conference rti2011.1178 avt-heat.exch.npra.mrc.fv1

30
Anti-Vibration Technologies for Heat Exchangers NPRA Maintenance and Reliability Conference May 26, 2011 Amar S. Wanni Jerard T. Smith Zdenka F. Ruzek

Upload: kataria200784

Post on 24-Nov-2015

50 views

Category:

Documents


12 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Anti-Vibration Technologies for Heat Exchangers

    NPRA Maintenance and Reliability Conference May 26, 2011

    Amar S. Wanni Jerard T. Smith Zdenka F. Ruzek

  • 2

    Outline

    Flow-Induced Vibration Problems in Heat Exchangers Including Examples of Failures

    Overview of Vibration Analysis

    Example Anti-Vibration Solutions for Heat Exchangers

    Analysis of Vibration with HTRI Xvib

    Questions / Discussion

    2

  • 3

    The Flow-Induced Vibration Problem In Heat Exchangers: Background

    Tube damage from flow-induced vibrations has increased over the past 5 to 10 years, primarily from two main sources: Advances in catalyst and control technologies allow

    operators to increase plant capacity by simply increasing flow through existing process equipment

    New exchanger designs are smaller than in the past, which entails greater shell side velocities

    Tube failures are always very expensive and lead to lost production, contaminated products, additional energy usage, and/or high repair costs

  • 4

    Most Likely Cause for Tube Vibration Damage: Fluidelastic Instability When Local Velocity Exceeds Critical Velocity, Tubes Experience

    Orbital Motion that Could Lead to Necking at Baffle Holes HTRI Programs (Xist and Xvib) Predict Fluidelastic Instability Ratio

    (FIR = Local Velocity/Critical Velocity) FIR Must be Kept Below 0.8 for high-quality Design Rate of Tube Failure Proportional to FIR4 if FIR > 1

    Vortex Shedding Could Lead to Tube-to-Tube Collisions, and Failure at Baffles, Near Tubesheet, and U-Bend Regions Vortex Shedding Frequency Ratio Preferably Kept Below 0.8 Limit Cross-Flow Amplitudes to Less Than 10% of Tube Spacing

    The Flow-Induced Vibration Problem In Heat Exchangers: Background (continued)

  • 5

    Acoustic Vibration Not Known to Have Caused Tube Failures

    Often, Flow-Induced Vibration (FIV) Conditions are Misdiagnosed

    Often, Plant Operations Do Not Facilitate Proper Root Cause Failure Analyses

    Leaky Tubes are Plugged and Exchanger Quickly Put Back in Operation to Avoid Throughput Losses

    Photographs of Failed Tubes are often Unavailable

    The Flow-Induced Vibration Problem In Heat Exchangers: Background (continued)

  • 6

    Examples of Tube Failures in Field

    Feed/Effluent Exchanger Tube Damage Shellside : Reactor Effluent Failure Mode: Vortex Shedding

  • 7

    Examples of Tube Failures in Field (Continued)

    Liquid on Shellside Failure Mode: Fluidelastic Instability

  • 8

    Examples of Tube Failures in Field (Continued)

    Gas on Shellside Tube Fretting at Baffle Hole

  • 9

    Anti-Vibration Solutions for Heat Exchangers

  • 10

    Needs for Anti-Vibration Technologies

    Improve reliability of existing equipment that may have already suffered vibration damage

    Provide tube vibration mitigation to an existing bundle predicted to have vibration problems at a future/planned increased throughput

    Modify baffle design to decrease shellside pressure drop while also providing vibration mitigation

    Design new exchangers with axial shell side flow to substantially decrease pressure drop (e.g., compressor circuits)

    10

  • 11

    Anti-Vibration Technologies Open Substantial Opportunities

    In Existing Bundles Allow greater flow rates while minimizing risk of vibration

    damage Allow re-use of bundles that failed due to flow-induced vibration

    damage of tubes

    In New Bundles... Allow use of fewer baffles (e.g., 50% Less) decreasing shellside

    p by as much as 75% Allow design of exchangers with axial shellside flow providing

    smaller footprint, lower cost, and superior performance than other technologies available in todays market

    Allow design of heat exchangers at their optimum configuration based on heat transfer and pressure drop considerations.

  • 12

    ExxonMobil has Developed a Suite of New Anti-Vibration Technologies:

    Dimpled Tube Support (DTS)

    Saddled Tube Support (STS)

    Slotted Baffle Exchangers (SBX)

    12

  • 13

    Dimpled Tube Support (DTS)

    Each strip is fabricated from a thin strip of metal

    Outer end consists of a dimpled region Dimples lock into tubes avoiding

    accidental dislodging Remainder of strip has corrugations

    somewhat similar to dimpled region Both dimpled and corrugated regions

    deflect tubes slightly thereby stiffening tubes and avoiding tube chatter

    Suitable for all tube layouts (30, 45, 60, and 90)

    Suitable for vertical tube bundles Modified DTS strip used as a U-Bend

    stiffener Applicable even when some of the

    tubes are warped 13

  • 14

    Dimpled Tube Supports - Installation

    14

  • 15

    Saddled Tube Supports (STS)

    Each support is formed by welding of two strips that are fabricated to provide Saddles

    A locking device prevents accidental dislodging of tube support

    Similar to DTS strips, each tube is slightly deflected to stiffen tubes and provide vibration mitigation

    Suitable for 45 and 90 tube layouts only

    Suitable for low-finned tubes made of softer metals such as carbon steel and brass

    Suitable for exchangers with axial shell side flow

    15

  • 16

    Saddled Tube Supports - Installation

    16

  • 17

    DTS and STS Strip Concept

    DTS and STS strips are used to mitigate vibrations perpendicular to the tube axis

    Inserting strips into every other tube lane diminishes

    tube chatter as the tubes are slightly deformed and pushed against the baffle holes - Tube-to-baffle impacts reduced - Natural frequency of the tubes is substantially

    increased with a negligible rise in shellside pressure drop

    The tube bundle as a whole tightens up and will act as one rigid entity, significantly lessening relative motion of components

  • Anti-Vibration Technologies for Heat Exchangers

    18 18

    EXAMPLES DTD / STS

  • 19

    Repair of Failed Heat Exchangers (Example 1) An LNG Plant experienced tube failures in a

    number of kettle reboilers Vibration analyses showed a very high

    probability for tube damage due to fluidelastic instability as well as excessive cross-flow amplitudes due to vortex shedding

    A field inspection showed heavy fretting at tube support locations in top 10 tube rows

    Unsupported tube span was around 4.5 ft for tubes having a diameter of 0.75 in and a wall thickness of 0.065 in

    DTS strips inserted at 1/3 and 2/3 locations within each unsupported span

    Free movement of tubes non-existent following DTS installation; no further vibration failures reported

    19

    Kettle Reboiler

    Original Conditions

    Conditions with DTS

    Duty (MBtu/hr) 244 244

    P (psi) 0.29 0.29 Fluidelastic Instability Ratio (FIR)

    4.1 0.2

    Vibration Problems YES NO

  • 20

    Application of DTS Retrofit into Treat Gas Heater (Example 2)

    Current Case has no vibration problems

    Future operating case with 30% increase in capacity predicted to have vibration problems

    Use of DTS allowed re-use of existing equipment while eliminating vibration potential

    A new design would have required replacement of both shell and bundle and potentially piping modifications

    20

    Feed / Effluent Heat

    Exchanger

    TEMA BEU 33 x 126, 1 tubes 1,180 ft2 Segmented baffles

    Existing Design

    Conditions

    30% Capacity

    Creep without DTS

    30% Capacity

    Creep with DTS

    Duty (MBtu/hr) 49.4 64.2 64.2

    p (psi) 8.4 10.0 10.2 Vibration Problems NO YES NO

  • 21

    An Optimum Design (Example 3)

    Optimum conventional design even with double-segmental baffles has vibration problems

    Alternate conventional design to avoid vibration requires a larger shell diameter (44 in vs. 36 in)

    Alternate exchanger also requires No-Tube-In-Window (NTIW) design

    Optimum Design with DTS: No vibration problem

    Smaller shell diameter

    Lower shell side pressure drop 1.4 psi vs. 1.8 psi

    21

    Condensing Service

    Exchanger

    Conventional Design

    (with no vibration)

    Optimum Design with DTS

    TEMA: AES

    44 x 192

    Plain Tubes NTIW/Seg

    2p / 1s

    36 x 192

    Plain Tubes Double seg

    2p / 1s

    Duty (MBtu/hr) 17.7 17.7

    p (psi)

    1.8 1.4

  • 22

    October 20, 2011

    Application of SBX to Debottleneck Gas Loop (Example 4)

    Original Bundle with Conventional Baffles Experienced a Shellside Pressure Drop of 110 kPa

    SBX Bundle Designed for 24 kPa Axial Shellside Flow Decreases

    Shellside Heat-Transfer Coefficient

    To Maintain Heat Duty, Low-Finned Tubes Were Used

    22

    Exchanger: TEMA AEU

    Feed Preheat w/ Steam

    Original bundle (at debottleneck

    conditions) SBX Bundle

    25"x126" Shell

    1200 ft2 0.75 plain

    tubes Segmental

    baffles

    2140 ft2 0.75 finned

    tubes No baffles (axial

    flow)

    Duty (MBtu/hr) 97.6 103

    p(psi) 16 3.5 Vibration Problem? Yes No

  • 23

    Example of DTS Installation

    23

  • 24

    Example of DTS Installation in U-Bend

    24

  • 25

    Example of DTS Installation

    25

  • 26

    HTRI Xvib DTS/STS Modeling Options

    Capability to simulate shell and tube heat exchanger with specific locations of DTS or STS and their effect on flow induced vibration probability

    Capability to model DTS and STS as tube supports to reduce unsupported tube span to affect flow induced vibration however without impacting pressure drop or flow velocity

    26

  • Anti-Vibration Technologies for Heat Exchangers

    27 27

    HTRI Xvib

  • Anti-Vibration Technologies for Heat Exchangers

    28

    SAMPLE CASE DETAILS

    28

  • Anti-Vibration Technologies for Heat Exchangers

    29

    QUESTIONS AND DISCUSSION

    29

  • 30

    In Conclusion

    AVTs technology will eliminate tube chatter Suitable for U-bend and vertical bundles Applicable even when some of the tubes are

    warped HTRI software (Xvib) now includes DTS

    and STS modeling options Licensed to a select number of qualified

    heat exchanger manufacturers for applications worldwide

    Successfully used at ExxonMobil and third party sites

    ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company proprietary technology

    30

    Anti-Vibration Technologiesfor Heat ExchangersOutlineThe Flow-Induced Vibration Problem In Heat Exchangers: BackgroundThe Flow-Induced Vibration Problem In Heat Exchangers: Background (continued)Slide Number 5Examples of Tube Failures in FieldExamples of Tube Failures in Field (Continued)Examples of Tube Failures in Field (Continued)Anti-Vibration Solutions for Heat ExchangersNeeds for Anti-Vibration TechnologiesAnti-Vibration Technologies Open Substantial OpportunitiesExxonMobil has Developed a Suite of New Anti-Vibration Technologies:Dimpled Tube Support (DTS)Dimpled Tube Supports - InstallationSaddled Tube Supports (STS)Saddled Tube Supports - InstallationDTS and STS Strip ConceptEXAMPLES DTD / STSRepair of Failed Heat Exchangers(Example 1)Application of DTS Retrofit into Treat Gas Heater (Example 2)An Optimum Design(Example 3)Application of SBX to Debottleneck Gas Loop (Example 4)Example of DTS InstallationExample of DTS Installation in U-BendExample of DTS InstallationHTRI Xvib DTS/STS Modeling OptionsHTRI XvibSAMPLE CASE DETAILSQUESTIONS AND DISCUSSIONIn Conclusion