concepts and knowledge thomas g. bowers, ph.d. penn state harrisburg 2000
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Concepts and Knowledge Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg 2000](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083008/56649f385503460f94c55422/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Concepts and Knowledge
Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D.Penn State Harrisburg
2000
![Page 2: Concepts and Knowledge Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg 2000](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083008/56649f385503460f94c55422/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Concepts and Knowledge
We are now moving away from episodic memory to information – Described as semantic memories– Or, sometimes, context-free or
generic memories
![Page 3: Concepts and Knowledge Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg 2000](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083008/56649f385503460f94c55422/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Concepts and Knowledge
What is a dog?– What we know is similar to a
dictionary definition– The definition itself is not completely
adequate
![Page 4: Concepts and Knowledge Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg 2000](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083008/56649f385503460f94c55422/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Concepts and Knowledge
More difficult concepts– What is schizophrenia?– What is truth?– Or virtue?
Wittgenstein (1953) wrote at length on the philosophical nature of these questions
![Page 5: Concepts and Knowledge Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg 2000](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083008/56649f385503460f94c55422/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Concepts and Knowledge
Game is a good example of a concept which does not allow ready definition
Question: How do we decide about a concept?
![Page 6: Concepts and Knowledge Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg 2000](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083008/56649f385503460f94c55422/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Concepts and Knowledge
Use Family Resemblances– “Fuzzy” logic or fit– There may be no definition
• No “necessary” conditions (shared by all)• Or “sufficient” conditions (unique
attributes)
![Page 7: Concepts and Knowledge Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg 2000](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083008/56649f385503460f94c55422/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Concepts and Knowledge
Prototypes are an alternative to definitions– An “average” or representative
member of a class– Marked by fuzzy boundaries – Graded degree of membership
• i.e. a degree of dogginess
![Page 8: Concepts and Knowledge Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg 2000](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083008/56649f385503460f94c55422/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Concepts and Knowledge
How to test the prototype notion?– Sentence verification task– Assesses processing speed for
categorical task– For example, “A chair is furniture” or
“A collie is cat”
![Page 9: Concepts and Knowledge Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg 2000](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083008/56649f385503460f94c55422/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Concepts and Knowledge
Subjects are faster for true sentences
Subjects are faster for familiar categories
Subjects are slower for atypical examples
![Page 10: Concepts and Knowledge Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg 2000](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083008/56649f385503460f94c55422/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Concepts and Knowledge
We can also use a production taskSimply name as many birds as you
can, as quickly as you canLook for convergence with reaction
time tasks
![Page 11: Concepts and Knowledge Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg 2000](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083008/56649f385503460f94c55422/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Concepts and Knowledge
Apple 6.25 Robin 6.89Peach 5.81 Bluebird 6.42Pear 5.25 Seagull 6.26Grape 5.13 Swallow 6.16Strawberry 5.00 Falcon 5.74Lemon 4.86 Mockingbird 5.47Blueberry 4.56 Starling 5.16
Typicality Ratings of Fruit and Bird
![Page 12: Concepts and Knowledge Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg 2000](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083008/56649f385503460f94c55422/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Concepts and Knowledge
Convergent evidence for prototypes– 1. Sentence verification tasks
(McCloskey & Glucksberg, 1979) – 2. Production (Barsalou, 1985)– 3. Picture identification (Smith,
Balzano & Walker, 1978)– 4. Explicit memory of membership
(Rosch, 1975)
![Page 13: Concepts and Knowledge Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg 2000](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083008/56649f385503460f94c55422/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Concepts and Knowledge
Convergent evidence for prototypes– 5. Induction - Inferences from typical
to the whole, but not from atypical to whole
– 6. “Thinking about” categories
![Page 14: Concepts and Knowledge Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg 2000](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083008/56649f385503460f94c55422/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Concepts and Knowledge
Prototypes as heuristics – There may be gains in cognitive
efficiency and economy– Problems can be solved by step by step
algorithm• Tedious, exhaustive, consider and rule out all
choices
– Heuristics - consider only general plan or strategy• Efficient, may overlook possibilities
![Page 15: Concepts and Knowledge Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg 2000](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083008/56649f385503460f94c55422/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Concepts and Knowledge
Schema theory revisited – There is thought to be a network of
associations– Related to each other by propositions– There is a network of relationships
![Page 16: Concepts and Knowledge Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg 2000](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083008/56649f385503460f94c55422/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Concepts and Knowledge
Dog
Cat
Chase
Agent
Object
Action
![Page 17: Concepts and Knowledge Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg 2000](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083008/56649f385503460f94c55422/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Concepts and Knowledge
More complex analysis is possibleSome theories attempt to take into
account complex human relationships
Object Relations Theory