conf paper 2012

Upload: santosh-trimbake

Post on 06-Apr-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 Conf Paper 2012

    1/12

    1

    Proceedings of TFMS 2012

    National Conference on Thermal, Fluid and Manufacturing Science

    January 2021, 2012

    Surat, Gujarat, India

    Combustion Control with Trapped Residual Gas

    (TRG) for 4-Stroke HCCI/CAI EnginesSantosh B Trimbake

    Assistant Professor

    Department of Mechanical Engineering

    College of Military Engineering Pune Maharashtra 411031

    santoshtrimbake @ yahoo.co.in

    Mobile No: +919960431466

    Abstract: Over the last decade, an alternative combustion

    technology, commonly known as homogeneous charge compression

    ignition (HCCI) or controlled auto-ignition (CAI) combustion, has

    emerged that has the potential to achieve efficiencies in excess of

    GDI engines and approaching those of current CI engines, with very

    low NOx emissions and virtually no smoke emissions. While thepotential benefits of this new combustion technology are significant,

    this combustion mode faces its own set of challenges, such as

    difficulty in controlling the combustion phasing, a restricted

    operating range, and high hydrocarbon emissions.

    The most successful and practical approach to HCCI/CAI

    combustion initiation and control in a gasoline engine is through the

    use of large amounts of burned gases by trapping them within the

    cylinder or through internal recirculation, as their thermal energy

    will heat the charge to reach auto-ignition temperature and help totame the heat release rate.

    This paper presents the review of combustion control

    technology with residual gas trapping using variable valve actuation

    for 4 stroke HCCI/CAI engine.

    Advancements in combustion control with residual gas

    trapping technology has been reviewed as reported in the literature,

    as it can realized in both single/multi-cylinder production type PFI

    (Port Fuel Injection) and DI (Direct Fuel Injection) gasoline engines

    using the NVO (negative valve overlap) approach.

    Initially the various aspects of residual gas trapping for

    PFI gasoline engine have been presented. Subsequently, DI which

    offers more independent control over CAI output and combustion

    phasing, has been discussed. Further how fuel injection timing canbe used as an effective means to control CAI combustion has been

    evaluated.

    Keywords: CAI, HCCI, PFI, DI, Control, NVO & Residual

    gas trapping

    1 INTRODUCTION: HCCI is an alternative piston-engine

    combustion process that can provide efficiencies as high as CI,

    engines while, unlike CI engines, producing ultra-low NOx and PM

    emissions. HCCI engines operate on the principle of having a dilute,

    premixed charge that reacts and burns volumetrically throughout the

    cylinder as it is compressed by the piston. In some regards, HCCI

    incorporates the best features of both SI and CI. Most engines

    employing HCCI to date have dual mode combustion systems inwhich traditional SI or CI combustion is used for operating

    conditions where HCCI operation is more difficult. Typically, the

    engine is cold-started as an SI or CI engine, then switched to HCCI

    mode for low- to mid-load operation to obtain the benefits of HCCI

    in this regime, which comprises a large portion of typical automotive

    driving cycles. For high-load operation, the engine would again be

    switched to SI or CIDI operation. Research efforts are underway to

    extend the range of HCCI operation .Combustion control is the

    biggest challenge to HCCI engines becoming a commercial success.

    Trapped Residual gas method (TRG) with variable valve actuation

    (VVA) seems to be one of the most effective and practical

    combustion control approach for four-stroke gasoline engines(PFI/DI)

    2 FUNDAMENTALS OF CAI/HCCI GASOLINE

    ENGINES: CAI combustion is achieved by controlling the

    temperature, pressure and composition of the air/fuel mixture so that

    auto-ignited combustion can start at the right time and will proceed

    without causing a runaway heat release rate. There is no direct

    control over the ignition timing as in a SI or CI engine In an ideal

    case, CAI/HCCI combustion can be described as controlled auto

    ignition of a premixed fuel/air mixture and involves the simultaneous

    reactive envelopment of the entire fuel/air mixture without a flame

    front. As shown fig1, the initiation of combustion always occurs at

    multiple sites in the premixed fuel/air mixture. The heat release

    process is much faster than the conventional SI combustion and is

    more closely described by a constant volume heat addition process,

    This combustion mode also results in a more uniform and repeatable

    heat release incomparison with that of SI operation. The cumulative

    heat release in such an engine is therefore the sum of the heat

    released Q from the complete mixture in the cylinder, m, each

    combustion reaction, dq i and where k is the total number of heat

    release reactions, and q is the heat released from the i th heat release

    reaction involving per unit mass of fuel and air mixture (fig 2).

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/3/2019 Conf Paper 2012

    2/12

    2

    2.1 Requirements For HCCI: The HCCI combustion process puts two

    major requirements on the conditions in the cylinder:

    (a) The temperature after compression stroke should equal the auto

    ignition temperature of the fuel/air mixture.

    (b) The mixture should be diluted enough to give reasonable burn

    rate.

    Fig 1 HCCI combustion process

    Fig 2 heat released in HCCI combustion

    3 CHALLENGES FOR HCCI COMBUSTION [1]: HCCI

    combustion is achieved by controlling the temperature, pressure, and

    composition of the fuel and air mixture so that it spontaneously

    ignites in the engine. This control system is fundamentally morechallenging than using a spark plug or fuel injector to determine

    ignition timing as used in SI and CI engines, respectively. The recent

    advent of electronic engine controls has enabled consideration of

    HCCI combustion for application to commercial engines. Even so,

    several technical barriers must be overcome to make HCCI engines

    applicable to a wide range of vehicles and viable for high volume

    production. Significant challenges include:

    Controlling Ignition Timing and Burn Rate Over a Rangeof Engine Speeds and Loads

    Extending the Operating Range of HCCI to High EngineLoads

    Cold-Starts and transient response with HCCI Engines

    Minimizing Hydrocarbon and Carbon Monoxide Emissions4 ADVANCEMENTS IN COMBUSTION CONTROL

    TECHNOLOGIES [1]: Combustion control is the biggest

    challenge to HCCI engines becoming a commercial success. For this

    reason, several methods have been proposed for achieving HCCI

    engine control over the wide range of operating conditions required

    for typical transportation-engine applications. Control technologies

    reported in the literature have demonstrated some degree of success.

    Some of the proposed methods include:

    Trapped Residual Gas (TRG) using VVA(Variable valve actuation): Here residual gas from the

    previous cycle is trapped for next cycle by VVA and used

    as driving force for charge temperature to attained auto

    ignition temperature Amount and temperature of TRG is

    the tool to control the combustion.

    Variable compression ratio (VCR): VCR engine hasthe potential to achieve satisfactory operation in HCCImode over a wide range of conditions because the

    compression ratio can be adjusted as the operating

    conditions change.

    Thermal control In this methodology, thermal energyfrom exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) and compression

    work from a supercharger are either recycled or rejected to

    obtain satisfactory combustion.

    Ignition-enhancing additives HCCI engine controlcould be achieved by using two fuels with different octane

    ratings.

    5. PRINCIPLE OF CAI/HCCI OPERATION WITH

    RESIDUAL GAS TRAPPING: The principle of CAI operationwith residual gas trapping is to initiate CAI combustion and to

    control the subsequent heat release rate by trapping large and variable

    amounts of residual gases in the cylinder. The burned gases from the

    previous cycle are trapped in the cylinder by closing the exhaust

    valves relatively early. Unlike spark ignition operation, the engine

    load is controlled primarily by the exhaust valve timing/lift. As the

    load is decreased, the exhaust valve closure (EVC) is advanced so

    that more burned gases are trapped, and the intake valve opening

    (IVO) is retarded accordingly to avoid backflows of residuals into the

    intake ports. This leads to negative valve overlap, NVO (fig 3)

    which is in contrast to positive valve overlap normally used in SI

    engines in order to maximize the volumetric efficiency Combustion

    control by retained residual gas is often called controlled auto-

    ignition, CAI. Fig 4 shows how residual gas can be retained using a

    NVO and fig 5 shows the valve timing diagram for residual gas

    trapping .

    The larger amount of residuals trapped will lead to less

    fresh charge being admitted into the cylinder and hence less fuel

    being burned. Conversely, retarded EVC will lead to reduced amount

    of residuals and hence more fresh charge to be flowed into the

    cylinder for greater work output. It is important to note that such

    operations are carried out with wide open throttle and hence there are

    no pumping losses associated with a partly closed throttle as in the SI

    operation.

    From above discussion it can be realized that Variablevalve actuation (VVA) needs to be used to control the timing / lift

    of exhaust valve and inlet valve to control the initial charge

    temperature by retaining variable amount of residual gas.

    VVA exists in many flavors with different degrees of

    freedom. VVA could be implemented in an engine with mechanical,

    magnetic, or hydraulic valve actuators. There are systems that merely

    provide cam phasing on the intake/exhaust cam shaft. Other systems

    provide cam profile switching, CPS, or combinations of cam phasing

    and CPS. Finally there are systems that provide fully variable valve

  • 8/3/2019 Conf Paper 2012

    3/12

    3

    timing as well as lift (electro-hydraulic / electro-magnetic VVA

    system).

    The NVO approach is attractive since many production

    engines have VVA capability that allows CPS and cam phasing.

    Fig 3 Illustration of NVO strategy (dashed) as opposed to the

    normal positive valve overlap strategy (solid).

    Fig 4 In-cylinder P- diagram with residual gas trapping

    Fig 5 Valve timing diagrams for different operation strategies.

    6. CAI OPERATION IN A FOUR-STROKE PORT FUEL

    INJECTION (PFI) GASOLINE ENGINE

    J. Li & et. al. [2] first investigated the performance and emission

    characteristic on 4-cylinder production type PFI gasoline engine

    using substantially standard components, modified only in cam

    dimensions to control the gas exchange process in order tosignificantly increase the trapped residuals. operating with CAI and

    equipped with Variable Cam Timing (VCT) .The engine used was a

    Ford 1.7 Litre Zetec SE 16-valve 4-cylinder PFI gasoline engine with

    sequential fuel injection strategy to ensure that the same mixture

    preparation event was applied to each of the four cylinders The intake

    and exhaust camshafts were equipped with two independent VCT

    system with a pair of special camshafts of reduced lift and the

    compression ratio was kept at 10.3. The fuel used was the standard

    unleaded gasoline of RON 95. During the tests the throttle was kept

    at wide open and the air flow was changed by varying the cam

    timings, which could be continuously changed by up to 40 degrees

    crank angle. All experiments were carried out when the coolant

    reached 90 0 C or over in order to minimize the effects of coolant

    temperature.

    6.1Performance and combustion characteristics

    It was found that the largely increased trapped residuals alone were

    sufficient to achieve CAI in this engine and with VCT, a range of

    loads between 0.5 and 4 bar BMEP and engine speeds between 1000and 3500 rpm ( fig 6) were mapped for CAI fuel consumption and

    exhaust emissions. The measured CAI results were compared with

    those of Spark Ignition (SI) combustion in the same engine but with

    standard camshafts at the same speeds and loads. There was a linear

    correlation between the residual fraction and engine output,

    independent of the engine speed (fig 7). The higher the residual

    fraction was, the lower the torque became. As the engine was

    operated at WOT, the mass in the cylinder was more or less the same

    and only the mixture concentration changed .Fig 8 shows variation

    of the maximum rate of pressure rise with residuals or load. In most

    cases, the maximum rate of pressure rise decreased with residuals or

    increased with load, so was the peak cylinder pressure. The rate of

    maximum pressure rise varied between 1 and 7 bar/CA.

    Fig 6 CAI operation range with residual gas trapping

    6.2Fuel consumption and emission characteristics

    Fig 9 to12 compare the fuel consumption and emission results of the

    CAI combustion mode and SI mode from the same engine. The

    comparison showed more than 30% reduction in BSFC (Fig 9) is

    seen . Up to 99% reduction in NOx at low loads(fig 10) is seen with

    CAI operation But it should be noted that CAI combustion in the 4-

    stroke gasoline engine had been always associated with higher CO

    emissions than the SI combustion until the residual gas trapping

    method was employed.(fig 12). Fig 11 shows that the unburned HCs

    were much higher from CAI combustion than that from SI

    combustion with port-fuel injection, but they were on a par with those

    from the stratified charge direct injection gasoline engine

    7 EFFECT OF DI ON CAI COMBUSTION IN THE 4-

    STROKE GASOLINE ENGINE During the CAI operation,

    engine output is principally controlled by the EVC timing. As the

    engine load or speed increases, combustion starts earlier and burns

    faster, leading to too rapid a rate of heat release and very high peak

    cylinder pressure as well as higher fuel consumption.

  • 8/3/2019 Conf Paper 2012

    4/12

    4

    Fig 7 Effect of residual fraction on maxi. Rate of Pressure rise.

    Fig 8 Relationship between residual fraction & engine o/p

    Fig 9 Changes in BSFC (%) with CAI combustion relative to SI.

    Fig 10 Changes in BSNOx emissions (%) with CAI combustion

    At the low load region, the very retarded combustion

    causes large cyclic variation and even partial burn therefore, it will be

    desirable and necessary to find other means capable of more

    independent control over the combustion phasing from the engine

    load, in order to improve the CAI combustion and its operational

    range Research done at the Brunel Universitys laboratory [35] has

    shown that direct fuel injection into the cylinder can be used as one

    of the most effective means of controlling the combustion phasing for

    optimised engine performance and emissions. This section will

    present some of the main findings from such studies

    Fig 11 Changes in BSHCs emissions (%) with CAI combustion

    relative to SI.

    Fig 12 Changes in BSCO emissions (%) with CAI combustion

    relative to SI.

    There are three significant phases occurring sequentially in the CAI

    engine cycle with negative valve overlap, namely, residuals

    trapping, residuals conditioning and CAI combustion. Each phase

    has an effect on the following, with the end-of-cycle conditions

    feeding back to the first phase in order to sustain the CAI operation

    continuously.

    The residual trapping phase is controlled primarily by the exhaustvalve closing timing (variable early EVC) and the trapped residuals

    temperature Once trapped, the mass of the residuals is fixed for the

    subsequent cycle, but its temperature and pressure are variable during

    theresiduals conditioning phase according to re-compression and re-

    expansion and further heat subtraction and heat addition if fuel can be

    injected directly into the residuals during that period. At the end of

    the residuals conditioning phase which also marks the beginning the

    intake period (variable late IVO), the released temperature and

    pressure of the residuals will affect the intake air flow, the charge

    dilution (residuals/total volume ratio) and the combustible charge

    temperature, while direct fuel injection during the intake and

    compression periods will affect the charge homogeneity or

    stratification as well as charge temperature and quantity, leading up

    to the CAI combustion phase which is characterized by the CAI

    ignition timing, heat release rate, IMEP, ISFC and exhaust emissions.

    The final exhaust gas temperature after CAI is then fed back to the

    next cycle to initiate the next residuals trapping phase

    Initially single fuel injection timing strategy has been used to study

    its effect on combustion characteristics which has been further

    grouped into three categories [7] :

    ( i ) Early injections during the negative valve overlap period, in

    which fuel is injected into the hot residual gas in the cylinder for the

  • 8/3/2019 Conf Paper 2012

    5/12

    5

    purpose of reforming the fuel or initiating the minor combustion if

    possible, and improving ignitability;

    (ii) Mid-injections during the intake stroke and early compression

    stroke to create a homogeneous mixture of different charge

    temperature or quantity;

    (iii) Late injections during the late compression stroke for

    charge/thermal stratification.

    7.1Early injections during the NVO period R Standing & et al.[ 5 ] Investigated the effects of injection timing and valve timings on

    CAI operation in a multi-cylinder DI gasoline engine having

    displacement volume of 1.6 liters and a compression ratio of 11.5. A

    high pressure swirl injector mounted below and between the two

    intake valves was operated at an injection pressure of 100 bars. Both

    intake and exhaust camshafts were equipped with VVT devices and

    their cam lobes were machined to produce maximum valve lifts

    around 2 mm. fig13 shows the effect of fuel injection timings on the

    main combustion process. It can be seen that the earlier the fuel

    injection took place during the negative valve overlap period, the

    more advanced the start of main combustion when the engine

    operated with a lean fuel air mixture. However, in the case of

    stoichiometric mixture shown in fig 14 fuel injection at 20 BTDCduring the recompression phase led to the earliest combustion,

    followed by 40 BTDC and TDC injections. Delayed injection into the

    intake stroke resulted in the most retarded combustion and the lowest

    peak pressure in both stoichiometric and lean mixtures. In addition it

    can be seen that the early injections into lean burned mixtures led to

    more advanced combustion than for stoichiometric mixtures.

    In order to understand better the underlying mechanisms, detailed

    analysis has been carried out at Brunel University [6] on the physical

    and chemical processes taking place within the cylinder by means of

    3-D full cycle engine simulation. The simulation programme is based

    on the KIVA3v with improvements in turbulence, the gas/wall heat

    transfer, spray atomization, ignition and combustion and it takes intoaccount the gas exchange processes that are crucial to the residual gas

    trapping method. The Shell ignition model was chosen and has been

    modified to simulate the auto-ignition process in low temperature

    combustion. For the high temperature combustion, a characteristic

    time combustion model is used. The transition from auto-ignition to

    the main combustion process is based on the local cell temperature:

    when the temperature of a cell exceeds 1080K, high temperature

    combustion model is activated for such a cell. The simulation

    programme was validated against engine experiments before it was

    applied to study CAI combustions.

    The main combustion characteristics for injections during

    the NVO period are summarised in Table 1. The value of net IMEP is

    closely related to combustion phasing and pumping loss. Both too

    early combustion phasing and higher pumping losses contribute to

    lower IMEP values with injections at 40 and 20 ATDCoverlap, as

    compared with the injection at 75 ATDCoverlap. Comparing the

    cases with injections at 75 ATDCoverlap and TDCoverlap, the

    combustion phasings of those two injection cases are quite similar,

    however the higher pumping losses result in lower IMEP with

    injection at TDCoverlap

    7.2 Mid and late injections during the intake and compression

    strokes Using the same 3-D full cycle engine simulation, the effect

    and underlying mechanism of mid and late injections on CAI

    combustion were examined Figure 15 shows the pressure and heat

    release rate varying with injection timings. Comparing the two

    injections during the intake stroke, the start of combustion is slightly

    retarded with later injection timing(SOI at 150 ATDC Overlap), leading

    to lower peak pressure. Table.2 shows that there is little difference in

    the compression temperature between the two injections during the

    intake stroke. The delayed start of combustion with later injection is

    therefore likely related to the time available for fuel to mix with air

    and subsequent low temperature chemical reactions. However, the

    combustion phasing is advanced, as the injection is retarded further

    into the compression stroke (SOI at 218 ATDC Overlap). This is more

    likely due to the in-cylinder mixture stratification.

    Based on the above studies, the mechanisms of combustion

    phasing control by injection timing in a lean-burn CAI DI gasoline

    engine can be summarized herewith. The factors include the

    thermal/chemical effects caused by early injection during the NVO

    period, or charge cooling effect by injection during the intake stroke,

    or fuel stratification effect by late injection at the compression stroke.

    Heat release or thermal effect associated with injection during the

    NVO period has a dominant effect on advancing the start of maincombustion. The chemical effect is secondary and its presence

    promotes the first stage of ignition during the compression stroke.

    However, injection during the negative valve overlap period can also

    slow down the main combustion process, if the in-cylinder

    temperature during the recompression process is reduced

    significantly due to chargecoolingeffect and hence less or no heat

    release reactions can take place during the recompression and re-

    expansion. The late injection during the compression stroke can lead

    to an advanced combustion due to charge stratification, whilst the

    injection during the intake stroke slows down the start of main

    combustion by charge cooling effects.

    Fig 13 In cylinder pressure and heat release with various injection

    timing for lean mixtures

    Fig14 In cylinder pressure and heat release with various injection

    timing for stoichiometric mixtures

  • 8/3/2019 Conf Paper 2012

    6/12

    6

    Table 1 Effect of early fuel injection timing on CAI combustion at

    1500 rpm & = 1.2

    Fig 15 Pressure & heat rate profiles with mid & late injections

    Table 2 Effect of mid & late fuel injection timing on CAI combustion

    at 1500 rpm & = 1.2

    CONCLUSION: CAI combustion control has been realized in

    both single / multi-cylinder production type PFI and DI gasoline

    engines using the NVO approach with VVA technology that allows

    CPS and cam phasing. It is achieved by trapping copious amount of

    burned gases in the cylinder through EVC early. Such engines are

    characterized with superior fuel economy due to the lack of throttling

    loss and extremely low NOx emissions. However, the range of CAI

    operation needs to be significantly extended not only to the high load

    region but also the low load region to take advantage the fuel

    economy and low emission benefits across the vehicle driving modes.

    DI is one such technology which offers more independent control

    over CAI output and combustion phasing for optimized performance

    and emissions as compared to PFI. It has shown that fuel injection

    timing in DI can be used as an effective means to control CAI

    combustion.

    REFERENCES

    1. Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition(HCCI) Technology ,

    A Report by Office of Transportation Technologies ,U.S.

    Department of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, 2001.

    2. Li, J., Zhao, H., and Ladommatos, N., Research and development

    of controlled auto-ignition (CAI) combustion in a four-stroke multi-

    cylinder gasoline engine, SAE paper 2001-01-3608, 2001.3. Leach, B., Zhao, H., Li, Y., Ma, T., Control of CAI combustionthrough injection timing in a GDI engine with an air-assited injector,SAE Paper 2005-01-0134, 2005.

    4. Li, Y., Zhao H., Bruzos N., Ma T., and Leach B., Effect ofInjection Timing on Mixture and CAI Combustion in a GDI Engine

    with an Air-Assisted Injector, SAE Paper 2006-01-0206, SAESpecial Publication SP-2005, 2006.

    5. Standing, R., Kalian, N., Ma, T., Zhao, H., Effects of injectiontiming and valve timings on CAI operation in a multi-cylinder DI

    gasoline engine, SAE paper 2005- 01-0132, 2005.

    6. Cao, L, Zhao, H., Jiang. X, Kalin, N., Investigation into the Effect

    of Injection Timing on Stoichiometric and Lean CAI operations in a

    4-Stroke GDI Engine, SAE Paper 2006-01-0417, 2006.7. Hua Zhao HCCI and CAI engines for the automotive industry

    1st ed., Woodhead Publishing Limited ,ISBN 978-1-84569-128-8,2007.

    Authors brief bio-data and photograph

    Shri Santosh B. Trimbake presently Assistant professor in

    Mechanical Engg Dept of College of Military Engineering Pune

    411031 affiliated to JNU, New Delhi. Author is M Tech (Thermal &

    Fluids Engg) from IIT Powai. Area of interest is I C Engines &

    Refrigeration & Air Conditioning. He Possesses total experience of

    14 years, out of which 5 years served in Defence Industry (Ordnance

    factory) & remaining 9 years in teaching

    *[email protected]

  • 8/3/2019 Conf Paper 2012

    7/12

    7

  • 8/3/2019 Conf Paper 2012

    8/12

    8

  • 8/3/2019 Conf Paper 2012

    9/12

    9

  • 8/3/2019 Conf Paper 2012

    10/12

    10

  • 8/3/2019 Conf Paper 2012

    11/12

    11

  • 8/3/2019 Conf Paper 2012

    12/12

    12