communicating risk and hazard to policy-makers
TRANSCRIPT
Communicating risk and hazard to policy makers
Sir Mark WalportChief Scientific Adviser to HM Government
2 Communicating risk and hazard to policy makers
• Health, wellbeing, security & resilience
• Knowledge translated to economic advantage
• The right science for emergencies
• Underpinning policy with evidence
• Advocacy and leadership for science
Government’s Chief Scientific Adviser
Credit: iStockphoto
3 Communicating risk and hazard to policy makers
Where does risk come in?
Natural Credit: CDC/EthleenLloydCredit: Maccheek/PD
4 Communicating risk and hazard to policy makers
Where does risk come in?
Human
Credit: AP Credit: @Boston_to_a_T/Twitter
5 Communicating risk and hazard to policy makers
National Risk Register
6 Communicating risk and hazard to policy makers
Risk all pervasive in work as GCSA
Innovation held back by badly framed discussions about risk
•Communication
•Science meets values
•Regulation
7 Communicating risk and hazard to policy makers
Communicating risk to policy makers
• Hazard
• Exposure
• Vulnerability
• Risk
• Uncertainty
• Threat
Credit: Warren Photographic
8 Communicating risk and hazard to policy makers
Language matters
Source: Somerville and Hassol, Communicating the science of climate change, Physics Today, October 2011
The need for scientific precision needs to be balanced with the need to be understood by non-specialists
9 Communicating risk and hazard to policy makers
Source: Somerville and Hassol, Communicating the science of climate change, Physics Today, October 2011
BUT!
Language matters
The need for scientific precision needs to be balanced with the need to be understood by non-specialists
10 Communicating risk and hazard to policy makers
COBR
Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies
(SAGE)
Non-Governmental Organisations
Government Scientists
Industry Academia
• 2010 – Volcanic Ash• 2011 – Fukushima• 2012 – Olympics • 2013 – Flooding• 2014 – Ebola • 2015 – Nepal Earthquake
• Operational response• Impact management• Recovery• Public Information
Communicating Risk in an Emergency
Home Office Rapid Diagnostics, 25th June 201310
SACs
11 Communicating risk and hazard to policy makers
Communicating Risk in an Emergency:Ebola
• Modelling – what are the best and reasonable worst case scenarios?
• Risk to UK – how many cases should we expect to see?
• Screening – will it be effective in identifying cases?
• Virus survival – how long does the virus last on different surfaces? Will it survive in sewage?
• Vaccines –What clinical trials do we need?
• What else can we do?
Cumulative cases 24 666Cases in past 21 days 398Cumulative deaths 10 179WHO Ebola Situation Report - 18 March 2015
12 Communicating risk and hazard to policy makers
Communicating Risk in an Emergency:Nepal Earthquake
• Risk Assessment - What is the reasonable worst case scenario? Is there a risk of another earthquake?
• Aftershocks – How many, what magnitude, how long will they last and where might these occur?
• Landslides – Where have they occurred? What is the risk of further landslides?
• Monsoon season – What additional risks will this pose?
• Geo-mapping - What satellite data can we provide to aid the response?
Mapping and images from Nepal Earthquake 2015
Credit: Omar Havana/Getty
13 Communicating risk and hazard to policy makers
Effective communication requires an understanding of your audience
Source: Rankmaniac, 2012
14 Communicating risk and hazard to policy makers10 Science Advice to Government - Auckland
Scientific evidence is just one part of the picture
We can provide the very best evidence but must recognise that the ‘lenses’ of politics and the machinery of delivery will all interact to produce the final outcome.
Politics
DeliveryEvidence
Policy
Communicating to policy makers:Lenses
15 Communicating risk and hazard to policy makers
Communicating to policy makers:Lenses – Shale gas
Scientific concerns
‘Hydraulic fracturing’
Fossil fuel, engineering and geological:
• Loss of integrity in aquifer zone
• Seismic events
• Methane release
Understanding public attitudes
‘Fracking’
Anti-fracking movements are not solely concerned with emissions or the risks of pollution or seismicity:
•Opposition to the oil and gas industry
•‘Not in my back yard’
•Opposition to continued exploitation of fossil fuels in general
Credit: greensefa/CC BY 2.0
16 Communicating risk and hazard to policy makers
• Human Fertility and Embryology Authority
• addresses policy issues relating to fertility regulation
• sometimes ethically and clinically complex
• Scrupulous care in assessing a wide range of data and evidence
• Comprehensive programme of public engagement
• Helped build trust in community at large
• Worked closely with legislators
Science meets values
Credit: iStockphoto
Credit: CBCEW
17 Communicating risk and hazard to policy makers
Communication when science meets values
…and to counter misinformation
To inform…
18 Communicating risk and hazard to policy makers
Meta-analysis is a highly valuable tool
19 Communicating risk and hazard to policy makers
Scientists should take care not to over-hype their own research
20 Communicating risk and hazard to policy makers
“If you say the world is going to end, people switch off thinking ‘here they go again, trying to sell us something’.”Focus group participant, Sutton Coldfield
(Shuckburgh et al, 2012)
“If you say the world is going to end, people switch off thinking ‘here they go again, trying to sell us something’.”Focus group participant, Sutton Coldfield
(Shuckburgh et al, 2012)
Framing matters
Positive or negative framing (and values emphasised) can influence how information is assimilated
21 Communicating risk and hazard to policy makers
Perception of future risk is influenced by experience
Source: Defra/Ipsos MORI/AEA Technology, 2013
22 Communicating risk and hazard to policy makers
Perception of future risk is influenced by experience
Source: Defra/Ipsos MORI/AEA Technology, 2013
23 Communicating risk and hazard to policy makers
Holding a Wider Conversation about Risk
• Risk – a societal issue
• Language
• Values and lenses
• Who benefits and who carries the risk
• Transparency
• Widening the conversation is a democratic necessity
Credit: Focus Features
24 Communicating risk and hazard to policy makers
Scientific Diplomacy
25 Communicating risk and hazard to policy makers
Conclusion
• To be a good scientist, you need to be a good communicator – Science isn’t finished until it is communicated!
• During emergencies, effective communication to policy makers is essential
• We need to be precise in our communication:
• Hazard vs Risk
• The level of uncertainty
• Language we use
Every effort has been made to trace copyright holders and to obtain their permission for the use of copyright material. We apologise for any errors or omissions in the included attributions and would be grateful if notified of any corrections that should be incorporated in future versions of this slide set. We can be contacted through [email protected] .
@uksciencechief
www.gov.uk/go-science