conditional statements m260 2.2. deductive reasoning proceeds from a hypothesis to a conclusion. if...

28
Conditional Statements M260 2.2

Upload: britney-pauline-higgins

Post on 26-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Conditional Statements M260 2.2. Deductive Reasoning Proceeds from a hypothesis to a conclusion. If p then q. p  q hypothesis  conclusion

Conditional Statements

M260 2.2

Page 2: Conditional Statements M260 2.2. Deductive Reasoning Proceeds from a hypothesis to a conclusion. If p then q. p  q hypothesis  conclusion

Deductive Reasoning

• Proceeds from a hypothesis to a conclusion.

• If p then q.

• p q

• hypothesis conclusion

Page 3: Conditional Statements M260 2.2. Deductive Reasoning Proceeds from a hypothesis to a conclusion. If p then q. p  q hypothesis  conclusion

Conditional Example

• If you show up for work on Monday morning, then you will get the job.

• When is the statement false?

• Answer--Only when the hypothesis is true and the conclusion is false.

Page 4: Conditional Statements M260 2.2. Deductive Reasoning Proceeds from a hypothesis to a conclusion. If p then q. p  q hypothesis  conclusion

Conditional Truth Table

p q pq

T T

T F

F T

F F

Page 5: Conditional Statements M260 2.2. Deductive Reasoning Proceeds from a hypothesis to a conclusion. If p then q. p  q hypothesis  conclusion

Conditional Truth Table

p q pq

T T T

T F F

F T T

F F T

Page 6: Conditional Statements M260 2.2. Deductive Reasoning Proceeds from a hypothesis to a conclusion. If p then q. p  q hypothesis  conclusion

Conditional is vacuously true when hypothesis is false.

Page 7: Conditional Statements M260 2.2. Deductive Reasoning Proceeds from a hypothesis to a conclusion. If p then q. p  q hypothesis  conclusion

Precedence of Logical Operators

• ~ and

Page 8: Conditional Statements M260 2.2. Deductive Reasoning Proceeds from a hypothesis to a conclusion. If p then q. p  q hypothesis  conclusion

Precedence Examples

• p ~q ~p

• Order is ~, , • (p (~q)) (~p)

Page 9: Conditional Statements M260 2.2. Deductive Reasoning Proceeds from a hypothesis to a conclusion. If p then q. p  q hypothesis  conclusion

p ~q ~p

Page 10: Conditional Statements M260 2.2. Deductive Reasoning Proceeds from a hypothesis to a conclusion. If p then q. p  q hypothesis  conclusion

p ~q ~p

p q ~p ~q p ~qp ~q

~p

T T

T F

F T

F F

Page 11: Conditional Statements M260 2.2. Deductive Reasoning Proceeds from a hypothesis to a conclusion. If p then q. p  q hypothesis  conclusion

p ~q ~p

p q ~p ~q p ~qp ~q

~p

T T F F T F

T F F T T F

F T T F F T

F F T T T T

Page 12: Conditional Statements M260 2.2. Deductive Reasoning Proceeds from a hypothesis to a conclusion. If p then q. p  q hypothesis  conclusion

Logical Equivalence

• Statement Forms are logically equivalent if, and only if, they have the same truth tables.

• P Q

Page 13: Conditional Statements M260 2.2. Deductive Reasoning Proceeds from a hypothesis to a conclusion. If p then q. p  q hypothesis  conclusion

Logical Equivalence Example

• p q r (pr) (qr)

Page 14: Conditional Statements M260 2.2. Deductive Reasoning Proceeds from a hypothesis to a conclusion. If p then q. p  q hypothesis  conclusion

Rewriting

• p q ~p q• Either you get to work on time

or you are fired

• If you do not get to work on time,then you are fired.

Page 15: Conditional Statements M260 2.2. Deductive Reasoning Proceeds from a hypothesis to a conclusion. If p then q. p  q hypothesis  conclusion

Negation of if p then q

• ~(p q) ~(~p q) p ~q

Page 16: Conditional Statements M260 2.2. Deductive Reasoning Proceeds from a hypothesis to a conclusion. If p then q. p  q hypothesis  conclusion

Contrapositive

• Contrapositive of if p then q isif ~q then ~p

• p q ~q ~p

• Conditional and contrapositive are logically equivalent.

Page 17: Conditional Statements M260 2.2. Deductive Reasoning Proceeds from a hypothesis to a conclusion. If p then q. p  q hypothesis  conclusion

Converse

• Converse of if p then q isif q then p

• Converse (p q) is (q p)

• Conditional and converse are NOT logically equivalent.

Page 18: Conditional Statements M260 2.2. Deductive Reasoning Proceeds from a hypothesis to a conclusion. If p then q. p  q hypothesis  conclusion

Inverse

• Inverse of if p then q isif ~p then ~q

• Inverse (p q) is (~p ~q)

• Conditional and inverse are NOT logically equivalent.

• Converse and inverse are logically equivalent.

Page 19: Conditional Statements M260 2.2. Deductive Reasoning Proceeds from a hypothesis to a conclusion. If p then q. p  q hypothesis  conclusion

Only If

• p only if q means if not q then not p

• id est if p then q

Page 20: Conditional Statements M260 2.2. Deductive Reasoning Proceeds from a hypothesis to a conclusion. If p then q. p  q hypothesis  conclusion

Only If Example

• John will break the world’s record for the mile only if

• he runs the mile in under four minutes.

Page 21: Conditional Statements M260 2.2. Deductive Reasoning Proceeds from a hypothesis to a conclusion. If p then q. p  q hypothesis  conclusion

Biconditional

• p if, and only if, q

• Abbreviated: p iff q

• Notation: p q p q p q

T T T

T F F

F T F

F F T

Page 22: Conditional Statements M260 2.2. Deductive Reasoning Proceeds from a hypothesis to a conclusion. If p then q. p  q hypothesis  conclusion

Precedence of Logical Operators

• ~ and and

Page 23: Conditional Statements M260 2.2. Deductive Reasoning Proceeds from a hypothesis to a conclusion. If p then q. p  q hypothesis  conclusion

Rewriting

• p q (p q) (q p)

Page 24: Conditional Statements M260 2.2. Deductive Reasoning Proceeds from a hypothesis to a conclusion. If p then q. p  q hypothesis  conclusion

Sufficient Condition

• r is a sufficient condition for s

• If r then s

• rs

Page 25: Conditional Statements M260 2.2. Deductive Reasoning Proceeds from a hypothesis to a conclusion. If p then q. p  q hypothesis  conclusion

Necessary Condition

• r is a necessary condition for s

• If not r then not s

• ~r ~s

• s only if r

• If s then r

Page 26: Conditional Statements M260 2.2. Deductive Reasoning Proceeds from a hypothesis to a conclusion. If p then q. p  q hypothesis  conclusion

Necessary and Sufficient

• r is a necessary and sufficient conditionfor s

• r if, and only if, s

• r s

Page 27: Conditional Statements M260 2.2. Deductive Reasoning Proceeds from a hypothesis to a conclusion. If p then q. p  q hypothesis  conclusion

Practice Necessary/Sufficient

• Use “John is eligible to vote” and “John is at least 18 years old” to make

• A conditional statement:

• A necessary statement:

• A sufficient statement:

Page 28: Conditional Statements M260 2.2. Deductive Reasoning Proceeds from a hypothesis to a conclusion. If p then q. p  q hypothesis  conclusion

Formal vs. Conversational Logic

• Unrelated conclusions

• Understood biconditionals