8-1.9) ----19-AUG-2010 9 ----

EA029-C: Sulfur Trail

Page 230: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

22 of 22:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1008731 Amendment 1ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061:Project

Matrix: SOILAnalysisExtraction / Preparation

Date analysedDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) Days overdue

Days overdue

Due for extraction Due for analysisMethod

EA029-C: Sulfur Trail - Analysis Holding Time ComplianceSnap Lock Bag

----10-AUG-2010TP4 (2.1-2.2), TP10 (1.8-1.9) ----19-AUG-2010 9 ----

EA029-D: Calcium ValuesSnap Lock Bag

----10-AUG-2010TP4 (2.1-2.2), TP10 (1.8-1.9) ----19-AUG-2010 9 ----

EA029-E: Magnesium ValuesSnap Lock Bag

----10-AUG-2010TP4 (2.1-2.2), TP10 (1.8-1.9) ----19-AUG-2010 9 ----

EA029-F: Excess Acid Neutralising CapacitySnap Lock Bag

----10-AUG-2010TP4 (2.1-2.2), TP10 (1.8-1.9) ----19-AUG-2010 9 ----

EA029-G: Retained AciditySnap Lock Bag

----10-AUG-2010TP4 (2.1-2.2), TP10 (1.8-1.9) ----19-AUG-2010 9 ----

EA029-H: Acid Base AccountingSnap Lock Bag

----10-AUG-2010TP4 (2.1-2.2), TP10 (1.8-1.9) ----19-AUG-2010 9 ----

EA033-A: Actual AciditySnap Lock Bag

----10-AUG-2010TP4 (2.1-2.2), TP10 (1.8-1.9) ----19-AUG-2010 9 ----

EA033-B: Potential AciditySnap Lock Bag

----10-AUG-2010TP4 (2.1-2.2), TP10 (1.8-1.9) ----19-AUG-2010 9 ----

EA033-C: Acid Neutralising CapacitySnap Lock Bag

----10-AUG-2010TP4 (2.1-2.2), TP10 (1.8-1.9) ----19-AUG-2010 9 ----

EA033-D: Retained AciditySnap Lock Bag

----10-AUG-2010TP4 (2.1-2.2), TP10 (1.8-1.9) ----19-AUG-2010 9 ----

EA033-E: Acid Base AccountingSnap Lock Bag

----10-AUG-2010TP4 (2.1-2.2), TP10 (1.8-1.9) ----19-AUG-2010 9 ----

Outliers : Frequency of Quality Control SamplesThe following report highlights breaches in the Frequency of Quality Control Samples.

l No Quality Control Sample Frequency Outliers exist.

Page 231: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

SUITE 710 / 90 GEORGE STREET, HORNSBY NSW 2077 – P.O. BOX 1644 HORNSBY WESTFIELD NSW 1635 PHONE: (02) 99872183 FAX: (02)99872151 EMAIL: [email protected] WEBSITE: www.Ausset.com.au

Page 1 of 2

OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH & SAFETY STUDIES • INDOOR AIR QUALITY SURVEYS • HAZARDOUS MATERIAL SURVEYS • RADIATION SURVEYS • ASBESTOS SURVEYS ASBESTOS DETECTION & IDENTIFICATION • REPAIR & CALIBRATION OF SCIENTIFIC EQUIPMENT • AIRBORNE FIBRE & SILICA MONITORING

Our ref : ASET22916/ 26096 / 1 - 7 Your ref :EM1008731 NATA Accreditation No: 14484 16 August 2010 Australian Laboratory Services Pty Ltd 4, Westal Road, Springvale, VIC 3171 Attn: Mr Steven Mcgrath Dear Steven, Asbestos Identification This report presents the results of seven samples, forwarded by Australian Laboratory Services Pty Ltd on 13 August 2010, for analysis for asbestos. 1.Introduction:Seven samples forwarded were examined and analysed for the presence of asbestos. 2. Methods : The samples were examined under a Stereo Microscope and selected fibres were analysed by Polarized Light Microscopy in conjunction with Dispersion Staining Method (Safer Environment Method 1.) 3. Results : Sample No. 1. ASET22916 / 26096 / 1. EM1008731 - 002. Approx dimensions 5.0 cm x 5.25 cm x 0.45 cm The sample consisted of a mixture of clayish soil, stones, plant matter and fragments of plaster. No asbestos detected. Sample No. 2. ASET22916 / 26096 / 2. EM1008731 - 021. Approx dimensions 6.5 cm x 7.0 cm x 1.2 cm The sample consisted of a mixture of clayish soil, stones, plant matter and fragments of plaster and brick. No asbestos detected.

Sample No. 3. ASET22916 / 26096 / 3. EM1008731 - 021. Approx dimensions 7.0 cm x 6.0 cm x 1.25 cm The sample consisted of a mixture of soil, stones, plant matter, fibres^, fragments of plaster, cement, brick, corroded metal, coal like material, bitumin and glass. Chrysotile^ asbestos detected. Sample No. 4. ASET22916 / 26096 / 4. EM1008731 - 032. Approx dimensions 8.0 cm x 6.5 cm x 3.0 cm The sample consisted of a mixture of clayish soil, stones, fibres^, plant matter and fragments of plaster, cement, bitumin and brick. Chrysotile^ asbestos and Crocidolite^ asbestos detected.

AUSTRALIAN SAFER ENVIRONMENT & TECHNOLOGY PTY LTD ABN 36 088 095 112

Page 232: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Page 2 of 2

Sample No. 5. ASET22916 / 26096 / 5. EM1008731 - 039. Approx dimensions 6.0 cm x 7.0 cm x 1.0 cm The sample consisted of a mixture of clayish soil, stones, fibres^, fragments of plaster, bitumin, brick and glass. Chrysotile^ asbestos detected. Sample No. 6. ASET22916 / 26096 / 6. EM1008731 - 050. Approx dimensions 7.0 cm x 6.5 cm x 1.2 cm The sample consisted of a mixture of clayish soil, stones, fibres^, plant matter and fragments of plaster, cement and brick. Chrysotile^ asbestos detected. Sample No. 7. ASET22916 / 26096 / 7. EM1008731 - 060. Approx dimensions 6.0 cm x 6.5 cm x 1.25 cm The sample consisted of a mixture of clayish soil, stones, plant matter and fragments of plaster, bitumin, corroded metal and brick. No asbestos detected.

Analysed and reported by, Mahen De Silva . BSc. MSc. Grad Dip (Occ Hyg) Occupational Hygienist / Approved Signatory. Approved Identifier.

This document is issued in accordance with NATA’s Accreditation requirements. Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025.

Page 233: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Certificate of AnalysisEnvironmental and Earth SciencesP.O Box 1090St Kilda SouthVictoria 3182 Attention: Jordan Fraser Project 273205Client Reference 210061 (Yarraville)Received Date Aug 12, 2010 Customer Sample ID SPLIT 1 SPLIT 2 SPLIT 3 Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soilmgt-Labmark Sample No. 10-AU21450 10-AU21451 10-AU21452Date Sampled Aug 09, 2010 Aug 09, 2010 Aug 09, 2010Test/Reference PQL Unit Total Recoverable HydrocarbonsTRH C6-C9 Fraction by GC 20 mg/kg < 20 < 20 < 20TRH C10-C14 Fraction by GC 10 mg/kg < 10 50 < 10TRH C15-C28 Fraction by GC 20 mg/kg 130 610 61TRH C29-C36 Fraction by GC 20 mg/kg 100 480 58Polycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsAcenaphthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5Acenaphthylene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5Anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5Benz(a)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5Benzo(a)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5Benzo(b)fluoranthene & Benzo(k)fluoranthene1 mg/kg < 1 < 1 < 1Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5Chrysene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5Fluoranthene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5Fluorene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5Naphthalene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5Phenanthrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5Pyrene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 0.7Total PAH 0.5 mg/kg < 1 < 1 0.70Anthracene-d10 (surr.) 1 % 109 106 100p-Terphenyl-d14 (surr.) 1 % 102 101 992-Fluorobiphenyl (surr.) 1 % 104 105 104Individual Phenols (standard list)2-Chlorophenol 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 < 0.52-Methylphenol (o-Cresol) 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 < 0.52.3-Dichlorophenol 1 mg/kg - < 1 < 12.3.4-Trichlorophenol 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 < 0.52.3.4.6-Tetrachlorophenol 1 mg/kg - < 1 < 12.3.5-Trichlorophenol 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 < 0.52.3.5.6-Tetrachlorophenol 1 mg/kg - < 1 < 12.3.6-Trichlorophenol 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 < 0.52.4 & 2.5-Dichlorophenol 2 mg/kg - < 2 < 22.4.6-Trichlorophenol 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 < 0.52.6-Dichlorophenol 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 < 0.53&4-Methylphenol (m&p-Cresol) 1 mg/kg - < 1 < 13-Chlorophenol & 4-Chlorophenol 1 mg/kg - < 1 < 13.4-Dichlorophenol 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 < 0.53.5-Dichlorophenol 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 < 0.54-Chloro-3-methylphenol 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 < 0.5Pentachlorophenol 1 mg/kg - < 1 < 1

First Reported: Aug 18, 2010Date Printed: Aug 18, 2010

mgt-LabMark 1868 Dandenong Rd, Clayton, VIC Australia 3168ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 9538 2277 Facsimile: +61 3 9538 2278

Page 1 of 8Report Number: 273205-S

NATA AccreditedLaboratory Number 1645

The tests covered by this document have beenperformed in accordance with NATA and ISO/IES 17025and are traceable to national standards ofmeasurement.This document shall not be reproduced, except in full.

Page 234: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Customer Sample ID SPLIT 1 SPLIT 2 SPLIT 3 Sample Matrix Soil Soil Soilmgt-Labmark Sample No. 10-AU21450 10-AU21451 10-AU21452Date Sampled Aug 09, 2010 Aug 09, 2010 Aug 09, 2010Test/Reference PQL Unit Phenol 0.5 mg/kg - < 0.5 < 0.52.4.6-Tribromophenol (surr.) 1 % - 108 78BTEXBenzene 0.5 mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5o-Xylene 1 mg/kg < 1 < 1 < 1Total m+p-Xylenes 2 mg/kg < 2 < 2 < 2Toluene 1 mg/kg < 1 < 1 < 1Ethylbenzene 1 mg/kg < 1 < 1 < 1Xylenes(ortho.meta and para) 3 mg/kg < 3 < 3 < 34-Bromofluorobenzene (surr.) 1 % 85 86 73

% Moisture 0.1 % 18 34 29Cyanide (free) 0.1 mg/kg - < 0.1 -Cyanide (total) 0.1 mg/kg - 1.5 -Metals (8)Arsenic 2 mg/kg 68 77 37Cadmium 2 mg/kg 13 5.2 < 2Chromium 2 mg/kg 49 130 32Copper 2 mg/kg 72 2000 38Lead 2 mg/kg 100 230 73Nickel 2 mg/kg 45 110 32Zinc 2 mg/kg 450 1200 370Mercury 0.01 mg/kg 0.17 0.26 0.15

Sample History

Where samples are submitted/analysed over several days, the last date of extraction and analysis is reported.

Description Testing Site Extracted AnalysedTotal Recoverable Hydrocarbons Clayton Aug 13, 2010 Aug 16, 2010- Method: LM-LTM-ORG-2000Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Clayton Aug 13, 2010 Aug 16, 2010- Method: LM-LTM-ORG-20000Individual Phenols (standard list) Clayton Aug 13, 2010 Aug 16, 2010- Method: LM-LTM-ORG-20000BTEX Clayton Aug 13, 2010 Aug 16, 2010- Method: LM-LTM-ORG-1100: Determination of BTEX & Volatile Alkanes (C6-C9) in Soils & Waters by Purge & Trap / GCMS% Moisture Clayton Aug 13, 2010 Aug 16, 2010Cyanide (free) Clayton Aug 13, 2010 Aug 18, 2010Cyanide (total) Clayton Aug 13, 2010 Aug 18, 2010- Method: INO-4270Metals (8) Clayton Aug 13, 2010 Aug 17, 2010- Method: LM-LTM-MET-3100

First Reported: Aug 18, 2010Date Printed: Aug 18, 2010

mgt-LabMark 1868 Dandenong Rd, Clayton, VIC Australia 3168ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 9538 2277 Facsimile: +61 3 9538 2278

Page 2 of 8Report Number: 273205-S

Page 235: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

mgt-Labmark Internal Quality Control ReviewGeneral1. Laboratory QC results for Method Blanks, Duplicates, Matrix Spikes, and Laboratory Control Samples are included in this QC report where applicable. Additional QC data may be available on request.2. All soil results are reported on a dry basis, unless otherwise stated.3. Actual PQLs are matrix dependant. Quoted PQLs may be raised where sample extracts are diluted due to interferences.4. Result are uncorrected for matrix spikes or surrogate recoveries.5. SVOC analysis on water are performed on homogenized, unfiltered sample, unless noted otherwise.6. Samples were analysed on an as received basis.7. This report replaces any interim results previously issued. Holding TimesPlease refer to 'Sampling and Preservation Chart for Soils & Waters' for holding times. (LM-FOR-ADM-020)For samples received on the last day of holding time, notification of testing requirements should have been received at least6 hours prior to sample receipt deadlines as stated on the Sample Receipt Acknowledgment.If the Laboratory did not receive the information in the required timeframe, and regardless of any other integrity issues,suitability qualified results may still be reported. Holding times apply from the date of sampling, therefore compliance to these my be outside the laboratory's control. **NOTE: pH duplicates are reported as a range NOT as an RPD UNITSmg/kg:milligrams per Kilogram mg/l:milligrams per litre ug/l: micrograms per litre ppm: Parts per millionppb: Parts per billion %: Percentageorg/100ml: Organisms per 100 millilitres NTU: Units TERMSDry: Where a moisture has been determined on a solid sample the result is expressed on a dry basis.LOR: Limit of Reporting.SPIKE: Addition of the analyte to the sample and reported as percentage recovery.RPD: Relative Percent Difference between two Duplicate pieces of analysis.LCS: Laboratory Control Sample - reported as percent recovery.CRM: Certified Reference Material - reported as percent recovery.Method Blank: In the case of solid samples these are performed on laboratory certified clean sands. In the case of water samples these are performed on de-ionised water.Surr - Surrogate: The addition of a like compound to the analyte target and reported as percentage recovery.Duplicate: A second piece of analysis from the same sample and reported in the same units as the result to show comparison.Batch Duplicate: A second piece of analysis from a sample outside of the clients batch of samples but run within the laboratory batch of analysis.Batch SPIKE: Spike recovery reported on a sample from outside of the clients batch of samples but run within the laboratory batch of analysis.USEPA: United States Environment Protection AuthorityAPHA: American Public Health AssociationASLP: Australian Standard Leaching Procedure (AS4439.3)TCLP: Toxicity Characteristic Leaching ProcedureCOC: Chain of CustodySRA: Sample Receipt Advice

QC - ACCEPTANCE CRITERIARPD Duplicates: Global RPD Duplicates Acceptance Criteria is 30% however the following acceptance guidelines are equally applicable: Results <10 times the LOR : No Limit Results between 10-20 times LOR : RPD must lie between 0-50%Results >20 times LOR : RPD must lie between 0-20% Surrogate Recoveries : Recoveries must lie between 50-150% - Phenols 20-130%. QC DATA GENERAL COMMENTS1. Where a result is reported as a less than (<), higher than the nominated LOR this is due to either Matrix Interference, extract dilution required due to interferences or contaminant levels within the sample, high moisture content or insufficient sample provided.2. Duplicate data shown within this report that states the word "BATCH" is a Batch Duplicate from outside of your sample batch, but within the laboratory sample batch a 1:10 ratio. The Parent and Duplicate data shown is not data from your samples.3. Organochlorine Pesticide analysis - where reporting LCS data, Toxaphene & Chlordane are not added to the LCS.4. Orgaonchlorine Pesticide analysis - where reporting Spike data, Toxaphene is not added to the Spike.5. Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - where reporting Spike & LCS data, a single spike of commercial Hydrocarbon products in the range of C12-C30 is added and it's Total Recovery is reported in the C10-C14 cell of the Report.6. Recovery Data (Spikes & Surrogates) - where chromatographic interference does not allow the determination of Recovery the term "INT" appears against that analyte.7. Polychlorinated Biphenyls are spiked only using Arochlor 1260 in Matrix Spikes and LCS's.8. For Matrix Spikes and LCS results a dash " -" in the report means that the specific analyte was not added to the QC sample.9. Duplicate RPD's are calculated from raw analytical data thus it is possible to have two two sets of data below the LOR with a positive RPD - eg: LOR 0.1, Result A = <0.1 (raw data is 0.02) & Result B = <0.1 (raw data is 0.03) resulting in a RPD of 40% calculated from the raw data.

First Reported: Aug 18, 2010Date Printed: Aug 18, 2010

mgt-LabMark 1868 Dandenong Rd, Clayton, VIC Australia 3168ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 9538 2277 Facsimile: +61 3 9538 2278

Page 3 of 8Report Number: 273205-S

Page 236: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Quality Control Results

Sample, Test, Result Reference Units Result 1

Acceptance Limits

Pass Limits

Qualifying Codes

Method Blank Method BlankTotal Recoverable Hydrocarbons LM-LTM-ORG-2000 TRH C6-C9 Fraction by GC mg/kg < 20 20 Pass TRH C10-C14 Fraction by GC mg/kg < 10 10 Pass TRH C15-C28 Fraction by GC mg/kg < 20 20 Pass TRH C29-C36 Fraction by GC mg/kg < 20 20 Pass Method Blank Method BlankPolycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons LM-LTM-ORG-20000 Acenaphthene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Acenaphthylene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Anthracene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Benz(a)anthracene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Benzo(b)fluoranthene & Benzo(k)fluoranthenemg/kg < 1 1 Pass Benzo(g.h.i)perylene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Chrysene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Dibenz(a.h)anthracene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Fluoranthene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Fluorene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Naphthalene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Phenanthrene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Pyrene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Method Blank Method BlankIndividual Phenols (standard list) LM-LTM-ORG-20000 2-Chlorophenol mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass 2-Methylphenol (o-Cresol) mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass 2.3-Dichlorophenol mg/kg < 1 1 Pass 2.3.4-Trichlorophenol mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass 2.3.4.6-Tetrachlorophenol mg/kg < 1 1 Pass 2.3.5-Trichlorophenol mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass 2.3.5.6-Tetrachlorophenol mg/kg < 1 1 Pass 2.3.6-Trichlorophenol mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass 2.4 & 2.5-Dichlorophenol mg/kg < 2 2 Pass 2.4.6-Trichlorophenol mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass 2.6-Dichlorophenol mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass 3&4-Methylphenol (m&p-Cresol) mg/kg < 1 1 Pass 3-Chlorophenol & 4-Chlorophenol mg/kg < 1 1 Pass 3.4-Dichlorophenol mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass 3.5-Dichlorophenol mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Pentachlorophenol mg/kg < 1 1 Pass Phenol mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass Method Blank Method BlankBTEX LM-LTM-ORG-1100: Determination of BTEX & Volatile Alkanes (C6-C9) in Soils & Waters by Purge & Trap / GCMS Benzene mg/kg < 0.5 0.5 Pass o-Xylene mg/kg < 1 1 Pass Total m+p-Xylenes mg/kg < 2 2 Pass Toluene mg/kg < 1 1 Pass Ethylbenzene mg/kg < 1 1 Pass Xylenes(ortho.meta and para) mg/kg < 3 3 Pass Method Blank Method Blank

Cyanide (free) mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass Cyanide (total) mg/kg < 0.1 0.1 Pass Method Blank Method BlankMetals (8) LM-LTM-MET-3100 Arsenic mg/kg < 2 2 Pass Cadmium mg/kg < 2 2 Pass Chromium mg/kg < 2 2 Pass Copper mg/kg < 2 2 Pass Lead mg/kg < 2 2 Pass Nickel mg/kg < 2 2 Pass Zinc mg/kg < 2 2 Pass

First Reported: Aug 18, 2010Date Printed: Aug 18, 2010

mgt-LabMark 1868 Dandenong Rd, Clayton, VIC Australia 3168ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 9538 2277 Facsimile: +61 3 9538 2278

Page 4 of 8Report Number: 273205-S

Page 237: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Sample, Test, Result Reference Units Result 1

Acceptance Limits

Pass Limits

Qualifying Codes

Mercury mg/kg < 0.01 0.01 Pass LCS - % Recovery LCS - % RecoveryTotal Recoverable Hydrocarbons LM-LTM-ORG-2000 Result 1 TRH C6-C9 Fraction by GC % 86 70-130 Pass TRH C10-C14 Fraction by GC % 101 70-130 Pass TRH C15-C28 Fraction by GC % 100 70-130 Pass TRH C29-C36 Fraction by GC % 92 70-130 Pass LCS - % Recovery LCS - % RecoveryPolycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons LM-LTM-ORG-20000 Result 1 Acenaphthene % 102 70-130 Pass Acenaphthylene % 100 70-130 Pass Anthracene % 110 70-130 Pass Benz(a)anthracene % 103 70-130 Pass Benzo(a)pyrene % 98 70-130 Pass Benzo(g.h.i)perylene % 85 70-130 Pass Chrysene % 94 70-130 Pass Dibenz(a.h)anthracene % 85 70-130 Pass Fluoranthene % 94 70-130 Pass Fluorene % 102 70-130 Pass Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene % 87 70-130 Pass Naphthalene % 100 70-130 Pass Phenanthrene % 102 70-130 Pass Pyrene % 100 70-130 Pass LCS - % Recovery LCS - % RecoveryIndividual Phenols (standard list) LM-LTM-ORG-20000 Result 1 2-Chlorophenol % 90 30-130 Pass 2-Methylphenol (o-Cresol) % 96 30-130 Pass 2.3.4-Trichlorophenol % 93 30-130 Pass 2.3.5-Trichlorophenol % 94 30-130 Pass 2.3.6-Trichlorophenol % 87 30-130 Pass 2.4 & 2.5-Dichlorophenol % 96 30-130 Pass 2.4.6-Trichlorophenol % 92 30-130 Pass 2.6-Dichlorophenol % 91 30-130 Pass 3&4-Methylphenol (m&p-Cresol) % 89 30-130 Pass 3-Chlorophenol & 4-Chlorophenol % 91 30-130 Pass 3.4-Dichlorophenol % 96 30-130 Pass 3.5-Dichlorophenol % 93 30-130 Pass 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol % 93 30-130 Pass Pentachlorophenol % 103 30-130 Pass Phenol % 94 30-130 Pass LCS - % Recovery LCS - % RecoveryBTEX LM-LTM-ORG-1100: Determination of BTEX & Volatile Alkanes (C6-C9) in Soils & Waters by Purge & Trap / GCMSResult 1 Benzene % 103 70-130 Pass Toluene % 85 70-130 Pass Ethylbenzene % 80 70-130 Pass Xylenes(ortho.meta and para) % 100 70-130 Pass LCS - % Recovery LCS - % Recovery

Result 1 Cyanide (free) % 100 70-130 Pass Cyanide (total) % 86 70-130 Pass LCS - % Recovery LCS - % RecoveryMetals (8) LM-LTM-MET-3100 Result 1 Arsenic % 94 70-130 Pass Cadmium % 91 70-130 Pass Chromium % 91 70-130 Pass Copper % 91 70-130 Pass Lead % 94 70-130 Pass Nickel % 88 70-130 Pass Zinc % 94 70-130 Pass Mercury % 105 70-130 Pass[Duplicate of 10-AU21296 - BATCH]Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons Result 1 Result 2 RPD TRH C6-C9 Fraction by GC mg/kg < 20 < 20 <1 30% Pass TRH C10-C14 Fraction by GC mg/kg < 10 < 10 <1 30% Pass TRH C15-C28 Fraction by GC mg/kg 130 100 25 30% Pass TRH C29-C36 Fraction by GC mg/kg 100 83 23 30% Pass

First Reported: Aug 18, 2010Date Printed: Aug 18, 2010

mgt-LabMark 1868 Dandenong Rd, Clayton, VIC Australia 3168ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 9538 2277 Facsimile: +61 3 9538 2278

Page 5 of 8Report Number: 273205-S

Page 238: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Sample, Test, Result Reference Units Result 1

Acceptance Limits

Pass Limits

Qualifying Codes

[Duplicate of 10-AU21450]Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Result 1 Result 2 RPD Acenaphthene mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Acenaphthylene mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Anthracene mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Benz(a)anthracene mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Benzo(a)pyrene mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Benzo(b)fluoranthene & Benzo(k)fluoranthenemg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass Benzo(g.h.i)perylene mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Chrysene mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Dibenz(a.h)anthracene mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Fluoranthene mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Fluorene mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Naphthalene mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Phenanthrene mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Pyrene mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass[Duplicate of 10-AU21296 - BATCH]BTEX Result 1 Result 2 RPD Benzene mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass o-Xylene mg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass Total m+p-Xylenes mg/kg < 2 < 2 <1 30% Pass Toluene mg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass Ethylbenzene mg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass Xylenes(ortho.meta and para) mg/kg < 3 < 3 <1 30% Pass[Duplicate of 10-AU21450]Metals (8) Result 1 Result 2 RPD Arsenic mg/kg 68 84 22 30% Pass Cadmium mg/kg 13 17 22 30% Pass Chromium mg/kg 49 55 12 30% Pass Copper mg/kg 72 91 23 30% Pass Lead mg/kg 100 120 14 30% Pass Nickel mg/kg 45 45 1.0 30% Pass Zinc mg/kg 450 430 5.0 30% Pass Mercury mg/kg 0.17 0.22 26 30% Pass[Duplicate of 10-AU21430 - BATCH]Individual Phenols (standard list) Result 1 Result 2 RPD 2-Chlorophenol mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass 2-Methylphenol (o-Cresol) mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass 2.3-Dichlorophenol mg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass 2.3.4-Trichlorophenol mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass 2.3.4.6-Tetrachlorophenol mg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass 2.3.5-Trichlorophenol mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass 2.3.5.6-Tetrachlorophenol mg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass 2.3.6-Trichlorophenol mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass 2.4 & 2.5-Dichlorophenol mg/kg < 2 < 2 <1 30% Pass 2.4.6-Trichlorophenol mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass 2.6-Dichlorophenol mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass 3&4-Methylphenol (m&p-Cresol) mg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass 3-Chlorophenol & 4-Chlorophenol mg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass 3.4-Dichlorophenol mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass 3.5-Dichlorophenol mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass Pentachlorophenol mg/kg < 1 < 1 <1 30% Pass Phenol mg/kg < 0.5 < 0.5 <1 30% Pass[Duplicate of 10-AU21032 - BATCH]

Result 1 Result 2 RPD Cyanide (free) mg/kg < 0.1 < 0.1 <1 30% Pass Cyanide (total) mg/kg 0.20 0.20 <1 30% Pass[Spike of 10-AU21450] - % RecoveryTotal Recoverable Hydrocarbons Result 1 TRH C6-C9 Fraction by GC % 71 70 - 130 Pass TRH C10-C14 Fraction by GC % 97 70 - 130 Pass TRH C15-C28 Fraction by GC % 103 70 - 130 Pass TRH C29-C36 Fraction by GC % 80 70 - 130 Pass[Spike of 10-AU21450] - % Recovery

First Reported: Aug 18, 2010Date Printed: Aug 18, 2010

mgt-LabMark 1868 Dandenong Rd, Clayton, VIC Australia 3168ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 9538 2277 Facsimile: +61 3 9538 2278

Page 6 of 8Report Number: 273205-S

Page 239: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Sample, Test, Result Reference Units Result 1

Acceptance Limits

Pass Limits

Qualifying Codes

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Result 1 Acenaphthene % 100 70 - 130 Pass Acenaphthylene % 110 70 - 130 Pass Anthracene % 116 70 - 130 Pass Benz(a)anthracene % 122 70 - 130 Pass Benzo(a)pyrene % 125 70 - 130 Pass Benzo(b)fluoranthene & Benzo(k)fluoranthene% 127 70 - 130 Pass Benzo(g.h.i)perylene % 86 70 - 130 Pass Chrysene % 98 70 - 130 Pass Dibenz(a.h)anthracene % 87 70 - 130 Pass Fluoranthene % 114 70 - 130 Pass Fluorene % 99 70 - 130 Pass Indeno(1.2.3-cd)pyrene % 92 70 - 130 Pass Naphthalene % 100 70 - 130 Pass Phenanthrene % 110 70 - 130 Pass Pyrene % 113 70 - 130 Pass[Spike of 10-AU21430 - BATCH] - % RecoveryIndividual Phenols (standard list) Result 1 2-Chlorophenol % 84 30 - 130 Pass 2.3-Dichlorophenol % 75 30 - 130 Pass 2.3.4-Trichlorophenol % 97 30 - 130 Pass 2.3.5-Trichlorophenol % 96 30 - 130 Pass 2.3.5.6-Tetrachlorophenol % 101 30 - 130 Pass 2.3.6-Trichlorophenol % 86 30 - 130 Pass 2.4 & 2.5-Dichlorophenol % 90 30 - 130 Pass 2.4.6-Trichlorophenol % 91 30 - 130 Pass 2.6-Dichlorophenol % 88 30 - 130 Pass 3&4-Methylphenol (m&p-Cresol) % 87 30 - 130 Pass 3-Chlorophenol & 4-Chlorophenol % 94 30 - 130 Pass 3.4-Dichlorophenol % 102 30 - 130 Pass 3.5-Dichlorophenol % 95 30 - 130 Pass 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol % 85 30 - 130 Pass Pentachlorophenol % 83 30 - 130 Pass Phenol % 92 30 - 130 Pass[Spike of 10-AU21450] - % RecoveryBTEX Result 1 Benzene % 79 70 - 130 Pass o-Xylene % 75 70 - 130 Pass Total m+p-Xylenes % 78 70 - 130 Pass Toluene % 80 70 - 130 Pass Ethylbenzene % 75 70 - 130 Pass Xylenes(ortho.meta and para) % 77 70 - 130 Pass[Spike of 10-AU21032 - BATCH] - % Recovery

Result 1 Cyanide (free) % 100 70 - 130 Pass Cyanide (total) % 100 70 - 130 Pass[Spike of 10-AU21450] - % RecoveryMetals (8) Result 1 Arsenic % 127 70 - 130 Pass Cadmium % 91 70 - 130 Pass Chromium % 95 70 - 130 Pass Copper % 84 70 - 130 Pass Lead % 80 70 - 130 Pass Nickel % 104 70 - 130 Pass Zinc % 104 70 - 130 Pass Mercury % 94 70 - 130 Pass

First Reported: Aug 18, 2010Date Printed: Aug 18, 2010

mgt-LabMark 1868 Dandenong Rd, Clayton, VIC Australia 3168ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 9538 2277 Facsimile: +61 3 9538 2278

Page 7 of 8Report Number: 273205-S

Page 240: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Sample IntegrityCustody Seals Intact (if used) N/AAttempt to Chill was evident YesSample correctly preserved YesOrganic samples had Teflon liners YesSamples received with Zero Headspace NoSamples received within HoldingTime YesSome samples have been subcontracted No

Authorised By

Glenn Jackson

Final report - this Report replaces any previously issued Report- Indicates Not Requested* Indicates NATA accreditation does not cover the performance of this servicemgt-Labmark shall not be liable for loss, cost, damages or expenses incurred by the client, or any other person or company, resulting from the use of any information or interpretation given in this report. In no case shall mgt-Labmark be liable for consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost profits, damages for failure to meet deadlines and lost production arising from this report. This document shall not be reproduced except in full and relates only to the items tested. Unless indicated otherwise, the tests were performed on the samples as received.

First Reported: Aug 18, 2010

Date Printed: Aug 18, 2010

mgt-LabMark 1868 Dandenong Rd, Clayton, VIC Australia 3168

ABN : 50 005 085 521 Telephone: +61 3 9538 2277 Facsimile: +61 3 9538 2278

Page 8 of 8Report Number: 273205-S

Sample IntegrityCustody Seals Intact (if used) N/AAttempt to Chill was evident YesSample correctly preserved YesOrganic samples had Teflon liners YesSamples received with Zero Headspace NoSamples received within HoldingTime YesSome samples have been subcontracted No

Authorised By

Glenn JacksonNATA Signatory

Final report - this Report replaces any previously issued Report- Indicates Not Requested* Indicates NATA accreditation does not cover the performance of this servicemgt-Labmark shall not be liable for loss, cost, damages or expenses incurred by the client, or any other person or company, resulting from the use of any information or interpretation given in this report. In no case shall mgt-Labmark be liable for consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost profits, damages for failure to meet deadlines and lost production arising from this report. This document shall not be reproduced except in full and relates only to the items tested. Unless indicated otherwise, the tests were performed on the samples as received.

Page 241: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street
Page 242: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

EM1009164

False

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSISWork Order : EM1009164 Page : 1 of 10

:: LaboratoryClient Environmental Division MelbourneENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES: :ContactContact MR JORDAN FRASER Steven McGrath

:: AddressAddress P.O.BOX 2253FOOTSCRAY VIC, AUSTRALIA 3011

4 Westall Rd Springvale VIC Australia 3171

:: E-mailE-mail [email protected] [email protected]:: TelephoneTelephone +61 03 96871666 +61-3-8549 9600:: FacsimileFacsimile +61 03 96871844 +61-3-8549 9601

:Project 210061 REBATCH OF EM1008731 QC Level : NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement:Order number ----:C-O-C number ---- Date Samples Received : 23-AUG-2010

Sampler : ---- Issue Date : 02-SEP-2010Site : YARRAVILLE

16:No. of samples receivedQuote number : EN/010/10 16:No. of samples analysed

This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. All pages of this report have been checked and approved for release.

This Certificate of Analysis contains the following information:l General Commentsl Analytical Resultsl Surrogate Control Limits

NATA Accredited Laboratory 825

This document is issued in accordance with NATA

accreditation requirements.

Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025.

SignatoriesThis document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories indicated below. Electronic signing has been carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.Signatories Accreditation CategoryPosition

Kim McCabe Senior Inorganic Chemist InorganicsNancy Wang Senior Semivolatile Instrument Chemist OrganicsTerrance Hettipathirana Team Leader - Metals InorganicsXingbin Lin Senior Organic Chemist Organics

Page 243: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Environmental Division Melbourne

4 Westall Rd Springvale VIC Australia 3171Tel. +61-3-8549 9600 Fax. +61-3-8549 9601 www.alsglobal.com

Page 244: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

3 of 10:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1009164ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061 REBATCH OF EM1008731:Project

General CommentsThe analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.

Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.

Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insuffient sample for analysis.

Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.

When date(s) and/or time(s) are shown bracketed, these have been assumed by the laboratory for processing purposes. If the sampling time is displayed as 0:00 the information was not provided by client.

CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society.LOR = Limit of reporting^ = This result is computed from individual analyte detections at or above the level of reporting

Key :

Analysis for TP10 (1.8-1.9) conducted by ALS Brisbane, NATA Site No. 818.l

EP070: EM1009164_2 Poor duplicate precision due to sample heterogeneity. Confirmed by re-analysis.l

EP070: EM1009164_4 Poor matrix spike recovery due to sample heterogeneity. Confirmed by re-analysis.l

EP075(SIM): Insufficient sample to confirm surrogate recoveries via re-extraction.l

Page 245: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

4 of 10:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1009164ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061 REBATCH OF EM1008731:Project

Analytical ResultsTP7 (2.0-2.1)TP2 (3.2-3.3)TP1 (1.5-1.6)TP9 (2.0-2.1)TP6 (0-0.1)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: ASLP LEACHATE

25-AUG-2010 12:0025-AUG-2010 12:0025-AUG-2010 12:0025-AUG-2010 12:0025-AUG-2010 12:00Client sampling date / time

EM1009164-007EM1009164-006EM1009164-003EM1009164-002EM1009164-001UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EG005C: Leachable Metals by ICPAES-------- ---- 0.7 0.5mg/L0.17440-38-2Arsenic

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons-------- <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.091-20-3Naphthalene-------- <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.0208-96-8Acenaphthylene-------- <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.083-32-9Acenaphthene-------- <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.086-73-7Fluorene-------- 2.2 ---- ----µg/L1.085-01-8Phenanthrene-------- <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.0120-12-7Anthracene-------- <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.0206-44-0Fluoranthene-------- <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.0129-00-0Pyrene-------- <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.056-55-3Benz(a)anthracene-------- <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.0218-01-9Chrysene-------- <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.0205-99-2Benzo(b)fluoranthene-------- <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.0207-08-9Benzo(k)fluoranthene

<0.5<0.5 <0.5 ---- ----µg/L0.550-32-8Benzo(a)pyrene-------- <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.0193-39-5Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene-------- <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.053-70-3Dibenz(a.h)anthracene-------- <1.0 ---- ----µg/L1.0191-24-2Benzo(g.h.i)perylene

EP075(SIM)S: Phenolic Compound Surrogates24.922.0 16.8 ---- ----%0.113127-88-3Phenol-d668.960.6 46.3 ---- ----%0.193951-73-62-Chlorophenol-D4102122 72.1 ---- ----%0.1118-79-62.4.6-Tribromophenol

EP075(SIM)T: PAH Surrogates65.563.6 39.2 ---- ----%0.1321-60-82-Fluorobiphenyl92.291.8 56.3 ---- ----%0.11719-06-8Anthracene-d10150125 96.8 ---- ----%0.11718-51-04-Terphenyl-d14

Page 246: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

5 of 10:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1009164ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061 REBATCH OF EM1008731:Project

Analytical Results----------------TP10 (1.8-1.9)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: ASLP LEACHATE----------------25-AUG-2010 14:00Client sampling date / time

----------------EM1009164-016UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EG005C: Leachable Metals by ICPAES----2.6 ---- ---- ----mg/L0.17440-50-8Copper

Page 247: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

6 of 10:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1009164ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061 REBATCH OF EM1008731:Project

Analytical ResultsTP11 (1.9-2.0)TP5 (2.0-2.1)TP1 (1.5-1.6)TP9 (2.0-2.1)TP6 (0-0.1)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1009164-005EM1009164-004EM1009164-003EM1009164-002EM1009164-001UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EA055: Moisture Content49.6---- ---- 41.8 31.6%1.0----^ Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C)

EN60: ASLP Leaching Procedure5.05.0 5.0 ---- ----pH Unit0.1----Extraction Fluid pH

EN60: Bottle Leaching Procedure8.77.1 8.0 ---- ----pH Unit0.1----Initial pH1.61.5 1.5 ---- ----pH Unit0.1----After HCl pH5.85.1 5.1 ---- ----pH Unit0.1----Final pH

EP070: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Speciation16600---- ---- 3000 1000mg/kg100----Aliphatic C16-C359600---- ---- 1900 700mg/kg100----Aliphatic > C358590---- ---- 2160 660mg/kg90----Aromatic C16-C357400---- ---- 2700 700mg/kg100----Aromatic > C35

EP070: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Speciation93.1---- ---- 101 98.0%0.1580-13-22-Bromonaphthalene95.3---- ---- 95.3 96.4%0.1321-60-82-Fluorobiphenyl

Page 248: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

7 of 10:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1009164ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061 REBATCH OF EM1008731:Project

Analytical ResultsTP10 (1.4-1.5)TP11 (0.9-1.0)TP12 (0.4-0.5)TP7 (2.0-2.1)TP2 (3.2-3.3)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1009164-010EM1009164-009EM1009164-008EM1009164-007EM1009164-006UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EA055: Moisture Content-------- 12.6 15.5 13.0%1.0----^ Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C)

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES-------- 111 109 320mg/kg27440-48-4Cobalt

EN60: ASLP Leaching Procedure5.05.0 ---- ---- ----pH Unit0.1----Extraction Fluid pH

EN60: Bottle Leaching Procedure8.68.5 ---- ---- ----pH Unit0.1----Initial pH1.61.7 ---- ---- ----pH Unit0.1----After HCl pH6.15.4 ---- ---- ----pH Unit0.1----Final pH

Page 249: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

8 of 10:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1009164ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061 REBATCH OF EM1008731:Project

Analytical ResultsTP5 (1.4-1.5)TP5 (0.4-0.5)TP3 (0.4-0.5)TP2 (0.4-0.5)TP14 (0.9-1.0)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

EM1009164-015EM1009164-014EM1009164-013EM1009164-012EM1009164-011UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EA055: Moisture Content13.614.7 20.3 13.9 31.5%1.0----^ Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C)

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES18366 46 61 184mg/kg27440-48-4Cobalt

Page 250: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

9 of 10:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1009164ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061 REBATCH OF EM1008731:Project

Analytical Results----------------TP10 (1.8-1.9)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL----------------09-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

----------------EM1009164-016UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EN60: ASLP Leaching Procedure----5.0 ---- ---- ----pH Unit0.1----Extraction Fluid pH

EN60: Bottle Leaching Procedure----7.4 ---- ---- ----pH Unit0.1----Initial pH----1.6 ---- ---- ----pH Unit0.1----After HCl pH----5.2 ---- ---- ----pH Unit0.1----Final pH

Page 251: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

10 of 10:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1009164ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061 REBATCH OF EM1008731:Project

Surrogate Control LimitsRecovery Limits (%)Sub-Matrix: ASLP LEACHATE

Compound CAS Number Low High

EP075(SIM)S: Phenolic Compound SurrogatesPhenol-d6 13127-88-3 10.0 59.32-Chlorophenol-D4 93951-73-6 15.2 116.32.4.6-Tribromophenol 118-79-6 14.5 137.9

EP075(SIM)T: PAH Surrogates2-Fluorobiphenyl 321-60-8 37.8 128.4Anthracene-d10 1719-06-8 36.3 136.74-Terphenyl-d14 1718-51-0 42.1 130.1

Recovery Limits (%)Sub-Matrix: SOIL

Compound CAS Number Low High

EP070: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Speciation2-Bromonaphthalene 580-13-2 70 1302-Fluorobiphenyl 321-60-8 70 130

Page 252: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

False

QUALITY CONTROL REPORTWork Order : EM1009164 Page : 1 of 5

:: LaboratoryClient Environmental Division MelbourneENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES

: :ContactContact MR JORDAN FRASER Steven McGrath

:: AddressAddress P.O.BOX 2253

FOOTSCRAY VIC, AUSTRALIA 3011

4 Westall Rd Springvale VIC Australia 3171

:: E-mailE-mail [email protected] [email protected]

:: TelephoneTelephone +61 03 96871666 +61-3-8549 9600

:: FacsimileFacsimile +61 03 96871844 +61-3-8549 9601

:Project 210061 REBATCH OF EM1008731 QC Level : NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement

Site : YARRAVILLE

:C-O-C number ---- Date Samples Received : 23-AUG-2010

Sampler : ---- Issue Date : 02-SEP-2010

:Order number ----

16:No. of samples received

Quote number : EN/010/10 16:No. of samples analysed

This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. All pages of this report have been checked and approved for

release.

This Quality Control Report contains the following information:

l Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report; Relative Percentage Difference (RPD) and Acceptance Limits

l Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report ; Recovery and Acceptance Limits

l Matrix Spike (MS) Report; Recovery and Acceptance Limits

NATA Accredited Laboratory 825

This document is issued in

accordance with NATA

accreditation requirements.

Accredited for compliance with

ISO/IEC 17025.

SignatoriesThis document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories indicated below. Electronic signing has been

carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.

Signatories Accreditation CategoryPosition

Kim McCabe Senior Inorganic Chemist Inorganics

Nancy Wang Senior Semivolatile Instrument Chemist Organics

Terrance Hettipathirana Team Leader - Metals Inorganics

Xingbin Lin Senior Organic Chemist Organics

Page 253: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

2 of 5:Page

Work Order :

:Client

EM1009164

ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES

210061 REBATCH OF EM1008731:Project

General CommentsThe analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house

developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.

Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.

Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insuffient sample for analysis.

Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.

Anonymous = Refers to samples which are not specifically part of this work order but formed part of the QC process lot

CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society.

LOR = Limit of reporting

RPD = Relative Percentage Difference

# = Indicates failed QC

Key :

Page 254: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

3 of 5:Page

Work Order :

:Client

EM1009164

ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES

210061 REBATCH OF EM1008731:Project

Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) ReportThe quality control term Laboratory Duplicate refers to a randomly selected intralaboratory split. Laboratory duplicates provide information regarding method precision and sample heterogeneity. The permitted ranges

for the Relative Percent Deviation (RPD) of Laboratory Duplicates are specified in ALS Method QWI -EN/38 and are dependent on the magnitude of results in comparison to the level of reporting: Result < 10 times LOR:-

No Limit; Result between 10 and 20 times LOR:- 0% - 50%; Result > 20 times LOR:- 0% - 20%.

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report

Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%)

EA055: Moisture Content (QC Lot: 1459832)

EA055-103: Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) ---- 1.0 % 11.9 11.7 2.1 0% - 50%AnonymousEM1009153-004

EA055-103: Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) ---- 1.0 % 11.3 12.5 10.0 0% - 50%AnonymousEM1009161-010

EA055: Moisture Content (QC Lot: 1459833)

EA055-103: Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) ---- 1.0 % 14.7 13.2 10.8 0% - 50%TP14 (0.9-1.0)EM1009164-011

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES (QC Lot: 1460523)

EG005T: Cobalt 7440-48-4 2 mg/kg 25 29 14.5 0% - 50%AnonymousEM1009131-040

EG005T: Cobalt 7440-48-4 2 mg/kg <2 <2 0.0 No LimitAnonymousEM1009168-004

EP070: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Speciation (QC Lot: 1462067)

EP070: Aliphatic C16-C35 ---- 100 mg/kg 16600 11300 # 37.7 0% - 20%TP9 (2.0-2.1)EM1009164-002

EP070: Aliphatic > C35 ---- 100 mg/kg 9600 7400 # 25.9 0% - 20%

EP070: Aromatic > C35 ---- 100 mg/kg 7400 6000 # 21.1 0% - 20%

EP070: Aromatic C16-C35 ---- 90 mg/kg 8590 6090 # 34.0 0% - 20%

Sub-Matrix: WATER Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report

Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%)

EG005C: Leachable Metals by ICPAES (QC Lot: 1462338)

EG005C: Copper 7440-50-8 0.1 mg/L <0.1 <0.1 0.0 No LimitAnonymousEB1014864-001

EG005C: Leachable Metals by ICPAES (QC Lot: 1464311)

EG005C: Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.1 mg/L <0.1 <0.1 0.0 No LimitAnonymousEM1009161-016

Page 255: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

4 of 5:Page

Work Order :

:Client

EM1009164

ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES

210061 REBATCH OF EM1008731:Project

Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) ReportThe quality control term Method / Laboratory Blank refers to an analyte free matrix to which all reagents are added in the same volumes or proportions as used in standard sample preparation. The purpose of this QC

parameter is to monitor potential laboratory contamination. The quality control term Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) refers to a certified reference material, or a known interference free matrix spiked with target

analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor method precision and accuracy independent of sample matrix. Dynamic Recovery Limits are based on statistical evaluation of processed LCS.

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Report

Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report

Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%)

Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit

EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES (QCLot: 1460523)

EG005T: Cobalt 7440-48-4 2 mg/kg <2 90.725.4 mg/kg 11980

EP070: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Speciation (QCLot: 1462067)

EP070: Aliphatic C16-C35 ---- 100 mg/kg <100 87.85400 mg/kg 13771

EP070: Aliphatic > C35 ---- 100 mg/kg <100 -------- --------

EP070: Aromatic C16-C35 ---- 90 mg/kg <90 94.71860 mg/kg 12873

EP070: Aromatic > C35 ---- 100 mg/kg <100 -------- --------

Sub-Matrix: WATER Method Blank (MB) Report

Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report

Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%)

Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit

EG005C: Leachable Metals by ICPAES (QCLot: 1462338)

EG005C: Copper 7440-50-8 0.1 mg/L <0.1 1121.0 mg/L 12781

EG005C: Leachable Metals by ICPAES (QCLot: 1464311)

EG005C: Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.1 mg/L <0.1 94.41.00 mg/L 12080

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1463907)

EP075(SIM): Naphthalene 91-20-3 1 µg/L <1.0 65.25 µg/L 12638

EP075(SIM): Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 1 µg/L <1.0 80.45 µg/L 13335

EP075(SIM): Acenaphthene 83-32-9 1 µg/L <1.0 81.35 µg/L 12741

EP075(SIM): Fluorene 86-73-7 1 µg/L <1.0 91.85 µg/L 12842

EP075(SIM): Phenanthrene 85-01-8 1 µg/L <1.0 96.25 µg/L 13145

EP075(SIM): Anthracene 120-12-7 1 µg/L <1.0 97.85 µg/L 12947

EP075(SIM): Fluoranthene 206-44-0 1 µg/L <1.0 1035 µg/L 13242

EP075(SIM): Pyrene 129-00-0 1 µg/L <1.0 92.45 µg/L 13242

EP075(SIM): Benz(a)anthracene 56-55-3 1 µg/L <1.0 89.25 µg/L 14530.8

EP075(SIM): Chrysene 218-01-9 1 µg/L <1.0 1055 µg/L 13930.7

EP075(SIM): Benzo(b)fluoranthene 205-99-2 1 µg/L <1.0 1235 µg/L 14440

EP075(SIM): Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 1 µg/L <1.0 1295 µg/L 13644

EP075(SIM): Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 0.5 µg/L <0.5 1045 µg/L 13543

EP075(SIM): Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene 193-39-5 1 µg/L <1.0 84.85 µg/L 14947

EP075(SIM): Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 53-70-3 1 µg/L <1.0 82.35 µg/L 15147

EP075(SIM): Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 191-24-2 1 µg/L <1.0 1035 µg/L 15147

Page 256: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

5 of 5:Page

Work Order :

:Client

EM1009164

ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES

210061 REBATCH OF EM1008731:Project

Matrix Spike (MS) ReportThe quality control term Matrix Spike (MS) refers to an intralaboratory split sample spiked with a representative set of target analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor potential matrix effects on analyte

recoveries. Static Recovery Limits as per laboratory Data Quality Objectives (DQOs). Ideal recovery ranges stated may be waived in the event of sample matrix interference.

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report

Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike

HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number

EP070: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Speciation (QCLot: 1462067)

TP5 (2.0-2.1)EM1009164-004 ----EP070: Aliphatic C16-C35 # 60.65400 mg/kg 13070

----EP070: Aromatic C16-C35 # Not Determined1860 mg/kg 13070

Sub-Matrix: WATER Matrix Spike (MS) Report

Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%)Spike

HighLowMSConcentrationLaboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number

EG005C: Leachable Metals by ICPAES (QCLot: 1462338)

TP10 (1.8-1.9)EM1009164-016 7440-50-8EG005C: Copper 96.41.00 mg/L 13070

EG005C: Leachable Metals by ICPAES (QCLot: 1464311)

AnonymousEM1009161-017 7440-38-2EG005C: Arsenic 96.61.00 mg/L 13070

Page 257: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

True

INTERPRETIVE QUALITY CONTROL REPORTWork Order : EM1009164 Page : 1 of 7

:: LaboratoryClient Environmental Division MelbourneENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES: :ContactContact MR JORDAN FRASER Steven McGrath

:: AddressAddress P.O.BOX 2253FOOTSCRAY VIC, AUSTRALIA 3011

4 Westall Rd Springvale VIC Australia 3171

:: E-mailE-mail [email protected] [email protected]:: TelephoneTelephone +61 03 96871666 +61-3-8549 9600:: FacsimileFacsimile +61 03 96871844 +61-3-8549 9601

:Project 210061 REBATCH OF EM1008731 QC Level : NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirementSite : YARRAVILLE

:C-O-C number ---- Date Samples Received : 23-AUG-2010----:Sampler Issue Date : 02-SEP-2010

:Order number ----No. of samples received : 16

Quote number : EN/010/10 No. of samples analysed : 16

This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. All pages of this report have been checked and approved for release.

This Interpretive Quality Control Report contains the following information:l Analysis Holding Time Compliancel Quality Control Parameter Frequency Compliancel Brief Method Summariesl Summary of Outliers

Environmental Division Melbourne

4 Westall Rd Springvale VIC Australia 3171Tel. +61-3-8549 9600 Fax. +61-3-8549 9601 www.alsglobal.com

Page 258: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

2 of 7:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1009164ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061 REBATCH OF EM1008731:Project

Analysis Holding Time ComplianceThe following report summarises extraction / preparation and analysis times and compares with recommended holding times. Dates reported represent first date of extraction or analysis and precludes subsequent dilutions and reruns. Information is also provided re the sample container (preservative) from which the analysis aliquot was taken. Elapsed period to analysis represents number of days from sampling where no extraction / digestion is involved or period from extraction / digestion where this is present. For composite samples, sampling date is assumed to be that of the oldest sample contributing to the composite. Sample date for laboratory produced leachates is assumed as the completion date of the leaching process. Outliers for holding time are based on USEPA SW 846, APHA, AS and NEPM (1999). A listing of breaches is provided in the Summary of Outliers.

Holding times for leachate methods (excluding elutriates) vary according to the analytes being determined on the resulting solution. For non -volatile analytes, the holding time compliance assessment compares the leach date with the shortest analyte holding time for the equivalent soil method. These soil holding times are: Organics (14 days); Mercury (28 days) & other metals (180 days). A recorded breach therefore does not guarantee a breach for all non-volatile parameters.

Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod

EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s)

EA055: Moisture ContentSoil Glass Jar - Unpreserved

16-AUG-2010----TP9 (2.0-2.1), TP5 (2.0-2.1),TP11 (1.9-2.0), TP12 (0.4-0.5),TP11 (0.9-1.0), TP10 (1.4-1.5),TP14 (0.9-1.0), TP2 (0.4-0.5),TP3 (0.4-0.5), TP5 (0.4-0.5),TP5 (1.4-1.5)

23-AUG-2010----09-AUG-2010 ---- û

EG005C: Leachable Metals by ICPAESClear Plastic Bottle - Nitric Acid; Unfiltered

21-FEB-201121-FEB-2011TP10 (1.8-1.9) 31-AUG-201025-AUG-201025-AUG-2010 ü üClear Plastic Bottle - Nitric Acid; Unfiltered

21-FEB-201121-FEB-2011TP2 (3.2-3.3), TP7 (2.0-2.1) 27-AUG-201027-AUG-201025-AUG-2010 ü üEG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AESSoil Glass Jar - Unpreserved

05-FEB-201105-FEB-2011TP12 (0.4-0.5), TP11 (0.9-1.0),TP10 (1.4-1.5), TP14 (0.9-1.0),TP2 (0.4-0.5), TP3 (0.4-0.5),TP5 (0.4-0.5), TP5 (1.4-1.5)

26-AUG-201024-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 ü ü

EN60: ASLP Leaching ProcedureLab Split: Leach for metals excl. Hg

05-FEB-201105-FEB-2011TP10 (1.8-1.9) 24-AUG-2010---09-AUG-2010 ---- üLab Split: Leach for metals excl. Hg

05-FEB-201105-FEB-2011TP2 (3.2-3.3), TP7 (2.0-2.1) 25-AUG-2010---09-AUG-2010 ---- üLabSplit: Leach for organics and other tests

23-AUG-201023-AUG-2010TP6 (0-0.1), TP9 (2.0-2.1),TP1 (1.5-1.6)

25-AUG-2010---09-AUG-2010 ---- û

Page 259: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

3 of 7:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1009164ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061 REBATCH OF EM1008731:Project

Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod

EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s)

EN60: Bottle Leaching ProcedureLab Split: Leach for metals excl. Hg

05-FEB-201105-FEB-2011TP10 (1.8-1.9) 24-AUG-2010---09-AUG-2010 ---- üLab Split: Leach for metals excl. Hg

05-FEB-201105-FEB-2011TP2 (3.2-3.3), TP7 (2.0-2.1) 25-AUG-2010---09-AUG-2010 ---- üLabSplit: Leach for organics and other tests

23-AUG-201023-AUG-2010TP6 (0-0.1), TP9 (2.0-2.1),TP1 (1.5-1.6)

25-AUG-2010---09-AUG-2010 ---- û

EP070: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - SpeciationSoil Glass Jar - Unpreserved

04-OCT-201023-AUG-2010TP9 (2.0-2.1), TP5 (2.0-2.1),TP11 (1.9-2.0)

27-AUG-201025-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 û ü

EP075(SIM)B: Polynuclear Aromatic HydrocarbonsAmber Glass Bottle - Unpreserved

05-OCT-201001-SEP-2010TP6 (0-0.1), TP9 (2.0-2.1),TP1 (1.5-1.6)

27-AUG-201026-AUG-201025-AUG-2010 ü ü

Page 260: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

4 of 7:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1009164ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061 REBATCH OF EM1008731:Project

Quality Control Parameter Frequency ComplianceThe following report summarises the frequency of laboratory QC samples analysed within the analytical lot(s) in which the submitted sample(s) was(where) processed. Actual rate should be greater than or equal to the expected rate. A listing of breaches is provided in the Summary of Outliers.

Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Quality Control frequency not within specification ; ü = Quality Control frequency within specification. Quality Control SpecificationQuality Control Sample Type

ExpectedQC Regular ActualRate (%)Quality Control Sample Type Count

EvaluationAnalytical Methods Method

Laboratory Duplicates (DUP)NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 12.0 10.03 25 üMoisture Content EA055-103NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 10.5 10.02 19 üTotal Metals by ICP-AES EG005TNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 11.1 10.01 9 üTPH - Speciation EP070

Laboratory Control Samples (LCS)NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 5.3 5.01 19 üTotal Metals by ICP-AES EG005TNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 11.1 5.01 9 üTPH - Speciation EP070

Method Blanks (MB)NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 5.3 5.01 19 üTotal Metals by ICP-AES EG005TNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 11.1 5.01 9 üTPH - Speciation EP070

Matrix Spikes (MS)ALS QCS3 requirement 5.3 5.01 19 üTotal Metals by ICP-AES EG005TALS QCS3 requirement 11.1 5.01 9 üTPH - Speciation EP070

Matrix: WATER Evaluation: û = Quality Control frequency not within specification ; ü = Quality Control frequency within specification. Quality Control SpecificationQuality Control Sample Type

ExpectedQC Regular ActualRate (%)Quality Control Sample Type Count

EvaluationAnalytical Methods Method

Laboratory Duplicates (DUP)NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 28.6 10.02 7 üLeachable Metals by ICPAES EG005C

Laboratory Control Samples (LCS)NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 28.6 5.02 7 üLeachable Metals by ICPAES EG005CNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 14.3 5.01 7 üPAH/Phenols (GC/MS - SIM) EP075(SIM)

Method Blanks (MB)NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 28.6 5.02 7 üLeachable Metals by ICPAES EG005CNEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 14.3 5.01 7 üPAH/Phenols (GC/MS - SIM) EP075(SIM)

Matrix Spikes (MS)ALS QCS3 requirement 28.6 5.02 7 üLeachable Metals by ICPAES EG005C

Page 261: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

5 of 7:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1009164ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061 REBATCH OF EM1008731:Project

Brief Method SummariesThe analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the US EPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. The following report provides brief descriptions of the analytical procedures employed for results reported in the Certificate of Analysis. Sources from which ALS methods have been developed are provided within the Method Descriptions.

Analytical Methods Method DescriptionsMatrixMethod

A gravimetric procedure based on weight loss over a 12 hour drying period at 103-105 degrees C. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 102)

Moisture Content EA055-103 SOIL

APHA 21st ed., 3120; USEPA SW 846 - 6010 The ICPAES technique ionises leachate sample atoms emitting a characteristic spectrum. This spectrum is then compared against matrix matched standards for quantification. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Appdx. 2)

Leachable Metals by ICPAES EG005C SOIL

(APHA 21st ed., 3120; USEPA SW 846 - 6010) (ICPAES) Metals are determined following an appropriate acid digestion of the soil. The ICPAES technique ionises samples in a plasma, emitting a characteristic spectrum based on metals present. Intensities at selected wavelengths are compared against those of matrix matched standards. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3)

Total Metals by ICP-AES EG005T SOIL

(USEPA SW 846 - 8015A) Sample extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/FID and quantified against alkane standards over the range C10 - C36. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 506.1)

TPH - Speciation EP070 SOIL

USEPA SW 846 - 8270D Sample extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/MS in SIM Mode and quantification is by comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Appdx. 2)

PAH/Phenols (GC/MS - SIM) EP075(SIM) SOIL

Preparation Methods Method DescriptionsMatrixMethod

USEPA SW846-3005 Method 3005 is a Nitric/Hydrochloric acid digestion procedure used to prepare surface and ground water samples for analysis by ICPAES or ICPMS. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Appdx. 2)

Digestion for Total Recoverable Metals in TCLP Leachate

EN25C SOIL

AS4439.3 Preparation of LeachatesASLP for Non & Semivolatile Analytes EN60a SOILUSEPA 200.2 Mod. Hot Block Acid Digestion 1.0g of sample is heated with Nitric and Hydrochloric acids, then cooled. Peroxide is added and samples heated and cooled again before being filtered and bulked to volume for analysis. Digest is appropriate for determination of selected metals in sludge, sediments, and soils. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 202)

Hot Block Digest for metals in soils sediments and sludges

EN69 SOIL

USEPA SW 846 - 3510B 500 mL to 1L of sample is transferred to a separatory funnel and serially extracted three times using 60mL DCM for each extract. The resultant extracts are combined, dehydrated and concentrated for analysis. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Appdx. 2). ALS default excludes sediment which may be resident in the container.

Separatory Funnel Extraction of Liquids ORG14 SOIL

In-house, Mechanical agitation (tumbler). 10g of sample, Na2SO4 and surrogate are extracted with 20mL 1:1 DCM/Acetone by end over end tumble. The solvent is transferred directly to a GC vial for analysis.

Tumbler Extraction of Solids (Option B - Non-concentrating)

ORG17-SP SOIL

Page 262: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

6 of 7:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1009164ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061 REBATCH OF EM1008731:Project

Summary of Outliers

Outliers : Quality Control SamplesThe following report highlights outliers flagged in the Quality Control (QC) Report. Surrogate recovery limits are static and based on USEPA SW846 or ALS-QWI/EN/38 (in the absence of specific USEPA limits). This report displays QC Outliers (breaches) only.

Duplicates, Method Blanks, Laboratory Control Samples and Matrix Spikes

Matrix: SOIL

Compound Group Name CommentLimitsDataAnalyteClient Sample IDLaboratory Sample ID CAS Number

Duplicate (DUP) RPDs

Aliphatic C16-C35EM1009164-002 ----TP9 (2.0-2.1) RPD exceeds LOR based limits0-20%37.7 %EP070: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - SpeciationAliphatic > C35EM1009164-002 ----TP9 (2.0-2.1) RPD exceeds LOR based limits0-20%25.9 %EP070: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - SpeciationAromatic C16-C35EM1009164-002 ----TP9 (2.0-2.1) RPD exceeds LOR based limits0-20%34.0 %EP070: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - SpeciationAromatic > C35EM1009164-002 ----TP9 (2.0-2.1) RPD exceeds LOR based limits0-20%21.1 %EP070: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Speciation

Matrix Spike (MS) Recoveries

Aliphatic C16-C35EM1009164-004 ----TP5 (2.0-2.1) Recovery less than lower data quality objective

70-130%60.6 %EP070: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Speciation

Aromatic C16-C35EM1009164-004 ----TP5 (2.0-2.1) Matrix spike recovery not determined due to sample matrix interference.

----Not Determined

EP070: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Speciation

l For all matrices, no Method Blank value outliers occur.

l For all matrices, no Laboratory Control outliers occur.

Regular Sample Surrogates

Sub-Matrix: ASLP LEACHATE

Compound Group Name CommentLimitsDataAnalyteClient Sample IDLaboratory Sample ID CAS Number

Samples Submitted EM1009164-002 1718-51-04-Terphenyl-d14TP9 (2.0-2.1) Recovery greater than upper data quality

objective42.1-130.1

%EP075(SIM)T: PAH Surrogates 150 %

Outliers : Analysis Holding Time ComplianceThis report displays Holding Time breaches only. Only the respective Extraction / Preparation and/or Analysis component is/are displayed.

Matrix: SOIL

AnalysisExtraction / PreparationDate analysedDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) Days

overdueDays

overdueDue for extraction Due for analysis

Method

EA055: Moisture ContentSoil Glass Jar - Unpreserved

16-AUG-2010----TP9 (2.0-2.1), TP5 (2.0-2.1),TP11 (1.9-2.0), TP12 (0.4-0.5),TP11 (0.9-1.0), TP10 (1.4-1.5),TP14 (0.9-1.0), TP2 (0.4-0.5),TP3 (0.4-0.5), TP5 (0.4-0.5),TP5 (1.4-1.5)

23-AUG-2010---- ---- 7

Page 263: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

7 of 7:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1009164ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061 REBATCH OF EM1008731:Project

Matrix: SOIL

AnalysisExtraction / PreparationDate analysedDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) Days

overdueDays

overdueDue for extraction Due for analysis

Method

EN60: ASLP Leaching ProcedureLabSplit: Leach for organics and other tests

23-AUG-2010----TP6 (0-0.1), TP9 (2.0-2.1),TP1 (1.5-1.6)

25-AUG-2010---- ---- 2

EN60: Bottle Leaching ProcedureLabSplit: Leach for organics and other tests

23-AUG-2010----TP6 (0-0.1), TP9 (2.0-2.1),TP1 (1.5-1.6)

25-AUG-2010---- ---- 2

EP070: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - SpeciationSoil Glass Jar - Unpreserved

----23-AUG-2010TP9 (2.0-2.1), TP5 (2.0-2.1),TP11 (1.9-2.0)

----25-AUG-2010 2 ----

Outliers : Frequency of Quality Control SamplesThe following report highlights breaches in the Frequency of Quality Control Samples.

l No Quality Control Sample Frequency Outliers exist.

Page 264: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Data File : 7901012.DLaboratory Number: EM1009628-002Sample ID : TP3 (1.4-1.5) Date Acquired : 07-Sep-10, 15:40:40

0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

300000

350000

400000

450000

500000

550000

600000

650000

700000

750000

800000

850000

900000

950000

Time

Response_ Signal: 7901012.D\FID1A.CH

3.800

6.468

7.443

C29

- C

36 (6

.85-

7.99

)

C15

- C

28 (3

.93-

6.85

)

C10

- C

14 (1

.080

-3.9

40)

Page 265: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Data File : 0701002.DLaboratory Number: EM1009628-001Sample ID : TP11 (1.9-2.0) Date Acquired : 07-Sep-10, 10:24:33

0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

300000

350000

400000

450000

500000

550000

600000

650000

700000

750000

800000

850000

900000

950000

Time

Response_ Signal: 0701002.D\FID1A.CH

3.795

6.911

7.570

C29

- C

36 (6

.89-

8.00

)

C15

- C

28 (3

.97-

6.89

)

C10

- C

14 (1

.18-

3.97

)

Page 266: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Data File : 013B0901.DLaboratory Number: EM1009628-004Sample ID : TP5 (2.0-2.1) Date Acquired : 07-Sep-2010, 10:54:47

0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

300000

350000

400000

450000

500000

550000

600000

650000

700000

750000

800000

850000

900000

950000

Time

Response_ Signal: 013B0901.D\FID2B.ch

3.587

4.559

7.423

C29

- C

36 (7

.26-

8.42

)

C15

- C

28 (4

.30-

7.26

)

C10

- C

14 (2

.32-

4.30

)

Page 267: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Data File : 012B0801.DLaboratory Number: EM1009628-003Sample ID : TP9B (2.5-2.6) Date Acquired : 07-Sep-2010, 10:38:11

0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

300000

350000

400000

450000

500000

550000

600000

650000

700000

750000

800000

850000

900000

950000

Time

Response_ Signal: 012B0801.D\FID2B.ch

3.587

4.560

7.424

C29

- C

36 (7

.26-

8.42

)

C15

- C

28 (4

.30-

7.26

)

C10

- C

14 (2

.32-

4.30

)

Page 268: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street
Page 269: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street
Page 270: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

EM1009628

False

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSISWork Order : EM1009628 Page : 1 of 4

:: LaboratoryClient Environmental Division MelbourneENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES

: :ContactContact MR JORDAN FRASER Carol Walsh:: AddressAddress P.O.BOX 2253

FOOTSCRAY VIC, AUSTRALIA 30114 Westall Rd Springvale VIC Australia 3171

:: E-mailE-mail [email protected] [email protected]:: TelephoneTelephone +61 03 96871666 +61-3-8549 9608:: FacsimileFacsimile +61 03 96871844 +61-3-8549 9601

:Project 210061 REBATCH EM1008731 and EM1009164 QC Level : NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement:Order number ----:C-O-C number ---- Date Samples Received : 02-SEP-2010

Sampler : JF Issue Date : 07-SEP-2010Site : YARRAVILLE

4:No. of samples receivedQuote number : EN/010/10 4:No. of samples analysed

This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. All pages of this report have been checked and approved for release.

This Certificate of Analysis contains the following information:l General Commentsl Analytical Results

NATA Accredited Laboratory 825

This document is issued in accordance with NATA

accreditation requirements.

Accredited for compliance with ISO/IEC 17025.

SignatoriesThis document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories indicated below. Electronic signing has been carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.Signatories Accreditation CategoryPosition

Emily Yuen Senior Organic Instrument Chemist OrganicsHerman Lin Senior Inorganic Chemist Inorganics

Environmental Division Melbourne

4 Westall Rd Springvale VIC Australia 3171Tel. +61-3-8549 9600 Fax. +61-3-8549 9601 www.alsglobal.com

Page 271: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

2 of 4:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1009628ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061 REBATCH EM1008731 and EM1009164:Project

General CommentsThe analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.

Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.

Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insuffient sample for analysis.

Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.

When date(s) and/or time(s) are shown bracketed, these have been assumed by the laboratory for processing purposes. If the sampling time is displayed as 0:00 the information was not provided by client.

CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society.LOR = Limit of reporting^ = This result is computed from individual analyte detections at or above the level of reporting

Key :

EP071: Samples were received outside of holding times for the analysis of EP071. Results should be scrutinised accordingly.l

Page 272: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

3 of 4:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1009628ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061 REBATCH EM1008731 and EM1009164:Project

Analytical Results------------TP5 (2.0-2.1)TP9B (2.5-2.6)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: ASLP LEACHATE

------------06-SEP-2010 12:0006-SEP-2010 12:00Client sampling date / time

------------EM1009628-004EM1009628-003UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons<50<50 ---- ---- ----µg/L50----C10 - C14 Fraction

110<100 ---- ---- ----µg/L100----C15 - C28 Fraction

<50<50 ---- ---- ----µg/L50----C29 - C36 Fraction

110<50 ---- ---- ----µg/L50----^ C10 - C36 Fraction (sum)

Page 273: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

4 of 4:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1009628ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061 REBATCH EM1008731 and EM1009164:Project

Analytical Results----TP5 (2.0-2.1)TP9B (2.5-2.6)TP3 (1.4-1.5)TP11 (1.9-2.0)Client sample IDSub-Matrix: SOIL

----09-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:0009-AUG-2010 15:00Client sampling date / time

----EM1009628-004EM1009628-003EM1009628-002EM1009628-001UnitLORCAS NumberCompound

EA055: Moisture Content21.524.4 ---- ---- ----%1.0----^ Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C)

EN60: ASLP Leaching Procedure-------- 5.0 5.0 ----pH Unit0.1----Extraction Fluid pH

EN60: Bottle Leaching Procedure-------- 8.2 8.6 ----pH Unit0.1----Initial pH

-------- 1.6 2.1 ----pH Unit0.1----After HCl pH

-------- 5.3 6.8 ----pH Unit0.1----Final pH

EP071 SG-S: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil - Silica gel cleanup<50<50 ---- ---- ----mg/kg50----C10 - C14 Fraction

1090790 ---- ---- ----mg/kg100----C15 - C28 Fraction

20701120 ---- ---- ----mg/kg100----C29 - C36 Fraction

31601910 ---- ---- ----mg/kg50----^ C10 - C36 Fraction (sum)

Page 274: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

False

QUALITY CONTROL REPORTWork Order : EM1009628 Page : 1 of 5

:: LaboratoryClient Environmental Division MelbourneENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES: :ContactContact MR JORDAN FRASER Carol Walsh

:: AddressAddress P.O.BOX 2253

FOOTSCRAY VIC, AUSTRALIA 3011

4 Westall Rd Springvale VIC Australia 3171

:: E-mailE-mail [email protected] [email protected]

:: TelephoneTelephone +61 03 96871666 +61-3-8549 9608

:: FacsimileFacsimile +61 03 96871844 +61-3-8549 9601

:Project 210061 REBATCH EM1008731 and EM1009164 QC Level : NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement

Site : YARRAVILLE

:C-O-C number ---- Date Samples Received : 02-SEP-2010

Sampler : JF Issue Date : 07-SEP-2010

:Order number ----

4:No. of samples received

Quote number : EN/010/10 4:No. of samples analysed

This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. All pages of this report have been checked and approved for

release.

This Quality Control Report contains the following information:

l Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report; Relative Percentage Difference (RPD) and Acceptance Limits

l Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report ; Recovery and Acceptance Limits

l Matrix Spike (MS) Report; Recovery and Acceptance Limits

NATA Accredited Laboratory 825

This document is issued in

accordance with NATA

accreditation requirements.

Accredited for compliance with

ISO/IEC 17025.

SignatoriesThis document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories indicated below. Electronic signing has been

carried out in compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.

Signatories Accreditation CategoryPosition

Emily Yuen Senior Organic Instrument Chemist Organics

Herman Lin Senior Inorganic Chemist Inorganics

Environmental Division Melbourne

4 Westall Rd Springvale VIC Australia 3171

Tel. +61-3-8549 9600 Fax. +61-3-8549 9601 www.alsglobal.com

Page 275: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

2 of 5:Page

Work Order :

:Client

EM1009628

ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES

210061 REBATCH EM1008731 and EM1009164:Project

General CommentsThe analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house

developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.

Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.

Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insuffient sample for analysis.

Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.

Anonymous = Refers to samples which are not specifically part of this work order but formed part of the QC process lot

CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society.

LOR = Limit of reporting

RPD = Relative Percentage Difference

# = Indicates failed QC

Key :

Page 276: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

3 of 5:Page

Work Order :

:Client

EM1009628

ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES

210061 REBATCH EM1008731 and EM1009164:Project

Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) ReportThe quality control term Laboratory Duplicate refers to a randomly selected intralaboratory split. Laboratory duplicates provide information regarding method precision and sample heterogeneity. The permitted ranges

for the Relative Percent Deviation (RPD) of Laboratory Duplicates are specified in ALS Method QWI -EN/38 and are dependent on the magnitude of results in comparison to the level of reporting: Result < 10 times LOR:-

No Limit; Result between 10 and 20 times LOR:- 0% - 50%; Result > 20 times LOR:- 0% - 20%.

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report

Original Result RPD (%)Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Duplicate Result Recovery Limits (%)

EA055: Moisture Content (QC Lot: 1474556)EA055-103: Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) ---- 1.0 % 16.6 16.0 3.9 0% - 50%AnonymousEM1009496-054

EA055-103: Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) ---- 1.0 % 8.8 9.1 3.6 No LimitAnonymousEM1009496-064

Page 277: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

4 of 5:Page

Work Order :

:Client

EM1009628

ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES

210061 REBATCH EM1008731 and EM1009164:Project

Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) ReportThe quality control term Method / Laboratory Blank refers to an analyte free matrix to which all reagents are added in the same volumes or proportions as used in standard sample preparation. The purpose of this QC

parameter is to monitor potential laboratory contamination. The quality control term Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) refers to a certified reference material, or a known interference free matrix spiked with target

analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor method precision and accuracy independent of sample matrix. Dynamic Recovery Limits are based on statistical evaluation of processed LCS.

Sub-Matrix: WATER Method Blank (MB) Report

Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report

Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%)

Result Concentration HighLowLCSMethod: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit

EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 1476122)EP071: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 µg/L <50 99.84448 µg/L 12464

EP071: C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L <100 11714955 µg/L 13070

EP071: C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 50 µg/L <50 1193118 µg/L 12868

Page 278: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

5 of 5:Page

Work Order :

:Client

EM1009628

ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES

210061 REBATCH EM1008731 and EM1009164:Project

Matrix Spike (MS) ReportThe quality control term Matrix Spike (MS) refers to an intralaboratory split sample spiked with a representative set of target analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor potential matrix effects on analyte

recoveries. Static Recovery Limits as per laboratory Data Quality Objectives (DQOs). Ideal recovery ranges stated may be waived in the event of sample matrix interference.

l No Matrix Spike (MS) Results are required to be reported.

Page 279: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

True

INTERPRETIVE QUALITY CONTROL REPORTWork Order : EM1009628 Page : 1 of 5

:: LaboratoryClient Environmental Division MelbourneENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES: :ContactContact MR JORDAN FRASER Carol Walsh

:: AddressAddress P.O.BOX 2253FOOTSCRAY VIC, AUSTRALIA 3011

4 Westall Rd Springvale VIC Australia 3171

:: E-mailE-mail [email protected] [email protected]:: TelephoneTelephone +61 03 96871666 +61-3-8549 9608:: FacsimileFacsimile +61 03 96871844 +61-3-8549 9601

:Project 210061 REBATCH EM1008731 and EM1009164 QC Level : NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirementSite : YARRAVILLE

:C-O-C number ---- Date Samples Received : 02-SEP-2010JF:Sampler Issue Date : 07-SEP-2010

:Order number ----No. of samples received : 4

Quote number : EN/010/10 No. of samples analysed : 4

This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. All pages of this report have been checked and approved for release.

This Interpretive Quality Control Report contains the following information:l Analysis Holding Time Compliancel Quality Control Parameter Frequency Compliancel Brief Method Summariesl Summary of Outliers

Environmental Division Melbourne

4 Westall Rd Springvale VIC Australia 3171Tel. +61-3-8549 9600 Fax. +61-3-8549 9601 www.alsglobal.com

Page 280: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

2 of 5:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1009628ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061 REBATCH EM1008731 and EM1009164:Project

Analysis Holding Time ComplianceThe following report summarises extraction / preparation and analysis times and compares with recommended holding times. Dates reported represent first date of extraction or analysis and precludes subsequent dilutions and reruns. Information is also provided re the sample container (preservative) from which the analysis aliquot was taken. Elapsed period to analysis represents number of days from sampling where no extraction / digestion is involved or period from extraction / digestion where this is present. For composite samples, sampling date is assumed to be that of the oldest sample contributing to the composite. Sample date for laboratory produced leachates is assumed as the completion date of the leaching process. Outliers for holding time are based on USEPA SW 846, APHA, AS and NEPM (1999). A listing of breaches is provided in the Summary of Outliers.

Holding times for leachate methods (excluding elutriates) vary according to the analytes being determined on the resulting solution. For non -volatile analytes, the holding time compliance assessment compares the leach date with the shortest analyte holding time for the equivalent soil method. These soil holding times are: Organics (14 days); Mercury (28 days) & other metals (180 days). A recorded breach therefore does not guarantee a breach for all non-volatile parameters.

Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time. AnalysisExtraction / PreparationSample DateMethod

EvaluationDue for analysisDate analysedEvaluationDue for extractionDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s)

EA055: Moisture ContentSoil Glass Jar - Unpreserved

16-AUG-2010----TP11 (1.9-2.0), TP3 (1.4-1.5) 03-SEP-2010----09-AUG-2010 ---- ûEN60: ASLP Leaching ProcedureLabSplit: Leach for organics and other tests

23-AUG-201023-AUG-2010TP9B (2.5-2.6), TP5 (2.0-2.1) 06-SEP-2010---09-AUG-2010 ---- ûEN60: Bottle Leaching ProcedureLabSplit: Leach for organics and other tests

23-AUG-201023-AUG-2010TP9B (2.5-2.6), TP5 (2.0-2.1) 06-SEP-2010---09-AUG-2010 ---- ûEP071 SG-S: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil - Silica gel cleanupSoil Glass Jar - Unpreserved

13-OCT-201023-AUG-2010TP11 (1.9-2.0) 07-SEP-201003-SEP-201009-AUG-2010 û üSoil Glass Jar - Unpreserved

25-SEP-201023-AUG-2010TP3 (1.4-1.5) 07-SEP-201016-AUG-201009-AUG-2010 ü üEP080/071: Total Petroleum HydrocarbonsAmber Glass Bottle - Unpreserved

16-OCT-201013-SEP-2010TP9B (2.5-2.6), TP5 (2.0-2.1) 07-SEP-201006-SEP-201006-SEP-2010 ü ü

Page 281: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

3 of 5:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1009628ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061 REBATCH EM1008731 and EM1009164:Project

Quality Control Parameter Frequency ComplianceThe following report summarises the frequency of laboratory QC samples analysed within the analytical lot(s) in which the submitted sample(s) was(where) processed. Actual rate should be greater than or equal to the expected rate. A listing of breaches is provided in the Summary of Outliers.

Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Quality Control frequency not within specification ; ü = Quality Control frequency within specification. Quality Control SpecificationQuality Control Sample Type

ExpectedQC Regular ActualRate (%)Quality Control Sample Type Count

EvaluationAnalytical Methods Method

Laboratory Duplicates (DUP)NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 10.0 10.02 20 üMoisture Content EA055-103

Matrix: WATER Evaluation: û = Quality Control frequency not within specification ; ü = Quality Control frequency within specification. Quality Control SpecificationQuality Control Sample Type

ExpectedQC Regular ActualRate (%)Quality Control Sample Type Count

EvaluationAnalytical Methods Method

Laboratory Control Samples (LCS)NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 9.1 5.01 11 üTPH - Semivolatile Fraction EP071

Method Blanks (MB)NEPM 1999 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement 9.1 5.01 11 üTPH - Semivolatile Fraction EP071

Page 282: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

4 of 5:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1009628ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061 REBATCH EM1008731 and EM1009164:Project

Brief Method SummariesThe analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the US EPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. The following report provides brief descriptions of the analytical procedures employed for results reported in the Certificate of Analysis. Sources from which ALS methods have been developed are provided within the Method Descriptions.

Analytical Methods Method DescriptionsMatrixMethod

A gravimetric procedure based on weight loss over a 12 hour drying period at 103-105 degrees C. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 102)

Moisture Content EA055-103 SOIL

USEPA SW 846 - 8015A The sample extract is analysed by Capillary GC/FID and quantification is by comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve of n-Alkane standards. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Appdx. 2)

TPH - Semivolatile Fraction EP071 SOIL

(USEPA SW 846 - 8015A) Sample extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/FID and quantified against alkane standards over the range C10 - C36. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Method 506.1)

TPH - Semivolatile Fraction (Silica Gel Clean Up)

EP071SG-S SOIL

Preparation Methods Method DescriptionsMatrixMethod

AS4439.3 Preparation of LeachatesASLP for Non & Semivolatile Analytes EN60a SOILUSEPA SW 846 - 3510B 500 mL to 1L of sample is transferred to a separatory funnel and serially extracted three times using 60mL DCM for each extract. The resultant extracts are combined, dehydrated and concentrated for analysis. This method is compliant with NEPM (1999) Schedule B(3) (Appdx. 2). ALS default excludes sediment which may be resident in the container.

Separatory Funnel Extraction of Liquids ORG14 SOIL

In-house, Mechanical agitation (tumbler). 20g of sample, Na2SO4 and surrogate are extracted with 150mL 1:1 DCM/Acetone by end over end tumble. The solvent is decanted, dehydrated and concentrated (by KD) to the desired volume for analysis.

Tumbler Extraction of Solids/ Silica Gel Clean Up

ORG17A-SG SOIL

Page 283: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

5 of 5:PageWork Order :

:ClientEM1009628ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES210061 REBATCH EM1008731 and EM1009164:Project

Summary of Outliers

Outliers : Quality Control SamplesThe following report highlights outliers flagged in the Quality Control (QC) Report. Surrogate recovery limits are static and based on USEPA SW846 or ALS-QWI/EN/38 (in the absence of specific USEPA limits). This report displays QC Outliers (breaches) only.

Duplicates, Method Blanks, Laboratory Control Samples and Matrix Spikes

l For all matrices, no Method Blank value outliers occur.

l For all matrices, no Duplicate outliers occur.

l For all matrices, no Laboratory Control outliers occur.

l For all matrices, no Matrix Spike outliers occur.

Regular Sample Surrogates

l For all regular sample matrices, no surrogate recovery outliers occur.

Outliers : Analysis Holding Time ComplianceThis report displays Holding Time breaches only. Only the respective Extraction / Preparation and/or Analysis component is/are displayed.

Matrix: SOILAnalysisExtraction / Preparation

Date analysedDate extractedContainer / Client Sample ID(s) Days overdue

Days overdue

Due for extraction Due for analysisMethod

EA055: Moisture ContentSoil Glass Jar - Unpreserved

16-AUG-2010----TP11 (1.9-2.0), TP3 (1.4-1.5) 03-SEP-2010---- ---- 18

EN60: ASLP Leaching ProcedureLabSplit: Leach for organics and other tests

23-AUG-2010----TP9B (2.5-2.6), TP5 (2.0-2.1) 06-SEP-2010---- ---- 14

EN60: Bottle Leaching ProcedureLabSplit: Leach for organics and other tests

23-AUG-2010----TP9B (2.5-2.6), TP5 (2.0-2.1) 06-SEP-2010---- ---- 14

EP071 SG-S: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil - Silica gel cleanupSoil Glass Jar - Unpreserved

----23-AUG-2010TP11 (1.9-2.0) ----03-SEP-2010 11 ----

Outliers : Frequency of Quality Control SamplesThe following report highlights breaches in the Frequency of Quality Control Samples.

l No Quality Control Sample Frequency Outliers exist.

Page 284: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc

APPENDIX E QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES

Page 285: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061 QAQC J1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1� INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ........................................................................ 2�1.1� INTRODUCTION 2�1.2� BACKGROUND 3�

2� DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES ...................................................................................... 3�

3� QUALITY CONTROL AND QUALITY ASSURANCE .................................................... 6�3.1� MEASUREMENT DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES 6�

3.1.1� Repeatability (Field collected intra-laboratory duplicates) 7�3.1.2� Precision 7�3.1.3� Accuracy 8�3.1.4� Representativeness 8�3.1.5� Completeness 9�3.1.6� Comparability 9�3.1.7� Sensitivity 9�3.1.8� Blanks 9�3.1.9� Holding times 10�3.1.10�Procedures for anomalous samples and confirmation checking 10�

3.2� FIELD QA/QC 10�3.2.1� Details of sampling team 10�3.2.2� Sampling controls 10�3.2.3� Field instrument calibration 15�

3.3� LABORATORY QA/QC 15�3.4� QA/QC DATA EVALUATION 15�

4� REFERENCES ............................................................................................................. 15�

Page 286: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061 QAQC J2

1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

1.1 Introduction The aim of a quality control and quality assurance (QA/QC) is to deliver data that is:

x representative of what is sampled;

x precise;

x accurate; and

x reproducible. As investigations involve both field and laboratory QA/QC, these are similarly divided. The objective of this document is to evaluate and identify the data quality objectives (DQOs) and the data quality indicators (DQIs), which are used to assess whether the DQOs have been met. All soil sampling procedures followed are described in full in the Soil, gas and groundwater sampling manual (Environmental Earth Sciences Pty Ltd 2005). This document should be referred to for field procedures for sampling and conveyance. Copies are available for inspection if required. The Victorian guideline documents used in the evaluation of the data set for this investigation are:

Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council 1992, Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for the assessment and management of contaminated sites, Australia and New Zealand Environment Council, National Health and Medical Research Council, Melbourne, Vic;

EPA Victoria 2000, Publication 441, A guide to the sampling and analysis of waters, waste-waters, soils and wastes, EPA VIC, Southbank, Vic;

National Environment Protection Council (NEPC) 1999, National environment protection (assessment of site contamination) measure, National Environment Protection Council, Adelaide, SA;

Standards Australia 2005, Guide to the sampling and investigation of potentially contaminated soil, Part 1: Non-volatile and semi-volatile compounds, (AS 4482.1), Standards Australia, Homebush, NSW; and

Standards Australia 1999, – Guide to the sampling and investigation of potentially contaminated soil, Part 2: Volatile substances, (AS 4482.2), Standards Australia, Homebush, NSW.

Data quality is typically discussed in terms of precision, accuracy, representativeness, comparability and completeness. These are referred to as the PARCC parameters. The PARCC (and additional QA) parameters are discussed within this report. The following items form part of the QA/QC appendix:

x repeatability;

x precision;

Page 287: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061 QAQC J3

x accuracy;

x representativeness;

x completeness;

x comparability;

x sensitivity;

x holding times;

x blanks; and

x procedures for anomalous samples and confirmation checking.

1.2 Background The terms “quality assurance” and “quality control” are often confused. In any program, quality control is required before assurance can be put in place. With respect to laboratory analysis activities, these terms are defined as follows: Quality Assurance (QA): “All the planned and systematic activities implemented within the quality system and demonstrated as needed to provide adequate confidence that an entity will fulfil requirements for quality”. (ISO 8402-1995) This encompasses all actions, procedures, checks and decisions undertaken to ensure the accuracy and reliability of analysis results. It includes routine procedures which ensure proper sample control, data transfer, instrument calibration, the decisions required to select and properly train staff, select equipment and analytical methods, and the day-to day judgements resulting from regular scrutiny and maintenance of the laboratory system. Quality Control (QC): “The operational techniques and activities that are used to fulfil the requirements for quality”. (ISO 8402-1995) These are the components of QA which serve to monitor and measure the effectiveness of other QA procedures by comparison with previously decided objectives. They include measurement of the quality of reagents, cleanliness of apparatus, accuracy and precision of methods and instrumentation, and reliability of all of these factors as implemented in a given laboratory from day to day. A complete discussion of either of these terms or the steps for implementing them is beyond the scope of this document. It is widely recognised, however, that adoption of sound laboratory QA and QC procedures is essential and readers are referred to documentation available from the National Association of Testing Authorities (NATA), if further information is required.

2 DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES Development of data quality objectives (DQOs) for each project is a requirement of the NEPC 1999. This is based on a DQO process formulated by the USEPA for contaminated land assessment and remediation. This has not been formally adopted by the EPA Victoria, or the contaminated land industry, however, it provides sound guidance for a consistent

Page 288: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061 QAQC J4

approach in understanding site assessment and remediation. Many environmental practitioners are now following this process. The DQO process is defined by seven steps. Each of these steps has been given due consideration in the undertaking of this project. In brief, these steps are: Step 1: State the problem and establish the DQO team. Step 2: Determine the possible and probable actions that will resolve the problems. Step 3: Identify the informational inputs to assist in the problem resolution. Step 4: Define the boundaries of the study (geographical, temporal, etc). Step 5: Develop and define decision rules. Step 6: Specify tolerable limits to reduce probability of incorrect decisions. Step 7: Ensure the quality of the information obtained. Step 1 � State the Problem The problem will be addressed directly by scientists from Environmental Earth Sciences VIC. The problem is that the site has been used for historical disposal of municipal and construction waste. Potential exists for soil and groundwater contamination to have occurred during this time through uncontrolled filling. The purpose of the investigation is to determine the chemical status of soil at the site and prepare a preliminary feasibility study. Step 2 � Identify the Decision These works have been commissioned to determine if the property has been impacted by past or present potentially polluting activities, or importation of fill materials containing CoPC. A decision is required on what management action is necessary (if any) to ensure the site becomes suitable for its intended use. If the site is deemed not to be suitable for its intended use, direction will be given to determine what is considered by Environmental Earth Sciences VIC to be the most suitable path for making the site suitable. Step 3 � Identify the Inputs to the Decision The study inputs included a historical investigation of the site (Section 3), a review of previous investigations (Section 5) and a soil investigation (Section 6). Step 4 � Define the Study Boundaries The physical boundary of the study area is defined in Section 3. The temporal boundary of the project is restricted to the timing of the investigation. This restriction is not expected to limit the outcome of the investigation as the aim is to determine the site conditions at the time of the investigation. Step 5 � Develop and Define Decision Rules Under the DQO process, it is important to nominate action levels for decision making. Initially, all analytical data will be compiled and evaluated against the appropriate criteria. Dependent upon the sampling and analysis design, statistical parameters such as arithmetic mean, standard deviation and 95% upper confidence limits (95% UCLs) may be applied to designated soil populations for particular analytes. The NEPM will be used as the primary guidance document in decision making on action levels. In the event that action levels are exceeded, a management plan, remedial action plan, and/or qualitative risk assessment (with modeling of potential groundwater impacts on the

Page 289: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061 QAQC J5

local receiving environment) will be required. These procedures constitute the alternative action plan. Step 6 � Specify Tolerable Limits on Decision Errors Most of the procedures in the AS 4482.1 - Guide to the sampling and investigation of potentially contaminated soil (Standards Australia 1997) and NEPM (NEPC 1999) have risk probabilities associated with wrong decisions incorporated into them. It is therefore proposed that no further “tolerable limits” be investigated at this stage of the project. Acceptable limits for field data analysis (relative percent differences for primary and duplicate results) are between 50 and 150 percent (depending on the origin of the sample and volatility of the chemicals present). Acceptable limits for laboratory duplicate analysis may be affected by the heterogeneity of soil and will be set based on site specific information such as background concentrations. These are summarised in Table 1 as the measurement data quality indicators (MDQIs), which will be used to establish whether the DQOs have been met. The MDQIs are discussed further in the Quality control and quality assurance section of this report. It should be noted that Standards Australia procedures specify MDQIs for precision should be �50% RPD, however also acknowledge that low concentrations and organic compounds in particular can be acceptably outside this range. AS 4482.1 suggests that �50% RPD be used as a ‘trigger’ and values above this level of repeatability need to be noted and explained. Step 7 � Optimise the Design The sample design will be undertaken with reference to the AS 4482.1 - Guide to the sampling and investigation of potentially contaminated soil (Standards Australia 1997). As well as a statistically justifiable systematic sampling design, this sampling pattern has also taken into account targeted areas of concern on the site (i.e. judgemental sampling locations). Environmental Earth Sciences VIC believes that the sampling design is optimal considering temporal limitations and access constraints. The density of the sampling pattern and the quality of the data set are suitable for determination of the suitability of the site for its proposed current and future use.

Page 290: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061 QAQC J6

TABLE 1 DATA PROFIT MDQIS

Parameter Procedure Minimum Frequency

Criteria

(5 to 10x LOR4) >10x LOR

Precision Field Duplicates

1 in 20 - metals and semi-volatiles

<80-100 RPD <50-80 RPD

1 in 20 - volatiles <150 RPD <130 RPD

Lab Replicate* 1 in 20 <50 RPD <30 RPD

Accuracy*

Reference Material

1 in 10 60% to 140%R 80% to 120%R Matrix spikes

Surrogate spikes

Representativeness* Reagent Blanks 1 per batch No detection

Holding Times* Every sample -

Blanks** Trip Blank

1 per batch No detection Rinsate Blanks

Sensitivity Limit of Reporting Every sample LOR < ½ site criteria Notes:

1. RPD – relative percentage difference 2. PR – percent recovery (%R) 3. LOR – limit of reporting 4. 4 no limit at <5x LOR 5. * the MDQI is usually specified in the standard method. If not, use the default values set out in this table 6. ** only necessary when measuring dissolved metals and volatile organic compounds in water samples

3 QUALITY CONTROL AND QUALITY ASSURANCE

3.1 Measurement data quality objectives Step 7 of the DQO process (Section 2.0) is a focus on the quality of the information by measurement, that is, measurement data quality objectives (MDQOs). The aim of a quality control and quality assurance (QA/QC) is to deliver data that is representative of what is sampled, precise, accurate and reproducible. As investigations involve both field and laboratory QA/QC, these are similarly divided. The objective of this section is to provide the MDQOs and the measurement data quality indicators (MDQIs), which will be used to establish whether the DQOs have been met.

Page 291: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061 QAQC J7

All soil sampling procedures need to be undertaken according to a standard procedure, for example those procedures set out in:

x EPA Victoria 2000 A guide to the sampling and analysis of waters, waste-waters, soils and wastes. Publication 441. EPA Information Bulletin

x National Environment Protection Council (NEPC) 1999 National environment protection (assessment of site contamination) measure

x Standards Australia 1997 Guide to the sampling and investigation of potentially contaminated soil (Part 1: Non-volatile and semi-volatile compounds. AS 4482.1)

x Standards Australia 1999 Guide to the sampling and investigation of potentially contaminated soil (Part 2: Volatile substances). AS 4482.1

Measurement data quality is typically discussed in terms of precision, accuracy, representativeness, comparability and completeness. Although not necessarily considered in list order, the following items should form part of the QA/QC data evaluation:

x Measured Parameters: precision, accuracy, repeatability (comparability), blanks; and

x Assessed Parameters: completeness, representative of site conditions, sensitivity, and holding times.

The laboratories used should be NATA accredited for the analytical methods performed. Containers, sample preservation (if necessary) and holding times should be consistent with industry practices as set out in NEPM and as defined by ASTM. The QA parameters selected and the criteria used to evaluate the analytical data are defined below and presented in Table 1 of this report.

3.1.1 Repeatability (Field collected intra-laboratory duplicates) These samples provide a check on the analytical performance of the laboratory. At least 5 percent of soil samples (1 in 20) from a site are collected in duplicate. For comparability of data, it is important that there is little delay in the sample submission. For split samples, because of error associated with field splitting, an RPD of between 80 and 150% (depending on the substance) will be allowed as the MDQI. Soil heterogeneity due to the “nugget effect” could result in significantly greater difference, particularly for metals. Consequently, samples with the most observable field homogeneity are selected. Any value >50% RPD will be noted and discussed, as per Standards Australia requirements, with respect to its acceptability for inclusion in the data-set.

3.1.2 Precision Precision is a measure of the reproducibility of results, and is assessed on the basis of agreement between a set of replicate results obtained from duplicate analyses. The precision of a duplicate determination can be measured as relative percentage difference (RPD), and is calculated from the following equation:

Where: X1 is the first duplicate value

X2 is the second duplicate value

100

2X2X1X2 - X1 = RPD u

»»»»

¼

º

««««

¬

ª

¸¹·

¨©§ �

Page 292: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061 QAQC J8

The field blind and field split duplicate results and calculated RPDs are presented in Tables 2 and 3. All results are considered to be within the acceptable range.

3.1.3 Accuracy Accuracy is a measure of the agreement between an experimental determination and the true value of the parameter being measured. The determination of accuracy can be achieved through the analysis of known reference materials or assessed by the analysis of matrix spikes. Accuracy is measured in terms of percentage recovery as defined by the following equation:

100SA

SRSSRR% u�

where: %R = percentage recovery of the spike SSR = spiked sample result SR = sample result (native) SA = spike added Laboratory personnel calculate percentage recoveries of spiked compounds, which are evaluated against control or acceptance limits taken from the appropriate method or the Contract Laboratory Program Statement of Work. If the spike recovery for a sample does not fall within the prescribed control limits, laboratory based corrective action is required. Surrogate spikes consist of spiking non-target compounds into the sample prior to analysis. The spiked compounds are expected to behave during analysis in the same way as the target compounds. Every sample is spiked prior to extraction or analysis with surrogate compounds that are representative of the analysis. If surrogate spike recovery does not meet the prescribed control limits, samples should be reanalysed. For inorganic analyses, certified reference materials are analysed (for SAL this is BCSS-1).

3.1.4 Representativeness Data Point Evaluation Representativeness expresses the degree to which sample data accurately and precisely represents a characteristic of a population, parameter variations at a sampling point, or an environmental condition. Representativeness is primarily dependent on the design and implementation of the sampling program. Representativeness of the data is partially ensured by the avoidance of contamination, adherence to sample handling and analysis protocols, and use of proper chain-of-custody and documentation procedures. Blanks, holding times and field duplicates are all QA parameters that can assist in the analysis of representativeness for data point evaluation and will need to be analysed as part of the measurement data quality assessment. Data Set Evaluation Whether the data is representative of the site is checked in part by undertaking an evaluation of the whole data set to establish the data is compatible. Data compatibility is authenticated by confirming that the laws of chemistry are upheld (i.e. nitrate is not present when Eh is -250 mV), that intra-laboratory analysis relationships are consistent (i.e. BTEX is a subset of the TPH C6-C9 fraction), that observations and field measurements are in agreement with

Page 293: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061 QAQC J9

other field data and the laboratory data and that results are consistent with the geology, history and logic.

3.1.5 Completeness The following information is required to check for completeness of data sets:

x chain-of-custody forms (completed by Environmental Earth Sciences and the laboratory);

x sample receipt forms;

x all requested sample results reported;

x all blank data reported;

x all laboratory duplicates reported and relative percent differences (RPDs) calculated;

x all surrogate spike data reported;

x all matrix spike data reported; and

x NATA stamp on reports.

3.1.6 Comparability Comparability is the evaluation of the similarity of conditions (e.g. sample depth, sample homogeneity, sampling procedures) under which separate sets of data are produced to ensure minimal common error. Data comparability should be demonstrated by the use of standardised sampling and analysis procedures. Data comparability was maintained by undertaking the investigations as follows:

x the soil samples collected during the investigation were conducted by trained Environmental Earth Sciences field team using Environmental Earth Sciences’ standard operating procedures; and

x the same laboratories (ALS and LabMark) were used for organic and inorganic analysis for all relevant samples using the same NATA approved analytical methods.

3.1.7 Sensitivity When interferences are present in the sample, a loss of sensitivity can occur resulting in an increase in the method detection limit. In some instances (e.g. where one or more compounds have particularly high concentrations) the sample must be diluted for analysis. This increases the method detection limit by the dilution factor. The detection limits achieved by the laboratory, when adjusted for dry weight and interferences from the presence of other chemicals within the sampled matrix, must be less than half the site criteria for all analytes tested (i.e. 2 x LOR <site criteria).

3.1.8 Blanks To meet the QC acceptance criteria, laboratory blanks should have no detectable concentrations of the target compounds. Trip blanks (taken to and returned from the field) and rinsate blanks (taken in the field) will only be necessary for analysing dissolved metals and volatile organic compounds in water samples where the threshold value is near the detection limit for an individual compound or element.

Page 294: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061 QAQC J10

3.1.9 Holding times Where standard holding times are exceeded, a discussion, using professional judgement, as to the integrity of the data will be required, taking into account such factors as field storage, laboratory storage and even sample bottle characteristics.

3.1.10 Procedures for anomalous samples and confirmation checking All results should be checked for discrepancies by the project manager, against the anticipated results and all other results, within 8 hours of receipt of the results from the laboratory. Any result that is considered by the supervising scientist to be unusually high or at variance with other results is automatically reanalysed. A significantly different result requires immediate remedial action on the whole sample batch (retesting or using an alternative analytical method) at the laboratory’s expense. After appropriate checking by laboratories, all sample analysis results work-sheets, including those of duplicates and replicate analyses, should be checked by the consultant. Soil is defined as that passing through a 2 mm sieve when air dry. The gravel fraction (that retained) is assumed to be inert. Analysis is undertaken on the less than 2 mm fraction where possible. This procedure is not possible for organics, and original laboratory sheets are reported on ‘an as received’ basis unless a correction has been applied. All results of chemical analysis are analysed on an air dry weight basis and reported on an oven (105qC) dry weight basis, unless specified otherwise. All samples should be adjusted for moisture content when not reported on an oven dry basis. Once confirmation checking is completed the final laboratory report is issued. For blind duplicates, if one sample has more than two analytes exceeding the data quality objectives, the sample is carefully checked. If the error is not apparent, the sample is rejected. If more than three samples are rejected all the samples collected at that time are rejected. These samples are then re-sampled and reanalysed.

3.2 Field QA/QC

3.2.1 Details of sampling team Fieldwork was conducted over a 2-day period using the following staff:

x Site inspection: Jordan Fraser; and

x Soil sampling: Jordan Fraser.

3.2.2 Sampling controls Decontamination procedures carried out between sampling events All sampling equipment to be re-used and which came into contact with soil samples, were thoroughly washed with detergent (Decon 90 or similar) water, then rinsed with clean water and dried before the collection of each sample. Any items accidentally contaminated were similarly washed before re-use. In addition, soil samples were collected from soil profiles removed from a excavator bucket. New nitrile gloves were used at each sampling location. To prevent cross contamination the exterior of each soil sample was cut away (effectively

Page 295: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061 QAQC J11

skinning the soil sample) using a clean spatula. During this process the field scientist would also determine the colour and texture of the soil sample. Sample notation details The borehole logs for each sample collected (including time, location, initials of sampler, duplicate locations, duplicate type and field screening details) are presented in Appendix C. The chemical analyses to be performed on each sample are presented on the chain of custody documentation (Attachment D) which also identify for each sample – the sampler, nature of the sample, collection date, analyses to be performed, sample preservation method (if any), departure time from the site and dispatch courier. Duplicate sampling Duplicate samples were collected at a rate of one duplicate per twenty two samples collected (4.5%). Duplicate samples were analysed at a rate of approximately one duplicate per twenty samples analysed (5.1%). The field duplicate analysis results are presented in Tables 2 and 3. For this project three field duplicate and three split duplicate samples were analysed for a range of CoPC.

Page 296: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061 QAQC J12

TABLE 2 BLIND DUPLICATE RESULTS

Analyte LOR TP4

(1.4-1.5) DUP1

RPD (%)

TP10 (1.9-2.0)

DUP2 RPD (%)

TP12 (2.4-2.5)

DUP3 RPD (%)

Arsenic 5 15 60 120.0 33 <5 --- 74 54 31.3

Cadmium 1 13 <1 --- 2 <1 --- 1 <1 ---

Chromium 2 21 58 93.7 136 <2 --- 97 32 100.8

Copper 5 334 59 139.9 641 8 195.1 98 47 70.3

Lead 5 337 73 128.8 231 <5 --- 142 122 15.2

Nickel 2 54 47 13.9 70 <2 --- 49 39 22.7

Zinc 5 745 286 89.0 720 6 196.7 472 378 22.1

Mercury 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.5 22.2 0.3 0.4 28.6

Naphthalene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 ---

Acenaphthylene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 ---

Acenaphthene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 ---

Fluorene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 ---

Phenanthrene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- 0.7 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 ---

Anthracene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 ---

Fluoranthene 0.5 <0.5 0.8 --- 2 <0.5 --- <0.5 0.6 ---

Pyrene 0.5 <0.5 0.9 --- 1.9 <0.5 --- 0.6 1 50.0

Benz(a)anthracene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- 1.2 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 ---

Chrysene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- 1.1 <0.5 --- <0.5 0.5 ---

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- 1.4 <0.5 --- <0.5 0.5 ---

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- 0.6 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 ---

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- 1 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 ---

Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- 0.8 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 ---

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 ---

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- 0.9 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 ---

Benzene 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 --- <0.2 <0.2 --- <0.2 <0.2 ---

Toluene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 ---

Ethylbenzene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 ---

meta- & para-Xylene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 ---

ortho-Xylene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 ---

C6 - C9 Fraction 10 <10 <10 --- <10 <10 --- <10 <10 ---

C10 - C14 Fraction 50 <50 <50 --- <50 <50 --- <50 <50 ---

C15 - C28 Fraction 100 <100 140 --- 340 <100 --- 170 <100 ---

C29 - C36 Fraction 100 <100 230 --- 540 <100 --- 130 <100 ---

Page 297: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061 QAQC J13

TABLE 3 SPLIT DUPLICATE RESULTS

Analyte LOR TP4

(1.4-1.5) SPLIT1

RPD (%)

TP10 (1.9-2.0)

SPLIT2 RPD (%)

TP12 (2.4-2.5)

SPLIT3 RPD (%)

Arsenic 5 15 68 127.7 33 77 80.0 74 37 66.7

Cadmium 1 13 13 0.0 2 5.2 88.9 1 <2 ---

Chromium 2 21 49 80.0 136 130 4.5 97 32 100.8

Copper 5 334 72 129.1 641 2000 102.9 98 38 88.2

Lead 5 337 100 108.5 231 230 0.4 142 73 64.2

Nickel 2 54 45 18.2 70 110 44.4 49 32 42.0

Zinc 5 745 450 49.4 720 1200 50.0 472 370 24.2

Mercury 0.1 0.2 0.17 16.2 0.4 0.26 42.4 0.3 0.15 66.7

Free Cyanide 1 --- --- --- <1 <0.1 --- --- --- ---

Total Cyanide 1 --- --- --- 2 1.5 28.6 --- --- ---

Naphthalene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 ---

Acenaphthylene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 ---

Acenaphthene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 ---

Fluorene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 ---

Phenanthrene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- 0.7 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 ---

Anthracene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 ---

Fluoranthene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- 2 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 ---

Pyrene 0.5 <0.5 0.6 --- 1.9 <0.5 --- 0.6 0.7 15.4

Benz(a)anthracene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- 1.2 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 ---

Chrysene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- 1.1 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 ---

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- 1.4 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 ---

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- 0.6 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 ---

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- 1 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 ---

Indeno(1.2.3.cd)pyrene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- 0.8 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 ---

Dibenz(a.h)anthracene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 ---

Benzo(g.h.i)perylene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- 0.9 <0.5 --- <0.5 <0.5 ---

Benzene 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 --- <0.2 <0.5 --- <0.2 <0.5 ---

Toluene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <1.0 --- <0.5 <1.0 ---

Ethylbenzene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <1.0 --- <0.5 <1.0 ---

meta- & para-Xylene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <3.0 --- <0.5 <3.0 ---

ortho-Xylene 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 --- <0.5 <1.0 --- <0.5 <1.0 ---

C6 - C9 Fraction 10 <10 <20 --- <10 <20 --- <10 <20 ---

C10 - C14 Fraction 50 <50 <10 --- <50 50 --- <50 <10 ---

C15 - C28 Fraction 100 <100 130 --- 340 610 56.8 170 61 94.4

Page 298: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061 QAQC J14

TABLE 3 SPLIT DUPLICATE RESULTS CONTINUED

Analyte LOR TP4

(1.4-1.5) SPLIT1

RPD (%)

TP10 (1.9-2.0)

SPLIT2 RPD (%)

TP12 (2.4-2.5)

SPLIT3 RPD (%)

C29 - C36 Fraction 100 <100 100 --- 540 480 11.8 130 58 76.6

C10 - C36 Fraction (sum) 50 <50 230 --- 880 1140 25.7 300 119 86.4

Notes:

1. LOR – (laboratory) limit of reporting 2. RPD relative percentage difference 3. all units in mg/kg 4. Acceptance Criteria (see Table 1) 5. no limit applies to <5x MDL 6. 80-150% for low level (5x – 10 x MDL) 7. 50-130% for medium to high level (>10x MDL)

Table 2 and 3 indicate that soil duplicate results recorded a number RPD’s greater than 50%, ranging from 64.2% to 196.7%. Blind duplicate sample DUP2 recorded heavy metal concentrations much lower than the primary sample TP10(1.9-2.0). RPD values for Cu and Zn were recorded at 195.1% and 196.7%, respectively. These concentration discrepancies and high RPD values mainly related to blind and split duplicates 1 and 2, and are likely to be due to the heterogeneity of the fill material from which the samples were obtained. It should be noted that the highest result was used in determining the fate of these samples. Splitting of duplicate samples involved an undisturbed soil sample being removed from the excavator bucket. The outer layer of the sample was then scraped off using a spatula (to prevent cross contamination) and the sample was cut in half (lengthways) with each half being placed in separate sample jars. For samples collected from a sandy soil profile the undisturbed soil sample was removed scraped and placed immediately in two clean glass jars. The field scientists typically attempt to disturb sandy soils as little as possible due to the high potential for loss of volatiles. Blanks, spikes and rinsate samples The scope of this project did not include analysis of rinsate samples, trip and field blanks or laboratory prepared trip spikes for the soil sampling program. Environmental Earth Sciences VIC did not consider analysis of rinsate samples, trip blanks or trip spikes necessary for the following reasons:

x rinsate samples are a measure of potential cross contamination between samples due to contamination on sampling equipment. Rinsate samples were not collected due to the field sampling procedures which included use of new sampling gloves for each soil sample. In addition, AS4482.1 Guide to the investigation and sampling of sites with potentially contaminated soil (Australian Standards 2005) states that rinsate blanks “should be collected where the threshold value for a contaminant is near the detection limit for the contaminant.” Thus, as no analysis undertaken was for analytes where the method detection limit was near the site criteria, rinsate blank analysis was not deemed necessary.

x a trip blank is used to document contamination attributable to shipping procedures for volatile components. For this project shipping was closely monitored, with collected samples immediately placed upright within a chilled Esky and passed directly from the

Page 299: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061 QAQC J15

field scientist to an NMI specific courier. This process is documented within the chain of custody documentation. A field blank is used to document contamination attributable to field handling. The measurement of volatiles present within samples due to field handling procedure is a measurement of false p0.5ositives. False positives are not considered to be a major concern due to the industrial nature of the site.

x laboratory prepared trip spikes are used to measure potential volatile contaminant loss due to transport and field handling procedures. Environmental Earth Sciences VIC follows strict sample handling procedures and consider the potential for volatile loss during handling and transport low. Furthermore the use of laboratory prepared trip spikes is difficult to control on a site such as this where the soil matrix is considerably varied. The ability of a laboratory prepared trip spike to accurately represent the matrix of fill samples collected from the site is thought to limit the usefulness of the data. For these reasons project laboratory prepared trip spikes were not used for this project.

3.2.3 Field instrument calibration Field equipment used for the soil investigation was appropriate for the required works and was used in the appropriate manner. A Photoionisation detector (PID) was calibrated in accordance with the manufacturer specifications and Environmental Earth Sciences VIC QA/QC documentation.

3.3 Laboratory QA/QC All soil analysis was undertaken by Australian Laboratory Services (ALS), Labmark and Australian Safer Environment & Technology (ASET), which are all NATA accredited for the methods used. Details of this accreditation can be viewed at http://www.nata.asn.au/, while details of the samples sent to each laboratory and the analysis requested are contained in the chain of custody documentation held in Appendix D. A review of the collection date of samples, laboratory extraction date and allowable holding time indicated all analysis was completed within the allowable holding times. These reports include details of surrogates and spikes used, percent recoveries of surrogates and spikes used, the instrument detection limits, the method detection limits, the practical quantification limits and the reference samples results.

3.4 QA/QC data evaluation Based on information presented in Sections 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 it can be confidently stated that the MDQO’s for this project have been met and the data set is considered to be reliable.

4 REFERENCES

APHA 1995, Standard methods for the examination of water and waste-water 19th edition.

Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council (ANZECC) 1992, Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for the assessment and management of contaminated sites Australia and New Zealand Environment Council, National Health and Medical Research Council, Melbourne, Victoria.

Page 300: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061 QAQC J16

Australian/New Zealand Standard 1998 Water Quality Sampling, Part 1: Guidance on the design of sampling programs, sampling techniques and the preservation and handling of samples New Zealand Standards Institute, Wellington, NZ. AS/NZ 5667.

Environmental & Earth Sciences 2005, Soil, gas and groundwater sampling manual, unpublished.

EPA Victoria 2000, A guide to the sampling and analysis of waters, waste-waters, soils and wastes. EPA Information Bulletin. Publication 441.

EPA Victoria 2000, Groundwater sampling guidelines EPA Information Bulletin. Publication 669

ISO Standards 1995, Quality management and quality assurance ISO8402.

National Environment Protection Council (NEPC) 1999, National environment protection (assessment of site contamination) measure

Rayment & Higginson 1992, Australian laboratory handbook of soil and water chemical methods.

Standards Australia 1997, Guide to the sampling and investigation of potentially contaminated soil (Part 1: Non-volatile and semi-volatile compounds) Standards Australia. AS 4482.1.

Standards Australia 1999, Guide to the sampling and investigation of potentially contaminated soil (Part 2: Volatile substances) Standards Australia. AS 4482.1

Page 301: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

210061_ReportV2.doc

APPENDIX F PROJECT TIMEFRAME

Page 302: Contamination Report - 20 Gordon Parade & 28 Salisbury Street

Work required

Engage an auditorEnvironmental auditAllow time for Auditor to review previous reports/dataPossible additional soil works for 53V audit (if needed)Groundwater investigation Sampling and analysis plan (SAP) and approval Bore installation and development First round of sampling and analysis Issue GME letter to AuditorReceipt of Auditor comments Second round of sampling and analysis and reportingSoil vapour and Risk assessment and reportingCleanup PlanAddressing Auditor comments on report and Cleanup PlanEnvironmental management plan (EMP)*Cap system constructionAdjustments to Environmental management plan (EMP) for post works management

Provisional Timeframe for Environmental Works

Mon

th 8

Mon

th 9

Mon

th 1

0

Mon

th 1

1

Mon

th 1

2

Mon

th 1

3

Mon

th 7

* EMP includes site management during cleanup and ongoing future management (up to 5 years)

Mon

th 1

Mon

th 2

Mon

th 3

Mon

th 4

Mon

th 5

Mon

th 6