coastal structure foundations
TRANSCRIPT
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Design of Maritime Structures
Steven A. Hughes, PhD, PE
Coastal and Hydraulics LaboratoryUS Army Engineer Research and Development Center
Waterways Experiment Station3909 Halls Ferry Road
Vicksburg, Mississippi 39180-6199
Email: [email protected]
Coastal StructureFoundations
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Coastal Structure Foundations
Contents• Overview of Foundation Design
• Site-Specific Geotechnical Investigations
• Soil Characteristics
• Foundation Loading and Response
• Foundation Related Failure Modes
• Geotechnical Design Criteria
• Slip Surface and Zone FailuresCEM Chapter VI-3-1 (Author: Steven A. Hughes)CEM Chapter VI-5-5 (Author: Hans F. Burcharth)
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Lecture Caveats
Not Covered: Details of foundation design techniques.This should be done by trained geotechnical engineers.
Objective: Present and discuss those aspects of foundation design that distinguish coastal structure foundations from conventional foundation design.
Emphasis: Primarily gravity structures that restdirectly on the sea bed.
Coastal Structure Foundations
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Foundation Design Objectives
For structures built or placed directly on top ofsoil, sand, or other bottom material thefoundation must...
Overview of Foundation Design
• Support the structure dead weight
• Resist applied loads that are transferred to thefoundation
• Minimize foundation deformation or settlement
• Maintain sufficient reserve strength throughout thestructure service life
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Added Geotechnical Factors
Overview of Foundation Design
Major differences between geotechnical stability ofcoastal structures and land-based structures includethe following:• Wave action on the structure and foundation
• Wave-induced pore pressure variation in porous structuresand sea bed soils
Waves induce stress variations in soils which cause:• Soil strength degradation
• Pore pressure build up
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Design EngineerResponsibilities
* Predict short- and long-term stress and strength developmentin the soils
Overview of Foundation Design
• Estimate (within reason) expected loading conditions• Determine appropriate site-specific foundation soil
engineering properties and site variations• Reasonably understand the structure/soil interaction
and failure modes• Determine that applied soil stresses will not exceed soil
strength* during project lifetime
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Coastal Structure Foundations
Contents• Overview of Foundation Design
• Site-Specific Geotechnical Investigations
• Soil Characteristics
• Foundation Loading and Response
• Foundation Related Failure Modes
• Geotechnical Design Criteria
• Slip Surface and Zone FailuresCEM Chapter VI-3-1 (Author: Steven A. Hughes)CEM Chapter VI-5-5 (Author: Hans F. Burcharth)
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Acquire data to assess the nature and extent offoundation soil properties at the project site
Guiding Criterion: Gather sufficient data andperform necessary lab tests and analysis toassure project design adequacy andconstructability
Site-Specific Geotechnical Site Investigations
Purpose of Site Investigation
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Typical Questions
Site-Specific Geotechnical Site Investigations
• Soil types and strata at the site
• Soil mechanical properties and capability towithstand loads
• Range of environmental conditions (e.g.,freeze/thaw, wet/dry)
• Potential soil degration with time
• Signs of soil fissuring or weathering
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Study Sequence
• Site Reconnaissance Phase• Preliminary Exploration Phase• Detailed Design Exploration Phase
• Three Investigative Phases overlap
• Planning specifics of latter phases depend on earlier results
• Level of detail is dictated by project scope, importance and cost
Notes:
Site-Specific Geotechnical Site Investigations
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Site Reconnaissance Phase
• Primarily a desk study to assemble existing geological data for site
• Results help establish data collection requirements of next phase
• Site visit to reconcile data and observe surface evidence and site condition
• Information sources include:
• Topographic and geologic maps
• Aerial photography
• Groundwater maps
• Past historical records and geotechnical studiesat nearby locations
• Any published studies or local descriptions
Goal: Glean from available data a feel for the project sitegeology (stratification, formation, history, groundwater, etc.)
Site-Specific Geotechnical Site Investigations
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Goals:• Recognize potential geotechnical problems• Obtain sufficient data to finalize site selection• Determine geotech parameters needed for preliminary design
• Approximate depth, thickness of strata• Depth to bedrock• Groundwater variations• Estimates of critical soil parameters• Potential sources of construction materials
Results go into Survey Report used for project authorization
Site-Specific Geotechnical Site Investigations
Preliminary Exploration Phase
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Investigative Methods:
Bottom Line: Gathered information should be sufficient toselect site and complete preliminary design
Site-Specific Geotechnical Site Investigations
Preliminary Exploration Phase
• Continuous seismic reflection surveys (soil types and strata depth)
• Side-scan sonar images (surface soil characteristics, relicstructures)
• Dry-land methods (electro-resistivity/magnetic, seismic refraction)
• Small number of in-situ borings (when feasible) to calibrate/verifysurvey data
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Detailed Design Exploration Phase
Bottom Line: Realistic soil parameters can savemore than cost of investigation, whereasuncertainties in soil strength can lead to over-design.
Purpose: Collect and analyze specific soil data to determinegeotechnical parameters needed for final design
• Specify which soil parameters are needed• At which locations• Best methods/instruments/analyses for time and budget constraints
Site-Specific Geotechnical Site Investigations
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Elements of Typical Field Study of In-Situ Soils:
• Penetration and vane shear devices to measure soil strength
• Pressure meters to estimate load-deformation characteristics
• Nuclear densimeters and sand cone devices to measure density
• Equipment to measure permeability and pore pressure
• Test loading of piles
• Instrumentation of embankments and foundations
• Monitoring during vibratory and impulse loading
Site-Specific Geotechnical Site Investigations
Detailed Design Exploration Phase
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Coastal Structure Foundations
Contents• Overview of Foundation Design
• Site-Specific Geotechnical Investigations
• Soil Characteristics
• Foundation Loading and Response
• Foundation Related Failure Modes
• Geotechnical Design Criteria
• Slip Surface and Zone FailuresCEM Chapter VI-3-1 (Author: Steven A. Hughes)CEM Chapter VI-5-5 (Author: Hans F. Burcharth)
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Soil Classification by Grain-Size
Common Soil Properties
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Soil Bulk Density
Common Soil Properties
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Volume of Voids
Common Soil Properties
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Relative Density
Common Soil Properties
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Other Soil Parameters
Common Soil Properties
• Unit volume weight (based on bulk density)
• Plasticity index (water content range over which cohesivesoils remain plastic)
• Geostatic stress (soil weight on horizontal surface)
• Coefficient of lateral stress (ratio of horizontal to verticalstress
• Overconsolidation ratio (ratio between maximum andactual pore pressure)
• Normal Consolidation: Equilibrium at maximum stress ever applied
• Overconsolidation: Equilibrium at stress less than maximum everapplied
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Soil Deformation Moduli
Note: Typicalvalues are given intables in the CEM
Common Soil Properties
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Soil Stress Definition
Soil Strength Properties
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Mohr Failure Circle
• Failure occurs on the Mohr circle envelope• Determined from drained triaxial tests• Generally the failure curve is not a straight line
Soil Strength Properties
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Mohr Circle Straight-Line Approximations
For Drained Soils
Approximation for noncohesivesoils. Valid only close tofailure load of interest
Soil Strength Properties
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Failure Criterion for Cohesive Soils
Soil Strength Properties
• Strength due to friction between particles and cohesion forces
• Undrained shear strength determined by tests with monotonicload increase to failure
• For a specific clay cu depends solely on initial stress condition
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Coastal Structure Foundations
Contents• Overview of Foundation Design
• Site-Specific Geotechnical Investigations
• Soil Characteristics
• Foundation Loading and Response
• Foundation Related Failure Modes
• Geotechnical Design Criteria
• Slip Surface and Zone FailuresCEM Chapter VI-3-1 (Author: Steven A. Hughes)CEM Chapter VI-5-5 (Author: Hans F. Burcharth)
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Foundation Loads
Static Force Loads• Structure and foundation self weight• Relatively constant over structure lifetime
• Buoyancy effects cause cyclic variation instructure weight with tide
• Be aware of weight distribution and differentialloading
• Be aware of spanning different soil types• Lateral forces due to imbalanced hydrodynamic
pressure• Construction loads?
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Dynamic Force Loads
• Wave, currents, tides, storm surges, and wind
• Earthquake ground motions in some regions
• Loads vary in time, duration and intensity
• Examine the worst likely combination
Foundation Loads
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Impact Force Loads
Foundation Loads
• Ship or ice collisions, partial structure failure,slamming waves
• Importance depends on magnitude andstructure type
• Rubble-mounds can absorb a portion of impactload
• Monolithic structures transmit more load tofoundation, but large mass and naturalfrequency help reduce that load
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Foundation Soil ResponseSoil Consolidation:• Reduction in soil voids over time by squeezing out water• Results in denser soil and increased soil strength• May result in unacceptable settlement
Soil Loss by Scour and Erosion
Foundation Loads
Soil Shear Stresses:
• Induced when lateral forces and overturning moments aretransmitted to the foundation soil...may lead to damage
• Excess pore pressure• Caused by rapid loading and results in decreased soil strength
• Also caused by cyclic loading of sand
• Both cases may cause liquefaction (earthquake accelerations)
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Coastal Structure Foundations
Contents• Overview of Foundation Design
• Site-Specific Geotechnical Investigations
• Soil Characteristics
• Foundation Loading and Response
• Foundation Related Failure Modes
• Geotechnical Design Criteria
• Slip Surface and Zone FailuresCEM Chapter VI-3-1 (Author: Steven A. Hughes)CEM Chapter VI-5-5 (Author: Hans F. Burcharth)
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Slip Surface and Zone FailureRubble-Mound Structures and Dikes
Foundation Failure Modes
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Monolithic Structures
Foundation Failure Modes
Slip Surface and Zone Failure
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Tied Wall Structures
Foundation Failure Modes
Slip Surface and Zone Failure
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Excess Settlement(Including Differential Settlement)
Foundation Failure Modes
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Coastal Structure Foundations
Contents• Overview of Foundation Design
• Site-Specific Geotechnical Investigations
• Soil Characteristics
• Foundation Loading and Response
• Foundation Related Failure Modes
• Geotechnical Design Criteria
• Slip Surface and Zone FailuresCEM Chapter VI-3-1 (Author: Steven A. Hughes)CEM Chapter VI-5-5 (Author: Hans F. Burcharth)
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Geotechnical Design Criteria
Foundation TypesShallow Foundations
• Load is supported by soil just beneath the sea bottom
• Most coastal structures use shallow foundations
• Foundation often serves to widen load bearing surface
Deep Foundations
• Load is supported throughout a substantial depth of soil
• Examples are pile-supported structures and piers
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Shallow Foundation Environmental Factors
Factors• Currents• Tides/storm surges• Waves• Seismic activity
Site Specific Considerations• Soil type and strength• Topography• Water depth• Structure positioning
Geotechnical Design Criteria
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Shallow Foundation Design Considerations
Noncohesive Soils• Ultimate bearing capacity for sand is very high• Design is usually based on expected foundation settlement• Must check differential settlement• Settlement is rapid• Rubble-mounds more tolerant of differential settlements
Cohesive Soils• Must check both bearing capacity and settlement• Settlement is time-dependent
Geotechnical Design Criteria
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Three Phases of Settlement in Cohesive Soils
Immediate Settlement is soil distortion thatoccurs concurrently with loading
Primary Consolidation occurs over time aswater is pushed for voids
Secondary Compression occurs as the soilskeleton adjusts to the applied load afterconsolidation
Geotechnical Design Criteria
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Sloping Structure Design Considerations
Geotechnical Design Criteria
• Slopes and embankments susceptible to slip-surfacefailure
• Pertains to bulkheads, seawalls, revetments, and dikes
• Pore pressure distribution is a necessary designparameter
• Problem increased by saturated backfill material causedby overtopping, rain, etc.
• Usually not a problem for submerged foundations exceptfor structures built on weak soils
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Seismic Design Considerations
Geotechnical Design Criteria
• Evaluate liquefaction potential for high seismic riskareas
• Rubble-mound structure damage usually notcatastrophic
• Slender concrete armor units may sustainsignificant breakage
• May need to include repair costs in projecteconomics
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Coastal Structure Foundations
Contents• Overview of Foundation Design
• Site-Specific Geotechnical Investigations
• Soil Characteristics
• Foundation Loading and Response
• Foundation Related Failure Modes
• Geotechnical Design Criteria
• Slip Surface and Zone FailuresCEM Chapter VI-3-1 (Author: Steven A. Hughes)CEM Chapter VI-5-5 (Author: Hans F. Burcharth)
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Slip Surfaces
Slope Instability
• Rarely occurs in conventional rubble-mound structures
• Problems can occur if placed on weak soils or strata
• Large breakwaters with steep slopes may have problems
• Slipping between armor layer and underlayers
• Direct wave action on permeable slopes:
• Creates extra loads by run-up
• Creates pore pressure fluctuations
• Creates hydraulic gradients
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Rubble-Mound Flow Nets
Slip Surfaces
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Simple Slope Analysis
Procedure: Minimize F by varying location and radius of failure circle
Slip Surfaces
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Noncircular Slip Failure Surfaces
Slip Surfaces
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Method of Slices
Various methodsproposed to sum upresultants of individualslices
Equations given in CEM
Slip Surfaces
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Three-Dimensional Slope Failure
Slip Surfaces
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Other Geotechnical AspectsPhenomena Associated With Coastal Structures
Coastal Structure Foundations
• Hydraulic gradients in porous structures
• Wave-induced internal set-up in rubble-
mound structures
• Cyclic loading of soils by waves and tides
• Dynamic loading of monolithic structures
US Army Corpsof Engineers
CHL: Steven Hughes, PhD
Conclusions
Coastal Structure Foundations
• Geotechnical aspects of coastal
structures are important and should not
be overlooked
• Foundation failure modes can be critical
• Foundation design is very site-specific