comparative study of ovarian reserve between the users and non users of oral contraceptives abstract...

27
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OVARIAN RESERVE BETWEEN THE USERS AND NON USERS OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES Abstract id: 1183

Upload: reynard-gordon

Post on 11-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OVARIAN RESERVE BETWEEN THE USERS AND NON USERS OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES Abstract id: 1183

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OVARIAN RESERVE BETWEEN THE USERS AND NON USERS OF ORAL

CONTRACEPTIVES

Abstract id: 1183

Page 2: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OVARIAN RESERVE BETWEEN THE USERS AND NON USERS OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES Abstract id: 1183

• This study aims

1. To quantify and compare the sonographic ovarian reserve

markers in the users and non users of oral contraceptives.

2. To show that sonographic ovarian reserve assessment still

retains its efficacy as it is safer and cheaper than hormonal

studies.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

Page 3: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OVARIAN RESERVE BETWEEN THE USERS AND NON USERS OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES Abstract id: 1183

• This study included 500 women aged between 18 – 45 years for a

period of 12 months, of which

- 260 were non users and

- 240 were users (of which 30% were former pill users).

• Sonographic ovarian reserve includes ovarian volume and antral

follicular count which were done using transvaginal ultrasound on

day 2–5 of the menstrual cycle.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Page 4: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OVARIAN RESERVE BETWEEN THE USERS AND NON USERS OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES Abstract id: 1183

METHOD OF COLLECTION OF DATA

• A profoma was prepared for the study of all patients based on

- regularity of mensuration,

- use of oral contraceptives,

- measurement of antral follicle count and

- ovarian volume.

• Study type : Prospective study.

Page 5: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OVARIAN RESERVE BETWEEN THE USERS AND NON USERS OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES Abstract id: 1183

METHOD OF COLLECTION OF DATA

• INCLUSION CRITERIA:

- Patients who are married and are in reproductive age group (18 to

45 years).

- Patients willing to undergo transvaginal ultrasound.

• EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

- Patients who refuse to undergo transvaginal ultrasound.

- Patients who lost follow up.

Page 6: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OVARIAN RESERVE BETWEEN THE USERS AND NON USERS OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES Abstract id: 1183

INVESTIGATION DONE

TRANSVAGINAL OVARIAN SONOGRAPHY

Page 7: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OVARIAN RESERVE BETWEEN THE USERS AND NON USERS OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES Abstract id: 1183

• On day 2–5 of the menstrual cycle or during withdrawal bleeding,

a transvaginal sonography was performed.

• Only those with both ovaries clearly visible on transvaginal

sonography were included in the study.

• The number of antral follicles was counted and grouped according

to three predefined size categories:

- 2–4 mm (small),

- 5–7 mm (intermediate) and

- 8–10 mm (large).

TRANSVAGINAL OVARIAN SONOGRAPHY

Page 8: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OVARIAN RESERVE BETWEEN THE USERS AND NON USERS OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES Abstract id: 1183

• Each ovary was measured in three planes and ovarian volume

was calculated using the prolate ellipsoid formula

V = D1 x D2 x D3 x 0.523

• D1, D2 and D3 being the three maximal longitudinal, antero-

posterior and transverse diameters respectively.

• Mean ovarian volume is the volume calculated as the mean value

of the left and right ovary.

TRANSVAGINAL OVARIAN SONOGRAPHY

Page 9: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OVARIAN RESERVE BETWEEN THE USERS AND NON USERS OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES Abstract id: 1183

RESULTS

34%

14%

Patients for study

non - users of OCP

current users of OCP

former OCP users

52%

Page 10: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OVARIAN RESERVE BETWEEN THE USERS AND NON USERS OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES Abstract id: 1183

RESULTS

18-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 41-450

50

100

150

200

Graph 1 : Age Distribution

No of patients

Page 11: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OVARIAN RESERVE BETWEEN THE USERS AND NON USERS OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES Abstract id: 1183

RESULTS

Age group

Total No of patients

500

Non usersof OCP260

Users 240Current users Former OCP users 168 72

18 - 25 83 42 41 0

26 - 30 172 76 65 31

31 - 35 156 61 59 36

36 - 40 61 53 3 5

41 - 45 28 28 0 0

• Table 1: Number of patients involved in the study:

Page 12: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OVARIAN RESERVE BETWEEN THE USERS AND NON USERS OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES Abstract id: 1183

• Antral follicle counts done between day 2 to 5 after menstruation were

compared between the users and non users of oral contraceptive pills. 

• Most of the users and former users had fewer than five follicles under

10 mm in diameter prior to the onset of therapy.

• The ovarian volume was believed to be dependent upon follicle

number.

• The decline in antral follicle size and counts has been directly

correlated with a decline in ovarian volume.

•  Decreased ovarian volume and ovarian antral follicle count has been

observed in users and former users of oral contraceptive pills.

RESULTS

Page 13: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OVARIAN RESERVE BETWEEN THE USERS AND NON USERS OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES Abstract id: 1183

Ovary of non user: A dominant follicle is visualized in the central

portion of the image and several subordinate follicles (2–5 mm) are

observed in the left lateral aspect of the ovary.

RESULTS

Page 14: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OVARIAN RESERVE BETWEEN THE USERS AND NON USERS OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES Abstract id: 1183

Ovary of OCP user: Only the stroma of the ovary is identified. A

very few follicles of less than 1 mm diameter can be observed on the

inferior aspect of the ovary. 

RESULTS

Page 15: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OVARIAN RESERVE BETWEEN THE USERS AND NON USERS OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES Abstract id: 1183

RESULTS

Ovary of non users

Page 16: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OVARIAN RESERVE BETWEEN THE USERS AND NON USERS OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES Abstract id: 1183

RESULTS

Ovary of OCP users

Page 17: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OVARIAN RESERVE BETWEEN THE USERS AND NON USERS OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES Abstract id: 1183

• When compared with non users, in oral contraceptive pill users,

and former oral contraceptive pill users, the antral follicular counts

were reduced by ~ 15 – 20 % and ovarian volume was reduced by ~

25 – 30 %.

• When follicle size was further categorized into subclasses (small,

intermediate and large), the number of antral follicles was

significantly lower in all three antral follicle size categories in users

compared with non-users of oral contraception.

RESULTS

Page 18: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OVARIAN RESERVE BETWEEN THE USERS AND NON USERS OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES Abstract id: 1183

• After discontinuation of oral contraceptive pills,

- 20% of patients conceived after 1 month ( after 1st cycle)

- 75% of patients conceived in and after 1 year (after 4 - 12 cycles)

RESULTS

Page 19: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OVARIAN RESERVE BETWEEN THE USERS AND NON USERS OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES Abstract id: 1183

RESULTS

19%

74%

7%

Distribution of patients conceived and not conceived

Pt conceived after 1 cycle

Pt.conceived in or before 1 yr

Pt.not conceived during study period

Page 20: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OVARIAN RESERVE BETWEEN THE USERS AND NON USERS OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES Abstract id: 1183

Age group

30 % former pill user (72 patients)

20 % patient conceived ( 14)

75 % patient conceived within 1 year

(55)

5 % patient did not conceive during study

( 3 )

18 - 25 0 0 0

26 - 30 11 20 0

31 - 35 3 33 0

36 - 40 0 2 3

41 - 45 0 0 0

RESULTS

Page 21: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OVARIAN RESERVE BETWEEN THE USERS AND NON USERS OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES Abstract id: 1183

• Conception typically occurs at a rate of 20–22% per cycle in

women who are less than 35 years of age.

• Approximately 50% of women not practicing contraception

conceive within 3 months, others over a period of 6 months, 12

months, and within 18 months when no specific attention was

paid to the time of optimal fertility. 

DISCUSSION

Page 22: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OVARIAN RESERVE BETWEEN THE USERS AND NON USERS OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES Abstract id: 1183

• This study based on ovarian reserve parameters from the use of

oral contraception in a population of healthy women.

• The ovarian reserve parameters AFC and ovarian volume were all

comparatively lower in users than in non-users of oral

contraception.

• Additionally, there was significant decrease in AFC and ovarian

volume with increasing duration of oral contraception use in

current users.

DISCUSSION

Page 23: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OVARIAN RESERVE BETWEEN THE USERS AND NON USERS OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES Abstract id: 1183

• Another ovarian reserve marker, serum Anti mullerian hormone

concentration was not accounted in this study.

• However, the reductions in Antral follicle count and ovarian

volume, which are probably temporary, should be taken into

account when counselling women on their reproductive lifespan as

these parameters might improve after termination of oral

contraception use.

DISCUSSION

Page 24: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OVARIAN RESERVE BETWEEN THE USERS AND NON USERS OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES Abstract id: 1183

ADVANTAGES OF SONOGRAPHIC OVARIAN RESERVE

ASSESSMENT

• Sonographic ovarian reserve assessment is an

- Safe,

- Readily available,

- Noninvasive technique,

- Rapid diagnosis, 

- Cheaper and cost effective than Anti mullerian hormone

(AMH) studies.

Page 25: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OVARIAN RESERVE BETWEEN THE USERS AND NON USERS OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES Abstract id: 1183

CONCLUSION

• This study indicates that sonographic ovarian reserve markers i.e.

AFC and ovarian volume, are negatively affected by oral

contraception, and are lower in women using oral contraceptive

pills and suggests that reproductive life span may be temporarily

affected in users of oral contraceptives.

• Sonographic ovarian reserve still retains its efficacy as it is safer

and cheaper than hormonal studies

Page 26: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OVARIAN RESERVE BETWEEN THE USERS AND NON USERS OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES Abstract id: 1183

1. Chizen, D. R. and R. A. Pierson (2004). Tranvaginal Ultrasonography at First Consultation Assists Management of Infertility. International Federation of Fertility Societies18th World Congress on Fertility and Sterility, Montreal, Quebec, IFFS 2004.

2. Timor-Tritsch, I. and S. Ruttem (1989). Transvaginal ultrasonography in the management of infertility. In: Kurjak A (ed) Ultrasound and Infertility. . Boca Raton, CRC Press.

3. Andersen, A.N., Witjes, H., Gordon, K., Mannaerts, B., 2011. Predictive factors of ovarian response and clinical outcome after IVF/ICSI following a rFSH/GnRH antagonist protocol with or without oral contraceptive pre-treatment. Hum. Reprod. 26, 3413–3423

4. Broekmans, F.J., Kwee, J., Hendriks, D.J., Mol, B.W., Lambalk, C.B., 2006. A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Hum. Reprod. Update 12, 685–718

5. Kelsey, T.W., Anderson, R.A., Wright, P., Nelson, S.M., Wallace, W.H., 2012. Data-driven assessment of the human ovarian reserve. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 18, 79–87

REFERENCES

Page 27: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OVARIAN RESERVE BETWEEN THE USERS AND NON USERS OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES Abstract id: 1183

6. Chow, G. E., A. R. Criniti, et al. (2004). "Antral follicle count and serum follicle- stimulating hormone levels to assess functional ovarian age." Obstet Gynecol 104(4): 801-4.7. Haadsma, M.L., Bukman, A., Groen, H., Roeloffzen, E.M., Groenewoud, E.R.,

Heineman, M.J., Hoek, A., 2007. The number of small antral follicles (2–6 mm) determines the outcome of endocrine ovarian reserve tests in a subfertile population. Hum. Reprod. 22, 1925–1931.

8. Rosen, M.P., Sternfeld, B., Schuh-Huerta, S.M., Reijo Pera, R.A., McCulloch, C.E., Cedars, M.I., 2010. Antral follicle count: absence of significant midlife decline. Fertil. Steril. 94, 2182–2185.

9. Gougeon, A., 1996. Regulation of ovarian follicular development in primates: facts and hypotheses. Endocr. Rev. 17, 121–155.

10. Gougeon, A. (1979). "Qualitative changes in medium and large antral follicles in the human ovary during the menstrual cycle." Annals Biol Anim Bioch Biophys 19(5): 1464-1468.

REFERENCES