compstat report february 20, 2009 target school east high school

23
Compstat Report February 20, 2009 Target School East High School

Upload: maria-walsh

Post on 26-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Compstat Report February 20, 2009 Target School East High School

Compstat Report February 20, 2009Compstat Report February 20, 2009

Target SchoolTarget School

East High SchoolEast High School

Page 2: Compstat Report February 20, 2009 Target School East High School

AgendaFebruary 20, 2009

AgendaFebruary 20, 2009

• Academic Report-Math-English/ Reading / Language Arts

• Non Academic Reports Attendance

-Week, 20-Day, Year (Students)

Discipline -Referrals

Graduation -Number of Seniors -Number of On-Time Graduates Summary

Page 3: Compstat Report February 20, 2009 Target School East High School

School DemographicsSchool Demographics

Current Enrollment - 1064Special Education Population - 153TCAP –Alt (Portfolios) - 30STAR Folders- 411Free and Reduced Lunch- 93%Membership 1 Students- 895Ethnicity/Race-98.7% African American-0.9% White-0.1% Hispanic-0.3% Asian

9th 10th 11th 12th

368 274 232 190

Special Education (Full Inclusion)

9th 10th 11th 12th

58 25 23 17

STAR Folders411

68 95 35

Page 4: Compstat Report February 20, 2009 Target School East High School

Academic ReportAcademic Report

• Math-What’s working-Area for Improvement

• English/Reading / Language Arts -What’s working -Area for Improvement

Page 5: Compstat Report February 20, 2009 Target School East High School

MathMath

What’s working1. Focus on State Performance Indicators (SPI’s)2. Double dosing in math3. Collaborative teacher planning4. In-School Tutoring (Our Children Our Future)

Area for Improvement-Based on data1. Implementation of technology (Stanford Math)2. Use of differentiated instruction3. Monitoring of student attendance4. Analyzing Discovery Assessment Data

Page 6: Compstat Report February 20, 2009 Target School East High School

The Self-Directed Improvement System™ SDIS™ | Action PlanThe Self-Directed Improvement System™ SDIS™ | Action Plan

Data

Execute

MCS Proficiency Target

Feedback

Strategy

Baseline Assessments

Discovery Assessment Tests A & B

• Teachers are not consistently using math interventions (Stanford/EPIC)• During the testing a fight occurred resulting in students being pepper sprayed

• Algebra I teachers and Math Coach will analyze Discovery Assessment Tests A & B data• Algebra I teachers and Math Coach will create “Bell Ringers” for areas of weakness • Algebra I teachers will use T.O.P. S. folder to track class performance• Algebra I teachers will increase use of technology during instruction

• Math Coach will monitor the use of Discovery Assessment data during instruction

• Admin, Math Coach, PDSCC’s will monitor the use of technology in math classes

Decrease by 50% the number of students

below proficient in Math

EHS Formative Assessment Math

61%67%

72% 72%86% 72%

37%

70%

56%67%

Number Theory Alg Express Geometry Measurement Probability

Test A Prof/Adv Test B Prof/Adv

Page 7: Compstat Report February 20, 2009 Target School East High School

East High School 2008 – 2009 Proficiency Target

2008 Gateway Math Test Results

2009 Gateway Math Test Goals

Reduce by at least 50%Increase to at less 83%

Proficient

Teachers # of Repeaters Goal# of 1st Time

Testers Goal

Alexander 3 2 84 71

Batiste 3 2 55 47

Booker 1 1 N/A N/A

Below Proficient = 22%

Coleman 0 0 N/A N/A

Downey 10 5 65 55

Gallina 7 4 46 39

Proficient = 43.3%

Graham 3 2 N/A N/A

Hatley 22 11 N/A N/A

Hawthorne 18 9 N/A N/A

Advanced = 34.3%

Henderson 17 9 103 88

Johnson 5 3 N/A N/A

No Math 5 3 N/A N/A

Page 8: Compstat Report February 20, 2009 Target School East High School

Stanford MathStanford Math

What’s working1. Identification of targeted students2. Implementation of mobile computer lab schedule

Area for Improvement-Based on data1. Implementation of Stanford Math with targeted students2. Connection to Wi-Fi throughout the building3. Interruption of class time

Page 9: Compstat Report February 20, 2009 Target School East High School

Critical Area of Need: Mathematics SDIS™ | Action

East High School 2008-09

Critical Area of Need: Mathematics SDIS™ | Action

East High School 2008-09Data

Execute

System-wide TargetSystem-wide Target

Decrease by 50% the Decrease by 50% the number of students number of students

below proficient in mathbelow proficient in math

Feedback

Strategies

Baseline Assessments

EPGY Stanford Math ReportsEPGY Stanford MathEPGY Stanford Math

• Number of Target Students: 169• Average Number of Student Use: 15• Average Total Minutes: 28.8• Average Number of Exercises: 47.2• Average Percent Correct: 56• Average Correct First Attempt: 28.8

• Admin. And Math Coach will monitor Stanford Math use.

• Math Coach, Epic Coordinator, and Tech Support will trouble-shoot Epic laptop issues.

School Goal - To ensure that target students participate in a minimum of 90 minutes per week with a minimum average of 70% correct (preferred 80%) • Identify the students targeted for

Stanford Math

• Create a mobile computer lab (Epic laptops) schedule

• Monitor the teachers’ use of the mobile lab

• Secure support when needed to trouble-shoot mobile lab problems

Sub-Goal this Assessment Period: To increase from 30 minutes per week to 90 for target students

• Why aren’t more target students using Stanford Math?• Why is the average percent correct so low?• Why aren’t the students completing at least 90 minutes of Stanford Math per week?

Page 10: Compstat Report February 20, 2009 Target School East High School

English/Reading / Language ArtsEnglish/Reading / Language Arts

What’s working1. Focus on State Performance Indicators (SPI’s)2. Read alouds during Instruction and assessment for SWD3. Discovery formative assessments and feedback4. After-school tutoring5. School-wide literacy strategies

Area for Improvement-Based on data1. Reading2. Use of differentiated instruction

Page 11: Compstat Report February 20, 2009 Target School East High School

The Self-Directed Improvement System™ SDIS™ | Action PlanThe Self-Directed Improvement System™ SDIS™ | Action Plan

Between Test A and Test B we experienced a 72% decrease in below proficiency in writing, 82% decrease in below proficiency in reading, and a 30% below proficiency in viewing.

Execute

MCS Proficiency Target

Feedback

Strategy

Baseline Assessments

• Discovery Tests A and B

Data

• 10th grade students practiced writing along with the 11th grade• Implementation of Ramp-Up Writing• Improved use of vocabulary, literacy, and writing strategies• Students are more engaged in test prep

• Incorporating journaling in all classes schoolwide• Focusing on research-based literacy strategies schoolwide• Implemented plan for Spring Test Prep• Continuous review on foundational skills for greater retention• Experienced teacher will team teach with novice teacher• Take a closer look at SPI’s pertaining to Viewing and incorporate more into lesson plans across the curriculum

• English Department will meet once per month with Literacy Coach to plan lessons, discuss student progress, and to collaborate on strategies

• Literacy Coach will meet with all teachers to plan implementation of literacy strategies and Spring Test Prep

Decrease by 50% the number of students below Proficient in

Language ArtsEHS Formative Assessment Language Arts

89%77%

92% 98%84%

71%

Writing Reading Viewing

Test A Prof/Adv Test B Prof/Adv

Page 12: Compstat Report February 20, 2009 Target School East High School

Non Academic ReportsNon Academic Reports

Attendance

• Weekly, 20-Day, Year (Students)

-What’s working

-Area for Improvement

Page 13: Compstat Report February 20, 2009 Target School East High School

Student AttendanceStudent Attendance

What’s working

1. Student Attendance Review Team meeting with parents (SART). 2. Letters from Attorney General, parents do not like threats to be summoned to court. 3. Communicating attendance procedures to parents. 4. Students with ten consecutive absences are dropped and re- enrolled when they return.

What’s not working-Based on data 1. Absences are still problematic. 2. Student addresses are incorrect in the SMS system, therefore, many attendance letters are returning. Phone numbers are not “working” numbers.

Page 14: Compstat Report February 20, 2009 Target School East High School

The Self-Directed Improvement System™ SDIS™ | Action PlanThe Self-Directed Improvement System™ SDIS™ | Action Plan

Data

Execute

Proficiency Proficiency TargetTarget

FeedbackStrategy

BaselineAssessmen

ts

SMS 20-Day attendance reports

• The same students continue to be absent or tardy to school

• Inaccurate contact information in SMS

• Greater implementation of Parent Link

• Use overnight suspensions to increase parent contact

• Attendance Incentives• Continue to drop students with 10

consecutive absences• Consistent hall sweeps

• Administration will update Parent Link weekly.

• Administration will issue suspensions and meet with parents.

Student attendance will increase 3% each 20-Day period.

Student Attendance                

Year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 YTD  

2007-2008 96.4 90.9 89.7 88.5 90 89.7 89.9 90.3 83.3 90.9  

2008-2009 96.6 90.5 89.4 88.3 90         91  

Page 15: Compstat Report February 20, 2009 Target School East High School

DisciplineDiscipline

• Referrals -What’s working-Area for Improvement

Page 16: Compstat Report February 20, 2009 Target School East High School

ReferralsReferrals

What’s working1. Teacher/Administration Monitoring2. “Student’s Pending Suspension” Notification to Parents3. Conferences with Parents 4. Teacher/Student Relationships

Area for Improvement -Based on data1. Strategies for decreasing tardiness to class 2. Strategies for decreasing dress code violations3. More effective use of Four Step Plan

Page 17: Compstat Report February 20, 2009 Target School East High School

The Self-Directed Improvement System™ SDIS™ | Action PlanThe Self-Directed Improvement System™ SDIS™ | Action Plan

Data

Execute

Proficiency Proficiency TargetTarget

FeedbackStrategy

Baseline Assessments

Reports from Administration, Behavioral Specialists, and Guidance Counselors

Referrals 1st 20 day: 52Referrals 2nd 20 day: 137 Referrals 3rd 20 day: 75Referrals 4th 20 day: 30Referrals 5th 20 day: 7

• Consistent implementation of discipline plan• Teachers handling discipline issues in the classroom

• Admin will monitor classroom management during observations and assist those teachers with high numbers of referrals• Students who are continuing to experience discipline issues will counsel with Behavioral Specialists and Guidance Counselors• Utilizing Success Schools• Hall sweeps• Character building activities• Metal detections/searches• Improve communication between everyone• Fewer interruptions• Positive Change Award

• Behavioral Specialists and Guidance Counselors

will continue with weekly small groups.

• Admin will continue to assist students in enrolling in Success Schools.

• Teachers will continue to make contact with parents and schedule conferences.

• Admin will continue to focus on measures promoting school safety.

Reduce the number of referrals per 20-day period by 10%.

Page 18: Compstat Report February 20, 2009 Target School East High School

GraduationGraduation

• Number of Seniors -What’s working-Area for Improvement

• Number of On-Time Graduates -What’s working-Area for Improvement

Page 19: Compstat Report February 20, 2009 Target School East High School

Number of SeniorsNumber of Seniors

What’s working1. Course Recovery2. E-Learning3. Tutoring offered at various times4. Our Children, Our Future volunteer tutors

Area for Improvement-Based on data1. Communicating with parents about grades and conduct2. Providing feedback/consequences for tardiness and absences3. Current attendance interventions

Page 20: Compstat Report February 20, 2009 Target School East High School

The Self-Directed Improvement System™ SDIS™ | Action PlanThe Self-Directed Improvement System™ SDIS™ | Action Plan

Data

Execute

Proficiency Proficiency TargetTarget

Feedback

Strategy

BaselineAssessments

TranscriptsCumulative filesGateway Test Results

• 187 Seniors with the minimum required credits

• Many seniors need to complete course recovery credits/E-Learning

• Some seniors will need to complete summer credits to graduate

• Some seniors need to score proficient on Gateway tests

• Continuous review of transcripts• Teacher/Parent/Student will develop

contracts to ensure graduation requirements are met

• Seniors are required to be in tutoring after-school and Our Children, Our Future

• Grad Coach and Counselors will review transcripts.

• Grad Coach and counselors will have parent conferences in November to notify parents of grad requirements.

• Grad coach and teachers will develop contracts and obtain signatures.

100% of Seniors will meet graduation requirements for May, 2009 graduation.

Page 21: Compstat Report February 20, 2009 Target School East High School

Number of On-Time GraduatesNumber of On-Time Graduates

What’s working1. Passing required credits and Gateway assessments before senior year2. Checking earned credits on a regular basis3. Enrolling over aged students in E-Learning/Course Recovery4. GOS staff has been properly trained in historical transcript and records data

Area for Improvement -Based on data1. Daily attendance requirements2. Missing data in district/out of district

Page 22: Compstat Report February 20, 2009 Target School East High School

The Self-Directed Improvement System™ SDIS™ | Action PlanThe Self-Directed Improvement System™ SDIS™ | Action Plan

Data

Execute

Proficiency Proficiency TargetTarget

Feedback

Strategy

BaselineAssessments

Graduation Rate: 72.7%Transcript Information

• Incomplete information in cum files• Students needing more than 4 years and a summer to graduate

• Continuous review of credits• Increase communication with parents

via Parent Link• E-Learning and credit recovery

• Grad Coach and counselors will review senior credits.

• Grad coach and Counselors will meet with parents and students who are not being successful.

• Admin will increase Parent Link communications weekly.

2009 Graduation Rate Target 75.7%

Graduation Rate 2007-2008

Page 23: Compstat Report February 20, 2009 Target School East High School

SummarySummary

What are the Next Steps… 1. Implement a computer lab for before, during, and after school use. 2. Increase interventions and monitor the effectiveness of the interventions. 3. Increase communication with parents. 4. Encourage students to do their best on formative assessments. 5. Teachers/Coaches will continue to provide effective lesson plans and make changes in strategies when necessary to increase student achievement. 6. Use Star Reports effectively with students and parents. 7. Use all tools that are available to increase attendance and decrease tardiness and absences. 8. Provide teacher training in differentiated instruction. 9. EHS will continue focus on common planning and common assessments in English and math

classes and greater utilization of the D/F/S model.