comparisons…systems

21
Comparisons… Systems

Upload: deana

Post on 22-Feb-2016

37 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Comparisons…Systems. Electoral Systems: Single Member District Plurality vs. Proportional Representation. How the votes get counted or who gets a seat in the legislature. Parliamentary vs. Presidential System. How the executive branch is born. Unitary vs. Federal System. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Comparisons…Systems

Comparisons…Systems

Page 2: Comparisons…Systems

Electoral Systems:

Single Member District Plurality

vs.Proportional Representation

How the votes get counted or who gets a seat in the legislature

Page 3: Comparisons…Systems

Parliamentary vs.

PresidentialSystem

How the executive branch is born

Page 4: Comparisons…Systems

Distribution of Power

Unitary vs. Federal System

Page 5: Comparisons…Systems

Interest Group Systems

Corporatist vs.

Pluralist

Who gets heard?

Page 6: Comparisons…Systems

Electoral Systems:

Single Member District Plurality

vs.Proportional Representation

How the votes get counted or who gets a seat in the legislature

Page 7: Comparisons…Systems

Single Member District Plurality

Definition: Electoral system in which candidates run

for a single seat from a specific geographic district.

The winner is the person who receives the most votes, whether or not that is a majority

Characteristics: Usually results in two-party system Silences minority voters Creates large catch-all parties

Page 8: Comparisons…Systems

Proportional Representation

Definition: An electoral system in which voters

select parties rather than individual candidates and parties are represented in legislatures in proportion to the shares of votes they win.

Characteristics: Usually results in multi-party systems Gives voice to minority voters Wider representation of political views

Page 9: Comparisons…Systems

Parliamentary vs.

PresidentialSystem

How the executive branch is born

Page 10: Comparisons…Systems

Parliamentary SystemCharacteristics:

Fusion of Powers Executive born of legislature—executive

branch is populated by members of legislative branch

Parliamentary sovereignty Collective responsibility Vote of confidence to remove Prime Minister High party discipline No direct election of executive branch Examples: UK

Page 11: Comparisons…Systems

Presidential SystemCharacteristics:

Separation of Powers Checks and balances Direct election of president Lower party discipline Inefficient policy process Gridlock more likely Examples: Mexico, Nigeria, Iran (sort of)

Page 12: Comparisons…Systems

Relationship with Legislature

in both systemsRole of legislature to enact legislation, so executive needs legislative to pass bills

Executive influences the legislative agenda by drafting bills

Executive is head of governmentLegislature can remove the executiveExecutive can introduce legislation

Page 13: Comparisons…Systems

Mixed Presidential/Parliamentary System

Characteristics:Both a PM and a PresidentDirectly elected presidentSeparate head of government

and state

Page 14: Comparisons…Systems

Distribution of Power

Unitary vs. Federal System

Page 15: Comparisons…Systems

Unitary SystemDefinition:

Concentration of political power in a central government

Examples from AP6 United Kingdom China Iran

Page 16: Comparisons…Systems

Federal SystemDefinition:

A system of governance in which political authority is shared between the national government and regional or state governments

Examples from AP6 Russia Mexico Nigeria

Page 17: Comparisons…Systems

Interest Group Systems

Corporatist vs.

Pluralist

Who gets heard?

Page 18: Comparisons…Systems

Pluralist Interest Group SystemDefinition:

Multiple groups may represent a single society interest.

Characteristics: Group membership is voluntary and

limited. Groups often have a loose or

decentralized organizational structure. There is a clear separation between

interest groups and the government. United States is perfect example.

Page 19: Comparisons…Systems

Corporatist Interest Group System Definition:

Interest groups are an institutional part of the political structure and are active in policy formation and implementation.

Characteristics Membership in the peak association is often

compulsory and nearly universal. Peak associations are centrally organized and direct

the actions of their members. Groups are often systematically involved in making

and implementing policy. Key Point: Interest group part of policy process!

Page 20: Comparisons…Systems

Rentier States

Page 21: Comparisons…Systems

Rentier StatesDefinition:

A country that obtains much of its revenue from the export of oil or other natural resources

Impact: Government doesn’t have to be

accountable to citizens for income.Examples from AP6

Nigeria Russia Iran